31:
290:. I understand you may have spent a lot of time on the article, but you need to realize that other people have different opinions. In fact, another editor has been reverting some of your additions, too. Instead of accusing me of being "ignorant", "arrogant", "immature", "juvenile", of having "NOTHING better to do", and so forth, perhaps you should look at your own actions and consider your behavior. Additionally, calling my actions vandalism is not helping your argument at all.
82:
151:
important to include only pertinent information in the article. Also, do you work for the
Sheriff's Office? I ask because you seem to be fairly defensive and protective of this article. In articles where we care greatly about a subject or have a vested interest, it is important for all of us to take a step back and look at our own biases, which I urge you to do.
131:, and users don't vote on every change to an article. If a change is widely-seen as controversial, then it is brought up for discussion, where a consensus is reached. Second, I've been here for a pretty long time, and I like to think that I have a fair idea of what a good article looks like. For example:
141:
Information about officers who have been killed in the line of duty is a grayer area, but generally isn't included in articles about police forces unless their deaths were unusual or part of a larger incident that made headlines. It's not because we don't honor their sacrifice, but that their deaths
150:
Remember that the
Sheriff's Office is a relatively small agency in the sea of police forces. Even the county police lacks an article here, and I'm fairly certain that they are considerably larger. In these cases, where the Sheriff's Office may be seen by some as non-notable altogether, it is
344:
I'm sorry you feel that way, but there isn't any reason to be defeatist. I apologize if I came off harsh, but all I ask is that you refrain from personal attacks and consider being flexible. Is that an unreasonable request? You seem to be a member of the
Sheriff's Office, so you certainly
103:
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
299:
As for the block warning, be aware that it is not because I disagree with you. People disagree with each other all the time here, and it rarely results in a block. However, your behavior is aggressive, threatening, demanding, and involves several
304:
on my talk page (i.e., your comments quoted above). The community takes behavior very seriously in an effort to create a collegial and positive environment, so I am gently warning you a second time to calm down and comment on the content, not the
400:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
349:
disagree with you here. I've gone through and made some cosmetic adjustments to the article, but I left most of the content in place, so see what you think. Also, thanks for creating an article on the county police.
138:
Furthermore, the "fleet" section is also unnecessary for the same reasons as above. Most police agencies use standard-issue
Impalas or Crown Vics, so it's redundant/common sense/unimportant.
397:
100:. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the pageā you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
213:): Articles should not give their subjects a glowy appearance, nor should they lambaste them. An article should not overemphasize minor or obscure aspects related to it.
456:
135:
Detailed information about ranks isn't necessary since most police forces share the same rank system and thus the information is redundant and/or common sense.
226:. I have just as much of a right to edit articles as you do. In fact, any editor has the right to enforce policy, whether or not they are an administrator.
460:
315:
252:
and you have been unwilling to adjust to the rules and policies of the project. Hostility will only hinder your cause, and you risk being
436:
363:
331:
273:
415:
175:
199:
your articles to defend, and anyone else has just as much of a right to change your text. That is the fundamental purpose of a
117:
420:
Please do not cut and paste copyrighted material into
Knowledge articles. For example, you have repeatedly put material from
345:
understand how important it is to keep a cool head. Let's work together to create a good article, and remember that people
452:
410:
122:
66:
222:
38:
373:
314:
Regarding the content of the article itself, any discussion of that would be more appropriate on the
234:
113:
359:
327:
269:
171:
74:
394:, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
390:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
257:
237:
is how a page is disambiguated; do not add an honorific before a person's name in the title.
220:
It is also my "job" as an editor to make sure articles maintain those standards, as well as
448:
383:
8:
379:
128:
109:
89:
421:
47:
17:
406:
253:
249:
210:
155:
105:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
287:
206:
143:
443:
433:
355:
323:
265:
188:
167:
159:
97:
93:
75:
240:
Do not remove categories from an article unless they are clearly inaccurate.
429:
402:
301:
428:. Apart from the fact that you're attempting to use an opinion piece as a
81:
195:
ownership of what you have written under the terms of the GFDL. These
391:
231:
In addition, many of your contributions are not formatted correctly:
351:
319:
261:
163:
425:
282:
You are taking this personally and are becoming defensive. I am
286:
attacking you nor am I removing your information "in spite", so
96:, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page:
396:
387:
378:
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
200:
382:
and
Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
142:
aren't notable enough for inclusion. For example, the
92:. I have performed a web search with the contents of
146:
only mentions the number of officers they have lost.
432:, the copyright violation is not acceptable. --
248:Finally, and most importantly, your tone is
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
25:
23:
88:This is an automated message from
80:
24:
472:
395:
127:Hello. First of all, Knowledge
29:
416:Cutting, pasting, and copyright
243:Do not use bolding excessively.
185:the following policy articles:
13:
1:
364:04:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
162:(read the links). Thanks. --
160:no one owns the articles here
154:Additionally, please work on
118:06:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
461:23:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
437:22:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
411:17:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
332:04:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
274:21:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
176:15:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
7:
123:Re: Unnecessary Information
10:
477:
156:being civil to other users
106:the maintainer's talk page
235:Michael Jackson (sheriff)
223:all of the other polices
158:, and understand that
85:
207:Neutral point of view
189:Ownership of articles
84:
42:of past discussions.
316:article's talk page
86:
18:User talk:Sallicio
463:
451:comment added by
374:Your recent edits
256:from editing for
129:isn't a democracy
72:
71:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
468:
446:
399:
302:personal attacks
288:keep a cool head
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
476:
475:
471:
470:
469:
467:
466:
465:
430:reliable source
418:
386:by typing four
384:sign your posts
376:
125:
79:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
474:
453:166.161.83.131
444:User: Sallicio
441:
417:
414:
375:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
337:
336:
335:
334:
309:
308:
307:
306:
294:
293:
292:
291:
277:
276:
246:
245:
244:
241:
238:
228:
227:
217:
216:
215:
214:
209:(specifically
204:
148:
147:
139:
136:
124:
121:
110:CorenSearchBot
90:CorenSearchBot
78:
73:
70:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
473:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
445:
442:Fair enough.
439:
438:
435:
431:
427:
423:
413:
412:
408:
404:
398:
393:
389:
385:
381:
365:
361:
357:
353:
348:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
310:
303:
298:
297:
296:
295:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
239:
236:
233:
232:
230:
229:
225:
224:
219:
218:
212:
208:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
186:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
152:
145:
140:
137:
134:
133:
132:
130:
120:
119:
115:
111:
107:
101:
99:
98:County police
95:
94:County Police
91:
83:
77:
76:County Police
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
440:
422:this article
419:
377:
346:
305:contributor.
283:
221:
211:undue weight
196:
192:
182:
153:
149:
144:NYPD article
126:
102:
87:
60:
43:
37:
447:āPreceding
191:: You have
36:This is an
380:talk pages
258:disruption
392:Shift key
193:forfeited
67:ArchiveĀ 2
61:ArchiveĀ 1
449:unsigned
434:jpgordon
426:Kwanzaa
403:SineBot
254:blocked
250:uncivil
197:are not
181:Please
39:archive
388:tildes
424:into
360:email
328:email
270:email
260:. --
172:email
16:<
457:talk
407:talk
356:talk
347:will
324:talk
318:. --
266:talk
201:wiki
183:read
168:talk
114:talk
352:Tom
320:Tom
284:not
262:Tom
164:Tom
459:)
409:)
401:--
362:)
358:-
350:--
330:)
326:-
272:)
268:-
174:)
170:-
116:)
108:.
455:(
405:(
354:(
322:(
264:(
203:.
166:(
112:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
