Knowledge

User talk:RMCD bot/Archive 4

Source 📝

31: 1339: 922: 444: 278: 317: 191: 354:– I started working on adding a new function to the bot's framework yesterday, and that function had a syntax error (a missing ".") and then I wasn't paying attention because I hadn't yet coded anything to actually call the function. Sorry about that, and thanks for the heads-up. I've been multi-tasking and working reducing on another backlog so far this morning. Need my coffee to kick in before I get back to coding. – 348: 1253:, notices on article pages are intended to be temporary, only posted while the RM is still open. In contrast, the talk page notices are intended to last forever, or until archived, as a permanent record of historical move requests. Yes, ideally the bot would be smart enough to distinguish between legitimate requests and vandalism, and would revert 1161:
your first edit? The bot would not have edit-warred with you if you had. I guess I need to either bite the bullet and implement code to detect reverts of bot edits, or just pull the plug on notices and just stop posting them altogether. I'm guessing it could take me a couple days or more to implement
597:
would have stopped the bot's edit-warring here. Not sure about how well the bot may handle future requests to move CSS pages, but I'm dropping this from my to-do list and will deal with any new CSS page-move issues as they may happen in the future. Really, these moves are borderline out-of-scope for
168:
specifying a timestamp with a sufficient window to detect the same previous edit that was subsequently reverted will enable the framework to stop apps from edit warring. Not sure what the default timestamp should be (1 day, 1 week?) but the RM app could specify the timestamp of the edit that started
95:
Please could you update the code of your bot so it will add the RM banner just once to each page, for a particular move discussion. Then if it is removed by a human editor, the bot will not edit war. I think this may be the simplest way to avoid many of the problems documented on this page. — Martin
114:
Checking the edit history of pages to see if the bot has previously been reverted is something that could be done, though coding for that isn't a quick 'n easy task. I view this as checking for symptoms. For example you could watch for fuel leaks on the launchpad (symptom) and abort the launch upon
1188:
suggested an edit filter to disallow certain strings commonly used in those mass move vandal requests & regularly affected articles, since that filter was active the vandal appeared to stop doing that until yesterday. If that filter can be modified, that would help stop the bot making loads of
1113:
passed before the revert. I could make the bot wait a full hour before posting these notices, but then I might see people asking me here why the bot is so slow in posting notices. I suppose it's a trade-off. Or maybe increase the delay time for multi-moves with more than a small number of pages
978:
Hi, a vandal has returned to make a vandal mass-move request earlier today on a random talk page. The bot posts on every talk page alerting watchers that they should participate in the original talk page of where the mass move request takes place. After someone removed the mass move request for
973: 115:
detection, but you'll still want to find and fix the source of the leak before restarting the countdown. If this was life and death task I would surely do that, but resources are stretched thin around here, so just keeping this on the back burner for now. –
423:
and making several fixes to address them, my v 7.33 fix of 9 June 2020 didn't address all the remaining scenarios. Also still open is implementing a more robust backup to catch unaddressed issues by making the bot stop
416: 251:
Only then call a new function to get an array of previous editors and edit times (no need to get previous content, I don't think) and check whether the bot was a recent editor, especially with multiple recent
1304: 1299: 629:
each have hundreds of deleted edits (I buried them to remove the clutter in the page histories) dating from 11:06, 16-Oct-2020. This problem persisted for over three days before I was notified here.
412: 1320:
I might could write a bot that patrolled for these by monitoring recent changes in talk namespaces, and parsing out edits ending with standard-format signatures. Would be an interesting project. –
859: 1000: 984: 1309: 497: 530:
Then since there's no notice on the pages; the bot assumes that the discussions have closed and thus removes the templates from the talk pages of the others in this multi-move request.
1315: 557:
added a check to catch requests to move CSS pages, and handle them in a similar way as requests to move Lua modules. I'm not sure whether there's anything more I need to do here. –
1190: 1358: 863: 761:
The bot's edit warring started after the 10:48, 16 October 2020 procedural close and persisted until my 21:00, 19 October 2020 edit, which was the second procedural close. –
1176:
My guess would have been that Seasider53 is not familiar with the usual behaviour the vandal has been doing this and last year. I actually missed those replies linked from
899:
making changes to your RM after others have !voted, without everyone on board with your changes, is asking for trouble. This started out as a single-page move request, so
420: 1177: 1104: 1261:
a high priority, and I intend to implement that fix before I address the specific issue here any further than I already have by implementing the 20-minute delay. –
575:
indicates the issue continued after I posted my "working on it" message and the warring didn't stop until 4:39, 22 October 2020 which was 5 minutes after the RM at
332: 947: 676: 805: 781: 594: 465: 129: 1143:
I spent thirty minutes reverting them before realising how futile it was, since it will likely happen again. I think we need competent bot owners.
