User talk:Sarvagnya

3279:"...In official language the four recognised Kanarese districts of this presidency viz. Belgaum,Bijapur and Dharwar collectorates together with the Kolhapur, Miraj and other Native states called the "Southern Maratha Country". A more misleading appellation, however it originated, could not well have been devised. It is true that, in one of the earliest inscriptions of Pulakesin II, this part of the country is included in what was known then and even many centuries before his time as Maharashtra. But this term meaning literally "the great country", does not inherently imply any of the racial and lingusitic peculiarities which are now naturally attached to the terms 'Maratha' and 'Marathi', derived from it. In the whole area of so-called Southern Maratha country ,not a single Marathi inscription has been discovered, of a greater age than two or three centuries. With the exception that two Prakrit records have been obtained at Banawasi in North Kanara and 'Malavalli' in Mysore, and that a few Prakrit words occur here and there in other records, the inscriptions are all either in pure Sanskrit or pure Kanarese, or in the two languages combined. This fact speaks of itself, as to what the vernacular of the country was in early times. In the present day, the people and the language of British districts are essentially Kanarese; and the Kanarese people and language have been displaced , to a certain extent, by the Marathi people and language in the Native States, only because those States were established by the aggressions of the Marathas from the north, whose local influence proved to be greater than that of the native rulers whom they dispossessed. Even in the Native States, and in Marathi official correspondence, the Political Agent at Kolhapuris , to the present day always addressed as the Political Agent, not of the "Dakshina Maharasthra" or "Southern Maratha Country, but of the "Karavira Ilakha and the Karnataka Prant"..." 377:

Classical Sanskrit by the indian government available so far. I can find no single reason, why these references should be ignored in any way. Your POV is easily negatived by the sources i provided. Please explain your position now in full details belonging to this matter: Why do you ignore the references i provided in full? Why do you think, that your POV is accurater than those of government of india institutes and the MIT? What's your POV of the newspaper articles, which provided the government's "Classical" tag reference and why do you ignore them also? Please give me an answer in full details as soon as possible, since i'd like to go back to work soon. If you continue to ignore the references after these three days, i have to ask on a third opinion provided by the Knowledge Community or any other available constructive solution. Frankly speaking, i doubt highly in your good faith in this particular case, but i give it a try. Thanks for reading. --

888:

the premium and largest site on Hindi film stats" but the issue doesn't have to be such a major one if we act maturely over it and work together to improve it for everybody and ensure there are no doubts over anything. I've replaced several, not because you disagreed with BOI as a source but because I felt the reference also prvided an insight to why a film was considered a flop or whatever and is more informative as a source than just a statistic at BOI. There are now actually only 2 out of 110 references which isn't a cause for much of a fuss, given that the article is extremely well referenced anyway I don't think it would make much difference if the remaining two were taken out or replaced

858:

article reaches an acceptable standard in this way. But on certain sources finding a replacement would be very difficult particularly for Indian film statistsics. It would help if the site could publish more about their staff and editor status certainly, but they have stated how they compiled the statistics. If each reference was worded as "According to BOI" it would remove any indication that we are stating the exact truth but are merely reporting what has been reported elsewhere. Can it really be possible to verify absolutely every digit published by that site or any other?

2807: 3276:

thence east, to the neighbourhood of Bidar. This however wrongly excludes Kolhapur. As for Sholapur which now officially counts as a Marathi District , Kanarese is still , to a great extent the vernacular of south east corner of it. And there are Kanarese inscriptions of the Western Chalukyas ,Kalachurya and Devagiri yadavas of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries and some later ones, at Sholapur itself, and at Kudal and Mohol in that district, and at Karajgi, Kudal, and Tadwal in the Akalkot state.

46: 2694: 3735: 2772: 3845: 81: 3787: 3451: 21: 3147: 1401: 3076: 2652: 828:

wrong impression of your intentions. I've seen evidence that you can create good content and removing serious POV from several articles but if you conducted yourself better you'd save so much less time in conflict. Part of the problem with wikipedia is time wasting with such disreputes, when all those poor stubs and articles which actually do have serious POV problems and unreliable sources are being neglected.

1887:

the last week or so, any effort towards addressing the tags by whoever it was that added it in the first place. And fyi, this OR/POV-pushing goes back far more than a week. The same OR/POV in various shapes has been recycled across a host of articles for months now. I am perfectly within my rights to remove it. If you want it back, just cite it and be done. Also, if you dont realize, it surely is quite

3562: 1632: 2336: 2306:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 3534:

I am a Ph.D. student doing research on music in the Vijayanagara period. I request you to give me the reference of the original article by Dr. R. Sathyanarayana which has been the main source for the Knowledge page - Vijayanagara Musicological Nonet. This reference would be invaluable for me and your

3271:

I saw you placing arguments in the discussion page of the above topic. Precisely i think both the parties have been beating around the bush without much headway. I am providing here the excerpts of the book "Dynasties Of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency" by J.F.Fleet (1894) which forms

2019:

Look.. if you want to improve the article.. do it! If you think it is missing something.. add it! Or sit back and relax. Somebody will get to it eventually. Whatever it may be.. if it has to do with article content, you take it to the article's talk page.. not an individual editor's talk page...

1525:

The reason is mentioned in the tag. It fails #8 of NFCC... ie., it does not add in any way to the readers' understanding. There's nothing the picture says or records that cannot be said in words. It is just a bunch of guys beating up somebody... maybe a thief.. maybe a saint. But it can very well

1040:

As in "kumble bedi"? Not sure what it would mean.. but in the context of that sentence in that article, I dont think it is meant as a joke. also depends on how the bedi is spelt in Kannada, bEdi, BEDi, bEDi, beedi are all different words in Kannada with vastly differing meanings. Considering it is

990:

Oh I wasn't questioning notability. In fact I realised they were pretty important articles which is why I asked you. Personally I think it would be a good idea if there is a wikiproject on it to draw up a list of articles or at least articles you consider as a priority on the topic which have serious

3990:

in which you were involved. I'd say your arguments were spot on, and remain valid to date. It's a bit unfortunate that the discussion did not go your way because you were outnumbered. Nevertheless, you've set a good example for future Wikipedians to follow. I see your last edit was 11 years ago, and

1769:

A person Ronz is seriously distorting the presentation of the entry "Bosnian Pyramid", removing valid material, with references, etc. But as they do not fit into his whatever, he simply deletes, etc. I am not the only one who has pointed this out, and I would like an editor to address this point, as

1735:

Pls stop your disruptive editing. If you are tagging for POV, you need to show the other POV with references and so, we can "make" it NPOV. If you are tagging for original research, you need to specifically point to a sentence which you think is original research. If you want the citations checked,

1380:

While I can revert the abusive talk page remarks, the IP's contribution history also shows a string of changes to multiple Indian history articles. Given the circumstances, it appears that these changes are of questionable merit. Unfortunately, I am not qualified on the topic content to determine if

635:

Hi Sarvagnya. I disabled EmailUser a couple of years ago after a particularly annoying - and wearisome - round of allegations (including, inter alia, meatpuppetry and off-wiki coordination), and I'm reluctant to enable it again. Is it something important? If it's about my swiftly reverted comment

308:

in favour of deletion, and I admit that the speedy deletion tag that was added was done so without clear thought. For this reason alone I will restore the article, however I would appreciate if your responses to the deletion (if ever to happen again, on another page say) that they do not come across

3315:

Recently I saw many of your contributions, edits and debates here and some are impressive. So I thought let me try to create an article so that more information about India and Karnataka be on the Internet. I tried to created an article called "Karnataka History Timeline" and it appears that no one

1212:

No. I was not even "contacted" about any SLR. My comments only had to do with the issue of blocking of two editors on allegations of sockpuppetry. So it wouldnt be appropriate to put my name under any "Contacted" list. If it was a "Editors interested in SL topics" or "Editors who have edited SL

1196:

Hiya, just coming in as an uninvolved person with a suggestion. Sarvagnya, I understand that you don't want to be listed as "abstaining" since you don't really have an opinion. What if there were another section on the page that just listed "Editors contacted", with your name there? I think it's

876:

It is precisely because it is humanly impossible for editors on wikipedia to verify the veracity of every written word that we have WP:RS standing between us and the sources. It is presumed that if the quality of the sources used is taken care of, the veracity of the content takes care of itself.

