Knowledge

User talk:Rosguill

Source 📝

630: 2253:. Laughing and mocking other users in edit summaries is highly incivil, as it poisons the atmosphere and makes reaching a compromise that much harder. Rosguill, as I'm sure you are aware as well, I've lost count how many times Ktrimi or someone from the same group editors that edits the same topics from the same POV has come to your talkpage for block-fishing. I've been editing this encyclopedia for over 17 years, and as you can see I have acquired many enemies who continuously try to find a "gotcha", but while avoiding ANI or AE, where their own behavior would come under scrutiny. 1113: 1550:
revisioning the edits an account that violated the restriction made), I (again) stopped editing and brought the topic to the talk pages of each article because I was told so. And also, the edits were indeed agenda-pushing, nationalistic and false reports with sources being taken out of context, victims and attackers literally being swapped in one event, edits with sources where the source mentioned NOTHING mentioned in the edit and calling Monte Melkonian a revolutionary hero on an article that's supposed to be neutral (you can call him hero on the Armenian page idc).
2149:, which was appropriate. The thread has since devolved into rather flimsy accusations against specific editors that have left no one looking particularly great. As a reminder, I generally do not impose sanctions as a result of disruptive editing complaints brought to my talk page unless the issues are in the realm of obvious vandalism and other bright red-line violations. For anything more in the weeds than that, please bring your case to AE or ANI in order to allow for a more thorough examination of evidence. 71: 2271:
personal attack against RHA as the latest example of PA breaches on Voisava so Rosguill is aware that edit warring is not the only issue concerning the article. You are not the only one there in recent months to have breached the civility policy while editing or discussing Voisava. If I were to seek sanctions on you personally, I would report you at AE. Rosguill themselves have made it clear in the past that they are not willing to sanction reports posted on this tp.
1881: 704: 21: 1326:, thank your for reviewing my request at new page patrol a little while ago. I have contributed a lot to Knowledge since I had my deleted article in May which I've made 27 articles since then that haven't been deleted, plus I'm making two or three per day as well as participating in a few AfD's with 84% of my decisions being matches. Could you please re-consider your decision, even if it's just a trail for a one month. Many thanks! 44: 1394:
WS:GSAA. However, others can freely and for a long time edit on the topic with even less edits than me with zero consequences whatsoever. Also, the only people that are against the articles I wrote are Armenians using the "government propaganda" argument for anything. Also, why are only Azerbaijanis being met with restrictions and consquences hwen violating, but I never saw any Armenian getting the same treatment? See
1601:
it because I provided proof and reasons for it multiple times. Also, when an Armenian made the same attacks against me suddenly it wasn't a problem, but now when it's the other way around it is? I thought discrimination wasn't allowed on Knowledge? And why is it a problem when I mention the Melkonian-topic. Why is it allowed to depict him as a hero on English Knowledge? Anyone can be depicted as a hero then.
1093: 1101: 2240:@Rosguill: On the subject of the disruptive edit by RoyalHeritageAlb, the evidence is the edit itself and the misleading edit-summary used. It's a pretty obvious attempt at removing undesirable information (that the mother of the Albanian national hero Skenderbeg was in fact Serbian), precisely the type of disruption that plagues the article practically non-stop. And everyone involved 2420:, a suggestion for this case would be an interaction ban between @RoyalHeritageAlb and @Khirurg to try and prevent this poor behavoir. Or banning both from editing the Balkans topic area completely, as as been done with other past editors. One hopes there is improvement on the part of all editors with the maturity of time, as editing in the Balkan space is complicated enough. Cheers. 2034:
instead of waiting for the draft to be moved to mainspace. Now if I go to my articles created list, it shows up under my name when it's not supposed to. Since I haven't created it, I want it to be removed, but I don't know how to do it because I'm afraid if I tag it for deletion, it'll still show up under my name but in the deletion section. Can you please help me with that? Thanks!
