Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/Siege of Baghdad/archive1 - Knowledge

Source šŸ“

1139:"It clearly held a ready appeal for Christian writers, since variants are supplied by authors as diverse as the Byzantine historian Georgios Pachymeres (d. c. 1310), the Armenian historian Grigor Aknertsā€›i (c. 1313), the expatriate Armenian prince Hayton of Gorighos (1307), the anonymous ā€˜Templar of Tyreā€™ (c. 1314), the Venetian adventurer Marco Polo (1298), the Dominican missionary Riccoldo da Montecroce (c. 1300) and St Louisā€™ biographer Jean de Joinville (1309)." 1550:
very extensive and focused article. I have not done a source review so AGF. I found it a challenge to follow what empires/political configurations of each city/country was at the time, but that's not German to the article which is about the siege. I have made some last nitpicks, but accepted or not,
1361:
I would understand "assault" to be interchangeable with battle, but according to your explanation, the assault on 29/30 January is the beginning of the siege, while on 17 January was an unrelated battle. Infobox title refers to siege and includes a date range, without explicitly clarifying what this
966:
As you note, they are not required by the FA criteria. What the FA criteria do require are consistently formatted citations, which would not be present if those to certain books contain DOIs and those to other books do not. In any case, DOIs for books are created by adding the code of the publisher
1161:
There's a lot of mention of what religion certain people or factions belong to, which is good for context, but it leaves me wondering about the religion of the Mongols at this time, since one talked about "god", another had a Christian wife, etc. Perhaps it can be added somewhere whether they were
1165:
Very hard to summarize in an article like this, because the Mongols' concept of religion was very different from our own, and the modern world would consider them very religiously diverseā€”the royal family contained shamanists, Christians, Buddhists, Muslims. Later, the religious differences would
1388:, notes they surrounded Baghdad, and states they began their assault at the end of the month. I don't know how "assault" could be interpreted as referring to the battle on 17 Januaryā€”that seems counterintuitive.The body, meanwhile, does essentially the same over three paragraphs, and even says 396:
To be honest, I'm feeling a bit out of my depth in reviewing this article. I have a feeling that the "background" section is a bit too long, but don't have any concrete suggestions on what to cut. I also feel that some of the language used is not accessible to a wide audience. I'm giving a
1171:
Similarly, the legacy section describes this as a blow to the Islamic world, but it appears the Mongols didn't try to weaken the hold of the religion? Wasn't it rather just weakening of Arab dominance of it (as later rulers were still Muslims, just of non-Arab ethnicities)?
96:
The Siege of Baghdad shook the world. The end of the Abbasid Caliphate, the zenith of the Mongol conquests, the foundation of a new empire in the Middle East. Legends sprang up around the siege, and it became a byword for wanton destructionā€”but was it?
1324:
Ah I see why I didn't find 29 January, because there's 30 January possibility too. The infobox refers to Siege with date range, while body refers to assault. Either modify body or the infobox to make it clear they're referring to same thing. ~ šŸ¦
951:
Yes, but it's always a good idea to give readers multiple options for accessing a source. DOIs are not required per FA criteria but it does not hurt to have them. You should get comments from other reviewers on this and see what they have to say.
195:"Hulegu's progress from Karakorum was extremely leisurely by Mongol standards." Suggest to change to "Hulegu's progress from Karakorum was slow by Mongol standards." Leisurely feels too imprecise. It wasn't literally leisurely was it? 524:
I think "delusional" is somwhat tameā€”al-Musta'sim has been described by sources as "pathologically avaricious", "in a state of mental imbecility", "extremely reckless", "weak, vain, incompetent and cowardly", and "utterly lumpen and
817:"As was normal practice and as was stipulated by the Mongolsā€™ yasa, the caliph had been presented with the clear option of submitting peacefully to HĆ¼legĆ¼ and in return of receiving HĆ¼legĆ¼ā€™s assurances of safety." 1382:"the Mongol army soon approached Baghdad, routing a sortie on 17 January 1258 by flooding their camp. They then invested Baghdad, which was left with around 30,000 troops. The assault began at the end of January. 1362:
date range refers to. I do not have a specific solution in mind, but was and am still confused when reading it, so clarifying what is being referred to would help other readers. Perhaps I am not familiar with
1134:"This incident is likely the source of a folktale, reproduced in the writings of Christian writers such as Marco Polo" What is the significance of mentioning religion? Does it mean Western writers instead? 346:
I've struck though the comments that have been addressed. There is one left which I think you have missed. I would like to do a second read-through of the whole article before deciding to support.