3275:

here it is, " In defining the limits of the Kanarese language, on the west and north may be designated "by a line drawn from Sadashivgad (Karwar), to the westward of Belgaum,Hukkeri through Kagal and Kurundwad, passing between 'Keligaon' and 'Pandegaon' through Brahmapuri on Bhima and Sholapur and

3249:

offlate, i have been facing unilateral notices on the material without a proper knowledgable discussion on the topic. the member issuing notices seems to lack relevent knowledge in the subject and is defintely biased. but the warnings and unwarranted editing may lead to the page loosing out on the

3245:

belonging to Karnataka wikigroup, is edited by me and deals with the community history of the Namadharis/Halepaiks of Uttara Kannada. In creating this article i have referred to most of Kannada literature sources, some of which are really rare . These form a necessary part of the glorious literary

1943:

Right! The first line describes it as just Tamil Nadu's opposition while it was more pan-India than that. To be sure, the most sensational and dramatic agitations happened in TN.. but it surely was a more widespread agitation. As for the title, I can't think of a good one right now.. if you can

1886:

On wikipedia, we are not in the business of "discussing" unsourced disputed content. Without your sources, there's nothing to "discuss". The fact that you added the {cn}} tags does not mean you can keep it there for years. Not only is the content patent nonsense but there has also not been, in

1616:

page. Also note that, there was no rv warring going on there worth mention (I had.. what? 1.5 RR?). Whatever there was, had ceased for hours now. For that matter, another impeccable editor of long standing Dineshkannambadi also was reverting to my version. If there was any warring, it was by

906:

The RfC has been deleted because I don't think John Carter and SheffieldSteel have sufficiently demonstrated that they unsuccessfully tried to resolve the issues regarding your conduct. You don't have a free pass here. Your behavior on the article's talk page (and even some of your recent comments

887:

Well yes of course the source should be considered a professional one. Where the conflict seems to be arising is that you disagree on whether it is or not. I can see your concerns about the lack of information on how the statistics were compiled and that you completely disbelieve that the site "is

846:

I dont demand any more of others than I demand of myself and infact, is demanded of me. If you can find a source I have used anywhere which you suspect is not RS, feel free to bring it up. If I am not able to demonstrate its RS-ness, I will stop using that source myself without further ado. You

827:

Dude you don't make life easy for yourself. I think you are forgetting what a gift wikipedia is when you get into these disputes. I am all for articles being of a neutral tone and of reliable sources but I really do think you look into certian things far too much and in doing so people may get the

2249:

Oh boy.. there's been plenty of discussions and the issue was taken to RSN where the site was deemed non-RS. And the image is a blatant copyvio. Knowledge would be a better place if people like you would start to recognize that non-RS sources and blatant copyvios are a bigger problem than being

2000:

Your talk page will be used to discuss content changes you make to articles. I may be wrong. I may even believe that the agitations were more pan-Indian, i just dont see it in the article. I also am aware that not being in the article doesnt indicate its non-existence. But you are just calling me

718:

I could be sympathetic to your uncontrollable temper where you wanted one of your close buddy's article's to go through - Dinesh did put hard work into it, and you wanted him (and his work) to receive recognition for it, even if it meant casting a blind eye (or even attempting to dismiss) a valid

1085:

I am sorry but your revert and reply does not answer my question. I've never been a member of SLR and consequently I dont get to either "agree", "disagree" or "abstain" from any of its proposals. It is not upto you or anyone to sign me up for any project you like. All I know is that I edit SL

925:

Well.. content disputes on talk pages do heat up quite often on wikipedia and if we had parties to content disputes filing RfCs against each other, there'd be an RfC for every editor on wikipedia. Surely, you dont expect me to treat such mala fide filings with respect. Having said that, I must

376:

I have provided the highest reliable sources from the government of india (Archaeological survey of india, Centre of Excellence for Classical Tamil), a source from MIT university and from one of the highest respected newspaper in india, which contains the only reference for the classification of

240:

Not quite. By cropping part of the image, it only strengthens the fair use claim since we are using less of the work. Whereas, the requirement is to use as little as possible to infringe on the copyright as little as possible. If the useage is not appropriate (not used for critical commentary or

857:

OK, I'm not faulting you from questioning certain sources and aiming to improve the reliability of wikipedia, lord knows that accuracy, neutrality and reliability are some of the most important issues in this encyclopedia and to improve its credibility. Naturally everybody would wish that every

522:

Starting with the Kavirajamarga (850 CE) authored during the reign of the Rashtrakuta king Nripatunga, until the middle of the 12th century, literature in Kannada is almost exclusively Jaina -- explained in part by the fact that they found eager patrons in the Kannada region among the Chalukya,

3604:

Hello, i recently saw that you have uploaded a licensed photo of kannada actor upendra's residence "Summane". I request you to similarly upload a licensed photo of Upendra and add it to his wiki page. Since i dont know how to upload licensed photo, each time i upload an unlicensed pic, it gets

1178:

asked/consulted/informed when they decided to put my name on the SLR page. Secondly, admins - even the most respected of them simply dont get to put another editor's name on any page/discussion they want. That would be a gross misrepresentation of the editor's views. I for one, have no view

1443:

hai this is Naag from Hyderabad..I am planning to visit coorg in 1st week of sep 08.....also some other places near coorg...i have seen some good pics in your account which cannot be copied..if you dont mine send me the jog falls fotos to my mail plzzzz. I am requesting you.....my mail id is

3300:

Hi, I'm trying to put together a list of Wikipedians from Karnataka. I'm also trying to gather together the contacts. The idea is to build a network of Wiki enthusiasts, contributors from the region that could help sync off-line Wiki activity, bring together people who can work together in

523:

Rashtrakuta, Hoysala and Ganga kings who were either Jains themselves or offered generous support to the faith -- as also by the fact that the Jains themselves were early champions of the vernaculars (unlike the Buddhists and the Brahmins who chose Pali and Sanskrit) to spread their faith.

2274:

talk page archives and the WP:RSN archives. Or ask Ncmvocalist himself. He was part of the discussions and he should be able to dig it out for you. btw.. you might also want to drop him a line about 3rr and editwar.. he's precariously perched on 3 reverts if you didnt notice.

1381:

any of the other changes are correct. Accordingly, I am posting to the talk pages of the editors referenced by the IP so that you can collectively or individually take any actions on the change articles, talk pages, or the IP account that you think appropriate. --

1151:

As you said correctly, you are not an SLR member. As such, you are welcome as a guest on our talk page, but you need to respect our house rules, which state that only members can change the project page. Please read and abide by the boxes on project and talk page.

1736:

you need to tell me which citation? If you think the material is sythesised, you need to explain. Random tagging because "I dont like it" is not the way things work here. In other words, you can not sprinkle the articles with tags and get away without explaining.

2020:

If you want content added, sources added.. anything added to the article.. all that goes on the article talk page. Not mine. Don't bother discussing article content on my page in future. I will be ignoring and/or reverting it. Thanks for your cooperation.

1197:

useful to have a list of "editors who edit in this topic area", to ensure that those who are interested in a debate, are informed of it. Though, as you said, there is no requirement that you actually participate. Would that address everyone's concerns? --

907:

here) have been uncivil. I suggest you be more careful about your talkpage comments in the future, as such behavior is grounds for a block. Please do not use attacks or make uncivil comments when you can get your message across in a much friendlier manner.

2195:

looked into the issue. I reverted only because the tag used was obviously not valid. It's a little ironic that you just chastised me for not looking into an issue when it's clear that you haven't actually looked into my reasons for acting yourself.

1090:

to be a party to it. I am not a part of it and I dont know what it is. My involvement back then was about L and N's blocks and has/had nothing to do with any SLR. Infact, I dont have the time to find the diff now, but If I remember correctly, I

299:

to see where pages have been put up for deletion where only one or two editors have edited a page and it has been flagged for deletion - we don't use AFD for this matter, because it would cause unnecessary wastage of time. However, I do see from

1967:

the lead of the article. I understand the rational behind your changes. What is missing is that the article does not discuss about agitations anywhere else other than TN. You might want to add such information before changing the lead. Thanks.

3991:

I don't know if you'd ever come back to see this message. However, I felt I should leave a message anyway so that your contributions to improve the site will be remembered. I hope that a good editor like you will make a return, Best regards --

2927: 979:

on google. Then I'd also do a similar search on deccanherald.com. Between them, I'm sure we'll find something. I'll take a look when I find time, but you could go ahead and do a few searches on the sources I mentioned and see what you get.

1539:

I guess it was obvious... that the above post was typed by me ...rather it would have been a courteous gesture on your part to inform the uploader of the tagging...using the template — {{subst:di-disputed fair use rationale-notice}}. Cheers!

3301:

effectively reaching out to the public in the region on using Knowledge and related open content projects. Can you help by sending your contact and also by referring editors from Karnataka you've come across on Knowledge? Thank you, --

991:

referencing issues and work gradually at improving them. I am continuously shocked at the some of the core American articles like Las Vegas which you'd think would be pretty sound but is rather a poor article in terms of referencing.

301: 1095:

infact explicitly stated somewhere that I reject any moves to make me a party to that. I will be reverting you and I also suggest you check with Gnanapiti. I believe it will also surprise him that his name is there. Thanks.

973:

Well.. to begin with both Kanyakumari and Ramani are leading artists and there should be no doubt about their notability. As for sources, for anything to do with Carnatic music (or indeed with India), I'd start with searching

1612:{{unblock|1=You must be kidding. Admins should do their homework before diving in to block long standing users of good standing. If you want discussion, feel free to dive into about 500 kb worth of discussion and RfC on the 265:

I'll be online tomorrow, just letting you know I've read your comment and will be replying soon. Apologies for the slight delay in the response, hopefully I can use this to my advantage and re-evaluate the situation. Regards,

3599: 1854:

sigh.. is this what you do for a living? now.. if you have any complaints about this, that or the other article.. kindly take it to the respective article or talk pages. my page is not a talk page for any article. bye.

1139: 1075:. If you prefer to agree or reject, then I think you can still add yourself to the appropriate list. (Since so much time has passed since, I would prefer if you could add the date, but I won't make a fuss if you don't.) — 2299: 1870:

I'm not saying you don't have valid points. I was the one who questioned the validity of some of those phrases, I'm just saying 1. let it be discussed, and 2. as per general convention let there be a chance to source it.

