8475:- I haven't been able to find a good way to formulate questions of when to create a second article when there is a redirect to an existing article. It definitely isn't a merge proposal, because a merge either converts two articles into one or pulls draft material into an article. A merge tag is often appropriate when someone writes a draft on a topic that already has an article, but the content is somewhat different but overlapping. If there is an article, and a draft is submitted that has the topic of a redirect to the article, I think that the discussion should be on the article talk page. The problem seems to be that the terminology of split and merge causes confusion. Do you have a different idea in general of how to handle these cases? In this specific case I will re-review the draft on the dance. The question seems to be largely one of terminology. Is there a more substantive issue?
9423:
the band Reyko meets the following: 1. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart 2. Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country 3. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. 4. Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network Please, reconsider. But also, please, feel free to improve the article or give me any advice? Thank you! --
5934:
For my uni, i am studying a course which asks me to write a wikipage and need to post it. If it is not published or delete or there are any problems with copyright i might get a failure to this unit.So i am so urgent as the assignment is already due. Also, my uni is in a
English speaking country and i have to edit in English. I also dont have the right to ask my tutor to ask in the education board. I think i have the ability to do this by my self.What i am trying to do now is that fix all the problems and try my best to let it submit succesfully.That's the reason i resubmitted several time yesterday and i do revised a lot of places .But i am feel worried that i still have not got passed. Could you tell me the reason? I have checked on the
5523:- First, I see that the article has been accepted; I see that it is currently only a stub. That is all right; it needs expansion. Second, I see that I misread the draft as to one letter and therefore three orders of magnitude when I declined it. I read that Bezos had donated $ 10 million to the fund, which is a non-trivial amount of money that will finance an organization with an executive director who is paid out of endowment, but I have a template that says that not every 501(c)(3) organization, or its equivalent under other national laws, is notable. It didn't say that Bezos had pledged $ 10 million to the fund. This wasn't a Rockefeller or a Ford; this was Bezos. The size of the founding gift was
4262:, and was tagging crud that needed tagging. The issue was that I was thought by some editors to be tagging it too quickly, and I respectfully disagreed with their opinion. So I have not been at New Page Patrol much recently, now that the throw-away accounts have to play for four days before they can submit stuff, and some of them learn what is a proper submission, and some of them submit to AFC, which is even more backlogged. If your question is whether I have become a different editor or have grown up, the answer is no. I was already a grown-up. If the question is whether I have annoyed anyone recently, the answer is that I have annoyed a few contentious editors about content disputes.
1354:
closures at TfD pending a more thorough understanding of the nuances of the process and, even at RfD, I have not closed anything in over a month. None have been challenged at DRV and all were supported by the participants, but even there, I want to more fulsomely digest the applicable policies in that area before I resume closures. At least 4-6 months. Even when I resume doing a few closures, I will still limit myself to one or two areas and not AfD, given that is a much more high profile and controversial area. CfDs can be complicated in terms of multiple closing outcomes discussed in the comments, so would also avoid that, and I would also avoid MfD until the dispute over portals ends.
8994:
getting the permission from the owner, so I have to download them from her page & uploaded to
Wikimedia Common with her named attached ( I complainted this to the owner of the photos, she said she will try to upload the photos by herself tomorrow, but she never join Knowledge before). This Thai user proposed many other photos I uploaded to other article for deletion as well! Some photos, I took it by myself from the National Museum of Cambodia and 1 photo, I asked my friend to took it when he was on a trip to Angkor Wat temple! So I get them via FB which is convenient. I am a new contributor/ editor, I dont know much about Knowledge. Help me! I dont know that technical stuff!
10435:. A grade is a paraphyletic group of organisms that lack the innovations of a derived group. For example fish are a grade, lacking the legs of tetrapods. Herptiles are a grade, lacking the hair and homeothermy of mammals, and the feathers, wings and homeothermy of birds. Non-bat, non-cetacean mammals could be seen as a grade, though anthropocentrism gets in the way of that. Green algae are a grade, lacking the derived features of land plants. A guild is a collection of species with similar ecological roles, such as a carnivore guild, a browser guild, a grazer guild, a scavenger guild, and so on. Algae in general can be seen as a guild of photosynthetic organisms.
4502:
first, I would have to wait for the administrator to delete the redirect first, which would leave the title temporarily vacant until I saw that the redirect had been deleted. What I do is to move the redirect out of the way, and then accept the draft, and then tag the redirect for G6. I have been doing this for maybe two or three years. It has the advantage that it doesn't require me to wait for the administrator to delete the redirect first, because the redirect can be deleted afterwards. Other administrators haven't objected, so I assumed that this was one reasonable way to accept drafts when there already is a redirect.
3096:
picked up where I left off. Several of my pages have since been approved. Thats really cool...but one page seems to be hijacked by the company itself. I made the article for
Traackr, and it was very long. I took a long time on it...and it was completely neutral. Complete w/ a section for controversy. Anyhow, it looks like last mont the company itself tried to submit it's own article, and in doing so deleted my draft and created a fluff peice. You went ahead and denied their article and basically told them to quit being corporate scum. How do I get my original draft back? I can't find it anywhere in the revision history?
1496:
but this is movie article and i had discuss with one of our editor on Tea house, he said we can not add biography information in movie article. second point you said this person is not notable but i have given you some news paper links of mid-day Mumbai, Times of India and some other web links. i have saw some
Biographical article on Knowledge with very less references but they got publish. so i think i have given proper references then why my article is getting declined. so i don't want to split this article with another article i want to make biography article of Sunil Prem Vyas. so please guide me for the same.
4967:. I just wanted to let you know that this was an article before I had it as a userspace draft (My Usual MO for major expansions), unfortunately, there was a discussion about the validity of the article and the consensus was to redirect it into the article the character originated from. The consensus was reached with only 2-3 people voting and improper research was made which resulted in the consensus that there were not enough sources to constitute a separate article. I was just wondering how I would get that decision reversed as there was insufficient research done for the consensus of redirecting it was reached?--
9850:- I'll clarify, since this is high school math (and I've forgotten college math). He is saying that the title should be Modular forms modulo p, which is like Modular forms modulo n, except that n is an integer and p is a prime integer. It could be Modular forms modulo 3 or Modular forms modulo 5. You aren't overthinking it. He changed the nature of the complexity from 2 to any prime number. Everything beyond stating what the modulo is gets into discrete higher math, which I haven't forgotten because I didn't study it. (I have forgotten differential equations.)
1118:'s comment that he would like to see the thread closed, I'm contemplating closing as no consensus and/or wrong venue or unclear proposal. There's a lot of involved editors and administrators that are likely precluding it from being closed. There is some later discussion that some issues may be worth considering, in a different venue, but there is no consensus for the original proposal. Being an experienced editor, and seeing as you're also uninvolved in that thread, would you mind giving me a second opinion on if you think such a close has merit?
4168:- I am willing to try again if you have looked at my previous RFA, and if you recognize that I haven't tried to be the different editor that some well-meaning supporters told me I should become, and then try again. That is, some editors gave me advice for the track record I should establish in order to have another RFA. I didn't plan to become an "excellent content creator" or to be more tolerant of crud. If you are willing to nominate me again anyway, then I would prefer to wait about a week to ten days and then give it a chance again.
2059:- To explain a little further, what was weird was that I had apparently confused you to the point where I couldn't resolve the confusion, because I thought that I had tried to explain that it was a question of whether to spin out an article and that the place to discuss was the existing article. I felt that I was trapped in the situation where what I communicated the first time was not what I meant, and where it was apparently impossible to re-explain. Maybe now I have explained, and maybe I will still have to explain four more times.
7846:- Okay, you are likely right in that maybe I should have given your draft a more detailed review. On the other hand, you are being very undiplomatic if your objective is to get me to re-review the draft. You have now annoyed me so that I am not likely to be neutral. If your objective was to ask for a different reviewer, you will get your request, because I will recuse from reviewing your draft. If your objective was for me to accept your draft as an article, I will recuse from reviewing it, because I am no longer unbiased.
3403:. That illustrates two unrelated issues with the scripts that reviewers use. The one that I usually complain about is that it thinks it was my sandbox. My only connection was that I had moved a previous draft out of that sandbox. Also, it doesn't accept the reviewer's input as to what language it is. Well, I didn't decline that draft, and so I never said it was in German. But I have tried to say that drafts were in German or French or Spanish, and it has sometimes only said that they weren't in English. Oh well.
4847:
10870:. Honestly I've never heard of the term in this draft, so I suspect if this is made up of. Also, apologies that I have to review in breakneck speed due to a busy real life, so sometimes I don't list out all the reason, if I find one reason, I decline it right away unless there are so many problems that I'm not comfortable if I don't tell the author. Sorry for that. However, this article is still a duplicate. Regarding the trout, I don't mind people trouting me but this is not used in the right occasion.
3692:. PS: It's been my direct experience that if you want to track down previous references to something like this (e.g. with "What links here"), and fix the links to point to the current location, no one is likely to object (even in talk-page archives). It'll almost never produce a revert if you leave the original link (if visible) alone and pipe it to the current location. But many editors would not care to bother with that, since most of us don't read archives unless looking for something specific.
1885:
terms āInca ruinsā, āInca citadelā. āInca ruins at Pisacā is not suitable as it is a term of the state of repair. āInca citadel at Pisacā is not quite correct as it had more functions than acting as a fortress. The legal name of the complex is the āPisca
Archeological Parkā. I donāt think this is the best as we donāt use the legal name for the palaces, castles, etc which are now museums as their article name. But at the end of the day the important thing is to describe this stunning place.
9022:. I have declined the draft at this time because it is difficult to read because the English is not good. It needs a heavy copy-edit for grammar, style, and usage. A history merge of the draft into the existing redirect is then needed. (I am not recommending a merge into the article on the goddess, but a history merge into what is currently a redirect from the title of the dance to the goddess.) If you have any further questions, you may ask them here, or on the talk page of the draft.
2763:
higher education, just as I do.) I didn't choose to invite him to the
Teahouse. I simply used the Articles for Creation script, and it decides whether to invite an editor to the Teahouse. If an editor chooses to use Articles for Creation, they will get invited to the Teahouse. He can ignore the invitation, just as anyone else who gets it from a script can. I will pass on to the editors who maintain the script that it annoys some experienced editors who submit articles for review.
4757:
individual. I checked through the page history and fully agree with you, that there were multiple accounts involved. I do not know who's behind these accounts, why he's constantly trying to vandalize the article, and what could be his intentions. I understand that he may have violated
Knowledge's guidelines that led the page to be redirected. I tried resubmitting the draft but it got rejected for the subject not being notable. I read Knowledge's General Notability Guidelines at
6665:
9961:
8122:
6577:
1050:
10887:
7442:
deserve to be addressed in this manner. Some of us need to eat, and love to help people make articles. I guess the articles wonāt pass AfC unless they are at featured status first, but I didnāt know that, I am new to the process. Last I knew, we had a policy of āDonāt bite the newbiesā, and I was new to this. They should just ban paid editing entirely if this is the way that paid editors who attempt to disclose and contribute are going to be treated.
1699:
10348:- I have reviewed the revised draft briefly, and it does not appear to be a significant improvement. I can either decline it again or leave it for another reviewer. There is a myth in Knowledge about references. The myth is that any draft will be accepted if enough references are added to it. References are a necessary but not a sufficient condition for the acceptance of a draft. If you want the opinions of other reviewers, you can ask at
9511:
to the article, but it seems to be moved or deleted. Can you please give me more information on that? Where is Draft:Joseph G. Giambra? There is some comment about copyright infringement, but no requests were made regarding further information. While I do not have a copy of the deleted draft, my recollection is that the photos were taken by me or owned by Joseph
Giambra. Or links to other websites such as IMBD. The content was my own.
3323:
2280:
1616:
295:
5273:
2167:
7936:- I don't see anything in the game notability guidelines that is different about coverage for games that have not yet been released, but perhaps the game press routinely provides neutral coverage to games prior to release in a way that is different from films, books, or other subjects. My advice still is to discuss the split on the talk page. I would also suggest that a general discussion of games and unreleased games at
3565:
advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use
Knowledge to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Knowledge is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
6126:
5338:
4689:. Talk to the reviewer there. I don't know anything about algebraic geometry. It isn't one of the mathematical subjects that I have forgotten, because it isn't part of the higher mathematics that is studied by a chemist. So either discuss at the talk page of the existing article, or discuss at the mathematics project talk page. You would be better off to talk to a real mathematician at
9905:
8067:
6522:
995:
844:
648:
243:
5443:
4600:
1451:
10500:: Here is a long partial answer. First, as I noted above to another editor, there is a myth in Knowledge about references. The myth is that any draft will be accepted if enough references are added to it, or the right references. References are a necessary but not a sufficient condition for acceptance of a draft. The first part of my conclusion is that the track does not satisfy
11220:. She was correct in noting that I was parsing the meanings of an English word to a degree of precision that requires en-5, and she is at en-4, and her English is better than that of some Americans. (It is probably also better than that of some Britons.) I saw a sarcastic humor in her comment about lexical meanings and languages. I agree that her comments about
7980:- I am not sure that I understand. I think I understand that you want to avoid having the draft deleted, but I am not sure what sort of deletion you are concerned about needing to avoid. I don't think that there is a risk that it is about to be deleted. Has someone posted something to that effect? If you have a vague general concern, you could ask a question at
3434:- If it notifies multiple editors who were involved in the history, then it is worth the false positives to avoid any misses where the actual creator is not notified. If it is notifying multiple editors, including the true creator, then I will mostly stop complaining, because it is a reasonable solution then, if it minimizes the annoyance factor.
7398:- There is a difference between paid editing and the paid collection of household garbage. Both are looked down on. The difference is that someone has to do the paid collection of garbage, because no one will do it for free, and it has to be done. No one has to do paid editing of Knowledge, because it will be done for free if it needs doing.
6299:
the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" (Knowledge: Notability (Music)). Could you please iterate what exactly you feel I should do to indicate that the first criteria for musical notability is satisfied? Thank you.
7901:) that are all regarding upcoming releases. I'm just curious to figure out how an unreleased game with healthy coverage (ironically much of it being geared towards its unreleased nature) wouldn't be considered notable. I'm definitely waiting to hear from other editors on the Star Citizen page, just wanted to clear up that part. Thanks! ā
8447:, I think it would be much clearer to frame the discussion as a choice of whether to (1) create a stand-alone article of a subtopic, or (2) merge the draft's content into the main article. A new maintenance tag would be best suited for this, but if we must choose among existing tags, I'd say it makes much more sense to tag the issue as a
5898:, because assignments involving editing articles in Knowledge are problematic. If your assignment is to write a paper on the subject, you do not need to submit it for review, but it should still be in your own words and not copied. Please explain your university assignment. In particular, please explain why this draft is important.
5795:- Thank you. My name is Sandrah.Akol, am seriously struggling to contribute African Content on Knowledge but its an fortunate that most times I donot conform to its policies. Recently I wrote about Ntinda Vocational Training Institution-Kampala, I have been reading about the Knowledge's guidelines and I believe currently this article
959:- This is an interesting situation because it seems that more disambiguation is needed than is usually the case, because there are two people in the same line of work with the same name. I have renamed your draft to include his middle initial. This is an interesting disambiguation question, and I suggest asking for advice at the
9039:@Robert_McCleon Quite disappointing after the draft article is declined for the second time. I'm not a native speaker of English, thus limited in the language used! I did my best for the contribution anyway! I'm completely blank who can really help me over here! Will find somebody to help and resubmit the draft again! Sad
5816:- Stop submitting multiple copies with slightly different names. That only shows that you are trying to confuse the reviewers. We have told you where and how to discuss, and you should discuss rather than just resubmitting multiple copies, and you should discuss with the community rather than asking me on my talk page.
8195:'The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability'. This has been proven by providing numerous citations (significant attention) from independent sources.
10705:- I have not reviewed the sources for the draft in depth. The draft reads as if it is written from the company's viewpoint, which is expected because it is being written from the company's viewpoint. I have not reviewed the sources, but the draft does not convince me of the need to review the sources in depth.
5159:
redirect first. So I move the redirect and accept the draft. If you would prefer that I move the redirect to draft space or user space, I am willing to do that. Is that your request? I can move the redirect to draft space, or to my user space, and accept the draft. Is that what you are asking? If so, okay.
3040:, someone has a snit and decides that some sportsperson fails general notability although they passed a sports notability guideline. My own thinking is to pretend that the special notability guideline is the only one that matters if there is one, because it is clearer. So my advice would be not to assess for
3593:. If I am mistaken ā you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits ā please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Per Dorsetonian (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
4093:- It appears that what is needed is a History Merge, which is somewhat different from a regular merge. I have left your merge request on the page, but have added a History Merge request. This is done by an administrator, and is done in order to preserve the attribution in accordance with the terms of the
9114:@Robert_McCleon,thanks for your help. But can you please add some sections from the second submission of the draft as it contains more information such the characters' costume,...etc & could get help from the team as well. Really appreciate your assistance! Take care & stay healthy! God blessed!
11281:
have reviewed your proposed version of the article and have stated that they prefer the existing version. They are not required to comment in detail on your version. It is unfortunate that you choose to characterize editors with whom you disagree about article content as your opponents, but that is
10015:
or somewhere else, and found that comment, that it should be in article space, persuasive. So I resubmitted the draft, and then I reviewed the draft and accepted it. As a result of the fact that I was the last submitter of the draft to review, the script put the message on my talk page, saying that
9698:
The copyright infringement was probably of the text of the draft, because copyright to images and copyright to text are handled by somewhat different procedures. We normally will allow the use of copyrighted pictures with the consent of the photographer or other copyright owner. We cannot allow the
8732:
said was that the parties should have used dispute resolution. Barkeep further said that could be an RFC. With multiple parties coming from multiple directions, RFC is more likely to be an effective method of dispute resolution than is moderated discussion at DRN. You still can formulate an RFC.
8535:, sometimes after some discussion, and sometimes unilaterally. In those cases, it really is important to ensure that there is new discussion. In cases where there is no special notability guideline and no previous discussion, it is really just a matter of inclusion philosophy, and that gets messy.
8530:
criteria are detailed and well-defined, so that the draft can be accepted if it charted or otherwise meets a specific criterion, and otherwise can usually be declined. One of the considerations, that you mentioned, is that quite often there was an article, and it has been stubbed down to a redirect,
8439:
in an article. The tag you placed, saying, "It has been suggested that this article be split into a new article titled Draft:Robam Moni
Mekhala," made no sense to me, because the content is already in the target, and there's no existing content in the main article to be split. (In any case, one would
6000:
Why would you suggest to these users that they should consider bringing things to DRV? How would that be in scope for DRV? I think you should stop doing these random things. Draftspace is for waylaying dubious contributors, and DRV is a high level forum for admin continuing education. There is no
3265:
Resubmitted after considering the notability criteria pointed out (thanks!, there was indeed some stuff to clean up and reorganize). References and comments have been added to make clear the contribution to the academic discipline of algorithmic music, as well as citations to its global impact in the
10831:
to the one with whom you disagree. You are asking multiple reviewers for help. They may notice that you were quick to put a big fish on the talk page of a reviewer. I agree that you have made the case that brand activism is not the same as consumer activism. At the same time, your draft does not
8993:
from Thailand. After trying to prevent the draft articleĀ : Robam Moni Mekhala from being approved as a separate article, now he proposed many of the photos I uploaded to Knowledge ( including those used in the draft article) for DELETION! Some photos I got them from the facebook page (Hattha) after
8188:
6. The list of markets that the subject covers is not an 'Example of trivial coverage' on the pure basis that, the list of markets that the subject covers, are the reason for the citations & existence of the subject's secondary coverage in the first place, wholly this would seem 'trivial' had it
5158:
Move, but this would require then that I wait anywhere between 5 minutes and 24 hours to see when an administrator has deleted the redirect, and during the time after the deletion and before I can accept the draft, there is nothing. So I want to accept the draft, which means that I need to move the
5054:
to create a draft for review. The alternative, since it is so old, would be just to create the page, but as a reviewer I don't think that I should ignore the previous closure. You already have a draft. I will request permission to review it. In that case, we probably don't need to discuss at the
4631:
I saw you rejected my article because you labelled it as a spinoff of the article on derived algebraic geometry. Although these articles has similar sounding titles, they are distinct subjects. Here's a useful analogy: algebraic geometry is to noncommutative geometry as derived algebraic geometry is
3614:
who said it's mandatory to re-submit for further review (though, he still hasn't shown me where it says that this is mandatory). In any event, I'd like to request your help and receive feedback for further edits, if any. I've made suggested changes to the sources, added a COI (not an autobiography),
413:
for copyright violation. Knowledge takes copyright violation very seriously, and I see no particular reason why we should assist you in recovering content that was lost because you infringed copyright. If you have the original material available on your computer or elsewhere, you can resubmit it.
373:
Hello Robert, I had posted a page to be published and you had deleted it due to a quote from a magazine that was used directly. I would gladly update that to be a paraphrased version but the entire page is now gone. How can it be restored and then fixed? Thank you for any insight you can provide on
9510:
I am unfamiliar with the Wikipage process and hope you will excuse my query here if it does not follow the appropriate protocol. I reach out to you because you left me a message that the tone of my article was not acceptable. I made edits to comply with the request. I just popped in to add an IMBD
9422:
Hi Robert! Hope you are well? Thank you for your feedback, I'm very new to Knowledge so I'm trying my best here. I have deleted the draft for Reyko as the article is already published. And I have seen your nomination to delete the article so I have checked the criteria for notability in music and
9339:
I accepted it as is, and then fixed the headings; sometimes in a case like this I fix them first, and then accept. This is simply a decent quality translation from the frWP, not a machine translation. (Iddon ot know why the contributor didn't copy the hreading format, but it's one of the things
8202:
Furthermore, the Notability terms state 'The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own
8198:
None of the citations, or coverage can be regarded as 'Self-promotion, autobiography, product placement and most paid material are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article' The articles to which I've referred are not paid, nor classifiable as the remainder above. They're provided by independent
7377:
I know paid editing is very looked down upon, but do you know of anyone who does it well, you know, produces good quality articles in a Knowledge sense? Or is there a forum or wiki project for sharing best practices about how to comply with disclosed paid editing? I am a very old hand at Knowledge,
7059:
Hi, I'm writing to ask which is the best way to go about resolving a particular dispute along with some ongoing civility issues. I am asking you because you are the first editor on the Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers list who has made any edits today. I hope I'm going about this the right
7039:
Hi Robert, I have been working on the article for Councilmember Rishi Kumar. A bunch of people showed up and changed a lot of stuff, and submitted a bunch more articles. Can I please have to time to fix it, before it get's deleted. Can you please help me with getting this up. I am doing this in the
6298:
I would like to emphasize that my references include Voir, The Jerusalem Post, and 303 Magazine - which has an editorial board. An editor on live chat also agreed with me that these three sources should be viable for the page to be accepted. I believe I have satisfied the first criteria: "Has been
3521:
I have been told my article is not being published because it seems I may be compensated directly or indirectly for this article. I was asked to reply here to assure wiki that that is not the case. I assure you that is not the case. I am not being paid directly or indirectly to create and post this
2781:
AfC (afaik), but others move his creations to draft, where some simmer until too old ... - sad topic. They are moved to draft because they are translations from fr and de, where sourcing is different. I struggle with that a lot, and sometimes feel that writing an article from scratch is easier than
1495:
Hello Robert McClenon, last month you had rejected Biographical article of "Sunil Prem Vyas". i'm not able to understand what kind of changes should i do in article. first point you said i can split this article with another article "Take it easy (Movie 2015)" which is directed by Sunil Perm Vyas.
1245:
I will restate something that apparently needs restating. The banner at the top of a noticeboard archive that says not to edit the contents of the archive means not to edit the archive of a noticeboard or a talk page. If you think that you misread it because your thread was supposed to be closed,
571:
I created a Knowledge entry for my client, "Webfleet Solutions" and submitted it two months ago. At the time I received timely feedback from you, I quickly made all the arrangements (added third party information from reliable sources) you suggested on your feedback but I have not received any news
126:
I apologise if it looks like I have duplicated a submission. My understanding was that the article was sitting in the Draft space for a number of months but on checking the guidance it looked like it had to be moved to my own user space and then submitted. My understanding of the Draft page is that
10840:
I would expect to see to sell a product. The fact that you are promoting a strategy turns my level of discomfort with the phrase down from 10 to 8. So if I had reviewed your draft, I probably would have declined it for a different reason than WikiAviator. So address the tone issues. You might
8736:
After reviewing the explanation of the need for cookies and your personal inability to enable cookies, I do not find a compelling reason to allow anonymous participation in a moderated dispute where moderation is not likely to work anyway. In the absence of an explanation that goes into excessive
8489:
There are some common cases where a draft has the same title as a redirect, such as the name of an album that is redirected to the article on the artist, or the name of a song or track that is redirected to the article on the album. In those cases, I think it is clear that discussion should be at
7965:
continues? I'd agree with jumping the gun on submitting it for review, I just don't want it to be deleted while the rest is ongoing (I don't really know how all this works in detail). Or would it be best to leave it in the state it's in now, continue improving it and continuing the discussion, and
5933:
Hi!I am Matilda. This topic is about a type of surgery. My cat has the hip dysplasia disease and need this type of surgery. I did a lot of researches on this and i hope my draft can be posted. Maybe i had violated the copyright.But i did not mean to do it. This is my first time to edit a wikipage.
5840:
Hi! My ID is Zzhu8516. My article is rejected by u as u said it is contrary to the aim of wikipedia which means i copy too much. And my wikipage is deleted now. I know some people rejected my article before but i already changed a lot of words and sentences. This wikipage is cooresponding with my
5375:
Hello. Thanks for your message about the deletion of "Political Game Theory". Sorry I didn't see it until now. I'm very old and I don't log in at Knowledge very often these days. I think that article was probably an obsolete idea for a longer page or a neglected stub from a long time ago. Deletion
5298:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
5197:
Lourdes' solution is the one I usually suggest for extendedmovers who find themselves having to jump through complex hoops to get things done, yes. (I don't offer to nominate anymore, though; my endorsement would be of little value.) In the meantime, moving the leftover revisions into draft:, or
4865:
discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to
2871:
Thank you for deleting the draft. I incorrectly submitted it as an article for creation when I was, in fact, attempting to create a user-page. I was looking for how to retract the submission myself, but you beat me to it. Sorry for wasting your time! I am still learning how to properly use the
2521:
in one detail, and that is that, in my opinion, draftifying an undersourced article a second time should never be done, even if its author is a known paid editor. Draftifying a page twice is move-warring, and move-warring is disruptive, and experienced editors should not edit-war or move-war. If
2204:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
1868:
I visited the area in 2017 and was blown away of how massive what I term āInca Pisacā is. Upon my return home I found that there is very little information available on it, mostly tourist blogs and the odd scientific paper. As a result I decided to be bring it to peopleās attention. I had intended
1198:
could have closed the thread if they had acted. Now my view, which is consistent with the banner at the top of the archive, is to let sleeping bears sleep. (If you wake up a bear, the result is unpredictable, because bears are unpredictable, but one likely result is that the bear will injure you
575:
I wanted to ask you if you knew a way of knowing when will I receive new feedback or to know if my entry is approved or rejected? I contacted the help desk yesterday and they sent me information regarding conflicts of interests but I'm not sure how this is related to me since Webfleet Solutions is
11020:
10826:
did. I disagree with both you and WikiAviator. On the one hand, I agree that you have made a case that brand activism is not the same as consumer activism, and so I think that WikiAviator was too quick to decline your draft, in particular after I had said that the evaluation should focus on the
8030:
You didn't submit them for review, so I submitted them. You also have drafts in some other genera in various plant families, but I have left them alone, because you didn't ask about them. I am willing to accept any draft on a species with a proper source and a proper binomial name, based on the
7828:
Addendum: Also did you even read the draft talk page before declining the submission? Literally no one has thus far said that sources like GQ, Elite Daily, and Tempo don't constitute significant coverage. The draft was declined *in the past* because those sources *had not been discovered yet*. So
7152:
completely unacceptable. What is the best way to go about dealing with consistently uncivil behavior? I'm not trying to get this editor blocked or anything, but I feel a warning of some sort is in good order, and as mentioned and pointed out, I'm definitely not the only editor who feels this way.