521:"were still quite delusional": Is this per the sources? Otherwise, "delusional" seems too strong a word for Wiki since we have to be neutral. Atwood 2004 uses "unrealistic" which is quite better. 203:. There was feasting, hunting, diplomatic negotations, more banquets, etc. It took almost three years to travel from Mongolia to Persia, a journey which could have been made in a number of months. 550:"Baiju returned to the vanguard at Irbil": Our last mention of Baiju says he had rejoined Hulegu at Hamadan. Where was he in the interim between Hamadan and Irbil, was he not with the main army? 799:#8: Is p. 263 the right one for Atwood 2004? That page has details on the history of Japan and Mongolia/the Mongol Empire. Also need the quotation from May 2018, accessing it is tough. 804:"Thus in 1251 Mongke became Qaā€™an of the Mongol Empire and began the Toluid revolution. While the transition of the position of Qaā€™an from the house of Ogodei to the house of Tolui..." 1153:"Having granted the palace to Makkikha to be the Christians' church" A bit hard to understand. Why specific, and not "a church"? And doesn't "church" already imply it's "Christian"? 1075: 391: 219:"...while Gerdkuh held out for fifteen years, only falling in 1271." Is this part relevant to the siege of Baghdad, seeing as it take place over a decade after the event. 1627: 1471: 1380:
The infobox is titled "Siege of Baghdad". As such, the information therein is about the siege of Baghdad, not about the events leading up to it.The lead section states:
1356: 998: 976: 961: 946: 844: 749: 727: 713: 695: 681: 472: 128: 1445: 1401: 1375: 1294: 1166:
grow more stark, but that would be at least a decade away. Religion had no real impact on this campaign as it was going onā€”its importance was increased in retrospect.
424: 410: 373: 355: 341: 232: 1101: 1057: 608:? It questions the occurrence of a plague during the siege. I have not read it yet but if you do read it before I can, please let me know if it can be used here. 65: 1503:? I appreciate that sometimes the territory/region changed, but it's hard to tell during the travels whether these are different countries by geography or time. 285:"The assault on Baghdad's flood-weakened walls..." I think the flood-weakened walls should be mentioned in the above paragraph at "the walls were in disrepair". 117: 718:
Alright with me. The sources that I can access, I will. For the ones I will need quotations for, I will ask. Planning to do the source review tomorrow. Cheers
1560: 1334: 586:
Provide 26673137 as the JSTOR ID for Biran 2019? I can't remember the exact MOS but I read that the policy is to provide multiple access options for sources.
89: 161:
What variety of English is being used? I see "utilised" rather than "utilized", but "centers" rather than "centres" and "vassalize" rather than "vassalise".
1542: 1426: 1280: 322: 140: 780:
Add 10.1515/9781474417402 as the DOI for May 2018? ISBNs are different in both this one and the above one but I don't think that would affect the content.
295:"According to Kirakos Gandzaketsi, an Armenian historian..." Suggest changing to "According to Kirakos Gandzaketsi, a 13th-century Armenian historian..." 1673: 1609: 1145:
You could also give dates in the captions of the last two images as you do for the others, for context (show they're not contemporary with the events).
1434: 927: 830: 455: 686:
I want to do a source text but some of the sources are inaccessible. Will you be able to wikimail 5-10 supporting sources to me for spot checks?
1208: 662: 513:"ordered him put to death": rephrase to "ordered him to be put to death"? Though former may be grammatically correct, latter flows much better. 821:
None of the sources say that he asked the caliph to dismantle the defences. Or maybe I missed something. Can you provide the supporting text?
