User talk:Saintstephen000

5302:. The IP provided a clear edit summary justifying their edit, which removed some uncited material and two wikilinks on a country no one needs to look up, Russia. Both of these were well within the range of acceptable actions. Although editors vary—some do wikilink all countries, although it's recommended not to, and some would have either cut all the unreferenced material, or looked for a few sources instead of cutting—that was by no means a vandal edit or a test edit, which is what leaving the automatically generated edit summary means. Based on that random sample, you had no valid reason to revert and should consider reverting yourself in the other edits in that sequence. And not justifying your reverts with edit summaries and telling the IP above 2414:

colorism, but by definition that is not true because colorism is discrimination against someone with a darker skin tone than you. Though provided by TheGrio.com, that information is incorrect. She has many reliable articles about her family struggles with money, wanting to be a ballet dancer, moving a lot because her dad was an aspiring actor too, etc. I tried adding that but you keep removing it, so if it is done incorrectly on my part I ask that you edit it to be done correctly. But that is the information is important to her story and should be included in her Early Life section instead a singular quote that is being used to paint her in a bad light.

3456: 3967: 5315:

example to broken formatting) or a different change (such as rephrasing the new addition if you don't like the wording). That way, you and the other editor assist each other in improving the article, or at least the other editor understands what they did wrong and can avoid the same mistake next time. And take your time to make sure the problem is really a problem; for example that you didn't miss the addition of sources. It's better to get it right than to get carried away with being fast.

530: 3860: 213: 1064: 1011: 5200: 2908: 2450: 1133: 5116: 3754: 3543: 3394: 3170: 3041: 2744: 2121: 1889: 1397: 944: 1642:

proven to exist today. Specifically, special relativity only states that all observers, irrespective of their relative motions will all measure the speed of light as the same number in vacuum, and that is it! It says nothing more. A corollary to this is that a classical point mass will take infinite energy to reach the speed of light. This says nothing about energy in general or more abstractly, "information".

22: 4609: 849:

bacharach perform on a living room piano songs later presented as Lennon McCartney compositions. that is notable, would be attested to by a handful of people, and would be factual let's say. but it would be a claim requiring similarly strong sources. i suggest you identify all series thought of as dramatic comedy but with script and directorial elements you have identified, and just do it.

4199:

bands from that era. I didn’t realise that UK chart positions needed citations because this information is freely available on the U.K. charts website. I’m a newbie to editing on Wiki, so I’m not even sure if this is how I respond to you correctly. Over the weekend, I’ll take some time to read up and learn. Thanks for your advice and understanding.

3319:, I recently attempted to update the titular see of Arsennaria and the Archdiocese of Ho Chi Minh city to reflect the recent (as of this morning) installation of the newest auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese, Joseph Bui Cong Trac, whose titular see is Arsennaria. It has been reverted to the original, whilst the source in the Arsennaria article : 807:

The new content regards nothing more than understanding and identification of literary devices; any given individual with associated fundamental knowledge could make such an assessment. It would seem a "source" per se, within this context, is actually nothing more than validating one's capacity for knowledge -- which is wholly unnecessary.

5306:, without explanation, were both rude. Is it possible you don't feel the same need to respect unregistered editors as registered editors? If so, please be aware that you're mistaken; the civility rule applies to IP editors, too. And sometimes the unregistered editor is a newbie putting their toe in the water here for the first time; don't 3808:'early life' section that her family lived in harsh circumstances in Sombor (they were homeless war refugees), without elaborating on the reasons why they were were forced to be in that situation. The family arrived in Australia on a refugee VISA, yet the article wants us to believe that they just 'decided' to leave their home one day. 304:, meaning they are "notable" enough to be mentioned among the band's "notable" songs and therefore I restored them in the article. Not only that, but "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" had some airplay on radio or MTV back in at least 1989, is that not "notable" enough? If you disagree, you might want to consider taking it over to 4162:

Saba was older than 1000 BC, and European missions indicate that it was very old, some sources (1) Reports of the German Archaeological Institute + Al-Watan Magazine - New Discoveries - Dr. Youssef Mohamed Abdel Issue 5 / year 11 / June 1988 AD. (2) History of the ancient kingdoms in the south of the

2264:

Perhaps you could be of help here. How would one cite something like this? Trying to do the right thing here - because there is not only missing information on his page but also seems to be biological offspring claims that are also not proven. I ask in the spirit of making sure a deceased individual

884:

My muted tirade aside, I spent about 45 internet minutes and found a few articles to support my opinion and have provided the sources. (To sound haughty, I doubt any one of those writers has either watched or studied the show as much as I have; and still maintain that my unbiased opinion is as valid

806:

The reason for the "interesting" edit summary was in response to MarnetteDI's rejection of the same edit, last week (please review the Barney Miller Talk Page entry, "Barney Miller 'genre' Discussion"), where he/she provided no rationale for why such a rudimentary, base-level edit requires a source.

