5427:
I was unaware of anything more than a possible connection to the Iolani Palace from a relative I only met twice and never had a personal relationship with. I found a name of someone who was supposed to be a 3xgreat grandfather. Their history and position within the
Hawaiian Royal Family found in the a few sources I found, as well as pointed out by another Wikipedian led to very interesting research on very notable portions of encyclopedic value. I decided to seriously begin researching my own genealogy and share what I was able on Knowledge, since this involved very notable situations of historic context that there seemed no reason not to share on Knowledge, as I do not write about anyone I have ever had a real personal relationship with. Bias is a matter that everyone has to deal with when writing about things of interest, not just things of a personal nature. I welcome input from others. I always have and always will, but discussing me is a personal attack if not directly related to improving project or article and if only used as retaliation to my bringing attention to real TOS and copyright violations. The file,
714:
than amusement as the results are largely laughable and indecipherable. The next largest obstacle is the lack of knowledge about computing and word processing, it took me @ 40 mins to figure out how to respond to you. I've tried substantial editing when I saw a jazz-pop fusion bands discography hadn't been updated in 6 yrs. I came close after spending considerable time atempting to add an album but never suceeded and decided to leave the cyber-witchery to the Harry
Potters of the internet, believe me you don't want this bull in your chinashop. The last significant problem is the band itself. Recently formed from 2 failed groups, there aren't many usefull citations to add. I'm not even sure what is notable so that brings me to the last problem of having to spend time learning about Knowledge itself. Reading about proper procedures for hours doesn't sound appealing and with that my apologies. The band itself is doing well, they matured somewhat and lost the "Avril Lavigne with rabies" sound but as a result have gained a larger audience so I have no doubt if the page is deleted it'll be recreated. Sincerly yours, --
5463:
to represent on
Knowledge and one editor that appears to also have added sources they have a conflict with. I have also tried to fix what I perceived as some small COI with opposition editors, when I discovered that an image on the TMT article had been hidden with wiki markup, only after I unhid it and discovered the editor had disclosed a personal relationship to the subject of the image who is involved in a lawsuit with the TMT company. That is the editor I pinged to the Mauna Kea article and why I felt inclined to disclose my FB account on Knowledge after I felt it was a DOXing attempt by Kanoa. I believed it best to be transparent that when I used the Knowledge e-mail function to notify the editor that they were pinged, the response to me demonstrated that I had them on my contact list on Facebook. I have many people as contacts from Hawaii because of our shared interest in the islands, the TMT protests, and many other subjects. But I live in Northern California and am unemployed and spend most of my time editing Knowledge.--
5643:
guideline is a behavioral guideline and if followed correctly should mean an editor with a "financial" or direct personal relationship should not be editing the article. "Should not". Not "Cannot". If editors agree to disclose their COI then that is the first step in collaborative editing. I fully understand that. Just as I feel it is inappropriate to remove that disclosure just before editing articles one has a COI to and accusing another editor of editing with a POV and bias on those articles. I am going to disagree with you on the point that, if one is paid by the company that is the subject of the article and has removed the disclosure before adding that source, it is a conflict of interest. Also, if they helped develop that source or write it...it is a direct conflict of interest. We are not allowed to ad our own sources that we have written or helped write, into articles we have a financial connection to or not. Anyway, thanks for your responses and hope you have a good summer (well...if its summer where you are).--
1218:
automated script which overwrote the human input information. It is never constructive, and if persistent I would consider it disruptive, to overwrite human editor input without checking with an automated process. In most cases the human editor has taken the article title from reading the page. The script takes the title from the html headers, which may, or may not be saying something useful and in most cases is certainly saying something less specific. The most glaring error is the first ref that was changed, which, if you actually look at the page, has clearly gone dead and now contains completely different material. Overwriting the title of the deadlink page pretty much ensures that there is no hope of anyone ever recovering the ref from an archive in the future.
5506:
think it was relevant and had not read the policy since I signed up. As soon an Mark Miller pointed it out and I read the current policy I added the disclosure back to my user page and added one to the talk page for CFHT. I won't edit the CFHT article directly in the future. I think I was too aggressive with my first edits to the Mauna Kea article and the Mauna Kea
Observatories article. I have not made any edits since then while we discuss on the talk pages. I'm not sure why Mark Miller has fixated on my pic. When I uploaded a photo of myself nine years ago I believe it complied with the copyright requirements of the time but those have since changed. Lastly, I don't know what Mark is talking about regarding the PDF.
6503:: Are you saying that administrators have no responsibility to act in a respectful, civil manner outside of their administrator duties? Regardless of whether they're acting as an administrator remains independent of their expected conduct. Also, I never said that Spinningspark's comment was not substantive, as mentioned above. The concern is the failure to recognize that the revert was made as a good-faith anti-vandal edit and, with that, the tone in which the administrator decided to use. Although this instance may not be directly related to the exact case at hand, it still exemplifies the administrator's tone towards other editors. I'm not sure how this would classify as a "low blow." --
4679:"...researching each journal...", exactly, even if I had put the refs in myself I would not remember exactly which one said what. I would have to reread each source, just as you said you would have to, and I expect Chetvorno would have to too. So no, I am not prepared to expend that effort because, in the end, it will make no difference to the substance of the article. What I would be prepared to do is to cite bundle the references to improve the visual appearance of the article, a technique I think I have already noted that I have used before, provided that Chetvorno is happy with using that citation style (and let me say once again, citation style is
5097:
poorly determined orbit." I think the problem is that the sentence does not clearly indicate what the MOID values are more practical FOR. It says explicitly that they are more practical for small objects, but this sounds paradoxical because it makes it sound like it is easier to obtain MOID values for small objects than for large objects. (That is what threw me.) But the real thrust of the sentence is supposed to be that MOID values are more practical for ASCERTAINING COLLISION POTENTIAL for small objects than for large objects, since predictions for large objects can generally rely on a larger data set than is needed to ascertain MOID values.
1819:, either in whole or in part. They are generally about the Scottish referendum and the affect that is having on other indepedence dreams. Getting into the news, in any case, does not amount to a "credible claim to importance". The claim that it is the largest organisation campaigning for Cascadia is pretty meaningless. I could start an organisation today campaigning for cabbage and peanut butter sandwiches. In all probability it would be the largest such organisation, but hardly important. I am not inclined to restore it on that basis as in my opinion it stands little chance of surviving a full deletion debate.
6846:
a non-explanatory "Disruptive editing" in the block log. Then you blew off EdJohnston, above on this page, when he asked you to explain what the block was for. Because of this series of actions, it seems to me you ought to either hand in your tools (with or without a re-RFA, as you prefer) or expect to be taken to RFAR for arbcom review. If you'd rather, I suppose a third alternative might be that you complement your less than satisfactory logged unblock rationale with an apology to jps, logged in the usual way (i.e., a one-second block with a note of apology for the improper one-week block).
2936:"In my opinion, material on well known subjects that can be found in college level textbooks does not really need inline cites. (snip) SpinningSpark 17:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)" I agree with this. I think I have only removed one "citation needed", though I might have thought about it more. The one I removed was obvious to anyone who cared, and for those who it wasn't obvious, they wouldn't care. Well, there might be some things that could be usefully cited, even from college (especially upper level) college textbooks. But some are just too well known. Thanks!
312:
Please restore their page. They aren't your neighbors kids garage band, this band was formed less than a year ago, but all members have been active on the music scene for at least 5+ yrs., have a loyal following internationally, put out multiple albums, done concerts, professionally produced videos featured on-air tv shows, commercials and other endorsements, music shows, and documentaries. I can send links if you'd like but it'd be time comsuming as I don't speak Korean (can read the alphabet but don't understand it, same with cyrillic). Sincerely yours (
2597:
2762:
find any paper that directly confirmed what the previous editor(s) had written. I doubt
Knowledge has reverted back to the early days when citations/references were not asked for or "citation needed" not added? In fact, on other topics editors will just remove un-referenced additions. I'm not a fan of that either and feel "citation needed" is a compromise that at least lets readers know to do more research before accepting the statement as correct. Look forward to your reply on this. Policy over opinion greatly preferred. :-)
999:
3196:
3040:"Does not do any harm" is not one of the reasons given for including a link at WP:EL as far as I recall, nor is the "only site devoted to a subject". It's a bit rich calling my post on your page "offensive" (in fact it is studiously polite) when you then go and refer to me as "wiki-police" and accuse me of having an "accusatory tone". The only thing I have "accused" you of is posting the same thing twice without an adequate rationale. There still isn't one, at least not in terms covered at WP:EL.
6450:
7158:
5571:. I have a few questions in regard to COI and paid advocacy editing. First, can such TOS violations be stale if they were caught in a timely manner, brought up to the editor involved and then other violations such adding sources from the company they work for, discovered? Would not adding such sources that you are directly involved with financially be evidence of advocacy editing? If you look at the editor's history over the last six months, is there sufficient reason to cause concern?--
31:
198:
category of notable self-published sources - okay to use in an article, but probably not enough to confer notability to a topic. I'm not necessarily requesting that the article be restored - just wanted to see what you thought. It might be worth having a formal deletion nomination, since there are at least a few sources, however weak they may be. But if you don't feel that the four that I've found make much of a case for keeping the article, then maybe we should just leave as is. --
2008:
accept that this is not spam. It is a non-commercial, education site and we are naturally much more open to such sites, but that does not stop the behaviour from being spam. I would also require a clear statement of whether or not
Krelcoyne and NilubonT are the same person. Although I AGF'd this in the first instance, there is a worrying lack of time overlap between the two accounts. Now that they are both blocked we should clear that up before unblocking either one of them.
4436:
7096:
haven't already. So far as I know, at least theoretically, everyone with overlong statements will or maybe should be told to cut them back. The third bullet point in the box below the "request for arbitration" page says "Without exception, statements (including responses to other statements) must be shorter than 500 words" with a link to the word count tool I used following. Believe it or not, I wasn't intending the comment to be one which would be seen as hostile.
3567:
6966:
5773:
5689:
4849:
4802:
4200:
3855:
2491:
1586:
2957:
2221:
906:
734:
5375:] Kanoa made that is directly related to me is his edits to an article I created where he began deleting sourced content. I note that these edits were made on the very same day Kanoa deleted their employment and financial connection disclosure, making all of the following edits concerning and possible TOS violations. In the edit summary, it states that he removed the claim because it was not what the judge ordered however, the
5432:
procedure however, Kanoa reacted to it with accusations of harassment. He only made a request for its deletion as an orphan after my nomination for it to be deleted as a copyright violation and giving him a chance to provide permissions should he choose to keep the image he uploaded and used for several years before deleting at the same time as deleting his employment disclosure, that I do admit to seeing as a bad faith edit.
6087:. This kind of use of parentheses is to be avoided, and in this case is entirely unnecessary. The title term is still bolded, it is just in its plural form. That is perfectly ok. If it was necessary to emphasise that both plural and singular are possible, stating it in full like "element or elements" would be preferable. However, it is not necessary, and the grammar of the entire sentence is cast in the plural.
5735:
4913:"This is not the smallest Earth MOID in the catalogues; many bodies with a small Earth MOID are not classed as PHO's because the objects are less than roughly 140 meters in diameter (or absolute magnitude, H < 22). Earth MOID values are generally more practical for asteroids less than 140 meters in diameter as those asteroids are very dim and often have a small observation arc with a poorly determined orbit."
3292:). The book is listed on Amazon.com, and is a textbook on radio antennas. It's 892 pages long and written by an Ohio State University professor. Although I don't own the book, I referred to it a fair amount over the course of several years. Nowhere in it does the author use the word "antennas" to refer to a plurality of radio antennas. Most obviously, the title of the book is "Antennas", not "Antennae".
4141:
1543:
6867:
2727:
4549:
4090:
3804:
2440:
2073:. One user seems to be taking the 'none shall pass' attitude. Passages contributed by others are reverted. Attempts to tag the article as unbalanced are reverted. The NPOV board seemed to concur that the article is unbalanced. The obstructing editor requested a 3rd opinion which found the article had balance issues. Despite this, the user has continued to obstruct others who would add balance.
1332:
6434:"The Zener diode's operation depends on the heavy doping of its p-n junction." Although your point about scaring away new editors is valid, your tone when referring to the actions of your fellow colleagues is absolute nonsense. Rather than pointlessly arguing over one diff, if you feel a high affinity towards the edit, feel free to welcome the editor and make changes to their edits yourself. --
3525:
6360:. Although you have been an administrator for some time, and your hard work is widely appreciated by the community, I am sure, your tone was absolutely inappropriate. Although "administrators are not expected to be perfect," this is surely a mark of brash commenting. I just thought I would inform you how your comment is potentially perceived by others, as well, on the wiki. --
6478:'s comments were made in good faith as well. Spinningspark was absolutely correct. If you actually reviewed the edit, you would have realized that there was little reason to revert, and even less reason to leave a templated warning. That you want to use this exchange in the ArbCom case Spinningspark is involved in is a low blow, and as unjustified as that templated warning.
1637:
Journal, National Public Radio, Occupy Wall Street, Over the Edge, Pigsquash, PolicyMic, Portland
Mercury, Post Defiance, Seattle Globalist, Seattle Times, Slate, Somewhere In Colorado, Swiss Public Broadcasting, USA Today, Vice, Washington Post. I don't have time to format reference properly, but I have included links at the bottom of this message to each of those.
5115:"useful" conveys more of the sense that MOID values are especially helpful when working with small objects (since for larger objects better data than are needed to ascertain MOID values are available for determining collision potential). Then, second, the explanation of why they are more useful needs to be further fleshed out (in line with what I have written here).
1945:
from the user's edit history that they are not updating old links as claimed but inserting completely new ones, all to the same site. The very definition of spam. The user is a single purpose account for the sole purpose of inserting external links, failed to stop when challenged, and failed to communicate with an explanation either before or after being blocked.
122:
new force in Irish contemporary music. In addition, all the the 6 ensemble members have significant reviews, articles written on them in addition to having been invited to perform at important international festivals and venues. The ensemble has featured in a "Salon Series" a profile of significant Irish composers hosted by CMC (Contemporary Music Centre) Dublin -
4315:. In any case, I think you will find that, mostly, the sources can be viewed online, at least the relevant snippets. Let me know if there are any specific sources you need and we will try and get you a copy. You will need to e-mail me (or Chetvorno) first so I get your e-mail address, attachments cannot be sent through the Knowledge e-mail system.
6614:
that doesn't result in article that clearly establishes notability, I see no objection to start another AfD." There is also no "we" discussing this at FTN, there is only the thread you have just opened in an attempt at forum shopping. The correct way forward is to open a new AfD, as the closer indicated. You can do that when your block expires.
369:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,
2170:. I opened the discussion in September, and declared in OCTOBER that I was going to make this change as a result of the discussion. There has been plenty of opportunity to respond to that if anyone cared that much. For the moment it needs to be left in agreement with WP:AFD/AI until such time as there is agreement to change both pages.
5340:
involving the protests that is sourced content and seems to show a conflict in their editing with a clear bias by removing content. That is when I looked at the editors editing history and discovered that they made edits to the Canada–France–Hawaii
Telescope and then a few months later removed the former disclosure on their talk page.
2829:
actually says, no attempt to provide a citation themselves, no explanation of a perceived problem (other than the lack of a little blue number). This is not constructive for two reasons. Firstly, it is unfair on the experts here who have to service these requests. They are volunteers too, not the servants of the taggers.
5622:
no reason to believe that there will be any repetition. COI editing, although frowned on, is not outright forbidden by the guidelines. Using a source from one's own organisation does not, in itself, amount to advocacy editing (admittedly though, that is frequently what is happening). It depends what the source was used
3958:
their settings. We should give priority to the experience of our readers. The semantic meaningfulness of the code comes a very poor second. You may be right that the standard settings should be changed, but it is silly to format our articles to some conception of what the settings should be if it makes a mess of the
6518:
at someone who chided you. Bringing that up at ArbCom where no one can feel comfortable, yes, I think that's a low blow. That doesn't mean, by the way, that I agree with
Spinningspark's use of "stupidity", but I think you misunderestimate how often we run into such hasty reverts and vandalism warnings. Thank you,
5286:, or were paid at the time you edited that article, then under the Wikimedia Terms of Use for paid editors you must declare that fact either on the article talk page or your own user page. The only behavioural issue that I am seeing that would warrant administrator action is some of the uncivil posts to you from
2289:
the appropriate location within an infobox, if applicable." The article faithfully complies with that guideline. I have not found a rule against a link to the external link section via an anchor in this guideline, nor in the style guide on internal links. If there is such a guideline to it please point me to it.
6349:'s comment. Additionally, the copyediting of the statements that the user added were grammatically incorrect; this is not to highlight user's flaws, but rather to make it clearer as to why someone may perceive this as vandalism while doing anti-vandalism work. Not to mention, the information is unsourced.
5586:
Ah the old F-word. As far as I'm concerned it is not intrinsically offensive. It can, of course, be very counterproductive, and using it when someone clearly takes offense at it can become disruptive/NPA. But man, what a great word. And think of the progress in power and offensiveness made when those
5562:
shows CZAR commenting that the attribution to a "friend" lacks permissions. It also had a bot request for transfer to
Commons but as it had obvious evidence from the uploader that they did not have the right upload the image, it could not be transferred to commons so I removed that and tagged it with
5549:
I mention the deleted image because it was an image violation that was removed at the same time the disclosure was removed and that did look dishonest. It was not a selfie. It was another example of violating important policies, namely copyright. I am now concerned that the image deleted is now being
5481:
I had seen the removals, but these were not at CFHT, the article I was referring to. The removals may, or may not, have been problematic, but Kanoa did not respond to their restoration by either trying to edit war them back in or overwhelm other editors with wall-of-text arguments on the talk page.
5426:
decent has no bearing on the issues, articles or disputes, but do have a direct bearing on my interests in Hawaiian related articles and subjects. Through Knowledge research, I have become aware of a family link to historic subjects, situations etc., throughout Hawaiian history. There is no conflict.
5281:
COI. Even at the article where you have an undisputed COI, the telescope where you work, your edits were restricted to simple updates of technical information. Those kinds of edits are widely considered to be acceptable from a COI editor. It would be a different matter if I were seeing promotional
3683:
Ok that is very helpful to know, it would be great if you can restore it as a draft for me to do more work on it. So when it gets Significant coverage, Independent sources, More sources, etc which for example talk about the school project I was mentioning, then I can try again. Also, would it help if
2875:
In my opinion, material on well known subjects that can be found in college level textbooks does not really need inline cites. At most, a general reference would suffice. Knowledge is the only site anywhere, online or print, that habitually inline cites such material. And making that a requirement
2737:
regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about
2361:
So I feel I am fully within the guidelines and you have you cannot reverse the edit on this ground. Less formally and more practically. The link is useful. If somebody wants to know more about fabrication data, he is guided to the link. Otherwise he has to stumble on the external link. For those who
1217:
They are not bare urls. A bare url is a url that is bare. That is, it is a url and nothing else. These links are showing the page title, not the url, so by definition they are not bare urls. What the editor actually did was not fix bare urls, but to fill out a citation template using some sort of
690:
guideline. My apologies for not giving an explanatory edit summary, I accidentally saved it too soon. I deleted it because it gives no information that is not in the article, or could not easily be put in the article, it is condescending to its audience, it is an amateurish production, it is not by
197:
Yeah, the two books are just different volumes of the same series, and I assume that they don't contain anything more than a basic plot description with perhaps some cast/crew info. It's not a lot, but hey, it's more than nothing. My thinking with The Nostalgia Critic, is that he might fall under the
121:
Hi Spinningspark. Thanks for your fast response and for your offer of help. In terms of meeting notability criteria. The ensemble has been the subject of a major newspaper article in the Belfast Newsletter on Dec 4th 2014, which discussed the importance of the establishment of the ensemble as a major
7059:
The tool at the top of the ArbCom evidence page says your current comments run to 651 words, having done a full cut and paste of everything in your section, which is a bit above the 500 word limit. I don't know if the Arbs count all the signatures and everything, of course, but you might want to cut
6845:
SpinningSpark, I agree with MastCell that you abused your admin tools by blocking jps for a week after he and you had edit-warred over a redirect (where it looks like you actually breached 3RR), and then reverting to your preferred version. This without even a rationale or block notice and with only
6517:
Well, I saw a lot of justification for your revert and your warning; I didn't hear a "yeah I guess you're right". The ArbCom case isn't about tone as much as it is about alleged misuse of tools. That you would add an example of what you are suggesting is admin abuse seems like an attempt to get back
6014:
mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Knowledge it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by
5621:
Mark, in reply to your questions, it is a general principle that administrative action is not taken to punish a misdemeanor, but rather, to protect the encyclopaedia. Thus, there is currently no cause to take any action against Kanoa as all issues have already been dealt with and there is currently
5505:
I chose SpinningSpark at random, did not know they are an administrator and was not asking for administrator intervention. I also didn't mean to drag them into a debate. I freely admit that removing my disclosure was a violation of the ToS and COI policy. I wasn't trying to be sneaky, I just did not
5391:
that SpinningSpark might not have caught at first glance, the source itself that Kanoa added was a Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope PFD Document. I believe this is problematic. A clear conflict of interest adding a source from a place you have a financial connection to, to the article itself that your
4637:
Lingzhi's problem is that he has found things he does not like but cannot legitimately fail the article for something that is not in the criteria. That is why we are getting all this nonsense of putting on hold and asking for second opinions. My advise is to address the points raised that you feel
2165:
Your notes don't amount to policy. I have now removed oldprodfull as that has clearly caused a contradiction. Possibly they should all go to #9, but there was no consensus in the talk page discussion to do that. Largely the response was don't care/apathy but with a slight leaning to #11. I don't
1952:
who is doing exactly the same thing. The relationship between the two requires an explanation. The user needs to understand that it is not acceptable to mass spam Knowledge with links to their site and I would want to hear what useful work they intend to do for the encyclopaedia before unblocking.
1826:
for an understanding of why comparison to other articles do not make a convincing argument. Comparing to an article that has been through some kind of quality review, or has survived a deletion debate would carry some weight as that would show such articles have community support, but that does not
1486:
The article should have been discussed at Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gregg l Greer until a consensus was reached, and anyone was welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence
1244:
where Mr. Dilks gave a talk about the airship America, radio communications & safety. I am not sure what specific facts the linkage is being used to source and since the reference is being hosted at UStream am unsure how to cite it. I also went through and added information to some of the refs
1077:
for "The Huffington Post", has appeared on CNN, MSNBC, and more. Additionally she's worked for a number of British newspapers. I'm happy to provide links if you need them. Can you restore the page? We will add more sources and if you have any advice on making sure the page doesn't get deleted again,
169:
Articles deleted under the prod process are restored automatically on request, you do not really need to convince me of anything. Are you making such a request? If you are asking my opinion, I doubt that the Nostalgia Critic can be counted as a reliable source. There is no editorial review of his
5566:
At the time of my last post on Kanoa's talk page, the rev deletion had not taken place, so I request all further mention of my social media activity to be left off Knowledge. Should there ever be a need to add further information as evidence to a dispute, it should be handled via e-mail. However, I
5462:
where I do tend to keep an open eye for COI and advocacy editing. I have discovered the same sort of COI editing on the TMT article where a Marketing firm that is listed as being hired by the TMT company is the same name of a registered Knowledge account that made two edits to clients they are paid
3662:
for a summary of the requirements. Generally, resorts are not going to be notable enough for an article and it would be a wasted effort to work on it. If you think you are really able to establish notability then the article could be restored as a draft for you to work on if you want. Otherwise,
2761:
Hello. Is there a Knowledge policy on this? You state "completely perverse to challenge something you know to be correct". Sure, I may know it to be correct, but what that means is I've read/heard about it. I'm no authority (and even if I was references are asked for in Knowledge) and could not
2355:
I suppose you argue that the anchor is a roundabout way (gaming) to link the article internally. I don't think so. The effect is similar to inline citations: the links are grouped in a dedicated section at the bottom of the article, and from the body you link to that section. What I did is similar.
2076:
I do not know what the next course of action is, but at this time I am not interested in edit warring. The user refuses to engage with others on the talk page by stating "The discussion is over". Should the appropriate course of action be taking this to a wiki bureaux, and which notice board is the
2007:
of their edits are updates, they were actively spamming right up to the time they were blocked, and obstinately refused to respond to a warning. I would be a lot more cautious about unblocking that one, and would examine much more closely their explanation of what they were up to. I simply do not
2002:
Well I'm not the blocking admin for Krelcoyne, although I did selectively revert some of their additions (and allowed others to stay). I did not block Krelcoyne since they had stopped by the time I got on the case and I AGF'd it was a different (but obviously connected) user. Nevertheless, before
1399:
There is no particular reason why I should review this, in fact an administrator not involved in the original deletion would be preferable as that gets a second opinion. I have, however, moved the page to the original (and proper) capitalisation. Hint for future reference, if you want an admin to
1239:
I see that URLs with titles are not bare...who knew! In any case, per your mention of deadlinks, I am going through the references and see that the first one now links to the entire website and not to a specific column by Mr. Dilks. So far as I can tell the content at k2tqn.com that has the title
685:
Well first of all, when it comes to external links, it is for you to justify why we should have a link rather than me justifying why we should not. The default position is not to have links unless there is a positive reason for needing them, Knowledge is not here to drive traffic to other people's
311:
Hi Spinnings Spark, I was looking for the Walking After U page and saw that it was deleted and was wondering why. I hope it wasn't notability issues as I came to find out the dates and places for their SE Asia tour. Japan and Taiwan are two countries on the schedule but the rest I don't know about.
6613:
There was no such consensus at the AfD, the closers remarks were "The result was no consensus. With a note that many arguments at both sides are not really policy-based or well argued. I would recommend that interested editors clean up the article for the problems identified during this debate. If
6397:
No I won't be changing my comments. It is more important that a new editor is not driven away by pile-on warnings than pandering to the feelings of those responsible for his unnecessary harassment. I know all about Stiki, but I don't see why it is relevant that you made the edit with that tool.
5642:
You're preaching to the choir. Also...I was not asking for or seeking intervention. I regularly deal with COI editors on many different types of articles from theatrical, film television as well as other subjects not related to the entertainment industry such as politics and social issues. Our COI
5431:
has been deleted, but it was indeed a true copyright violation actually disclosed by the uploading editor, Kanoa. The image, a pic of himself taken by a friend, had the discloser but no permissions. Tagging the file for dleletion and then notifying the editor with the proper template is the proper
4916:
In the first sentence, I question first the limiting size of 140 meters for a PHO, as, since Chelyabinsk, even 20 meters has been seen to be worrisome. But certainly 40 meters, the size of the Tunguska object. 140 meters was just a somewhat arbitrary figure chosen by Congress for some legislation.
3451:
Hello I rolled back the changes, the very limited data that was on the old ver was unhelpful and did not give indication as to what is the actual process, moreover it did not indicate why the implementation will improve component life. the ref. are very limited in the subject and i used well known
3366:
in passages discussing radio equipment. Now Brown is certainly no expert in electronics, but as a successful author he is certainly an expert in correct English usage. Interestingly, in another passage where the word "antennas" comes up in informal conversation Brown uses the Anglised plural for
3017:
I find the accusatory tone of voice of you and the other Wiki-police quite offensive. I have no strong interest, financial or otherwise, in having the link there - but as my site seems to be the only site devoted to Oliver apart from one by a family member, I can't see what harm there would be in
2920:
So, I'll leave this one be - and I certainly appreciate everyone such as yourself who is trying to contribute and improve Knowledge. Just do please monitor your own reverts and "policing" based more on personal-want than on the consensus opinions of the rest. If ones talk-page grows too long, or
2910:
But this is not at all what my "citation needed" was about. Again, I just "citation wanted" that paragraph to help confirm the statements with original published research. As I wrote in the Edit summary, "links to research would be nice." I'd also wager I'm not the only one who would appreciate
2813:
WP:V further states "If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it". You clearly believe that the material is verifiable and your expected behaviour is clear from the policy. On the other hand, if
2805:
Understood. It seems the tag I was looking for, more than "citation needed", was "citation wanted". I would have really enjoyed reading and referring to an original research source than to the uncorroborated Knowledge edit - even though I'm pretty sure it is valid. Although, "pretty sure" coming
2797:
to challenge it if it doesn't. What is more, according to your edit summary, you did not actually challenge the verifiability of the statement. You did just the opposite, you said you thought the information was correct, but that "but links to research would be nice". Links to research would be
2288:
2) I do not see where it violates the EL guideline. I had read this guideline after your first intervention and I find "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article. Instead, include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article, and in
1944:
I would very much oppose unblocking this account on that basis, especially when the block appeal is not publicly visible. I don't have an account at UTRS so can't look at the case (but now that you have brought this to my attention I will open one and take a look). However, it is perfectly plain
6548:
Hi my page was deleted reason for copied contents.actually the site is a one i developed and i am the owner of the domain too.Now can you help me to recreate this page? but how to avoid the previous issue?Because last time it was like i copied the content from a third party and added that but the
6433:
Although I understand you may not have an extensive knowledge of bot algorithms, this is simply not true: "I meant that the user probably would not have been reverted three times if the bot had not initially made a false positive." Also, there is no citation under the Construction section either:
5923:
You are responsible for the comments you place in the edit history. If yoi have no evidence of me making bad faith edits, then there is no need to imply that I do, by stating that in a specific case I have made good faith revert. I suggest you either ask the maintainers of Twinkle to change their
5453:
when a few editors raised concerns with me on my talk page and the article talk page that I addressed. I have no personal, professional or financial relationship to any of the subjects, people or places that are a part of the situations, subjects or articles. I have a general interest in Hawaiian
4977:
Even if the definition of a PHO has changed, it remains the case that a small MOID does not equate to a PHO unless the object is also larger than what is considered a PHO. If it has changed, the article should still record the historical definitions: an encyclopaedia has a different purpose to a
4906:
This is my first "talk" on wikipedia, so please forgive if I'm doing it not quite right. I'm writing to you because I think a couple of things might need to be changed in the MOID entry and I infer from the history that you initiated the MOID entry and I wouldn't know how to ascertain if somebody
4699:
By the way, what three instances of OR? The only one you raised that I accept as being OR, and dealt with, was "...majority of authors". Making such a statement requires someone to count authors and decide which authors are to be included in the count in the first place. If that "someone" is a
2867:
That is your opinion. May be valid, may not be. To me, Knowledge has moved towards wanting more "little blue numbers" than less. You may disagree with this, but if so, perhaps it's time better spent joining into the policy discussions that must go on about this matter rather than to wage a one
2828:
That's the policy, here's what I think. There are too many people here with "the little blue number disease" who think that every uncited passage must be tagged. They just mindlessly look for a little blue number, and if it doesn't have one, it gets tagged. No consideration of what the passage
713:
After seeing the page and trying a few things it saddens me to say I'm way in over my head. My first handicap is I don't know Korean. I can read the words but only know about 50 or so, but things like bling-bling and fo' shizzle are useless. Pasting text into translators mostly has no value other
5383:
a master plan and an EIS before any further development. The editor offered no source to back up his deletion summary. The following edit removed a claim because the current version of the source does not support the claim however, the claim is simply: "despite opposition", which it turns out is
4593:
Well, it shouldn't have been a sticking point. To be honest, if I was reviewing the article, I would probably have mentioned the overcite issue myself. The difference being that I would have left it as a review comment and passed the article anyway. If there were genuine GA issues that needed
3982:
I'm using the standard settings in konqueror, firefox, and chromium (not logged in). In none of them I'm happy with the result of scriptstyle. Too small and too much pixel. Actually, I'm also not happy with the textstyle. I will try to figure out, if there is a help page addressing this problem.
3957:
Scriptstyle looks fine for me, about matching the text size. It looks ok in any browser/OS combination I have ever tried. Are you using the standard settings? Try logging out and see what it looks like then. The vast majority of our readers are not logged in and have no opportunity to change
3941:
foo foo, at least on my computer screen. If you want to correct this behaviour, it is not preferable to do this locally. This would be semantically not meaningful. You should agitate to change the standard settings and not to fix the problem with an inappropriate syntax. An appropriate textstyle
3431:
OK, I put the "three phase" comment in Talk. The reason it was in a comment, was because the previous change was in a comment, and it seemed easier close to the source. (And people watching it will see where the source is.) I do sometimes get discouraged when there is discussion in talk, but I
2859:
Secondly, little blue numbers might make an article look sound, but that can be far from the truth. Those who write hoax articles will typically litter them with references to make them look good. The references will be misleading, unreliable, titles which sound like they support the claim but
1930:
explaining that the organization's website has been moved and redesigned. Their email address domain checks out and I googled their original domain and it is directing to the new domain. They appear to be here to update old links from their old domain to the new one. I don't see any reason to
264:
Conceivably, his opinion could be cited, I don't know but I'd rather not cite it personally. However, there is no way that I am undeleting an article on the basis of his manic rant on Youtube. I listened to the first five minutes of it and it gave me a headache, I'm guessing the rest of the 32
126:
In addition, the ensemble is a registered charity, a member of Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action and an organisation governed by committee and not-for-profit. As such we feel it is in the public's interest to be aware of the organisation and the work it does in the promotion of Irish
6401:
I don't accept your reasons for reverting as valid. We don't revert users providing new information because their contribution is ungrammatical or needs copyediting. We tag it for improvement, or better, improve it ourselves. Your claim that the contribution was uncited does not cut much ice
6019:
to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Knowledge to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer
5545:
is the best admin to ask on this count as he has been warned me about such overuse of the "F" word before. It actually seems best to seek his assistance on that...maybe not for me, but he would be the best to respond to whether that requires administrative intervention, even if it is also their
5339:
may well be a terms of service violation if they do work at the observatory and since they returned the disclosure, I can only assume they do work there. No, their edits were not simple updates of technical material. There was a mass amount of sourced content removed across a number of articles
5250:
but in this case I'm asking only about my own conduct and compliance. The editor keeps threatening to have me blocked or to initiate formal dispute resolution. I've read through the relevant policies and I have to conclude that I'm not experienced enough to know if I should be concerned or not.
5096:
OK, I think I see the point, Spinnigspark; but even so I am unsatisfied with the wording of the original sentence, to wit: "Earth MOID values are generally more practical for asteroids less than 140 meters in diameter as those asteroids are very dim and often have a small observation arc with a
3295:
Also, please perform a search on Amazon.com, in the category "Books", using the term "antenna". You'll find many textbooks on radio antennas in the search. When I did this recently, I didn't see a single one that has the word "antennae" in its title, when the plural form of the word is in the
1636:
CascadiaNow is the largest organization promoting the idea of Cascadia. Over the past year it has been featured in : Anniston Star, Atlantic Monthly, Business Insider, Canadian Broadcasting Company, City Arts, Crosscut, Huffington Post, Humanosphere, KUOW/National Public Radio (Audio), National
236:
I'm not particularly familiar with The Nostalgia Critic, but I guess that the question I would have is whether the standard for self-published sources is any different between sources for fact and sources for opinion. In other words, if the Nostalgia Critic video discussed production history of
7095:
I ain't official in any way, shape or form. I only noticed your addition when it showed up on my watchlist and I saw you had added 3000+ to the page, which is what caused me to notice your edit. The clerks probably will tell everyone who has excessively long statements to shorten them, if they
6289:
in place, I don't want to squabble over trifling matters, but this hay/straw business drags the article down. As per my comment today, "Very obscure measures, extremely poorly explained". Most references I see to "old hay" etc refer to how many pound of which make up a "truss" or a "load". I'm
5540:
I informed the editor that I was not interested in taking this to COI as they had returned the disclosure after I made note of it on their talk page but told them they always had options to take this to an admin. You are acting as an admin here, so whether they came to as such or not no longer
5477:
Hello Mark, I don't think there is much you have raised that I have not already seen. I responded here to a request for editor assistance, not as an administrator. Kanoa may not even have realised that I am an administrator. I agree that Kanoa's failure to disclose his connection to CFHT is
5353:
As far as the cuss words littering the responses, the two last post are where I reacted to the editor continuing to discuss off Knowledge activity with vulgarity. I believe that reaction was not civil and certainly can apologize for that, but Knowledge is also not censored and all of my other,
6305:
If you are arguing that Cardare is a poor reference, then I could go along with that. His book has come in for criticism before, particularly his conversions which are often unjustifiably over-precise and his sources aren't traceable. But to say the passage is confusing is ridiculous. It is
5667:
Spinningspark, you didn't complete the review here: all reviews need to include an icon, and all approved nominations need one of the two tick icons (depending on whether you had to AGF any significant portions of the review). Please return as soon as possible to finish this one. Many thanks.
5114:
If I've got that right, then, first of all, the word "useful" would make more sense than the word "practical" in the original sentence. The word "practical" makes it sound like it's easier to obtain MOID values for small objects than for large objects. (Again, that is what threw me.) The word
4661:
Alas, you have caught me between a rock and a hard place. I cannot in good conscience let you sit another sx months. I was really hoping someone would help; back in the old days there were more hands on deck I suppose.. I very honestly do not believe stripping refs is a matter of more than..
3153:
You semi-protected it for an indefinite period of time. Then someone upgraded protection to temporary full protection without reverting back to what it was. Then it's been semi-protected temporarily three times. Can you add indefinite pending changes or change time expiration to indefinite?
3277:
I changed "antennae" to "antennas" because in the "T-Pad" article, a type of radio antenna is briefly mentioned. In my opinion, radio antennas are those metal things through which electromagnetic energy flows. Insect antennae are those quivering hairy things usually found on insects.
5605:. Any images uploaded after January 8, 2006, require a statement of permission from the photographer (OTRS tickets were introduced in Sept 2006). This image did not have such a statement, merely the note that the image was taken by a friend. The image was uploaded on January 31, 2006. --
7110:
John, I haven't taken it as hostile, and thanks for the heads up, but I need to respond to some lengthy criticisms of me. Bishonen's in particular is way over the limit, and even the initiator jps's is a few bytes over according to the tool. I don't intend to prune my statement until
4700:
Knowledge editor then it is OR. Stating that something is a common presentation when that presentation appears in several student-level textbooks is entirely uncontroversial and should not be labeled OR. However, it is easily dealt with by rewording, which I might just go and do now.
4362:
Hi, Lingzhi. Virtually all the sources are viewable online. I can give you a list of the few that are not. If you want the actual text of these sources I'll see what I can do, although it may take a little while as I no longer have access to the lab library where I looked them up.
7131:
I looked and don't see anything on the user talk page of either of the above to indicate that they have received similar comments about the lengths of their posts, so, hell, I dunno, maybe they won't be here. If that is the case, and I guess for all I know it could be, my apologies.
5541:
matters. Now you claim you are not acting as an admin, which make me very uncomfortable. I trust your good faith Spinning Spark, however you must remember from where I am sitting. While someone came to you at random for editor assistance, you did react as an administrator. Perhaps
328:
The article was deleted under the proposed deletion process and such articles are automatically restored when challenged, which I have now done. It is still open to any editor to initiate a full deletion debate, which may well happen as the sourcing of the article is very poor.
5529:
Hi Spinningspark (I've always loved that name) cool that you are speaking as an editor and not an administrator. That means I should not need to provide diffs, however let me point out that whether or not Kanoa sought your assistance as an administrator, you did respond as one:
5906:
Very strange that you can read "good faith" to imply bad faith. Of course I am not doing that. It is one of three standard Twinkle buttons. The other two are: go to your user talk page to give you a templated warning for something, or mark the revert as reverting vandalism.
1123:
Hi - I thought it looked good to have all of the material I place on this page in one place, but I was waiting for someone to comment that the content now seemed inappropriate under the existing heading. Can you point me to the page(s) which the material I added duplicates ?
5064:. To predict a collision, the elements are needed but are not always available due to limited observations. MOID is thus an ersatz parameter for collision probability, but, as the article explains, a small MOID does not mean there will be a collision soon, or even at all.
4310:
so that is more a question for him, hopefully he will see this ping. However, we usually AGF offline sources unless there is some question of the accuracy of a given statement and the exact wording needs to be checked. It is not normal to request copies of all the sources
1969:
They are likely both from the same organization and likely going around updating links all over the web. Perhaps they aren't away of how to update links and are mistakenly adding new ones? Not sure, but I think what they're asking to do looks like spam - but isn't.--v/r -
250:. Is there any editorial oversight for that website? I have no idea. But it seems that he does this professionally, he has a huge audience, he's been interviewed and written about by professional publications. Wouldn't it be appropriate to cite his opinion in an article? --
5000:
On your second point, I don't think you really wanted to say that Earth MOID is "more problematic for asteroids less than 140 meters". MOID is less problematic for small objects because it is much easier to determine than either the size of the object or its exact orbit.
4961:
saying that objects smaller than 140 metres are PHOs? That could be the "something" you are missing. Knowledge articles should be entirely based on reliable sources. I don't doubt that objects smaller than 140 metres can cause considerable damage, but according to the
4920:
Then in the second sentence, it seems to me what follows would be better expressed by the word "problematical" rather than "practical." (In fact, this substitution could make up for the use of "140" in the first sentence, thereby removing the need to change the number.)
4288:
Hello. Your GA nom has been listening to muzzle unconscionably long. I know nothing of electronic engineering, but I do know how to read. Could you start emailing sources to me that you know are unavailable on the Internet? I can start source checking next week or so.
1899:
is a disambiguation page. The purpose of such pages is to point the reader to the Knowledge article they are looking for when there is more than one Knowledge article of that name. Subjects that do not have articles on Knowledge do not belong on disambiguation pages.
5535:"The only behavioural issue that I am seeing that would warrant administrator action is some of the uncivil posts to you from user:Mark Miller, littered as they are with cuss words. If you have any specific issues you would like me to look at, please provide diffs"
6340:
to make the revert. If you are unaware of what that might be, I would suggest you briefly read through it - it uses one of the algorithms as ClueBot to recognize potentially vandal edits, as well as multiple others. You should note that before edits are made with
4594:
sorting before passing I would make a clear distinction on what these were. If this was being nominated for Featured Article the citations would definitely need a lot of cleaning up, but then so would a lot of other things. GA is not meant to be this onerous.
5021:
I'm still scratching my head about the logic of this sentence, Spinningspark, and now also of your reply. As I read the sentence, it seems to be saying that a smaller object is easier to characterize because it is more difficult to characterize. How could that
3604:
Actually there's a new project the resort is involved in which is quite notable in Anda, they have established a school that helps local people/kids to get into education and they give them an opportunity to work at the resort as well, they have partnered with
245:
been published in a peer reviewed journal. But at what point is someone notable enough to have their opinion cited on Knowledge? It looks like this guy started out on YouTube, but from what I can tell, he's making his videos professionally now for the website
3281:
About 6 years ago, I spent a bit of time looking into this. I even communicated via e-mail with a representative at the Unviersity Of Chicago "Manual Of Style". That person agreed with me: "antennas" for the radio kind; "antennae" for the insectile kind.
2844:
They have better things to do, and very possibly might do them instead of paying attention to a pointless tag. So tagging might (sometimes does) end up damaging the encyclopaedia instead of protecting it because a perfectly fine passage can end up getting
2280:
You undid a recent edit of mine on the PCB page with the words: Reverted good faith edits by Karloman2: That doesn't really work for the bottom of the page. Also seems to be a ineffective attempt to circumvent the guidelne proscribing ELs in article body.
1502:
You have not actually opened a deletion review. When you last brought this to my page, and again this time on your talk page, I asked you to link to a reliable source that discusses the subject directly and in depth. Unless you do that, I can't help you.
152:
2315:, especially when done immediately after the original EL insertion was reverted. We just don't point readers off site in the body of an article, that's the thrust of the guideline. Take it to a wider discussion if you want, but that's my interpretation.
1263:. Citation templates are not a requirement and in some cases inserting them may be against guidelines (but I'm not saying that is the case at Morse code). For instance, I have brought several articles to FA without ever using a single citation template.
150:
3254:
I think it isn't so well known what Nyquist did and what Shannon did. I might think that I do, but even so probably not as well as I would like. So yes, I am not surprised that many would get it wrong. In other words, I agree that Nyquist was important.
3206:. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards
4638:
you can deal with, but politely decline on those you find too onerous. The ball is then in his court and we wait to see where he goes with it. If it does fail, resubmitting is no big deal, it just means another long wait until someone picks it up.
6892:
5478:
probably a breach of the ToS, as I already pointed out to him above, and would warrant administrative action if he does not do this now. However, if I were to take action as an administrator I would feel obliged to respond to your incivility also.
3600:
thanks for deleting FloWer Beach Resort Bohol earlier today - it appears that what I wrote was not good enough to go on Knowledge... I would appreciate if you could point me in the right direction or highlight what was wrong with the page perhaps?
3557:
2284:
1) I must say that "an ineffective attempt to circumvent the guideline proscribing..." seems to accuse me of willfully trying to violate the guidelines. I am upset about this. Or am I paranoiac and is it not your intention to (willfully) say this?
1931:
consider this a scam or a spam attempt. I'd like to unblock them and allow them to update deadlinks. I do not think this is similar to the deadlink scam that recently came up at ANI because their email address goes to the old domain name.--v/r -
1072:
Hi Spinning Spark, I just noticed the page for Caroline Modarressy-Tehrani was deleted due to "Expired PROD, concern was: Fails general notability". Caroline is a regular host on 's livestreaming network, . Aside from hosting her own segments, she
3224:
2364:
I did not object to your reversal of my first attempt because it was indeed clumsy and needed to many words in the article. I am not yet enamored by how it is now, but it does the job. Advice on how to do this better would be much appreciated.
6402:
either. First of all, the addition was to the lead, which normally does not require citations as it is a summary of the article body. The statement that Zeners are heavily doped can be found in the body of the article, and besides, a simple
2348:
Gaming the system means deliberately using Knowledge policies and guidelines in bad faith to thwart the aims of Knowledge. Gaming the system may represent an abuse of process, disruptive editing, or otherwise evading the spirit of community
195:
2860:
actually don't, or are just hard to access. There is no substitute for actually reading the sources. Promulgating the idea that lots of blue numbers = good, less blue numbers = bad actually lulls everyone into a false sense of security.
2292:
3) I hold the internal link as useful, as requested by the guideline and common sense. I am with you that the anchor does not work as precisely as I had hoped, but it does the job. If you now a more precise way of linking, please advise.
5229:
page of several points of misconduct including COI, bad faith, copyright violation, vandalism, disruptive editing, personal attacks, and doxing. They are a much more experienced editor so I assume the accusations are valid but they are
2788:
and the relevant, and most important, sentence is "All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material". What that
5945:
Frankly, it is just idiotic, or at least overly sensitive to read anything in that as an implication of bad faith. The purpose of that templated edit summary is to make it explicitly clear that the edit being reverted is considered a
4409:
3269:
6194:?) Are you trying to generate the total phasor from the component phasors? I'm not sure that Inkscape is capable of doing that, but it can easily produce a phasor plot if you calculate the values of the phasors first. This link
542:
7015:
Come on, large swathes of the article are uncited. There are numerous facts, such as the claim he was Copenhagen Chief of Police, that need citing. I couldn't possibly go to the trouble of listing them all, but if this were a
3013:
I'm sorry you've excluded a link to my Oliver Heaviside site from his Knowledge page - again. I honestly don't remember previously submitting it. (When you're as old as I am, you'll find that your memory is not 100% perfect.)
1365:
Spinningspark, Please review the updated article Gregg l Greer, and make and decide if this article should be deleted or not. I will be stand by your decision. Article has multiple updates including Major News articles. Thank
148:
and Familiar Faces - the latter seems to be affiliated with The Nostalgia Critic. I'm not 100% sure whether these would be considered reliable sources, but my assumption is that they would be. I also turned up these two books
2615:
is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you posted to a feedback page for VisualEditor. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work well for you. The team has a list
2310:
Karloman2, it was not my intention to accuse you of doing anything in bad faith, and I apologise if that is how it has come across. However, using an internal link to point to an external link certainly counts as trying to
4413:
5891:"Reverted good faith edits by PBS-AWB" have you ever known me to make a bad faith edit? If not why state that this is a revert of a good faith edit. Why not put in your edit summary "Revert of edit by PBS-AWB" instead? --
3488:
It is nonsense that references are hard to find. I found two textbooks covering the issue on the first page of gbook results. Your reversion also failed to address other porblematic aspects of your original edit such as
612:
Hi, Thanks for reviewing. I'm struggling a bit with the comments around "copyrighted content"...can you elaborate? I don't believe anything in there is not in the public domain, or copyrighted. Can you help me out please?
2362:
do not want to know more, there is only the very small inconvenience of another letter color, but this is standard Knowledge. So I hold the anchor as perfectly valid and a that the article is more useful with the anchor.
2358:
Because citation templates were not designed for use in the External links section, editors who use citation templates in this section should be careful to ensure the resulting description is appropriate for an external
2331:
Hello Spinningspark. No need for apologies, I was just oversensitive. I will study the guideline you point to. (This will not be before next weekend, I am afraid.) I will then see if I take this any further. Probably
1234:
Ah well, I had always thought simple URLs with just a title attached were considered bare and that the cite templates - with their parameters of publisher, date, editor, etc were preferred but in looking just now at
3510:
4973:
I may edit this and/or the PHO page since what counts as hazardous has, as I previously noted, been set at a lower size in recent discussions of planetary defense. I'll do a little homework to find a good source.
3370:
I think the real difference is that in the life sciences writers are much more familiar with Latinate forms so Latinate is almost universal whereas in electronics authors may or may not be familiar so both can be
6262:
Please don't post on my talk page (or anywhere) while you are blocked. That will only lead to the IP address being blocked as well. You must first follow the block appeal procedure explained on your talk page.
5488:
I had not covered the DOXing issue (partly because this had already been dealt with by revision deletion) but this strikes me as a simple misunderstanding of the etiquette here rather than a deliberate attempt.
2900:
There probably is a balance between getting fact published and not having falsehoods or opinions published in Knowledge. I assume this has been a debate since day-one and will continue of for the life of the
4622:), there's also his complete inexperience with the subject area. I don't want to edit the article to suit Lingzhi, then wait for him to bring in an electronics second-opinion and re-edit the article to suit
1384:. I looked at it, didn't think it met the notability guidelines and nominated it for AFD. Subsequently I saw the prior AFD (under a slightly different title) so tagged the article for speedy as a recreation.
6306:
perfectly straightforward and understandable. The terms are presented and conversions given in a perfectly plain way. What more needs explaining? Whatever, I'm not intending to look for more references.
5482:
Those are the usual things we see from COI editors. I am not seeing a pdf document inserted at CFHT, but in any case, verifying the instruments used at a telescope is a reasonable use of a primary source.
3409:
3724:
Regarding the proposal I started, I respect your opinion and input and hope that my comments haven't any in anyway affected future interactions between us, or how you view me if you have an opinion of me
2836:
You may be dealing with more issues than just this, seems I just ran afoul of it. Over many years, I have added primary source material references to many Knowledge articles. No one would consider me a
2196:. As of this morning, this sandbox only shows a small, basic set of special characters. However, the list of characters can be customized at each wiki. Please test it out, and leave your feedback at
4716:
Three is reasonable; if it is just three instances I can do the editing. Which three, Lingzhi? And what else must be done to the article? What about the other points you mentioned in the review? --
3592:
3405:
3328:. There are many papers there using both spellings indicating that both are acceptable and it is thus a matter of editor choice. Amongst the notable authors found there using the Latinate plural are
788:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block,
3316:
398:
392:
1451:
127:
contemporary music. I hope this helps, please excuse my wiki-naiveté again and if you could restore the article as a draft and allow me to work on it, perhaps you could help me knock it into shape?
5225:. I have never heard of you before and I apologize if I misunderstood how this is supposed to work. Would you be willing to give me advice on my own Knowledge conduct? Someone is accusing me on my
628:
5886:
3378:
actually say that? You seem to be saying that that is just someone's opinion, not that it is actually in there, which is pretty meaningless as an issue of authority. In any case, it is not in
4618:
I'm thinking about letting Lingzhi fail it and reapply. I really don't want to do that. But in addition to his "extra" GA criteria, which he doesn't seem to be willing to compromise on (see
6356:
and myself in your comment. Allow me to cite the following: "administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful, civil manner in their interactions with others" from
3587:
2192:
The special character inserter has been re-designed. Because you previously shared your opinions on the old “floating box” version, I would like your feedback on the new, full-width design.
3343:
3341:
216:
has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." I doubt that anyone considers Nostalgia Critic to be an expert other than his fan base on Youtube. If he has published
7115:
is told to (or they are summarily chopped). As it is, I have kept it to the essentials and avoided responding to every single point, especially some of the wilder or less relevant claims.
6409:
Instead of whining at me for picking up on this mistake and doing something about it, I suggest a better course of action would be to provide a warm welcome message to the offended editor.
3477:
You used a link to the company BQR, the same as you have done in every other edit you have ever made. Likely that you are connected with the company in some way, in which case you have a
3239:
1744:
6345:, the end-user reviews each edit prior to making the revert. Hence, the revert was made intentionally. Secondly, the term "basically" is not a fairly encyclopedic term, as you can see in
2351:
To be honest, I do not feel addressed by this. The question is, I think, if the anchor violates the letter or spirit of WP:EL. I do not see where it violates the letter. WP:EL does state
3942:
environment would be the solution. The scriptstyle should be reserved for smaller fonts used e.g. in citations or captions. Is there a style guide entry which fits to this problem? --
1050:
1017:
1773:
365:
6103:
Hello again, that's not right, because I changed from Electrical element (as headline) to Electrical element(s). Elements was written, therefore not headline-identical. Regards --
3652:
3635:
1097:
for a quick understanding of how we establish notability. It is not relevant who she writes for, notability is not inherited from one's employer. I will restore the article, but
6950:
6767:
6722:
6603:
3367:
insect feelers. It would seem that, in Brown's mind at least, the difference is not between insects and radio, but between formal, technical use and informal, conversational use.
2721:
2121:
1165:
Thanks for doing some research before deleting it as a PROD. I looked online for sources before PRODing it, but somehow missed that study, which I agree clearly shows notability.
415:
136:
2573:
Appreciate your looking. Given the ip editor's insistence on inserting this inappropriate material, I'd appreciate it if you and others kept eyes on. Thanks again for your help.
1472:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
6001:
2468:
1101:
because we do this automatically for articles deleted through the prod process, not because I think you have a case. The article is still open to deletion after a full debate.
6888:
6641:
Remember that it is not a majority vote. It was shown that Nathan Norman was notable because he had multiple significant roles in notable works. Could you please reconsider? --
3452:
sources like the Mil standard(issued by non other then the us military) and is the base and the major reason for derating practice(started by nasa in the late 60's early 70's)
363:
article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,
3939:
723:
5550:
represented as having proper license and permissions. Whether Kanoa wishes to call it a selfie now, the image was attributed to an unnamed friend without proper permissions.
5700:
2930:
Thanks for the talk-reply, keep doing good work and stay optimistic about Knowledge... because remember, the optimist invents the aeroplane, the pessimist the parachute! ;-)
2522:
2413:
1785:
708:
5939:
5900:
3169:
That was in 2011, four years ago. Speak to the administrators who have been more recently involved. I don't even watchlist the page any more, it's too much of a headache.
471:
6398:
When I said you were blindly following the bot, I meant that the user probably would not have been reverted three times if the bot had not initially made a false positive.
6049:
4403:
2751:
2463:
390:
6946:
6717:
6599:
5368:
OK. Since the door has been opened on this to admin, I feel I should add the diffs and full concerns I have and how they were presented as best as possible for clarity.
1853:
1622:
467:
3698:
The thing is, do you have reason to believe suitable sources actually exist, or are you just hoping something will turn up one day? If not, it will be a wasted effort.
2542:
again at RSN. I'm surprised there haven't been escalating warnings issued. Could you look at the situation and take appropriate admin action, if any is needed? thanks.
5811:
5748:
4045:
You (rightly) deleted this page, but you should check for redlinks, in this case you left four incoming links (from article namespace) in place. I have now redirected
2777:
2110:
1240:
of "100 years ago this airship sailed from Atlantic City" is a 40 minute taping of an October 2010 meeting of the New Jersey Antique Radio Club hosted at ustream.tv -
745:
1202:
etc in mind I was thinking the titles could be kept but then fill in the rest of the refs with the needed information for complete inline citations. Any objections?
6549:
actual is something different! can you advice me to resolve this.will it be deleted if i created a new entry with my own contents written especially for wikipedia?
3962:
appearance of the article. It is not for me to agitate for changing anything. It is what it is, if it changes in the future bots can go round fixing the problems.
2756:
2085:
1714:
871:
409:
5677:
4425:
2634:
You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with
6625:
5880:
5660:
4765:
I haven't read your post at WT:GAN; I'm just gonna let everyone else comment. I'll check back in maybe 1 or 2 days from now. Sorry that I caused you distress. •
4517:
2704:
1550:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 14 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
715:
313:
130:
5723:
4148:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
3917:
6771:
2699:
because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
340:
1563:
1520:
1488:
1473:
1438:
1367:
163:
5515:
5319:
5305:
2945:
1514:
496:
6791:
I think the user will already be well aware of the reason, and I'm pretty sure he already knows how to appeal a block so a template is not necessary either.
4578:
Thanks a lot for going to bat on the ref issue. I knew the article was "overcited", but it never occurred to me that this would be such a sticking point. --
2135:
1666:
6703:
6689:
6667:
5472:
5417:
5401:
5363:
5211:
5060:
The point it is making is very simple; for small objects, the MOID can be determined more easily and accurately (often much more accurately) than the exact
4711:
3886:
2891:
1087:
893:
212:
The requirement for treating self-published sources as reliable is that they have been "produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work
6500:
6158:
Can you elaborate on what you are trying to do? Maybe link to an example. You may find Extensions/Render/Polar_Grid on the Inkscape menu helpful to you.
5758:
5682:
5171:
4880:
4821:
3460:
3349:. If this were an unacceptable spelling I would expect this to be picked up by editors of peer reviewed journals in the very expert field applicable here.
3051:
2798:
nice, it may be useful to some readers, but that is not the primary purpose of citations, and it is certainly not the purpose of citation needed templates.
2181:
1650:. The style and paragraph content was used almost entirely verbatim, so I am confused why one would be considered promotional, while the other would not.
1305:
7141:
7126:
7105:
7090:
6274:
5834:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
5652:
5637:
5500:
4231:
4172:
3827:
3393:
2921:
the number of undone-reverts starts getting a bit large, one should step back and see if the effort is truly contributing to the improvement of Knowledge.
1911:
1822:
The article without doubt is not written in an encyclopaedic style. It would pretty much need completely rewriting to make it so. Please read the essay
1617:
1558:
7046:
7035:
6802:
6290:
generally an "inclusionist", so if you can find a better, or more good references, and improve the explanation I'm more than happy to see it go back in.
6232:
6208:
6169:
5692:
4826:
4779:
4572:
4496:
3101:
1745:
http://www.policymic.com/articles/81321/there-are-11-megaregions-in-america-here-s-where-they-are-and-why-they-re-so-important?amp;utm_medium=social&
1496:
1481:
1274:
1254:
1229:
1194:- I can understand that there can be stylistic/tone concern about the refs' titles but am wondering why you converted them back into bare URLs. Keeping
1112:
845:
6465:
6443:
6420:
4722:
4649:
4632:
4605:
4369:
4113:
3180:
2341:
2326:
1355:
536:
6061:
Good morning Spinningspark, you reverted my correction at above. It's usual in all WPs to begin the text as the headline. In the en-WP not? Regards --
5728:
5157:
5141:
5079:
5040:
5012:
4989:
3709:
3693:
3674:
3413:
3304:
2353:
Knowledge articles may include links to web pages outside Knowledge (external links), but they should not normally be placed in the body of an article.
1429:
1411:
648:
620:
573:
554:
321:
6352:
However, the rationale of the revert is not the true main idea here. I am more concerned about your tone towards your 'colleages,' as you referred to
6175:
Actually ,I have to make a phasor diagram.The values known to me are V_L ,V ,V_R and V_C.I have to plot them so that the angles are automatically set.
4694:
4674:
4357:
4326:
3140:
2852:
Then railing against "citation needed" passage-deleters may be an even more noble cause. I've seen this occur and in many cases feel it went too far.
2582:
2568:
6734:
6128:
6112:
6098:
5601:
It was not Kanoa who described the photo as a selfie; it was SpinningSpark. At the time the image was uploaded in 2006, the rules were changing. See
4522:
2716:
2209:
2058:
2019:
1997:
1977:
1964:
1696:
1079:
1067:
702:
433:
290:
281:
That's fine. Again, I wasn't so much looking for the article to be restored, as I was just wanting to get a second opinion. Thanks for discussing! --
276:
259:
231:
207:
189:
6607:
6569:
6388:
6317:
5853:
5614:
4856:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
4809:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
4207:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
3992:
3973:
3862:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
2551:
2498:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
2401:
2385:
1593:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
1154:
6970:
6475:
6346:
6020:
another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at
6011:
5661:
5596:
4886:
Looks like we're "good" to go. I want to thank you again, Spinningspark, for all the help, and walking me through the process. It's been fun. --
4177:
4118:
3832:
3769:
3753:
3324:
I don't agree with your assessment. I too have looked into this in some depth previously. A good place to look for authoritative usage on this is
2003:
ublocking I would want to hear from the user that they understood why they had been blocked and undertook to desist. NilubonT is a different case;
1291:
No, of course not. (Sorry, I made a misprint in the comment). But the reference is wrong, the year of publication is 1854, after the french paper.
174:, is not viewable but is probably just a routine listing. The first one is a deadlink to me, but the gbooks id just resolves to another volume of
5991:
5975:
5961:
5918:
4892:
4584:
4389:
1774:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/09/american_secessionists_inspired_by_the_scottish_referendum_groups_in_vermont.html
1446:
1375:
6783:
6527:
6512:
6487:
5821:
5555:
5428:
4033:
3685:
3644:
3627:
1791:
1761:
1469:
1458:
679:
421:
6954:
4773:
4341:
2620:, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a
385:
6940:
5222:
4063:
3777:
3097:
985:
6770:
giving the rationale for the one-week block? This would be helpful in case he wants to appeal. My guess is that this has something to do with
6650:
5930:
I am familiar with the sentence you quoted in that guideline (why would I not be?), but I fail to see the significance of it in this case. --
3347:
3345:
118:
6299:
5310:
Thanks for your assessment, I really appreciate you taking the time for that. I feel relieved to have a perspective from an uninvolved party.
3623:
I will appreciate if you can unlock the template so I can save it, I don't have a copy of the final and I was quite happy with the template.
2686:
2557:
You gave the user a warning at 10:22 and they have not edited the page since. There is no need for administrator involvement at this stage.
1702:
482:
403:
4009:
2965:
Message added 05:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
1948:
I accept that this is not a scam, and I had nothing to do with the sockpuppetry notice. However, the user is clearly working together with
6680:
are significant roles. The villain role wasn't even discovered until yesterday so the other participants were not able to consider that. --
6543:
4662:
seriously .. 20 minutes work...tops. I would very gladly do the work myself, if I knew which refs were best. Fix those three instances of
3997:
3736:
2539:
2533:
2527:
1815:
None of those articles are features on CascadiaNow!. They have passing mentions, or quotes from a spokesperson, but they are not articles
1393:
1125:
5332:
4924:
I am willing to make the change or changes, but first I wanted to understand why the original text was used. Maybe I'm missing something.
2045:
1786:
http://www.srf.ch/player/tv/10vor10/video/bye-bye-washington-junge-amerikaner-wollen-eigenen-staat?id=29813cdd-982f-4b60-a9ab-d186f1212d8e
875:
691:
a recognised expert, and it contains gross errors (it is incorrect that current in parallel resistors "separates into two slower paths").
5567:
think I would like to seek the assistance of at least one other, someone known for their knowledge and involvement in the COI guideline,
5260:
4452:
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
3203:
3504:
1887:
641:
i'm going to re-write and resubmit. It's difficult since i write the content for the website which comes out of club archives. Ah well!
439:
6835:
6728:
3274:
In the "T-Pad" article, I recently changed the word "antennae" to "antennas". You undid that, and I don't see that you gave a reason.
1300:
661:
4619:
3109:
2814:
you genuinely think the material is possibly wrong or dubious then that is a different matter, but so far you have not indicated that.
958:
427:
5580:
5392:
have a financial connection to, just after what appears to be hiding one's COI. This really seems like a clear TOS violation to me.--
5191:
3033:
2821:
Yes, as I mentioned, I certainly tried to find a paper or some citation to back it up, no luck, but then I didn't spend hours trying.
2680:
2159:
1456:
1178:
2114:
1016:, for spinning according to "unless you can explain it to your grandmother" and sparking brilliant ideas and kindness, - you are an
656:
525:
I don't agree, but you should make this comment on the article talk page where the discussion is visible to all interested editors.
7069:
5763:
5485:
Poor quality selfie on a mobile phone? Was it really necessary to raise this with me again after the file had already been deleted?
5376:
4430:
4297:
3003:
2734:
1672:
1062:
1032:
3421:
2536:
2089:
1715:
http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/what-three-u-s-secessionist-groups-think-about-the-scottish-independence-movement-20140911
826:
6927:
6280:
6070:
4748:
4259:
4254:
3481:. If that is the case you should not be editing the article at all, let alone reverting someone else. You might also want read
2150:
since #9 contains "Old prod" and #11 "Old prod full". According to my notes for AWB the correct place for both of them is #9. --
123:
4552:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
4093:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
3899:. You are right, that numbers in the math environment are displayed larger than in the text environment, e.g. foo foo 5 foo foo
3807:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
3230:
Hello Spark this is dfrr. your motion image on your userpage is also on my userpage just so you know come check it out thank you
2443:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
1335:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
6711:
6369:
6195:
5388:
5283:
5247:
4263:
3719:
2197:
1690:
1211:
1133:
4857:
4810:
4208:
3863:
3163:
3079:
2499:
1594:
5187:
5184:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
4759:
463:
306:
7009:
6854:
6255:
6117:
I agree that's what you did, and that is what I intended to type, I just mistyped it. The rest of my comments still stand.
3658:
Your article was not deleted for the quality of the writing, although it was somewhat promotional which does not help. See
3122:
1938:
519:
6184:
6152:
5372:
4513:
4412:
because of unambiguous c/r infringement. The author(?) went and re-created the same copy/pasted article under a new name:
4246:
2495:
2304:
2106:
1738:
1174:
5232:
1667:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/09/american-secessionists-are-rooting-for-an-independent-scotland/380047/
749:
5873:
5719:
4019:
3951:
3468:
3215:
2769:
2081:
1487:
and our policies and guidelines. The discussion should focuse on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines--
867:
3441:
1779:
667:
241:(it doesn't though; it's just a review), then we might not want to use that information, since as far as I can tell, he
7224:
7216:
7211:
7199:
7194:
7186:
7079:
demand to shorten my statement? Mine is not the longest statement in the case, nor is it the only one over 500 words.
6752:
5696:
4843:
4796:
4194:
4135:
4058:
3849:
3289:
3025:
2485:
2187:
1580:
1537:
1360:
346:
97:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
6213:
If this is not for Knowledge purposes, you may not have a need to generate SVG diagrams. You may be better of with a
5779:
5290:, littered as they are with cuss words. If you have any specific issues you would like me to look at, please provide
4936:
6585:
theory had consensus for a redirect to its parent alternative gravitational theory. We are discussing this matter at
6247:
5831:
3312:
1883:
1660:
963:
785:
564:
105:
6989:
6758:
6329:
4346:
As I said, before I can do anything at all about this, I need a list of documents required and your e-mail address.
3264:
2650:
2267:
1767:
1465:
6740:
6631:
6746:
6456:
Also, as mentioned earlier, the revert was made in good-faith. You have limited grounds to make any claim here. --
6190:
That's still not enough to fully explain what you are doing. You seem to have a specific circuit in mind (series
2667:
1720:
1697:
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/03/12/what-is-cascadia_n_4944819.html?1394652609&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067
6576:
5602:
5450:
4509:
4505:
4435:
4268:
3897:
3547:
3512:
2876:(it isn't a requirement by policy, but is rapidly becoming a de facto one due to editor behaviour) makes writing
2696:
2481:
2474:
2426:
2419:
2381:
1839:
973:
544:
6379:. I would suggest you change your comment on his talk page and respond here with an explanation of some sort. --
5458:
after all) and always balance my interests in subjects of any nature but especially controversial articles like
5328:
3620:,it's in tagalog though and there's this person that talks about this school project "Florance Lerning Centre".
1284:
460:
6810:
3408:. I just wanted to notify you that a new RfC regarding the methodical removal of Persondata is taking place at
3126:
3084:
1983:
796:
6403:
2656:
1792:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/18/america-secessionist-scotland-independence-vote/15821863/
1762:
http://www.seattleglobalist.com/2014/09/17/cascadia-separatist-secessionist-movements-scotland-catalonia/29021
1749:
1630:
Earlier today you deleted the article CascadiaNow - I would like to contest this on both points you flagged.
265:
minutes doesn't get any better. It really isn't the sort of stuff that WP:SPS had in mind for an exception.
6565:
5746:
has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
5176:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3543:
3105:
6891:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
4280:
2967:
2231:
1834:
I would be prepared to restore it as a draft if you thought you could make it into a compliant article (see
1400:
look at something you are more likely to get a response if you provide a link to the page under discussion.
916:
6197:
gives examples of creating phasor diagrams directly in an svg file (without the need for Inkscape at all).
4963:
2677:
2205:
2029:
1859:
1823:
1191:
1008:
Thank you, specialist on the "1920s electronic filter designs and designers", for quality articles such as
851:
808:
753:
2646:
2617:
1703:
http://www.humanosphere.org/world-politics/2014/09/from-scotland-to-cascadia-a-new-push-to-empower-locals/
453:
6932:
6021:
5282:
language or determined edit warring, but I am not. What may be an issue, is that if you are paid by the
4656:
4236:
3613:
which is an official body, it's called "Florance Learning Centre" - Florance is the owner of the resort.
2312:
1987:
1684:
1590:
1551:
812:
719:
317:
2950:
2663:
7165:
6589:. Please do not revert further. A second AfD would be useless as the first AfD was dominated by fringe
6376:
6054:
5835:
5817:
3446:
1828:
38:
5796:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
1803:
508:
6238:
I have to make exactly the same type of phasor diagrams as you made here (with little modification) :
5511:
5422:
Before I add any further diffs and concerns I think I should address a few things first. My being of
5315:
5256:
5226:
5216:
3075:
2975:
2239:
1492:
1477:
1442:
1380:
Spinningspark, to clarify, I saw this page because I got a notification when the editor linked it to
1371:
1118:
924:
791:
510:, you can see that the picture (SOS.svg) is repeated. There is no need for that repeating. Thanks. --
3225:
The image that happens to be on your userpage is also on my userpage along with other motion images.
6905:
BIBO stability]] (Bounded Input, Bounded Output stability), in signal processing and control theory
6357:
6353:
6336:. Firstly, if you checked my revert, the edits are not made by following a "brainless bot." I used
5800:
5791:
5739:
4853:
4806:
4250:
3922:
3684:
I put it first in the sandbox for someone to review it right? I just realized that :) Many thanks,
3008:
2229:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
2141:
1170:
951:
914:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
633:
154:
which probably don't count for much, but might count for something. What do you feel about this? --
6375:
Also, please review the revert edit summary "Notification of good faith revert found using STiki"
4276:
3616:
I was planning to expand on this topic sometime later on, you can see that it's all for real here
7174:
7121:
7085:
7054:
7030:
6797:
6699:
6685:
6662:
6646:
6620:
6415:
6312:
6269:
6227:
6203:
6164:
6123:
6093:
5986:
5956:
5913:
5715:
5632:
5559:
5495:
5300:
5152:
5074:
5007:
4984:
4828:
4781:
4706:
4689:
4644:
4600:
4524:
4352:
4321:
4179:
4120:
4065:
4029:
3968:
3834:
3779:
3748:
3704:
3669:
3582:
3499:
3464:
3388:
3175:
3135:
3046:
2886:
2773:
2674:
2563:
2518:
2470:
2459:
2415:
2321:
2201:
2176:
2130:
2040:
2014:
1959:
1906:
1848:
1838:
for what that means), but honestly, you would be better off starting a completely new article at
1565:
1522:
1509:
1406:
1307:
1269:
1224:
1149:
1107:
981:
899:
888:
821:
697:
598:
531:
491:
377:
335:
271:
226:
184:
47:
17:
5273:
I have looked at your recent edits and am not really seeing anything problematic. I agree with
2601:
1673:
http://www.businessinsider.com/american-separatists-are-hyped-about-scottish-independence-2014-9
882:
I have no idea why you can't find it, the article is there. What do you want me to do about it?
760:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
6860:
6816:
5446:
3399:
3029:
2155:
1576:
1569:
1533:
1526:
1318:
1311:
1160:
1058:
1028:
990:
804:
765:
741:
170:
material (other than by those pursuing him for copyvio). Of the two book sources, the second,
114:
6242:
Moreover ,I am blocked due to some misunderstanding,please clarify situation on my talk page
5772:
5065:
4272:
3610:
124:
https://cmcireland.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/hard-rain-ensemble-perform-in-cmcs-november-salon/
7137:
7101:
7065:
6323:
6251:
5849:
5784:
5673:
5648:
5576:
5468:
5413:
5397:
5359:
4742:
4204:
4149:
3919:
foo foo. But within the scriptstyle environment the numbers are displayed too small, foo foo
3882:
3859:
3823:
3417:
3308:
2700:
2692:
2638:. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their
2635:
2629:
2094:
1917:
1879:
1285:
652:
624:
586:
582:
558:
6915:
1691:
http://crosscut.com/2014/09/17/environment/121941/real-cascadia-answer-climate-refugee-boom/
1656:
Also, for your consideration, here are the links to all the articles feauting CascadiaNow:
7044:
7007:
6923:
6779:
6553:
6243:
6180:
6148:
6036:
5507:
5311:
5268:
5252:
3456:
3300:
3186:
3146:
3093:
3071:
3021:
2999:
2765:
2747:
2369:
2102:
2064:
1871:
1726:
1296:
1250:
1207:
1183:
1083:
1046:
863:
841:
728:
594:
145:
5825:
578:
8:
6840:
6508:
6461:
6439:
6384:
6365:
6333:
5563:
the proper template and left the proper notification which spawned the current dilemma.
4839:
4832:
4792:
4785:
4535:
4528:
4333:
If you AGF the sources, then only a domain expert can legitimately review the article. •
4242:
4227:
4168:
4109:
4054:
3891:
3426:
3159:
2739:
2397:
2377:
2337:
2300:
1236:
1166:
945:
800:
757:
515:
7024:
actually dead. Well ok, that's pretty certain, but the date of his death is not cited.
2645:
More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at
1739:
http://pigsquash.wordpress.com/2014/03/22/poets-cruise-to-cascadia-poetry-festival-2014/
832:
Your info isn't welcome on my talk page, the precise number of reverts by you and me is
7116:
7080:
7025:
6851:
6792:
6695:
6681:
6657:
6642:
6636:
6615:
6410:
6307:
6264:
6222:
6198:
6159:
6118:
6088:
6055:
5981:
5951:
5908:
5858:
5706:
5627:
5490:
5459:
5455:
5324:
The editor has disclosed that they work for the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope but had
5295:
5147:
5137:
5069:
5036:
5002:
4979:
4932:
4701:
4684:
4639:
4595:
4347:
4316:
4025:
3963:
3743:
3699:
3689:
3664:
3648:
3631:
3577:
3494:
3383:
3333:
3170:
3130:
3041:
2881:
2590:
2558:
2514:
2509:
2455:
2450:
2316:
2171:
2125:
2035:
2009:
1954:
1901:
1843:
1647:
1504:
1425:
1401:
1389:
1264:
1219:
1144:
1102:
977:
883:
816:
692:
526:
502:
486:
371:
330:
266:
221:
179:
5814:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
5752:
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~
4907:
else was responsible for the particular items I'm writing about. Without further ado:
3902:
2649:. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on
2392:
OK, I will try to make an internal link to the reference in the least obtrusive way.
2080:
As I am not as familiar with the ins and outs of Knowledge, I defer to your judgment.
1708:
359:
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a
139:, due to an unchallenged PROD. I've done a bit of research and found these two videos
6994:
6590:
6561:
5743:
5610:
5207:
5198:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
4876:
4818:
4770:
4756:
4671:
4568:
4421:
4386:
4338:
4294:
3640:
Apologies, I forgot to sign, hope the message went through, must be late right now..
3286:
3118:
2712:
2578:
2547:
2272:
2151:
1260:
1199:
1140:
1054:
1024:
1013:
110:
2166:
really care either, my concern is only that the page needs to say the same thing as
1780:
http://somewhereincolorado.blogspot.com/2014/04/cascadia-poetry-fest-in-posters.html
481:, along with your evidence that it is the same user, or else go to an admin who has
448:
for disruptive editing, but this editor is evading his block by using the static IP
220:
in a peer reviewed journal I will be astounded (but stranger things have happened).
7133:
7097:
7061:
6582:
6523:
6483:
6138:
6108:
6066:
6042:
5845:
5669:
5644:
5592:
5572:
5464:
5409:
5393:
5355:
5287:
5061:
4190:
4183:
4131:
4124:
4076:
4069:
3878:
3873:
3845:
3838:
3819:
3814:
3790:
3783:
3490:
3066:
article. He is removing my contributions and is unwilling to resolve the issue on
2263:
2167:
2055:
1994:
1974:
1935:
1875:
1009:
969:
675:
286:
255:
203:
159:
5236:
and I can't tell where I am going astray and where the other party is just upset.
3325:
3062:
I see your on the editor assistance list. Im having trouble with an editor on the
1661:
http://www.annistonstar.com/news/article_8afe40f2-3bd1-11e4-b833-6f8c8335ebd3.html
1074:
7041:
7004:
6919:
6871:
6775:
6342:
6337:
6295:
6239:
6176:
6144:
6025:
6016:
5568:
5423:
4966:
article PHOs are "big enough to cause regional devastation to human settlements".
4543:
4084:
4005:
3988:
3947:
3798:
3566:
3546:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
3358:
3249:
2995:
2743:
2434:
1768:
http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2020721242_biztaltoncol07xml.html
1326:
1292:
1246:
1203:
1129:
1041:
837:
247:
7173:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2793:
say is that all material must have an inline citation, nor does it say that you
2624:. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.
1646:
The format used for the article was copied from a very similar organization the
998:
590:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
6914:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
6504:
6471:
6457:
6435:
6380:
6361:
6218:
5384:
actually sourced in ref 12 and is accurate information with encyclopedic value.
5291:
4954:
4887:
4717:
4627:
4579:
4376:
4364:
4307:
4223:
4218:
4164:
4159:
4145:
4105:
4100:
4050:
3761:
3728:
3531:
3516:
3437:
3260:
3243:
3235:
3211:
3155:
3057:
2941:
2639:
2393:
2373:
2333:
2296:
1949:
1732:
1721:
http://www.npr.org/2014/11/15/364152696/americans-for-independence-from-america
1547:
1381:
511:
7020:, it would be torn to shreds. Come to that, there is not even a cite that he
6656:
Most of the other participants did not agree that his roles were significant.
4000:
reports about the problem. Unfortunatelly, there is no good solution given. --
3617:
3195:
3089:
Hi Spinningspark, Do you have references for the model of the human ear? -MC
1678:
1452:
Please advise of reason for Gregg l Greer article deletion (Restore Requested)
1245:
to guard against linkrot and to help safeguard the cited information. Thanks,
449:
142:
140:
7017:
6975:
6847:
6821:
6586:
5971:
5935:
5896:
5754:
5133:
5055:
5032:
4944:
4928:
4898:
4443:
4038:
3611:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Technical_Education_and_Skills_Development_Authority
3478:
3329:
2214:
2147:
1918:
1613:
1421:
1385:
1351:
1195:
478:
3485:, something you are likely to be in conflict with if you continue reverting.
1926:
1755:
6557:
6449:
6286:
5606:
5551:
5203:
5199:
4958:
4872:
4867:
4863:
4814:
4766:
4752:
4667:
4663:
4564:
4559:
4555:
4539:
4417:
4382:
4334:
4290:
4214:
4155:
4096:
4080:
3869:
3810:
3794:
3659:
3482:
3337:
3147:
3067:
2985:
2877:
2708:
2596:
2574:
2543:
2505:
2446:
2430:
2249:
2193:
2070:
1835:
1750:
http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/a-call-to-arms/Content?oid=12634948
1600:
1338:
1322:
1094:
934:
687:
7000:
6973:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —
4534:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
4075:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
4049:, so the problem is solved, I just wanted to let you know. Thank you -- --
3789:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
2425:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1317:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1241:
355:
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation
6959:
6519:
6494:
6479:
6191:
6104:
6062:
5866:
5588:
5542:
3758:
IDK. I felt a vibe, and I wasn't sure. I'm glad to hear it though. :-)—
2785:
2259:
2099:
there was no reason to delete the YG world tour 2014: power article -.-
2052:
1991:
1971:
1932:
1864:
Hi Spinningspark, What was the problem with my edit of the RIVA article?
799:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
671:
282:
251:
199:
155:
4747:
I am sorry to have caused you so much concern. Please see new thread at
4446:
has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and
2612:
6291:
5859:
5274:
4001:
3984:
3943:
2356:
Note that this practice is explicitly supported in WP:EL:#How to link:
1184:
773:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
6637:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nathan_Norman
4848:
4801:
4199:
3854:
3538:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
2490:
1842:
where you can get the page reviewed before it goes live to mainspace.
1685:
http://www.cityartsonline.com/articles/behold-cascadia-poetry-festival
1585:
6880:
6677:
6501:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Statement_by_uninvolved_JustBerry
5243:
5181:
3539:
3433:
3353:
3256:
3231:
3207:
2937:
2621:
455:
also for being "László Vazulvonal of Stockholm editing logged out" .
5239:
If I can provide diffs and links to illustrate I would be happy to.
3382:
Manual of Style. Until it is, both forms should remain acceptable.
178:. In short, I don't think you have enough to establish notability.
6673:
5967:
5931:
5892:
5177:
3663:
if you want a copy to use on some other site then please email me.
3593:
Thanks for deleting FloWer Beach Resort Bohol, can you help me out?
3565:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
1804:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/files/2014/03/yPov2.gif
1797:
1609:
1604:
1555:
1347:
1342:
6876:
6406:
quickly confirms that the information is both true and well known.
5734:
5454:
related articles, the general sciences both real and sci-fi (I am
2733:
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
135:
I just noticed that a few days ago, you deleted an article called
5966:
If good faith is assumed then why not write "reverting edit"? --
5805:
5354:
extensive posts and comments were both civil and in good faith.--
3534:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
3063:
457:
He is adding unsourced infromation to biograhies of living people
6240:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:RC_voltage_gain_phasor_diagram.svg
5887:
Objection to your edit summary with its implication of bad faith
3285:
Also, please see the book "Antennas" (Kraus, 1988, McGraw-Hill,
3270:
T-Pad: I changed "antennae" to "antennas"; you undid that. Why?
2962:
Hello, Spinningspark. Please check your email; you've got mail!
2226:
Hello, Spinningspark. Please check your email; you've got mail!
1437:
Please Advise of rational for deletion-AFD review is requested--
911:
Hello, Spinningspark. Please check your email; you've got mail!
795:. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
6884:
4471:: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
3340:. There are also many recent papers using the Latinate plural
6815:
I completely disagree with your decline reason for the CSD at
6217:
based graphic program. I believe you can get a free trial of
4666:
and I will Pass. I wish you the best of luck in all things. •
4626:. This is just getting to be too much. What do you think? --
4140:
1542:
6214:
6015:
which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that
5408:
I have a few more concerns to post but its time for dinner.--
4046:
4039:
3432:
can't easily figure out where it is in the article. Thanks,
2034:
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool.
1990:. I think all we have to do is explain that to them.--v/r -
4548:
4483:: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
4089:
3803:
3362:
Brown uses "antennae" in passages discussing insect feelers
2726:
2439:
2069:
Unfortunately I am once again seeking your advice regarding
1827:
apply to the one you picked. The best articles to copy are
1331:
6937:
I have filed a request for arbitration over my last block:
4950:
3606:
3524:
1896:
811:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
790:
breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a
5812:
Template:Did you know nominations/Sorby Research Institute
746:
Knowledge:The answer to life, the universe, and everything
6941:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case#jps vs. Spinningspark
5701:
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page
4410:
Acupuncture analgesia: Areas of consensus and controversy
3554:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
3121:
article? The reference is stated in the article. Here's
2707:
if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.
5950:
edit. That is why it says "reverting good faith edit".
4477:: advise on building tools to support the library's work
3296:
title. For each such book, I see the word "antennas".
2880:
standard pages a lot more difficult and a lot less fun.
2722:
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
1727:
http://occupywallst.org/article/cascadianow-cascadianow/
6772:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Self-creation cosmology
6143:
How do you create phasors using inkscape? Please reply.
6002:
Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list
5180:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
2742:. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
857:
6766:
Hello Spinningspark. Will you be leaving a message at
5335:
the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope article. I believe
4306:
The current form of the article is mostly the work of
3926:
3542:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
543:
Request on 13:20:10, 6 January 2015 for assistance on
3925:
3905:
803:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
709:
Thank you for restoring the Walking After U wikipage.
7003:
you think would benefit from better referencing. --
5980:
Sorry, I don't have any more time to waste on this.
5865:
Hi, can you userfy this plus talk page to my space?
5810:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
4414:
Acupuncture analgesia:possitive and negative opinion
4404:
Acupuncture analgesia:possitive and negative opinion
3352:
Another notable author using the Latinate plural is
1831:
as these are considered Knowledge's very best works.
856:
I try to find some cover bands of The Cure...I find
6887:by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just
6010:user group we wanted to let you know about the new
5387:The next edit that concerns me, is the edit to the
2868:
person crusade against the little blue numbers? :-)
1709:
http://kuow.org/post/it-time-washington-leave-union
1623:
Request CascadiaNow be un-deleted - Contest A7, G11
6819:. And this is really discoursing to contribute. —
5699:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
5554:should be able to confirm the copyright status of
5277:that for you to edit the Mauna Kea article is not
5132:Do you concur, or am I still lost in space? Thanks
5068:explains this in detail, see the fifth paragraph.
3933:
3911:
3742:Of course not. Whatever made you think it would?
3125:. The anatomy diagram is based on a diagram from
2703:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
2664:Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter
1640:All of these are verifiable third party sources.
779:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
3117:Are you talking about the model described in the
452:. The IP 213.114.147.52 was blocked in the past:
6900:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
5662:Template:Did you know nominations/Albert Downing
5246:and related articles where we are involved in a
3896:I do not understand the reason for your revert:
131:The Christmas Tree (1991 film) - deleted article
6971:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
5221:Hello, I picked you at random from the list of
2532:A IP editor has been inserting a personal rant
2198:the VisualEditor/Feedback page on mediawiki.org
2194:Click here to open the Sandbox at mediawiki.org
1039:A year ago, you were the 719th recipient of my
2806:from a layman in the subject isn't worth much.
784:In particular, editors should be aware of the
4381:Review started. Expect it to take a while. •
5924:standard comments or use a non-standard one.
5683:Nomination for deletion of Template:DirectIP
5242:The point of contention is really about the
5172:Disambiguation link notification for July 22
3998:Knowledge:WikiProject_Mathematics/Typography
1733:http://overtheedgenewspaper.ca/cascadia-now/
194:Sorry about the bad link. This should work.
3618:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCp-LpJIYwg
2604:and sharing your ideas with the developers.
1679:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCHdb4lCcow
507:Hello Spinningspark, regarding your revert
5804:were made to wear the dirty underpants of
5729:DYK nomination of Sorby Research Institute
3374:I don't know about the Chicago MoS. Does
744:according to the reverts you have made on
6024:and the associated talk page. Thank you!
5788:was updated with a fact from the article
4949:There is no problem with you editing the
3575:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge!
1756:http://postdefiance.com/washington-rules/
1068:Caroline Modarressy-Tehrani Page Deletion
740:You currently appear to be engaged in an
6285:Happy to leave your other reversions to
4152:for things which need to be addressed.
2735:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
2595:
1924:Hey. I got an appeal from this user on
1682:Canadian Broadcasting Company</a: -->
1554:for things which need to be addressed.
366:here are the questions for the interview
4749:Knowledge talk:Good article nominations
2757:Y chromosome "citation needed" removal.
1420:for some reason he reverted your move.
1259:You should also acquaint yourself with
1242:http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/10080192
14:
7171:Do not edit the contents of this page.
5546:opinion for you to "administrate" it.
4459:: help distribute free research access
4144:. The article is close to meeting the
1811:Which would indicate it's importance.
1546:. The article is close to meeting the
1078:I'd be happy to hear them. Thank you.
686:sites. That means it should meet the
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
6874:. I have automatically detected that
5379:is clear that a judges order was for
5223:editors willing to provide assistance
2691:A file that you uploaded or altered,
2687:Possibly unfree File:Grave marker.jpg
1712:KUOW/National Public Radio</a: -->
858:http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Cureheads
7152:
6544:Ella Ridge View Holiday Inn Contents
5767:
5587:GIs in WW1 coined "motherfucker"...
2966:
2528:Could I get uninvolved eyes at RS/N?
2496:Talk:Mechanical-electrical analogies
2230:
2146:I am confused with your addition in
1789:Swiss Public Broadcasting</a: -->
915:
25:
6969:There is currently a discussion at
5251:Thanks for considering my request!
3202:I'd like to invite you to join the
2346:Hello Spinningspark. From WP:GAME
860:but I don't find Easy Cure...why?
393:User:László_Vazulvonal_of_Stockholm
23:
6999:Please let me know which parts of
4465:: seek new donations from partners
4434:
3523:
3410:Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)
3204:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music
2955:
2725:
2594:
2219:
1633:A7 - No indication of importance.
904:
766:Knowledge's policy on edit warring
764:Please be particularly aware that
732:
662:Series/parallel circuits reversion
24:
7238:
6694:How can I appeal the decision? --
4408:You recently deleted the article
7156:
6964:
6865:
6448:
5771:
5764:DYK for Sorby Research Institute
5733:
5687:
4847:
4800:
4547:
4431:The Knowledge Library needs you!
4198:
4139:
4088:
3853:
3802:
3194:
2911:more of this on complex entries.
2489:
2438:
1798:http://www.vice.com/tag/cascadia
1783:Somewhere In Colorado</a: -->
1724:National Public Radio</a: -->
1584:
1541:
1330:
997:
29:
6281:UK and US hay and straw weights
5603:Commons:Grandfathered old files
5451:Thirty Meter Telescope protests
2697:Knowledge:Possibly unfree files
2482:Mechanical-electrical analogies
2475:Mechanical-electrical analogies
2427:Mechanical-electrical analogies
2420:Mechanical-electrical analogies
974:List of bus routes in Singapore
6990:16:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
6955:14:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
6928:07:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
6855:22:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
6836:10:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
6803:08:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
6784:02:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
6768:User talk:I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc
6712:Will there be a block message?
6704:00:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
6690:01:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
6668:01:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
6651:00:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
6626:23:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
6608:23:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
6570:02:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
6528:01:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
6513:01:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
6488:00:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
6466:13:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
6444:13:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
6421:09:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
6389:02:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
6370:01:46, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
6328:As you may remember, you left
6318:22:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
6300:22:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
6233:16:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
6209:15:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
6185:15:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
6170:14:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
6153:10:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
6129:01:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
6113:00:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
6099:08:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
6071:07:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
5389:Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope
5284:Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope
3934:{\displaystyle \scriptstyle 5}
3720:Everyone has their own opinion
752:with others, to avoid editing
399:László Vazulvonal of Stockholm
137:The Christmas Tree (1991 film)
13:
1:
6050:18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
5992:13:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
5976:10:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
5962:12:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
5940:00:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
5919:21:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
5901:20:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
5744:Did You Know nominations page
4813:to appear in Did you know. •
3983:Thank you for your answer. --
2182:12:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
2160:11:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
2136:00:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
2115:23:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
2090:04:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
1730:Occupy Wall Street</a: -->
307:Walking After U page deletion
4964:potentially hazardous object
4683:supposed to be a GA issue).
3190:
2971:at any time by removing the
2628:You can share your thoughts
2235:at any time by removing the
2059:23:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
2046:22:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
2020:22:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
1998:22:14, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
1978:22:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
1965:22:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
1939:18:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
1912:23:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
1888:20:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
1854:00:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
1824:Knowledge:Other stuff exists
1765:Seattle Globalist</a: -->
1618:02:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
1559:05:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
1515:19:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1497:19:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1482:19:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1447:18:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1430:17:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1412:17:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1394:17:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1376:17:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
1356:07:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
1301:20:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
1275:14:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
1255:23:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
1230:21:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
1212:17:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
1179:18:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
1155:14:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
1134:09:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
1113:20:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
1088:19:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
1063:22:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
1033:11:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
920:at any time by removing the
7:
7142:20:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
7127:20:37, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
7106:20:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
7091:20:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
7070:17:52, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
7047:22:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
7036:22:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
7010:20:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
6275:13:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
6256:06:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
5874:12:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
5854:12:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
5798:... that volunteers at the
5759:02:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
4955:it is positively encouraged
4860:to appear in Did you know.
4469:Communications coordinators
4211:to appear in Did you know.
4020:Blacketts Lake, Nova Scotia
3866:to appear in Did you know.
3406:the previous Persondata RfC
2647:mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015
2502:to appear in Did you know.
1753:Portland Mercury</a: -->
1718:National Journal</a: -->
1676:Business Insider</a: -->
1670:Atlantic Monthly</a: -->
1597:to appear in Did you know.
1591:Talk:Double-tuned amplifier
1552:Talk:Double-tuned amplifier
986:22:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
959:21:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
894:14:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
876:14:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
846:04:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
827:16:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
724:04:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
703:16:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
680:15:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
657:14:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
629:13:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
537:20:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
520:19:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
497:15:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
472:15:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
386:10:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
341:13:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
322:04:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
291:04:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
277:22:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
260:21:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
232:19:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
208:18:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
190:18:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
164:17:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
119:17:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
10:
7243:
6916:these opt-out instructions
5738:Hello! Your submission of
5724:13:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
5678:04:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
5653:17:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
5638:21:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
5615:16:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
5597:14:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
5581:07:13, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
5516:22:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
5501:09:49, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
5473:03:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
5418:01:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
5402:01:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
4510:MediaWiki message delivery
3265:21:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
3240:19:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
3216:19:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
3181:22:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
3164:18:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
3141:17:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
3110:08:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
3080:05:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
2892:17:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
2778:08:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
2752:18:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
2717:18:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
2681:15:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
2658:Unsubscribe from this list
2583:11:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
2569:10:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
2552:10:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
2523:18:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
2464:17:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
2402:16:42, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
2386:09:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
2188:Special character inserter
2051:Activated, thanks.--v/r -
1807:Washington Post</a: -->
1700:Huffington Post</a: -->
1653:Thank you for your time,
1464:An editor has asked for a
1361:Gregg L Greer updated page
1143:, as it says on the page.
666:Hi, why did you revert my
477:You should report this to
7060:something back a little.
5830:, and it may be added to
5558:before deletion, and the
5364:23:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
5320:20:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
5306:16:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
5261:02:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
5212:09:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
5158:09:04, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
5142:19:00, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
5080:21:58, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
5041:18:37, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
5013:09:22, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
4990:21:58, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
4937:17:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
4893:05:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
4881:21:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
4822:20:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
4774:07:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
4760:03:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
4723:15:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
4712:15:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
4695:14:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
4675:13:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
4650:11:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
4633:00:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
4606:17:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
4585:16:47, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
4542:-status according to the
4083:-status according to the
4059:09:11, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
4034:23:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
4010:22:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
3993:22:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
3974:18:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
3952:21:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
3887:02:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
3828:05:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
3797:-status according to the
3052:12:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
3034:14:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
3004:05:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
2433:-status according to the
2342:18:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
2327:13:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
2305:11:33, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
2268:19:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
2210:18:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
1325:-status according to the
964:Deletion review requested
547:submission by NeilRedburn
106:Hard Rain SoloistEnsemble
6632:I think you made mistake
6012:wikipedia-en-editfilters
5801:Sorby Research Institute
5792:Sorby Research Institute
5740:Sorby Research Institute
5449:article and created the
5248:debate about NPOV issues
5146:That sounds good to me.
4854:Talk:Negative resistance
4807:Talk:negative resistance
4573:13:20, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
4518:04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
4489:: run reference services
4426:00:32, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
4390:13:20, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
4370:22:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
4358:21:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
4342:20:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
4327:16:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
4298:01:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
4232:18:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
4173:00:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
4138:has been placed on hold
4114:23:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
3770:05:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
3754:16:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
3737:16:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
3710:11:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
3694:10:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
3675:00:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
3653:22:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
3636:22:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
3607:http://www.tesda.gov.ph/
3588:16:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
3568:leaving us some feedback
3544:create articles yourself
3505:16:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
3442:21:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
3404:Hi, You participated in
3070:. What should be done?.
2946:02:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
2668:Translate the user guide
1771:Seattle Times</a: -->
1759:Post Defiance</a: -->
1736:Over the Edge</a: -->
1664:Anniston Star</a: -->
1540:has been placed on hold
758:try to reach a consensus
748:. Users are expected to
483:been previously involved
6893:my operator's talk page
6577:Self-creation cosmology
6017:wouldn't be appropriate
5749:your nomination's entry
3483:our edit warring policy
3422:08:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
3394:18:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
3317:03:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
1706:Humanosphere</a: -->
805:appropriate noticeboard
18:User talk:Spinningspark
7040:Have a look again. --
6817:Deforestation in India
6811:Deforestation in India
5881:User:Valoem/Moxie Raia
5836:Did you know talk page
5697:nominated for deletion
5538:
5447:Thirty Meter Telescope
4475:Technical coordinators
4439:
3935:
3913:
3528:
3085:Model of the human ear
2960:
2730:
2651:the survey's talk page
2608:Hello, Spinningspark,
2605:
2224:
1817:about the organisation
1577:Double-tuned amplifier
1570:Double-tuned amplifier
1534:Double-tuned amplifier
1527:Double-tuned amplifier
1319:Double-tuned amplifier
1312:Double-tuned amplifier
909:
737:
7169:of past discussions.
6258:. Thanks in advance.
6085:Electrical element(s)
6006:Hi, as a user in the
5532:
5066:One of the references
4910:In the two sentences
4862:Message delivered by
4554:Message delivered by
4506:The Knowledge Library
4487:Research coordinators
4481:Outreach coordinators
4444:The Knowledge Library
4438:
4213:Message delivered by
4205:Talk:Staggered tuning
4154:Message delivered by
4150:Talk:Staggered tuning
4146:good article criteria
4095:Message delivered by
3936:
3914:
3868:Message delivered by
3860:Talk:Mobility analogy
3809:Message delivered by
3548:Articles for Creation
3527:
3513:Articles for creation
2959:
2729:
2701:file description page
2695:, has been listed at
2693:File:Grave marker.jpg
2630:by clicking this link
2618:top-priority problems
2599:
2504:Message delivered by
2445:Message delivered by
2223:
1840:Articles for creation
1713:(Audio), <a href="
1599:Message delivered by
1548:good article criteria
1337:Message delivered by
908:
736:
446:02:50, 1 January 2015
214:in the relevant field
176:The Video Source Book
172:The Video Source Book
42:of past discussions.
6883:may have broken the
6718:I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc
6676:and lead villain in
6022:WP:Edit filter/Draft
5445:I began editing the
5200:opt-out instructions
4463:Partner coordinators
4457:Account coordinators
3923:
3903:
3479:conflict of interest
2600:Thank you for using
2277:Dear Spinningspark,
2030:UTRS Account Request
1860:Edit of RIVA article
1795:USA Today</a: -->
1742:Pigsquash</a: -->
1688:City Arts</a: -->
1457:Deletion review for
1286:Bertrand's postulate
852:Easy Cure cover band
146:The Nostalgia Critic
6933:Arbitration Request
6672:Lead guitarist for
6334:User talk:Javed4122
6008:edit filter manager
5832:the statistics page
4953:article. In fact,
4842:you nominated as a
4840:Negative resistance
4833:Negative resistance
4795:you nominated as a
4793:negative resistance
4786:negative resistance
4536:Negative resistance
4529:Negative resistance
4243:Negative resistance
4237:negative resistance
4193:you nominated as a
4134:you nominated as a
3848:you nominated as a
3511:Your submission at
2740:Magneto (generator)
2484:you nominated as a
1694:Crosscut</a: -->
1627:Hi Spinningspark,
1579:you nominated as a
1536:you nominated as a
6078:Electrical element
6056:Electrical element
5460:Occupy Wall Street
5190:• Join us at the
4903:Hi Spinningspark,
4538:you nominated for
4504:Send on behalf of
4448:we need your help!
4440:
4079:you nominated for
3931:
3930:
3909:
3793:you nominated for
3529:
3447:change to Derating
3334:Reginald Fessenden
2968:remove this notice
2961:
2731:
2675:Whatamidoing (WMF)
2606:
2429:you nominated for
2232:remove this notice
2225:
2202:Whatamidoing (WMF)
1984:this is legitimate
1927:UTRS appeal #13122
1648:Bullitt Foundation
1321:you nominated for
1018:awesome Wikipedian
917:remove this notice
910:
809:dispute resolution
738:
644:I'll keep trying!
239:The Christmas Tree
7230:
7229:
7181:
7180:
7175:current talk page
6573:
6556:comment added by
6470:Just driving by:
6358:WP:Administrators
5842:
5841:
5829:
5693:Template:DirectIP
5217:editor assistance
5195:
4957:. Do you have a
4870:
4660:
4657:talk page stalker
4562:
4221:
4162:
4103:
4057:
3912:{\displaystyle 5}
3876:
3817:
3768:
3735:
3519:has been accepted
3473:
3459:comment added by
3320:
3303:comment added by
3222:
3221:
3119:impedance analogy
3113:
3096:comment added by
3036:
3024:comment added by
2784:The policy is at
2780:
2768:comment added by
2512:
2453:
2389:
2372:comment added by
2117:
2105:comment added by
1982:I would say that
1891:
1874:comment added by
1829:Featured articles
1643:G11 - Promotion
1607:
1345:
1141:impedance analogy
1119:Capacitor analogy
1014:Otto Julius Zobel
878:
866:comment added by
786:three-revert rule
716:Brilliantradience
391:Block evasion of
384:
314:Brilliantradience
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
7234:
7208:
7183:
7182:
7160:
7159:
7153:
6985:
6982:
6979:
6968:
6967:
6910:
6896:
6869:
6868:
6831:
6828:
6825:
6762:
6735:deleted contribs
6572:
6550:
6498:
6452:
6332:not long ago on
6048:
6047:
6045:
5871:
5815:
5775:
5768:
5737:
5722:
5713:
5709:
5691:
5690:
5288:user:Mark Miller
5272:
5235:
5185:
5062:orbital elements
5059:
4948:
4890:
4861:
4851:
4804:
4720:
4654:
4630:
4582:
4553:
4551:
4499:
4380:
4367:
4284:
4266:
4212:
4202:
4191:Staggered tuning
4184:Staggered tuning
4153:
4143:
4132:Staggered tuning
4125:Staggered tuning
4094:
4092:
4077:Staggered tuning
4070:Staggered tuning
4053:
3940:
3938:
3937:
3932:
3918:
3916:
3915:
3910:
3867:
3857:
3846:Mobility analogy
3839:Mobility analogy
3808:
3806:
3791:Mobility analogy
3784:Mobility analogy
3764:
3759:
3731:
3726:
3570:
3560:
3472:
3453:
3356:. In his novel
3319:
3297:
3198:
3191:
3112:
3090:
3019:
3009:Oliver Heaviside
2992:
2990:
2984:
2980:
2974:
2970:
2958:
2951:You've got mail!
2878:Featured Article
2763:
2503:
2493:
2444:
2442:
2388:
2366:
2256:
2254:
2248:
2244:
2238:
2234:
2222:
2142:Talk page layout
2100:
1929:
1890:
1868:
1777:Slate</a: -->
1598:
1588:
1545:
1336:
1334:
1093:You should read
1044:
1010:Waveguide filter
1001:
957:
954:
948:
941:
939:
933:
929:
923:
919:
907:
861:
735:
634:RHADC submission
603:
602:
574:User:NeilRedburn
485:with this user.
443:
416:deleted contribs
382:
380:
374:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
7242:
7241:
7237:
7236:
7235:
7233:
7232:
7231:
7204:
7157:
7057:
7055:ArbCom evidence
6997:
6983:
6980:
6977:
6965:
6962:
6935:
6906:
6875:
6866:
6863:
6843:
6829:
6826:
6823:
6813:
6720:
6714:
6634:
6579:
6551:
6546:
6492:
6326:
6283:
6141:
6059:
6043:
6041:
6040:
6004:
5889:
5867:
5863:
5766:
5731:
5711:
5705:
5704:
5688:
5685:
5665:
5424:Native Hawaiian
5269:KanoaWithington
5266:
5231:
5219:
5192:DPL WikiProject
5174:
5053:
4959:reliable source
4942:
4901:
4888:
4866:, on behalf of
4836:
4789:
4745:
4718:
4628:
4580:
4558:, on behalf of
4532:
4501:
4497:
4433:
4406:
4374:
4365:
4257:
4241:
4239:
4217:, on behalf of
4187:
4158:, on behalf of
4128:
4099:, on behalf of
4073:
4043:
4022:
3924:
3921:
3920:
3904:
3901:
3900:
3894:
3872:, on behalf of
3842:
3813:, on behalf of
3787:
3767:
3766::Limited Access
3762:
3734:
3729:
3722:
3595:
3590:
3556:
3550:if you prefer.
3521:
3454:
3449:
3429:
3402:
3359:Deception Point
3298:
3272:
3252:
3227:
3218:
3189:
3151:
3091:
3087:
3072:Khanyusufkhalil
3060:
3018:including it.
3011:
2993:
2988:
2982:
2978:
2976:You've got mail
2972:
2964:
2956:
2953:
2759:
2724:
2689:
2684:
2671:
2593:
2530:
2508:, on behalf of
2478:
2449:, on behalf of
2423:
2367:
2313:game the system
2275:
2257:
2252:
2246:
2242:
2240:You've got mail
2236:
2228:
2220:
2217:
2200:. Thank you!
2190:
2144:
2097:
2067:
2032:
1925:
1922:
1869:
1862:
1801:Vice</a: -->
1625:
1603:, on behalf of
1573:
1530:
1489:Greeralivetoday
1474:Greeralivetoday
1466:deletion review
1462:
1454:
1439:Greeralivetoday
1368:Greeralivetoday
1363:
1341:, on behalf of
1315:
1289:
1188:
1163:
1121:
1070:
1042:
1037:
1036:
1005:spinning sparks
1002:
993:
966:
952:
946:
944:
942:
937:
931:
927:
925:You've got mail
921:
913:
905:
902:
900:Elsevier access
854:
813:page protection
733:
731:
711:
664:
636:
576:
572:
549:
505:
464:109.185.154.159
444:was blocked on
401:
396:
378:
372:
352:
309:
248:Channel Awesome
133:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
7240:
7228:
7227:
7222:
7219:
7214:
7209:
7202:
7197:
7192:
7189:
7179:
7178:
7161:
7151:
7150:
7149:
7148:
7147:
7146:
7145:
7144:
7056:
7053:
7052:
7051:
7050:
7049:
6996:
6993:
6961:
6958:
6934:
6931:
6912:
6911:
6902:
6901:
6862:
6861:September 2015
6859:
6842:
6839:
6812:
6809:
6808:
6807:
6806:
6805:
6764:
6763:
6713:
6710:
6709:
6708:
6707:
6706:
6692:
6633:
6630:
6629:
6628:
6578:
6575:
6545:
6542:
6541:
6540:
6539:
6538:
6537:
6536:
6535:
6534:
6533:
6532:
6531:
6530:
6446:
6426:
6425:
6424:
6423:
6407:
6399:
6392:
6391:
6325:
6322:
6321:
6320:
6282:
6279:
6278:
6277:
6236:
6235:
6221:for instance.
6211:
6173:
6172:
6140:
6137:
6136:
6135:
6134:
6133:
6132:
6131:
6058:
6053:
6003:
6000:
5999:
5998:
5997:
5996:
5995:
5994:
5928:
5927:
5926:
5925:
5888:
5885:
5884:
5883:
5862:
5857:
5846:Chris Woodrich
5840:
5839:
5780:16 August 2015
5776:
5765:
5762:
5730:
5727:
5684:
5681:
5664:
5659:
5658:
5657:
5656:
5655:
5618:
5617:
5599:
5527:
5526:
5525:
5524:
5523:
5522:
5521:
5520:
5519:
5518:
5486:
5483:
5479:
5438:
5437:
5436:
5435:
5434:
5433:
5420:
5406:
5405:
5404:
5385:
5366:
5346:
5345:
5344:
5343:
5342:
5341:
5218:
5215:
5173:
5170:
5169:
5168:
5167:
5166:
5165:
5164:
5163:
5162:
5161:
5160:
5123:
5122:
5121:
5120:
5119:
5118:
5117:
5116:
5105:
5104:
5103:
5102:
5101:
5100:
5099:
5098:
5087:
5086:
5085:
5084:
5083:
5082:
5046:
5045:
5044:
5043:
5026:
5025:
5024:
5023:
5016:
5015:
4997:
4996:
4995:
4994:
4993:
4992:
4968:
4967:
4900:
4897:
4896:
4895:
4835:
4831:nomination of
4825:
4788:
4784:nomination of
4778:
4777:
4776:
4744:
4741:
4740:
4739:
4738:
4737:
4736:
4735:
4734:
4733:
4732:
4731:
4730:
4729:
4728:
4727:
4726:
4725:
4611:
4610:
4609:
4608:
4588:
4587:
4531:
4527:nomination of
4521:
4503:
4495:
4493:
4491:
4490:
4484:
4478:
4472:
4466:
4460:
4432:
4429:
4405:
4402:
4401:
4400:
4399:
4398:
4397:
4396:
4395:
4394:
4393:
4392:
4330:
4329:
4308:user:Chetvorno
4301:
4300:
4238:
4235:
4186:
4182:nomination of
4176:
4127:
4123:nomination of
4117:
4072:
4068:nomination of
4062:
4042:
4037:
4021:
4018:
4017:
4016:
4015:
4014:
4013:
4012:
3977:
3976:
3929:
3908:
3893:
3890:
3841:
3837:nomination of
3831:
3786:
3782:nomination of
3776:
3775:
3774:
3773:
3772:
3760:
3727:
3721:
3718:
3717:
3716:
3715:
3714:
3713:
3712:
3678:
3677:
3594:
3591:
3573:
3572:
3563:
3536:
3532:Lambda2 method
3522:
3520:
3517:Lambda2 method
3509:
3508:
3507:
3486:
3448:
3445:
3428:
3425:
3401:
3400:Persondata RfC
3398:
3397:
3396:
3372:
3368:
3350:
3290:978-0070354227
3271:
3268:
3251:
3248:
3226:
3223:
3220:
3219:
3201:
3199:
3188:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3150:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3086:
3083:
3059:
3056:
3055:
3054:
3010:
3007:
2963:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2895:
2894:
2872:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2862:
2861:
2856:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2847:
2846:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2831:
2830:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2816:
2815:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2800:
2799:
2758:
2755:
2723:
2720:
2705:the discussion
2688:
2685:
2655:
2640:privacy policy
2592:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2529:
2526:
2477:
2473:nomination of
2467:
2422:
2418:nomination of
2412:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2363:
2274:
2271:
2227:
2218:
2216:
2213:
2189:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2143:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2107:99.238.104.213
2096:
2093:
2077:correct one?
2066:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2031:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
1980:
1950:User:Krelcoyne
1946:
1921:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1861:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1832:
1820:
1802:, <a href="
1796:, <a href="
1790:, <a href="
1784:, <a href="
1778:, <a href="
1772:, <a href="
1766:, <a href="
1760:, <a href="
1754:, <a href="
1748:, <a href="
1743:, <a href="
1737:, <a href="
1731:, <a href="
1725:, <a href="
1719:, <a href="
1707:, <a href="
1701:, <a href="
1695:, <a href="
1689:, <a href="
1683:, <a href="
1677:, <a href="
1671:, <a href="
1665:, <a href="
1624:
1621:
1572:
1568:nomination of
1562:
1529:
1525:nomination of
1519:
1518:
1517:
1461:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1415:
1414:
1382:Trayvon Martin
1362:
1359:
1314:
1310:nomination of
1304:
1288:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1187:
1182:
1167:StringTheory11
1162:
1161:NGC 4038 Group
1159:
1158:
1157:
1139:That would be
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1069:
1066:
1007:
996:
995:
994:
992:
991:Precious again
989:
965:
962:
947:Chris Troutman
912:
903:
901:
898:
897:
896:
853:
850:
849:
848:
782:
781:
776:
761:
730:
727:
710:
707:
706:
705:
663:
660:
635:
632:
619:
609:
607:
606:
605:
604:
570:
548:
541:
540:
539:
504:
501:
500:
499:
450:213.114.147.52
395:
389:
351:
347:Interview for
345:
344:
343:
308:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
132:
129:
107:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
7239:
7226:
7223:
7220:
7218:
7215:
7213:
7210:
7207:
7203:
7201:
7198:
7196:
7193:
7190:
7188:
7185:
7184:
7176:
7172:
7168:
7167:
7162:
7155:
7154:
7143:
7139:
7135:
7130:
7129:
7128:
7125:
7124:
7120:
7119:
7114:
7109:
7108:
7107:
7103:
7099:
7094:
7093:
7092:
7089:
7088:
7084:
7083:
7078:
7074:
7073:
7072:
7071:
7067:
7063:
7048:
7045:
7043:
7039:
7038:
7037:
7034:
7033:
7029:
7028:
7023:
7019:
7014:
7013:
7012:
7011:
7008:
7006:
7002:
6992:
6991:
6988:
6987:
6986:
6972:
6957:
6956:
6952:
6948:
6944:
6942:
6938:
6930:
6929:
6925:
6921:
6917:
6909:
6904:
6903:
6899:
6898:
6897:
6894:
6890:
6889:edit the page
6886:
6882:
6878:
6873:
6858:
6856:
6853:
6849:
6838:
6837:
6834:
6833:
6832:
6818:
6804:
6801:
6800:
6796:
6795:
6790:
6789:
6788:
6787:
6786:
6785:
6781:
6777:
6773:
6769:
6760:
6757:
6754:
6751:
6748:
6745:
6742:
6739:
6736:
6733:
6730:
6727:
6724:
6719:
6716:
6715:
6705:
6701:
6697:
6696:Giant Bernard
6693:
6691:
6687:
6683:
6682:Giant Bernard
6679:
6675:
6671:
6670:
6669:
6666:
6665:
6661:
6660:
6655:
6654:
6653:
6652:
6648:
6644:
6643:Giant Bernard
6639:
6638:
6627:
6624:
6623:
6619:
6618:
6612:
6611:
6610:
6609:
6605:
6601:
6597:
6594:
6592:
6591:WP:POVPUSHers
6588:
6584:
6574:
6571:
6567:
6563:
6559:
6555:
6529:
6525:
6521:
6516:
6515:
6514:
6510:
6506:
6502:
6496:
6491:
6490:
6489:
6485:
6481:
6477:
6473:
6469:
6468:
6467:
6463:
6459:
6455:
6451:
6447:
6445:
6441:
6437:
6432:
6431:
6430:
6429:
6428:
6427:
6422:
6419:
6418:
6414:
6413:
6408:
6405:
6404:gbooks search
6400:
6396:
6395:
6394:
6393:
6390:
6386:
6382:
6378:
6374:
6373:
6372:
6371:
6367:
6363:
6359:
6355:
6350:
6348:
6344:
6339:
6335:
6331:
6324:Your Comments
6319:
6316:
6315:
6311:
6310:
6304:
6303:
6302:
6301:
6297:
6293:
6288:
6276:
6273:
6272:
6268:
6267:
6261:
6260:
6259:
6257:
6253:
6249:
6245:
6241:
6234:
6231:
6230:
6226:
6225:
6220:
6216:
6212:
6210:
6207:
6206:
6202:
6201:
6196:
6193:
6189:
6188:
6187:
6186:
6182:
6178:
6171:
6168:
6167:
6163:
6162:
6157:
6156:
6155:
6154:
6150:
6146:
6130:
6127:
6126:
6122:
6121:
6116:
6115:
6114:
6110:
6106:
6102:
6101:
6100:
6097:
6096:
6092:
6091:
6086:
6082:
6081:
6075:
6074:
6073:
6072:
6068:
6064:
6057:
6052:
6051:
6046:
6038:
6034:
6032:
6028:
6023:
6018:
6013:
6009:
5993:
5990:
5989:
5985:
5984:
5979:
5978:
5977:
5973:
5969:
5965:
5964:
5963:
5960:
5959:
5955:
5954:
5949:
5944:
5943:
5942:
5941:
5937:
5933:
5922:
5921:
5920:
5917:
5916:
5912:
5911:
5905:
5904:
5903:
5902:
5898:
5894:
5882:
5879:Done, now at
5878:
5877:
5876:
5875:
5872:
5870:
5861:
5856:
5855:
5851:
5847:
5837:
5833:
5827:
5823:
5819:
5813:
5809:
5807:
5803:
5802:
5795:
5794:
5793:
5787:
5786:
5781:
5777:
5774:
5770:
5769:
5761:
5760:
5757:
5756:
5751:
5750:
5745:
5741:
5736:
5726:
5725:
5721:
5717:
5712:Pigsonthewing
5708:
5702:
5698:
5694:
5680:
5679:
5675:
5671:
5663:
5654:
5650:
5646:
5641:
5640:
5639:
5636:
5635:
5631:
5630:
5625:
5620:
5619:
5616:
5612:
5608:
5604:
5600:
5598:
5594:
5590:
5585:
5584:
5583:
5582:
5578:
5574:
5570:
5564:
5561:
5557:
5556:File:Kpad.jpg
5553:
5547:
5544:
5537:
5536:
5531:
5517:
5513:
5509:
5504:
5503:
5502:
5499:
5498:
5494:
5493:
5487:
5484:
5480:
5476:
5475:
5474:
5470:
5466:
5461:
5457:
5456:Amadscientist
5452:
5448:
5444:
5443:
5442:
5441:
5440:
5439:
5430:
5429:File:Kpad.jpg
5425:
5421:
5419:
5415:
5411:
5407:
5403:
5399:
5395:
5390:
5386:
5382:
5378:
5374:
5370:
5369:
5367:
5365:
5361:
5357:
5352:
5351:
5350:
5349:
5348:
5347:
5338:
5334:
5330:
5327:
5323:
5322:
5321:
5317:
5313:
5309:
5308:
5307:
5304:
5303:
5299:
5298:
5293:
5289:
5285:
5280:
5276:
5270:
5265:
5264:
5263:
5262:
5258:
5254:
5249:
5245:
5240:
5237:
5234:
5228:
5224:
5214:
5213:
5209:
5205:
5201:
5196:
5193:
5189:
5183:
5179:
5159:
5156:
5155:
5151:
5150:
5145:
5144:
5143:
5139:
5135:
5131:
5130:
5129:
5128:
5127:
5126:
5125:
5124:
5113:
5112:
5111:
5110:
5109:
5108:
5107:
5106:
5095:
5094:
5093:
5092:
5091:
5090:
5089:
5088:
5081:
5078:
5077:
5073:
5072:
5067:
5063:
5057:
5052:
5051:
5050:
5049:
5048:
5047:
5042:
5038:
5034:
5031:Thanks again
5030:
5029:
5028:
5027:
5020:
5019:
5018:
5017:
5014:
5011:
5010:
5006:
5005:
4999:
4998:
4991:
4988:
4987:
4983:
4982:
4976:
4975:
4972:
4971:
4970:
4969:
4965:
4960:
4956:
4952:
4946:
4941:
4940:
4939:
4938:
4934:
4930:
4925:
4922:
4918:
4914:
4911:
4908:
4904:
4894:
4891:
4885:
4884:
4883:
4882:
4878:
4874:
4869:
4865:
4859:
4855:
4850:
4845:
4841:
4834:
4830:
4824:
4823:
4820:
4816:
4812:
4808:
4803:
4798:
4794:
4787:
4783:
4775:
4772:
4768:
4764:
4763:
4762:
4761:
4758:
4754:
4750:
4743:your concerns
4724:
4721:
4715:
4714:
4713:
4710:
4709:
4705:
4704:
4698:
4697:
4696:
4693:
4692:
4688:
4687:
4682:
4678:
4677:
4676:
4673:
4669:
4665:
4658:
4653:
4652:
4651:
4648:
4647:
4643:
4642:
4636:
4635:
4634:
4631:
4625:
4621:
4617:
4616:
4615:
4614:
4613:
4612:
4607:
4604:
4603:
4599:
4598:
4592:
4591:
4590:
4589:
4586:
4583:
4577:
4576:
4575:
4574:
4570:
4566:
4561:
4557:
4550:
4545:
4541:
4537:
4530:
4526:
4520:
4519:
4515:
4511:
4507:
4500:
4494:
4488:
4485:
4482:
4479:
4476:
4473:
4470:
4467:
4464:
4461:
4458:
4455:
4454:
4453:
4450:
4449:
4445:
4437:
4428:
4427:
4423:
4419:
4415:
4411:
4391:
4388:
4384:
4378:
4373:
4372:
4371:
4368:
4361:
4360:
4359:
4356:
4355:
4351:
4350:
4345:
4344:
4343:
4340:
4336:
4332:
4331:
4328:
4325:
4324:
4320:
4319:
4314:
4309:
4305:
4304:
4303:
4302:
4299:
4296:
4292:
4287:
4286:
4285:
4282:
4278:
4274:
4270:
4265:
4261:
4256:
4252:
4248:
4244:
4234:
4233:
4229:
4225:
4220:
4216:
4210:
4206:
4201:
4196:
4192:
4185:
4181:
4175:
4174:
4170:
4166:
4161:
4157:
4151:
4147:
4142:
4137:
4133:
4126:
4122:
4116:
4115:
4111:
4107:
4102:
4098:
4091:
4086:
4082:
4078:
4071:
4067:
4061:
4060:
4056:
4052:
4048:
4041:
4036:
4035:
4031:
4027:
4026:Verne Equinox
4011:
4007:
4003:
3999:
3996:
3995:
3994:
3990:
3986:
3981:
3980:
3979:
3978:
3975:
3972:
3971:
3967:
3966:
3961:
3956:
3955:
3954:
3953:
3949:
3945:
3927:
3906:
3898:
3889:
3888:
3884:
3880:
3875:
3871:
3865:
3861:
3856:
3851:
3847:
3840:
3836:
3830:
3829:
3825:
3821:
3816:
3812:
3805:
3800:
3796:
3792:
3785:
3781:
3771:
3765:
3757:
3756:
3755:
3752:
3751:
3747:
3746:
3741:
3740:
3739:
3738:
3732:
3711:
3708:
3707:
3703:
3702:
3697:
3696:
3695:
3691:
3687:
3682:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3676:
3673:
3672:
3668:
3667:
3661:
3657:
3656:
3655:
3654:
3650:
3646:
3641:
3638:
3637:
3633:
3629:
3626:many thanks,
3624:
3621:
3619:
3614:
3612:
3609:also on wiki
3608:
3602:
3598:
3589:
3586:
3585:
3581:
3580:
3576:
3569:
3564:
3561:
3559:
3553:
3552:
3551:
3549:
3545:
3541:
3535:
3533:
3526:
3518:
3514:
3506:
3503:
3502:
3498:
3497:
3492:
3487:
3484:
3480:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3470:
3466:
3462:
3461:62.219.210.83
3458:
3444:
3443:
3439:
3435:
3424:
3423:
3419:
3415:
3411:
3407:
3395:
3392:
3391:
3387:
3386:
3381:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3361:
3360:
3355:
3351:
3348:
3346:
3344:
3342:
3339:
3335:
3331:
3330:Michael Pupin
3327:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3318:
3314:
3310:
3306:
3302:
3293:
3291:
3288:
3283:
3279:
3275:
3267:
3266:
3262:
3258:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3244:Talk to me:-)
3241:
3237:
3233:
3217:
3213:
3209:
3205:
3200:
3197:
3193:
3192:
3182:
3179:
3178:
3174:
3173:
3168:
3167:
3166:
3165:
3161:
3157:
3149:
3142:
3139:
3138:
3134:
3133:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3111:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3082:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3053:
3050:
3049:
3045:
3044:
3039:
3038:
3037:
3035:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3015:
3006:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2987:
2977:
2969:
2948:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2909:
2908:
2907:
2906:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2896:
2893:
2890:
2889:
2885:
2884:
2879:
2874:
2873:
2866:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2858:
2857:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2848:
2843:
2842:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2827:
2826:
2820:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2812:
2811:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2796:
2792:
2787:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2779:
2775:
2771:
2770:72.234.220.38
2767:
2754:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2741:
2736:
2728:
2719:
2718:
2714:
2710:
2706:
2702:
2698:
2694:
2683:
2682:
2679:
2676:
2670:
2669:
2665:
2660:
2659:
2654:
2652:
2648:
2643:
2641:
2637:
2633:
2631:
2625:
2623:
2619:
2614:
2609:
2603:
2598:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2567:
2566:
2562:
2561:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2541:
2538:
2535:
2525:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2515:Chiswick Chap
2511:
2510:Chiswick Chap
2507:
2501:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2483:
2476:
2472:
2466:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2456:Chiswick Chap
2452:
2451:Chiswick Chap
2448:
2441:
2436:
2432:
2428:
2421:
2417:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2390:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2360:
2354:
2350:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2325:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2314:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2270:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2251:
2241:
2233:
2212:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2195:
2183:
2180:
2179:
2175:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2149:
2137:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2128:
2123:
2122:Yes there was
2120:
2119:
2118:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2095:YG World Tour
2092:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2082:36.253.151.16
2078:
2074:
2072:
2060:
2057:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2044:
2043:
2039:
2038:
2021:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2012:
2006:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1996:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1979:
1976:
1973:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1963:
1962:
1958:
1957:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1937:
1934:
1928:
1920:
1919:User:NilubonT
1913:
1910:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1898:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1865:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1846:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1830:
1825:
1821:
1818:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1809:
1805:
1799:
1793:
1787:
1781:
1775:
1769:
1763:
1757:
1751:
1746:
1740:
1734:
1728:
1722:
1716:
1710:
1704:
1698:
1692:
1686:
1680:
1674:
1668:
1662:
1657:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1644:
1641:
1638:
1634:
1631:
1628:
1620:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1606:
1602:
1596:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1578:
1571:
1567:
1561:
1560:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1535:
1528:
1524:
1516:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1484:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1470:Gregg l Greer
1467:
1460:
1459:Gregg l Greer
1449:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1404:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1344:
1340:
1333:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1313:
1309:
1303:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1287:
1276:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1262:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1186:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1076:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1021:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1000:
988:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
961:
960:
955:
949:
936:
926:
918:
895:
892:
891:
887:
886:
881:
880:
879:
877:
873:
869:
868:150.217.26.99
865:
859:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:
829:
828:
825:
824:
820:
819:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
793:
787:
780:
777:
774:
771:
770:
769:
767:
762:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
726:
725:
721:
717:
704:
701:
700:
696:
695:
689:
684:
683:
682:
681:
677:
673:
669:
659:
658:
654:
650:
645:
642:
639:
631:
630:
626:
622:
617:
614:
610:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
575:
571:
569:
568:
566:
563:
560:
556:
553:
552:
551:
546:
538:
535:
534:
530:
529:
524:
523:
522:
521:
517:
513:
509:
498:
495:
494:
490:
489:
484:
480:
476:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
461:
458:
454:
451:
447:
441:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
414:
411:
408:
405:
400:
394:
388:
387:
381:
376:
375:
368:
367:
362:
357:
356:
350:
342:
339:
338:
334:
333:
327:
326:
325:
323:
319:
315:
292:
288:
284:
280:
279:
278:
275:
274:
270:
269:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
244:
240:
235:
234:
233:
230:
229:
225:
224:
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
196:
193:
192:
191:
188:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
168:
167:
166:
165:
161:
157:
153:
151:
147:
143:
141:
138:
128:
125:
120:
116:
112:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
7205:
7170:
7164:
7122:
7117:
7112:
7086:
7081:
7076:
7058:
7031:
7026:
7021:
6998:
6976:
6974:
6963:
6945:
6939:
6936:
6913:
6907:
6864:
6844:
6822:
6820:
6814:
6798:
6793:
6765:
6755:
6749:
6743:
6737:
6731:
6725:
6663:
6658:
6640:
6635:
6621:
6616:
6598:
6595:
6580:
6552:— Preceding
6547:
6453:
6416:
6411:
6351:
6330:this comment
6327:
6313:
6308:
6287:Pound (mass)
6284:
6270:
6265:
6237:
6228:
6223:
6204:
6199:
6174:
6165:
6160:
6142:
6124:
6119:
6094:
6089:
6084:
6079:
6077:
6076:You changed
6060:
6030:
6026:
6007:
6005:
5987:
5982:
5957:
5952:
5947:
5929:
5914:
5909:
5890:
5868:
5864:
5843:
5826:daily totals
5799:
5797:
5790:
5789:
5785:Did you know
5783:
5753:
5747:
5732:
5720:Andy's edits
5716:Talk to Andy
5707:Andy Mabbett
5686:
5666:
5633:
5628:
5623:
5565:
5548:
5539:
5534:
5533:
5528:
5496:
5491:
5380:
5336:
5325:
5301:
5296:
5278:
5241:
5238:
5220:
5197:
5175:
5153:
5148:
5075:
5070:
5008:
5003:
4985:
4980:
4926:
4923:
4919:
4915:
4912:
4909:
4905:
4902:
4844:good article
4838:The article
4837:
4797:good article
4791:The article
4790:
4751:. Thanks. •
4746:
4707:
4702:
4690:
4685:
4680:
4645:
4640:
4623:
4601:
4596:
4533:
4502:
4492:
4486:
4480:
4474:
4468:
4462:
4456:
4451:
4447:
4441:
4407:
4353:
4348:
4322:
4317:
4312:
4240:
4195:good article
4189:The article
4188:
4136:good article
4130:The article
4129:
4074:
4044:
4023:
3969:
3964:
3959:
3895:
3850:good article
3844:The article
3843:
3788:
3749:
3744:
3723:
3705:
3700:
3670:
3665:
3642:
3639:
3625:
3622:
3615:
3603:
3599:
3596:
3583:
3578:
3574:
3555:
3537:
3530:
3500:
3495:
3493:violations.