986: 1267:
BC and AD revolve around the death of Jesus Christ, whereas this article is about a non-Christian subject, specifically the decline of
40: 1584: 1229: 1031: 860:"believing that they would be allowed to retire into Syria, marched out unarmed, only to be divided into companies and slaughtered." 1529:? It is mentioned 6x including the very first lede, so seems important term for warfare but I am unfamiliar with it. Similar to how 1432: 180:"...in the words of Justin Marozzi." How about "...in the words of English historian Justin Marozzi." to tell the readers who he is. 1180:"transported either to Mongke" Is this a place or Mƶngke Khan? Could be specified either way, and if the latter, needs an umlaut. 877:
Add 10.1163/9789004192119 as the DOI and 10.1163/j.ctt1w8h10n as the JSTOR ID for Baiļø aļø”rsaÄ­khan 2011? The latter is open access.
1575:
nice article and one that fulfils the criteria. (I made one tiny edit for grammar, but aside from that, it's a lovely read). -
275:"...this was just "provocative bluster"..." Who is saying this quote. I don't think this should be stated in Knowledge's voice. 1643: 1122:
Not your "fault", but a bit weird that Talisman Gate links to a Commons page, it should really have its own article here...
30: 17: 1654: 167:
I take it you are using Oxford spelling. "centers" and "epicenter" still need to be changed to "centres" and "epicentre".
1189: 553:
Yes, he rejoined Hulegu and the main army at Hamadan, where they decided to attack Baghdad, and then he rode back to the
1285:
Putting aside that this article is not about the decline of the Islamic Golden Age, I'll just remove the calendar eras.
1235: 1175:
No, the legacy says it was a "momentous occasion"ā€”I have specified that it was the end of the caliphate that made it so.
122: 636: 255:"...meaning Baghdad was in a difficult position..." Suggest changing to "...placing Baghdad in a difficult position..." 653:
That's all from me on the text. A great article overall, with more details than I expected would have been extant.
594:
Consider removing the second link to JA Boyle in Boyle 1968? It does not serve any purpose as far as I can tell.
1623: 1441: 1397: 1352: 1290: 1204: 1071: 1053: 972: 942: 840: 709: 677: 468: 420: 387: 369: 337: 228: 113: 85: 1590: 1499:
My knowledge of geography/kingdoms at the time is limited, but what is the relation of historic Persia to
1162:
still pagan or were starting to adopt Islam or what was going on, and what it meant for their conquests?
534:, since we haven't linked to it in the article at all even though we have the corresponding categories? 1321:
No, 17 January was the date of a battle to the north of the city, not the start of the actual siege.
757: 505:"Assassins": add a apostrophe after since we have a possessive noun, or change to just "Assassin"? 542:"disrespectful behaviour towards Hulegu's envoys": Any details which can be added to the article? 440: 1619: 1487: 1437: 1393: 1348: 1286: 1200: 1067: 1049: 968: 938: 836: 762: 705: 673: 464: 416: 383: 365: 333: 224: 109: 81: 200: 104:
earlier this year, and I now bring its nomination to FAC. If successful, it will be used in the
1669: 1605: 1467: 1045:
Link Hulegu in the first caption he's mentioned in (infobox) instead of the caption far below?
480: 1530: 164:
Should be standardised to BrE now, which allows both -ise and -ize in many cases, I believe.
1596:"The number of people who died is unknown, as the number was likely increased by subsequent 1500: 994: 957: 923: 826: 745: 723: 691: 658: 451: 893:
Add 10.2307/j.ctv125jrx5.7 as the DOI and j.ctv125jrx5.7 as the JSTOR ID for Hodous 2020?
700:
The files are very big, so that could be troublesome. I could provide quotations on-wiki,
8: 1556: 1538: 1422: 1371: 1330: 1276: 406: 351: 318: 136: 71: 1646:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
1580: 1268: 1225: 1097: 1027: 1017: 531: 1665: 1615: 1601: 1511: 1463: 1363: 1341:"Either modify body or the infobox to make it clear they're referring to same thing." 53: 1647: 1126: 617: 72: 61: 1137:
No, "Christian" is specifically highlighted by Jackson 2017, who provides a list:
489:
In the lead, "prince" does not need to be linked, doing so is creating SEAOFBLUE.
990: 953: 934: 919: 822: 741: 719: 701: 687: 669: 654: 623: 461: 447: 265:"...who had been occupied with troubles to the northwest." What kind of troubles? 985:
then. I would appreciate it if you could comment at a PR I have running, linked
967:
to the ISBN, meaning they essentially duplicate what is already in the article.
