1013:: Google Scholar works well for fields where all (or nearly all) respected venues have an online presence. Most papers written by a computer scientist will show up, but for less technologically up-to-date fields, it is dicey. For non-scientific subjects, it is especially dicey. Many journals, additionally, do not permit Google Scholar to list their articles. For books, the coverage in Google Scholar is partly through Google Book Search, and is very strongly influenced by publisher's permissions and policies. Thus, the absence of references in Google Scholar should not be used as proof of non-notability. In the other direction, GS includes sources that are not peer-reviewed, such as academic web sites and other
1036:, is a well-established broadly based search engine, covering much of biology and all of medicine, published since 1967 and sometimes even earlier. It includes a few journals in medically related clinical subjects, but is not complete in those. Further, not all articles in PubMed are from peer-reviewed journals, as it includes medical news sources of various degrees of quality, including such items in peer-reviewed journals it does cover. It also exhaustively covers letters to the editor and similar material, not all of which is of any significance.
625:; exceptions may exist. Some academics may not meet any of these criteria, but may still be notable for their academic work. It is very difficult to make clear requirements in terms of number/quality of publications. The criteria, in practice, vary greatly by field and are determined by precedent and consensus. Also, this guideline sets the bar fairly low, which is natural; to a degree, academics live in the public arena, trying to influence others with their ideas. It is natural that successful ones should be considered notable.
711:. Major disciplines, such as physics, mathematics, history, political science, or their significant subdisciplines (e.g., particle physics, algebraic geometry, medieval history, fluid mechanics, cancer genetics are valid examples). Overly narrow and highly specialized categories should be avoided. Arguing that someone is an expert in an extremely narrow area of study is, in and of itself, not necessarily sufficient to satisfy Criterion 1, except for the actual leaders in those subjects.
993:
incomplete especially for the less developed countries. Additionally, they list citations only from journal articles – citations from articles published in books or other publications are not included. For that reason, these databases should be used with caution for disciplines such as computer science in which conference or other non-journal publication is essential, or humanistic disciplines where book publication is most important. Web of
Science provides a
75:
444:. It is possible for an academic not to be notable under the provisions of this guideline but to be notable in some other way under the general notability guideline or one of the other subject-specific notability guidelines. Conversely, failure to meet either the general notability guideline or other subject-specific notability guidelines is irrelevant if an academic is notable under this guideline.
140:
678:
proceedings whereas in humanities book publications tend to play a larger role (and are harder to count without access to offline libraries). The meaning of "substantial number of publications" and "high citation rates" is to be interpreted in line with the interpretations used by major research institutions in determining the qualifications for the awarding of tenure.
1062:, etc., are of limited usefulness in evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied. They should be approached with caution because their validity is not, at present, completely accepted, and they may depend substantially on the citation database used. They are also discipline-dependent; some disciplines have higher average citation rates than others.
1048:
is the tedious method of looking at every one of the related articles published after the article in question, finding its "cited article" display, and check if it is there. (Some PubMed records do not list cited articles, for a variety of reasons.) Nor will such a listing necessarily include all the citations. –
1073:
A report from the association of
European computer science departments lists ten bullet points for evaluation of computer science research, two of which emphasize the importance of non-journal publication and one of which specifically cautions against the use of Web of Science. Instead, it recommends
1065:
For scholars in humanities the existing citation indices and Google
Scholar often provide inadequate and incomplete information. (Google Scholar is not totally irrelevant in many cases, for it now does include citations to books—it's worth a look). In these fields one can also look at how widely the
694:
There are other considerations that may be used as contributing factors (usually not sufficient individually) towards satisfying
Criterion 1: significant academic awards and honors (see below); service on editorial boards of scholarly publications; publications in especially prestigious and selective
1047:
cite the original (and some clearly do not, for they will have been published before the articles in question). They are useful for finding additional papers on a subject, which is the purpose for which they were designed. The only way to count citations using such a listing in, for example, PubMed,
185:
Having published work does not, in itself, make an academic notable, no matter how many publications there are. Notability depends on the impact the work has had on the field of study. This notability guideline specifies criteria for judging the notability of an academic through reliable sources for
1049:
683:
Criterion 1 can also be satisfied if the person has pioneered or developed a significant new concept, technique or idea, made a significant discovery or solved a major problem in their academic discipline. In this case it is necessary to explicitly demonstrate, by a substantial number of references
408:
level, sometimes also called professors, are not presumed to be academics. They may only be considered academics for the purposes of this guideline if they are engaged in substantial scholarly research and are known for such research. If not, they are evaluated by the usual rules for notability in
792:
Victories in academic student competitions at the high school and university level as well as other awards and honors for academic student achievements (at either high school, undergraduate or graduate level) do not qualify under
Criterion 2 and do not count towards partially satisfying Criterion
677:
Generally, more experimental and applied subjects tend to have higher publication and citation rates than more theoretical ones. Publication and citation rates in humanities are generally lower than in sciences. Also, in sciences, most new original research is published in journals and conference
992:
cover the sciences back to 1900, the social sciences back to 1956, and the humanities (very incompletely) back to 1975, but only the largest universities can afford the entire set. (Fortunately, additional citation indexes with public access are being developed.) These databases are furthermore
895:
Lesser administrative posts (provost, dean, department chair, etc.) are generally not sufficient to qualify under
Criterion 6 alone, although exceptions are possible on a case-by-case basis (e.g., being a provost of a major university may sometimes qualify). Generally, appointment as an acting
698:
For the purposes of partially satisfying
Criterion 1, significant academic awards and honors may include, for example: major academic awards (they would also automatically satisfy Criterion 2), highly selective fellowships (other than postdoctoral fellowships); invited lectures at meetings of
650:
academic work – either several extremely highly cited scholarly publications or a substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates. Reviews of the person's work, published in selective academic publications, can be considered together with ordinary citations here.
703:
academic and scholarly societies; honorary degrees; and others. Ordinary colloquia and seminar talks and invited lectures at scholarly conferences, standard research grants, named post-doctoral fellowships, visiting appointments, or internal university awards are insufficient for this
925:
Criterion 7 may also be satisfied if the person has authored widely popular general audience books on academic subjects provided the author is widely regarded inside academia as a well-established academic expert and provided the books deal with that expert's field of study. Books on
699:
national or international scholarly societies, where giving such an invited lecture is considered considerably more prestigious than giving an invited lecture at typical national and international conferences in that discipline; named lectures or named lecture series; awards by
921:
Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this
857:
5. The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a named chair appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are
673:
fall into that category. The mere fact that an article or a book is reviewed in such a publication does not serve towards satisfying
Criterion 1. However, the content of the review and any evaluative comments made there may be used for that
769:
qualify under
Criterion 2. Some less significant academic honors and awards that confer a high level of academic prestige can also be used to satisfy Criterion 2. Examples may include certain awards, honors and prizes of
880:
For documenting that a person has held such a post (but not for a judgement of whether or not the institution or society is a major one), publications of the institution where the post is held are considered a reliable
1005:(Chemical Abstracts), and similar disciplinary indexes are also valuable resources, often specifically listing citation counts, but access to them is also not free and usually requires a university computer account.
837:
For documenting that a person has been elected member or fellow (but not for a judgement of whether or not that membership/fellowship is prestigious), publications of the electing institution are considered a reliable
695:
academic journals; publication of collected works; special conferences dedicated to honor academic achievements of a particular person; naming of academic awards or lecture series after a particular person; and others.
955:
For documenting that a person has held such a position (but not for a judgement of whether or not the journal is a major well-established one), publications of the journal or its publishers are considered a reliable
613:
The criteria above are sometimes summed up as an "Average
Professor Test": When judged against the average impact of a researcher in a given field, does this researcher stand out as clearly more notable or more
863:
For documenting that a person has held such an appointment (but not for a judgement of whether or not the institution is a major one), publications of the appointing institution are considered a reliable
789:
For documenting that a person has won a specific award (but not for a judgement of whether or not that award is prestigious), publications of the awarding institution are considered a reliable source.
684:
to academic publications of researchers other than the person in question, that this contribution is indeed widely considered to be significant and is widely attributed to the person in question.
870:
Major institutions, for these purposes, are those that have a reputation for excellence or selectivity. Named chairs at other institutions are not necessarily sufficient to establish notability.
