1148:- I hear you, and won't do it in the meantime until I get this resolved, but I only partly understand. First, and this is a minor point, AFC reviewers always use G6-AFC-Move for a blocking redirect rather than G6-Move, because we are asking the deleting admin not to handle the page move, unless they use the AFC script. The AFC accept script performs a considerable amount of useful cleanup work. If an admin does a regular page move of the draft into article space, a lot of manual cleanup work is required afterward. But, second, G6, either Move or AFC-Move, says it should be used if there is only a minor page history. So are you saying that the minor page history should be preserved also, or sort of preserved also? Third, what I am looking for is a way that I can immediately accept a draft when there is a blocking redirect, without needing to wait for the admin to delete the redirect. Are you aware of a way that I can do that (free up the article title immediately, without waiting for the G6 queue)?
1264:{{#if: {{hasTemplate|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:MiszaBot/config}} | {{#switch: {{{1|}}} |bot = Lowercase sigmabot III |age = {{#if: {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:MiszaBot/config|1|algo}} | {{#invoke:String|match| {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:MiszaBot/config|1|algo}} |^%s*old%s*%((%d+)d%)%s*$ |nomatch=}} }} |units = {{#if: {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:MiszaBot/config|1|algo}} | {{#switch: {{#invoke:String|match| {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:MiszaBot/config|1|algo}} |^%s*old%s*%(%d+(%a)%)%s*$ |nomatch=}} | d = days | h = hours | #DEFAULT = seconds }} }} |minkeepthreads |minthreadsleft |min = {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:MiszaBot/config|1|minthreadsleft}} |#DEFAULT = }} | {{#if: {{hasTemplate|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis}} | {{#switch: {{{1|}}} |bot = ClueBot III |age = {{#if: {{{round|{{{r|}}}}}} | {{#ifexpr: {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|1|age}} : -->
1324:
sometimes it makes it impossible to see the logic flow of the code. So the first thing I do, on any template I am updating (after moving it to the sandbox) is to strip out all the subst protection. Voilà, readable code! (Or at least, more readable than before.) Next, I add newlines, whitespace, and comments. I make my code changes, and the last thing I do is to reverse the process, stripping the white space and reinserting the subst protection. The good news is that stripping it out and reinserting it are completely mechanical, and you don't have to understand anything about subst protection. If you are familiar with
1401:(which I just created for you), you will see step #1 in action. If you want to play around changing the code in the sandbox, be my guest. If your changes work in step 2 (note one missing item: I have not yet written the test cases page) then you can proceed to step 3, and if it still looks good in all the test cases, you can move the sandbox back to live. Nobody is using this template yet, so you are not going to break anything. That said, if you'd rather I make specific functional changes to how the template works, I'm happy to do it; just let me know.
775:
2372:
942:
version havent specified, in my understanding, any specific section or problem in the article, stating only general NPOV issues. I will try to refill the notification, as I am really really exhausted by this discussion, which seems unfair and unrelated to the principles of the
Knowledge. This is my last call, because if no one can help me with this kind of hindering pressure against the encyclopedia development, then i can no longer dedicate so much of my time to english wikipedia,
2038:, and truthfully this user does not do it every time, but it seems like the user is relishing that the results of the polls indicate poor news for the incumbent government. I wonder if I'm just getting my knickers in a twist about this particular annoyance, as the user is for the most part an constructive member of the project. If I should address this issue, do I take it to the user's talk page or to the talk page of the Opinion polling article? Any thoughts would be appreciated.
25:
1241:
template *users* (proper messaging, useful params, good doc, etc.) and only secondarily to *template writers* (ease of maintainability), although the latter is definitely a goal as well, and something I always do if/when it is possible, through various methods, including indenting/newlines, but also use of subtemplates. Most of your questions or issues appear to be in the second category. I will address them, but it requires some detailed, and I'm sorry—lengthy, explanation.
2502:
1975:
1927:
1661:
1435:
wikicode looks like and why, and how to improve the code for maintainability by other template writers, that is very much a different question essentially unrelated to the functionality question that is more about template language, which opens up a huge can of worms and takes a lot longer to discuss. If it interests you, I'm game, and it sounds like it does because you asked about it, hence the long explanation. Otoh feel free to ignore it if it doesn't.
1226:. I have tried it right below this message, and that looks right. I have two comments at this time. First, I think that a few spaces and line feeds in the template code would make it a little easier to read for any third party. Second, I would have made this change myself, except that you are using safesubst, which I do not have experience with. Can you tweak the template so that Anomiebot substitutes the template? I think that is all for now.
429:
1514:
1470:
1311:}} was required. But that requires Template:Foo to have internal subst-protection (safesubst); there is no such thing as a bot that fixes placement of a template that lacks subst protection in the code itself. So, unfortunately, the tweak you refer to is impossible—I cannot remove subst protection from the template. It would be great if we could, then we wouldn't have to have subst-protection in
2106:. It has been more than a month now and all the comments so far have been unanimous and positive. Legobot has now closed the RFC. Can you kindly guide about the next steps? Can I now include the section which people have voted positively about? And what should I do if any individual continues to do stonewalling and deleting that section even after consensus in the RFC?
2188:
two or three editors / administrators. I am getting worn down and feel pretty insulted by the tone of their comments. Some have implied that with a Drama and
English degree, I should be able to read, and can't. I have been very civil to Tim Trent and now receive a snide comment about how he has been banging a drum and I only hear every seventh bang.
1126:
deleted page in your User space which is kind of ridiculous. Let's try to keep a page's history together, whether it is the current page history or a deleted page history. There is no need to move pages to your User space when there is a simple way to keep all of the history together using
Twinkle. Please do this in the future. Thank you.
2300:
editor. Perhaps we should be more discouraging up front about paid editors than we are, because most paid editors do not work out. It is true that we do not offer paid editors the level of advice and support that we offer to new unpaid editors, and that we expect paid editors to be able to learn from system documentation.
