973:
473:
218:
639:. Let me explain the rationale behind this. The goal of Knowledge is to provide free content to everyone, without worry of violating copyright rules for reusing the material. The presence of images that aren't "free" (used by anyone, anywhere, at any time, and for any reason) counters this fundamental philosophy. Where we draw the line, i.e. "How many non-free images should we have?", is actually a hotly-contested issue around here, and many people feel strongly one way or the other.
31:
1062:
859:). In the future, you may want to consider working up future articles in a sandbox, or even in a word processing program. Keep in mind that once an article is published on wikipedia, it is live and should meet all standards. Rough drafts in the main article space are frowned upon (and can lead to users filling the header with clean up tags, or worse, the article gets deleted). Anyway, again I hope this helps explain things more. Good luck.-
1130:
1239:
If you didn't realize that recruiting a brand new user to your side in a discussion is not an accepted practice, and do realize it now, then I don't think there is anything else to say about the issue. If that is the case, and if it's agreeable to you, I think the matter should be considered closed.
93:
We're done with sarcasm. Sarcasm breeds hostility which is not tolerated on this site. If you have something to say, say it. If I have done something in error, explain (without sarcasm) why, and if I agree, I will correct myself. Check your talk page for verification of me owninup to something I have
806:
Since this is a state, not a national or international organization, this criteria needs to be fulfilled. Next, not a single independent, secondary source was cited, and no mention of notability was established. I suggest you read through that page and figure out if you believe the organization fits
1212:
Actually, I agree with the nominator. The department doesn't seem to be notable enough to warrant its own article, though I don't see any problem with it having a section in the Bowie State article. It isn't enough for an article to be well cited/written; it also has to be about a topic worthy of
854:
You quoted a pretty relevant part of the guideline in your response to me. Multiple, non-trivial, independent reliable sources need to be found, and this is especially important because the scope of the organization is in essence local. The article was simply one sentence describing it, one article
654:
Hammersoft is right (if not entirely diplomatic) that non-free images shouldn't be on userpages, templates, categories, etc. (only the article namespace), and he can remove them if he sees fit. You'll notice that a bot initially removed your images, which means that this idea has a strong enough
1165:
In regard to your suggestion that I am taking your opposition to the article deletion personally, I am not at all. I'm just acting on what I see as a clear violation of
Knowledge policy. Whether the other account is you, or is a friend acting under your direction, that is a violation of the
642:
Using your officers' discretion analogy, some people here are sticklers for enforcing the rules while others see them as flexible. Also, since
Knowledge doesn't have a police force, everyone has the right to enforce the policy as they see fit, not just admins: "while the tools granted to
711:, which dictates how such material may be used on Knowledge, item #9 says that such material may only be used in the article namespace. I.e., actual encyclopedia articles. Userpages do not count as such, and thus such images can not be displayed on your userpage. Does that clarify? --
122:. This means that a link in the article you are trying to save has been blacklisted as a spam site. It may not be a link you added; it could have been added before it was determined to be a spam site but has not yet been removed. Which article are you getting this warning from? --
658:
As I said, this is a pretty hotly contested issue. If you want my advice, I'd recommend staying away from it lest the politicking and endless debating drives you insane. That is, of course, unless you like that kind of stuff. Let me know if you still have questions.
706:
Sure. Have a look at the image's page. Scroll down to the box that has the big red "C" on it. Read the box in full, and you'll observe that it says it's protected by copyright, and it's use here on
Knowledge is under terms of fair use. Now, moving on to
807:
the shoes for what we usually include, and try to find sources independent of the organization which establish notability. Hope this explains the deletion. If you have any questions, or need help, feel free to contact me. Thanks.-
878:
Regarding your deleted article, I think Andrew c sums up the situation fairly well above. Knowledge can't include everything, and a program that is somewhat obscure doesn't seem to meet the criteria for inclusion. As for
448:
Thats all right mate, you dont have to thank me. I was looking at your pages you created and contributed to, the pages you have created are full of facts and is to the point - your a credt to the project! Happy
Editing!