1090: 1072: 1047: 1022: 724: 683: 132:
has convinced me that I need to bump up the priority of this task; seems I'll never plug all the holes enabling the bot to edit-war as users will
1245: 884: 841: 1206: 1131: 987:
for example does not have to manually remove nonsense posted by a good bot themselves which, of course, only edits by it's programming. Thanks,
878: 1171: 1152: 983:
at 10:38 today (UTC). I know this sort of thing does not happen very often but I think that issue should be fixed so that users like me and
941: 915: 1288: 1270: 459: 437: 588: 145: 1233: 1162:
edit-reversion detection handling. The lack of experienced editor/administrator oversight of the RM process at times is frustrating. –
288:
with bot version 8.40. The bot is limited to a maximum of three recent edits to sync modified notices of move discussions on a page. –
124: 1329: 929: 509: 979:
vandalism, the bot removes the transcluded notice off the talk pages from the same group of pages but the text stays put. (Example:
654: 1107:
on other pages in May 2020. A couple of previous vandalism posts of this sort were each reverted after nine minutes. In this case,
285: 1225: 340: 576: 477: 974:
Bot is still not removing notices from multi-move request after someone removes the mass-move request on the original talk page.
963: 793: 607: 827: 815: 363: 405: 617: 672:
without closing the above single-page RM. It would be nice if I could "blacklist" this edit from being allowed to be saved.
514: 660: 483: 866:(initiated 19:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)) to run normally. I also reverted your bot deny to allow RMCD bot to tidy up. -- 1202: 1086: 1043: 996: 626: 493: 572: 566: 549: 1108: 271: 820:
Update: I added a Bot Deny template to the article and talk page. Feel free to remove it when the issue is resolved. –
770: 752: 297: 178: 305: 108: 90: 1279:
posting, obviously: sorry I'm a bit slow) that was probably the reason the bot left the notice in place. cheers,
156:
documents the API for getting the content of pages, including the page history (all revisions). The framework's
851: 622: 489: 328: 69: 64: 59: 799: 369: 214: 1236:, it leaves some behind. If it reverted the whole of its addition, there wouldn't be a problem. cheers, 244:
There's only a need to check for previous bot edits to a page AFTER it has decided it should POST, i.e.
385: 336: 38: 1198: 1082: 1039: 992: 540:
I've made some code changes to accommodate this usage, but still need to make more. Working on it. –
393: 534: 381: 1257:
the vandalism, but... Your struggle with my bot to revert the vandalism has convinced me to make
1158: 1119: 1013:
you've linked the wrong Struway there, if it's the football-article editing one I'm thinking of.
900: 892: 888: 225: 389: 748: 741: 734: 727: 707: 701: 695: 689: 669: 650: 634: 554: 980: 468:
would have stopped the bot's edit-warring here, if the v 7.60 fix hadn't been implemented. –
533:
So, as with Lua modules, CSS pages are special cases that need special handling. Hmm, I see
1148: 1068: 1018: 401: 233:
I spent some more time thinking about how to do this. Most of the time after the bot gets (
84: 8: 874: 824: 812: 370: 359: 906:
someone had already voted in support of the single-page request is a definite NO-NO!! –
1284: 1241: 1194: 1078: 1054: 1035: 1008: 988: 860:
Talk:Illegal immigrant population of the United States#Requested move 28 September 2021
845: 210: 47: 17: 1316:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 140#Edit filter to prevent Signature faking
896: 396:. Is there anything that can be done to stop this, other than closing a discussion? – 183: 1354: 1325: 1266: 1167: 1127: 959: 937: 911: 789: 766: 643: 603: 584: 562: 545: 473: 455: 433: 411:
Belated reply. After becoming aware of this, I cleared out 202 junk bot edits to the
321: 293: 267: 195: 174: 141: 136:
find another way. This is my next significant task, as soon as I make time for it. –
120: 153: 504: 164:
which limits the server to providing only the latest revision. Replacing this with
1144: 1115: 1064: 1029: 1014: 855: 686:
reverting your own RM is OK if others haven't yet participated in the discussion
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1183: 867: 835: 821: 809: 103: 864:
Talk:Illegal immigration to the United States#Requested move 18 September 2021
262:
Now just need a solid, uninterrupted chunk of time to focus on coding this. –
1346: 1280: 1250: 1237: 854:) started two parallel discussions about the same proposed move, contrary to 638: 397: 307: 221: 206: 1157:
Oh. So sorry to see you wasted so much time doing that. Why didn't you make
1350: 1321: 1310:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mike Matthews17/Archive#13 October 2021
1262: 1219: 1163: 1138: 1123: 955: 933: 907: 785: 762: 599: 580: 558: 541: 469: 451: 429: 419:. I'm frustrated that after putting a lot of work time into addressing the 377: 355: 289: 263: 170: 137: 116: 728:
reverted the bot on its Knowledge:Requested moves/Current discussions page
653:
to "withdraw all these separate requests and renominate them in a single
501: 202: 1345:
by bot v 8.41 to stop edit warring in this scenario – the bot is now on
1338: 1232:
remove the whole of its addition, but on the associated talk page, e.g.
921: 755:
which supersedes this discussion and nobody else has participated here."
443: 277: 661:
Knowledge:Requested moves/Current discussions at 08:37, 16 October 2020
1180:
back in 2020, and there are good points explained there. Additionally
99: 1189:
invalid edits over a small period of time as well. See the relevant
520:
The bot cannot place notices on CSS pages; I see this error message:
730:(at 08:54, 16 October 2020) which is not necessary, but harmless... 862:(which was initiated at 03:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)), and left 237:) a page it decides that it does not need to POST an update. So 1077:
Seems like that part of the confusion has been solved, I hope.
744:"Procedurally closed in favor of the multi-move request below." 1305:
30 relevant Iggy the Swan edits, 15:14–16:56, 13 October 2021
784:
fixes would have put an end to the Ba'ath Party edit war. –
663:
shows 16 open requested moves for Baath Party related titles
347: 1300:
56 relevant Seasider53 edits, 10:12–10:35, 13 October 2021
858:
and one or two other guidelines. I've procedurally closed
496:, and the talk pages affected by my multi-move request at 690:
History of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Syria Region
928:
by bot version 7.57 – this should have been caught and
751:"the RM from this page, since you opened a newer RM at 948:
Undocumented immigrant population of the United States
1224:
I think the issue is that on the article page, e.g.
1122:, then time to revert would have been 35 minutes. – 1105:
implemented a 20-minute delay before posting notices
804:
Hey, can you take a look at what the bot's doing at
677:§ Multiple requested move sections on the same page 932:and next time this scenario happens it will be. – 259:has made sure the bot is allowed to edit the page. 255:This new function will often be called just after 806:Illegal immigrant population of the United States 753:Talk:Ba'ath Party#Requested move 16 October 2020 327:Sorry, but I don't think it works any more, see 808:? Looks like it's stuck in some sort of loop. – 1059:I now see you filtered the contributions; it 950:page history) would have been stopped by the 417:Talk:George Papadopoulos (junk bot edit dump) 526:Invalid selector list at line 2 character 1. 524:Invalid selector list at line 1 character 1. 1275:Thanks for the explanation. I did realise ( 954:, before bot version 7.57 was installed. – 901:THIS EDIT that converted it to a multi-move 201:RMCD bot is having some kind of episode at 537:– I need to familiarize myself with that. 388:. This has led to RMCD bot, well.... see 1034:- which article are you're thinking of? 413:George Papadopoulos (junk bot edit dump) 981:as seen on the bottom of this talk page 577:User talk:SDZeroBot/G13 soon/styles.css 14: 220:Thanks. Users always ignore rules per 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 384:and another that affects the page at 25: 23: 946:The edit-warring (now seen in the 627:Talk:Ba'ath Party (disambiguation) 494:Talk:Ba'ath Party (disambiguation) 24: 1369: 1258: 951: 777: 498:Template talk:G13 soon/styles.css 425: 241:just the latest revision is fine. 1337: 920: 442: 346: 315: 276: 189: 29: 733:...but you missed a couple, so 286:"Twin Towers friendly-fire war" 930:flagged as a malformed request 889:removed it from the multi-move 879:21:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC) 828:12:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC) 816:12:09, 29 September 2021 (UTC) 500:. Not sure what's causing it. 415:and 198 junk bot edits to the 406:15:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 329:Special:Contributions/RMCD_bot 13: 1: 1359:23:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 1330:23:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 964:00:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC) 794:23:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC) 623:Ba'ath Party (disambiguation) 608:23:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC) 490:Ba'ath Party (disambiguation) 478:23:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC) 364:14:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC) 341:14:07, 14 December 2023 (UTC) 298:13:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 179:15:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC) 89:Suggestion originally posted 1349:for these types of edits. – 1289:20:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 1271:19:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 1246:12:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC) 1207:06:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 1172:00:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 1153:23:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 1132:23:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 1091:16:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 1073:16:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 1048:16:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 1023:16:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 1001:16:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 771:17:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 635:a single-page RM was started 589:15:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC) 567:15:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC) 550:14:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC) 510:20:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC) 484:Bot edit warring with itself 460:18:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC) 438:19:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC) 272:02:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC) 215:17:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC) 146:19:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 7: 942:17:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC) 916:15:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC) 696:History of the Ba'ath Party 670:a multi-move RM was started 10: 1374: 747:At 21:00, 19 October 2020 740:At 10:48, 16 October 2020 737:at 09:07, 16 October 2020 668:At 08:38, 16 October 2020 649:At 22:19, 15 October 2020 633:At 10:26, 15 October 2020 421:issues reported previously 386:Talk:Georgios Papadopoulos 380:. A user started an RM at 313: 187: 88: 1178:the discussions I started 893:that removal was reverted 710:at 08:52, 16 October 2020 704:at 08:53, 16 October 2020 698:at 08:53, 16 October 2020 692:at 08:53, 16 October 2020 651:the nominator was advised 125:21:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 535:Knowledge:TemplateStyles 382:Talk:George Papadopoulos 109:13:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 891:while in-progress but 742:the single-page RM was 450:by bot version 7.60 – 42:of past discussions. 1193:discussion. Thanks, 735:the bot reverted you 702:Arab Ba'ath Movement 1191:edit filter request 800:Dozens of bot edits 371:George Papadopoulos 18:User talk:RMCD bot 1120:rather than shrug 322:User talk:wbm1058 196:User talk:wbm1058 107: 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1365: 1341: 1223: 1187: 1142: 1058: 1033: 1012: 924: 870: 840:This is because 839: 646: 555:Bot version 7.41 527: 446: 350: 333:NmWTfs85lXusaybq 319: 318: 306:What happens to 280: 258: 247: 240: 236: 193: 192: 167: 163: 159: 154:mw:API:Revisions 97: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1217: 1181: 1136: 1063:the same user. 1052: 1027: 1006: 976: 883:In fairness to 868: 833: 802: 642: 620: 523: 517: 507: 506:it has begun... 486: 374: 325: 324: 316: 312: 284:to prevent the 256: 245: 238: 234: 199: 198: 190: 186: 165: 161: 157: 93: 87: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1371: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1318: 1307: 1302: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 975: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 918: 897:WP:TALK#REVISE 801: 798: 797: 796: 759: 758: 757: 756: 745: 731: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 712: 711: 705: 699: 693: 681: 680: 679: 666: 665: 664: 647: 619: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 552: 538: 531: 528: 525: 521: 516: 515:TemplateStyles 513: 505: 485: 482: 481: 480: 462: 440: 373: 368: 367: 366: 314: 311: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 260: 253: 249: 242: 231: 188: 185: 182: 160:function sets 151: 150: 149: 148: 86: 83: 80: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1370: 1361: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1297: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1221: 1216: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1185: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1140: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1118:had reverted 1117: 1114:involved. If 1112: 1111: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1056: 1055:Iggy the Swan 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1031: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1010: 1009:Iggy the Swan 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 944: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 917: 913: 909: 905: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 881: 880: 876: 872: 865: 861: 