User talk:Spinningspark/Archive 18

2873:— and fair enough. But I am confused about the use of the letter L. I understand that it means inductance, but on circuit diagrams I regularly see the letter L next to the symbol for an inductor (in the same way I see the letter C next to capacitors and R next to resistors) and that if there are multiple inductors (or capacitors or resistors) that these get numbered (L1, L2, C1, Q1 for a transistor, etc.). The number has nothing to do with the inductance, it is a way of distinguishing inductors from each other— because the letter L is signifying "here is an inductor." Am I not understanding that correctly? (I do not have an electrical engineering background, though I have built a few simple circuits in my time). Please clarify for me if you would. Thanks! 466:. However, they band together to quote WP:BLP, WP:UNDUE and WP:CONSENSUS. Unfortunately, even for this controversial article, almost nobody apparently cares enough about the subject to comment about these issues; I posted queries on three message boards and only one editor responded. The few regular editors of the article, are often against me. In that case, I'll never achieve their idea of consensus. I'm really not sure how to proceed. I'm sure you'll be able to find out which article I'm talking about, but I'm not sure if you should intervene on that talk page yet. I was hoping to discuss my actions with you here, if possible, instead of you contacting the other editors. Thank you very much for your time. 2389:. I have seen the preview of the book in Amazon. It is not written in the style of a factual account. Baxter puts a lot of emotions into the characters that are her own insinuation. You might be right that I am being unfair to describe it as a fictionalized account, but it is not a straight historical factual account either. Anyway, the bibliography section is for a bibliography of sources that have been used in writing the article and this book clearly has not been so used. If you were to expand the article using the book as a source that would be a different matter. We could compromise and have it in a "Further reading" section though. 615:

my opinion, your insertion of the sentence "this charge was dropped on September 8 when evidence could not prove Bieber was the assailant" was the cause of the latest round of reversions. That is massively POV, implying as it does that Knowledge thinks Bieber really did carry out the assault, just that it couldn't be proved in court. That is completely unacceptable and was quite rightly reverted. Other minor issues may have got caught up in that but removing negative POV in BLP articles must be a priority for us and the article did finally settle down to a version with the same information in a more neutral form.

2084:

some of the best engineers in the industry. These articles are not scrapped. Each one of them takes over a week to write. Hours go into diligently researching and writing every single piece of content. Additionally, there are no "buy now buttons" or "get a quote" buttons. Nor are there any external links or advertisement. If anything, the only thing you will find is a link to a detailed guide on Liquid Silicone Rubber (LSR), the material, the applications, and the process. Something that I can assure you, Knowledge readers will find extremely useful.

2311: 462:. This is related but not entirely the same issue, but it is regarding the same article. I can't help but feel that certain experienced editors are being very combative as to my edits regarding a controversial article. My edits, which I feel are legitimate, are being reverted multiple times. I feel that some parts of my edits are definitely positive instead of controversial, but the whole edits are being reverted. When I discuss my edits at the talk page, I can't help but feel that these editors are 4574: 31: 3458: 2924:. Of course, the silkscreen of a pcb is commonly marked with component references and in that context they are to be seen as part numbers rather than values. But my basic problem with your edit is that it unnecessarily complicated the first sentence of the lead. We should try and make leads as clear and simple as possible. I don't have any fundamental objection to the symbol being mentioned in the article, but it really doesn't have to be in the first sentence. 703: 1959:#5. The second one is a bit more borderline, but still probably does not belong, the site is a directory rather than selling something themselves, but nevertheless, the information is placed there to attract customers to companies in their directory. It still fails ELNO #1 if the same information could be written in the article. The default position is not to have external links. They should only be inserted if there is a positive reason for having them. 4501: 2590: 2207: 3691: 1699: 1618: 1261: 1202: 1890:

add external links, another sign of a spammer. Secondly, many of the links I removed were placed in the references section or the see also section. Both of those are inappropriate; they are not referencing any fact in the article and see also is not supposed to be used for external links. The most appropriate place for such links is the external links section but even there I would probably still remove them. See our

3793: 4494: 1785:. The name in the ref ids is really of no consequence, it is just there to let the software know which ref is being reused. It is never visible to the encyclopaedia user. You can change it if you want, but please note that spaces are not allowed in ref ids unless the id is enclosed in quotes. If you do change it, please use the preview button before saving your edit to make sure you have the result you intended. 4140: 1364: 3312: 1567: 1061: 988: 887: 3586:

longer supported on new platforms. The research paper related to this new tool is under review process in some research journal and, as in most cases, will take around 1-2 year to come in print. I have included this article to provide a resource for the students and teaching community who come to wiki for this purpose and found outdated software links on this prestigious site. Regards majid

3416: 4046:, I only get 3 hits, none of them ever cited. I thought that using the full first names was somehow limiting me, so I changed to "JW Diesel" and got the same result. Right now, I get 39 results for "John W." and 86 for "J W", which are the same results you get, I think... I have no clue what happened there, why I got different results for the same search yesterday and today. Do you? 1442:. I'm not really sure why, at a quick look I can't find the line you are triggering in the regex. However, I would question the suitability of the video in any case. It is clearly a prototype (no stickers) and probably the manufacturer's video. There is no indication that the uploader has permission and it is probably a copyright violation. As such, we shouldn't link to it. 1838:

of AFC reviewers to get the article perfect. The purpose of AFC is only to check that the material is not a copyvio, POV, advertising, non-notable or otherwise a heap of crap. I have removed the duplicate posting which was your other objection and fixed some other cosmetic stuff, so you should have no problem passing the article now, should you?

4069:. I thought it might be country specific, but I get the same result after trying all the likely country codes. I can only conclude you entered it wrong. The best search term (for Scholar) is "John Diesel" which finds the maximum number of relevant hits with the minimum number of false positives. It returns all the J Diesels and JW Diesels. 4096:

the median... But I cannot impose my standards, of course, so I go with the current consensus. There have been previous discussions about this on the talk page of ACADEMIC and in different AfDs, without ever coming to a clear conclusions on what is an acceptable citation rate. As for GS: I just ran the searches again and 39 results

4065:"John Wallace Diesel" is definitely a poor choice of search term, it will only return results that have "Wallace" actually written in the source (you can check what the source has by clicking on the "cite" link). I get the same result as you for that. I don't understand why you do not get more results for "JW Diesel", I get 2563:

single reference to find it, which makes it very difficult for them. Is there something they missed? If there is, please link to it and I can advise you further from there how to proceed. If not, you will have to wait for the subject to gain some actual notabiity before he can have an article on Knowledge.

1955:

look at them, I was only looking at your links. You came to my attention because you posted links in an article on my watchlist. The first link I would definitely remove (and probably will now you have brought it to my attention), any page that has a big "request a quote" button is a big no-no. It fails

2947: 4019:

Sorry, I'm not going to revert my close because you DONTLIKEIT. There were arguments from the sources, and potential sources, in the keep camp, as well as them being in the majority, so yes, I did give due weight to policy based argument. Possibly not the way I would have voted personally, but that

3947:

deletion has nothing to do with copyright, it is deletion of an article that gives no indication of the importance of the subject. But I tell you what I'll do with this one, I'll restore it and send it for a deletion debate where the community can decide. As it stands, it will probably end up being

3060:

Regarding the deletion of Blanca Gómez's blp. Why did you discount my vote on the grounds of failing to "present some kind of rationale why the subject should be kept"? My rationale was, as I stated, that the only thing wrong with the blp was the link rot. If you don't agree with my rationale, or you

2708:

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine

2552:

The debate was held open for ten days, substantially longer than the required seven days. Nobody in the debate except you, the creator of the aricle, called for it to be kept. No evidence of notability of the subject was presented in the debate. Thus, the deletion process was properly followed and

1837:

You are not supposed to fail articles for a lack of inline citations. To quote the reviewing instructions "Avoid declining an article because it correctly uses general references to support some or all of the material". The article has a ton of good quality scholarly references. It is not the role

614:

As I say, I am not going to get involved in this, and looking at those edits I don't think there is any need for outside help, only rational editor discussion is needed. There is certainly no call for administrator action; I don't see any evidence that you are being bullied. If you insist on having

535:

before. Many people weighed in and a majority of them did not object to a majority of content I added. The RfC was closed as "no consensus to not include", but I found that some content was removed anyway after the RfC due to no "consensus to include". Another editor virtually declined to participate

4565:

Hi Spinningspark. The page Hard Rain SoloistEnsemble was deleted. As a new user I'm a little confused about what went wrong and find it hard to cut through all the wiki jargon. I'd like to attempt to improve the article and get it to a point where it can be acceptable to Knowledge. Perhaps you could

4095:

scientists with these citation rates, probably not even an obituary when they pass away. In life sciences, an h about equal to the number of years a scientist has been active after their PhD is about the median. Someone who has been active for 30 years and has an h of 19 is therefore decidedly below

3649:

I'd like to say I am not that person. Basically I was in the process of creating short articles wherever a template had a red link and this was in the hope of seeing them flourish over time from other editors. I am presuming their original outlook was very different, if not then I assure you this is

3106:

Just let you know that we would like to remove the page of Blanca Gomez, since 'the community' already decided to delete it with out enough evidence. We can mention a lot of examples in wikipidia that don't have any relevance as a 'notable' journalists. We don't want 'public debates' under her name.