1084:
568:
Thanks for teaching me that individual articles for
University police forces are acceptable and should be part of Knowledge. I am glad to see you removed the prod tag, and you also did a good job with the parent
678:
1056:
795:
1236:
Hello. I don't know if the third party comments on this matter have changed your viewpoint at all, or if you still think I'm on some crazy vendetta. I assure you that was never what this was about.
902:
Public domain materials can be used any way you please. Once a work enters the public domain, no one holds rights to them. As for the law question, I'm not sure which you are speaking of. --
352:
1076:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "
823:. You are free to work up the article as a rough draft. Once you feel the article is ready to go live again, I strongly urge you to seek a second opinion about whether the article meets
173:
it, but not use the text word-for-word for commercial use). Public information is different from public domain. When in doubt, it is always better to put things in your own words. --
1083:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
947:
I'm terribly sorry, I didn't mean to remove your question. I was reverting a string of vandalism to the page, and I missed the edit. I've restored the question to the talk page. -
348:
145:
posted links to famousamericans.net on his userpage. That link is on the spam blacklist, which is why you (nor I) can edit the page unless they are removed in the process. --
1107:
820:
467:
819:
I disagree that the article was "barely out of regs", as I noted above. Here is what I have done, I've recreated the article in a sandbox in your own user space. See
518:
375:
371:
284:
562:
677:
328:
to find all the really short articles, pick one from that list and improve it. When you are done go to the talk page of that article and removed {{WPLE| class=
873:
987:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
1213:
inclusion. As for the sock puppet accusation, I also agree with the nominator. At a cursory glance, it would seem that you have some explaining to do. --
967:
700:
1069:
1051:
550:
486:
1264:
1175:
1031:
to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add
537:
to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add
1015:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
804:
Organizations whose activities are local in scope are usually not notable unless verifiable information from reliable independent sources can be found.
789:
521:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
433:
367:
1012:
813:
896:
920:
If you are quoting and properly attributing, then it shouldn't be a problem. Just keep the quote as short as necessary, and use the <ref: -->
720:
590:
1279:
case and refactored the deletion debate to take the sting out of it. The above posts can be deleted or archived by being copied-and-pasted (to
691:. This policy is inviolable. Please, if you have questions about the policy, by all means ask, but do not violate the policy again. Thanks, --
1147:
865:
845:
1044:
984:
325:
883:, you'll notice that at the bottom of the article it says the text is from the Catholic Encyclopedia of 1913, which is public domain. --
299:
784:
761:
1143:
766:
1226:
1159:
934:
915:
605:
is the person who uploaded it. If you would like to add a more accurate picture, feel free to take your own and upload it to the
332:}} the bit in bold and another editor will be along to see how well you have done and reassess the article to a much higher class.
205:
158:
1249:
655:
following for a bot to gain approval to do this automatically. Be sure to read the policies linked to on the bot page as well.
186:
1020:
526:
416:
429:
233:
351:
and if particular articles in this project are suffering from vandalism, edit wars or talk-page abuse, please add it to the
1207:
962:
461:
828:
747:
742:
685:
672:
574:
135:
1290:
164:
622:
304:
192:
I would cite it the same way you cite any quotation, by using the ref tags. Try to paraphrase wherever possible. --
988:
494:
169:
It may be public information, but it also might have protections or limitations applied to its use (i.e., you can
1024:
992:
578:
530:
498:
635:
As for the fair use (or "non-free" as they are now called, since it is more accurate for this site) images, see
406:
107:
88:
855:
quoting the mission, and a list of publications (which IMO isn't really what wikipedia is, per the spirit of
1280:
880:
59:
980:
689:
627:
490:
79:
Hmm - then you don't work as a Deputy
Sheriff in Prince Georges County, and don't know Michael Jackson?
1073:
636:
410:
313:: For news and information, please read the bulletin board regularly or add it to you user-page using:
113:
38:
1117:
996:
836:
502:
251:
Since you now are a member you get to have our userbox or banner on your userpage! To add these use:
307:. There are also a number of small projects on the talk page as well that may be of interest to you!
1260:
1245:
1231:
1187:
1171:
1155:
648:
1011:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
517:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
1098:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
596:
1181:
688:#9, you can not have such images on your userpage, whether a bot has removed them before or not
953:
632:
First of all, feel free to ask as many questions as you like. I will always help new editors.