2199:, I've added the page to my watchlist, will deliver CTOP notices to people who haven't received one. While I agree that there's been excessive reverting, given the variety of different editors involved, the age of the accounts, and that most instances are just a single undo, I'm not seeing a quick fix measure that would clearly help. 1105: 2449:
I could just easily say the same thing about you, Ktrimi991, and RoyalHeritageAlb (and many others) with regards to the Greek and Serbian topic space. When you left that invalid warning on my talkpage (I only had one revert), why didn't you do the same at Ktrimi's talkpage? When editors are civil and
1615:
It's literally mentioned in the second sentence "User accounts or IP addresses used to evade a block should also be blocked." Your IP got blocked, then you resumed editing on your account. And please drop the discrimination card (this is the second time you're using it in this thread), the users here
1600:
How am I evading my block? The block said that I can't use that IP on anonymous edits, this ain't an anonymous edit. Evading my block would be if I log onto another account when my different account is blocked, my account isn't blocked and I don't have any other blocked account. Also I didn't violate
1365:
The problem that I had with my other articles getting deleted is because articles on royalty, many editors on the EN wiki believe that it is not sufficient simply to be a member of a notable family but for inclusion in Knowledge, which is why my articles were getting deleted. I'm expanding my varity
446:
So, based on the available information, my sense is that most likely either a) Freedman 1981 has been superseded by more recent scholarship or else b) it possibly doesn't actually attribute "invention" but rather "first publication" or similar claims to Cabeza de Baca. I would be convinced otherwise
2033:
Hi Rosguill, I need your help regarding this article. It was created a couple of months ago but had no sources, so I draftified it with the script, which tagged the redirect for speedy deletion automatically. The user who originally created it removed the deletion tags and created the article again
1393:
I was blocked from editing Knowledge for 2 days, forbidden from discussing the deletion of an article I wrote, got multiple warnings and gopt threatened with my account being blocked because "I broke WS:GSAA" when I just added a flag into an article and edited on an article that is not mentioned as
2411:
behavoir @Khirurg brings to editing Knowledge and keeps reappearing time and time again. Looking at some of @Khirurg's edit history, these flare ups happen or are triggered with editors who either edit the Albanian space or Turkish space and related topical articles. It appears there is a pattern,
2289:
Rosguill, I don't want this to turn into a wall of text, so I will not respond again. My request for you is, if you are willing, to keep an eye on the Voisava Kastrioti article for both edit warring (be it "slow" or blatant 3RR breaches) and civility issues. The article has had enough of both, and
2222:. I don't agree with the changes made by RoyalHeritageAlbanian, but their edit is certainly not nationalistic. It concerns wording that has been a concern for multiple editors of different backgrounds. This actuallyis part of a pattern of making personal attacks in edit summaries by Khirurg, e.g. 2270:
with whom were I "edit warring"? With you. And you know full well I did not "mock" you; I just responded to your claim that my edit was "hiding" information to readers, a claim which you had done multiple times in the past as well. Anyways, I was not asking for a block above; I did mention your
2117:
Sorry, I don't see a reason for doing this: 4/5 of your most recent articles have been deleted at AfD, and the most recent one was approved but tagged for several issues. In general, you've hardly edited since the permissions were removed, and I'm not seeing any acknowledgement of the past UPE
1517:
I am not trying to bypass it,I thought it was allowed to ask others to edit because I saw someone else do it before. Right after I was told that that's Canvassing I immediately apologized and promised that I'll refrain from it, which I did and do. Again: I'm sorry for doing it because I didn:t
956:
Winning a medal as part of a team, in the absence of coverage of the subject as an individual, does not make a compelling case for notability. It could begin to make a case for the team being notable collectively, although again, we'd want to see coverage about the team's history, composition,
1549:
Like you already said, it was KhndzorUtogh. I edited on my IP because I thought those accounts didn't have the restriction and those special edits were a dorn in my eye. However, after finding out that it's restricted (I took some time to process it because I thought y'all meant I should stop
991:
I think you're missing the point here. Anyone can meet the notability guidelines, if extensive there's coverage in secondary sources. Almost every single player of top-flight football (let alone the top teams of the top flight) has thousands of words written about their career in independent
976:
while a team competition was held and this person was a member of the team. With this point of view and reasoning, most of the articles about athletes should be restricted. due your statementes, none of the members of a football team that won the World Cup can't have an article.
1210:: the reply is disingenuous and lacks context, but I can't explain as to why in AE or here (because in a way I'd circumvent the 500 limit) because I'm already at 498 words in AE. Can I get granted an extension, and if not, can the user comment be removed per word limit rules? 2453:. Considering how closely you follow me around and watch my talkpage, didn't you see that? The problem is always with the same group of editors, not me. You should be sanctioned for making groundless accusations and purposely misleading one-sided statements. 2226:. In a wider context, keeping an eye on the civiliy of editors on the Voisava article might be as valuable as preventing the edit warring itself. Personal attacks unfortunately have been made by various editors before as well in disputes on Voisava. Cheers, 31:
They're happy to try to speak to you here in Spanish, German, French, Portuguese, Italian, Hebrew, Yiddish, or Russian, although they may need to switch back to English depending on the subject matter. For a full list of proficiencies, see their User page.
1097: 1072:
Also, keep in mind, non-Olympic combat sports are no covered very much, resources for such competitions are limited. I have no insistence to keep this article, but this article is really notable. There are also many Persian sources available.
2399:
in relation to me was mentioned, my thoughts are this. @Khirurg, a Wikipedian of 17 years continues with poor engagement with editors instead of cordial or neutral interaction. Even in this thread, Khirurg considers some editors as "enemies"
2339:
Because it's part of the same pattern of disruption, identical in spirit as RHA's edit - removal of "undesirable" information, even though it's well sourced and long-standing. It keeps happening, there and in many other articles as well.
2075:
I agree. There was a misunderstanding in the initial assessment and draftifying the article was an oversight. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and thank you so much for helping me out by restoring it to mainspace.
2382:(ec) He explicitly removed the word "Serbian", in spite of the multitude of sources in the article (and more that could be added), with a misleading edit-summary on top of that. It doesn't get worse than that, really. 762:
Fixed--I remain of the opinion that the method and pace on display in the recent AJ discussions is not compatible with good-faith editing, and do intend to file a case at AE if tendentious challenges continue.
1136:
Fadakar, not just listing his participation. Persian sources are as good as English, but none of the Persian sources identified have depth of coverage either. Please seek further assistance at the
1469:
was not correctly invoked, the a-a code needs to be added to the first parameter in order to display the relevant text, and the following warning from Nemoralis was excessively confrontational.
1736:
and feel your way around different kinds of editing work. The existing guides and introductions to various areas of work linked from there should provide you with the introduction you need.