5314:

Anyway, thank you for patrolling, but please could I ask you to be more careful in doing so? Don't revert just because you yourself wouldn't have made that edit, only if it's actively damaging, always explain why in an edit summary, and consider instead reverting only partially, or making a fix (for

5060:

I'm happy to discuss why you feel that why. And why you left no edit summary. I explained my edits in an edit summary. You have failed to explain why you reverted them - they comply with wp policy, and your reverts fail to, and your "finding" is not wp-policy based. If we can't discuss properly, and

4321:

if it's a biographical article with next to no references, it's likely to be contentious. persons close to articles sometimes believe fish are actually whales. we really edit articles within our field of expertise; we have no editorial opinion outside the prime directive. 👍 thanks for the heads up,

2602:

I am not angry, I am telling you that you might be seen as breaching our policies. I am communicating with you at this point in order to inform you so that you do not end up with some kind of sanction. But fine. This is now a warning if you continue to post in a way that seems to look like more than

2501:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

876:

no other long-term "sitcom" at that time routinely provided consequential (and at times pivotal) relevant topics in an earnest, effected manner.) Second, it all seems rather silly that my objective opinions are deemed invalid; yet, seemingly given internet articles smitten with blatant inaccuracies

4442:

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I’ve noticed my contributions to the “Katie Feeney” article keep getting reverted due to purported lack of sources. I have added primary sources each time to support the added text. Could you please explain why these changes are getting reverted each time? They

3218:

Hi, why did you removed some of the information from the article? Her music certifications are shown in the discography section, where all the references are correctly credited by the corresponding certification body database / link: Promusicae, FIMI, SNEP, etc. Furthermore, she is a Top5 Streaming

1641:

A citation is absolutely needed because every textbook you claim says this is wrong. It specifically has occurred in history because of a misunderstanding of energy and information, as well as the difference between an idealized classical vacuum and the real life exotic quantum vacuum that has been

848:

I can't do it. I agree with your basic premise, but am unable to create an exception to unsourced categorizing. Barney Miller has element you describe, but to drop that into the category churn, it needs more than your obvious thoughtful knowledge and my agreement. an example, say an editor watched

241:

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright

3807:

Jelena Dokic and her family did not 'decide' to leave Osijek in 1991. The war was already raging for six months when they were forced to flee in a brutal ethnic-cleansing campaign against Serbian civilians, and mixed-marriage families. Its highly offensive to claim otherwise. You cant claim in the

3266:

GreetsConcord, also known as KOMBINAT PITANIYA KONKORD OOO, a company which Yevgeniy Prigozhin founded and owned until November 2019, and a group of other companies with ties to him, including Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Megaline LLC, have been benefitting from large public contracts

654:

Hi there, you've indicated that you intend to "sandbox" articles and rewrite them. Please first spend some time considering the Knowledge policies that encourage editors to thoroughly discuss article issues on the talk pages before they are "sandboxed". I haven't seen much discussion by you on the

5274:

focuses on fringe positions in science and history, its underlying point is that Knowledge presents what reliable sources state; we don't beat the bushes for a contrary opinion just to be fair. We are not subject to any "fairness doctrine", and neutrality means factually summarizing the available

4570:

you reverted my second revision rather than my original one. While I do still contend that for anthology series this parameter should only be used for composers whose work was featured prominently througout a significant number/percentage of episodes as the infobox should be a summary rather than

4142:

hi, and thanks for helping us edit Knowledge. if you have acceptable citations for claims, yes please! it's important that your additions are correctly sourced, you seem to have an interest in this topic. which makes it even more important that your addition is perfect. better to add nothing than

3947:

We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate, corruption in the Indian subcontinent. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your

786:

i don't know what you mean. you send me a message like this one, it shows up on a link at the top of the page, i click it and respond politely and firmly, as I'm doing now. i did not initiate or perpetuate the exchange you've engaged me in. i will simply block you, if that's ok. thanks again for

4198:

Hello, Thanks for your messages. I’m the person that has been adding some content with chart positions to record releases by British group, Ride. Yes, I do have knowledge on them, having followed the group for over thirty years. I know every release, date, label info etc, as I do with many other

4178:

thanks for engaging. there isn't academic consensus to date this any earlier, although there have been notable attempts. perhaps find correct sources and cite a paragraph speaking to the legendary status and various interpretations of archeological discoveries. thanks for helping edit wikipedia,

4163:

Arabian Peninsula - Klaus Scheibmann - p. 66 - translation center Studies - 2001 AD. (3) Report of the activities of the German Archaeological Institute in Berlin - Al-Thawra Newspaper - Sana'a - Issue 5/1/1984 AD. (4) Report of the Dutch Physical Laboratory - Al Ittihad Magazine - 11/23/1988. -

3733:

Thank you for taking the time to help us correctly correct wikipedia. To correct the non controversial edit, add the sourced reference as an inline citation. Knowledge can't use itself as a source, as you well-understand Biographical information needs near constant vigilance, as you can imagine.