185:"In that year Chormaqan..." Suggest to add a comma: "In that year, Chormaqan..." 1552: 1551:
they are not blockers for my support. Thank you for creating a FA article ~ šŸ¦
1534: 1459: 1418: 1367: 1344: 1326: 1272: 1261: 402: 379: 361: 347: 329: 314: 132: 101: 1566: 1010: 1576: 1221: 1196: 1093: 1063: 1023: 105: 644:
Add 10.2307/3632138 as the DOI and 3632138 as the JSTOR ID for Smith 1975?
578:"by the Ottomans in 1534,": the comma is not necessary, consider removing? 508:
Added an apostrophe; the Assassins were never referred to in the singular.
1661: 1037: 989:, your comments would be very helpful for improving that article. Cheers 813:#23: Jackson 2017 and Boyle 1968 ok. Need exact quotation for Lane 2003. 597: 57: 1392:
to reduce confusion. I honestly don't see where the lack of clarity is.
415:
No worries, I'll take a look at what you've said. Thanks for your time.
1314:
Date range inside Infobox does not match body of article. Should it be
1260:
mentions Islam, or why this article should be considered "about Islam"
1462:, just a courtesy check to see if there is any more to come from you. 772:
Add 10.12987/yale/9780300125337.001.0001 as the DOI for Jackson 2017?
606: 1507: 1020:
at the end of the article, which can be highlighted with this script:
1600:". Is it possible to avoid using "number" twice in close proximity? 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1597: 554: 1021: 937:. My general position is that citations to books don't need DOIs. 1526: 1257: 1242: 632:
Link to Cambridge University Press as done for other publishers?
627:
bacterium. I have added a half-sentence citing it in the article.
1385: 497:"near to": remove the "to" from both instances in the article? 364:, the article should be ready for your second readthrough now. 245:"...and so he refused." Suggest changing to "...so he refused." 918:
Mostly ok just needs the above changes and quotations. Cheers
605:
Have you read this recent article by Brack, Biran and Amitai:
530:"Seljuk, Georgian, and Armenian vassals": link "Georgian" to 1347:. I've added "/30" to the infobox if that's what you meant? 856:#41: Jackson 2017 is ok, need quotation from Chambers 1979. 127:
I'll have a look at this. If you would like to do a review,
791:
It's a summary of two chapters; I cannot quote all of them.
1384:
This, chronologically, defines the 17 January battle as a
885:
Add 10.1163/9789004314726_008 as the DOI for Biran 2016?
1092:
I'll be back soonish, had to wrap up some other things.
647:
That is essentially the same link three times, but done.
1271:. CE on other hand is a more neutral year system. ~ šŸ¦ 570:
Translate daruyachi as admin officers per NOFORCELINK?
401:, but I encourage you to take those comments on board. 611:
I had not; it seems to not question the occurrence of
769:
All sources are from reliable publishers and authors.
909:
Add 10.4324/9781315165172 as the DOI for Lane 2022?
901:
Add 10.4324/9780203417874 as the DOI for Lane 2003?