1684:, it looks like you've only made 24 edits to articles so far, so I don't think NPP training is appropriate just yet. I would recommend that you look for useful edits to make by checking out 1069:
Because, this tournament was held in team category, and it news was covered. In the those resurces that i provided to you, they mentioned his name (fadakar), it wasn't indivitual tournament.
2059:. This makes the page history of the cut and paste split moot. The page really should not have been draftified in the first place and I'm puzzled as to why you decided to take that action. 884:
WKF is a primary source, so that's not what we're looking for. Meanwhile, the Mehr article you've linked doesn't mention Fadakar at all. I clicked through the linked articles on the page,
1053:
sources. Moreover, the issue across the board is that the sources you've identified have virtually nothing to say about Fadakar, not that there's something wrong with their credibility.
1032:
Its problem here, that your point is diffrent of other. those resources that i provided, all are most reable sport news agencies, but you said those are primary news and non-independent.
2181:. The article is freuqently a subject of edit warring, ususally involving multiple editors. Would you consider placing some revert restriction on the article, such as an AE-logged 1RR? 896:, and they don't mention Fadakar either. Ideally, we'd want to see multiple sources with at least 2-3 sentences specifically about Fadakar and his life/career. Have you read through 2447:
Looking at some of @Khirurg's edit history, these flare ups happen or are triggered with editors who either edit the Albanian space or Turkish space and related topical articles.
1265:
Is there anyway we can protect this article per WP:GS/AA enforcement action? User:Sergiopoghosyan200(33+ edits) and IP37.61.125.53(3 edits) are edit warring over the article. --
830:
other than an interview I found online (not independent), coverage is limited to mere mentions, does not meet WP:GNG. Redirect to 2023 Asian Karate Championships where mentioned
725:
RfC’s are not the place to comment on editor conduct. Further, your claims are false; nine errors, "regardless of significance", were identified, not "76 (!) "serious" errors".
2244:, which is why no one has reverted my edit, despite all the concerns about "civility". On the subject of civility, which Ktrimi seems so concerned about, let's not forget this 407: 1659:
Hello Rosguill, I see your talents and specialties and I would love to learn more about Knowledge and NPP. I think you are the best teacher. I would love to be an adoptee.
1772:
If you're referring to past edits to an article, you can check the "view history" tab on any page. If you're referring to checking how many edits you've made, you can use
83: 1132:
None of these do more than mention Fadakar's inclusion on a team. We need sources that discuss his biography, his style, the quality of his play/coaching, actual prose
59:, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. 2304:(ec) It's pretty obvious what you came here to try and get, so let's not pretend. But yes, I do agree that the article really needs admin attention. Stuff like this 1385: 810:
Why did you restrict this article?! This person is a famous iranian athlete, he won 2023 asian karate championships gold medal. I think you mistake, he is notable.
378:
You base your deletion on a citation in another article, but that citation is a pop-culture website whereas mine is a published journal with scholastic integrity.
683:. I think I cleaned up any collateral damage but I would want to know if it had been my edit so just letting you know that something went wonky. Have a good day! 1849: 2006: 1992: 1417:
It’s plainly inaccurate to say that you are the only one being affected by these restrictions; you can see a full list of affected pages and accounts at
783: 731: 712: 555: 1616:
couldn't care less whether you're Azeri or Kryptonian. The fact that you're trying to justify the stuff that got your IP blocked says more than enough.
2275:
It is such a pity that you think fellow editors are "enemies". We are here to build a better encyclopedia for the readers, we are not at war. Cheers,
936: 1869: 1342: 1207: 720: 410:
is a peer-reviewed Food Studies paper that identifies the mass-production of hard-corn shells in the 1930s as an evolution of pre-existing foodways
1411: 620: 425:
3. One would think that if Cabeza de Baca was the inventor it would figure prominently into her own biography, but reviewing the sources at
2362:
a pretty obvious attempt at removing undesirable information (that the mother of the Albanian national hero Skenderbeg was in fact Serbian)
1848:
I don't understand what you are asking me to do. AfD pages are automatically transcluded to daily logs; the article in question appears at
1442: 447:
by additional peer reviewed citations that address the question of whether hard-shell tacos were mass-produced in the early 20th century.
2220: 1495:. Perhaps one ought to ask Viceskeeni2 who this "Armenian user" that "spread misinformation" is. The accusation is likely directed at 1970: 1564:
Damn, I should become a detective instead of a physiotherapist! I also found your still blocked IP (2 weeks for using Knowledge as a
399:
1. I was not able to pull up the actual page of the citation to Freedman 1981 that you provided and would like to see the exact quote
819: 801: 681: 646: 2111: 434: 2412:
something that has gone on for nearly two decades. Whether or not further action is needed is up to administrators. Within the
1955: 894: 387: 1127: 2219:
by Khirurg, to whom you have given an AE-logged warning against making accusations of nationalistic editing without evidence
1732:
Did you have any specific questions in particular? My usual advice for people just starting to edit Knowledge is to start at
864: 2364:
RHA did not remove the theory of Serb origin; the section continued to mention the possibility of her being a member of the
1934: 2172:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2097: 1395: 782:
FYI, off the top of my head two sources recently have been subject to a greater level of scrutiny - ADL and The Telegraph.