2413:

If you wish to continue editing the page please do so with relevant life events and not instances that do not add substance to the biography. If you want to add different referenced material that is fine, but I do ask that you remove that article from TheGrio. They state that she has experienced

2221:

Hello, I’m wondering why you removed factual information from Bob McBride’s wiki page? This is information that has been clearly missing for a very long time and can easily be confirmed through marriage and birth records. Legally, Bob McBride has one biological daughter whom he had with his wife

4112:

Hi! Being that it was literally the week the world shut down, we were married in the back yard of a neighbor's home with 10 people. I can certainly supply or marriage license it that is necessary. What we would appreciate is that the exact location of our whereabouts - Newport, KY - be omitted.

1045:

my concern was the older lawsuits without any information about the eventual settlement, and wanting to at least give the last filing from accused. it reads as a group of disgruntled parents and teens, verses a group of very scurrilous criminals, and am trying to source some of the thousands of

671:

thanks for your suggestions regarding my rewrite. it's surely welcome. as this is a collaborative project, and as i rewrite articles for style, npov, sources, etc, and as i am a disinterested editor, I'm sure you'll have lots of good ideas. I'm not an interested editor in the topic. totally non

5310:

them, you were new once, too. Sometimes, on the other hand, they're a long-term editor; we have IP editors who've been helping the project for years, as well as registered editors who sometimes edit logged-out for whatever reason. Both are perfectly legal so long as they don't double-vote in a

4474:

We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your precious time. Gather your sources,

1806:

5453:

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please

3263:

Pavel Prigozhin is the son of Yevgeniy Prigozhin, a prominent Russian businessman with close ties to President Putin and the Russian Ministry of Defence. Yevgeniy Prigozhin is the funder and unofficial head of the Wagner Group, a Russia-based unincorporated military entity responsible for the

1849:

With desktop view and a window width of 1280 or more, the "See also" section heading is to the right of the last photo; the list wraps around the photo to the left margin. "Clear" forces the "See also" section to begin below the image so it's all in one column on the left, like it should be.

3948:

precious time. Gather your sources, scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced.

1525:

i though your question was rhetorical, as an experienced editor like yourself would know i moved it boldly without discussing it. seemed non controversial, now the various persons more inclined to bureaucracy and debate can have at it. thanks for the suggestions, and enjoy helping me edit

3638:

After the Islamization of the Ilkhanate, the Khan used a Persian name instead of Mongolian, and the original Mongolian language had no meaning and origin, which did not meet the standards of Knowledge. As for adai khan, I supplemented the notes in the history book. His source is already

5430: 2460:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 2795:

Thank you for fixing the Brittany Dawn article. I believe someone connected to this article has been removing content without discussion. I did restore some of it and did remove other content that isn't relevant to the article. If it doesn't look right, make a BOLD edit. Thanks,

4676:. It clearly states that unsourced information is not entertained at all, and if necessary, we should remove such content. I think you haven't read those guidelines properly. If you continue to revert my edits, especially those with unsourced information, then I will inform 5372:

You reverted one of my correct changes to an inccorection. Do people not fact check shit anymore and just blindly assume? Learn to know when people die, we use past tense in those cases, not present because a dead person can't be alive, therefore it should be WAS and :

590:. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged 867:

First, I would offer that my request is not a genre classification change; rather, my request is to simply qualify the classification, "sitcom", early in the narrative so the reader has a more accurate understanding regarding the show’s unique content. (Aside from

1853:

With a window width of about 900 or less, the References section is all in one narrow column between the left margin and the Official Languages box on the right. "Clear" forces the References section to begin below the boxes so that the full window width is used.

5010:

Today you made a series of reverts of completely appropriate edits. Introducing overlink violations. Restoring unsupported text without supplying RS refs. etc. Without any edit summaries on your part. Your multiple reverts were improper. Please undo them.

3413:. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be 4475:

scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced.

1807:

5286:

was just strange: the paragraph was cited to 2 good sources, as the other editor said, and what you actually did in that edit and others was remove the section heading?? Please give an edit summary that justifies/explains what you did in your edit.

4590:

Good afternoon, thanks for the heads up. I am of the mind that main theme composer would go to the infobox with the composers of individual episodes background music coming later in the article. That's quite a notable list, regardless. Cordially,

1197: 5433: 4082:

Hello, I am Walfredo Reyes, Jr's wife. He had asked me to include the brief statement about our wedding on his page. If you would be so kind as to not remove it again, both Wally and I would be appreciative. Kind regards, Kirsten de los Reyes

993:

Thank you for the heads up on that, and your instruction. I was trying to find places where the content couldbe altered to fit extant citations, and delete content for which i could not find an actual citation especially in promotional non

2618:

we function as a multiplicity. we celebrate the fractal nature of the human psyche. we speak in the royal we because we simply are. we don't have time for your suggestions, regardless of how well intended. we wish you well, all of us.

