1657:. Overall, it looked like you were saying that I'm a vandal, and from here I didn't really read much further. I guess that's my problem, however I wonder how many others have also gotten a might tetchy from your talk page messages? I understand where you are coming from, and yes, edit summaries are important. However, I hardly use them as they tend to slow me down, and pretty much every vandal fighter knows that I'm not a vandal. So, apologies for being horrible to you, but hopefully you can take this as constructive criticism and modify the heading as well as target newer editors, or ones without a reasonable reputation in future. After all, I'm hardly likely to try to destroy Knowledge! -
162:
83:
125:
97:
190:
111:
143:
69:
37:
1043:
going to be resurrected. Talk pages, especially user talk pages, are about communicating with other
Wikipedians. They are a method of communications, not a historical record of all communications that have happened on Knowledge. I find that having a clean user talk page is better for actually communicating, which is why I cleared my own talk page a few days ago. Once again, thank you for your comments.
430:
addition of ABC to the page as the televising network (the new AFL television contract was still under negotiation at the time you tagged the page and thus no network was listed) satisfies the criterion for notability as "published works". But in any case, it appears the tag has been removed by another user. Unless you object, I think we can consider that a resolution to our discussion.
1427:
a summary. But again, the essence of the suggestion is communication - something your form letter seemed to lack in terms of actual specifics about what I should have been commenting on. While vandal fighting is necessary, its not the point of summaries, and there are plenty of cases where a summary just isn't needed IMHO. Good luck, and if I may, Id like to suggest using
507:. The second one was still in my opinion blatant vandalism but I guess you could argue it to be in within the lines of the template you provided. I rarily revert information which is not indisputable vandalism (with the exceptions of RC patrol mistakes), I do however appreciate you signifying a template that might come in handy though. Regards,
1008:
look like a vandal" is provocative at best and inflammatory at worst, and isn't likely to encourage cooperation. If you want to continue your summary crusade, then it might not hurt to rephrase both your templates and edit summaries in such a way that they aren't worded as administrator warnings, which they are not.
1426:
While I usually like form mails, I have to take a minor issue with yours. The issue with summaries is communication of the work you are doing at a particular point. Its not always necessary, particularly in cases like today where I was mostly working on templates I had started myself. I usually leave
1406:
Of course I'm more than happy to personally assume good faith in the tone of the reminder, but since it seems to me that some users might consider the "spell-it-out" tone of the warning to be insulting, I might humbly submit that if you happen to know that a user is not new to
Knowledge, that you use
1214:
So who's the vandal here? The person editing appropriately, adding edit summaries except for routine minor edits, or the one who arrogantly adds unnecessary edit summary messages on usertalk pages without checking edit histories? Given the number of complaints about your behaviour, I should point you
836:
alone. Your edits to his talk page are misguided and harassing. Users are more than free to remove comments from their talk pages if they wish. The slight exception to that rule - that is, for warnings - only applies to actual warnings made for the information of other administrators. Since not using
546:
Hi Will! I signed on to
Knowledge in order to add something to a paragraph on "language games" for the benefit of the 4th graders that I work with. In attempting this, I've realized that even with Knowledge instructions, I am having trouble figuring out how it works. Are you available to walk someone
1376:
I think what you have is fine. I think there are few robots out there that even care to interpret more than just the easy ones, since there are so many email addresses out there hat aren't disguised in any way. Eventually enough email addresses will be disguised that (with more processing power) it
1252:
Why did you have to load the diffs for each separately? As to which page it was, I don't know either - I've checked back through my last 1000 mainspace edits and cannot find anything which matches that. And, as I said, looking through the non-minor edits, there are very few with no edit summaries at
1007:
Will, you really need to re-think your method, as it's counter-productive and borders on spam, especially when left for editors with large edit counts (most of which have edit summaries) or with existing talk threads on the topic - although you may not see it as such. Your own edit summary of "don't
983:
speaking that I was also kindly reminded of this by another editor. I do forget to do the edit summaries but everybody could tell that my edits are not vandalism and
Knowledge does have history of every page. As per what the Admin who wrote on your page the last time said, please do not re post the
804:
Will, please consider involving yourself in something which does not consist of me leaving messages and you leaving templates. Your templates are quite clearly spam based on the vast quantities you're spreading around and the fact that they don't, for the most part, apply to many of the users you're
1542:
In theory, I agree with you. Right now, there are over 200 items on the speedy delete page, and if I try to stop and compute which ones have been up for "a few hours", it'll take even longer to clear the backlog than it is already taking. Plus, the article plainly asserted that the subject was an
1123:
Thanks for a welcome over 2 years since I first contributed. Not sure from other comments you made to others that absence of an Edit
Summary in a User talk contributions is a good predict of a serious vandal. Got a source or reference for me. Seems from the above postings you get a lot of attention
1042:
Will, thanks for the comments left on my talk page. I'll try to fill in my edit summaries more often than I have been. About archiving my talk page, I don't see a point. Knowledge has a history of what was there, and old conversations that hadn't been posted to in a year or more probably weren't
1648:
too harsh, and I apologise. This is one reason I'd never ask to be on the ArbCom - I am far too firey, and I tend to shoot my mouth off. However, the reason I got het up was the heading: "Editors that don't provide an edit summary tend to look like vandals". This implies that I look like a vandal,
1507:
I would like to apologize for any trouble I have caused you and wikipedia, I will try and remember to add an edit summary to all future edits, I honestly just keep forgetting to do the edit summaries and for that, once more, I would like to say sorry, thank you for bringing this to my attention -
1402:
Thank you for your reminder to summarize my edits. It is possible that I forget to provide a summary when I make very trivial orthographic or aesthetic changes, but you can be certain that I am very aware of the helpfulness of summarizing and need no reminders on what the "edit summary" input box
1329:
if(location.href.indexOf('action=edit') != -1&&wgPageName == 'User_talk:Will_Pittenger') { addOnloadHook(function() { var image = document.createElement("img"); image.width = 23; image.height = 22; image.src = "http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/Button_verse.png";
663:
While having not received that lecture myself, I have read it on someone else's talk page and find its tone demeaning. Saying something like "Please use an edit summary so that we can understand the motivation behind an edit. In particular, I did not understand the motivation behind ." would be
406:
I am attempting to understand why you have questioned the notability of the ArenaBowl XXI article. Having read the criteria for notability, I am unsure what part of the guidelines the page does not fulfill. Please let me know what you think the page requires to become "notable" and I will address
1024:
Gee, I never thought it was mandatory to fill in the summary field; I do usually tend to fill it in, but there are times where I feel my edits speak for themselves enough so that I don't really need to fill in a summary about it... I'll keep it in mind, but don't expect me to be flawless in this
429:
It's the championship game of a fairly popular national professional sports league, isn't that notable enough? I would say the millions of fans that attend AFL games each year have deemed it "notable" more than adequately. However, as governed by
Knowledge's notability standards, I believe the
1674:
What I liked about your comment was that it presented the problem and a solution. I have my reasons for not using + - I don't like the heading layout - I generally use "edit this page". So I would have preferred that it said "one way of avoiding this is to use the "+" tab", i.e. was less
1695:
Incidentally, you may want to think about how your various messages will be recieved by different people. If you are planning to leave it at experienced editors pages, it should avoid coming across as patronising. Perhaps the phrase "As you may know" might be useful in there somewhere.
1246:
There was a page, not sure where, that you made 5 edits. None had edit summaries. I saw no evidence you used summaries at all. I had to load the diffs for each to ensure you weren't a vandal. That took time. Without the edit summaries, I assume the worse. With them, I tend to skip
1330:
image.border = 0; image.alt = 'archive'; image.title = 'archive'; image.style.cursor = "pointer"; image.onclick = function() { location.href = 'http://en.wikipedia.org/Archivemanage'; } document.getElementById('toolbar').appendChild(image); return true; }); }
1630:
If your bot, or anyone else's, reverts my perfectly decent edits, I will personally campaign for the blocking of the bot. I don't feel the urge to make a comment on every edit that I place on a talk page, and I have no intention of starting now. In fact, when I got
452:" to "paved area" was justified. However, the edit comment that I provided was somewhat substandard. My intent was NOT to change an American usage to a British one; it was to change an American usage to one which would be universal among English speakers.
1156:
Hey dude, thanks for telling me I look like a vandal. I really appreciate being compared to those people. I've always envied them, you know? They way they sneak around the bowels of the
Internet, seeking out items to destroy. They live the life, eh?
