610:
converting it to a redirect, the article had six citations. Citation #1 is HBO's hosting of the special (not independent or significant coverage), #3 is a press release published on
Broadway World (not a reliable source, not independent), and #2, #4, #5, and #6 are database entries (not reliable or significant). Rotten Tomatoes often has links to significant coverage (in the critics reviews section), but in this case the only article isn't actually even a review of the piece, it's a Haaretz piece on comedy specials more broadly and doesn't have enough coverage to establish notability on its own. Examples of significant coverage would be full length reviews, or academic papers that discuss the subject.
220:. The two sources thing is primarily a rule of thumb. A synagogue, and especially an old synagogue, is unlikely to be terribly controversial, so I as a new page patroller would not be overly concerned that relying on only one source would cause neutrality issues. The issue then is whether enough had actually been written in the book to establish notability. I would suggest including actual quotes from the book to demonstrate the quality and depth of coverage. I can't guarantee that such an article would make it past AfD (especially without even seeing the source or the hypothetical article), but I think it's worth a shot.
686:), which is to say that bold edits (including converting articles to redirects) are encouraged and don't require prior notice, so long as everyone is civil in discussing changes if a bold edit turns out to be controversial. Your contributions have not been deleted: if you think you can demonstrate the subject's notability, you can absolutely revert my edit and add more sources. If you'd like some time to work on the article without other editors interfering, we can also move it to Draft-space where you can work on it unmolested. That having been said, I'd suggest making sure that you're familiar with
165:, I marked it as needing more sources because the entire Architecture section has no footnotes, and 2 sources is essentially the minimum amount of sources for a page to meet notability requirements, especially if one of the sources is not available online and thus of minimal use to readers (offline sources are very much allowed, but it's nice to be able to provide online literature for readers as well). What's more, the Ukrainian language version of the article has many sources, so it didn't seem like a tall order to request additional citations.
403:
3963:
1297:
31:
3321:
865:
331:
2221:
3935:, I think that you may be mischaracterizing other people's edits. Nothing in their behavior on that talk page suggests to me in the slightest that they are holocaust deniers. While there likely should be some coverage of the intersection between racism and antisemitism in the article, adding a polemical paragraph to the lead with an incredibly weak source without changing any of the rest of the article is emphatically
2017:, tagged it with a CSD template, or potentially taken some other action to make sure the redirect is pointing at a useful target. In principle, we should have always been reviewing redirects (or at least since we started reviewing new pages in general), but due to a software bug, redirects were silently slipping off the new page queue sooner than regular articles, and thus most of them were not being reviewed.
1657:
3492:
419:
4254:, thanks for the kind words. If you think you can qualify for autopatrol privileges, go for it, although I think admins are paying more attention to article-creation history than redirects. I tried looking up your track record on xtools to get a better idea of whether you're likely to get the privileges or not, but it looks like the website is down so unfortunately I can't offer much more advice.
2520:
284:, haha I was actually about to propose that myself. I'm a software engineer so while I haven't built any Knowledge bots yet, I think I can actually do this myself once I've read through some documentation. Other examples of uncontroversial redirects include redirects to biographies with varying usage of initials and full names, redirects that vary only in their usage of diacritics, etc.
1048:
3633:, all new redirects go to the new article queue where someone looks over them. "Reviewing" them removes them from the queue. There was nothing wrong with the Triplemania (2019) redirect but I do come across a non-trivial amount of vandalism, redirects pointing to the wrong targets, and redirects which should be disambiguations so I'd say it's still important as a whole.
2788:. Bear in mind that Pr has been doing this since 2017, they've hijacked several articles and effectively run them into the ground, they've been told twice that this isn't acceptable, and they still suggest adding more references to Open Space to try to artificially inflate its notability; the issue is rampant, chronic, and seemingly intractable. I completely agree about
4197:. Generally, when a subject is already covered in a section of another article, it's best to expand that section before splitting into another article. Only when the section becomes so long that it's making the article it's currently in awkward (i.e. 3+ paragraphs, 3+ reliable independent sources) does it start to make sense to split it off into its own article.
3159:, thanks, I've gone ahead and supported the proposal at Charismatic Christianity. I think I'm going to refrain from voting on the Church invisible one, as I honestly don't know much about the subject and feel like a poor judge (not that I know a ton about evangelical Christianity, but I know a purely redundant article when I see one).
3047:, apologies for any offense. In the future, if you're copying information from one Knowledge page to another, please provide attribution in your edit summary so that others know where the info is coming from. Additionally, it appears that even if you didn't intentionally add copyright-violating material, the material itself
1489:, this makes sense. However, I've also noticed that not all the pages I create get reviewed. I'm not really clear how pages are chosen to be reviewed. Are there specific namespaces that NPP tends to patrol, and ones they don't? Is there a limited number of volunteers, and pages expire from being "new" after a month?
4150:
Good morning, Rosguill. I thought the information should be there, but as you need to expand. I come from the
Knowledge in Spanish, so I do not know much about the rules of Knowledge in English. I do not know if you could help me, in my editions in this Knowledge. I ask you to be my tutor. Thanks for
1533:
For the last few weeks, I've taken it upon myself to review all redirects that are about to slip off the back of the queue, and we still have a fair amount of breathing room on the article queue so right now all new pages should get reviewed within three months, although we are understaffed and could
1185:
I actually wasn't the editor who made this change, but rather I reviewed the redirect created by another editor. That having been said, looking at the article that you've restored on that page, I agree with the decision made by the other editor to change the article of the redirect, as the article as
4304:
Hi, Rosguill, Since one of my pages (on a Kpop artist) was deleted by you I decided to proceed with caution. I would really appreciate your help and guidance. I created a draft page which I had submitted. And was declined and asked to add citation. I am pretty sure its done. And I want to submit the
3998:
for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and
655:
Maybe it's my fault, but I still feel like my time as an editor for
Knowledge has been stifled and ruined by editors like you who make choices on a whim without comparisons to similar topics. Maybe instead of reverting all the work I did, you could have sent me a message or commented on it first and
170:
Having read your comment on the talk page, I would just add that you shouldn't take the "Low importance" thing personally or let that get you discouragedāā"low" is the default rating when assigning an article to a project, so unless I'm personally very familiar with a given subject I generally leave
265:
Hello and thanks for reviewing several redirects I created recently. I wonder if it might help you to request a bot to auto-review certain types of uncontentious new pages, such as those called Foo (disambiguation) which consist only of #REDIRECT ] and some templates. Yes, an editor full of beans
3774:
and you was wrong. Those summaries wasn't copyrighted because they were original summaries written all the way from 2009. Mircosoft added the series that site in 2016 and copied the summary from here. This isn't the first time I seen that happen as other another site I use does the same thing when
2697:
starts off looking like a database entry, but if you scroll down, it's actually several decent-length reviews by separate writers for the site (dubbed "experts", hence the site name). I've honestly never heard of the source before, but they have an editorial board so I'd say they're good for music
4388:
coverage. So even if the three sources that I wasn't able to review were top tier, this article would still be just barely passing notability guidelines. I would suggest filling out the existing citations so that other editors can actually review them, and also finding more coverage in additional
4360:
could very well be significant coverage in a reliable source! But you linked to an entire edition of a newspaper in a language most editors don't speak, making it almost impossible for them to verify the coverage's quality. When citing long texts, and especially long texts in languages other than
2740:
All in all, I think we're at a level that it's appropriate to keep the article. That having been said, Pr also attempted to bully me after I nominated one of their articles for deletion by threatening to nominate an article I wrote for deletion. I think that at this point we may want to consider
171:
that as the set rating. What's more, many WikiProjects are aware of how this works, and specifically go over new articles listed as low in order to update them with a more accurate evaluation, although that may not be the case if the articles you work on are not supported by active WikiProjects.
3977:
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not
2631:, I actually hadn't seen that, thanks for bringing it to my attention. That having been said, given that it's based on one source and a US government source at that, I'd almost be surprised if it didn't have a pov issue. Unfortunately, they didn't explain specifically what looked off to them.
2971:
Both subjects are somewhat notable, but need a massive cleanup. I am not very active on the project now, but if the community decides to take action and cleanup some of their contributions, I am ready to help. Also left a comment at the reopened case about possible COI of the user discussed.
2765:
I'll admit I don't personally think this is enough to qualify for a weak keep, but I also won't try to argue the point, since it's difficult for me to verify the significance of those articles due to a language barrier. I'll leave the nomination up and see if anyone else chimes in, and if an
4049:
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for
609:
for inclusion in
Knowledge. Thus, I redirected it to the article for Bill Maher, as I explained in the edit summary. You can revert this edit by clicking undo in the history, but I would caution you against doing this unless you can actually demonstrate the article's notability. Prior to my
4337:? Looking through the sources of that article, I agree with the editor that declined the submission that notability hasn't been established. In order to establish notability, you need significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Looking through the sources attached to the article:
4011:
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page
Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
1240:, it seems to specifically recommend making such redirects only to sections or anchors in the article, which I don't believe was the case for the Bull baronet links. At any rate, I'm not particularly invested in the article so if you think it's appropriate to add them back, go ahead.