686:

They are not just my concerns. Multiple editors have the concerns as it’s unusual to rewrite an entire article. Please refrain. And if you have any issues do as you should by discussing them on the talk pages. Thank you so much.

2835:

as it suggests the current line up operates under the title you'd provided of 'Ian Anderson and the Jethro Tull Band'. I've seen no evidence that this is the case. If you do have evidence, it should be provided with the change.

5066: 5016: 4580: 2866:

Hello. I noticed you were helping clean up Knowledge by undoing vandalism which great. And I saw that you undid several edits on the same article back to back. There is a way to undo multiple edits at once. Check out

1829: 4756: 4685: 4632:. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reference, perhaps from the article you originally linked to. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 3700: 3675: 1987: 1205: 5382: 4698:

unfortunately, uncontentious edits similar to the ones you are quickly removing are likely still relevant, and as they are not biographical, i think I'll ask you to discuss these multiple changes on the talk

2265:

has accurate information on his wiki page. For example this statement “ He has a daughter, Elisa “ is missing a citation. (There is no evidence of this person’s biological relationship to Bob McBride cited.)

2408: 207: 4667:

for the information that is added, whether you add it or any other person does. Without reliable sources, there is absolutely no credibility to the article. Please read carefully about wiki guidelines in

1236: 2222:

Penelope McBride. The two worked very hard to keep their daughter out of the spotlight and media as she was growing up. She is well know as his daughter within Bob’s inner circles of the music industry.

4055:

Next time something like this happens, consider requesting protection instead (which in this case you won't have to; I will be putting the article under protection after I'm done with you and the IP).

553:

to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions

2937:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2423: 1440: 1041:

i thought the responses from the respondent were in the pdf documents cited in the same paragraph from the filings from the l petitioner, but should have included the page and line from the document.

3715:

It is accepted on Knowledge to include lineage of people. Mr Adams's lineage is of particular interest as his mother was a sporting celebrity, and his father Norwegian. Both have Knowledge articles

877:

and misleading generalizations (for instance, calling all the detectives "quirky" or "off the wall", and referring to Inspector Lugar as a "racist" ) would seem more likely to receive the Knowledge

1664:

I see you deleted the picture for David W. Dugan I inserted for his profile. The reason you gave was fair usage claims. Could you explain what the issue is so I can try to correct it? Thank you

594:. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 5208: 4561: 4584: 1118: 1185: 975: 4826:

we don't find them to be helpful, and we wish you would find the time to quickly locate sources or tag for citation needed, rather than deleting v established, non controversial content,

4743:. These templates are made in places where unsourced content should be removed. If you can provide reliable sources, then go ahead and add sources nobody will stop you. Please also read 1716:

or just add whatever comment you want to make. After the last word of your comment, click the signature button in the bottom line of the editor to sign and date the comment. Examples:

1624:

it's been a learning experience and the feedback has been helpful. it's been instructive watching this article expand organically, the process, arguments, and prose. on good behavior,

3367: 2953: 5447: 2353:

Hey, I hope to edit 'Ryan Tu' because his credited screen name in Taiwan in "Du Zheng Zhe" or "Tu Cheng Che" and would like to make this person's credit's as accurate as possible.

1112: 1051: 1003: 854: 839: 792: 761: 714: 680: 640: 624: 493: 460: 178: 77: 591: 286: 5131: 5109: 2922: 1401: 1389: 798: 635:

as written, the word 'parts' used twice in a longer sentence seemed confusing on the first read, but now 'discrete parts' almost seems redundant. thank you for clearing that up

394: 386: 5193: 2726:

thank you for pointing towards a wiki policy, and for attempting unbiased accuracy when editing. anything you can do to help us with our online encyclopedia is certainly welcome.

242:

holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

1246:! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 282: 5062: 5012: 4576: 3836:

i looked at it again, because this story is compelling. of course, you are correct. we're going back to the article, and checking it throughout for content. thanks again

3267:

with the Russian Ministry of Defence following the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation and the occupation of Eastern Ukraine by Russia-backed separatists.

1825: 858: 843: 4752: 4681: 4200: 3696: 3671: 2415: 2058: 2030: 1983: 1708:. This is the second time I noticed that you're not using the proper format, so I assume you're not aware of it. Please, start your line with an asterisk * and optionally 1108: 1047: 999: 850: 835: 788: 757: 710: 676: 636: 620: 546: 489: 456: 174: 74: 5455: 5336:

it's factual that at times i edit quickly when the new additions page is busy, and reading over the errors i can see where this could cause mistakes and misunderstanding.