570:
1270:
1222:
1139:
1118:
930:
911:
892:
780:
668:
618:
401:
242:
201:
182:
154:
131:
1094:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
957:
736:
726:
716:
696:
586:
558:
457:
452:
103:
8:
1256:
1241:
1167:
1151:
1028:
1004:
942:
832:
534:
510:
493:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy
Knowledge's
119:
291:
to the base of the article and our project banner to the talk page of the article using
1036:
863:
843:
811:
757:
542:
84:
47:
17:
1285:
948:
606:
573:
article. I did a little research and found a few other similar articles, for example
238:
1085:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Bowie State
University, Department of Public Safety
394:
211:
1112:
1103:
733:
712:
692:
582:
554:
246:
142:
647:, administrators are people that are entrusted with potentially harmful tools" (
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1016:
972:
824:
799:
708:
522:
472:
217:
1276:
1218:
1095:
1088:
1077:
926:
907:
888:
860:
856:
840:
808:
776:
753:
664:
614:
481:
197:
178:
150:
127:
99:
80:
609:
under a free license (presuming you have easy access to one of the cars). --
1191:
74:
1061:
1099:
602:
1057:
AfD nomination of Bowie State
University, Department of Public Safety
794:
Just letting you know that I speedy deleted the article you created,
386:
1129:
1214:
1186:
Hi, you tagged your sandbox for deletion yourself, as seen in this
922:
903:
884:
772:
660:
610:
193:
174:
146:
123:
245:
dedicated to improving
Knowledge's coverage of topics related to
1146:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
1072:, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for
731:
You can just use "frustrated". It's a synonym for annoyed. --
821:
User talk:Sallicio/Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence
1019:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
525:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
827:
or not. You are free to solicit opinions from a place like
95:
999:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
505:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
643:
administrators are technical and do not convey authority
991:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
798:. It did not meet our inclusion criteria a discussed at
497:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
1283:
for instance) at your choice. Or just left. Cheers. ➔
752:
Thanks for your help. I always appreciate assistance.
287:
for articles you can create, but don't forget to add
1070:
Bowie State University, Department of Public Safety
551:
Bowie State University, Department of Public Safety
487:
Bowie State University, Department of Public Safety
468:
Bowie State University, Department of Public Safety
1190:. I've undeleted it anyway, so no harm done. :-)
489:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
679:Image:Washington Redskins helmet rightface.png
428:Or any project coordinator listed on the main
874:Re: Speedy deletions and Catholic Reparations
1045:Frostburg State University Police Department
985:Frostburg State University Police Department
968:Frostburg State University Police Department
98:and don't instigate hostilities. Thank you.
684:This is a fair use, copyrighted image. Per
274:Here are some more tips to get you started:
796:Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence
790:Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence
1144:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Sallicio
983:template has been added to the article
485:template has been added to the article
14:
921:tags to cite where you got it from. --
581:articles in the future. Thanks again.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
241:! As you would have guessed we are a
1240:Please let me know if you agree. --
303:: It is highly recommended that you
25:
829:Knowledge:Village pump (assistance)
686:Knowledge:Non-free content criteria
575:Boston University Police Department
23:
1150:before editing the evidence page.
1060:
971:
471:
216:
24:
1301:
1166:sockpuppet policy either way. --
1128:
767:Re: Barnstar awarded to User:Tom
601:I may have added the photo, but
29:
1289:has changed his plea to guilty
316:{{Lawenforcementbulletinboard}}
13:
1:
1124:
1027:, where it may be deleted if
533:, where it may be deleted if
462:16:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
381:Members in trouble can go to:
187:14:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
159:02:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
136:21:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
108:21:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
89:20:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1291:22:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
1281:User talk:Sallicio/Archive 1
1265:19:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
1250:19:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
1227:21:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
1208:Re: help me save my article!
1176:18:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
1160:09:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
1108:01:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
1052:22:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
963:04:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
935:04:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
916:01:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
897:00:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
881:Reparation (Catholic Church)
866:15:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
846:15:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
814:14:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
802:. One of the main issues is
785:04:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
442:Again, Thank you and Welcome
7:
1182:Re: you deleted my sandbox?
1091:with four tildes (~~~~).