837:
Please also be aware that
Knowledge has to take copyright violations very seriously. Unless a source specifically states that its content is free and in the public domain or released through a relevant Creative Commons license, you cannot copy text from it into a Knowledge article.
4179:
are a bit stricter on enWiki than on esWikiāāwhile on esWiki you can make arguments just based on a subject's real-world importance, on enWiki it is critical to actually be able to provide multiple examples of independent coverage in reliable sources before starting an
199:. (There are 2 new books from Sergey Kravtsov about synagogues in Wolhynia that I consider to obtain too). So if I cite these well researched books and no other source (especially online sources, which might not be available at all) will more sources be required?--
2601:
and tagged them yourself as being dependent on minimal sources. That's fine with me from the NPP standpoint, as the community can expand those articles in due time, but are you aware that someone else has questioned the neutrality of the
Somalia article? Later,
1561:
How about templates and userspace pages then? Most of the pages I have created thus far are one of the two, though I hope to create some new articles in the future. I might be interested in helping with NPP after I get more experience with article creation.
194:. You may have noticed that I work on the German wikipedia as well, and there I have created more articles on (Ukrainian) synagogues, which I would like to create in English as well. For some synagogues there is only 1 reliable source, which are the books:
4040:
and have no intention of returning to
Knowledge. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
1190:. In order to demonstrate notability, you need to provide more citations to significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. In your draft, sources #1 and #3 are not significant coverage, and #2 is not independent. For more information, please see
682:, so my main task on Knowledge is reviewing new articles and determining whether they comply with notability guidelines (among other issues). As far as sending a message first, editing etiquette is governed by the process of Bold, Revert, Discuss (i.e.
3051:
a copyright violation. If you see episode summaries like the ones in the
Railgun article, you should probably do a background check, as they are an extremely common (and with a little practice, easy to notice) type of copyright violation (you can use
3905:
Nick has a track record of stalking and disruptively reverting my contributions to wikipedia. I was hoping Nick could be blocked from editing, or that a report be submitted against him, at the very least. His abusive behavior is getting out of hand.
992:. I thought consensus was to include all, not just CSD and Prods. There were strong arguments to leave all AfD articles as unreviewed. I think DGG's Support iVote explains it best (last one in the discussion). Directly under that discussion is the
721:... Given that I had the presence of mind to mention the category in the edit summary when creating it, I probably should have made it around to the conclusion that it should go in the page too... oh well, I'll try to remember next timeĀ :) ā{{u|
1349:
across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the
651:
In comparison the the other similar entries, I just dont understand why you chose to do that. I modeled what I wrote after the other entries for his other specials. I even purchased the special so I could watch it and document things about it.
4409:
This makes sense and I kind-of understand what needs to be done. Thank you for taking your time and explaining about things. I'm sure these points will help me not just with this article but other original articles I will write in the future.
2653:
I really feel like I need guidance in dealing with Pr12402, the editor who brought you to the deletion nomination thread for Open Space; their consistently disruptive editing is ruining the articles they've effectively hijacked, most notably
2775:
As far as the threat goes, that's really low; I would be interested to see where this happened. I actually tried to discuss Pr on ANI, but I was told to "leave them a custom note and help them out" and that I should assume good faith.
4202:
I unfortunately don't really have the bandwidth to do much tutoring right now, but if you have any other questions I can do my best to answer them. If you're looking for an experienced editor to mentor you more thoroughly, check out
3901:
some seem to disagree that the Jews were discriminated against. These seem to be the same people who believe that the holocaust never existed. Nick is just a really bad person. At this point, I believe I need administrative help.
1527:
is 1 month. Pages that miss the cutoff date are silently taken off the queue as if they had been reviewed. We only realized that there were separate cutoff dates a few weeks ago, so most redirects were not being patrolled until
196:
Heavenās Gates. Masonry synagogues in the territories of the former PolishāLithuanian
Commonwealth.' and Heavenās Gates. Wooden synagogues in the territories of the former PolishāLithuanian Commonwealth.' by Maria and Kazimierz
239:, thanks. As these books are definitely the best source available (and in English too), I will use them for further articles (and try to include other sources from the internet where they are available in English or German).--
814:
criteria that are usable only for articles that are obvious violations of Knowledge's policies, and a discussion is not required for an admin to delete the article once it has been tagged, unlike the more formal processes of
779:
I did not agree for deletion of page of Jolanta Omilian, of course I can correct it and use her www as source of information. There is no the button button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". Can you please help me?
3586:
3209:
989:
2079:
thanks for this explanation, I also came here because of a similar notice and was curious about this process. At first glance I thought it was notice of a problem, I didn't expect "notice: there was no problem"
4024:, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which
1854:
Hi, thanks for reviewing the new redirect I created. I see you have added the R from alternative name tag, should this be the R from predecessor company name tag as St Hild's merged with St Bedes's to form the
3999:
sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at
4282:ā and hold the opinion that redirects and stubs take little time to patrol. I'm not sure how that squares with a backlog that is a month deep, but it certainly answers my question about whether to apply. --
4361:
English, you need to provide sufficient page-and-section information in the citation for people to find the text that you're citing. Alternatively, you can quote the relevant section in the citation.
3830:
Hi Rosguill, I've seen that you recently reviewed several articles that I've written, and I thought it was only appropriate for me to thank you for your efforts. Keep up the good work on wikipedia!
4233:
Hi! Thanks for your service to the community, particularly in regards to patrolling new pages. Your work taught me to include appropriate rcat templates to new redirects, which improves usability.
2178:
1017:, no worries it happens. At any rate, the implementation discussion it seems that ICPH said it was done? But also, I don't think there was anything to change in how the script interacts with AfD.
3555:
1731:
3909:
People like him also launched several smear-campaigns, simply because I wrote about some things that are well-sourced and well-documented that does not fit their chauvinistic point of view.
2946:
2917:
which was noticed by TheTechnician27. In any case, if there is going to be any sort of investigation for disruptive editing, I can help out and you might want to contact Bbarmadillo too. ---
3808:, all apologies. Feel free to add back that content, although I would suggest noting the mirror in the edit summary or on the talk page so that someone else does not make the same mistake.
3272:
but saw that you already added 2 maintenance tags. You are also a NPP, so I figured it would be good to confirm that you haven't reviewed it already (it isn't marked as such yet). Thanks,
4334:
1589:, oops, you're absolutely correct. Re templates and userspace, I don't think we have any review system in place for stuff outside of mainspace. You can find out more about the patrol at
415:
Thank you for providing R tags on some of the countless artist-to-record label redirects I've created. They've been serving as a reminder for me to actually use those tags more often.
3228:
2664:, and I feel like I have nowhere to turn to address this, the admins included. I was hoping you might be willing to help guide me, or to hear me out as a fellow editor. All the best,
1169:
Kindly let me know the possible reasons for the same. The Principal Mutual Fund page is a division of Principal_Financial_Group and represents Indian product offerings of the parent.
105:
4036:
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are
2846:
Kind of unrelated, but I really like the article. It's well-written, it's an appropriate length, and all of the information is sourced. I don't know if it helps or not, but I found
1722:
1321:
3223:
4305:
article. But I am worried if it would be declined again or if any changes is required I'll be allowed to make it or deleted directly. I would like you to let me know the process.
3176:
471:
467:
451:
4236:
I've created something like 200 redirects so far (of which none have been deleted) and am wondering, should I apply for the autopatrolled right to help decrease your backlog? --
3029:
I didn't copyright any info. That was already on the main episode page before I separated it into a new page. Get your facts straight first before wrongfully accusing somebody.
1351:
2361:
No need for apologies lol, we're all here to help! Thinking about it perhaps I should have dropped you a line, but I did not notice you were TWing until a few minutes agoĀ :Ā¬)
4357:
does not have enough information in the citation for me to find the relevant source. You could amend this by providing a link, more complete citation information, or a quote.
2780:
correctly pointed out that this needed "more than a nice word". Nonetheless, my concerns were effectively completely brushed off by the admin, and I'm at least thankful that
832:. However, unless you can find significant coverage of the subject in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject, the article will likely be deleted again.
3053:
3712:
1520:, currently, pages in the new page queue are split between redirects and articles. Due to some sloppy code, the backlog cutoff for articles is 3 months, but the cutoff for
2206:
1257:
1492:
Anyway, I'll probably be turning off these notifications, since I don't see much benefit in receiving them; I only care if a page I create has been reviewed and deleted.
4069:
Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at
4066:
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
447:
4107:
1141:. I would suggest that you read through the concerns raised in that discussion and make sure that you address them in any future drafts of the article that you write.
3406:
2055:
3256:
2688:, I don't blame you one bit, Pr clearly has no idea how notability guidelines work. Luckily, I speak Russian, so it's a bit easier for me to go through the sources.
