760:
what attracts me to write is the current examples of man ability to revert himself back to the animal stage that inspite of thousands of years of civilization has been unable to cleanse him of. I document the recent history of rapes, murders, beatings and other examples of savagery that is rendered by man on fellow man from the tear drop island that I was fated to be born in. But I can help to steer the conversation in Tamil language talk page to follow wiki process. As I had pointed out , lets start a project page and list out each and every item that is if contention and strictly follow the wiki process. If no compromise is possible then we take it all the way to mediation. In your mind there should be 1 or 2 things you want to see changed and that’s what you concentrate on.
716:
only one form of truth to be told and everything else has to be censored. Couple to it a total lack of process focus can make this so called harmonious effort at bringing a Ivy leaguer and person with an access to a computer in a mental asylum to collaborate on facts over whelming. To make matters worst you specifically have a charming way of feeding the trolls. This charm my friend is primarily your own making and may work to keep some trolls as well as legitimate
Wikipedians at bay but all what it takes is one determined person to take you to arbcom and the charm has to come off or else. Infact the charm is in the way of you harmoniously collaborating with the Ivy Leaguer and the nut case from the asylum.
366:
139:
92:
36:
726:
India theorists. What you are discussing is the difference between using scientific analysis and the question which one takes precedence over which. It is a question of mere 1,000 years in one of the differences. I think it is very plausible to reach a consensus that is scientifically correct in these circumstances as long as you stick to wiki process. But what you did in
243:
I have one suggestions, as for as hinduism is concerned mythology plays a great rule. When one can say the basava is the incarnation of Nandi why not we include mythology behind
Veerashaivism, that is of course is the first part whenver there comes lingayatism thats too, arise of panchacharyas from
759:
and many others like them. If you think that you have the heart and the patience to waste (really it is a waste of time on big and controversial articles) away about 6 months of your life to make the article truly neutral please go ahead. I may or may not be able to focus on things ancient because
704:
You have raised many points in my talk page and my head is still formulating an answer and a method to go forward in the Tamil langauge article (although parts of it, I have already suggested in the Tamil language talk page). I will follow up with a detailed reply when time permits after month end
321:
Thanks for the response on the
Karnataka page.. But a lot of my pictures have been misused before.. Used in calenders, sold as posters , etc.. Which is why i put the FOR WIKIPEDIA USE picture.. I thought i'd show some more of Flora and Fauna around.. I'd prefer if both watermarks remained.. I dont
715:
As you have pointed so eloquently some where else, we are here not to tell the truth but to cite verifiable information from reliable sources. That is this is a documentation project of all the truths and facts out there about a subject matter. Problem starts when most people assume that there is
659:
Often, when I edit articles, I do similar edits to few others, thus having to leave the same edit summary message to each one, as it can be seen in my contribution list. Thus, I write one edit summary and copy it, pasting it whenever I do a similar edit to another article. When I removed the fact
725:
and to make it neutral (for what ever it is worth) requires patience, perseverance and total and undeniable dedication to wiki process. The differences between you and the other party are not that great. You are not a creationist and them evolutionists, they are not from India and you are out of
687:
Hi there, thanks for reporting the IP vandalizing the India related articles. I will watch the IP, but it is not blocked as the vandalism last occurred at almost 20:00, May 5 (UTC), which is about nine hours after the edits were contributed. Blocking by administrators is a preventative measure
660:
template (BTW, I did not know what the fact template is; so I removed it), I pasted the same edit summary, and you took it as "sneaky" vandalism. I apologize for the inconvenience, but would mind telling me what the fact template is actually there for?
777:
Thank you, but my computer is more than 5 years old and renders Tamil as blank boxes. So I tend to defer to editors from India when dealing with Indic-language spellings (I'm not of Indian background, though my name is similar to yours!).
582:. If you do not either explain your uncalled personal attack or apologize for remark, I will be forced take this issue with admins (I am not using warning templates as per DTTR mentioned in above post). Thanks
322:
mind anyone using the pics as long as my watermarks remain.. So its upto you, you want to keep the pictures , keep them, else its out.. I cannot put up unwatermarked ones for the reasons i've mentioned above..
734:
and myself had to go in and remove the excessive fact tags shows either you have not read these things before or were angry because of something else but the very least it does not help the great wiki process.
548:
Please reach a consensus in talk page. If we keep, your 1000 year claim, then it means that we give importance only to Herman's work. This will be grossly unfair to other scholars' work. Thanks
796:
This aint vandalism,Rashtrakutas are part of
Marathi history and Yadavas of devagiri have little kannadi to write a whole para on it. Plz dont belittle other language to market kannadi.
600:
weren't 'removal of cited content'. They were valid edits and rephrasings. I have provided the citations you omitted. You are welcome to provide the one missing citation.