757: 1346: 1187:"abstain" from, "support" or "oppose" a proposal, nobody else gets to speak for me. And FayssalF didnt "meticulously explain" anything to me. No offence to him, but like I said above, he simply doesnt get to do it. 719:

oppose. But particularly for your recent conduct, I have no sympathy because it is inexcusible, meritless and unwarranted by even the most lowest standard that exists (if it actually can be considered a standard).

504:

Sarvagnya, I hope you dont mind that have reverted your recent edits to the lead. Perhaps the lead should be concise and the details of metres is better of in the "content and genre" section. How do you feel about

3691:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 636:

on the Kannada literature talk page, don't bother - the comment was quite uncalled for (not to mention bordering on ad hominem). I've had a fairly tiring few months, so I'm a little snappier than normal. --

2959: 2930:

have now been addressed. Please tell me if anything else needs to be done or I have missed something. As for the other problems with the article, I'm still working on the images but others have been fixed.

693:. He was the only one for the image and there were 9 people against it. Still he has insisted on keeping it in the rotation, even after I tried explaining to him. He called me a liar and has kept doing it. 847:

wont find me stonewalling, filibustering or abusing process with dishonest reports of my opponents' behaviour. Knowledge could be such a better place if people would simply bow to policy and chug along.

3167: 3036: 2085:

Hi Sarvagnya! Thank you very much for your questions and support in my RfA, which passed yesterday. I hope not to let you and the others down and use the tools for the benefit of the project. Cheers,

2658:

Thanks for making 2008 an interesting and enlightening year for me; at some point, our paths have crossed and I've found your comments amusing, helpful or thought-provoking—I'll let you guess which!

810: 2131:

for a moment can also help out at times. Please take some time to review your recent actions and work to improve on them in the future. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions.

1927:

I agree (about the title). The first line itself is biased. Plus, the riots were both pro-Hindi (a bit later) and anti-Hindi-as-national-language, so the title is not even correct in spirit. --

605:, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. 1230:

PS:An even more precise formulation would be and for one which I wouldnt need to be contacted would be - "Editors who participated in the Lahiru and Netmonger block discussions". That is it.

1273: 1086:

related articles occassionally(I havent edited in months perhaps) and thats it. Unless I take it upon myself to join SLR and opine about its processes and proposals, I dont see how I can be

877:"According to..." is used when you are quoting an expert... and BOI is not an "expert". Just as you cannot say .. "According to my neighbour..", you can also not say "According to BOI...". 241:

illustrative purposes to show what the CD cover looks like), then you could claim the rationale is not valid. But to say an image under fair use is a copyvio is the whole point of fair use.

3135: 3105: 3094: 3086: 3069: 2700:

Hello Sarvagnya! I just wanted to wish you and your family a merry Christmas! May this Christmas be full of great cheer and holiday spirit. Have a great day and a wonderful New Year, from

1617:

user:Fowler & fowler who kept reverting both me and Dineshkannambadi. Protect the page if you will, but a block is way out of line and an abuse of admin tools. I request an unblock.

3160:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 291:

and place KH as the article maintainer/developer, *even though* he wasn't. With this in mind, articles are not brought to AFD if a user wants deletion of a page he has dealt with, we use

3049:

I have seen more photos without a description or a link to a category. That makes it difficult for others to find your very nice photos. An explanation about categories is given on page

3644: 2001:

wrong without answering my question. Pls add information (with reliable sources) to the content of the article reflecting the change you made to the lead. Thanks for your cooperation.

715:, and this time, not just on me, but the efforts of the entire Assessment Team of a prominent WikiProject and you honestly think I'd treat your request as a genuine one? Think again. 3166:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

2431: 287:

who actually created it, KH developed the page nine-fold from 3KB to just over 27KB, and so as the creator of the page was actually absent at the time of deletion, I was willing to

2250:

politically correct about things like incivilty (real and imagined) and EDITWAR. btw, i have 2 reverts there and user:Ncmv has 3.. pray, what earns me to your special attention?

3625: 2437: 1390: 1114: 951:. I have my doubts evne if they are vlaid sources it still needs fixing. COuld you help reference it properly? I know Carnatic music is a subject you are interested in so,. Also 3642:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 926:

point out that the fake-content and bogus citations on that article page still remain and John Carter was one of them who warred to keep it. And as for talk page messages like

3552: 340:

Thanks for your contribution to the above article. Can you let me know why those citations were removed, especially when it is used for non-controvertial statements. Thanks

3753: 3389:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

3809:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

3118:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click

2977: 3062: 97: 3987: 3413: 3335: 1987:

And you might want to stop using my talk page as the place for discussing assorted content from assorted articles. And in any case, you got it mostly wrong. Again.

1518: 2403:) which presented evidence for both why the recent page move there was controversial and why the sources used in that article are flawed? Your edits I refer to are: 2099:

Hello again, Sarvagnya. Regarding some of your recent edits, if you have a problem with some of the actions taken by another user, please comment on the content in a

1418:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 3067: 2865:? ALL of his edits are biased, slanted against India, and undue weight based on tendentious anti-India misinterpretation of his "sources". He has completely trashed 1458: 283:

I think you've misinterpreted the point of AFD here. As far as I can see from the history, KH seems to have been the majority editor in the page, even though it was

3543: 3386: 3378: 3370: 3364: 2886: 2718: 1289: 2555: 1221:

what the specific proposal is and getting my permission. Right now, I am being put down under a "signatories" list of some "agreement", I was not even privy to!

3200: 3108:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 2661:

Wishing you and yours a joyous holiday season, and happiness, health and hopefulness in 2009. I trust you'll enjoy this little token, a favourite performance of

2628:

I was looking for a meaning for "raiyat" in the Administration section. The closest I caould come up with was "land owners" or "feudal chiefs". Is that correct?

1445: 1274: 1910:(I don't think they quite belong there!) and got to wondering why wikipedia has no articles on the 1965 language riots in India? Any interest in starting one? 792: 441:

Ok, sorry for the accuse of vandalization. Keep in mind, that i don't want double or even more messages of the same kind in such manner. Thanks for reading. --

4020: 2581:

Hi Sarvagnya. Thanks for the content in the Music section, which I will copy edit soon. Please add the name of the ref book in the reference section.thanks,

1907: 1828: 1217:.. yes.. my name can be put under that list.. (as can many other names like Black Falcon, Jayjg, Blnguyen, FayssalF etc) but that too only after telling me 764:

rules. Canvassing is prohibited for FAC (which is not a vote by a means of determining consensus) and I encourage you to be aware of that in future FACs.

4015: 2191:

was "Claimed as free. If you dispute the free-ness of the image, use PUI". I was not saying that the image was completely valid for the very reason that I

2111:

and hinder everyone's ability to have a constructive discussion on the topic. Other comments which detract from having a calm and civil discussion such as

3594: 900: 870: 840: 2841:

Nice to see you still around. Both the India and Hinduism projects seem to be awfully quiet otherwise - hopefully it's just the holidays. Happy editing.

2735: 3986:

Hey, there. I'm quite new around here, and to make myself familiar with the community, I was going through some old archives. I happened to come across

3754:

https://kn.wikipedia.org/%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%82%E0%B2%9C%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%97%E0%B3%82%E0%B2%A1%E0%B3%81_%E0%B2%B0%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%AC%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%B3%E0%B3%86

2443: 3806: 3798: 3790: 3779: 3764: 1407: 3316:

reviews it. It is presently on the talk page. So if you fell free do look at it and suggest any changes/deletions,etc. The address of the article is:

2754: 1142:. At SLR, we respect and defend the Sri Lanka Dispute Resolution Agreement, which is why we are happy to host its current version in our project page. 3131: 3030: 1671: 3362: 2637: 2623: 2605: 1415: 1354:

Please consider this note a head's-up on a recent spate of articles changes and abusive talk page remarks by an apparent single-purpose IP account

822: 557: 514: 251: 3720: 2492: 1562: 1549: 2260: 2238: 2181: 1740: 602: 3398: 3046: 734:

I dont remember coming to you seeking your sympathy. All I asked you was to review a WP:INDIA article which is up on FAC. Also, please review

1068: 2413: 2407: 984: 920: 881: 851: 3760: 3006: 2410:, with edit summary, "rm vios of WP:TALK and abuse of the talk page... this is not a personal scratchpad..." and, after my subsequent revert, 2326: 314: 267: 2474: 1697: 586: 3828: 3605:

deleted. Hence i am requesting your help. Its necessary that there must be a photo of a famous personality like Upendra in his wiki page.

1774: 2378: 360:

you insulted another editor and his contribution. Please try to keep your cool and be respectful, even when you feel provoked. Thanks,

3457: 3250:

precious information derived from above mentioned sources. So i request neutral observers like you to review it and opinionate. thankyou

3157: 3140: 2968:

page to see if we can put this list to really good use, pl give your thoughts on the same and we can take it further from there. Thanks.

1434: 1121: 1109: 1100: 242: 2881:

at all, and all of his attacks are on high-ranked high-visibility India articles. Please do take a look at this stuff. Thanks very much.