997:Knowledge's deletion policy
771:Just glad to be helpful. --
762:21:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
748:Jacksonville Port Authority
743:21:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
721:21:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
701:20:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
673:23:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
623:16:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
591:12:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
563:03:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
503:Knowledge's deletion policy
234:Law Enforcement Wikiproject
206:04:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
94:done wrong. So try to stay
10:
1306:
1201:at 20:45, January 31, 2008
637:Knowledge:Non-free content
345:That this project aims for
257:{{User WikiprojectPolice}}
231:Thank you for joining the
226:Welcome Sallicio/Archive 2
165:Re: Copyright Infringement
1138:You have been accused of
1017:proposed deletion process
837:Knowledge talk:Notability
577:. This will help me as I
523:proposed deletion process
349:No vandalism, no conflict
338:All members are reminded:
1068:An editor has nominated
1021:speedy deletion criteria
649:Knowledge:Administrators
527:speedy deletion criteria
311:Check the bulletin board
265:{{Lawenforcementmember}}
1255:Sounds good. Thanks. --
424:(Assistant Coordinator)
1087:and please be sure to
1065:
989:criteria for inclusion
976:
571:Bowie State University
495:criteria for inclusion
476:
221:
1148:notes for the suspect
1096:articles for deletion
1078:What Knowledge is not
1064:
1025:Articles for Deletion
1023:or it can be sent to
993:What Knowledge is not
975:
531:Articles for Deletion
529:or it can be sent to
499:What Knowledge is not
475:
390:(Project Coordinator)
268:-- our member banner.
220:
42:of past discussions.
1113:Suspected sockpuppet
839:. Hope this helps.-
833:Knowledge:Help desk
628:Re: Fair use images
298:Participate on our
1142:. Please refer to
1089:sign your comments
1066:
977:
477:
353:Article Watch List
322:Improve an article
260:-- our userbox, or
222:
114:Re: Spam blacklist
18:User talk:Sallicio
1203:
1136:
1135:
1049:
981:proposed deletion
961:
607:Wikimedia Commons
491:proposed deletion
482:proposed deletion
464:
425:
422:
391:
281:Creating articles
239:English Knowledge
72:
71:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1297:
1275:I've closed the
1232:AfD/Puppet issue
1192:
1132:
1125:
1048:
1042:
1041:
1035:
1010:
1009:
1003:
951:
741:
548:
547:
541:
516:
515:
509:
455:
423:
419:
413:
404:
399:
389:
317:
266:
258:
68:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1273:
1234:
1210:
1197:
1184:
1123:
1115:
1059:
1039:
1033:
1032:
1007:
1001:
1000:
970:
945:
876:
792:
769:
750:
732:
729:
682:
630:
599:
597:Re: PGSO Impala
545:
539:
538:
513:
507:
506:
470:
453:Police,Mad,Jack
446:
417:
411:
402:
378:
315:
264:
256:
247:law enforcement
228:
214:
167:
116:
77:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1303:
1272:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1233:
1230:
1209:
1206:
1195:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1134:
1133:
1122:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1058:
1055:
1047:. Blanchardb-
1043:to the top of
969:
966:
944:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
875:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
849:
848:
791:
788:
768:
765:
749:
746:
728:
725:
724:
723:
681:
676:
629:
626:
598:
595:
594:
593:
549:to the top of
469:
466:
438:
437:
426:
392:
383:
382:
379:
366:
360:In a nutshell:
356:
355:
334:
333:
319:
308:
295:
270:
269:
261:
224:
215:
213:
210:
209:
208:
166:
163:
162:
161:
115:
112:
76:
73:
70:
69:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1302:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1282:
1278:
1271:All complete?
