Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

3940: 2296:, anything that reduces the "catch-all" status of G6 is a win. Yes, technically we could have literally nothing but G6 as criterion, and argue that all other criteria count as "uncontroversial maintenance", but having precise criteria allows for more specificity, and spells out what kind of stuff is already known to be uncontroversial deletions. This is a very good example of a criterion that is both uncontroversial (these categories are never going to be populated again) and precise enough to be formulated as a criterion of its own. 613: 21: 3668:: Grouping this into F2 is more appropriate since F2 is about file pages that are broken in some way while G8 is about pages depending on non-existent/deleted pages. The move should make the criteria easier to learn and apply for newcomers. To address the concern that Graeme raised, we could have a grace period where we allow tagging and deletion under either category for a while and a clear date for when we fully switch over. 1792: 822: 685: 643: 1777: 1762: 1747: 803: 788: 773: 100:. These processes are more discriminating because they treat articles case-by-case, and involve many points of view; CSD sacrifices these advantages in favor of speed and efficiency. If a situation arises only rarely, it's probably easier, simpler, and fairer to delete it with one of the other methods instead. This also keeps CSD as simple and easy to remember as possible, and avoids 3766:. I just want to comment on the last few comments. G8 and F2 both apply to these pages. While there are some changes proposed, there is no need to add a prohibition for continuing to use G8. It's more a proposed change in examples, and the deletion template, than the actual criteria. Talk of grace periods and 'allowing deletion' is a bit misplaced, IMO. -- 1559:, splitting G6 is generally a good idea if we want to clarify that it is not "clearly unnecessary pages that should be deleted". Category pages almost never have any interesting history; everything about categories is on other pages, so there is very little harm in deleting any empty categories as long as there is no limit on undeletion or recreation. — 3710:: F2 is the cleanest and narrowest CSD for this type of deletion, and it makes no sense to have fully-redundant clauses. Re Graeme's oppose, people will learn, and there is no need or expectation of immediate awareness. Re qwerty, I don't think a formal grace period is required, just don't bite anyone who uses the old criterion inadvertently. 2018:

different criteria meaningful is that A) you can show that a given criterion is known to be uncontroversial; B) users can easily tell why a given page was deleted, and if they care, find the underlying discussions why it's uncontroversial; C) you can list what kinds of things that, while superficially meeting a criterion (such as "

3092:- you pick something banal for the log comment like G7 or F5. (And if the file was at File:Omg_child_corn.jpg or whatever, go ahead and revdelete your deletion log too.) Then you mail oversight and block the uploader and it's not your problem anymore, at least once they're out of sleeper socks.And if you insist on playing 2072:-speedy deletions where a specific consensus was formed at TFD, and "Hooray, we've finally cleared the backlog of unreferenced pages! (up until December 2004, anyway)", in a speedy deletion criterion that was created for temporary deletions made as part of history merges, makes it impossible to find such abuses. — 3536:

There is a consensus to move the language of: "File pages without a corresponding file" from G8 to F2 on the grounds that this circumstance better fits the nature of F2 than G8. This is not a major or important change, but editors would be pleased to see such deletions cited to F2 instead of G8 going

2197:

While we're at it, let's explicitly include empty "Knowledge sockpuppets of Example"/"Suspected Knowledge sockpuppets of examples" categories. Last time I did a G6 taxonomy they were one of the more common kinds of G6, and, assuming we're fine with them being deleted instantly when they become empty,

1349:

Has this ever actually been a problem? A careful admin applying this criterion would have to look at the history to see when (and hence why) the category was removed. and if there's some hairy dispute involved they won't delete it. On the other hand non-careful admins will just use G6 for this anyway

727:

Hi all. I am thinking of drafting a new category CSD, which would cover unused maintenance categories. It would cover two related situations. The first is it would split from G6 empty dated maintenance categories from the past, and thereby lessen the load G6 is bearing. The second case is maintenance

3146:

Incredibly problematic ("illegal") content should not be CSD'd. The Oversight team should be contacted directly. If a page must be quickly and expediently deleted, contact an admin directly (IRC, Discord, email to an admin you know is active, etc). That being said, it's not the end of the world if a

2625:

on them at one point, actually, because they were maintainenance categories of the sort that were exempt from C1, and then something changed to make them no longer populated. There should be a separate template listing the templates that claim to use a category, so the C4-deleting admin can validate

2040:

get blamed when the move turns out to be controversial, and sometimes my brain's too fried to deal with G11s but I have some spare time I could spend deleting empty maintenance cats if they weren't mixed in with those untouchable db-moves.Worse, the controversial and incorrect uses of G6 are getting

1493:

on all potentially empty categories because it stops the category from appearing in the C1 report. And I agree that both including the insource search link on the tag and an encouragement to note which templates use the category should be sufficient. The worst case scenario is a category needs to be

3206:

I mean, assuming I send somebody a message or whatever, it's still going to be a few minutes before they get it; am I just supposed to refrain from deleting it during this interval and leave the goat sex pics/etc sitting there untouched until they get around to formally OSing it? This feels like it

3128:

Certainly in terms of child pornography and similar, anything that is not the uploader's own work will almost certainly either be a copyright violation (the normal laws around copyright are not impacted by it being illegal), or the free license claimed will be unverifiable. Claims that material of

1328:

I have a bit of a concern with respect to the template rewrite part namely if consensus is required for it or not otherwise for non protected templates anyone could rewrite them and the category ends up being deleted. Maybe the dependant on template part should be added to C1 to allow a week before

3498:

G14 currently does not apply to set indexes. My first thought is that there isn't a good reason why it shouldn't but then I realised that some set indexes can have viable prose or list content so there would need to be some qualification. Thinking a bit more on this I'm not convinced that spending

2045:

criteria of G6 that are only included in G6 because it was too much of a hassle to get an independent criterion passed. Empty maintenance categories are the single largest identifiable group of G6s, accounting for more than one in six out of every deletion mentioning "G6" anywhere in the deletion

3229:

If you are an admin delete or revdel it with a bland summary. If you aren't and it's a busy page revert the edit/blank the page with a bland summary. If you aren't an admin and it's a page with few likely readers just leave it - especially if you aren't autopatrolled. The goal is to avoid drawing

2098:

to old mainspace pages. In the unlikely event I decide to attempt either of those again, having this subcriterion split out won't make the G6 classification runs any easier (dated maintenance category runs were among the easiest to filter out there), and won't make the G8 classification runs that

2056:

where the closest thing to a test was "OK, so you tried to create an autobiography of yourself without anybody noticing. Your test failed, and I noticed and now I'm going to get an admin to delete it!" and I'll show you an admin who hasn't performed enough speedy deletions to talk knowledgeably

119:

If you do have a proposal that you believe passes these guidelines, please feel free to propose it on this discussion page. Be prepared to offer evidence of these points and to refine your criterion if necessary. Consider explaining how it meets these criteria when you propose it. Do not, on the

3428:

If it has to be a CSD (revdel doesn't work well for whatever reason), I'd delete under the broadest criterion with the most vanilla summary (G6-Housekeeping or G3 - Vandalism or something). The core takeaways should be to follow up with the appropriate functionaries immediately, do not tag it,

2017:

maintenance categories is uncontroversial maintenance. Deleting user subpages when their user says they're done with them is uncontroversial maintenance. Deleting disambiguation pages after everything linked from them has already been deleted is uncontroversial maintenance.What makes having

3129:

this nature is the uploader's own work will also almost certainly be unverifiable (by us, the relevant law enforcement body may be interested though) - I would also argue that it is not credible someone would openly claim images that are illegal to create were created by them if it were true.

3074:

don't really play nicely with revision deletion.JPxG, you were made an admin because people had confidence in your good judgment, not in how well you're able to ruleslawyer in order to argue you're permitted to take an action that makes the encyclopedia better. This is the sort of thing

3796:

without discussion I can find, so no help there. I was kind of surprised that edit's so late, since I don't remember this happening much after 2007 or so; but then, all my deletions mentioning "F2" were in 2015 or later, so if that's really the case, it wasn't me cleaning them up.