5565:
In general, common sense is better than elaborate guidelines. I could not figure out why you had not accepted it, but that you had not noticed the actual size certainly explains it; had it been $ 10 million I wouldn't have either. I noticed it especially because I was aware of it from the NYT
3568:
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted
3175:
I can't find anything to say that the article ever existed at all, which is strange because I made it. I have the code saved in a Google Doc. I'd rather not resubmit something that got deleted already however. I just figured if it was already there maybe I could edit it up. I'll just let this one
2536:
I thought that I wasn't going to review it, but I see that a previous article on the actress was already deleted after a deletion discussion, and that was sufficient for me to decline it with a warning that I am ready to nominate it for deletion if it is resubmitted again without evidence that it
1872:
The concurrent Knowledge article called āPisacā is on the existing town and surrounding area. This area was settled by various tribes from which no buildings remains before it was conquered by the Incas. They constructed a massive complex on a mountain side overlooking the valley. This complex is
10511:
However, second, since you are being so persistent, I am willing to do either of two things for you. I advised you to discuss the rejection with other editors before resubmitting. You have chosen to persist in asking me. I am willing, the first option, just to get you to stop bothering me, to
8371:
The sources cited are the only available references I can find for the proposed article as such English-based books regarding this Cambodian dance is rare although it is a popular dance in Cambodia. The acceptance of this draft article will open it up to other editors who may have access to more
8213:
The Notability guidelines state 'No organization is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization'. It has been proven that there has been Significant attention given to the subject matter by; multiple,
8170:
1. The citations provided are to articles which are written specifically upon the subject matter submitted, these are not 'just passing mentions' so much as they provide "Significant coverage" by 'addressing the topic directly and in detail, so that no research is needed to extract the content'
5963:
I dont understand why things become so difficult. I have revised my article and i am all the way trying to make my article better.The problem is not i violated the poiucy or what my tutor ask is unreasonable. It is that i am trying my best to revise it. I hope my effort could make sense. Or if i
3095:
So around two years ago I decided I would try and become the "Influencer Guy" on wiki. So I made pages for several YouTube Celebrities and Agency's. I think all of my submissions got deleted, and then I got bored and went elsewhere. But I returned today out of curiosity, and see that other users
2762:
is an experienced editor. Knowledge is sometimes a strange complicated place. I will add that you do not have problems with English. Your English is at proficiency level 4, and I cannot tell the difference in writing between level 4 and level 5. (What I do notice is that you appear to have a
1884:
Part of the problem is that the name āInca Pisacā also refers to the period of Inca occupation of the area, which I think confused you. If you agree that your decision should be reversed there is still the problem of the article name, if you feel it is confusing. Various peoples seem to use the
1260:
Sorry if I wasn't clear? I am not suggesting that it should be closed post-archiving - I just dropped in to explain why I didn't close it myself (since you pinged me, and mentioned that I could have done so), and to say that I'm happy to leave it as is. I'm not suggesting that anyone disturb the
10770:
Brand activism seeks to change society's biggest problem (such as economic injustice, education, healthcare, immigration etc. issues), using the economic power of the business. The Brand activism claims that today for the companies is not enough to offer good product and price, but they have to
8178:
3. This draft is not written from the viewpoint of the company, the submission details only factual points relating to the subject matter & is fully cited for all factual points made, as would be expected from an external source's viewpoint. Furthermore the citations are "Independent of the
7441:
I have added over 40,000 edits to this encyclopedia over since 2006 over countless hours, for free. I have created dozens of Good Articles, and contributed to at least 5 Featured Articles. I have won dozens of barnstars, and over 98% of all my contributions have been retained thus far. I do not
4501:
I always (almost always) deal with drafts that replace redirects in this fashion. An example is a redirect for an album to the article on the musical artist, or a redirect for a song to the article on the album. Then a draft is written for the article or the song. If I were to G6 the redirect
1880:
If what you are saying is correct then shouldnāt these and any place, castle, significant structure not have a separate article and instead be incorporated in the article on the town or city in which they are located. If you search for āPisac Archaeological Parkā in Google maps and go to the 3D
1740:
Hello Robert McClenon, thank you for reviewing my submission. It seems I have resubmitted a more recent draft with the same name. How do we move forward reviewing the most recent draft (December 28, 2019), and discarding the first draft reviewed in (September 30, 2019)? Thank you for your help.
1193:
are archived if there is no activity in a period of time which may be 72 hours. If you read the header of an archive, you will notice that it normally has instructions which say not to edit it. That means do not edit the archive of a talk page or a noticeboard. This amounts to a close due to
11120:
Dispute resolution noticeboard was created to solve issues. You have taken the responsibility to sum up the disputes therefore you must understand the essence of the problem, in my case ā to check a draft in detail. You didn't do it yourself and didn't let other people join when you closed the
8367:
I wish this article will be accepted as a separate article from Manimekhala. This proposed article is a separate article for a Cambodian traditional dance Robam Moni Mekhla while Manimekhala is an article for a goddess in Hindu and Buddhist mythology. Like there are an article for Apsara and a
7888:
Hello, you left a comment on the Squadron 42 draft that I was a little confused with. I understand the discussion on splitting Star Citizen with Squadron 42, I opened that discussion but so far there's only been one other person talking it over prior to me really working on this draft. In your
1353:
page overly cluttered relative to other areas of Knowledge, so I just missed that banner you referenced. In terms of non-admin closures, I haven't closed any AfDs (other than withdrawing my nomination) and my closures have been limited to a handful of RfDs and several TfDs. I have curtailed my
8576:
I would appreciate you reading the various comments in the Arbitration Enforcement request where this matter was referred to DRN, if you haven't already, and reconsidering your closure in light of that. This dispute has been churning on the talk page and at AE for the past month, so it's very
8504:
Yes, it does seem it's an issue mainly of terminology. Would probably be best to create a new template to cover this directly. It would make sense to discuss cases at the main article talk page, but a more pertinent question, I think, would be when this is necessary. Redirects that used to be
8221:
Therefore, my submission should be approved wholly as the corporation is decidedly 'notable'. In fact, as one of my citations states, the subject is award winning, this is 'notable' in its own right. My submission has provided multiple citations to 'significant coverage' of the subject, from
5154:- Okay. How would you prefer that I handle these drafts? I am willing to follow a somewhat different approach. The situation is that there is a draft article submitted for review that should be accepted, but there is a redirect to a parent article. I could tag the redirect for deletion as
3564:
Hello Mmizeasrm. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to American Society for Reproductive Medicine, but you have not complied with Knowledge's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid
1291:
threads could be archived without closure. It's clear that nothing needs to happen from that thread as there's no clear outcome on what, if anything, needs to happen. If someone from that thread wants to re-open an aspect of that discussion, they're certainly able to do that by bringing a new
8217:
The Notability guidelines specifically state that 'A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. notable if it has been the subject of
8206:
Which of course is the case, multiple independent, sources have considered the topic notable enough to have written and published non-trivial work of their own that specifically focus upon the subject, without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to this topic matter.
5050:- First, you made a typo in copying the URL of the deletion discussion to my talk page, and it didn't link to anything, but I guessed what it was supposed to be and have fixed it and viewed the AFD. That is a nine-year-old AFD. The usual procedure in such a case is to request permission at
8225:
I have spoken to members of the Tea Room & one comment was that the City A.M. citation is of a 'trivial coverage' nature. To rebuttal this, my comment is, the statement is short, stating the company raised 30k. But just because the statement is short, does not mean it doesn't constitute
8156:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Knowledge article ā that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the
4756:
I am writing to you regarding the draft about Saket Modi which was declined by you stating There has been a history of sockpuppetry in the previous article on Saket Modi that has been stubbed down to a redirect. I am assuming by "sockpuppetry" you mean multiple accounts operated by a single
1331:
is archived, and there are other things you don't know, is it possible that you don't know enough to do non-admin closures of XFD? Either you know what you are doing and can't explain it, so that other think you don't know what you are doing, or you actually don't know what you are doing.
8163:
This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject. Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate
3806:
The creator of this material came to me several weeks ago and requested me to assist him create his first article. I did not have the time at that time. When I found the time, I noticed that his draft has been rejected on more than one occasion, despite the presence of adequate referencing
3572:
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mmizeasrm. The template
7799:. There have been statements that she has enough individual coverage to qualify for a separate article, and there have been statements that she does not have enough individual coverage to qualify for a separate article. I am requesting that the community discuss at the group talk page.
6999:- It says: "Both the sender and recipient must have allowed user emails in their preferences." That confirms my thinking. If the would-be sender, GDX420, hasn't allowed user emails at their end, they can't email me, although I have enabled email. Both users have to have enabled it.
10580:
I'd argue that testguild.com definitely is a noteworthy independent source, as it is one of the top resources in the software testing space. There are also a lot of other third-party references in the article, including an article in the "Computer Standards & Interfaces" journal.
8759:
I will note that 2600:1004 has been a productive contributor to the discussion for quite some time and so if that was the only thing preventing this from being handled at DRN I'd ask for reconsideration. However, I will affirm that while DRN is part of the dispute resolution process,
3561:@Robert McClenon:I received the below from Dorsetonian. Please see in the message below where I am asked to respond to the message below that I am not being compensated directly or indirectly. I apparently replied to you rather than Dorsetonian in error. I apologize. Can you help me?
10374:
I understand that you have rejected the submission from my sandbox. I understand most reasons for your decision. I do not understand why the info in my sandbox has been erased -- this does not make sense to me if I want to improve the text. Can you reinstate the sandbox content?
8572:
I'm unable to use an account because I can't enable cookies on the device that I use to edit. I don't know who the other IP is, or whether they have a legitimate reason for editing anonymously, but they're a different person. (It's helpful to compare our respective geolocations.)
3120:- What exact name did you give to the article or draft that you created? There was a page deleted from article space eight years ago that was also a fluff piece by the same author as wrote the draft that I declined last month. There was also a draft deleted two years ago named
4632:
to derived noncommutative algebraic geometry. The basic objects considered in these fields are separate. In DNCAG the objects are triangulated categories while in DAG they are derived rings, such as simplicial rings or differential graded algebras. Here's a couple relevant links
8737:
detail (for which I am not asking), it sounds as though, first, you may be able to find a device at a library or Internet cafƩ, second, the "personal reason" sounds like the device isn't really yours, third, I don't know which of the other parties to the dispute you might be.
4987:- I will review the history of the article within 48 hours. In any case, you should discuss on the talk page of the existing article. What I will research is whether any sort of formal action in order to approve the split (thus reversing the decision to redirect) is needed.
6334:
based on the first criterion, my advice is to indicate that on the draft talk page and in an AFC comment, and resubmit the draft. AFC review is done based on what is in the draft. If you and another editor think that it satisfies criterion 1, say so and resubmit the draft.
11085:
I'm a new person in an established community, English is not my native language, I openly support what most users oppose. This is not like an equal condition for me and you. And you know that your position is stronger now. Don't tell me that this is not discrimination in its
5004:- Where was the consensus reached to stub the article down to a redirect? I haven't found the discussion. Unless I can find it, my thought would be that I can accept it, and if anyone objects, they can nominate it for deletion, and we will have a deletion discussion.
1225:
Yeah - I didn't feel I should be the closer, since I'd expressed an opinion on one of the various side issues that arose (the relisting of the AfD, which was criticised by the OP). I'm quite content for it to slip away into the archive and attract dust instead of flame.
191:
and identify which criteria she satisfies. I am not saying that she does or does not satisfy the criteria, but that I am asking you to decide which criteria are applicable. Please indicate on the draft talk page what criteria are applicable and what references apply.
7064:. I also feel that SchroCat followed me to this article (no previous edits there). I don't know if this constitutes hounding/harassment, but I do wonder if it is something I should bring up. Several other editors and I have experienced civility issues with SchroCat at
3817:
If the transfer of material to one of my sandboxes violates some Knowledge rule, please show me how to do it properly. If it is a problem, I will delete the material, as I have other ways to help the writer without using his draft. Your guidance is welcome. Thank you.
10508:. Any argument that you make for acceptance of the draft should be based on general notability, because I think that it fails musical notability. I personally do not want to try to evaluate whether a song track passes general notability based on added references.
2100:
had commented on the Dilshad draft that "It's definitely better, nice". That was what made me confident enough that it would pass the review. How do you think I can improve it till it becomes eligible for an article? Your suggestions would be a great help. Cheers! ā
1876:
In many ways what I have termed āInca Pisacā is the same as the following all of which have separate articles in Knowledge: - The Acropolis overlooking Athens - The Alhambra palace complex overlooking the city of Granada - Edinburgh castle overlooking Edinburgh
10722:
Thank you for taking time to go over the article! I fully agree with your feedback and has since removed the content that came across as pitchy and rewrote the rest aiming for a significantly more neutral tone. I've also re-submitted the article for review.
4681:- I did not reject your draft. I declined your draft, which means that you can resubmit it. (Knowledge has its own vocabulary, just as any branch of mathematics or science does.) If you want more information about the draft review process, you may ask at
8362:
9223:
I was wondering what I can do to improve the article. I also want to let you know that "Let's Fall in Love for the Night" is Finneas' most successful song. It reached the top 20 on the alternative songs billboard chart and number 26 on the rock airplay.
7182:) regarding my submission for Criterion Software limited page, I wanted to understand what can be done in order for this page to be accepted? The Criterion Games page (which is a subsidiary of criterion software limited) has its own page. Please advise
8490:
the parent article talk page. I agree that some cases are less clear. In general, I would prefer to see discussion on a talk page if there is an appropriate talk page, rather than just making a reviewer decision. Do you understand what I am saying?
8226:'Significant coverage' as it addresses the subject directly in detail, as required by the Notability guidelines. This is no different to referring to a famous persons date of birth, or death. A statement, backed up by an independent, reliable source.
10523:
Do you want me to remove the Rejection and let another reviewer review it when they are ready? Do you want me to remove the Rejection and move it into article space (accept the draft) based on your request, without reviewing it myself? Your call.
6065:
content from the draft into the main article. Having thought a bit more about it, though, I'm not sure I agree that being a subtopic to an existing article should be a categorical reason for declining AfC drafts. The most relevant guideline would be
3875:
1. In the draft space, either you or one of your colleagues threatened to erase the draft. I might wake up tomorrow and that draft is gone! I wanted it in a place where I could find it when time came to work on it. 2. I could not find a sandbox for
1095:
10763:
While Consumer activism focuses on consumption and how goods or services are produced and delivered, Brand activism is a marketing and business management process by which businesses concern for the communities they serve and the world we live in.
10273:
I have been told by other editors that a song article can be notable if the references are good. I have done more research and found books and other websites explaining the origin of the song. Please check it out and see if it is good to resubmit.
9951:
10940:
Robert, thank you for your advice on more facts and a neutral tone. It will really help me write better. As for trout, I never knew it was too daring to use. I assumed it was normal functionality, I apologize to WikiAviator for using it hastily.
8112:
6567:
718:- I do not usually follow a draft through the approval process. However, you say that this is an important article. Why is it important? Why is the subject notable? Is it important because you are working for the subject? If so, please read
3880:. If it exists, please show me and I will gladly put the draft there. 3. My concern now is that the young man or woman has been frustrated and given up editing on Knowledge for good. He/She has not responded to my messages in the last two days.
5246:
is ready for the mainspace. I was thinking of moving the draft page myself into the mainspace, but I would like to have a second opinion. Could you possibly look over the draft, see if it needs anything else, before it moves to the mainspace?
3662:, but that is a difference of opinion. You should not have been move-warring with Bearcat. Editors who have a conflict of interest are not permitted to move their drafts into article space or otherwise to edit them. I do not know whether
1040:
7523:. The ref has more detail, but I'm tired. Could you please move the article back to article space, where it belonged all the time, imho? It could be improved better in the open, connected to links in articles and to the German Knowledge. --
9575:
9437:
8222:
multiple, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject; of which the citations adhere totally to Knowledge's Notability guidelines & my sources follow the exact points set out in the general notability guideline.
1873:
believed to have functioned as a combined royal retreat, farm, fortress and town. When the Spanish came the Inca complex was abandoned and the Spanish established a town on the valley floor below it and gave the Inca name to this town.
500:
10101:
10667:
Also, I just want to be transparent with that both I and the original draft submitter work for Load Impact, the company providing the open-source stewardship for the k6 project. This is also the reason why we we submitted to the AfC.
1530:- First, the page that was rejected was a sandbox that has only a picture of Vyas but no biography. If you want to use your sandbox for some other purpose, you can blank it and reuse it. Second, I suggest that you ask for advice at
5182:
has another suggestion above that would simplify acceptance by allowing me to delete the redirect, but it could be otherwise controversial, so I would like know what your advice is on accepting drafts that are blocked by redirects.
7412:
If you can set up a forum or WikiProject for sharing best practices, the other paid editors will appreciate it. Whether the volunteer editors will appreciate it may depend on whether you do it with as little stinking as possible.
4339:
10016:
the draft had been accepted and was Class C. So did I really do that? I guess yes and no. There is also a similar message accepting one of your plants, but that is for a stub. Does that tell you more than you wanted to know?
2353:
9890:
10478:
8174:
2. The subject is published in reliable, secondary sources, as the sources are 'third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy'... The first source is Bloomberg L.P The second source City A.M.
8052:
5857:
3453:
6507:
2801:
867:
11035:
in investigations against unscrupulous editors. The quality of Google translator allows you to easily check this. Why should my word weigh less than the word of David_Gerard? (This is a rhetorical question, no need to answer.)
9199:- If there is information from another version that needs to be added to the article, go ahead and add it. The article is tagged for copy-edit and is waiting for a copy-editor, so that any additions will also be copy-edited.
8509:}}, it could probably be accepted as a separate article straight away. Regarding your album and song examples, I'm not regularly involved at AfC, but if I were, I'd probably prefer to approve and "deal with it in Mainspace". --
10771:
understand the long-term needs of the society and to solve global problems as economic problems, regulations, corruption, global warming, discrimination, education, healthcare, and etc. using the economic power they possess.
3493:
752:
The only conflict of interest is that I'm interested in it. I'm about as remote as physically possible from that person. I live on a different continent and I learned about them only a few weeks ago while researching for the
4903:
3048:. If she does, accept the draft, and it will almost certainly be all right. If she doesn't pass acting notability, she almost certainly will not pass general notability either. So: Has she had multiple significant roles?
1417:
6060:
I think they're that different. In the case covered by the guideline, the content currently in main article is split off into a new sub-article. With drafts about potential sub-articles, the discussion would be whether to
5702:
980:
10520:. If you ask me to accept your draft without a review, I will accept your draft without a review. It is likely to be nominated for deletion. In that case, I am willing to remain neutral in a deletion discussion.
8815:
you are the main person who's monitoring behavioral issues on these articles, so I would particularly like your guidance on whether it's acceptable for the opening summary of a RFC to make these kinds of allegations.
4573:
on the DRN talk page, which has now gone from requesting a closure review (which I complied with) to simply relitigating the dispute at hand. I would do it myself, but at this point I would consider myself involved.
9248:
8821:
3484:
3154:
Do you see a View Logs link when you view the history of the draft? That shows you a few actions, including any past deletions with the same name. Of course, it only works with the same name, not a similar name.
10512:
remove the Rejection from the draft and allow you to resubmit it and have another editor review it. I do not plan to review it again. My guess is that another editor will decline or reject it, but you can try.
7813:
That's a strange way of not answering my question. I mean, *you* were the person who said Chaeyoung did not have enough coverage to satisfy GNG, and i asked you to explain that...you dodged that question entirely.
7378:
but very new to any paid editing and I want to try to fulfill the stringent requirements of disclosure, for example, and I keep doing it wrong. If you know of anyone that does it well, please let me know. Thanks,
2522:
the page has been improperly moved into article space a second time, it should be taken to AFD instead. That is my opinion anyway. But I agree with the current move-protection, and I do not plan to accept it.
579:
Also, I would like to know if I edit the draft version and submit it again, will the days start counting again until a reviewer can see my entry? I mean, if I edit it again, will I have to wait two more months?
10515:
The second option is that I am willing, based on your request, and on your opinion, and not my review or judgment, to move the draft into article space, without offering my opinion as to whether it will pass a
2595:
6866:
Hi Robert, I've looked all over my skin. I can see a few gnar scars, a birthmark and a dodgy tattoo from fresher's week 1999 but I can't see any email links sorry. Where would be the best place to send what I
6755:
and understand your viewpoint. That might have been the case earlier, but in the edits yesterday and today, the mentions on CNN, Fox, Vice, Guardian etc are substantial. Please see my comment at the bottom on
6704:
2726:(where I pointed by "read below"), and thousands of others. Admitted, we both are foreigners, and have problems with English. I thought inviting him to the teahouse was not appropriate. When an editor is new
9665:
9542:
10263:
10249:
10042:
9557:
because it was a copy of copyrighted material. You may discuss with the deleting administrator, but copyright infringement is never restored. You may rewrite the draft in your own words and resubmit it.
9652:
9529:
7586:- I will work them off as I work them off. I am about to go to bed, and I hope that I don't see them or read them for the next eight hours, because if I do, those are weird dreams, but dreams are weird.
10188:
8421:
8384:
7317:
This is an article of a health network, I think that this draft should be made its own article because of the fact that this is a hospital within the health network. A great example of another article is
10658:- Ref 13 is a study of scalable rest applications published in the journal "Computer Standards & Interfaces" where k6 was one of two tools used, which has since been quoted in an article on wiley.com
9978:
8140:
6595:
3650:'s actions somewhat, but I completely disagree with your actions. I do not normally follow a draft through the approval process, and I very seldom if ever assist paid editors or other editors who have
10141:
8716:
at least four times within the past month, as you said. That, in itself, doesn't incline me to try to mediate a dispute that keeps going back to conduct forums. I understand that you understand that
8412:@Robert McClenon Thanks anyway! I'll try to improve the draft later. I hope this will be my second article being approved. This is all I can contribute. Sorry to disturb you! Take care!God bless you.
5329:
1857:
598:
4455:
2432:
1147:
1068:
8435:
to the article back in January, but could not understand what the request was supposed to entail. In my understanding (and I believe this is the way most people see it), a split primarily concerns
2700:
426:. In either case, I am not optimistic that we will be able to restore your page. It should have been your responsibility to keep a copy of it. I have found a record that I moved your sandbox to
9992:
7889:
comment, it says that upcoming or unreleased games don't generally qualify under notability, but the page you linked to doesn't seem to have any information on that, and there are a few articles (
3533:
1114:
thread originated with a single proposal, supported by one other editor, and then devolved (as is typical at ANI) into a series of sidebar discussions and general comments and observations. Given
948:
10169:
Hi Robert, I would like to see what is the issue of not accepting the article for Nemanja Jovanovic. I see that you refer to Notability for sports but there also exists part for College athletes
2885:
696:. Many of these sources are restricted by paywalls, and I can't afford to go out of the way. This is an important article. Please hear me out, I'd love feedback and help with the article. Best,
11106:
Neither I nor any other editor are required to check a draft in detail. Besides, you didn't ask me to check your draft, and so you shouldn't fault me for not volunteering to check your draft.
6026:, but that guideline is about splitting off content from long articles, not creating new content that could be a subtopic of an existing one. It seems a bit confusing, pointing editors there. --
7739:
Hello. You said Chaeyoung does not have significant coverage in secondary sources, but you didn't explain why. Chaeyoung has received coverage as an individual from multiple secondary sources.
3718:
i didn't understand what i should do to improve the article should i delete eh article on my sandbox because there are 2 copies of the articleĀ ?, that's what i understand from these messages.--
2930:
2918:
9384:
Dear Robert McClenon, I take the view that the Jack Harman article meets the following criterion: "The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument" as demonstrated here:
5639:
that claims that the subject is worth $ 30.4 billion. After this discussion, I thought it particularly appropriate to do a very quick fact-check. The subject exists, and probably did attend
10132:
5657:
7310:
5662:
Hello Robert Mcclenon, my name is Sandrah.Akol. The Article was nominated for speedy deletion under category G5, and I have no financial stake on this article. I have done new edits on the
2841:
2438:
1323:- There is much detail about Knowledge, some of which one should know, most of which one can get away without knowing, as long as one doesn't mess in it. This may be off any subject, but,
6830:- Does your skin (view) include a link called Email this user when viewing a user talk page or user page? If it does, that works. If it doesn't, that is an issue that you could raise at
4074:. Please merge the histories, or have an admin help merge the histories so we don't lose credit to contributors of the original (which is also required by copyright). Thank you in advance
448:
The page was also hopelessly spammy. If a new version were to be created, it would need to have almost entirely different text so there is no point in letting you see the deleted stuff. ā
6966:
Hi Robert, there doesn't appear to be a connection. I've just tested it by unchecking the option in my own preferences, but I'm still able to see "email this user" on your page. GDX, see
3610:
Thanks for the edits to the article. After making changes to it and following your suggestions, I moved the article to mainspace, where it was later reverted to draftspace and blocked by
3544:- Who asked you to reply her that you are not being paid for the draft? Who told you that your article is not being published because you are being paid directly or indirectly for it?
2696:
1894:
830:
502:
229:
8693:
8659:
8633:
8611:
10399:. It is still there. Your sandbox has a link to the draft, so that you can either go from your sandbox to the draft, or do something else with your sandbox. The draft will remain at
9147:
Hi Robert_McCleon! I can not view or edit the draft: Robam Moni Mekhala, is the draft deleted? So, disappointing as I spent lot of times working on it! Or I have to re-draft it again?
8902:- A small issue, which is that the way her dates were formatted made it appear to say she is still alive. That should be changed to b. 1867 or to aĀ ? . Go ahead and review it again.
8843:
6204:
6192:
2154:
10011:
and asked other reviewers to review it. I declined it based on advice from mathematicians. I then got a further comment that the text should be in article space somewhere, either as
8916:
I don't know how to "review it again" as I didn't review it to begin with, e.g. I think all of the articles I create are put into auto-reviewed status. Is this something you can do? --
8185:
5. The submission provides "Significant coverage" in its citations as they 'addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content'.
6046:- Do you have a suggestion for how to improve the template message, such as a different guideline? Do you think that the two cases of splitting an article are really that different?
5400:
Do you still have objections to the deletion of this move page? I saw your note on the draft talk page but I wasn't sure if you had taken discussion of this page elsewhere. Thank you.
5365:
3930:
All of the sources are independent, and other blockchain platforms in Corda's peer group (some that are significantly less notable) have their own pages. Any help appreciated - thanks
2541:. Also, I agree that the editor should be blocked for the personal attacks of yelling vandalism. I do not have an opinion on whether the block should be for 72 hours or indefinite.