1351:
if(wgPageName == 'User_talk:Will_Pittenger') { addOnloadHook(function() { var nav = document.getElementById('p-navigation').getElementsByTagName('ul'); addlilink(nav, "http://en.wikipedia.org/Archivemanage", "archive", 'p-archive'); }); }
1756:. "Shut up" is not a personal attack and I did not insult him. It is a impassive expression meant to show my disinterest in his juvenile behavior. Read your own links and be more careful about accusing people of personal attacks next time. --
281:
Hello, My bot was accused of vandalism, because it removed an interwiki-link to a non-existing page on the
Indonesian wikipedia. The link is therefore, obviously, erroneous, so should be removed, either by a bot or a human. Please reply at
1210:
Check my contrib list and the proportion of times that I leave an edit summary. You can go over all 75,000 edits if you like, but the last few pages should be sufficient to see that - for major edits - it is in the high 90s percent.
300:
At the time I started using the bot a bot status was not necessary on this wikipedia. Apparently, as I look it up now, a bot status IS necessary, but I did not notice the change in the policy. I will request a bot flag soon. Thanks!
474:" refers to any and all areas that are paved, regardless of their use -- but Cletheroe is an Englishman and can therefore be excused if he doesn't exactly understand the American usage. I am relying on him for the British usage.)
1174:
Why did you leave that edit summary message on my talk page? What is wrong with just looking at the edit summaries to see what a user's previous edit was? By the way, what did I do to make you leave that message on my talk page?
837:
edit summaries is not a punishable offence on
Knowledge, there can be no 'warning' for it, and your stubborn reinsertion of such a notice onto his talk page constitutes more disruption than anything. Please stop. -
373:
What makes the page on Ronnie Maszk non-usable. I would really like to know because I worked on it for quite awhile. Please don't delete it until you let me know so I may fix it immediately, thank you.
1142:
I forgot to sign ONE talk page. Its not like I am habitual at it. Please leave me alone, your constant little reminders, are nothing more the sheer harassment. If it continues I will report it.
573:
article until I've been banned from editing this article. It seems, that even though WP is not a democracy, defamatory and libellous content is welcome as long as a majority supports its inclusion.
1037:
1225:
A user may be blocked when ... their conduct is inconsistent with a civil, collegial atmosphere and interferes with the process of editors working together harmoniously to create an encyclopedia.
653:
I am now making a more conscious effort to put something in the edit summary. One thing I do not intend to do, as some do, is to use an entire sentence to state that I fixed an apostrophe. :)
1517:
ok, so as long as I remember to include edit summaries in my edits, everything should be fine, right? (forgive me, I'm a little dyslexic and i try to avoid stepping on other people's toes) -
1160:
On a serious note, I don't use edit summaries, as they are unimportant. All they do is save people one click, and I'd rather view the history and observe what changes a user made anyway.
477:
When I referred to the "paved area", I was attempting to refer, briefly, to runways, taxiways, and automobile roadways (and I guess sidewalks also -- why not) in an unambiguous fashion.
1047:
1407:
a slightly less canned message. By no means would I saddle you with any sort of obligation or expectation, but it might help defuse some possible bad feelings on your talk page.
1300:. Most of them also have their status on their user pages. Which is always a good place to look before adding a warning on a user talk page. Sarcasm also doesn't sit well with
615:
Now i could be wrong, but warnings are for /warning/ a user to make sure they dont do something wrong again. This guy seems to be ignoring warnings and vandalize on purpose.
994:
I concur. He's done left the message on my talk page twice. There is no rule requiring ANYONE to fill in the edit summary. I do fill them in sometimes, when I want to.--
946:
FYI, this user has been temporarily blocked... s/he has been posting vandalism to their own talk page and attributing it to you in the hopes of getting you in trouble at
1392:
1368:
486:
1661:
1639:
1557:
I usually do that if I'm in a hurry or under stress, but point well taken I haven't been warned of vandalism in all my time here so no need to worry, Cheers! --
517:
551:
439:
924:
902:
634:
If you're going to post lectures on how to use edit summaries on every user talk page where they didn't put an edit summary, you're going to be one busy bee.
1590:
I am a user you have recently sent a message to concerning not leaving comments when i edited, this is something that i am trying to improve as i make edits.
1490:
1450:
940:
933:
770:
1728:
746:
541:
382:
352:
323:
1416:
561:
Hello Will, I very much appreciate your effort to keep
Knowledge free from libellous content. OTOH I don't think, that someone who states, that Islams
548:
431:
421:
408:
1253:
all. As for assuming the worst, you can usually assume that admins are not likely to be vandals, so remembering the names of a few of them may help!