458: 2484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1203: 402:
2. There's multiple sources, including academic sources, that place the invention of hard-shell tacos before the 1940s.
2321:
Not sure why you did bring that edit up. I removed content that did not concern Voisava and Barleti, and later made an
2129: 484:
Not closely no, obviously their edits are very fishy but I don't have any concrete links to other accounts to suggest.
1807: 1787: 1767: 1747: 1727: 1699: 1625: 1610: 1595: 1559: 1544: 1527: 1165: 1151: 1082: 1064: 1044: 1007: 986: 968: 951: 911: 879: 843: 1981: 1407: 885: 653: 2305: 1580: 1569: 1445:
is editing on the topic multiple times although he doesn't even have 1/5 of the needed edits to edit on that topics
1250: 1236: 1035:
Now I have a question for you, how did you recognize that those websites are not independent and not authoritative?
891: 888: 567: 2000: 1512: 2089: 2070: 2020: 1888: 1874: 1863: 1493: 791: 757: 692: 429:, they don't devote much attention to that aspect at all. Further, the work that the hard-shell taco appeared in, 2177:
Since you are an admin involved in AE stuff, I would like to raise my concern about the frequent edit warring on
1959: 1480: 1454: 1436: 1309: 1291: 927: 917: 602: 588: 545: 527: 509: 495: 383: 2299: 669: 2401: 2397: 2235: 2210: 1828:
can you please add this to the main space of artcile of deletion sept 5? I made some erros while editing this.
515: 426: 373: 2391: 2377: 2349: 2334: 2322: 2316: 2284: 2262: 2223: 2216: 1674: 1379: 1360: 1027: 774: 2462: 2429: 708: 328: 321: 316: 311: 304: 299: 294: 287: 282: 277: 270: 265: 260: 253: 248: 243: 236: 231: 226: 219: 214: 209: 202: 197: 192: 185: 180: 175: 168: 163: 158: 151: 146: 141: 2251: 2249: 2245: 996:
what establishes their notability, not the abstract fact that they've been on a team that has won a prize.
134: 129: 124: 117: 112: 107: 100: 95: 90: 1370:, none of my articles have been deleted recently due to me not creating articles on royalty and nobility. 1274: 413: 2413: 2190: 2107: 1975: 1947: 1892: 1870: 688: 361: 55: 2160: 2047: 2056:, I've gone ahead and restored the article to mainspace, as its bibliography was decent, in particular 1951: 1802: 1762: 1722: 1669: 1161: 1123: 1078: 1049:
Statistics from a sports tournament and announcements by the tournament's organizers are by definition
1040: 982: 947: 875: 815: 393: 379: 1991:
Hello, you made some early edits to this page so I wanted to notify you. Thank you for your work. ~~~
1335: 739: 418:
is not an academic press, but it interviews Pilcher and other academic subject-matter experts directly
396:, so a few considerations went into that revert that I would like to see addressed before reinstating 1219: 1012:
To give a concrete example, compare the sources you've provided to the sources cited in the article
478: 1246: 1215: 652:
Hi Rosguill. Just letting you know about this as a courtesy. Would you also mind taking a look at
1621: 1591: 1540: 1508: 1403: 1341:
I looked through your recent articles again per this request. While most of them are excellent,
2442: 2408: 2368:. You can disagree with the edit (as I do), but you can't call it "nationalistic POV-pushing". 2103: 2102:
Hello, hope you are doing well. Could you please restore my autopatrolled user rights? Regards
2084: 2042: 1996: 1842: 1838: 1583: 1565: 1459:
I've issued them a final warning, as I find the prior warnings issued to be somewhat lacking: (
787: 735: 684: 675: 1793: 1753: 1713: 1709: 1681: 1660: 1606: 1555: 1523: 1450: 1305: 1270: 1157: 1119: 1074: 1036: 978: 943: 871: 825: 811: 599: 564: 542: 506: 475: 2445:
applies to editors making baseless accusations and generating drama, such as yourself here.
1485:
Sorry for bothering you Rosguill, but it seems that Viceskeeni2 is now trying to bypass the
1156:
None of the recent references (persian news) I sent last time could attract your attention?
930:, one of the sources is the WKF website, this website is the most reliable source of karate. 2438: 2215:
OK, thanks, keeping an eye on the article is great. I would also ask for your attention at
2135: 1572: 1503:, who is quite popular on Reddit right now (welcome to the club) if you search their name. 1490: 1463: 1367: 1349:. I stand by my prior recommendation to keep up the good work and reapply in a few months. 634: 622: 1579:
against KhndzorUtogh (not the first time, I can see you have done it at least once before
973:
I respect what you have to say, but don't you think you are being harsh with this article?
861:
Also, several official Persian language news agencies that are mentioned in this article.
8: 2373: 2330: 2295: 2280: 2231: 2186: 1963: 1533: 1258: 1242: 1211: 854: 665: 642: 2425: 2057: 1900: 1649: 1617: 1587: 1536: 1504: 1375: 1331: 1317: 584: 523: 441:--i.e., not original recipes but rather adaptation and codification of existing foods. 2458: 2417: 2387: 2345: 2312: 2258: 2178: 2146: 2136: 2077: 2053: 2035: 1930: 1834: 1831: 1498: 1050: 719:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please 1917: 2365: 2325:
that ended the dispute between multiple editors after suitable sources were found.