670:
747:
s as I did with my daughter the other day but we need to take the information that comes out of
Knowledge with a pinch of salt when we come to articles such as
263:
282:
182:
161:
393:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
166:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
119:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
63:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
761:
706:
552:
543:
297:
579:
You have called the other editors (which includes me) as trolling on articles like
Halmidi & Rastrakuta Dynasty in Talk page of Tamil article
764:
329:
177:
721:
Further there is a total lack of process focus in these edits by all concerned. That is to edit a huge and politically charged article such as
557:
None of cited material were removed in my edits yesterday. I think it is you who should have had the courtesy to reach a consensus first before
250:
Then why do not we include mythology behind veerashaivism/Lingayatism, that is about panchacharyas as first chapte or section on this article.
504:
477:
247:
If you do not agree with this, then again the the god shiva himself is the mythological figure. and what we are mentioning is contradictory.
634:
290:
283:
489:
applies to Venu62's warnings as well. Both of you are regulars here. These warnings aren't helping much with resolving the issues. Regards,
689:
677:
664:
569:
533:
275:
468:
446:. Please consider discussing the issue or going to other dispute resolution routes rather than posting warning templates. Regards,
341:
586:
223:
325:
259:
311:
443:
621:
461:
421:
271:
212:
709:
791:
782:
230:
739:
I have come to understand the limitations of
Knowledge. It is a great place to research about neutral articles such as
694:
580:
428:
604:
77:
351:
186:
627:
526:
522:
410:
337:
316:
640:
191:
609:
114:
512:
394:
167:
120:
64:
433:
267:
235:
195:
348:
The photograph is on the
Churumuri site in the article on the Churumuri team meeting the Governor.
565:
removing cited content unilaterally. Please comment further on in the article's talk page. Thanks
574:
205:
787:
I'll get that software. I can see other
Unicode things but not the Tamil. My OS is Windows 98.
365:
138:
91:
35:
682:
614:
381:
308:
154:
107:
51:
770:
752:
699:
217:
8:
674:
661:
631:
583:
566:
549:
540:
530:
474:
302:
17:
333:
497:
454:
415:
591:
74:
756:
688:
only, so there is no immediate risk of re-occurrance. Thanks for the diligence,
407:
539:
Read whats already been said and what will be said on the concerned talk page.
788:
779:
748:
722:
518:
486:
352:
http://churumuri.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/to-the-governor-of-karnataka-from-us/
227:
58:
731:
617:
has gone through peer review and FAC review. Stop vandalising the article. -
356:
129:
771:
727:
490:
447:
618:
601:
597:
439:
425:
26:
521:
article. You removed cited content about Tamil's influence on
Sanskrit
404:
388:
293:
and the discussion page. Your inputs are much appreciated. Thanks -
744:
740:
525:. You removed cited content about early inscriptions in Tamilnadu
372:
294:
209:
145:
98:
42:
424:
before getting busy experimenting with the warning templates.
669:
Thank you. By the way, do you think my latest change to the
376:
149:
102:
46:
517:
I noticed that you have unilaterally removed content in
82:
291:Knowledge:WikiProject_Karnataka/Collaboration
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Karnataka/Collaboration
730:article where even neutral editors such as
385:was updated with a fact from the article
158:was updated with a fact from the article
111:was updated with a fact from the article
55:was updated with a fact from the article
253:Regards, Expecting constructive reply,
14:
444:Knowledge:Don't template the regulars
442:'s talk page. I wanted to point out,
438:I noticed your warning templates on
673:was wise, for I am doubtful of it?
23:
529:Could you care to explain? Thanks
24:
805:
364:
208:. Please provide your inputs. -
137:
90:
34:
705:activities at work end. Thanks
13:
1:
222:I replied to your questions
7:
10:
810:
429:23:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
411:13:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
342:13:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
312:13:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
298:07:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
276:17:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
231:18:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
213:15:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
187:08:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
115:Origin of Karnataka's name
395:"Did you know?" talk page
204:There is a discussion on
168:"Did you know?" talk page
121:"Did you know?" talk page
78:17:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
65:"Did you know?" talk page
792:02:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
783:01:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
765:15:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
710:23:23, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
695:05:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
678:14:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
665:14:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
635:02:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
622:23:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
605:23:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
587:13:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
570:23:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
553:23:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
544:19:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
534:19:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
505:03:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
478:01:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
462:00:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
206:Template_talk:Karnataka
317:Karnata and PICTURes..
671:India states template
628:Reply to the nonsense
615:History of Tamil Nadu
328:comment was added by
262:comment was added by
753:Indo-Aryan migration
641:removal of template
610:Stop your vandalism
18:User talk:Sarvagnya
513:Removal of content
434:Warning templates
401:
400:
345:
279:
256:Veeresh Hiremath
236:Note from Veeresh
174:
173:
127:
126:
71:
70:
801:
692:
653:
652:
648:
619:'Pompous' Parthi
602:'Pompous' Parthi
503:
500:
493:
460:
457:
450:
368:
361:
360:
323:
309:Dineshkannambadi
257:
244:sthavaralingas.