1716:
1164:
675:
1531:
968:
657:
648:
1453:
1015:
1000:
665:
604:
1770:
Whoops. Sorry about that. Sometimes when I go into "quick edit mode" I forget. Thanks for the reminder! P.S: Rich is right above, but I know you
1397:
491:
1057:
Maybe, but it must have been a genuine mistake. I have been a regular Knowledge contributor for a year, so obviously I know to sign my comments.
1649:
yet the record shows otherwise: I have contributed to more than a number of featured articles, I am an admin, and I have done things that have
805:
suggesting should use summaries. If you would like to discuss this, and can find time between pasting sessions, please respond on my talk page
988:
853:
1101:
1090:
570:
1296:- a couple of quick scans of that list and you should at least have some idea of a few of the more trusted editors on WP. They're listed at
1029:
816:
689:
685:: Unfortunately, he left Knowledge last month so is not likely to respond to you. But I looked into your question and left you a reply. --
1598:
262:
1146:
735:
1521:
1512:
1151:
1128:
271:
1363:
1341:
1227:
Consider this a gentle warning: persistent over-the-top messages on people's talk pages may result in a temporary block from editing.
1742:
936:
879:
1561:
1439:
1079:
1070:
1061:
798:
290:
1199:
1189:
1179:
1316:
1280:
1239:
912:
890:
867:
717:
434:
424:
411:
1760:
1579:
1444:
703:
668:
638:
504:
1624:
979:
I have removed the comment about looking like a Vandal from my talk page. I feel that the comment was inapproriate as well as
781:
Will, I'm sorry, but you're pasting a subst template in a way that looks very much like spam. Look at your contributions, then
599:
1635:
to FA status, I hardly added any edit comments at all. As I say, tough luck. Or would you prefer I didn't write FA content? -
577:
536:
841:
1547:
916:
894:
871:
765:
195:
102:
315:
Please don't don't tell me that my article is nonesense, I agree that it is very silly and I don't mind If you delete it.
749:
305:
1479:
1066:
I don't always leave summaries. Sometimes it is a complete waste of time for a minute change. Thanks for the tip though.
1497:
1387:
682:
673:
390:
360:
331:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
217:
214:
624:
1467:
I have seen dropdowm menus occasionally, and even experimented with them a while. I could implement a whole system...
974:
1778:
148:
459:, who is a Brit who writes travel advice for people visiting the United States and Canada, the British usage of "
257:
1502:
1304:, BTW. Oh, and please let me know if you ever find that page I did five major edits on with no edit summaries.
251:
116:
1219:, and also point out that non-civil behaviour of this sort may lead to a block from editing - as explained at
587:
124:
1169:
1134:
1117:
776:
727:
I have removed the "features" blurb as it was unencyclopedic, and was obviously ripped off from the official
722:
130:
1543:
elementary school student -- there was no way the author was going to be able to make it notable. Thanks,
1109:
445:
276:
1606:
782:
731:
website as it promotes the features of the software rather than describing them. Therefore I removed it.
283:
110:
1566:
1321:
960:
515:
96:
1575:) was written by me, and if you check you'll see that I provided the requested references. Thank you.
1701:
1680:
708:
161:
596:
583:
You need references? Well, apart from the quote above, which is a primary source, CAIR states, that
142:
1733:
1421:
1205:
1052:
920:
898:
875:
761:
463:" is equivalent to our American word "sidewalk", i.e. it only applies to paved pedestrian paths.
204:
88:
17:
598:
and the International Herald Tribune states, that she has repeatedly ridiculed Islam and Muslims.
950:. Luckily such shenanigans are easily seen through. Sorry for the trouble s/he has caused you. --
825:
36:
1410:
All that aside, cheers, and thanks for your conscientiousness in patrolling possible vandalism.
470:" refers to the roadway instead of the sidewalk, which of course is not correct -- in America, "
456:
1558:
1383:
629:
585:"Coulter has made a number of similarly anti-Muslim comments since the 9/11 terrorist attacks."
386:
356:
327:
1747:
1475:
1359:
1337:
859:
620:
556:
532:
508:
398:
43:
1124:
on this issue. Oh well off to do my own patrolling and occasional lapses in good wiki style
569:. I tried myself to remove defamatory and libellous content (such as the cartoons) from the
499:
Thank you for recommending that template however I must differ with you in the cases of the
1698:
1677:
1658:
1636:
1621:
1594:
1436:
1097:
503:
vandals. The very first one was obvious vandalism in my opinion if you take a look at the
378:
348:
319:
984:
commment, it will just be deleted again and will be considered vandalism. Have a nice day
8:
756:
713:
When tagging pages for cleanup/wikify, just use "Month Year". The day is not needed. ---
700:
74:
68:
1493:; I made one revision on an article but I forgot to sign in as myself. Thanks anyway!