3455:— Preceding
3450:
3430:
3412:. Thanks, —
3403:
3389:
3384:
3379:
3375:
3363:
3357:
3338:Oliver Lodge
3299:— Preceding
3294:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3273:
3253:
3229:
3228:
3176:
3171:
3152:
3148:Nikola Tesla
3136:
3131:
3092:— Preceding
3088:
3068:Talk:Barelvi
3061:
3047:
3042:
3026:80.177.4.109
3020:— Preceding
3016:
3012:
2994:
2935:
2887:
2882:
2794:
2790:
2764:— Preceding
2760:
2732:
2690:
2672:
2661:
2657:
2644:
2627:
2626:
2613:Editing team
2610:
2607:
2602:VisualEditor
2564:
2559:
2531:
2486:good article
2480:The article
2479:
2424:
2368:— Preceding
2357:
2352:
2347:
2322:
2317:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2276:
2258:
2191:
2177:
2172:
2152:Magioladitis
2145:
2131:
2126:
2101:— Preceding
2098:
2079:
2075:
2071:WOT Services
2068:
2065:WOT Services
2041:
2036:
2033:
2015:
2010:
2004:
1960:
1955:
1923:
1907:
1902:
1870:— Preceding
1866:
1863:
1849:
1844:
1816:
1810:
1659:<a href="
1658:
1655:
1652:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1635:
1632:
1629:
1626:
1581:good article
1575:The article
1574:
1538:good article
1532:The article
1531:
1510:
1505:
1485:
1463:
1436:
1407:
1402:
1379:
1364:
1316:
1290:
1270:
1265:
1237:WP:Bare URLs
1225:
1220:
1189:
1164:
1150:
1145:
1122:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1071:
1055:Gerda Arendt
1040:
1038:
1025:Gerda Arendt
1022:
1004:
1003:
967:
943:
889:
884:
862:— Preceding
855:
833:
822:
817:
789:
783:
778:
772:
763:
754:disruptively
739:
729:January 2015
712:
698:
693:
665:
646:
643:
640:
637:
618:
615:
611:
608:
561:
550:
532:
527:
506:
492:
487:
456:
445:
436:
430:
424:
418:
412:
406:
397:
370:
364:
360:
358:
354:
353:
349:The Signpost
348:
336:
331:
310:
272:
267:
242:
238:
227:
222:
217:
213:
185:
180:
175:
171:
134:
111:Greg caffrey
109:
78:
43:
37:
7163:This is an
7134:John Carter
7098:John Carter
7075:Is this an
7062:John Carter
6870:Hello, I'm
6841:Admin abuse
6354:Yamaguchi先生
6248:103.27.8.42
6192:RLC circuit
6044:MusikAnimal
5670:BlueMoonset
5645:Mark Miller
5573:Mark Miller
5465:Mark Miller
5410:Mark Miller
5394:Mark Miller
5377:book source
5356:Mark Miller
5331:after they
5279:prima facie
4858:nominate it
4846:has passed
4811:nominate it
4799:has passed
4498:Sign up now
4209:nominate it
4197:has passed
3892:scriptstyle
3879:Daniel Case
3874:Daniel Case
3864:nominate it
3852:has passed
3820:Daniel Case
3815:Daniel Case
3427:Three phase
3414:Msmarmalade
3326:IEEE Xplore
3305:Mbennett555
2673:Thank you,
2636:these terms
2500:nominate it
2488:has passed
1988:this is not
1876:Merryhanuka
1747:</a: -->
1595:nominate it
1583:has passed
750:collaborate
649:NeilRedburn
621:NeilRedburn
555:NeilRedburn
36:This is an
7225:Archive 25
7217:Archive 21
7212:Archive 20
7206:Archive 19
7200:Archive 18
7195:Archive 17
7187:Archive 15
7042:Sam Sailor
7005:Sam Sailor
6920:BracketBot
6918:. Thanks,
6872:BracketBot
6776:EdJohnston
6774:. Thanks,
6753:block user
6747:filter log
6177:Kanuraj123
6145:Kanuraj123
5948:good faith
5860:Moxie Raia
5822:live views
5818:here's how
5808:sufferers?
5569:Slimvirgin
5560:discussion
5373:first edit
5275:user:Awien
5202:. Thanks,
4978:textbook.
4927:Thanks --
4620:his latest
3597:hi there,
3187:Invitation
3127:this paper
2996:Nikkimaria
2837:"taggers".
2744:Biscuittin
2738:the topic
2591:Invitation
2349:consensus.
1293:Sapphorain
1261:WP:CITEVAR
1247:Shearonink
1204:Shearonink
1200:WP:linkrot
1185:Morse code
1080:Paulasrsly
838:Be..anyone
503:Morse code
434:block user
428:filter log
373:Rcsprinter
98:Archive 25
90:Archive 21
85:Archive 20
79:Archive 19
73:Archive 18
68:Archive 17
60:Archive 15
7001:Ole Rømer
6995:Ole Rømer
6881:Stability
6877:your edit
6759:block log
6678:16 Stones
6583:WP:FRINGE
6505:JustBerry
6476:Javed4122
6472:JustBerry
6458:JustBerry
6436:JustBerry
6381:JustBerry
6362:JustBerry
6347:Javed4122
5695:has been
5244:Mauna Kea
5186:Read the
5182:Warbonnet
4889:Chetvorno
4719:Chetvorno
4629:Chetvorno
4581:Chetvorno
4377:Chetvorno
4366:Chetvorno
4224:Wugapodes
4219:Wugapodes
4165:Wugapodes
4160:Wugapodes
4106:Wugapodes
4101:Wugapodes
3725:already.—
3660:this link
3558:help desk
3540:Knowledge
3491:WP:ENGVAR
3354:Dan Brown
3156:George Ho
2991:template.
2622:paper cut
2394:Karloman2
2374:Karloman2
2334:Karloman2
2297:Karloman2
2273:Your undo
2255:template.
2168:WP:AFD/AI
1895:The page
1192:this edit
940:template.
801:consensus
797:talk page
756:, and to
440:block log
7118:Spinning
7113:everyone
7082:Spinning
7077:official
7027:Spinning
6848:Bishonen
6794:Spinning
6729:contribs
6674:Devo 2.0
6659:Spinning
6617:Spinning
6596:Thanks,
6566:contribs
6554:unsigned
6454:Comment:
6412:Spinning
6309:Spinning
6266:Spinning
6224:Spinning
6200:Spinning
6161:Spinning
6139:Inkscape
6120:Spinning
6090:Spinning
5983:Spinning
5953:Spinning
5910:Spinning
5629:Spinning
5492:Spinning
5297:Spinning
5178:Dog rope
5149:Spinning
5134:Jmarks13
5071:Spinning
5056:Jmarks13
5033:Jmarks13
5004:Spinning
4981:Spinning
4945:Jmarks13
4929:Jmarks13
4703:Spinning
4686:Spinning
4641:Spinning
4597:Spinning
4544:criteria
4442:We hope
4349:Spinning
4318:Spinning
4313:en masse
4085:criteria
4024:Thanks.
3965:Spinning
3799:criteria
3745:Spinning
3701:Spinning
3686:Gabrio81
3666:Spinning
3645:Gabrio81
3643:thanks,
3628:Gabrio81
3579:Spinning
3496:Spinning
3469:contribs
3457:unsigned
3385:Spinning
3313:contribs
3301:unsigned
3172:Spinning
3132:Spinning
3106:contribs
3094:unsigned
3043:Spinning
3022:unsigned
2901:project.
2883:Spinning
2845:deleted.
2766:unsigned
2560:Spinning
2435:criteria
2382:contribs
2370:unsigned
2318:Spinning
2173:Spinning
2127:Spinning
2103:unsigned
2037:Spinning
2011:Spinning
1956:Spinning
1903:Spinning
1884:contribs
1872:unsigned
1867:Thanks
1845:Spinning
1506:Spinning
1422:Gaijin42
1403:Spinning
1386:Gaijin42
1327:criteria
1266:Spinning
1221:Spinning
1146:Spinning
1104:Spinning
968:{{subst:
885:Spinning
864:unsigned
818:Spinning
807:or seek
768:states:
742:edit war
694:Spinning
670:please?
565:contribs
528:Spinning
512:Dr-Taher
488:Spinning
410:contribs
361:Signpost
332:Spinning
268:Spinning
223:Spinning
218:anything
181:Spinning
7166:archive
6558:Rkvisit
5806:scabies
5742:at the
5607:Diannaa
5552:Diannaa
5326:removed
5204:DPL bot
4873:Lingzhi
4868:Lingzhi
4864:Legobot
4815:Lingzhi
4767:Lingzhi
4753:Lingzhi
4668:Lingzhi
4565:Lingzhi
4560:Lingzhi
4556:Legobot
4418:GLG GLG
4383:Lingzhi
4335:Lingzhi
4291:Lingzhi
4260:protect
4255:history
4215:Legobot
4156:Legobot
4097:Legobot
3960:current
3870:Legobot
3811:Legobot
3733::Online
3376:Chicago
3250:Nyquist
3098:Mcm3333
3064:Barelvi
2791:doesn't
2709:Stefan2
2575:BusterD
2544:BusterD
2506:Legobot
2447:Legobot
1601:Legobot
1339:Legobot
1043:Pumpkin
978:Charles
970:DRVNote
587:history
39:archive
6885:syntax
6587:WP:FTN
6520:Drmies
6495:Drmies
6480:Drmies
6105:Sweepy
6063:Sweepy
6039:) and
5869:Valoem
5589:Drmies
5543:Drmies
5333:edited
5233:heated
4852:; see
4819:(talk)
4805:; see
4771:(talk)
4757:(talk)
4672:(talk)
4508:using
4387:(talk)
4339:(talk)
4295:(talk)
4264:delete
4203:; see
3858:; see
3123:a link
3058:Assist
2678:(talk)
2494:; see
2260:Edison
2148:WP:TPL
1986:while
1806:": -->
1800:": -->
1794:": -->
1788:": -->
1782:": -->
1776:": -->
1770:": -->
1764:": -->
1758:": -->
1752:": -->
1741:": -->
1735:": -->
1729:": -->
1723:": -->
1717:": -->
1711:": -->
1705:": -->
1699:": -->
1693:": -->
1687:": -->
1681:": -->
1675:": -->
1669:": -->
1663:": -->
1589:; see
1198:&
1196:WP:MOS
1075:writes
672:Mebden
479:WP:SPI
459:(e.g,
379:(chew)
283:Jpcase
252:Jpcase
243:hasn't
200:Jpcase
156:Jpcase
7123:Spark
7087:Spark
7032:Spark
6799:Spark
6664:Spark
6622:Spark
6581:This
6499:from
6417:Spark
6343:STiki
6338:STiki
6314:Spark
6292:Snori
6271:Spark
6229:Spark
6215:SPICE
6205:Spark
6166:Spark
6125:Spark
6095:Spark
6033:alton
5988:Spark
5958:Spark
5915:Spark
5634:Spark
5508:kanoa
5497:Spark
5312:kanoa
5302:Spark
5292:diffs
5253:kanoa
5154:Spark
5076:Spark
5009:Spark
4986:Spark
4899:MOIDs
4827:Your
4780:Your
4708:Spark
4691:Spark
4664:WP:OR
4646:Spark
4602:Spark
4523:Your
4354:Spark
4323:Spark
4281:views
4273:watch
4269:links
4178:Your
4119:Your
4064:Your
4047:Uysyn
4040:Uysyn
4002:Boehm
3985:Boehm
3970:Spark
3944:Boehm
3833:Your
3778:Your
3750:Spark
3706:Spark
3671:Spark
3584:Spark
3501:Spark
3390:Spark
3371:used.
3177:Spark
3137:Spark
3048:Spark
2888:Spark
2565:Spark
2469:Your
2414:Your
2359:link.
2323:Spark
2215:Email
2178:Spark
2132:Spark
2042:Spark
2016:Spark
1961:Spark
1908:Spark
1850:Spark
1836:WP:42
1564:Your
1521:Your
1511:Spark
1408:Spark
1366:You--
1306:Your
1271:Spark
1226:Spark
1151:Spark
1126:G4oep
1109:Spark
1095:WP:42
1051:Prize
890:Spark
823:Spark
792:block
699:Spark
688:WP:EL
647:Neil
616:Neil
595:watch
591:links
533:Spark
493:Spark
337:Spark
273:Spark
228:Spark
186:Spark
16:<
7138:talk
7102:talk
7066:talk
6951:talk
6924:talk
6852:talk
6780:talk
6741:logs
6723:talk
6700:talk
6686:talk
6647:talk
6604:talk
6562:talk
6524:talk
6509:talk
6484:talk
6462:talk
6440:talk
6385:talk
6377:here
6366:talk
6296:talk
6252:talk
6244:talk
6219:TINA
6181:talk
6149:talk
6109:talk
6067:talk
6037:talk
5972:talk
5936:talk
5897:talk
5850:talk
5674:talk
5649:talk
5611:talk
5593:talk
5577:talk
5512:talk
5469:talk
5414:talk
5398:talk
5381:both
5371:The
5360:talk
5337:that
5316:talk
5257:talk
5227:talk
5208:talk
5138:talk
5037:talk
5022:be??
4951:MOID
4933:talk
4877:talk
4569:talk
4514:talk
4422:talk
4277:logs
4251:talk
4247:edit
4228:talk
4169:talk
4110:talk
4055:(𒁳)
4030:talk
4006:talk
3989:talk
3948:talk
3883:talk
3824:talk
3763:Chat
3730:Chat
3690:talk
3649:talk
3632:talk
3465:talk
3438:talk
3434:Gah4
3418:talk
3336:and
3309:talk
3287:ISBN
3261:talk
3257:Gah4
3236:talk
3232:Dfrr
3212:talk
3208:Dfrr
3160:talk
3102:talk
3076:talk
3030:talk
3000:talk
2942:talk
2938:Gah4
2795:have
2786:WP:V
2774:talk
2748:talk
2713:talk
2611:The
2579:talk
2548:talk
2540:over
2534:over
2519:talk
2460:talk
2398:talk
2378:talk
2338:talk
2332:not.
2301:talk
2264:talk
2206:talk
2156:talk
2111:talk
2086:talk
2005:none
1897:Riva
1880:talk
1614:talk
1493:talk
1478:talk
1443:talk
1426:talk
1390:talk
1372:talk
1352:talk
1297:talk
1251:talk
1208:talk
1130:talk
1099:only
1084:talk
1059:talk
1053:, --
1029:talk
1012:and
982:talk
953:talk
872:talk
842:talk
720:talk
676:talk
668:edit
653:talk
638:Hi,
625:talk
599:logs
583:talk
579:edit
559:talk
516:talk
468:talk
422:logs
404:talk
318:talk
287:talk
256:talk
204:talk
160:talk
115:talk
7018:BLP
6981:ska
6978:San
6960:ANI
6947:jps
6879:to
6827:ska
6824:San
6600:jps
6083:to
6029:am
5968:PBS
5932:PBS
5893:PBS
5778:On
5755:Rob
5714:);
5624:for
5188:FAQ
4871:--
4681:not
4624:him
4563:--
4416:.
4222:--
4163:--
4104:--
4051:dab
3877:--
3818:--
3380:our
3364:and
2986:ygm
2981:or
2666:•
2662:•
2642:.
2616:of
2537:and
2513:--
2454:--
2250:ygm
2245:or
1808:.
1610:23W
1608:--
1605:23W
1556:23W
1468:of
1348:23W
1346:--
1343:23W
1190:Re:
1047:Sky
935:ygm
930:or
836:. –
834:one
815:.
545:AfC
144:by
7221:→
7191:←
7140:)
7104:)
7068:)
7022:is
6984:ri
6953:)
6943:.
6926:)
6908:]]
6857:.
6850:|
6830:ri
6782:)
6702:)
6688:)
6649:)
6606:)
6593:.
6568:)
6564:•
6526:)
6511:)
6486:)
6474:,
6464:)
6442:)
6387:)
6368:)
6298:)
6254:)
6183:)
6151:)
6111:)
6069:)
5974:)
5938:)
5899:)
5852:)
5844:—
5824:,
5820:,
5782:,
5718:;
5703:.
5676:)
5651:)
5626:.
5613:)
5595:)
5579:)
5514:)
5471:)
5416:)
5400:)
5362:)
5329:it
5318:)
5294:.
5259:)
5210:)
5140:)
5039:)
4935:)
4879:)
4829:GA
4782:GA
4571:)
4546:.
4540:GA
4525:GA
4516:)
4424:)
4363:--
4289:•
4279:|
4275:|
4271:|
4267:|
4262:|
4258:|
4253:|
4249:|
4230:)
4180:GA
4171:)
4121:GA
4112:)
4087:.
4081:GA
4066:GA
4032:)
4008:)
3991:)
3950:)
3885:)
3835:GA
3826:)
3801:.
3795:GA
3780:GA
3692:)
3651:)
3634:)
3515::
3471:)
3467:•
3440:)
3420:)
3332:,
3315:)
3311:•
3263:)
3238:)
3214:)
3162:)
3154:--
3129:.
3108:)
3104:•
3078:)
3032:)
3002:)
2989:}}
2983:{{
2979:}}
2973:{{
2944:)
2776:)
2750:)
2715:)
2653:.
2581:)
2550:)
2521:)
2471:GA
2462:)
2437:.
2431:GA
2416:GA
2400:)
2384:)
2380:•
2340:)
2303:)
2266:)
2253:}}
2247:{{
2243:}}
2237:{{
2208:)
2158:)
2124:.
2113:)
2088:)
1886:)
1882:•
1616:)
1566:GA
1523:GA
1495:)
1480:)
1445:)
1428:)
1392:)
1374:)
1354:)
1329:.
1323:GA
1308:GA
1299:)
1253:)
1210:)
1177:)
1173:•
1132:)
1086:)
1061:)
1031:)
1023:--
1020:!
984:)
976:}}
938:}}
932:{{
928:}}
922:{{
874:)
844:)
722:)
678:)
655:)
627:)
597:|
593:|
589:|
585:|
581:|
567:)
518:)
470:)
462:)
324:)
320:)
289:)
258:)
206:)
162:)
117:)
94:→
64:←
7177:.
7136:(
7100:(
7064:(
6949:(
6922:(
6895:.
6778:(
6761:)
6756:·
6750:·
6744:·
6738:·
6732:·
6726:·
6721:(
6698:(
6684:(
6645:(
6602:(
6560:(
6522:(
6507:(
6497::
6493:@
6482:(
6460:(
6438:(
6383:(
6364:(
6294:(
6250:(
6246:.
6179:(
6147:(
6107:(
6080:s
6065:(
6035:(
6031:W
6027:S
5970:(
5934:(
5895:(
5848:(
5838:.
5828:)
5816:(
5710:(
5672:(
5647:(
5609:(
5591:(
5575:(
5510:(
5467:(
5412:(
5396:(
5358:(
5314:(
5271::
5267:@
5255:(
5206:(
5194:.
5136:(
5058::
5054:@
5035:(
4947::
4943:@
4931:(
4875:(
4817:♦
4769:♦
4755:♦
4670:♦
4659:)
4655:(
4567:(
4512:(
4420:(
4385:♦
4379::
4375:@
4337:♦
4293:♦
4283:)
4245:(
4226:(
4167:(
4108:(
4028:(
4004:(
3987:(
3946:(
3928:5
3907:5
3881:(
3822:(
3688:(
3647:(
3630:(
3571:.
3562:.
3463:(
3436:(
3416:(
3307:(
3259:(
3242:(
3234:(
3210:(
3158:(
3100:(
3074:(
3028:(
2998:(
2940:(
2772:(
2746:(
2711:(
2632:.
2577:(
2546:(
2517:(
2458:(
2396:(
2376:(
2336:(
2299:(
2262:(
2204:(
2154:(
2109:(
2084:(
2056:P
2053:T
1995:P
1992:T
1975:P
1972:T
1936:P
1933:T
1878:(
1612:(
1491:(
1476:(
1441:(
1424:(
1388:(
1370:(
1350:(
1295:(
1249:(
1206:(
1175:c
1171:t
1169:(
1128:(
1082:(
1057:(
1027:(
980:(
972:|
956:)
950:(
870:(
840:(
775:.
718:(
674:(
651:(
623:(
601:)
577:(
562:·
557:(
514:(
466:(
442:)
437:·
431:·
425:·
419:·
413:·
407:·
402:(
383:@
316:(
285:(
254:(
202:(
158:(
113:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.