2562:

As pointed out in the debate, many of the references are unacceptable on Knowledge, like about.com and facebook. Most, if not all, of the rest do not even mention the subject so evidence of notability is lacking within the article. If there is something in there, reviewers would have to read every

2520:

The Gregg L Greer article was hastily deleted outside of meeting the established criteria and I believe it needs a full discussion at the appropriate forum to decide on the overturn of the original decision and restore the page. I'm requesting a secondary review of the AFD information relevant prior

2083:

Thank you Spinningspark for taking the time to teach me the ropes. I will try not to make anymore mistakes, but please go easy on me while I learn. I will carefully read the content and post the articles as a reference if they make sense. For your edification, the articles I added were written by

1922:

I would really appreciate the feedback since my intent is not to spam Knowledge in anyway. As a matter of fact, I am one of the most loyal followers, reason I make sure I financially support it year after year. I am a true believer of what you do here. and that is the reason I take the time to add

1889:

Well first of all they are to the site of a commercial company. That is always a bad sign. There are also multiple instances of them across multiple articles all to the same company. That is usually an indication that someone is trying to spam us. Your account has done pretty much nothing except

1860:

Hi there. I just received a message that you had removed one or more external links I added to the page Elastomer, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. These are great technical articles that go in great detail about elastomers, so I am a bit puzzled. For future reference,

939:

It is not for me to unpick your edits a piece at a time either. Your edits amount to a change to your personal preference for formatting. They are adding nothing substantive to the article. Knowledge is not losing anything by reverting them. Instead of starting a war, go to the article talk page

4326:

Thanks for message. I wasn't aware that the same content was at AFD, but I'm not clear what remedial action you are proposing I take. The main user page isn't the appropriate place for a draft article anyway, and you say it exists already in article space. Do you want me to restore the content in a

2736:

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly

4370:

I was servicing a routine G6 request by Roman Spinner asserted to be uncontroversial. I did not look into it too closely, I thought maybe it was a WP:COMMONNAME issue, and it seemed fairly harmless, not requiring a big investigation. It was not "obviously" controversial until you undid Spinner's

2724:

decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Knowledge to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the

2693:

Hello Spinningspark. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the

2003:

of such sources, depending on exactly what information was being verified by the source. In any case book sources and published scholarly papers are much to be preferred for technical information if at all possible. Advertising does not entirely rule out a site for the purpose of either external

3013:

The article was proposed for deletion with the concern that it "doesn't meet Knowledge notability guidelines". Articles can only be deleted under this process if the deletion is not challenged. Since you are challenging, I have restored the article. However, please be aware that any editor can

2347:

I had added Carol Baxter's account of the "Salt Hill" Murder of Sarah Hart by John Tawell, "The Electric Constable", to the bibliography, but apparently you saw fit to remove it (or to have it removed) suggesting it was a fictional account. Ms Baxter, a criminal historian from Australia, wrote a

1977:

That makes sense. Thank you for taking the time to explain. In that case, let me ask you another question before I make another mistake. I noticed in the Injection Molding section, there is a reference by Thomasnet.com It says (1) Liquid Injection Molding and it takes you to a commercial page

1954:

Jackie, learn to sign your posts. I could make a career out of sifting through Knowledge removing all inappropriate links. It would be a full time job. I don't do it because I have better things to do here. I guess you are asking why I didn't remove those other links – simple answer, I didn't

1757:

I revised "Creg Robinson" to "Greg Robinson" in the citations to Japanese in New York City entry. The author's name for the articles cited in this entry is Greg Robinson. It is easy to check this. However, you undid my revisions so that it reads "Creg Robinson." I think it would be helpful to

3585:

DLD - Digital Logic Design is a new educational tool to provide assistance in teaching those subject areas mentioned in the article. The references given in the article are related to those subjects which are using some old tools for teaching those subjects. Those tools are either outdated or no

1466:

I am not questioning the blacklisting at all. I am just wondering what to do if other people can no longer add to the talk page because the existing blacklisting blocks page saves. Perhaps the blacklisted link from that other post can simply be removed, or stored in a way that does not block the

666:

I looked at the specific edits you explicitly brought to my attention and asked me to comment on. As I have said, I am not going to get involved in the dispute so it is useless to keep coming back at me. You asked for a comment, you got it, sorry if you don't like it but this discussion is now

4090:

I agree it's on the margin, given that he published mainly in the 60s. Personally, I actually think that our standards for including academics are too low, the figures I gave above are what is common practice in AfDs for academics. An h of 19 is, in many fields, actually quite mediocre (not in

1894:, especially the first point of links normally to be avoided - "Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article." In other words, we want Knowledge articles to be expanded in preference to pointing readers to other sites. 3212:

As I said in my closing remarks, you need to e-mail me first. Attachments cannot be sent through Knowledge e-mail, so you need to let me know your e-mail address before anything can be sent. Sending me a message is the easiest way to do this and avoids revealing your e-mail address online.

3259:

There is no need to ping me on my own talk page (and I watchlist any page I write to so usually it is not necessary to ping me at all). To e-mail me: while you are on my talk page or user page, go to the tools menu in the sidebar and click "email this user" then follow the instructions.

353:

Thank you for the answer. For the moment, I changed again the definition at the top because to say that a material is a single substance is wrong. For example the steel is a material formed mainly by two substances (carbon and iron). I will create the page "Material" as soon as possible.

494:

It is not really possible to give an opinion without seeing the discussion in question, but in general, if nobody agrees with you, then you might want to consider the possibility that you are wrong. As an aside, posting "queries on three message boards" will probably be viewed as

320:. They should never contain encyclopaedic information and thus never require references. Their only purpose is to direct the reader to the article they are looking for. As such, only the bare minimum of text necessary to distinguish the required article is needed on the page. 2487:

I'm not inclined to help save an article where the debate is being overrun with people canvassed from the outside who are completely clueless about Knowledge requirments. Maybe the article should be saved, but I'm not going to help. There is plenty of manpower in the army of

1736:

Thanks for indulging my comments on that review. :) I had one remaining question (really a clarification of a comment), but that can be answered at your leisure. the article certainly meets the GA criteria and I have no issue passing it with that question outstanding. Thanks.

2110:

and nominated it for DYK. Several articles about the topic just came through my RSS reader today. As the topic includes the word Zombie, it would be perfect for tomorrow, but I realize this is exceptionally late notice, so may not be possible. Anything to be done you think?

2406:

Thank you for your response. If you would add it to "Further reading" that would be fine. I know what you mean by Ms Baxter's style - all her books are written like that, but I can vouch for the fact that she researches them and they are meant as factual accounts.

252:

I'd be happy to help, are you working on something somewhere? My work on nothing was a kind of penance for a bad mistake I made early on involving that article (it nearly derailed my RFA). It was really a one-off, but I guess I could do something useful with

3337: 1998:

I'm not sure which article you are talking about there. Perhaps you can give a link to it. Yes, references do have different rules. If that is where the information genuinely came from that is what should be cited. However, I might question the

3448: 1305:

Can you review my pending changes on the "Carl Freer" Knowledge page? I am a clear, concise writer. I am well educated. And this page, and several other pages, have issues related to grammar, word choice, editorializing, and misrepresentations.

4288:

FYI, your reverting of a linked citation to remove an erroneous credit killed the very citation link to support the edit. Therefore, I reverted the deletion and corrected the citation. BTW, I am the one wearing the capote in the article.

3992:

comment, with which I would concur. Your close seems to have counted votes rather than giving due weight to policy-based argument. The keep !votes are mostly endorsing a couple of earlier "keeps" which themselves amount to little more than

3928:

Hi, you removed Oxygine again with reason "A7" but it is not true right now. Article was fixed. It is not article about blog or something else. It is article about free open source technology. And it doesn't have any copy pasted text from

1439: 159:

It's probably ok, but I'm inclined to let it run till tomorrow at least to give him a chance to calm down and take it all in. I really don't want to have to block him and leaving the article protected removes the temptation.

4091:

mathematics or humanities, but in high citation fields like physics or life sciences) and by accepting such a large bar we get stuck with a large number of stubs that are difficult to expand, because nobody will ever write

3937:

My fault that I didn't wait review and moved it from draft directly to articles because I saw warning that review could take very long time. I didn't know that it is forbidden. What I could do now to unlock it? Thank you.

3942:

It's not a requirement that you wait for a review, and you haven't broken any rules by posting the article yourself, but you were unwise to do so because a reviewer could have told you what problems the article had. The

3401: 3080:

which is an argument routinely ignored by closing admins in AFD debates, which I did in this case. I was only doing you a favour by letting you know that for future reference. Use the information however you like.

3621:

I get the impression from previous deletions of yours that any new editor creating pages like this are Tobias Conradi. But I don't know anything about the history of that user so I'm not sure. Can you glance at

4072:

It's a pity this was closed before the issue could be bottomed out. It's also a pity that there is not more guidance in WP:PROF on this. As it stands, there is huge room for disagreement and your target of h:

2800:

but two of the articles submitted in joint AFD were not deleted nor any mention of their being judged notable on their individual merits (Jeff Rosenthal, Pete Gross and redirects: Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, Peter R.

4183:

The first sentence in this page says "In the context of vectors and phasors, the term phase angle refers to the angular component of the polar coordinate representation." I don't understand the reason for your

536:

in the RfC, yet was displeased with the results and went ahead after the RfC to remove even more content. Therefore I've lost quite a bit of faith in (not the actual RfC process) but the "post-RfC" follow-up.

2821:

I've fixed the link. There was no mistake, all of the articles are deleted. I moved two unrelated articles back to their original titles as suggested in the debate, which is why they are now showing blue.

2004:

links or references, but it is often a bad sign. The plastics industry is well established and there is a huge body of material written about it. It should not be difficult to find a book source for any

1654: 4352:(Deletion log); 20:19:40 . . Spinningspark (talk | contribs) deleted page The Sleepwalkers: A History of Man's Changing Vision of the Universe ‎(G6: Deleted to make room for an uncontroversial page move) 3135:(see the page at the bottom, under the discussion, for more) and has blanked the page several times. I don't have the policy on-hand saying why that can't happen but figured you'd be able to sort it out. 2348:

fully well-researched factual account in this book, and if you have doubts I would suggest you get a copy and read it. I would respectfully request to put the citation I had back in the bibliography.

3388:

I would have preferred that you had added a note explaining your analysis of the close, but the case being made for keep was compelling and sets a good precedent for future discussions. Thank you, --

2949:. Now, that having been said, it may still be resolvable with normal editing, I'll leave that to your best judgment, of course, but that's what I was looking at. No worries either way. Cheers, -- 2087:

Thank you for your patience and for taking the time out of your personal life to keep Knowledge a reliable source of information. Now I know that my financial support is going to the right cause!

3478: 1978:

where it has a button "Find Suppliers" and also an advertisement banner on the right (It says advertisement on top). Is that ok because it is a reference inside the article posted in wikipedia?