10321:
7134:
Looks like someone else already did that, and consensus has been reached regarding the commas. That only covers one of the issues I brought up, but I guess that's that. Thanks again.
6290:
Hello! You recently declined my draft submission for the artist 'Anomalie' and I noticed the comment that said I must indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied.
634:
5353:
862:
261:
5938:
that my article have Violation Unlikely under 30%.And it is marked with green which i think it is fine. If u think it is not enough, i still need to make any change,just tell me .
3842:. It isn't clear to me why you thought it was necessary to copy-paste this into your sandbox when it was already in draft space (and when you could have put it in their sandbox).
11190:
whom she also accuses here of being 'cunning'. FWIW, I concur with David's removal of all the promo-speak and McClennon's DRN closure. Knowledge volunteers are not here to provide
6207:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
4027:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
2933:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
693:
10767:
Consumer activism seeks to change the way in which goods or services are produced in order to make the production process safer, more ethical, more environmentally friendly, etc.
10177:
and if this one is accepted I don't see the reason for not accepting Nemanja, too. Thanks for the review and I hope you'll accept this additional explanation. Best regards, Marko
8825:
7829:
far, you have been literally the only person to say those sources don't constitute significant coverage, and when questioned about this above you act like you never even said it.
7212:
In 2018, you offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has now accepted that request for arbitration, and an arbitration case has been opened at
4570:
3297:- I didn't really review the draft and I didn't decline it. I only commented that it should be reviewed. I may review it in the future, or I may leave it for another reviewer.
3036:, is occasionally contentious. As written, most of the special notability guidelines usually say that if they are met, notability is "presumed", and occasionally, typically with
2832:
907:
9271:
I also want to reaffirm my commitment towards following the rules guarding Knowledge editors. I have never taken com compensations for editing or creating articles on Knowledge.
675:
11248:
All my opponents make personal complaints about me and my choice of work instead of formally discussing claims to the text on three discussion pages. I see we are done here.))--
10307:
10268:
6933:, go to "Preferences" at the top of your page, then on that page scroll down to "Email options" and tick "allow other users to email me". Robert will then be able to email you.
5834:
5391:
2643:. The ANI report was almost a year ago, but the other party to the DRN likely remembers it as clearly and bitterly as if it were last week. The editor who filed the report at
2201:
2176:
2159:
540:
209:
9615:
9477:
6285:
6148:
2077:
6156:
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at
1574:
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at
473:- I assume you are telling the OP that there is no point is letting them see the deleted draft, because I didn't ask to see it. It is common for material to be both copyvio
10969:
8685:
8650:
What device are you using that doesn't accept cookies? I can use cookies on a smartphone, or a laptop, or a desktop. Where are you and what device are you trying to use?
8625:
8578:
8269:
8084:
7519:: I found a decent ref for this long-term music professor of the Leipzig Music University, with a premiere of his piece conducted by Masur during the opening of the Leipzig
7308:
223:
6729:- I probably would have seen that shortly, but thank you for mentioning it. I will respond to it when I respond to it, maybe in 24 to 48 hours, but anyway within a week.
6186:
5841:
assignment in the uni.So it is super important.Can u tell me what i need to improve as i think Violation Unlikely is below 28.6% now. I think i did not disobey any rules.--
2243:
2228:
9290:
9244:
8817:
7670:- Okay. I'll start sending them back. Thank you for being polite about this issue. We don't need to create extra work in a labor of love. (It just occurred to me. Is
4024:
4012:
1721:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
10052:
Is there anyway that nirvana books like āNirvana: The Recording Sessionsā be used as a reference for this article. Iāve seen it been used on other nirvana song articles.
9252:
7343:
6388:
Hello, Thank you for reviewing and publishing my draft. This was the first of many contributions I seek to make to Knowledge and become a part of this amazing community!
5139:
If you're going to move redirects out of the way like this to deliberately nonsensical names and request deletion, could you please move them out of the main namespace? ā
7898:
5675:
4780:
1840:, let the user edit. If the user edits, the userboxes are harmless. If the user doesn't edit, the userboxes just sit there and are harmless. None of them tell lies.
898:
10328:
with the citations that have been added to the page but it has been under review for a long time. Is there any way you could re-assess the page when you have a moment?
9643:
Thanks so much for the reply, Robert. How can I determine what part he thought was infringement? and how do I get a message to him? I can't find a talk page for him.
6318:
11048:
10539:
10497:
10482:
10287:
10275:
10255:
10241:
10069:
10053:
10034:
9931:
9225:
9019:
8431:
Hi. I just noticed the Manimekhala discussion mentioned above, and I must say I find your notion of what constitutes article splitting to be very peculiar. I saw your
8088:
6543:
6111:
5995:
5989:
5261:
4805:
2611:
2589:
1083:
1016:
531:
249:
234:
10584:
What kind of source is it that you think is lacking, exactly? I would love to assist in digging up more resources, but I personally think this should be good enough?
10093:
7869:
7855:
7838:
7823:
7808:
6010:
4874:
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the
3202:
3164:
3149:
10294:. My reading of the guidelines is that a song is normally considered notable if the song satisfies the special notability guidelines by having charted. Discuss at
9797:
9712:
9693:
9673:
9657:
9644:
9606:
9587:
9567:
9550:
9534:
9521:
9468:
9449:
4862:
10232:
9191:
9085:
9031:
8404:
8167:
I would like to state the case that this decline is not correct, under the terms of Knowledge's rules & guidelines. I will address the points made as follows:
3375:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
2332:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
1668:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
347:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
10929:
10836:
tone. It strikes me as being "in-your-face" in its support of brand activism. If brand activists are seeking to "solve the global problems", that is the sort of
10793:
10196:
10180:
10113:
8073:
8058:
7088:- Well, my first thought is that if this is an issue about commas, it isn't worth making an issue about. I will review the issue in more detail within 24 hours.
6678:
6169:
6161:
5324:
3128:, which is the code for spam or advertising. If it was yours, then you could ask to have it undeleted, but requests to have things undeleted that were deleted as
11071:
when it is based on suspect categories. The employment status of an editor is a category for which we are allowed to discriminate, that is, make a distinction.
10854:
9208:
8265:
7993:
7972:
7949:
7928:
7436:
7422:
5017:
4917:
4554:
2962:
2680:
2550:
2531:
583:
On the other hand, before submitting this entry I had not previously been active on Knowledge and had no Wiki authority, does this affect the review of my entry?
490:
10937:
10732:
10714:
10619:
9283:
8232:
6606:
5198:
user:, or talk: while it's awaiting deletion would avoid polluting mainspace. As an aside, admins who G6 a redirect to make way for a page move are supposed to
4669:
4623:
3800:
3675:
3391:
3314:
2149:
2112:
1825:
1718:
1710:
1702:
1691:
798:
689:
443:
427:
406:
10697:
10677:
10412:
7451:
7407:
7143:
7129:
7111:
7097:
5064:
4996:
4788:
2575:
2508:
1932:
1849:
626:
9867:, See, I was a liberal arts major in an effort to avoid any of this. I accepted the page with the suggested name, although I probably should have considered a
9306:
7553:
7503:
5825:
5385:
5345:
5295:
5280:
5266:
3248:
2791:
2772:
1774:
1480:
1466:
1275:
1255:
1240:
10814:
10504:
because it has not charted or satisfied another of the criteria for inclusion. The second part of my conclusion is that the track does not appear to satisfy
10464:
9826:
that the title should be? Am I overthinking what he's saying or did he somehow make it more complicated? I don't want to feel dumb and ask the guy to clarify
9233:
7162:
6236:
4003:
2068:
2051:
1762:
11282:
your designation; I did not see them identify you as an opponent. Again, RFC appears to be the most appropriate way to resolve the content of the article.
10744:
10599:
9823:
9399:
8782:. As I understand it, dispute resolution requests typically aren't accepted while there's a RFC underway, so at this point I'm willing to accept the closure.
8586:
8499:
7364:
7008:
6987:
6976:
6961:
6757:
6752:
5925:
5907:
5370:
4821:
3643:
3622:
3601:
2977:
2969:
2917:
2631:
1955:
1941:
1765:. You submit a draft for review by submitting it. You did not submit that draft. Click on the tab for the purpose. Do you want me to submit it for you?
1631:
1609:
1561:
1543:
1349:, I accept that don't know everything about Knowledge and, you're right, you can get away with that as it's not necessary. However, to be honest, I find the
402:
381:
11167:
11153:
11130:
11115:
10025:
9880:
9859:
8956:
8942:
8925:
8911:
8773:
8044:
7701:
7687:
7544:. In the future, if you are posting to something near the top of my talk page, a comment at the bottom would help, but I found your post via the history.
6497:
6277:
5192:
4194:
3747:
3553:
3417:
Yeah, I wish there was a way to fix the script so it only notified the original creator, rather than everyone who has been involved in the article process.
1904:
1794:
1750:
972:
9703:
releases the text for reuse by anyone else under a similar license anywhere in the world, and that is usually not the way people want to give permission.
9326:
9288:
8544:
8518:
8484:
7609:
7595:
6797:
6079:
6055:
5886:
5785:
5765:
5740:
5558:
4948:
4615:
3913:
3851:
3634:
3227:
3218:
are the 5 edits which were deleted in 2018 as "spam or advertising". Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but at least you now have the mystery solvedĀ :) --
2907:
2295:
2273:
1991:
1587:
1579:
463:
11291:
11241:
11099:
11080:
10960:
10361:
8395:- I will review the draft within 48 hours, probably 24 (since there isn't a whole lot that anyone can do other than use the Internet with the lockdown).
7722:
7662:
6647:
6480:
6344:
5225:
5208:
5168:
4735:
4702:
4426:
4294:
4271:
4177:
4121:
4106:
3443:
3412:
3082:
3059:
2183:, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Knowledge's goals. Please note that
11182:
is hardly a new user. Her English is excellent and her suggestion to continue this discussion in another language is very inappropriate. Her comments at
9257:
7300:
7221:
7217:
6918:
6897:
6876:
6861:
6847:
6016:
5813:
5800:
5667:
4647:
Will you let me resubmit this article? Is there anything you'd like me to add to the DAG article to try and differentiate the two subjects even further?
4351:
3348:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
2305:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
2263:
1786:
1758:
1742:
1684:
1641:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
1375:
1341:
1220:
320:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
201:
156:
11039:
I want a substantive discussion about draft quality, and not about my paid editing. Please help me phrase a request to the community at the Teahouse. --
10076:, but I see two separate questions. The first is whether Nirvana books can be used as references. The second is whether a particular song satisfies a
9738:
7768:
7355:
request, and I will put a comment to discuss on the talk page of the existing article whether other editors agree that separate articles are in order.
7019:
6450:
I hadn't seen the draft. It's certainly notable, & long enough for its own article. There seem to be 4 editors now who think so, so I'd just do it.
5808:
4537:
4511:
4222:
3306:
2499:
thread. If the editor in question is indeffed, it will leave the draft to be available for review in a few weeks or a few months by a neutral editor.
2348:
818:
776:
739:
9930:. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions ā kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the
7647:
6738:
5718:
4892:
4056:
3947:
3931:
2424:
2365:
1730:
1406:
1199:
and then go back to sleep.) If the user who was the original subject of the discussion messes with the article, then I would suggest that a report at
11012:ā volunteers or affiliates ā should follow Knowledge rules in the same way. Now my situation looks like discrimination (but I understand that this is
10911:
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that, just like the trout in this picture, your trouting of Wikipedians is overdone.
10215:. If they think that he is notable, I will accept. I am not really interested in whether other college coaches are listed, because that is known as
9371:
8894:
8182:
4. This business corporation is notable, given the significant coverage that has been provided by multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources.
7764:
6622:
5616:
5540:
5515:
5435:
5081:
5039:
4976:
3791:
3773:
1313:
11008:ā non my case. My contract says that I get paid for creating a draft for Knowledge, and not for publishing and saving the article. But Iām sure that
10975:
8979:
8689:
8629:
8582:
7189:
6419:
article take place on the the talk page of the existing article. The discussion, however, appears to have ended up on the talk page of the redirect,
6191:
5101:
4784:
2445:
2107:
1799:
1527:
1506:
393:
363:
310:
288:
10561:
10533:
9297:
I just came across it, and wanted to run reFill on it for a second, but don't want to create an edit conflict. (I wasn't intending to review it.) --
6939:
6459:
5996:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft%3ANtinda_Vocational_Training_Institute-Kampala&type=revision&diff=941798286&oldid=941797532
5869:
4794:
Hi Robert McClenon, I understand you must be busy. I will be highly obliged if you take out few minutes and help me fix above issue...thanks a lot
3185:
3109:
10983:
10649:- Ref 5, testguild.com is very well-considered in the software testing space, and, at least in my opinion, counts as a credible third-party source.
5964:
violate the policy for once, then i can not make some changes? I will be labelled as a rule breaker and i can not publish any article since then?
3541:
3525:
3465:
2988:
guidelines? Cause the coverage for the subject is low or close to nothing and being that she's played a couple of roles there should be something.
2031:
956:
940:
879:
11257:
11203:
10337:
8684:
of accepting cookies, but for personal reasons I can't enable them. If you aren't willing to reconsider your decision, you can just tell me that.
6210:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
4030:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
3426:
2997:
2936:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
1548:
Also, you are having difficulty in communicating in English. Have you considered contributing to the Knowledge in your first language, maybe the
1436:
1211:
thread. But to answer your question about policy, the policy is that the thread is closed by having been ignored by the community for 72 hours.
11212:, but will comment on his comment on her suggestion to continue the discussion in Russian. It was not inappropriate, but sarcastic, and, on the
7483:
6242:
6157:
6149:
5971:
5945:
5891:
5874:
5842:
5143:
3663:
3215:
3121:
3073:- Also, if you decide to accept it, and you need help with the redirect, please let me know and I will move it. A hatnote will then be added.
2663:. I haven't looked at the recent edit-war, but if the filing editor is being a bully, which is what it appears, then they have been notified of
1689:
1607:
7271:
I have added an email address and the link to my user page. I have lots of evidence about paid editing which I am sure will lead to indictments.
6690:
5983:
5957:
5850:
5796:
5652:
4545:
I remember noticing the redirect, and realizing that I must have been interrupted after I accepted the draft and before I tagged the redirect.
1181:
7280:
6769:
6327:
6306:
4097:. I think that is what you are requesting. In any case, thank you for calling the attention of reviewers and administrators to the problem.
2271:
10384:
9058:
9003:
8240:
7232:
6397:
5706:
4936:
type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of
937:
Thank you. This is for a different chef with the same name, John Shields, in Chicago. Please let me know if there are any changes I can make!
9411:
8871:
8444:
7784:
7713:
this was discussed elsewhere and I thought you had been told; sorry if that isn't the case. All you have to do is to use {{subst:PAGENAME}}.
7220:. Please add your evidence by March 23, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,
6996:
6981:
Perhaps this is connected to the "Allow emails from brand-new users" option? I'd have thought GDX's account was old enough, but perhaps not.
5709:). Looks like some blocks and salting may be in order. I'm a bit busy to investigate further atm, but if you need any help please ping me. --
1735:
184:
168:
144:
128:
75:
10994:
7261:
3814:
can create a sandbox of his/her own. I have sent a message to the owner of the material to inform him that I am ready to work with him/her.
11232:
after the fact from a request for mediation to a request to review a draft, and that DRN is not a forum for requesting review of a draft.
10569:
8753:
7907:
7334:
in Central and Western Massachusetts." As you may know, a healthcare system consists of many hospitals as does UMass Memorial Health Care.
6600:
5894:- Does your university assignment involve including an article in Knowledge? If so, please have your instructor discuss the assignment at
5680:
5411:
5093:
3294:
3273:
1602:
10061:
9839:
7077:
7049:
6140:
5577:
5461:
2476:
7760:
4809:
4427:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts/MMA_notability#Current_list_of_notable_MMA_organizations_and_promotions
3285:
2088:
1575:
286:
273:
267:
10492:
10007:. They are differential equations, and I have forgotten all of the higher mathematics that I learned fifty years ago. I was reviewing
9218:
7239:
6099:
6070:, but it doesn't actually say that the issue must be discussed on the main article talk page before a standalone page can be created. --
3889:
3827:
47:
10444:
9809:
8990:
7748:
7566:
Thanks. Was going to approve these after I moved them but looks like you are taking care of it. Thanks for speeding up the process. --
7213:
7201:
6173:
6089:
5072:
Thanks, I tried to find the actual discussion that resulted in the redirect but was unable to find it. Again, thanks for the insight.--
4379:
4011:
3708:
3599:
2712:
2083:
Hey Robert! I had submitted the Dilshad draft for review. Thanks for reviewing it. I hope it isn't wrong if I "argue" for my "case" :D
1591:
1079:
9243:
Many thanks for pointing out the perceptual gap - should have picked this up myself but it is all good learning. Much appreciated. --
9166:
8562:
7772:
7532:
6905:- Maybe you don't have the ability to send email enabled because you don't have the ability receive email enabled. Ask about that at
6819:
5877:- Have you considered editing the Knowledge in your first language? You are having difficulty explaining what you are trying to do.
5626:
2777:
Thank you for taking the time to explain. My education is as you assume, and noted in the infobox on my user page. LouisAlain doesn't
2008:
1967:
5256:
4443:
He is currently Rizin FF Light Heavyweight Champion and has vacated the title to fight for the UFC which is a top tier organization.
2209:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the
8566:
6035:
5487:
1518:
10753:
10315:
9597:
9459:
8799:
not neutrally worded, including a statement that I have "persistently advocated for lending credence to white supremacist sources".
6471:- I've accepted the draft. That appears to have been a mistake on my part about where to discuss, but that is enough discussion.
6378:
4820:
I put the right sources after you told me put other sources and improve the page can you review it again after editing the page is
4276:
Sure. Whenever you are ready, ping me a couple of days in advance. Let's start working on your mandatory queries in the meanwhile.
2967:
9918:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
9432:
7575:
3344:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
2599:
2557:
Thanks, Robert. I thought it best to draft again under the circumstances rather than move right to AfD. Creator is overwrought.--
2301:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
1637:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
316:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
266:
10123:
9351:
9162:
9054:
7619:
7319:
7013:
I've unchecked "Allow other users to email me" in my preferences and I've just sent you a test email via your "Email this user".
6257:
5086:
3939:
3509:
2393:
1907:. (It helps a reviewer to be given a link to the draft or article in question.) If you think that a separate article should be
176:
136:
11067:
between sense 1 and sense 3. We do discriminate between paid editing and volunteer editing. Discrimination is only considered
9137:
9123:
7474:
in Main space, merged with content from the draft. The draft is no longer needed. I don't now how to deal with the situation. --
7387:
5600:
If you owe your bank a million dollars, you are at their mercy. If you owe your bank a billion dollars, they are at your mercy.
4585:
4334:
2747:
7266:
7149:
5797:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Ntinda_Vocational_Training_Institute-Kampala#Draft:_Ntinda_Vocational_Training_Institute-Kampala
5262:
4958:
4713:
4690:
4686:
3986:
is never a satisfactory argument in itself for the acceptance of a draft. After you answer the first question, we can discuss
2155:
1194:
community boredom. So the community decided not to do anything about that issue because they didn't do anything in 72 hours.
87:
9109:
8878:
8451:
suggestion from the draft page. In this case, consensus not to merge would equal one to create a separate standalone article.
6067:
4838:
4082:
2731:
1816:, considering that, after checking, for all 3 days of their account's existence all they have done is accumulate userboxes. --
1207:, but either would be reasonable. If there is another thread opened, then please ping me. I wasn't paying attention to that
10455:- Thanks. Ok. A guild is people or organisms who do the same work. A grade is what you pass thru in school or evolution.
9268:
I'll go ahead and add more citations from independent and reliable websites to further improve the standard of the article.
8505:
articles will need discussion to determine whether the reason for merging or redirecting still applies. But if it's tagged {{
8019:
6444:
5833:
5390:
4370:
3497:
2013:
1090:
8464:
7919:
to see if games are different from other subjects such as films and books in often being notable before they are released.
7511:
4433:
should not have a wikipedia page because she has only fought at ONE Championship which is second tier according to the list
2647:
was, in my opinion, the one who made the DRN difficult, and it lasted several months. I suggest that you also consult with
707:
692:. The topic is worth writing an article on and I've really been struggling write this. There are reliable sources out there
9407:
6746:
6655:
6634:, not because it was uncivil, which it was not, but because I have reconsidered my ideas on notability. I have replied at
6107:
4910:
4801:
4066:
Hi! The article exists because an editor just copied and pasted the text into the main space from the draft. Now the whole
3630:
3505:
2722:
LouisAlain and I have collaborated for many years. He translated all Bach cantatas to French, and created articles such as
2076:
389:
368:
10477:
Please recheck the draft I have created. I have put way more references that are both reliable and good. Please check out
9182:
now. Please do not edit the draft for now. It is waiting to be reworked by an editor whose native language is English.
7740:
7060:
way and not too much of a nuisance to you. The editor SchroCat and I are in a disagreement about comma use in the article
4940:
for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
4395:
3489:
2495:. I haven't reviewed the draft in detail but agree that it should be reviewed by a neutral editor. I have looked at the
10886:
10157:
8153:
Yesterday I submitted a draft submission , receiving back a notification of decline from you, for the following reason:
6095:
5935:
1471:
Thanks much! And, I don't remember being part of a dispute before, but am now familiar with how it works, thanks to you.ā
1397:
730:. If I were to re-review the draft, I would decline it again, and I do not think that the Teahouse will be optimistic.
522:
10978:
me a comment at 15:43, but already at 16:57 you closed the discussion. Isn't a Dispute resolution noticeboard meant for
7228:
4833:
3807:(admittedly not well formatted). I also noticed that the draft was under threat of deletion, because it had gone stale.
11090:. šāāļø If you want to argue about lexical meanings then let's go into my language ā I will continue with pleasure.))--
8010:
Hi, I am notifying you that I've created 5 articles in the Salomonia genus and I think they are ready to be submitted.
7461:
5331:
4447:
4361:
3028:. I for one prefer the special notability guidelines, because they are usually clearer, and they sometimes provide an
2782:
the search for sources some other editor, often much earlier, and offline, may have had. End of sigh, happy editing! --
2384:
2022:. I just need a little clarification. Sorry if you felt that it went a little weird. We're all still friends. Regards,
6718:
3727:
3032:
test. The exact relationship between the general notability guidelines and any special notability guideline, such as
2602:. Reading the DRN gives me the impression that one particular editor was most of the problem. Any comment is welcome,
10998:
10956:
10789:
10173:
which can be applied in this case as Nemanja is part of NCAA team staff. The article is somewhat similar to this one
9265:
I got your review of my article "Alex Ajipe" and I acknowledge your observations on how to make the article better.
9238:
8853:
7207:
7061:
5498:- I will look at the NYT and USA Today. If they are stories about the Bezos Earth Fund, I agree. Please discuss at
5008:
is an authoritative method of determining what the consensus is on notability. Where is the inadequate discussion?
4490:
4157:
3703:
3260:
2375:
1978:- I do not usually follow a draft through the approval process, but I am willing to ask other experienced editors at
11121:
discussion. Please do not engage in discussions where you are not ready to help, especially because of prejudices.--
10904:
The trout you used to slap another Wikipedian has been gutted, roasted over the coals, and served with tartar sauce.
8859:
7197:
5216:- Okay. I can move the redirects into draft space without renaming them, then, while waiting for their deletion.
4418:
1.Have fought at least three professional fights for a top-tier MMA organization, such as the UFC (see WP:MMATIER);
4216:
3689:
2857:
2569:
2470:
2409:
1514:
669:
10754:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Brand_activism?fbclid=IwAR0u5fzm8wvFjtD_Xb-3ZVAFNwSVxsG63w65YPRSpseUFORCN7gtJb8MKJ8
5701:) and IP addresses are still at it. In addition to the request at WP:REFUND, my reinstatement of AFC templates at
4383:
2130:
10867:
10827:
differences. However, you aren't likely to make any friends with the AFC reviewers by being too quick to give a
10145:
10103:
9942:
9892:
9577:
9439:
8707:
8102:
8054:
6557:
6509:
6116:
6103:
4341:
3475:
3455:
3012:, but here is what I think, and why it is complicated. The primary guideline for notability for anything is the
2803:
2355:
1919:. Please discuss there. If you have any further questions, then experienced editors may be able to help you at
1569:
1030:
982:
889:
869:
809:, but they are likely to advise including any appropriate information about Dinka in the article on the region.
422:, although material that was deleted for copyright violation is very seldom if ever restored, or you can request
10822:- Here are my initial comments, and I may comment further. First, I didn't decline your article. As you know,
4391:
3501:
10990:
10841:
want to find a WikiProject that will help you work on the draft. If you want advice in finding a WikiProject,
10369:
10153:
9817:
8203:
that focus upon itāwithout incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter' .
7638:. I don't think they should be accepted until this is fixed; they are causing a lot of work for plant editors.
6610:
5979:
5953:
5469:
5422:- At this point the stupid redirect has already been moved into neverland, so that its effective deletion is a
5110:
5105:
4375:
4299:
Can we set up a sub-page with your three mandatory questions? Or would you prefer email communication? Thanks,
3810:
As I formulate the best way to help this young editor, I copied his material to one of my sandbox pages, until
3090:
2823:
2397:
568:
Hi Robert. I'm writing to kindly ask for your help in regards to a Knowledge entry I submitted two months ago.
481:) if it was copied from corporate advertising. That is two reasons why we don't want that crap in Knowledge.
459:
10137:
8792:
8791:
I have one other question, though. Is it a requirement for RFCs to be neutrally worded? That is what's stated
8363:
Request for a separate article for Robam Moni Mekhala (Cambodiaan dance) from Manimekhala (goddess of the sea)
5589:- I think that we can have a common-sense idea that won't be in policy but will sometimes be quoted that if a
4636:
923:
10543:
10486:
10279:
10259:
10245:
10057:
10038:
10008:
9938:
9229:
9158:
9050:
8506:
8098:
6805:
6553:
6383:
6314:
5114:
4964:
4731:
4665:
3799:
3244:
3181:
3105:
2405:
2019:
1026:
9787:
How is this not worth of wikipedia? Instead, will appreciate your feedback on the page to get this approved
8779:
2389:
2211:
1954:
Could you please spare some time to review my draft? Could you please check this draft out for an approval?
1709:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
9927:
9661:
9648:
9591:
9538:
9525:
9453:
9379:
8599:
7865:
7834:
7819:
7780:
5317:
2845:
2596:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Msasag reported by User:Bhaskarbhagawati (Result: )
2518:
1862:
I wish to ask you to reconsider your decision to not allow the creation of my article called āInca Pisacā.
1370:
1308:
1176:
1160:
discussions being archived? Should they be closed, or perhaps one should initiate a request for closure? --
1142:
83:
9388:
He also meets "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor" as a recipient of the
4466:
11287:
11237:
11149:
11111:
11076:
10850:
10810:
10710:
10615:
10557:
10529:
10408:
10357:
10303:
10228:
10184:
10117:
10089:
10021:
9974:
9855:
9805:
9708:
9689:
9563:
9367:
9334:
9322:
9204:
9187:
9133:
9119:
9081:
9027:
8999:
8975:
8938:
8907:
8839:
8749:
8607:
8540:
8495:
8480:
8417:
8400:
8380:
8145:
8136:
8040:
7989:
7945:
7924:
7851:
7804:
7683:
7591:
7549:
7499:
7432:
7418:
7403:
7360:
7179:
7125:
7093:
7004:
6957:
6952:
wasn't able to email me? Does the ability to receive email have to be enabled to enable sending email?