1689: 1036: 1056: 113:

If the deletion can be accomplished using a reasonable interpretation of an existing rule, just use that. If this application of that rule is contested, consider discussing and/or clarifying it. New rules should be proposed only to cover situations that cannot be speedily deleted

1259:: "All it seems to do is shift these deletions from one category to another, and while I agree that G6 is overused, the proper solution is to talk with admins who are using it incorrectly (and go to DRV if necessary), not to make a new criterion for something that undeniably 1086: 729: 1313:

per Crouch, Swale and Pppery. Stretching criteria on a regular basis is something that we strive to avoid and adding making G6 larger and more complicated is not a solution we should even contemplate undertaking. The nom presents a good case that a new criterion is needed.

1066: 1922:

dated maintenance categories look like the definition of "uncontroversial maintenance". This will add extra complexity (more CSD cats to watch) without changing the end result (the cats always get deleted). I'm not sure that adopting this would solve any problems.

1046: 1076: 4065: 1798:

I guess it could be a part of G6, but the last thing we need is to shove more deletion reasons into G6. And obviously dated maintence categories are already part of G6, but G6 is already overloaded and decreasing that burden is a feature, not a

1415: 3291:

I don't see how that CSD would draw any attention to the oversightable material. Much like RD4, admins would never invoke it by name, they would put some other bland reason in the field and contact oversight, just like you said they should.

3878:

I'd also add that most of this was previously in G6 so apart from the new part of template categories from a rewrite authors could previously remove such tags and its clearly not the same as the likes of A7 or G11 that we shouldn't allow.

986: 2517:

shows that a category is still in use. Therefore this should make it ineligible for C4. Can we make this more explicit? (Asking because I just had some categories deleted under C4 which clearly had this template on them.) — Martin

3650:

as a situation that rarely comes up, and you cannot expect taggers and deleters to suddenly be aware of a change. Basically I oppose most changes as unnecessary and changing criteria causes people to not know what they are doing.

2093:

to find questionable G8s largely out of spite at someone arguing G8 applied in a case where I felt it clearly didn't. Neither went anywhere because there were too many "other" for me to have the will to look at, and today I limit

926: 846: 2550:

template, along with trouting the administrators/taggers who are clearly not reading the actual text of the CSD (if they aren't reading the details of C4 they probably aren't reading the details of the other criteria either).

966: 876: 3429:

either straight delete it or leave it, and do not draw attention to the nature of the material in whatever documentation you leave. (I could be misinformed here, I have zero experience and this is a peanut gallery comment)

1026: 3749:- F2 is the natural fit for an issue where the file is somehow broken or not there. Changes to the CSD criteria are advertised in various appropriate places and any mistagging can be dealt a good dose of common sense. -- 3083:

for, for all that it's usually poorly-regarded when it comes to deletion.That said, you don't want to have something like "02:42, 31 July 2024 JPxG (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Me and Joey at Disneyland.jpg

760:– it just no longer populates that category. (Note that empty != unused: categories which happen to be empty are not necessarily unused. I am talking about categories a template does not populate under any circumstances.) 1016: 936: 3775:

I was about to close and implement this but have a question. F2 already speaks of "files that are missing"; does this refer to a different scenario from "File pages without a file"? They sound like the same thing to me.

2026:), are nonetheless widely considered to be controversial; D) you can find specific instances where deletion is controversial, and E) you can find the sorts of deletions you're willing to make: I don't act on third party 976: 886: 2453: 3332:

use it in their log comments even if it says not to. Source: there's one deletion, two log deletions, and 135 revision deletions that mention "RD4". (With the false positives like "prod contested by Richard44306 at

2340:

be empty". It's not at all rare for empty dated maintenance cats to get temporarily repopulated, such as when a redirection is reverted or somebody recreates an article with a cut-and-paste of a predeletion version.

956: 2089:. I found a very large number of different uses, some of which IMO met the criteria and some of which didn't, and then an unclassified "other" which made up a third of the entire set. I also made an attempt once at 1666: 1375: 2924:

I would say that there is, in fact, no CSD category for them, since every category is very rigorously defined and does not include illegal content. All possible options smell strongly of bullshit rules-lawyering.

916: 1006: 2067:

s that amount to the same thing. Lumping them in with automatic deletions made as part of a page move that don't require you to push a delete button or provide a deletion summary or even be an admin, and with

2154:. No one seems to know how to nominate this type of page (C1, G6, G8, etc) so putting these into a dedicated and specific group will ease the burden not only on the nominator but also on the patrolling admin. 996: 946: 906: 1468:

notice on them. Additionally we should strongly encourage category descriptions to link to all the templates that populate that category. These won't quite solve the issue completely but it very nearly will.

850: 896: 2057:

about the subject. Or maybe one who just doesn't give a fuck and will happily twinkle-delete anything you put in front of them.That, of course, is a (terrible) example of a G2, not a G6; but I've declined

1423: 866: 828:

I guess case two could be a part of G6, but the last thing we need is to shove more deletion reasons into G6. And obviously case one is currently part of G6, but getting this out of G6 is a feature, not a

82:

be deleted, according to consensus. CSD criteria should cover only situations where there is a strong precedent for deletion. Remember that a rule may be used in a way you don't expect, unless you word it

3147:

page is tagged (as Thryduulf suggests above) for G3, but keep in mind that throws it into multiple well-viewed categories so it will likely draw more attention. As much as it might seem like a good idea,

1806:

In sum, this would decrease the burden on both CFD and G6 while also saving editor time rubber-stamping pro forma discussions. One note that did come up in the above discussion is that we can program the

3930: 3561:

G8 currently includes "File pages without a corresponding file". I would suggest moving this unchanged to F2 instead, as it seems to fit better there with all of the other ways a file can be malformed.

2972:

The only remotely plausible thing I can think of is to manually enter it in as a G9, which I am pretty sure creates an actual urgent issue for WMF Legal, so I do not think it is a good idea to do this.

1256: 1287:. I guess that could be described as uncontroversial maintenance, but stretching G6 even further is unappealing. Nor is stretching G8 to cover cases in which the "dependent" page still exists, imo. 1203: 1030: 1020: 1010: 1000: 990: 980: 970: 960: 950: 940: 930: 920: 910: 900: 890: 880: 870: 4119: 3962: 3070:

selecting anything from the dropdown, right? Revision deletion doesn't work if there isn't a good version to revert to anyway; and the particular cases raised are likely to be files, which

2457: 1206:, which more or less petered out due to lack of participation. I'm all in favor, with mild preference towards merging the main case into C1 (without a timeout) rather than a separate C4. — 3499:

the time to craft that is worthwhile for the number of times situations like this arise (NEWCSD point 3). An alternative would be to adjust A3 so that it applies to lists with no entries.

1592: 48:

Contributors frequently propose new (or expansions of existing) criteria for speedy deletion. Please bear in mind that CSD criteria require careful wording, and in particular, need to be

1389:

I think we should also allow the creator to remove the CSD tag, because they are the person who best understands whether the category is being used or not. Comments? Suggestions? Typos?

3836:

I suggest like G14 that we allow authors to remove C4 tags given that most such authors will be experienced and this may allow someone who disagrees with a template rewrite to object.

810: 1102:

Is this something people would be inclined to support? Are there other related cases which should be included? If so, we can work on wording, but I wanted to get others' input first.

1090: 1080: 1070: 3374:" to the lead without assigning a criterion number would work, but honestly, it might be better to have it be an unspoken rule, so some admin doesn't delete with reason "oversight". 1669:) or tracking categories no longer used by a template after a rewrite. Note that empty maintenance categories are not necessarily unused—this criterion is for categories which will 1378:) or tracking categories no longer used by a template after a rewrite. Note that empty maintenance categories are not necessarily unused—this criterion is for categories which will 2574:

does not show that a category is still in use; it just shows that it was in use at one point in time. Things like template rewrites are not automatically reflected by the use of

1060: 1050: 1040: 4082: 4074: 4067: 3370:

Damn. I didn't know RD4 was misused so much. Maybe just adding some text that says "admins can delete oversightable material while waiting for oversight per the instructions at

860: 165: 2095: 2086: 3551: 604: 2678: 1677:

empty. If you are unsure whether a category is still being used by a template, consider asking the creator of the category or at the template's talk page before tagging.

1386:

empty. If you are unsure whether a category is still being used by a template, consider asking the creator of the category or at the template's talk page before tagging.