3168:

creating promotional pages for them) we can courtesy blank the debate. I have now done this, but you should note that editors can still access the debate online through the page history.

1595: 1341: 579:

Ok. Let's not talk about the RfC stuff, there's clearly too much history. Would you be willing to instead focus on the most recent edits to the article instead? From the "stable" state of

4074:=19 amounts to no more than just opinion. Anyway, with an h-index of around 12, Diesel is not so far off that target so I trust we can at least agree he is on the margins of notability. 3333: 3664:

I'm not seeing any obvious intersection with either this user or the previously deleted articles. I can't really remember how I got involved with this. You might be better off asking

961: 3076:

Saying that there is not anything wrong with an article is not a a policy based rationale, nor does it counter the claim that the subject is not notable. It is merely an example of

4566:

send me the original article I posted so that I can amend as necessary and I would welcome any advice you can give as to what I might do, specifically, to make it fit for purpose.

4260:

I added the GA icon, and Legobot promptly added the oldid to the template on the talk page. Not sure what's going on there, but I think it's fixed now; please let me know if not.

1671: 4471:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 1521:

Thanks! No time now, but there is that recent result on the optimal 26 quarter-turn solution, and I think it might be nice to have a couple of comments about beginner solutions.

3981: 715: 275:

article). We also need to watch out that Russell's sometimes idiosyncratic views do not poke through unattributed. But ff that's the kind of help you want, just let me know.

4541: 3131:

I've directed Blanquska here as you seem to be the final authority here by closing the AfD. User(s) (seems to be a shared account) is/are adamantly requesting deletion of the

2768: 2946:

I know DupeDet has been flaky recently, but I'm seeing a fair number of 10+ word sequence matches, more if you look carefully at the contexts of the ones DupeDet does find:

2701:

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when

4050:

100 citations, h-index of about 19 or more; lower for low citation fields such as mathematics or humanities, for the latter we often rely more on book reviews and such). --

1676: 563:

I'm really not very inclined to get involved in this, but a 15-point RfC and you expected it to come to a firm conclusion? Try something a little more specific next time.

3698: 3489: 3786: 3826: 1540: 3738: 3164:, but you will be wasting your time going there, the page won't get deleted. However, to save the embarassment of the subject (something that should be thought about 1649: 1395: 1238: 723: 4432: 1011: 740: 4049:

As an aside, it wouldn't have changed my !vote, as those citation data are way below the level that is normally judged to meet ACADEMIC (several articles with : -->

2753: 2472:

still has a couple of issues, one of which is that this page was nominated for deletion. You may help improving the page further and rescue it if your time permits.

4400: 4382: 3092: 2019: 1905: 1034: 4147:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2854: 2833: 1730: 1371:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 4408: 780: 1590: 4304:

I already replied to you on the article talk page. Congratulations on getting into a Knowledge article, but I don't think that really helps your position :-)

3906: 2547: 2531: 2530:{{TempUndelete}} Is my request for article while under review for restore. If consensus can not be meet for any reason, on any of the request please advise.-- 1292: 379: 363: 348: 3029: 2574: 2096: 2056: 1946: 637:

On September 8, Toronto dropped an assault charge against Bieber originally brought up in January 29 for an incident with a limousine driver in December 2013.

4449: 3778: 3764: 3659: 3509: 2503: 1855: 1849: 1781:

introduced multiple citation errors (follow the link and scroll down to the article to see what I mean). After reverting you I corrected the author name in

1084: 678: 661: 626: 609: 574: 558: 514: 4277: 4255: 4031: 2037: 1824: 1335: 955: 528:

I posted on 3 message boards almost simultaneously linking and directing them to contribute the Bieber talk page discussion, so I don't think that's guilty?

3989: 2688: 4482: 4315: 3679: 2896:

True enough, but the symbol on a circuit diagram will (usually) be an algebraic variable standing in for an actual number. For instance, one might write

2659:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2400: 2272:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1516: 1500: 1476: 1453: 4109: 4085: 3797: 2972: 2249: 1309:

I will be glad to contribute to Knowledge. In return, I ask only that you review my edits fairly as your time permits. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

447: 3179: 1530: 2636: 2076: 1970: 1796: 1767: 1432: 4532: 4171: 2935: 1233: 3884: 3866: 3271: 3224: 3050: 3000: 2793:-- link broken, needs opening bracket -- I would have fixed it but I know regular editors are not supposed to touch the closed out AFD work products. 1179: 1139: 801: 427: 411: 286: 228: 183: 171: 154: 138: 2741:; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. 1706:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1625:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1268:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1209:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

910: 3155: 2702: 2433: 2374: 1169: 1153: 940:

and make your case for the changes. If you can get anyone to agree that the article ought to be changed then we can make the changes. Until then

854: 707: 2191: 2170: 2150: 4418: 3594: 2991:

wiki page and would like to make necessary modifications so that the page meets needed guidelines. The page is linked in multiple Wiki articles.

2539: 2088: 2048: 1986: 1934: 1872: 860: 3132: 1746: 1752: 4562: 3712: 3299: 3247: 1400: 797: 4364: 3291: 3254: 3239: 3207: 3191: 2296: 1802: 2955: 1861:

I'd appreciate if you can let me know what was inappropriate about them so I am more careful when adding references or information sources.

432:

Hi Dan, you need to be aware that it is a breach of etiquette on this site to ask editors to reveal their real-life identities. Please see

121: 4244:

It also hasn't put the GA template on the article or added the reviewed version link to the talk page. Perhaps you should do it manually.

3606: 3561: 819: 532: 419: 246: 2709:

in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied

2259: 1134: 1028: 213: 4455: 3070: 2683: 2646: 2008:

fact that needs citing. Google books is a good place to search for sources, many publishers allow google to show a preview of the book.

1109: 719: 4238: 3580: 3122: 2705:

in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

2481: 2062:

That's ok as a reference, but as I said, a better (more reliable) source could easily be found. The very first result on google books

1811:

Hello, saw your good work on the equivalent pig article, thought you might have advice/interest in this AFC draft that just popped up:

722:. Because it's ANI, I think I'm required to give you a formal notice that I mentioned you, in case you wish to comment. The thread is 3160:

User Deadbeef is correct, deletion debates are never deleted. To answer your question, the correct venue to request a deletion is at

2334: 4391:

Well, not quite, as I'd already undone one of his moves, and this was noted on the talk page at that point. But, its not a big thing

3963: 3750: 3396: 760: 4298: 3769:

Oh, sorry, I didn't know - I thought you were responsible for reassessment:) Still thanks for directing me to the appropriate place)

4117: 1656: 1622: 1372: 920:

Reverting is not your tool to stop my edits until you approve of them. If you believe one specific part of the edits is wrong then

3061:

think that it is insufficient then that is fine, but I would be grateful if you would not state that that I didn't present any. --

4217:

I've passed Henry Nock as a GA. For some reason Legobot did not post the usual notification, but as far as I can tell I updated

2527:

Please: Endorse the original closing decision; or Reverse the deletion, or submit to the appropriate forum for reconsideration.

2342: 933: 4339: 4097: 3918: 3849: 3749:

What has that got to do with me? I don't have an interest in football articles and don't usually assess them. Take it up with

3375: 2908:

of the component. This can be seen to be so by the fact that the symbols can subsequently be used in an equation, for instance

1570:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1318: 1064:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

991:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

890:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

403:

I will understand if you don't wish to do this and I wanted to first ask before simply using the article name as the reference.

4013: 3742: 2815: 814: 310: 4066: 2805:

Only mentioning it as I checked my watchlist and in case you may have inadvertently overlooked something. Yours respectfully,

1707: 1626: 1269: 1210: 1017:

Placed this one as GA on Hold. Quite minor issues really, shouldn't be too hard to address. Great work overall!! Good luck, —

735: 499:

and asking me as well just makes that worse. One way of getting more editors involved to help reach a consensus is to open a

4487: 3238:

I could not find a way to send you message which would be private as I do not want to reveal my email address. Please guide.

2978: 756: 753:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 102: 3643: 1758:

readers of this entry if the author's name is listed correctly. I would appreciate it if you could correct this. Thanks.

488: 4478: 4428: 4273: 4234: 4207: 4193: 3734: 2764: 2473: 1089: 647: 595: 544: 474: 218: 2941: 2890: 1778: 4269: 4230: 4059: 2458: 1608: 1601: 1354: 1347: 1310: 1116: 974: 967: 925: 2596: 1417:

and I cannot save the page. This is not a link in my edit, but seems to be contained in one of the comments under talk,

4637: 4629: 4624: 4612: 4607: 4602: 4134: 3566: 2213: 1693: 1612: 1358: 1255: 1196: 808:

and haven't gotten anyone yet. Is there anyplace else I can go to get physics-knowledgeable outside editors? Thanks,

805: 195: 144: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 4464: 3800:. I am inviting you to try the improved script! It makes relisting and closing debates much easier and now works in 4549: 3161: 2656: 2509: 2429: 2370: 2269: 2197: 1782: 1405:

Hi Spinningspark, sorry to bother you, not sure whether you are the person to ask. When trying to add to the talk on

2120: 397:

I have completed a short assignment and have used your information on Stethoscopes as research material. Thank you.

3541: 3483: 3199: 2580: 1703: 389: 227:, and (perhaps despite this), I was wondering if you could help build an article on the rather abstract concept of 1462:

Ok, so it seems that somebody else added a link to the talk page which is now blacklisted. It's the link under 3.

146: 3438: 3403: 2760: 2694:

issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to

1421:. Never had this before (but I have limited Wiki experience). Any suggestion what to do about this? Many thanks. 1265: 400:

May I have your surname and first initial for correct APA v6.0 referencing style? I wish to credit you properly.

267: 2729:}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url= 839:

None of these ISBNs seem to resolve and I'm in general not qualified to determine if this is a hoax or other bs.

4396: 4360: 3708: 3602: 3148: 3066: 2679: 2166: 1942: 1880: 459: 1489:

Are you trying to edit the whole page? If so, try editing just the relevant section, or start a new section.