2850: 413: 3777: 3574: 2983: 1948: 1938: 1732: 1395: 742: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 3547: 1054: 1045: 1023:

in Malayalam means exploding firecrackers (as during festivals). Does "bedi" mean the same in Kannada ? I was wondering whether this "

450: 432: 3941: 3926: 2400: 2386: 1677: 1234: 1191: 1161: 934: 3953: 2279: 2265: 2254: 783: 3526: 1138:. If you can not respect that decision, you should have replied half a year ago, when FayssalF meticulously explained it to you at 671: 399: 3521: 1895: 1225: 1207: 2159: 2058: 2024: 2014: 1991: 1859: 686: 2321: 1806: 1462: 1134:

member, but because a panel of some of Knowledge’s most respected administrators unanimously put you there when they forged the

3906: 3833: 3670: 2428:

What Knowledge policy (please cite chapter and verse) did my three posts violate? Here they are for convenience of referring:

2303: 779:

I've been here long enough to know that canvassing is prohibited. But than I'm sure there hasnt been any canvassing. Thanks.

322: 1581:. Knowledge works on consensus, which requires civil discussion with other editors. Continually reverting edits is considered 1079: 3931: 3823: 3425: 3339: 3261: 3231: 1797: 773: 572: 543: 531:

Explained in part will open up questions about what the rest of the reason was which only makes it require more explanation.

498: 480: 3976: 3716: 3496: 3394: 3331: 2590: 1685: 1473:

Hi Sarvagnya, just wanted to pop in to say "Hi"...hope you're doing well, and it's good to see you back in action. Thanks

619: 235: 86: 3665: 3290: 1555: 1003: 967: 255: 3649: 3438: 2569: 1454: 1355: 1348: 420: 394: 378: 1891:

to bring back stuff {cn}} tags and all - particularly when it was apparently you who added the tags in the first place!

689:

into the Indian image rotation without accepting that there was clear consensus not to have it in the rotation when the

3703:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3305: 3295: 2882: 1493: 930:, I continue to consider it petty trolling and I reserve the right to remove such messages from my talk page. Thanks. 748: 346: 275: 2243: 2217:

Hello Sarvagnya, I just wanted to drop a note before things got any worse. I notice what appears to be the start of a

1964: 1377:. Additional abusive remarks and edit summaries directed to Dineshkannambadi are to be found in the IP's history log. 3768: 3621: 3566: 3554: 3492: 3205: 2890: 2307: 1438: 3119: 3053:

Could you please go over your gallery and add description and links to categories where needed? Thanks and regards,

2832: 2796: 2712: 1981: 1782: 1135: 1072: 927: 4000: 3972: 3485: 3409: 3236: 1880: 1546: 1375: 423:

for Thirusivaperur about this. I respectfully suggest that you let it lie, and maybe we can all cool down a bit.

2144: 1530: 1268: 625: 210: 3910: 3712: 3462: 3136: 2779:

Dear Sarvagnya, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Day, and that 2009 brings further success and happiness! ~

2205: 2188: 2070: 1922: 1526:

be said in words without having to resort to unfair free-use of somebody else's work. And btw.. sign next time.

1062: 260: 754: 728: 3403: 3357: 3272:

a part of the Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency. This should generously tilt the scale in Karnataka's favor .

3266: 2954: 1648:

I've unblocked Fowler, so you should probably be unblocked too. Please do not continue revert-warring, though.

1280:

FYI- Your attention and help is requested .You are receiving this note as you are the member of the project --

582:

Hmm.. feel free to revert now. I will think it over a little more and get back to you tomm. Logging off now.

169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 51:..have some serious catching up to do with RL. will only be sporadically active for atleast a couple of months 2678: 2104: 1944:

think of one, feel free to move it. At the very least we need to get rid of the "s" in the "agitations" imo.

1507: 1329: 1303: 1041:

in Kasargod, it may also mean something in Tulu.. I am not sure. Will google a little more and let you know.

357: 3964: 3747:

Thanks a lot for your picture of Nanjanagud Rasabaale. That was originally used in english wikipedia artcile

3570: 3047:

http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Gallery.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&img_user_text=Sarvagnya

2289: 1958: 1761: 1708: 133: 130: 127: 124: 121: 118: 115: 112: 109: 106: 62: 27: 3797:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 713: 3981: 3757: 3377:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3310: 2916: 2542: 2210: 1204: 319: 272: 1680:" a bit and changed the title back to Racism faced by Bihari Community in India, based on the discussions 1621: 1421: 1414:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 1034: 3968: 3898: 3856: 3834: 3725: 3708: 3632: 3319: 2965: 1865: 1848: 1722: 1662: 1606: 1542: 3016: 2992: 1341: 3902: 3345: 3191:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 3153: 3090: 3025: 3001: 2633: 2619: 2601: 2586: 2564: 2469: 2316: 1832: 1578: 661: 645: 568: 553: 539: 510: 494: 485:

Also, if you have added any info on critisism, please indicate so under Taxman's comments where I have

476: 463:

Hi Sarvagnya, thanks for your recent inputs into the modern literature section. Can you make sure that

458: 371: 3246:

tradition of Kannada language and need to be seconded. hence i request you to kindly review the page.

2521: 2237:. Remember edit warring does nothing by harm the article in question, and generally leads to a block. 2119:. If you are having difficulty working with other editors, I would encourage you to seek some form of 2112: 1315: 702: 3819: 3430: 3206: 2574: 2508: 2089: 2042: 1411: 1250: 330: 2527:

than India don't have inflammatory pictures presented with misleading and decontextualized captions)

2739: 2175: 2094: 1756: 1482: 1386: 613: 446: 409: 390: 3097:

has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (

1016: 351: 3949: 3922: 3659: 3573:

with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going

2903:

I have used all the pictures that you had uploaded on bugle rock on wikicommons in my article on

2856: 2724: 2687: 2155: 1613: 1512: 1430: 992: 956: 889: 859: 829: 382: 205: 182: 805:

has been filed concerning your conduct on Knowledge. The RFC entry can be found by your name in

3515: 3421: 3058: 2985: 2825: 2789: 2762: 2750: 2645: 2549: 2532: 2180: 1901: 1681: 942: 179: 3617: 3020: 2996: 2921: 2629: 2615: 2597: 2582: 2559: 2464: 2370: 2311: 1933: 1915: 1487: 1359: 818: 724: 564: 549: 548:

Some Jain writers continued to write scholarly works in Prakrit/Apabrahmasa till 9th century.

535: 506: 490: 472: 3177:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1105:

PS - If, in future, I decide to be a part of it, I will myself add my name there. Thanks.

3810: 3699:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3609: 3590: 3582: 3479: 3327: 3286: 3257: 3196: 3127: 2973: 2538: 2222: 2211: 1450: 1051: 1031: 3963:

Really miss you even after all these years.Thanks for all the good work.Have added you to

738:

and familiarise yourself with it before you accuse others of being violation of the same.

712:

Is this some kind of sick joke? You have the audacity to make a malicious personal attack

8: 3958: 3914: 3704: 3638: 3227: 3116:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that

2870: 2846: 2355: 2201: 1693: 1382: 1157: 1140:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Sri Lanka-LTTE blocks - reviewed#Comments

915: 707: 607: 442: 405: 386: 185: 3751:. Now we have used that to enhance kannada wikipedia article as well for the same topic 1770:

it is clear that the truth is FAR removed from what is being represented on this page.

1213:

topics" or "Editors who can be contacted to opine about a SL issue" or some such thing,

313:. I was only doing my job, and I make mistakes here and there just as anyone else does. 3945: 3918: 3758:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/CIS-A2K/Events/Geographical_Indications_in_India_Edit-a-thon

3653: 3320:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Karnataka_History_Timeline

2952: 2895: 2874: 2730: 2390: 1814: 1658: 1426: 1256: 1076: 806: 769: 641: 596: 3353:- isn't this idol the one at Beluru/Halebidu? Don't think this is the one at Hampi. -- 3152:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

3881: 3680: 3671: 3539: 3417: 3181:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

3104:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

3054: 2912: 2817: 2781: 2746: 2575: 2528: 2295: 2230: 2218: 2075:

It would probably be best if you removed the colon in your signature (it's currently

1702: 1502: 1264: 761: 341: 331: 80: 3868: 3408:

Hello. Since your account has been inactive for some time, it has been removed from

3350: 3793:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 3700: 3684: 3613: 3216: 3212:

If you're done with this page, you can ask for it to be deleted by tagging it with

2866: 2806: 2701: 2674: 2363: 1928: 1876: 1717: 1588: 1478: 1337: 1320: 1311: 1281: 1201: 814: 720: 698: 1788:

I've explained my edits, and will do so in more detail if anyone is interested. --

3996: 3586: 3578: 3474: 3282: 3253: 3192: 3123: 3113: 3082: 2969: 2964:

Hi, I have added a section 'How to use this list for effective collaboration' on

2502: 2169: 2124: 2100: 2052: 2008: 1975: 1888: 1842: 1824: 1778: 1750: 1572: 1328:

There's a discussion going on about the name on the Gandhi page. Please weigh in

1302:

There's a discussion going on about the name on the Gandhi page. Please weigh in

428: 365: 3867:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

3414:

Knowledge talk:Editor assistance/list#Problem with inactive accounts on the list

3098: 292: 3885: 3696: 3688: 3242: 3223: 2878: 2862: 2842: 2486: 2451: 2421: 2396: 2351: 2271: 2233:, I ask that you take your concerns to the articles talk page and/or request a 2197: 1793: 1689: 1363: 1294: 1153: 1008: 948: 909: 798: 677: 650: 310: 3756:. Happy to inform you that both articles are featured in below editathon now 3600:

Requesting your help : Please add a licensed photo of Upendra to his wiki page

2662: 4009: 3802: 3794: 3692: 3416:. You are, of course, welcome to re-add yourself to the list if you wish to. 3382: 3374: 3188: 3178: 3171: 3161: 3109: 2932: 2513: 2226: 2132: 2128: 2116: 2108: 2086: 1918:

already (though I don't quite think that's the right title for the article).