1220:- looks good to me, wasn't much to nitpick about. 1016:Marking my spot. In the meantime I see a bunch of 557:, which he commanded, which had remained at Irbil. 129:I've also got an article at FAC that needs reviews 1681:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 1125:I didn't realise it linked there, I've linked to 516:I disagree; I find the latter excessively wordy. 1525:Wiki link or explanation of Sacked is. Perhaps 1366:terminology, but neither are most readers ~ šŸ¦ 1036:Removed a couple; I think the others adhere to 209:19 November." Can a year be added to that date? 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 1192:in the article body like you do in the intro? 1687:No further edits should be made to this page. 1660:template in place on the talk page until the 1066:, wondering if you had forgotten about this. 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 152:Could Persia be linked in the lead and body? 1431:Recognised as rulerā€”see modern usage e.g. 869:#53 needs page numbers for Chambers 1979. 740:from me for promotion to FA class. Cheers 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 100:This article passed a GA nomination from 668:Thanks for an excellent set of comments 201:done in a relaxed way, without hurrying 14: 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 1516:Replace comma here with a fullstop. 1190:Mongol campaign against the Nizaris 313:Those are all my comments for now. 23: 1518:escape the increasingly putrid air 880:Book, DOI not needed. Added JSTOR. 835:That part was previously removed. 637:Template:Cambridge History of Iran 24: 1699: 896:Book, DOI not needed. Added JSTOR 1390:"The assault on Baghdad's walls" 1245:instead of BC/AD (where it says 1199:; I look forward to more input. 1114:Link dawatdar in image caption. 1195:Done. Thanks for the comments, 621:i.e. the disease caused by the 1674:19:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1628:23:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1610:19:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1561:17:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1543:17:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1510:even though it's implied from 1472:11:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1241:In an article about Islam use 13: 1: 1316:17 January ā€“ 10 February 1258 1247:Baghdad was founded in 762 AD 802:Was meant to be p. 363. May: 249:I think that works less well. 600:does not apply to citations. 223:Moved into the nearby note. 7: 1655:featured article candidates 1585:12:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1506:Wiki link first mention of 1446:18:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1427:18:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1402:10:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1376:10:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1357:10:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1335:00:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1295:10:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1281:00:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1230:16:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1209:12:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1102:13:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 1076:12:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 1058:23:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 1032:23:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 999:07:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 977:18:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 962:17:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 845:19:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 831:17:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 788:#1: need exact quotations. 750:07:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 425:18:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 411:15:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 392:12:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 374:13:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 356:07:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 342:18:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 323:15:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 233:11:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 31:featured article nomination 10: 1704: 1417:what does this mean? ~ šŸ¦ 947:20:26, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 928:18:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 728:18:18, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 714:15:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 696:14:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 682:12:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 663:11:18, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 473:11:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 456:05:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 141:02:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 118:15:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 90:15:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 1156:Simplified to "a church". 