2187:
I fear I am still confused as to what to include and what not to include. I am getting rather tired of snide comments. All the articles I am referred to in order to correct the draft article are ambiguous. No-one has direct access to the truth. The article is constantly being declined on the views of
1815:
when I edited the article. Should I revert my edit? Also, I wanted to let you know that there might be a delay in the reponses of the editors involved in the dispute as it appears one of the editors had been temporarily blocked for edit warring, and I do not know if that will effect their ability to
1750:
Also, you asked if I had any financial or other connection with the subject. I do not. I did go to a different school in the UCS neighborhood, so I have some experience with the makeup of the school's environment and community. I also admire what they do for the kids in the neighborhood - that's why
1434:
Only if you wish to. In my OP, I was proposing a functional critique, i.e., how well would it suit a potential user of it, such as the message text, layout, linkage, parameter names and usage, even the image, and the doc page and that's easy to discuss (and no weeds). When the topic becomes what the
1382:
Still with me? This is probably way more than you bargained for, and maybe the core of this explanation could be bootstrapped into that essay I mean to write at some point. But the bottom line is that there isn't a way to easily modify the template wikicode appearance the way you might wish, but the
1290:
That said, there are some places you can add newlines and blanks (before and after the pipe character in #if: and #switch: statements, for example) but not all templates are subject to that, so you have to add comment delimiters to protect the white space, and often that works, but there are still a
1286:
and have a look at the code there, you will see how I prefer to write template code. And now for the big reveal: the two are identical; the rubbish code in the collapse box is the exact same template, only without the newlines and spacing. So, believe me when I say I know what you are talking about,
2310:
You were repeatedly warned that you could be blocked for introducing unsourced statements into articles. You were not blocked for that. You were blocked for making legal threats, because you said that what we had said libelous and a legal attack, and that you had screen-captured our statements to
2252:
I hope it is highly entertaining for all of them to keep belittling and humiliating people trying to learn a new skill and publish a page. I did publish the page for David Wicht EVENTUALLY although all the credit was taken away from me, as they said they had needed to change it so much. This is not
1746:
Your post said "This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources." This is certainly a valid criticism and I'd like to
1240:
First, apologies for the length of this. Both of these issues (structured code, subst'ing) are things I am concerned with too, as template code can look abstruse, and make it very hard to modify. There is a solution, or workaround, but before I get into the weeds about that, my first priority is to
1204:
five months ago, then forgot about it, until I got a bot message just now that it was up for deletion as a stale draft. So I patched it up a little, and released it. If you are willing, could you have a look at it, critique the message text and parameter usage, and let me know what you think? Also,
557:
You're not making sense there. Nothing unusual is happening, except for the MfD for a draft article that is not finished or perfect. No rules have been broken. I am within the rules for article creation. I'm doing what many experienced editors do when they create articles in their userspace. Please
2200:
When I mention my views, I get blocked and told to stop as if I am some kind of perpretator. It seems that snide little in-jokes and fired off comments are only reserved for a select few editors / administrators who seem to take the elitist stance that because they are not getting paid they are in
1323:
All of which by way of long explanation that, unfortunately, your tweak of removing subst protection from the template is not possible. But, I do have a workaround that may work for you, in this, and every template that uses subst protection. I find subst protection just as annoying as you do, and
1296:
I still have a solution for that, though, and that segues us into the subst'ing issue now (and more weeds). Subst protection for templates that may, or must be subst'ed is annoying, but necessary. The thing you mentioned about AnomieBot, is only about subst'ing a template placed by a user who used
1265:
24 | {{#expr: ((2 * {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|1|age}}/24) round 0) / 2}} | {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|1|age}} }} | {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|1|age}} }} |units = {{#if: {{{round|{{{r|}}}}}} |
1125:
G6 Move and in the field, put the name of the draft or article you want moved and an admin can handle the deletion and page move. Do not move a main space redirect to your own User space and then tag the page for deletion. Then we lose the page history of the original redirect which ends up on a
2299:
Knowledge is a volunteer effort, developed by volunteers who work on it as a labor of love. Our readers trust that the encyclopedia that they read will have been developed without commercial influence. You are entering
Knowledge as a type of editor who has an inherently awkward role, the paid
2296:. I don't know how much effect my comments will have. You have said some extremely unkind things about the reviewer community, and I don't think that we deserve it. I don't think that it is fair or kind to the reviewers to say that they giggle at your difficulties or that they are abusive.
941:
Hello, Robert, how are you? I have just seem your commentary in the closure of my DRN notification. I really think that there is a content dispute in the article, the question about returning the article to the draft is secondary in relation to the dispute. The editors that contest the current
2303:
If you believe the extremely unkind things that you said about us, that we were giggling at your failure to understand the rules, and that we were abusive, when we were trying to advise you clearly and neutrally about what we expected, then maybe you do not have the temperament to work in an
2322:
will have other comments, but I think that you have explained that your emotional makeup is easily upset by working in an anonymous electronic office, and that your own mental health might benefit from not exposing yourself to the stresses of
Knowledge. Not everyone has the temperament for
2130:
and have closed the RFC as approving the addition of the section. Add the section. I see that no one opposed the inclusion of the section, so maybe the editor to whom you refer has accepted that they are in the minority. However, to answer your question in two parts, first, no one can
457:. You had kindly raised a RFC on 3 Aug in RRR talk page. It has been more than a month now and all the comments so far have been unanimous and positive. Can you kindly close the RFC and guide about the next steps? Can I now include the section which people have voted positively about?
2434:
Hello Robert McClenon, When you have a moment would you please review the Draft:Jennifer
Kumiyama article I recently re-submitted for review? I'm interested in how the tone of the article sounds, and what you think of my use of citations. Thank you in advance. Best, Jack Tarre.
1838:- The rule against editing the article only applies to participating editors who have agreed to it. Do you want to become a participant in the case? In the meantime, since you were not involved, there is no need to revert your edit. Shall I add you to the list of editors?
2481:
Hello, I haven't been able to respond quickly, but I would just like to express my gratitude for your assistance on the
Dispute resolution noticeboard. I will follow through with your advice. Thank you very much for taking the time to assist me and other Knowledge editors.