5294:, on the other hand, didn't have any edit summaries so far as I can see. After seeing the section above concerning these, "Your reverts", I had a look and I have undone 3337: 2270: 2227: 4457:

thanks for helping edit Knowledge. the lede is fine as is, the edits you are creating are for the purpose of subtle mocking, and will be removed. have a Knowledge day,

2590:

kindly explain what are you on about? we have no idea what you're referencing, why you seem angry, or why you're communicating with us at this point. we wish you well,

5423: 5378: 4411: 3224: 1442: 4375:, this user is going to end up being a competence issue. There are so many edits that I can't say for sure, but I think DMNE2020 may have partially self-reverted. -- 966:

for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been

893: 828: 824: 5142: 3052:

useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the

2755:

useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the

1896:

useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the

1465: 1271: 723:

Ok do as you like. I’ll have to report for wiki violations given your lack of discussion on the issues per wiki policies. Again, your use of “us” is also suspect.

4132: 4118: 4088: 1588:

It depends on the page. Anything about hot American cable news is almost always "up for debate". But unilaterally rewriting Cypriot political history from 2004 is

1170:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

1226: 308:

rather than engaging in an edit war, otherwise stop removing "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" from the list of W.A.S.P.'s "notable" songs. Thanks. Have a great day!

522: 464: 278: 5409: 5401: 5353: 5345: 5239: 5231: 5179: 5171: 5089: 5081: 5043: 5035: 4991: 4983: 4917: 4897: 4889: 4843: 4835: 4802: 4776: 4768: 4730: 4713: 4705: 4658: 4592: 4551: 4515: 4479: 4458: 4424: 4340: 4325: 4269: 4215: 4180: 4144: 4098: 4064: 3952: 3837: 3826: 3769: 3747: 3735: 3655: 3623: 3588: 3348: 3333: 3284: 3250: 3234: 3174: 3162: 3135: 3085: 3024: 2890: 2851: 2816: 2780: 2727: 2689: 2620: 2591: 2555: 2532: 2430: 2398: 2378: 2368: 2337: 2281: 2266: 2251: 2223: 2206: 2109: 2072: 2044: 2010: 1957: 1927: 1872: 1811: 1770: 1685: 1625: 1578: 1529: 1482: 1178: 1124: 958:. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the 554: 323: 1991: 5107: 4863: 4810: 2183: 1248: 1090: 5097: 5070: 5051: 897: 385: 336: 192:

two times,but according to Billboard hot 100,it charted No.13,not No.1,I hope you can see the link of Billboard charts and change it the right way,thanks.

5446:

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the

5222: 4784: 4760: 4721: 2438: 5470: 5339:

without responding point by point in this forum, be assured I'm spending my editing today reading over your guide and incorporating it into my flurrying.

4128: 4114: 4084: 3095: 2988: 2630: 1387: 903: 300:

based on your claim that "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" were not "notable" because they didn't chart. They both charted (at least in Europe) according to

5417: 3374: 780: 614: 514: 971: 3780: 3704: 3679: 771:

Hi, you keep coming on my talk page. Again, I have asked you to discuss your article issues on the ARTICLE talk page. Not my talk page. Please do so.

450: 201: 4236: 3917: 3364: 3316: 2392: 772: 738: 724: 688: 658: 261:. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a 4689: 3368:

https://mag.elcomercio.pe/fama/andres-restrepo-el-actor-de-la-reina-del-flow-que-murio-de-covid-19-en-medellin-celebs-de-colombia-nnda-nnlt-noticia/

1701: 765: 718: 5204: 4905: 4747:

to understand which sources are considered reliable. But if you revert such edits where no credible source is provided, then I will have to inform

4204: 2980: 2419: 2062: 2034: 1353: 380: 108: 4208: 932: 4871: 4354: 4307: 4284: 2354: 1747: 1409: 1280: 193: 151: 145: 2815:

as is often the case with biographies, one persons fish is another person's whale. we appreciate you're helping keep the encyclopedia accurate.

1833: 1435: 655:

articles that I believe you intend to sandbox. But i'd be happy to discuss further on those talk pages once you initiate that. Thanks so much.

3370: 2768: 605:. Please discuss edits that have been reverted in the talk page and try to get some consensus before adding them back to the article. Thanks. 5267: 4063:) 07:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC) I've reviewed my contributions and agree with your assessment and course of action. thanks for the heads up, s 3124: 3017: 2659: 603: 5159: 3049: 2752: 1893: 1192: 834:

interesting take, one with which the arbitration kids will find disagreement. let me again check the relevant, and work through the logic.

5282:

is not much better than the default supplied by the software, "Reverted edit 12345 by User:XXXX". And your subsequent revert edit summary

4333: 3341: 1778: 1382: 5395:

sometimes, editors use wiki for pranks. i was aware in real time of the passing of an important person, and was just trying to keep real.

5168:

although notable within a certain narrow segment of the punk goth music fanbase, i couldn't find sufficient sources to justify inclusion.

5020: 4300: 3745: 1348: 746: 732: 696: 666: 182: 173:

thank you for your kind request, but i don't have the actual technical skills to help with that. however, I'm checking out out. good day

71: 4097:

could you point us to a wedding announcement or other materials to source the claim, we could create for you a citation for the claim.