1021:. Thus, the number of citations found there can sometimes be significantly more than the number of actual citations from truly reliable scholarly material. In essence, it is a rough guide only.
852:
Criterion 4 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has authored several books that are widely used as textbooks (or as a basis for a course) at multiple institutions of higher education.
401:
need to be academic if they are known for their academic achievements. Conversely, if they are notable for their primary job, they do not need to be notable academics to warrant an article.
884:
Criterion 6 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has held the post of president or chancellor (or vice-chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant
930:
and marginal or fringe scientific theories are generally not covered by this criterion; their authors may still be notable under other criteria of this guideline or under the general
963:
and marginal or fringe theories are generally not covered by Criterion 8. However, their head editor may still be notable under other criteria of this guideline or under the general
529:
64:
606:
Once the passage of one or more notability criteria has been verified through independent sources, or through the reliable sources listed explicitly for this purpose in the
691:
dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1, except in the case of publication in vanity, fringe, or non-selective journals or presses.
610:, non-independent sources, such as official institutional and professional sources, are widely accepted as reliable sourcing for routine, uncontroversial details.
892:
academic independent research institute or center (which is not a part of a university), president of a notable national or international scholarly society, etc.
903:
and marginal or fringe theories are generally not covered by Criterion 6; they may still be notable under other criteria of this guideline or under the general
867:
Criterion 5 can be applied reliably only for persons who are tenured at the full professor level, and not for junior faculty members with endowed appointments.
834:
For the purposes of Criterion 3, elected memberships in minor and non-notable societies are insufficient (most newly formed societies fall into that category).
1043:
articles that necessarily cite the original; they are articles on the same general topic, usually selected by having title words or citations in common. Some
651:
Differences in typical citation and publication rates and in publication conventions between different academic disciplines should be taken into account.
635:
1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
272:
502:
The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
318:
323:
814:
595:
An article's assertion that the subject passes this guideline is not sufficient. Every topic on Knowledge must have sources that comply with
517:
980:
The only reasonably accurate way of finding citations to journal articles in most subjects is to use one of the two major citation indexes,
654:
To count towards satisfying Criterion 1, citations need to occur in peer-reviewed scholarly publications such as journals or academic books.
349:
875:
6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
229:
569:
The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
253:
720:
Having an object (asteroid, process, manuscript, etc.) named after the subject is not in itself indicative of satisfying Criterion 1.
562:
appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.
786:), etc. Significant academic awards and honors can also be used to partially satisfy Criterion 1 (see item 4 above in this section).
370:(people, not academic subjects) as measured by their academic achievements. An academic is someone engaged in scholarly research or
1221:
82:
212:
35:
60:
98:
46:
1099:, emphasis added: "A topic is presumed to merit an article if (1) It meets either the general notability guideline below,
385:) at colleges or universities. Also, many academics have held research positions at academic research institutes (such as
813:
3. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a
17:
489:
or other notability criteria. The merits of an article on the academic will depend largely on the extent to which it is
205:
516:
The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a
342:
155:; that is significant, interesting, or unusual enough to be worthy of notice, as evidenced by being the subject of
801:
583:
The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.
308:
1143:
265:
736:
2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
599:. Major awards must be confirmed, claims of impact must be substantiated by independent statements, reviews,
284:
279:
241:
42:
260:
246:
236:
896:
president/chancellor/vice-chancellor also is not generally sufficient to qualify under Criterion 6 alone.
707:
For the purposes of satisfying Criterion 1, the academic discipline of the person in question needs to be
509:
The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
1117:
988:. Scopus covers the sciences and the social sciences, but is very incomplete before 1996; Web of Science
804:, or from publications incorporating a substantial vanity press element in their business model, such as
495:
Before applying these criteria, see the General notes and Specific criteria notes sections, which follow.
335:
313:
762:
478:
291:
90:
941:
Patents, commercial and financial applications are generally not indicative of satisfying Criterion 7.