1020:- I assume that you mean to tag it for histmerge. I don't have the toolbox to do a histmerge. The older history hasn't been erased. That is why I did the round-robin swap and moved the older history into the draft position, rather than tagging the older redirect for
2218:
It seems this cite is filled with landmines and that the editors and administrators enjoy watching a new writer walk into them and giggle into their sleeves. Except they don't giggle into their sleeves, they are outright abusive at worst, belittling at best.
2135:
because discussion is finished. You may edit the article. If an editor deletes the section, my advice is to restore it once, with an edit summary saying that you are restoring it as per the RFC. If it is deleted a second time, make a report at
1292:
d, and that may make the code line too long to be able to align the if's and else's, and just make things worse instead of better. And that is compounded in templates that must be subst'ed, making what was a short line very long, and alignment
1319:
that have it, but unfortunately there is no way to do what you wish by bot. (If it's possible at all, imho it would have to be via a mediawiki software change that alters how the template language works, and I wouldn't hold my breath about
2207:
In the process, out of some kind of spite, my own page was removed during an exchange between me and the editors. The timing was too coincidental for me not to view it as a slap from them for me fighting back at their insulting comments.
1287:
as far as writing accessible code, and I think we are totally on the same page about that. (It's on my to-do list to write a template-writing essay about that, but sadly. my to-do list is too long to envision it happening any time soon.)
2070:, but not if you have also expressed your concerns to the user, because then someone at the project page will check to see what page you are talking about. So I think that a question on the user's talk page would be reasonable.
1368:
To re-substify, find all occurrences of two left curly brackets not preceded by another curly bracket (so exactly two, no more, no less) and replace them with two left curly brackets plus the subst phrase you removed before.
1580:
I've attempted to engage an editor on a philosophy article, but no response yet, just revert -- may or may not continue in this way; if it does, I'm not sure which is the more appropriate "Wikidiomatic" way to proceed.
923:
1267:
24 | days | hours }} | hours }} |minkeepthreads |minthreadsleft | min = {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|1|minkeepthreads}} |#DEFAULT = }} end #switch ClueBot III }} }}<noinclude:
2338:
As you will have noticed paid editing is barely tolerated here, especially poor quality editing such as yours. Reference your comment “I am told there is a process to report editors” you can find the venue here
1788:
535:
1244:(Warning: weeds ahead!) Here's an example of a subtemplate: can you make sense out of this? I see plenty of templates whose code looks like this, and it's very frustrating trying to read or understand it:
2214:
When I suggested this, I was blocked and severely reprimanded for soliciting work from them. I was also told that it would be "positively fraudulent" for me to still get paid for the David Wicht page.
1784:
501:
The RFC got closed by legobot on 2 september. Till then there were 3 comments in the survey (also the case now) and all 3 of them are in favor of including the edit. Will go ahead and do so tomorrow.
1610:. If there is discussion, I would suggest continuing with it for at least a few days. If it comes down to two different viewpoints as to the wording for the article, I would then suggest either
1539:
2066:
and asking them why they think that this use of the edit summary is appropriate. I also was thinking that asking about questions about edit summaries might be an appropriate question at
37:
1901:, destroying the identity of the preceding comment. I'm not going to try to fix it—it's unclear to me where your comment should placed—but it certainly should not be placed there. ―
737:
729:
2496:
2058:- I would suggest that any discussion of the edit summaries be on the user's talk page, so as not to get any third parties involved. I don't know exactly what the connotation of
1291:
fraction of templates for where it doesn't (or, more precisely, it would, but the comments would get emitted in the output, so the comment delimiters have to be <noinclude: -->
2237:
I would like to tag both @FiddleFaddle and @Theroadislong,Double
Grazing to view this, but I don't know how to tag them. One of many things it seems that i don't know how to do.
2225:
The editors say that they are trying to help me and then slam me with "naughty child" comments as if I just don't know how to listen, instead of giving me clear instrucitions.
1969:
531:
724:
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The
Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at
2311:
you as evidence. You were then blocked because this appeared to be a legal threat. You were unblocked when you specifically said that you are not making legal threats.
1747:
rewrite the article in the formal tone required but ask if you could be more specific? And perhaps point me in a way that would help me reach this goal? Thanks in advance.
2222:
None of this behaviour would be tolerated in any other context. But it seems to be tolerated here on
Knowledge of all sites. One of the most respected sites in the world.
1768:
1852:
I suppose you can add me to the list of participants since I seem to have stumbled myself into participation by way of editing the article and engaging on the talk page.
534:
I can solve my issue by a Request for Comments just now, would you mind telling me how to do it? It's a little bit complicated，am I right to create a new a new section
1875:
I am sure you know it is uncivil to cast aspersions, and I feel it is even less civil when doing so as a reason in a formal discussion. Remember, comment on content.
1743:
Second, I could use some help complying with your critique. I did - as you suggested - go to the Teahouse and post a request for assistance there. I hope that works.
2017:
1778:
1506:
741:
725:
2184:
Should I leave out the Emmy Awards cite? Is this considered reliable? How else would I mention that their films have received Emmys but by referencing the site?
927:
402:
2027:
1655:
1567:
2256:
I will continue to work on the Film Afrika Draft, and attempt to implement the changes. I however am appalled and shocked by the treatment I have received.
1921:
1798:
1551:
1460:
640:, since there seem to be differences of opinion as to whether Ngāti Tukorehe is a subtribe of Ngāti Raukawa or a separate tribe. Yes, I made a mistake.
2539:
2012:
1176:
702:- I forgot about it. I have dropped it from review so that you can look at it. I will take another look at it, but it's your turn now if you wish.
2436:
682:
539:
2340:
2047:
1491:
2550:
1754:
Again, thanks for the quick response to my submission; thanks for any help you can give me that will make me a more proficient Knowledge editor.
1205:
it would be great if you could try it out live a couple of times and lmk how it goes, and if there's anything you would change about it. Thanks,
416:
2240:
I am told there is a process to report editors, but frankly I am so worn out by finding which specific code to put where, I don't think I will.
1726:
1397:
will work here (and will work everywhere and simplify the changes you want to make to any template). If you look at the history and changes to
1606:- If there isn't a response yet, then I would suggest continuing to try to discuss on the article talk page, and possibly editing the article
1124:
Please, if you want to move an article or draft to a page that has a redirect, use Twinkle, go to the page with a redirect and tag it CSD: -->
1964:
395:
374:
448:
388:
381:
790:
2407:, and two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday ;) - See
2387:
2276:
1860:
1847:
367:
466:
1057:
882:
2332:
975:
2356:
438:
2323:
Knowledge. If you think that we are laughing at your difficulties in listening to us, this site may be too stressful for you.
1898:
711:
1675:
1647:
931:
547:
2558:
2194:
Frankly what I am getting paid to do this job for Film Afrika is not worth the abuse that I have received from the editors.
1444:
1429:
1410:
1235:
951:
870:
861:- You didn't agree not to edit the article. Leave it as you last edited it. We haven't started moderated discussion yet.
2471:
2079:
1563:
1329:
1283:
591:
409:
316:
309:
304:
299:
292:
287:
282:
275:
270:
265:
258:
253:
248:
241:
236:
231:
224:
219:
214:
207:
202:
197:
190:
185:
180:
173:
168:
163:
156:
151:
146:
139:
134:
129:
122:
117:
112:
105:
100:
95:
2166:
2149:
2026:. I wanted a third opinion on this issue and didn't feel comfortable going to the Teahouse about it. There is a editor on
1763:
1550:
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
820:, and the image one. The cantata is an extrordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in
1696:
903:
760:
88:
83:
78:
71:
66:
61:
54:
49:
44:
1033:
663:
649:
2544:
2271:
1157:
898:
749:
521:
1282:
Got it all figured out now? I'm sure not, and I hate code like that. But it doesn't have to be that way. If you go to
824:. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --
1111:
852:
843:
Hey, Robert, I edited that Nabongo article yesterday after the DRN request was posted. Should I revert or leave it?
567:
2444:
2246:
I do not deserve the level of disrespect levelled at me, but when one says this, one is accused of making threats.
1827:
1531:
Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
1480:(3O) regarding a content dispute you have been involved in. You are not required to participate, but you are both
1009:
2424:
2181:
Thank you for your comment. It is difficult in the Film Industry to find sources that do not sound peacock like.
1731:
1559:
691:
513:
493:
1214:
2243:
I am a well respected award-winning celebrity actress, Casting Director and Script Supervisor in South Africa.
2115:
1884:
1097:
1073:
1787:. If you have comments on the proposed decision, they may be brought to the attention of the committee on the
833:
811:
625:
912:
2396:
1638:
is best if you think that compromise may be possible, or if you want assistance in formulating the issues.
1092:
817:
578:- I had already seen your questions at the MFD, but had other priorities besides answering your questions.
2467:
1737:
1595:
916:
876:
799:
428:
1916:
915:
does not meet the notability guidelines. However, you did not provide any specific guideline. I looked at
2491:
1087:
983:
936:
685:
as "under review", and haven't accepted nor declined. Are you still reviewing this? A friendly reminder.
1420:- You said that this is long, and it is long, and I will read it within 36 hours. Thank you, sort of.
798:
Thank you for explaining to a new editor! - I have three "musicians" on the Main page, one the topic of
1689:
1500:
1398:
1048:
copied the former version from the redirect in creating the draft that I accepted. I have tagged it.
881:
Hello, I have informed the other party on their talk page and we are both ready for dispute resolution
719:
552:
997:
2455:
2383:
2267:
2030:
who will frequently insert their opinions into edit summaries, often going (strangely) with "it's so
1184:
838:
786:
1000:, and even if it was written independently, the older history shouldn't have been erased like this.
1481:
1137:
989:
947:
2522:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
1995:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
1947:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
1709:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
481:
The RFC has now been open for more than a month. Request you to kindly guide about the next steps.
2463:
2352:
1934:
728:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at
599:
1386:
simplifying the code via subst protection removal and adding white space to highlight the logic,
605:
2509:
2449:
2429:
2420:
2087:
1854:
1835:
1821:
1795:
1312:
829:
807:
756:
1360:
and remove every occurrence of it. Lately, an alternative method has become popular, which is
2379:
2176:
1870:
1591:
1189:
1180:
821:
782:
637:
2487:
2440:
2324:
2285:
2278:
2263:
2155:
2141:
2127:
2096:
2071:
2023:
1895:
1839:
1639:
1421:
1227:
1149:
1067:
1049:
1025:
967:
862:
703:
641:
583:
543:
527:
454:
8:
2459:
2344:
2132:
2034:" or "Comeback" when adding new polls to the article. It certainly doesn't seem like the
959:
943:
919:. But I could not find any rule about opera. So please show me the notability guideline.
2554:
2362:
2348:
2319:
2293:
1911:
1759:
1440:
1406:
1210:
1198:
1072:
Just a reminder that it has been over twelve hours since your edit beginning to review
993:
894:
848:
673:
579:
1175:
Please can it be protected, if not constant ip vandal blocked, you spoke him recently
2416:
2043:
1880:
1792:
1682:
1534:
Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
1266:{{#ifexpr: {{tmpv|{{{2|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}|User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|1|age}} : -->
825:
803:
746:
734:
Please add your evidence by August 20, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes.
699:
687:
616:
is just a redirect, not an article. Did you mean to say something different? Thanks.
563:
2197:
I don't find any of it collegial. It is patronising, patriarchical and humiliating.
774:
613:
609:
434:
If this page has been recently modified, it may not reflect the most recent changes.
2535:
2371:
2162:
2111:
2008:
1960:
1722:
1668:
1603:
1587:
509:
489:
462:
349:
1528:
Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
1484:
to do so, to help this issue come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a
2483:
2035:
1982:
1889:
1803:
1082:
963:
765:
608:
a few months ago that said it was a "draft on a subtopic of an existing article,
332:
2531:
2412:
2404:
2004:
1956:
1811:
I wasn't aware at the time that a Dispute Resolution had been posted regarding
1718:
1607:
1525:
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
1485:
1316:
1107:
1076:. If there is anything I could do to expedite the process, please let me know.
1005:
659:
621:
1634:, is a policy, and should always be followed, but gives you various options.
328:
2523:
2519:
2315:
2289:
2137:
2067:
1996:
1992:
1948:
1944:
1902:
1755:
1710:
1706:
1635:
1627:
1615:
1572:
1436:
1417:
1402:
1223:
1206:
1116:
966:, which is a better forum for the general concerns that you want addressed.
890:
858:
844:
24:
2549:
Hi! I was confused a bit by your comment--I responded to you on my article.
498:
Alright, you must be busy or maybe this is not a part of dispute resolution.
2476:
2462:
for you a few days ago, so you can accept the draft whenever you're ready.
2400:
2055:
2039:
1876:
1631:
1623:
1619:
1611:
1477:
1462:
1308:
1301:
1021:
575:
559:
2204:
I resent all these tones. This process has been extremely damaging to me.
2103:
476:
2158:
2123:
2107:
1736:
I hope I'm doing this in the right place. First, thank you for reviewing
505:
485:
458:
334:
2518:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
1991:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
1943:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
1705:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
1392:
undo white space (if necessary), and re-add subst protection (required)
1077:
2211:
Frankly, I feel like leaving the page to be edited by someone else.
1103:
1039:
1017:
1001:
655:
633:
617:
802:, like 22 July but with interview and today's music at the Proms --
1145:
1128:
330:
2062:
is meant to be, and I would suggest both asking what they mean by
1257:
Sample of fairly typical, unstructured and abstruse template code
2307:
We do not deserve the level of disrespect that you provided us.
1165:
738:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections/Workshop
730:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections/Evidence
582:
an AFD, MFD, or DRV is usually not the most effective approach.
2092:*Re-posting the earlier message at the bottom of the talk page*
2063:
2059:
2031:
1740:
so quickly. I was told that process could take several months.
1513:
2126:- Since my only involvement in the RFC was to start it, I was
335:
2497:
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
1812:
996:. It seems obvious that the current version is based on e.g.
886:
2415:'s 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --
1679:
on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment
1469:
1970:
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
1353:
1325:
1170:
2288:. I will try to reply to your comments, and I will copy
1693:
on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment
654:
Ok. I see you have fixed your comment. Thanks very much.
742:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction
726:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections
2102:
You had kindly raised a RFC on 3 Aug in RRR talk page.
2028:
Opinion polling for the 45th Canadian federal election
2018:
Inappropriate edit summaries - To warn or not to warn?
1783:
arbitration case, in which you offered a statement, a
736:
You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,
18:
1672:
on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment
1656:
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
1476:This message is to let you know of a request for a
2513:on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment
2228:I have edited other pages FOR FREE on this site.
1700:on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment
1044:
1922:Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
1102:G6'ed. Please proceed with draft acceptance. --
1986:on a "History and geography" request for comment
1686:on a "History and geography" request for comment
2341:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1356:, to unsubstify, basically look for the string
2249:The only people who win here are the Editors.
740:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see
2231:I consider myself intelligent and well read.
1492:New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
343:This page has archives. Sections older than
1816:respond in a timely manner on the dispute.
2370:
2253:collegial. It is nasty. And unnecessary.
773:
2234:I do not deserve these ongoing attacks.
2191:I am not sure how to take this further.
883:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
449:Closure for Request for Comments for RRR
2530:Message delivered to you with love by
2003:Message delivered to you with love by
1955:Message delivered to you with love by
1938:on a "Biographies" request for comment
1717:Message delivered to you with love by
1171:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Calicut_FC#
475:Here is the link for quick reference.
353:when more than 7 sections are present.
964:the neutral point of view noticeboard
1461:Notice of content dispute listed at
1284:Template:Talk header/archivebotparse
1269:{{documentation}}</noinclude: -->
423:
2411:for a stunning sunrise, on the day
13:
2500:
1973:
1925:
1659:
1512:
1468:
14:
2569:
1785:proposed decision has been posted
744:. For the Arbitration Committee,
347:may be automatically archived by
2304:anonymous electronic office.
1777:Hi Robert McClenon, in the open
1677:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Korea
904:On Draft:The Doctor of Alcantara
818:Bach's cantata was 300 years old
442:to view the most recent changes.
427:
23:
2545:Draft: Boston Common (magazine)
2508:Your feedback is requested at
1981:Your feedback is requested at
1933:Your feedback is requested at
1667:Your feedback is requested at
1389:make code changes and test, and
1363:safesubst:</includeonly: -->
1345:Alternative method without PCRE
1194:Hi, Robert. I created template
522:About the Request for Comments.
2559:03:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
2540:03:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2492:03:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
2472:22:25, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
2445:15:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
2425:20:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
2357:12:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
2333:06:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
2272:12:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
2167:20:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
2150:15:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
2116:14:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
2080:00:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
2048:21:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1628:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard
1074:Draft:Hurricane Ernesto (2024)
636:- Yes. I meant to discuss at
514:08:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
2399:! On display his portrait by
2013:02:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
1965:02:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1917:22:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1885:17:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1861:02:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1848:02:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1828:01:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1698:Talk:Existential risk studies
913:Draft:The Doctor of Alcantara
494:04:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
467:12:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
403:PhiladelphiaInjustice Archive
2534::) | Is this wrong? Contact
2515:. Thank you for helping out!
2007::) | Is this wrong? Contact
1988:. Thank you for helping out!
1959::) | Is this wrong? Contact
1940:. Thank you for helping out!
1738:Draft:Urban Community School
1732:Draft:Urban Community School
1721::) | Is this wrong? Contact
1702:. Thank you for helping out!
1507:September 2024 Backlog Drive
1352:If you're not familiar with
917:Knowledge:Notability (music)
504:Thanks for your kind help.
7:
2397:Schoenberg's 150th birthday
2036:right use of edit summaries
1799:14:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1789:proposed decision talk page
1764:17:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
1727:12:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
1648:18:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
1596:22:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
1568:17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
1537:Interested in taking part?
1445:09:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
1430:17:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1411:21:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
1383:template update method of:
1365:, so remove all of those.
1236:17:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
1215:08:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
1185:20:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1158:06:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1138:05:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1112:03:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1098:Tropical Storm Sonca (2022)
1093:15:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
1058:18:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
1034:18:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
1010:07:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
976:23:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
952:16:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
932:06:30, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
834:11:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
604:Hi. You added a comment to
558:explain yourself there. --
548:16:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
10:
2574:
1560:MediaWiki message delivery
1399:Template:3O-notice/sandbox
908:Hello !!! Robert McClenon
899:17:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
871:16:15, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
853:11:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
812:22:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
761:00:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2456:Draft:Ideology and Utopia
2378:
2369:
1769:Proposed decision in the
1549:
1511:
1315:, and all the many other
877:dispute resolve wikipedia
781:
772:
712:16:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
692:09:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
664:03:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
650:02:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
626:08:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
592:03:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
568:02:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
2520:Feedback Request Service
2328:
2259:Wishing you a great day
2145:
2075:
1993:Feedback Request Service
1945:Feedback Request Service
1843:
1707:Feedback Request Service
1643:
1425:
1231:
1153:
1053:
1029:
990:Draft:Galician Knowledge
984:Draft:Galician Knowledge
971:
937:Existential risk studies
866:
707:
645:
587:
962:- I see that you found
720:Arbitration case opened
553:Please reply at the MfD
2505:
2454:Just a reminder about
1978:
1930:
1836:User:BrocadeRiverPoems
1751:I wrote the article.
1664:
1517:
1482:invited and encouraged
1473:
1317:user warning templates
1313:Template:Uw-vandalism1
839:editing article at DRN
2504:
2068:Village pump - Policy
1977:
1929:
1663:
1584:Cheers & thanks,
1516:
1472:
417:DIRECTIVEA113 Archive
2286:User:Karinvanderlaag
2279:User:Karinvanderlaag
2201:some way superior.
1780:Historical elections
1771:Historical elections
1691:Talk:Twisters (film)
1616:Request for Comments
1362:<includeonly: -->
606:Draft:Ngāti Tukorehe
600:Draft:Ngāti Tukorehe
2460:Ideology and Utopia
2450:Ideology and Utopia
2430:Asking your opinion
2262:Karin van der Laag
2088:Closure for RRR RFC
1856:Brocade River Poems
1823:Brocade River Poems
1577:When to do which?
1328:, you can just use
960:User:JoaquimCebuano
396:John Carter Archive
2524:removing your name
2506:
2464:Extraordinary Writ
2320:User:DoubleGrazing
2294:User:DoubleGrazing
2177:Draft: Film Afrika
1997:removing your name
1979:
1949:removing your name
1931:
1871:Casting aspersions
1711:removing your name
1665:
1624:Dispute Resolution
1518:
1474:
1190:Template:3O-notice
994:Galician Knowledge
638:Talk:Ngāti Raukawa
375:Famekeeper Archive
2527:
2393:
2392:
2000:
1952:
1936:Talk:Kathy Hochul
1714:
1557:
1556:
1374:
1373:
1358:{{{|safesubst:}}}
1330:these two regexes
1274:
1273:
1068:Hurricane Ernesto
988:Please histmerge
796:
795:
700:User:SafariScribe
446:
445:
422:
421:
389:Jack User Archive
382:FuelWagon Archive
357:
356:
322:
321:
2565:
2517:
2511:Talk:Sahaja Yoga
2503:
2374:
2367:
2366:
1990:
1976:
1942:
1928:
1914:
1909:
1857:
1824:
1704:
1662:
1618:. When you say
1604:User:Himaldrmann
1509:
1501:New pages patrol
1496:
1495:
1364:
1359:
1341:
1340:
1306:
1300:
1253:
1252:
1222:You're welcome,
1203:
1197:
1136:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1047:
777:
770:
769:
752:
690:
441:
431:
424:
359:
358:
352:
336:
41:
40:
27:
19:
2573:
2572:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2547:
2536:my bot operator
2501:
2499:
2479:
2452:
2432:
2365:
2363:September music
2325:Robert McClenon
2282:
2264:Karinvanderlaag
2179:
2156:Robert McClenon
2142:Robert McClenon
2104:Talk:RRR#Survey
2090:
2072:Robert McClenon
2024:Robert McClenon
2020:
2009:my bot operator
1974:
1972:
1961:my bot operator
1926:
1924:
1912:
1903:
1892:
1873:
1855:
1840:Robert McClenon
1822:
1806:
1775:
1734:
1723:my bot operator
1660:
1658:
1640:Robert McClenon
1575:
1505:
1494:
1467:
1422:Robert McClenon
1375:
1361:
1357:
1346:
1304:
1298:
1275:
1270:
1258:
1228:Robert McClenon
1201:
1195:
1192:
1168:
1150:Robert McClenon
1127:
1121:Hello, Robert,
1119:
1100:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1070:
1050:Robert McClenon
1043:
1026:Robert McClenon
986:
968:Robert McClenon
939:
911:You wrote that
906:
879:
863:Robert McClenon
841:
768:
750:
722:
704:Robert McClenon
686:
683:Draft:Camarines
676:
674:Draft:Camarines
642:Robert McClenon
602:
584:Robert McClenon
555:
524:
477:Talk:RRR#Survey
451:
439:purge this page
437:
368:Problem Archive
362:Other archives
348:
337:
331:
32:
12:
11:
5:
2571:
2546:
2543:
2516:
2498:
2495:
2478:
2475:
2451:
2448:
2431:
2428:
2405:Moses und Aron
2403:, music from
2391:
2390:
2376:
2375:
2364:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2281:
2275:
2178:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2089:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2019:
2016:
1989:
1971:
1968:
1941:
1923:
1920:
1891:
1888:
1872:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1819:All the best,
1805:
1802:
1774:
1767:
1733:
1730:
1703:
1657:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1630:? The first,
1622:, do you mean
1574:
1571:
1555:
1554:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1535:
1532:
1529:
1526:
1520:
1519:
1510:
1493:
1490:
1488:. Thank you!
1466:
1465:for assistance
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1372:
1371:
1348:
1347:
1344:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1321:
1294:
1288:
1272:
1271:
1263:
1260:
1259:
1256:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1242:
1191:
1188:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1118:
1115:
1099:
1096:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1042:. I see that
985:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
944:JoaquimCebuano
938:
935:
905:
902:
878:
875:
874:
873:
840:
837:
816:On 13 August,
800:my story today
794:
793:
779:
778:
767:
764:
721:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
675:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
614:Ngāti Tukorehe
610:Ngāti Tukorehe
601:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
554:
551:
523:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
502:
499:
482:
479:
473:
450:
447:
444:
443:
435:
432:
420:
419:
413:
412:
406:
405:
399:
398:
392:
391:
385:
384:
378:
377:
371:
370:
364:
363:
355:
354:
342:
339:
338:
333:
329:
327:
324:
323:
320:
319:
313:
312:
307:
302:
296:
295:
290:
285:
279:
278:
273:
268:
262:
261:
256:
251:
245:
244:
239:
234:
228:
227:
222:
217:
211:
210:
205:
200:
194:
193:
188:
183:
177:
176:
171:
166:
160:
159:
154:
149:
143:
142:
137:
132:
126:
125:
120:
115:
109:
108:
103:
98:
92:
91:
86:
81:
75:
74:
69:
64:
58:
57:
52:
47:
34:
33:
28:
22:
16:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2570:
2561:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2542:
2541:
2538:. | Sent at
2537:
2533:
2528:
2525:
2521:
2514:
2512:
2494:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2474:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2447:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2427:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2368:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2349:Theroadislong
2346:
2342:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2321:
2317:
2316:User:Timtrent
2312:
2308:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2295:
2291:
2290:User:Timtrent
2287:
2280:
2274:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2260:
2257:
2254:
2250:
2247:
2244:
2241:
2238:
2235:
2232:
2229:
2226:
2223:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2209:
2205:
2202:
2198:
2195:
2192:
2189:
2185:
2182:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2157:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2125:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2100:
2098:
2093:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2015:
2014:
2011:. | Sent at
2010:
2006:
2001:
1998:
1994:
1987:
1985:
1967:
1966:
1963:. | Sent at
1962:
1958:
1953:
1950:
1946:
1939:
1937:
1919:
1918:
1915:
1910:
1908:
1907:
1900:
1897:
1887:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1862:
1859:
1858:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1826:
1825:
1817:
1814:
1809:
1801:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1781:
1772:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1729:
1728:
1725:. | Sent at
1724:
1720:
1715:
1712:
1708:
1701:
1699:
1694:
1692:
1687:
1685:
1680:
1678:
1673:
1671:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1612:Third Opinion
1609:
1605:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1582:
1578:
1570:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1553:
1548:
1542:
1541:
1536:
1533:
1530:
1527:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1515:
1508:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1497:
1489:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1478:third opinion
1471:
1464:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1418:User:Mathglot
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1391:
1388:
1385:
1384:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1370:
1366:
1355:
1350:
1349:
1343:
1342:
1331:
1327:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1303:
1295:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1262:
1261:
1255:
1254:
1243:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1224:User:Mathglot
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1200:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1173:
1172:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1122:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1095:
1094:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1075:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
949:
945:
934:
933:
929:
925:
920:
918:
914:
909:
901:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
872:
868:
864:
860:
859:User:Valereee
857:
856:
855:
854:
850:
846:
836:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
814:
813:
809:
805:
801:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
771:
763:
762:
758:
754:
753:
748:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
713:
709:
705:
701:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
689:
688:Safari Scribe
684:
679:
665:
661:
657:
653:
652:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
565:
561:
550:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
497:
496:
495:
491:
487:
483:
480:
478:
474:
471:
470:
469:
468:
464:
460:
456:
440:
433:
430:
426:
425:
418:
415:
414:
411:
408:
407:
404:
401:
400:
397:
394:
393:
390:
387:
386:
383:
380:
379:
376:
373:
372:
369:
366:
365:
361:
360:
351:
346:
341:
340:
326:
325:
318:
315:
314:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
297:
294:
291:
289:
286:
284:
281:
280:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
263:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
246:
243:
240:
238:
235:
233:
230:
229:
226:
223:
221:
218:
216:
213:
212:
209:
206:
204:
201:
199:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
178:
175:
172:
170:
167:
165:
162:
161:
158:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
144:
141:
138:
136:
133:
131:
128:
127:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
93:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
59:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
42:
39:
36:
35:
31:
26:
21:
20:
17:
2548:
2529:
2510:
2507:
2480:
2453:
2433:
2417:Gerda Arendt
2408:
2401:Egon Schiele
2394:
2345:WP:BOOMERANG
2343:be aware of
2313:
2309:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2283:
2261:
2258:
2255:
2251:
2248:
2245:
2242:
2239:
2236:
2233:
2230:
2227:
2224:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2210:
2206:
2203:
2199:
2196:
2193:
2190:
2186:
2183:
2180:
2101:
2094:
2091:
2056:User:Bkissin
2021:
2002:
1983:
1980:
1954:
1935:
1932:
1905:
1904:
1893:
1890:Interleaving
1874:
1853:
1820:
1818:
1810:
1807:
1804:DRN On Neith
1793:SilverLocust
1779:
1776:
1770:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1742:
1735:
1716:
1697:
1690:
1683:
1676:
1669:
1666:
1586:
1583:
1579:
1576:
1558:
1540:Sign up here
1538:
1499:
1475:
1367:
1351:
1193:
1174:
1169:
1130:
1129:
1123:
1120:
1101:
1071:
987:
940:
921:
910:
907:
880:
842:
826:Gerda Arendt
815:
804:Gerda Arendt
797:
766:August music
745:
733:
723:
680:
677:
603:
576:User:Valjean
566:) (PING me)
556:
525:
452:
344:
29:
15:
2154:Thank you @
2124:User:SaibaK
1896:interleaved
1894:Hello. You
1773:case posted
1695:, and at
1688:, and at
1684:Talk:Kosovo
1681:, and at
1674:, and at
1588:Himaldrmann
1293:impossible.
1177:Cenderabird
759:· he/they)
681:You marked
678:Hi Robert,
580:Bludgeoning
472:Hi, Robert.
350:ClueBot III
2484:Adachi1939
2437:Jack Tarre
2128:uninvolved
1670:Talk:Silla
1573:RFC vs. DR
1117:Page moves
922:Thank you
540:Kof2102966
410:78 Archive
317:Archive 49
310:Archive 48
305:Archive 47
300:Archive 46
293:Archive 45
288:Archive 44
283:Archive 43
276:Archive 42
271:Archive 41
266:Archive 40
259:Archive 39
254:Archive 38
249:Archive 37
242:Archive 36
237:Archive 35
232:Archive 34
225:Archive 33
220:Archive 32
215:Archive 31
208:Archive 30
203:Archive 29
198:Archive 28
191:Archive 27
186:Archive 26
181:Archive 25
174:Archive 24
169:Archive 23
164:Archive 22
157:Archive 21
152:Archive 20
147:Archive 19
140:Archive 18
135:Archive 17
130:Archive 16
123:Archive 15
118:Archive 14
113:Archive 13
106:Archive 12
101:Archive 11
96:Archive 10
2532:Yapperbot
2477:Thank you
2458:: I G6'd
2395:Today is
2277:Reply to
2133:stonewall
2005:Yapperbot
1984:Talk:Jinn
1957:Yapperbot
1719:Yapperbot
1486:consensus
1309:subst:Foo
1199:3O-notice
1040:User:Fram
1018:User:Fram
924:ブラン＝アルジャン
822:the cycle
634:User:Nurg
484:Thanks.
89:Archive 9
84:Archive 8
79:Archive 7
72:Archive 6
67:Archive 5
62:Archive 4
55:Archive 3
50:Archive 2
45:Archive 1
2551:Govwikis
2413:Bruckner
2347:though.
1906:Mandruss
1756:Benetsee
1437:Mathglot
1403:Mathglot
1307:when {{
1207:Mathglot
1146:User:Liz
891:Potymkin
845:Valereee
30:Archives
2040:Bkissin
1877:Kingsif
889:topic.
885:on the
751:Blaster
612:". But
560:Valjean
532:told me
436:Please
345:60 days
2409:places
2388:places
2314:Maybe
2284:Okay,
2159:SaibaK
2138:WP:ANI
2108:SaibaK
2097:Robert
2064:Joever
2060:Joever
2032:Joever
1608:boldly
1320:that.)
1038:Okay,
791:places
530:. You
528:Robert
506:SaibaK
486:SaibaK
459:SaibaK
455:Robert
2384:music
2380:story
2140:.
1813:Neith
1552:here.
1463:WP:3O
992:into
887:Neith
787:music
783:story
747:House
38:Index
2555:talk
2488:talk
2468:talk
2441:talk
2421:talk
2353:talk
2329:talk
2292:and
2268:talk
2163:talk
2146:talk
2112:talk
2076:talk
2044:talk
2022:Hey
1899:here
1881:talk
1844:talk
1808:Hi,
1760:talk
1644:talk
1592:talk
1564:talk
1441:talk
1426:talk
1407:talk
1354:PCRE
1326:PCRE
1232:talk
1211:talk
1181:talk
1166:Note
1154:talk
1108:talk
1104:Whpq
1079:✶Qux
1054:talk
1030:talk
1006:talk
1002:Fram
998:this
972:talk
948:talk
928:talk
895:talk
867:talk
849:talk
830:talk
808:talk
757:talk
708:talk
660:talk
656:Nurg
646:talk
622:talk
618:Nurg
588:talk
564:talk
544:talk
536:here
510:talk
490:talk
463:talk
2318:or
2099:.
2095:Hi,
1636:DRN
1626:or
1614:or
1302:Foo
1268:-->
1045:PK2
1024:.
526:Hi,
453:Hi,
2557:)
2490:)
2470:)
2443:)
2423:)
2386:·
2382:·
2355:)
2331:)
2270:)
2165:)
2148:)
2114:)
2078:)
2046:)
1883:)
1846:)
1796:💬
1791:.
1762:)
1646:)
1632:DR
1620:DR
1594:)
1566:)
1443:)
1428:)
1409:)
1305:}}
1299:{{
1234:)
1213:)
1202:}}
1196:{{
1183:)
1156:)
1134:iz
1110:)
1084:yz
1056:)
1032:)
1022:G6
1008:)
974:)
950:)
930:)
897:)
869:)
851:)
832:)
810:)
789:·
785:·
732:.
710:)
662:)
648:)
624:)
590:)
546:)
512:)
492:)
465:)
2553:(
2526:.
2486:(
2466:(
2439:(
2419:(
2351:(
2327:(
2266:(
2161:(
2144:(
2110:(
2074:(
2042:(
1999:.
1951:.
1913:☎
1879:(
1842:(
1758:(
1713:.
1642:(
1590:(
1562:(
1543:.
1503:|
1439:(
1424:(
1405:(
1332:.
1230:(
1209:(
1179:(
1152:(
1131:L
1106:(
1089:✶
1052:(
1028:(
1004:(
970:(
946:(
926:(
893:(
865:(
847:(
828:(
806:(
755:(
706:(
658:(
644:(
620:(
586:(
562:(
542:(
538:？
508:(
488:(
461:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