6914:
6893:
6857:
6843:
6793:
6734:
6643:
6591:
6476:
6412:
6340:
6273:
6220:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
6051:
5921:
5903:
5882:
5821:
5761:
5736:
5648:
5612:
5536:
5511:
5431:
5221:
5188:
5164:
5097:
5060:
5013:
4992:
4698:
4611:
4550:
4530:
4507:
4483:
4290:
4267:
4190:
4173:
4102:
4040:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
3999:
3909:
3847:
3743:
3671:
3549:
3439:
3408:
3338:
3316:
3302:
3281:
3198:
3160:
3145:
3136:. However, I am not optimistic that you can get your draft restored. You can ask for further advice at
3078:
3055:
2946:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
2903:
2853:
2768:
2676:
2627:
2546:
2527:
2504:
2259:
2064:
2047:
1987:
1940:
1928:
1845:
1770:
1557:
1539:
1462:
1337:
1251:
1216:
1064:
968:
858:
814:
772:
735:
622:
556:
486:
439:
257:
197:
152:
43:
10982:?)) David_Gerard is cunning when he says that he doesnāt know about Insilico's CEO Alex Zhavoronkov. He
10320:
I was going through some public company pages and noticed you were the last editor to review this page (
9631:
9493:
8372:
photos, sources, and information. As I am alone for this article, I need assistance from other editors.
7756:
5119:
2837:
10219:, and maybe the other stuff should be deleted, or maybe it should be kept. So I suggest discussing at
10211:, explain on the draft talk page, and resubmit. I would suggest asking the advice of other editors at
9403:
8984:
8565:
by the administrator who closed Dlthewave's Arbitration Enforcement request against Jweiss11. When you
8247:
8236:
7467:
7327:
7054:
7034:
6714:
6539:
6420:
5300:
3626:
2451:
2206:
385:
8440:
want to split into Mainspace, not a draft, and the template doesn't even work with Draftspace pages.)
4070:
of the draft is lost and this person is "credited" in the main space article as the main contributor,
1785:
I was wondering if the updated draft has been resubmitted properly, with the updated edits. Thank you
911:
10610:- I will try to research this within 24 hours, but it would help if you would identify the article.
10460:
10423:
9389:
9105:
8882:
8655:
7883:
7296:
7120:
at the Third Opinion noticeboard, but maybe from an editor who is neither an American nor a Briton.
6852:
I would email you so that you can reply, but I think that you should get this capability addressed.
6015:
5936:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=User%3AZzhu8516%2Fsandbox
4761:
and the topic fullfils the requirements, it has been featured in multiple reliable sources including
4387:
4185:- I think that the comments addressed my concerns. I am willing, but will wait a week to ten days.
3683:
3350:
1413:
Today we worked on updating the lede regarding the content that Lightningstrikers was concerned about
544:
65:
Please tell me where you see and advertisement? If so, then I see many more advertisements here too:
17:
10149:
9619:
9481:
6788:? Since you ask me to reconsider, please re-read. Are you satisfied that I already reconsidered?
1246:
you read it correctly, and it says not to edit the archive. Leave it alone, like a sleeping bear.
919:
688:
I noticed you declined my draft, thanks for the feedback! I added more sources and rewrote my draft
11032:
11028:
11024:
10728:
10693:
10673:
10595:
10472:
8764:
is correct that I suggested an RfC as the proper kind of dispute resolution for this matter. Best,
8259:
6967:
6393:
5799:
Comforms to its standards. But for any help please kindly don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you--
5131:
4748:
3240:
3209:
3177:
3117:
3101:
2448:
how do I go about resubmitting my article for another review by you? Or do I not resubmit? Thanks!
2103:
1424:
I am hoping that we all come back with a calmer approach going forward. Should this be closed now?
903:
552:
117:
10324:) and saw that it was a public company that could use some cleaning up. I think the subject meets
9627:
9489:
8218:
significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.'
6784:? Did you notice that I entered a statement that Knowledge should pay a little more attention to
5527:
in its own right. I don't know if we should have a special notability guide to that effect or if
3666:
is notable, but, now that you have move-warred, it is unlikely that an article will be accepted.
3379:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
2401:
2336:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
2126:
1672:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
1084:
Knowledge:Teahouse#Disambiguation Question for Two Individuals with Same Name in Same Line of Work
536:
351:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
10952:
10785:
10380:
10012:
10004:
9911:
9896:
9778:
9611:
9473:
8834:
or another administrator decide what should be done about a concern that an RFC is non-neutral.
8598:
whether there is a way to edit from a registered account without cookies. That discussion is at
7861:
7843:
7830:
7815:
7792:
7776:
7734:
7718:
7643:
7561:
7447:
7383:
7216:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at
7158:
7139:
7107:
7073:
7045:
6374:
6160:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at
5287:, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
5077:
5035:
5028:
4972:
4211:
3950:- I have a few questions. The first question is not optional. Do you have any affiliation with
3654:. In my opinion, rather than moving your article back to draft space a second and a third time,
2708:
2690:
2564:
2465:
1890:
1821:
1578:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at
1490:
664:
594:
516:
127:
this is a temporary page. Provided the original article is in the queue for review that is fine.
10989:
Iām very surprised by your behavior. Why do you not want to check the sources and text style of
8712:
I have reviewed the DRN request as you requested. I see that Race and Intelligence has been to
11183:
9725:
I don't remember everything, but a quick check reveals some text was copied from this website:
9196:
9175:
9154:
9129:
9115:
9069:
9046:
9011:
8995:
8971:
8432:
8413:
8392:
8376:
7528:
7479:
7193:
5804:
5671:
5470:
5252:
5237:
4451:
4355:
4330:
2787:
2743:
1790:
1746:
1510:
1476:
1432:
1270:
1235:
850:
835:
654:
639:
26:
10752:
Thank you you have read and commented on the Brand activism draft I did. (here is the draft:
10400:
10396:
9782:
7961:
Question, is it possible to revert this draft to an unsubmitted state while the discussion at
2849:
10986:
the removal of the article about this scientist in 2017. Did I expect any help from David?))
10925:
10440:
9767:
9417:
9279:
7516:
6528:
6513:
6241:
5476:
I rather think the nYT article + the USA today article amounts to significant coverage.Ā ????
5127:
4637:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Noncommutative_geometry#Noncommutative_affine_and_projective_schemes
4564:
4239:, just pinging you to request you to keep this thread in your watchlist if possible. Thanks,
3935:
3700:
2428:
2369:
2027:
1643:
1012:
219:
10170:
5705:
was undone, and there have been moves and redirects all over the place including mainspace (
5663:
4773:. I was wondering if you could provide me with some guidance and help me restore the page.
2307:
1427:
I wasn't sure how to ask that on the dispute page if no one had volunteered to take it yet.ā
11283:
11233:
11145:
11107:
11072:
10944:
10861:
10846:
10806:
10777:
10719:
10706:
10633:
10611:
10553:
10525:
10456:
10404:
10353:
10299:
10224:
10085:
10047:
10017:
9970:
9864:
9851:
9801:
9704:
9685:
9559:
9428:
9395:
9363:
9318:
9200:
9183:
9150:
9101:
9077:
9042:
9023:
8934:
8903:
8835:
8761:
8745:
8651:
8603:
8536:
8491:
8476:
8452:
8396:
8132:
8036:
7985:
7977:
7967:
7956:
7941:
7933:
7920:
7902:
7847:
7800:
7679:
7600:
Yeah. The more I move, the more that appear. Hopefully they don't appear in your dreams. --
7587:
7545:
7495:
7471:
7428:
7414:
7399:
7356:
7339:
7292:
7185:
7121:
7089:
7000:
6953:
6910:
6889:
6853:
6839:
6789:
6785:
6730:
6639:
6587:
6485:
6472:
6415:, which you declined and where you requested that a discussion on splitting section of the
6408:
6360:
6336:
6302:
6269:
6232:
6221:
6047:
5975:
5967:
5949:
5941:
5917:
5899:
5878:
5817:
5757:
5732:
5644:
5608:
5532:
5507:
5427:
5361:
5217:
5184:
5160:
5056:
5009:
4988:
4875:
4797:
4776:
4758:
4719:
4709:
4694:
4653:
4607:
4546:
4503:
4286:
4263:
4186:
4169:
4098:
4061:
4052:
4041:
3995:
3905:
3864:
3843:
3779:
3761:
3739:
3667:
3618:
3545:
3435:
3404:
3376:
3298:
3269:
3194:
3156:
3141:
3074:
3051:
2958:
2947:
2899:
2764:
2672:
2623:
2607:
2542:
2523:
2500:
2333:
2255:
2184:
2060:
2043:
1983:
1948:
1924:
1841:
1782:
1766:
1669:
1553:
1535:
1502:
1458:
1346:
1333:
1284:
1247:
1212:
1104:
1073:
1060:
964:
854:
810:
760:
731:
680:
618:
482:
435:
377:
348:
253:
193:
165:
148:
71:
39:
10993:
and suggest corrections for it? I insist on checking my version because it was written on
8600:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Are_Cookies_Required_for_Registered_Editors%3F
7224:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
617:, I have replied there rather than here so that we can keep the discussion in one place.
214:
I have created another page kindly review my sandbox and let me know what's you feedback.(
8:
10724:
10702:
10689:
10669:
10607:
10591:
9988:
9876:
9868:
9835:
8952:
8921:
8890:
8867:
8769:
8556:
8251:
8097:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can
8015:
7697:
7658:
7065:
6686:
6552:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can
6493:
6440:
6389:
6352:
6310:
6253:
6006:
4829:
4727:
4661:
3987:
3975:
3971:
3926:
Hi - please can you give me some guidance on what to improve to get this page approved?
3921:
3787:
3769:
3723:
3615:
and adjusted the tone. Please advise on next steps, as it would be greatly appreciated.
3529:
3469:
3345:
3029:
2302:
1958:. I added extra links on the talk page of the article. Maybe this could be considered. --
1865:
You suggested that I incorporate what I have written into the existing āPisacā article.
1638:
1025:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can
944:
915:
883:
414:
If you believe that a substantial amount of non-infringing material was deleted, you can
322:
317:
280:
11060:
9937:
If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can
7752:
4235:
How has been your deletion tagging (the issue which was a significant one pointed out)?
2188:
548:
10428:
10392:
10376:
10200:
9623:
9485:
9302:
9179:
9142:
9073:
8514:
8460:
7796:
7714:
7667:
7639:
7605:
7571:
7443:
7395:
7379:
7323:
7257:
7154:
7135:
7103:
7085:
7069:
7041:
6765:
6370:
6136:
6075:
6031:
5865:
5846:
5781:
5714:
5554:
5073:
5047:
5031:
5001:
4984:
4968:
4762:
4712:
Thanks for the heads up and directionĀ :). I'll go ahead and chat with the folks at the
4206:
3885:
3823:
3223:
3009:
2881:
2817:
2704:
2559:
2514:
2492:
2484:
2460:
2452:
2122:
2004:
1963:
1886:
1833:
1817:
659:
606:
590:
512:
453:
79:
9317:- Go ahead and make any minor tweaks to it. I will deal with it within a few hours.
4258:- I have done little deletion tagging since then. I was doing New Page Patrol before
1584:
Please add your evidence by January 28, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes.
11274:
11270:
11253:
11221:
11217:
11199:
11187:
11163:
11126:
11095:
11044:
10757:
10333:
9793:
8426:
8005:
7962:
7632:
7541:
7524:
7491:
7475:
6618:
6613:, I ask that you strike through your uncivil comments on my talk page, AFD, and XFD.
6455:
6402:
6023:
5860:
rather than the red link above. There are no deleted edits in this user's history. --
5640:
5503:
5381:
5248:
5123:
4929:
4879:
4524:
4477:
4326:
4320:
4259:
4153:
4119:
4080:
3422:
3387:
3277:
3037:
2993:
2783:
2755:
2739:
2717:
2652:
2344:
2234:
Sorry, you got twinkled since ASA c&p'd another copy over the redirect you left.
2145:
1908:
1801:
1680:
1472:
1444:
1428:
1280:
1262:
1227:
1195:
1115:
849:
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
768:
653:
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
359:
248:
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
11064:
6166:
Please add your evidence by March 13, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes.
10948:
10921:
10823:
10819:
10802:
10781:
10501:
10452:
10436:
10077:
9275:
8577:
unlikely that kicking it back to those places will produce any further resolution.
8527:
7372:
7326:. The proposed draft is just an hospital within the health network. If you look at
7276:
6872:
6815:
6331:
6214:
6177:
5686:
5311:
4516:
Okay, that works, I'm just surprised by the 24 hour delay in tagging for G6. Best,
4034:
3695:
3334:
3133:
3045:
3041:
3033:
3017:
2985:
2981:
2940:
2664:
2291:
2239:
2224:
2056:
2039:
2023:
1705:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
1627:
1362:
1300:
1168:
1134:
1001:
986:
419:
415:
306:
215:
188:
172:
132:
5770:
Thanks. I've dealt with your RFPP request. While doing that, I found another SPA:
2458:
If you have some time, this has been the subject of some strife and discontent.--
11225:
11191:
10892:
10828:
10432:
9960:
9733:
9681:
9424:
8121:
7916:
7894:
7744:
7675:
7352:
7348:
7335:
7014:
6992:
6982:
6971:
6945:
6934:
6810:
What is your email address mate? I think it's about time we got all this settled.
6698:
6576:
6228:
6200:
5666:
Please help me and review this page, for any help is kindly accepted. thank you--
5499:
5357:
4204:
FWIW, I like you just fine and would have supported the last time had I known.--
4048:
4020:
3974:? Third, do the other blockchain platforms that have their own articles satisfy
3959:
2954:
2926:
2759:
2636:
2619:
2603:
2097:
1912:
1809:
1726:
1549:
1049:
703:
5299:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
5284:
5283:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
5200:
5029:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Billy_(Black_Christmas)
2639:- Yes. That was an extremely difficult DRN, and I agree with the assessment of
2205:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
2180:
2179:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
1881:
option you will get an appreciation of its size and how it relates to the town.
34:
Comments about drafts that have been nominated for deletion should be posted to
10837:
10833:
10000:
9984:
9872:
9847:
9831:
8948:
8930:
8917:
8899:
8886:
8863:
8831:
8810:
8765:
8729:
8717:
8027:
8011:
7708:
7693:
7654:
7625:
6711:
6682:
6489:
6464:
6436:
6424:
6366:
6265:
6249:
6002:
5749:
5636:
5243:
4937:
4825:
4766:
4422:
Has fought 12 times for Rizin FF which is considered a top tier organization.
4409:
3783:
3765:
3735:
3719:
2980:
but i want to clear this up with you first, in the case where she doesn't meet
2723:
2668:
2660:
2648:
2644:
2216:
1911:
from the article on the village to discuss the Inca ruin, the place to discuss
1813:
1596:
1200:
1099:
discussion for "Doncram's actions ignoring the AfD Result and now edit warring"
610:
276:
7068:. What is the best way to go about resolving these issues? Thanks in advance!
4846:
3927:
3329:
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the
2655:. I had to threaten to fail the moderation and to let the parties go back to
2441:
I've left a comment/question on Teahouse, If you'd like to review. Thank you.
2286:
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the
1622:
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the
1121:
If you prefer to close that thread, I would have no issues with that as well.
301:
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the
11266:
11229:
11178:
From the claims she makes on her user page and her user data (all projects),
11138:
10842:
10517:
10505:
10349:
10295:
10291:
10220:
10216:
10212:
10208:
10204:
10081:
10073:
9677:
9347:
9314:
9298:
9015:
8741:
8725:
8595:
8532:
8523:
8510:
8472:
8456:
8214:
independent, reliable, secondary sources, from outside of its organisation.
7981:
7937:
7890:
7671:
7601:
7583:
7567:
7244:
6906:
6885:
6835:
6831:
6781:
6777:
6761:
6631:
6132:
6071:
6043:
6027:
5913:
5895:
5861:
5792:
5777:
5753:
5745:
5728:
5724:
5710:
5582:
5573:
5550:
5528:
5483:
5423:
5051:
5005:
4933:
4899:
4682:
4593:
4578:
4460:
3991:
3983:
3979:
3967:
3963:
3901:
3897:
3881:
3877:
3839:
3835:
3819:
3811:
3659:
3651:
3587:
3577:
3330:
3234:
3219:
3137:
3129:
3125:
3025:
3021:
3013:
2895:
2877:
2813:
2538:
2496:
2488:
2287:
2000:
1979:
1975:
1959:
1920:
1837:
1714:
1706:
1623:
1531:
1350:
1328:
1288:
1208:
1204:
1190:
1157:
1111:
1096:
960:
831:
806:
727:
719:
635:
478:
474:
470:
449:
434:
then deleted your sandbox because it was only a redirect to a deleted page.
423:
410:
302:
230:
35:
10080:. The two questions are not directly related. Beyond that, I would ask at
8624:
In light of the response there, are you willing to reconsider your closure?
8561:
I didn't mention this in my DRN request, but seeking dispute resolution was
8189:
not been for the 'significant coverage' relating to these subject matters.
4895:
around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
2898:- You already have created a user page. So I think that we are all right.
1916:
11278:
11262:
11249:
11209:
11195:
11179:
11159:
11122:
11091:
11056:
11040:
10345:
10329:
9095:
8713:
7117:
6635:
6614:
6468:
6451:
6430:
5664:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Ntinda_Vocational_Training_Institute-Kampala
5590:
5377:
5213:
5205:
5179:
5155:
5151:
5140:
4815:
4723:
4678:
4657:
4300:
4282:
4277:
4255:
4240:
4182:
4165:
4149:
4145:
4139:
4114:
4090:
4075:
3655:
3647:
3611:
3431:
3418:
3400:
3383:
3070:
3005:
2989:
2656:
2340:
2141:
2137:
2118:
1676:
614:
355:
6664:
4759:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline
4325:
THanks for the barnstar! It brightened up a less than stellar day today.
722:
and make your declaration. The article should explain why the subject is
103:
66:
10325:
10171:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:NCOLLATH&redirect=no
8032:
7288:
7272:
6949:
6930:
6902:
6881:
6868:
6827:
6811:
6248:
Hi i was wondering why this page does not online yet on google search?.--
5594:
5524:
5305:
4133:
2251:
2235:
2220:
2093:
1355:
1324:
1320:
1293:
1186:
1161:
1127:
723:
11019:
Itās unpleasant for me that people look at my work through prejudice. I
11001:
sources. It's unlikely that anyone will find sources better than these.
10403:
but may be subject to normal editing. Does that answer your question?
9941:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
8101:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
6556:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
1869:
once the article was accepted to then revise the main āPisacā article.
1029:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
107:
94:
10395:- I did not remove content from your sandbox. I moved your sandbox to
9796:- Please sign your posts. Also please follow the advice to discuss at
9730:
9726:
9554:
7520:
7148:
Sorry to keep bugging you, but I find SchroCat's recent reply to me at
4542:
4518:
4498:
4471:
4236:
3713:
2640:
1722:
1698:
794:
764:
715:
699:
430:. I cannot retrieve its content. You should have kept a copy of it.
11228:. I will also note that she is changing the nature of her request at
8093:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
6548:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
5290:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
2196:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
1021:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
8721:
8284:
8094:
6726:
6708:
6549:
6423:
where no one is likely to see it. Did you intend it to take place at
6416:
1022:
802:
754:
11194:
or any other assistance to editors who use Knowledge to earn money.
7775:. Surely the GQ and Tempo articles alone are enough to satisfy GNG.
6607:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Preemptory review request
4963:
Hello Robert McClenon, I got your messages on my submitted draft of
11213:
10174:
9959:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
9700:
9359:
9342:
8569:, were you were that this matter had been referred to DRN from AE?
8120:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
6575:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
5632:
5586:
5568:
5520:
5495:
5478:
5452:
5419:
5402:
4770:
4094:
2018:
Hey RMcC, I hope you don't stress too much about the discussion at
1858:
Non acceptance of the proposed article on the Inca complex ar Pisac
1156:
A bot just archived that discussion. What's the policy on unclosed
1048:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
431:
10774:
Can you, please, give me advice on how to proceed? Thanks, Ivan
7470:, - the article was created independently by a different user and
4878:. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at
4439:
2.Have fought for the highest title of a top-tier MMA organization
3008:- That's a good question, and I would like to see it discussed at
1080:
Knowledge:Teahouse#Disambiguation and Draft:John B. Shields (chef)
11137:
I don't think that you need help in formulating a request at the
9914:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
8076:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
6531:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
5603:
Reviewer: "Hmmm. That looks notable with two billion euros ...
4285:- I'm ready any time, and will be even more ready on Wednesday.
3569:
through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
1812:'s case, I am wondering if I need to take any special actions on
1004:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
11004:
My persistence is my character, š it's not about paid editing.
10866:
Thanks, but I still doubt if solving global problems is part of
10003:- Yes and no, I guess. I certainly couldn't have written about
9777:
There is plethora articles on Danish Renzu with released films?
9676:- If you are having difficulty with talk pages, ask for help at
9385:
7427:
If I knew of someone who did it well, I wouldn't let you know.
5772:
2117:
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
2096:. I believe the Dilshad one matches that one's "quality". Also,
6125:
2437:
Hello, this is in reference to the article you recently denied
963:
as to exactly what is the preferred degree of disambiguation.
11144:
I will reply to your request in more detail within 48 hours.
11006:
In fact, if your employer needs it, Knowledge doesn't need it.
9779:
https://www.amazon.com/Half-Widow-Neelofar-Hamid/dp/B07XLW36SX
9699:
use of copyrighted text by "ordinary" permission, because our
8989:
Hello @Robert_McClenon I suspected the intention of this user
5337:
4410:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Jiri_Prochazka_(martial_artist)
2699:
know it was proposed for deletion. Comments can be made here
1915:
an article is the talk page of the existing article, that is,
11269:
to ask the community to choose between your proposed text of
8970:@Robert_McCleon I just saw it after a break. Thank so much!
8031:
idea, that I stated yesterday, that if there is agreement on
6909:. But you don't have the ability to receive email enabled.
5344:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
3928:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Corda_(decentralized_database)
2042:- I thought I had clarified it after the first explanation.
1717:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
9772:
4641:
3782:
i put the new sources in the draft can you review againĀ ?.--
10756:) I see the draft is declined, for it looks similar to the
9904:
9783:
https://bookandfilmglobe.com/film/movie-review-the-illegal/
8066:
6521:
5691:
5204:
too, but as you've no doubt observed, they usually don't. ā
1086:
earlier, if you'd like to combine the two sections, orĀ ...
994:
843:
647:
242:
11023:
a review-flagg in Russian Knowledge, I'm a true Knowledge
4943:
Six Month Queue Data: Today ā 7095 Low ā 4991 High ā 7095
4913:
with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
3124:, the same name as the one I declined. It was deleted as
2215:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
1203:
would be more likely to get action than another report at
797:- Why is it important to have a separate stub article for
9948:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
8862:, please let me know why you unreviewed it. Thank you. --
8858:
Hello. Regarding this note that you left on my talkpage,
8740:
Do you want assistance in formulating a neutrally worded
8455:
would also be the most relevant guideline to point to. --
8375:
Please reconsider this draft article! Thanks in advance!
8109:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
6564:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
1037:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
147:- You created multiple copies. I will review one copy.
104:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Comparison_of_genealogy_software
67:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Comparison_of_genealogy_software
8879:
User talk:Rosiestep#I have unreviewed a page you curated
6293:
6170:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Motorsports/Workshop
6162:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Motorsports/Evidence
5055:
article talk page, because DRV is a more public forum.
4138:
If you're interested, I'll be more than pleased to nom.
3349:
2659:
at least twice, and was ready to recommend that they be
405:- After considerable searching, I see that a draft page
11186:
are borderline inflammatory and/or personal attacks at
10479:
Draft:Gallons of Rubbing Alcohol Flow Through the Strip
10269:
Draft:Gallons of Rubbing Alcohol Flow Through the Strip
8304:
7678:
because labor is what happens nine months after love?
6365:, thank you for reviewing, approving and assessing the
6068:
Knowledge:Notability#Whether to create standalone pages
5858:
Draft:Triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) (canine and feline)
5697:
4947:
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
4340:
Request on 15:31:41, 7 February 2020 for assistance on
3955:
3951:
3454:
Request on 13:55:45, 30 January 2020 for assistance on
3097:
2802:
Request on 03:39:39, 26 January 2020 for assistance on
2758:- I will consider your advice, and will recognize that
2354:
Request on 16:29:27, 23 January 2020 for assistance on
2121:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1711:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Toy portals
805:
independence movement. I suggest asking for advice at
210:
I have Created Another Page Please Give me The Feedback
110:
you have no objection to me posting the article again.
108:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Windows-only_software
95:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Windows-only_software
8445:
User talk:Robert McClenon/Archive 27#Template:Talkspin
6286:
Declined Draft: Anomalie - Musical Notability Criteria
6168:
You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,
6100:
Knowledge:Village_pump_(policy)#Rethinking_draft_space
4685:. Also, I advised the merger based on the comment at
1586:
You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,
868:
Request on 21:31:44, 9 January 2020 for assistance on
572:
or update or feedback from you or any other reviewer.
10970:
Comment about Wikipedian reputation and small request
10760:
article, but they are completely different concepts.
10102:
Request on 20:51:38, 26 March 2020 for assistance on
9576:
Request on 20:35:46, 24 March 2020 for assistance on
9438:
Request on 19:25:33, 24 March 2020 for assistance on
8877:
Here's the right link to where you left the message,
8368:
separate article for Robam Tep Apsara (in Cambodia).
123:
8285:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:ARRACO_Global_Markets
7238:
The secondary mailing list is in use for this case:
6330:- If another editor thinks that the draft satisfies
4469:? Normally, you would G6 the redirect first, right?
4430:
1588:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung/Workshop
1580:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung/Evidence
8860:
user:Rosiestep#I have unreviewed a page you curated
8246:Please see additional discussion of this matter at
7222:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Workshop
7218:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Evidence
3900:- I will be requesting input from other editors at
1409:dispute. I think it can be closed for two reasons:
10637:
10175:https://en.wikipedia.org/Bogdan_Karai%C4%8Di%C4%87
8728:, but that isn't exactly what Barkeep said. What
8316:
7984:. I am not sure that I understand the question.
6022:Hi. I noticed that your template message links to
5990:Stop inappropriately directing new users to WP:DRV
5703:Draft:Ntinda Vocational Training Institute-Kampala
5658:Draft:Ntinda Vocational Training Institute-Kampala
3764:i want the draft not the article in the sandbox.--
2590:AN3 report which mentions a DRN that you moderated
2487:- I have given the user an additional warning for
4113:Indeed it is a history merge I meant. Thank you!
3583:can be used for this purpose ā e.g. in the form:
3176:ride off into the sun. Thanks for the info dude.
1327:, please consider whether, if you don't know how
801:? His notability appears to have to do with the
8881:, and here's a link to the article in question,
7235:are being read into the evidence for this case.