658:
1181:
1103:
listed in the box on the right," which includes this document, "and (2) It is not excluded under the
885:
644:
The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of
596:
555:
490:
178:" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being
1039:
A caution about "related articles": In PubMed, and most other databases, "related articles" are
724:
417:
779:
528:
of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g.,
461:
174:
Many scientists, researchers, philosophers, and other scholars (collectively referred to as "
160:
53:
1176:
1096:
750:
662:
533:
363:
198:
41:"WP:TEACHER" redirects here. For advice on running a student project within Knowledge, see
8:
405:
168:
122:
1066:
person's books are held in various academic libraries (this information is available in
629:
115:
52:"WP:SCHOLAR" redirects here. For advice on evaluating sources produced by scholars, see
1198:
1018:
805:
453:
107:
94:
916:
7. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
1002:
670:
808:, do not qualify for satisfying Criterion 2 or for partially satisfying Criterion 1.
576:
The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
1201:
1190:
947:
844:
825:
of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g., the
544:
371:
156:
420:
and their meanings. Note that academic ranks are different in different countries.
1172:
783:
433:
728:
1168:
1010:
981:
960:
927:
900:
758:
437:
1215:
1104:
1014:
964:
931:
904:
818:
521:
486:
441:
429:
31:
1194:
843:
4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of
657:
In some disciplines there are review publications that review virtually all
797:
754:
164:
975:
968:
935:
908:
889:
775:
771:
746:
700:
688:
559:
152:
63:
has a list of deletion of articles related to academics and educators at
946:
8. The person has been head or chief editor of a major well-established
543:
The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of
998:
666:
558:
appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a
1017:. It has also been criticized for not vetting journals and including
413:
382:
589:
1075:
367:
175:
30:"WP:ACADEMIC" redirects here. For advice for academic editors, see
714:
Simply having authored a large number of published academic works
687:
The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a
640:
notes to Criterion 2, some of which apply to Criterion 1 as well.
151:
Subjects of biographical articles on Knowledge are required to be
1059:
1055:
1029:
731:) is not, in and of itself, indicative of satisfying Criterion 1.
1033:
1025:
997:, which may be of some value. In individual scientific fields,
985:
822:
530:
Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
525:
428:
from the other subject-specific notability guidelines, such as
65:
Knowledge:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators
994:
1144:"Many Academics Are Eager to Publish in Worthless Journals"
826:
390:
1067:
847:, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
547:, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
481:, are notable. Academics meeting none of these conditions
447:
440:, etc., and is explicitly listed as an alternative to the
386:
93:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
1101:
or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline
727:
from a famous or notable academic (e.g., having a small
888:
college or university, director of a highly regarded,
477:
of the following conditions, as substantiated through
899:
Heads of institutes and centers devoted to promoting
1082:
716:
is not considered sufficient to satisfy Criterion 1.
1070:) when evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied.
34:. For a list of academic studies of Knowledge, see
381:Many academics have been faculty members (such as
661:in that discipline. For example, in mathematics,
1213:
485:still be notable if they meet the conditions of
27:Knowledge guideline on notability of academics
343:
607:
362:This guideline reflects consensus about the
89:Editors should generally follow it, though
1177:"Research Evaluation for Computer Science"
350:
336:
1171:; Choppy, Christine; Staunstrup, Jørgen;
796:Biographical listings in and awards from
81:This page documents an English Knowledge
36:Knowledge:Academic studies of Knowledge
14:
1214:
1141:
995:free index of highly cited researchers
374:; academic notability refers to being
646:
600:
47:Knowledge:Teachers can be vandals too
134:
69:
1050:Help for "Related articles" feature
24:
1032:, now usually accessed as part of
778:foundations and trusts (e.g., the
97:. When in doubt, discuss first on
25:
1233:
741:For the purposes of Criterion 2,
603:, or library holdings, and so on.
1142:Kolata, Gina (30 October 2017).
959:Journals dedicated to promoting
138:
73:
1222:Knowledge notability guidelines
1123:. The University of New England
1118:"Identifying Academic Journals"
802:American Biographical Institute
1161:
1135:
1110:
1089:
1054:Citation measures such as the
709:sufficiently broadly construed
395:may also work outside academia
13:
1:
745:academic awards, such as the
43:Knowledge:Student assignments
815:National Academy of Sciences
518:National Academy of Sciences
442:general notability guideline
393:, etc.). However, academics
206:General notability guideline
7:
416:for more information about
324:Why was my article deleted?