1310:
1274:
1233:
851:
601:
574:
522:
295:
82:
189:
1739:
1572:
1552:
1378:
1259:
1143:
985:
694:
259:
1721:
Hi Will, how can I make or get the tags for some of those boxes on your user page?
1537:
1471:
1449:
Duly noted, when I look at my edit history, I admit it kind of looks suspicious. --
1355:
1333:
1105:
1044:
732:
616:
528:
483:
1757:
1615:
1602:
1544:
1484:
1432:
1301:
1220:
1216:
1161:
1076:
1067:
1058:
1012:
998:
826:
813:
795:
1528:
1518:
1509:
1287:
You can tell admins apart from non-admins by the user name? I didn't know that.
1125:
957:
686:
654:
645:
635:
500:
547:
like me through the process? Thanks for getting back to me when you are able.
1771:
1765:
1428:
1305:
1269:
1228:
1093:, will now use the edit summary box from now on. Thank you for reminding me.
947:
848:
493:
417:
268:
368:
1753:
1725:
1654:
1494:
1458:
1412:
1297:
740:
714:
563:"tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad'"
157:
1775:
302:
287:
864:
Dont keep deletingmy comments. That's bad. All did was ask a question
1706:
1685:
1576:
1026:
1009:
995:
833:
810:
792:
728:
610:
593:
1196:
1186:
1176:
980:
952:
838:
1464:
I could possibly make some userboxes, maybe i will when i have time.
1431:
to preview edits from the RC or wherever. Its quite the timesaver. -
595:, the Muslim Civil Rights Center considers her remarks islamophobic
1377:
will be worthwhile to try to figure out the straightforward ones.
1185:
Why don't you ask someone with a fast computer to patrol for you? (
471:
467:
460:
449:
1527:
Ok, thanks and I will try to conform to the rules of wikipedia -
1038:
Your comments regarding edit summaries and archiving my talk page
167:
589:, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee accuse her of
28:
209:
Please do not edit here. Add new stuff to my normal talk page
1195:
You seem to have plenty of complaints about your behaviour. (
1084:
1709:
1688:
1632:
664:
much better and would avoid the lecturing tone. Thoughts?
310:
1669:
567:"expressed sentiments opposed to the religion of Islam"
527:
welcome links should now appear on history pages too.
1075:
I have never had a problem of that sort with any bot.
644:
I add edit summaries when necessary and appropriate.
1292:
No, you can't - but you can do what I suggested and
466:(Cletheroe goes on to say that in America the word "
339:
1369:Are my e-mail addresses tough for parsers to read?
1326:You would add the following to your monobook:
440:British, American, and universal English usage
932:Nah I wont sign. STOP DELETING MY COMMENTS!
571:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
444:Good morning Will. I still think my edit to
344:yeah sorry about that i will login next time
267:Hey Will. Thanks for the intro to Knowledge.
136:
1752:Honestly, you've insulted me much more than
791:. Following this, please stop bothering me.
745:Will rules all Wikipedians. God bless you.
542:Thanks for the welcome (and offer of help!)
1373:(Response from your post on my talk page)
1347:Ah... I see. You would use this code then:
565:could feel offened by stating that he/she
1717:those neat little boxes on your user page
887:Not me, don't tell me what to do please.
683:the message you left for Omnicronpersei8
33:
14:
1268:Indeed it is. Guideline, not policy.
809:re-applying the templates. Thank you.
591:"promoting hatred and discrimination"
455:I am an American, but according to
23:
1152:Thanks (This message is sarcastic)
24:
1789:
492:RE: Please require users to read
785:, and note that 80% of my edits
256:Thank you. I came to post this
188:
160:
141:
123:
109:
95:
81:
67:
35:
25:
909:Not going to anser me are you?
1620:Yeah, well, I'm not. Tough. -
131:Templates I created for my use
13:
1:
1738:Fair point, will try harder.