2026: 1908: 1904: 1712:
however! Could you maybe teach me a bit about editing and more beginner things? :)
1602: 1551: 1519: 1446: 1399: 1301: 1266: 1259: 1202:
Good day. I'm here about AE case; the user had already exceeded the 500 word limit
920:, his name was mentioned as a member of the Iranian men's team and a gold medalist. 594: 574: 559: 537: 501: 470: 1518:
clearly know it's unpermissible. After getting my warning, I immediately stopped.
2434: 1486: 1422: 1418: 657: 50: 1916:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
851:
Karate Championship 2023 results on the website of the World Karate Federation.
2369: 2326: 2291: 2276: 2227: 2196: 2182: 1752:
Not many specific questions! Just one actually, how can I check article edits?
1733: 1685: 1387: 697: 661: 638: 340: 27:
This user is a polyglot and likes languages a bit too much for their own good.
2421: 2404: 2203: 2153: 2122: 2063: 2027: 2013: 1967: 1856: 1780: 1740: 1692: 1576: 1473: 1429: 1371: 1353: 1346: 1327: 1323: 1284: 1229: 1144: 1137: 1057: 1020: 1000: 961: 904: 897: 836: 807: 767: 750: 580: 551: 533: 519: 488: 464: 451: 439:
plac recipes within the historic and cultural contexts out of which they grew
70: 2454: 2451: 2383: 2341: 2308: 2254: 1225:
Granted, although I don't know that you'll actually need it at the moment.
1109: 2009:, I did not create this article and am not sure why you are notifying me. 1940:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
579:
Great! I might request a global lock (for the sockmaster) later on today.
1197: 1013: 746:
I had misunderstood the scope of the prior discussion and will rephrase.
344: 346: 916:
These links you mentioned are related news. In the Knowledge article
703: 1832:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/M._M._Akbar
342: 1345:
created a few days ago seems to lack sources that would add up to
43: 1823: 1773: 1089: 933:
Also This website is known as the reference of sports websites.
713:
wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Reliability_of_Al_Jazeera
347: 832:. Do you have access to any sources with better coverage? 2450:
collaborative, I have an easy time reaching a compromise
2224:"get a life and learn to properly count reverts, stalker" 680:
Hi Rosguill, this edit seems to have come out a bit messy
500:
Ok. They just seem to know a lot, including about socks.
1535:- my bad. Anyways, may I ask who this Armenian user is? 656:? There seems like a good chance that this is a case of 1958:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1366:
on what articles I am creating now, and as you can see
923:
It is clear that he won a gold medal and it is notable.
1923:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
2145:
I've addressed the initial request to keep an eye on
1850:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 5
64: 556:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthfindervert
2246:lol Don't worry, not everyone "hides" things. lol 1425:. Infractions are addressed as they are reported. 514:They have been CU confirmed to another editor (by 1386:Why do only I have to follow the guidelines of 431:The Good Life: New Mexico Traditions and Foods 1688:and start getting practice editing that way. 1568:), mentioning the exact same about Melkonian 355:This page has archives. Sections older than 1571:. In other words, you're not only violating 1206:, and they exceeded it more by their latest 1140:, as I feel like I'm repeating myself here. 2273:as you can see I have acquired many enemies 1708:ways away haha. I will certainly check out 633:You are invited to join the discussion at 2290:admin attention is long overdue. Cheers, 1929:notice, but please explain why in your 365:when more than 5 sections are present. 2248:by Ktrimi, while he was edit-warring 1280:Yes, that seems reasonable. Will do. 723:and keep this in mind while editing. 469:Did you look at their contributions? 2168:The following discussion is closed. 1396:Knowledge:WikiProject Discrimination 38: 15: 13: 1918:deleted for any of several reasons 1895:because of the following concern: 1879: 828:, As I wrote in the edit summary, 14: 2494: 2098:Restore autopatrolled user rights 654:Special:Contributions/Bottleboy04 359:may be automatically archived by 2480:The discussion above is closed. 1582:), but also evading your block ( 702: 628: 69: 42: 19: 928:2023 Asian Karate Championships 918:2023 Asian Karate Championships 2463:03:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2430:02:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2392:00:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2378:00:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2350:01:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2335:01:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2317:00:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2300:00:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2285:00:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2263:00:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2236:15:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 2211:15:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 2191:15:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 2161:12:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2130:22:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2112:07:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2090:17:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2071:17:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2048:16:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2021:21:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 2001:20:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 1982:subst:Proposed deletion notify 1971:13:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 711:other editors, as you did at 427:Fabiola Cabeza de Baca Gilbert 1: 