133:
1690:
3204:
2471:
is 1993 it is already created by other editor but i have created Other Languages (Bhojpuri) film not related to each other any Ange so please undo this artical
1110:
4070:
1285:
2191:
2180:
1410:
1137:. However, the issue with the article is that the version you wrote did not sufficiently address the issues raised as part of an earlier deletion discussion
3463:
1511:
4091:
3732:
3115:
2534:
2074:
2046:
2028:
1795:
1449:
1320:
that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the
722:
810:), ie the article was almost entirely copied from a copyrighted course that was itself a promotional website and not a reliable source. These are special
3994:
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please
3956:
3844:
546:
2937:
1124:
1604:
1581:
1545:
1376:
513:
3760:
3872:
2820:
1910:
771:
3576:
541:
147:, but nobody seems to bother. Maybe you would be so kind to tell me which statement is unsourced (please read the given source before you answer).--
4275:
4112:
2902:
2884:
2865:
2838:
2807:
2756:
1938:
1781:
1362:
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the
789:
577:
508:
248:
231:
208:
182:
4140:
3600:
2959:
2642:
2528:
1971:
1943:
1642:
1614:
1105:
1077:
928:
4344:
is a splash page for a magazine issue that I was not able to review directly. You could provide quotes from the cited article to help with this.
3986:
submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
3662:
3644:
3561:
Hello there, it appears that you have mistakenly deleted or forgot to file the deletion discussion entry for the RfD initiated by you. See this
3554:
2410:
3819:
3562:
3241:
3230:
3067:
2981:
2382:
2296:, I'm a bit confused, how is a third-party tag inappropriate? Although if you're expanding the article to address the issue it's a moot point.
2129:
2042:
2000:
1801:
1480:
441:
118:
107:
3950:
3788:
3785:
3782:
3779:
3776:
2370:
2344:
2325:
2307:
2089:
2004:
706:
640:
621:
156:
4222:
3019:
2579:
2101:
1844:
3726:
3542:
3523:
3507:
3483:
1902:
1888:
959:
766:
4400:
3189:
3178:
1152:
1138:
922:
849:
3305:
3170:
3095:
2504:
1331:
Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
1251:
313:
295:
2991:
2551:
1028:
1009:
979:
1219:, the circular redirects were in place so that, when those redirects become articles, nothing further needs to be done (as suggested at
388:
143:
Hello, some weeks ago you stated that this article lacks sufficient citations. I gave a statement about that on the relevant talk-page (
4291:
4283:
4265:
4251:
4237:
3400:
3290:, I would hop over to the talk page for the articleāāit was approved at AfC, but some of the provided sources turned out to be about a
738:
2622:
2013:, it means that I looked at the redirect and assessed that it was in fact an appropriate redirect. Otherwise, I would have sent it to
3678:"obristan above all" appears in one of the endings to the game and on the topic of obristan it's a fictional country inside the game
2443:
1575:
1505:
1205:
1868:
3345:
2543:
1270:
1259:
4323:
4245:
3926:
2824:
2262:
1423:
1223:ā I'm not qualified to decide the likelihood of those becoming articles, but I saw no harm in leaning towards the possibility).
433:
3912:
3038:
2873:, thanks! Btw I messaged Oshwah with more of the information brought up here and they agree that we should reopen the ANI case.
1473:
352:
4204:
4079:
2914:
2732:
1856:
1682:
1437:
888:
596:
360:
917:
3701:
3143:
2316:
Yes, and a little miffed that I got 2 ecs because of your banner change after I put the right one there (while adding refs!)
1417:
665:
3799:
4228:
4103:
3375:
1763:
is not responsive any longer or his user id is blocked. May i kindly request you to review and approve my article please ā
1461:
138:
4166:
2679:
2430:
point 4 d), and also has very wide coverage. I'm not sure why but the redirect came up on my watchlist. I have prepared a
1849:
1069:
2932:
2617:
799:
3150:
275:
4121:
3853:
3741:
3655:
3624:
3617:
3237:
3185:
3127:
3000:
2705:
2660:
2560:
2391:
2187:
2173:
2110:
2038:
1996:
1952:
1919:
1623:
1266:
1227:
1158:
1086:
908:
as requested. It is certainly a quite slanted article; wondering what you think of what I put on the talk page for it.
747:
522:
474:
of that article. Could you please take a look when you have a moment? It should only take a moment or two. Thank you. (
369:
114:
1780:, I actually haven't done AfC reviews and am not sure what the exact process is. I would suggest starting a thread in
733:
4058:, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
4028:
have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
3839:
3093:
2480:
1713:
1134:
829:
1893:
No problem, both tags are completely new to me and it is good that you are ensuring that new redirects get reviewed.
1115:
I noticed the tag for deletion a little too late and now the page is already deleted. What can i do in this regard??
4299:
3745:
3734:
3281:
3135:
2510:
1166:
I have noticed that you've reviewed my Principal Mutual Fund and now its redirecting to Principal_Financial_Group.
4099:
3857:
3846:
2287:
1807:
1692:
1457:
1747:
3913:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Xinjiang_Pages_and_User%3AAlexkyoung
3697:
3333:
2598:
2594:
2590:
2584:
526:
515:
3890:
3649:
A redirect is not an article. Seems pointless to have it show up in the new article queue. That's just me.
2489:, I actually never said the movies were related. However, you have not demonstrated that the Bhojpuri film is
3995:
3877:
3311:
3139:
2211:
2051:
2034:
2010:
1992:
1923:
1912:
1569:
1499:
855:
393:
97:
3585:, my apologies for any confusion. I merged it to an ongoing discussion from a previous day. You can find it
2847:
1735:
4125:
4114:
3446:
3101:
3083:
2415:
1976:
1819:
1673:
Thanks so much for all your tireless work with the New Page Patrol! Your efforts are appreciated by all. ~
1290:
940:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
3340:. I can think of no better person for this barnstar than you. It seems every week I either see you (1) at
1743:
988:
Apologies, Rosguill - I had a momentary memory failure. I went back & marked it reviewed, then reread
828:
If you want the case to be reviewed and potentially have the article restored, you can start a discussion
4347:
is a database entry, which is considered trivial coverage and does not contribute toward notability (see
2897:
This issue is not new, as I got mixed up in that editor's tactics with the Hair Peace Salon article. See
2431:
2144:
1956:
1945:
1727:
1627:
1616:
1090:
1079:
968:, why, it's at Afd? The flowchart says that we should mark articles as reviewed once they're up for AfD.
718:
321:
2147:. The Stella was a cancelled $ 4 coin, while a "quintuple Stella" is a $ 20 coin, otherwise known as a
3670:
3611:
The Triplemania (2019) redirect did not need to be reviewed. Seems pointless and redundant to do so.
3024:
2395:
2384:
582:
38:
4209:
pero si hay cualquier cosa que crees que no entendiste bien en inglĆŖs, tambiĆ©n puedo ayudar en espaƱol
2860:
2802:
2674:
2114:
2103:
1647:
1065:
244:
204:
152:
4278:, it does seem that the admins have exceedingly stringent requirements ā I mean, they didn't accept
2245:, region, and topic. Your efforts help ensure that new articles on Knowledge are of high quality. ā
3882:
3073:
2439:
2134:
1586:
1563:
1517:
1493:
899:
646:
301:
3917:
I appreciate your input on this urgent issue. Knowledge has no space for such bullying and abuse.
3571:
3121:
3004:
2993:
2928:
2784:, without prompt, took time out of their day to leave Pr a message themselves and helped work on
2613:
2564:
2553:
1486:
1006:
956:
260:
192:
2 sources is essentially the minimum amount of sources for a page to meet notability requirements
2819:, although they went by a different signature back then, which happened right after I nominated
4145:
3765:
3079:
2255:
1739:
1388:
1317:
1210:
751:
740:
3294:
Sufi trail, so the editor who did that is doing some more research before taking more action.
3795:
3034:
2977:
2898:
1770:
1707:
1678:
913:
798:, it appears that you were too late to argue for the article to not be deleted. According to
2422:
Hello and thank you for your edits. I wonder if you could close the redirect discussion for
996:
discussion so I asked ICPH if the fix was done. I don't know how to check for that, do you?
4319:
3922:
3835:
3693:
3685:
2870:
2852:
2812:
2794:
2685:
2666:
2453:
2423:
2416:
2366:
2321:
2283:
2085:
1380:
1363:
1061:
730:
726:
661:
592:
504:
348:
240:
213:
200:
162:
148:
3887:
I recently made these edits. They are cited by this article (though you can find others):
2695:
1759:
I have improved the article as per previous reviewer comments. But unfortuantely reviewer
8:
4385:
4348:
4162:
2435:
1469:
1346:
428:
2722:
2054:
also, hopefully we're going to be able to turn over a fair amount of this to bots soon (
4000:
3979:
3582:
3566:
3261:
3131:
2942:
2919:
2628:
2604:
1898:
1864:
1191:
486:
475:
455:
373:
362:
47:
17:
402:
4415:
4313:
4136:
3868:
3756:
3630:
3355:
3252:
3200:
3015:
2906:
2789:
2742:
2719:
2575:
2406:
2202:
2125:
1987:
1967:
1934:
1638:
1384:
1281:
1237:
1220:
1120:
1101:
884:
785:
762:
555:
548:
537:
384:
129:
2597:, as reviewed for the New Pages Patrol. I see that you spun them off from the older
1485:
I've recently noticed I get notifications when pages I create are reviewed. Reading
3825:
3805:
3791:
3606:
3277:
3219:
3044:
3030:
2973:
2910:
2785:
2781:
2655:
2648:
2476:
2427:
2140:
1810:, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on
1777:
1765:
1703:
1674:
1552:
the backlog cutoff for articles is 3 months, but the cutoff for articles is 1 month
1180:
1038:
931:, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on
909:
905:
309:
271:
2058:), but we're rolling it out slowly so for now the bot just catches redirects from
802:, the article was deleted for copyright infringement and unambiguous advertising (
554:
Hello Rosguill. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
4377:
3932:
3918:
3831:
2816:
2718:, we've got an interview that comes with a four paragraph secondary introduction
2362:
2330:
2317:
2293:
2279:
2248:
2238:
2234:
2081:
1760:
1000:
950:
932:
773:
671:
657:
626:
602:
588:
587:
I'm very confused. Did you delete the article I wrote fir Bill Maher's special??