1445:Re: Don't look like a vandal
1398:Re: "Summarize posts" message
306:10:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
291:10:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
272:04:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
263:08:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
1779:22:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1761:21:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1743:18:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1729:17:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1662:12:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1640:10:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1625:10:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1580:06:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
1562:05:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
1548:04:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
1532:02:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
1522:01:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
1513:01:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
1498:23:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
1480:07:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
1454:16:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
1440:09:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
1417:09:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
1393:17:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
1364:05:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
1342:16:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
1317:01:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
1281:01:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
1240:01:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
1200:20:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1190:20:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1180:19:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1165:07:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1147:05:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1129:01:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1080:02:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1071:21:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
1062:21:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
1048:07:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
1030:22:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
1016:18:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
1001:17:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
989:17:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
969:08:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
937:08:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
925:07:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
903:07:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
880:07:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
854:15:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
842:06:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
817:06:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
799:06:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
669:06:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
446:Denver International Airport
202:
186:
153:
139:
121:
107:
93:
79:
65:
57:
49:
7:
771:03:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
750:23:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
736:08:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
718:14:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
704:10:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
690:06:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
658:09:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
649:01:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
639:00:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
625:00:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
605:02:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
578:17:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
552:06:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
537:23:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
518:22:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
487:18:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
480:May I reinstate this edit?
435:22:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
425:08:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
412:22:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
284:nl:Overleg gebruiker:Thijs!
184:
61:Monday, September 23, 2024
10:
1794:
1294:remember the name of a few
407:your concerns. Thank you.
1653:vandalism, like start up
1571:The article in question (
975:Vandal and Edit Summaries
135:
1258:I should also note that
117:User boxes created by me
18:User talk:Will Pittenger
1503:Message from RVDDP2501
699:Thanks for your advice
416:The page is not gone.
252:Thanks for the welcome
1170:What is your problem?
1135:Please leave me alone
1118:Check before you leap
915:comment was added by
893:comment was added by
870:comment was added by
777:your pasted templates
755:I don't rule anyone.
723:The Sims Life Stories
277:Vandalism accusation
1491:User:71.126.194.105
1567:Re: Edit summaries
1322:re:toolbox buttons
955:
511:¤~Persian Poet Gal
1611:
1597:comment added by
1573:Yevhen Kushnaryov
1559:Dark Dragon Flame
1391:
1313:
1277:
1260:Help:Edit summary
1236:
1114:
1100:comment added by
953:
928:
906:
883:
769:
709:Cleanup templates
395:
381:comment added by
369:Ronnie Maszk page
365:
351:comment added by
336:
322:comment added by
246:
245:
242:
241:
177:
176:
173:
172:
149:Send me an e-mail
1785:
1610:
1591:
1381:
1311:
1275:
1234:
1113:
1094:
1053:Re: Not confused
967:
939:changed my mind
910:
888:
865:
759:
394:
375:
364:
345:
335:
316:
213:Archive Pages:
210:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
146:
145:
137:
128:
127:
114:
113:
103:My Contributions
100:
99:
86:
85:
72:
71:
40:
39:
26:
1793:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1768:
1750:
1736:
1719:
1672:
1659:Ta bu shi da yu
1637:Ta bu shi da yu
1622:Ta bu shi da yu
1618:
1592:
1569:
1555:
1540:
1505:
1487:
1461:
1447:
1424:
1400:
1371:
1353:
1331:
1324:
1208:
1172:
1154:
1137:
1120:
1095:
1087:
1055:
1040:
977:
965:
951:
911:—The preceding
889:—The preceding
866:—The preceding
862:
830:
827:User talk:Ericg
779:
743:
725:
711:
697:
679:
676:Template:Tlurow
632:
613:
559:
544:
525:
497:
442:
401:
376:
371:
346:
342:
317:
313:
298:
279:
254:
208:
166:
165:
159:
140:
122:
108:
94:
80:
66:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1791:
1767:
1764:
1749:
1746:
1735:
1734:Edit summaries
1732:
1718:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1675:prescriptive.
1671:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1587:
1586:
1568:
1565:
1554:
1551:
1539:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1504:
1501:
1486:
1483:
1469:
1468:
1465:
1460:
1457:
1451:72.138.222.109
1446:
1443:
1423:
1422:Edit summaries
1420:
1399:
1396:
1370:
1367:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1328:
1323:
1320:
1290:
1289:
1266:
1265:
1262:is a guideline
1250:
1249:
1207:
1206:Edit summaries
1204:
1171:
1168:
1153:
1150:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1119:
1116:
1086:
1083:
1054:
1051:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1019:
1018:
1004:
1003:
976:
973:
972:
971:
961:
941:74.140.190.187
934:74.140.190.187
930:
929:
917:74.140.190.187
907:
895:74.140.190.187
872:74.140.190.187
861:
858:
857:
856:
829:
824:
822:
820:
819:
788:have summaries
778:
775:
774:
773:
742:
739:
724:
721:
710:
707:
701:Belbo Casaubon
696:
693:
678:
672:
661:
660:
651:
631:
630:Edit summaries
628:
612:
609:
608:
607:
558:
555:
543:
540:
524:
521:
496:
490:
457:John Cletheroe
441:
438:
420:is your link.