857: 853: 850: 847: 843: 837: 832: 831: 830: 829: 826: 823: 818: 817: 814: 811: 807: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 774: 773: 772: 768: 764: 754: 750: 746: 743: 739: 738: 736: 732: 729: 726: 723: 716: 715: 714: 713: 709: 706: 703: 700: 697: 694: 691: 688: 687: 685: 682: 678: 674: 673: 671: 667: 662: 659: 658: 656: 652: 648: 645: 640: 636: 632: 631: 630: 628: 624: 609: 605: 601: 596: 592: 591: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 553: 551: 547: 543: 539: 536: 532: 529: 522: 519: 518: 512: 511: 508: 503: 499: 495: 491: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 439: 435: 431: 427: 426:#Edit warring 422: 418: 414: 410: 409: 408: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 372: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 344: 343: 342: 338: 334: 330: 323: 309: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 273: 269: 265: 261: 254: 250: 243: 232: 229: 228: 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 197: 181: 180: 176: 172: 155: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 130:This incident 128: 127: 126: 122: 118: 113: 112: 111: 110: 105: 101: 92: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1342: 1336: 1276: 1254: 1229: 1109: 1060: 977: 925: 903: 848: 819: 803: 760: 639:Ba'ath Party 621: 618:Ba'ath Party 573:page history 487: 447: 375: 351: 326: 281: 226: 205:. Just FYI. 200: 152: 133: 94: 85:Edit warring 75: 43: 37: 708:Arab Ba'ath 644:Baath Party 320:Moved from 203:Twin Towers 194:Moved from 36:This is an 1228:, the bot 1145:Seasider53 1116:Seasider53 1110:52 minutes 1065:Seasider53 1030:Seasider53 1015:Seasider53 952:v 8.40 fix 595:v 8.41 fix 579:closed. – 502:* Pppery * 466:v 8.41 fix 227:find a way 169:the RM. – 1259:this task 1184:Gricehead 836:Dlthewave 822:dlthewave 810:dlthewave 749:I removed 725:Sahib1609 684:Sahib1609 655:multimove 162:rvlimit=1 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 1281:Struway2 1251:Struway2 1238:Struway2 1203:Contribs 1087:Contribs 1044:Contribs 997:Contribs 985:Struway2 885:Showiecz 856:WP:MULTI 852:contribs 842:Showiecz 637:to move 593:OK, the 464:OK, the 398:Muboshgu 352:Facepalm 308:RMCD bot 207:Station1 184:RMCD bot 1351:wbm1058 1322:wbm1058 1263:wbm1058 1220:Wbm1058 1164:wbm1058 1139:Wbm1058 1124:wbm1058 956:wbm1058 934:wbm1058 908:wbm1058 887:– they 786:wbm1058 763:wbm1058 600:wbm1058 581:wbm1058 559:wbm1058 542:wbm1058 470:wbm1058 452:wbm1058 430:wbm1058 378:wbm1058 356:wbm1058 290:wbm1058 264:wbm1058 248:a page. 239:getpage 235:getpage 171:wbm1058 158:getpage 138:wbm1058 117:wbm1058 39:archive 1347:WP:0RR 895:. Per 871:rose64 782:v 8.41 778:v 8.40 598:RM. – 257:nobots 252:edits. 222:WP:IAR 166:rvend= 134:always 1343:Fixed 1314:Hmm, 1277:after 926:Fixed 904:after 571:This 448:Fixed 282:Fixed 16:< 1355:talk 1326:talk 1285:talk 1267:talk 1255:only 1242:talk 1234:here 1230:does 1226:here 1199:Swan 1195:Iggy 1168:talk 1159:THIS 1149:talk 1128:talk 1083:Swan 1079:Iggy 1069:talk 1040:Swan 1036:Iggy 1019:talk 993:Swan 989:Iggy 960:talk 938:talk 912:talk 875:talk 873:🌹 ( 846:talk 790:talk 780:and 776:The 767:talk 717:etc. 675:See 625:and 604:talk 585:talk 563:talk 546:talk 474:talk 456:talk 434:talk 428:. – 402:talk 394:here 392:and 390:here 376:Hi, 360:talk 337:talk 294:talk 268:talk 246:edit 224:and 211:talk 175:talk 142:talk 121:talk 104:talk 100:MSGJ 91:here 1201:) ( 1085:) ( 1042:) ( 995:) ( 869:Red 657:." 488:On 1357:) 1328:) 1287:) 1269:) 1244:) 1205:) 1170:) 1151:) 1130:) 1103:I 1089:) 1071:) 1061:is 1046:) 1021:) 999:) 962:) 940:) 914:) 877:) 792:) 769:) 641:→ 606:) 587:) 565:) 548:) 492:, 476:) 458:) 436:) 404:) 362:) 339:) 331:. 296:) 270:) 213:) 177:) 144:) 123:) 102:· 1353:( 1324:( 1283:( 1265:( 1240:( 1222:: 1218:@ 1197:( 1186:: 1182:@ 1166:( 1147:( 1141:: 1137:@ 1126:( 1081:( 1067:( 1057:: 1053:@ 1038:( 1032:: 1028:@ 1017:( 1011:: 1007:@ 991:( 958:( 936:( 910:( 849:· 844:( 838:: 834:@ 825:☎ 813:☎ 788:( 765:( 602:( 583:( 561:( 544:( 472:( 454:( 432:( 400:( 358:( 335:( 310:? 292:( 266:( 230:. 209:( 173:( 140:( 119:( 106:) 98:( 50:.

Index

User talk:RMCD bot
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
here
MSGJ
talk
13:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
wbm1058
talk
21:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This incident
wbm1058
talk
19:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
mw:API:Revisions
wbm1058
talk
15:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
User talk:wbm1058
Twin Towers
Station1
talk
17:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:IAR
find a way
wbm1058

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.