572:
561:
500:
499:
I'm very confused. Did you delete the article I wrote fir Bill Maher's special??
344:
3883:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Racial_discrimination&oldid=903968918
678:, largely because it wasn't supported by reliable sources. I'm an editor on the
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4186:
4172:
4158:
2160:
1835:
1811:
1465:
816:
712:
423:
3962:
3675:
2707:
is a bit long on quotes, but it's also got some legitimate secondary coverage.
1296:
4393:
4287:
4258:
4241:
4215:
4190:
4037:
3983:
3943:
3812:
3719:
3708:
3689:
3637:
3593:
3535:
3528:
3513:
3497:
3476:
3469:
3453:
3422:
3418:
3393:
3367:
3341:
3337:
3298:
3163:
3108:
3060:
2964:
2952:
2877:
2843:
2831:
2766:
administrator thinks the article is worth keeping, I won't belabor the point.
2749:
2635:
2497:
2463:
2337:
2300:
2067:
2021:
2014:
1894:
1881:
1874:
1860:
1788:
1597:
1590:
1538:
1396:
1392:
1244:
1216:
1198:
1145:
1021:
972:
842:
820:
811:
807:
803:
699:
687:
683:
679:
633:
614:
490:
485:(to be more precise, please see there my message dated Nov 1st. Thank you!) (
479:
459:
288:
236:
224:
187:
175:
2063:
and between titles where the only difference is the presence of diacritics.
1324:
on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
190:, thanks for your response. But what causes some problems is your statement
144:
4411:
4330:
4309:
4132:
3891:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/12/are-jews-white/509453/
3864:
3752:
3679:
3352:
3248:
3210:
problem with quote formatting would you please have a look at my talk page?
3196:
3011:
2571:
2468:
2454:
2402:
2270:
2242:
2198:
2148:
2121:
1963:
1930:
1634:
1354:
about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
1277:
1130:
1116:
1097:
880:
795:
781:
758:
558:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
533:
380:
125:
3320:
927:
Hi, I'm Atsme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,
864:
330:
4176:
3287:
3273:
3215:
3156:
3147:
2777:
2490:
2486:
2472:
2220:
1806:
Hi, I'm PamD. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,
1233:
1187:
675:
656:
given me the chance to rectify whatever situation you claim is an issue.
606:
305:
281:
267:
266:
could sneak in a #REDIRECT ] {{text|poop}}, but no reader will see that.
3336:
is awarded to editors who have contributed substantially in the area of
3349:
3269:
3262:
1014:
997:
965:
947:
567:
3412:
3344:
helping ensure our redirects are the most quality they can be or (2)
2741:
taking this to ANI because intentionally or unintentionally they are
2152:
1826:
3896:
3472:, hahaha. I haven't requested it yet. I probably should go do that.
2525:
We have a disagreement which is a good excuse to have tea. cheers.
4194:
3386:
3362:
2278:
Just just changed the banner to a completely inappropriate one ...
1699:{anchor|09:42:12, 8 May 2019 review of submission by Lesenwriter}}
2449:
thank you kindly for the procedural close.04:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
4189:, there weren't enough citations attached to the article to meet
3775:
they upload movies and episodes cartoons and anime. Here's proof
3138:
articles. I have started a merge proposal for these articles at
4193:. Moreover, the content in the article was already included at
4021:
1877:, ah my mistake, feel free to make that change as you see fit.
1656:
4094:
to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
1452:
to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
2913:
at that project attempted to get some advice from experts at
2519:
2493:, and its title is a likely search term for the other movie.
605:, not exactly. The article's subject does not appear to meet
4175:, thanks for following up on this. My understanding is that
4050:
permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome
3711:, I would suggest bringing your comments to the discussion
3146:. If this interests you, please have a look. With regards,
1312:
695:
I'm also happy to answer any other questions you may have.
448:
List of fact-finding reports on human rights in North Korea
300:
It's amazing what bots can do. Today, one even managed to
145:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Choral-Synagogue_(Drohobych))
4073:- it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.
3130:. The same user who created that article also created the
1047:
1430:
Six Month Queue Data: Today ā 7242 Low ā 2393 High ā 7250
2731:
They also won a government award of unclear importance.
1985:
has been reviewed." with your username attached, since
1341:
560:
can easily be redirected to her daughter's article per
470:. I left you a follow-up message recently, in the same
450:. I have written a more detailed message to you on the
4378:
notability guidelines for companies and organizations
2241:), a comprehensive list of news sources organized by
3897:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Racial_discrimination
3433:To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with
4364:is the company's website, which is not independent
454:. I look forward to your reply there. Thank you! (
3407:A page you started (House red) has been reviewed!
343:Thank you for reviewing the redirects I created!
4384:examples of significant, reliable, independent,
4276:Knowledge:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
3126:Hello User:Rosguill, thanks for your efforts at
2903:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hair Peace Salon
2792:for a number of reasons listed in that section.
1981:Hi Rosguill, I was just notified that "The page
1782:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Articles for creation
1328:Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
216:, I think it depends on how much is actually in
4274:Thanks for the advice! Browsing the history of
2905:. I brought up the preposterous ref-bombing at
2426:?He is in multiple museum collections, meeting
2194:Talk:International Mass Spectrometry Foundation
2181:Talk:International Mass Spectrometry Foundation
629:please add comments here, not on my user page.
1111:Re: Speedy deletion nomination of Ren (singer)
3144:Talk:Charismatic Christianity#Merger proposal
3978:working as it should, please let us know at
3682:just "obristan" redirects to papers please
3437:. And, don't forget to sign your reply with
446:Dear Rosguill, thank you for your review of
3957:New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019
3676:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zYtUdV90C4
3421:while reveiwing this page as a part of our
1186:written does not demonstrate the subject's
1413:for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
3939:the way to go about improving that page.
2909:(posts in December 2018 and April 2019).
1991:is just a redirect what does this mean? ā
1316:, a product manager for the growth team,
1172:Let me know changes to improve the page.
674:, the reason why was that it didn't meet
3715:so that other editors can hear you out.
3680:https://papersplease.fandom.com/Obristan
3244:Talk:Jimi Hendrix posthumous discography
3231:Talk:Jimi Hendrix posthumous discography
823:which are used for less egregious cases.
121:Template talk:Country data New Caledonia
108:Template talk:Country data New Caledonia
3104:, thanks, that looks super concerning.
2589:Hey, I shall mark your "new" articles,
1391:; in its place, editors should consult
725:}} (they/their)ļ½š¹ļ½āļøļ½John 15:12ļ½ā®ļøļ½šļ½
14:
4078:Stay up to date with even more news ā
3512:My apologies for creating that drama.
3214:would you please have a look there? --
3192:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
3179:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
2915:Knowledge:WikiProject Citation cleanup
2033:Interesting and good to know, thanks.ā
1857:College of St Hild and St Bede, Durham
1436:Stay up to date with even more news ā
1416:There has been a lot discussion about
1133:, at this point you can take it up at
442:Article review - awaiting your reponse
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
4205:Knowledge:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area
3360:Your work is so truly appreciated!! ā
3140:Talk:Church invisible#Merger proposal
1554:, do you mean the cutoff for article
1381:subject-specific notability guideline
690:before spending much more time on it.
3982:. There is now also a live queue of
3556:Royal College of Art Students' Union
3489:
1802:I have unreviewed a page you curated
1383:for pornographic actors and models (
1347:compiling a list of reliable sources
923:I have unreviewed a page you curated
416:
25:
4376:Keep in mind that in order to meet
2333:, apologies for any inconvenience.
1784:and ask someone to help you there.
1422:What, if anything, would a SNG for
23:
4335:Draft:McClelland Engineers Pvt Ltd
3961:
3128:Talk:Moderate evangelical theology
2698:until I see someone say otherwise.
2432:draft to replace the redirect with
2275:Next time, wait a while will you?