3254: 1965: 3208: 2772: 4867: 3160: 2764: 1763: 1300: 579: 360: 3283:

sounds like they are worthy of their own article. I'll read the link, thank you for taking the time to bring that to our attention,

2274: 2231: 429:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 4348: 4282: 3310: 1732: 644: 599: 5386: 5137:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4471:

Thanks. Totally did not intend for it to be subtle mocking—-it is just the truth. The current lede doesn’t do her work justice.

3775:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

2066: 2038: 5263: 3797: 2397:

i might have been reverting a removal of previously cited and sourced content. i will look into it. thank you for the heads up.

1589: 649: 4136: 4127:

If you really need reassurance, check out their new documentary - The Last Band on Stage - our wedding/marriage is highlighted.

4122: 5361: 4487: 4466: 3648: 2900: 5247: 3845: 2191: 4851: 4452: 3934: 3817: 3551: 3398: 3382: 3193: 3182: 1937: 1420: 1296: 356: 5283: 5279: 4395: 4362: 4152: 4106: 2298: 1951: 5259: 4407: 4315: 4255: 4223: 3809: 3719: 3640: 3220: 2976: 1793: 497: 124: 5327: 5266:. It's big of you to admit that; thank you. However, while recentism is a valid concern, the concern for balance that you 4999: 3332:

I know of this change first hand, since I attended the consecration Mass for his installation just a couple of hours ago.

2884: 2576:] 2nd revert. Thus I warned you before you got to 3RR (as in revert, and not just altering what other users had written). 2367:

we seem to be going with the english language cited press version. thank you for helping create a fantastic encyclopedia.

168: 4968: 4444: 4092: 4018: 3604: 889: 820: 737:

For the record, you’ve been asked by other users to discuss your issues on the article talk pages and have not done so.

571: 273: 5295: 4432: 2315: 1604: 1262:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 5187: 5061:

you fail to restore the edits, let's involve an admin, who can block whichever one of us is not following wp policy. --

4498: 4415: 2528:

he is a vandalism reverter, perhaps you're referring to someone with a specific bone to pick. we don't play favorites.

2384: 2216: 2167:

I am the owner of idea scuba USA I have edited the page and somebody keeps deleting my edits I do not appreciate that.

1858: 1801: 1651: 189: 93: 4977:

I'm going to go over my revisions, this seems to be a topic of which you have some knowledge and significant interest.

4857: 433:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––

317: 3988: 3358: 3304: 3277: 2494: 2168: 1102: 963: 262: 4820:

hello fellow wikipedia editor, and thank you for taking the time to engage with us over the content you're deleting.

4523: 3155: 4911: 4735:

Not only biographical articles but any article that is unsourced then it shall be removed immediately. Check these

4572: 4567: 4550:

moved content to after the info box would be a better description, and thank you for asking. have a Knowledge day,

4306:

I edited my own page with publicly verifiable information. And then some unknown person removed all my edits. Why?

2809: 1917: 1759: 1743: 1728: 1556: 1512: 1086: 67: 45: 41: 5333:

that was absolutely the nicest correction possible, thank you for taking the time to instruct me on these matters.

4823:

we are of the mind that the edits you were committing were tendentious, and being perpetrated for unknown reasons.

3365:

https://www.eltiempo.com/cultura/cine-y-tv/murio-andres-restrepo-hijo-del-actor-fabio-restrepo-por-covid-19-646839

2682: 2009:

use your knowledge to make solid cited additions to this topic, that would be our suggestion. be safe out there,

4806: 4506: 3530: 2972: 1139: 1120: 583: 4542: 4244: 3449: 3177:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months 1790: 1404:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months 1285:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

483: 4736: 4390: 3999: 3633: 3578: 2461: 1636: 1184:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

1035: 987: 250: 3727: 3509: 2720: 1476:

i have been reading and re-reading suggestions from other editors and watching data come across the desk here.

5075:

thank you again for taking the time to help instruct me regarding what i consider to be unconstructive edits.

4437: 4277: 3665: 3414: 3244: 1866: 1675: 1212: 1075:, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the 704:

your seem to be very strident as regards your various multiple edits, and i understand how that can be hard.

331: 28:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to

4263: 3558:

have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your

3371:

https://www.elespectador.com/entretenimiento/gente/muere-andres-restrepo-productor-e-hijo-de-fabio-restrepo/

3228: 2096: 1976:

What talk section are you talking about? Some of the sources that are cited have questionable information.

1142:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

974:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your

562:

is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means

5253: 4007: 3960: 3942: 3802: 3684: 3559: 2946: 2477: 2176: 2141: 2052: 1495:

A thread has been opened about this at the article talk page, so you need to comment there immediately. --

129: 5141:, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can 4814: 4616:

have been removed because you cited the information you added to another Knowledge article or an external

4188: 3779:, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can 3473: 3079: 2673:

while not logged in. I keep an eye on this fairly sensitive page to try to keep it reasonably troll-free.

