438:
413:
31:
I believe we should add composers who are both important in terms of
Romanticism, and who are part of the movement generally labelled Romanticism - by all means add Richard Wagner, as he certainly is part of Romanticism, even if he later departs from it. At the moment I am working on a Romantic Poets
69:
The "unnamed second half of the 19th century"ism (called victorianism, realism and a fist full of other names), differs from the first half of the 19th century is the focus on pragmatism. The critique of the late 19th century of
Romanticism (voiced by Bismarck, Wagner, Verdi among others) is that it
65:
Remember that
Romanticism has an academic streak in it that is quite large. Romantics loved classification, codification and organization. Brahms' studies into the past were more extensive, but in line with Schumann, Mendelssohn, Chopin and Beethoven's searches into past practice. More over - they
377:
Oh, BTW, Schissel, would you like becoming an admin? I'm going to nominate you but wanted to make sure it was OK with you first before posting your "official" nomination- when you can "officially" accept! You've done a lot of good work and deserve it- if you wish to be nominated, just drop me a
39:
the movement in the top level category, even if there is some duplication. Particularly since the
Romantic Composers list is meant to be comprehensive - listing virtually anyone who composed a work in the style by the broadest measure who left anything we still play even occasionally.
73:
In musicology terms, Brahms is a "Romantic" because
Romantic is defined as the practice from Weber to Mahler, and Brahms sits squarely in the middle of that period. Roughly speaking, the period of systematic application of voiceleading to extended tonality.
166:
I'll look into it (this weekend if poss.) The image-tagging pages etc. suggested that this is generally true of images created by US gov'ts federal, state etc. within certain limits, but there may well be certain states that are exceptions.
181:
There are only two states that release their images into the public domain: California and, I believe, Utah. All other states hold copyrights on their images. The templates you created are in error; please remove them. Thanks, –
70:
was impractical, dreamy and incapable of fulfilling its goals by the means it had. In short, if one wanted great results, argued the late 19th century, one had to make a "Faustian" bargain, and do whatever needed to be done.
47:
I will run a script to key all of the names I've added to cats later (currently I've added about 200 articles to various cats over the last few days, and want to simply run the script once so that there are no errors.)
290:
Hi! I noticed you have previously been involved in editing this article, and it is currently being worked on to try to raise it to FA standard. If you are interested in helping improve this article once more, see
86:
Yeah, I noticed him in the category of
Croatian musicians and was quite surprised to see him listed there. I googled quickly and found the extra information that provided the explanation. --
130:
project; I beg to draw your attention to part 2 of the project - there are about 12,000 more images in need of tagging. Any assistance you could provide would be most welcome. thanks --
499:. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new
35:
Since "Romantic" is used in musicology in a manner radically at odds with the rest of intellectual history, I think it better to list those composers important for
219:
195:
445:
337:
edit for reasons that I do not want to go into (but with the authority of Jimbo to back me up on it). If you have a problem with it, please contact me privately.
450:
No sooner than I open up the
Knowledge and start doodling around do I see that not only you've been contributing, but that you're nominated for adminship!
267:
386:
P.S. I'll be travelling the next couple of days, so bear with me if I take a few days to nominate you. My computer access might be limited...
311:- thanks! BTW, are you a cellist? I'll be working on making entries for pieces in the list... thanks for all your dedication to Knowledge!
308:
468:
Thanks for supporting me on my RfA. It's always nice to get some positive feedback. I hope I can put my new abilities to some good use. --
274:
on merging? I think the string quartet list should be kept separate, not merged, but I'm not sure how to handle disagreements on Wiki. --
154:; I'm curious about Florida government works being public domain. Where did you see this? A search online doesn't reveal anything. --
358:
278:
397:. Please put your "official" acceptance on and answer the candidate questions- then we'll keep our fingers crossed! Thanks again,
500:
492:
365:
played with piano accompaniment. Shouldn't two (or maybe all three) be merged into one list? Tell me what you think, thanks!
252:
315:
292:
32:
list, to replace the current one - which has 6 names, and 4 are thrown to disambiguation pages. Not very helpful.
121:
139:
562:
I noticed that you've edited the TWW page a couple of times. I'm a huge WW fan myself. What is your opinion on
257:
198:
on my usertalk page. So here is what I am wondering, can we consider it fair use if the same image is on her
495:
before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the
189:
354:
236:
127:
488:
114:
Feel free to add some to the lists. I've really only had time to work on the 20th century solidly.
325:
You beat me to the correction! The entry in Grove is ambiguous and the MDG notes are precise. DN
307:
Hello! I've noticed that you are a classical music lover, just like me! Thanks for compiling the
241:
Hello, Schissel! Fancy meeting you here. It's a small
Internet, I guess. Hope you're doing well.
66:
all shared the
Romantic trait of seeing the past as different, and valued that archaic quality.
487:
Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an
320:
456:(Hopefully you do end up an admin; either way, I voted for you after looking at your history.)
271:
115:
103:
75:
56:
49:
41:
551:
361:. Aren't they are basically the same? A cello sonata is considered a solo cello piece and is
134:
541:
8:
533:
457:
263:
215:
202:? I'm not too familiar with what is fair use or not. Please let me know what you think.
508:
172:
17:
474:
229:
207:
148:
557:
81:
548:
526:
249:
131:
540:
437:
26:
567:
433:
429:
417:
398:
379:
366:
312:
284:
275:
334:
159:
97:
504:
394:
302:
168:
55:
Instead of war of the
Romantics - what about "Brahmsians Versus Wagnerians".
491:. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the
470:
412:
350:
225:
203:
183:
482:
522:
519:
296:
245:
242:
283:
338:
328:
496:
425:
155:
102:
Nice start, well laid out. We need more work articles in wikipedia.
87:
453:
Where on the internet aren't you? I can't escape you, aaaaaugh!
199:
407:
344:
563:
463:
446:
You're following me! Or I'm following you. Or something
109:
262:
Schissel, could you take a look at the discussion on
424:to Schissel for his excellent contributions to the
372:
349:Schissel, I noticed that you created pages for
393:I've now placed your "official" nomination on
268:Talk:List_of_string_quartets_by_Sergei_Taneyev
309:List of compositions for cello and orchestra
126:You were kind enough to contribute to the
411:
359:List of compositions for cello and piano
378:message and I'll nominate you! Thanks,
194:Thanks for pointing that out about the
14:
122:Return of the Untagged Image project
140:Florida government = public domain?
23:
24:
579:
218:tag now, this would be OK in the
436:
190:Minnesota Public Domain Images
13:
1:
532:Congratumalations, schissel!
501:administrators' how-to guide
493:administrators' reading list
420:, do hereby award the first
7:
321:Re Fuchs 4th string quartet
162:) 07:59, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
10:
584:
547:Answered on my talk page.
299:00:07, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
270:and see if you agree with
186:18:53, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
570:13:50, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
554:13:41, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
514:04:46, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
479:17:41, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
460:23:17, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
432:. Keep up the good work!
382:13:52, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
369:13:44, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
355:List of solo cello pieces
210:04:54, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
177:14:07, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
128:Knowledge:Untagged images
118:23:10, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
106:15:54, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
94:22:12, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
78:16:28, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
536:21:40, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
529:21:22, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
441:23:30, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
422:Barnstar of High Culture
401:02:45, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
341:02:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
316:20:46, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
279:05:39, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
232:05:13, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
62:Brahms and Romanticism.
59:04:56, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
52:03:18, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
44:03:15, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
253:02:31, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
220:Image:Amy klobuchar.jpg
196:Image:Amy klobuchar.jpg
442:
558:Donna Moss Discussion
415:
258:Sergei Taneyev merge?
82:Re: Felix Weingartner
542:User:JarlaxleArtemis
503:helpful. Cheers! --
428:articles related to
27:Romanticism Category
264:Talk:Sergei_Taneyev
216:Template:promophoto
443:
222:instance, correct?
98:Symphony 6 article
18:User talk:Schissel
237:Long time no see!
116:Stirling Newberry
104:Stirling Newberry
92:
91:
76:Stirling Newberry
57:Stirling Newberry
50:Stirling Newberry
42:Stirling Newberry
575:
483:Congratulations!
477:
473:
440:
333:I reverted your
200:campaign website
153:
147:
90:
89:
583:
582:
578:
577:
576:
574:
573:
572:
564:this discussion
560:
545:
510:explains it all
485:
475:
469:
466:
448:
430:classical music
410:
375:
347:
331:
323:
305:
288:
285:Edgar Allan Poe
260:
239:
192:
151:
145:
142:
124:
112:
100:
84:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
581:
559:
556:
544:
539:
538:
537:
534:A Man In Black
530:
484:
481:
465:
462:
458:A Man In Black
447:
444:
409:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
388:
387:
374:
371:
346:
343:
335:Harlan Ellison
330:
329:Harlan Ellison
327:
322:
319:
304:
301:
287:
282:
259:
256:
238:
235:
234:
233:
223:
214:I'm using the
191:
188:
179:
178:
141:
138:
123:
120:
111:
108:
99:
96:
83:
80:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
580:
571:
569:
565:
555:
553:
550:
543:
535:
531:
528:
524:
520:
517:
516:
515:
513:
511:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:administrator
480:
478:
472:
461:
459:
454:
451:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
400:
396:
392:
391:
390:
389:
385:
384:
383:
381:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
342:
340:
336:
326:
318:
317:
314:
310:
300:
298:
294:
286:
281:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
212:
211:
209:
205:
201:
197:
187:
185:
176:
175:
170:
165:
164:
163:
161:
157:
150:
137:
136:
133:
129:
119:
117:
107:
105:
95:
93:
79:
77:
71:
67:
63:
60:
58:
53:
51:
45:
43:
38:
33:
19:
561:
546:
509:
486:
467:
455:
452:
449:
421:
376:
362:
351:Cello sonata
348:
332:
324:
306:
289:
272:Kelly_Martin
261:
240:
193:
180:
173:
144:You created
143:
125:
113:
101:
85:
72:
68:
64:
61:
54:
46:
36:
34:
30:
549:FreplySpang
174:bowl listen
132:Tagishsimon
37:Romanticism
568:newsjunkie
518:Congrats!
434:Flcelloguy
418:Flcelloguy
399:Flcelloguy
380:Flcelloguy
367:Flcelloguy
313:Flcelloguy
276:dcnicholls
497:Main Page
426:Knowledge
505:Cecropia
408:Barnstar
345:Question
169:Schissel
149:PD-FLGov
471:grm_wnr
464:Thanks!
363:usually
226:MicahMN
204:MicahMN
184:Quadell
552:(talk)
523:Gwalla
395:WP:RfA
357:, and
297:Harro5
246:Gwalla
135:(talk)
110:Sonata
339:Danny
303:Cello
16:<
566:? --
527:Talk
293:here
266:and
250:Talk
230:Talk
208:Talk
160:talk
156:SPUI
88:Joy
476:Esc
416:I,
373:RfA
525:|
521:—
507:|
353:,
295:.
248:|
244:—
228:|
206:|
171::
152:}}
146:{{
512:®
158:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