1277:

Another thing that I should've made more clear: case two is currently not (at least in my understanding) covered by any CSD criteria. They were in my CSD log because of

1937:

Per above, the "what's wrong" is that G6 is overloaded and splitting some would make it easier for reviewers. It also lessens the potential hassle of typing a reason.

856: 244: 3789: 3613:

No. When it comes to changes to policies like CSD it's always better not to rush things. The question is less than two days old, let's give people at least a week.

2990: 1837: 1241:

this as well - turns a deletion people (including myself) are doing anyway by stretching G6 and G8 in areas they don't quite into a clear and objective criterion.

3571: 3514: 3189:. I know I wasn't; I was responding directly to and advising another admin. For a non-admin, yes, tagging oversightable material is a bad idea - not only is 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 3353:) in violation of ban or block" filtered out, but I haven't looked at most of the actual deletions except for their log comments. All the ones labeled like " 1646: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 4018: 3089: 3995: 2380:

again be populated, i.e. dated maintenance categories that have become empty, this criterion allows for specificity and clear guidance to any admins. —

2683:

Lots of very scintillating conversation above, unfortunately none of it seems to address a rather simple core issue: what actual category is it under?

127: 1716:. As a regular closer at CfD, I have only ever seen them get unanimously deleted and it is a fairly regular occurance (you can see the collapsed list 1688:

is carrying. However, the primary reason that I came here is to allow for speedy deletion of additional unused maintenance categories. As an example,

1118: 1961: 1439: 1303: 1272: 4057: 4042: 3153:

as suggested above is a bad idea, primarily because it increases the chances of that showing up in the deletion log itself (and therefore requiring

2099:

much easier (the biggest problem I had there is that there's no way to find out that a redirect was broken without looking at the deleted history).

4006: 2488: 3894: 3873: 2368: 1722:

List of entries in just my own CSD log since June 1 for unused maintenance categories (it is possible I missed some, but I think I got them all)

1344: 1233: 838:

List of entries in just my own CSD log since June 1 for unused maintenance categories (it is possible I missed some, but I think I got them all)

3972:

There are two types of template /doc pages that have been sent to TfD and always deleted. Navigation templates that had their doc converted to

3967: 2314: 1932: 1907: 1453: 1405: 3813: 3801: 3492: 2192: 3910: 3783: 3737: 3508: 3660: 3112:→ "using any image in a way that is disruptive". Genuinely illegal imagery can't fall under the "if they have encyclopedic value" clause. — 2610: 2444: 2345: 2146: 1991: 1973: 1951: 1586: 1541: 1523: 1323: 3944: 3932: 2388: 2163: 1191: 1177: 1143: 3924: 3851: 2327: 2076: 1359: 1210: 705: 3677: 3636: 3622: 3608: 2666: 2635: 2232: 2207: 2129: 1422:

in detail might help, but even that doesn't rule out that some other template somewhere is using it. I suppose I could run a search like

1250: 663: 3388:

I think at most we need something (a hatnote perhaps) that points to the instructions elsewhere, perhaps "For material that needs to be

3166: 1568: 4000: 3788:

My understanding is that the intent there is for images that 404 (or equivalent), like what was happening with a specific file version

3719: 3141: 3125:

article it definitely cannot elsewhere, but uploading an image that you know it is illegal for the WMF to host is unarguably vandalism.

701: 649: 200: 3702: 3586: 3401: 3301: 3286: 3272: 3201: 2417: 2268: 2249: 1478: 667: 3438: 2286: 3423: 3383: 3371: 3365: 3277:

Absolutely not! The goal is to avoid drawing attention to oversightable material, not putting up a bright red arrow pointing to it!

3258: 3239: 2560: 2108: 3770: 3224: 3061: 3031: 654: 3116: 1161:), not redirected to a different template. I was just using the shortcut because that is what the categories used in their names. 3758: 3323: 2502: 3478: 659: 150: 2530: 2046:

summary. There's so many that they make it near-impossible to find genuine abuses. Show me an admin who's never declined a

722: 206: 2240:. I think that falls under "unused maintenance categories" but there is no harm and possible benefit to making it explicit. 131: 2540:. I suggest putting something like "This category is ineligible for speedy deletion under criterion C4" in the text of the 2482: 2319:

This is the sort of thing that would be uncontroversial post-enactment, but as long as we're still discussing, can we link

1574: 1414:

be empty can be challenging, and I'm not convinced we should just let admins figure it out unilaterally. If someone tagged

612: 3827:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2498:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

4054: 4015: 3686: 1182:

Ah, my misunderstanding. I would still argue that if the template is not populating the category, it is eligible for G8.

3248:

should be created so it's obvious to admins that they should do what Thryduulf wrote above. I'm thinking something like:

3121:

Crypic has it almost spot on. It is arguable that an image of child pornography could serve an encyclopaedic use on the

3862: 2655: 2599: 2310: 2221: 1896: 1826: 1652:

Should C4 (unused maintenance categories) be enacted as a new criterion for speedy deletion? 03:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

1512: 1394: 1292: 1166: 1107: 713: 671: 1665:

This applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past (e.g.

1374:

This applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past (e.g.

691: 3361:: Personal and non-public information: real name and harassment" that I've spot-checked were the real deal though.) — 2187: 709: 2933:, we've already had deletion discussions that reached consensus to delete all videos of men having sex with horses" 2619: 2578: 2568: 2544: 2511: 2454:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_July_24#Category:Technology_articles_with_topics_of_unclear_notability

1418:, for instance, what would be due diligence for me as a reviewing admin? Examining the source code and history of 696: 2694: 1849: 93: 4035:

when making an edit request to ensure it is seen. However, I do not understand what change you are requesting.

3018: 2733: 2320: 1601: 146: 3976: 2323:

here to make it crystal clear which cats are covered and which need to go through the week-long C1 process? —

195: 3472: 2903: 1642: 1435: 1268: 3540: 3109: 2880: 1629: 186: 97: 3414: 3314: 3215: 3076: 3052: 2981: 239: 4075:

Template talk:Keep local#RfC: Limit usage of this template to files which are fully or partly own work

4068:

Template talk:Keep local#RfC: Limit usage of this template to files which are fully or partly own work

3656: 3591:

Seems that no one is opposing the move/merge, and I don't mind the changes as well. Shall the change

1918:

maintenance" – including, but not limited to, empty dated maintenance categories. Permanently empty

1444:

Can't the deletion tag have an insource search link built into it so all you have to do is click it?

92:

Speedy deletion is intended primarily as a means of reducing load on other deletion methods such as

3831: 2803: 2477: 1821:

search to make it easy for the patrolling admin to double-check that the category is in use. Best,

2690:

asking whether I should contact the functionaries — which of these do I select from the dropdown?

716:

for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

674:

for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

627: 4051: 4012: 3957: 3888: 3845: 3596: 3488: 2362: 1867: 1487: 1462: 1431: 1338: 1264: 1227: 763:

NEWCSD checklist (I am only focusing on case two, because case one is already eligible for CSD):

3869: 3793: 3733: 3673: 2662: 2644: 2606: 2306: 2228: 1969: 1928: 1903: 1833: 1706: 1696: 1684:

as proposer. There are two benefits that I see from this change. One, it lessens the load that

1519: 1401: 1299: 1173: 1114: 743: 2693:

The actual options that I get in the dropdown menu when I delete a page (e.g. the contents of

4108: 4038: 3809: 3779: 3547: 2264: 2183: 1947: 1494:

REFUNDed, and at that point we can make a note on the category itself saying something like

224: 4032: 3715: 3690: 3652: 3434: 2826: 1768:

As a regular CFD closer, I have only seen these get deleted unanimously (see my list below)

1204:

Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 86#Empty monthly maintenance categories

794:

As a regular CFD closer, I have only seen these get deleted unanimously (see my list below)

61:

whether a page meets the criterion. Often this requires making the criterion very specific.

39: 8: 3906: 3698: 3632: 3618: 3604: 3582: 3504: 3397: 3282: 3252: 3235: 3137: 3103: 3005: 2724: 2556: 2465: 2438: 2274: 2245: 2142: 1987: 1915: 1582: 1537: 1474: 1419: 1319: 176: 1964:

currently contains two (2) pages. What makes you think that two pages is "overloaded"?