400:
397:
370:
367:
341:
338:
312:
309:
297:
294:
278:
275:
253:
250:
248:
244:
243:
240:
239:
211:
207:
205:Main Talk Page
201:
200:
182:
175:
174:
171:
170:
156:
155:
154:
152:
134:
120:
106:
92:
78:
63:
62:
55:
54:
48:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1790:
1781:
1780:
1777:
1773:
1763:
1762:
1759:
1755:
1748:You annoy me.
1745:
1744:
1741:
1731:
1730:
1727:
1722:
1711:
1708:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1683:
1682:
1679:
1663:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1647:
1644:OK, this was
1643:
1642:
1641:
1638:
1634:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1623:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1589:
1588:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1578:
1574:
1564:
1563:
1560:
1550:
1549:
1546:
1533:
1530:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1520:
1515:
1514:
1511:
1500:
1499:
1496:
1492:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1466:
1463:
1462:
1456:
1455:
1452:
1442:
1441:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1414:
1408:
1404:
1403:looks like.
1395:
1394:
1389:
1385:
1380:
1374:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1327:
1319:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1288:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1278:
1271:
1263:
1261:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1212:
1203:
1201:
1198:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1158:
1149:
1148:
1145:
1140:
1130:
1127:
1122:
1121:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1092:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1031:
1028:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1006:
1005:
1002:
999:
997:
993:
992:
991:
990:
987:
982:
970:
966:
964:
958:
956:
949:
945:
944:
943:
942:
938:
935:
926:
922:
918:
914:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
886:
885:
884:
881:
877:
873:
869:
860:Not an attack
855:
852:
850:
846:
845:
844:
843:
840:
835:
832:Please leave
828:
823:
818:
815:
812:
808:
803:
802:
801:
800:
797:
794:
790:
789:
784:
772:
767:
763:
758:
754:
753:
752:
751:
748:
738:
737:
734:
730:
720:
719:
716:
706:
705:
702:
692:
691:
688:
684:
677:
671:
670:
667:
659:
656:
652:
650:
647:
643:
642:
641:
640:
637:
627:
626:
622:
618:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
592:
588:
586:
582:
581:
580:
579:
576:
572:
568:
564:
557:block warning
554:
553:
550:
539:
538:
534:
530:
520:
519:
516:
514:
513:
512:
506:
502:
501:Bill O'Reilly
495:
489:
488:
485:
481:
478:
475:
473:
469:
464:
462:
458:
453:
451:
447:
437:
436:
433:
427:
426:
423:
419:
418:ArenaBowl XXI
414:
413:
410:
404:
399:ArenaBowl XXI
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
308:
307:
304:
293:
292:
289:
285:
274:
273:
270:
265:
264:
261:
258:
249:
238:
237:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
206:
203:
199:
198:
197:
191:
187:
183:
181:
180:
169:
163:
158:
151:
150:
144:
138:
133:
132:
126:
119:
118:
112:
105:
104:
98:
91:
90:
84:
77:
76:
70:
64:
60:
56:
52:
47:
45:
38:
31:
27:
19:
1769:
1754:User:Saikano
1751:
1740:Belovedfreak
1737:
1723:
1720:
1697:
1676:
1673:
1650:
1645:
1619:
1570:
1556:
1541:
1516:
1506:
1488:
1470:
1448:
1425:
1411:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1379:CRGreathouse
1375:
1372:
1354:
1332:
1325:
1309:
1293:
1291:
1286:
1273:
1267:
1257:
1251:
1245:
1232:
1224:
1215:straight to
1213:
1209:
1194:
1184:
1173:
1159:
1155:
1144:Mystify85JEC
1141:
1138:
1088:
1074:
1065:
1056:
1041:
986:Mystify85JEC
978:
962:
931:
863:
831:
821:
806:
787:
786:
783:look at mine
780:
747:71.62.10.130
744:
726:
712:
698:
680:
662:
633:
614:
590:
584:
566:
562:
560:
545:
526:
510:
509:
498:
482:
479:
476:
465:
454:
443:
428:
415:
405:
402:
383:Ronnie_davis
372:
353:71.62.10.130
343:
324:Bailey Cooke
314:
299:
280:
266:
260:Dakshaaayani
255:
247:
220:
212:
194:
193:
147:
129:
115:
101:
89:My talk page
87:
75:My User Page
73:
58:
50:
41:
29:
1707:22 January
1686:22 January
1593:—Preceding
1489:Will, I am
1472:GeorgeMoney
1356:GeorgeMoney
1334:GeorgeMoney
1096:—Preceding
733:Sillygostly
674:Re: Bug in
617:GeorgeMoney
549:Alphadalpha
529:GeorgeMoney
432:Dhmachine31
422:Dhmachine31
409:Dhmachine31
377:—Preceding
347:—Preceding
318:—Preceding
168:My Homepage
1772:meant well
1758:SeizureDog
1702:Farmbrough
1681:Farmbrough
1585:Hello Will
1545:NawlinWiki
1162:VitaleBaby
1077:UberCryxic
1068:UberCryxic
1059:UberCryxic
847:Agreed. —
729:The Sims 2
523:re:welcome
448:changing "
296:Bot status
1651:decreased
1553:Summaries
1529:RVDDP2501
1519:RVDDP2501
1510:RVDDP2501
1126:ChaseKiwi
1085:All right
981:redundant
695:Thank You
687:Gogo Dodo
666:VivekVish
655:Wahkeenah
646:Wahkeenah
636:Wahkeenah
1705:, 12:31
1684:, 12:21
1607:contribs
1595:unsigned
1538:Speedies
1306:Grutness
1302:WP:CIVIL
1270:Grutness
1229:Grutness
1221:WP:BLOCK
1217:WP:CIVIL
1110:contribs
1098:unsigned
1025:regard.
913:unsigned
891:unsigned
868:unsigned
849:ceejayoz
766:contribs
602:Raphael1
575:Raphael1
472:pavement
468:pavement
461:pavement
450:pavement
391:contribs
379:unsigned
361:contribs
349:unsigned
332:contribs
320:unsigned
311:Nonsense
269:Acid0057
196:Archives
30:My Pages
1726:Tintina
1724:Thanks
1691:(GMT).
1670:Wording
1616:Vandals
1577:Cossack
1495:Dkostic
1485:Thanks!
1437:vertigo
1429:WP:POPs
1413:Alekjds
807:without
715:RockMFR
403:Hello,
1776:Just H
1712:(GMT).
1247:edits.
1139:Will,
1102:Zazzer
1091:Zazzer
948:WP:ANI
681:About
494:WP:BLP
303:Thijs!
288:Thijs!
53:20:21
1766:Subst
1655:WP:AN
1599:Ifcp1
1298:WP:LA
1045:Grant
1027:H Hog
1010:ericg
996:Kross
834:Ericg
811:ericg
793:ericg
340:Sorry
59:Date:
51:Time:
16:<
1710:2007
1699:Rich
1689:2007
1678:Rich
1633:MDAC
1603:talk
1476:talk
1360:talk
1338:talk
1312:wha?
1276:wha?
1235:wha?
1197:Iuio
1187:Iuio
1177:Iuio
1106:talk
954:Kinu
921:talk
899:talk
876:talk
839:Mark
762:Talk
757:Will
741:Will
621:talk
533:talk
505:diff
484:Paul
387:talk
357:talk
328:talk
1646:way
1433:Ste
1308:...
1272:...
1231:...
1089:I,
286:.
44:CST
1609:)
1605:•
1478:)
1459:re
1386:|
1362:)
1340:)
1223::
1202:)
1192:)
1182:)
1112:)
1108:•
923:)
901:)
878:)
764:-
623:)
611:re
535:)
393:)
389:•
363:)
359:•
334:)
330:•
46:)
1774:.
1601:(
1474:(
1435:|
1390:)
1388:c
1384:t
1382:(
1358:(
1336:(
1264:.
1175:(
1104:(
1013:✈
963:c
959:/
927:.
919:(
905:.
897:(
882:.
874:(
814:✈
796:✈
768:)
760:(
619:(
531:(
385:(
355:(
326:(
236:8
233:7
230:6
227:5
224:4
221:3
218:2
215:1
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