1864:14:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC) 1843:13:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC) 1808:23:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1788:23:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1768:22:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1748:22:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1728:22:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1700:20:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1675:20:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1626:01:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1611:00:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1596:00:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1560:00:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1545:00:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1528:00:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1513:00:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1481:18:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1455:22:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 1437:15:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 635:User talk:Liz § Los Fantasmas 623:User talk:Liz § Los Fantasmas 49:This user talk page might be 2396:As comment within this post 7: 1962:allows discussion to reach 1943:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1926:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1412:16:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1380:19:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1361:19:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1336:19:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1310:17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1292:16:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1275:16:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1251:03:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 1237:22:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1220:17:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1166:21:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1152:21:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1128:20:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1083:20:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1065:19:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1045:19:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1028:02:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1016:, or any of his teammates. 1008:02:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 987:01:21, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 969:19:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 952:18:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 912:16:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 880:15:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 844:15:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 820:11:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 802:About "Amirhossein fadakar" 792:16:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 775:16:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 758:15:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 740:15:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 729:Please remove that comment. 693:15:55, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 374:Disagree with your deletion 10: 2499: 1954:exist. In particular, the 670:01:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 647:01:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 603:14:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 589:13:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 568:12:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 546:06:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 528:20:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 510:20:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 496:19:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 479:19:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 459:15:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 388:12:53, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 1948:proposed deletion process 1889:Vũ Minh Hiếu (footballer) 1875:Vũ Minh Hiếu (footballer) 2482:Please do not modify it. 2170:Please do not modify it. 1976:prod Bor Skate Plaza FYI 1704:Oh yes, I know NPP is a 1489:through proxy editing / 1935:the article's talk page 2360:Also, for the record. 2307:really needs to stop. 1914: 1884: 362:Lowercase sigmabot III 2407:, it may explain the 1960:articles for deletion 1897: 1893:proposed for deletion 1883: 554:And here, by me. See 394:Wikipedian-in-Waiting 380:Wikipedian-in-Waiting 2242:knows this full well 926:Due, in the article 2268:he was edit-warring 676:Edit came out messy 2171: 1952:deletion processes 1885: 518:) on simple wiki. 433:, is described by 56:talk page stalkers 2414:General sanctions 2217:that edit summary 2179:Voisava Kastrioti 2169: 2147:Voisava Kastrioti 2137:Voisava Kastrioti 2104:TheBirdsShedTears 1871:Proposed deletion 1792:Awesome thanks! 