1133:, so a redirected template that no longer uses a cat would make the cat eligible for G8. 4048: 4026: 4009: 3986:. Can these be tagged with G6? Sending them to TfD really adds nothing to the process. 3948: 3881: 3838: 3577:

Good idea. These are arguably "missing" files anyway so it makes sense to merge there.

3484: 3162: 3037: 3014: 2385: 2355: 2282: 2159: 2004: 1859: 1853: 1622:

to adopt C4. The argument that this criterion would be duplicative of G6 and would not

1426:, but it's not realistic to expect a deleting admin to do that. If it's possible to be 1331: 1220: 1187: 1151: 1139: 750: 736: 216: 191: 31: 2538:

this criterion is for categories which will always be empty, not just currently empty.

3859: 3729: 3669: 3592: 3122: 2915: 2652: 2596: 2297: 2218: 2061: 1979: 1965: 1924: 1893: 1823: 1509: 1391: 1289: 1163: 1104: 172: 1458:

We can (and maybe do?) encourage categories that may be sometimes empty to have the

4116: 3991: 3919: 3566: 3379: 3334: 3297: 3268: 3041: 3026: 2775: 2630: 2202: 2174: 2124: 2103: 2050: 2030: 1735: 1638: 1449: 1354: 1350:

so in neither case does the waiting period help. And undeletions are cheap anyway.

1245: 1783:~20 in the past two months at CFD, and many more which are currently handled by G6 4104: 3711: 3430: 3346: 2831: 2818: 2809: 2799: 2786: 2755: 2255: 1728: 1564: 1281: 1263:'uncontroversial maintenance'" Per the closure there, this would require an RfC. 101: 4078: 4047:

Thank you for the information. For the edit request, someone else corrected it.

3338: 3097: 2891: 2885: 2872: 2863: 2853: 2842: 2780: 2771: 2765: 2751: 2738: 2729: 2720: 2714: 2704: 2594:

and create a new template which does indicate which templates use the category.

4100: 4088: 3982:

and WikiProject banners that had their doc converted to the automatic one with

3902: 3754: 3694: 3628: 3614: 3600: 3578: 3500: 3419: 3393: 3319: 3278: 3231: 3220: 3197:

mirror the pages in it, the better to fight the Evils of Rampant Deletionism. —

3175: 3133: 3057: 3022: 2986: 2909: 2588: 2552: 2525: 2428: 2258: 2241: 2138: 1983: 1957: 1941: 1887: 1811: 1578: 1533: 1470: 1315: 3171:

I don't think Thryduulf was suggesting that non-admins tag material like this

3088:" in your deletion log, for the same reason as the bolded text midway through 1690:

Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title

1037:

Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title

623: 3358: 3354: 3342: 3245: 3158: 3010: 3001: 2997: 2857: 2822: 2794: 2790: 2759: 2746: 2742: 2412: 2381: 2278: 2155: 1883: 1183: 1158: 1135: 3090:

Knowledge:Revision deletion#Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight

4092: 3798: 3389: 3362: 3350: 3198: 3113: 3044:

does not explicitly mention actual page deletions anywhere that I can see.

2813: 2708: 2461: 2342: 2324: 2073: 1863: 1685: 1500: 1207: 1126: 3257:

This applies if every revision of a page is eligible for suppression. See

3230:

attention, and most OS requests get actioned in much less than 5 minutes.

2918:: Nominated for seven days with no reliable sources present in the article 1087:

Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title

730:

Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title

4113: 3987: 3916: 3767: 3728:

Good point, there. Simply asking people not to bite is probably simpler.

3689:. Additionally if it is enacted then it can (and should) be announced in 3563: 3375: 3293: 3264: 3184: 2940:, anybody who posts a video of a man having sex with a horse is blocked." 2876: 2867: 2627: 2199: 2121: 2100: 2090: 2082: 1879: 1871: 1634: 1445: 1351: 1242: 1057:

Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) ≠ year in page title

4083:

Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 89#F8 and keep local

628: 4081:. Since the proposal there is very similar to the recent discussion at 1875: 1560: 1366:

Alright, before starting a formal RfC here is my draft wording of C4:

1047:

Category:EstcatCountry — used on page without a year in the page title

4096: 3901:

I can't think of any good reason not to allow author removal for C4.

3750: 3408: 3308: 3209: 3193:

highly visible on Knowledge, there are some... fine... projects that

3046: 2975: 2879:

in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at

2521: 2458:

Category:Articles_that_need_to_differentiate_between_fact_and_fiction

1067:

Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) ≠ year in page title

1255:

I continue to think this is not a good idea, for the reasons I gave

2452:

In addition to the ones that are currently handled in CfD, such as

2425:: seems like it'd be useful per nom, Primefac, & Chaotic Enby. 2398: 2087:

Wikipedia_talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 83#New taxonomy

625: 3132:

All of this means that such material is covered under G3 and G12.

2615:

Yeah, agreed with HouseBlaster. I would say most C4 deletions had

2376:- By explicitly limiting this to maintenance categories that will 1982:

it is overloaded in the sense of doing too many different things.

1077:

Category:Eiei-year — used on page without a year in the page title

3190: 3036:

Hmm -- but the revdel criteria don't show up in the dropdown on

3477:

Should G14, or another clause, apply to empty set indexes? See

2023: 2019: 1845: 1702:, but no longer did so after a rewrite. It is not a G8 because 1218:

I'd agree this makes sense similar to G14 and R4 splits of G6.

2894:: Redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation 2774:: One author who has requested deletion – to retrieve it, see 1416:

Category:Technology articles with topics of unclear notability

1410:

Does that really meet NEWCSD #1? Proving that a category will

629: 3093: 1753:

Obviously objective: either a category is in use or it is not

779:

Obviously objective: either a category is in use or it is not

2456:, dated maintenance categories (such as the monthly ones in 742:, but that template no longer populates that category after 4085:, I'm also pinging the people involved in that discussion: 3945:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy) § CSD X4 criterion proposal

3933:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy) § CSD X4 criterion proposal

2081:

I've made several attempts to do what Cryptic suggested at

1428:

unsure whether a category is still being used by a template

987:

Category:European Microstates articles with deprecated tags

3372:

WP:REVDEL#Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight

3259:

WP:REVDEL#Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight

1914:

What's wrong with leaving it at G6? G6 says "This is for

2679:

No, really, what category does illegal stuff fall under?

2096:

WP:Database reports/Possibly out-of-process deletions#G6

728:

categories no longer used by a template. As an example,

2961:, it's trying to convince me to have sex with a horse." 1717: 1131:

Categories populated by deleted or retargeted templates

2768:: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup 2332:

Separately, suggest "categories which are expected to

1430:, this probably isn't straightforward enough for CSD. 927:

Category:Channel Islands articles with deprecated tags

847:

Category:Cricket articles needing attention to tagging

2947:, it's not very controversial to delete that, is it?" 2009:

All speedy deletions are uncontroversial maintenance

967:

Category:Southeast Asia articles with deprecated tags

877:

Category:Czech Republic articles with deprecated tags

3529:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

1600:

The following discussion is an archived record of a

1027:

Category:United States articles with deprecated tags

141: 2686:If I see something illegal, such as "child corn" — 1610:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1017:

Category:Vatican City articles with deprecated tags

937:

Category:Central Asia articles with deprecated tags

809:case one is the most common reason G6 is used (see 655:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Speedy/Criteria

27:

Read this before proposing new or expanded criteria

2273:For reference, these categories are generated via 977:Category:Catholicism articles with deprecated tags 887:Category:South Sudan articles with deprecated tags 4077:that seems relevant to this policy, specifically 2783:: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page 1962:Category:Candidates for technical speedy deletion 957:Category:Montenegro articles with deprecated tags 120:other hand, add it unilaterally to the CSD page. 1856:. Pinging participants in the above discussion: 1667:Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2004 1593:RfC: enacting C4 (unused maintenance categories) 1376:Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2004 4007:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as spam 3328:It will draw attention because clueless admins 2584:. I think we need to add the insource magic to 917:Category:Slovakia articles with deprecated tags 2336:be empty", rather than "categories which will 1007:Category:Fantasy articles with deprecated tags 3532:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 1613:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 997:Category:Africa articles with deprecated tags 947:Category:Serbia articles with deprecated tags 907:Category:France articles with deprecated tags 666:on 20:38, 4 December 2013. The former page's 2968:, horses can't release content as CC-BY-SA." 2912:: Nominated for seven days with no objection 2845:: Talk page of a nonexistent or deleted page 897:Category:Italy articles with deprecated tags 3968:Template doc pages that have been converted 3357:, serious BLP vio" and "RD4/WP:YOUNG" and " 2888:: Redirect to a deleted or nonexistent page 867:Category:Iran articles with deprecated tags 3943:You are invited to join the discussion at 1573:I've left a note about this discussion at 702:Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Speedy 683: 641: 3515:"File pages without a corresponding file" 3066:You do know you can type something there 2120:per my comments in the previous section. 57:Most reasonable people should be able to 1724:; n.b. they were only CSD candidates as 690:Text and/or other creative content from 648:Text and/or other creative content from 4005:Change the number for spam to 1 as per 4001:Extended-confirmed-protect edit request 3261:for when and how to use this criterion. 2640:I have added insource functionality to 2137:per proposer and my previous comments. 2041:drowned out by formulaic, well-defined 2022:" not being a plausible misspelling of 708:on 16 November 2016. The former page's 3479:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hepnar 2091:https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/62274 2083:https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/61527 697:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion 660:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion 3792:. The specific wording was added in 3693:, improving awareness of the change. 3523:The following discussion is closed. 1575:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Templates 679: 637: 15: 3687:Knowledge talk:Files for discussion 3685:I've advertised this discussion at 149:for discussing improvements to the 13: 2711:, meaningless, or incomprehensible 1329:deletion to allow for objections. 723:C4 – unused maintenance categories 14: 4130: 3244:Perhaps a G15 that is similar to 2834:: Unnecessary disambiguation page 2825:submission – to retrieve it, see 2762:user in violation of block or ban 1662:C4. Unused maintenance categories 1370:C4. Unused maintenance categories 3938: 3823:The discussion above is closed. 3627:A week has passed since the OP. 3004:(any of RD1-4 would apply) then 2954:, it's defamatory to the horse." 2866:: Recently created, implausible 2741:: Recreation of a page that was 2701:General (can apply to any page) 2626:whether they in fact do use it. 2494:The discussion above is closed. 1790: 1775: 1760: 1745: 820: 801: 786: 771: 611: 166:Click here to start a new topic. 70:It must be the case that almost 19: 2695:MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown 1850:Knowledge:Village pump (policy) 94:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 4120:00:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC) 4073:Someone has created an RFC at 4058:02:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 4043:22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 4019:12:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3814:14:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3802:13:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3784:12:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3552:18:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2966:uh, if you think about it, man 2959:uh, if you think about it, man 2952:uh, if you think about it, man 2945:uh, if you think about it, man 2938:uh, if you think about it, man 2931:uh, if you think about it, man 2536:They already are ineligible - 732:was at one point populated by 1: 4033:one of the relevant templates 3996:08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 3963:21:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 3925:21:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 3911:19:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 3895:18:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 3874:18:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 3852:17:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 3771:20:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 3759:19:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 3738:16:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 3720:15:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 3703:13:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 3678:11:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 3439:04:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 2667:15:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2636:15:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2611:15:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2561:08:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2531:08:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 813:), and see below for case two 163:Put new text under old text. 3110:WP:Vandalism#Image vandalism 2904:Knowledge:Copyright problems 2460:) are routinely deleted per 1692:was previously populated by 151:Criteria for speedy deletion 7: 3661:22:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 3637:15:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 3623:06:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 3609:06:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 3587:10:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 3572:03:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 3509:22:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 3493:21:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1647:02:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 171:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 98:Knowledge:Proposed deletion 78:be deleted using the rule, 10: 4135: 3806:That makes sense, thanks. 3424:11:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 3402:10:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 3384:02:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 3366:00:59, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 3324:00:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 3086:(omg iar child corn HALP!) 2650:; thoughts on the design? 2489:06:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 2445:07:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 2353:per my previous comments. 