5549:... billion?! Wowsers, that's a lot of money! --
3485:Draft:American Society for Reproductive Medicine
1642:
9514:Please advise as to how I can view the draft.
9386:https://en.wikipedia.org/Statue_of_Harry_Jerome
7692:Thanks for letting me know via the talk pages.
7653:I'm gonna go through them and change them all.
7628:has had accepted contain unsubstituted uses of
6158:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Motorsports
6150:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Motorsports
6094:As a user who has expressed an interest in the
4624:Draft:Derived noncommutative algebraic geometry
3132:are usually denied. You ask for undeletion at
2306:
2113:Disambiguation link notification for January 21
1110:I don't have an opinion on the matter, but the
6172:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see
5912:Please ask for advice on editing Knowledge at
5607:yen? Hmmm. I'll review it more carefully."
5426:. Go ahead and deal with the silly dispute.
5285:section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2181:section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1590:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see
10745:How can I proceed with this declined article?
10203:essentially say that the subject should meet
8830:RFCs should be neutrally worded. I will let
8157:notability of organizations and companies).
7494:I have redirected the draft to the article.
3382:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge!
2339:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge!
1675:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge!
354:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge!
93:And I see many more advertisements here too:
5531:(about uncommon endowments) is sufficient.
3193:Maybe you called it Trackr or Traackr.com.
1999:Thank you. Would be expecting a feedback. --
1287:, thanks for your replies. I didn't realize
321:
268:Draft: The Masked Singer (American season 3)
9773:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Danish_Renzu
9258:Your review in Afc: Alex Ajipe (March 2020)
5748:- Okay. I have attacked it in two forums,
5593:mentions a billion dollars, it is probably
5352:redirect, you might want to participate in
4642:https://en.wikipedia.org/Algebraic_geometry
4148:, but it depends whether he would have me.
3838:- My first comment is to ask for advice at
3688:MfD closed; userspaced without redirect to
2600:DRN, which concluded in June 2019, was here
2185:Knowledge is not a free web hosting service
1576:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung
274:Talk:The Masked Singer (American TV series)
10640:, and just to give some additional "meat":
9553:- Your draft was deleted by administrator
7214:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog
6611:Knowledge:Civility#Dealing with incivility
6174:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration
6098:, you are invited to join a discussion at
5348:. Since you had some involvement with the
4920:to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
4839:New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
4429:is outdated. If rules are consistent then
4414:The MMA notability criteria has been met
3970:. Second, does the Corda product satisfy
3044:at all, but to look at whether she passes
2191:, such pages may be deleted at any time.
1592:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration
54:The following discussion has been closed.
9128:Robert McClenon, Thank for information!
8130:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge!
8035:, cleanup can be done in article space.
7966:then making the final decision later? ā
6585:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge!
6217:of the content if it meets requirements.
5727:- Thank you. I will look at it, and may
5242:I believe my draft for financial company
4465:Hey, would you mind explaining this move
4037:of the content if it meets requirements.
3966:, you must declare it in accordance with
3140:, but they may say much the same thing.
2943:of the content if it meets requirements.
2734:(= go to my user page, click on the word
2622:I will check it within 8 hours or less.
1058:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge!
102:Since you cannot see advertisements here
10577:Thank you for reviewing our submission!
10538:I am going to go for the second option.
9934:to see how you can improve the article.
8091:to see how you can improve the article.
6780:- Did you read the entire discussion at
6546:to see how you can improve the article.
5643:, and that is the extent of the truth.
1019:to see how you can improve the article.
726:. I suggest that you ask for advice at
8686:2600:1004:B14E:63FD:A8E7:E862:289A:18DD
8626:2600:1004:B14E:63FD:A8E7:E862:289A:18DD
8579:2600:1004:B14E:63FD:A8E7:E862:289A:18DD
8443:Picking up from my previous comment at
7320:Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
7227:All content, links, and diffs from the
7040:interest of free and fair elections. --
6294:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Anomalie
5376:was probably the right thing. Cheers!
3738:- Which version do you want reviewed?
2701:Talk:2019 Lilbourn, Missouri Earthquake
586:Thank you in advance for your answers.
14:
10201:College athletic notability guidelines
9245:2A02:C7F:DC5B:C700:8C6C:BD8E:A197:2CE3
8885:(my 1,390th new woman's biography). --
8818:2600:1004:B159:F772:1F3:3811:8D45:C868
8305:https://en.wikipedia.org/Bloomberg_L.P
8229:Many thanks for your time. The Dolph
7330:, the line states "...and the largest
7150:Talk:John Davie (British Army officer)
3098:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Traackr
2671:may be the only way to contain this.
2665:India-Pakistan discretionary sanctions
1736:Draft:Trang T. LĆŖĀ rejected questions.
1416:The user has been blocked for 2 weeks
8724:specifically referred the parties to
8087:. You may like to take a look at the
8083:, which is recorded on the article's
6542:. You may like to take a look at the
6538:, which is recorded on the article's
6203:. I just wanted to let you know that
5695:(possibly the user formerly known as
4781:2402:3A80:64D:4B17:FCF0:5DBF:953:5E3D
4371:Draft:Jiri Prochazka (martial artist)
4301:Lourdes 12:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
4278:Lourdes 13:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
4023:. I just wanted to let you know that
3954:? All of your edits have been about
2931:Draft:Order of Franciscans Ecumenical
2929:. I just wanted to let you know that
2919:Draft:Order of Franciscans Ecumenical
2703:. (You worked on the draft version)
2651:, who was in the background with the
1808:In the light of people's opinions on
1015:. You may like to take a look at the
1011:, which is recorded on the article's
38:, not to the nominator's talk page.
10587:Thanks in advance and best regards,
10570:Resolving issues with the k6 article
10133:Draft:Nemanja Jovanovic (basketball)
9781:And work with Academy winning actor
9727:http://www.perniente.org/actors.html
6601:Preemptory review requested at WP:AE
5681:Ntinda Vocational Training Institute
4930:Geographic regions, areas and places
4241:Lourdes 06:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
4140:Lourdes 08:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
1292:discussion to an appropriate venue.
124:https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Pmsouc
10805:- I will respond within 24 hours.
7311:Draft:UMass Memorial Medical Center
6268:- I will reply on your talk page.
6096:Knowledge:The future of NPP and AfC
5371:Deletion of "Political Game Theory"
5301:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
4431:https://en.wikipedia.org/Angela_Lee
3214:Robert is correct. Your 5 edits to
3010:the Articles for Creation talk page
2695:Just letting editors who worked on
2439:Draft:Aid Worker Security Database.
2207:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
503:Knowledge: Webfleet Solutions entry
23:
11216:, nobody knows that you are being
9903:
8065:
7153:Thanks again for taking the time.
6520:
6090:Discussion on the Draft namrespace
5336:
5271:
4845:
3321:
2697:2019 Lilbourn, Missouri Earthquake
2385:Draft:Aid Worker Security Database
2278:
2165:
1614:
993:
842:
646:
409:was deleted on 4 November 2019 by
293:
241:
24:
11309:
10845:would be a good place to start.
10638:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:K6
10254:I have added it to the tea house
9968:Thanks again, and happy editing!
9922:The article has been assessed as
8780:RFC on a closely related question
8317:https://en.wikipedia.org/City_A.M
8079:The article has been assessed as
7062:John Davie (British Army officer)
6638:, and am not striking anything.
6534:The article has been assessed as
6205:Draft:Rostrevor Old Collegians FC
6193:Draft:Rostrevor Old Collegians FC
6176:. For the Arbitration Committee,
5450:Thanks for your prompt response.
5330:"Adhesive Bonding (2)" listed at
5027:Here is the archived discussion:
1594:. For the Arbitration Committee,
1007:The article has been assessed as
11273:and the current text. At least
10885:
10322:Draft:Information Services Group
10316:Information Services Group Draft
10240:I have added it on the teahouse
9580:submission by MariaAnnelovesyou2
9442:submission by MariaAnnelovesyou2
9219:Let's fall in love for the night
9018:- I have completed my review of
6671:For surviving a swarm of weevils
6663:
6124:
5441:
4598:
3690:User:Robert McClenon/Toy portals
2254:- Oh. That sandbox. Oh well.
1697:
1449:
11158:OK. This is an honest answer.--
10920:Happy editing for both of you!
10868:corporate social responsibility
10290:- I suggest that we discuss at
10106:submission by Markomarkovic1980
9072:- Isn't it in article space at
8778:Someone else has just opened a
7620:Starzoner articles for creation
7291:Indictments for what by whom?
7243:For the Arbitration Committee,
6760:. I hope you will reconsider.
4898:A recent discussion of whether
4866:make the discussion a success.
3968:the conflict of interest policy
3962:, and Corda. If you have any
720:the conflict of interest policy
189:the musical notability criteria
10207:. If you think that he meets
10033:Sorry, I meant āsong articleā
9729:; there mqy hqve been others.
9680:. You may post a message at
8349:
8340:
8331:
8322:
8310:
8298:
8289:
8278:
7267:Paid editing off-wiki evidence
6227:Thank you for your attention.
4959:Draft: Billy (Black Christmas)
4955:16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
4047:Thank you for your attention.
3024:. There are also a number of
2984:can it still be reviewed with
2953:Thank you for your attention.
2833:User:Loanfish/sandbox/Loanfish
13:
1:
10209:general notability guidelines
10205:general notability guidelines
10009:Draft:Hyperbolastic functions
9822:Do you get what that dude is
8795:, but this particular RFC is
6187:00:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
6141:15:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
6112:08:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
6080:20:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
6056:19:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
6036:18:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
6011:09:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
5984:02:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
5958:19:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
5926:14:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
5908:14:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
5887:14:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
5870:14:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
5851:20:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
5835:Draft:Triple pelvic osteotomy
5826:15:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
5809:08:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
5786:20:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
5766:18:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
5741:17:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
5719:15:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
5676:08:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
5653:01:56, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
5617:01:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
5578:22:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
5559:21:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
5541:17:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
5516:20:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
5488:19:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
5462:03:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
5436:00:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
5412:23:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
5392:Draft:Move The City Beautiful
5386:17:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
5366:14:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
5325:01:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
5257:20:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
5226:18:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
5209:15:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
5193:15:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
5169:15:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
5144:08:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
5082:16:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
5065:16:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
5040:16:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
5018:01:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
4997:02:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
4977:02:14, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
4834:21:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
4810:18:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
4789:18:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
4736:19:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
4703:03:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
4670:01:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
4616:01:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
4586:00:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
4295:18:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
3249:07:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
3228:14:11, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
3026:special notability guidelines
2177:User:Arav Sri Agarwal/sandbox
2160:User:Arav Sri Agarwal/sandbox
2020:Talk:Take It Easy (2015 film)
2014:Talk:Take It Easy (2015 film)
1982:to comment within 24 hours.
1795:20:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
283:) 2:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
10078:musical notability criterion
10072:- I suggest that you ask at
8933:- I've marked it reviewed.
8680:The device is theoretically
8526:- For albums and songs, the
6747:Kyle Kulinski Draft Deletion
6656:Outlasted the Invasion Award
5750:Requests for Page Protection
5689:, I'm letting you know that
5566:before I saw the WP article
4934:general notability guideline
4555:03:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
4538:02:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
4512:02:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
4491:01:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
4456:15:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
4335:15:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
4272:17:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
4223:17:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
4195:16:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
4178:16:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
4158:15:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
4122:17:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
4107:16:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
4083:13:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
4057:01:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
4004:06:56, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
3940:19:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
3914:23:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
3890:19:41, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
3852:18:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
3828:08:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
3792:06:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
3774:12:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
3748:03:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
3728:02:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
3709:05:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
3676:22:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
3635:22:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
3554:15:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
3534:13:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
3444:17:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3427:16:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3413:16:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3392:16:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3307:17:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3286:10:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3203:16:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3186:09:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3165:22:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
3150:22:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
3110:21:52, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
3083:23:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
3060:22:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
3022:general notability guideline
3020:is what is described by the
3014:general notability guideline
2998:20:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
2963:01:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
2908:03:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
2886:03:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
2792:08:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
2773:08:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
2748:08:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
2713:19:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
2681:01:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
2645:the edit-warring noticeboard
2632:19:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
2612:17:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
2576:12:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
2551:04:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
2539:special notability guideline
2532:04:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
2519:User:Winged Blades of Godric
2509:04:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
2477:17:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
2433:16:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
2349:11:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
2264:21:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
2244:20:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
2229:16:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
2189:criteria for speedy deletion
2150:08:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
2108:05:54, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
2078:Draft:Dilshad (entrepreneur)
2069:20:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
2052:07:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
2032:05:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
2009:00:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
1992:21:28, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
1968:16:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
1933:00:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
1895:23:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
1850:18:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
1826:18:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
1775:23:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
1751:23:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
1731:23:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
1685:21:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
1603:05:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
1562:16:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
1544:16:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
1519:08:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
1481:05:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1467:05:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1437:03:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1376:17:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1342:16:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1314:16:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1276:16:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1256:16:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1241:15:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1221:05:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1201:the edit-warring noticeboard
1182:02:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1148:02:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1091:00:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
819:16:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
777:14:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
491:21:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
464:20:50, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
369:Sumitomo SHI FW Page Deleted
7:
10891:
10636:Sure! The draft article is
9926:, which is recorded on its
9076:and tagged for copy-edit?
6413:Draft:Linthorpe Art Pottery
4902:restraunts are notable was
3317:User:Mighty.Germany/sandbox
1761:- The draft in question is
1398:Dispute resolution - close?
1069:21:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
973:21:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
949:21:31, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
863:21:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
740:21:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
708:19:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
676:04:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
627:15:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
599:12:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
505:submission by Suarezmartell
444:21:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
394:15:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
364:19:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
262:23:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
224:20:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
202:20:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
177:18:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
157:18:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
137:18:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
99:And I can continue this...
88:16:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
48:16:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
10:
11314:
11292:23:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
11258:20:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
11242:19:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
11204:18:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
11168:11:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
11154:21:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
11131:11:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
11116:21:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
11100:11:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
11081:21:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
11049:21:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
10961:03:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
10930:01:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
10855:21:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
10815:16:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
10794:15:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
10733:10:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
10678:16:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
10620:16:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
10600:14:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
10562:16:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
10534:03:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
10493:Gallons of Rubbing Alcohol
10465:23:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
10445:19:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
10413:15:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
10385:14:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
10362:15:49, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
10338:13:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
10308:23:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
10264:23:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
10250:23:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
10233:22:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
10189:20:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
10094:04:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
10062:04:11, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
10043:04:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
10026:18:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
9993:17:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
9979:17:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
9881:23:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9860:23:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9840:23:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9810:22:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9739:09:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
9713:21:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9694:21:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9666:20:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9653:20:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9568:20:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9543:19:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9530:19:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9433:18:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
9412:06:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
9372:03:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
9352:02:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
9327:01:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
9307:00:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
9291:Draft:Xbox system software
9284:20:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
9253:07:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
9234:19:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
9209:18:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
9192:21:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
9167:08:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
9138:03:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
9124:16:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
9110:18:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
9086:15:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
9059:07:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
9032:17:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
9004:13:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8980:17:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
8957:01:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8943:00:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8926:19:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
8912:18:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
8895:18:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
8872:16:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
8844:04:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8826:04:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8774:03:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8754:03:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8694:04:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
8660:03:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
8634:01:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
8612:00:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
8587:20:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
8545:01:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
8519:00:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
8500:01:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8485:01:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8465:19:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
8422:03:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8405:01:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
8385:16:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
8266:17:40, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
8248:User_talk:Dolphinhouse2019
8241:16:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
8141:23:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
8045:00:13, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
8020:21:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
7994:15:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
7973:19:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
7950:14:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7929:13:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7908:05:05, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7870:04:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7856:04:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7839:03:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7824:03:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7809:03:11, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7785:02:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
7723:16:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7702:16:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7688:15:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7663:15:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7648:15:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7624:Many of the articles that
7610:05:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7596:05:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7576:04:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7504:14:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7484:07:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7468:Draft:Le Concert Spirituel
7462:Draft:Le Concert Spirituel
7452:15:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7437:15:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7423:15:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7408:15:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7388:01:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7365:01:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7351:- In that case, this is a
7344:22:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
7328:UMass Memorial Health Care
7301:04:14, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
7163:07:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
7144:16:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
7130:01:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
6630:I have updated my post at
6435:who created the redirect.
6421:Talk:Linthorpe_Art_Pottery
6104:MediaWiki message delivery
5635:and I just encountered an
4344:submission by 210.6.22.101
4025:Draft:Windlass Steelcrafts
4013:Draft:Windlass Steelcrafts
3978:? If not, should they be
2738:, search for the name). --
1082:, the other editor posted
613:has replied to you at the
501:Request for assistance on
10715:00:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
10698:12:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
9390:Order of British Columbia
9239:Orwell Society submission
8883:Evelyn Campbell (actress)
8854:Evelyn Campbell (actress)
7899:Final Fantasy VII: Remake
7281:19:26, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
7262:17:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
7112:17:07, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
7098:17:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
7078:16:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
7050:18:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
7020:22:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
7009:22:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6988:20:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6977:20:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6962:20:14, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6940:19:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6919:19:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6898:19:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6877:15:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6862:14:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6848:14:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6820:14:33, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
6798:15:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
6770:13:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
6739:01:00, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
6719:22:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
6691:20:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
6662:
6648:06:47, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
6623:05:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
6596:01:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
6498:02:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
6481:01:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
6460:23:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
6445:22:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
6398:11:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
6379:04:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
6345:16:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
6319:00:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
6278:00:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
6258:22:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
6237:01:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
5896:the Education Noticeboard
5685:Further to the ping from
5279:A tag has been placed on
5201:actually perform the move
4886:Discussions and Resources
3660:nominated it for deletion
3261:Article on Francisco Vico
2594:Hello Robert. Please see
2358:submission by HumOutcomes
2175:A tag has been placed on
1903:The draft in question is
1818:MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.)
899:Draft:John Shields (chef)
18:User talk:Robert McClenon
11069:invidious discrimination
10498:User:Beatleswillneverdie
10288:User:Beatleswillneverdie
10070:User:Beatleswillneverdie
9983:Did you really do that?
9962:leaving us some feedback
9939:create articles yourself
9871:when I saw the article.
9178:- It should be there at
9020:Draft:Robam Moni Mekhala
8270:(Not watching this page)
8123:leaving us some feedback
8099:create articles yourself
7860:All good, my apologies.
7844:User:Apples&Manzanas
7793:User:Apples&Manzanas
7554:23:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
7533:22:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
7202:10:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
7102:Ok, thank you, no rush.
6968:Knowledge:Emailing users
6888:about Email This User.
6836:Village pump (technical)
6677:For surviving the grand
6578:leaving us some feedback
6554:create articles yourself
6131:Here is a cheeseburger
5332:Redirects for discussion
4904:archived without closure
3646:- Well, I disagree with
3118:User:PopCultureSuperHero
1800:Yet another potentially
1405:You posted a message on
1051:leaving us some feedback
1027:create articles yourself
532:Draft:Webfleet Solutions
250:User:Aureliojohn/sandbox
235:User:Aureliojohn/sandbox
57:Please do not modify it.
10013:Hyperbolastic functions
10005:hyperbolastic functions
9912:Hyperbolastic functions
9897:Hyperbolastic functions
9798:Draft talk:Danish Renzu
9674:User:MariaAnnelovesyou2
9607:Draft:Joseph G. Giambra
9551:User:MariaAnnelovesyou2
9469:Draft:Joseph G. Giambra
8714:Arbitration Enforcement
8433:addition of a split tag
7795:- I said to discuss at
7208:Arbitration case opened
6636:Arbitration Enforcement
6117:A cheeseburger for you!
5754:Miscellany for Deletion
5356:if you wish to do so.
5354:the redirect discussion
4965:Billy (Black Christmas)
4857:Source Guide Discussion
4853:Hello Robert McClenon,
4714:WikiProject Mathematics
4691:WikiProject Mathematics
4687:WikiProject Mathematics
3458:submission by Mmizeasrm
3134:Requests for Undeletion
2657:Arbitration Enforcement
1570:Arbitration case opened
1407:the Occupational stress
872:submission by Jziemniak
420:Requests for Undeletion
11184:Talk:Insilico Medicine
10370:Recovery of my sandbox
10197:User:Markomarkovic1980
9908:
9818:Math talk page Comment
9197:User:Antony Willianson
9176:User:Antony Willianson
9070:User:Antony Willianson
9012:User:Antony Willianson
8393:User:Antony Willianson
8074:Salomonia longiciliata
8070:
8059:Salomonia longiciliata
6970:for more information.
6751:I saw your comment on
6525:
5856:Probably referring to
5752:in article space, and
5627:An Unreal $ 30 billion
5471:Draft:Bezos Earth Fund
5341:
5292:contest the nomination
5276:
4932:generally do not need
4850:
4569:You may want to close
3980:nominated for deletion
3326:
3091:I could use your help!
2976:I was about to review
2806:submission by Loanfish
2283:
2212:deleting administrator
2198:contest the nomination
2170:
1713:and please be sure to
1619:
998:
851:Draft:Joseph I. Castro
847:
836:Draft:Joseph I. Castro
655:Draft:Joseph I. Castro
651:
640:Draft:Joseph I. Castro
298:
246:
10938:User:Robert McClendon
10688:A gentle reminderĀ :)
9943:Articles for Creation
9907:
9893:Articles for creation
8567:closed my DRN request
8103:Articles for Creation
8069:
8055:Articles for creation
7517:Draft:Reinhard Pfundt
7116:As I said, request a
6948:. Was that also why
6806:Paid editing evidence
6609:. In accordance with
6558:Articles for Creation
6529:Linthorpe Art Pottery
6524:
6514:Linthorpe Art Pottery
6510:Articles for creation
6384:Thanks for the review
5776:(already blocked). --
5506:a separate article.
5340:
5275:
5087:Moves to "hyperspace"
5006:Articles for Deletion
4849:
3801:Draft:Andrew Naimanye
3331:Articles for Creation
3325:
2288:Articles for Creation
2282:
2169:
1719:Knowledge:Toy portals
1703:Knowledge:Toy portals
1692:Knowledge:Toy portals
1624:Articles for Creation
1618:
1031:Articles for Creation
997:
983:Articles for creation
846:
799:Draft:Fon Gorji Dinka
650:
428:Draft:Sumitomo SHI FW
407:Draft:Sumitomo SHI FW
303:Articles for Creation
297:
245:
11267:Request for Comments
11265:- You may publish a
11208:I mostly agree with
10749:Hi Rober McClennon,
10720:User:Robert McClenon
10634:User:Robert McClenon
9392:Please reconsider.
9380:Jack Harman (artist)
9340:that don't matter.
8742:Request for Comments
8563:specifically advised
8531:sometimes by formal
8507:r with possibilities
8355:Knowledge:Notability
8346:Knowledge:Notability
8337:Knowledge:Notability
8328:Knowledge:Notability
8295:Knowledge:Notability
7978:User:Seadoubleyoujay
7940:might be in order.
7934:User:Seadoubleyoujay
7322:being separate from
6786:Internet celebrities
5350:Adhesive Bonding (2)
5346:Adhesive Bonding (2)
5281:Adhesive Bonding (2)
5267:Adhesive Bonding (2)
4753:Hi Robert McClenon,
4710:User:Robert McClenon
4260:auto-confirmed trial
3964:conflict of interest
3780:User:Robert McClenon
3762:User:Robert McClenon
3652:conflict of interest
3315:Your draft article,
3042:significant coverage
3018:significant coverage
2730:, perhaps check out
2272:Your draft article,
2138:Opt-out instructions
2092:which was passed by
1608:Your draft article,
287:Your draft article,
10838:marketing buzzspeak
10703:User:Simon Aronsson
10608:User:Simon Aronsson
10540:Beatleswillneverdie
10518:deletion discussion
10483:Beatleswillneverdie
10429:Evolutionary grades
10401:Draft:David TomƔnek
10397:Draft:David TomƔnek
10276:Beatleswillneverdie
10256:Beatleswillneverdie
10242:Beatleswillneverdie
10054:Beatleswillneverdie
10035:Beatleswillneverdie
9891:Your submission at
9335:Draft:RenƩ Panthier
9226:Beatleswillneverdie
8160:Additionally that:
8146:Declined submission
8053:Your submission at
7862:Apples&Manzanas
7831:Apples&Manzanas
7816:Apples&Manzanas
7777:Apples&Manzanas
7066:Talk:No Time to Die
6508:Your submission at
4822:Draft:Arash Shakour
4650:--Thanks, Wundzer
4072:which he/she is not
3988:software notability
3976:software notability
3972:software notability
3644:User:AMPLIFYHER2020
3602:Draft:Karlyn Percil
3351:edit the submission
3337:page you started, "
3241:PopCultureSuperHero
3210:PopCultureSuperHero
3178:PopCultureSuperHero
3102:PopCultureSuperHero
2978:Draft:Brooke Butler
2970:Draft:Brooke Butler
2489:the personal attack
2308:edit the submission
2294:page you started, "
2131:fix with Dab solver
2086:I had earlier made
1956:Draft:Martin Fayomi
1942:Draft:Martin Fayomi
1644:edit the submission
1630:page you started, "
1610:Draft:Aarthi Ganesh
981:Your submission at
403:User:Ravikrishnan72
323:edit the submission
309:page you started, "
10506:general notability
10502:musical notability
10393:User:David.Tomanek
10217:Other Stuff Exists
9909:
9869:different approach
9658:MariaAnnelovesyou2
9645:MariaAnnelovesyou2
9588:MariaAnnelovesyou2
9535:MariaAnnelovesyou2
9522:MariaAnnelovesyou2
9450:MariaAnnelovesyou2
9180:Robam Moni Mekhala
9074:Robam Moni Mekhala
8985:Paul_012 Intention
8528:musical notability
8071:
7797:Talk:Twice (group)
7668:User:Peter coxhead
7396:User:Integritas888
7324:RWJBarnabas Health
7309:AfC submission of
7086:User:GrammarDamner
7055:Dispute Resolution
7035:Draft: Rishi Kumar
6753:Kulinski Draft MfD
6526:
6411:, I stumbled upon
6332:musical notability
5342:
5277:
5048:User:Paleface Jack
5002:User:Paleface Jack
4985:User:Paleface Jack
4893:ongoing discussion
4851:
4763:The Economic Times
3984:Other Stuff Exists
3327:
2515:User:Deepfriedokra
2485:User:Deepfriedokra
2453:Draft:Rubina Bajwa
2284:
2274:Draft:Intersection
2171:
2123:Curve of the Earth
1834:User:Moonythedwarf
1715:sign your comments
1690:MfD nomination of
1620:
999:
848:
652:
607:User:Suarezmartell
416:request undeletion
299:
247:
11275:User:David Gerard
11271:Insilico Medicine
11222:User:David Gerard
10963:
10947:comment added by
10918:
10917:
10913:
10906:
10796:
10780:comment added by
10758:Consumer activism
10433:ecological guilds
10424:Grades and guilds
10181:Markomarkovic1980
10114:Markomarkovic1980
9899:has been accepted
9794:User:Cinephile786
9414:
9398:comment added by
9289:Are you still on
9169:
9155:Antony Willianson
9153:comment added by
9130:Antony Willianson
9116:Antony Willianson
9061:
9047:Antony Willianson
9045:comment added by
8996:Antony Willianson
8972:Antony Willianson
8708:DRN Closure Reply
8414:Antony Willianson
8377:Antony Willianson
8272:
8061:has been accepted
7963:Talk:Star Citizen
7884:Squadron 42 draft
7542:User:Gerda Arendt
7492:User:Gerda Arendt
7332:healthcare system
7204:
7188:comment added by
7018:
6986:
6975:
6938:
6696:
6695:
6516:has been accepted
6321:
6305:comment added by
6146:
6145:
6017:Template:Talkspin
5986:
5970:comment added by
5960:
5944:comment added by
5814:User:Sandrah.Akol
5773:Akol Joseph Latif
5756:in draft space.
5641:Oxford University
5296:visiting the page
4951:
4844:
4812:
4800:comment added by
4791:
4779:comment added by
4738:
4722:comment added by
4672:
4656:comment added by
3684:Userspacification
3637:
3621:comment added by
3288:
3272:comment added by
3046:acting notability
3038:sports notability
3034:acting notability
2756:User:Gerda Arendt
2653:Sword of Damocles
2493:yelling vandalism
2202:visiting the page
1836:- As they say at
1763:Draft:Trang T. LĆŖ
1759:User:Namnguyen408
1521:
1505:comment added by
1445:User:CaroleHenson
1196:User:Girth Summit
989:has been accepted
838:has a new comment
779:
763:comment added by
642:has a new comment
576:not my company.
396:
380:comment added by
237:has a new comment
115:
114:
90:
74:comment added by
11305:
10942:
10912:
10909:
10902:
10899:
10889:
10882:
10881:
10865:
10824:User:WikiAviator
10820:User:Ivan gurkov
10803:User:Ivan gurkov
10775:
10473:Recheck my draft
10453:User:Lavateraguy
10162:
10161:
9964:
9954:
9736:
9636:
9635:
9498:
9497:
9393:
9148:
9040:
8814:
8594:I have asked at
8437:existing content
8356:
8353:
8347:
8344:
8338:
8335:
8329:
8326:
8320:
8314:
8308:
8302:
8296:
8293:
8287:
8282:
8271:
8268:
8262:
8256:
8233:Dolphinhouse2019
8210:IN CONCLUSION.
8125:
8115:
7970:
7960:
7905:
7712:
7637:
7631:
7252:
7250:
7183:
7017:
6985:
6974:
6937:
6667:
6660:
6659:
6580:
6570:
6434:
6364:
6300:
6213:You may request
6128:
6121:
6120:
5965:
5939:
5775:
5729:request deletion
5700:
5694:
5545:It's only 10...
5529:Use Common Sense
5460:
5449:
5445:
5444:
5410:
5323:
5274:
5135:
5117:
4946:
4900:Michelin starred
4863:NPP source guide
4843:
4795:
4774:
4749:Draft:Saket Modi
4717:
4651:
4606:
4602:
4601:
4536:
4489:
4400:
4399:
4219:
4214:
4209:
4033:You may request
3948:User:Nickpwarren
3707:
3616:
3592:
3586:
3582:
3576:
3514:
3513:
3371:
3370:
3365:
3364:
3359:
3358:
3353:
3324:
3267:
3238:
3213:
2939:You may request
2862:
2861:
2572:
2567:
2562:
2513:I disagree with
2473:
2468:
2463:
2414:
2413:
2328:
2327:
2322:
2321:
2316:
2315:
2310:
2281:
2214:
2168:
2127:check to confirm
2057:User:Cyphoidbomb
2040:User:Cyphoidbomb
1905:Draft:Inca PĆsac
1701:
1664:
1663:
1658:
1657:
1652:
1651:
1646:
1617:
1601:
1599:
1500:
1457:
1453:
1452:
1373:
1365:
1311:
1303:
1268:
1265:
1233:
1230:
1179:
1171:
1145:
1137:
1089:
1053:
1043:
1002:Joseph I. Castro
987:Joseph I. Castro
928:
927:
758:
694:cambridge source
672:
667:
662:
561:
560:
375:
343:
342:
337:
336:
331:
330:
325:
296:
187:- Please review
118:Hayley Griffiths
69:
59:
31:
30:
11313:
11312:
11308:
11307:
11306:
11304:
11303:
11302:
11284:Robert McClenon
11234:Robert McClenon
11196:Kudpung ąøąøøąøąøąø¶ą¹ąø
11146:Robert McClenon
11108:Robert McClenon
11073:Robert McClenon
10972:
10910:
10893:
10862:Robert McClenon
10859:
10847:Robert McClenon
10807:Robert McClenon
10747:
10707:Robert McClenon
10612:Robert McClenon
10572:
10554:Robert McClenon
10526:Robert McClenon
10495:
10475:
10457:McClenon mobile
10426:
10405:Robert McClenon
10372:
10354:Robert McClenon
10318:
10300:Robert McClenon
10271:
10225:Robert McClenon
10135:
10131:
10108:
10086:Robert McClenon
10050:
10018:Robert McClenon
9981:
9971:Robert McClenon
9950:
9945:if you prefer.
9901:
9865:Robert McClenon
9852:Robert McClenon
9820:
9802:Robert McClenon
9770:
9734:
9705:Robert McClenon
9686:Robert McClenon
9682:User talk:WilyD
9609:
9605:
9582:
9560:Robert McClenon
9507:Hello Robert,
9471:
9467:
9444:
9420:
9382:
9364:Robert McClenon
9337:
9319:Robert McClenon
9295:
9266:
9260:
9241:
9221:
9201:Robert McClenon
9184:Robert McClenon
9145:
9140:
9102:McClenon mobile
9098:
9078:Robert McClenon
9024:Robert McClenon
8987:
8935:Robert McClenon
8904:Robert McClenon
8856:
8836:Robert McClenon
8808:
8762:Robert McClenon
8746:Robert McClenon
8710:
8652:McClenon mobile
8604:Robert McClenon
8559:
8537:Robert McClenon
8492:Robert McClenon
8477:Robert McClenon
8429:
8397:Robert McClenon
8365:
8360:
8359:
8354:
8350:
8345:
8341:
8336:
8332:
8327:
8323:
8315:
8311:
8303:
8299:
8294:
8290:
8283:
8279:
8260:
8252:
8148:
8143:
8133:Robert McClenon
8111:
8105:if you prefer.
8063:
8037:Robert McClenon
8008:
7986:Robert McClenon
7969:seadoubleyoujay
7968:
7957:Robert McClenon
7954:
7942:Robert McClenon
7921:Robert McClenon
7917:game notability
7904:seadoubleyoujay
7903:
7895:Half-Life: Alyx
7886:
7848:Robert McClenon
7801:Robert McClenon
7737:
7735:Chaeyoung draft
7706:
7680:Robert McClenon
7676:double entendre
7635:
7629:
7622:
7588:Robert McClenon
7564:
7562:Rubiaceae stubs
7546:Robert McClenon
7514:
7512:Reinhard Pfundt
7496:Robert McClenon
7464:
7429:Robert McClenon
7415:Robert McClenon
7400:Robert McClenon
7375:
7357:Robert McClenon
7349:User:Andrew nyr
7314:
7293:McClenon mobile
7269:
7248:
7247:
7210:
7122:Robert McClenon
7090:Robert McClenon
7057:
7037:
7001:Robert McClenon
6993:User:SlimVirgin
6954:Robert McClenon
6946:User:SlimVirgin
6911:Robert McClenon
6890:Robert McClenon
6854:Robert McClenon
6840:Robert McClenon
6808:
6790:Robert McClenon
6749:
6731:Robert McClenon
6703:Did you notice
6701:
6679:weevil invasion
6658:
6640:Robert McClenon
6603:
6598:
6588:Robert McClenon
6566:
6560:if you prefer.
6518:
6486:Robert McClenon
6473:Robert McClenon
6428:
6409:Robert_McClenon
6405:
6386:
6361:Robert McClenon
6358:
6355:
6337:Robert McClenon
6288:
6270:Robert McClenon
6246:
6197:
6154:
6119:
6092:
6048:Robert McClenon
6020:
5992:
5918:Robert McClenon
5900:Robert McClenon
5879:Robert McClenon
5838:
5818:Robert McClenon
5771:
5758:Robert McClenon
5733:Robert McClenon
5696:
5690:
5683:
5660:
5645:Robert McClenon
5629:
5609:Robert McClenon
5605:adjusts glasses
5591:reliable source
5547:adjusts glasses
5533:Robert McClenon
5508:Robert McClenon
5500:Talk:Jeff Bezos
5474:
5451:
5442:
5440:
5428:Robert McClenon
5401:
5397:Hello, Robert,
5395:
5373:
5335:
5322:
5304:
5272:
5270:
5263:Speedy deletion
5240:
5218:Robert McClenon
5185:Robert McClenon
5161:Robert McClenon
5108:
5092:
5089:
5057:Robert McClenon
5052:Deletion Review
5010:Robert McClenon
4989:Robert McClenon
4961:
4953:
4841:
4818:
4751:
4695:Robert McClenon
4626:
4608:Robert McClenon
4599:
4597:
4577:
4571:this discussion
4567:
4547:Robert McClenon
4517:
4504:Robert McClenon
4470:
4463:
4373:
4369:
4346:
4323:
4287:Robert McClenon
4264:Robert McClenon
4217:
4212:
4207:
4187:Robert McClenon
4170:Robert McClenon
4150:Kudpung ąøąøøąøąøąø¶ą¹ąø
4136:
4099:Robert McClenon
4064:
4017:
3996:Robert McClenon
3960:David E. Rutter
3924:
3906:Robert McClenon
3865:Robert McClenon
3844:Robert McClenon
3804:
3740:Robert McClenon
3716:
3693:
3686:
3668:Robert McClenon
3605:
3600:Need your help
3590:
3584:
3580:
3574:
3566:
3546:Robert McClenon
3487:
3483:
3460:
3436:Robert McClenon
3405:Robert McClenon
3368:
3367:
3362:
3361:
3356:
3355:
3354:and remove the
3322:
3320:
3299:Robert McClenon
3263:
3232:
3207:
3195:Robert McClenon
3157:Robert McClenon
3142:Robert McClenon
3100:Thanks dude! --
3093:
3075:Robert McClenon
3052:Robert McClenon
2974:
2923:
2900:Robert McClenon
2835:
2831:
2808:
2765:Robert McClenon
2760:User:LouisAlain
2720:
2693:
2691:Just a heads up
2673:Robert McClenon
2637:User:EdJohnston
2624:Robert McClenon
2620:user:EdJohnston
2592:
2570:
2565:
2560:
2543:Robert McClenon
2524:Robert McClenon
2501:Robert McClenon
2471:
2466:
2461:
2456:
2446:Robert McClenon
2387:
2383:
2360:
2325:
2324:
2319:
2318:
2313:
2312:
2311:and remove the
2279:
2277:
2256:Robert McClenon
2210:
2166:
2163:
2156:Speedy deletion
2115:
2081:
2061:Robert McClenon
2044:Robert McClenon
2016:
1984:Robert McClenon
1949:Robert McClenon
1945:
1925:Robert McClenon
1860:
1842:Robert McClenon
1810:User:Bryan.Wade
1806:
1783:Robert McClenon
1767:Robert McClenon
1738:
1695:
1661:
1660:
1655:
1654:
1649:
1648:
1647:and remove the
1615:
1613:
1597:
1595:
1572:
1554:Robert McClenon
1550:Hindi Knowledge
1536:Robert McClenon
1528:User:Jay1Rudra1
1493:
1491:Sunil Prem Vyas
1459:Robert McClenon
1450:
1448:
1400:
1369:
1361:
1347:Robert McClenon
1334:Robert McClenon
1307:
1299:
1285:Robert McClenon
1273:
1266:
1263:
1248:Robert McClenon
1238:
1231:
1228:
1213:Robert McClenon
1175:
1167:
1141:
1133:
1105:Robert McClenon
1101:
1087:
1076:
1071:
1061:Robert McClenon
1039:
1033:if you prefer.
991:
965:Robert McClenon
901:
897:
874:
865:
855:Robert McClenon
840:
811:Robert McClenon
732:Robert McClenon
683:
678:
670:
665:
660:
644:
619:Robert McClenon
534:
530:
507:
483:Robert McClenon
436:Robert McClenon
424:Deletion Review
371:
340:
339:
334:
333:
328:
327:
326:and remove the
294:
292:
289:Draft:Quantenna
271:
264:
254:Robert McClenon
239:
212:
194:Robert McClenon
166:Robert McClenon
149:Robert McClenon
120:
55:
40:Robert McClenon
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
11311:
11299:
11297:
11296:
11295:
11294:
11246:
11245:
11244:
11175:
11174:
11173:
11172:
11171:
11170:
11142:
11135:
11134:
11133:
11104:
11103:
11102:
11061:discrimination
10971:
10968:
10967:
10966:
10965:
10964:
10916:
10915:
10907:
10901:
10890:
10880:
10879:
10878:
10877:
10876:
10875:
10874:
10873:
10871:
10746:
10743:
10742:
10741:
10740:
10739:
10738:
10737:
10736:
10735:
10725:Simon Aronsson
10690:Simon Aronsson
10683:
10682:
10681:
10680:
10670:Simon Aronsson
10662:
10661:
10660:
10659:
10653:
10652:
10651:
10650:
10644:
10643:
10642:
10641:
10627:
10625:
10624:
10623:
10622:
10592:Simon Aronsson
10571:
10568:
10567:
10566:
10565:
10564:
10494:
10491:
10474:
10471:
10470:
10469:
10468:
10467:
10425:
10422:
10420:
10418:
10417:
10416:
10415:
10371:
10368:
10367:
10366:
10365:
10364:
10317:
10314:
10313:
10312:
10311:
10310:
10270:
10267:
10238:
10237:
10236:
10235:
10168:
10166:
10165:
10164:
10163:
10129:
10107:
10100:
10099:
10098:
10097:
10096:
10049:
10046:
10031:
10030:
10029:
10028:
10001:User:Starzoner
9932:grading scheme
9919:
9916:
9902:
9900:
9889:
9888:
9887:
9886:
9885:
9884:
9883:
9848:User:Sulfurboy
9819:
9816:
9815:
9814:
9813:
9812:
9769:
9766:
9765:
9764:
9760:
9757:
9754:
9751:
9748:
9746:
9745:
9744:
9743:
9742:
9741:
9718:
9717:
9716:
9715:
9696:
9642:
9640:
9639:
9638:
9637:
9603:
9581:
9574:
9573:
9572:
9571:
9570:
9504:
9502:
9501:
9500:
9499:
9465:
9443:
9436:
9419:
9416:
9400:Sheijiashaojun
9381:
9378:
9377:
9376:
9375:
9374:
9336:
9333:
9332:
9331:
9330:
9329:
9294:
9287:
9264:
9262:Hi McClenon,
9259:
9256:
9240:
9237:
9220:
9217:
9216:
9215:
9214:
9213:
9212:
9211:
9144:
9141:
9127:
9097:
9094:
9093:
9092:
9091:
9090:
9089:
9088:
9037:
9036:
9035:
9034:
8986:
8983:
8968:
8967:
8966:
8965:
8964:
8963:
8962:
8961:
8960:
8959:
8931:User:Rosiestep
8900:User:Rosiestep
8855:
8852:
8851:
8850:
8849:
8848:
8847:
8846:
8832:User:Barkeep49
8803:
8802:
8801:
8800:
8786:
8785:
8784:
8783:
8730:User:Barkeep49
8718:User:Barkeep49
8709:
8706:
8705:
8704:
8703:
8702:
8701:
8700:
8699:
8698:
8697:
8696:
8669:
8668:
8667:
8666:
8665:
8664:
8663:
8662:
8641:
8640:
8639:
8638:
8637:
8636:
8617:
8616:
8615:
8614:
8558:
8555:
8554:
8553:
8552:
8551:
8550:
8549:
8548:
8547:
8487:
8428:
8425:
8410:
8409:
8408:
8407:
8364:
8361:
8358:
8357:
8348:
8339:
8330:
8321:
8309:
8297:
8288:
8276:
8275:
8274:
8273:
8254:TransporterMan
8150:Dear Robert,
8147:
8144:
8128:
8127:
8118:
8089:grading scheme
8078:
8064:
8062:
8051:
8050:
8049:
8048:
8047:
8028:User:Starzoner
8007:
8004:
8003:
8002:
8001:
8000:
7999:
7998:
7997:
7996:
7931:
7915:I will review
7885:
7882:
7881:
7880:
7879:
7878:
7877:
7876:
7875:
7874:
7873:
7872:
7826:
7757:korea herald 2
7736:
7733:
7732:
7731:
7730:
7729:
7728:
7727:
7726:
7725:
7621:
7618:
7617:
7616:
7615:
7614:
7613:
7612:
7563:
7560:
7559:
7558:
7557:
7556:
7513:
7510:
7509:
7508:
7507:
7506:
7463:
7460:
7459:
7458:
7457:
7456:
7455:
7454:
7425:
7410:
7374:
7371:
7370:
7369:
7368:
7367:
7313:
7307:
7306:
7305:
7304:
7303:
7268:
7265:
7209:
7206:
7176:
7175:
7174:
7173:
7172:
7171:
7170:
7169:
7168:
7167:
7166:
7165:
7056:
7053:
7036:
7033:
7031:
7029:
7028:
7027:
7026:
7025:
7024:
7023:
7022:
7011:
6979:
6927:
6926:
6925:
6924:
6923:
6922:
6921:
6900:
6850:
6807:
6804:
6803:
6802:
6801:
6800:
6748:
6745:
6744:
6743:
6742:
6741:
6700:
6697:
6694:
6693:
6674:
6673:
6668:
6657:
6654:
6653:
6652:
6651:
6650:
6602:
6599:
6583:
6582:
6573:
6544:grading scheme
6533:
6519:
6517:
6506:
6505:
6504:
6503:
6502:
6501:
6500:
6465:User:Vexations
6427:instead? Ping
6425:Talk:Linthorpe
6404:
6401:
6390:ElricFullMetal
6385:
6382:
6367:Kontoor Brands
6354:
6351:
6350:
6349:
6348:
6347:
6287:
6284:
6283:
6282:
6281:
6280:
6266:User:FCBlinder
6245:
6240:
6199:Hi there, I'm
6196:
6190:
6153:
6147:
6144:
6143:
6129:
6118:
6115:
6091:
6088:
6087:
6086:
6085:
6084:
6083:
6082:
6019:
6014:
6001:crossover. --
5991:
5988:
5931:
5930:
5929:
5928:
5910:
5889:
5837:
5832:
5831:
5830:
5829:
5828:
5790:
5789:
5788:
5743:
5682:
5679:
5659:
5656:
5628:
5625:
5624:
5623:
5622:
5621:
5620:
5619:
5601:
5598:
5563:
5562:
5561:
5518:
5473:
5468:
5467:
5466:
5465:
5464:
5438:
5394:
5389:
5372:
5369:
5334:
5328:
5308:
5269:
5265:nomination of
5260:
5244:Draft:PayActiv
5239:
5238:Draft:PayActiv
5236:
5235:
5234:
5233:
5232:
5231:
5230:
5229:
5228:
5174:
5173:
5172:
5171:
5137:
5136:
5088:
5085:
5070:
5069:
5068:
5067:
5025:
5024:
5023:
5022:
5021:
5020:
4960:
4957:
4927:
4926:
4922:
4921:
4914:
4907:
4896:
4888:
4887:
4876:New Pages Feed
4872:
4871:
4859:
4858:
4842:
4840:
4837:
4817:
4814:
4802:42.107.133.105
4767:Business World
4750:
4747:
4746:
4745:
4744:
4743:
4742:
4741:
4740:
4739:
4645:
4644:
4639:
4625:
4622:
4621:
4620:
4619:
4618:
4575:
4566:
4563:
4562:
4561:
4560:
4559:
4558:
4557:
4540:
4462:
4459:
4446:
4436:
4406:
4404:
4403:
4402:
4401:
4367:
4345:
4338:
4322:
4319:
4318:
4317:
4316:
4315:
4314:
4313:
4312:
4311:
4310:
4309:
4308:
4307:
4306:
4305:
4304:
4303:
4244:
4243:
4232:
4231:
4230:
4229:
4228:
4227:
4226:
4225:
4197:
4180:
4135:
4132:
4131:
4130:
4129:
4128:
4127:
4126:
4125:
4124:
4063:
4060:
4019:Hi there, I'm
4016:
4010:
4009:
4008:
4007:
4006:
3923:
3920:
3919:
3918:
3917:
3916:
3873:
3872:
3871:
3870:
3869:
3868:
3857:
3856:
3855:
3854:
3803:
3798:
3797:
3796:
3795:
3794:
3777:
3776:
3755:
3753:
3752:
3751:
3750:
3736:User:FCBlinder
3715:
3712:
3685:
3682:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3623:AMPLIFYHER2020
3604:
3598:
3596:
3563:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3556:
3542:User:Mmizeasrm
3520:
3518:
3517:
3516:
3515:
3481:
3459:
3452:
3451:
3450:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3446:
3415:
3333:submission or
3319:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3309:
3262:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3255:
3254:
3253:
3252:
3251:
3170:
3169:
3168:
3167:
3152:
3092:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3049:
2973:
2966:
2925:Hi there, I'm
2922:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2873:
2870:
2868:
2866:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2829:
2807:
2800:
2799:
2798:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2794:
2724:Reinhold Fritz
2719:
2716:
2692:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2649:User:Abecedare
2591:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2511:
2455:
2450:
2423:
2420:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2381:
2359:
2352:
2290:submission or
2276:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2162:
2158:nomination of
2153:
2114:
2111:
2080:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2054:
2015:
2012:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1951:
1944:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1897:John Prattley
1859:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1814:User:ChopChop4
1805:
1798:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1737:
1734:
1694:
1688:
1626:submission or
1612:
1606:
1571:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1546:
1492:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1422:
1421:
1414:
1399:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1271:
1236:
1125:
1100:
1094:
1078:Hi. Regarding
1075:
1072:
1056:
1055:
1046:
1017:grading scheme
1006:
992:
990:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
957:User:Jziemniak
934:
932:
931:
930:
929:
895:
873:
866:
841:
839:
834:notification:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
745:
744:
743:
742:
682:
679:
645:
643:
638:notification:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
611:User:ColinFine
589:
567:
565:
564:
563:
562:
528:
506:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
477:) and spammy (
467:
466:
382:Ravikrishnan72
370:
367:
305:submission or
291:
285:
270:
265:
240:
238:
233:notification:
228:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
162:
161:
160:
159:
119:
116:
113:
112:
61:
60:
51:
50:
28:
27:Advertisement?
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
11310:
11301:
11293:
11289:
11285:
11280:
11276:
11272:
11268:
11264:
11261:
11260:
11259:
11255:
11251:
11247:
11243:
11239:
11235:
11231:
11227:
11223:
11219:
11215:
11211:
11207:
11206:
11205:
11201:
11197:
11193:
11189:
11185:
11181:
11177:
11176:
11169:
11165:
11161:
11157:
11156:
11155:
11151:
11147:
11143:
11140:
11136:
11132:
11128:
11124:
11119:
11118:
11117:
11113:
11109:
11105:
11101:
11097:
11093:
11089:
11088:general sense
11084:
11083:
11082:
11078:
11074:
11070:
11066:
11062:
11058:
11055:
11054:
11053:
11052:
11051:
11050:
11046:
11042:
11037:
11034:
11030:
11026:
11025:pop-scientist
11022:
11017:
11015:
11011:
11007:
11002:
11000:
10999:Science-level
10996:
10992:
10987:
10985:
10981:
10977:
10962:
10958:
10954:
10950:
10946:
10939:
10936:
10935:
10934:
10933:
10932:
10931:
10927:
10923:
10914:
10905:
10900:
10898:
10897:
10888:
10884:
10883:
10872:
10869:
10863:
10858:
10857:
10856:
10852:
10848:
10844:
10839:
10835:
10830:
10825:
10821:
10818:
10817:
10816:
10812:
10808:
10804:
10801:
10800:
10799:
10798:
10797:
10795:
10791:
10787:
10783:
10779:
10772:
10768:
10765:
10761:
10759:
10755:
10750:
10734:
10730:
10726:
10721:
10718:
10717:
10716:
10712:
10708:
10704:
10701:
10700:
10699:
10695:
10691:
10687:
10686:
10685:
10684:
10679:
10675:
10671:
10666:
10665:
10664:
10663:
10657:
10656:
10655:
10654:
10648:
10647:
10646:
10645:
10639:
10635:
10632:
10631:
10630:
10629:
10628:
10621:
10617:
10613:
10609:
10606:
10605:
10604:
10603:
10602:
10601:
10597:
10593:
10588:
10585:
10582:
10578:
10575:
10563:
10559:
10555:
10551:
10550:
10549:
10548:
10547:
10545:
10541:
10536:
10535:
10531:
10527:
10521:
10519:
10513:
10509:
10507:
10503:
10499:
10490:
10488:
10484:
10480:
10466:
10462:
10458:
10454:
10451:
10450:
10449:
10448:
10447:
10446:
10442:
10438:
10434:
10430:
10421:
10414:
10410:
10406:
10402:
10398:
10394:
10391:
10390:
10389:
10388:
10387:
10386:
10382:
10378:
10377:David.Tomanek
10363:
10359:
10355:
10351:
10347:
10344:
10343:
10342:
10341:
10340:
10339:
10335:
10331:
10327:
10323:
10309:
10305:
10301:
10297:
10293:
10289:
10286:
10285:
10284:
10283:
10282:
10281:
10277:
10266:
10265:
10261:
10257:
10252:
10251:
10247:
10243:
10234:
10230:
10226:
10222:
10218:
10214:
10210:
10206:
10202:
10198:
10195:
10194:
10193:
10192:
10191:
10190:
10186:
10182:
10178:
10176:
10172:
10159:
10155:
10151:
10147:
10143:
10139:
10134:
10130:
10128:
10127:
10125:
10122:
10119:
10115:
10112:
10111:
10110:
10105:
10095:
10091:
10087:
10083:
10079:
10075:
10071:
10068:
10067:
10066:
10065:
10064:
10063:
10059:
10055:
10045:
10044:
10040:
10036:
10027:
10023:
10019:
10014:
10010:
10006:
10002:
9999:
9998:
9997:
9996:
9995:
9994:
9990:
9986:
9980:
9976:
9972:
9969:
9966:
9963:
9957:
9955:
9953:
9946:
9944:
9940:
9935:
9933:
9929:
9925:
9920:
9915:
9913:
9906:
9898:
9894:
9882:
9878:
9874:
9870:
9866:
9863:
9862:
9861:
9857:
9853:
9849:
9846:
9845:
9844:
9843:
9842:
9841:
9837:
9833:
9829:
9825:
9811:
9807:
9803:
9799:
9795:
9792:
9791:
9790:
9789:
9788:
9785:
9784:
9780:
9775:
9774:
9768:Why rejected?
9763:
9762:
9761:
9758:
9755:
9752:
9749:
9740:
9737:
9732:
9728:
9724:
9723:
9722:
9721:
9720:
9719:
9714:
9710:
9706:
9702:
9697:
9695:
9691:
9687:
9683:
9679:
9675:
9672:
9671:
9670:
9669:
9668:
9667:
9663:
9659:
9655:
9654:
9650:
9646:
9633:
9629:
9625:
9621:
9617:
9613:
9608:
9604:
9602:
9601:
9599:
9596:
9593:
9589:
9586:
9585:
9584:
9579:
9569:
9565:
9561:
9556:
9552:
9549:
9548:
9547:
9546:
9545:
9544:
9540:
9536:
9532:
9531:
9527:
9523:
9518:
9515:
9512:
9508:
9505:
9495:
9491:
9487:
9483:
9479:
9475:
9470:
9466:
9464:
9463:
9461:
9458:
9455:
9451:
9448:
9447:
9446:
9441:
9435:
9434:
9430:
9426:
9418:Reyko Article
9415:
9413:
9409:
9405:
9401:
9397:
9391:
9387:
9373:
9369:
9365:
9361:
9358:
9357:
9356:
9355:
9354:
9353:
9349:
9345:
9344:
9328:
9324:
9320:
9316:
9315:User:Gryllida
9313:
9312:
9311:
9310:
9309:
9308:
9304:
9300:
9292:
9286:
9285:
9281:
9277:
9272:
9269:
9263:
9255:
9254:
9250:
9246:
9236:
9235:
9231:
9227:
9210:
9206:
9202:
9198:
9195:
9194:
9193:
9189:
9185:
9181:
9177:
9174:
9173:
9172:
9171:
9170:
9168:
9164:
9160:
9156:
9152:
9139:
9135:
9131:
9126:
9125:
9121:
9117:
9112:
9111:
9107:
9103:
9087:
9083:
9079:
9075:
9071:
9068:
9067:
9066:
9065:
9064:
9063:
9062:
9060:
9056:
9052:
9048:
9044:
9033:
9029:
9025:
9021:
9017:
9016:User:Paul_012
9013:
9010:
9009:
9008:
9007:
9006:
9005:
9001:
8997:
8992:
8982:
8981:
8977:
8973:
8958:
8954:
8950:
8947:Thank you. --
8946:
8945:
8944:
8940:
8936:
8932:
8929:
8928:
8927:
8923:
8919:
8915:
8914:
8913:
8909:
8905:
8901:
8898:
8897:
8896:
8892:
8888:
8884:
8880:
8876:
8875:
8874:
8873:
8869:
8865:
8861:
8845:
8841:
8837:
8833:
8829:
8828:
8827:
8823:
8819:
8812:
8807:
8806:
8805:
8804:
8798:
8794:
8790:
8789:
8788:
8787:
8781:
8777:
8776:
8775:
8771:
8767:
8763:
8758:
8757:
8756:
8755:
8751:
8747:
8743:
8738:
8734:
8731:
8727:
8723:
8719:
8715:
8695:
8691:
8687:
8683:
8679:
8678:
8677:
8676:
8675:
8674:
8673:
8672:
8671:
8670:
8661:
8657:
8653:
8649:
8648:
8647:
8646:
8645:
8644:
8643:
8642:
8635:
8631:
8627:
8623:
8622:
8621:
8620:
8619:
8618:
8613:
8609:
8605:
8601:
8597:
8593:
8592:
8591:
8590:
8589:
8588:
8584:
8580:
8574:
8570:
8568:
8564:
8546:
8542:
8538:
8534:
8529:
8525:
8524:User:Paul 012
8522:
8521:
8520:
8516:
8512:
8508:
8503:
8502:
8501:
8497:
8493:
8488:
8486:
8482:
8478:
8474:
8473:User:Paul 012
8471:
8470:
8469:
8468:
8467:
8466:
8462:
8458:
8454:
8453:WP:PAGEDECIDE
8450:
8446:
8441:
8438:
8434:
8424:
8423:
8419:
8415:
8406:
8402:
8398:
8394:
8391:
8390:
8389:
8388:
8387:
8386:
8382:
8378:
8373:
8369:
8352:
8343:
8334:
8325:
8318:
8313:
8306:
8301:
8292:
8286:
8281:
8277:
8267:
8263:
8257:
8255:
8249:
8245:
8244:
8243:
8242:
8238:
8234:
8230:
8227:
8223:
8219:
8215:
8211:
8208:
8204:
8200:
8196:
8193:
8190:
8186:
8183:
8180:
8176:
8172:
8168:
8165:
8161:
8158:
8154:
8151:
8142:
8138:
8134:
8131:
8124:
8119:
8116:
8114:
8108:
8107:
8106:
8104:
8100:
8096:
8090:
8086:
8082:
8077:
8075:
8068:
8060:
8056:
8046:
8042:
8038:
8034:
8029:
8026:
8025:
8024:
8023:
8022:
8021:
8017:
8013:
7995:
7991:
7987:
7983:
7979:
7976:
7975:
7974:
7971:
7964:
7958:
7953:
7952:
7951:
7947:
7943:
7939:
7935:
7932:
7930:
7926:
7922:
7918:
7914:
7913:
7912:
7911:
7910:
7909:
7906:
7900:
7896:
7892:
7891:Halo Infinite
7871:
7867:
7863:
7859:
7858:
7857:
7853:
7849:
7845:
7842:
7841:
7840:
7836:
7832:
7827:
7825:
7821:
7817:
7812:
7811:
7810:
7806:
7802:
7798:
7794:
7791:
7790:
7789:
7788:
7787:
7786:
7782:
7778:
7774:
7773:IBT Singapore
7770:
7766:
7762:
7758:
7754:
7750:
7746:
7742:
7724:
7720:
7716:
7715:Peter coxhead
7710:
7705:
7704:
7703:
7699:
7695:
7691:
7690:
7689:
7685:
7681:
7677:
7673:
7672:labor of love
7669:
7666:
7665:
7664:
7660:
7656:
7652:
7651:
7650:
7649:
7645:
7641:
7640:Peter coxhead
7634:
7627:
7611:
7607:
7603:
7599:
7598:
7597:
7593:
7589:
7585:
7584:User:CNMall41
7582:
7581:
7580:
7579:
7578:
7577:
7573:
7569:
7555:
7551:
7547:
7543:
7539:
7538:
7537:
7536:
7535:
7534:
7530:
7526:
7522:
7518:
7505:
7501:
7497:
7493:
7490:
7489:
7488:
7487:
7486:
7485:
7481:
7477:
7473:
7469:
7453:
7449:
7445:
7444:Integritas888
7440:
7439:
7438:
7434:
7430:
7426:
7424:
7420:
7416:
7411:
7409:
7405:
7401:
7397:
7394:
7393:
7392:
7391:
7390:
7389:
7385:
7381:
7380:Integritas888
7366:
7362:
7358:
7354:
7350:
7347:
7346:
7345:
7341:
7337:
7333:
7329:
7325:
7321:
7316:
7315:
7312:
7302:
7298:
7294:
7290:
7287:
7286:
7285:
7284:
7283:
7282:
7278:
7274:
7264:
7263:
7259:
7255:
7254:
7253:
7241:
7240:
7236:
7234:
7230:
7225:
7223:
7219:
7215:
7205:
7203:
7199:
7195:
7191:
7187:
7181:
7164:
7160:
7156:
7155:GrammarDamner
7151:
7147:
7146:
7145:
7141:
7137:
7136:GrammarDamner
7133:
7132:
7131:
7127:
7123:
7119:
7118:Third Opinion
7115:
7114:
7113:
7109:
7105:
7104:GrammarDamner
7101:
7100:
7099:
7095:
7091:
7087:
7084:
7083:
7082:
7081:
7080:
7079:
7075:
7071:
7070:GrammarDamner
7067:
7063:
7052:
7051:
7047:
7043:
7042:PoliticalEddy
7032:
7021:
7016:
7012:
7010:
7006:
7002:
6998:
6994:
6991:
6990:
6989:
6984:
6980:
6978:
6973:
6969:
6965:
6964:
6963:
6959:
6955:
6951:
6947:
6943:
6942:
6941:
6936:
6932:
6928:
6920:
6916:
6912:
6908:
6904:
6901:
6899:
6895:
6891:
6887:
6883:
6880:
6879:
6878:
6874:
6870:
6865:
6864:
6863:
6859:
6855:
6851:
6849:
6845:
6841:
6837:
6833:
6829:
6826:
6825:
6824:
6823:
6822:
6821:
6817:
6813:
6799:
6795:
6791:
6787:
6783:
6779:
6778:User:Viktorpp
6776:
6775:
6774:
6773:
6772:
6771:
6767:
6763:
6759:
6754:
6740:
6736:
6732:
6728:
6725:
6724:
6723:
6722:
6721:
6720:
6716:
6713:
6710:
6706:
6692:
6688:
6684:
6680:
6676:
6675:
6672:
6669:
6666:
6661:
6649:
6645:
6641:
6637:
6633:
6629:
6628:
6627:
6626:
6625:
6624:
6620:
6616:
6612:
6608:
6597:
6593:
6589:
6586:
6579:
6574:
6571:
6569:
6563:
6562:
6561:
6559:
6555:
6551:
6545:
6541:
6537:
6532:
6530:
6523:
6515:
6511:
6499:
6495:
6491:
6487:
6484:
6483:
6482:
6478:
6474:
6470:
6466:
6463:
6462:
6461:
6457:
6453:
6449:
6448:
6447:
6446:
6442:
6438:
6432:
6426:
6422:
6418:
6414:
6410:
6400:
6399:
6395:
6391:
6381:
6380:
6376:
6372:
6371:FelixtheNomad
6368:
6362:
6346:
6342:
6338:
6333:
6329:
6326:
6325:
6324:
6323:
6322:
6320:
6316:
6312:
6308:
6304:
6296:
6295:
6291:
6279:
6275:
6271:
6267:
6264:
6263:
6262:
6261:
6260:
6259:
6255:
6251:
6244:
6243:Arash Shakour
6239:
6238:
6234:
6230:
6225:
6223:
6222:WP:REFUND/G13
6218:
6216:
6211:
6208:
6206:
6202:
6194:
6189:
6188:
6184:
6183:
6182:
6175:
6171:
6167:
6163:
6159:
6151:
6142:
6138:
6134:
6130:
6127:
6123:
6122:
6114:
6113:
6109:
6105:
6101:
6097:
6081:
6077:
6073:
6069:
6064:
6059:
6058:
6057:
6053:
6049:
6045:
6044:User:Paul 012
6042:
6041:
6040:
6039:
6038:
6037:
6033:
6029:
6025:
6018:
6013:
6012:
6008:
6004:
5998:
5997:
5987:
5985:
5981:
5977:
5973:
5969:
5961:
5959:
5955:
5951:
5947:
5943:
5937:
5927:
5923:
5919:
5915:
5911:
5909:
5905:
5901:
5897:
5893:
5892:User:Zzhu8516
5890:
5888:
5884:
5880:
5876:
5875:User:Zzhu8516
5873:
5872:
5871:
5867:
5863:
5859:
5855:
5854:
5853:
5852:
5848:
5844:
5836:
5827:
5823:
5819:
5815:
5812:
5811:
5810:
5806:
5802:
5798:
5794:
5793:User:kingboyk
5791:
5787:
5783:
5779:
5774:
5769:
5768:
5767:
5763:
5759:
5755:
5751:
5747:
5746:User:kingboyk
5744:
5742:
5738:
5734:
5730:
5726:
5725:User:kingboyk
5723:
5722:
5721:
5720:
5716:
5712:
5708:
5704:
5699:
5693:
5688:
5678:
5677:
5673:
5669:
5665:
5655:
5654:
5650:
5646:
5642:
5638:
5637:autobiography
5634:
5631:Well, well.
5618:
5614:
5610:
5606:
5602:
5599:
5596:
5592:
5588:
5584:
5583:User:kingboyk
5581:
5580:
5579:
5575:
5571:
5570:
5564:
5560:
5556:
5552:
5548:
5544:
5543:
5542:
5538:
5534:
5530:
5526:
5522:
5519:
5517:
5513:
5509:
5505:
5501:
5497:
5494:
5493:
5492:
5491:
5490:
5489:
5485:
5481:
5480:
5472:
5463:
5459:
5457:
5456:
5448:
5439:
5437:
5433:
5429:
5425:
5424:fait accompli
5421:
5418:
5417:
5416:
5415:
5414:
5413:
5409:
5407:
5406:
5398:
5393:
5388:
5387:
5383:
5379:
5368:
5367:
5363:
5359:
5355:
5351:
5347:
5339:
5333:
5327:
5326:
5320:
5319:
5314:
5313:
5307:
5302:
5297:
5293:
5288:
5286:
5282:
5268:
5264:
5259:
5258:
5254:
5250:
5245:
5227:
5223:
5219:
5215:
5212:
5211:
5210:
5207:
5203:
5202:
5196:
5195:
5194:
5190:
5186:
5181:
5178:
5177:
5176:
5175:
5170:
5166:
5162:
5157:
5153:
5150:
5149:
5148:
5147:
5146:
5145:
5142:
5133:
5129:
5125:
5121:
5116:
5112:
5107:
5103:
5099:
5095:
5091:
5090:
5084:
5083:
5079:
5075:
5074:Paleface Jack
5066:
5062:
5058:
5053:
5049:
5046:
5045:
5044:
5043:
5042:
5041:
5037:
5033:
5032:Paleface Jack
5030:
5019:
5015:
5011:
5007:
5003:
5000:
4999:
4998:
4994:
4990:
4986:
4983:
4982:
4981:
4980:
4979:
4978:
4974:
4970:
4969:Paleface Jack
4966:
4956:
4952:
4950:
4944:
4941:
4939:
4935:
4931:
4924:
4923:
4919:
4915:
4912:
4911:resource page
4908:
4905:
4901:
4897:
4894:
4890:
4889:
4885:
4884:
4883:
4881:
4877:
4869:
4868:
4867:
4864:
4856:
4855:
4854:
4848:
4836:
4835:
4831:
4827:
4823:
4813:
4811:
4807:
4803:
4799:
4792:
4790:
4786:
4782:
4778:
4772:
4768:
4764:
4760:
4754:
4737:
4733:
4729:
4725:
4721:
4715:
4711:
4708:
4707:
4706:
4705:
4704:
4700:
4696:
4692:
4688:
4684:
4680:
4677:
4676:
4675:
4674:
4673:
4671:
4667:
4663:
4659:
4655:
4648:
4643:
4640:
4638:
4635:
4634:
4633:
4629:
4617:
4613:
4609:
4605:
4595:
4594:User:Rosguill
4592:
4591:
4590:
4589:
4588:
4587:
4584:
4583:
4582:
4572:
4565:DRN talk page
4556:
4552:
4548:
4544:
4541:
4539:
4534:
4533:
4528:
4527:
4522:
4521:
4515:
4514:
4513:
4509:
4505:
4500:
4497:
4496:
4495:
4494:
4493:
4492:
4487:
4486:
4481:
4480:
4475:
4474:
4468:
4458:
4457:
4453:
4449:
4444:
4441:
4440:
4434:
4432:
4428:
4423:
4420:
4419:
4415:
4412:
4411:
4407:
4397:
4393:
4389:
4385:
4381:
4377:
4372:
4368:
4366:
4365:
4363:
4360:
4357:
4353:
4350:
4349:
4348:
4343:
4337:
4336:
4332:
4328:
4302:
4298:
4297:
4296:
4292:
4288:
4284:
4281:
4280:
4279:
4275:
4274:
4273:
4269:
4265:
4261:
4257:
4254:
4253:
4252:
4251:
4250:
4249:
4248:
4247:
4246:
4245:
4242:
4238:
4234:
4233:
4224:
4221:
4220:
4215:
4210:
4203:
4202:
4201:
4200:
4198:
4196:
4192:
4188:
4184:
4181:
4179:
4175:
4171:
4167:
4164:
4163:
4162:
4161:
4160:
4159:
4155:
4151:
4147:
4142:
4141:
4123:
4120:
4118:
4117:
4112:
4111:
4110:
4109:
4108:
4104:
4100:
4096:
4092:
4089:
4088:
4087:
4086:
4085:
4084:
4081:
4079:
4078:
4073:
4069:
4059:
4058:
4054:
4050:
4045:
4043:
4042:WP:REFUND/G13
4038:
4036:
4031:
4028:
4026:
4022:
4014:
4005:
4001:
3997:
3993:
3989:
3985:
3981:
3977:
3973:
3969:
3965:
3961:
3957:
3953:
3949:
3946:
3945:
3944:
3943:
3942:
3941:
3937:
3933:
3929:
3915:
3911:
3907:
3903:
3899:
3898:User:Fsmatovu
3896:
3895:
3894:
3893:
3892:
3891:
3887:
3883:
3879:
3878:User:Wkigenyi
3866:
3863:
3862:
3861:
3860:
3859:
3858:
3853:
3849:
3845:
3841:
3837:
3836:User:Fsmatovu
3834:
3833:
3832:
3831:
3830:
3829:
3825:
3821:
3815:
3813:
3812:User:Wkigenyi
3808:
3802:
3793:
3789:
3785:
3781:
3778:
3775:
3771:
3767:
3763:
3760:
3759:
3758:
3757:
3756:
3749:
3745:
3741:
3737:
3734:
3733:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3725:
3721:
3711:
3710:
3705:
3702:
3699:
3698:
3691:
3677:
3673:
3669:
3665:
3664:Karlyn Percil
3661:
3657:
3653:
3649:
3645:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3638:
3636:
3632:
3628:
3624:
3620:
3613:
3608:
3603:
3597:
3594:
3589:
3579:
3570:
3562:
3555:
3551:
3547:
3543:
3540:
3539:
3538:
3537:
3536:
3535:
3531:
3527:
3523:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3499:
3495:
3491:
3486:
3482:
3480:
3479:
3477:
3474:
3471:
3467:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3457:
3445:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3430:
3429:
3428:
3424:
3420:
3416:
3414:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3397:
3396:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3389:
3385:
3380:
3378:
3373:
3352:
3347:
3342:
3340:
3336:
3332:
3318:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3287:
3283:
3279:
3275:
3271:
3250:
3246:
3242:
3236:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3225:
3221:
3217:
3216:Draft:Traackr
3211:
3206:
3205:
3204:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3183:
3179:
3174:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3153:
3151:
3147:
3143:
3139:
3135:
3131:
3127:
3123:
3122:Draft:Traackr
3119:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3084:
3080:
3076:
3072:
3069:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3050:
3047:
3043:
3039:
3035:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3007:
3004:
3003:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2995:
2991:
2987:
2983:
2979:
2971:
2965:
2964:
2960:
2956:
2951:
2949:
2948:WP:REFUND/G13
2944:
2942:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2928:
2920:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2897:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2883:
2879:
2875:
2859:
2855:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2839:
2834:
2830:
2828:
2827:
2825:
2822:
2819:
2815:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2805:
2793:
2789:
2785:
2780:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2761:
2757:
2754:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2745:
2741:
2737:
2733:
2729:
2725:
2715:
2714:
2710:
2706:
2705:Elijahandskip
2702:
2698:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2638:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2577:
2574:
2573:
2568:
2563:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2520:
2516:
2512:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2475:
2474:
2469:
2464:
2454:
2449:
2447:
2442:
2440:
2435:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2421:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2386:
2382:
2380:
2379:
2377:
2374:
2371:
2367:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2357:
2351:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2337:
2335:
2330:
2309:
2304:
2299:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2275:
2265:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2213:
2208:
2203:
2199:
2193:
2192:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2172:
2161:
2157:
2152:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2134:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2110:
2109:
2106:
2105:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2090:
2084:
2079:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2055:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2011:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1976:User:Goldie19
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1952:
1950:
1943:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1887:John Prattley
1882:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1863:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1803:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1693:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1673:
1671:
1666:
1645:
1640:
1635:
1633:
1632:Aarthi Ganesh
1629:
1625:
1611:
1605:
1604:
1600:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1497:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1425:
1419:
1415:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1408:
1403:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1366:
1364:
1359:
1358:
1352:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1304:
1302:
1297:
1296:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1274:
1269:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1239:
1234:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1189:- Threads in
1188:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1172:
1170:
1165:
1164:
1159:
1155:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1138:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1113:
1108:
1106:
1098:
1093:
1092:
1085:
1081:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1059:
1052:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1005:
1003:
996:
988:
984:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
938:
935:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
900:
896:
894:
893:
891:
888:
885:
881:
878:
877:
876:
871:
864:
860:
856:
852:
845:
837:
833:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
756:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
697:
695:
691:
686:
677:
674:
673:
668:
663:
657:. Thanks! --
656:
649:
641:
637:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
591:Suarezmartell
587:
584:
581:
577:
573:
569:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
533:
529:
527:
526:
524:
521:
518:
514:
513:Suarezmartell
511:
510:
509:
504:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:User:RHaworth
469:
468:
465:
461:
458:
455:
451:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
412:
411:User:RHaworth
408:
404:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
366:
365:
361:
357:
352:
350:
345:
324:
319:
314:
312:
308:
304:
290:
284:
282:
278:
275:
269:
263:
259:
255:
251:
244:
236:
232:
227:
225:
221:
217:
203:
199:
195:
190:
186:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
170:
167:
158:
154:
150:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
125:
111:
109:
105:
100:
97:
96:
91:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
68:
63:
62:
58:
53:
52:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
32:
19:
11298:
11279:User:Kudpung
11263:User:Birulik
11210:User:Kudpung
11188:David_Gerard
11139:the Teahouse
11087:
11068:
11065:discriminate
11057:User:Birulik
11038:
11018:
11013:
11009:
11005:
11003:
10988:
10979:
10973:
10943:āĀ Preceding
10919:
10908:
10903:
10895:
10894:
10843:the Teahouse
10776:āĀ Preceding
10773:
10769:
10766:
10762:
10751:
10748:
10626:
10589:
10586:
10583:
10579:
10576:
10573:
10537:
10522:
10514:
10510:
10496:
10476:
10427:
10419:
10373:
10350:the Teahouse
10346:User:Edproms
10319:
10296:the Teahouse
10292:the Teahouse
10272:
10253:
10239:
10221:the Teahouse
10213:the Teahouse
10179:
10167:
10120:
10109:
10082:the Teahouse
10074:the Teahouse
10051:
10048:Song article
10032:
9982:
9967:
9958:
9949:
9947:
9936:
9923:
9921:
9917:
9910:
9827:
9821:
9786:
9776:
9771:
9759:
9756:
9753:
9750:
9747:
9678:the Teahouse
9656:
9641:
9594:
9583:
9533:
9519:
9516:
9513:
9509:
9506:
9503:
9456:
9445:
9421:
9394:āĀ Preceding
9383:
9362:Thank you.
9341:
9338:
9296:
9273:
9270:
9267:
9261:
9242:
9222:
9149:āĀ Preceding
9146:
9113:
9099:
9041:āĀ Preceding
9038:
8988:
8969:
8857:
8796:
8739:
8735:
8711:
8681:
8596:the Teahouse
8575:
8571:
8560:
8448:
8442:
8436:
8430:
8411:
8374:
8370:
8366:
8351:
8342:
8333:
8324:
8312:
8300:
8291:
8280:
8253:
8231:
8228:
8224:
8220:
8216:
8212:
8209:
8205:
8201:
8197:
8194:
8191:
8187:
8184:
8181:
8177:
8173:
8169:
8166:
8164:notability.
8162:
8159:
8155:
8152:
8149:
8129:
8110:
8092:
8080:
8072:
8009:
7982:the Teahouse
7938:the Teahouse
7887:
7753:Korea Herald
7738:
7623:
7565:
7525:Gerda Arendt
7515:
7476:Gerda Arendt
7465:
7376:
7331:
7270:
7246:
7245:
7242:
7237:
7229:original ARC
7226:
7211:
7184:āĀ Preceding
7177:
7058:
7038:
7030:
6907:the Teahouse
6886:the Teahouse
6832:the Teahouse
6809:
6750:
6702:
6670:
6604:
6584:
6565:
6547:
6535:
6527:
6469:User:Johnbod
6406:
6387:
6356:
6328:User:Afunk45
6301:āĀ Preceding
6297:
6292:
6289:
6247:
6226:
6219:
6215:Userfication
6212:
6209:
6198:
6180:
6179:
6165:
6155:
6093:
6062:
6021:
5999:
5993:
5966:āĀ Preceding
5962:
5940:āĀ Preceding
5932:
5914:the Teahouse
5839:
5801:Sandrah.Akol
5692:Sandrah.Akol
5684:
5668:Sandrah.Akol
5661:
5630:
5604:
5567:
5546:
5477:
5475:
5454:
5453:
5446:
5404:
5403:
5399:
5396:
5374:
5349:
5343:
5316:
5310:
5291:
5289:
5278:
5249:Cardei012597
5241:
5214:User:Cryptic
5199:
5180:User:Lourdes
5152:User:Cryptic
5138:
5071:
5026:
4962:
4954:
4945:
4942:
4928:
4891:There is an
4873:
4860:
4852:
4819:
4796:āĀ Preceding
4793:
4775:āĀ Preceding
4755:
4752:
4718:āĀ Preceding
4683:the Teahouse
4679:User:Wundzer
4652:āĀ Preceding
4649:
4646:
4630:
4627:
4603:
4580:
4579:
4568:
4531:
4525:
4519:
4484:
4478:
4472:
4464:
4448:210.6.22.101
4445:
4442:
4438:
4435:
4424:
4421:
4417:
4416:
4413:
4408:
4405:
4358:
4352:210.6.22.101
4347:
4327:Nightenbelle
4324:
4283:User:Lourdes
4256:User:Lourdes
4205:
4183:User:Kudpung
4166:User:Lourdes
4144:I'd co-nom,
4143:
4137:
4115:
4091:User:Teemeah
4076:
4071:
4067:
4065:
4062:Draft:Ayanga
4046:
4039:
4035:Userfication
4032:
4029:
4018:
3992:the Teahouse
3925:
3902:the Teahouse
3874:
3840:the Teahouse
3816:
3809:
3805:
3754:
3717:
3696:
3687:
3658:should have
3656:User:Bearcat
3648:User:Bearcat
3617:āĀ Preceding
3612:User:Bearcat
3609:
3607:Hi Robert,
3606:
3595:
3571:
3567:
3560:
3524:
3519:
3472:
3461:
3432:User:Bkissin
3401:User:Bkissin
3381:
3374:
3363:{{db-draft}}
3343:
3328:
3268:āĀ Preceding
3264:
3239:Thanks man!
3173:MY RESPONSE:
3172:
3171:
3138:the Teahouse
3094:
3071:User:Lapablo
3006:User:Lapablo
2975:
2968:About Draft
2952:
2945:
2941:Userfication
2938:
2935:
2924:
2876:
2867:
2820:
2809:
2784:Gerda Arendt
2778:
2740:Gerda Arendt
2735:
2727:
2721:
2694:
2661:topic-banned
2593:
2558:
2537:satisfies a
2459:
2457:
2443:
2436:
2422:
2419:
2372:
2361:
2338:
2331:
2320:{{db-draft}}
2300:
2296:Intersection
2285:
2233:
2197:
2195:
2194:
2187:. Under the
2174:
2173:
2164:
2135:
2119:Mystery Jets
2116:
2102:
2089:this article
2087:
2085:
2082:
2017:
1998:
1980:the Teahouse
1953:
1946:
1921:the Teahouse
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1864:
1861:
1807:
1787:Namnguyen408
1781:
1743:Namnguyen408
1739:
1696:
1674:
1667:
1656:{{db-draft}}
1636:
1621:
1583:
1573:
1532:the Teahouse
1501:āĀ Preceding
1499:Thank you.
1498:
1494:
1473:CaroleHenson
1454:
1429:CaroleHenson
1426:
1423:
1404:
1401:
1368:
1360:
1356:
1306:
1298:
1294:
1281:Girth Summit
1174:
1166:
1162:
1153:
1140:
1132:
1128:
1123:
1120:
1116:Girth Summit
1109:
1102:
1077:
1074:John Shields
1057:
1038:
1020:
1008:
1000:
939:
936:
933:
886:
875:
807:the Teahouse
759:āĀ Preceding
728:the Teahouse
698:
687:
685:Hey Robert,
684:
681:Hello Robert
658:
588:
585:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
519:
508:
456:
376:āĀ Preceding
372:
353:
346:
335:{{db-draft}}
315:
300:
272:
213:
163:
121:
101:
98:
92:
70:āĀ Preceding
64:
56:
11141:for advice.
11010:all editors
10949:Ivan gurkov
10922:WikiAviator
10782:Ivan gurkov
10574:Hi Robert,
10437:Lavateraguy
9824:saying here
9517:Thank you.
9276:Thisissegun
8557:DRN closure
8192:IN SUMMARY
7749:Elite Daily
7289:User:GDX420
6997:User:Gdx420
6950:User:GDX420
6944:Thank you,
6903:User:GDX420
6882:User:GDX420
6828:User:GDX420
6605:Please see
5502:whether to
4628:Hi Robert,
4199:Thank you.
3932:Nickpwarren
3922:Corda draft
3697:SMcCandlish
3399:Thank you,
2425:HumOutcomes
2366:HumOutcomes
2252:User:Cabayi
2104:JosephJames
2024:Cyphoidbomb
1325:User:Dmehus
1321:User:Dmehus
1187:User:Dmehus
1009:Start-Class
216:Aureliojohn
185:User:Pmsouc
145:User:Pmsouc
11059:- Look up
10980:discussion
9555:User:WilyD
9425:Bluevespa8
9100:Nothing.
8199:sources.
8179:subject"
8081:Stub-Class
8033:notability
7521:Gewandhaus
7336:Andrew nyr
7233:latest ARC
7190:WikiWhizz2
6488:, thanks!
6229:HasteurBot
6201:HasteurBot
6024:WP:SPINOUT
5358:Lithopsian
5094:Pipara (0)
4880:WP:RPATROL
4861:The first
4543:User:L293D
4499:User:L293D
4049:HasteurBot
4021:HasteurBot
3522:article.
3369:{{db-g13}}
3357:{{db-afc}}
3295:User:Quipa
3030:ipso facto
2955:HasteurBot
2927:HasteurBot
2641:User:Bbb23
2604:EdJohnston
2326:{{db-g13}}
2314:{{db-afc}}
2098:Largoplazo
1917:Talk:PĆsac
1802:WP:NOTHERE
1662:{{db-g13}}
1650:{{db-afc}}
1507:Jay1Rudra1
1357:Doug Mehus
1295:Doug Mehus
1163:Doug Mehus
1129:Doug Mehus
853:. Thanks!
795:User:Flalf
757:article.
716:User:Flalf
341:{{db-g13}}
329:{{db-afc}}
252:. Thanks!
164:Thank you
11218:sarcastic
10984:initiated
9985:Starzoner
9952:help desk
9928:talk page
9873:Sulfurboy
9832:Sulfurboy
8949:Rosiestep
8918:Rosiestep
8887:Rosiestep
8864:Rosiestep
8811:Barkeep49
8797:obviously
8766:Barkeep49
8722:User:El_C
8427:Splitting
8113:help desk
8095:Knowledge
8085:talk page
8012:Starzoner
8006:Salomonia
7769:IDN times
7761:IBT India
7709:Starzoner
7694:Starzoner
7655:Starzoner
7626:Starzoner
6884:- Ask at
6727:User:Tvx1
6683:Sulfurboy
6681:of 2020.
6568:help desk
6550:Knowledge
6540:talk page
6490:Vexations
6437:Vexations
6417:Linthorpe
6403:Linthorpe
6353:Thank you
6250:FCBlinder
6003:SmokeyJoe
5687:WP:REFUND
4925:Refresher
4870:Redirects
4826:FCBlinder
4425:The list
4321:Thank you
3784:FCBlinder
3766:FCBlinder
3720:FCBlinder
3526:Mmizeasrm
3466:Mmizeasrm
3377:this link
3346:mainspace
2986:WP:NACTOR
2982:WP:SIGCOV
2874:-Claudia
2718:My friend
2669:topic-ban
2334:this link
2303:mainspace
1913:splitting
1670:this link
1639:mainspace
1598:CodeLyoko
1272:(blether)
1261:bears...
1237:(blether)
1041:help desk
1023:Knowledge
1013:talk page
941:Jziemniak
880:Jziemniak
803:Ambazonia
755:ambazonia
615:Help Desk
349:this link
318:mainspace
311:Quantenna
277:Rider0101
11214:Internet
11192:WP:BOGOF
10991:my draft
10957:contribs
10945:unsigned
10790:contribs
10778:unsigned
10124:contribs
9701:copyleft
9598:contribs
9460:contribs
9408:contribs
9396:unsigned
9360:User:DGG
9299:Gryllida
9274:Thanks.
9163:contribs
9151:unsigned
9143:Question
9055:contribs
9043:unsigned
8991:Paul 012
8511:Paul_012
8457:Paul_012
7633:PAGENAME
7602:CNMall41
7568:CNMall41
7373:Question
7231:and the
7198:contribs
7186:unsigned
6762:Viktorpp
6315:contribs
6303:unsigned
6133:Gale5050
6072:Paul_012
6028:Paul_012
5980:contribs
5972:Zzhu8516
5968:unsigned
5954:contribs
5946:Zzhu8516
5942:unsigned
5862:kingboyk
5843:Zzhu8516
5778:kingboyk
5711:kingboyk
5698:Likol Jo
5633:User:DGG
5587:User:DGG
5551:kingboyk
5521:User:DGG
5504:spin out
5496:User:DGG
5420:User:Liz
4918:proposal
4798:unsigned
4777:unsigned
4771:India TV
4732:contribs
4720:unsigned
4666:contribs
4654:unsigned
4581:Rosguill
4576:signed,
4362:contribs
4095:copyleft
3882:Fsmatovu
3820:Fsmatovu
3631:contribs
3619:unsigned
3476:contribs
3282:contribs
3270:unsigned
3266:media.
3235:Kingboyk
3220:kingboyk
2878:Loanfish
2824:contribs
2814:Loanfish
2732:Precious
2667:, and a
2376:contribs
2001:Goldie19
1960:Goldie19
1909:spun out
1707:deletion
1515:contribs
1503:unsigned
1124:Cheers,
961:Teahouse
890:contribs
773:contribs
761:unsigned
609:- Since
523:contribs
460:contribs
450:RHaworth
432:User:Liz
390:contribs
378:unsigned
122:Robert,
106:or here
84:contribs
72:unsigned
11250:Birulik
11226:uncivil
11180:Birulik
11160:Birulik
11123:Birulik
11092:Birulik
11041:Birulik
11014:caution
10896:Sizzle!
10834:neutral
10832:have a
10552:Done.
10330:Edproms
10146:history
9924:C-Class
9620:history
9482:history
8682:capable
7015:SarahSV
6983:SarahSV
6972:SarahSV
6935:SarahSV
6615:EllenCT
6536:C-Class
6452:Johnbod
6431:Johnbod
6307:Afunk45
6195:concern
6178:Dreamy
5707:example
5595:notable
5525:notable
5378:wayland
5206:Cryptic
5141:Cryptic
5111:protect
5106:history
4938:WP:SPAM
4724:Wundzer
4716:page.
4658:Wundzer
4384:history
4146:Lourdes
4116:Teemeah
4077:Teemeah
4068:history
4015:concern
3498:history
3419:Bkissin
3384:Bkissin
3372:code.
3339:sandbox
2990:Lapablo
2921:concern
2896:Claudia
2869:Robert,
2846:history
2444:Also -
2398:history
2341:Lapablo
2329:code.
2142:DPL bot
1677:Bkissin
1665:code.
1402:Hello,
1154:Comment
912:history
724:notable
690:article
545:history
374:this.
356:Lapablo
344:code.
11033:assist
10590:Simon
9520:Maria
7897:, and
7540:Done,
7466:Help!
7273:GDX420
7251:Thomas
6931:GDX420
6869:GDX420
6812:GDX420
6369:page.
6152:opened
5306:Utopes
5115:delete
3016:, and
2779:choose
2728:to you
2598:. The
2497:WP:ANI
2236:Cabayi
2221:Cabayi
2094:Frayae
1947:Hello
1804:editor
1329:WP:ANI
1267:Summit
1232:Summit
1209:WP:ANI
1205:WP:ANI
1191:WP:ANI
169:Pmsouc
129:Pmsouc
76:Midibo
11224:were
11029:tutor
10976:wrote
10829:trout
10154:watch
10150:links
9828:again
9628:watch
9624:links
9490:watch
9486:links
9348:talk
8449:merge
7741:Tempo
7353:split
6867:have?
6699:Query
6063:merge
5574:talk
5484:talk
5132:views
5124:watch
5120:links
4520:L293D
4473:L293D
4461:Query
4392:watch
4388:links
4237:SoWhy
4213:fried
3506:watch
3502:links
3366:, or
3335:Draft
3274:Quipa
2872:site.
2854:watch
2850:links
2736:Peace
2566:fried
2467:fried
2406:watch
2402:links
2323:, or
2292:Draft
2140:.) --
1723:Hobit
1659:, or
1628:Draft
1264:Girth
1229:Girth
920:watch
916:links
765:Flalf
700:Flalf
666:fried
553:watch
549:links
338:, or
307:Draft
16:<
11288:talk
11277:and
11254:talk
11238:talk
11200:talk
11164:talk
11150:talk
11127:talk
11112:talk
11096:talk
11077:talk
11063:and
11045:talk
11031:, I
11027:and
11021:have
10995:WSJ-
10974:You
10953:talk
10926:talk
10851:talk
10811:talk
10786:talk
10729:talk
10711:talk
10694:talk
10674:talk
10616:talk
10596:talk
10558:talk
10544:talk
10530:talk
10487:talk
10461:talk
10441:talk
10431:and
10409:talk
10381:talk
10358:talk
10334:talk
10326:WP:N
10304:talk
10280:talk
10260:talk
10246:talk
10229:talk
10185:talk
10158:logs
10142:talk
10138:edit
10118:talk
10090:talk
10058:talk
10039:talk
10022:talk
9989:talk
9975:talk
9877:talk
9856:talk
9836:talk
9806:talk
9731:Wily
9709:talk
9690:talk
9662:talk
9649:talk
9632:logs
9616:talk
9612:edit
9592:talk
9564:talk
9539:talk
9526:talk
9494:logs
9478:talk
9474:edit
9454:talk
9429:talk
9404:talk
9368:talk
9323:talk
9303:talk
9280:talk
9249:talk
9230:talk
9205:talk
9188:talk
9159:talk
9134:talk
9120:talk
9106:talk
9096:Test
9082:talk
9051:talk
9028:talk
9000:talk
8976:talk
8953:talk
8939:talk
8922:talk
8908:talk
8891:talk
8868:talk
8840:talk
8822:talk
8793:here
8770:talk
8750:talk
8720:and
8690:talk
8656:talk
8630:talk
8608:talk
8583:talk
8541:talk
8515:talk
8496:talk
8481:talk
8461:talk
8418:talk
8401:talk
8381:talk
8261:TALK
8250:. ā
8237:talk
8137:talk
8041:talk
8016:talk
7990:talk
7946:talk
7925:talk
7866:talk
7852:talk
7835:talk
7820:talk
7805:talk
7781:talk
7765:SCMP
7719:talk
7698:talk
7684:talk
7659:talk
7644:talk
7606:talk
7592:talk
7572:talk
7550:talk
7529:talk
7500:talk
7480:talk
7448:talk
7433:talk
7419:talk
7404:talk
7384:talk
7361:talk
7340:talk
7297:talk
7277:talk
7258:talk
7194:talk
7180:talk
7178:Hi (
7159:talk
7140:talk
7126:talk
7108:talk
7094:talk
7074:talk
7046:talk
7005:talk
6958:talk
6915:talk
6894:talk
6873:talk
6858:talk
6844:talk
6816:talk
6794:talk
6766:talk
6735:talk
6705:this
6687:talk
6644:talk
6619:talk
6592:talk
6494:talk
6477:talk
6456:talk
6441:talk
6394:talk
6375:talk
6341:talk
6311:talk
6274:talk
6254:talk
6233:talk
6185:š·
6181:Jazz
6137:talk
6108:talk
6076:talk
6052:talk
6032:talk
6007:talk
5976:talk
5950:talk
5922:talk
5904:talk
5883:talk
5866:talk
5847:talk
5822:talk
5805:talk
5782:talk
5762:talk
5737:talk
5715:talk
5672:talk
5649:talk
5613:talk
5555:talk
5537:talk
5512:talk
5447:Done
5432:talk
5382:talk
5362:talk
5318:cont
5312:talk
5303:.
5253:talk
5222:talk
5189:talk
5165:talk
5128:logs
5102:talk
5098:edit
5078:talk
5061:talk
5036:talk
5014:talk
4993:talk
4973:talk
4949:here
4830:talk
4806:talk
4785:talk
4728:talk
4699:talk
4662:talk
4612:talk
4604:Done
4551:talk
4508:talk
4467:here
4452:talk
4396:logs
4380:talk
4376:edit
4356:talk
4331:talk
4291:talk
4268:talk
4218:okra
4208:Deep
4191:talk
4174:talk
4154:talk
4103:talk
4053:talk
4000:talk
3936:talk
3910:talk
3886:talk
3848:talk
3824:talk
3788:talk
3770:talk
3744:talk
3724:talk
3672:talk
3627:talk
3588:paid
3578:paid
3550:talk
3530:talk
3510:logs
3494:talk
3490:edit
3470:talk
3440:talk
3423:talk
3409:talk
3388:talk
3341:".
3303:talk
3278:talk
3245:talk
3224:talk
3199:talk
3182:talk
3161:talk
3146:talk
3106:talk
3079:talk
3056:talk
2994:talk
2959:talk
2904:talk
2882:talk
2858:logs
2842:talk
2838:edit
2818:talk
2788:talk
2769:talk
2744:talk
2709:talk
2677:talk
2628:talk
2608:talk
2571:okra
2561:Deep
2547:talk
2528:talk
2517:and
2505:talk
2472:okra
2462:Deep
2429:talk
2410:logs
2394:talk
2390:edit
2370:talk
2345:talk
2298:".
2260:talk
2240:talk
2225:talk
2219:.
2217:here
2146:talk
2133:).
2065:talk
2048:talk
2028:talk
2005:talk
1988:talk
1964:talk
1929:talk
1891:talk
1846:talk
1822:talk
1791:talk
1771:talk
1747:talk
1727:talk
1681:talk
1634:".
1558:talk
1540:talk
1511:talk
1477:talk
1463:talk
1455:Done
1433:talk
1418:here
1338:talk
1283:and
1252:talk
1217:talk
1065:talk
969:talk
945:talk
924:logs
908:talk
904:edit
884:talk
859:talk
815:talk
769:talk
736:talk
704:talk
671:okra
661:Deep
623:talk
595:talk
557:logs
541:talk
537:edit
517:talk
487:talk
454:talk
440:talk
386:talk
360:talk
313:".
281:talk
258:talk
220:talk
198:talk
173:talk
153:talk
133:talk
80:talk
44:talk
11230:DRN
11016:).
10997:or
10352:.
10298:.
10223:.
10104:AfC
10084:.
9800:.
9684:.
9578:AfC
9440:AfC
9343:DGG
8726:DRN
8602:.
8533:AFD
6929:Hi
6838:.
6834:or
6782:MFD
6758:MfD
6632:MFD
6407:Hi
6357:Hi
5994:RE
5916:.
5731:.
5569:DGG
5479:DGG
5294:by
4824:.--
4693:.
4437:or
4342:AfC
4134:RfA
3994:.
3990:at
3982:?
3904:.
3706:š¼
3456:AfC
3130:G11
3126:G11
2804:AfC
2491:of
2356:AfC
2200:by
1923:.
1838:UAA
1552:?
1534:.
1351:ANI
1289:ANI
1158:ANI
1112:ANI
1103:Hi
1097:ANI
870:AfC
832:AfC
636:AfC
479:G11
475:G12
418:at
279:, (
231:AfC
36:MFD
11300:.
11290:)
11256:)
11240:)
11202:)
11166:)
11152:)
11129:)
11114:)
11098:)
11079:)
11047:)
10959:)
10955:ā¢
10928:)
10853:)
10813:)
10792:)
10788:ā¢
10731:)
10713:)
10696:)
10676:)
10618:)
10598:)
10560:)
10546:)
10532:)
10489:)
10481:.
10463:)
10443:)
10411:)
10383:)
10360:)
10336:)
10306:)
10262:)
10248:)
10231:)
10199:-
10187:)
10156:|
10152:|
10148:|
10144:|
10140:|
10126:)
10092:)
10060:)
10041:)
10024:)
9991:)
9977:)
9965:.
9956:.
9895::
9879:)
9858:)
9838:)
9830:.
9808:)
9711:)
9692:)
9664:)
9651:)
9630:|
9626:|
9622:|
9618:|
9614:|
9600:)
9566:)
9541:)
9528:)
9492:|
9488:|
9484:|
9480:|
9476:|
9462:)
9431:)
9410:)
9406:ā¢
9370:)
9350:)
9325:)
9305:)
9282:)
9251:)
9232:)
9207:)
9190:)
9165:)
9161:ā¢
9136:)
9122:)
9108:)
9084:)
9057:)
9053:ā¢
9030:)
9014:,
9002:)
8978:)
8955:)
8941:)
8924:)
8910:)
8893:)
8870:)
8842:)
8824:)
8772:)
8752:)
8744:?
8692:)
8658:)
8632:)
8610:)
8585:)
8543:)
8517:)
8498:)
8483:)
8463:)
8420:)
8403:)
8383:)
8264:)
8239:)
8139:)
8057::
8043:)
8018:)
7992:)
7948:)
7927:)
7893:,
7868:)
7854:)
7837:)
7822:)
7807:)
7783:)
7771:,
7767:,
7763:,
7759:,
7755:,
7751:,
7747:,
7745:GQ
7743:,
7721:)
7700:)
7686:)
7674:a
7661:)
7646:)
7636:}}
7630:{{
7608:)
7594:)
7574:)
7552:)
7531:)
7502:)
7482:)
7472:IS
7450:)
7435:)
7421:)
7406:)
7386:)
7363:)
7342:)
7299:)
7279:)
7260:)
7200:)
7196:ā¢
7161:)
7142:)
7128:)
7110:)
7096:)
7076:)
7048:)
7007:)
6995:,
6960:)
6917:)
6896:)
6875:)
6860:)
6846:)
6818:)
6796:)
6768:)
6737:)
6717:1
6689:)
6646:)
6621:)
6594:)
6512::
6496:)
6479:)
6467:,
6458:)
6443:)
6396:)
6377:)
6343:)
6317:)
6313:ā¢
6276:)
6256:)
6235:)
6224:.
6164:.
6139:)
6110:)
6102:.
6078:)
6054:)
6034:)
6009:)
5982:)
5978:ā¢
5956:)
5952:ā¢
5924:)
5906:)
5885:)
5868:)
5849:)
5824:)
5807:)
5784:)
5764:)
5739:)
5717:)
5674:)
5651:)
5615:)
5585:,
5576:)
5557:)
5539:)
5514:)
5486:)
5458:iz
5434:)
5408:iz
5384:)
5364:)
5315:/
5255:)
5224:)
5191:)
5167:)
5156:G6
5130:|
5126:|
5122:|
5118:|
5113:|
5109:|
5104:|
5100:|
5080:)
5063:)
5038:)
5016:)
4995:)
4975:)
4916:A
4909:A
4882:.
4832:)
4816:Hi
4808:)
4787:)
4769:,
4765:,
4734:)
4730:ā¢
4701:)
4668:)
4664:ā¢
4614:)
4596:-
4553:)
4529:ā¢
4510:)
4482:ā¢
4454:)
4394:|
4390:|
4386:|
4382:|
4378:|
4364:)
4333:)
4293:)
4270:)
4193:)
4176:)
4156:)
4105:)
4055:)
4044:.
4002:)
3958:,
3956:R3
3952:R3
3938:)
3912:)
3888:)
3876:[[
3850:)
3826:)
3790:)
3772:)
3746:)
3726:)
3714:Hi
3694:ā
3674:)
3633:)
3629:ā¢
3591:}}
3585:{{
3581:}}
3575:{{
3552:)
3532:)
3508:|
3504:|
3500:|
3496:|
3492:|
3478:)
3442:)
3425:)
3411:)
3390:)
3360:,
3305:)
3284:)
3280:ā¢
3247:)
3226:)
3201:)
3184:)
3163:)
3148:)
3108:)
3081:)
3058:)
2996:)
2961:)
2950:.
2906:)
2884:)
2856:|
2852:|
2848:|
2844:|
2840:|
2826:)
2790:)
2771:)
2746:)
2711:)
2679:)
2630:)
2610:)
2549:)
2530:)
2507:)
2431:)
2408:|
2404:|
2400:|
2396:|
2392:|
2378:)
2347:)
2317:,
2262:)
2242:)
2227:)
2148:)
2129:|
2067:)
2050:)
2030:)
2007:)
1990:)
1966:)
1931:)
1893:)
1848:)
1824:)
1793:)
1773:)
1749:)
1729:)
1683:)
1653:,
1582:.
1560:)
1542:)
1517:)
1513:ā¢
1479:)
1465:)
1447:-
1435:)
1340:)
1254:)
1219:)
1126:--
1107:,
1088:āā
1067:)
985::
971:)
947:)
922:|
918:|
914:|
910:|
906:|
892:)
861:)
817:)
775:)
771:ā¢
738:)
706:)
625:)
597:)
555:|
551:|
547:|
543:|
539:|
525:)
489:)
462:)
442:)
392:)
388:ā¢
362:)
332:,
260:)
226:)
222:)
200:)
175:)
155:)
135:)
86:)
82:ā¢
46:)
11286:(
11252:(
11236:(
11198:(
11162:(
11148:(
11125:(
11110:(
11094:(
11075:(
11043:(
10951:(
10924:(
10864::
10860:@
10849:(
10809:(
10784:(
10727:(
10709:(
10692:(
10672:(
10614:(
10594:(
10556:(
10542:(
10528:(
10485:(
10459:(
10439:(
10407:(
10379:(
10356:(
10332:(
10302:(
10278:(
10258:(
10244:(
10227:(
10183:(
10160:)
10136:(
10121:Ā·
10116:(
10088:(
10056:(
10037:(
10020:(
9987:(
9973:(
9875:(
9854:(
9834:(
9804:(
9735:D
9707:(
9688:(
9660:(
9647:(
9634:)
9610:(
9595:Ā·
9590:(
9562:(
9537:(
9524:(
9496:)
9472:(
9457:Ā·
9452:(
9427:(
9402:(
9366:(
9346:(
9321:(
9301:(
9293:?
9278:(
9247:(
9228:(
9203:(
9186:(
9157:(
9132:(
9118:(
9104:(
9080:(
9049:(
9026:(
8998:(
8974:(
8951:(
8937:(
8920:(
8906:(
8889:(
8866:(
8838:(
8820:(
8813::
8809:@
8768:(
8748:(
8688:(
8654:(
8628:(
8606:(
8581:(
8539:(
8513:(
8494:(
8479:(
8459:(
8416:(
8399:(
8379:(
8319:.
8307:.
8258:(
8235:(
8135:(
8126:.
8117:.
8039:(
8014:(
7988:(
7959::
7955:@
7944:(
7923:(
7864:(
7850:(
7833:(
7818:(
7803:(
7779:(
7717:(
7711::
7707:@
7696:(
7682:(
7657:(
7642:(
7604:(
7590:(
7570:(
7548:(
7527:(
7498:(
7478:(
7446:(
7431:(
7417:(
7402:(
7382:(
7359:(
7338:(
7295:(
7275:(
7256:(
7249:C
7192:(
7157:(
7138:(
7124:(
7106:(
7092:(
7072:(
7044:(
7003:(
6956:(
6913:(
6892:(
6871:(
6856:(
6842:(
6814:(
6792:(
6764:(
6733:(
6715:x
6712:v
6709:T
6707:?
6685:(
6642:(
6617:(
6590:(
6581:.
6572:.
6492:(
6475:(
6454:(
6439:(
6433::
6429:@
6392:(
6373:(
6363::
6359:@
6339:(
6309:(
6272:(
6252:(
6231:(
6135:(
6106:(
6074:(
6050:(
6030:(
6005:(
5974:(
5948:(
5920:(
5902:(
5881:(
5864:(
5845:(
5820:(
5803:(
5780:(
5760:(
5735:(
5713:(
5670:(
5647:(
5611:(
5597:.
5572:(
5553:(
5535:(
5510:(
5482:(
5455:L
5430:(
5405:L
5380:(
5360:(
5321:)
5309:(
5251:(
5220:(
5187:(
5163:(
5134:)
5096:(
5076:(
5059:(
5034:(
5012:(
4991:(
4971:(
4906:.
4828:(
4804:(
4783:(
4726:(
4697:(
4660:(
4610:(
4549:(
4535:)
4532:ā
4526:ā
4523:(
4506:(
4488:)
4485:ā
4479:ā
4476:(
4450:(
4398:)
4374:(
4359:Ā·
4354:(
4329:(
4289:(
4266:(
4189:(
4172:(
4152:(
4101:(
4051:(
3998:(
3934:(
3908:(
3884:(
3867:,
3846:(
3822:(
3786:(
3768:(
3742:(
3722:(
3704:Ā¢
3701:ā
3670:(
3625:(
3548:(
3528:(
3512:)
3488:(
3473:Ā·
3468:(
3438:(
3421:(
3407:(
3386:(
3301:(
3276:(
3243:(
3237::
3233:@
3222:(
3212::
3208:@
3197:(
3180:(
3159:(
3144:(
3104:(
3077:(
3054:(
2992:(
2972:.
2957:(
2902:(
2880:(
2860:)
2836:(
2821:Ā·
2816:(
2786:(
2767:(
2742:(
2707:(
2675:(
2626:(
2606:(
2545:(
2526:(
2503:(
2427:(
2412:)
2388:(
2373:Ā·
2368:(
2343:(
2258:(
2238:(
2223:(
2144:(
2136:(
2125:(
2063:(
2046:(
2026:(
2003:(
1986:(
1962:(
1927:(
1889:(
1844:(
1820:(
1789:(
1769:(
1745:(
1725:(
1679:(
1556:(
1538:(
1509:(
1475:(
1461:(
1431:(
1420:.
1371:C
1367:Ā·
1363:T
1336:(
1309:C
1305:Ā·
1301:T
1250:(
1215:(
1177:C
1173:Ā·
1169:T
1143:C
1139:Ā·
1135:T
1063:(
1054:.
1045:.
967:(
943:(
926:)
902:(
887:Ā·
882:(
857:(
813:(
767:(
734:(
702:(
621:(
593:(
559:)
535:(
520:Ā·
515:(
485:(
457:Ā·
452:(
438:(
384:(
358:(
256:(
218:(
196:(
171:(
151:(
131:(
78:(
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.