446:Suggest adding alt text. 328:Thanks for the comments, 1684:Please do not modify it. 1490:last series of nitpicks: 1339:I don't understand what 382:, any further comments? 36:Please do not modify it. 1236:Comments from Shushugah 981:The source review is a 123:Comments from Steelkamp 1416:proclaimed khan -: --> 1620:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1533:is wiki linked. ~ šŸ¦ 1438:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1394:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1349:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1309:Probably better, yes. 1287:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1201:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1068:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1050:~~ AirshipJungleman29 969:~~ AirshipJungleman29 939:~~ AirshipJungleman29 912:Book, DOI not needed. 904:Book, DOI not needed. 888:Book, DOI not needed. 837:~~ AirshipJungleman29 783:Book, DOI not needed. 775:Book, DOI not needed. 706:~~ AirshipJungleman29 674:~~ AirshipJungleman29 465:~~ AirshipJungleman29 417:~~ AirshipJungleman29 384:~~ AirshipJungleman29 366:~~ AirshipJungleman29 334:~~ AirshipJungleman29 225:~~ AirshipJungleman29 110:~~ AirshipJungleman29 82:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1501:Azerbaijan (toponym) 1305:repercussions -: --> 872:Fixed a sfn mistake. 64:) 17 September 2024 1488:AirshipJungleman29 1269:Islamic Golden Age 1256:I don't see where 763:AirshipJungleman29 532:Kingdom of Georgia 1512:Abbasid Caliphate 672:. Replies above. 360:Sorry about that 240:Baghdad campaign 92: 1695: 1686: 1659: 1653: 1650:, and leave the 1591:Drive-by comment 1522: 1519: 1391: 1383: 1342: 1317: 1252: 1248: 1148:Good idea, done. 1140: 1127:Gates of Baghdad 933:Responses above 866:#45 and #56: ok. 861: 818: 805: 79: 73:Siege of Baghdad 48:The article was 38: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1682: 1657: 1651: 1593: 1569: 1520: 1517: 1389: 1381: 1340: 1315: 1250: 1246: 1238: 1138: 1013: 859: 816: 803: 760: 624:Yersinia pestis 562:Link to Karkh? 545:Added a phrase. 483: 443: 125: 76: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1701: 1690: 1689: 1677: 1676: 1664:goes through. 1635: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1545: 1523: 1514: 1504: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1306:ramifications 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1237: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 916: 915: 914: 913: 907: 906: 905: 899: 898: 897: 891: 890: 889: 883: 882: 881: 875: 874: 873: 867: 864: 863: 862: 854: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 833: 811: 808: 807: 806: 797: 794: 793: 792: 786: 785: 784: 778: 777: 776: 770: 759: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 651: 650: 649: 648: 642: 641: 640: 635:Done, through 630: 629: 628: 603: 602: 601: 592: 591: 590: 584: 583: 582: 576: 575: 574: 568: 567: 566: 560: 559: 558: 548: 547: 546: 540: 539: 538: 528: 527: 526: 525:uncontrolled". 519: 518: 517: 511: 510: 509: 503: 502: 501: 495: 494: 493: 482: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 442: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 311: 310: 303: 302: 301: 300: 292: 291: 290: 282: 281: 280: 272: 271: 270: 262: 261: 260: 252: 251: 250: 238: 237: 236: 235: 216: 215: 214: 206: 205: 204: 192: 191: 190: 182: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 171: 159: 158: 157: 148: 147: 124: 121: 94: 93: 80:Nominator(s): 75: 70: 69: 46: 45: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1700: 1688: 1685: 1679: 1678: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1656: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1546: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1515: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1415: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1387: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1313: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1191: 1187: 1182: 1181: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1170: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1147: 1146: 1144: 1136: 1135: 1133: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1112: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1044: 1039: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 979: 978: 974: 970: 965: 964: 963: 959: 955: 950: 949: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 931: 930: 929: 925: 921: 911: 910: 908: 903: 902: 900: 895: 894: 892: 887: 886: 884: 879: 878: 876: 871: 870: 868: 865: 858: 857: 855: 852: 846: 842: 838: 834: 832: 828: 824: 820: 819: 815: 814: 812: 809: 801: 800: 798: 795: 790: 789: 787: 782: 781: 779: 774: 773: 771: 768: 767: 766: 765:, here goes: 764: 758:Source review 