2362: 2157: 1492:

Please answer the question and provide a diff to the discussion where the consensus for the move is found.

5299: 4980:

i encourage you to revert or fix what you've indicated is a mistake, and I'll look over it in the morrow,

4923: 4650: 4072: 4011: 2958: 2845: 2481: 1755: 1739: 1724: 559: 550: 98: 4372: 2612: 2585: 2570:, as all of the above was added by you, but appears to be trying to pretend to not be you. As to where, 2515: 268:

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is

5291: 4862:

I get yku hate arabs amd want to kill all arabs now but please stop reverting my edits zipnist headahh

4645: 4077: 4034: 3903: 3612: 3502: 2861: 2802: 2182:

I would like to know why you are deleting facts? I own IDEA Scuba and edited it but you keep deleting?

1847: 1695: 1019: 575: 4952: 4193: 3975: 3938: 3129: 2489: 1913: 1098: 1072: 587: 341:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2140:

or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your

1846:

Because you are using mobile view, you probably didn't see the purpose of my edit that you reverted.

137:

Is it ok to make a help request regarding women related articles if following topics interest you?

4296: 4259: 3813: 3723: 3644: 2291: 2187: 2137: 2003:

you seem quite passionate as regards this topic, whereas we are just an encyclopedist without bias.

1797: 1705: 1286: 1161: 1068: 1046:

clients who perhaps had other experiences. thank you for some new reading material. it's a climb.

1023: 951: 313: 5145:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 3783:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 2875:. Just wanted to make sure you knew. If you have any questions feel free to ask. Have a good one. 2545:

Your complaint has been addressed, your oddly captioned photo revision will remain in the article.

4448: 4291:

The user mass reverted all of your edits to a page. What do you think? I am not sure what to do.

4172: 3608: 3101: 2880: 2311: 1892:

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find

1824:

You continue to do this - and especially with controversial unexplained reverts, you should not.

1089:

The same applies for removing the disambiguation template. There is an ongoing discussion at DRN

566:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the

5271: 4502: 4401: 3992: 3984: 3890: 3406: 2664: 2608: 2581: 2511: 2473: 2457: 2388: 1862: 1784: 1600: 1479:

people inclined to snowball will debate the move, but i think it's non controversial and solid.

630: 567: 56: 3378: 3347:

thank you for helping edit. i may have misunderstood your intent, thanks for the information,

5323: 4948: 4060: 4030: 2934: 2797: 2172: 2144:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 1015: 16: 5467: 4628:, Knowledge and other wikis should not be used in citations because they are not considered 2551:

thank you for taking the time to bring this to our attention, re: geijutsu wa bakuhatsu da.

5217: 4673: 4571:

anything exhaustive, I realize this is better left for community discussion (as started in

4538: 4240: 3692: 3204: 2945:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2092: 1979: 1905: 1431: 1290: 1267: 1222: 1094: 947: 816: 776: 742: 728: 692: 662: 539:

it contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

510: 479: 442: 422: 350: 305: 301: 258: 244: 235: 222: 89: 5461:

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

2087:

Hi, sorry, if you saw my previous message, it was in error, I clicked the wrong username.

8: 5138: 4528: 4292: 4228: 4003: 3897: 3776: 3567: 3445: 3057: 2760: 2678: 2603:

one person, or if you continue to edit war I will report you. I will not warn you again.

2465: 2280:

take responsibility for your additions. please don't add uncited information. thank you.

1901: 1671: 1057: 610: 309: 5443:

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

3685:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Yang_(surname)&diff=prev&oldid=1135227129

2871:

and it will tell you how to do it. Wanted to say something so you don't get flagged for

2688:

i know nothing regarding the topic, outside of my field, thank you for the corrections.

1293:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 751:

not sure why your are continuing to harass me into not editing a page, but please stop.

353:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 5278:

Also, while I'm happy to see you using edit summaries while reverting at that article,

4621: 4492: 4385: 4358: 4311: 3563: 3469: 3320: 3151: 2994: 2876: 2841: 2468:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about

2358: 2307: 2153: 2145: 1550: 1506: 1459: 1258: 810:

I kindly ask that you re-instate the requested edit, the content of which is accurate.

563: 197: 117: 4406:

This user is trying to hide the truth by deleting recently discovered facts off pages

3622:

perhaps the unsourced biographical information needs a source? have an excellent day,

2472:. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant 4922:

Recently you seem to have reverted a new user edit vide dif 1152082128 @ the article

4641: 4633: 3536: 3440: 3425: 3410: 3120: 3053: 3034: 3013: 2916: 2872: 2756: 2655: 2604: 2577: 2507: 1897: 1882: 1656: 1596: 1544: 1500: 1453: 1378: 1344: 1335:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1076: 959: 937: 928: 376: 367:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

5319: 5127: 4964: 4168: 4056: 4026: 3765: 3571: 3547: 3233:

i rechecked my edit, and you are absolutely correct. thank you for the correction,

3186: 2965: 2930: 2790: 2748: 2737: 2469: 2303: 1647: 1413: 1031: 983: 864:

Thank you for taking the time to offer a detailed response — very much appreciated.