273:Organizations and companies
213:Subject-specific guidelines
45:. For the humour page, see
10:
1238:
763:Pulitzer Prize for History
532:or Honorary Fellow of the
451:
376:known for such engagement.
105:
99:this guideline's talk page
58:
51:
40:
29:
1182:Communications of the ACM
186:the impact of their work.
800:publishers, such as the
319:Common deletion outcomes
146:This page in a nutshell:
61:Deletion Sorting Project
1195:10.1145/1498765.1498780
774:academic societies, of
630:Specific criteria notes
608:specific criteria notes
597:Knowledge:Verifiability
556:distinguished professor
404:School teachers at the
1015:self-published sources
953:
950:in their subject area.
919:
878:
861:
850:
832:
739:
725:collaboration distance
642:
554:The person has held a
397:and their primary job
1105:What Knowledge is not
780:Guggenheim Fellowship
659:refereed publications
182:of secondary sources.
1097:Knowledge:Notability
751:MacArthur Fellowship
663:Mathematical Reviews
617:Note that this is a
534:Institute of Physics
230:Astronomical objects
157:significant coverage
83:notability guideline
406:secondary education
285:Sports and athletes
254:Geographic features
18:Knowledge:NACADEMIC
1148:The New York Times
1074:Google Scholar or
1019:predatory journals
470:Academics meeting
424:This guideline is
1003:SciFinder Scholar
806:Marquis Who's Who
671:Zentralblatt MATH
409:their profession.
360:
359:
314:Guide to deletion
309:Notability essays
193:
192:
133:
132:
16:(Redirected from
1229:
1206:
1204:
1173:van Leeuwen, Jan
1165:
1159:
1158:
1156:
1154:
1139:
1133:
1132:
1130:
1128:
1122:
1114:
1108:
1093:
1024:A caution about
1009:A caution about
976:Citation metrics
948:academic journal
845:higher education
665:, also known as
601:citation metrics
585:
584:
578:
577:
571:
570:
564:
563:
549:
548:
545:higher education
538:
537:
511:
510:
504:
503:
479:reliable sources
464:
372:higher education
352:
345:
338:
195:
194:
142:
141:
135:
125:
118:
77:
76:
70:
21:
1237:
1236:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1169:Meyer, Bertrand
1167:
1166:
1162:
1152:
1150:
1140:
1136:
1126:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1094:
1090:
1085:
1078:for this field.
978:
784:Linguapax Prize
723:Having a small
632:
592:
582:
581:
575:
574:
568:
567:
553:
552:
542:
541:
515:
514:
508:
507:
501:
500:
468:
467:
460:
456:
450:
356:
296:
189:
139:
129:
128:
121:
114:
110:
102:
74:
68:
57:
50:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1235:
1225:
1224:
1208:
1207:
1160:
1134:
1109:
1087:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1071:
1063:
1052:
1037:
1022:
1011:Google Scholar
982:Web of Science
977:
974:
973:
972:
961:pseudo-science
957:
943:
942:
939:
928:pseudo-science
923:
913:
912:
901:pseudo-science
897:
893:
882:
872:
871:
868:
865:
854:
853:
840:
839:
835:
810:
809:
794:
790:
787:
759:Bancroft Prize
733:
732:
721:
718:
712:
705:
696:
692:
685:
681:
680:
679:
675:
655:
631:
628:
627:
626:
615:
611:
604:
591:
588:
587:
586:
579:
572:
565:
550:
539:
512:
505:
466:
465:
457:
452:
449:
446:
422:
421:
418:academic ranks
410:
402:
358:
357:
355:
354:
347:
340:
332:
329:
328:
327:
326:
321:
316:
311:
303:
302:
298:
297:
295:
294:
288:
287:
282:
276:
275:
269:
268:
263:
257:
256:
250:
249:
244:
239:
233:
232:
226:
225:
219:
216:
215:
209:
208:
202:
201:
191:
190:
188:
187:
183:
172:
148:
143:
131:
130:
127:
126:
119:
111:
106:
103:
88:
87:
78:
54:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1234:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1217:
1203:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1164:
1149:
1145:
1138:
1119:
1113:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1092:
1088:
1077:
1072:
1069:
1064:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1051:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1004:
1000:
996:
991:
987:
983:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
952:
951:
949:
940:
937:
933:
929:
924:
920:
918:
917:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
891:
887:
883:
879:
877:
876:
869:
866:
862:
860:
859:
851:
849:
848:
846:
836:
833:
831:
830:
828:
824:
820:
819:Royal Society
816:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
788:
785:
781:
777:
773:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
738:
737:
730:
726:
722:
719:
717:
713:
710:
706:
702:
697:
693:
690:
686:
682:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
653:
652:
649:
648:
643:
641:
639:
636:
624:
620:
616:
614:accomplished?