1295:
1273:Template talk:British Royal Family
1260:Template talk:British Royal Family
717:for putting the category template
24:
4430:
1666:The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
1135:Knowledge:Requests for undeletion
409:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
4191:the general notability guideline
3490:
3449:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
3319:
3136:Evangelical charismatic movement
2518:
2219:
1822:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
1655:
1046:
943:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
904:Hello, I have done some work on
863:
417:
401:
329:
29:
4333:, I assume you're asking about
4124:is asking for participation in
3973:WMF at work on NPP Improvements
3856:is asking for participation in
3744:is asking for participation in
3348:a massive number of redirects (
3240:is asking for participation in
3188:is asking for participation in
3003:is asking for participation in
2563:is asking for participation in
2394:is asking for participation in
2190:is asking for participation in
2113:is asking for participation in
1955:is asking for participation in
1922:is asking for participation in
1808:To Have and to Hold (1996 film)
1723:Draft:Thamizhachi Thangapandian
1626:is asking for participation in
1307:WMF at work on NPP Improvements
1269:is asking for participation in
1089:is asking for participation in
750:is asking for participation in
525:is asking for participation in
372:is asking for participation in
117:is asking for participation in
3496:. Keep up the excellent work.
3429:How are you not autopatrolled?
2599:Freedom of religion by country
2595:Freedom of religion in Morocco
2591:Freedom of religion in Somalia
2139:I noticed that you redirected
13:
1:
3770:I went back on old edits for
2945:, the case has been reopened
2233:Thank you for assembling the
2060:"foo (disambiguation)" ā: -->
1534:use more people helping out.
466:Dear Rosguill, thank you for
4229:Creating many redirect pages
4126:this request for comment on
4071:New Page Review Coordinators
3858:this request for comment on
3772:A Certain Scientific Railgun
3746:this request for comment on
3425:had the following comments:
3242:this request for comment on
3190:this request for comment on
3005:this request for comment on
2850:from Vice about Obongjayar.
2565:this request for comment on
2396:this request for comment on
2235:new page patrol source guide
2192:this request for comment on
2115:this request for comment on
1957:this request for comment on
1924:this request for comment on
1773:) 9:20, 21 May 2019 (UTC)}}
1628:this request for comment on
1481:"The page has been reviewed"
1271:this request for comment on
1091:this request for comment on
879:For reviewing so many pages.
752:this request for comment on
527:this request for comment on
482:5:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
462:8:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
374:this request for comment on
139:Choral Synagogue (Drohobych)
119:this request for comment on
7:
2145:Stella (United States coin)
493:5:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
10:
4435:
4100:MediaWiki message delivery
3748:Talk:Murder of Hae Min Lee
3735:Talk:Murder of Hae Min Lee
3445:Message delivered via the
1818:Message delivered via the
1458:MediaWiki message delivery
1159:Principal Mutual Fund page
939:Message delivered via the
772:Speedy deletion declined:
547:Speedy deletion declined:
353:06:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
314:09:59, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
296:21:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
276:21:32, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
249:08:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
232:17:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
209:08:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
183:20:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
157:19:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
134:04:32, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
4108:04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
3951:07:00, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
3927:05:12, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
3873:04:35, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
3860:Knowledge talk:Notability
3847:Knowledge talk:Notability
3840:06:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
3820:20:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
3800:20:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
3761:04:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
3727:18:05, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
3702:17:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
3663:03:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
3645:22:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
3625:21:32, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
3601:03:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
3577:03:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
3543:02:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
3524:02:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
3508:02:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
3484:01:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
3464:01:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
3401:19:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
3376:18:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
3318:
3306:16:56, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
3282:12:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
3257:04:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
3224:19:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
3205:04:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
3171:23:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
3151:22:41, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
3116:05:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
3096:05:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
3068:01:59, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
3039:00:05, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
3020:04:34, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
2982:05:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
2960:00:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
2938:00:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
2218:
1850:St Hild's College, Durham
1695:submission by Lesenwriter
1661:
1654:
1364:New Page Patrol talk page
1358:Backlog drive coming soon
1045:
869:
862:
400:
328:
4401:16:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4354:is also a database entry
4324:12:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4300:Doubts regarding a draft
4292:02:19, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4266:01:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4246:01:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4223:16:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4167:12:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4141:04:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4122:feedback request service
3854:feedback request service
3742:feedback request service
3268:Hey, I wanted to review
3238:feedback request service
3186:feedback request service
3001:feedback request service
2885:06:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
2866:06:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
2839:06:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
2808:05:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
2757:05:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
2680:04:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
2643:23:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
2623:22:59, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
2580:04:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
2561:feedback request service
2544:13:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
2511:Some bubble tea for you!
2505:07:36, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
2481:06:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
2444:01:57, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
2411:04:32, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
2392:feedback request service
2371:17:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
2345:17:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
2326:17:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
2308:17:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
2288:17:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
2263:21:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
2207:04:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
2188:feedback request service
2174:20:04, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
2130:04:32, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
2111:feedback request service
2090:19:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
2075:23:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
2047:23:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
2029:23:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
2005:23:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
1972:04:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
1953:feedback request service
1939:04:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
1920:feedback request service
1903:17:44, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
1889:17:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
1869:17:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
1845:17:48, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
1796:16:47, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
1683:01:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
1643:04:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
1624:feedback request service
1605:20:32, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
1582:20:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
1546:20:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
1512:19:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
1474:19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
1411:request for bot approval
1336:Reliable Sources for NPP
1286:04:34, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
1267:feedback request service
1252:23:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
1228:23:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
1206:11:35, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
1153:11:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
1125:07:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
1106:04:33, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1087:feedback request service
1070:12:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1029:04:53, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1010:04:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
980:19:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
960:16:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
918:02:00, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
889:21:37, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
850:20:24, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
790:20:07, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
767:04:36, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
748:feedback request service
529:Talk:Three Worlds Theory
523:feedback request service
516:Talk:Three Worlds Theory
452:talk page of the article
370:feedback request service
115:feedback request service
3488:If you don't, I will.
3102:Winged Blades of Godric
2052:The Editor's Apprentice
2011:The Editor's Apprentice
1926:Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair
1913:Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair
1487:Knowledge:Autopatrolled
1418:Notability of Academics
1404:Discussions of interest
734:06:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
707:23:59, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
666:23:50, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
641:22:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
622:02:56, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
597:02:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
578:08:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
542:04:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
509:02:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
434:23:51, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
389:04:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
4128:Talk:Charles Desmarais
4115:Talk:Charles Desmarais
3966:
3431:
2585:New Pages Patrol Stuff
1300:
4351:for more information)
4177:notability guidelines
3965:
3878:Harassment by Nickm57
3427:
3423:page curation process
3334:The Redirect Barnstar
3327:The Redirect Barnstar
2899:Talk:Hair Peace Salon
2815:, you can read it at
2721:and a concert review
2227:The Guidance Barnstar
1959:Talk:Frankfurt School
1946:Talk:Frankfurt School
1630:Talk:Call-out culture
1617:Talk:Call-out culture
1299:
1093:Talk:History of India
1080:Talk:History of India
873:The Reviewer Barnstar
821:articles for deletion
676:notability guidelines
607:notability guidelines
337:The Original Barnstar
42:of past discussions.
3990:QUALITY of REVIEWING
3411:Thanks for creating
3358:just today alone!).
2424:Nathaniel Mary Quinn
2417:Nathaniel Mary Quinn
2398:Talk:Kodomo no Jikan
2385:Talk:Kodomo no Jikan
1977:Wapato Jail Redirect
1291:NPR Newsletter No.18
4389:secondary sources.
4367:is a database entry
3312:A barnstar for you!
2212:A barnstar for you!
2117:Talk:Julian Assange
2104:Talk:Julian Assange
1691:Need assistance on
1587:E to the Pi times i
1518:E to the Pi times i
1377:request for comment
856:A Barnstar For You!
394:A barnstar for you!
322:A barnstar for you!
4113:Please comment on
3967:
3895:On the talk page:
3845:Please comment on
3733:Please comment on
3671:Obristan Above All
3229:Please comment on
3177:Please comment on
3025:Railgun (season 1)
2992:Please comment on
2716:Muzykalnaya Gazeta
2552:Please comment on
2383:Please comment on
2179:Please comment on
2102:Please comment on
2056:most recent thread
1944:Please comment on
1911:Please comment on
1615:Please comment on
1301:
1258:Please comment on
1078:Please comment on
739:Please comment on
583:Bill Maher special
514:Please comment on
468:your kind response
361:Please comment on
106:Please comment on
18:User talk:Rosguill
4326:
4210:
4095:
4087:
3704:
3688:comment added by
3531:, lol no worries
3450:
3382:
3381:
3132:Believers' Church
3007:Talk:Donald Trump
2994:Talk:Donald Trump
2923:
2907:Knowledge:Cleanup
2608:
2567:Talk:William Barr
2554:Talk:William Barr
2549:
2548:
2268:
2267:
2260:
1823:
1688:
1687:
1648:Barnstar for you!
1476:
1453:
1445:
1175:Regards, Namrata
1075:
1074:
1003:
953:
944:
894:
893:
817:proposed deletion
556:Eleni Malandrinou
549:Eleni Malandrinou
439:
438:
358:
357:
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4426:
4317:
4208:
4154:Attentively....