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1237:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1205:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1189:
1188:this revision
1177:
1173:
1169:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1120:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1092:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1063:
1054:
1053:
1046:
1038:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1013:its talk page
1006:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
974:
965:
964:
959:
955:
950:
936:
932:
928:
924:
919:
918:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
900:
899:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
867:
864:
862:
858:
853:
852:
851:
850:
847:
844:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
817:
816:
815:
812:
810:
805:
801:
797:
787:
786:
782:
778:
774:
764:
763:
759:
755:
745:
744:
740:
739:
735:
722:
718:
714:
710:
705:
704:
703:
702:
698:
694:
690:
687:
680:
675:
674:
670:
666:
662:
656:
652:
650:
646:
640:
638:
633:
625:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
567:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
552:
544:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:its talk page
512:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
483:
474:
465:
463:
460:was added at
459:
454:
450:
445:
444:
443:
435:
431:
427:
420:
414:
408:
405:
398:
397:
393:
388:
385:
384:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
331:
327:
323:
320:
318:
312:
309:
306:
302:
301:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
267:
262:
259:
254:
253:
252:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
229:
227:
219:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
139:
138:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
111:
109:
105:
101:
97:
91:
90:
86:
82:
67:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1284:
1274:
1257:L. Pistachio
1242:L. Pistachio
1238:
1235:
1211:
1200:
1193:
1185:
1168:L. Pistachio
1152:L. Pistachio
1140:sockpuppetry
1137:
1119:Sockpuppetry
1093:
1082:
1067:
978:
949:Royalguard11
946:
877:
803:
793:
770:
751:
737:
730:
727:Re: Wikimood
683:
657:
653:
644:
641:
634:
631:
600:
480:
478:
451:
447:
441:
440:
439:
434:members page
430:project page
395:
359:
358:
357:
344:
337:
336:
335:
329:
321:
314:
310:
305:watchlist it
297:
292:
288:
280:
273:
272:
271:
263:
255:
250:
232:
230:
225:
223:
170:
168:
120:WP:BLACKLIST
117:
92:
78:
65:
43:
37:
943:Re:Question
456:—Preceding
396:Dep. Garcia
36:This is an
1005:dated prod
713:Hammersoft
693:Hammersoft
603:User:IFCAR
583:Truthanado
555:Truthanado
511:dated prod
418:Complaints
1037:db-author
1029:consensus
543:db-author
535:consensus
412:Help Desk
300:talk page
110:Sallicio
66:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
1074:deletion
861:Andrew c
841:Andrew c
809:Andrew c
754:Mgreason
734:Denelson
324:: Click
293:{{WPLE}}
212:Welcome!
143:recently
100:Sallicio
81:Tedickey
1286:REDVEЯS
1050:-timed
825:WP:CORP
800:WP:CORP
709:WP:NFCC
458:comment
237:on the
39:archive
1277:WP:SSP
1080:").
995:" and
857:WP:NOT
645:per se
579:patrol
501:" and
376:Assess
374:&
372:Create
283:: See
1223:email
1100:BJBot
931:email
912:email
893:email
781:email
669:email
619:email
243:group
202:email
183:email
155:email
141:Some
132:email
16:<
1261:talk
1246:talk
1219:talk
1194:east
1172:talk
1156:talk
1121:case
1104:talk
927:talk
908:talk
889:talk
777:talk
758:talk
717:talk
697:talk
665:talk
615:talk
587:talk
559:talk
403:Talk
387:SGGH
368:Join
330:Stub
326:here
285:here
198:talk
179:talk
171:read
151:talk
128:talk
118:See
104:talk
96:calm
85:talk
1215:Tom
1198:718
923:Tom
904:Tom
885:Tom
835:or
773:Tom
661:Tom
651:).
611:Tom
553:.
432:or
194:Tom
175:Tom
147:Tom
124:Tom
75:COI
1263:)
1248:)
1225:)
1221:-
1174:)
1158:)
1106:)
1040:}}
1034:{{
1008:}}
1002:{{
979:A
958:R!
933:)
929:-
914:)
910:-
895:)
891:-
831:,
783:)
779:-
760:)
738:83
719:)
699:)
671:)
667:-
659:--
621:)
617:-
589:)
561:)
546:}}
540:{{
514:}}
508:{{
479:A
421:)
415:|
409:|
400:(
370:,
347::
204:)
200:-
185:)
181:-
157:)
153:-
134:)
130:-
106:)
87:)
1259:(
1244:(
1217:(
1196:.
1170:(
1154:(
1102:(
960:)
956:·
954:T
952:(
925:(
906:(
887:(
775:(
756:(
715:(
695:(
663:(
613:(
585:(
557:(
436:.
407:+
289:]
196:(
177:(
149:(
126:(
102:(
83:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.