1654: 1594: 1582: 1131: 802: 765: 735: 637: 630: 288: 45: 2259:

Hm, I was unaware of said threads. Would you mind providing me with a link?

3168:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka

2908: 2693: 2455: 2234: 2149: 2120: 1820: 1727: 1497: 1260: 657: 3891:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

3734: 3093:

from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because

2771: 2907:, which I have posted as a DYK hook today. I hope you like the article.-- 2670: 2457:

Do not strike out the comments of other editors without their permission.

2080: 1872: 1713: 1474: 1468: 1371: 1333: 1307: 1198: 1027: 1024: 694: 3042: 690: 655:

Hi Sarvagnya. Thanks for your participation. I appreciate you comments.

3992: 3786: 2904: 2497: 2164: 2047: 2003: 1970: 1837: 1745: 424: 361: 284: 2960:

How to use this top Indian Wikipedian list for effective collaboration

1819:

I merely wanted to make sense of your understanding and perception of

3937: 3852: 3838: 1789: 975: 952: 3450: 3434:

Just letting you know that WikiProject Karnataka now has a userbox:

1071:

why your name was there. The answer is because you never replied to

3354: 3302: 3146: 3075: 3037:

Please add description and links to categories to photos on Commons

2873:), and his edits deserve close scrutiny (particularly his edits to 2651: 1400: 1367: 3373:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 3351:

http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Ugranarasimha_statue_at_Hampi_dtv.JPG

3050: 20: 3687:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2614:

Hi Sarvagnya. Please add the ref book name for Venkata Ramanappa.

1358:

to Kannada-related articles. Those abused in the remarks include

471:

etc are in italics whereever you touched/added info to it.thanks.

296: 2399:, Could you please explain why you removed my three posts (from 563:

Please provide full citation for this:Sangave V. A, pp. 187–188

404:

Don't do it again or i will get an administrator to stop you. --

3045:

that does not have a description. In your gallery on Commons

2335: 2154:

FYI, I started a thread at ANI about some comments you made at

1179:

whatsoever about either SLR or any of SLR's proposals. Unless

1009: 3940:

has been listed deletion by me. You can comment on that here:

3577:, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 3561: 3385:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

2861:

When you can spare the time, could you look into the edits of

1275:

WP:INDIA Tagging with TinucherianBot for WikiProject Karnataka

3805:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

2514: 2359: 3967:.But will be pleased to remove it when you choose to return. 1631: 3748: 2302:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 2123:

so that other users can help you sort things out. Taking a

3512:

Need your views and comments. One should also go through .

2432:

A record of the creation of this page and its name changes

1130:

You are not in the list because someone mistook you for a

3379:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sarvagnya/Annavru

2524: 215: 3909:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3514:..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. 2454:

policy did you use to override the WP:TALK injunction:

1906:

I saw the two Ram Guha articles that were deleted from

1577:

You have been blocked for 31 hours for edit warring at

3874:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

1558:

and land on somebody's page lecturing about courtesy.

2045:

on ANI for the above comments you just made. Thanks.

760:. I think you might be on the line or just over the 534:

Jains also used Prakrit profusely before 4th century.

3089:, by another Knowledge user, requesting that it be 753:

Hi, I saw that you've made a few comments like this

3565:An article that you have been involved in editing, 3043:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/File:MysorePalace2.JPG

2736:

Chattisinghpora, Pathribal, and Barakpora massacres

2523:? Seems biased (countries in South Asia with lower 978:... ie., a <"mysearchstring" site:hindu.com: --> 3799:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Karnataka 489:a set of points I added after his comments.thanks. 3679:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2926:Hi, Sarvagnya! I believe your concerns expressed 947:Hi Sarvagnya. Could you check the reliability of 4007: 2719:Fake Duplicate Articles created by propagandists 1585:. You may contest this block by adding the text 1416:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Churumuri (blog) 3535:help in this matter would be much appreciated. 3041:I have seen in Commons for example your photo 1259:that you may wish to respond to. Best Regards, 1496:is ready to be used. Do have a go at testing. 793:RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Sarvagnya) 3051:http://commons.wikimedia.org/Commons:Category 2438:Name change: What about the period 1900–1947? 4021:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 809:, and the actual discussion can be found at 4016:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 3158:Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka 3141:Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka 1626: 1554:Oh.. next time.. ask the tagger before you 3749:https://en.wikipedia.org/Nanjanagud_banana 3942:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Churumuri 1678:Racism faced by Bihari Community in India 1672:Racism faced by Bihari Community in India 2416:with edit summary, "Read up on WP:TALK") 1733:I cant find anything in the talk page??? 1711:vote at its AfD. Thanks for your time 1347:Recent changes to articles and abuse by 813:, where you may want to participate. -- 811:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Sarvagnya 3880:notice, but please explain why in your 3187:This is an automatic notification by a 2877:). he seem to have no understanding of 1739:For the record, Marathi regionalism is 4008: 2333: 1136:Sri Lanka Dispute Resolution Agreement 2401:Talk:Kannada literature, 1600–1900 CE 2344:The Indian Barnstar of National Merit 2327:The Indian Barnstar of National Merit 31:. Sarvagnya has not edited Knowledge 3445: 2450:Could you also explain what part of 2225:. To ensure that you do not violate 40: 15: 3106:Category:Organisations of Karnataka 3095:Category:Organisations of Karnataka 3087:Category:Organisations of Karnataka 3070:Category:Organisations of Karnataka 2463:Please reply below. Best regards, 2414:this edit of 23:28 17 December 2008 2408:this edit of 23:24 17 December 2008 1356:Special:Contributions/218.248.1.194 1349:Special:Contributions/218.248.1.194 13: 3869:deleted for any of several reasons 3859:because of the following concern: 3843: 3585:) 11:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 3567:List of people of North Karnataka 3555:List of people of North Karnataka 3145: 3074: 2692: 2650: 1688:. Kindly discuss if you disagree. 1399: 1396:AfD nomination of Churumuri (blog) 1183:involve myself in its affairs and 14: 4032: 3705:review the candidates' statements 2838:Happy new year to you, Sarvagnya! 2491:FYI, pls see this thread at AN/I 2387:Please explain removal of content 28:This user may have left Knowledge 3785: 3733: 3560: 3527:Vijayanagara Musicological Nonet 3449: 3410:Knowledge:Editor assistance/list 2805: 2801: 2778: 2770: 2334: 1630: 400:you have vandalized my talk page 79: 44: 19: 3516: 3513: 295:for that matter. You can visit 3711:. For the Election committee, 3681:Arbitration Committee election 3672:ArbCom elections are now open! 3666:19:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC) 3595:11:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 3480: 3340:08:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 3081:Hello, this is a message from 2667:, for your holiday amusement. 1723:23:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 1698:09:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 1663:21:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1622:21:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1607:20:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1563:17:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 1550:17:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1531:17:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1410:, an article you created, for 601:Thanks for your support in my 385:) 21:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)-- 243: 1: 4001:22:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC) 3965:Knowledge:Missing Wikipedians 3954:11:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 3932:Churumuri listed for deletion 3721:13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3548:10:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC) 3493:00:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 3486: 3412:. There is an explanation at 3358:03:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC) 3132:05:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 2755:20:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 2713:11:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 2679:01:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 2606:23:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 2591:21:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 2570:20:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 2543:08:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 2509:05:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 2475:00:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 2176:00:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 1709:Indo-Aryan loanwords in Tamil 1645:for the following reason(s): 1508:13:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 3977:03:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 3769:15:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC) 3626:09:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3497:Need comments on this RFC - 3426:12:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 3399:16:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 3063:21:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3031:04:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 3007:01:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2804: 2769: 2444:Sources used in this article 2379:07:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 2322:02:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 2300:featured article review here 2280:22:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2266:21:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2255:21:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2244:20:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2206:20:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2145:23:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 2090:19:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 2059:20:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2025:20:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2015:19:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1992:19:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1982:19:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1949:19:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1939:19:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1923:19:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1896:19:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1881:01:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1860:23:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 1849:23:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 1807:22:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 1798:16:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC) 1783:17:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 1757:17:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 1639:Your request to be unblocked 1030:" is real or a subtle joke. 916:Make articles, not wikidrama 352:Incivility in edit summaries 236:Re: Image:Papanasamsivan.jpg 103: 94: 77: 75: 7: 3927:11:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC) 3913:allows discussion to reach 3894:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3877:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3707:and submit your choices on 3156:. The nominated article is 3112:. Feel free to contact the 3085:. A tag has been placed on 2978:18:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 2966:User:Tinucherian/Indians WP 2955:14:06, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 2917:16:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 2891:08:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2851:02:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 2833:05:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2797:05:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2638:01:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2624:22:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 2520:Could you look at this edit 2362:. We are proud of you ! -- 1676:I have edited the article " 1483:04:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 1463:07:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 955:is completely unreferenced. 685:Fowler&Fowler has been 10: 4037: 3905:exist. In particular, the 3713:MediaWiki message delivery 3569:, has been proposed for a 3439:User WikiProject Karnataka 3296:Wikipedians from Karnataka 3241:Hi Sarvagnya, the article 2815:What monkey brain I have. 2738:- duplicate propaganda of 2115:are also considered to be 2101:civil and objective manner 2041:FYI, I have listed for an 1629: 1579:Extinct Kannada literature 1519:Image:Mumbai 20080212.jpg‎ 756:to editors concerning the 749:A friendly word of warning 672:00:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 662:00:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 646:22:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 626:18:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 499:16:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC) 481:16:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC) 451:21:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 433:20:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 414:18:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 395:18:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 347:09:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 323:11:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 276:21:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 256:19:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 68:to leave me a new message. 3899:proposed deletion process 3732: 3650:Categories for discussion 3306:19:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC) 3232:20:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC) 3207:User:Sarvagnya/KARInfobox 3201:01:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 3174:with four tildes (~~~~). 2745:Could you look into them? 2340: 2304:featured article criteria 2103:. Edit summaries such as 1439:hai superb collection ... 1435:19:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 1424:of receiving this notice? 1391:03:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 1255:There is some commentary 801:. Please be aware that a 587:02:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 573:02:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 558:02:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 544:02:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 515:01:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3936:The article you created 3829:02:00, 13 May 2019 (UTC) 3522:08:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC) 3291:12:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC) 3262:18:08, 20 May 2010 (UTC) 3237:Request for peer review. 