3434: 3098: 2622: 1916: 745:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

523:, see the last two discussions (last is more important) and the corresponding edits leading to discussion at 500: 271:. Doing that again will, of course, weight the article to Western thinkers (something still apparent in the 3336:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1912: 1463: 3994: 201: 2749: 2492:

at the AFD debate to do any necessary work. And if they don't do it or mess it up, I don't really care.

2301: 1689: 1682: 1553: 1546: 632: 583:'s edit to the present state? That's less than 10 edits. Then the only relevant talk page discussion is 301:. Please revert your revert and I will be happy to write a page about materials if necessary. Thanks. -- 4581: 3655: 3380: 2660: 2642: 2273: 2255: 1251: 1244: 1047: 1040: 584: 433: 359: 306: 143:

Based on the latest comments by Petershatner do you think removing the protection would be appropriate?

38: 4100:. "John Diesel" gives 59 results. I never use a country-specific site, but always the .com version. -- 800:

and if you are inclined, giving your opinion. I wouldn't ask, but I posted requests for opinions on

4392: 4356: 4212: 3872: 3831: 3704: 3685: 3668:

who was the blocking admin (although talk page claims he is retired, he is still very much editing).

3062: 3046: 2996: 2744:

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--

2554: 2535: 2468:

Thanks for detecting and removing this tag mentioning copy-paste yields false-positive. This page at

2047:

If you scroll all the way down to reference, you will see the and the link to the article. Thanks!

324: 3818:

to make that process easier. Please do check out the description page and give it a try! Thanks. —

3650:

a co-incidence. Once the deletion notices started coming (after just two), I stopped immediately. --

298: 4344: 4283: 3774: 3493: 2845: 2806: 2477: 2463: 1820: 655: 603: 552: 496: 482: 2557:

as this will only look at the process followed. It will not allow a renewed debate to take place.

4590: 4444: 4377: 4310: 4265: 4250: 4226: 4167: 4119: 4080: 4043: 4026: 4009: 3958: 3923: 3861: 3759: 3674: 3513: 3473: 3266: 3219: 3174: 3087: 3024: 2967: 2930: 2828: 2569: 2498: 2395: 2071: 2032: 2014: 1965: 1900: 1844: 1812: 1804: 1791: 1678: 1597: 1542: 1511: 1495: 1448: 1343: 1330: 1314: 1240: 1181: 1148: 1036: 963: 950: 929: 862: 673: 621: 569: 509: 442: 374: 343: 281: 166: 133: 47: 17: 2063: 1662:

You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic.

127:

Thanks, but I just realised that myself and fully protected the article while you were writing.

4558: 4321: 3525: 1206: 696: 2589: 2206: 796:

between another editor and I. If you have time, I wonder if you would mind taking a look at

323:

By all means write an article, but before doing so the disambiguation page should be moved to

4529: 4294: 3651: 3639: 3631: 3305: 2601: 2489: 2425: 2366: 2291: 2218: 2180: 1526: 1472: 1428: 785: 355: 302: 3804:. Support has been added to deal with some incompatibility it had with other gadgets (like 3363: 3014:

initiate a full deletion debate and the article may still end up deleted if not fixed. See

176:

Its OK either way, I am involved so it is up to you, just thought it might be a good idea.

4105: 4055: 3730: 3590: 3557: 3537: 3533: 3392: 3371: 3055: 3042: 3008: 2992: 2953: 2745: 2446: 2417: 2358: 2330: 1982: 1930: 1868: 850: 580: 415: 200:

Hi Spinningspark, the user actually did say what article it was, just above your comment -

8: 4473: 4423: 4334: 4221:

correctly, and Legobot has removed the nomination from GAN, so I think everything is OK.

4176: 3770: 3325: 3118: 1832: 1816: 915: 711: 640: 639:

I really doubt that there is POV here. In any case, thanks for your time, SpinningSpark.

588: 537: 467: 1413:

The following link has triggered a protection filter: google.com ... =bv.68911936,d.c2E

4439: 4372: 4305: 4261: 4245: 4222: 4163: 4158: 4075: 4021: 4005: 3953: 3856: 3754: 3669: 3598: 3468: 3285: 3261: 3233: 3214: 3169: 3143: 3082: 3036: 3019: 2962: 2925: 2864: 2823: 2673: 2626: 2564: 2493: 2440: 2390: 2187: 2160: 2146: 2127: 2116: 2092: 2066: 2052: 2027: 2009: 1990: 1960: 1938: 1915:

under Elastomer. It is a commercial site. What would the difference be? or this one

1895: 1876: 1839: 1786: 1777:. I don't dispute that you have the correct name, but that's not why I reverted you. 1763: 1506: 1490: 1443: 1325: 1297: 1143: 945: 668: 616: 564: 520: 504: 437: 369: 338: 276: 161: 128: 2639:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2310: 2252:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 4554: 4203: 4189: 3998: 3972: 3898: 3837: 3821: 3549: 3422: 3407: 3077: 2887: 2234: 2225: 2044: 1911:

Thank you for the detailed explanation. Let me ask you, I see for example this link

1742: 1726: 1586: 1192: 1185: 1120: 873: 866: 825: 776: 767:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

731: 209: 3753:, or else you can assess it yourself if you haven't been a major contributor to it. 2779: 4290: 3914: 3880: 3845: 3801: 3718: 3635: 3613: 3501: 3295: 3243: 3195: 2738: 2617: 2608: 2454: 2421: 2384: 2362: 2283: 2263: 1522: 1468: 1424: 844: 746: 331: 262: 241: 180: 151: 118: 2650: 4468: 4457: 4218: 4198:

I saw your most recent edits, which clarify the article significantly. Thank you!

4148: 4101: 4051: 3812: 3805: 3627: 3623: 3553: 3529: 3497: 3457: 3437:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 3389: 3367: 3316: 2950: 2326: 2239: 2026:

Jackie, the correct way to sign your posts is with four tildes (like this: ~~~~)

1667: 1561: 1055: 982: 881: 111: 104: 4589:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3944: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4328: 4144: 4037: 4001:. I would prefer that you self revert and allow another admin to deal with it. 3362:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

3114: 2177: 1956: 1891: 1645: 1391: 1368: 1288: 1229: 1165: 1130: 1105: 1080: 1024: 1007: 906: 809: 292: 114:

will not stop the user from readding the BLP material as he is autoconfirmed.

458:

Hello SpinningSpark, I'm writing to you because you originally responded to a

3545: 3517: 3138: 2669: 2183: 2156: 2142: 2135: 2131: 2112: 1774: 1759: 1406: 793: 786: 524: 453: 3855:

The image was created by me. I am hardly likely to object to my own image!

4199: 4185: 4154: 3949: 3521: 3381: 3185: 3015: 2988: 2980: 2875: 2139: 2000: 1738: 1722: 1717: 1713: 1632: 1582: 1577: 1573: 1557: 1378: 1275: 1216: 1067: 1051: 994: 978: 893: 877: 772: 768: 750: 727: 205: 3697:

Thanks for taking the time to write up a thorough and thoughtful close at

1917:

http://www.thomasnet.com/articles/plastics-rubber/liquid-injection-molding

1552:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1046:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

973:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

872:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

4177: 3910: 3876: 3841: 3505: 2773: 2630: 2450: 2107: 2101: 1913:

http://www.customadvanced.com/common-properties-of-rubber-elastomers.html

832: 232: 177: 148: 115: 4493: 4130: 4123: 3985: 3665: 3190:

Please share the copy of the article ButN which I had up on Knowledge.

1663: 4355:

The move is obviously not uncontroversial. Could you explain, please?

3429:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

1923:

good content (or for what at least I believe to be excellent content)

1698: 1617: 1260: 1201: 3902: 3894: 3893:

About vector images: can you produce a new one from (inspiration of)

3690: 3575: 3430: 2613:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2243: 2230:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1641: 1636: 1387: 1382: 1284: 1279: 1225: 1220: 1160: 1125: 1100: 1076: 1071: 1019: 1003: 998: 902: 897: 835:

has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

254: 4500: 2045:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Injection_molding_of_liquid_silicone_rubber

223:

I mean that literally - I noticed that you've done a lot of work on

4525: 4510: 3724: 3456:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2870: 1919:

under Liquid Injection Molding. That is also a commercial site.

941: 631:

I acknowledge that the sentence you brought up might have had POV.

337:

on the page to get an admin to delete it so a move can take place.

3984:. I find the outcome of no consensus surprising, given that admin 3952:

which gives a simple overview of our requirements for an article.

3321: 2323:

50,000 edits deserves a hearty "Well done!" and a pat on the back.

3425:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 2900:

next to a resistor, or one might generalise that with the symbol

317: 258: 224: 2713:, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the 204:. Just thought you might want to re-word your reply. Regards, 3982:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Singapore

3358:

J. H. Gridley, ''Principles of Electrical Transmission Lines in

3329: 798:

Talk:Electromagnet#The term "ferromagnetic" in the introduction

4139: 3934: 1363: 3699:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kedar Joshi (2nd nomination)

1566: 1060: 987: 886: 3948:

deleted for lack of notability. I recommend that you read

3808:). It also makes use of the new relist count parameter in 3415: 2714: 2126:

Pinging a few other reviewers and admins for wider notice.

316:

I think you have misunderstood what dab pages are for, see

2469: 3871:

Ops, now I see... Good work!! Well, about Ashby's image,

3445:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

3041:. Will improve the article as per notability guidelines. 327:. When you have an article ready you will need to place 2725:

page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=

2553:

in my opinion it would be a waste of time to request a

749:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 297:

If you need it, I can give billions of reference about

3433:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can 2521:

to deletion. The context seemed to be misinterpreted.

3930: 2737:

informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with

3701:. That went above and beyond, and I appreciate it. 3492:, for deletion. Might I also suggest the following? 2635:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

2248:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

3798:

Knowledge:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/CloseAFD

3787:

Knowledge:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/CloseAFD

3332:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just 2250:

Template:Did you know nominations/Impedance analogy

1657:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals) Media Viewer RfC

635:Instead, in my last edit, the sentence I added was 633:

I had already stopped advocating for its insertion.