4089:
4077:
3969:Hello Rosguill,
3683:
3661:
3658:
3653:
3623:
3620:
3615:
3520:
3517:
3504:
3501:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3460:
3457:
3444:
3440:
3436:
3374:
3365:
3323:
3316:
3315:
3091:
3086:
3074:Reliable sources
2936:
2921:
2911:User:Bbarmadillo
2863:
2857:
2805:
2799:
2786:Hair Peace Salon
2677:
2671:
2656:Hair Peace Salon
2621:
2606:
2541:
2538:
2532:
2522:
2515:
2514:
2467:
2258:
2254:
2251:
2223:
2216:
2215:
2172:
2165:
2157:
2141:Quintuple Stella
2135:Quintuple Stella
1990:
1842:
1833:
1817:
1766:User:Lesenwriter
1752:
1751:
1659:
1652:
1651:
1578:
1572:
1566:
1508:
1502:
1496:
1455:
1447:
1435:
1344:
1315:
1303:Hello Rosguill,
1226:
1184:
1050:
1043:
1042:
1001:
951:
938:
906:Fulani extremism
900:Fulani extremism
867:
860:
859:
754:Talk:Pacific War
741:Talk:Pacific War
647:Whatever I guess
575:
570:
431:
426:
422:
421:
420:
405:
398:
397:
333:
326:
325:
302:appeal its block
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4434:
4433:
4429:
4428:
4427:
4425:
4424:
4423:
4392:
4302:
4257:
4231:
4214:
4185:In the case of
4148:
4118:
4097:
4032:Notifying users
3996:be on the alert
3959:
3942:
3880:
3850:
3828:
3811:
3768:
3738:
3718:
3673:
3660:
3657:I didn't do it!
3656:
3651:
3650:
3636:
3622:
3619:I didn't do it!
3618:
3613:
3612:
3609:
3592:
3559:
3534:
3518:
3515:
3502:
3499:
3491:
3475:
3458:
3455:
3438:
3435:{{Re|Onel5969}}
3434:
3409:
3392:
3363:
3361:
3314:
3297:
3266:
3234:
3212:
3182:
3162:
3124:
3122:Merge proposals
3107:
3087:
3084:
3076:
3059:
3027:
2997:
2951:
2918:
2876:
2871:TheTechnician27
2861:
2855:TheTechnician27
2853:
2830:
2823:for PROD. Also
2821:Harkin Deximire
2817:Talk:Obongjayar
2813:TheTechnician27
2803:
2797:TheTechnician27
2795:
2748:
2686:TheTechnician27
2675:
2669:TheTechnician27
2667:
2651:
2634:
2603:
2587:
2557:
2536:
2530:
2527:
2513:
2496:
2461:
2458:
2420:
2388:
2336:
2299:
2273:
2256:
2249:
2214:
2184:
2168:
2167:
2161:
2153:
2137:
2107:
2066:
2020:
1986:
1979:
1949:
1916:
1880:
1852:
1836:
1827:
1804:
1787:
1725:
1721:
1697:
1650:
1620:
1596:
1576:
1570:
1564:
1537:
1506:
1500:
1494:
1483:
1478:
1464:) on behalf of
1340:
1311:
1293:
1263:
1243:
1224:
1213:
1197:
1178:
1161:
1144:
1113:
1083:
1062:EvasiveFire1987
1041:
1020:
1005:
990:this discussion
971:
955:
925:
902:
858:
841:
812:speedy deletion
800:the public logs
777:
774:Jolanta Omilian
744:
715:
698:
680:new page patrol
649:
632:
613:
585:
573:
568:
552:
519:
444:
429:
424:
418:
396:
366:
324:
287:
263:
261:Redirect patrol
241:Wanfried-Dublin
223:
214:Wanfried-Dublin
201:Wanfried-Dublin
174:
163:Wanfried-Dublin
149:Wanfried-Dublin
141:
111:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4432:
4422:
4421:
4420:
4419:
4404:
4403:
4390:
4374:
4372:
4371:
4370:
4369:
4368:
4365:
4362:
4358:
4355:
4352:
4345:
4338:
4322:comment added
4301:
4298:
4297:
4296:
4295:
4294:
4269:
4268:
4255:
4230:
4227:
4226:
4225:
4212:
4200:
4198:
4187:NBC News Radio
4183:
4181:
4151:the reversal.
4147:
4146:NBC News Radio
4144:
4117:
4111:
4088:
4075:
4064:
4063:
4047:
4046:
4034:
4033:
4018:
4017:
4009:
4008:
3992:
3991:
3975:
3974:
3960:
3958:
3955:
3954:
3953:
3940:
3879:
3876:
3849:
3843:
3827:
3824:
3823:
3822:
3809:
3767:
3766:You were wrong
3764:
3737:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3716:
3672:
3669:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3654:
3634:
3616:
3608:
3605:
3604:
3603:
3590:
3558:
3553:
3552:
3551:
3550:
3549:
3548:
3547:
3546:
3545:
3532:
3473:
3408:
3405:
3404:
3403:
3390:
3380:
3379:
3330:
3329:
3324:
3313:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3295:
3265:
3260:
3233:
3227:
3211:
3208:
3181:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3160:
3123:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3105:
3075:
3072:
3071:
3070:
3057:
3026:
3023:
2996:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2949:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2874:
2828:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2760:
2759:
2746:
2738:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2714:Meanwhile, in
2710:
2709:
2708:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2690:
2689:
2650:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2632:
2586:
2583:
2556:
2550:
2547:
2546:
2523:
2512:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2494:
2457:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2436:ThatMontrealIP
2419:
2414:
2387:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2334:
2311:
2310:
2297:
2272:
2269:
2266:
2265:
2230:
2229:
2224:
2213:
2210:
2183:
2177:
2159:
2136:
2133:
2106:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2064:
2018:
1978:
1975:
1948:
1942:
1915:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1878:
1851:
1848:
1803:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1785:
1758:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1719:
1696:
1689:
1686:
1685:
1670:
1669:
1662:
1660:
1649:
1646:
1619:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1594:
1559:
1557:
1535:
1531:
1529:
1482:
1479:
1454:
1446:
1433:
1431:
1428:
1427:
1420:
1414:
1406:
1405:
1401:
1400:
1372:
1371:
1360:
1359:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1329:
1313:Niharika Kohli
1309:
1308:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1262:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1241:
1212:
1211:Circular links
1209:
1195:
1160:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1142:
1112:
1109:
1082:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1057:
1056:
1051:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1018:
999:
994:Implementation
983:
982:
969:
949:
924:
921:
901:
898:
896:
892:
891:
876:
875:
870:
868:
857:
854:
853:
852:
839:
835:
833:
826:
824:
776:
770:
743:
737:
714:
711:
710:
709:
696:
693:
691:
648:
645:
644:
643:
630:
624:
611:
584:
581:
551:
545:
518:
512:
497:
496:
495:
494:
443:
440:
437:
436:
412:
411:
406:
395:
392:
365:
359:
356:
355:
340:
339:
334:
323:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
285:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
221:
218:Heaven's Gates
172:
168:
166:
140:
137:
110:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4431:
4417:
4413:
4408:
4407:
4406:
4405:
4402:
4399:
4398:
4397:
4387:
4383:
4379:
4375:
4373:
4366:
4363:
4359:
4356:
4353:
4350:
4346:
4343:
4342:
4341:
4340:
4339:
4336:
4332:
4329:
4328:
4327:
4325:
4321:
4315:
4311:
4306:
4293:
4289:
4285:
4281:
4277:
4273:
4272:
4271:
4270:
4267:
4264:
4263:
4262:
4253:
4250:
4249:
4248:
4247:
4243:
4239:
4234:
4224:
4221:
4220:
4219:
4206:
4201:
4199:
4196:
4192:
4188:
4184:
4182:
4178:
4174:
4171:
4170:
4169:
4168:
4164:
4160:
4155:
4152:
4143:
4142:
4138:
4134:
4130:
4129:
4123:
4116:
4110:
4109:
4105:
4101:
4096:
4093:
4085:
4081:
4074:
4072:
4067:
4061:
4060:
4059:
4057:
4055:
4044:
4043:
4042:
4039:
4031:
4030:
4029:
4027:
4023:
4016:Move to draft
4015:
4014:
4013:
4006:
4005:
4004:
4002:
3997:
3989:
3988:
3987:
3985:
3981:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3964:
3952:
3949:
3948:
3947:
3938:
3934:
3931:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3924:
3920:
3915:
3914:
3910:
3907:
3903:
3899:
3898:
3893:
3892:
3888:
3885:
3884:
3875:
3874:
3870:
3866:
3862:
3861:
3855:
3848:
3842:
3841:
3837:
3833:
3821:
3818:
3817:
3816:
3807:
3804:
3803:
3802:
3801:
3797:
3793:
3789:
3786:
3783:
3780:
3777:
3773:
3763:
3762:
3758:
3754:
3750:
3749:
3743:
3736:
3728:
3725:
3724:
3723:
3714:
3710:
3707:
3706:
3705:
3703:
3699:
3695:
3691:
3687:
3681:
3677:
3664:
3659:
3648:
3647:
3646:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3632:
3629:
3628:
3627:
3626:
3621:
3602:
3599:
3598:
3597:
3588:
3584:
3583:HitroMilanese
3581:
3580:
3579:
3578:
3575:
3574:
3570:
3569:
3564:
3557:
3544:
3541:
3540:
3539:
3530:
3527:
3526:
3525:
3522:
3521:
3511:
3510:
3509:
3506:
3505:
3487:
3486:
3485:
3482:
3481:
3480:
3471:
3468:
3467:
3466:
3465:
3462:
3461:
3451:
3448:
3447:Page Curation
3442:
3430:
3426:
3424:
3420:
3419:User:Onel5969
3416:
3414:
3402:
3399:
3398:
3397:
3388:
3384:
3383:
3378:
3377:
3373:
3371:
3366:
3357:
3354:
3351:
3347:
3343:
3339:
3335:
3332:
3331:
3328:
3325:
3322:
3317:
3307:
3304:
3303:
3302:
3293:
3289:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3279:
3275:
3271:
3264:
3259:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3246:
3245:
3239:
3232:
3226:
3225:
3221:
3217:
3207:
3206:
3202:
3198:
3194:
3193:
3187:
3180:
3172:
3169:
3168:
3167:
3158:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3149:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3133:
3129:
3117:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3103:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3090:
3081:
3069:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3055:
3050:
3046:
3043:
3042:
3041:
3040:
3036:
3032:
3022:
3021:
3017:
3013:
3009:
3008:
3002:
2995:
2983:
2979:
2975:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2948:
2944:
2943:Doomsdayer520
2941:
2940:
2939:
2934:
2930:
2926:
2925:
2916:
2912:
2908:
2904:
2900:
2896:
2886:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2872:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2864:
2859:
2858:
2856:
2849:
2845:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2806:
2801:
2800:
2798:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2774:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2758:
2755:
2754:
2753:
2744:
2739:
2737:
2733:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2723:
2720:
2717:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2706:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2696:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2687:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2678:
2673:
2672:
2670:
2663:
2662:
2657:
2644:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2630:
2629:Doomsdayer520
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2610:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2582:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2568:
2562:
2555:
2545:
2542:
2540:
2533:
2524:
2521:
2517:
2516:
2506:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2492:
2488:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2465:
2456:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2418:
2413:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2399:
2393:
2386:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2346:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2332:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2309:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2295:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2276:
2264:
2261:
2259:
2253:
2252:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2231:
2228:
2225:
2222:
2217:
2209:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2189:
2182:
2176:
2175:
2171:
2166:
2164:
2158:
2156:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2132:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2118:
2112:
2105:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2062:
2057:
2053:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2016:
2012:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1954:
1947:
1941:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1927:
1921:
1914:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1876:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1847:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1840:
1834:
1832:
1831:
1824:
1821:
1820:Page Curation
1815:
1814:. Thank you.