2740:Chittisinghpura massacre 1342:01:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 1316:01:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 1290:05:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 1269:04:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 1235:23:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 1226:23:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 1208:19:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 1192:19:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 1162:03:14, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1122:17:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 1110:17:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 1101:17:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 1080:02:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 1055:09:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 1046:04:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 1035:03:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 1004:08:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 985:14:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 968:11:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 935:00:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 921:23:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 901:13:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 882:22:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 871:21:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 852:21:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 841:20:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 823:17:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 784:16:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 774:16:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 743:01:51, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 729:15:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 3886:the article's talk page 2725:Kunan Poshpora incident 2664:Baby, it's Cold Outside 2156:Talk:Languages of India 2071:Colon in your signature 1614:Talk:Kannada literature 1063:Why your name was there 703:16:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 356:Hi. I noticed that in 261:Re: Deletion of article 3969:Pharaoh of the Wizards 3865: 3848: 3801:and please be sure to 3404:Editor assistance list 3387:User:Sarvagnya/Annavru 3381:and please be sure to 3371:User:Sarvagnya/Annavru 3365:User:Sarvagnya/Annavru 3267:Belgaum Border Dispute 3150: 3079: 2986:Talk:Kingdom of Mysore 2900:Sarvagnya, Namaskara! 2697: 2655: 1802:Sorry. Wrong number. 1741:discussed in this book 1707:Kindly have a look at 1404: 667:Sorry. Wrong number. 33:since January 30, 2009 3911:articles for deletion 3861: 3857:proposed for deletion 3847: 3741:The Original Barnstar 3685:Arbitration Committee 3553:Merge discussion for 3464:WikiProject Karnataka 3179:articles for deletion 3162:What Knowledge is not 3149: 3078: 2696: 2654: 2541:comment was added at 2356:most prolific editors 2290:Kingdom of Mysore FAR 1959:anti-hindi agitations 1916:Anti-Hindi agitations 1762:Bosnian Pyramid entry 1743:among other sources. 1403: 1360:User:Dineshkannambadi 687:adding the Toda image 3982:A small appreciation 3645:the category's entry 3311:Creating new article 3170:. Please be sure to 3015:: Please respond at 2223:M. L. Vasanthakumari 2212:M. L. Vasanthakumari 1593:below this message. 1174:First of all, I was 997:♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 961:♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 894:♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 864:♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 834:♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 803:request for comments 3726:A barnstar for you! 3689:arbitration process 3639:Category:Kannadigas 3633:Category:Kannadigas 3538:Thanks and Regards! 3517:Humour Thisthat2011 3324:Thanks..santhosh. 2871:Economy of Pakistan 2187:You will note that 1963:I noticed that you 1934:sink with my stocks 1908:Marathi nationalism 1866:marathi nationalism 1652:Request handled by: 1556:unilaterally revert 1521:should be deleted? 1492:Just an update: My 691:last vote was taken 304:that consensus was 3903:deletion processes 3849: 3803:sign your comments 3778:MfD nomination of 3701:arbitration policy 3652:page. Thank you. — 3397:and a clue-bat • 3383:sign your comments 3363:MfD nomination of 3346:Ugranarasimha idol 3172:sign your comments 3151: 3080: 2991:Please respond at 2875:Education in India 2731:Gawakadal massacre 2698: 2656: 2121:dispute resolution 1405: 459:Kannada literature 372:classical language 188: 3835:Proposed deletion 3827: 3775: 3774: 3629: 3612:comment added by 3490: 3471: 3470: 3431:Karnataka Userbox 3330:comment added by 3022:Fowler&fowler 2998:Fowler&fowler 2813: 2812: 2576:Kingdom of Mysore 2561:Fowler&fowler 2481: 2480: 2466:Fowler&fowler 2384: 2383: 2313:Fowler&fowler 2296:Kingdom of Mysore 2294:I have nominated 1937: 1669: 1668: 1543:KnowledgeHegemony 1465: 1453:comment added by 1425: 1406:I have nominated 1251:User: John Carter 358:this edit summary 332:Dravidian parties 254: 227: 226: 223: 222: 189: 178: 172: 100: 55: 54: 39: 38: 4028: 3896: 3895: 3879: 3878: 3846: 3818: 3816: 3814: 3807:Portal:Karnataka 3791:Portal:Karnataka 3789: 3780:Portal:Karnataka 3737: 3730: 3729: 3662: 3656: 3628: 3606: 3564: 3520: 3518: 3509: 3508: 3504: 3488: 3482: 3478: 3465: 3453: 3446: 3443: 3437: 3392: 3391:Ten Pound Hammer 3342: 3221: 3215: 3091:speedily deleted 3083:an automated bot 3028: 3023: 3004: 2999: 2949: 2946: 2943: 2940: 2936: 2867:Economy of India 2828: 2820: 2809: 2802: 2799: 2792: 2784: 2774: 2767: 2766: 2710: 2709: 2630:Dineshkannambadi 2616:Dineshkannambadi 2598:Dineshkannambadi 2596:Took care of it. 2583:Dineshkannambadi 2567: 2562: 2546: 2505: 2500: 2472: 2467: 2391: 2338: 2331: 2330: 2319: 2314: 2263: 2241: 2172: 2167: 2109:personal attacks 2095:Personal attacks 2077: 2076: 2055: 2050: 2011: 2006: 1978: 1973: 1931: 1845: 1840: 1753: 1748: 1721: 1634: 1627: 1592: 1591:|1=your reason}} 1517:Why do you feel 1505: 1500: 1448: 1419: 1408:Churumuri (blog) 1001: 1000: 965: 964: 912: 898: 897: 868: 867: 838: 837: 758:Preity Zinta FAC 660: 624: 622: 616: 610: 565:Dineshkannambadi 550:Dineshkannambadi 536:Dineshkannambadi 507:Dineshkannambadi 491:Dineshkannambadi 473:Dineshkannambadi 317: 293:CSD criterion G7 270: 250: 247: 195: 194: 177: 105: 96: 83: 76: 67: 65: 48: 41: 23: 16: 4036: 4035: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4006: 4005: 4004: 3988:this discussion 3984: 3961: 3934: 3907:speedy deletion 3893: 3892: 3876: 3875: 3844: 3842: 3812: 3811: 3783: 3728: 3709:the voting page 3675: 3660: 3654: 3635: 3607: 3602: 3558: 3531:Dear Sarvagna, 3529: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3500: 3499: 3491: 3472: 3463: 3456:This user is a 3441: 3435: 3433: 3406: 3390: 3368: 3348: 3325: 3313: 3298: 3269: 3239: 3219: 3213: 3210: 3144: 3073: 3039: 3026: 3021: 3002: 2997: 2989: 2962: 2947: 2944: 2941: 2938: 2934: 2924: 2898: 2869:(compare it to 2863:lalit Jagannath 2859: 2857:lalit Jagannath 2826: 2818: 2790: 2782: 2765: 2721: 2716: 2703: 2702: 2690: 2688:Merry Christmas 2682: 2648: 2579: 2565: 2560: 2552: 2536: 2518: 2503: 2498: 2489: 2470: 2465: 2389: 2329: 2317: 2312: 2292: 2261: 2239: 2215: 2189:my edit summary 2185: 2170: 2165: 2152: 2097: 2083: 2073: 2053: 2048: 2009: 2004: 1976: 1971: 1961: 1904: 1868: 1843: 1838: 1817: 1764: 1751: 1746: 1730: 1712: 1705: 1674: 1586: 1575: 1515: 1513:May I know why? 1503: 1498: 1490: 1471: 1441: 1420:Do you want to 1398: 1352: 1323: 1297: 1278: 1253: 1115:Here's the diff 1065: 1013: 994: 993: 958: 957: 945: 919: 908: 891: 890: 861: 860: 831: 830: 795: 751: 710: 680: 656: 653: 633: 620: 614: 608: 606: 599: 461: 402: 374: 354: 335: 315: 302:this discussion 268: 263: 238: 71: 70: 63: 61: 12: 11: 5: 4034: 4024: 4023: 4018: 3983: 3980: 3960: 3957: 3933: 3930: 3917:for deletion. 3897:will stop the 3841: 3832: 3782: 3776: 3773: 3772: 3744: 3743: 3738: 3727: 3724: 3678: 3674: 3669: 3634: 3631: 3601: 3598: 3557: 3551: 3528: 3525: 3498: 3495: 3477: 3469: 3468: 3461: 3454: 3444: 3432: 3429: 3405: 3402: 3367: 3361: 3347: 3344: 3332:110.225.240.38 3312: 3309: 3297: 3294: 3268: 3265: 3243:Namadhari naik 3238: 3235: 3209: 3204: 3143: 3139:nomination of 3134: 3103: 3102: 3072: 3068:No content in 3066: 3038: 3035: 3034: 3033: 2988: 2982: 2961: 2958: 2923: 2920: 2897: 2894: 2858: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2839: 2811: 2810: 2803: 2775: 2764: 2763:Happy New Year 2761: 2759: 2743: 2742: 2733: 2728: 2720: 2717: 2691: 2689: 2686: 2684: 2681: 2668: 2659: 2649: 2647: 2646:Happy holidays 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2626: 2609: 2608: 2578: 2573: 2556:Requested move 2551: 2550:Requested move 2548: 2517: 2512: 2488: 2485: 2483: 2479: 2478: 2461: 2460: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2441: 2435: 2420:I just reread 2418: 2417: 2411: 2397:user:Sarvagnya 2388: 2385: 2382: 2381: 2374: 2367: 2347: 2346: 2341: 2339: 2328: 2325: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2272:Carnatic music 2214: 2209: 2184: 2182:Image:MLV1.jpg 2179: 2151: 2148: 2140: 2137: 2096: 2093: 2082: 2079: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 1995: 1994: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1903: 1902:Language riots 1900: 1899: 1898: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1816: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1763: 1760: 1729: 1726: 1704: 1701: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1666: 1647: 1646: 1635: 1611: 1602: 1599: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1534: 1533: 1514: 1511: 1489: 1486: 1470: 1467: 1447:you Naag.... 1440: 1437: 1397: 1394: 1383:Michael Devore 1364:User:Sarvagnya 1351: 1345: 1322: 1319: 1296: 1293: 1285: 1277: 1272: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1125: 1124: 1112: 1103: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1012: 1007: 988: 987: 949:A. Kanyakumari 944: 943:A. Kanyakumari 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 913: 885: 884: 855: 854: 794: 791: 789: 787: 786: 750: 747: 746: 745: 709: 706: 679: 676: 675: 674: 652: 649: 632: 629: 598: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 561: 560: 546: 532: 527: 518: 517: 460: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 443:Thirusivaperur 436: 435: 406:Thirusivaperur 401: 398: 387:Thirusivaperur 373: 370: 353: 350: 334: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 262: 259: 237: 234: 232: 229: 225: 224: 221: 220: 219: 218: 216:External links 213: 208: 200: 199: 191: 190: 174: 173: 102: 101: 93: 92: 91: 73: 58: 57: 56: 53: 52: 49: 37: 36: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4033: 4022: 4019: 4017: 4014: 4013: 4011: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3989: 3979: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3956: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3946:Crashed greek 3943: 3939: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3919:Crashed greek 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3889: 3887: 3883: 3872: 3870: 3864: 3860: 3858: 3854: 3840: 3836: 3831: 3830: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3781: 3771: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3759: 3755: 3750: 3746: 3745: 3742: 3739: 3736: 3731: 3723: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3673: 3668: 3667: 3664: 3663: 3657: 3651: 3647: 3646: 3641: 3640: 3630: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3597: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3563: 3556: 3550: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3536: 3532: 3524: 3523: 3519: 3505: 3494: 3489: 3483: 3476: 3466: 3459: 3455: 3452: 3448: 3447: 3440: 3428: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3411: 3401: 3400: 3396: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3366: 3360: 3359: 3356: 3352: 3343: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3308: 3307: 3304: 3293: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3277: 3273: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3244: 3234: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3218: 3208: 3203: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3180: 3175: 3173: 3169: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3148: 3142: 3138: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3122: 3121: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3077: 3071: 3065: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3032: 3029: 3024: 3018: 3014: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3005: 3000: 2994: 2987: 2981: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2957: 2956: 2953: 2951: 2950: 2929: 2922:Your comments 2919: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2901: 