474:...is a licensed pilot, otherwise there would be no license for the FAA to revoke. 291: 164: 141: 44:, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please 5212: 5005: 4933: 4740: 4534: 4049: 3925: 3882: 3618:

thank you for taking the time to help us create an excellent online encyclopedia.

3402: 3387: 3300: 3273: 3200: 2716: 2506:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2348: 2129: 2088: 2082: 1427: 1321: 1263: 1218: 506: 475: 434: 297: 269: 85: 33: 5307: 4929: 4796: 4669: 4233:

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM WRITING LIES AND CONTROVERSY YOU DO NOT KNOW THIS PERSON .

4045: 3911: 3555: 3478: 3327: 2942: 2868: 2826: 2708: 2702: 2674: 2636: 2567: 2524:

where exactly do you find evidence for saintstephen000 engaging in an edit war?

2498: 2133: 2026: 1947: 1841: 1667: 1157: 1080: 967: 606: 469: 397:, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 104: 5122:

Hello, Saintstephen000. It has been over six months since you last edited the

4829:

we could be wrong, but we're going to tag along with you for a while and help.

3760:

Hello, Saintstephen000. It has been over six months since you last edited the

3173:

Hello, Saintstephen000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that

1400:

Hello, Saintstephen000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that

5123: 4748: 4744: 4677: 4625: 4602: 4377: 3761: 3710: 3465: 3178: 3147: 3045: 2938: 2837: 2162: 2149: 2125: 1405: 1107:

we fixed it, therefore dispute settled. thank you for helping edit Knowledge

754: 430: 342: 112: 49: 5431:

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

3455: 3219:

Spanish female artist in Spain according to Spotify and Sony. What's wrong?

3084:

it is a nice standardization, the availability of forms and such. thank you

4664: 4637: 4629: 4040:

Sorry I had to do this; you seem like a pretty reasonable guy, but a) this

3966: 3924:. Before making edits in this topic area, please familiarise yourself with 3921: 3885:. Your behavior on this page is subject to special rules. You must follow: 3146:) contains the current date, as all other signatures you'll see around do. 3116: 3112: 3009: 3005: 2651: 2647: 2409:

My edits are based on fact. Your edits are harmful and seem rooted in bias.

1738:

Wait. Blend into eventual featured article 'Trial and Incarceration of...'

1540: 1496: 1449: 1374: 1370: 1359: 1340: 1336: 1308: 1145: 1079:. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been 924: 920: 408: 402: 398: 372: 368: 107:

by changing the external URL that you added to a reference. You might find

63: 29: 5264:

admitted you had probably been carried away while patrolling for vandalism

5367: 4960: 4613: 4249: 4164: 4017:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

3878: 3512: 3484: 3213: 3105: 3061: 2832: 1643: 1153: 1027: 979: 909: 418: 414: 160: 5377:

I hope you understand your blunder and don't do it again in the future.

5207:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

4512:

it doesn't belong in the lede. sufficiently covered in its own section.

4021:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 2949:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2627:) please leave us alone. again, you don't seem to understand what we do 2456:

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an

529: 52:, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. 4497:

You deleted an edit on Lamjarred. What was your thinking on the issue?

3859: 3296: 3269: 3258: 2998: 2926:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2712: 2670: 1026:

and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

955: 248:

to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Knowledge. The page on

2136:

for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please

1256:

questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the

4974:

thank you for taking the time to help me learn and grow as an editor.

4877:

thank you for taking the time to give me feedback on my recent edits.

3850: 3603:

Stop changing my edits to the Tyler Styer page or I will report you.

2907: 2640: 2444: 2020: 1943: 1235: 1063: 1010: 208:

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Iot ritual.jpeg

5032:

thank you for taking the time to help keep my encyclopedia accurate,

4951:, I suppose, explaining why their edit can not be retained @ their 4880:

I'll take a look at them again for the problems you are referencing.

5398:

thanks for the conversation about something with which i also care,

5150: 4157: 3874: 3788: 3443:

you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting

2711:. Also, the growth rate is different to the natural increase rate. 2449: 1132: 4926:. I could not find any mention of the reason in the edit summary. 950:. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed 5318:

Thank you again for helping to protect and improve Knowledge :-)

5262:, where you had taken another look at the edits you reverted and 4941: 4421:

Hello, thank you for helping up edit Knowledge. have a nice day,

3598: 1327: 701:

i rewrite entire articles for style, noov, sourcing, prose, ect.

4562:

Reminder: always double-check to which revision you're reverting

3100: