User talk:Robert McClenon/Archive 18

10078:

have. Even if we only use that skill rarely because we rarely if ever add content. There are a couple of things behind that, one of which is that admins are expected by many to set an example that others can follow, another is that we are making decisions abut content, especially in deletion. The second thing is tagging speed. Here we differ, like SoWhy I find speedy tagging of A7s to be bitey and I don't do that myself. But I'm aware that consensus is with you on A7 and I wouldn't oppose on that issue. I'm not seeing many people endorse that part of SoWhy's concerns. Tagging accuracy/deletionism is something that has derailed many RFAs, and used to be a big bugbear of mine. We all make mistakes, and the busy ones among us make more mistakes than those who are less active (though hopefully the proportion of mistakes falls among the hyper active, else they get into trouble). What isn't clear from your RFA at present is whether we are talking about mistakes or a different view of the deletion criteria. RFA is a process whereby we try to appoint admins who will use the tools in line with consensus. If you have an admin who advocates for a change of policy to become more deletionist but who complies with current policy, then that should be fine - provided they will use the tools in line with consensus. I'm not sure whether your definition of "crud" is the same as consensus, and I suspect this RFA could yet hinge on that.

10076:

don't recall anyone suggesting that I withdraw early, when I used to nominate candidates withdrawal was something I and others would recommend when an RFA was tanking and the support percentage falling because the mood was clearly shifting against the candidate, or the dialogue had ceased and there was nothing new to learn. If consistently below 50% used to be the rule of thumb for advising people to withdraw, then logically with the lower passing threshold it would be 45% and your RFA is one that could run the 7 days. It is now over 24 hours since you have answered a question there, so I'd suggest you either return to the Q& A section or if you can't face that withdraw. As I see it there are three areas of contention in that RFA, content contributions, tagging speed and deletionism/inaccuracy. Looking around your articles created I think your content contributions are better than your answer to Q2 implies and that you have undersold yourself. The community has diverse expectations re content at RFA. Clearly you don't have the GA or FA needed to get : -->

154:

approved Knowledge pages I have read from similar companies, I am not far off of this goal. Many if not all of these companies have similar sections and provide very similar information about the companies. I used the agglomerated list of those companies as a template for how to write the draft for this article. I was hoping that you could provide a bit more information about what should be removed or altered in this draft in order to make it appear less like an advertisement. The first paragraph along with the "history" and "business ventures" sections have all been edited to match the style of other pages and I imagine a few tweaks should set this page up for success. I do have a COI in editing this page as I am an employee of the company, and I understand the importance of keeping Knowledge impartial. Because of this, I was curious if is there a different route that should be taken to make sure that this article doesn't simply fizzle out? Thanks for all your help again. Austin at Shinesty (talk) 17:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

4062:- It appears that you are asking for my opinion, so here is my opinion. I agree that the guideline tends to suggest that we don't need those lists. I am not sure that there is anything wrong with those lists, because I have an inclusionist philosophy when it comes to popular culture. (I have a deletionist philosophy about most living people and most living companies.) However, in both cases, the lists existed for more than a year, and then someone decided to replace the lists with redirects. I think that replacing an existing article with a redirect, even if it is a questionable article, is a form of blanking, and should not be done without discussion. (If there is a guideline that encourages blanking by redirect unilaterally without discussion, it is a guideline that needs fixing.) So in both cases, I don't think that the list should have been blanked by redirection, at least not without talk page discussion. I personally think that the right forum to discuss such blanking by redirection is 10450:

a while. I think that the basic problem is that I have an outlook on the English Knowledge that differs somewhat from that of other editors and is (I think) less idealistic and more cynically realistic. I think that, with five million articles, and as a heavily favored site by search engines, the English Knowledge should be much more focused on the maintenance of quality, and much less on any sort of expansion or growth, even if that involves a tradeoff with outreach or expansion. Unfortunately, most new editors are not useful or even potentially useful contributors to the encyclopedia. Too many new editors either are self-serving, seeking to promote themselves or their companies, or clueless, drawn by a sort of glamor and seeking a place in the limelight. The English Knowledge, due to its success and popularity, is being swamped by good-faith useless contributions and by bad-faith contributions, and, unfortunately, should place a higher value on quality than on warmth.

7021::): you certainly agree that the List of Hi-5 episodes or List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States are much longer than my article, and had been not deleted. They are totally irrelevant for any other country and nation than the the US/UK, so hardly notable internationally. My article is notable for Nepal and internationally (includes internat. media). I guess that you do not belong among those interested in this particular topic (Buddhism, cults and their influence on media) and cannot see the encyclopedic importance of a Nepalese religious movement's media coverage and censorship cases. It is your freedom not to be, yet I just cannot agree that a topic so widely and so long-time being covered by the big media in Nepal and many countries, is not notable. Yes, and please share with me the link to that Deletion Discussion, I cannot find it anywhere. DarkAges 20:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)KaliageDarkAges 20:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 9834:

even though I certainly don't intend it to, but I have seen you improve greatly over the past several years in terms of objectivity and neutrality in communication. If you can and have improved in that, you can improve in the areas the !voters have pointed out as desirable in an admin. (If on the other hand you cannot or more precisely do not want to, then yes it's best not to re-run for adminship.) The important thing is not to let the RfA turnout get you down or stop you from doing what you do best on Knowledge or from making the tireless contributions which we so value. The important thing is to recognize your own value in the face of the often inevitable painful onslaught of critiques that is RfA. (It's also worthwhile to note that you can withdraw the RfA – which was apparently ill-advised in its timing – at any time. There's no need to stick it out to the end if you aren't answering questions anymore.)

9049:

starting a stub is legitimate. I sometimes wite new, long, detailed articles. Other times, I start stubs and hope that users who know the topic well will arrive to make it into a reasonable useful article They usually do. Look, I'm sorry I annoyed you, and I'm sorry for my WP clumsiness - I think long-term editors tend to underestimate how awkward and booby-taped with arcane rules and coding this place is. It;'s a wonder new editors arrive at all (excepting those with an ax to grind or a product to promote}. I am here to ask you to either clean up whatever it is you object to, or leave the article alone, as a stub until I or someone else has the time to improve it. Alexandra Laignel-Lavastine's notability is not in doubt, even if my editing is clumsy.

11620:- I did the research that I said I would do. I see that the OP is asking, in September, about editing that happened in June. I see that you were attacked in June once. I see that there was a brief exchange a week ago. I agree with the statement that you did not make but could have made that you were not bullying the OP but were just trying to edit. At this point I would still suggest ignoring the OP. I referred at the Help Desk to editors who made entirely too much noise about bullying. (Bullying does exist, but so do idle accusations of bullying.) I said that such an editor is either a combative editor or a passive-aggressive editor. Unfortunately, it appears that we have a passive-aggressive editor, whom I suggest be ignored for now. 9941:

issue, provided that any concerns brought up are addressed. Sometimes it is difficult to have a clear perspective on those concerns while an RFA is in progress, because there is a lot of emotion flying around, and candidates can often get defensive. My feeling is that you can comfortably address the concerns - pause a little longer before tagging new articles; reflect on the wider community ethos, and accept that while you may personally want more protection and governance for Knowledge (and a proportion of the community would support you in that), that the consensus is to be open, welcoming, supportive and helpful to new users, so the community would want their admins to support consensus

1744:, is notable. It is true that the purpose of the roadshow is for unknown artists to promote their work. The question is whether the roadshow itself has been given independent coverage by reliable sources. In view of the fact that it has been covered in Knowledge since 2011, I personally think that the burden of proof should be on the deleter to show that it is not notable after all. For a new article, I think that the burden of proof should be on the proponent to show that the subject is notable. In this case, I think that it should be shown that it is not notable. I haven't finished researching it, but I think that I will !vote Keep on an AFD on the roadshow. 5575:, and now it looks great and everyone assumes it must be correct, because hey, good English, and a reference. But it's still wrong; it's just been painted over with a coat of fresh paint, but underneath the hood, it's a lemon. I've corrected errors of fact in articles resulting from a translation error that has stood for fourteen years. So it's vital to catch these at the outset, because if they sneak through, only the bilinguals will be able to determine if it's correct or not, and why would they bother if there's no reason to suspect the article is even a translation in the first place? (You can tag an article that sneaks through in this manner with 9945:. I don't think it would be impossible for you to hold personal views at odds with community consensus, as long as you upheld community consensus. I have often taken part in discussions arguing for black, but when the consensus was for white, I would then carry out white, and do it to the best of my ability. I think this is true for pretty much every admin. It is only where an individual feels that their personal views are so totally incompatible with community norms that they would refuse to follow community consensus that there would be a problem with them becoming an admin. Indeed, such users often have problems remaining as regular editors. 6140:

true knowledge. So why prevent even the search therefore of? The use of talk pages should be a positive action toward creating a positive result in the creation of the article. If you had read my report thoroughly I stated the comments are in the history tab as I have not allowed the negative comments from the other editors to remain. This is in the dispute report and not the talk page. It is not an attack on the editors but a cautioning that unless they can prove my sources are not reliable, then they have no case. True knowledge is power, especially in the realm of biblical research and dissemination.

1823:- Thank you. Far from nominating the replaced article for deletion, I marked it as reviewed. I mark scientific articles as reviewed if they appear to be reliably sourced, because they are expanding human knowledge (or, in Knowledge, documenting the expansion of human knowledge). I accomplished my objective of getting the mess replaced by a valid short article. I will note that the rules say that an article can be PRODd for any reason, and I still think that, if the choice was between the mess and nothing, nothing is to be preferred, so the PROD. Anyway, I accomplished my objective. Thank you. 10462:

which it still has ideas that are left over from a past when it was in need of expansion that are not as appropriate to a present when it is in need of quality control. Sometimes there is a disconnect between what we say and what we do. I think that my statements of my outlook were not really as radical as they were taken to be. The English Knowledge’s attitudes have matured and become more nearly oriented to quality control, but some editors find it jarring to hear them stated (such as that crud should be tagged, and that new editors should not necessarily be worshiped).

2234:. The alternatives are biographies of dead people and articles that are about anything other than specific people. (Also, the rules about biographies of living persons apply to any article that mentions living people, even if the article is not a biography and mentions them only in passing. For instance, if I am writing about a city, and I mention its mayor, then the rules about living persons apply, in particular that the statement as to who the mayor is must be verifiable because I am referring to a living person.) Perhaps you are really asking about whether to establish 9442:

concur), that six months of clear, good tagging and six months of contribution to a GA or two (I can work with you on developing the same; all you have to say is yes) and staying clear of messy dispute resolutions, and you'll have a list of supports out at the Rfa in your next run. Don't let the current situation rock your contributions. Look at even the opposers. Almost all of them have said they really appreciate your contributions here. It's September; March is not that far off. Smile and get back to your contributions. Best wishes, love, and all that too...

11927: 10466:

responsibility should be on an author to provide some indication of notability, not simply to throw a topic at the community and say, “Here is the topic. You write it.” The idea that an author can throw a topic at the community and tell us to write the article is a problem. It also plays directly into the hands of spammers, who will argue that their companies are notable and so should be expanded neutrally rather than deleted. Maintaining quality is, in my opinion, more important than looking for topics for new articles.

6031:

looks like instead of me waiting for the page to be deleted before expanding it, it looks like I have to expand it, and hope it doesn't get deleted. Kinda sucks and unfair, but I can understand. I'll try working on those articles soon, and hopefully whatever efforts I make will stand. I believe there are people out there (including possibly the guys themselves) who would like an article on these 2 people, but almost no one would actually be willing to work on such an article (other than me). Well, off to work I go.

9851:- Well, first, some of your comments are patronizing, so I will respond with a patronizing reply. If you realize that your comments will be read as patronizing, it is because they are, and is an indication that maybe it would be more prudent not to say them at all. However, second, there seems to be an idea that a candidate can, on proper advice from the community, reshape himself or herself into the kind of person that the community thinks is an ideal leader, or something. I will be drawing up a statement. 10183:

and I remain convinced that this is the truth. Since I believe that, I want to let you know two things: I am deeply sorry that you are going through this ordeal, and also I hope that you will stick with this project. You have made it clear that you do not want to modify your persona to comply with the expectations of the crowd. I get that. But please make no quick decisions and please consider things carefully going forward. And please be aware that many editors in the oppose section think very highly of you.

9614: 11457: 7897: 2573: 2429: 10032:

who are at odds with the community on various issues, and this is acceptable to the community as we welcome diversity and challenges to the status quo, but folks who become admins who then don't follow consensus get desysoped. None of this is to say that you are in the wrong with who you are and what you believe in, just to respond to your queries with answers. What you do, and how you do it is entirely up to you. I'm just trying to help you with advice because I have been in your position. Regards

7803:

and wearisome. Then when you run into a newcomer who pushes back, especially against something which no experienced editor would even blink an eye at, it truly tests your ability not to bite. With the DR work we at least can spend some time working on real disputes which cannot be resolved by merely saying "it's OR" or "you have to have a RS", but with your draft work you're constantly dealing with newcomers. Maybe you can take it and I'm reading something into your VP posting that's not there, but

10507: 2633: 3697:- I don't understand why any editor thinks that my talk page or another reviewer's talk page is a reasonable place to discuss an article. You are providing me, or any reviewer, with information about the company that is not in the article. That is, you are asking me to sign off on an article based on information that I have that isn't available to the readers of Knowledge. Please consider whether that would be appropriate and whether that would be fair to the readers of Knowledge. 3626:. My own opinion is that the episode of placing a bed in an office is not really about BrightHR and does not establish notability and that the sources in the first list are not independent reliable sources, but those are only my opinions, and you can ask other editors for their opinions. In any event, it is not useful to provide references on a reviewer's talk page to argue that an article should be kept or accepted; any supporting information should be in the article itself. 10413: 7006:"Righting Great Wrongs" is even showing in its definition "On Knowledge, you’ll have to wait until it’s been reported in mainstream media". (I did not have to wait, it had been already published, and not less than ten years long till today). And that it is too long? There are many people who can appreciate a comprehensive list of media links, though I accept that this topic might be not interesting to you personally. I have seen much longer articles on Knowledge. Examples: 5739: 1168:

it looks like it has been closed. I was surprised to see that again, no one understood my reason for wanting to make the change in the first place and that the problem sentence still appears to be there, although the references to it have been changed and Teen Vogue has been removed. I do not want to get embroiled in another series of edit wars but I would like to explain my problem with that sentence and see if it can be addressed. What is the best way to proceed here?

576:- Point made. The MFD was one thing, and it was already confused before I made it more confused. As to moves to user space, I do need to be sure that the name of the article and the name of the creator are the same. If so, it may be a valid user page if it isn't spammy. If they are different in detail, it is probably just another A7. I was trying a new technique of moving pages to user space to avoid deletion, and I guess we usually just have to A7 them after al. 2642: 10680:

It now does cover much of human knowledge, and has a problem with editors who want to insert useless knowledge or useless non-knowledge. It still needs to be expanded, especially in some under-covered areas, and in the sciences, which are the expansion of human knowledge. Its policies and guidelines remain the same, but its priority should no longer be expansion, but the control of expansion to include only that which is worth expanding.

10458:

Perhaps I made a mistake in stating my views straightforwardly. Maybe it wasn’t diplomatic for me to say that many of our new articles are crud and need deleting. Maybe some editors would prefer to think that crud is a minor problem rather than our biggest problem. (It hasn’t always been our biggest problem. The English Knowledge wasn’t always as big and popular as it is now, and wasn’t always the magnet for crud that it is now.)

10288:. This was evidently Abe's way of getting shit off his chest. Then he could write a much more effective letter to Grant. So write your statement, and make it as powerful and nasty as you can. Then put it in a drawer, take some long, deep breaths, and write the "real letter to Grant". Everytime we have a chance to do this, it is a chance to make the system better and more effective. Always remember that just like Knowledge, you rock 9977:

opposes on the RfA pages can become disheartening for you and other RfA readers. I hope you'll still feel able to contribute to Knowledge regardless of the outcome and not feel as though you need to leave, like you did after your first RfA, and that you'll review the oppose votes and do your best to adhere to those users' concerns if you wish to run for adminship again, and hopefully there'll be no prejudice to your next RfA candidacy.

12037: 9390: 9075: 4126: 659: 4018:- I may be really confused. It appears that an editor replaced a long list article with a redirect in 2015. I haven't read the talk page, but I think that replacing a list article with a redirect is a backdoor delete, and calls for discussion either at AFD or at an RFC. The list article was in article space long enough that just replacing it with a redirect was a contentious edit and should not have been done without consensus. 8233:"? There are many more. Why some people deserve and can have their pen/stage name and the other not??? Please give me an answer. As I said very clearly, Ching Hai is a very ambiguous name or phrase. Very few people (maybe only those who opposed to the move) will refer the two words "Ching Hai" to the subject. You can try with your friends if you like, but I know as it can mean many things in Chinese, even English. I will try the 7612: 3282: 2038: 1875: 10668:

from another group of editors has to do with the relative importance of quality control and of outreach to new editors. My own view is that maintaining quality control is even more important than an enthusiastic outreach to new editors. The mainstream opinion appears to be that outreach to new editors is the zeroth pillar of Knowledge. I was criticized for prompt tagging of new articles by new editors, which was said to be

6177:- Did you read the close of the dispute resolution thread before replying here? I told you to discuss on article talk pages. You have not discussed on article talk pages. I did read your report thoroughly. You said that the comments are in the history tab, but that is not correct; I did not find any discussion in any history tab. I advised you to listen to the advice of other editors. I see that you have again edited 2348:- In this case I recognized it as an article that I had previously nominated for speedy. Just put {{salt}} at the bottom of the page. The deleting admin may or may not actually salt. Some admins have different thresholds than others for how many times the topic has to have been deleted. The other possible action, and both can be done, is to use Twinkle to give the editor a warning for Creating Inappropriate Pages. 10024:(it is a useful asset for an admin to calm drama rather than cause or prolong it), c) it brings to an end what is now a meaningless activity that takes people away from building the encyclopaedia, and d) it indicates to the community that the candidate is thinking more of the community than of themself (some candidates have said they wish to prolong a failing RFA because they value the feedback - though that is what 4817:- I removed the speedy deletion tag even before you asked to have it removed. In the future, please do not put fragmentary articles with no references in article space. You may build articles in user space or draft space until they are sufficiently complete so that they will not be subject to speedy deletion or to nomination for deletion. If you do not know how to use draft space or user space, ask for advice at 11325: 10002:- I don't really know why it is considered so important that I withdraw the application rather than to let it run and be closed against, but I might as well go ahead and withdraw it. As I said, I think that the usual advice. which is to become a different editor and try again in six months after having become someone else, is well-meaning but not useful advice. I will work on a statement in the next day or two. 1764: 1006:. Discussion should be at the noticeboard. However, discussion at that noticeboard is not working either, both because you are editing the article (maybe a strong warning is needed at the top of the noticeboard saying not to edit the article while a case has been filed), and because there is back-and-forth discussion, which already has not worked. Please take your discussion back to the article talk page, 8576:) 06:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)I got a message saying you sent me an e-mail, but I cannot locate it. Perhaps you could tell me what was in it here? Or tell me how to open a Wiki e-mail? I am also requesting permission to delete all of Sm5574's contributions to the HEY, HEY page if it is alright with you. I think he is a fraud (or worse) and I know his information is incorrect (and no doubt fabricated). 108: 2651: 7059:, i have put a lot of efforts on this Knowledge page. I have added references from reliable sources only. The company has earned good reviews from their customers even from me. You can check the web source of TrustPilot. News sources are reliable though. I'm requesting you to review the page. I know you'r in rush finding errors in other new Knowledge pages. I appreciate your concern but the page 10802:- I don't think that your work was deleted. I think that it was moved to a version with the correct space in the file name. Try that. Also, in the future, if you are trying to create a file and can't create it because there is a redirect in place, please do not create a file with a misspelled or mispunctuated name. Please either overwrite the redirect or request administrative assistance. 10672:. I don’t think that other editors disagree that quality control is important. I think that there is substantial disagreement as to whether it is as important as outreach to new editors. My opinion is that, in the English Knowledge at least, which is one of the most frequently accessed web sites on the Internet and has taken on a duty to be reliable, quality control is even more important. 2009:- That was partly my doing. When a page is moved, this creates a second page, because the old title is a redirect and the new title exists. This only doesn't happen if the page mover suppresses redirect creation, but there are rules as to when the page mover should suppress redirect creation. If the old title is a plausible form of the title, the redirect should exist. Anyway, thanks. 8017:

the pen name of an author of many published books, and the stage name of an artist should be changed just because some editors think her name is an honorific title? We should not change anyone's name on wikipedia because of our liking, right? I am not making any trouble here just want to make things right. Please let me know where and how can I request for a justice appeal? Thank you. --

8856: 10478:

case, I think that the advice means well, but is to become the type of editor whom they view as an ideal editor. I don’t plan to do that, and don’t plan to change who I am. I am willing to submit a new Request for Adminship, not when I have grown up, but when the outlook of the Knowledge has grown up to accept my approach and philosophy. I am aware that this may not happen.

5071:- Your article had no citations. There is no way that a reviewer or administrator can know that a subject is notable (other than that its author or its managers claim it is notable) without citations. (Arguments can be raised about whether local businesses meet Knowledge's notability standards with local citations, but your article had no citations and so was not verifiable.) 10470:

Articles can be built in user space or in draft space. In my opinion, an experienced reviewer can anyway usually tell when a sub-stub is a sub-stub needing deletion and when it is a work in progress. I am aware that some editors think that editors should be able to build articles in article space that do not initially have references. (I have built articles in user space.)

10595:- What I was sort of saying about philosophy is that some editors look at individual articles and agree with me but don't realize that they illustrate a pattern, and the pattern is that a lot of new pages are crud. That is, some editors agree that any specific page is crud, but not that it illustrates that a philosophy of quality control is needed to keep out the crud. 5556:. Imho, there is no reason to revert a sentence like that: any monolingual English speaker can come in afterward and fix it up without knowing jack about the Sun, because we understand what the editor intended to say, and the reference can be consulted. It's a very simple copyedit job to fix it, and then we've improved the Sun article with more facts, and a reference. 8514:

Knowledge, but he has no user page, and no talk page, & I think he made at least one edit unsigned. If he's not saying he works for Wiki, then he sure comes across as being arrogant (well, he strikes me that way even if he does work for Wiki!). I'm tired of fighting him alone, but I don't want him ruining the article page. Can you please help? Thank you. Abbythecat

5505:. I will try to remember to check on whether articles are machine translations. However, a much more common, and sometimes valid, criticism of AFC is that we do not accept articles that should be accepted, and the English was better than on some of the articles that we get on inhabited named places in India by editors who should have studied English in high school. 3794:- Your article had no references, and probably is of little interest to the general reader but of interest to other Knowledge editors. First, I thought that it was at risk of being deleted from article space, because it has no references and isn't about the sort of topic that is covered in Knowledge articles. If you have any more questions, I would suggest asking at 10348:

interactions with Robert, I see him as an editor who looks at the facts and is guided by principle when making decisions. I have not known him to show favor to anyone, and that is one of the characteristics I respect most about him. WP could use more like him. I'm looking forward to his statement because I feel it will be an eye-opener for many in a positive way.

2281:. That help would be much appreciated. How would you suggest to go about this? What would be the next step? When it comes to the editor who I am in a disagreement with, I honestly have a lot of respect for him, but I think that the editor is wrong on this particular issue. Since we two seemingly cannot reach an agreement, external mediation would be great. 10904:. By removing the articles you will lead to a scandal. Yandex-Maps - present in Geohack in each Knowledge article many-many years. Yandex-Translator - present in the Russian Knowledge interface. And Yandex products are used by millions of people. If the US does not use Yandex, then it's not a good idea to delete its articles. And you do not delete chinese 8012:

coincided with the RM.) All of the editors are advised to read the guideline against forum shopping, because there appears to be forum shopping. Also, this noticeboard should not be used to try to circumvent Knowledge policies and guidelines including the Manual of Style rule on honorifics in titles. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

4975:- It is true that sometimes a DRN thread waits for a moderator for a few days, but editors should check on its status occasionally. I am willing to discuss some sort of instruction to editors to keep tabs on their disputes. I don't think that moderators should be required to ping editors on their talk pages. Any further discussions can go to 7706:- Well, well. It certainly wasn't my article. I had done two things with it, moving it to title case, since the original title was SHOUTING, and then tagged it for A7. I think that I have learned a minor lesson, and that is on moving a page that I am about to tag for speedy, I should move it without a redirect. Well, well. 7436:- I was replying to both you and the IP. I will assume good faith for now that the IP editor posting the question is not the one who resulted in the blocks. The alternative is that we have a troll. However, if we have a troll, this is a case where the best way not to feed them is to respond as if they are a regular editor. 7505:, I would like to inform you that the case request named "topic-banning Supermann from all pages related to film for one year" (in which you had been listed as involved party) has been declined. The committee concluded that has no jurisdiction on the issues involved in this case, and that therefore cannot be accepted. 2618:

the Dispute Resolution page, where he politely and patiently tries to mediate between warring factions, keeping the focus on the issues and never losing his cool. He also helps extensively at the Help Desk and the Teahouse. This kind of work is incredibly important to Knowledge and I believe it should be recognized.

715:- I was in an easy mood when I didn't tag it for G11. I thought it was marginal there for draft space, and I think that, while G11 does apply to draft space also, it should be applied only in the most obvious cases. I hadn't been thinking G12, which we agree should absolutely always be applied strictly. 9937:

slightly over-eager desire to clean up Knowledge, and also with some of your protectionist beliefs in terms of your comments regarding BITE and the governance of Knowledge. At the same time the community has indicated there is much in your attitude, work ethic, and personality that they like and admire.

8962:. Could you take a look and fill in the answers when you have time. I imagine one of the initial questions may be how after your first RfA ended unsuccessfully in March 2006, it seems that you have disappeared into inactivity before resurfacing again in April 2013. Was there any correlation? Best regards, 6010:, that is, protected against creation. Go ahead and discuss that on the talk page, but add the references to the article to minimize the likelihood of it being deleted and salted. I am in general a deletionist when it comes to Youtubers, and am not the person to help you on him, just letting you know. 5953:, well, I'm surprised he doesn't have his own article. It just gets redirected right back to the TV show he's best known for. I couldn't find a way to remove that redirect, or why it was the case. I made the typo on purpose to get over that, but of course, I couldn't move that page to the proper name. 11973:

administrator. Our project is experiencing a need for trusted users to help create accounts regularly and I think you would do great in this capacity. Most of these requests come from users who are unable to do the creations themselves. If this interests you and you're willing to help, and you match

11795:

Well, moving an article to draft space is not addressed by policy. There isn't any policy saying that that can be done or should be done or not be done. Moving to draft space is a compromise. If the editor doesn't want to compromise, there are policies and guidelines that support having a deletion

10461:

The English Knowledge has been remarkably successful. The strategy that was appropriate for its early successful establishment and expansion is no longer the most appropriate strategy for preserving and improving it. To some extent, its working strategy has evolved. However, there are some ways in

10031:

As regards not taking on board the concerns raised and adjusting your approach so that it meets more with the communities expectations, well that is your choice, but if you are unwilling to follow consensus, then it may not be a good idea to ask for the tools to uphold that consensus. We have editors

9914:

I'd love to meet you sometime for beer/coffee/cheesecake/whatever (though given that we live on different continents, it seems unlikely) and I feel sure I'd like the real you even more than I like the virtual Wiki-you. I do hope you will continue to contribute to this important project for many years

7802:

if you're doing yourself no favors by your work at AfC/Draft review. IMHO, one of the most tedious and grating parts of doing DR is having to constantly push newcomers through the learning curve. You have to teach the same basic lessons over, and over, and over again until it becomes very frustrating

7344:

You say that you have put a lot of effort on the page. You might consider not trying to rewrite the page to be non-promotional, because it is very difficult for a paid editor to write an article that does not read promotionally. If you are not a paid editor, you might consider working on any of the

5376:

the answer I wanted (broad support for my version) at the very first forum (the Language Desk) where I raised the issue, but that didn't help because my edit still continued to be reverted. Edit warring being out of the question, what was I supposed to do? After reading the dispute resolution page, I

3909:

I am new to Knowledge in regards to writing articles and such. You sent me a message saying my article about Mark Soden was "Peacocking" or I sounded like I praised him too much. How was I doing that?, I was just stating facts. He was a great player, he did a lot for the club. How can I write that

1024:

I'm sorry, Robert, but I was unaware of the dispute resolution noticeboard at the time I was improving the article. And I strongly feel that I should not be forbidden from improving an article on Knowledge, at the exact same time others are proposing to have that same article disappeared from off the

11046:

are strongly and basically universally discouraged from attempting to write on these topics, is that is it exceedingly difficult and at times outright impossible to write about them in a way that is anything resembling neutral, and this leads to a lot of frustration for everyone, both the person who

10679:

My own opinion is that the English Knowledge has been and is very much of a success, but that, because of its success, it no longer should have the same priorities as it had during its first decade or decade-and-a-half when its priority was expansion to cover as much as possible of human knowledge.

10646:

Broadly speaking, I agree. For those of us who edit on minority language wikipedias, it is significant that we encounter much lower levels of vandalism (when it appears, it's usually in English) and spam. This fact would seem to back up some of your arguments. We just don't get the people who create

10457:

is a guideline. I have said that in practice it has become a dogma, something higher-ranking than policies. I think that some editors go to unnecessary pains to avoid being “bitey”, but I think that the overriding focus on avoiding “bite” interferes with realism on quality. That is what I think.

10449:

I would like to thank those editors who supported my candidacy for administrator, to comment on what I see as the disconnect between my views and those of the opposing editors, and to reply to those who have offered the well-meaning advice to transform myself into a different editor and try again in

10326:

Robert should not of course personally attack anyone. But I think that a frank and full response to the concerns raised in his RfA would be welcome and constructive, whether he agrees with them or not. I don't believe that he needs to mince words. I think that speaking frankly is a virtue as long as

9048:

Hi. i know tha tI made a clumsy strat to this article - i did leave a construction tag and clear statement that I would return. the thing is, wehn an intellectual is making this much noise, when I bump into her in this many footnotes while reading in multiple topics in English, it seems clear that

8831:

Hello Robert, I just saw that you added a speedy deletion tag for one of the pages i was trying create. I was actually trying to keep the page in my account but i have no idea why the page is published. I am not actually done with the article. If you could give me 2 days time, I can learn more about

8011:

Regarding your comment on Dispute resolution noticeboard about "Talk:Ching Hai": Closed as not the proper forum for this dispute. The forum to contest a Requested Move is Move Review. (The forum to contest a Request for Comments is Administrators' Noticeboard, but the RFC was out of place because it

238:

This is to inform you that our article about Akhar2016 looks like an advertisement. Ok I agree but this is a Free Software tool for the public like Knowledge. We do not get any benefit from this article at all. This is for Public so giving all information on this Knowledge is actually helping people

31:

I am working in Sandbox and, in line with Knowledge guidelines, I assumed that I could save an incomplete article and revisit it to add material and citations at a later date. I also read on a Knowledge website that editors should delete this warning if they are working on draft articles in Sandbox.

10667:

I would like to respond to a few of the comments that were made in response to my “concession” statement. Maybe I was not entirely clear. I didn’t mean that other editors are not interested in quality control. I should clarify that perhaps where my opinion and those of some other editors differs

10573:

I'm sorry to see it didn't succeed, Robert. Reading what you've wrote here, I wouldn't even say that there is much of a 'philosophical' difference between your outlook and the policies. I think a lot of the opposers are simply disconnected from the realities of new article patrolling. It's all very

10465:

I will comment that I still think that my record on CSD tagging is as good as my supporters said it was. I will also defend my PROD tagging, in particular against the correct argument that I didn’t Google for references before tagging a page. Since a lot of new articles are crud, I think that the

10075:

Hi Robert, sorry to intrude at a stressful time, but I have a slightly different perspective than some others in this section. My first RFA went the whole 7 days and I think was about 60% the whole time. That's a bit closer to passing than you, but not much as the threshold has fallen since then. I

9940:

In my experience it is better at this stage to withdraw from the RFA, with or without a statement (though a calm, reflective statement is always helpful). A number of current admins (myself included) withdrew from their first (and sometimes second or third) RFA. Not passing an RFA is not seen as an

9833:

It's extremely difficult if not impossible not to take RfA personally. So it's not surprising that that is what you are doing there. What the oppose !voters want to see is improvement in areas in which candidates are lacking or not up to admin standards. I'm sure this will come across patronizingly

8016:

I appreciate for your comment, but I still need a resolution to my request. Can you please tell where can I further discuss this issue with the administrators or other editors who have no prejudice against the subject of the article? Also I need a clear reason on why "The Supreme Master Ching Hai",

7853:

reads that guideline, and begins using it as a cudgel to fend off advice that they should try to be more cooperative, or caution that their conduct may result in blocks. Second, I see some reasonable experienced editors avoid warning inexperienced editors precisely for fear that they don't want to

5722:

Hi, Rober, it's Xihuliu here. I am sorry if i have ever posted twice of the article as I am still don't quite know the editing on Knowledge. I have been nervous working on the ediding, i didn't know how i ended up sending twice. Please ignore the fist edition i sent this morning. Thank you so much.

4955:

I monitored the DRN daily, but I wasn't pinged about another third stmt request from you. Therefore, I thought the opposition was still modifying her second statement, but I was already expecting a moderation result. Never mind. I have followed your suggestion to initiate RfC. I don't know what can

1167:

Greetings. I am the person who filed the original dispute resolution. I tore a ligament in my neck a week ago and was laid up in bed until about two days ago. During that time I was immobilized and unable to use a computer. After catching up with my life, I took a look at the dispute resolution and

10182:

Let me begin by offering an apology for using the "come back in six months or a year" formulation, which I did not anticipate would bother you. But now I understand your reasoning. In my interactions with you at the Teahouse, I was always convinced that you had Knowledge's best interests at heart,

9948:

In short - you don't need to agree with community consensus (indeed you can speak out against it, or attempt to get in changed), but you would need to follow it and uphold it. I think you are quite capable of doing that, and I look forward to you applying again at some point in the future when you

9168:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

8220:

I saw your edit and it is really ridiculous. Who is Hai????? Please go and search on the internet and please learn some Chinese, or ask any one you think would know the subject, who is Hai? I saw many titles in wikipedia where people use "Prince", "Princess", "Queen" to refer to a subject, and no

7720:

I do apologise Robert McClenon, I could also have checked to whom the notification would go, but one rather makes assumptions I suppose. To be fair, since it's been created / moved / recreated something like three times each in the past twenty-four hours, we can probably both excuse ourselves from

7667:

6181:

without discussing on the talk page. If you continue to make contentious edits to that article or other articles without being willing to discuss them, you are not likely to persuade other editors. You said: "The use of talk pages should be a positive action toward creating a positive result in

5533:(e.g, the article subject is not about a scientist, but a journalism professor). The damage done by this one editor has still not been repaired, up to two years later, because who's going to go through these, in a volunteer encyclopedia? These errors will probably lurk for years, or indefinitely. 4909:

I would agree that a statement to that effect is warranted. I kept tabs on the page for several days, as did others based off their comments; as one noted, this was responded to and archived over a period when some editors were not active (the weekend, I believe). It does seem fair, considering it

4870:

due to a lack of response from those of us involved. To note, I never received a notification of your response and (based off comments some of the others have made) I do not believe they did either; so closing took everyone by surprise. The issue is still ongoing with the same circular discussion.

4322:

Just realized the runtime DRN was closed because I didn't notice the other editor had added a third stmt. I object to her proposal and once again request the runtime columns be added. Could you please reopen the process? I don't think I need to add any further stmt. I only soapbox on the talk page

3674:

Hello really sorry to clog up your user talk page. I didn't realise this wasn't the right place to discuss this. I have shared this information on the talk page as suggested however the page was deleted before a discussion was had about the notability. I did declare when setting up the page that I

3572:

This is by no means an extenive list of the publications in which BrightHR has been discussed. There are no conflicts of interest in using these as sources because BrightHR does not sell beds, nor does its software have an employee engagement function. Most of the above references are unaffiliated

3315:

3037:

Hi Robert my draft article for Goziex Technologies Limited was rejected because i cited Youtube, and also did say that have lots of unreliable sources, I will like to ask, do I have to remove only the youtube , and if the company website can be referenced, in terms of text which could be validated

2617:

I nominate Robert McClenon as Editor of the Week. He has been here since 2005, made more than 50,000 edits and previously received this award for the week beginning July 5, 2015. I especially admire him for his helpfulness to other editors, both newbies and established users. He is a major help at

2089:

1908:

11091:

Yes. All good advice. Sorry for reinstating the page. I literally thought i was working in the draft space, due to my unfamiliarity with how all this works. Which should be the number clue that I should not be the one to write this article. I will leave this be for now and see if someone else who

10485:

I am willing to submit a new Request for Adminship if and when the attitudes of the community have changed and evolved to reflect what I think is more realistic, rather than saying that I will follow a learning path that may have been appropriate for some editors. I thank my supporters for their

10477:

I realize that those editors who have given me the advice to follow a program which they describe of particular types of editing experience and to come back for adminship in six months or twelve months mean well. I am also aware that it may be appropriate advice for some admin candidates. In my

10283:

I hope this is still "in process". I'm reminded of Abe Lincoln who, after he was shot and killed (much like some RfAs go – full of criminal INjustice), letters to various people were found in his desk, unsent. Many, for example, were to General Grant, chastising him for this and that in manners

9976:

100 more than you have now) for your RfA to pass, given the number of opposes. Usually, how things flesh out during the first one or two days of an RfA are reflective of how they will be by the end of the full one-week period. Furthermore, the presence of a (don't mean to rub it in) big number of

9910:

I admire your response of not not being prepared to change who you are just to pass RfA in the future. *You* are the Robert McClenon I like and greatly respect, and I think it would be entirely wrong for you to try to change that just to get the approval of a bunch of anonymous nonentities on the

6139:

Obviously the hastily closing of my dispute resolution shows that the censorship here is placed above the search for true knowledge, Mr. McClenon. Unless the editors are well versed in the knowledge of New Testament and Biblical accounts, there is no determinaton of "reliable sources" other than

6030:

Hello Robert. Thanks for the reply. Regarding Forrest Wheeler, thank you for moving that page to the correct name. Now for both pages, I do fear they could get deleted, which is why they're so short. I don't want to invest time making the page and all, only for it to be deleted in the end, but it

5945:

page, I noticed it was deleted twice before, but a lot of the reasons why they were deleted, were a bit outdated. I'm indifferent on whether or not that page should stand, but I would like a discussion on it before (if) it's deleted. I'm not sure if you know anything about the topic, but I listed

5371:

Hi Robert McClenon, I only just now read your concluding statement on the Peacock Alley dispute. To be honest, I was unpleasantly surprised at your allegation that I have engaged in forumshopping, which is defined as trying different forums in the hope of finding one where you 'get the answer you

602:

I got a warning from you for reverting a specific edit. It was me and another user who reverted each other's edits. Your warning seemed unfair, but I now discovered that both me and the other user got the warning for 3x consecutive reversals. In retrospect, the warning to both of us was more than

10481:

Some editors in particular advised me to bring some articles up to Featured Article or Good Article quality. I could do that, but I think that there are other editors who do this better than I do. I don’t think that it should be necessary for administrators to spread themselves too thin or for

10077:

90% at RFA, but neither do I or many other admins. The question you could settle, either in this RFA or in the next one is whether you have demonstrated an ability to do inline cites to reliable sources. To me, and I believe a significant block of RFA !voters, that is a skill we expect admins to

7005:

Thank you for your opinion. It is surprising to me that a pragmatic list of media links to mainstream Nepalese and international media and quotes from them you call Soapbox, while a mythological cult propaganda (the original biographical page) you did not call to be that. And your other argument

5988:

by moving the redirect into the void and tagging the old redirect for G6. The alternative would have been to ask an admin to move the stub over the redirect. The one-sentence stub on the boy does appear to me to be just barely notable. Second, I don't and didn't have an issue with keeping the

5620:

I don't mean to pick on you, because I think you're doing a great job. Plus, I assume this is a more general problem. Perhaps it would have been better for me to post this at AFC rather than here, but I never heard of it before. Do you agree? If so, I'll create a condensed version for the TP

11068:

here to build an encyclopedia, then there are plenty of people willing to help, and maybe when you get the hang of things you can try again to write an article on the product that works, but until then, well... there's lots of other work that needs to be done that doesn't involved this product.

10675:

I have in the past stated that perhaps we need a special volunteer function which is a group of meeters and greeters whose purpose is to interact with new editors and to assist them in learning the policies and guidelines and culture of Knowledge. If outreach to new editors is important, it is

10469:

As a minor point, I mostly disagree with the criticism that I was too quick to tag articles either for speedy deletion or for PROD. I, and some other editors, disagree with the idea of editors building articles in article space starting with an article in article space that has no references.

9626:

Some of us have been where you are now; i.e., knowing in our hearts that we're doing what we believe to be the right thing for WP. Sometimes our core principals fit what is trending today, and sometimes they don't. Robert McClenon, you are a good editor who generously contributes your time and

7527:

I'm sorry if my third statement isn't what you wanted. I haven't been through dispute resolution before so I'm not entirely familiar with the process. What I don't understand is why you took down my statement and let the other editor's stand, since it was also not what you asked for. This is in

10347:

I have faith that Robert will follow his principles when drafting and publishing his statement. Over the years, he has scolded me, (justifiably) misunderstood my comments once or twice, but he has always been upfront and truthful; characteristics we should all appreciate about him. Based on my

9936:

Hi Robert. I've had a look over your RFA, and it's up to you what you do, but it's now at the situation where it's not possible for you to be given the tools on this request. Looking at the concerns raised, it appears that a significant proportion of the community feel uneasy with your perhaps

153:

Thank you for taking the time to review the second draft of the article I am working on, Draft:Shinesty. The obvious end goal is to utilize all of the external sources from the web with content published about the company to create an impartial encyclopedic article. I believe that based on the

70:

Robert, I too am new to Knowledge and see that you have closed my dispute on "William M. Branham". I posted the dispute on the talk page, but you say I must put it on each user's page. I can try to do that, but do I need to file a new dispute now? I'm sorry, but I don't understand Knowledge

9441:

Firstly, this is to thank you for the effort to stand for the Rfa. Secondly, I have to say that yes, there are absolutely clear mistakes in your CSD/prod tagging. But most importantly, multiple editors have commented at your Rfa, and I concur (and I believe the strongest of opposers too would

4794:

I was just beginning to edit the article when you tagged it for speedy deletion. Mann has an article in ODNB and at least one full-length book about him. His work is a mainstay of international law. Now that I've had the time to add refs, perhaps the speedy deletion notice can come down? Much

3855:- You moved the draft into Knowledge space, and it didn't belong there, and it has been deleted. You may discuss the deletion with the deleting administrator. If you have a copy of the draft on your computer, you may restore it to draft space. You may request comments from other editors at 2449:

Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be

1760:

I don't know, Robert. I doubt that a marketing & promotion company that arranges a single relatively unknown event each year is worthy of having a stand alone article. What is notable about it? The barbeques I host here at the ranch get more attention. There is an art to serving up fine

10518:

on the Internet is a privilege, not a right. When I first started contributing to the project, the prevailing sentiment was to increase coverage, and poor articles with no substantial content were often overlooked. This is no longer the case, as Robert has pointed out. The tendency to favour

8513:

Robert, could you please help me? I'm having trouble with Sm5574 on the article and talk pages for HEY, HEY, IT'S THE MONKEES. He's very rude (IMO) and he keeps fighting me about edits. Perhaps you could take a look and help me out. He seems to be saying (I think! not sure) that he works for

1943:- That's a mystery. First, it isn't my crud. It appears that I moved it, and now Twinkle thinks it is mine. However, I am confused, because the history doesn't show that I declined it. I wouldn't normally have moved it to draft space unless it was tagged as waiting for AFC review. Huh. 10700:

Yes. Whatever happened to the welcome committee anyway? I always seem to be welcoming newcomers, even when I'm deleting their first articles. How would it be if we introduced some kind of safeguard whereby a new editor wasn't allowed to create a new article unless they did it in a specified

6542:. Don't write about yourself. That isn't what Knowledge is for. Second, I requested deletion of the article because it had no content. You apparently either forgot to enter the text of the article, or were expecting someone else to enter it for you. I suggest that you ask for advice at 2362:

Thanks for the reply. I had checked the logs and noticed the previous deletions. We will see what happens with the salt request. Sometimes it feels like the person creating things like this is taking part in performance art and they don't care whether the article stays or not. Best regards.

3350:- Well, well. I was about to say it isn't my page, but the redirect from the capitalized title is my redirect, and I did leave a redirect when I moved it. Well, well. I would contest the speedy deletion of the redirect, except that the page has also been nominated for speedy deletion. 1081:

Robert, thanks for the advice. Respectfully disagree with you about starting AFD, articles for deletion is the way to bring to the community assessment about whether or not an article should be disappeared. I hope that there are no more attempts to get the page removed off from Knowledge.

4404:) 14:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC) My apologies for making the request in the first place. It seems that I was asked to review the page and gave some suggestions which were not followed. I appreciate you taking the time to respond and do see some issues throughout. May you have a wonderful day! 9461:- I hear you. However, I don't think that I should take the advice to be someone else. I think that the advice that I am giving at this point is well-meant but for someone else. I will be drafting a concession speech, but it isn't the one anyone is advising, but it won't be hostile. 5877:. I submitted it for review as it's the first writing I've done for Knowledge and I want to make sure it's OK. Also there's a date problem in the references, that I don't quite understand. I'm not sure if this will like back to my sandbox now so you can see the new section I've written. 4396:. However, second, I don't think that it establishes notability. It is no longer a weird mix of a profile of a non-notable person and a how-to manual. It is only a social media profile of a non-notable person. Third, why are you asking? You haven't edited or improved the article. 8733:

NARTIST 4, that is, if some significant number of the listed exhibitions are permanent, but I'm not seeing much on the fellow anywhere at all, in either English or Armenian, and of course the whole thing is nearly entirely unsourced. Bleh, two AfD's today already. Must be a M Monday.

1326:

Thanks very much for your information and assessment of the page I am requesting. Can you tell me how I might be able to provide information on the faculty member's impact that would be worthy of a bio page on Knowledge? I have not done this before so I am not certain how to begin.

51:

Hello Robert, sorry for any inconvenience I have caused, i only wish to learn how to use Knowledge the right way. Could you please help me with the article as I am new to this site and don't fully understand the coding. I appreciate your help , please don't delete my article, thanks.

10531:, as long as it's done constructively and in a civil manner. I find it rather irresponsible to categorically allowing useless content to stay on the project (but not working on them) simply because they could "potentially be notable" (and having the patrollers to constantly citing 9752:" and the community says no. But... it's a selfless enterprise, and sometimes we have to serve the community despite themselves. Because sometimes fuck the community. We're not here because of them; we're here because of their grandkids, and the encyclopedia they're going to read. 5405:. However, second, if you had already gotten the answer that you wanted, and you went to another content forum, it is still forum shopping, although not in the usual sense. If you think that there is already a consensus for your edits, mediation is not the best answer. Either a 11008:

Thanks Robert. I'm enlisting a bit of help from some more experienced wiki editors who also know a bit about Syrinscape. I'll let them have a go at making it work better and then draw your attention again. Is it safe from deletion if it is on the draft page? And not visible?

10983:- Okay, thank you for trying to make it less promotional. You probably are not the person to make it read neutrally, since you are the developer, and I have labeled it with the conflict of interest tag. I have moved the article to draft space to allow you to ask for help at 6005:

notability. As to the YouTuber, any references have to be in the article, not just cited on the talk page. It is not useful to create articles whose titles have been previously deleted without discussion, because they may get deleted again, and because the title then may be

5551:

Content like this tortured example is fine in my book, as long as the English is sufficiently clear that we know what the human editor intended, that the facts as stated are correct, and that the citations back them up. Sure, they got the grammar and syntax all mangled, but

10159:- I can't really accept your apology, at least not right now. Unlike the comments that I referred to as well-meaning advice, I don't think that your comment was made in good faith. However, I do appreciate your recognition that it wasn't made in good faith. Thank you. 9231:- First, did you read the banner at the top of my talk page? I said not to post to the top of my talk page; a helpful admin moved this to the bottom where it belongs. Second, I said to contest the speedy deletion using the button provided for the purpose. However, read 6082:, that is, very short articles, are likely to be deleted if they don't establish a case for notability, more likely than longer articles that have more space to establish a case for notability. The exception is that stubs will not be deleted if they establish what I call 10222:

Best of luck to you Robert. I supported you in the RfA and I'll support you again for the same reason: you look to establish a precedent for quality in the encyclopedia. Not every editor, as was apparent, will understand that but a minority will always be happy with your

6479:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the

11092:

really knows what they are doing wants to make a start. There is a link to the Syrinscape on Paizo's big Starfinder page so I reckon one of the many geeks who pass through there might do something before to long. Sorry for causing a hassle, and thanks for your help.

519: 10262:

Robert, you're probably not feeling too great about Knowledge right now. I hope you give it some time and think about what your best contributions can continue to be. Been there, done that, think I understand your mysterious "younger and different editor" quip. ☆

7204:

Thanks, you have found some reliable sources. Is there anyway, you can help me modify the contents. That would helpful. I don't want's defend myself. I admit, i have not enough idea about guidelines. I read them, will try to apply them for sure. Thanks very much.

8046:

while the move is no longer pending. However, I may have misunderstood your request, because you appear to be asking for where you can find administrators who will ignore Knowledge guidelines. You may ask any reasonable question, especially for new editors, at

3949:

have said. We do not say, in the voice of Knowledge, that a player was great. If a sportswriter said this, quote them. If a newspaper says that he did a lot for a club, quote the newspaper. If you want to discuss your draft further, I suggest that you ask at

3526:

When BrightHR placed a double bed in the office there was a considerable amount of attention and discussion. Again, these are made up of a mix of Business, City and Personal sources and a mix of Independant and Non-Independant sources. These can be viewed below:

5194:. Also they sent me a fake (scam) message to try to obtain private information about me. I tried to negotiate with this person, offering to share information in a professional manner, but was answered with another storm of accusations, threats and rudeness. 207:

Hello Robert. I would like to add an article about the micronation Republic of West Who. Knowledge has numerous articles about micronations, such as, Nation of Celestial Space and the Republic of Molossia. Why was the article on West Who deleted so quickly?

10473:

It may be that some editors actually share my attitudes toward what should and should not be in Knowledge on a case-by-case basis, but haven’t formulated my outlook as a philosophy and weren’t ready for it to be stated. I can’t speak for anyone but myself.

11603:- I didn't know that you were the editor who is being accused of bullying the OP. If you are just referring to the posting at the Help Desk that has just been archived, I would suggest ignoring it, because it has been archived. I will take a deeper look. 6091:

according to the military notability guideline. It could however be tagged as needing a reference. So, to summarize, look into AFC as a way of addressing your concerns about having pages deleted, and I personally will not be encouraging about Youtubers.

5313:- I did not say that it has a ton of issues. I said that it has tone issues. Those two statements are not the same and not very similar in meaning, only in appearance. (In English, two words that differ only by a silent vowel may have no relationship.) 6086:

notability, based on meeting a criterion that is clearly specified in a notability guide. The baseball umpire was an example. A one-sentence statement that X was a major general in the army of Kenya would be another example, because general officers are

2504:

has been marked as historical. Knowledge talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it

2807:

so this may get to be a problem if he is intent on creating articles for each of his examples. Let's try to interrupt this further before there are 40 different articles to PROD. Any ideas on the best course of action? I will post to his talk page soon.

6299:

subjects including notable companies. Sometimes, when editors use the term "company page", they are working for the company. Are you working for the company? If you want more comments, which may be more optimistic or less optimistic, you may ask at

4110:

I'm just wading through the backlog trying to learn the differences that warrant exemptions from policy or don't apply to policy at all. I'm hoping to avoid making stupid mistakes, or at the very least, if I make one, I will be readily forgiven. 😇

9115:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of 5478:

A bot can be programmed to generate new articles from foreign Wikipedias at script speed, but this does not mean they should be accepted as new articles. When an editor does precisely the same thing, they should not be accepted either. Cordially,

4237:

now that you have inferred "the reduction in runtime of a movie indicates how much of the movie was taken out by the censor." Where do we go from here since you are neither accepting nor declining the case? Thanks and hope you have a great weekend.

5497:- I was not aware that the articles were pure machine translations or that the editor did not know German. I assumed that the author did know German and that their English was not very good. In any case, I made a judgment that the subjects were 9790:

have an issue with you, I'd have mentioned it either on here or on ANI, but I haven't, because there isn't one). For now, I think it would be useful to answer the remaining questions if you want, as you never know - you might change some views.

8355:- I have no idea what happened here, as in I have no idea why it thinks that I reviewed the page, and it is no longer there. I certainly don't think that I meant to approve it. Oh well. We know that sometimes the reviewed flag is gibberish. 2846:, which I would like to see somewhat more often with respect to articles that shouldn't exist, but does, on its face, violate the spirit of speedy deletion. I think that the matter is now resolved and we can go back to whatever we were doing. 11336:

but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed

10701:

sandbox-type area and waited for it to be approved before they could create any more? Maybe it would put some off, but it's got to be better than creating an article and not really understanding what's wrong with it and why it's been deleted.

5209:

Is there anything I can do to have my article restored, and have this person told, by an editor with a higher level of authority than me, that they must provide hard evidence not invective to substantiate their claims that my facts are wrong?

5571:, and either the English is so good it looks like a human wrote it and so there's no reason to copyedit it or check on it, or the English isn't quite that good, and somebody comes along afterward and patches up any grammar or syntax problems, 10425:

I have recently been in your shoes and know how it feels to fail an RfA. I appreciate your contributions and I think you handled the process very well. Thank you for going for it again and I look forward to continuing to see you around! --

9781:

run, it would be an obvious pass. Although you've got a lot of opposition, you've got a lot of support too and this RfA does seem to be split right down the middle. In any case, I'll say what I do for just about every RfA that I oppose at -

3062:. Third, you have a promotional user account name. You need to change it, as soon as possible. Fourth, if you have not declared your conflict of interest, you must do so as soon as possible. If you have any more questions, please ask at 1120:

No, you don't have to do that. I don't have plans right now to start an AFD. Rather, I hope simply the research I've done to expand the article, in and of itself quiets down the grumbling about trying to disappear the article itself. Okay?

6752:- I do not normally follow a draft through the approval process. However, on re-reading your draft, it still reads promotionally, just not as promotionally. I would suggest that you ask for the comments of other experienced editors at 11056:. You're more than welcome to contribute, and I'm sure you're knowledgeable in lots of subjects that I'm not, but if you're flatly not interested at all in writing about anything other than your personal product, then you may likely be 4352: 10948:

1) We've made some changes to make the text of the page less 'salesy' 2) We have mistakenly deleted your tag = sorry, we are new to this 3) Want to check the page as it stands now and help us fix anything else that is still wanting?

2230:- I don't understand the question. Maybe you are asking about a distinction that you perceive that either doesn't exist or isn't important or isn't seen as important by experienced editors. Every article about a living person is a 9342:

The section is not limited to "the history of BART's early train control problems." Rather, it describes the history of BART's early years. Many of the events were political or managerial, and had little to do with train control or

1050:

and reworking it. You should be ready, and I think you are, for new controversy about the article. I suggest that, if an effort is made to get rid of the article or turn it into a redirect, the best way to prevent that would be a

10513:

I think the part on the shifting focus and attitude of the English Knowledge is perfectly on point. As the flagship of all Wikimedia projects, the minimal bar of quality control should be enforced effectively. Contributing to the

9744:

We don't always need a hundred thousand admins. Sometimes we just need good old salty bastards to shake things up. We're here to build the encyclopedia that our great grandkids will read, and they will, at least if we do our jobs

6676: 11262:

You should know why. At best, it calls for opinions and nothing else, and is likely just to result in aggravation. You were already cautioned a month ago about posting questions at the Reference Desks that serve no purpose.

6538:- I can't see the article, because it has been deleted. I can see at least two problems. First, the name of the article was the same as your user name. Were you trying to write an article about yourself? If so, please read 1700:

which is more of the same promotion. It appears to be nothing more than a traveling exhibition created by Olufeko to give unknown artists some exposure. I'm thinking it should go to AfD along with the redirect. Your thoughts?

3618:, and the deleting admin will compare the current article with the deleted article. If you think that the article should not have been deleted because of a problem with the deletion discussion, you may appeal the deletion at 2070:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 11114:

Is it possible to retrieve the content of the deleted article about APEK digital for improvements? Or if you think that it is not even eligible for improvements, do I at least have the possibility to get the material back?

5638: 9812:- Thanks, but, the usual advice to come back in six months doesn't make sense. I will be addressing that usual comment, which essentially is that they will accept me when I am someone else. I will address the comments. 4081: 10520: 9369:) 02:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC) You can read my apology and thanks at the HEY, HEY, IT'S THE MONKEES talk page. I just wanted you to know how sorry I am that I caused trouble. My thanks to you. With respect. AGF. Goodbye. 5600:

filter tag in it, or that makes you suspect there might be a translation involved, that should immediately raise a red flag causing any AFC reviewer to do additional checks. For example, does the creating editor have a

9512:

didn't understand the "the advice that I am giving at this point" part of your comment, because I think you meant "the advice that I am being given at this point". Nothing to do with your to-be-written concession post.

1713:- I'm confused. What is the question? He doesn't have a mainspace article, only a redirect to his roadshow. Do you want to take the roadshow to AFD? Do you mean that the roadshow doesn't have independent coverage? 3375:

Here is a list of references to BrightHR's thought leadership in the employee engagement sphere. These are made up of a mix of Business, City and Personal sources and a mix of Independant and Non-Independant sources.

3405: 1845:

Hey,it's Jenevee.I'd like to apologise for cursing at you for something as trivial as a wikipedia page.I acknowledge my sin and hope you can forgive me for it.There's no explanation for saying what I said.Im sorry.

11539:

Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on

3256:

OK! I have deleted my draft on Brian Michaels. The other draft has been created by a friend of mine, but we didn't know from each other that we woorked on the same project. Sorry - Best regards Skellingslighthouse--

355:

When he moved the page, he accidentally put it at the draft talk page, then copied the text to the draft page and blanked the talk. I tagged the redirect for deletion, so it shouldn't matter wherever it's pointing.

280:

and asked me for a review .I think it passes the muster, but I feel it would be a bit COI for me to approve it myself - could you take a look and post a formal draft review in a few days, as a favor for me? Thanks!

11580: 10535:). This is definitely not the way to identity potentially good contributors, as based on my experience, these editors are identified through productive discussions on their area of interest and editing behaviour. 5621:

there. Or, since I'm unfamiliar with AFC and you are, you might do a better job at condensing this for that audience. Which would you prefer? I'd be happy to have you do so, if you would agree to it. Cordially,

3141:

Any objection if I send this to draft space so the original editor can work on it? I agree that it's not ready for article status, but I'm willing to entertain the possibility that it can be sourced and improved.

10362:

I read your statement below with great interest and I appreciate both your positions and your integrity in expressing them clearly. It is a crying shame your RfA failed, and I feel that more so after reading it.

9007:

You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at

4493:

6569: 3164:- Go ahead. I only have an issue with the article in article space. If the author wants to find newspaper coverage, that is all right. Go ahead and move it, and I can say as nominator that Draftify is okay. 9627:

energy when, at times, it seems unappreciated. I just want you to know that I am one of many editors who appreciate your tireless efforts, and all that you have done and tried to do to make WP a better place.

7153:

professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources (not directories) are reliable sources. The TechCrunch article (maybe The Scotsman and The Memo) are the only sources I see that meet that

6896:

You had one week in which to add references to the page before it was deleted, and you did not. In the future, please respond in less than one week. It is easier to fix an article than to have it reloaded.

9776:

I wish I'd seen this admin request earlier before it transcluded, because I could have advised against it, given you some advice, and potentially had a look every now and again in the future so that when you

6066:? It is a procedure for developing draft articles in draft space or user space to have them reviewed, and accepted into article space when, in the opinion of reviewers, they are satisfactory in establishing 5303:

has notability issues and a tone of other issues. I am currently going through the notability guidelines and trying to fix some of those issues. Can you touch upon why there are still a ton of other issues?

2143:

Guessing the above happened for the same reason it did for me. Robert, somebody needs to create a userbox for you that says something about, "This user receives too many deletion notices not meant for him."

7841:- First, I don't revert unwanted talk page comments. Second, your point is well taken that draft work is tiring. I will consider your advice, and focusing on DR and on NPP for a while. My comments about 4105:

Thank you, Robert. Certain types of lists are certainly head scratchers, especially when they appear to be something out of TV Guide, so I asked an admin who was familiar with a particular case, and wanted

732: 2246:

or both. If so, the answer is that your draft will be accepted as an article if it establishes either type of notability. If you have any further questions about notability, I would advise you to ask at

5197:

At the same time an anonymous person in Knowledge has twice deleted some of my facts and references in the above-mentioned article, and gave a false reason (which was only an opinion) for their change.

9475:

Ok. I can't understand what you've written. But leave that. Take some time off before you write anything else. Gather your thoughts and come back with the enthusiasm I've normally seen you with. Cheers.

7132:

source is affiliated by merit of having the CEO as a guest speaker, the Prestige Apartments citation is also affiliated as a business partner, and so not independent enough to establish notability. The

6765: 7330:

says, it is not the responsibility of volunteer editors to help you write a neutral non-promotional draft for your employer, and it is your responsibility to disclose your connection with the client.

433:

I'm not criticizing you at all. I am very selective about where I do this - as you say, something that is not suitable as an article can be suitable as a user page, but that's by no means always true.

3622:. Also, you may create a new draft that will be better than the deleted version in draft space and may request that it be reviewed. Also, you may ask other experienced editors for their opinions at 10683:

I think that quality control is even more important than some other priorities in Knowledge. Apparently some editors either disagree as to priorities, or disagree as to how to apply the priorities.

5678: 523: 515: 2682: 8726:

Yeeeah... it's arguably poorly written vaguely promotional English, rather than well written obviously promotional English. And I sympathize. I too am often inspired by the beauty of female beauty.

11657:- Yes. That is the brief exchange. I would suggest ignoring her unless there is a content issue, and then focusing on content. (However, focusing on content is always the advice that I give.) 9705:

You... seem like you might be ready to quit, and... I don't want to see you quit. So whatever you do, don't quit. Feel free to email me, or email me for a number if you need somebody to talk to.

4137: 4119: 3372:

Hello, thank you for taking the time to review the BrightHR page I created. I'm sorry it's not yet met the criteria for notability, however I am confident that BrightHR does meet these criteria.

3004: 26: 7406:. Could you clarify—were you replying to me or to the 99...IP? (I'm guessing the latter, but I'm just fatigued enough tonight that I sat there for a minute trying to figure out what you meant.) 4910:

can take several days for a DRN response and the filer has to notify everyone that it has started, that a notification goes out letting editors know that the DRN has been responded to. Regards,

4694:

I'm not surprised there were socks at work, even if I didn't directly...smell them at first. And you have a point: the AfD can create a record and sometimes lead to a snowball delete and salt. —

2822:

Someone just deleted the articles. I wonder where he was getting the source code because he has been blocked before for copyright violations and warned it will be permanent if it happens again.

10109:

I sincerely and unreservedly apologise for making that comment which as I said at the RFA should never have been said not ever! - It was completely out of order and should never have been said,

7489: 4392:- I am a little puzzled. First, as the message at the top of this talk page states, I do not usually follow a draft through the approval process, and I will suggest that you ask for advice at 3215: 535:

will need to be adjusted to discuss its new pagename, all sorts of folks notified, as well as being moved and I've not yet had my first coffee of the day, I'll just point it out and let it be.

7284:

You can post a new, non-promotional, reliably-sourced draft of the article in the same spot. I recommend starting from scratch and only summarizing and paraphrasing the sources I highlighted.

5717: 11341:. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at 10744:

I suppose so. Thanks for pointing me to that. You know what, another thing that would help would be if there weren't so many guidelines and other non-articles to familiarise myself with! :-)

9907:

Those are just a few comments pulled in just a couple of minutes from the RfA, and I want you to know I agree with every one of them (especially the "seems OK" one, because you really do ;-).

7241:, not the responsibility of other users to clean up after you. I will delete the article soon. It could be rewritten by summarizing and paraphrasing the factual (i.e. non-opinion) parts of 6505: 6421: 3714:- Please read my reply above again. I don't know what conversation you want to have. However, if you want to have any conversation about Knowledge in general, I suggest that you take it to 314:

in at least two places. Look at that very carefully. Because it has quotes inside the internal link, it is a red link. Either get rid of the quotes, or get rid of the links. More later.

6476: 5669: 2715: 936: 757: 10058: 4346: 4323:

but not on the article page to remain neutral. 50 more films are impacted because no secondary resources analyse them textually other than listing out runtime differences. Many thanks.

2995: 41: 11781:

This is probably the best way to handle these types of situations. Editors such as the one, who undermine this process, don't seem too concerned about how things work on Knowledge. ---

11691:- I just looked at the other editor's history. I don't know anything about an edit that was oversighted. (I am not an oversighter, and an edit that was oversighted does not exist.) 5190:

Someone contacted me a few weeks ago (outside Knowledge) with an intimidating and insulting message about my integrity and the accuracy of my work including my Knowledge article about

5177: 2894:

Good morning, I'm French, sorry for my approximative English. I don't understand why you ask to delete this article. Can you tell me how I can create a good article about this album?

988: 907: 9308:- In the future, to post to talk pages, use the New Section feature, and it puts them at the bottom. What do you mean by getting the page reinstated? You can appeal the deletion at 6321: 4117: 3206: 2159: 2026: 1414: 3859:, but I suggest that you first discuss your (good-faith but mistaken) move of the article to Knowledge space and learn about draft space, article space, and Knowledge space. Ask at 1025:

face of Knowledge. I agree with you the article talk page is a better place for more discussion. I hope you can appreciate the amount of research I have done to improve the article.

8392: 7517: 7491: 7458:

Hi Robert McClenon. Because it involves New Page and AfC reviewers along with other maintenance workers (SPI, COIN), an informal chat has begun on some aspects of paid editing. See

6527: 3406:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3359171/Is-Britain-s-fun-workplace-Digital-entrepreneur-installed-den-staff-naps-recording-studio-ICE-RINK-office-car-park-255-staff-use.html

3098: 2970: 2193: 11883:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 11833:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 7550:- Please read my second statement carefully. I had already said you appeared to have the better case, and I didn't ask you to restate your case because it didn't need restating. 6407: 2260: 1435: 8221:

one say these titles are against wikipedia guidelines, it is very obvious that you are bias when referring to the Supreme Master Ching Hai. Discussing with you is waste of time.;

7695: 3551: 1863: 1800:. This had the effect of removing your prod tag. Feel free to renom for deletion if you think you should, but the page being a mess isn't really a valid deletion reason. Cheers!-- 1355:. I said that you would need to provide independent references. A list of his own works is not the same as independent references. If you have further questions, please ask at 532: 10883:- Did you read the banner at the top of my page that said to use the button on the speedy deletion notice? Maybe all of the other Yandex advertisements should be deleted also. 9137:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you

8555:) 01:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Thank you. I'm considering contacting the authorities if Sm5574 doesn't quit bullying me. BTW, who is he anyway? Does he really work for Knowledge? 8063:. I would agree to that; I don't know about other editors or about administrators, but redirects are cheap. I have answered your question as best I can for now. You may go to 4367: 3614:

tag for any reason or no reason. If the current article is significantly better than the version that was deleted, you may contest the speedy deletion at the article talk page,

818:

Please also note, at the top of the article's talk page, I've added links to the number of times certain individuals have attempted to get the article disappeared from Knowledge

5806: 1563:

I said that a list of the subject's works was not a substitute for references. It still isn't, and you still haven't provided references. Please ask for any further advice at

1530: 46: 7459: 5322: 832:

on the part of the complainants. Example, saying something is a "neologism", and throwing around the word "neologism" like a pejorative, based on their own personal opinions.

10111:

Although it's no excuse and I'm by no means trying to justify the comment but I was unfortunately extremely tired and as such I tend to be more blunt than I normally would be,

5234: 2086: 2063: 2031: 1481: 9260:

Hello, I'm currently unable to contest the speedy deletion of London Duck Tours Limited page. I'm in no way affiliated with this company. I am not breaching Knowledge's COI.

5229: 4184: 3181: 3047: 856:

It appears to be a transparent attempt to remove off of Knowledge any and all content found to be disagreeable to the country of origin to which the subject is referring to.

61: 12052: 12030: 11202: 7798:

Robert, if you don't mind me speculating or offering unsolicited advice (and if you do, feel free to revert this now with no hard feelings), I have to wonder if in light of

6355: 5524: 5450: 5268: 3684: 3587: 1681: 10497: 8756: 8700:

because I didn't like it and it had no references. I didn't like it because, as you allude, it drips with praise for its subject. However, I personally don't think that

4471:

who are better at handling crap like that than I am, and not so deeply concerned with the general combat of advocacy and combating it through NPP. (Drmies is also an Arb).

2461:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to

2001: 12160: 11880: 11868: 11333: 7781: 7738: 7715: 6394:- It appears that your sandbox version was just replaced by a redirect to draft space. That should take care of the issue. If you have any more questions, please ask at 4507: 4499: 3390: 3367: 3090: 2800: 2184: 1905: 1882: 1868: 1626: 11219:

Just so you know, tagging something for speedy using Twinkle automatically marks the page as reviewed. I'm not sure if there's a thing to turn it off in the preferences.

1932: 11214: 8863:

As per your request, I have moved the page into draft space and removed the speedy deletion tag. If you have any questions about draft space, you may ask for advice at

8673:

What to do with this one? Had it on my watch list because it was a prior G12 (along with about a dozen copyvio images on commons). Frankly I'm torn between G11 and AfD.

5886: 5777: 5770: 5768: 2221:

Instead of placing him as an article for a musician, what if it was changed to the Biography of a Living Person, like his former partner Andy Chanley and his wiki page?

1592: 6618: 6581: 5488: 2111: 859:

When one attempt fails at a deletion debate, well, let's try and merge it away into another article and then chip away at it over time until it's gone from there also.

11194: 10442: 8649:

pages is not to try to re-create them. You evidently want the page created because Coates Hire wants it, and that has nothing to do with whether Knowledge wants it.

6424:

removed your prod tag, and I rolled that back. He also, curiously submitted a draft on the same topic. Anywho, just something for you to keep an eye on, and hi again!

5088: 3877: 3134: 2018: 1793: 11671:

Thanks. This is the first editor that I've had oversighted for doxing, and I'm concerned that she's oblivious to her own behavior in her continued attacks against me.

12124: 9021: 9013: 6987: 6716: 2804: 2796: 2641: 160: 132: 12089:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

11583:. Any thoughts on what to do about these personal attacks would be appreciated. It appears to be continuing and escalating in a manner that I've not seen before. -- 11489:. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today! 11272: 9764: 9736: 9190: 8746: 8721: 8381: 8364: 5358: 5116: 4168:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

9063: 7600: 6563: 5801: 5259: 3735: 3663: 11943:

For completing over 4,000 reviews in the past year, it is my pleasure to award you the silver award. Thank you so much for your hard work and leadership, Robert.

11000: 10257: 8117: 7759: 5336: 4689: 2942: 12028: 11381:- If I accidentally left out one of the steps on one of the lists that I included in the deletion package, and if you corrected an error on my part, thank you. 9924: 8762: 8456:

that should summarily pass the smell and Google test, you should give them some time to improve the page before tagging it with soon to be unwarranted concerns.

7863: 6313: 5611:

language box on their user page? If not, you might wish to seek assistance from a bilingual editor to assess the likelihood that the creating editor has a clue.

5080: 5063: 3706: 3635: 2831: 2817: 1617: 724: 8344: 6601: 5171: 2695:

Editor since 2005 with 50,000+ edits and a previous EotW two years ago. Helpfulness at the Dispute Resolution page, the Help Desk, the Teahouse and elsewhere.

2471:

has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

2314: 11738: 11093: 11039: 11016: 10980: 10959: 10378: 9860: 9843: 9696: 8876: 7849:

rule is a good idea as written, but that as implemented it actually does more harm than good. First, it seems that every warrior who has come to Knowledge to

6555: 6485: 2898: 1576: 1558: 1368: 11805: 11790: 11776: 10011: 9540: 9522: 7482: 7063:

can be improved. It was features by TechCrunch, Daily Record (Scotland), The Scotsman, AngelList. I'm requesting you to restore the page. Thanks very much. --

6940: 6668: 4988: 4919: 4904: 4765: 4751: 3981: 3963: 3339: 1832: 670: 650: 385: 11830: 11818: 10922: 10811: 10232: 10117:

But anyway I do sincerely and humbly apologise for the stupid and very ill-thought comment and I wanted to say thank you for your helpful contributions here,

10094: 9821: 8540: 7445: 6906: 6891: 6756:. Also, do you have a connection with the company? The only edits you have made have to do with the draft (and previous deleted articles) on the company. 6276: 6255: 6191: 4538: 3893: 3872: 3711: 3694: 3676: 3595: 3579: 3536: 3410: 3075: 3058:- No. First, I do not normally follow a draft through the approval process. Second, I do not normally provide assistance to paid editors or editors with a 2787: 1993:

P.S. it actually is a bit funny though because the creator must have re-made the page in both places, and now it exists with and without "Dr." in the title.

1253: 1220: 1130: 1108: 1091: 1076: 1034: 1019: 703: 310:. We don't normally have articles on neologisms, even if one reputable scholar has used the neologism. As a minor, easily correctable point, the draft has 11444: 10626: 10541: 10321: 8968: 8953: 8942: 8192: 8162: 6126: 6101: 5873:

You declined my submission for review on the grounds that it does not have a proper lead sentence, however it is only to be added to an existing article on

5440: 5418: 5035: 5005: 4965: 4950: 4310: 4296: 4279: 4265: 4218: 4204: 2855: 2389: 2371: 2357: 973:. That issue is now resolved and done. Complainants appear to have moved on from that and are now proposing getting rid of the entire article altogether at 11556: 10892: 10044: 9329: 9252: 9165: 9100: 9068: 8790: 8369:

Hi, I'm Timothyjosephwood and I have no idea what happened either. I assume I nominated for a different reason, or something. But it's gone. So. You know.

8323: 7988: 7664: 7637: 7605: 7354: 6707: 6462: 5630: 5514: 4941:- I don't understand what your complaint is. There was only one response after 48 hours. I don't understand your concern about not getting back to you. 4565: 3561: 3455: 3430: 3359: 2512: 457: 403: 12145: 11406: 11390: 11230: 10604: 10585: 9717: 9555: 9503: 9486: 9470: 8658: 5918: 5377:

decided to ask for mediation, and when that didn't result in resolution of the discord it was mediator KDS444 who suggested to open a RfC on the subject.

4783: 4480: 4458: 4041: 3843: 1952: 1889:, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Knowledge's goals. Please note that 1191: 1177: 340: 323: 12062:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 10342: 10217: 8437: 8080: 7470: 7339: 6535: 6519: 6507: 6237:

After a thorough examination, I launched a new entry into Knowledge on "Biard - Research and Development Company Ltd." of Bar-Ilan University in Israel.

4830: 4705: 4672: 4626: 4495: 4378: 4147:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 3807: 3270: 3173: 1538: 1522: 1453: 1396: 1348: 1331: 1233: 1196: 1169: 453: 53: 11160: 11085: 10676:

sufficiently important to have its own volunteers, rather than to have other editors dump on the New Page Patrol and Articles for Creation reviewers.

9657: 8465: 8055:

is her name and "Supreme Master Ching Hai", even if it is her pen name, is her name with an honorific. The compromise that I would propose is to treat

7573: 7559: 7172:-- Irrelevant to the criteria for page inclusion. Also, that sounds like something a hired shill would say, and we don't really like hired shills (see 6167: 4933: 4093: 4075: 4054: 4027: 2747: 1987: 1767: 1753: 1732: 1727:

The roadshow is a promotion that simply provides a platform for unknowns to display their work. I'm of the mind that Visual Collaborative doesn't meet

1722: 11912: 11714: 11700: 11683: 11666: 11649: 11629: 11612: 11416: 11174: 10443: 10070: 9992: 8959: 6799: 6785: 6749: 6688: 6442: 5594:

So the AFC folks have a very important role to play in catching this problem and nipping it in the bud. Anytime you see something that either has the

3852: 2227: 2165: 311: 11101: 11028: 10971: 10710: 10656: 10574:

well being high-and-mighty about inclusionism and not biting the newbies if you don't ever look at the new pages feed or interact with any newbies! –

10113:

Regardless it should never have been said and I will say right here right now (in very polite terms) I was a complete & utter moron for saying it,

8992: 8981: 4332: 2781: 2136: 585: 11567: 10349: 10248: 9677: 9599: 7999: 7830: 7313: 7293: 7266: 7220: 7191: 6922: 6867: 6851: 6174: 6141: 5981: 4895:, you are expected to watch it. Maybe a statement to that effect is needed. You may open a new case. The original dispute has now been archived. 4635: 3929: 3831: 3055: 3039: 2976: 407: 5897:- First, AFC is not meant to be used for additions to articles, only for new articles. If you want to add to an existing article, either just edit 4924:

My DRN on runtime columns was also closed, despite I have been staying on top of monitoring the progress. And Robert hasn't got back to me, either.

2558: 9009: 8299: 8276: 8246: 8026: 6840: 6391: 6327: 6231: 2524: 2416: 227: 164: 11886:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

11836:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

11373: 11313: 9243:. It looked to me and to the deleting administrator like an advertisement for a non-notable business. Also, do you work for London Duck Tours? 8445: 5523:

Hi Robert, and thanks for your comments. Please don't assume editors know German just because they're creating "Translations" from it. Here's a

3541: 3450: 2761: 2153: 1966: 9058: 8781: 8471: 7322:- What is your affiliation or connection with Urban Massage? Your only edits have been to create its page and to discuss its page. Please read 7060: 7049: 6934: 6859: 6283:. However, I will offer you a brief review here. The article isn't ready for acceptance into article space. It doesn't, in my view, establish 3615: 3312: 3289: 3275: 399: 11862: 11254: 10753: 10739: 10662: 10272: 9431: 8413: 7648:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

3552:

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/gallery/2016/nov/26/worlds-most-sustainable-offices-treadmill-desks-apps-solar-lighting-gallery

423: 11522: 11168: 9297: 9282: 9219: 8585: 8564: 8510: 7951: 7916:

pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

7125: 7117: 7028: 6960: 6807: 6793: 6078:. Third, I think that you are sort of working against yourself if you keep an article very short out of fear that it will be deleted, because 5709: 5650: 5149: 3107: 3102: 3038:

about this? if you could please give a general explanation on the affected sources, I could make those amends and resubmit Thank you in Advance

2462: 2446:

pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

449: 349: 11737:

Hi. I posted about a problem that I sometimes have with draft space articles and uncooperative article creators. The section I opened is here

9975:: I think it is best you withdraw your RfA. This isn't personal, but at this point I think you would need an immense amount of supports (: --> 9398:

Message added 20:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

7590: 6291:

have written about the company. Because it is only what the company says about itself, it reads like a brochure about the company. Also, at

4143:

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

3475: 180: 12011:

We have a very friendly team to help you get started and we also have an IRC channel. If you have any questions for us or about the process,

11476:

pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.

10016:

The reason it is considered useful to withdraw an obviously failing RFA is that it a) indicates to the community that you are able to assess

8616: 7392: 5942: 5310: 5240: 5162:, you may create a new better version of the article. (Almost anything would be better than the deleted article with a malformed infobox.) 5026:

I do not understand how you can say that this is not notable but I can tell you it it is notable to over 160,000 people who live in Donegal.

4856: 4581: 4539: 3815: 3111: 2886: 881: 682: 558: 544: 500: 483: 469: 253: 215: 7250: 3566: 3265: 2290: 11136: 11119: 8685: 8317: 6415: 5158:- Please do not provide links or references to reviewers. They must be in the article. If the article has been deleted, and has not been 4994: 4806: 3153: 1668:- In looking at the draft, there isn't one part of it in particular that is the problem, but the overall tone. I will ask for comments at 1665: 1598: 1306: 491:, No, Robert userfied the page using its article name rather than its author's name. Looks like Robert's just had a bad day on page moves. 197: 72: 7078: 2913:

and did not provide enough information about the performer or performers. An article about a musical work should explain why the work is

2327:

Hello RM. In my many years here I had never had to file a salt request. I was in the middle of trying to figure out what to do when I saw

9571: 5386: 5021: 4358:

I moved it to the proper place. However I may have left a couple of empty pages behind. Can you get them speedy-deleted? Thanks... --

4247: 3094: 2803:. I was going to AfD since I couldn't decide on a CSD (other than A3 for the program examples one). I notice the user has just created a 977: 974: 11756: 11205:- Twinkle strikes again. I had tagged it for speedy deletion, and it has been deleted. I don't know what caused this stupid message. 11127: 9378: 7649: 5427:(or ask another administrator to do that; I am not sure whom to turn to). The question is whether I was right in assuming, based on the 3391:

https://www.robertsoncooper.com/good-daily-psychology-article/1518-it-pays-to-play-brighthr-and-professor-sir-cary-cooper-on-fun-at-work

2733: 1339: 11952: 11867: 10694: 10306: 9025: 8841: 8006: 6267: 4511: 3647: 3599: 2881: 2530: 1203:

and I have now said, any discussion should be at the article talk page. If there are any further questions, you may ask for advice at

202: 10768:

Hi thanks for catching my mistake on having no content, I had pressed submit prematurely. You can remove the deletion request. Thanks

9452: 9352: 6648: 6240:

After collecting the relevant information for the entry, I entered the company information on a draft page. (I've sent you the link).

11545: 10917: 10872: 10791: 10777: 9801: 9146: 8492: 7977: 7764:

Of course, I was thinking of twinkle's AfD notice which- curiously- does provide the option. Oh well. Thanks for adding salt, too. —

7672:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 6812: 5760: 4880: 4413: 3485: 3445: 3400: 3320:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 3197: 2497: 2404:

You proposed deletion of CNS Control article. Article should not be deleted as it is important topic and should be improved instead.

2094:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1913:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1812: 265: 10434: 10202:

I regret very much that the community does not recognize your qualifications to be an administrator, which are ample. Best regards.

10196: 4423:

Robert, you know my stance on paid editing, and I fully respect yours too and I support it and respect it and I am grateful for all

836: 11592: 11280: 10168: 9142: 7645: 7381: 6225: 6149: 4663:- I had my reason for AFD. I thought that it had been created once before, and that an AFD would get it salted quicker. Anyway. 4051: 3999: 2067: 958: 787: 142: 12058:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

7641: 7541: 5409:

or a conduct forum is better. In any case, you were asking the question in multiple places. We can let the RFC run its course.

4234: 3490: 365: 10453:

Officially, the English Knowledge has policies, guidelines, and essays, in decreasing order of importance. Officially, the rule

8391: 7799: 7425: 7145:

and The Memo pieces, though they appear to be independent professional reviews). The links to the Google Play iOS App Store are

3901: 2399: 1409: 612: 11356: 9629: 8898: 4652: 4533: 11449: 10613:, as I have said, it is in the abstract an excellent guideline (not a policy even, but a guideline). However, the emphasis on 9064: 8772: 8446: 7889: 7601: 7129: 6781:

You recently reviewed my Cassantec AG page. I made the necessary additions and changes-- would you mind re-reviewing the page?

6500: 6019: 5527:

from 14 different languages by a single editor. I first noticed this well-intentioned and prolific generator of crap due to a

5101: 5090: 3301: 3271: 2632: 2501: 2339: 2027: 1864: 1392: 442: 12023: 11767:- I have nominated the article for deletion. I don't have a general answer, but a deletion discussion is a specific answer. 10945:

We were still under the process of a bit of copying and pasting from various text sources when you posted a quick delete tag.

9145:. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see 8477:

Hi, I have deProdded this one. Article always had two external links. You may take it to AfD or nominate it for Speedy. Thanks

8398:

Do you think the publications are sufficiently scholarly that the article doesn't qualify for speedy deletion under criterion

6592:- Thank you. The AFD should be speedy-closed, because that is a reasonable use of user space. I will ask what can be done. 5424: 4440: 4112: 4007: 3783: 2328: 11024: 10967: 10635:

IMO the whole project is jeopardized, long term, if the entry-point quality of articles isn't maintained. More power to you.

10134: 9344: 8832:

this and add more references about him. I see that there are tons of references about him on Google news. Hope this is okay?

8704:

is meant to apply to non-neutral articles unless they are meant to benefit the subject. If it doesn't currently qualify for

6953:: Please do read it till the end. Thank you!DarkAges 19:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)KaliageDarkAges 19:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC) 6074:. Second, you can request the opinions of experienced editors, either about new articles in article space, or about AFC, at 3824:

I would like to invite people who have expertise in the subject to contribute once it is out of draft. Is that appropriate?

3675:

was a representative of the organisation. Would it be possible to reinstate the deleted page so we can hve the conversation?

3505: 9038: 8497: 8038:- You say that you still need a resolution to your request. I think that I said that you may contest the Requested Move at 7246: 5423:

Robert McClenon, sorry to bother you once again about the "defunct restaurant" dispute, but could you please have a look at

4722:

Hello! I am going to take my first case, so I would like to ask you, would you mind if I link your rules in my statement? --

11342: 9195: 7793: 7478: 6874:. I cannot restore it; I do not have it. You have had several pages deleted. Please read our guidelines and policies on 6845: 6263: 5428: 4256:- If I or another volunteer neither accept nor decline a case, it means that another volunteer is asked to take the case. 2739:

Congrats RM. I know this is the second time you've received this and it was well deserved on both occasions. Best regards.

2421: 1702: 1447:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1318:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

948:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

769:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

11526:. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Knowledge will be restricted to users with 10523:). New contributors should absolutely be responsible for what they write, and that responsibility is described clearly in 10057:

Hi. At the risk of annoying you as well as the wise heads advising you here, I want to ask you read (or possibly re-read)

8922: 4742:- Go ahead. However, don't be surprised if the editors don't read it. I don't know if the editors in my cases read it. 4427:

support for everything else, but please don't ping me to ANI (a confirmed cesspit), if it is for me to be insulted by

3537:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3484514/Is-sleeping-day-key-success-career-women-swear-afternoon-nap-office.html

3460: 3411:

http://www.personneltoday.com/hr/play-and-professionalism-at-work-boosting-engagement-while-maintaining-standards-webinar/

2622:

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

1588:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1380:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1285:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

916:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

11817: 11745: 9043: 8590: 7884: 7128:

does not establish notability because it is just a listing, not in-depth coverage (1% of a source is not in-depth). The

6050: 4731: 3531: 3520: 1858: 293: 10647:"articles" consisting of their own CV because they don't have the command of English required to understand the basics. 8612: 7564:

OK, then I'll wait to contribute anything else until the other editor makes his fourth statement or you ask me to do so.

5694: 4107: 3562:

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/jul/07/nerf-guns-beds-beanbag-areas-what-makes-a-productive-office

3456:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sponsored/business/business-reporter/12211084/investing-for-the-next-generation-part-two.html

3431:

http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/article-details/why-it-pays-to-play-workplace-fun-breeds-employee-wellbeing-and-productivity

3116: 118: 11425: 10373: 10337: 10212: 9580: 7772: 7729: 7686: 6821: 5097: 4789: 3995: 3083: 2539: 1463: 630: 393: 9965: 7746:- If you used Twinkle, you can't help who gets the notification. Also, I have requested that the BLOCK CAPS title be 5931:

Hi Robert. You seem to be on the ball with all the new pages I've created. Don't know how you do it, but that's good.

3515: 71:

format. This may be the wrong place to put my comment too, but I couldn't find any place for a new subject. Thanks.

12143: 12109: 9990: 7453: 7047: 6773: 6698: 6243:

I will be grateful if one of your editors will see the text and be able to help raise the value to the encyclopedia.

3925: 2175: 1974: 11581:

Knowledge:Help_desk/Archives/2017_September_13#Do_I_have_the_right_to_delete_a_section_that_I_added_to_an_article.3F

328:

COI as in the person who asked me for a review is a personal friend and I feel I could be biased in reviewing it. --

11178: 11106: 10398: 9799: 8607:. Are you able to provide some evidence as to how it violates the policy, or how the page can be improved? Thanks, 7416: 7403: 7368: 7162: 6930: 6878:

and include references when you create a page, so that it will not have to be deleted. If you need advice, ask at

5529: 5127: 3839: 3420: 3395: 3231: 3128: 2986: 121:

require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see

90: 6453:- I will have to AFD that article then. Once a PROD tag is removed, even by the author, it may not be restored. 5548:

Sun big of 1,391,400 km diameter; of heat is it 5,500 C temperture surface, more hotter corona gasses.<ref: -->

3556: 3546: 3020: 2958:- Thank you. I will use this pages. I thought that it was as on french wikipedia. The page creation is different. 1241: 1237: 970: 11532: 11329: 7474: 6678: 6337: 6046: 5971: 5901:, or discuss on the article talk page first. Second, if you have a question about a date in a reference, ask at 5640: 5471: 5465: 5121: 4956:

of worms I am getting myself into though. The DRN is not resolved in my eyes. Still, I am grateful for your time.

4838: 4235:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Film_censorship_in_China.23Runtime_columns

3718:. You ask whether it is possible to reinstate the deleted page. You may ask for a copy of a deleted article at 1731:. They arrange shows for unknowns to promote their work. WP is not a platform for unknowns to become notable. 891: 888: 885: 398:

I think you should be more careful when moving newly created articles to user space. For example, you have moved

5682: 4149: 3798:. I will try to answer, but, in my opinion, it was more appropriate in Knowledge space than in article space. 835:

The research shown in the article itself doesn't bear that out, as I believe you've already observed, yourself.

11429: 11418: 10020:(it is a useful asset for an admin to be able to read consensus), b) it closes an incident that may be causing 9278: 9215: 9108: 7529: 3542:

http://www.managementtoday.co.uk/six-weird-wonderful-ways-boost-teams-morale/leadership-lessons/article/1409072

3451:

https://www.hyperisland.com/community/news/how-can-digital-technology-change-the-future-of-hr-and-our-workplace

2278: 851: 829: 11985: 10900:

If you have not previously known Yandex products, this is not a sign that the articles are promotional. Look:

9400: 8626: 8608: 7845:

however are something that I have been thinking and writing for months. As I said, I actually think that the

5690: 3008: 11638: 10901: 10403: 9920: 7765: 7743: 7722: 7703: 7679: 7036: 6968: 5822: 5674: 5660: 5366: 4228: 3261: 3219: 3191: 2863: 1797: 966: 10782:

Imzadi1979 wrongly Deleted this page. With you being a more qualified user, could you help me reinstate it

10237:

Pretty much what TheGracefulSlick said. Your work is valued whether or not you do it with the sysop flag. ~

7955:. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features. 6420:

Hey there AfC buddy! Seen ya around doing great stuff, so thought I'd say hi! Also, I noticed the author of

5946:

some of my reasons on the talk page. Hopefully someone responds to them (and it's not just a quick delete).

3016: 11574: 11240: 10524: 9436: 9084: 7621: 5460: 5284: 5250: 3476:

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/701028/Timewasters-biggest-revealed-work-guilty-lifestyle-research

3227: 3000: 2610: 2588: 2474: 2268: 2209: 2047: 1511:

The faculty member has asked that I provide his Google Scholar ranking for your review. Thanks very much.

846: 261: 233: 223: 163:- First, please do not top post your inquiry. It is confusing and hard to find. The draft in question is 136: 98: 11640:

this? I've been trying to figure out how well I've been avoiding her, but couldn't find a way to do so. --

3211: 12120: 11896:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

11846:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

11801: 11772: 11696: 11662: 11625: 11608: 11386: 11268: 11250: 11210: 11188: 11156: 11147:, there may not be a lot of improving that can be done. Also, do you work for APEK? If so, please read 11083: 11020: 10996: 10963: 10888: 10807: 10717: 10690: 10622: 10600: 10493: 10164: 10085: 10007: 9856: 9828: 9817: 9732: 9692: 9653: 9536: 9499: 9466: 9357: 9325: 9248: 8938: 8872: 8717: 8654: 8536: 8433: 8360: 8327: 8188: 8138:

just because it has resulted in an outcome you don't like doesn't mean you should try to change consensus

8124: 8113: 8076: 7968: 7859: 7755: 7711: 7555: 7441: 7350: 7335: 7141:

pieces are press releases, overglorified advertisements, not real news stories (and I have concern about

6983: 6902: 6887: 6761: 6664: 6597: 6551: 6481: 6458: 6403: 6371: 6309: 6187: 6122: 6097: 6015: 5914: 5729: 5579: 5510: 5414: 5354: 5332: 5318: 5167: 5076: 5059: 4984: 4946: 4900: 4826: 4747: 4685: 4668: 4622: 4454: 4401: 4292: 4261: 4200: 4089: 4071: 4037: 4023: 3977: 3959: 3889: 3868: 3803: 3731: 3702: 3659: 3631: 3567:

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/business-news/brighthr-launches-sleep-room-staff-10986404

3435: 3355: 3169: 3124: 3071: 2938: 2851: 2480: 2385: 2353: 2310: 2256: 2132: 2096: 2075: 2014: 1948: 1915: 1828: 1749: 1718: 1677: 1608: 1572: 1554: 1431: 1364: 1302: 1216: 1104: 1072: 1015: 932: 753: 720: 646: 581: 381: 319: 176: 10115:

I thought it was only fair I apologise directly to you but I wanted to do so when the dust settled abit,

9383: 3470: 1497: 460:. I've marked it U2 before I saw the move but wouldn't have been inclined to userfy it anyway. Regards, 188:

I am now editing the page have not add in references yet. Please wait and not straight away delete it.

11732: 11362:

Never mind, I saw the bundled nomination on the AfD log and fixed the tag on that one article. Cheers,

10822: 10389:

I'm so sorry I didn't see this until it was too late. I would certainly have supported your candidacy.

10254: 10228: 10061:. It might help you see things from a different angle, even if that's just to resent me as a busybody. 9428: 9170: 8766: 8428:. If you want to nominate it for A11, I certainly won't pull the tag, but will let the admin decide. 8104:

that the honorific should be included in the primary name of her web page, I will have to take this to

7669: 7522: 6477:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case#topic-banning Supermann from all pages related to film for one year

6259: 6208:

Proposed deletion processes are not intended to clean up articles. The subject is arguably notable per

5856: 5191: 3583: 3425: 3317: 2563: 2197: 2091: 1910: 11504:

that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see:

8908:

Thanks for helping me out with some responses to deletion recently. You are far more deserving of the

8183:, but be aware that the issue is only one of primary name because there has always been a redirectr. 7962:

are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by

7345:

five million articles that we already have rather than trying to contribute one that we do not have.

7014: 5585:

to somewhat mitigate this problem of invisibility, but it's still better to catch them at the outset.)

5341:

I do not normally follow an article through the approval process. If you want advice, you may ask at

3510: 1642: 12064: 12005: 11097: 10302: 9408: 9348: 9130: 8912:

than I do – I know you have been approached before, but I cannot to seem to find your thoughts about

8604: 7384:

as a good faith objection to deletion. I would have no objection to nominating this article at AfD. —

6201: 5840: 4372: 3120: 2667: 2205: 2006: 1994: 1980: 1289: 428: 37: 17: 11796:

discussion. So yes, in such situations, a deletion discussion may be the most effective approach.

7811:

get tired of it just doing DR and not doing draft work. Most of the time, I can just suck it up and

6385:

Hi Robert, which one of the two submissions needs to be deleted? Is there really a duplicate entry?

4270:

Thanks. I wasn't sure if the discussion will be archived automatically if no volunteer picks it up.

3292:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done for the following reason:

2929:. For more information about how to create a good article about an album, please ask for advice at 2587:

Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as

2189: 1485: 1099:- I will ask about whether it is reasonable for a proponent of keeping an article to start an AFD. 11917: 10763: 10174: 9916: 9604: 9091: 8826: 8089: 8056: 7824: 7804: 7628: 7138: 7124:

because they're directories that in most cases any monkey on a typewriter can register a page on.

6732: 6623: 6359: 6295:, you referred to a "company page". Knowledge doesn't have company pages. We have articles about 5686: 5272: 5031: 3680: 3257: 3187: 2869: 2274: 2054: 1514: 1384: 1359:. There must be on-line summaries of his career. Just be sure to rework them in your own words. 698: 167:. It is very hard for a connected contributor to write a neutral article. My advice is to ask at 12093:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 10827:

That page is not unambiguously promotional, because Knowledge has many articles about produkts of

9112: 8947:

Cool. If I may be entrusted, I will prepare a nomination statement after scanning over some data.

8933:- At this point I am ready to run/stand for admin if someone will nominate me other than myself. 4172:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 3486:

https://www.helmoperations.com/about-us/blog/post/2016/09/07/the-benefits-of-play-in-the-workplace

3446:

http://www.workstars.com/recognition-and-engagement-blog/2016/06/13/really-fun-motivate-employees/

3401:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/626776/Britain-nicest-boss-builds-skate-rink-staff-Lawrence-Jones

1630: 1493: 11960: 11527: 11501: 9584: 9573: 9012:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 8668: 8485: 7134: 6614: 6577: 6367: 5844: 5463:

who have explicitly stated that they do not speak the language of the source article, as you did

5280: 5145: 5134: 4861: 4634: 4498:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 3921: 3500: 3495: 3012: 2286: 1783: 1477: 1472: 1352: 608: 9949:

feel you are ready. Though I would suggest you consult with someone experienced in RFA, such as

8975:

Take your time, it's not live until the time parser is substituted and the page is transcluded.

6351: 5997:

because he has umpired MLB. This also applies to players. We get a lot of very short stubs on

5264: 3223: 1638: 11948: 11563: 11543:

To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to

11318: 11246: 11070: 10369: 10333: 10208: 10080: 9839: 9753: 9724: 9706: 9673: 8837: 8735: 8693: 8674: 8402:? I was debating whether that applied; I don't think the tone is so overboard that it's spam. — 8370: 8352: 8333: 7995: 7975:

To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to

7242: 6926: 6720: 6523: 6511: 6346: 6230: 6134: 5852: 4363: 4287:

Yes, the discussion will be archived in Two Weeks if no volunteer picks it up. In Two Weeks.

3989: 3835: 3491:

https://www.robertsoncooper.com/blog/entry/nine-things-the-workplace-can-learn-from-roller-derb

3251: 2543: 2532: 2520: 1622: 1526: 1457: 1335: 1173: 819: 277: 193: 86: 57: 8806: 7530:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Fourth_statements_by_editors

6978:

The place for discussion of whether an article should be deleted is the Deletion Discussion.

6915:

I don't know to ask about to stop deletation can you please ask from me to stop deletation ?

6632:. You had proded the article, but instead I changed it to a redirect to the existing article, 5836: 5596: 3480: 12136: 12102: 11786: 11752: 10278: 10224: 10066: 9983: 9518: 9186: 9054: 9002: 8894: 8470: 7881: 7812: 7674: 7513: 7289: 7262: 7187: 6825: 6814: 6803: 6789: 6728: 6692: 6643: 6042: 5967: 5225: 4915: 4876: 4871:

So, is there a policy for reopening closed DRNs or does one have to file a new one? Regards,

4852: 4779: 4761: 4727: 3745: 2729: 2169: 2149: 1807: 825: 419: 361: 126: 7949:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the

7644:, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not 6950: 6712: 3576:

Would using the above material to build out an alement of the article make it more notable?

2477:

adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Knowledge

549:

Oh, I see. Well, we all have bad days. I've certainly had a few recently, as Rob knows! ;-)

12116: 12090: 11908: 11897: 11858: 11847: 11797: 11768: 11692: 11658: 11621: 11604: 11481: 11472: 11382: 11264: 11206: 11173:

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

11152: 11012: 10992: 10955: 10884: 10803: 10787: 10773: 10686: 10618: 10596: 10556: 10532: 10489: 10294: 10253:

Please stick around. I speak for many others when I say that I appreciate having you here.

10160: 10003: 9852: 9813: 9797: 9728: 9688: 9649: 9532: 9495: 9462: 9374: 9366: 9337: 9321: 9274: 9266: 9244: 9211: 9203: 9150: 8934: 8868: 8713: 8650: 8596: 8581: 8573: 8560: 8552: 8532: 8519: 8506: 8453: 8429: 8356: 8222: 8184: 8109: 8072: 7912: 7855: 7751: 7707: 7653: 7578: 7551: 7437: 7418: 7397: 7346: 7331: 7309: 7216: 7074: 7056: 7024: 6979: 6956: 6918: 6898: 6883: 6855: 6757: 6660: 6593: 6547: 6475:

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

6454: 6399: 6305: 6251: 6183: 6163: 6145: 6118: 6093: 6034: 6011: 5998: 5959: 5910: 5831: 5782:

contributing to a notable album indcates significance (and is a potential merge target per

5506: 5410: 5350: 5328: 5314: 5201:

I believe that if I write on their talk page about this I will be subjected to more abuse.

5163: 5072: 5055: 4980: 4942: 4896: 4822: 4743: 4681: 4664: 4618: 4524: 4450: 4418: 4397: 4317: 4288: 4257: 4196: 4169: 4085: 4067: 4047: 4033: 4019: 3973: 3955: 3913: 3885: 3864: 3827: 3799: 3727: 3698: 3671: 3655: 3627: 3380: 3351: 3165: 3067: 3043: 2980: 2959: 2955: 2934: 2906: 2895: 2847: 2381: 2349: 2306: 2252: 2128: 2010: 1944: 1890: 1824: 1745: 1741: 1714: 1697: 1673: 1568: 1550: 1427: 1360: 1298: 1249: 1227: 1212: 1187: 1126: 1115: 1100: 1087: 1068: 1030: 1011: 984: 928: 903: 874:

This is well researched, well documented source material. Over a sustained period of time.

749: 716: 642: 577: 377: 348: 315: 249: 211: 172: 114: 78: 33: 8794: 3506:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fun-day-friday-why-you-should-promote-fun-work-jason-crooks

2201: 868:

When that attempt fails, try merger again at a different article to merge somewhere else.

811: 804: 8: 12059: 11506: 11288:

Hello Robert McClenon. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

10832: 10737: 10640: 10539: 10319: 10189: 10017: 9154: 8990: 8979: 8966: 8951: 8920: 8645:

and getting reviews before moving it into article space. However, my usual advice about

8292: 8269: 8229:" to Andre Romelle Young instead because it is an honorific name? Or change the name of " 8155: 7938:

in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

7838: 7816: 7032: 6964: 6496: 6470: 6331: 5994: 5776:

Hello Robert McClenon. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

5436: 5382: 5372:

want'. The fact of the matter – and the essential difference – is however that I already

5068: 5043: 5027: 5002: 4961: 4929: 4488: 4409: 4385: 4328: 4306: 4275: 4243: 4214: 4180: 4144: 4066:, where the action can be Redirect. Good question. I will ask the question somewhere. 2827: 2813: 2744: 2412: 2368: 2336: 2322: 1689: 712: 686: 9288:

Also, I'm sorry for posting at the top of your talk page, I am rather new to Knowledge.

9200:

Hello, I was wondering as to why the London Duck Tours Article is going to be deleted?

8802: 7402:

Hi Robert McClenon. Hope you're having a good weekend. I'm confused by your indentation

4774:

For some reason the bot fails recognize me as volunteer, even though I am on the list --

3322: 1894: 1659:

Hi Robert, would you mind elaborating on what parts you felt the page failed on? Thanks

12012: 11338: 10913: 10868: 10041: 9962: 9293: 9018:

Please add your evidence by 13 September 2017, which is when the evidence phase closes.

8884: 8786: 8478: 8462: 8452:

When someone emerges from semi-retirement to create a new content contribution such as

7958:

Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not

7238: 7177: 6946: 6610: 6589: 6573: 6437: 6155: 6109:- What you need to do to prevent the article on the boy from being deleted is to add a 5626: 5484: 5155: 5141: 5138: 5130: 4976: 4428: 3461:

http://www.keepintheloop.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Get-your-workplace-INTHELOOP.pdf

3335: 2788: 2298: 2282: 1489: 604: 257: 219: 11975: 8322:

Hi, I'm Timothyjosephwood. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

6363: 5276: 3532:

https://www.psfk.com/2016/07/nerf-guns-beds-beanbag-areas-makes-productive-office.html

3521:

https://tabletennisengland.co.uk/news/archived/how-workplaces-are-getting-in-the-loop/

11944: 11559: 11486: 11440: 11399: 11366: 11349: 11309: 11294:

There is without doubt a multinational company called "Zetron". Whether this article

11223: 11061: 10730: 10580: 10364: 10328: 10203: 10100: 9848: 9835: 9684: 9669: 9595: 9548: 9479: 9445: 8849: 8833: 8697: 7991: 7959: 7237:

reliable. The page will need to be deleted because the first draft is promotional.

7146: 6836: 6539: 6221: 6202: 5882: 5816: 5756: 5751:

Thank you for your positive and helpful feedback. I'll keep working on the article.

5713: 5654: 5502: 5112: 4844: 4476: 4468: 4436: 4359: 4082:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of births, marriages and deaths in Waterloo Road

4003: 2888: 2877: 2776: 2591:

in recognition of your helpfulness to others. Thank you for the great contributions!

2554: 2516: 2377: 1962: 1928: 1854: 1634: 1007: 998:- My talk page is a reasonable place to discuss an article that is pending review at 924: 824:

Most of the complaints about the article's existence amount to transparently obvious

745: 597: 334: 287: 189: 11926: 9786:

and has no reflection on you as an editor or a person. (This stands to reason; if I

5848: 4504:

Please add your evidence by August 6, 2017, which is when the evidence phase closes.

641:- Because it needed deleting. Because it was left over from a previous archiving. 406:, but the user account has no contributions, and the article was in fact created by 12134: 12112: 12100: 12048: 11890: 11840: 11782: 11764: 11748: 11140: 10856: 10566: 10062: 9981: 9514: 9313: 9050: 8890: 8409: 8242: 8022: 7876: 7509: 7502: 7466: 7377: 7370: 7327: 7303: 7285: 7258: 7210: 7201: 7183: 7068: 6871: 6656: 6637: 6629: 5244: 5221: 4972: 4911: 4888: 4872: 4848: 4802: 4775: 4757: 4739: 4723: 4701: 4648: 4577: 3969: 3938: 3917: 3779: 3719: 3465: 3149: 2910: 2909:- The article did not have any references and so did not explain why the album met 2725: 2239: 2145: 2124: 1820: 1801: 1405: 663: 638: 623: 569: 540: 496: 465: 415: 373: 357: 10107:

You've probably seen my RFA comment and so I wanted to take the time to apologise,

8175:

My talk page is not the place for further discussion of this issue. Please go to

7257:

sources you posted). Write material that even their competitors could not deny.

6724: 3516:

http://www.hcamag.com/features/does-your-workplace-have-the-fun-factor-234036.aspx

2066:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 11904: 11876: 11854: 11826: 11144: 11123: 11057: 10799: 10783: 10769: 10144: 10021: 9950: 9809: 9792: 9748:

It's always very frustrating to me personally when someone says "I want to serve

9370: 9362: 9236: 9232: 9104: 8909: 8646: 8577: 8569: 8556: 8548: 8528: 8515: 8502: 8399: 7586: 7569: 7537: 7433: 7407: 7386: 6284: 6159: 6071: 5985: 5795: 5402: 5398: 5397:- First, I wasn't the first one to say that you were forum shopping. Originally 5346: 4867: 4680:- I now see that all of those articles are the work of a persistent sockmaster. 4515: 3440: 1840: 1789: 1602: 1245: 1200: 1183: 1122: 1096: 1083: 1064: 1039: 1026: 995: 980: 899: 271: 82: 9613: 9169:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

9103:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

7668:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

7640:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

6570:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Listed Buildings in Cornwall (New Pages)

5128:

http://www.leagle.com/decision/20011457156FSupp2d1301_11347/SANDERS%20v.%20MOORE

3421:

https://www.hrzone.com/community/blogs/paul-harris/hr-managers-have-the-most-fun

3396:

https://lucybristow.com/blog/having-fun-at-work-is-essential-for-modern-offices/

3316:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2090:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1909:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1886: 1885:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

11994: 11710: 11679: 11645: 11588: 11177:, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on 10734: 10669: 10636: 10614: 10610: 10536: 10528: 10515: 10454: 10316: 10184: 10156: 10122: 10025: 9174: 9127:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 9036: 8987: 8976: 8963: 8948: 8930: 8917: 8903: 8630: 8326:, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on 8284: 8261: 8230: 8217: 8147: 8137: 7846: 7842: 7747: 7173: 6492: 6209: 6106: 6079: 6059: 6038: 6007: 5963: 5950: 5898: 5605: 5432: 5394: 5378: 5159: 4998: 4957: 4938: 4925: 4405: 4389: 4381: 4324: 4302: 4284: 4271: 4253: 4239: 4210: 4192: 4176: 4132:

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited your

3942: 3821: 3611: 3603: 3557:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/company-installs-double-bed-office-7462867

3547:

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/company-installed-double-bed-employees-110203305.html

3415: 3385: 3327: 2839: 2823: 2809: 2740: 2408: 2364: 2345: 2332: 2120: 2071: 1979:

Haha, all apologies for that one :D It was Twinkle's fault, so let's blame it.

1920: 1047: 122: 12043:

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the

11456: 7896: 2572: 2428: 790:, dealing with entrenched viewpoints which appear to ignore reliable sources. 12154: 12044: 11970: 11299: 11295: 11148: 11043: 10988: 10984: 10909: 10880: 10864: 10848: 10836: 10749: 10706: 10652: 10394: 10384: 10268: 10238: 10034: 9999: 9972: 9955: 9317: 9309: 9305: 9289: 9270: 9240: 9228: 9207: 8913: 8864: 8798: 8709: 8705: 8701: 8642: 8638: 8458: 8425: 8068: 8048: 8043: 7850: 7323: 7121: 6879: 6753: 6543: 6450: 6425: 6395: 6301: 6292: 6280: 6213: 6178: 6114: 6075: 6063: 5926: 5902: 5783: 5622: 5494: 5480: 5456: 5406: 5342: 5051: 5047: 4892: 4818: 4610: 4602: 4561: 4393: 4133: 4063: 3951: 3881: 3860: 3856: 3795: 3723: 3715: 3651: 3623: 3619: 3347: 3331: 3063: 3059: 2930: 2918: 2843: 2757: 2606: 2594: 2468: 2302: 2248: 2243: 2231: 2107: 1669: 1564: 1546: 1542: 1423: 1356: 1204: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1043: 1003: 999: 741: 554: 479: 438: 411: 307: 303: 168: 10527:. To correct their editing problems should never be considered as a form of 526:

without leaving a redirect: the draft was moved, so the MFD should be moved)

306:? My first thought is that the phrase "American tianxia" is something of a 11500:

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for

11436: 11396: 11378: 11363: 11346: 11305: 11292:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 11220: 10844: 10617:

has become a dogma, and it has become a distraction from quality control.

10592: 10575: 10506: 10412: 10148: 9591: 9528: 9509: 9491: 9458: 9418: 8234: 8180: 8176: 8141: 8133: 8105: 8101: 8064: 8039: 7142: 6875: 6832: 6288: 6217: 6110: 5906: 5894: 5878: 5812: 5780:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 5752: 5108: 4472: 4446: 4432: 3946: 3607: 2873: 2767: 2550: 1958: 1940: 1924: 1850: 1208: 795: 779: 330: 299: 283: 8599:, I see you have been quick to jump on to the page I've recently created, 5738: 2450:

followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

850:. I've added those attempts, also, to the top of that article's talk page 520:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Allenkelly/Madware (2nd nomination)

11530:

status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to

11485:

pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before

10860: 10852: 10840: 10140: 9931: 9083:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

8634: 8600: 8421: 8404: 8253: 8238: 8129: 8092:

has been an accepted redirect to her name and thus to her web page since

8085: 8035: 8018: 7871: 7620:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

7319: 7299: 7228: 7206: 7087: 7064: 7010: 6633: 6296: 6088: 6067: 5935: 5498: 4814: 4798: 4717: 4696: 4677: 4660: 4643: 4598: 4590: 4573: 4464: 3791: 3775: 3161: 3144: 2926: 2922: 2914: 2235: 2046:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1763: 1728: 1690: 1401: 862:

When that attempt fails, try another deletion debate at another article.

573: 536: 492: 461: 410:. (I don't think the article was really suitable for user space, either; 11139:- You can ask for it to be provided to you by email or in user space at 8132:: as an uninvolved editor I have copyedited the page to comply with our 7239:

It is your responsibility to not post promotional material to begin with

4209:

Yup that confirms if you move a draft you and the creator get notified.

9645: 7582: 7565: 7547: 7533: 7113: 7101: 6304:. I don't think that the draft will be accepted. I won't accept it. 5874: 5790: 4059: 4015: 4006:

which caused the article to go back into NPR. What are your thoughts?

2483:

adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

1737: 1710: 1236:

and I seem to have amicably resolved all issues, per their comments at

962: 11454:

Hello Robert McClenon, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

9160:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

8637:? No, I do not provide advice to editors whose pages were deleted as 8140:. If this does end up at ANI, I will second a reasonable request for 7894:

Hello Robert McClenon, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

7659:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

6945:

Dear Mr. McClenon, please read my reaction to your decision to put my

5938:

page, I think it's notable enough. I'll add to it as time progresses.

4641:

Don't bother with AfD. That's a clear candidate for speedy deletion. —

3764: 3436:

http://www.luminaenergy.co.uk/when-life-gives-you-lemons-make-lemonade

3307:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

2426:

Hello Robert McClenon, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

2081:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1900:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1182:

As Robert noted, already, above, best place now is article talk page.

12017: 11966: 11706: 11688: 11675: 11654: 11641: 11617: 11600: 11584: 10486:

support, and those who gave me well-meaning advice for meaning well.

10428: 10139:(I'm also pinging those that replied on the RFA so they can see this 9030: 8060: 8052: 7105: 7007: 3471:

https://www.mca.org.uk/news/updates/consultants-you-are-what-you-wear

617: 9312:. You might be able to get the page restored to your user space at 7170:

The company has earned good review from their customers even from me

5345:. Please be sure that the draft is not neutral and does not try to 3426:

https://www.resourcepro.com/2016/03/24/value-fun-office-environment/

3066:. Some editors there are more tolerant of paid editors than I am. 2277:

you mentioned that you could possibly help in formulating a neutral

1740:- The question that I have is whether the roadshow itself, that is, 10745: 10724: 10702: 10648: 10390: 10264: 7652:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 4614: 4557: 4556:

I don't think it's worth the effort, unless the problem escalates.

4148: 3511:

http://wishtv.com/2016/10/25/lids-headquarters-opens-in-zionsville/

2753: 2650: 2102: 733:

I've done significant research to improve the article, Whataboutism

565: 550: 488: 475: 434: 11298:

describes that company should be discussed on its talk page or at

9395:

Hello, Robert McClenon. Please check your email; you've got mail!

9239:. If you think that the deletion was wrong, you may appeal it at 7581:, thanks for your help moderating this dispute. I appreciate it. 3863:. I can't comment further on your draft because it was deleted. 3182:

17:15:43, 17 July 2017 review of submission by Skellingslighthouse

1422:

NAC:Any further input should be either by editing the draft or at

8757:

22:40:26, 28 August 2017 review of submission by Careyjamesbalboa

8226: 6659:- Thanks. It was a promotional stub and it needed redirecting. 5300: 5046:- Discuss that with the deleting administrator, or discuss it at 3608:

speedy deletion because it had already been discussed and deleted

844:

made, to try to disappear the entire wiki article on the subject

658: 8712:

over trying to force-fit G11, and the admin might decline G11.

8641:

on how to improve them. You could try building the article via

7233:

Please read my post again -- most of the sources you found were

4195:- Twinkle strikes again. It wasn't my draft; I only moved it. 3304:, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. 1515:

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8PDU3Y4AAAAJ&hl=en

1063:

when you want an article kept would be considered disruptive or

865:

When that attempt fails, try a deletion review at that article.

533:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Madware (2nd nomination)

27:

Re: warning that article might be deleted due to lack of content

12002:

Have a good at dealing with a situation even while in a dispute

11289: 11282: 10828: 10519:

technicality over common sense can have negative implications (

9113:

http://www.universipop.org/resourcepersons/waldabahstewart.html

7109: 7018: 4613:. Stop editing disruptively while logged out. Administrator 3998:

and my initial reaction is to revert (undo) the removal of the

2917:, such as with chart figures, sales figures, or reviews. Read 1297:

NAC:It appears that the submitter is working for the subject.

243: 240: 239:

for their knowledge. We are inspired from existing articles as

11324: 9316:, but they will not always restore pages that were deleted as 6182:

the creation of the article." Yes. Use article talk pages.

4175:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.

3822:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Color_change_vehicle_vinyl_wrap

3501:

http://www.auxil.co.uk/blog/53-employees-just-want-to-have-fun

3496:

http://www.mojoactive.co.uk/blog/2017/01/shaking-off-sick-days

1395:

notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with

1002:. It is not the right place to discuss an article that is at 12096:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.

11740:. I am also a new pages patrol editor. I also left a similar 10905: 9494:- You can't understand it because I haven't yet written it. 8986:

Sorry for the delay. I have transcluded just now. Good luck!

8479: 7462:. Please add your thoughts there. It is not a debate or RfC. 5299:

You wrote that my article that I am trying to get published (

4606: 4594: 1696:

Confusing - there's a redirect from his mainspace article to

1042:- If you didn't know that the article was being discussed at 603:

fair and it helps to keep Knowledge organized. Thank you! //

10284:

that might chill one's spine. But as I said, they were all

9141:

verify that externally by one of the processes explained at

7015:

List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States

4866:

I note that a few days ago you closed the DRN regarding the

4508:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Maglioladitis 2/Workshop

4500:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Maglioladitis 2/Evidence

3954:. I have explained very briefly what I see as the issues. 3880:

is still in draft space. You may ask for comments on it at

3756: 2872:

about the upcoming trial and you may wish to comment there.

1211:, but content disputes should go to the article talk page. 8633:, I will ask it as a real question. Are you being paid by 6870:- If you want a deleted page restored, you need to ask for 4995:

Talk:Film censorship in China#RfC about the runtime columns

4572:

Sir remove this tag. He is famous in Bihar state of India.

4347::User:Jorge Stolfi/Scratch/Hexahydroxy-2,3-naphthalenedione 3481:

http://smallbusiness.co.uk/monitoring-productivity-2533881/

12015:. If you can help out, we would greatly appreciate it. -- 8424:- I personally think that if it was published, that isn't 7966:, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with 7854:

be "bitey". I will take your advice into consideration.

6572:

please help with this, read the comment on the afd first.

6322:

17:20:18, 10 August 2017 review of submission by Ealdahdah

4353:

User:Jorge Stolfi/Scratch/Hexahydroxy-2,3-naphthalenedione

4050:? I'm starting to see more of these lists in NPR, such as 3326:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 2160:

18:34:02, 11 July 2017 review of submission by Cinemasianx

1919:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 1415:

14:37:23, 7 July 2017 review of submission by Jonloliverru

11034:

Hi, is the page completely gone now? Where do I edit it?

9022:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arthur Rubin/Workshop

9014:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arthur Rubin/Evidence

7934: 7815:, but occasionally I have to take a break. Best regards, 4997:

related the DRN - well one of them anyway. Best regards.

2971:

05:00:46, 17 July 2017 review of submission by Goziextech

12063: 11674:

Did you use an interaction tool to find the exchange? --

11052:

Sometimes the best answer in cases like these is simply

10987:

in making it neutral. Please ask for further advice at

9971:

Hi Robert, I'd like to say that I'm in concurrence with

8629:- Since you haven't answered the rhetorical question by 8059:, which is her name with an honorific, as a redirect to 5178:

Disputes - when other party won't negotiate/collaborate?

4233:

Hi Robert, hope you are well. Just want to follow up on

3598:- My user talk page is not the place to discuss whether 3381:

http://www.personneltoday.com/hr/work-play-todays-teams/

11047:

loses their work and the person who has to clean it up.

8696:- This one is problematic. I see that I tagged it for 8486: 7963: 5807:

12:53:59, 5 August 2017 review of submission by MissusK

5215:

Email reply, please, not talkpage, if you do not mind.

47:

Sorry I am new To Knowledge, Please help, thanks Robert

10119:

I wish you all the best with your RFA and here aswell,

9911:

Internet for the right to do a largely thankless task.

9020:

You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,

7928: 6850:

Please do return my page I will add references please

6677:

Request on 07:38:28, 15 August 2017 for assistance on

6279:- I asked you to request a review by other editors at 5235:

08:12:05, 2 August 2017 review of submission by Nguo17

4506:

You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,

3602:

is an appropriate Knowledge article. I tagged it for

957:

Robert, as to the issue of original contention at the

810:

Article after research and expansion efforts, so far:

793:

I've done significant research to improve the article

681:

Unrelated note to above, but I wanted to let you know

9149:

for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at

8051:. However, I think that you will still be told that 6287:. It doesn't include what independent (third-party) 6246: 5639:

Request on 02:19:54, 3 August 2017 for assistance on

5451:

Stop approving machine translations from monolinguals

4080:

A new list came up, and I nominated it for AFD. See

3765:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dates_in_Wikipedia

1792:

because it was obviously a copy-paste page move from

880:

Both articles are independently notable, as noted by

125:. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see 10934: 10924: 10482:editors in general to spread themselves too thin. 6113:. If you need help in finding one, ask for help at 5984:- First, I've tried to take care of the spelling of 5182:Please suggest what I can do about the following: 3368:

Speedy Deletion of BrightHR - grounds for notability

1389:

Please don't accuse me of doing something I didn't:

12161:

Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions

10819:Thank you so much for your reply it was so helpful 4756:

Yes, I know, I bet they don't. Thank you anyways --

4496:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Maglioladitis 2

4351:Hi, sorry for the confusion. I had meant to create 1593:

22:12:43, 7 July 2017 review of submission by Adzie

10444:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Robert McClenon 2 10315:Agree. Looking forward to your statement, Robert! 7098:I have added references from reliable sources only 5546:English in articles. For example, I'm fine with: 4463:It's probably better to ping ANI regulars such as 171:, where some of the editors are willing to help. 11520:On 14 September 2017 the English Knowledge began 10550:Don't think anybody could've said it better, R. M 10327:he speaks the truth and provides good takeaways. 5530:German translation which contained errors of fact 3650:? If so, you must declare it in accordance with 12152: 12115:- Twinkle strikes again. It's not my nothing. 11635:I see that there was a brief exchange a week ago 9107:, because the page appears to be an unambiguous 9010:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arthur Rubin 8067:(but are likely to be overruled), or may ask at 7494:in which you had been involved has been declined 7159:I don't know how to write non-advertise contents 6564:List of Listed Buildings in Cornwall (New Pages) 5542:I actually have no problem with relatively poor 5301:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Klook_Travel_(2)) 3573:with BrightHR and the topics they are covering. 1545:has asked you to provide your input, you have a 514:00:28, 2 July 2017 (diff | hist) . . (0)‎ . . m 9105:section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion 7800:Knowledge:Village_pump_(policy)#Comment_on_BITE 4301:Then what would be our other recourse? thanks. 3466:http://www.smeweb.com/2016/07/21/pays-fun-work/ 2331:. That saved me some time - thanks :-) Cheers. 2068:section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion 11555:If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go 11395:That is indeed what I did, so you're welcome! 11328:Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a 9024:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 7987:If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go 7642:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 4510:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 4431:with his 7,568 non-admin edits there. Cheers. 3769:I do not understand the significance of this. 3441:http://www.wearepes.co.uk/value-fun-workplace/ 2842:- It appears that an administrator just did a 2511:If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go 2463:Knowledge:Page Curation/Suggested improvements 1887:section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 622:Why is there a signature on top of your page? 32:Any further problems, please advise. Regards, 9883:without doubt, a net positive for the project 9111:. This page appears to be a direct copy from 5549:''Some ref here about the sun.''</ref: --> 5327:Do you have a connection with Klook Travel? 4540:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nitin Chandra 11143:. However, if the company does not satisfy 8823:hello, I think we have fixed it. thank you. 4977:the dispute resolution noticeboard talk page 3416:http://prmomentawards.com/2016-winners-north 3386:https://workingwellsolutions.com/office-fun/ 777:Thank you for your interest in the article, 7750:. Apparently the spammer likes to shout. 6941:Media on Ram Bahadur Bomjon's controversies 3757:https://en.wikipedia.org/Dates_in_Wikipedia 1891:Knowledge is not a free web hosting service 9879:thoughtful, considerate, and knowledgeable 9026:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 8199:The following discussion has been closed. 7460:Conflict of Interest - of a different kind 7165:for why that is a very, very bad argument. 6994:The following discussion has been closed. 5565:The danger of machine translation is that 4512:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 2301:- Do you want mediation, or do you want a 1897:, such pages may be deleted at any time. 11893:of the content if it meets requirements. 11843:of the content if it meets requirements. 11546:Knowledge talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers 9943:regardless of their own personal feelings 9147:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission 8889:Hi Robert, that was excellent decision. 7978:Knowledge talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers 7326:and make the appropriate disclosure. As 5431:, that I was at liberty to end this RfC. 2570: 2498:Knowledge talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers 2123:, not in educated, somewhat overly wordy 11523:the autoconfirmed article creation trial 9263:How can I get the page reinstated now? 9143:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials 7298:Sir, it really hurts. Thanks very much-- 6518:please help me restore it to develop it 4052:List_of_Miles_from_Tomorrowland_episodes 4032:Other than that, what is the question? 3772:What is the difference between the two? 3722:or to have the deletion reconsidered at 840:Please also note, similar attempts were 788:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 524:Knowledge:Draft/Madware (2nd nomination) 516:Knowledge:Draft/Madware (2nd nomination) 246:If they Exist then why not Akhar 2016? 9953:, when you feel you are ready. Regards 9891:Has a clue. Is an adult. Is not a jerk' 9085:the guide to writing your first article 8281:Also, when did I ever say who is Hai? 7622:the guide to writing your first article 5956:Penguincw 04:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC) 4847:regarding your notability tag? Thanks. 4843:Could you please look at my comment on 4355:but inadvertently omitted the ":User". 3816:Draft:Color change vehicle vinyl wrap ‎ 2609:submitted the following nomination for 2048:the guide to writing your first article 1796:, which itself was a botched move from 1059:, you can oppose that, but starting an 14: 12153: 11990:In good standing with no recent blocks 11986:Identified to the Wikimedia Foundation 11744:request on NewYorkActuary's talk page 8225:I wonder if you can change the title " 7130:Society of Ticket Agents and Retailers 4377:Can you please check this page again? 4120:User:Y~ruwiki/TEM (nuclear propulsion) 2502:Knowledge:New pages patrol/Noticeboard 11879:. I just wanted to let you know that 11829:. I just wanted to let you know that 11470:The new page backlog is currently at 9741:I mean that. It's not just a gesture. 9237:the rule against promotional articles 8447:Knowledge:Don't template the regulars 8136:. The dispute has been resolved and 7910:The new page backlog is currently at 7654:what is generally accepted as notable 5941:However, the other 2 pages, meh. The 2442:The new page backlog is currently at 2378:not here to maintain the encyclopedia 1957:Lol Twinkle does same strange things 331:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 284:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 11936:The New Page Reviewer's Silver Award 11705:No problem. Thanks for your help. -- 11343:Knowledge talk:Articles for deletion 11169:I have unreviewed a page you curated 10939:With a red link (no page existing). 9399: 9153:for more details, or ask a question 8318:I have unreviewed a page you curated 7952:autoconfirmed article creation trial 6422:Mobile Application Usage in Tanzania 6416:Mobile Application Usage in Tanzania 6247:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:BIRAD 2689:for the week beginning July 16, 2017 1443:The following discussion is closed. 1314:The following discussion is closed. 1065:disrupting Knowledge to make a point 944:The following discussion is closed. 765:The following discussion is closed. 740:Discussion that should be either at 102: 11993:Understand and being able to apply 11044:editors with a conflict of interest 10935:https://en.wikipedia.org/Starfinder 10925:https://en.wikipedia.org/Syrinscape 9233:the corporate notability guidelines 9171:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 9090:You may want to consider using the 7670:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 7627:You may want to consider using the 5670:User:Xihuliu/sandbox/the Fahai Lama 5573:leaving the factual errors in place 5022:My articles sppedy deletion request 3318:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 2092:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 2053:You may want to consider using the 1911:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 961:, please note I myself removed the 412:Knowledge is not a personal website 23: 12035: 11455: 11058:here only for promotional purposes 9895:clearly a huge help to the project 9388: 9073: 8007:RE: Dispute resolution noticeboard 7895: 7610: 6486:Arbitration Committee's procedures 6293:the dispute resolution noticeboard 4893:the dispute resolution noticeboard 4124: 3996:List of Chibi Maruko-chan episodes 3280: 2596:Knowledge Editor Retention Project 2427: 2036: 1873: 1004:the dispute resolution noticeboard 203:Micronation - Republic of West Who 24: 12172: 11999:Have worked with new contributors 11062:not here to build an encyclopedia 9028:. For the Arbitration Committee, 7498:Dear Robert McClenon/Archive 18, 4553:, but I'm not sure I would do it. 4514:. For the Arbitration Committee, 2996:Draft:Goziex Technologies Limited 2376:Yes, and performance artists are 1046:, then you cannot be faulted for 969:and noted it on the talk page at 959:WP:Dispute resolution noticeboard 923:NAC:Further discussion can be at 803:State before my research efforts 12013:feel free to ask at the talkpage 11974:the following description, then 11925: 11323: 10505: 10411: 9620:A turtle in a school of baitfish 9612: 8854: 6216:. I have no COI that I know of. 5737: 5401:did that, and I rebuked him for 5126:I found a link that might help. 5104:Talk:White House Press Secretary 5091:Talk:White House Press Secretary 4549:I don't see why it shouldn't be 3610:. You are entitled to remove a 3207:User:Skellingslighthouse/sandbox 2649: 2640: 2631: 2627: 2571: 1762: 1584:The discussion above is closed. 1376:The discussion above is closed. 1281:The discussion above is closed. 1061:Articles for Deletion discussion 912:The discussion above is closed. 657: 276:A colleague of mine has created 106: 12111:03:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC) 11428:is asking for participation in 11149:the conflict of interest policy 9583:is asking for participation in 9531:- Is it a little clearer now? 8867:or I will try to answer them. 8522:) 21:07, 267 August 2017 (UTC) 8393:Probabilistic Innovation Theory 7324:the conflict of interest policy 7011:List of new religious movements 6949:among candidates for deletion 6824:is asking for participation in 5525:page showing 330 "translations" 5425:the RfC concerning this dispute 5100:is asking for participation in 4617:has already blocked you once. 4609:is not always considered to be 4597:, provide that case. However, 4545:In answer to your questions... 3902:What was wrong with the article 3652:the conflict of interest policy 2868:You will be very interested in 2724:Thanks again for your efforts! 2542:is asking for participation in 2400:Deletion of CNS Control article 12146:03:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC) 12125:03:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC) 12024:05:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC) 11953:02:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC) 11913:21:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC) 11903:Thank you for your attention. 11863:21:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC) 11853:Thank you for your attention. 11806:05:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 11791:03:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 11777:03:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 11757:03:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 11715:15:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 11701:15:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 11684:15:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 11667:01:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 11650:00:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 11630:00:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC) 11613:23:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC) 11593:23:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC) 11568:02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) 11445:04:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 11407:02:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 11391:02:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 11374:01:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 11357:01:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 11314:10:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC) 11273:04:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC) 11255:03:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC) 11231:01:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 11215:00:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC) 11195:19:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC) 11161:20:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC) 11128:19:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC) 11102:22:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC) 11086:17:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC) 11029:06:01, 12 September 2017 (UTC) 11001:05:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC) 10972:05:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC) 6609:This has been dealt with now. 6062:- First, have you looked into 3753:I do not know why my article: 3646:Do you have a connection with 786:Thank you for your efforts at 664: 624: 518:‎ (Robert McClenon moved page 13: 1: 12006:The full list of requirements 11549:and add it to your watchlist. 11533:a newly designed landing page 11054:go write about something else 10942:So we began creating a page. 10933:Syrinscape was mentioned on: 10918:12:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC) 10902:List of most popular websites 10893:00:20, 9 September 2017 (UTC) 10873:18:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC) 10812:19:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC) 10792:04:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC) 10778:03:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC) 10754:08:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC) 10740:07:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC) 10711:07:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC) 10695:03:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC) 10657:18:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC) 10627:20:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC) 10605:20:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC) 10586:14:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC) 10542:05:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC) 10498:02:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC) 10435:02:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC) 10399:21:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10379:03:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC) 10350:23:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10343:18:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10322:16:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10307:15:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10273:03:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC) 10258:20:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10249:15:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10233:15:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10218:11:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10197:05:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10169:05:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC) 10135:20:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC) 10095:10:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC) 10071:20:33, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 10045:18:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 10012:15:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9993:14:33, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9966:12:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9925:03:20, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9861:02:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9844:01:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9822:00:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9802:21:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9765:01:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9737:00:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9718:21:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9697:00:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9678:21:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9658:00:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9630:19:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9600:04:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9556:06:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9545:Yes. Thanks and best always. 9541:00:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 9523:18:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9504:15:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9487:03:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9471:03:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 9453:03:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 8071:, or may create a redirect. 7981:and add it to your watchlist. 7744:User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 7721:any confusion?! Take care! — 7704:User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 7149:plain and simple. In short, 6514:) 07:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC) 6212:. Please take this matter to 4993:RM. Please note that this is 1798:User:Autoctono~enwiki/sandbox 11450:New Page Reviewer Newsletter 11430:this request for comment on 10525:Knowledge:Your first article 9585:this request for comment on 9527:] - Yes, typo. Thank you. 9404:at any time by removing the 9196:London Duck Tours (Woo-hoo!) 9151:Knowledge's copyright policy 9094:to help you create articles. 8698:deletion as an unsourced BLP 8258:good luck, you'll need it. 7890:New Page Reviewer Newsletter 7794:A particular kind of burnout 7650:criteria for speedy deletion 7631:to help you create articles. 7094:I found sources are reliable 6846:Kashmira Kulkarni deletation 6826:this request for comment on 6628:Just a friendly heads up on 5102:this request for comment on 4388:) 02:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 3302:criteria for speedy deletion 2544:this request for comment on 2475:User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js 2422:New Page Reviewer Newsletter 2232:biography of a living person 2064:Draft:Pt Angad Prasad Tiwari 2057:to help you create articles. 2032:Draft:Pt Angad Prasad Tiwari 1895:criteria for speedy deletion 847:And you are lynching Negroes 145:) has been paid by Shinesty. 7: 12031:User:Johnnyelephant/sandbox 11579:Thanks for you comments at 11203:User:InsertCleverPhraseHere 10121:Thanks and Happy editing, – 9668:Well said Atsme. Cosigned. 9432:20:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC) 9379:02:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC) 9353:22:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 9330:19:11, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 9298:18:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 9283:18:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 9253:16:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 9220:15:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 9191:15:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 9059:15:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 9044:Alexandra Laignel-Lavastine 9039:05:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 8993:23:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 8982:16:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 8969:04:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 8954:02:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 8943:20:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC) 8923:19:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC) 8899:16:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC) 8877:10:34, 29 August 2017 (UTC) 8842:10:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC) 8747:17:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC) 8722:17:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC) 8686:14:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC) 8659:16:40, 28 August 2017 (UTC) 8617:10:43, 28 August 2017 (UTC) 8591:Coates Hire speedy deletion 8586:06:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC) 8565:01:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC) 8541:23:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 8511:21:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 8493:19:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 8466:05:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 8438:01:30, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 8414:17:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC) 8382:01:46, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 8365:01:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 8345:15:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC) 8300:10:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC) 8277:10:40, 31 August 2017 (UTC) 8247:10:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC) 8193:14:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC) 8163:14:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC) 8118:16:32, 25 August 2017 (UTC) 8100:further attempts to insist 8081:14:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC) 8027:12:48, 25 August 2017 (UTC) 8000:20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) 7885:14:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC) 7864:18:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7831:14:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7782:14:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7760:14:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7739:14:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7716:14:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7696:10:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7591:06:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 7574:18:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7560:08:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7542:06:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC) 7518:16:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 7483:13:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC) 7446:06:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC) 7426:05:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC) 7393:00:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 7355:18:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 7340:18:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 7314:17:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 7294:17:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 7267:16:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 7221:16:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 7192:16:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 7079:16:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 7008:Electric car use by country 6988:21:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 6935:11:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 6907:15:22, 16 August 2017 (UTC) 6892:15:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC) 6860:14:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC) 6841:04:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC) 6808:07:38, 15 August 2017 (UTC) 6794:07:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC) 6766:19:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC) 6669:04:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC) 6649:03:40, 15 August 2017 (UTC) 6619:15:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC) 6602:15:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC) 6582:14:14, 13 August 2017 (UTC) 6556:13:47, 13 August 2017 (UTC) 6540:the autobiography guideline 6528:07:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC) 6501:21:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC) 6463:04:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 6443:04:44, 11 August 2017 (UTC) 6408:18:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 6314:17:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 6268:07:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 5441:11:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC) 5137:) 17:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 4891:- If you file a dispute at 4136:draft article submission, " 3910:in a neutral boring way?. 3606:, and then I tagged it for 2481:User:The Earwig/copyvios.js 2076:Knowledge:FAQ/Organizations 228:03:47, 19 August 2017 (UTC) 62:17:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC) 42:03:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC) 10: 12177: 11971:account creation interface 11881:Draft:Marco Antonio Zapata 11869:Draft:Marco Antonio Zapata 11334:List of fictional athletes 11281:Speedy deletion declined: 10908:, which US does not use -- 10733:will be kind of offering? 10516:fifth most popular website 9875:Great editor and very fair 8498:Hey, Hey, It's The Monkees 8237:, thanks for the info. -- 7475:MediaWiki message delivery 6872:at Requests for Undeletion 6226:20:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 6192:18:27, 7 August 2017 (UTC) 6168:16:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC) 6150:13:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC) 6127:04:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC) 6102:22:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC) 6051:20:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC) 6020:06:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC) 5919:19:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC) 5887:12:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC) 5802:14:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC) 5769:Speedy deletion declined: 5761:13:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC) 5718:02:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC) 5631:01:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC) 5515:22:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 5489:10:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 5419:22:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 5387:10:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 5359:22:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 5337:22:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 5323:22:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 5230:02:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 5192:William Nevin Tatlow Hurst 4790:Speedy deletion F. A. Mann 3820:May I request feedback on 3091:Hawaiian Chocolate Factory 3084:Hawaiian Chocolate Factory 2801:List of C program examples 2791:and how-to manual articles 2185:Draft:Christian James Hand 1883:User:Ptangadprasad/sandbox 1869:User:Ptangadprasad/sandbox 1549:that should be declared. 394:Moving pages to user space 75:05:35, 08 September 2017 11931: 11924: 11042:. One of the big reasons 10615:do not bite the newcomers 10455:not to bite the newcomers 10410: 9899:experience in bucketloads 9611: 9119:, but not as a source of 9099:A tag has been placed on 7964:Earwig's Copyvio Detector 7636:A tag has been placed on 7454:COI - of a different kind 7163:WP:Competence is required 6774:Re-review of Cassantec AG 6681:submission by Daninguyen0 5778:Kenny Wayne Hollingsworth 5771:Kenny Wayne Hollingsworth 5736: 5172:22:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 5150:17:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 5117:04:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 5081:14:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 5064:04:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 5036:02:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 5006:04:37, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 4989:03:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 4966:03:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 4951:03:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 4934:14:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC) 4920:13:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC) 4905:05:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 4881:05:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 4857:22:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC) 4831:03:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC) 4807:23:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 4784:08:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 4766:08:12, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 4752:23:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC) 4732:09:15, 25 July 2017 (UTC) 4706:18:46, 25 July 2017 (UTC) 4690:04:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC) 4673:03:42, 25 July 2017 (UTC) 4653:23:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC) 4627:16:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC) 4582:15:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC) 4566:07:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC) 4534:17:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 4481:15:44, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 4459:15:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 4441:15:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 4414:20:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC) 4368:16:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC) 4333:18:27, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 4311:15:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 4297:14:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 4280:17:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC) 4266:23:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 4248:21:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 4219:02:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC) 4205:18:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 4185:12:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 4113:23:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 4094:23:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 4076:22:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 4055:19:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 4042:19:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 4028:19:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 4008:18:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 3982:13:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 3968:The draft in question is 3964:13:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 3930:05:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 3894:14:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 3873:13:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 3844:06:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 3808:21:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3784:19:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3736:14:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3707:14:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3685:14:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3664:12:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3636:12:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3588:12:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3360:09:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3340:09:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 3288:A tag has been placed on 3266:17:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 3174:16:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 3154:16:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 3076:05:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 3048:05:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 2943:16:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC) 2899:10:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC) 2882:02:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC) 2856:17:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC) 2832:16:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC) 2818:16:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC) 2782:15:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 2762:02:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 2748:18:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC) 2734:14:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC) 2709:being polite and patient 2577: 2559:04:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC) 2525:03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC) 2417:11:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 2390:10:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 2372:02:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 2358:02:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 2340:02:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 2315:21:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2291:13:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2275:OnePlus OnePlus talk page 2261:00:08, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2154:17:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 2137:17:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 2112:16:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 2062:A tag has been placed on 2019:16:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 2007:User:El cid, el campeador 2002:15:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 1988:15:49, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 1975:Deletion Notice retracted 1967:15:53, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 1953:14:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 1933:12:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 1881:A tag has been placed on 1859:18:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 1833:02:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 1813:02:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 1768:01:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 1754:00:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 266:10:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 198:03:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 181:18:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 18:User talk:Robert McClenon 11432:Talk:Sex characteristics 11426:feedback request service 11419:Talk:Sex characteristics 11107:Deletion of APEK digital 9581:feedback request service 9125:say it in your own words 9123:. This part is crucial: 8202:Please do not modify it. 8108:and request sanctions. 8090:Supreme Master Ching Hai 8057:Supreme Master Ching Hai 7376:Hello, I have deprodded 7139:Escapism Travel Magazine 6997:Please do not modify it. 6822:feedback request service 5098:feedback request service 4138:TEM (nuclear propulsion) 3878:Draft:Vehicle vinyl wrap 2962:8:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 2923:the verifiability policy 2766:Thanks for all you do. ― 2540:feedback request service 2496:Following discussion at 1794:Autoctono~enwiki/sandbox 1733:23:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 1723:22:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 1703:09:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 1682:02:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1586:Please do not modify it. 1577:14:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1559:14:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1541:- If the subject of the 1531:14:37, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1445:Please do not modify it. 1436:14:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1410:02:23, 6 July 2017 (UTC) 1378:Please do not modify it. 1369:22:40, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 1340:17:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 1316:Please do not modify it. 1307:14:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1283:Please do not modify it. 1254:00:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1221:00:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1192:23:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC) 1178:21:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC) 1131:22:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 1109:21:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 1092:21:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 1077:21:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 1035:18:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 1020:18:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 989:16:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 946:Please do not modify it. 937:00:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 914:Please do not modify it. 908:16:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 767:Please do not modify it. 758:18:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 725:18:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC) 704:17:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC) 671:19:21, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 651:16:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 631:13:32, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 613:11:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 586:16:19, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 559:12:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 545:08:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 501:08:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 484:07:48, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 470:07:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 443:07:32, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 424:06:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 386:21:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 366:21:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 341:22:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 324:21:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 294:19:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 11141:Requests for Undeletion 10729:Hello, isn't that what 9314:Requests for Undeletion 8603:, and nominated it for 7135:Daily Record (Scotland) 6778:Hello Robert McClenon, 5568:it gets the facts wrong 5459:created by users using 5122:John Barrett (Criminal) 5050:, or ask for advice at 4839:Alvin Valley notability 3945:policy and quotes what 3720:Requests for Undeletion 2805:Adding two numbers in C 2797:Printing a message in C 2659:A Guide for how to edit 2078:for more information. 1997:‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador 1983:‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador 1473:Draft:Brent David Ruben 1353:Draft:Brent David Ruben 830:WP:No original research 161:User:Austin at Shinesty 12040: 11514:General project update 11460: 11189:InsertCleverPhraseHere 10419:The Resilient Barnstar 9725:User:Timothyjosephwood 9393: 9162:contest the nomination 9109:copyright infringement 9096: 9078: 8694:User:Timothyjosephwood 8353:User:Timothyjosephwood 7943:General project update 7900: 7675:deleting administrator 7661:contest the nomination 7633: 7615: 7380:because I interpreted 6347:User:Ealdahdah/sandbox 5503:named inhabited places 5455:Please stop accepting 5260:Draft:Klook Travel (2) 4129: 4108:to share his response. 3994:Ok, so I'm looking at 3323:deleting administrator 3309:contest the nomination 3298: 3285: 2795:Thank you for PRODing 2490:General project update 2432: 2119:That one is in broken 2097:deleting administrator 2083:contest the nomination 2072:the guidelines on spam 2059: 2041: 1916:deleting administrator 1902:contest the nomination 1878: 774:Dear Robert McClenon, 685:was both G11 and G12. 278:Draft:American Tianxia 12045:Articles for Creation 12039: 11459: 9784:it's nothing personal 9392: 9081: 9077: 8710:Articles for Deletion 8643:Articles for Creation 8042:. You may publish a 7899: 7618: 7614: 7503:arbitration committee 7019:List of Hi-5 episodes 6064:Articles for Creation 5993:notable according to 5745:The Original Barnstar 5643:submission by Xihuliu 5554:the facts are correct 5457:articles for creation 5367:Peacock Alley dispute 4593:- If he is famous in 4229:After you inferred... 4134:Articles for Creation 4128: 4064:Articles for Deletion 3943:neutral point of view 3294: 3284: 2927:the notability policy 2864:About the NPP backlog 2431: 2044: 2040: 1877: 1618:Draft:Hussain Manawer 1391:Please do not remove 1057:Articles for Deletion 1000:Articles for Creation 12029:Your draft article, 11575:Help desk discussion 11479:Currently there are 11241:Deletion of question 11145:corporate notability 10981:User:Benjamin Loomes 10952:Thanks in advance! 9437:Love and all that... 9131:blocked from editing 8958:I have finished the 8597:User:Robert McClenon 8454:Manhattan Industries 8223:User:Robert McClenon 8044:Request for Comments 7579:User:Robert McClenon 6482:guide to arbitration 6285:corporate notability 5832:User:MissusK/sandbox 5407:Request for Comments 5349:the travel agency. 4601:in one state of the 4118:Your draft article, 3060:conflict of interest 2907:User:Land and travel 2887:Speedy deletion for 2625:{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}} 2380:and need blocking. 2303:Request for Comments 2269:Request for comments 1742:Visual Collaborative 1698:Visual Collaborative 1547:conflict of interest 1053:Request for Comments 304:conflict of interest 234:For Your Information 115:Wikimedia Foundation 99:All Help Appreciated 12065:edit the submission 12051:page you started, " 11995:the username policy 11831:Draft:Kashi Utkarsh 11819:Draft:Kashi Utkarsh 11330:deletion discussion 11245:Why was it deleted? 10833:Yandex Data Factory 10404:A barnstar for you! 9917:Boing! said Zebedee 9358:apology and thanks. 7839:User:TransporterMan 7813:do it one more time 6277:User:Merav burstein 5995:baseball notability 5730:A barnstar for you! 5461:machine translation 5069:User:GolfingIreland 5044:User:GolfingIreland 4150:edit the submission 3712:User:Cosmicsqueaker 3695:User:Cosmicsqueaker 3596:User:Cosmicsqueaker 3258:Skellingslighthouse 3188:Skellingslighthouse 2716:Submit a nomination 1788:I speedily deleted 1761:barbeque you know. 713:User:SwisterTwister 474:Presumably a sock? 12041: 11733:Looking for advice 11461: 11417:Please comment on 10823:Yandex.Peoples map 9572:Please comment on 9508:Actually, I think 9401:remove this notice 9394: 9101:Dr.Waldaba Stewart 9079: 9069:Dr.Waldaba Stewart 8324:Mulla koya thangal 7901: 7851:right great wrongs 7638:ADEYEMI ADERINSOLA 7616: 7606:ADEYEMI ADERINSOLA 7523:Dispute resolution 7253:sources (the only 6813:Please comment on 6708:Draft:Cassantec AG 6590:User:Aguyintobooks 5597:ContentTranslation 5580:Hidden translation 5156:User:Matt Campbell 5139:User:Matt Campbell 5089:Please comment on 4611:general notability 4130: 3941:- Knowledge has a 3286: 2919:Your first article 2911:musical notability 2789:User:Nikunj3121994 2683:Editor of the Week 2611:Editor of the Week 2589:Editor of the Week 2581:Editor of the Week 2564:Editor of the Week 2531:Please comment on 2433: 2299:User:D.Novosibirsk 2244:general notability 2240:musical notability 2042: 1879: 1446: 1317: 1055:. If there is an 947: 768: 458:User:Bishubaswal16 404:User:Arpit Malviya 133:Austin_at_Shinesty 12141: 12107: 11981:Ideal users are: 11958: 11957: 11570: 11494:Technology update 11247:Uncle dan is home 11191: 11031: 11015:comment added by 10974: 10958:comment added by 10718:talk page stalker 10584: 10570: 10440: 10439: 10377: 10341: 10309: 10304: 10246: 10216: 10152: 9988: 9849:User:Softlavender 9829:talk page stalker 9685:User:Innisfree987 9636: 9635: 9587:Talk:Jared Taylor 9574:Talk:Jared Taylor 9554: 9485: 9451: 9285: 9269:comment added by 9222: 9206:comment added by 9166:visiting the page 8850:User:JaneWatson88 8708:, I would prefer 8315: 8314: 8142:general sanctions 8125:talk page stalker 8002: 7921:Technology update 7665:visiting the page 7646:credibly indicate 7501:On behalf of the 7485: 7424: 7423: 7316: 7223: 7120:do not establish 7112:, Reviews.co.uk, 7081: 7045: 7044: 7040: 7027:comment added by 6972: 6959:comment added by 6937: 6921:comment added by 6536:User:Deweni Inima 6270: 6254:comment added by 6203:Debra_Neil-Fisher 6053: 6037:comment added by 5975: 5962:comment added by 5766: 5765: 4845:Talk:Alvin Valley 4379:Draft:Bryan Seely 4373:Draft:Bryan Seely 4004:Chibi Maruko-chan 3932: 3916:comment added by 3846: 3830:comment added by 3612:proposed deletion 3604:proposed deletion 3313:visiting the page 3296:capitalized title 2889:Breizh eo ma bro! 2752:Congratulations! 2722: 2721: 2604: 2603: 2593:(courtesy of the 2515: 2455:Technology update 2087:visiting the page 1906:visiting the page 1539:User:Jonloliverru 1444: 1397:WorkJam (Company) 1349:User:Jonloliverru 1315: 1290:Draft of BIO page 1197:User:DeadEyeSmile 1008:Talk:Whataboutism 945: 925:Talk:Whataboutism 766: 746:Talk:Whataboutism 454:User:Bishu baswal 429:Mukesh Kumar Bhoi 268: 252:comment added by 230: 214:comment added by 151: 150: 94: 81:comment added by 12168: 12140: 12137: 12133: 12113:User:Linguist111 12106: 12103: 12099: 12085: 12084: 12079: 12078: 12073: 12072: 12067: 12038: 12020: 11929: 11922: 11921: 11918:NPR Silver Award 11889:You may request 11839:You may request 11765:User:Steve Quinn 11554: 11404: 11371: 11354: 11327: 11228: 11187: 11175:CSP Incorporated 11081: 11080: 11077: 11074: 11010: 10953: 10857:Yandex.Translate 10764:Otsego county 26 10728: 10721: 10578: 10564: 10559: 10509: 10431: 10415: 10408: 10407: 10367: 10331: 10305: 10301: 10297: 10242: 10225:TheGracefulSlick 10206: 10194: 10192:Let's discuss it 10175:Wishing you well 10138: 10132: 10127: 10092: 10088: 10083: 10037: 9987: 9984: 9980: 9958: 9832: 9762: 9759: 9756: 9715: 9712: 9709: 9616: 9609: 9608: 9605:Some Wikilove... 9551: 9546: 9482: 9477: 9448: 9443: 9425: 9423: 9417: 9413: 9407: 9403: 9391: 9384:You've got mail! 9264: 9201: 9177: 9076: 9033: 8960:draft nomination 8862: 8858: 8857: 8827:Pascal Levensohn 8811: 8810: 8763:Careyjamesbalboa 8744: 8741: 8738: 8683: 8680: 8677: 8639:promotional spam 8490: 8483: 8379: 8376: 8373: 8342: 8339: 8336: 8297: 8295: 8290: 8287: 8274: 8272: 8267: 8264: 8257: 8204: 8172: 8171: 8160: 8158: 8153: 8150: 8128: 8096:. If there are 7986: 7969:this user script 7931: 7879: 7827: 7821: 7779: 7770: 7736: 7727: 7693: 7684: 7677: 7613: 7464: 7415: 7414: 7412: 7391: 7378:Project Peshawar 7371:Project Peshawar 7328:User:Ian.thomson 7307: 7281: 7280: 7232: 7214: 7091: 7072: 7022: 6999: 6975: 6974: 6954: 6916: 6876:reliable sources 6750:User:Daninguyen0 6737: 6736: 6657:User:Fabrictramp 6646: 6640: 6630:Dehydrated fruit 6624:Dehydrated fruit 6611:A Guy into Books 6574:A Guy into Books 6440: 6436: 6433: 6430: 6376: 6375: 6289:reliable sources 6249: 6032: 5957: 5861: 5860: 5798: 5793: 5741: 5734: 5733: 5699: 5698: 5610: 5604: 5584: 5578: 5550: 5532: 5474: 5468: 5289: 5288: 4973:User:EnigmaMcmxc 4889:User:EnigmaMcmxc 4740:User:Kostas20142 4529: 4520: 4321: 4164: 4163: 4158: 4157: 4152: 4127: 3970:Draft:Mark Soden 3947:reliable sources 3939:User:Sully198787 3911: 3853:User:Sean Andres 3825: 3325: 3283: 3236: 3235: 3132: 3114: 3025: 3024: 2956:Robert Mc CLenon 2844:Ignore All Rules 2779: 2774: 2653: 2644: 2635: 2628: 2600: 2597: 2575: 2568: 2567: 2546:Talk:Robert Gant 2533:Talk:Robert Gant 2510: 2228:User:Cinemasianx 2214: 2213: 2125:American English 2099: 2039: 1999: 1985: 1918: 1876: 1821:User:Fabrictramp 1810: 1804: 1766: 1647: 1646: 1502: 1501: 1385:False Accusation 1231: 1119: 701: 696: 668: 662: 661: 639:User:The garmine 628: 570:User:Mike Rosoft 374:User:Home Lander 337: 290: 247: 209: 110: 109: 103: 76: 12176: 12175: 12171: 12170: 12169: 12167: 12166: 12165: 12151: 12150: 12138: 12131: 12130:Whoops! Sorry. 12117:Robert McClenon 12104: 12097: 12082: 12081: 12076: 12075: 12070: 12069: 12068:and remove the 12036: 12034: 12018: 11976:please do apply 11963: 11961:ACC needs help! 11920: 11873: 11823: 11798:Robert McClenon 11769:Robert McClenon 11747:. Regards. ---- 11735: 11693:Robert McClenon 11659:Robert McClenon 11622:Robert McClenon 11605:Robert McClenon 11577: 11572: 11475: 11452: 11422: 11400: 11383:Robert McClenon 11367: 11350: 11332:on the article 11321: 11286: 11265:Robert McClenon 11243: 11224: 11207:Robert McClenon 11171: 11153:Robert McClenon 11109: 11094:Benjamin Loomes 11078: 11075: 11072: 11071: 11040:Benjamin Loomes 11017:Benjamin Loomes 10993:Robert McClenon 10960:Benjamin Loomes 10928: 10885:Robert McClenon 10825: 10804:Robert McClenon 10800:User:Bacardi379 10766: 10722: 10715: 10687:Robert McClenon 10665: 10619:Robert McClenon 10597:Robert McClenon 10567:Rouge non-admin 10557: 10490:Robert McClenon 10447: 10429: 10406: 10387: 10296:Paine Ellsworth 10295: 10281: 10245: 10190: 10177: 10161:Robert McClenon 10128: 10123: 10103: 10090: 10086: 10081: 10059:my essay on RfA 10035: 10004:Robert McClenon 9985: 9978: 9956: 9951:User:Ritchie333 9934: 9853:Robert McClenon 9826: 9814:Robert McClenon 9810:User:Ritchie333 9760: 9757: 9754: 9729:Robert McClenon 9713: 9710: 9707: 9689:Robert McClenon 9650:Robert McClenon 9632: 9607: 9577: 9549: 9533:Robert McClenon 9496:Robert McClenon 9480: 9463:Robert McClenon 9446: 9439: 9426: 9421: 9415: 9411: 9409:You've got mail 9405: 9397: 9389: 9386: 9360: 9345:166.107.163.254 9340: 9322:Robert McClenon 9310:deletion review 9245:Robert McClenon 9241:deletion review 9198: 9175: 9097: 9074: 9072: 9065:Speedy deletion 9046: 9031: 9005: 8935:Robert McClenon 8906: 8887: 8869:Robert McClenon 8855: 8853: 8829: 8784: 8780: 8759: 8742: 8739: 8736: 8714:Robert McClenon 8681: 8678: 8675: 8671: 8669:Gagik Manoukian 8651:Robert McClenon 8605:speedy deletion 8593: 8533:Robert McClenon 8529:User:Abbythecat 8500: 8475: 8450: 8430:Robert McClenon 8396: 8377: 8374: 8371: 8357:Robert McClenon 8340: 8337: 8334: 8320: 8293: 8288: 8285: 8283: 8270: 8265: 8262: 8260: 8251: 8200: 8185:Robert McClenon 8156: 8151: 8148: 8146: 8122: 8110:Robert McClenon 8073:Robert McClenon 8009: 8004: 7927: 7915: 7892: 7877: 7874: 7856:Robert McClenon 7825: 7817: 7796: 7773: 7766: 7752:Robert McClenon 7730: 7723: 7708:Robert McClenon 7687: 7680: 7673: 7634: 7611: 7609: 7602:Speedy deletion 7552:Robert McClenon 7525: 7496: 7456: 7438:Robert McClenon 7434:User:Rivertorch 7421: 7408: 7400: 7385: 7374: 7347:Robert McClenon 7332:Robert McClenon 7226: 7085: 7057:Robert McClenon 7053: 6995: 6980:Robert McClenon 6943: 6899:Robert McClenon 6884:Robert McClenon 6868:User:Neha-Purva 6848: 6828:Talk:Lindy West 6818: 6815:Talk:Lindy West 6776: 6758:Robert McClenon 6710: 6706: 6683: 6661:Robert McClenon 6644: 6638: 6626: 6594:Robert McClenon 6566: 6548:Robert McClenon 6516: 6506:Deweni Inima - 6488:may be of use. 6473: 6455:Robert McClenon 6438: 6434: 6431: 6428: 6418: 6400:Robert McClenon 6349: 6345: 6324: 6306:Robert McClenon 6235: 6206: 6184:Robert McClenon 6175:User:Joseph1100 6137: 6119:Robert McClenon 6111:reliable source 6094:Robert McClenon 6012:Robert McClenon 5989:umpire. He is 5986:Forrest Wheeler 5982:User:Penguinmcw 5929: 5911:Robert McClenon 5834: 5830: 5809: 5796: 5791: 5774: 5732: 5672: 5668: 5645: 5608: 5602: 5582: 5576: 5547: 5528: 5507:Robert McClenon 5470: 5464: 5453: 5411:Robert McClenon 5399:User:The Banner 5369: 5351:Robert McClenon 5329:Robert McClenon 5315:Robert McClenon 5262: 5258: 5237: 5180: 5164:Robert McClenon 5124: 5094: 5073:Robert McClenon 5056:Robert McClenon 5048:Deletion Review 5024: 4981:Robert McClenon 4943:Robert McClenon 4897:Robert McClenon 4868:Battle for Caen 4864: 4862:Re-opening DRNs 4841: 4823:Robert McClenon 4792: 4744:Robert McClenon 4720: 4682:Robert McClenon 4665:Robert McClenon 4639: 4636:Hamoussin fouad 4619:Robert McClenon 4543: 4527: 4518: 4491: 4473:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4451:Robert McClenon 4433:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4421: 4398:Robert McClenon 4375: 4349: 4318:Robert McClenon 4315: 4289:Robert McClenon 4258:Robert McClenon 4231: 4197:Robert McClenon 4161: 4160: 4155: 4154: 4153:and remove the 4125: 4123: 4086:Robert McClenon 4068:Robert McClenon 4034:Robert McClenon 4020:Robert McClenon 3992: 3974:Robert McClenon 3956:Robert McClenon 3904: 3886:Robert McClenon 3865:Robert McClenon 3818: 3800:Robert McClenon 3748: 3728:Robert McClenon 3699:Robert McClenon 3672:Robert McClenon 3656:Robert McClenon 3628:Robert McClenon 3620:deletion review 3370: 3352:Robert McClenon 3321: 3281: 3279: 3272:Speedy deletion 3254: 3209: 3205: 3184: 3166:Robert McClenon 3105: 3089: 3086: 3068:Robert McClenon 3056:User:Goziextech 2998: 2994: 2973: 2960:Land and travel 2935:Robert McClenon 2896:Land and travel 2892: 2874:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2866: 2848:Robert McClenon 2793: 2777: 2768: 2704: 2686: 2668:Robert McClenon 2626: 2595: 2592: 2566: 2536: 2528: 2445: 2424: 2402: 2382:Robert McClenon 2350:Robert McClenon 2325: 2307:Robert McClenon 2271: 2253:Robert McClenon 2187: 2183: 2162: 2129:Robert McClenon 2095: 2060: 2037: 2035: 2028:Speedy deletion 2011:Robert McClenon 1995: 1981: 1977: 1945:Robert McClenon 1914: 1874: 1872: 1865:Speedy deletion 1843: 1825:Robert McClenon 1808: 1802: 1790:Fluorochromasia 1786: 1784:Fluorochromasia 1746:Robert McClenon 1715:Robert McClenon 1694: 1674:Robert McClenon 1620: 1616: 1595: 1590: 1589: 1569:Robert McClenon 1551:Robert McClenon 1475: 1471: 1449: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1428:Robert McClenon 1417: 1393:speedy deletion 1387: 1382: 1381: 1361:Robert McClenon 1351:- The draft is 1320: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1299:Robert McClenon 1292: 1287: 1286: 1228:Robert McClenon 1225: 1213:Robert McClenon 1201:User:Sagecandor 1116:Robert McClenon 1113: 1101:Robert McClenon 1097:User:Sagecandor 1069:Robert McClenon 1040:User:Sagecandor 1012:Robert McClenon 996:User:Sagecandor 950: 941: 940: 939: 929:Robert McClenon 918: 917: 877:It is notable. 771: 762: 761: 760: 750:Robert McClenon 735: 717:Robert McClenon 699: 687: 656: 643:Robert McClenon 620: 600: 578:Robert McClenon 431: 408:User:Arpit11111 396: 378:Robert McClenon 353: 339: 335: 316:Robert McClenon 292: 288: 274: 236: 205: 173:Robert McClenon 107: 101: 49: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 12174: 12164: 12163: 12149: 12148: 12047:submission or 12033: 12027: 12009: 12008: 12003: 12000: 11997: 11991: 11988: 11962: 11959: 11956: 11955: 11940: 11939: 11932: 11930: 11919: 11916: 11875:Hi there, I'm 11872: 11866: 11825:Hi there, I'm 11822: 11816: 11815: 11814: 11813: 11812: 11811: 11810: 11809: 11808: 11734: 11731: 11730: 11729: 11728: 11727: 11726: 11725: 11724: 11723: 11722: 11721: 11720: 11719: 11718: 11717: 11672: 11615: 11576: 11573: 11552: 11551: 11550: 11541: 11537: 11511: 11510: 11491: 11490: 11477: 11471: 11464:Backlog update 11453: 11451: 11448: 11421: 11415: 11414: 11413: 11412: 11411: 11410: 11409: 11320: 11319:September 2017 11317: 11285: 11279: 11278: 11277: 11276: 11275: 11242: 11239: 11238: 11237: 11236: 11235: 11234: 11233: 11181:. Thank you. 11170: 11167: 11166: 11165: 11164: 11163: 11108: 11105: 11089: 11088: 11049: 11048: 11006: 11005: 11004: 11003: 10927: 10921: 10898: 10897: 10896: 10895: 10824: 10821: 10817: 10816: 10815: 10814: 10765: 10762: 10761: 10760: 10759: 10758: 10757: 10756: 10664: 10661: 10660: 10659: 10644: 10633: 10632: 10631: 10630: 10629: 10607: 10571: 10547: 10546: 10545: 10544: 10521:recent example 10446: 10441: 10438: 10437: 10422: 10421: 10416: 10405: 10402: 10386: 10383: 10382: 10381: 10359: 10358: 10357: 10356: 10355: 10354: 10353: 10352: 10280: 10277: 10276: 10275: 10260: 10251: 10243: 10235: 10220: 10179:Hello Robert, 10176: 10173: 10172: 10171: 10157:User:Davey2010 10137: 10120: 10118: 10116: 10114: 10112: 10110: 10108: 10106: 10102: 10099: 10098: 10097: 10073: 10054: 10053: 10052: 10051: 10050: 10049: 10048: 10047: 10029: 9933: 9930: 9929: 9928: 9903:seems OK to me 9870: 9869: 9868: 9867: 9866: 9865: 9864: 9863: 9774: 9773: 9772: 9771: 9770: 9769: 9768: 9767: 9746: 9742: 9703: 9702: 9701: 9700: 9699: 9666: 9665: 9664: 9663: 9662: 9661: 9660: 9634: 9633: 9628: 9623: 9622: 9617: 9606: 9603: 9576: 9570: 9569: 9568: 9567: 9566: 9565: 9564: 9563: 9562: 9561: 9560: 9559: 9558: 9438: 9435: 9396: 9387: 9385: 9382: 9359: 9356: 9339: 9336: 9335: 9334: 9333: 9332: 9258: 9257: 9256: 9255: 9197: 9194: 9092:Article Wizard 9080: 9071: 9067:nomination of 9062: 9045: 9042: 9004: 9001: 9000: 8999: 8998: 8997: 8996: 8995: 8973: 8972: 8971: 8956: 8931:User:Alex Shih 8905: 8902: 8886: 8883: 8882: 8881: 8880: 8879: 8828: 8825: 8820: 8817: 8815: 8814: 8813: 8812: 8778: 8758: 8755: 8754: 8753: 8752: 8751: 8750: 8749: 8727: 8706:G12 as copyvio 8670: 8667: 8666: 8665: 8664: 8663: 8662: 8661: 8631:User:Alex Shih 8592: 8589: 8546: 8545: 8544: 8543: 8499: 8496: 8474: 8469: 8449: 8444: 8443: 8442: 8441: 8440: 8395: 8390: 8389: 8388: 8387: 8386: 8385: 8384: 8330:. Thank you. 8319: 8316: 8313: 8312: 8311: 8310: 8309: 8308: 8307: 8306: 8305: 8304: 8303: 8302: 8279: 8231:Mother Theresa 8218:User:DrStrauss 8206: 8205: 8196: 8195: 8170: 8169: 8168: 8167: 8166: 8165: 8120: 8030: 8029: 8008: 8005: 7984: 7983: 7982: 7973: 7956: 7940: 7939: 7918: 7917: 7911: 7904:Backlog update 7893: 7891: 7888: 7873: 7870: 7869: 7868: 7867: 7866: 7819:TransporterMan 7795: 7792: 7791: 7790: 7789: 7788: 7787: 7786: 7785: 7784: 7741: 7629:Article Wizard 7617: 7608: 7604:nomination of 7599: 7598: 7597: 7596: 7595: 7594: 7593: 7524: 7521: 7495: 7488: 7463: 7455: 7452: 7451: 7450: 7449: 7448: 7419: 7399: 7396: 7373: 7367: 7366: 7365: 7364: 7363: 7362: 7361: 7360: 7359: 7358: 7357: 7342: 7312:comment added 7274: 7273: 7272: 7271: 7270: 7269: 7219:comment added 7195: 7194: 7181: 7166: 7155: 7077:comment added 7052: 7046: 7043: 7042: 7001: 7000: 6991: 6990: 6942: 6939: 6914: 6912: 6911: 6910: 6909: 6894: 6847: 6844: 6817: 6811: 6798: 6775: 6772: 6771: 6770: 6769: 6768: 6743: 6741: 6740: 6739: 6738: 6704: 6682: 6675: 6674: 6673: 6672: 6671: 6625: 6622: 6607: 6606: 6605: 6604: 6565: 6562: 6561: 6560: 6559: 6558: 6515: 6504: 6472: 6469: 6468: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6417: 6414: 6413: 6412: 6411: 6410: 6392:User:Ealdahdah 6382: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6377: 6343: 6323: 6320: 6319: 6318: 6317: 6316: 6256:Merav burstein 6234: 6232:Merav_Burstein 6229: 6205: 6200: 6199: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6136: 6135:Hasty Decision 6133: 6132: 6131: 6130: 6129: 6107:User:Penguincw 6104: 6070:and not being 6060:User:Penguincw 6025: 6024: 6023: 6022: 6001:players under 5951:Forest Wheeler 5928: 5925: 5924: 5923: 5922: 5921: 5870: 5867: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5828: 5808: 5805: 5773: 5767: 5764: 5763: 5748: 5747: 5742: 5731: 5728: 5708: 5705: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5666: 5644: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5634: 5633: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5518: 5517: 5452: 5449: 5448: 5447: 5446: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5395:User:Marrakech 5368: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5339: 5325: 5295: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5290: 5256: 5236: 5233: 5179: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5123: 5120: 5093: 5087: 5086: 5085: 5084: 5083: 5066: 5028:GolfingIreland 5023: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5008: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4939:User:Supermann 4863: 4860: 4840: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4791: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4719: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4638: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4585: 4584: 4569: 4568: 4554: 4542: 4537: 4490: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4420: 4417: 4390:User:Twillisjr 4374: 4371: 4348: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4285:User:Supermann 4254:User:Supermann 4230: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4193:User:Legacypac 4122: 4116: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4078: 4030: 3991: 3990:Your advice... 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3966: 3903: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3875: 3817: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3761:Was moved to: 3747: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3709: 3677:Cosmicsqueaker 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3580:Cosmicsqueaker 3570: 3569: 3564: 3559: 3554: 3549: 3544: 3539: 3534: 3524: 3523: 3518: 3513: 3508: 3503: 3498: 3493: 3488: 3483: 3478: 3473: 3468: 3463: 3458: 3453: 3448: 3443: 3438: 3433: 3428: 3423: 3418: 3413: 3408: 3403: 3398: 3393: 3388: 3383: 3369: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3278: 3274:nomination of 3269: 3253: 3252:Brian Michaels 3250: 3248: 3245: 3242: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3203: 3183: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3139: 3138: 3085: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3034: 3031: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 2992: 2972: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2891: 2885: 2865: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2840:User:DIYeditor 2792: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2764: 2750: 2720: 2719: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2702:Recognized for 2700: 2697: 2696: 2692: 2691: 2687: 2680: 2677: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2662: 2661: 2655: 2654: 2646: 2645: 2637: 2636: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2602: 2601: 2584: 2583: 2578: 2576: 2565: 2562: 2535: 2529: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2478: 2465: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2436:Backlog update 2425: 2423: 2420: 2407:Tomas Ukkonen 2401: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2346:User:MarnetteD 2324: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2220: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2181: 2161: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2121:Indian English 2055:Article Wizard 2043: 2034: 2030:nomination of 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 1976: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1955: 1871: 1867:nomination of 1862: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1693: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1656: 1653: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1614: 1594: 1591: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1561: 1519: 1508: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1469: 1450: 1441: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1416: 1413: 1386: 1383: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1330:Thanks again. 1323:Mr. McClenon, 1321: 1312: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1232:, thankfully, 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 951: 942: 922: 921: 920: 919: 911: 826:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 816: 815: 808: 772: 763: 739: 738: 737: 736: 734: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 707: 706: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 619: 616: 599: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 529: 528: 527: 511:And this move 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 430: 427: 395: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 352: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 329: 302:- What is the 282: 273: 270: 235: 232: 204: 201: 186: 185: 184: 183: 165:Draft:Shinesty 149: 148: 147: 146: 127:WP:COIRESPONSE 111: 100: 97: 96: 95: 66: 48: 45: 34:Roget's Minion 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 12173: 12162: 12159: 12158: 12156: 12147: 12144: 12142: 12135: 12129: 12128: 12127: 12126: 12122: 12118: 12114: 12110: 12108: 12101: 12094: 12092: 12087: 12066: 12061: 12056: 12054: 12050: 12046: 12032: 12026: 12025: 12022: 12021: 12014: 12007: 12004: 12001: 11998: 11996: 11992: 11989: 11987: 11984: 11983: 11982: 11979: 11977: 11972: 11968: 11954: 11950: 11946: 11942: 11941: 11938: 11937: 11933: 11928: 11923: 11915: 11914: 11910: 11906: 11901: 11899: 11898:WP:REFUND/G13 11894: 11892: 11887: 11884: 11882: 11878: 11870: 11865: 11864: 11860: 11856: 11851: 11849: 11848:WP:REFUND/G13 11844: 11842: 11837: 11834: 11832: 11828: 11820: 11807: 11803: 11799: 11794: 11793: 11792: 11788: 11784: 11780: 11779: 11778: 11774: 11770: 11766: 11763: 11762: 11761: 11760: 11759: 11758: 11754: 11750: 11746: 11743: 11739: 11716: 11712: 11708: 11704: 11703: 11702: 11698: 11694: 11690: 11687: 11686: 11685: 11681: 11677: 11673: 11670: 11669: 11668: 11664: 11660: 11656: 11653: 11652: 11651: 11647: 11643: 11639: 11637:Did you mean 11636: 11633: 11632: 11631: 11627: 11623: 11619: 11616: 11614: 11610: 11606: 11602: 11599: 11598: 11597: 11596: 11595: 11594: 11590: 11586: 11582: 11571: 11569: 11565: 11561: 11558: 11548: 11547: 11542: 11538: 11535: 11534: 11529: 11528:autoconfirmed 11525: 11524: 11519: 11518: 11517: 11515: 11509: 11508: 11503: 11502:page curation 11499: 11498: 11497: 11495: 11488: 11484: 11483: 11478: 11474: 11469: 11468: 11467: 11465: 11458: 11447: 11446: 11442: 11438: 11434: 11433: 11427: 11420: 11408: 11405: 11403: 11398: 11394: 11393: 11392: 11388: 11384: 11380: 11377: 11376: 11375: 11372: 11370: 11365: 11361: 11360: 11359: 11358: 11355: 11353: 11348: 11345:. Thank you. 11344: 11340: 11335: 11331: 11326: 11316: 11315: 11311: 11307: 11303: 11301: 11297: 11291: 11284: 11274: 11270: 11266: 11261: 11260: 11259: 11258: 11257: 11256: 11252: 11248: 11232: 11229: 11227: 11222: 11218: 11217: 11216: 11212: 11208: 11204: 11201: 11200: 11199: 11198: 11197: 11196: 11193: 11192: 11190: 11182: 11180: 11176: 11162: 11158: 11154: 11150: 11146: 11142: 11138: 11135: 11134: 11133: 11132: 11131: 11129: 11125: 11121: 11116: 11112: 11104: 11103: 11099: 11095: 11087: 11084: 11082: 11067: 11063: 11059: 11055: 11051: 11050: 11045: 11041: 11037: 11036: 11035: 11032: 11030: 11026: 11022: 11018: 11014: 11002: 10998: 10994: 10990: 10986: 10982: 10979: 10978: 10977: 10976: 10975: 10973: 10969: 10965: 10961: 10957: 10950: 10946: 10943: 10940: 10937: 10936: 10931: 10926: 10920: 10919: 10915: 10911: 10907: 10903: 10894: 10890: 10886: 10882: 10881:User:Ffederal 10879: 10878: 10877: 10876: 10875: 10874: 10870: 10866: 10862: 10858: 10854: 10850: 10849:Yandex Search 10846: 10842: 10838: 10837:Yandex.Direct 10834: 10830: 10820: 10813: 10809: 10805: 10801: 10798: 10797: 10796: 10795: 10794: 10793: 10789: 10785: 10780: 10779: 10775: 10771: 10755: 10751: 10747: 10743: 10742: 10741: 10738: 10736: 10732: 10726: 10719: 10714: 10713: 10712: 10708: 10704: 10699: 10698: 10697: 10696: 10692: 10688: 10684: 10681: 10677: 10673: 10671: 10663:Clarification 10658: 10654: 10650: 10645: 10642: 10638: 10634: 10628: 10624: 10620: 10616: 10612: 10608: 10606: 10602: 10598: 10594: 10591: 10590: 10589: 10588: 10587: 10582: 10577: 10572: 10569: 10568: 10562: 10561: 10560: 10553: 10549: 10548: 10543: 10540: 10538: 10534: 10533:WP:OTHERSTUFF 10530: 10526: 10522: 10517: 10512: 10508: 10504: 10503: 10502: 10501: 10500: 10499: 10495: 10491: 10487: 10483: 10479: 10475: 10471: 10467: 10463: 10459: 10456: 10451: 10445: 10436: 10433: 10432: 10424: 10423: 10420: 10417: 10414: 10409: 10401: 10400: 10396: 10392: 10380: 10375: 10371: 10366: 10361: 10360: 10351: 10346: 10345: 10344: 10339: 10335: 10330: 10325: 10324: 10323: 10320: 10318: 10314: 10313: 10312: 10311: 10310: 10308: 10303: 10300: 10299: 10298: 10291: 10287: 10279:The Statement 10274: 10270: 10266: 10261: 10259: 10256: 10252: 10250: 10247: 10241: 10236: 10234: 10230: 10226: 10221: 10219: 10214: 10210: 10205: 10201: 10200: 10199: 10198: 10195: 10193: 10188: 10187: 10180: 10170: 10166: 10162: 10158: 10155: 10154: 10153: 10150: 10146: 10142: 10136: 10133: 10131: 10126: 10096: 10093: 10089: 10084: 10074: 10072: 10068: 10064: 10060: 10056: 10055: 10046: 10043: 10042: 10039: 10038: 10030: 10027: 10023: 10019: 10015: 10014: 10013: 10009: 10005: 10001: 10000:User:SilkTork 9998: 9997: 9996: 9995: 9994: 9991: 9989: 9982: 9974: 9970: 9969: 9968: 9967: 9964: 9963: 9960: 9959: 9952: 9946: 9944: 9938: 9927: 9926: 9922: 9918: 9912: 9908: 9904: 9900: 9896: 9892: 9888: 9884: 9880: 9876: 9872: 9871: 9862: 9858: 9854: 9850: 9847: 9846: 9845: 9841: 9837: 9830: 9825: 9824: 9823: 9819: 9815: 9811: 9808: 9807: 9806: 9805: 9804: 9803: 9800: 9798: 9796: 9795: 9789: 9785: 9780: 9766: 9763: 9751: 9747: 9743: 9740: 9739: 9738: 9734: 9730: 9726: 9723: 9722: 9721: 9720: 9719: 9716: 9704: 9698: 9694: 9690: 9686: 9683: 9682: 9681: 9680: 9679: 9675: 9671: 9667: 9659: 9655: 9651: 9647: 9644: 9643: 9642: 9641: 9640: 9639: 9638: 9637: 9631: 9625: 9624: 9621: 9618: 9615: 9610: 9602: 9601: 9597: 9593: 9589: 9588: 9582: 9575: 9557: 9553: 9552: 9544: 9543: 9542: 9538: 9534: 9530: 9526: 9525: 9524: 9520: 9516: 9511: 9507: 9506: 9505: 9501: 9497: 9493: 9490: 9489: 9488: 9484: 9483: 9474: 9473: 9472: 9468: 9464: 9460: 9457: 9456: 9455: 9454: 9450: 9449: 9434: 9433: 9430: 9420: 9410: 9402: 9381: 9380: 9376: 9372: 9368: 9364: 9355: 9354: 9350: 9346: 9331: 9327: 9323: 9319: 9315: 9311: 9307: 9306:User:Wolf WIK 9304: 9303: 9302: 9301: 9300: 9299: 9295: 9291: 9286: 9284: 9280: 9276: 9272: 9268: 9261: 9254: 9250: 9246: 9242: 9238: 9234: 9230: 9229:User:Wolf WIK 9227: 9226: 9225: 9224: 9223: 9221: 9217: 9213: 9209: 9205: 9193: 9192: 9188: 9184: 9183: 9180: 9172: 9167: 9163: 9158: 9156: 9152: 9148: 9144: 9140: 9135: 9133: 9132: 9126: 9122: 9118: 9114: 9110: 9106: 9102: 9095: 9093: 9088: 9086: 9070: 9066: 9061: 9060: 9056: 9052: 9041: 9040: 9037: 9035: 9034: 9027: 9023: 9019: 9015: 9011: 8994: 8991: 8989: 8985: 8984: 8983: 8980: 8978: 8974: 8970: 8967: 8965: 8961: 8957: 8955: 8952: 8950: 8946: 8945: 8944: 8940: 8936: 8932: 8929: 8928: 8927: 8926: 8925: 8924: 8921: 8919: 8915: 8911: 8901: 8900: 8896: 8892: 8878: 8874: 8870: 8866: 8861: 8851: 8848: 8847: 8846: 8845: 8844: 8843: 8839: 8835: 8824: 8821: 8818: 8808: 8804: 8800: 8796: 8792: 8788: 8783: 8782:Draft:AJ Kang 8779: 8777: 8776: 8774: 8771: 8768: 8764: 8761: 8760: 8748: 8745: 8732: 8728: 8725: 8724: 8723: 8719: 8715: 8711: 8707: 8703: 8699: 8695: 8692: 8691: 8690: 8689: 8688: 8687: 8684: 8660: 8656: 8652: 8648: 8644: 8640: 8636: 8632: 8628: 8625: 8624: 8623: 8622: 8621: 8620: 8619: 8618: 8614: 8610: 8606: 8602: 8598: 8588: 8587: 8583: 8579: 8575: 8571: 8567: 8566: 8562: 8558: 8554: 8550: 8542: 8538: 8534: 8530: 8527: 8526: 8525: 8524: 8523: 8521: 8517: 8512: 8508: 8504: 8495: 8494: 8491: 8489: 8484: 8482: 8473: 8472:Mitsuo Sagawa 8468: 8467: 8464: 8461: 8460: 8455: 8448: 8439: 8435: 8431: 8427: 8423: 8420: 8419: 8418: 8417: 8416: 8415: 8411: 8407: 8406: 8401: 8394: 8383: 8380: 8368: 8367: 8366: 8362: 8358: 8354: 8351: 8350: 8349: 8348: 8347: 8346: 8343: 8331: 8329: 8325: 8301: 8298: 8296: 8291: 8280: 8278: 8275: 8273: 8268: 8255: 8250: 8249: 8248: 8244: 8240: 8236: 8232: 8228: 8224: 8219: 8216: 8215: 8214: 8213: 8212: 8211: 8210: 8209: 8208: 8207: 8203: 8198: 8197: 8194: 8190: 8186: 8182: 8178: 8174: 8173: 8164: 8161: 8159: 8154: 8143: 8139: 8135: 8134:core policies 8131: 8126: 8121: 8119: 8115: 8111: 8107: 8103: 8102:tendentiously 8099: 8095: 8091: 8087: 8084: 8083: 8082: 8078: 8074: 8070: 8066: 8062: 8058: 8054: 8050: 8045: 8041: 8037: 8034: 8033: 8032: 8031: 8028: 8024: 8020: 8015: 8014: 8013: 8003: 8001: 7997: 7993: 7990: 7980: 7979: 7974: 7971: 7970: 7965: 7961: 7957: 7954: 7953: 7948: 7947: 7946: 7944: 7937: 7936: 7935:a NPP browser 7930: 7926: 7925: 7924: 7922: 7914: 7909: 7908: 7907: 7905: 7898: 7887: 7886: 7883: 7880: 7865: 7861: 7857: 7852: 7848: 7844: 7840: 7837: 7836: 7835: 7834: 7833: 7832: 7828: 7822: 7820: 7814: 7810: 7806: 7801: 7783: 7780: 7778: 7777: 7771: 7769: 7763: 7762: 7761: 7757: 7753: 7749: 7745: 7742: 7740: 7737: 7735: 7734: 7728: 7726: 7719: 7718: 7717: 7713: 7709: 7705: 7702: 7701: 7700: 7699: 7698: 7697: 7694: 7692: 7691: 7685: 7683: 7676: 7671: 7666: 7662: 7657: 7655: 7651: 7647: 7643: 7639: 7632: 7630: 7625: 7623: 7607: 7603: 7592: 7588: 7584: 7580: 7577: 7576: 7575: 7571: 7567: 7563: 7562: 7561: 7557: 7553: 7549: 7546: 7545: 7544: 7543: 7539: 7535: 7531: 7528:reference to 7520: 7519: 7515: 7511: 7506: 7504: 7499: 7493: 7487: 7484: 7480: 7476: 7472: 7468: 7461: 7447: 7443: 7439: 7435: 7432: 7431: 7430: 7429: 7428: 7427: 7422: 7417: 7413: 7411: 7405: 7395: 7394: 7390: 7389: 7383: 7379: 7372: 7356: 7352: 7348: 7343: 7341: 7337: 7333: 7329: 7325: 7321: 7318: 7317: 7315: 7311: 7305: 7301: 7297: 7296: 7295: 7291: 7287: 7283: 7282: 7278: 7277: 7276: 7275: 7268: 7264: 7260: 7256: 7252: 7248: 7244: 7240: 7236: 7230: 7225: 7224: 7222: 7218: 7212: 7208: 7203: 7199: 7198: 7197: 7196: 7193: 7189: 7185: 7182: 7179: 7175: 7171: 7167: 7164: 7160: 7156: 7152: 7148: 7144: 7140: 7136: 7131: 7127: 7123: 7119: 7115: 7111: 7107: 7103: 7099: 7095: 7089: 7084: 7083: 7082: 7080: 7076: 7070: 7066: 7062: 7061:Urban Massage 7058: 7051: 7050:Urban Massage 7041: 7038: 7034: 7030: 7026: 7020: 7016: 7012: 7009: 7003: 7002: 6998: 6993: 6992: 6989: 6985: 6981: 6977: 6976: 6973: 6970: 6966: 6962: 6958: 6952: 6948: 6938: 6936: 6932: 6928: 6924: 6920: 6908: 6904: 6900: 6895: 6893: 6889: 6885: 6881: 6877: 6873: 6869: 6866: 6865: 6864: 6863: 6862: 6861: 6857: 6853: 6843: 6842: 6838: 6834: 6830: 6829: 6823: 6816: 6810: 6809: 6805: 6801: 6796: 6795: 6791: 6787: 6782: 6779: 6767: 6763: 6759: 6755: 6751: 6748: 6747: 6746: 6745: 6744: 6734: 6730: 6726: 6722: 6718: 6714: 6709: 6705: 6703: 6702: 6700: 6697: 6694: 6690: 6687: 6686: 6685: 6680: 6670: 6666: 6662: 6658: 6655: 6654: 6653: 6652: 6651: 6650: 6647: 6641: 6635: 6631: 6621: 6620: 6616: 6612: 6603: 6599: 6595: 6591: 6588: 6587: 6586: 6585: 6584: 6583: 6579: 6575: 6571: 6557: 6553: 6549: 6545: 6541: 6537: 6534: 6533: 6532: 6531: 6530: 6529: 6525: 6521: 6513: 6509: 6503: 6502: 6498: 6494: 6489: 6487: 6483: 6478: 6464: 6460: 6456: 6452: 6451:User:Drewmutt 6449: 6448: 6447: 6446: 6445: 6444: 6441: 6427: 6423: 6409: 6405: 6401: 6397: 6393: 6390: 6389: 6388: 6387: 6386: 6383: 6373: 6369: 6365: 6361: 6357: 6353: 6348: 6344: 6342: 6341: 6339: 6336: 6333: 6329: 6326: 6325: 6315: 6311: 6307: 6303: 6298: 6294: 6290: 6286: 6282: 6278: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6271: 6269: 6265: 6261: 6257: 6253: 6248: 6244: 6241: 6238: 6233: 6228: 6227: 6223: 6219: 6215: 6211: 6204: 6193: 6189: 6185: 6180: 6179:Mary in Islam 6176: 6173: 6172: 6171: 6170: 6169: 6165: 6161: 6157: 6154: 6153: 6152: 6151: 6147: 6143: 6128: 6124: 6120: 6116: 6112: 6108: 6105: 6103: 6099: 6095: 6090: 6085: 6081: 6077: 6073: 6069: 6065: 6061: 6058: 6057: 6056: 6055: 6054: 6052: 6048: 6044: 6040: 6036: 6028: 6021: 6017: 6013: 6009: 6004: 6000: 5996: 5992: 5987: 5983: 5980: 5979: 5978: 5977: 5976: 5973: 5969: 5965: 5961: 5954: 5952: 5947: 5944: 5939: 5937: 5932: 5920: 5916: 5912: 5908: 5907:the Help Desk 5904: 5900: 5896: 5893: 5892: 5891: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5884: 5880: 5876: 5871: 5868: 5858: 5854: 5850: 5846: 5842: 5838: 5833: 5829: 5827: 5826: 5824: 5821: 5818: 5814: 5811: 5810: 5804: 5803: 5800: 5799: 5794: 5787: 5785: 5779: 5772: 5762: 5758: 5754: 5750: 5749: 5746: 5743: 5740: 5735: 5727: 5724: 5720: 5719: 5715: 5711: 5706: 5696: 5692: 5688: 5684: 5680: 5676: 5671: 5667: 5665: 5664: 5662: 5659: 5656: 5652: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5642: 5632: 5628: 5624: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5607: 5599: 5598: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5581: 5574: 5570: 5569: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5555: 5545: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5531: 5526: 5522: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5516: 5512: 5508: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5495:User:Mathglot 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5486: 5482: 5476: 5473: 5467: 5462: 5458: 5442: 5438: 5434: 5430: 5426: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5416: 5412: 5408: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5384: 5380: 5375: 5360: 5356: 5352: 5348: 5344: 5340: 5338: 5334: 5330: 5326: 5324: 5320: 5316: 5312: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5302: 5297: 5286: 5282: 5278: 5274: 5270: 5266: 5261: 5257: 5255: 5254: 5252: 5249: 5246: 5242: 5239: 5238: 5232: 5231: 5227: 5223: 5218: 5217: 5216: 5211: 5207: 5206: 5202: 5199: 5195: 5193: 5188: 5187: 5183: 5173: 5169: 5165: 5161: 5157: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5147: 5143: 5142:Matt Campbell 5140: 5136: 5132: 5131:Matt Campbell 5129: 5119: 5118: 5114: 5110: 5106: 5105: 5099: 5092: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5070: 5067: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5053: 5049: 5045: 5042: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5033: 5029: 5007: 5004: 5000: 4996: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4986: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4959: 4954: 4953: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4931: 4927: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4917: 4913: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4902: 4898: 4894: 4890: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4878: 4874: 4869: 4859: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4846: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4808: 4804: 4800: 4796: 4795:appreciated. 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4738: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4729: 4725: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4698: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4687: 4683: 4679: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4670: 4666: 4662: 4659: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4645: 4637: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4603:United States 4600: 4596: 4592: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4571: 4570: 4567: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4552: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4541: 4536: 4535: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4482: 4478: 4474: 4470: 4466: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4456: 4452: 4448: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4429:Beyond My Ken 4426: 4416: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4380: 4370: 4369: 4365: 4361: 4356: 4354: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4319: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4294: 4290: 4286: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4236: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4182: 4178: 4173: 4171: 4166: 4151: 4146: 4141: 4139: 4135: 4121: 4115: 4114: 4109: 4095: 4091: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4053: 4049: 4048:WP:NOTTVGUIDE 4045: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3983: 3979: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3907: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3876: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3823: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3770: 3767: 3766: 3762: 3759: 3758: 3754: 3751: 3746:My moved page 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3710: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3673: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3616:Talk:BrightHR 3613: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3574: 3568: 3565: 3563: 3560: 3558: 3555: 3553: 3550: 3548: 3545: 3543: 3540: 3538: 3535: 3533: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3522: 3519: 3517: 3514: 3512: 3509: 3507: 3504: 3502: 3499: 3497: 3494: 3492: 3489: 3487: 3484: 3482: 3479: 3477: 3474: 3472: 3469: 3467: 3464: 3462: 3459: 3457: 3454: 3452: 3449: 3447: 3444: 3442: 3439: 3437: 3434: 3432: 3429: 3427: 3424: 3422: 3419: 3417: 3414: 3412: 3409: 3407: 3404: 3402: 3399: 3397: 3394: 3392: 3389: 3387: 3384: 3382: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3373: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3348:User:Pariah24 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3324: 3319: 3314: 3310: 3305: 3303: 3297: 3293: 3291: 3290:MELANIE PARRY 3277: 3276:MELANIE PARRY 3273: 3268: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3249: 3246: 3243: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3208: 3204: 3202: 3201: 3199: 3196: 3193: 3189: 3186: 3185: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3146: 3136: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3113: 3109: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3035: 3032: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2997: 2993: 2991: 2990: 2988: 2985: 2982: 2978: 2975: 2974: 2961: 2957: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2897: 2890: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2790: 2783: 2780: 2775: 2773: 2772: 2765: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2749: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2718: 2717: 2713: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2698: 2694: 2693: 2690: 2685: 2684: 2679: 2678: 2675: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2664: 2663: 2660: 2657: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2629: 2623: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2612: 2608: 2607:User:MelanieN 2598: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2582: 2579: 2574: 2569: 2561: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2541: 2534: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2505:periodically. 2503: 2499: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2491: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2472: 2470: 2466: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2456: 2448: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2437: 2430: 2419: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2405: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2370: 2366: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2283:D.Novosibirsk 2280: 2276: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2186: 2182: 2180: 2179: 2177: 2174: 2171: 2167: 2164: 2163: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2104: 2098: 2093: 2088: 2084: 2079: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2058: 2056: 2051: 2049: 2033: 2029: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1917: 1912: 1907: 1903: 1898: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1870: 1866: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1847: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1805: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1769: 1765: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1699: 1692: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1657: 1654: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1619: 1615: 1613: 1612: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1587: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1512: 1509: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1474: 1470: 1468: 1467: 1465: 1462: 1459: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1394: 1379: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1328: 1324: 1319: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1284: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1229: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1209:the Help Desk 1206: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1117: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 986: 982: 978: 975: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 953: 952: 949: 938: 934: 930: 926: 915: 910: 909: 905: 901: 897: 894: 892: 889: 886: 883: 878: 875: 872: 869: 866: 863: 860: 857: 854: 852: 849: 848: 843: 838: 837: 833: 831: 827: 822: 820: 813: 809: 806: 802: 801: 800: 798: 797: 791: 789: 784: 782: 781: 775: 770: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 726: 722: 718: 714: 711: 710: 709: 708: 705: 702: 697: 694: 690: 684: 680: 679: 672: 669: 667: 660: 654: 653: 652: 648: 644: 640: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 629: 627: 615: 614: 610: 606: 605:D.Novosibirsk 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 556: 552: 548: 547: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 525: 521: 517: 513: 512: 510: 509: 502: 498: 494: 490: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 444: 440: 436: 426: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400:Arpit Malviya 387: 383: 379: 375: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 363: 359: 351: 342: 338: 332: 327: 326: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 298: 297: 296: 295: 291: 285: 279: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 245: 242: 231: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 200: 199: 195: 191: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 159: 158: 157: 156: 155: 144: 141: 138: 134: 131: 130: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 105: 104: 92: 88: 84: 80: 74: 69: 68: 67: 64: 63: 59: 55: 44: 43: 39: 35: 19: 12095: 12088: 12077:{{db-draft}} 12057: 12042: 12016: 12010: 11980: 11964: 11945:TonyBallioni 11935: 11934: 11902: 11895: 11891:Userfication 11888: 11885: 11874: 11852: 11845: 11841:Userfication 11838: 11835: 11824: 11741: 11736: 11634: 11578: 11560:TonyBallioni 11553: 11544: 11531: 11521: 11513: 11512: 11505: 11493: 11492: 11480: 11463: 11462: 11431: 11423: 11401: 11379:User:Ansh666 11368: 11351: 11322: 11304:Thank you. 11293: 11287: 11244: 11225: 11186: 11185: 11183: 11179:my talk page 11172: 11118:Thank you! 11117: 11113: 11110: 11090: 11065: 11053: 11033: 11011:— Preceding 11007: 10989:the Teahouse 10985:the Teahouse 10954:— Preceding 10951: 10947: 10944: 10941: 10938: 10932: 10929: 10899: 10863:and others-- 10845:Yandex.Money 10826: 10818: 10781: 10767: 10685: 10682: 10678: 10674: 10666: 10593:User:Joe Roe 10565: 10555: 10554: 10551: 10510: 10488: 10484: 10480: 10476: 10472: 10468: 10464: 10460: 10452: 10448: 10427: 10418: 10388: 10365:Figureofnine 10329:Figureofnine 10293: 10292: 10289: 10285: 10282: 10239: 10204:Figureofnine 10191: 10185: 10181: 10178: 10129: 10124: 10104: 10079: 10040: 10033: 9961: 9954: 9947: 9942: 9939: 9935: 9913: 9909: 9906: 9902: 9898: 9894: 9890: 9887:Level headed 9886: 9882: 9878: 9874: 9836:Softlavender 9793: 9787: 9783: 9778: 9775: 9749: 9670:Innisfree987 9619: 9586: 9578: 9547: 9529:User:Lourdes 9492:User:Lourdes 9478: 9459:User:Lourdes 9444: 9440: 9427: 9361: 9341: 9338:BART article 9287: 9265:— Preceding 9262: 9259: 9202:— Preceding 9199: 9181: 9178: 9161: 9159: 9138: 9136: 9128: 9124: 9120: 9116: 9098: 9089: 9082: 9047: 9029: 9017: 9006: 8907: 8888: 8865:the Teahouse 8859: 8834:JaneWatson88 8830: 8822: 8819: 8816: 8769: 8730: 8729:But there's 8672: 8627:User:Романов 8594: 8568: 8547: 8531:I'll look. 8501: 8487: 8480: 8476: 8457: 8451: 8403: 8397: 8332: 8328:my talk page 8321: 8282: 8259: 8201: 8145: 8097: 8093: 8069:the Teahouse 8049:the Teahouse 8010: 7992:TonyBallioni 7985: 7976: 7967: 7950: 7942: 7941: 7933: 7932:has created 7920: 7919: 7903: 7902: 7875: 7818: 7808: 7797: 7775: 7774: 7767: 7732: 7731: 7724: 7689: 7688: 7681: 7660: 7658: 7635: 7626: 7619: 7526: 7507: 7500: 7497: 7492:case request 7473:. Sent by 7457: 7409: 7401: 7398:Extra colon? 7387: 7375: 7254: 7251:The Scotsman 7234: 7169: 7158: 7151:unaffiliated 7150: 7143:The Scotsman 7126:Startups.com 7118:Startups.com 7097: 7093: 7054: 7048:Deletion of 7023:— Preceding 7013:, or better 7004: 6996: 6955:— Preceding 6944: 6917:— Preceding 6913: 6880:the Teahouse 6849: 6827: 6819: 6797: 6783: 6780: 6777: 6754:the Teahouse 6742: 6695: 6684: 6636:. Cheers! -- 6627: 6608: 6567: 6544:the Teahouse 6520:Deweni Inima 6517: 6508:Deweni Inima 6490: 6474: 6419: 6396:the Teahouse 6384: 6381: 6334: 6302:the Teahouse 6281:the Teahouse 6250:— Preceding 6245: 6242: 6239: 6236: 6207: 6138: 6115:the Teahouse 6083: 6076:the Teahouse 6033:— Preceding 6029: 6026: 6002: 5990: 5958:— Preceding 5955: 5948: 5940: 5933: 5930: 5903:the Teahouse 5895:User:MissusK 5872: 5869: 5866: 5819: 5789: 5781: 5775: 5744: 5725: 5721: 5707: 5704: 5657: 5646: 5595: 5572: 5567: 5566: 5553: 5543: 5477: 5454: 5373: 5370: 5343:the Teahouse 5298: 5294: 5247: 5219: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5208: 5204: 5203: 5200: 5196: 5189: 5185: 5184: 5181: 5125: 5103: 5095: 5052:the Teahouse 5025: 4865: 4842: 4819:the Teahouse 4797: 4793: 4721: 4695: 4642: 4640: 4550: 4544: 4526: 4525: 4517: 4516: 4503: 4492: 4447:User:Kudpung 4424: 4422: 4419:Paid editing 4394:the Teahouse 4376: 4360:Jorge Stolfi 4357: 4350: 4232: 4174: 4167: 4142: 4131: 4104: 3993: 3952:the Teahouse 3912:— Preceding 3908: 3905: 3882:the Teahouse 3861:the Teahouse 3857:the Teahouse 3826:— Preceding 3819: 3796:the Teahouse 3774: 3771: 3768: 3763: 3760: 3755: 3752: 3749: 3716:the Teahouse 3670: 3624:the Teahouse 3578: 3575: 3571: 3525: 3374: 3371: 3308: 3306: 3299: 3295: 3287: 3255: 3247: 3244: 3241: 3194: 3143: 3140: 3064:the Teahouse 3036: 3033: 3030: 2983: 2931:the Teahouse 2893: 2867: 2821: 2794: 2770: 2769: 2723: 2714: 2701: 2688: 2681: 2666: 2665: 2658: 2621: 2605: 2580: 2545: 2537: 2517:TonyBallioni 2509: 2489: 2488: 2454: 2453: 2435: 2434: 2406: 2403: 2326: 2272: 2249:the Teahouse 2219: 2172: 2101: 2082: 2080: 2061: 2052: 2045: 1996: 1982: 1978: 1941:User:Gbawden 1901: 1899: 1893:. Under the 1880: 1848: 1844: 1787: 1695: 1670:the Teahouse 1658: 1655: 1652: 1605: 1585: 1565:the Teahouse 1523:Jonloliverru 1521: 1518: 1513: 1510: 1507: 1460: 1454:Jonloliverru 1442: 1424:the Teahouse 1390: 1388: 1377: 1357:the Teahouse 1332:Jonloliverru 1329: 1325: 1322: 1313: 1282: 1234:DeadEyeSmile 1205:the Teahouse 1170:DeadEyeSmile 954: 943: 913: 898: 895: 879: 876: 873: 870: 867: 864: 861: 858: 855: 845: 841: 839: 834: 823: 817: 796:Whataboutism 794: 792: 785: 780:Whataboutism 778: 776: 773: 764: 692: 688: 666:The garmine 665: 626:The garmine 625: 621: 601: 450:Bishu baswal 432: 397: 354: 350:Team Versiya 300:User:Piotrus 275: 248:— Preceding 237: 210:— Preceding 206: 190:Bryan4562013 187: 169:the Teahouse 152: 139: 119:Terms of Use 77:— Preceding 65: 54:Diddomontoya 50: 30: 11965:Hello! I'm 11783:Steve Quinn 11749:Steve Quinn 10930:Hi Robert, 10861:Yandex Maps 10853:Yandex.Taxi 10841:Yandex Disk 10063:Yngvadottir 9727:- Thanks. 9687:- Thanks. 9648:- Thanks. 9515:BlueMoonset 9343:technology. 9318:advertising 9117:information 9051:E.M.Gregory 9003:Case opened 8891:scope_creep 8647:promotional 8635:Coates Hire 8601:Coates Hire 8422:User:C.Fred 8235:Move Review 8177:Move Review 8086:User:Orwuck 8065:Move Review 8040:Move Review 8036:User:Orwuck 7878:Doug Weller 7847:Do Not Bite 7843:Do Not Bite 7807:knows that 7510:Kostas20142 7508:Sincerely, 7320:User:NilamB 7308:—Preceding 7286:Ian.thomson 7259:Ian.thomson 7215:—Preceding 7202:Ian.thomson 7184:Ian.thomson 7178:WP:ADVOCACY 7073:—Preceding 6800:Daninguyen0 6786:Daninguyen0 6689:Daninguyen0 6639:Fabrictramp 6634:Dried fruit 6471:arbitration 6156:WP:THETRUTH 6072:promotional 5943:Dodgerfilms 5936:Chris Segal 5788:Thank you. 5311:User:Nguo17 5222:SurveyorMJF 5205:My question 4912:EnigmaMcmxc 4873:EnigmaMcmxc 4849:Michipedian 4815:User:Atchom 4776:Kostas20142 4758:Kostas20142 4724:Kostas20142 4678:User:C.Fred 4661:User:C.Fred 4591:User:Djha12 4489:Case opened 4046:What about 3918:Sully198787 3792:User:Jroehl 3162:User:C.Fred 2726:Lepricavark 2273:Robert, on 2166:Cinemasianx 2146:Home Lander 1803:Fabrictramp 1691:Ade Olufeko 896:Sincerely, 683:Draft:GIDSS 574:User:Cabayi 456:created by 416:Mike Rosoft 358:Home Lander 12083:{{db-g13}} 12071:{{db-afc}} 11905:HasteurBot 11877:HasteurBot 11855:HasteurBot 11827:HasteurBot 11487:WP:ACTRIAL 11296:verifiably 11137:User:Smehh 10923:Help with 10784:Bacardi379 10770:Bacardi379 10731:WP:ACTRIAL 10145:Ritchie333 10105:Hi Robert, 9794:Ritchie333 9646:User:Atsme 9371:Abbythecat 9363:Abbythecat 8885:Dan Wagner 8578:Abbythecat 8570:Abbythecat 8557:Abbythecat 8549:Abbythecat 8516:Abbythecat 8503:Abbythecat 7960:tagbombing 7776:velut luna 7733:velut luna 7690:velut luna 7548:User:Mole2 7410:Rivertorch 7388:KuyaBriBri 7243:TechCrunch 7147:WP:REFSPAM 7122:notability 7114:Trustpilot 7102:CrunchBase 7017:, or even 6923:Neha-Purva 6852:Neha-Purva 6645:talk to me 6160:Tgeorgescu 6142:Joseph1100 6084:ipso facto 6068:notability 6003:ipso facto 5991:ipso facto 5875:Swan Hills 5403:incivility 5186:Background 4599:notability 4162:{{db-g13}} 4156:{{db-afc}} 4060:User:Atsme 4016:User:Atsme 3906:Hi Robert 3832:SeanAndres 3300:Under the 3040:Goziextech 2977:Goziextech 2824:—DIYeditor 2810:—DIYeditor 2236:notability 1809:talk to me 1738:User:Atsme 1711:User:Atsme 1666:User:Adzie 1246:Sagecandor 1199:- As both 1184:Sagecandor 1123:Sagecandor 1084:Sagecandor 1048:being bold 1027:Sagecandor 981:Sagecandor 965:source at 963:Teen Vogue 900:Sagecandor 448:Ditto for 336:reply here 289:reply here 83:Danpeanuts 73:Danpeanuts 12091:this link 12060:mainspace 11689:User:Ronz 11655:User:Ronz 11618:User:Ronz 11601:User:Ronz 11064:. If you 10735:Alex Shih 10637:Bluehotel 10537:Alex Shih 10317:Alex Shih 10018:consensus 9915:to come. 9424:template. 9121:sentences 8988:Alex Shih 8977:Alex Shih 8964:Alex Shih 8949:Alex Shih 8918:Alex Shih 8061:Ching Hai 8053:Ching Hai 7467:WP:NPPAFC 7382:this edit 7154:standard. 7106:AngelList 6493:Supermann 6328:Ealdahdah 6039:Penguincw 5964:Penguincw 5433:Marrakech 5379:Marrakech 4999:MarnetteD 4958:Supermann 4926:Supermann 4551:requested 4406:Twillisjr 4382:Twillisjr 4325:Supermann 4303:Supermann 4272:Supermann 4240:Supermann 4211:Legacypac 4177:Legacypac 4170:this link 4145:mainspace 2741:MarnetteD 2409:Cutesolar 2365:MarnetteD 2333:MarnetteD 2329:your post 2323:Thank you 2238:based on 1849:-Jenevee 598:Thank you 452:moved to 312:"tianxia" 308:neologism 12155:Category 12132:Linguist 12098:Linguist 11025:contribs 11013:unsigned 10968:contribs 10956:unsigned 10910:Ffederal 10865:Ffederal 10511:Comment: 10374:contribs 10338:contribs 10223:efforts. 10213:contribs 10091:Chequers 10036:SilkTork 10028:is for). 9979:Linguist 9973:SilkTork 9957:SilkTork 9290:Wolf WIK 9279:contribs 9271:Wolf WIK 9267:unsigned 9216:contribs 9208:Wolf WIK 9204:unsigned 9129:will be 8773:contribs 8459:Andrevan 7369:Deprod: 7255:reliable 7247:The Memo 7037:contribs 7025:unsigned 6969:contribs 6957:unsigned 6931:contribs 6919:unsigned 6699:contribs 6491:Thanks, 6484:and the 6426:Drewmutt 6338:contribs 6264:contribs 6252:unsigned 6047:contribs 6035:unsigned 5972:contribs 5960:unsigned 5823:contribs 5726:Xihuliu 5661:contribs 5623:Mathglot 5481:Mathglot 5429:RfC page 5251:contribs 5220:Thanks. 4449:- Ack. 4000:redirect 3926:contribs 3914:unsigned 3840:contribs 3828:unsigned 3750:Robert, 3648:BrightHR 3600:BrightHR 3332:Pariah24 3198:contribs 2987:contribs 2469:tutorial 2176:contribs 1609:contribs 1464:contribs 812:LINK TWO 805:LINK ONE 566:User:Deb 262:contribs 250:unsigned 224:contribs 212:unsigned 143:contribs 91:contribs 79:unsigned 12086:code. 12053:sandbox 11871:concern 11821:concern 11742:comment 11507:T175225 11437:Legobot 11306:Shirt58 11111:Hello, 10149:Joe Roe 10101:Apology 10026:WP:ORCP 9755:Timothy 9708:Timothy 9592:Legobot 9550:Lourdes 9510:Lourdes 9481:Lourdes 9447:Lourdes 8914:running 8795:history 8737:Timothy 8676:Timothy 8609:Романов 8372:Timothy 8335:Timothy 8289:Strauss 8266:Strauss 8227:Dr. Dre 8152:Strauss 7929:Rentier 7768:fortuna 7725:fortuna 7682:fortuna 7471:Opt-out 7310:undated 7217:undated 7174:WP:PAID 7161:-- See 7075:undated 7029:Kaliage 6961:Kaliage 6947:article 6833:Legobot 6721:history 6360:history 6297:notable 6218:Bearian 6210:WP:BARE 6089:notable 5949:As for 5879:MissusK 5845:history 5813:MissusK 5753:Gadje75 5710:Xihuliu 5683:history 5651:Xihuliu 5499:notable 5347:promote 5296:Hello, 5273:history 5109:Legobot 4165:code. 3220:history 3108:protect 3103:history 3009:history 2915:notable 2771:Buster7 2551:Legobot 2198:history 1959:Gbawden 1925:Gbawden 1851:Jenevee 1841:Apology 1631:history 1486:history 272:A favor 123:WP:PAID 11473:14304 11300:WP:AFD 11290:ZETRON 11283:ZETRON 11130:Smehh 10829:Yandex 10609:As to 10529:biting 10286:unsent 10186:Cullen 10141:Begoon 9758:Joseph 9745:right. 9711:Joseph 8904:Thanks 8740:Joseph 8679:Joseph 8405:C.Fred 8375:Joseph 8338:Joseph 8254:Orwuck 8239:Orwuck 8130:Orwuck 8019:Orwuck 7913:16,991 7748:salted 7300:NilamB 7249:, and 7229:NilamB 7207:NilamB 7110:Duedil 7088:NilamB 7065:NilamB 6784:Best, 6214:WP:AfD 6008:salted 5999:soccer 5899:boldly 5784:WP:ATD 5241:Nguo17 5160:salted 4799:Atchom 4697:C.Fred 4644:C.Fred 4574:Djha12 4528:apolis 4469:Dennis 4465:Drmies 3776:Jroehl 3724:WP:DRV 3145:C.Fred 3112:delete 2444:18,511 1402:Zaurus 1044:WP:DRN 882:Cunard 744:or at 742:WP:DRN 695:wister 691:wister 537:Cabayi 531:Since 493:Cabayi 462:Cabayi 376:Yes. 254:Tej74i 244:Baraha 241:InPage 216:Cor225 12080:, or 12049:Draft 11969:, an 11557:here. 11120:Smehh 10906:Baidu 10670:bitey 10558:Paine 10385:Sorry 10125:Davey 10087:Spiel 10022:drama 8803:watch 8799:links 8731:maybe 8481:Hitro 8181:WP:AN 8106:WP:AN 7989:here. 7678:. — 7583:Mole2 7566:Mole2 7534:Mole2 7465:From 7420:WATER 7279:Sir, 7200:Sir, 7055:Sir, 6729:watch 6725:links 6368:watch 6364:links 6080:stubs 5927:Pages 5853:watch 5849:links 5691:watch 5687:links 5606:Babel 5544:human 5281:watch 5277:links 4607:India 4595:Bihar 3228:watch 3224:links 3129:views 3121:watch 3117:links 3017:watch 3013:links 2513:here. 2206:watch 2202:links 2108:talk 1639:watch 1635:links 1599:Adzie 1494:watch 1490:links 955:Note: 414:.) - 16:< 12139:Eins 12121:talk 12105:Eins 12055:". 12019:Dane 11967:Dane 11949:talk 11909:talk 11859:talk 11802:talk 11787:talk 11773:talk 11753:talk 11711:talk 11707:Ronz 11697:talk 11680:talk 11676:Ronz 11663:talk 11646:talk 11642:Ronz 11626:talk 11609:talk 11589:talk 11585:Ronz 11564:talk 11441:talk 11435:. 11424:The 11397:ansh 11387:talk 11364:ansh 11347:ansh 11339:here 11310:talk 11269:talk 11251:talk 11221:ansh 11211:talk 11157:talk 11124:talk 11098:talk 11060:and 11038:Hey 11021:talk 10997:talk 10964:talk 10914:talk 10889:talk 10869:talk 10808:talk 10788:talk 10774:talk 10750:talk 10707:talk 10691:talk 10653:talk 10641:talk 10623:talk 10611:bite 10601:talk 10581:talk 10494:talk 10430:Dane 10395:talk 10370:talk 10334:talk 10269:talk 10229:talk 10209:talk 10165:talk 10130:2010 10082:Ϣere 10067:talk 10008:talk 9986:Eins 9921:talk 9905:"... 9901:", " 9897:", " 9889:", " 9885:", " 9881:", " 9877:", " 9857:talk 9840:talk 9818:talk 9761:Wood 9750:more 9733:talk 9714:Wood 9693:talk 9674:talk 9654:talk 9596:talk 9590:. 9579:The 9537:talk 9519:talk 9500:talk 9467:talk 9375:talk 9367:talk 9349:talk 9326:talk 9294:talk 9275:talk 9249:talk 9235:and 9212:talk 9187:talk 9173:. 9155:here 9139:must 9055:talk 9032:Mkdw 8939:talk 8895:talk 8873:talk 8860:Done 8838:talk 8807:logs 8791:talk 8787:edit 8767:talk 8743:Wood 8718:talk 8682:Wood 8655:talk 8613:talk 8582:talk 8574:talk 8561:talk 8553:talk 8537:talk 8520:talk 8507:talk 8488:talk 8434:talk 8410:talk 8378:Wood 8361:talk 8341:Wood 8294:talk 8271:talk 8243:talk 8189:talk 8157:talk 8114:talk 8094:2007 8077:talk 8023:talk 7996:talk 7882:talk 7860:talk 7826:TALK 7756:talk 7712:talk 7587:talk 7570:talk 7556:talk 7538:talk 7514:talk 7479:talk 7442:talk 7404:here 7351:talk 7336:talk 7304:talk 7290:talk 7263:talk 7211:talk 7188:talk 7176:and 7137:and 7096:and 7069:talk 7033:talk 6984:talk 6965:talk 6951:here 6927:talk 6903:talk 6888:talk 6856:talk 6837:talk 6831:. 6820:The 6804:talk 6790:talk 6762:talk 6733:logs 6717:talk 6713:edit 6693:talk 6665:talk 6615:talk 6598:talk 6578:talk 6568:per 6552:talk 6524:talk 6512:talk 6497:talk 6459:talk 6439:talk 6404:talk 6372:logs 6356:talk 6352:edit 6332:talk 6310:talk 6260:talk 6222:talk 6188:talk 6164:talk 6146:talk 6123:talk 6098:talk 6043:talk 6027:--- 6016:talk 5968:talk 5934:The 5915:talk 5883:talk 5857:logs 5841:talk 5837:edit 5817:talk 5757:talk 5714:talk 5695:logs 5679:talk 5675:edit 5655:talk 5627:talk 5511:talk 5485:talk 5475:. 5472:here 5469:and 5466:here 5437:talk 5415:talk 5383:talk 5355:talk 5333:talk 5319:talk 5285:logs 5269:talk 5265:edit 5245:talk 5226:talk 5168:talk 5146:talk 5135:talk 5113:talk 5107:. 5096:The 5077:talk 5060:talk 5032:talk 5003:Talk 4985:talk 4962:talk 4947:talk 4930:talk 4916:talk 4901:talk 4877:talk 4853:talk 4827:talk 4803:talk 4780:talk 4762:talk 4748:talk 4728:talk 4702:talk 4686:talk 4669:talk 4649:talk 4623:talk 4578:talk 4562:talk 4519:Mini 4477:talk 4455:talk 4437:talk 4425:your 4410:talk 4402:talk 4386:talk 4364:talk 4329:talk 4307:talk 4293:talk 4276:talk 4262:talk 4244:talk 4215:talk 4201:talk 4181:talk 4140:". 4090:talk 4072:talk 4038:talk 4024:talk 3978:talk 3960:talk 3922:talk 3890:talk 3869:talk 3836:talk 3804:talk 3780:talk 3732:talk 3703:talk 3681:talk 3660:talk 3632:talk 3584:talk 3356:talk 3336:talk 3328:here 3262:talk 3232:logs 3216:talk 3212:edit 3192:talk 3170:talk 3150:talk 3125:logs 3099:talk 3095:edit 3072:talk 3044:talk 3021:logs 3005:talk 3001:edit 2981:talk 2939:talk 2925:and 2921:and 2878:talk 2870:this 2852:talk 2828:talk 2814:talk 2799:and 2758:talk 2745:Talk 2730:talk 2555:talk 2549:. 2538:The 2521:talk 2467:The 2413:talk 2386:talk 2369:Talk 2354:talk 2337:Talk 2311:talk 2287:talk 2257:talk 2210:logs 2194:talk 2190:edit 2170:talk 2150:talk 2133:talk 2100:. 2074:and 2015:talk 1963:talk 1949:talk 1929:talk 1923:. 1921:here 1855:talk 1829:talk 1750:talk 1729:WP:N 1719:talk 1678:talk 1643:logs 1627:talk 1623:edit 1603:talk 1573:talk 1555:talk 1527:talk 1498:logs 1482:talk 1478:edit 1458:talk 1432:talk 1406:talk 1365:talk 1342:Jon 1336:talk 1303:talk 1250:talk 1242:DIFF 1240:and 1238:DIFF 1217:talk 1188:talk 1174:talk 1127:talk 1105:talk 1088:talk 1073:talk 1031:talk 1016:talk 985:talk 976:and 971:DIFF 967:DIFF 933:talk 904:talk 890:and 887:and 871:No. 842:also 828:and 754:talk 721:talk 700:talk 647:talk 609:talk 582:talk 555:talk 541:talk 497:talk 480:talk 466:talk 439:talk 420:talk 382:talk 362:talk 320:talk 258:talk 220:talk 194:talk 177:talk 137:talk 113:The 87:talk 58:talk 38:talk 11978:! 11540:it. 11482:532 11402:666 11369:666 11352:666 11226:666 11151:. 11066:are 10991:. 10746:Deb 10725:Deb 10703:Deb 10649:Deb 10576:Joe 10391:Deb 10265:Bri 10255:GAB 10240:Rob 9932:RFA 9893:, " 9788:did 9779:did 9429:GAB 9419:ygm 9414:or 9320:. 9182:six 9179:dog 9176:red 9164:by 9157:. 8910:mop 8702:G11 8595:Hi 8426:A11 8400:A11 8179:or 8144:. 8098:any 7872:YGM 7805:FSM 7663:by 7656:. 7306:) 7235:not 7213:) 7168:Re 7157:Re 7100:-- 7092:Re 7071:) 6882:. 6679:AfC 6546:. 6432:^ᴥ^ 6398:. 6117:. 5909:. 5905:or 5797:Why 5641:AfC 5501:as 5374:got 5054:. 4979:. 4821:. 4718:DRN 4615:Deb 4605:or 4558:Deb 4467:or 4159:or 4084:. 4002:to 3972:. 3884:. 3726:. 3654:. 3330:. 3311:by 3135:AfD 2933:. 2754:Mz7 2305:? 2279:RfC 2251:. 2242:or 2127:. 2103:DGG 2085:by 1904:by 1672:. 1567:. 1543:BLP 1426:. 1207:or 1067:. 1010:. 927:. 884:at 748:. 655:Ok. 551:Deb 522:to 489:Deb 476:Deb 435:Deb 402:to 129:. 117:'s 12157:: 12123:) 12074:, 11951:) 11911:) 11900:. 11861:) 11850:. 11804:) 11789:) 11775:) 11755:) 11713:) 11699:) 11682:) 11665:) 11648:) 11628:) 11611:) 11591:) 11566:) 11516:: 11496:: 11466:: 11443:) 11389:) 11312:) 11271:) 11253:) 11213:) 11184:— 11159:) 11126:) 11100:) 11027:) 11023:• 10999:) 10970:) 10966:• 10916:) 10891:) 10871:) 10859:, 10855:, 10851:, 10847:, 10843:, 10839:, 10835:, 10831:: 10810:) 10790:) 10776:) 10752:) 10709:) 10693:) 10655:) 10625:) 10603:) 10563:– 10496:) 10397:) 10372:• 10336:• 10271:) 10244:13 10231:) 10211:• 10167:) 10147:, 10143:, 10069:) 10010:) 9923:) 9859:) 9842:) 9820:) 9735:) 9695:) 9676:) 9656:) 9598:) 9539:) 9521:) 9502:) 9469:) 9422:}} 9416:{{ 9412:}} 9406:{{ 9377:) 9351:) 9328:) 9296:) 9281:) 9277:• 9251:) 9218:) 9214:• 9189:) 9134:. 9057:) 9016:. 8941:) 8916:. 8897:) 8875:) 8852:- 8840:) 8805:| 8801:| 8797:| 8793:| 8789:| 8775:) 8720:) 8657:) 8615:) 8584:) 8563:) 8539:) 8509:) 8436:) 8412:) 8363:) 8286:Dr 8263:Dr 8245:) 8191:) 8149:Dr 8116:) 8088:- 8079:) 8025:) 7998:) 7945:: 7923:: 7906:: 7862:) 7829:) 7758:) 7714:) 7589:) 7572:) 7558:) 7540:) 7516:) 7490:A 7486:. 7481:) 7469:. 7444:) 7353:) 7338:) 7292:) 7265:) 7245:, 7205:-- 7190:) 7180:). 7116:, 7108:, 7104:, 7039:) 7035:• 6986:) 6971:) 6967:• 6933:) 6929:• 6905:) 6890:) 6858:) 6839:) 6806:) 6792:) 6764:) 6731:| 6727:| 6723:| 6719:| 6715:| 6701:) 6667:) 6642:| 6617:) 6600:) 6580:) 6554:) 6526:) 6499:) 6461:) 6406:) 6370:| 6366:| 6362:| 6358:| 6354:| 6340:) 6312:) 6266:) 6262:• 6224:) 6190:) 6166:) 6158:. 6148:) 6125:) 6100:) 6049:) 6045:• 6018:) 5974:) 5970:• 5917:) 5885:) 5855:| 5851:| 5847:| 5843:| 5839:| 5825:) 5792:So 5786:). 5759:) 5716:) 5693:| 5689:| 5685:| 5681:| 5677:| 5663:) 5629:) 5609:}} 5603:{{ 5583:}} 5577:{{ 5513:) 5487:) 5439:) 5417:) 5385:) 5357:) 5335:) 5321:) 5283:| 5279:| 5275:| 5271:| 5267:| 5253:) 5228:) 5170:) 5148:) 5115:) 5079:) 5062:) 5034:) 4987:) 4964:) 4949:) 4932:) 4918:) 4903:) 4879:) 4855:) 4829:) 4805:) 4782:) 4764:) 4750:) 4730:) 4704:) 4688:) 4671:) 4651:) 4625:) 4580:) 4564:) 4502:. 4479:) 4457:) 4439:) 4412:) 4366:) 4331:) 4309:) 4295:) 4278:) 4264:) 4246:) 4217:) 4203:) 4183:) 4092:) 4074:) 4040:) 4026:) 3980:) 3962:) 3928:) 3924:• 3892:) 3871:) 3842:) 3838:• 3806:) 3782:) 3734:) 3705:) 3683:) 3662:) 3634:) 3586:) 3358:) 3338:) 3264:) 3230:| 3226:| 3222:| 3218:| 3214:| 3200:) 3172:) 3152:) 3127:| 3123:| 3119:| 3115:| 3110:| 3106:| 3101:| 3097:| 3074:) 3046:) 3019:| 3015:| 3011:| 3007:| 3003:| 2989:) 2941:) 2880:) 2854:) 2830:) 2816:) 2760:) 2732:) 2613:: 2557:) 2523:) 2500:, 2492:: 2457:: 2438:: 2415:) 2388:) 2356:) 2313:) 2289:) 2259:) 2208:| 2204:| 2200:| 2196:| 2192:| 2178:) 2152:) 2135:) 2110:) 2017:) 1965:) 1951:) 1931:) 1857:) 1831:) 1806:| 1752:) 1721:) 1680:) 1641:| 1637:| 1633:| 1629:| 1625:| 1611:) 1575:) 1557:) 1529:) 1496:| 1492:| 1488:| 1484:| 1480:| 1466:) 1434:) 1408:) 1399:. 1367:) 1338:) 1305:) 1252:) 1244:. 1219:) 1190:) 1176:) 1129:) 1107:) 1090:) 1075:) 1033:) 1018:) 987:) 979:. 935:) 906:) 893:. 853:. 821:. 799:. 783:. 756:) 723:) 649:) 611:) 584:) 572:, 568:, 557:) 543:) 499:) 482:) 468:) 441:) 422:) 384:) 364:) 322:) 281:-- 264:) 260:• 226:) 222:• 196:) 179:) 93:) 89:• 60:) 40:) 12119:( 11947:( 11907:( 11857:( 11800:( 11785:( 11771:( 11751:( 11709:( 11695:( 11678:( 11661:( 11644:( 11624:( 11607:( 11587:( 11562:( 11536:. 11439:( 11385:( 11308:( 11302:. 11267:( 11249:( 11209:( 11155:( 11122:( 11096:( 11079:W 11076:J 11073:T 11019:( 10995:( 10962:( 10912:( 10887:( 10867:( 10806:( 10786:( 10772:( 10748:( 10727:: 10723:@ 10720:) 10716:( 10705:( 10689:( 10651:( 10643:) 10639:( 10621:( 10599:( 10583:) 10579:( 10552:! 10492:( 10393:( 10376:) 10368:( 10340:) 10332:( 10290:! 10267:( 10227:( 10215:) 10207:( 10163:( 10151:) 10065:( 10006:( 9919:( 9873:" 9855:( 9838:( 9831:) 9827:( 9816:( 9731:( 9691:( 9672:( 9652:( 9594:( 9535:( 9517:( 9498:( 9465:( 9373:( 9365:( 9347:( 9324:( 9292:( 9273:( 9247:( 9210:( 9185:( 9087:. 9053:( 8937:( 8893:( 8871:( 8836:( 8809:) 8785:( 8770:· 8765:( 8716:( 8653:( 8611:( 8580:( 8572:( 8559:( 8551:( 8535:( 8518:( 8505:( 8463:@ 8432:( 8408:( 8359:( 8256:: 8252:@ 8241:( 8187:( 8127:) 8123:( 8112:( 8075:( 8021:( 7994:( 7972:. 7858:( 7823:( 7809:I 7754:( 7710:( 7624:. 7585:( 7568:( 7554:( 7536:( 7532:. 7512:( 7477:( 7440:( 7349:( 7334:( 7302:( 7288:( 7261:( 7231:: 7227:@ 7209:( 7186:( 7090:: 7086:@ 7067:( 7031:( 6982:( 6963:( 6925:( 6901:( 6886:( 6854:( 6835:( 6802:( 6788:( 6760:( 6735:) 6711:( 6696:· 6691:( 6663:( 6613:( 6596:( 6576:( 6550:( 6522:( 6510:( 6495:( 6457:( 6435:) 6429:( 6402:( 6374:) 6350:( 6335:· 6330:( 6308:( 6258:( 6220:( 6186:( 6162:( 6144:( 6121:( 6096:( 6041:( 6014:( 5966:( 5913:( 5881:( 5859:) 5835:( 5820:· 5815:( 5755:( 5712:( 5697:) 5673:( 5658:· 5653:( 5625:( 5509:( 5483:( 5435:( 5413:( 5381:( 5353:( 5331:( 5317:( 5287:) 5263:( 5248:· 5243:( 5224:( 5166:( 5144:( 5133:( 5111:( 5075:( 5058:( 5030:( 5001:| 4983:( 4960:( 4945:( 4928:( 4914:( 4899:( 4875:( 4851:( 4825:( 4801:( 4778:( 4760:( 4746:( 4726:( 4700:( 4684:( 4667:( 4647:( 4621:( 4576:( 4560:( 4475:( 4453:( 4435:( 4408:( 4400:( 4384:( 4362:( 4327:( 4320:: 4316:@ 4305:( 4291:( 4274:( 4260:( 4242:( 4213:( 4199:( 4179:( 4088:( 4070:( 4036:( 4022:( 3976:( 3958:( 3920:( 3888:( 3867:( 3834:( 3802:( 3778:( 3730:( 3701:( 3679:( 3658:( 3630:( 3582:( 3354:( 3334:( 3260:( 3234:) 3210:( 3195:· 3190:( 3168:( 3148:( 3142:— 3137:) 3133:( 3131:) 3093:( 3070:( 3042:( 3023:) 2999:( 2984:· 2979:( 2937:( 2876:( 2850:( 2826:( 2812:( 2778:☎ 2756:( 2743:| 2728:( 2599:) 2553:( 2519:( 2411:( 2384:( 2367:| 2352:( 2335:| 2309:( 2285:( 2255:( 2212:) 2188:( 2173:· 2168:( 2148:( 2131:( 2106:( 2050:. 2013:( 1961:( 1947:( 1927:( 1853:( 1827:( 1748:( 1717:( 1676:( 1645:) 1621:( 1606:· 1601:( 1571:( 1553:( 1525:( 1500:) 1476:( 1461:· 1456:( 1430:( 1404:( 1363:( 1334:( 1301:( 1248:( 1230:: 1226:@ 1215:( 1186:( 1172:( 1125:( 1118:: 1114:@ 1103:( 1086:( 1071:( 1029:( 1014:( 983:( 931:( 902:( 814:. 807:. 752:( 719:( 693:T 689:S 645:( 618:? 607:( 580:( 553:( 539:( 495:( 478:( 464:( 437:( 418:( 380:( 360:( 333:| 318:( 286:| 256:( 218:( 192:( 175:( 140:· 135:( 85:( 56:( 36:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index