1813:
1809:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1783:
1779:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1768:
1767:
1762:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1724:
1720:
1718:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1709:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1694:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1631:
1625:
1618:
1606:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1592:
1588:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1579:
1573:
1567:
1560:
1555:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1532:
1530:
1526:
1523:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1509:
1503:
1497:
1490:
1488:
1477:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1456:Delivered by
1451:
1443:
1439:
1432:
1425:
1421:
1419:
1415:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1365:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1323:
1319:
1314:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1298:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1268:
1261:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1239:
1236:, looking at
1235:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1222:
1218:
1217:Bull baronets
1208:
1207:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1193:
1189:
1182:
1176:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1163:Hi Rosguill,
1154:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1088:
1081:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1054:Yee Yee Award
1052:
1049:
1044:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1004:
998:
995:
991:
987:
986:
985:
984:
981:
978:
977:
976:
967:
964:
963:
962:
961:
958:
954:
948:
945:
942:
941:Page Curation
936:
935:. Thank you.
934:
930:
929:Samina Akbari
920:
919:
915:
911:
907:
897:
890:
886:
882:
878:
877:
874:
871:
866:
861:
851:
848:
847:
846:
836:
834:
831:
827:
825:
822:
818:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
794:
793:
792:
791:
787:
783:
775:
769:
768:
764:
760:
756:
755:
749:
742:
736:
735:
732:
728:
724:
723:Goldenshimmer
720:
708:
705:
704:
703:
694:
692:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
670:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
653:
642:
639:
638:
637:
628:
625:
623:
620:
619:
618:
608:
604:
601:
600:
599:
598:
594:
590:
580:
579:
576:
571:
565:
563:
557:
550:
544:
543:
539:
535:
531:
530:
524:
517:
511:
510:
506:
502:
492:
491:user:Al83tito
488:
484:
483:
481:
480:user:Al83tito
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:user:Al83tito
457:
453:
449:
435:
432:
427:
425:Jalen D. Folf
414:
413:
410:
407:
404:
399:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:
371:
364:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:
338:
335:
332:
327:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:
297:
294:
293:
292:
283:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
234:
233:
230:
229:
228:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
189:
186:
185:
184:
181:
180:
179:
169:
167:
164:
161:
160:
159:
158:
154:
150:
146:
136:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
116:
109:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4395:
4394:
4381:
4349:WP:CORPDEPTH
4307:
4303:
4279:
4260:
4259:
4235:
4232:
4217:
4216:
4156:
4153:
4149:
4127:
4119:
4098:
4084:The Signpost
4083:
4076:
4068:
4065:
4053:
4051:
4048:
4035:
4025:
4019:
4010:
3993:
3976:
3968:
3945:
3944:
3936:
3916:
3911:
3908:
3904:
3900:
3894:
3889:
3886:
3881:
3859:
3851:
3829:
3814:
3813:
3771:
3769:
3747:
3739:
3721:
3720:
3684:āĀ Preceding
3674:
3639:
3638:
3631:Fishhead2100
3610:
3595:
3594:
3572:
3567:
3560:
3537:
3536:
3514:
3498:
3478:
3477:
3454:
3452:
3443:
3432:
3428:
3417:
3410:
3395:
3394:
3369:
3359:
3326:
3300:
3299:
3291:
3267:
3243:
3235:
3213:
3191:
3183:
3165:
3164:
3125:
3110:
3109:
3088:
3077:
3062:
3061:
3048:
3028:
3006:
2998:
2966:
2965:
2954:
2953:
2920:
2879:
2878:
2854:
2851:
2848:this article
2833:
2832:
2796:
2793:
2751:
2750:
2715:
2668:
2665:
2659:
2652:
2637:
2636:
2605:
2588:
2566:
2558:
2526:
2499:
2498:
2469:Aashik Awara
2459:
2455:Aashik Awara
2421:
2397:
2389:
2339:
2338:
2302:
2301:
2277:
2274:
2247:
2246:
2226:
2193:
2185:
2169:
2162:
2154:
2149:Double eagle
2138:
2116:
2108:
2069:
2068:
2059:
2023:
2022:
1982:
1980:
1958:
1950:
1925:
1917:
1883:
1882:
1853:
1838:
1837:
1829:
1828:
1825:
1816:
1812:my talk page
1805:
1790:
1789:
1764:
1757:
1710:
1698:
1665:
1664:
1629:
1621:
1599:
1598:
1551:
1540:
1539:
1524:
1521:
1491:
1484:
1442:The Signpost
1441:
1434:
1429:
1375:Following a
1361:
1339:
1322:project page
1310:
1302:
1272:
1264:
1246:
1245:
1214:
1200:
1199:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1147:
1146:
1114:
1092:
1084:
1053:
1023:
1022:
993:
974:
973:
946:
937:
933:my talk page
926:
903:
895:
872:
844:
843:
778:
753:
745:
716:
701:
700:
654:
650:
635:
634:
616:
615:
586:
559:
553:
528:
520:
498:
445:
408:
376:Talk:Romania
375:
367:
363:Talk:Romania
336:
290:
289:
264:
226:
225:
217:
195:
191:
177:
176:
142:
120:
112:
78:
43:
37:
4380:, you need
4318:āPreceding
3806:VarisKnight
3792:VarisKnight
3082:. Regards,
3045:VarisKnight
3031:VarisKnight
2974:Bbarmadillo
2862:(Talk page)
2804:(Talk page)
2782:Scope creep
2676:(Talk page)
2243:reliability
1988:Wapato Jail
1983:Wapato Jail
1778:Lesenwriter
1704:Lesenwriter
1558:is 1 month?
1192:WP:ORGCRITE
1181:K23.namrata
910:AmplifyWiki
566:Thank you.
349:talk to me!
36:This is an
4062:Other news
4054:absolutely
3933:Alexkyoung
3919:Alexkyoung
3832:Alexkyoung
3565:. Regards
3270:Sufi Trail
3263:Sufi Trail
2922:DOOMSDAYER
2790:WP:NOTHERE
2743:WP:NOTHERE
2607:DOOMSDAYER
2434:. Thanks.