1528:In which case this has my 214: 29: 3794:this edit in October 2015 3595:done right away then per 3473:G14 and empty set indexes 3302:23:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3287:23:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3273:23:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3240:18:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3225:18:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3202:13:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3167:12:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3142:11:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3117:03:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3062:02:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 3032:02:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 2991:02:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 2464:when they become empty. – 2418:22:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 2389:19:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2369:05:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2346:00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2328:00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2315:00:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2287:13:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 2269:04:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 2250:22:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2233:22:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2208:20:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2193:19:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2164:12:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2147:08:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2130:05:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2109:05:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2077:04:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 1992:11:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 1974:04:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 1952:04:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 1933:03:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 1908:03:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 1838:03:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 1587:14:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 1569:08:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 1542:14:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 1524:14:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 1496:This category is used by 1479:12:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 1454:08:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 1440:03:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 1406:03:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 1360:18:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 1345:18:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 1324:07:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 1304:00:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 1273:18:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1251:17:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1234:17:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1211:17:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1192:17:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1178:17:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1144:17:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1119:17:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 746:. It is not a G8 because 700:was copied or moved into 658:was copied or moved into 201:Be welcoming to newcomers 3825:Please do not modify it. 3526:Please do not modify it. 3150:{{db-reason|Child corn}} 2858:Cross-namespace redirect 2507:Marking a category with 2496:Please do not modify it. 1620:near unanimous consensus 1607:Please do not modify it. 811:Taxonomy of G6 deletions 2620:possibly empty category 2579:possibly empty category 2569:possibly empty category 2545:possibly empty category 2512:possibly empty category 2321:WP:Maintenance category 857:Category:NRISref errors 3263: 2814:copyright infringement 2793:or negative unsourced 2396:per nom and Primefac. 2198:should put them here. 2171:per nom and Primefac. 1626:was roundly rejected. 1388: 1257:in the last discussion 196:avoid personal attacks 3832:C4 and author removal 3249: 3102:Further information: 2964:"It's a G12 because, 2957:"It's a G11 because, 2950:"It's a G10 because, 2823:Articles for Creation 2821:: Abandoned draft or 1367: 1125:Just to be pedantic, 605:Auto-archiving period 3977:Navbox documentation 3691:Knowledge:Admin news 3207:cannot be the case. 2943:"It's a G6 because, 2936:"It's a G5 because, 2929:"It's a G4 because, 2254:inb4 someone argues 2036:s anymore because I 3104:Knowledge:Vandalism 3077:WP:Ignore all rules 2906:for over seven days 2747:deletion discussion 2275:Template:Sockpuppet 1673:be empty, not just 1602:request for comment 1420:Template:Notability 1382:be empty, not just 714:provide attribution 672:provide attribution 3857:Definitely agree. 3096:, G3 is closest. 2503:Eligibility for C4 2013:. Deleting empty 1868:Extraordinary Writ 1817:tag to include an 1624:solve any problems 1432:Extraordinary Writ 1265:Extraordinary Writ 1202:Last discussed at 207:dispute resolution 168: 4055:What have I done? 4016:What have I done? 3961: 3544: 3541:non-admin closure 3123:Child pornography 2881:Wikimedia Commons 2529: 2436: 2008: 1910: 1633: 1630:non-admin closure 1099: 1098: 720: 719: 678: 677: 636: 635: 187:Assume good faith 164: 138: 137: 102:instruction creep 4126: 4111: 4109:The Summum Bonum 4041: 4039:Compassionate727 4030: 3985: 3981: 3975: 3955: 3953: 3942: 3941: 3891: 3884: 3865: 3848: 3841: 3812: 3810:Compassionate727 3782: 3780:Compassionate727 3597:WP:EDITCONSENSUS 3550: 3548:Compassionate727 3538: 3528: 3491: 3188: 3180: 3174: 3152: 3151: 3030: 2754:: Creation by a 2658: 2649: 2643: 2624: 2618: 2602: 2593: 2587: 2583: 2577: 2573: 2567: 2549: 2543: 2519: 2516: 2510: 2485: 2480: 2443: 2441: 2434: 2431: 2416: 2415: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2365: 2358: 2303: 2302: 2261: 2224: 2191: 2180: 2177: 2066: 2060: 2055: 2049: 2035: 2029: 2002: 1944: 1899: 1891: 1843: 1829: 1820: 1816: 1810: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1782: 1779: 1778: 1767: 1764: 1763: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1733: 1727: 1711: 1705: 1701: 1695: 1627: 1609: 1515: 1505: 1499: 1492: 1486: 1467: 1461: 1397: 1341: 1334: 1295: 1286: 1280: 1230: 1223: 1169: 1156: 1150: 1110: 834: 833: 827: 824: 823: 808: 805: 804: 793: 790: 789: 778: 775: 774: 755: 749: 741: 735: 699: 687: 686: 680: 657: 645: 644: 638: 630: 616: 615: 606: 227: 142: 115: 105: 84: 62: 42: 23: 22: 16: 4134: 4133: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4086: 4071: 4036: 4031:You should use 4024: 4003: 3983: 3979: 3973: 3970: 3949: 3939: 3936: 3922: 3921:it has begun... 3889: 3882: 3863: 3846: 3839: 3834: 3829: 3828: 3807: 3777: 3653:Graeme Bartlett 3569: 3568:it has begun... 3559: 3545: 3524: 3517: 3482: 3475: 3341:: Created by a 3182: 3178: 3172: 3149: 3148: 3009: 2899:Other criteria 2850:Redirect pages 2709:Patent nonsense 2681: 2656: 2647: 2641: 2633: 2632:it has begun... 2622: 2616: 2600: 2591: 2585: 2581: 2575: 2571: 2565: 2547: 2541: 2514: 2508: 2505: 2500: 2499: 2483: 2478: 2439: 2429: 2426: 2411: 2406: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2397: 2363: 2356: 2300: 2298: 2259: 2222: 2205: 2204:it has begun... 2178: 2175: 2172: 2127: 2126:it has begun... 2106: 2105:it has begun... 2064: 2058: 2053: 2047: 2033: 2027: 1942: 1916:uncontroversial 1897: 1857: 1827: 1818: 1814: 1808: 1795: 1791: 1780: 1776: 1765: 1761: 1750: 1746: 1731: 1725: 1709: 1703: 1699: 1693: 1678: 1649: 1605: 1595: 1513: 1503: 1497: 1490: 1484: 1465: 1459: 1395: 1357: 1356:it has begun... 1339: 1332: 1293: 1284: 1278: 1248: 1247:it has begun... 1228: 1221: 1167: 1157:was moved (per 1154: 1148: 1129:currently says 1108: 1100: 839: 825: 821: 806: 802: 791: 787: 776: 772: 753: 747: 739: 733: 725: 695: 684: 653: 642: 632: 631: 626: 603: 233: 232: 231: 230: 223: 219: 212: 182: 134: 112: 91: 69: 56: 46: 45: 38: 34: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4132: 4070: 4066:Discussion at 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4002: 3999: 3969: 3966: 3935: 3931:Discussion at 3929: 3928: 3927: 3920: 3913: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3833: 3830: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3773: 3761: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3723: 3722: 3705: 3680: 3663: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3567: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3519: 3518: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3326: 3256: 3204: 3195:preferentially 3130: 3126: 3038:Special:Delete 2970: 2969: 2962: 2955: 2948: 2941: 2934: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2913: 2907: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2889: 2883: 2870: 2861: 2860:from mainspace 2848: 2847: 2846: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2829: 2816: 2812:: Unambiguous 2807: 2802:: Unambiguous 2797: 2784: 2778: 2769: 2763: 2749: 2736: 2727: 2718: 2712: 2680: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2631: 2504: 2501: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2447: 2420: 2391: 2371: 2348: 2339: 2335: 2330: 2317: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2271: 2252: 2235: 2203: 2195: 2166: 2149: 2132: 2125: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2104: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1912: 1911: 1840: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1784: 1769: 1754: 1715: 1676: 1672: 1659: 1656:Proposed text: 1650: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1596: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1571: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1488:empty category 1463:Empty category 1385: 1381: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1355: 1326: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1253: 1246: 1236: 1213: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1084: 1074: 1064: 1054: 1044: 1034: 1024: 1014: 1004: 994: 984: 974: 964: 954: 944: 934: 924: 914: 904: 894: 884: 874: 864: 854: 841: 840: 837: 832: 831: 830: 814: 795: 780: 759: 724: 721: 718: 717: 712:now serves to 688: 676: 675: 670:now serves to 646: 634: 633: 624: 622: 621: 618: 617: 235: 234: 229: 228: 220: 215: 213: 211: 210: 203: 198: 189: 183: 181: 180: 169: 160: 159: 156: 155: 154: 136: 135: 122: 117: 116: 106: 85: 63: 44: 43: 35: 30: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4131: 4122: 4121: 4118: 4115: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4069: 4059: 4056: 4053: 4050: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4040: 4034: 4028: 4027:Anonymous1261 4023: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4017: 4014: 4011: 4008: 3998: 3997: 3993: 3989: 3978: 3965: 3964: 3959: 3954: 3952: 3951:Novem Linguae 3946: 3934: 3926: 3923: 3918: 3914: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3886: 3885: 3883:Crouch, Swale 3877: 3876: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3866: 3861: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3849: 3843: 3842: 3840:Crouch, Swale 3826: 3815: 3811: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3800: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3781: 3774: 3772: 3769: 3765: 3762: 3760: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3745: 3744: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3706: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3681: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3664: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3649: 3646: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3570: 3565: 3553: 3549: 3542: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3530: 3527: 3521: 3520: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3485:Voice of Clam 3480: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3422: 3421: 3418: 3417: 3412: 3411: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3331: 3327: 3325: 3322: 3321: 3318: 3317: 3312: 3311: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3260: 3254: 3253:Oversightable 3247: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3223: 3222: 3219: 3218: 3213: 3212: 3205: 3203: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3187:|child corn}} 3186: 3177: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3124: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3105: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3082: 3078: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3060: 3059: 3056: 3055: 3050: 3049: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2989: 2988: 2985: 2984: 2979: 2978: 2967: 2963: 2960: 2956: 2953: 2949: 2946: 2942: 2939: 2935: 2932: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2917: 2914: 2911: 2908: 2905: 2901: 2900: 2898: 2893: 2890: 2887: 2884: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2871: 2869: 2865: 2862: 2859: 2855: 2852: 2851: 2849: 2844: 2841: 2840: 2838: 2833: 2830: 2828: 2827:WP:REFUND/G13 2824: 2820: 2817: 2815: 2811: 2808: 2805: 2801: 2798: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2785: 2782: 2779: 2777: 2773: 2770: 2767: 2764: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2750: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2737: 2735: 2731: 2728: 2726: 2722: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2706: 2703: 2702: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2696: 2691: 2689: 2684: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2654: 2646: 2645:Db-c4/sandbox 2639: 2638: 2637: 2634: 2629: 2621: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2603: 2598: 2590: 2580: 2570: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2546: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2527: 2523: 2513: 2497: 2490: 2486: 2481: 2475: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2448: 2446: 2442: 2432: 2424: 2421: 2419: 2414: 2410: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2372: 2370: 2366: 2360: 2359: 2357:Crouch, Swale 2352: 2349: 2347: 2344: 2337: 2333: 2331: 2329: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2295: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2257: 2253: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2236: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2201: 2196: 2194: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2170: 2167: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2133: 2131: 2128: 2123: 2119: 2116: 2110: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2075: 2071: 2063: 2052: 2044: 2039: 2032: 2025: 2021: 2016: 2012: 2011:by definition 2006: 2005:edit conflict 2001: 2000: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1900: 1895: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1860:Crouch, Swale 1855: 1851: 1847: 1842: 1841: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1830: 1825: 1813: 1805: 1803: 1788: 1785: 1773: 1770: 1758: 1757:Uncontestable 1755: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1737: 1730: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1708: 1707:EstcatCountry 1698: 1697:EstcatCountry 1691: 1687: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1674: 1670: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1648: 1644: 1643:contributions 1640: 1636: 1631: 1625: 1621: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1597: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1555: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1502: 1489: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1464: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1393: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1377: 1372: 1371: 1365: 1361: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1336: 1335: 1333:Crouch, Swale 1327: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1291: 1283: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1244: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1231: 1225: 1224: 1222:Crouch, Swale 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1153: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1106: 1092: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1002: 998: 995: 992: 988: 985: 982: 978: 975: 972: 968: 965: 962: 958: 955: 952: 948: 945: 942: 938: 935: 932: 928: 925: 922: 918: 915: 912: 908: 905: 902: 898: 895: 892: 888: 885: 882: 878: 875: 872: 868: 865: 862: 858: 855: 852: 848: 845: 844: 843: 842: 836: 835: 818: 815: 812: 799: 796: 784: 783:Uncontestable 781: 769: 766: 765: 764: 761: 757: 752: 745: 738: 731: 715: 711: 707: 703: 698: 693: 689: 682: 681: 673: 669: 665: 661: 656: 651: 647: 640: 639: 620: 619: 614: 610: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 243: 241: 237: 236: 226: 222: 221: 218: 208: 204: 202: 199: 197: 193: 190: 188: 185: 184: 178: 174: 173:Learn to edit 170: 167: 162: 161: 158: 157: 152: 148: 144: 143: 140: 133: 129: 125: 121: 110: 107: 103: 99: 95: 89: 86: 81: 77: 73: 67: 66:Uncontestable 64: 60: 54: 51: 50: 49: 41: 37: 36: 33: 28: 25: 18: 17: 4072: 4004: 3971: 3950: 3937: 3880: 3858: 3837: 3835: 3824: 3763: 3746: 3730:QwertyForest 3707: 3682: 3670:QwertyForest 3665: 3647: 3560: 3531: 3525: 3522: 3476: 3415: 3409: 3407: 3406:Yeah, that. 3329: 3315: 3309: 3307: 3250: 3216: 3210: 3208: 3194: 3181:, let alone 3154: 3101: 3085: 3080: 3071: 3067: 3053: 3047: 3045: 3006:WP:OVERSIGHT 2982: 2976: 2974: 2971: 2965: 2958: 2951: 2944: 2937: 2930: 2923: 2806:or promotion 2692: 2687: 2685: 2682: 2651: 2595: 2537: 2506: 2495: 2472: 2469: 2466: 2449: 2422: 2393: 2377: 2373: 2354: 2350: 2293: 2237: 2217: 2213: 2168: 2151: 2134: 2117: 2069: 2042: 2037: 2014: 2010: 1980:WhatamIdoing 1966:WhatamIdoing 1938: 1925:WhatamIdoing 1919: 1892: 1822: 1787:Nonredundant 1786: 1771: 1756: 1741: 1721: 1681: 1661: 1660: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1623: 1619: 1612: 1606: 1599: 1556: 1529: 1508: 1495: 1427: 1411: 1390: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1330: 1310: 1288: 1260: 1238: 1219: 1215: 1162: 1130: 1124: 1103: 1101: 817:Nonredundant 816: 797: 782: 767: 762: 726: 692:this version 650:this version 608: 238: 145:This is the 139: 123: 118: 109:Nonredundant 108: 87: 79: 75: 71: 65: 58: 52: 47: 26: 4052:Talk to me! 4013:Talk to me! 3872:• he/they) 3390:oversighted 3255:information 3000:case, it's 2996:It's not a 2839:Talk pages 2804:advertising 2791:Attack page 2717:: Test page 2665:• he/they) 2609:• he/they) 2231:· he/they) 2216:that, too. 2068:unarguably- 1906:· he/they) 1836:· he/they) 1738:checklist: 1618:There is a 1522:· he/they) 1404:· he/they) 1302:· he/they) 1176:· he/they) 1117:· he/they) 124:this header 74:pages that 4105:Nikkimaria 3917:* Pppery * 3712:Tazerdadog 3564:* Pppery * 3431:Tazerdadog 3392:see ...". 2916:WP:BLPPROD 2902:Listed at 2732:: Blatant 2628:* Pppery * 2200:* Pppery * 2122:* Pppery * 2101:* Pppery * 1844:Notified: 1483:We do use 1352:* Pppery * 1243:* Pppery * 1091:discussion 1081:discussion 1071:discussion 1061:discussion 1051:discussion 1041:discussion 1031:discussion 1021:discussion 1011:discussion 1001:discussion 991:discussion 981:discussion 971:discussion 961:discussion 951:discussion 941:discussion 931:discussion 921:discussion 911:discussion 901:discussion 891:discussion 881:discussion 871:discussion 861:discussion 851:discussion 114:otherwise. 83:carefully. 4101:Marchjuly 4089:Asclepias 4079:WP:CSD#F8 4049:Who am I? 4010:Who am I? 3984:|DOC=auto 3903:Thryduulf 3695:Thryduulf 3629:George Ho 3615:Thryduulf 3601:George Ho 3593:be boldly 3579:Thryduulf 3537:forward. 3501:Thryduulf 3394:Thryduulf 3335:WP:REFUND 3279:Thryduulf 3232:Thryduulf 3157:hiding). 3134:Thryduulf 3098:WP:CSD#G3 3042:WP:REVDEL 2776:WP:REFUND 2725:Vandalism 2553:Thryduulf 2260:Aaron Liu 2242:Thryduulf 2139:Thryduulf 1984:Thryduulf 1958:Aaron Liu 1943:Aaron Liu 1888:Thryduulf 1819:insource: 1742:Objective 1736:WP:NEWCSD 1675:currently 1579:Thryduulf 1534:Thryduulf 1471:Thryduulf 1384:currently 1316:Thryduulf 1152:eiei-year 768:Objective 751:eiei-year 744:a rewrite 737:eiei-year 706:this edit 664:this edit 209:if needed 192:Be polite 147:talk page 53:Objective 40:WP:NEWCSD 3915:Agreed. 3159:Primefac 3011:Headbomb 2877:Redirect 2868:redirect 2382:Jkudlick 2311:contribs 2299:Chaotic 2279:andrybak 2256:WP:CREEP 2188:contribs 2156:Primefac 2062:db-error 1884:Primefac 1772:Frequent 1734:s). The 1424:this one 1184:Primefac 1136:Primefac 798:Frequent 240:Archives 217:Shortcut 177:get help 88:Frequent 32:Shortcut 4107:, and 4093:Fastily 3864:Blaster 3799:Cryptic 3764:Comment 3747:Support 3708:Support 3666:Support 3363:Cryptic 3351:Ford489 3347:blocked 3337:" and " 3199:Cryptic 3191:CAT:CSD 3114:Cryptic 3079:really 3068:without 2910:WP:PROD 2756:blocked 2743:deleted 2697:) are: 2657:Blaster 2601:Blaster 2467:Laundry 2450:Support 2435:he/they 2423:support 2394:Support 2374:Support 2351:Support 2343:Cryptic 2325:Cryptic 2294:Support 2238:Support 2223:Blaster 2214:support 2169:Support 2152:Support 2135:Support 2118:Support 2074:Cryptic 2051:db-test 2031:db-move 1939:Support 1898:Blaster 1886:, and 1864:Cryptic 1828:Blaster 1682:Support 1557:Support 1530:support 1514:Blaster 1396:Blaster 1311:Support 1294:Blaster 1239:Support 1216:Support 1208:Cryptic 1168:Blaster 1109:Blaster 710:history 668:history 609:30 days 4114:Anomie 3988:Gonnym 3768:zzuuzz 3648:oppose 3376:Nickps 3349:user ( 3343:banned 3294:Nickps 3265:Nickps 3246:WP:RD4 3108:... → 3002:WP:CRD 2998:WP:CSD 2760:banned 2745:per a 2430:sawyer 2386:(talk) 2338:always 2334:always 2176:python 2038:always 2024:Africa 2020:AfricA 1880:Pppery 1872:Gonnym 1854:WT:CFD 1852:, and 1846:T:CENT 1729:db-xfd 1714:exists 1712:still 1671:always 1635:voorts 1446:Gonnym 1412:always 1380:always 1282:db-xfd 1159:WP:TPN 758:exists 756:still 225:WT:CSD 80:should 3860:House 3489:talk) 3251:G15. 3176:db-g3 3094:Nomic 2653:House 2597:House 2589:db-c4 2470:Pizza 2378:never 2219:House 2179:coder 1894:House 1876:Kusma 1824:House 1812:db-c4 1718:above 1686:WP:G6 1561:Kusma 1510:House 1392:House 1290:House 1164:House 1127:WP:G8 1105:House 704:with 662:with 245:Index 205:Seek 153:page. 76:could 59:agree 4097:JPxG 3992:talk 3958:talk 3947:. – 3907:talk 3890:talk 3870:talk 3847:talk 3790:here 3755:talk 3751:Whpq 3734:talk 3716:talk 3699:talk 3683:Note 3674:talk 3657:talk 3633:talk 3619:talk 3605:talk 3583:talk 3505:talk 3435:talk 3398:talk 3380:talk 3330:will 3306:G▉? 3298:talk 3283:talk 3269:talk 3236:talk 3163:talk 3155:more 3138:talk 3072:also 3040:and 2734:hoax 2663:talk 2607:talk 2557:talk 2526:talk 2522:MSGJ 2440:talk 2427:... 2364:talk 2307:talk 2301:Enby 2283:talk 2277:. —⁠ 2265:talk 2246:talk 2229:talk 2212:I'd 2184:talk 2160:talk 2143:talk 1988:talk 1970:talk 1948:talk 1929:talk 1904:talk 1834:talk 1799:bug. 1639:talk 1583:talk 1565:talk 1538:talk 1520:talk 1475:talk 1450:talk 1436:talk 1402:talk 1340:talk 1320:talk 1300:talk 1269:talk 1229:talk 1188:talk 1174:talk 1140:talk 1115:talk 829:bug. 194:and 132:edit 128:view 96:and 3893:) 3850:) 3420:🗯️ 3359:RD4 3355:RD4 3345:or 3320:🗯️ 3221:🗯️ 3106:and 3058:🗯️ 3008:. 2987:🗯️ 2832:G14 2819:G13 2810:G12 2800:G11 2795:BLP 2787:G10 2758:or 2688:not 2367:) 2070:non 2043:sub 2015:non 1720:at 1501:foo 1343:) 1232:) 694:of 652:of 72:all 4112:. 4103:, 4099:, 4095:, 4091:, 3994:) 3980:}} 3974:{{ 3909:) 3757:) 3736:) 3718:) 3701:) 3676:) 3659:) 3635:) 3621:) 3607:) 3599:? 3585:) 3507:) 3483:— 3481:. 3437:) 3410:jp 3400:) 3382:) 3339:G5 3310:jp 3300:) 3285:) 3271:) 3238:) 3211:jp 3185:db 3183:{{ 3179:}} 3173:{{ 3165:) 3140:) 3100:→ 3081:is 3048:jp 3025:· 3021:· 3017:· 2977:jp 2892:X3 2886:G8 2875:: 2873:R4 2864:R3 2856:: 2854:R2 2843:G8 2789:: 2781:G8 2772:G7 2766:G6 2752:G5 2739:G4 2730:G3 2723:: 2721:G3 2715:G2 2707:: 2705:G1 2648:}} 2642:{{ 2623:}} 2617:{{ 2592:}} 2586:{{ 2582:}} 2576:{{ 2572:}} 2566:{{ 2559:) 2548:}} 2542:{{ 2524:· 2515:}} 2509:{{ 2487:) 2484:c̄ 2473:03 2462:G6 2437:* 2433:* 2413:💬 2384:⚓ 2313:) 2309:· 2285:) 2267:) 2248:) 2186:| 2162:) 2145:) 2065:}} 2059:{{ 2054:}} 2048:{{ 2034:}} 2028:{{ 1990:) 1972:) 1960:, 1950:) 1931:) 1920:un 1882:, 1878:, 1874:, 1870:, 1866:, 1862:, 1848:, 1815:}} 1809:{{ 1789:: 1774:: 1759:: 1744:: 1732:}} 1726:{{ 1710:}} 1704:{{ 1700:}} 1694:{{ 1645:) 1604:. 1585:) 1577:. 1567:) 1540:) 1532:. 1507:. 1504:}} 1498:{{ 1491:}} 1485:{{ 1477:) 1466:}} 1460:{{ 1452:) 1438:) 1322:) 1285:}} 1279:{{ 1271:) 1261:is 1190:) 1155:}} 1149:{{ 1142:) 819:: 800:: 785:: 770:: 754:}} 748:{{ 740:}} 734:{{ 607:: 601:89 599:, 597:88 595:, 593:87 591:, 589:86 587:, 585:85 583:, 581:84 579:, 577:83 575:, 573:82 571:, 569:81 567:, 565:80 563:, 561:79 559:, 557:78 555:, 553:77 551:, 549:76 547:, 545:75 543:, 541:74 539:, 537:73 535:, 533:72 531:, 529:71 527:, 525:70 523:, 521:69 519:, 517:68 515:, 513:67 511:, 509:66 507:, 505:65 503:, 501:64 499:, 497:63 495:, 493:62 491:, 489:61 487:, 485:60 483:, 481:59 479:, 477:58 475:, 473:57 471:, 469:56 467:, 465:55 463:, 461:54 459:, 457:53 455:, 453:52 451:, 449:51 447:, 445:50 443:, 441:49 439:, 437:48 435:, 433:47 431:, 429:46 427:, 425:45 423:, 421:44 419:, 417:43 415:, 413:42 411:, 409:41 407:, 405:40 403:, 401:39 399:, 397:38 395:, 393:37 391:, 389:36 387:, 385:35 383:, 381:34 379:, 377:33 375:, 373:32 371:, 369:31 367:, 365:30 363:, 361:29 359:, 357:28 355:, 353:27 351:, 349:26 347:, 345:25 343:, 341:24 339:, 337:23 335:, 333:22 331:, 329:21 327:, 325:20 323:, 321:19 319:, 317:18 315:, 313:17 311:, 309:16 307:, 305:15 303:, 301:14 299:, 297:13 295:, 293:12 291:, 289:11 287:, 285:10 283:, 279:, 275:, 271:, 267:, 263:, 259:, 255:, 251:, 247:, 175:; 130:• 126:: 111:: 90:: 68:: 55:: 4117:⚔ 4087:@ 4037:— 4029:: 4025:@ 3990:( 3960:) 3956:( 3905:( 3887:( 3868:( 3844:( 3808:— 3797:— 3778:— 3753:( 3732:( 3714:( 3697:( 3672:( 3655:( 3631:( 3617:( 3603:( 3581:( 3546:— 3543:) 3539:( 3503:( 3487:( 3433:( 3416:g 3413:× 3396:( 3378:( 3316:g 3313:× 3296:( 3281:( 3267:( 3234:( 3217:g 3214:× 3161:( 3136:( 3054:g 3051:× 3029:} 3027:b 3023:p 3019:c 3015:t 3013:{ 2983:g 2980:× 2661:( 2605:( 2555:( 2528:) 2520:( 2479:d 2476:( 2407:A 2404:F 2401:C 2361:( 2341:— 2305:( 2281:( 2263:( 2244:( 2227:( 2190:) 2182:( 2173:— 2158:( 2141:( 2085:/ 2007:) 2003:( 1986:( 1978:@ 1968:( 1956:@ 1946:( 1927:( 1902:( 1890:. 1858:@ 1832:( 1796:Y 1781:Y 1766:Y 1751:Y 1641:/ 1637:( 1632:) 1628:( 1581:( 1563:( 1536:( 1518:( 1473:( 1448:( 1434:( 1400:( 1337:( 1318:( 1298:( 1267:( 1226:( 1186:( 1172:( 1138:( 1113:( 1093:) 1089:( 1083:) 1079:( 1073:) 1069:( 1063:) 1059:( 1053:) 1049:( 1043:) 1039:( 1033:) 1029:( 1023:) 1019:( 1013:) 1009:( 1003:) 999:( 993:) 989:( 983:) 979:( 973:) 969:( 963:) 959:( 953:) 949:( 943:) 939:( 933:) 929:( 923:) 919:( 913:) 909:( 903:) 899:( 893:) 889:( 883:) 879:( 873:) 869:( 863:) 859:( 853:) 849:( 826:Y 807:Y 792:Y 777:Y 281:9 277:8 273:7 269:6 265:5 261:4 257:3 253:2 249:1 242:: 179:. 104:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.