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 729: 725: 721: 717: 716: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 698: 697: 693: 689: 685: 684: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 665: 664: 660: 656: 646: 645: 643: 638: 634: 633: 631: 626: 625: 620: 619: 615:, but rather 614: 610: 609: 607: 604: 599: 596: 595: 593: 588: 587: 585: 580: 579: 577: 572: 571: 569: 564: 563: 561: 556: 552: 551: 549: 544: 543: 541: 536: 535: 533: 529: 523: 522: 520: 515: 514: 512: 507: 506: 504: 499: 498: 496: 491: 490: 488: 487: 486: 485:My comments: 474: 470: 466: 463: 459: 458: 457: 453: 449: 445: 444: 426: 422: 418: 414: 413: 412: 408: 404: 400: 395: 394: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 376: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 358: 357: 353: 349: 345: 344: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 308: 307: 306: 298: 297: 296: 293: 288: 287: 286: 283: 278: 277: 276: 273: 268: 267: 266: 263: 258: 257: 256: 253: 248: 247: 246: 243: 242: 241: 234: 230: 226: 222: 221: 220: 217: 212: 211: 210: 207: 202: 199:Yes, it was. 198: 197: 196: 193: 188: 187: 186: 183: 181: 178: 169: 168: 166: 165: 163: 162: 160: 155: 154: 153: 150: 149: 145: 144: 143: 142: 138: 134: 130: 120: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 91: 87: 83: 78: 77: 74: 68: 66: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 1683: 1680: 1666:Gog the Mild 1640:Closing note 1639: 1634: 1616:Gog the Mild 1602:Gog the Mild 1572: 1547: 1464:Gog the Mild 1217: 982: 917: 761: 737: 652: 622: 616: 612: 484: 441:Image review 398: 312: 309:No comments. 304: 294: 284: 274: 264: 254: 244: 239: 218: 208: 194: 184: 179: 151: 126: 99: 95: 54:Gog the Mild 49: 47: 35: 28: 1038:MOS:DUPLINK 1018:WP:duplinks 598:MOS:DUPLINK 1555:(he/himĀ ā€¢ 1537:(he/himĀ ā€¢ 1421:(he/himĀ ā€¢ 1370:(he/himĀ ā€¢ 1364:WP:MILHIST 1329:(he/himĀ ā€¢ 1275:(he/himĀ ā€¢ 1251:early 1258 1183:Specified. 991:Matarisvan 954:Matarisvan 935:Matarisvan 920:Matarisvan 823:Matarisvan 742:Matarisvan 720:Matarisvan 702:Matarisvan 688:Matarisvan 670:Matarisvan 655:Matarisvan 618:the plague 481:Matarisvan 462:Nikkimaria 448:Nikkimaria 299:Good idea. 279:Rephrased. 189:Done both. 146:Background 1648:WP:FAC/ar 1644:candidate 1598:epidemics 1553:Shushugah 1535:Shushugah 1460:Shushugah 1419:Shushugah 1368:Shushugah 1345:Shushugah 1327:Shushugah 1273:Shushugah 1262:Shushugah 573:Provided. 492:Adjusted. 403:Steelkamp 380:Steelkamp 362:Steelkamp 348:Steelkamp 330:Steelkamp 315:Steelkamp 259:Adjusted. 133:Steelkamp 102:sawyer777 1642:: This 1577:SchroCat 1222:FunkMonk 1197:FunkMonk 1129:instead. 1094:FunkMonk 1064:FunkMonk 1024:FunkMonk 853:#38: ok. 810:#18: ok. 613:a plague 555:vanguard 269:Defined. 50:promoted 1573:Support 1548:Support 1527:looting 1258:MOS:BCE 1243:MOS:BCE 1218:Support 1040:enough. 796:#4: ok. 738:support 399:support 305:Legacy 106:WikiCup 1531:invest 1508:Caliph 1386:sortie 1343:means 1048:Done. 289:Moved. 213:Added. 58:FACBot 1614:Done 1188:Link 1117:Done. 589:Done. 581:Done. 565:Done. 537:Done. 460:Done 170:Done. 156:Done. 16:< 1670:talk 1624:talk 1606:talk 1581:talk 1557:talk 1539:talk 1468:talk 1442:talk 1423:talk 1398:talk 1372:talk 1353:talk 1331:talk 1291:talk 1277:talk 1249:and 1226:talk 1205:talk 1098:talk 1072:talk 1054:talk 1028:talk 995:talk 987:here 983:pass 973:talk 958:talk 943:talk 924:talk 841:talk 827:talk 746:talk 724:talk 710:talk 692:talk 678:talk 659:talk 500:Done 469:talk 452:talk 421:talk 407:talk 388:talk 370:talk 352:talk 338:talk 319:talk 229:talk 137:talk 114:talk 86:talk 62:talk 56:via 1662:bot 1458:Hi 1062:Hi 378:Hi 52:by 1672:) 1658:}} 1652:{{ 1626:) 1618:. 1608:) 1583:) 1567:SC 1559:) 1541:) 1470:) 1444:) 1436:. 1425:) 1400:) 1374:) 1355:) 1333:) 1318:? 1293:) 1279:) 1264:. 1253:) 1228:) 1207:) 1100:) 1074:) 1056:) 1030:) 1011:FM 997:) 975:) 960:) 945:) 926:) 843:) 829:) 748:) 736:A 726:) 712:) 704:? 694:) 680:) 661:) 471:) 454:) 423:) 409:) 390:) 372:) 354:) 340:) 332:. 321:) 231:) 139:) 131:. 116:) 108:. 88:) 67:. 33:. 1668:( 1622:( 1604:( 1579:( 1521:, 1486:@ 1466:( 1440:( 1396:( 1351:( 1289:( 1224:( 1203:( 1096:( 1070:( 1052:( 1026:( 993:( 971:( 956:( 941:( 922:( 839:( 825:( 744:( 722:( 708:( 690:( 676:( 657:( 639:. 467:( 450:( 419:( 405:( 386:( 368:( 350:( 336:( 317:( 227:( 135:( 112:( 84:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
Gog the Mild
FACBot
talk

Siege of Baghdad
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk
15:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
sawyer777
WikiCup
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk
15:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
I've also got an article at FAC that needs reviews
Steelkamp
talk
02:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
done in a relaxed way, without hurrying
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk
11:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Steelkamp
talk
15:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Steelkamp
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