2893: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2822: 2821: 2808: 2800: 2798: 2794: 2793: 2786: 2785: 2776: 2773: 2768: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2741: 2737: 2734: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2723: 2722: 2715: 2714: 2711: 2708: 2707: 2695: 2685: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2666: 2665: 2660: 2653: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2577: 2572: 2571: 2568: 2563: 2557: 2547: 2544: 2540: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2516: 2511: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2501: 2494: 2484: 2477: 2476: 2473: 2468: 2459: 2458: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2429: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2423: 2415: 2412: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2402: 2398: 2393: 2392: 2380: 2376: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2368: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2354:, one of the 2353: 2349: 2348: 2345: 2342: 2337: 2332: 2324: 2323: 2320: 2315: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2281: 2278: 2273: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2264: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2253: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2242: 2236: 2235:third opinion 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2213: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2190: 2183: 2178: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2168: 2161: 2158:. Please see 2157: 2147: 2146: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2130: 2129:stepping back 2127:or even just 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2092: 2091: 2088: 2078: 2060: 2057: 2056: 2051: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2026: 2023: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2007: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1993: 1990: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1980: 1979: 1974: 1966: 1950: 1947: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1909: 1897: 1894: 1890: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1861: 1858: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1841: 1834: 1830: 1827:varying from 1826: 1822: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1771: 1767: 1759: 1758: 1755: 1754: 1749: 1742: 1737: 1734: 1725: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1633: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1620: 1615: 1609: 1608: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1590: 1584: 1580: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1532: 1529: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1520: 1510: 1509: 1506: 1501: 1495: 1494:upload script 1488:Upload script 1485: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1466: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1455:60.243.178.61 1452: 1446: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427:ChiragPatnaik 1423: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1402: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1350: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1326: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1292: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1283: 1276: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1236: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1011: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 998: 986: 983: 977: 972: 971: 970: 969: 966: 963: 962: 954: 950: 936: 933: 929: 924: 923: 922: 917: 911: 905: 904: 903: 902: 899: 896: 895: 883: 880: 875: 874: 873: 872: 869: 866: 865: 853: 850: 845: 844: 843: 842: 839: 836: 835: 825: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 790: 785: 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 744: 741: 737: 733: 732: 731: 730: 726: 722: 716: 714: 705: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 683: 673: 670: 666: 665: 664: 663: 659: 648: 647: 643: 639: 628: 627: 623: 617: 611: 604: 588: 585: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 570: 566: 559: 555: 551: 547: 545: 541: 537: 533: 530: 529: 528: 525: 524: 516: 512: 508: 503: 502: 501: 500: 496: 492: 488: 483: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 452: 448: 444: 440: 439: 438: 437: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 417: 416: 415: 411: 407: 397: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 379:80.108.50.167 369: 367: 363: 359: 349: 348: 345: 344: 343:Wiki San Roze 338: 333: 324: 321: 318: 312: 307: 303: 298: 294: 290: 289:ignore a rule 286: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 274: 271: 258: 257: 253: 248: 246: 233: 230: 217: 214: 212: 209: 207: 204: 203: 202: 201: 197: 196: 193: 192: 187: 184: 181: 176: 175: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 129: 126: 123: 120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 104: 99: 95: 90: 89: 88: 82: 78: 74: 69: 66: 60:Please click 50: 47: 43: 42: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 3985: 3962: 3935: 3901:, but other 3890: 3882:edit summary 3873: 3866: 3862: 3851:The article 3850: 3784: 3752: 3740: 3676: 3658: 3643: 3637: 3636: 3608:— Preceding 3603: 3559: 3540:Veena player 3537: 3533: 3530: 3511: 3418:JamesBWatson 3407: 3369: 3349: 3323: 3318: 3314: 3299: 3281: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3252: 3248: 3240: 3222:. Cheers, -- 3211: 3185:Please note: 3184: 3183: 3176: 3165: 3117: 3114:bot operator 3055:Wouterhagens 3040: 3012: 2995:. Thanks. 2990: 2984:Proposal at 2963: 2933: 2925: 2902: 2899: 2883:72.179.43.32 2860: 2827:bananabucket 2824: 2819:YellowMonkey 2816: 2814: 2791:bananabucket 2788: 2783:YellowMonkey 2780: 2777: 2758: 2747:Ontopofcosts 2744: 2706:The Bald One 2705: 2704: 2699: 2683: 2663: 2657: 2580: 2558:. Regards, 2554:Please see: 2553: 2529:Awareoftypes 2519: 2496: 2490: 2482: 2462: 2456: 2419: 2394: 2371: 2364: 2343: 2293: 2276: 2270:Look in the 2251: 2216: 2192: 2186: 2163: 2153: 2134: 2133: 2098: 2084: 2074: 2046: 2021: 2002: 1988: 1969: 1962: 1945: 1929:Regents Park 1919: 1914:There is an 1905: 1892: 1869: 1856: 1836: 1818: 1803: 1772: 1768: 1765: 1744: 1738: 1731: 1706: 1675: 1651: 1650: 1642: 1638: 1637: 1618: 1610: 1596: 1595: 1576: 1559: 1541: 1527: 1516: 1491: 1472: 1442: 1379: 1353: 1327: 1324: 1301: 1298: 1284:TinuCherian 1282: 1279: 1254: 1231: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1118: 1106: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1073:this request 1066: 1042: 1020: 1014: 996: 995: 989: 981: 960: 959: 946: 931: 893: 892: 886: 878: 863: 862: 856: 848: 833: 832: 826: 796: 788: 780: 752: 739: 717: 711: 684: 681: 668: 654: 634: 600: 583: 562: 526: 521: 519: 486: 484: 468: 464: 462: 419:I have left 403: 375: 355: 342: 339: 336: 305: 264: 244: 239: 231: 228: 211:Citation bot 85: 84: 72: 59: 32: 26: 3959:Best Wishes 3863:Non notable 3614:Abhijitkool 3458:participant 3326:—Preceding 3019:. Thanks. 2537:—Preceding 2350:Awarded to 2310:. Regards, 2107:constitute 1829:one article 1449:—Preceding 1372:User:Amarrg 815:John Carter 721:Ncmvocalist 708:Re: Your Hi 520:you wrote: 4010:Categories 3815:HairedGirl 3697:topic bans 3587:Ratibgreat 3579:Ratibgreat 3475:Ashershow1 3395:his otters 3283:Tej smiles 3254:Tej smiles 3193:Erwin85Bot 3124:CSDWarnBot 2970:Vjdchauhan 2905:Bugle Rock 2896:Bugle Rock 2231:WP:EDITWAR 2162:. Thanks. 2117:disruptive 2054:“what up?” 2010:“what up?” 1977:“what up?” 1844:“what up?” 1835:. Thanks. 1815:perception 1752:“what up?” 1583:disruptive 1332:. Thanks 1306:. Thanks 762:WP:CANVASS 597:RFA thanks 337:Hi there! 3938:Churumuri 3915:consensus 3855:has been 3853:Churumuri 3839:Churumuri 3693:site bans 3355:H P Nadig 3303:H P Nadig 3224:Stepheng3 2843:Abecedare 2352:Sarvagnya 2277:Sarvagnya 2252:Sarvagnya 2198:J Milburn 2125:wikibreak 2022:Sarvagnya 1989:Sarvagnya 1946:Sarvagnya 1920:Sarvagnya 1893:Sarvagnya 1857:Sarvagnya 1804:Sarvagnya 1703:Greetings 1690:Manoj nav 1641:has been 1619:Sarvagnya 1560:Sarvagnya 1528:Sarvagnya 1232:Sarvagnya 1223:Sarvagnya 1189:Sarvagnya 1154:Sebastian 1119:Sarvagnya 1107:Sarvagnya 1098:Sarvagnya 1077:Sebastian 1043:Sarvagnya 1021:vedikettu 1017:this edit 982:Sarvagnya 976:The Hindu 953:N. Ramani 932:Sarvagnya 910:Nishkid64 879:Sarvagnya 849:Sarvagnya 807:this list 799:Sarvagnya 781:Sarvagnya 740:Sarvagnya 669:Sarvagnya 658:Wikidās ॐ 584:Sarvagnya 3824:contribs 3795:deletion 3761:ಪ್ರಶಸ್ತಿ 3655:Spaceman 3622:contribs 3610:unsigned 3487:contribs 3375:deletion 3328:unsigned 3154:deletion 3017:Proposal 3013:Reminder 2993:Proposal 2504:What up? 2373:Cherian 2262:Tiptoety 2240:Tiptoety 2219:edit war 2171:What up? 2113:this one 2087:Ynhockey 1825:WP:Synth 1773:Thanks. 1655:Moreschi 1499:=Nichalp 1451:unsigned 1412:deletion 1368:User:KNM 1050:Thanks. 766:Karanacs 609:Lawrence 469:Novodaya 206:Analysis 87:Archives 3648:on the 3217:db-user 2909:Nvvchar 2879:WP:NPOV 2539:undated 2452:WP:TALK 2422:WP:TALK 1965:changed 1833:another 1766:Dear, 1643:granted 1589:unblock 1573:Blocked 1504:«Talk»= 1422:opt out 1261:Cleo123 1219:exactly 797:Hello, 198:Toolbox 3884:or on 3820:(talk) 3683:. The 3501:": --> 3110:WP:WMD 3099:CSD C1 3027:«Talk» 3003:«Talk» 2671:Risker 2669:Best, 2566:«Talk» 2499:Docku: 2471:«Talk» 2440:], and 2318:«Talk» 2298:for a 2227:WP:3RR 2193:hadn't 2166:Docku: 2049:Docku: 2043:advice 2005:Docku: 1972:Docku: 1873:Lihaas 1839:Docku: 1747:Docku: 1475:AreJay 1374:, per 1370:, and 1334:Nikkul 1321:Gandhi 1308:Nikkul 1295:Gandhi 1132:WP:SLR 1088:forced 1052:Tintin 1032:Tintin 1025:Kumble 1010:Kumbla 736:WP:NPA 695:Nikkul 678:Fowler 651:thanks 638:Arvind 487:listed 421:a note 316:Rudget 269:Rudget 3993:Ab207 3813:Brown 3661:Spiff 3571:merge 2515:India 2395:Dear 2360:India 2358:from 2105:these 1889:silly 1821:WP:OR 1775:Dsine 1547:Part2 1325:Hey, 1299:Hey, 1069:asked 682:Hey, 631:email 505:this? 465:Navya 425:Bovlb 362:Bovlb 311:bitey 285:Vagab 3997:talk 3973:talk 3950:talk 3923:talk 3765:talk 3717:talk 3618:talk 3591:talk 3583:talk 3575:here 3544:talk 3503:edit 3481:talk 3473:. -- 3422:talk 3336:talk 3287:talk 3258:talk 3228:talk 3197:talk 3164:"). 3128:talk 3120:here 3059:talk 2974:talk 2928:here 2913:talk 2887:talk 2847:talk 2751:talk 2675:talk 2634:talk 2620:talk 2602:talk 2587:talk 2533:talk 2525:HDIs 2493:here 2487:AN/I 2424:. 2366:Tinu 2308:here 2202:talk 2160:here 2150:AN/I 2139:fold 2136:Hers 1877:talk 1823:and 1794:talk 1790:Ronz 1779:talk 1728:tags 1718:talk 1714:Kris 1694:talk 1686:here 1684:and 1682:here 1659:talk 1601:fold 1598:Hers 1479:talk 1459:talk 1431:talk 1387:talk 1338:talk 1330:here 1312:talk 1304:here 1265:talk 1257:here 1215:then 1185:then 1158:talk 1067:You 1028:Bedi 928:this 819:talk 770:talk 725:talk 699:talk 642:talk 569:talk 554:talk 540:talk 511:talk 495:talk 477:talk 447:talk 429:talk 410:talk 391:talk 383:talk 366:talk 297:this 252:talk 245:MECU 64:here 3837:of 3822:• ( 3677:Hi, 3189:bot 3137:AfD 2535:) 2229:or 2221:at 2081:RfA 1831:to 1624:}} 1469:Hi! 1176:not 1093:had 1015:Re 603:RFA 309:as 306:not 98:??? 4012:: 3999:) 3975:) 3952:) 3944:. 3925:) 3888:. 3871:. 3767:) 3719:) 3695:, 3624:) 3620:• 3593:) 3546:) 3460:in 3442:}} 3436:{{ 3424:) 3393:, 3338:) 3289:) 3260:) 3230:) 3220:}} 3214:{{ 3199:) 3130:) 3101:). 3061:) 2980:. 2976:) 2915:) 2889:) 2849:) 2831:) 2795:) 2753:) 2677:) 2636:) 2622:) 2604:) 2589:) 2495:. 2377:- 2204:) 1879:) 1796:) 1781:) 1696:) 1661:) 1587:{{ 1540:-- 1481:) 1461:) 1433:) 1389:) 1366:, 1362:, 1340:) 1314:) 1288:- 1267:) 1205:ka 1202:on 1199:El 1160:) 1117:. 1019:, 821:) 772:) 727:) 701:) 644:) 612:§ 571:) 556:) 542:) 513:) 497:) 479:) 467:, 449:) 431:) 412:) 393:) 368:) 170:21 167:20 164:19 161:18 158:17 155:16 152:15 149:14 146:13 143:12 140:11 137:10 3995:( 3971:( 3948:( 3921:( 3826:) 3763:( 3715:( 3616:( 3589:( 3581:( 3542:( 3507:] 3484:• 3467:. 3420:( 3334:( 3285:( 3256:( 3226:( 3195:( 3126:( 3057:( 2972:( 2948:l 2945:a 2942:m 2939:a 2937:h 2935:C 2911:( 2885:( 2845:( 2823:( 2787:( 2749:( 2727:] 2673:( 2632:( 2618:( 2600:( 2585:( 2545:. 2531:( 2434:, 2200:( 1936:) 1932:( 1875:( 1792:( 1777:( 1720:) 1716:( 1692:( 1657:( 1477:( 1457:( 1429:( 1385:( 1336:( 1310:( 1263:( 1181:I 1156:( 918:) 914:( 817:( 768:( 723:( 697:( 640:( 621:e 618:/ 615:t 567:( 552:( 538:( 509:( 493:( 475:( 445:( 427:( 408:( 389:( 381:( 364:( 320:. 273:. 249:≈ 186:? 183:c 180:s 134:9 131:8 128:7 125:6 122:5 119:4 116:3 113:2 110:1 107:0

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index