612:
609:
605:
602:
598:
594:
593:
590:General notes
580:
573:
566:
561:
557:
551:
546:
540:
535:
531:
527:
523:
522:Royal Society
519:
513:
506:
499:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
475:
463:
459:
458:
455:
445:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
353:
348:
346:
341:
339:
334:
333:
331:
330:
325:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
306:
305:
304:
300:
299:
293:
290:
289:
286:
283:
281:
278:
277:
274:
271:
270:
267:
264:
262:
259:
258:
255:
252:
251:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
235:
234:
231:
228:
227:
224:
221:
220:
218:
217:
214:
211:
210:
207:
204:
203:
200:
197:
196:
184:
181:
177:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
149:
147:
144:
137:
136:
124:
120:
117:
113:
112:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
86:
84:
79:
72:
71:
66:
62:
55:
48:
44:
37:
33:
32:Help:Academic
19:
1189:(4): 31–34,
1186:
1180:
1163:
1151:. Retrieved
1147:
1137:
1125:. Retrieved
1112:
1100:
1091:
1044:
1040:
989:
979:
945:
944:
915:
914:
874:
873:
856:
855:
842:
841:
812:
811:
798:vanity press
766:
755:Fields Medal
742:
735:
734:
729:Erdős number
715:
708:
647:highly cited
645:
637:
634:
633:
622:
618:
494:
482:
473:
471:
469:
462:WP:NACADEMIC
425:
423:
398:
394:
375:
361:
222:
179:
145:
80:
971:guidelines.
938:guidelines.
911:guidelines.
747:Nobel Prize
689:Festschrift
560:named chair
426:independent
292:Web content
180:the subject
161:independent
1153:2 November
1127:2 November
999:MathSciNet
886:accredited
667:MathSciNet
621:and not a
491:verifiable
383:professors
364:notability
199:Notability
91:exceptions
858:uncommon.
619:guideline
414:professor
368:academics
223:Academics
176:academics
169:secondary
108:Shortcuts
95:consensus
1216:Category
1175:(2009),
1107:policy."
1076:Citeseer
1068:Worldcat
765:, etc.,
704:purpose.
674:purpose.
638:See also
454:Shortcut
448:Criteria
434:WP:MUSIC
399:does not
301:See also
171:sources.
165:reliable
123:WP:NPROF
1202:8625066
1060:g-index
1056:h-index
1030:Medline
956:source.
890:notable
881:source.
864:source.
838:source.
821:) or a
817:or the
776:notable
772:notable
701:notable
524:) or a
520:or the
438:WP:AUTH
266:Numbers
153:notable
116:WP:PROF
1034:PubMed
1026:PubMed
986:Scopus
965:WP:BIO
932:WP:BIO
905:WP:BIO
823:Fellow
767:always
761:, the
757:, the
753:, the
669:, and
526:fellow
487:WP:BIO
430:WP:BIO
280:People
242:Events
1199:S2CID
1121:(PDF)
1095:From
1083:Notes
922:mark.
743:major
261:Music
247:Films
237:Books
1155:2017
1129:2017
1001:,
984:and
969:WP:N
936:WP:N
909:WP:N
827:IEEE
623:rule
472:any
412:See
391:CNRS
59:The
1191:doi
1045:may
1041:not
990:may
967:or
934:or
907:or
829:).
483:may
474:one
387:NIH
366:of
159:in
1218::
1197:,
1187:52
1185:,
1179:,
1146:.
1058:,
1028::
793:1.
782:,
749:,
536:).
493:.
436:,
432:,
389:,
167:,
163:,
1205:.
1193::
1157:.
1131:.
351:e
344:t
337:v
101:.
85:.
67:.
56:.
49:.
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.