2363:Chaosdruid
2331:Chaosdruid
2318:Chaosdruid
2294:Chaosdruid
2280:Chaosdruid
2250:Newslinger
2082:Mathiastck
1761:Stevey7788
1675:Anastasia
1385:WP:PORNBIO
1352:discussion
1238:WP:SELFRED
1221:WP:SELFRED
1188:notability
672:Halfire101
658:Halfire101
627:Halfire101
603:Halfire101
589:Halfire101
501:Halfire101
345:Breawycker
98:ArchiveĀ 10
4386:secondary
4173:Villalaso
4159:Villalaso
4080:subscribe
4056:necessary
3413:House red
3346:reviewing
3338:redirects
3292:different
3080:this edit
3054:this tool
2825:this diff
2661:Gentleman
2428:WP:ARTIST
1556:redirects
1525:redirects
1466:DannyS712
1438:subscribe
1426:look like
1345:has been
1318:announced
472:talk page
197:Piechotka
90:ArchiveĀ 7
85:ArchiveĀ 6
79:ArchiveĀ 5
73:ArchiveĀ 4
68:ArchiveĀ 3
60:ArchiveĀ 1
4396:Rosguill
4391:signed,
4382:multiple
4261:Rosguill
4256:signed,
4218:Rosguill
4213:signed,
4195:NBC News
4180:article.
3946:Rosguill
3941:signed,
3815:Rosguill
3810:signed,
3722:Rosguill
3717:signed,
3709:An1alias
3698:contribs
3690:An1alias
3686:unsigned
3652:Mr. C.C.
3640:Rosguill
3635:signed,
3614:Mr. C.C.
3607:Redirect
3596:Rosguill
3591:signed,
3538:Rosguill
3533:signed,
3529:Onel5969
3479:Rosguill
3474:signed,
3470:Onel5969
3396:Rosguill
3391:signed,
3301:Rosguill
3296:signed,
3166:Rosguill
3161:signed,
3111:Rosguill
3106:signed,
3063:Rosguill
3058:signed,
2967:Rosguill
2955:Rosguill
2950:signed,
2933:Contribs
2880:Rosguill
2875:signed,
2844:Rosguill
2834:Rosguill
2829:signed,
2752:Rosguill
2747:signed,
2649:Guidance
2638:Rosguill
2633:signed,
2618:Contribs
2500:Rosguill
2495:signed,
2464:Rosguill
2340:Rosguill
2335:signed,
2303:Rosguill
2298:signed,
2239:WP:NPPSG
2070:Rosguill
2065:signed,
2024:Rosguill
2019:signed,
1895:TSventon
1884:Rosguill
1879:signed,
1875:TSventon
1861:TSventon
1791:Rosguill
1786:signed,
1714:contribs
1600:Rosguill
1595:signed,
1577:contribs
1541:Rosguill
1536:signed,
1522:articles
1507:contribs
1424:Softball
1342:Rosguill
1247:Rosguill
1242:signed,
1201:Rosguill
1196:signed,
1148:Rosguill
1143:signed,
1060:yee yee
1024:Rosguill
1019:signed,
975:Rosguill
970:signed,
881:ā
Trekker
845:Rosguill
840:signed,
702:Rosguill
697:signed,
636:Rosguill
631:signed,
617:Rosguill
612:signed,
562:WP:ATD-R
291:Rosguill
286:signed,
237:Rosguill
227:Rosguill
222:signed,
188:Rosguill
178:Rosguill
173:signed,
4412:Asikm03
4331:Asikm03
4320:undated
4310:Asikm03
4308:Thanks
4133:Legobot
4020:NPR is
4007:Backlog
3865:Legobot
3753:Legobot
3385:Thanks
3249:Legobot
3197:Legobot
3078:Noting
3012:Legobot
2572:Legobot
2491:notable
2403:Legobot
2199:Legobot
2122:Legobot
1964:Legobot
1931:Legobot
1736:history
1635:Legobot
1389:removed
1278:Legobot
1215:Hi. At
1131:Asikm03
1117:Asikm03
1098:Legobot
796:Atomksk
782:Atomksk
759:Legobot
534:Legobot
381:Legobot
126:Legobot
39:archive
4022:triage
3826:Thanks
3342:WP:RFD
3288:MrClog
3274:MrClog
3216:Gyanda
3157:Anupam
3148:Anupam
2778:Cabayi
2487:CHKMTS
2473:CHKMTS
2035:T.E.A.
2015:WP:RfD
1993:T.E.A.
1591:WP:NPP
1397:WP:GNG
1393:WP:ENT
1387:) was
1379:, the
1234:AlanM1
1039:Thanks
808:WP:G12
804:WP:G11
713:Thanks
688:WP:GNG
684:WP:BRD
430:(talk)
306:Certes
282:Certes
268:Certes
4026:might
3568:Hitro
2460:Dear
2043:Edits
2001:Edits
1744:watch
1740:links
1528:then.
1472:) at
1015:Atsme
966:Atsme
16:<
4416:talk
4314:talk
4288:talk
4280:you!
4242:talk
4163:talk
4137:talk
4131:.
4120:The
4104:talk
4092:here
4045:PERM
3923:talk
3869:talk
3863:.
3852:The
3836:talk
3796:talk
3757:talk
3751:.
3740:The
3713:here
3694:talk
3587:here
3573:talk
3563:diff
3519:5969
3516:Onel
3503:5969
3500:Onel
3459:5969
3456:Onel
3439:~~~~
3370:Talk
3356:mine
3278:talk
3253:talk
3247:.
3236:The
3220:talk
3201:talk
3195:.
3184:The
3142:and
3134:and
3035:talk
3016:talk
3010:.
2999:The
2978:talk
2947:here
2929:Talk
2901:and
2658:and
2614:Talk
2593:and
2576:talk
2570:.
2559:The
2477:talk
2440:talk
2407:talk
2401:.
2390:The
2367:talk
2322:talk
2284:talk
2271:MDMA
2257:talk
2203:talk
2197:.
2186:The
2155:ZLEA
2151:. -
2126:talk
2120:.
2109:The
2086:talk
2039:Talk
1997:Talk
1968:talk
1962:.
1951:The
1935:talk
1929:.
1918:The
1899:talk
1865:talk
1771:talk
1748:logs
1732:talk
1728:edit
1708:talk
1679:talk
1639:talk
1633:.
1622:The
1571:talk
1501:talk
1470:talk
1462:talk
1450:here
1395:and
1370:News
1282:talk
1276:.
1265:The
1139:here
1121:talk
1102:talk
1096:.
1085:The
1066:talk
1002:Talk
952:Talk
914:talk
885:talk
830:here
819:and
786:talk
763:talk
757:.
746:The
719:here
662:talk
593:talk
538:talk
532:.
521:The
505:talk
487:talk
476:talk
456:talk
385:talk
379:.
368:The
310:talk
272:talk
245:talk
205:talk
153:talk
130:talk
124:.
113:The
4316:)
4284:pmj
4252:Pmj
4238:pmj
4090:Go
4082:to
4052:if
4038:SPA
4001:NPR
3984:AfC
3980:NPR
3937:not
3387:MJL
3364:MJL
3089:WBG
3056:).
3049:was
2924:520
2609:520
2602:---
2537:ray
2531:Big
2143:to
2061:foo
1830:Pam
1693:AfC
1550:By
1448:Go
1440:to
574:Why
4290:)
4244:)
4211:.
4207:.
4165:)
4157:--
4139:)
4106:)
4003:.
3925:)
3871:)
3838:)
3798:)
3790:.
3787:,
3784:,
3781:,
3778:,
3759:)
3700:)
3696:ā¢
3589:.
3441:.
3415:.
3389:!
3353:of
3280:)
3255:)
3222:)
3203:)
3037:)
3018:)
2980:)
2972:--
2827:.
2745:.
2578:)
2479:)
2442:)
2409:)
2369:)
2324:)
2286:)
2205:)
2128:)
2088:)
2045:)
2003:)
1970:)
1937:)
1901:)
1867:)
1746:|
1742:|
1738:|
1734:|
1730:|
1716:)
1681:)
1641:)
1593:.
1580:)
1574:|
1510:)
1504:|
1409:A
1366:.
1284:)
1225:āā
1194:.
1123:)
1104:)
1068:)
1007:š§
957:š§
916:)
887:)
806:,
788:)
765:)
664:)
595:)
569:So
540:)
507:)
489:)
478:)
458:)
387:)
351:)
312:)
304:.
274:)
247:)
207:)
155:)
132:)
94:ā
64:ā
4418:)
4414:(
4312:(
4286:(
4240:(
4161:(
4135:(
4102:(
4086:.
3921:(
3867:(
3834:(
3794:(
3755:(
3692:(
3372:ā
3368:ā
3350:3
3276:(
3251:(
3218:(
3199:(
3085:āÆ
3033:(
3014:(
2976:(
2935:)
2931:|
2927:(
2724:.
2620:)
2616:|
2612:(
2574:(
2539:į
2535:X
2529:D
2475:(
2466::
2462:@
2438:(
2405:(
2365:(
2320:(
2282:(
2237:(
2201:(
2170:\
2163:T
2124:(
2084:(
2041:ā¢
2037:(
1999:ā¢
1995:(
1966:(
1933:(
1897:(
1863:(
1859:.
1839:D
1769:(
1750:)
1726:(
1711:Ā·
1706:(
1677:(
1637:(
1568:(
1565:e
1498:(
1495:e
1468:(
1460:(
1444:.
1399:.
1280:(
1183::
1179:@
1119:(
1100:(
1064:(
912:(
883:(
784:(
761:(
731:C
729:/
727:T
660:(
591:(
564:.
536:(
503:(
383:(
347:(
308:(
270:(
243:(
203:(
151:(
128:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.