4528:, and thanks for your contributions to Knowledge. 3110:Please let me know if its a procedure to follow . 2869:Hi, I saw you undid my revision to the article on 2637:Template:Did you know nominations/Mobility analogy 436:for the correct forms to cite Knowledge articles. 3901:(or updating it!)? There are more work to do at 802:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Electrical engineering 741:Disambiguation link notification for September 12 3488:Hi Spinningspark - you've suggested my article, 3345:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 2987:I would like to know the reason for deletion of 2445:Thank you for your really thorough GA review on 1419:Semi-protected edit request (II) on 15 June 2014 1140:User:Spinningspark/Why I don't upload to Commons 4409:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jeung Lai Chuen 3727:be reassessed as it does not look like a stub 2625:being proposed as a new theoretical element of 708:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 4042:There's something weird here. If I just click 2789:a) In the closing adjudication lede sentence: 1505:I've moved the problem thread to the archive. 368:So steel is not a substance by your thinking? 3935:https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_game_engines 3571:No, I don't have access to the book sources. 2720:If you do find a copyright violation, please 1856:Spinningspark left you a message on Knowledge 944:says we should stick to the status quo ante. 464:ignoring a significant amount of my arguments 4524:Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable 2791:"The result was delete. Delete all except ]" 2689:Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews 2629:and later fabricated as a real component in 4020:is not how AFDs are supposed to be closed. 3723:Hello, Spinningspark. I suggest an article 531:As an aside I've previously contributed to 3933:You could see hundred similar acticles on 3796:You are invited to join the discussion at 718:. I briefly mentioned your close of the 3751:Knowledge:WikiProject Football/Assessment 3466:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge! 3018:for a brief summary of the requirements. 2605:was updated with a fact from the article 2222:was updated with a fact from the article 4438:Try reading my closing rationale again. 4151:for things which need to be addressed. 2470:http://en.wikipedia.org/B._S._Daya_Sagar 1375:for things which need to be addressed. 792:There is an edit conflict developing on 1623:Talk:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle 1373:Talk:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle 14: 4587:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4143:. The article is close to meeting the 3290:sent you email. Please check. Thanks. 2615:... that a theoretical problem in the 1753:Your edit of Japanese in New York City 1367:. The article is close to meeting the 843:To reply, leave a comment on Talain's 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3319:. I have automatically detected that 2717:is very useful for sussing that out.) 1115:For example, how come you don't want 4568: 3357:In the words of Gridley <ref: --> 2584: 2201: 820:I have unreviewed a page you curated 25: 1401:Problem adding to Rubik's Cube page 1117:File:Impedance analogy resistor.svg 1098:thingies on the images you made? — 1094:Just curious, how come you put the 706:There is currently a discussion at 23: 4499: 4492: 4417:!vote out of five participants in 3689: 3414: 2065:gives a similar list of machines. 1609:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle 1602:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle 1355:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle 1348:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle 975:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle 968:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle 806:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Physics 585:Talk:Justin Bieber#Toronto assault 24: 4651: 3162:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion 2844:Oh, I see. Thanks. My apologies. 2317:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 4572: 4540:Send New Year cheer by adding {{ 4138: 3791: 3542:Donnchadh Mac an Caoilfhiaclaigh 3310: 3035:Appreciate your speedy response 2588: 2309: 2205: 1697: 1616: 1565: 1362: 1324:Sorry, not my area of interest. 1259: 1200: 1059: 986: 885: 701: 29: 2343:John Tawell - Carol Baxter book 1704:Talk:Foster's reactance theorem 1266:Talk:Indoor-outdoor thermometer 268:A History of Western Philosophy 4327:user sandbox? Happy New Year, 2961:Ok, that's convincing enough. 2242:is analogous to an electrical 1234:20:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 1110:20:23, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 1085:18:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 1012:18:21, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 956:00:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 934:23:59, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 911:23:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC) 855:22:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 815:21:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 781:09:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 736:22:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 679:15:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 662:14:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 627:07:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 610:04:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 257:. Most of my contribution to 110:The protection you applied to 13: 1: 4488:Happy New Year Spinningspark! 4340:17:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 4316:12:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC) 4299:12:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC) 4278:13:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC) 4256:18:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC) 4239:11:58, 24 December 2014 (UTC) 4208:16:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC) 4194:16:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC) 4172:04:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC) 4110:09:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC) 4086:08:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC) 4060:07:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC) 4032:18:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC) 4014:18:25, 21 December 2014 (UTC) 3964:18:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 3919:16:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 3885:16:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 3867:14:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 3850:10:10, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 3827:16:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC) 3779:20:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC) 3765:14:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC) 3743:14:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC) 3713:03:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC) 3680:22:40, 11 December 2014 (UTC) 3660:15:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC) 3644:15:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC) 3607:05:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC) 3581:01:42, 10 December 2014 (UTC) 2973:20:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC) 2956:19:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC) 2936:09:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC) 2891:02:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC) 2855:15:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC) 2834:15:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC) 2816:13:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC) 2785:and happened to notice that: 2769:02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC) 2754:02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC) 2684:12:43, 17 November 2014 (UTC) 2575:18:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC) 2540:16:45, 16 November 2014 (UTC) 2504:12:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC) 2482:11:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC) 2459:10:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC) 2043:Here is the link to the page 1440:triggering the spam blacklist 575:23:49, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 559:23:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 515:15:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 489:14:15, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 460:help desk query I had earlier 448:08:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 420:05:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 380:08:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 364:03:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 4421:makes a consensus to keep.-- 3562:20:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC) 3479:20:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC) 3397:19:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC) 3376:17:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC) 3300:17:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3272:17:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3248:17:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3225:15:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3200:05:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3180:15:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3156:04:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3123:04:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3093:01:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 3071:23:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3051:10:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3030:10:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3001:10:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 2434:07:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC) 2401:22:22, 8 November 2014 (UTC) 2375:20:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC) 2335:20:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC) 2297:00:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC) 2192:19:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC) 2171:19:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC) 2151:19:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC) 2121:19:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC) 2097:15:17, 24 October 2014 (UTC) 2077:15:08, 24 October 2014 (UTC) 2057:14:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC) 2038:14:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC) 2020:14:09, 24 October 2014 (UTC) 1971:23:27, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 1947:22:49, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 1906:22:30, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 1850:19:28, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 1825:19:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 1797:12:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC) 1768:14:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 1467:page. Thanks for your help! 1090:Images for Impedance analogy 219:Can you help with something? 202:Psychopathy in the workplace 7: 4563:13:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC) 4533:14:17, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 4483:14:23, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 4450:13:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 4433:13:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 4401:18:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 4383:11:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 4365:10:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 4004:Have a good festive season. 3897:, converting to a SVG like 3133:Blanca Gómez AfD discussion 1747:02:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 1731:02:43, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 1710:to appear in Did you know. 1672:19:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC) 1650:18:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC) 1629:to appear in Did you know. 1591:17:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC) 1531:18:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC) 1517:20:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC) 1501:18:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC) 1477:17:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC) 1454:12:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC) 1433:06:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC) 1396:03:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC) 1336:21:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 1319:21:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 1293:03:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 1272:to appear in Did you know. 1213:to appear in Did you know. 1170:18:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 1154:16:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 1135:14:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 1029:02:55, 3 October 2014 (UTC) 527:. RE: Forum shopping -: --> 349:14:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 311:12:50, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 287:09:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 247:03:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 214:14:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 184:19:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 172:17:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 155:17:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 139:15:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 122:15:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 10: 4656: 4463:An editor has asked for a 4044:the link on top of the AfD 3840:illustration now is ok. -- 3567:DLD - Digital Logic Design 3364:these opt-out instructions 2761:MediaWiki message delivery 2232:... that according to the 1690:Foster's reactance theorem 1683:Foster's reactance theorem 1554:Foster's reactance theorem 1547:Foster's reactance theorem 1252:Indoor-outdoor thermometer 1245:Indoor-outdoor thermometer 1158:Understood, no worries! — 1048:Indoor-outdoor thermometer 1041:Indoor-outdoor thermometer 196:Help Desk - Youtube Thread 4550:Hard Rain SoloistEnsemble 4542:subst:Happy New Year 2015 2942:Here's what I was seeing: 2655:, and it may be added to 2510:Deletion of Gregg L Greer 2308: 2293:Penny for your thoughts? 2268:, and it may be added to 2198:DYK for Impedance analogy 1560:-status according to the 1054:-status according to the 981:-status according to the 880:-status according to the 325:material (disambiguation) 4137:has been placed on hold 3980:Regarding your close of 3494:Laurentius of Echternach 3484:Suggestions for deletion 3459:leaving us some feedback 3435:create articles yourself 2581:DYK for Mobility analogy 2449:. It was very helpful. 1926:Awaiting your response 1892:external links guideline 1361:has been placed on hold 716:Barney the barney barney 390:Regarding referencing... 3875:, I need some help. -- 3836:Hello, please check if 3514:Laisren of Cloonkerrill 3490:Aed mac Brian Ó hUiginn 3338:my operator's talk page 1813:Draft:Jeju_black_cattle 1805:Draft:Jeju_black_cattle 1409:, I get an error about 519:Okay, here's the link. 18:User talk:Spinningspark 4544:}} to user talk pages. 4504: 4497: 3907:Talk:Analogical_models 3895:my File:Blackbox3D.png 3694: 3419: 2904:. That is, the resist 2661:Did you know talk page 2274:Did you know talk page 1207:Talk:Impedance analogy 841: 4585:of past discussions. 4503: 4496: 4153:Message delivered by 4145:good article criteria 3995:WP:Other stuff exists 3693: 3632:User:Marcus Az-Absent 3526:Tom O'Connor (priest) 3439:Articles for Creation 3418: 3404:Articles for creation 3099:Blanca Gomez deletion 2703:hallmarks of copyvios 1712:Message delivered by 1631:Message delivered by 1572:Message delivered by 1377:Message delivered by 1369:good article criteria 1274:Message delivered by 1215:Message delivered by 1066:Message delivered by 993:Message delivered by 892:Message delivered by 837: 824:Thanks for reviewing 42:of past discussions. 4456:Deletion review for 4413:I don't see how one 4393:William M. Connolley 4357:William M. Connolley 3705:Lesser Cartographies 3538:Mo Lua of Kilmoluagh 3328:may have broken the 3063:The Vintage Feminist 2447:Oil shale in Estonia 769:opt-out instructions 4133:you nominated as a 3510:Adrian James Martyn 3402:Your submission at 3326:Standing wave ratio 2657:the statistics page 2627:mechanical networks 2302:A barnstar for you! 2270:the statistics page 1692:you nominated as a 1611:you nominated as a 1357:you nominated as a 1254:you nominated as a 1195:you nominated as a 724:What started it all 501:Request for comment 4505: 4498: 3977:Hi Spinningspark. 3931:http://oxygine.org 3695: 3420: 3350:, radartutorial.eu 2514:Hi SpinningSpark, 1655:Please comment on 1556:you nominated for 1302:Hi SpinningSpark, 1050:you nominated for 977:you nominated for 876:you nominated for 828:, Spinningspark. 759:• Join us at the 521:Talk:Justin Bieber 4643: 4642: 4597: 4596: 4591:current talk page 4545: 4476: 4426: 4213:Passed Henry Nock 4161: 3903:black box article 3899:File:Blackbox.svg 3873:see are my answer 3838:Analogical models 3832:Analogical models 3745: 3733:comment added by 3686:A kitten for you! 3610: 3593:comment added by 3423:Brahim Darghouthi 3410:has been accepted 3408:Brahim Darghouthi 2667: 2666: 2654: 2437: 2420:comment added by 2378: 2361:comment added by 2340: 2339: 2280: 2279: 2267: 2235:impedance analogy 2226:Impedance analogy 1994: 1985:comment added by 1950: 1933:comment added by 1885: 1871:comment added by 1720: 1639: 1580: 1385: 1282: 1223: 1193:Impedance analogy 1186:Impedance analogy 1121:Wikimedia Commons 1074: 1001: 900: 874:Impedance analogy 867:Impedance analogy 826:Impedance analogy 764: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4647: 4621: 4599: 4598: 4576: 4575: 4569: 4539: 4516: 4472: 4422: 4349:I'm puzzled by: 4345:The Sleepwalkers 4337: 4284:Capote (garment) 4152: 4142: 3825: 3817: 3811: 3795: 3794: 3728: 3652:Marcus Az-Absent 3609: 3587: 3552:. Thanking you, 3502:Simon of Ireland 3461: 3451: 3355: 3341: 3314: 3313: 3289: 3258: 3237: 3211: 3154: 3153: 3151: 3146: 3141: 3012: 2899: 2889: 2885: 2880: 2852: 2813: 2640: 2618:mobility analogy 2609:Mobility analogy 2597:17 November 2014 2592: 2585: 2551: 2464:B. S. Daya Sagar 2436: 2414: 2410:Than you again. 2388: 2377: 2355: 2313: 2306: 2305: 2294: 2288: 2253: 2209: 2202: 2181:7%266%3Dthirteen 1993: 1979: 1949: 1927: 1884: 1865: 1836: 1711: 1701: 1630: 1620: 1571: 1569: 1376: 1366: 1273: 1263: 1214: 1204: 1065: 1063: 992: 990: 891: 889: 857: 812: 754: 747:Oppenheimer pole 705: 704: 658: 652: 645: 606: 600: 593: 555: 549: 542: 533:an RfC on Bieber 485: 479: 472: 434:Citing Knowledge 431: 356:Daniele Pugliesi 336: 330: 303:Daniele Pugliesi 263:Bertrand Russell 239: 112:William Shatner‎ 105:William Shatner‎ 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4655: 4654: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4617: 4573: 4552: 4547: 4546: 4517: 4507: 4490: 4481: 4469:Jeung Lai Chuen 4465:deletion review 4461: 4458:Jeung Lai Chuen 4431: 4411: 4353: 4347: 4335: 4324: 4286: 4219:Talk:Henry Nock 4215: 4181: 4157:, on behalf of 4149:Talk:Henry Nock 4127: 4040: 3975: 3926: 3924:Oxygine deleted 3834: 3819: 3815: 3809: 3792: 3789: 3721: 3688: 3634:and confirm? -- 3628:Time in Austria 3624:Time in Albania 3616: 3588: 3569: 3534:Néide mac Onchú 3530:Frances Moffett 3498:Miles de Angulo 3486: 3481: 3447: 3441:if you prefer. 3412: 3386: 3351: 3320: 3311: 3308: 3283: 3252: 3231: 3205: 3188: 3149: 3144: 3139: 3137: 3136: 3101: 3058: 3043:Girishgullapudi 3009:Girishgullapudi 3006: 2993:Girishgullapudi 2985: 2944: 2897: 2881: 2876: 2874: 2867: 2849:Quis separabit? 2846: 2810:Quis separabit? 2807: 2776: 2746:Fuhghettaboutit 2715:Wayback Machine 2691: 2583: 2555:deletion review 2548:Greeralivetoday 2545: 2532:Greeralivetoday 2512: 2466: 2443: 2415: 2382: 2356: 2345: 2304: 2292: 2284: 2214:2 November 2014 2200: 2155:Interesting.... 2106:I just created 2104: 1980: 1928: 1866: 1858: 1830: 1809: 1755: 1716:, on behalf of 1686: 1660: 1635:, on behalf of 1605: 1576:, on behalf of 1550: 1403: 1381:, on behalf of 1351: 1300: 1278:, on behalf of 1248: 1219:, on behalf of 1189: 1092: 1070:, on behalf of 1044: 997:, on behalf of 971: 924:edit those out. 918: 896:, on behalf of 870: 848: 822: 810: 790: 761:DPL WikiProject 743: 726:. Thank you. 720:John Mutton AfD 702: 699: 656: 648: 641: 604: 596: 589: 553: 545: 538: 483: 475: 468: 456: 425: 392: 334: 328: 295: 233: 221: 198: 108: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4653: 4641: 4640: 4635: 4632: 4627: 4622: 4615: 4610: 4605: 4595: 4594: 4577: 4551: 4548: 4538: 4536: 4535: 4523: 4511:Happy New Year 4506: 4491: 4489: 4486: 4477: 4474:JohnBlackburne 4460: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4427: 4424:JohnBlackburne 4410: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4386: 4385: 4351: 4346: 4343: 4323: 4322:User:Wasif0909 4320: 4319: 4318: 4285: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4258: 4214: 4211: 4180: 4175: 4126: 4122:nomination of 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4070: 4039: 4036: 4035: 4034: 3974: 3971: 3967: 3966: 3925: 3922: 3892: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3833: 3830: 3788: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3771:Oldstone James 3735:86.174.186.110 3720: 3717: 3715: 3687: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3662: 3615: 3612: 3568: 3565: 3485: 3482: 3464: 3463: 3454: 3427: 3413: 3411: 3400: 3385: 3379: 3360: 3359: 3347: 3346: 3307: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3279: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3228: 3227: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3158: 3129: 3100: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3057: 3054: 3033: 3032: 2984: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2943: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2866: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2837: 2836: 2803: 2802: 2796:b) Result was 2794: 2775: 2772: 2732: 2728: 2711:from the draft 2698:in particular. 2690: 2687: 2665: 2664: 2593: 2582: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2559: 2558: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2474:14.139.157.211 2465: 2462: 2442: 2439: 2404: 2403: 2344: 2341: 2338: 2337: 2324: 2320: 2319: 2314: 2303: 2300: 2278: 2277: 2210: 2199: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2103: 2100: 2082: 2080: 2079: 2041: 2040: 2023: 2022: 1976: 1974: 1973: 1909: 1908: 1857: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1833:MatthewVanitas 1817:MatthewVanitas 1808: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1685: 1681:nomination of 1675: 1659: 1653: 1604: 1600:nomination of 1594: 1549: 1545:nomination of 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1519: 1503: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1457: 1456: 1402: 1399: 1350: 1346:nomination of 1340: 1339: 1338: 1299: 1296: 1247: 1243:nomination of 1237: 1188: 1184:nomination of 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1091: 1088: 1043: 1039:nomination of 1033: 1032: 1031: 970: 966:nomination of 960: 959: 958: 917: 914: 869: 865:nomination of 859: 853:comment added 831:Unfortunately 821: 818: 789: 784: 742: 739: 712:DangerousPanda 698: 697:ANI discussion 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 529: 497:forum shopping 455: 452: 451: 450: 409: 406:Kind regards, 391: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 321: 294: 291: 290: 289: 220: 217: 197: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 186: 107: 103:Protection of 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4652: 4639: 4636: 4633: 4631: 4628: 4626: 4623: 4620: 4616: 4614: 4611: 4609: 4606: 4604: 4601: 4600: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4583: 4578: 4571: 4570: 4567: 4564: 4560: 4556: 4543: 4537: 4534: 4531: 4527: 4521: 4520:Spinningspark 4515: 4514: 4512: 4502: 4495: 4485: 4484: 4480: 4475: 4470: 4466: 4459: 4451: 4448: 4447: 4443: 4442: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4430: 4425: 4420: 4416: 4402: 4398: 4394: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4384: 4381: 4380: 4376: 4375: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4350: 4342: 4341: 4338: 4332: 4331: 4317: 4314: 4313: 4309: 4308: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4262:Mike Christie 4259: 4257: 4254: 4253: 4249: 4248: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4223:Mike Christie 4220: 4210: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4196: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4179: 4174: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4164:Mike Christie 4160: 4159:Mike Christie 4156: 4150: 4146: 4141: 4136: 4132: 4125: 4121: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4094: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4084: 4083: 4079: 4078: 4071: 4068: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4047: 4045: 4033: 4030: 4029: 4025: 4024: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4002: 4000: 3996: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3978: 3970: 3965: 3962: 3961: 3957: 3956: 3951: 3946: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3936: 3932: 3921: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3865: 3864: 3860: 3859: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3829: 3828: 3823: 3814: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3763: 3762: 3758: 3757: 3752: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3726: 3716: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3700: 3692: 3681: 3678: 3677: 3673: 3672: 3667: 3663: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3619: 3611: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3583: 3582: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3564: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3546:Margaret Athy 3543: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3518:Thomas Cawley 3515: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3480: 3477: 3476: 3472: 3471: 3467: 3460: 3455: 3452: 3450: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3426: 3424: 3417: 3409: 3405: 3399: 3398: 3394: 3391: 3383: 3378: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3356:</ref: --> 3354: 3349: 3348: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3339: 3335: 3334:edit the page 3331: 3327: 3323: 3318: 3306:December 2014 3301: 3297: 3293: 3287: 3286:Spinningspark 3282: 3281: 3280: 3273: 3270: 3269: 3265: 3264: 3256: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3235: 3234:Spinningspark 3230: 3229: 3226: 3223: 3222: 3218: 3217: 3209: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3181: 3178: 3177: 3173: 3172: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3157: 3152: 3147: 3142: 3134: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3111: 3108: 3104: 3094: 3091: 3090: 3086: 3085: 3079: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3053: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3039: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3023: 3022: 3017: 3010: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2982: 2974: 2971: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2952: 2948: 2937: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2928: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2888: 2886: 2884: 2879: 2872: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2850: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2835: 2832: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2814: 2812: 2811: 2799: 2795: 2792: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2784: 2783: 2771: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2757: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2742: 2740: 2734: 2731:URL of source 2730: 2727:URL of source 2726: 2723: 2718: 2716: 2712: 2706: 2704: 2699: 2697: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2678: 2675: 2671: 2662: 2658: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2638: 2634: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2604: 2603: 2598: 2594: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2576: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2561: 2560: 2556: 2549: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2528: 2526: 2522: 2519: 2515: 2505: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2496: 2491: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2461: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2438: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2411: 2408: 2402: 2399: 2398: 2394: 2393: 2386: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2352: 2349: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2322: 2321: 2318: 2315: 2312: 2307: 2299: 2298: 2295: 2289: 2287: 2275: 2271: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2251: 2247: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2236: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2221: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2208: 2204: 2203: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2182: 2179: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128:Carlojoseph14 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2109: 2099: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2085: 2078: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2039: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2030: 2025: 2024: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2012: 2007: 2002: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1972: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1958: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1924: 1920: 1918: 1914: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1898: 1893: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1864:Best regards, 1862: 1851: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1842: 1834: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1815:. Take care, 1814: 1806: 1803:Guidance for 1798: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1691: 1684: 1680: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1658: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1638: 1634: 1628: 1624: 1619: 1614: 1610: 1603: 1599: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1575: 1568: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1548: 1544: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1518: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1441: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1420: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1408: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1380: 1374: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1356: 1349: 1345: 1337: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1311:24.242.94.114 1307: 1303: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1271: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1246: 1242: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1222: 1218: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1198: 1194: 1187: 1183: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1146: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1097: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1069: 1062: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1042: 1038: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1000: 996: 989: 984: 980: 976: 969: 965: 957: 954: 953: 949: 948: 943: 938: 937: 936: 935: 931: 927: 926:87.254.66.250 923: 913: 912: 908: 904: 899: 895: 888: 883: 879: 875: 868: 864: 858: 856: 852: 846: 840: 836: 834: 829: 827: 817: 816: 813: 807: 803: 799: 795: 794:Electromagnet 788: 787:Electromagnet 783: 782: 778: 774: 770: 765: 762: 758: 752: 748: 738: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 680: 677: 676: 672: 671: 665: 664: 663: 660: 659: 653: 651: 646: 644: 638: 634: 630: 629: 628: 625: 624: 620: 619: 613: 612: 611: 608: 607: 601: 599: 594: 592: 587:. Thank you. 586: 582: 578: 577: 576: 573: 572: 568: 567: 562: 561: 560: 557: 556: 550: 548: 543: 541: 534: 530: 526: 525:Justin Bieber 522: 518: 517: 516: 