240:Dear Sarvagnya,
200:
196:Karnataka topics
194:
162:Churumuri (blog)
141:
134:
133:
94:
87:
86:
38:
31:
30:
809:
808:
804:
803:
802:
800:
799:
798:
775:
757:Sathya Sai Baba
702:
690:
685:
654:
650:
646:
644:
643:
612:
594:
577:
575:Personal attack
515:
498:
495:
491:
455:
452:
448:
436:
418:
359:
324:—The preceding
319:
305:
287:
264:Veereshhiremath
258:—The preceding
238:
220:
202:
198:
192:
132:
85:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
807:
774:
769:
768:
767:
749:Tamil language
736:
735:
723:Tamil language
718:
717:
701:
698:
684:
681:
656:Hi Sarvagnya,
645:template": -->
642:
639:
638:
637:
611:
608:
593:
590:
576:
573:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
519:Tamil language
514:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
481:
480:
464:
435:
432:
420:Try to answer
417:
414:
399:
398:
369:
358:
355:
318:
315:
304:
301:
286:
281:
237:
234:
219:
216:
201:
190:
172:
171:
142:
131:
128:
125:
124:
95:
84:
81:
69:
68:
59:Siribhoovalaya
39:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
806:
797:
794:
793:
790:
785:
784:
781:
773:
766:
763:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
737:
733:
732:User:Krankman
729:
724:
720:
719:
714:
713:
712:
711:
708:
697:
696:
693:
683:Vandal report
680:
679:
676:
675:Universe=atom
672:
667:
666:
663:
662:Universe=atom
657:
649:
636:
633:
629:
626:
625:
624:
623:
620:
616:
607:
606:
603:
599:
589:
588:
585:
581:
572:
571:
568:
556:
555:
554:
551:
547:
546:
545:
542:
538:
537:
536:
535:
532:
528:
524:
520:
506:
501:
494:
488:
485:
484:
483:
482:
479:
476:
472:
471:
467:
466:
465:
463:
458:
451:
445:
441:
431:
430:
427:
423:
413:
412:
409:
406:
396:
392:
391:
390:
384:
383:
382:Did you know?
378:
374:
370:
367:
363:
362:
354:
353:
349:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
314:
313:
310:
300:
299:
296:
292:
285:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
254:
251:
248:
245:
241:
233:
232:
229:
225:
215:
214:
211:
207:
197:
189:
188:
184:
180:
179:
169:
165:
164:
163:
157:
156:
155:Did you know?
151:
147:
143:
140:
136:
135:
122:
118:
117:
116:
110:
109:
108:Did you know?
104:
100:
96:
93:
89:
88:
80:
79:
76:
66:
62:
61:
60:
54:
53:
52:Did you know?
48:
44:
40:
37:
33:
32:
19:
795:
786:
776:
772:Gottuvadhyam
728:Tamil people
703:
700:My talk page
686:
668:
658:
655:
613:
596:My edits to
595:
578:
564:
516:
469:
437:
419:
402:
387:
386:
380:
350:
347:
320:
306:
288:
255:
252:
249:
246:
242:
239:
221:
218:WatchlistBot
203:
183:bananabucket
176:
175:
160:
159:
153:
113:
112:
106:
72:
57:
56:
50:
598:Tolkappiyam
303:Rashtrakuta
289:Please see
75:Carabinieri
762:Taprobanus
707:Taprobanus
789:Badagnani
780:Badagnani
755:and even
632:Sarvagnya
541:Sarvagnya
475:Sarvagnya
416:BGL Swamy
389:Bidriware
745:Ammonite
741:Mollusks
592:My edits
373:30 April
338:contribs
330:Jayanths
326:unsigned
272:contribs
260:unsigned
178:Blnguyen
146:April 20
99:10 March
584:Praveen
567:Praveen
550:Praveen
531:Praveen
492:Ganeshk
487:WP:DTTR
449:Ganeshk
43:9 March
440:Venu62
426:Parthi
408:(Talk)
307:Thanks
228:Ingrid
470:Reply
405:ALoan
16:<
743:and
691:Teke
647:edit
527:here
523:here
499:talk
456:talk
422:this
377:2007
334:talk
268:talk
224:here
150:2007
103:2007
47:2007
630:.
473:.
371:On
357:DYK
295:KNM
210:KNM
144:On
130:DYK
97:On
83:DYK
41:On
27:DYK
751:,
403:--
397:.
379:,
375:,
340:)
336:•
274:)
270:•
226:.
199:}}
193:{{
185:)
170:.
152:,
148:,
123:.
105:,
101:,
73:--
67:.
49:,
45:,
651:]
502:)
496:(
459:)
453:(
344:.
332:(
278:.
266:(
181:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