1532:Oh, you're right 1300:Thank you sir. -- 957:performance etc. 369: 368: 334: 333: 63: 62: 37: 36: 33: 2490: 2366:Brankovic family 2087: 2081: 2045: 2039: 1966:for deletion. – 1945: 1944: 1928: 1927: 1882: 1805: 1799: 1796: 1765: 1759: 1756: 1725: 1719: 1716: 1682:ScribblingScribe 1672: 1666: 1663: 1502: 1468: 1462: 1260:Lachin offensive 826:Payamkermanshahi 706: 685:Horse Eye's Back 632: 631: 597: 578: 562: 540: 504: 473: 364: 348: 87: 86: 73: 65: 46: 39: 30: 23: 22: 16: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2443:WP:BATTLEGROUND 2409:WP:BATTLEGROUND 2202: 2174: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2152: 2140: 2121: 2100: 2085: 2079: 2062: 2043: 2037: 2031: 2012: 1986:Bor Skate Plaza 1978: 1956:speedy deletion 1942: 1941: 1925: 1924: 1880: 1878: 1855: 1826: 1803: 1797: 1794: 1779: 1763: 1757: 1754: 1739: 1723: 1717: 1714: 1710:the task center 1691: 1670: 1664: 1661: 1652: 1650:Adoptee Program 1584:WP:BLOCKEVASION 1496: 1472: 1466: 1460: 1428: 1391: 1352: 1320: 1318:New page patrol 1283: 1263: 1228: 1200: 1143: 1056: 1019: 999: 960: 903: 835: 804: 766: 749: 700: 678: 629: 626: 595: 572: 560: 538: 502: 487: 471: 467: 450: 376: 360: 349: 343: 78: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2496: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2416:list, for the 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2287: 2200: 2175: 2166: 2150: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2119: 2099: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2060: 2030: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2010: 1977: 1974: 1946:will stop the 1877: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1853: 1825: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1777: 1737: 1689: 1655:Dear Rosguill, 1651: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1470: 1426: 1390: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1363: 1350: 1343:Danielle Moyse 1319: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1295: 1294: 1281: 1262: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1226: 1199: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1141: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1070: 1054: 1033: 1017: 997: 992:publications. 974: 958: 941: 940: 939: 931: 924: 921: 901: 869: 868: 867: 859: 858: 857: 849: 833: 803: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 780: 764: 747: 707:Please do not 699: 696: 677: 674: 673: 672: 625: 621:Discussion at 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 485: 466: 463: 462: 461: 448: 444: 443: 442: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 411: 400: 375: 372: 367: 366: 354: 351: 350: 345: 341: 339: 336: 335: 332: 331: 325: 324: 319: 314: 308: 307: 302: 297: 291: 290: 285: 280: 274: 273: 268: 263: 257: 256: 251: 246: 240: 239: 234: 229: 223: 222: 217: 212: 206: 205: 200: 195: 189: 188: 183: 178: 172: 171: 166: 161: 155: 154: 149: 144: 138: 137: 132: 127: 121: 120: 115: 110: 104: 103: 98: 93: 80: 79: 74: 68: 61: 60: 47: 35: 34: 29: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2495: 2483: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2439:WP:ASPERSIONS 2436: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2288: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2269: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2250: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2198: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2173: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2148: 2138: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2091: 2088: 2083: 2082: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2058: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2046: 2041: 2040: 2029: 2028:Tinio Brigade 2022: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1989: 1987: 1983: 1973: 1972: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1938: 1936: 1932: 1921: 1919: 1913: 1912: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1896: 1894: 1890: 1876: 1872: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1851: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1833: 1829: 1809: 1806: 1800: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1760: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1735: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1726: 1720: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1673: 1667: 1657: 1656: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618:HistoryofIran 1614: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588:HistoryofIran 1585: 1581: 1578: 1574: 1573:WP:ASPERSIONS 1570: 1567: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1537:HistoryofIran 1534: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1505:HistoryofIran 1500: 1494: 1492: 1491:WP:CANVASSING 1488: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1465: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1389: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1261: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1112: 1110: 1108: 1106: 1104: 1102: 1100: 1098: 1096: 1094: 1092: 1090: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 995: 990: 989: 988: 984: 980: 975: 972: 971: 970: 967: 966: 965: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 942: 938: 935: 934: 932: 929: 925: 922: 919: 915: 914: 913: 910: 909: 908: 899: 895: 892: 889: 886: 883: 882: 881: 877: 873: 870: 866: 863: 862: 860: 856: 853: 852: 850: 848:yes of course 847: 846: 845: 842: 841: 840: 831: 827: 824: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 809: 793: 789: 785: 781: 778: 777: 776: 773: 772: 771: 761: 760: 759: 756: 755: 754: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 737: 733: 727: 726: 722: 718: 715:. Comment on 714: 710: 705: 695: 694: 690: 686: 682: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 650: 649: 648: 644: 640: 636: 624: 604: 601: 598: 592: 591: 590: 586: 582: 576: 571: 570: 569: 566: 563: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 544: 541: 535: 531: 530: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 512: 511: 508: 505: 499: 498: 497: 494: 493: 492: 483: 482: 481: 480: 477: 474: 460: 457: 456: 455: 445: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 417: 416: 412: 409: 406: 405: 404: 403: 401: 398: 397: 395: 392: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 371: 363: 358: 353: 352: 338: 337: 330: 327: 326: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 309: 306: 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 292: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 275: 272: 269: 267: 264: 262: 259: 258: 255: 252: 250: 247: 245: 242: 241: 238: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 224: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 207: 204: 201: 199: 196: 194: 191: 190: 187: 184: 182: 179: 177: 174: 173: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 156: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 140: 139: 136: 133: 131: 128: 126: 123: 122: 119: 116: 114: 111: 109: 106: 105: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 85: 82: 81: 77: 72: 67: 66: 58: 57: 52: 48: 45: 41: 40: 28: 25: 18: 17: 2481: 2446: 2361: 2272: 2267: 2241: 2205: 2204: 2176: 2167: 2155: 2154: 2124: 2123: 2101: 2078: 2065: 2064: 2054:Iwaqarhashmi 2036: 2032: 2015: 2014: 2007:Agnieszka653 1993:Agnieszka653 1990: 1985: 1979: 1950:, but other 1939: 1931:edit summary 1922: 1915: 1899: 1898: 1887:The article 1886: 1858: 1857: 1835:Aparamoorthy 1830: 1827: 1782: 1781: 1742: 1741: 1705: 1694: 1693: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1566:battleground 1499:KhndzorUtogh 1475: 1474: 1431: 1430: 1392: 1355: 1354: 1321: 1286: 1285: 1264: 1231: 1230: 1201: 1146: 1145: 1133: 1059: 1058: 1022: 1021: 1002: 1001: 993: 963: 962: 906: 905: 838: 837: 829: 805: 784:BilledMammal 769: 768: 752: 751: 732:BilledMammal 730: 728: 724: 716: 701: 679: 627: 490: 489: 468: 453: 452: 438: 435:Rudnick 2012 430: 415:MEL Magazine 414: 408:Pilcher 2008 377: 370: 356: 75: 54: 53:by friendly 26: 1901:WP:ONEOTHER 1603:Viceskeeni2 1552:Viceskeeni2 1520:Viceskeeni2 1464:alert/first 1447:Viceskeeni2 1421:itself and 1400:Viceskeeni2 1302:Kansas Bear 1267:Kansas Bear 1014:Ali Alipour 698:August 2024 596:Doug Weller 593:Good idea. 575:Doug Weller 561:Doug Weller 539:Doug Weller 503:Doug Weller 472:Doug Weller 2418:WP:BALKANS 2118:concerns. 1795:Scribbling 1755:Scribbling 1715:Scribbling 1662:Scribbling 1443:AlenVaneci 1051:WP:PRIMARY 937:sport data 855:wkf result 465:Backupwiki 329:Archive 43 322:Archive 42 317:Archive 41 312:Archive 40 305:Archive 39 300:Archive 38 295:Archive 37 288:Archive 36 283:Archive 35 278:Archive 34 271:Archive 33 266:Archive 32 261:Archive 31 254:Archive 30 249:Archive 29 244:Archive 28 237:Archive 27 232:Archive 26 227:Archive 25 220:Archive 24 215:Archive 23 210:Archive 22 203:Archive 21 198:Archive 20 193:Archive 19 186:Archive 18 181:Archive 17 176:Archive 16 169:Archive 15 164:Archive 14 159:Archive 13 152:Archive 12 147:Archive 11 142:Archive 10 2370:Ktrimi991 2327:Ktrimi991 2292:Ktrimi991 2277:Ktrimi991 2228:Ktrimi991 2197:Ktrimi991 2183:Ktrimi991 1964:consensus 1909:WP:ORPHAN 1905:WP:INCDAB 1891:has been 865:mehr news 779:Thank you 721:stay cool 662:Marchjuly 639:Marchjuly 135:Archive 9 130:Archive 8 125:Archive 7 118:Archive 6 113:Archive 5 108:Archive 4 101:Archive 3 96:Archive 2 91:Archive 1 2435:WP:HOUND 2422:Resnjari 2405:Rosguill 2206:Rosguill 2201:signed, 2156:Rosguill 2151:signed, 2125:Rosguill 2120:signed, 2066:Rosguill 2061:signed, 2016:Rosguill 2011:signed, 1968:sgeureka 1859:Rosguill 1854:signed, 1783:Rosguill 1778:signed, 1743:Rosguill 1738:signed, 1695:Rosguill 1690:signed, 1487:WP:GS/AA 1476:Rosguill 1471:signed, 1432:Rosguill 1427:signed, 1423:WP:AELOG 1419:WP:GS/AA 1408:contribs 1372:Azarctic 1356:Rosguill 1351:signed, 1328:Azarctic 1324:Rosguill 1287:Rosguill 1282:signed, 1241:Thanks. 1232:Rosguill 1227:signed, 1198:AE limit 1147:Rosguill 1142:signed, 1138:teahouse 1060:Rosguill 1055:signed, 1023:Rosguill 1018:signed, 1003:Rosguill 998:signed, 964:Rosguill 959:signed, 907:Rosguill 902:signed, 839:Rosguill 834:signed, 808:Rosguill 770:Rosguill 765:signed, 753:Rosguill 748:signed, 658:WP:QUACK 581:M.Bitton 552:M.Bitton 536:Thanks. 534:M.Bitton 520:M.Bitton 516:Fr33kman 491:Rosguill 486:signed, 454:Rosguill 449:signed, 76:Archives 2455:Khirurg 2384:Khirurg 2342:Khirurg 2309:Khirurg 2255:Khirurg 1734:WP:TASK 1686:WP:TASK 1388:WP:GSAA 806:Hello @ 717:content 357:60 days 51:watched 1933:or on 1798:Scribe 1774:xtools 1758:Scribe 1718:Scribe 1665:Scribe 1577:WP:NPA 1347:WP:GNG 1322:Hello 1243:Vanezi 1212:Vanezi 994:That's 898:WP:GNG 709:attack 637:. -- 2080:Waqar 2038:Waqar 1441:User 1208:reply 1158:P@yam 1134:about 1120:P@yam 1075:P@yam 1037:P@yam 979:P@yam 944:P@yam 872:P@yam 812:P@yam 660:. -- 84:Index 2459:talk 2426:talk 2388:talk 2374:talk 2346:talk 2331:talk 2323:edit 2313:talk 2296:talk 2281:talk 2259:talk 2232:talk 2187:talk 2108:talk 1997:talk 1988:}} 1839:talk 1824:help 1804:TALK 1764:TALK 1724:TALK 1706:long 1671:TALK 1622:talk 1607:talk 1592:talk 1556:talk 1541:talk 1524:talk 1509:talk 1451:talk 1404:talk 1376:talk 1368:here 1332:talk 1306:talk 1271:talk 1247:talk 1216:talk 1204:here 1162:talk 1124:talk 1079:talk 1041:talk 983:talk 948:talk 876:talk 816:talk 788:talk 736:talk 689:talk 666:talk 643:talk 600:talk 585:talk 565:talk 543:talk 524:talk 507:talk 476:talk 384:talk 1873:of 1680:Hi 1586:). 1398:~~ 437:as 2461:) 2441:. 2437:, 2428:) 2403:. 2390:) 2376:) 2348:) 2333:) 2315:) 2298:) 2283:) 2261:) 2234:) 2189:) 2110:) 2086:💬 2044:💬 1999:) 1980:{{ 1937:. 1920:. 1907:, 1903:, 1852:. 1841:) 1801:- 1776:. 1761:- 1721:- 1668:- 1624:) 1609:) 1594:) 1575:/ 1558:) 1543:) 1526:) 1511:) 1467:}} 1461:{{ 1453:) 1410:) 1406:• 1378:) 1334:) 1308:) 1273:) 1249:) 1218:) 1164:) 1126:) 1081:) 1043:) 985:) 950:) 900:? 893:, 890:, 887:, 878:) 818:) 790:) 738:) 691:) 668:) 645:) 587:) 558:. 526:) 386:) 2457:( 2424:( 2386:( 2372:( 2344:( 2329:( 2311:( 2294:( 2279:( 2257:( 2230:( 2185:( 2106:( 1995:( 1984:| 1911:. 1837:( 1620:( 1605:( 1590:( 1554:( 1539:( 1522:( 1507:( 1501:: 1497:@ 1449:( 1402:( 1374:( 1330:( 1304:( 1269:( 1245:( 1214:( 1160:( 1122:( 1077:( 1039:( 981:( 946:( 874:( 814:( 786:( 734:( 687:( 664:( 641:( 583:( 577:: 573:@ 550:@ 532:@ 522:( 382:(

Index


watched
talk page stalkers

Index
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
Archive 6
Archive 7
Archive 8
Archive 9
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15
Archive 16
Archive 17
Archive 18
Archive 19
Archive 20
Archive 21
Archive 22
Archive 23
Archive 24
Archive 25

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.