513: 512: 508: 507: 502: 498: 493: 492: 491: 490: 487: 486: 480: 478: 473: 471: 465: 461: 449: 446: 445: 441: 440: 435: 429: 424: 423: 422: 421: 417: 413: 407: 404: 401: 398: 395: 381: 378: 377: 373: 372: 367: 366: 365: 361: 357: 352: 351: 350: 347: 346: 342: 341: 333: 326: 322: 319: 315: 314: 313: 312: 308: 304: 300: 288: 285: 284: 280: 279: 274: 270: 269: 264: 261:was based on 260: 256: 251: 250: 249: 248: 245: 244: 240: 238: 237: 230: 226: 216: 215: 211: 207: 203: 185: 182: 179: 175: 174: 173: 170: 169: 165: 164: 158: 157: 156: 153: 150: 147: 145: 142: 141: 140: 137: 136: 132: 131: 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 117: 113: 106: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4618: 4586: 4580: 4555:Greg caffrey 4553: 4530:NorthAmerica 4519: 4518: 4509: 4508: 4462: 4445: 4440: 4414: 4412: 4378: 4373: 4354: 4348: 4329: 4325: 4311: 4306: 4287: 4251: 4246: 4216: 4197: 4182: 4135:good article 4129:The article 4128: 4098:for "John W" 4092: 4081: 4076: 4048: 4041: 4027: 4022: 4003: 3979: 3976: 3968: 3959: 3954: 3927: 3891: 3862: 3857: 3835: 3822:Technical 13 3790: 3760: 3755: 3729:— Preceding 3722: 3703: 3696: 3675: 3670: 3620: 3617: 3589:— Preceding 3584: 3573: 3572: 3570: 3550:Scandlán Mór 3522:Markus Casey 3487: 3474: 3469: 3465: 3446: 3428: 3421: 3387: 3382:Jonah Falcon 3361: 3352: 3309: 3278: 3267: 3262: 3220: 3215: 3189: 3175: 3170: 3165: 3112: 3109: 3105: 3102: 3088: 3083: 3059: 3056:Blanca Gómez 3037: 3034: 3025: 3020: 2989:Aditya Music 2986: 2981:Aditya Music 2979:Deletion of 2968: 2963: 2945: 2931: 2926: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2882: 2877: 2868: 2848: 2847: 2829: 2824: 2809: 2808: 2804: 2797: 2790: 2781: 2780:watchlisted 2777: 2758: 2743: 2739:weasel words 2735: 2721: 2719: 2710: 2707: 2700: 2695: 2692: 2676: 2668: 2651:daily totals 2616: 2614: 2607: 2606: 2602:Did you know 2600: 2570: 2565: 2529: 2524: 2523: 2517: 2516: 2513: 2499: 2494: 2467: 2444: 2416:— Preceding 2412: 2409: 2405: 2396: 2391: 2357:— Preceding 2353: 2350: 2346: 2316: 2285: 2281: 2264:daily totals 2233: 2231: 2224: 2223: 2219:Did you know 2217: 2163: 2105: 2086: 2081: 2072: 2067: 2042: 2033: 2028: 2015: 2010: 2005: 1981:— Preceding 1975: 1966: 1961: 1929:— Preceding 1925: 1921: 1910: 1901: 1896: 1867:— Preceding 1863: 1859: 1845: 1840: 1810: 1792: 1787: 1756: 1694:good article 1688:The article 1687: 1661: 1613:good article 1607:The article 1606: 1551: 1512: 1507: 1496: 1491: 1449: 1444: 1423: 1418: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1407:Rubik's Cube 1404: 1359:good article 1353:The article 1352: 1331: 1326: 1308: 1304: 1301: 1256:good article 1250:The article 1249: 1197:good article 1191:The article 1190: 1159: 1149: 1144: 1124: 1099: 1096:local copies 1095: 1093: 1045: 1018: 972: 951: 946: 921: 919: 871: 849:— Preceding 842: 838: 830: 823: 791: 766: 751:Port Augusta 744: 714:'s block of 700: 674: 669: 654: 649: 642: 636: 622: 617: 602: 597: 590: 570: 565: 551: 546: 539: 510: 505: 481: 476: 469: 463: 457: 443: 438: 408: 405: 402: 399: 396: 393: 375: 370: 344: 339: 296: 282: 277: 272: 266: 242: 235: 234: 222: 199: 167: 162: 134: 129: 109: 75: 43: 37: 4579:This is an 4336:talk to me? 4291:Steelbeard1 4178:Phase angle 3636:Floquenbeam 3506:Martin Coen 3315:Hello, I'm 2631:Formula One 2621:led to the 2490:meatpuppets 2422:JesseLeiman 2385:JesseLeiman 2363:JesseLeiman 2351:Thank you. 2286:HJ Mitchell 2108:Zombie star 2001:reliability 1708:nominate it 1696:has passed 1627:nominate it 1615:has passed 1523:Randinfogen 1469:Randinfogen 1464:found here. 1425:Randinfogen 1270:nominate it 1258:has passed 1211:nominate it 1199:has passed 916:RLC circuit 410:Dan Gamble 36:This is an 4638:Archive 25 4630:Archive 20 4625:Archive 19 4619:Archive 18 4613:Archive 17 4608:Archive 16 4603:Archive 15 4131:Henry Nock 4124:Henry Nock 4102:Randykitty 4067:86 results 4052:Randykitty 3999:WP:ILIKEIT 3986:User:slakr 3969:Thank you 3666:user:Dpmuk 3554:Fergananim 3390:Scalhotrod 3368:BracketBot 3366:. Thanks, 3317:BracketBot 3078:WP:ILIKEIT 2951:j⚛e decker 2865:Inductors? 2798:delete all 2759:Sent via-- 2647:live views 2643:here's how 2441:Thank you! 2327:Tom Morris 2260:live views 2256:here's how 1298:Carl Freer 771:. Thanks, 710:regarding 428:Mambogambo 412:Mambogambo 231:. Cheers! 95:Archive 25 87:Archive 20 82:Archive 19 76:Archive 18 70:Archive 17 65:Archive 16 60:Archive 15 4330:Jimfbleak 3988:had made 3973:AfD close 3449:help desk 3431:Knowledge 3322:your edit 3115:Blanquska 2670:Cas Liber 2244:capacitor 2178:Prioryman 2157:Cas Liber 2006:technical 1783:this edit 1779:Your edit 1119:moved to 845:talk page 811:Chetvorno 755:Read the 255:something 229:Something 4526:New Year 4441:Spinning 4419:this AfD 4374:Spinning 4307:Spinning 4270:contribs 4247:Spinning 4231:contribs 4077:Spinning 4023:Spinning 3955:Spinning 3909:)... -- 3858:Spinning 3756:Spinning 3731:unsigned 3725:FC Tosno 3719:FC Tosno 3671:Spinning 3614:Time in 3603:contribs 3595:Drmajidn 3591:unsigned 3470:Spinning 3263:Spinning 3216:Spinning 3171:Spinning 3084:Spinning 3038:Spinning 3021:Spinning 2964:Spinning 2927:Spinning 2871:inductor 2825:Spinning 2782:this AFD 2680:contribs 2566:Spinning 2495:Spinning 2430:contribs 2418:unsigned 2392:Spinning 2371:contribs 2359:unsigned 2184:Gaijin42 2167:contribs 2143:Gaijin42 2136:Casliber 2132:Hawkeye7 2113:Gaijin42 2089:JackieBM 2068:Spinning 2049:JackieBM 2029:Spinning 2011:Spinning 1987:JackieBM 1983:JackieBM 1962:Spinning 1943:contribs 1935:JackieBM 1931:JackieBM 1897:Spinning 1881:contribs 1873:JackieBM 1869:unsigned 1841:Spinning 1788:Spinning 1775:Gordonap 1760:Gordonap 1562:criteria 1508:Spinning 1492:Spinning 1445:Spinning 1438:You are 1327:Spinning 1145:Spinning 1056:criteria 983:criteria 947:Spinning 942:MOS:MATH 882:criteria 670:Spinning 643:starship 618:Spinning 591:starship 566:Spinning 540:starship 506:Spinning 470:starship 439:Spinning 371:Spinning 340:Spinning 278:Spinning 163:Spinning 130:Spinning 4582:archive 4274:library 4235:library 4200:Brirush 4186:Brirush 4184:revert. 4155:Legobot 4006:Charles 3618:Hi SS, 2801:Gross). 2623:inerter 2525:Restore 2140:Smartse 1739:Protonk 1723:Protonk 1718:Protonk 1714:Legobot 1633:Legobot 1583:Protonk 1578:Protonk 1574:Legobot 1379:Legobot 1276:Legobot 1217:Legobot 1068:Legobot 995:Legobot 894:Legobot 851:undated 773:DPL bot 728:Msnicki 667:ended. 657:~ regal 605:~ regal 581:SNUGGUM 554:~ regal 484:~ regal 394:Hello, 332:Db-move 318:MOS:DAB 273:nothing 259:nothing 225:Nothing 206:CaptRik 39:archive 4371:move. 4038:Diesel 3911:Krauss 3877:Krauss 3842:Krauss 3813:Relist 3802:Vector 3393:(Talk) 3330:syntax 3292:Adsyvb 3255:Adsyvb 3240:Adsyvb 3208:Adsyvb 3192:Adsyvb 3166:before 3128:Spark, 3113:Thanks 2778:Hi, I 2722:do not 2451:Beagel 2413:Jeff 2354:Jeff 2240:spring 1702:; see 1621:; see 1264:; see 1205:; see 1123:??? — 833:Talain 650:.paint 598:.paint 547:.paint 477:.paint 293:Revert 236:bd2412 4479:deeds 4446:Spark 4429:deeds 4379:Spark 4312:Spark 4252:Spark 4118:Your 4093:about 4082:Spark 4028:Spark 3960:Spark 3950:WP:42 3905:(and 3863:Spark 3806:wikEd 3761:Spark 3676:Spark 3475:Spark 3384:- AfD 3268:Spark 3221:Spark 3176:Spark 3089:Spark 3026:Spark 3016:WP:42 2969:Spark 2932:Spark 2898:680 Ω 2830:Spark 2571:Spark 2500:Spark 2397:Spark 2073:Spark 2034:Spark 2016:Spark 1967:Spark 1902:Spark 1846:Spark 1793:Spark 1677:Your 1664:Alsee 1596:Your 1541:Your 1513:Spark 1497:Spark 1450:Spark 1342:Your 1332:Spark 1239:Your 1180:Your 1150:Spark 1035:Your 962:Your 952:Spark 861:Your 804:and 675:Spark 623:Spark 571:Spark 511:Spark 454:Hello 444:Spark 376:Spark 345:Spark 283:Spark 168:Spark 135:Spark 16:< 4559:talk 4415:keep 4397:talk 4361:talk 4295:talk 4266:talk 4227:talk 4204:talk 4190:talk 4168:talk 4106:talk 4056:talk 4010:talk 3997:and 3990:this 3915:talk 3881:talk 3846:talk 3820:{{U| 3775:talk 3739:talk 3709:talk 3656:talk 3640:talk 3630:and 3626:and 3599:talk 3576:Swpb 3558:talk 3395:☮ღ☺ 3372:talk 3296:talk 3244:talk 3196:talk 3186:ButN 3119:talk 3103:Hi, 3067:talk 3047:talk 2997:talk 2983:page 2906:ance 2883:4444 2765:talk 2750:talk 2674:talk 2536:talk 2518:Note 2478:talk 2455:talk 2426:talk 2367:talk 2331:talk 2238:, a 2188:talk 2161:talk 2147:talk 2117:talk 2093:talk 2053:talk 1991:talk 1957:ELNO 1939:talk 1877:talk 1821:talk 1773:Hi, 1764:talk 1743:talk 1727:talk 1668:talk 1646:talk 1642:Cirt 1637:Cirt 1587:talk 1527:talk 1473:talk 1429:talk 1392:talk 1388:Cirt 1383:Cirt 1315:talk 1289:talk 1285:Cirt 1280:Cirt 1230:talk 1226:Cirt 1221:Cirt 1166:talk 1161:Cirt 1131:talk 1126:Cirt 1106:talk 1101:Cirt 1081:talk 1077:Cirt 1072:Cirt 1025:talk 1020:Cirt 1008:talk 1004:Cirt 999:Cirt 930:talk 907:talk 903:Cirt 898:Cirt 777:talk 732:talk 416:talk 360:talk 307:talk 299:this 210:talk 4467:of 4272:- 4233:- 4162:-- 4073:--> 3824:}} 3324:to 3150:eef 3140:Dea 2878:KDS 2774:AFD 2733:}}. 2696:you 2595:On 2212:On 2102:dYK 1721:-- 1640:-- 1581:-- 1386:-- 1283:-- 1224:-- 1075:-- 1002:-- 922:you 901:-- 847:. 757:FAQ 265:'s 181:fan 152:fan 119:fan 4634:→ 4561:) 4399:) 4363:) 4333:- 4297:) 4276:) 4268:- 4237:) 4229:- 4206:) 4192:) 4170:) 4120:GA 4108:) 4058:) 4012:) 3945:A7 3917:) 3883:) 3848:) 3816:}} 3810:{{ 3777:) 3741:) 3711:) 3658:) 3642:) 3605:) 3601:• 3560:) 3548:, 3544:, 3540:, 3536:, 3532:, 3528:, 3524:, 3520:, 3516:, 3512:, 3508:, 3504:, 3500:, 3496:, 3406:: 3374:) 3298:) 3246:) 3198:) 3145:db 3121:) 3069:) 3049:) 2999:) 2767:) 2752:) 2682:) 2649:, 2645:, 2599:, 2538:) 2480:) 2457:) 2432:) 2428:• 2373:) 2369:• 2333:) 2290:| 2262:, 2258:, 2216:, 2190:) 2169:) 2149:) 2138:, 2134:, 2130:, 2119:) 2095:) 2055:) 1945:) 1941:• 1883:) 1879:• 1823:) 1766:) 1745:) 1729:) 1679:GA 1670:) 1648:) 1598:GA 1589:) 1564:. 1558:GA 1543:GA 1529:) 1475:) 1431:) 1394:) 1344:GA 1317:) 1291:) 1241:GA 1232:) 1182:GA 1168:) 1142:. 1133:) 1108:) 1083:) 1058:. 1052:GA 1037:GA 1027:) 1010:) 985:. 979:GA 964:GA 932:) 909:) 884:. 878:GA 863:GA 779:) 734:) 503:. 418:) 362:) 354:-- 335:}} 329:{{ 309:) 212:) 178:GB 149:GB 116:GB 91:→ 4593:. 4557:( 4522:, 4513:! 4395:( 4359:( 4293:( 4264:( 4225:( 4202:( 4188:( 4166:( 4104:( 4054:( 4008:( 3913:( 3879:( 3844:( 3773:( 3737:( 3707:( 3654:( 3638:( 3597:( 3574:— 3556:( 3462:. 3453:. 3370:( 3353:] 3340:. 3294:( 3288:: 3284:@ 3257:: 3253:@ 3242:( 3236:: 3232:@ 3210:: 3206:@ 3194:( 3117:( 3065:( 3045:( 3011:: 3007:@ 2995:( 2922:L 2920:ω 2918:j 2916:+ 2914:R 2912:= 2910:Z 2902:R 2763:( 2756:. 2748:( 2677:· 2672:( 2663:. 2653:) 2641:( 2633:? 2550:: 2546:@ 2534:( 2476:( 2453:( 2424:( 2387:: 2383:@ 2365:( 2329:( 2325:— 2282:— 2276:. 2266:) 2254:( 2246:? 2186:( 2164:· 2159:( 2145:( 2115:( 2091:( 2051:( 1989:( 1937:( 1875:( 1835:: 1831:@ 1819:( 1807:? 1762:( 1741:( 1725:( 1666:( 1644:( 1585:( 1525:( 1471:( 1427:( 1390:( 1313:( 1287:( 1228:( 1164:( 1129:( 1104:( 1079:( 1023:( 1006:( 928:( 905:( 775:( 763:. 730:( 430:: 426:@ 414:( 358:( 305:( 243:T 208:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index