Knowledge

User talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 7

Source 📝

334:
more than welcome to have all my research over 15 years my son has taken the steps at hadon hall off so not to confuse with the 1847 pic of steps at hadon hall with the Huguenot figures in clear they are in the pic of haweswater mill you put up but are in the trees embracing and you need to be up close to see those iv just uncovered a lovely emmerson knitting in the lake district 1854 when he was at carlisle being taught by wjb in the stanwix studio the white ground technique they all wanted blacklock was translator from c 1844 old masters to modernism the emmerson is so like blacklock and is before waiting and autumn leaves millais must have been influenced by it and dyce later in his knitting in wales it was exh 1854 and is mentioned in the lethard letters as mrs john Sheffield and child again emmersons knitting pic was just before waiting and autumn leaves it is full of truth and poetry thought is was a blacklock you need to see the infra red reflexology of the landscape with beehives it has pentemente like giorgione and v deep mad figures of wjb in death as a boy and bessy going through his body great last old master the bit you can see in the pic is wjb in old age and bessy as a lilliputian figure telling the bees YOUR MASTER IS DEAD its much greater than millais ophilia there is a beautiful manor house and in front a skep with zillions of bees buzzing round when the beekeeper died the family had to tell the bees your master is dead i keep bees but it is much much deeper the pic was done at the end of his short life and in the chrighton mental hospital christies misses the infra red pics that were discovered later by dr eastaugh incredible brilliant painter they said it was in tandem with early barbazon school you see each of wjb s pics are of a different character and importance as he stated. i agree re cotman and constable seen in his work but its developed with a little help from the old masters and maybe the ingenious me nutter of the once famous carlisle academy 1830s many of the cumbrian and northumberland artists were already in search of italy as you know please leave my little bit on the site i thankyou and please put the crummock pic 1853 on in place of the steps at h hall look forward to conversing in the future and indeed meeting you regards --
2758:
complaint about you calling it ″the broadest definition″. I have never seen and never expect to see any definition (other than those tracing back to the Knowledge itself) which claims yours is the broadest definition. It is one thing to produce a definition, another to claim that it is the broadest. Had you merely given your definition, with no citation, I might have passed it by, since it is one definition of modernism, but to make such an exaggerated claim for it, without citing a source for THAT PREPOSTEROUS CLAIM is much worse than leaving your definition uncited. Yes, I should have cited mine, can do, and will do, if mine stays up long enough, and you should have cited yours, too, surely we can agree on that.
183:
the most advanced landscapes in Europe of 1854. It set a new pathway into modernism where Cezanne and the modernists, including the surrealists are his heir. Blacklock was not as obscure as you think as alan staley has tried to hide. Blacklock's paintings are something that must be viewed in the flesh and i invite you to look at the paintings at tullie house carlisle and abott hall kendal and the one for sale in sothebys. and yes i do agree with christopher newall blacklock is an important cannon who was seen every year for sixteen years in the ra by the many and many other exhibitions in the uk and who was singled out by the kuntsplat german magazine in his day as the most authentic leading english landscape painter
147:
the barnard castle painting of 1852. 4. the ground braking report by dr nicholos estaugh possibly the leading expert on pigmentus in the world. who's done paintings by rembrandt. 5. we have letters on authoritys on pre-raphaeliteism regretting that alan staley left him out of the pre-raphaelite landscape exhibition. 6. by 1854 blacklock apears to have been the leading english landscape painter of his own country according to contemporary criticsm. it may take you and mr staley time to wake up to the truth of the importance of william james blacklock and the lies about the wet in wet technique that hunt and millais used if ever. so mr barlow were putting the truth of wjb back on the site.
2743:. In the interests of avoiding an edit war I will not make my change again today, but I am not going to give up on this while the definition for modernism begins with the uncited statement that what follows is its broadest definition. I believe articles should not make that claim. And, by the way, I agree with your comment on the Modernism discussion page that Modernism is a movement. If so, why do you support a definition which equates modernism with modern culture. ′Modern′ is an attribute of culture, applicable to something thought of as modern. Adding ′-ism′ gives it a meaning of preference, belief, advocacy or something which makes it, as you said, a movement. 239:
also anticipates early Monet. And does have Huguenot figures in it as do several others by blacklock including a later painting by blacklock called the rookery. we have further evidence but we are not 100% sure that blacklock is the unknown figure in the painting by millais called isabella. the one next to the female on the far right of the table. we know that william bell scott is portrayed as the servant who was best friends with blacklock. blacklock has a great future. the lost genius is being found. regards --
3002: 2012: 354: 2480: 685: 1051: 876: 444:
the Folger is of Hugh Hamersley, and neither of Shakespeare nor the Earl of Oxford. I would have thought the NPOV way of presenting this would have been to upload it with the title ascribed to it by the Folger Shakespeare library, namely Hugh Hamersley. Certainly, in the discipline of art history, it was associated with Shakespeare. But I know of no qualified historian of art who has gone to press on the Oxfordian position.
809: 114:
of all your pages. it's the truth and it's a free world. especialy regarding the wet in wet technique that has been as a tool to hype and sell paintings by the prb. it's complete lies. have you ever been face to face with a blacklock. have you even seen one or read the report. this is a sight for every one to contributeto. go on sothebys and type in blacklock in the search bar. you will see for yourself how great he is.
219:
to cancel or negotiate. i think i may know you well from the wordsworth trust programs. i'm sure i have met you and we got on very well with anne bacon and co who knows ground breaking research has been done on blacklock in the last 10 years but has not been published yet. blacklock was a genious like turner and authentic. they all wanted his power of truth. if you are going to be in london go to see the blacklock. --
3076: 1786:"BritishWatcher",and quite frankly the name says it all, he has started controversial arguements in adding such terms that are controversial in Ireland, such as British Isles, the other editors were happy with just Ireland and Britain as the geographical reference, but he had to have it his way, and he did, on numerous articles about Ireland,and this will be just another example. 2903:. Your accusations concerning the canvassing of ScottyBerg might be taken in the same way unless you have evidence. I see enough to think your behavior may also come under fire; I have no dog in this fight and not taking sides. I'm recommending de-escalation for all involved. I don't think others will see this as an attack as you do so the outcome may not be what you expect. 1295:
IE chart Handbook of Formal languages, and I noticed Dbachmann realized to the linguistic term. There is a modivation to disclude the links with Indo-Iranian, when there appears to be equally linked as Greek is, if not more. Armenian is also a Satem language like Indo-Iranian. So please can you correct the minor changes I just made that Taivo reverted. Thanks for your help.
1694:. Maybe terming people who don't see policy as narrowly as I do as morons is indeed unkind, but I wouldn't direct it at any individual editor. I still think the consensus is dead wrong, and I will absolutely revisit the issue in the future, since consensus can change. However, i will try to find ways to remain pleasant with those who disagree with me. - 2632:. I know of no procedure to merge two distinct page revision histories. I can only assume that you did not check that the decorative arts page pre-existed the merger, nor did you read the contents of the page. So you now criticise me for not using the move button, which would not have been possible, while cuttuing and pasting yourself! 1389: 2611:
several years, a move would not have helped. "Decorative arts" is clearly the better title as the lead shows: "Blackamoor figures (Italian moretto, moretti) are stylised depictions of black Africans used in sculpture, jewelry, armorial designs and decorative art." I think it's best just to revert your changes.
2884:
I disagree. Suggesting that a problem won't be resolved until "Jack disappears into the space-time contunuum from which he came" is pretty much an uncivil thing to say. There's already a lot of heat there. Barlow doesn't need to be tossing sterno on the fire. It was a personal attack, acting with the
1740:
when inconvenient (beyond those instances of IAR). I don't think of anyone as dispensable; the encyclopedia needs everyone in order for it to be collaborative - even those who disagree about the application of rules, if for no other reason than to strengthen or change those rules in questioning them.
1674:
There was nothing calm or polite about any of your responses. Throughout you adopted a sneering self-aggrandising tone in response to every editor who disagreed with you. The tone persists. So either they are all morons or the term more properly belongs elsewhere. I suggest that it is you who need to
1289:
page, which is also the Graeco-Aryan page, you and Dbachmann had added the Armenian and Indo-Iranian link with the subgroup Armeno-Aryan. This grouping is also excluding Greek, but in the main Armenian language page where it use to always have on the LEAD, Greek and Indo-Iranian families, they remove
585:
and the reflexes of that in Hindu culture might not in turn have an extensive differential anthropology. I would expect they do, in which case 'Hindu shame' would be perfectly comprehensible. The second point is that India has 70 million Muslims, with a distinctive shame culture, and therefore 'shame
182:
please can we have your home address to forward you Dr. Nicholas Estaugh's papers on Blacklock and the PRB, it is not for publication without permission. In Blacklock's painting the miller's homestead and landscape with a fisherman commissioned by the great Pre-raphaelite collector James Leathard are
77:
hi we have substantial evidence from dr nicholas eastaugh that supports our contention of what we have wrote. We will be putting it back on backed up by reports. Further Christopher Newell debatingly the world authority on pre-raphaelite landscape has agreed with Eastaugh in lot 33 in sothebys 13th
3183:
I've uploaded a couple of denser files for your pig article and I wonder if you might want to enlarge the feature image of move it down so it can be enlarged for better viewing. Also the comic Latin image really should be on the left instead of looking off the page. Great article, BTW. Are you going
2126:
Nonsense. I used the noticeboard precisely as it is intended to be used - to raise a question. If you found that I was mistaken, you should post that. But claiming I deliberately lied to waste peoples time is a personal attack. I am now done explaining to you; I sincerely hope you are done insulting
1831:
Ah - no, I think we're confusing each other. The words "Each flag displayed is used to express each of the respective nationalisms" originated from Dab's post, but they are words that Sheodred then inserted into the article text, rather than doing what he was asked to do which (as I read it) was to
1294:
that they even provide as the example of this, says Armenian not Phyrgian where they put the Phrygian and Indo-Iranian higher level subgrouping. What I need your help on is to correct some of the POV, of not including Indo-Iranian, which as I just pointed out with the sources also you added from the
443:
Clicking on it, I see you cleaned the picture. I am wondering why it is entitled shakespeare-lordoxford? The Folger Library certainly takes no position either way, but it dates the picture to 1612, which means it cannot be, implicitly, of Edward de Vere who died in 1604. Technically, the picture for
258:
hi paul another point i would like to make is that once alan staley in one of his books virtually claims constable as the greatest english landscape painter, it is difficult when a now obscure painter of great excellence that develops constable and the old masters for him to backtrack and accept it.
218:
hi my great friend dr robert woof thought Blacklock was a critical artist of the 19th century. And had great power of truth in his works. you have not researched blacklock and you are behind time with staley. when you are in time and knowledgeable on pre-raphaelite technique you will have the right
2379:
Because there are no source which indicates that Zimbabwe was of Celtic culture. And since you think that you are a clever manipulator, read the archives. Celts were not the dominant culture in Spain. Despite a lot of academic sources, you and your friends have succeded to revert them several times
2194:
is an arrogant user who thinks that he belongs to a superior kind of people. He will frequently revert your sourced edits without explanation, and if you ask him questions about his behaviour, you will have no answer, just a condescendant silence... A pity that such pretentious users can still post
1648:
I'm not sure why you decided to make it personal, but it was uncalled for. I didn't call you a moron because you didn't understand the problems with the removal of the text. I calmly, politely explained why it was wrong., No pretensions of higher intelligence - though I am fairly convinced that you
1579:
especially in relation to the table of Racial demographics? I am really not liking the way it synthesize data from many different sources without giving clarity about the proveniences of individual numbers or the degree to which they are comparable. Maybe I'm just fussing. If you have a little time
1067:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if
146:
we have cited our claims 1. christopher newall wrote up on julys sothebys sale 2010 on the blacklock 2. several other writings on the same over the last several years of sothebys cataloguing 3. the fact that william bell scott, rossetti and his circle tried to copy his luminous ground technique in
113:
i'm afraid allan staley is far behind in modern research on pre-raphelite landscape or technique where dr Nicholas estaugh's paper on blacklock and prb backs up along with christopher newell what we have stated. Because we have back up we are putting it back on. if you take it of again we will take
2627:
I am at a loss to understand your argument. When two pages exist to be merged, a merger will inevitably leave the page history of the merged article at the redirect. That does not eliminate it. It can still be found at the redirect. That is not a cut-and-paste move to a new title. It's a merger. I
333:
hi paul i have integrity so don't worry i can back up what i say please wait to see dr eastaughs paper half of my writings are already from chris newals wright up in sothebys cat and he is a world authority and in fast track on wjb because he has all the new research etc its not a comp and you are
238:
hi paul give me a few weeks for the papers, my son wrote the last extract to you we have changed it. Are you looking at the steps of haddon hall at tullie house and not the haddon hall picture that sothebys sold last year. The tullie house painting 1847 seems done under the influence Frederich and
2812:
I have removed the above editors talkpage privileges, and most of the content from the page except the block notice and ArbCom notices - and a comment by User:Fut.Perf - and noted my actions, mentioning they should contact ArbCom by email if they desire unblock or contributing to the case. If you
2610:
You appear to have now done exactly the same yourself, and worse by cutting and pasting the much more substantial article of the two. There was nothing on the "sculpture" talk page, and the "article" was only two lines or so. Since the decorative arts article had at that point already existed for
1362:
Do I? It's news to me. Where exactly have I ever "stuck up for" Hitler???? Frankly, I do not believe there is any such thing as "God's chosen folk" any more than there is a "master race". Killing millions of people wouldn't be somehow a lesser crime because they are not "God's chosen". There's an
538:
I hesitated a lot over this ostensibly awkward expression this morning, and appreciate your revision of it. My hesitation however is grounded in the fact that there is a vast literature on shame in anthropology, which distinguishes it according to culture, so that, to speak of areas I have a fair
603:
I expressed myself badly as usual. It wasn't my sentence you improved, but someone else's I didn't have the fortitude to adjust because overwhelmed by Hamletic perplexities as to the nuances, per above. You did the right edit, in any case. And of course, as for the French shame, it's appropriate
2757:
About my criticism of something as being uncited. As I said elsewhere, I can provide citations for my definition -- for goodness sake, let us all cite everything. But what I was really objecting to was not the lack for citation for your definition, I know of those, too, no problem, it was a
1601:
Is it? Do you agree, Paul? I see you've edited the template. Don't you think the box dignifies the "theories" and "theorists" too much? Note that Smatprt has asked on the template talkpage to have it in three columns, which IMO would make it ten times more in-your-face. (I guess the risk that
1785:
I think it would be best to be bold and put the flags back in, it is such a disgrace, the flag of Ireland is the Tricolour and does not apply to the whole island, just the nation. Have you noticed who has the problem and is throwing out all these statements that question my integretity,
586:
among Hindu youth' would have the advantage of specifying that Doniger's works would affect Hindu youth rather than Muslim Indians, but it steps round the problem of what local nuances are attached to the word/concept in Hindu culture. Still, faute de mieux, thanks for the correction.
1387:
has added that the article is unpublished apart from an abstract, and commented that readers are "misled by what is presented here". However, the brief New Scientist article cites William Jungers as agreeing that the study puts the idea to rest, and the full text is available at
934:" It is not ancient scripture, so references to Jesus, Mohammad... " How do you know??? This may only otherwise mean that Britishers deliberately changed Vedas to spread christianity in India. But maybe they also had some scriptural basis to do so and that is still not fake??? 1684:
I appreciate your input, Paul, but I think you'd be hard-pressed to find posts that used that same sort of language. I don't see myself as self-aggrandizing, as the term means boastful, or bragging; in fact, I don't think I'm like that at all. I know policy and guidelines
313:
hi please can you put the picture of crummock water, Grassmoor and Whitless pike 1853 on instead of the chapel at haddon hall. you have seen the wrong haddan hall picture the one you want to see is at tullie house and there is no pictures. it will confuse people. regards
464:
I think Les would go for the big spit in the wild blue yonder, and chuck a cosmic kalaidoscopic yawn over wiki, à la 'Blue Poles' by Jackson Pollack which, as you know, created a huge kerfuffle when it was purchased for 3 million smackeroos for the Australian National
2300:
for GA reassessment, an article you have previously shown interest in. The criteria have tightened quite a lot since it was last reviewed more than two years ago, and it currently fails on several criteria, some of which are serious. I hope you'll participate in the
907:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1855:
You undid my edit, labeling it as "baloney", without giving any reasons, references etc. Respectfully, did you actually read my entry with some consideration, or is this just a knee-jerk response?! I have cited 18 references. Did you bother to look them up?
1339:
You have a penchant for sticking up for "hitler". I advise you against this... it will not get you anywhere on wikipedia, did you really think you would earn brownie points for sticking up for he who stood against and KILLED 6 million of GODS CHOSEN FOLK???
1847: 576:
evoked a large Japanese critique for her putative failure to understand the local nuances of 'Japanese shame'), not to speak of the use of the word in Semitic languages, are often defined with culture-specific nuances. This made me wonder whether Sanskrit
2594:
I have no strong feelings about whether the page is titled “Blackamoors (sculpture)” or “Blackamoors (decorative arts)”. However, I do feel strongly that if the title is changed, it should be done by moving the page, and not by deleting and recreating.
2426:
Thank you for your edit. "Claim" is the right word. As I just wrote on the page of the person who added it as "confirmed by new technology" (a magnifying glass), that if I looked at Monet's "Waterlilies" at the Orangerie, I could find the whole of
1765:
Paul I noticed you've been editing the Shakespeare memorials page. There's a graf in there about the Shakespeare £20 note. I've got an image of that, but I can't seem to find the Knowledge policy on uploading money images. Do you know what it is?
1689:
well, and take a dim view of people who think they are dispensable. Yes, i may talk down to people who refuse to get the point, but that's mostly because I hate repeating myself to people who refuse to get the point and use the discussion like a
2506:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
1466:
Paul, thanks for expanding the article, it's a great job of adaptation, but the references need to be imported from the bottom of the SAQ page. As it is, when you click on the ref names in the notes, it goes nowhere. I would do it, but . . .
3094:
Well, I've not much opinion on the phrasing of the finding, but both senses of the word date to the 17th-century according to the OED, and the sense of “not interested” (1631) antedates the sense “unbiased” (1659) by 28 years. So there! ;D
2074:
Nor is it being ignored. You, as I say, you are the editor who acting in a disruptive fashion, not me. It is entirely proper to draw attention to violations of both policies and guidelines. It was you who began by misrepresenting issues.
2734: 259:
Grigson in his 1973/4 article in the country life magazine claims blacklock as a critical moment with courbet between the great romantics and the great impressionists. all in all i believe he is a corner stone of modernism.
2841:
towards me is uncivil and constitutes a personal attack. I would ask that you remove it, and seek to conduct yourself in discussions with more courtesy. I will wait a very short time before reporting the personal attack. -
1816:"The opinion Ghmytle referred to was Dab's, not yours." Sorry, you lost me there. I was referring to Sheodred's opinion. Dab asked him to provide references - he didn't, he just provided a statement of his own opinion. 2156:
you titled the section "evolution" to get people to support you in a debate that was not about evolution and you misrepresented the position of users in that debate. I am not the only one who has pointed this out to you.
2885:
presumption that I am some wacko that believes in time travel. He appears to be offline. If it isn't removed (or stricken, in the event that someone comments on it - whch of course they will), I'll have little choice. -
2344:
Well, I guess we all have a point of view, but I try to be as neutral as possible and to follow policy while promoting what I consider to be a reasonable position in the articles I edit. What edits do you have in mind?
2510:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
2397:
and then imagine no-one will notice, while still replying about Spain. No one says Celts were the "dominant" culture. The "agenda" is the truth, that's all. I really doubt that any of the editors who revert you
468:
Yes I knew you hadn't uploaded it, but not the background. It is definitely misnamed, and the matter will have to be re-examined. It is, as Dame Edna Everidge would say, definitely not 'commie ill foe'. Thanks
3153: 2786: 2782: 1874: 903:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
2767: 2752: 1972:
I'm trying to upgrade what was a desperate "start", and am slugging my way through the 18th century, Waterhouse in hand. Any additions on the 19th century, & anything else, would be great.
2587:
However, Knowledge does have a mechanism for MOVING a page to a new title. This procedure also moves the History and Discussion associated with the page, and leaves a Redirect. Please see
796: 2778: 1392:
for $ 24.95. I am sceptical that the editor has checked out the article - and reluctant to pay $ 24.95 to do so myself. Is there a Knowledge protocol for dealing with this situation?
1199:
I have recently add my arguments & refs. Someone is telling these are original research, do not fit with wiki standards,etc. Can you please give your opinion on this. Thank you.
78:
july victorian and edwardian,esthwaite lake and langdale pikes. If you would like to learn about him go on his wikipedia page or look in the catalogue regarding this great genius.
2266:
Hello, Paul. Hope all's well. I've been absent from Knowledge for some time for one reason and another (you know how it is); cheers for the edits and contributions to the Potter/
1383:
I added Colin Groves' claim to have disproved the cretinism hypothesis to this article, giving a reference to his article in HOMO, cited in New Scientist. An anonymous editor at
1986: 2703:
and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
2000: 2528: 2233: 2200: 1451:
As to the DYK nom, I created the article by taking it out of the SAQ page, and I also nominated it for DYK. I haven't looked at the nom lately, God knows what's there.
2669: 842: 2655:"wished to break with the nationalist traditions established by the Bengal school of art and to encourage an Indian avant-garde, engaged at an international level." 826:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 1448:
The editor you are replying to didn't put that there; Smatprt did (check the edit history). Why he put an RfC comment in the AN/I space is a mystery, to me anyway.
823: 626:
i was looking on the page about blacklock and it said sothebys sale 16th june 2010 this date is wrong. please change it to the proper date tuesday 13th july 2010
383:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 2545: 2523: 2103:
Actually it is. You have misused Knowledge's procedures. I drew attention to the fact, without any personal comments. You decided to make it a personal issue.
870: 924: 975: 673: 1071:
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created
513:
I didn't spell Corot at all. You wrote "Croft" by mistake, as one of your sockpuppets. Now you realise your mistake you try to blame me for it. Sad really.
1120: 3164:(or wikitext ]). I would normally just dab it myself but I don't want to mess with other people's comments at arbcom, and thought you might want to know. 2980: 2966: 2939: 2925: 2894: 2879: 2251: 2237: 2219: 2166: 2112: 2098: 2084: 2069: 2055: 2688: 2374: 2365:. Well, the real mystery is what your agenda is. It would be nice to know why you are obsessed with denying that there were ever any Celts in Zimbabwe. 2354: 788: 522: 1866: 1372: 335: 315: 289: 263: 240: 220: 194: 158: 122: 89: 1249: 2411: 2389: 1750: 1723: 1162: 281:
christopher newall and nicholas eastaugh think blacklock is important. we think he carries the technique of the old masters into the modern world.
3217:
Too bad, Paul. I nominated it 14 days after you created it and the rules say 5 days in the limit. Next time write it off-line and just drop it in.
1930: 40: 1533:(That's tomorrow or the next day's page.) Thanks very much for your help. I wonder if it's the first DYK from a topic-banned editor! Cheers Paul. 3226: 3212: 2641: 2469: 1562: 1542: 1460: 1045: 634: 613: 478: 2337: 1889: 1598: 2822: 2802: 2772: 2700: 2530: 2463: 1841: 1810: 908: 2620: 2242:
Not really. You appear to be too much of a coward to even create a user identity or say what sin I'm supposed to have committed against you.
1948: 1915: 987:
If even a great atheist hears Shri Chaitanya-mangala (previous name for Shri Chaitanya-bhagavata), he immediately becomes a great devotee."
2729: 2673: 2503: 1530: 343: 2286: 2273:
Being a keen student of Victoriana I wondered if you'd be interested in editing a page I'm hoping to construct about the 1968 Potter Play
323: 301: 271: 248: 228: 206: 170: 134: 3118: 3104: 506: 2707: 1880:
Sorry, but I have also reverted your edit; I explained in my edit summary. Let's please move the discussion to the article's talk page.
646: 101: 897: 2838: 1981: 1329: 66: 2492: 1304: 456: 3142: 2555: 1859:
I am happy to accept a substantiated rejection but would really appreciate reasons rather than a rather unprofessional "baloney".
1415: 1401: 417: 2204: 2136: 2036: 1406:
Thanks for your help. I have had confirmation that it is an abstract - which makes the price of $ 24.95 seem even more excessive!
1104: 1084: 2851: 1318: 892:
but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to
865: 1944: 1703: 1499: 1951:
was correct, although misplaced and redundant. "UTTER RUBBISH" is not a helpful way to describe a new editor's first effort!
1610: 1100: 1080: 764: 447:
Anyhow, what does one do here? Can the jpg upload page format be fixed to give the correct Folger title? Sorry for the trouble.
2566: 604:
given the context and shame-driven attempts to attack Doniger to remind ourselves of the cliché: 'honi soit qui mal y pense'.
3040: 2229: 2196: 2020: 1960: 1895: 1522: 1486:
I would have found it helpful if you had written more edit summaries on the recently vandalised page about Ann Hathaway; see
1355: 668: 3058: 1825: 1795: 1775: 1658: 1626: 1040: 1023: 491:
you have miss quoted griggson, this has been published by the country life magazine. you also have spelt Corot incorrectly
3173: 2665: 2329: 2317: 1476: 1445: 1438: 1233: 498: 3088: 2785:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 595: 3248: 2807: 2451: 1588: 1347: 1108: 1003: 950: 912: 58: 3193: 2604: 1007: 954: 2659: 2444: 2309: 2132: 2094: 2065: 2032: 1996: 1225: 1147: 1068:
the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
621: 328: 2395: 1208: 3012:
permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting
2381: 1965: 1638: 1189: 1139: 1131: 904: 308: 297: 276: 253: 233: 213: 202: 177: 166: 141: 130: 108: 97: 2402:
whether there were Celts in Spain or not. It just so happens that there were, so that's what we say in the article.
658:
Hey, I noticed you started adding to a bunch of plays. I was wondering if this had been discussed somewhere beyond
2652:
Savita Apte wrote this sentence in the catalogue "Indian Highway" (2008), in the page dedicated to Husain's work:
2694: 2647: 1510: 1309: 1273: 797: 768: 572: 72: 2060:
DTR is an essay. NPA is a policy. The one is opinion, freely ignored. The other is a policy, not to be ignored.
2261: 642: 422: 348: 3200: 2581: 2322:
By all your contributions and your reverts, you want to make us believe some biased things. Why ? Yes, why ?
2016: 1384: 737: 486: 2944:
No picking about it. Just saying what I think would be best. Water is better than gas for putting out fires.
2857:
That's no attack. Slightly snarky, maybe...but not enough to escalate to reporting. Try settling it, first.
2519: 822:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 1072: 3133:
I have begun an article and thought it might interest you as you uploaded the photograph of the monkeys.
3126: 2713: 1311: 1036: 1019: 971: 756: 696: 674: 399: 38: 1602:
somebody complies is minimal, though, since he made the request in 2007, and nobody has replied yet...)
539:
competence in, Greek shame (Αιδώς) is theorised as distinct from modern 'Western' conceptions of shame (
1138:) 18:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC) Once again, the same for you. It can also be applied to your action. -- 1092: 1063:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 760: 659: 368:
on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a
2720:
Thanks, and if you are aware of any other parties who might be usefully added, please list them etc.
2496: 2024: 1966: 1593: 1378: 1278: 1177:
article; I was amazed to find most of the text intact even after a long gap. Made some copyedits...
847: 819: 403: 369: 1801:
We do not need a flag for Northern Ireland, it is only Ireland (Republic) that is being represented.
1553:
A thought occurred to me that we could submit the same article 36 times without repeating the hook.
1264:. I would appreciate any suggestions you might have to make it better - it's still a bit ragged. - 409:
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
3239:
And thanks. Very pleased you improved it, didn't just do (as I did) remove the unreliable sources.
2976: 2971:
Fair enough, I am thinking in retrospect. I added a bit of levity, and will let the instance go. -
2935: 2890: 2847: 2818: 2725: 2333: 2282: 1832:
provide a reference for his assertion that flags should be used to represent national aspirations.
1746: 1699: 1654: 1300: 1116: 815: 801: 692: 678: 502: 1741:
I'm terribly sorry for the implication arising from the typo. Thanks for catching it, Bishonen. -
3064: 3054:
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!
2960: 2919: 2873: 2763: 2748: 2684: 2637: 2577: 2550: 2515: 2407: 2370: 2350: 2247: 2215: 2162: 2108: 2080: 2051: 1368: 1351: 1245: 1158: 999: 946: 893: 884: 518: 376: 62: 3030: 1936: 1780: 1504: 1495: 1481: 1411: 1397: 1261: 1229: 1032: 1029: 1015: 967: 428: 384: 3049:
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
2781:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 2491:
is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to
2277:— historical accuracy, that sort of thing. I hope to get the page up and running soon. Yours, 3147: 2996: 2832: 2385: 2005: 1870: 1760: 1570: 1291: 1143: 1135: 339: 319: 293: 267: 244: 224: 198: 162: 126: 93: 31:
Hi Can you look at the talkpages and give your opinion. Some users might have problems with
17: 1991:
on the fringe theories noticeboard. Feel free to remove this request when you have done so.
3244: 3138: 2699:
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at
2584:”. This maneuver fails to transfer the History and Discussion associated with the page. 2325: 2187: 2128: 2090: 2061: 2028: 1992: 1926: 1911: 1906:
Have you seen my post at FTN? You may recognise something if you look at the edit history.
1663: 1420: 1343: 1221: 1088: 991: 938: 920: 861: 653: 630: 494: 285: 190: 154: 118: 85: 54: 2735:
Please explain properly why uncited reference to somebodies broadest definition is correct
2394:
Zimbabwe???? What planet are you on? You change the word 'Spain' to 'Zimbabwe' in my post
1848:
Undid edit by Ashwinushas labeling it "baloney" without any other reasons. Please respond.
8: 3222: 3208: 3189: 3161: 3127: 2972: 2931: 2900: 2886: 2843: 2814: 2721: 2571: 2562: 2362: 2291: 2278: 1956: 1771: 1742: 1695: 1650: 1558: 1538: 1518: 1472: 1456: 1434: 1385:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Homo_floresiensis&diff=prev&oldid=389644384
1325: 1296: 1112: 966:- a site selling Hindu horoscopes. This is spam, and may result in you being blocked. -- 772: 748: 725: 609: 591: 528: 474: 452: 380: 365: 3169: 2946: 2905: 2859: 2813:
wish to continue communications with the editor I strongly suggest you do so off site.
2759: 2744: 2459: 2440: 1837: 1821: 1806: 1791: 1720: 1616: 1607: 1334: 1185: 995: 942: 889: 638: 3070: 1513:
I'm not sure how to go about it, and in any case I'm banned from editing the article.
1429:. Smatprt copied that comment from his RfC and pasted it at the AN/I for some reason. 3234: 3178: 3009: 2616: 2600: 2541: 2421: 1977: 1491: 1407: 1393: 1279: 1204: 1194: 984:"‘chaitanya-mangala’ shune yadi pashandi, yavana seha maha-vaishnava haya tatakshana 733: 548: 714: 2680: 2633: 2629: 2403: 2366: 2346: 2243: 2211: 2191: 2158: 2104: 2076: 2047: 1885: 1691: 1643: 1364: 1255: 1241: 1154: 663: 559: 552: 514: 1712: 3240: 3134: 3114: 3100: 3084: 2679:
Yes, you are right. Still, I have no copyright on the text! Thanks for the info.
1922: 1907: 1675:
consider how you interact with others. Paul B (talk) 07:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1634: 1168: 1077:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
916: 857: 836: 782: 713:
While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
1107:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 3218: 3204: 3185: 3055: 2558: 1952: 1937: 1896: 1767: 1554: 1534: 1514: 1468: 1452: 1430: 1321: 1125: 1059: 605: 587: 540: 470: 448: 398:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 391: 3165: 3013: 2793: 2455: 2436: 2043: 1833: 1817: 1802: 1787: 1716: 1603: 1576: 1269: 1181: 929: 743:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
705: 567: 395: 379:
to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only
2787:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Workshop
2783:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence
2089:"She started it!" is not an acceptable defense for making personal attacks. 980:
See you in spiritual world also, no matter 'paradigms' misconceptions etc...
2612: 2596: 2537: 2487: 2471: 1973: 1487: 1286: 1200: 853: 411: 32: 3001: 1028:
Quack quack, It would appear Theismcontrib is a sock of HareKrishnaPortal
2302: 2297: 1881: 1581: 1426: 3157: 3110: 3096: 3080: 1899: 1630: 1622: 1240:
Yep, that would be me, as envisaged by the deranged mind of Rex Curry.
831: 777: 684: 1947:
was too harsh. Aparts from mis-spelling "fistula", the text added by
1097:
the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
2740: 1174: 1064: 888:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 829:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —
544: 353: 1050: 875: 2428: 1265: 1180:
Keep up the good work. I think we should name a medal after you!!
808: 3073:” can be used in both senses. Since we're being pedantic and all… 2777:
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located
1715:, but then I suspect you're dispensable, too. Maybe not Paul. :-) 3020:
This permission does not give you any special status or authority
390:
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
3008:
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the
2827: 3075: 2701:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#Shakespeare authorship question
2432: 1625:
has mentioned something about you at the admins notice board
3023:
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
2930:
Fine, so it's pick on the little guy. Thanks for the 411. -
963: 2514:
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
1649:
are a jerk. If that was your goal, mission accomplished. -
402:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 1736:
I was referring to folk who thought the our policies were
48: 824:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The Scapegoat (painting)
2708:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration
1987:
You have insulted me, I ask that you strike your insult
1733:" and spell check word sub must have put "dispensable"! 1444:
As to the above, I'm referring to the comment you left
720:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
662:, where it was decided to not apply it to most works. 2127:
me, which you have now done on three separate pages.
375:
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
3203:. I used a cropped version of your featured image. 2588: 1629:, can you go there clarify your position. Thanks.-- 1285:Can you help me out on something? I noticed in the 911:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1014:Hi PaulB - I see you got one too. Did it work? -- 26: 2576:On 20 April 2009, Paul Barlow deleted the page “ 1729:Lol! Damned spellcheck - I must have mis-typed " 767:can result in deletion without discussion, and 2658:I think you wrote this sentence before her in 2531:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Warner 871:Fair use rationale for File:Daniojean haas.jpg 852:Some comments of yours have been discussed at 1575:WOould you mind taking a look at the article 2504:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/George McCoy 962:Theismcontrib, you are also adding links to 2454:page.... and it's lengthy discussion page. 3109:heh heh. I stand corrected, sir. Touché! — 1290:the Indo-Iranian link and distort it. The 360:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 2739:You have repeatedly reverted my edits to 2380:and to push your agenda. WHICH AGENDA ?-- 856:. I think the issue is moot now however. 2792:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 1363:implicit racism in that very viewpoint. 882:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 439:.jpg|thumb|200px|The Ashbourne portrait. 2536:Yes, that one! Seasons Greetings too! 2435:, if that was what I was looking for! 1260:I have been working on an expansion of 1046:File source problem with File:Laing.jpg 732:notice, but please explain why in your 534:create Hindu shame amongst Indian youth 14: 2773:Shakespeare authorship question opened 2580:” and replaced it with a redirect to “ 2450:P.S. Why don't you take a look at the 1921:Or a clone. But I think you're right. 2021:Knowledge:Fringe theories/Noticeboard 1217:blacklsited rexcurry.net link removed 2899:In that case, I'd watch out for the 704:Does not meet criteria set forth in 431:, I noted that the jpg is entitled 2493:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 2452:Lucan portrait of Leonardo da Vinci 2228:Confirmation of what I've said...-- 818:, an article that you created, for 23: 3000: 1173:Kudos for holding the fort on the 1130:Same for you. 4th times revert. -- 1049: 874: 715:deleted for any of several reasons 699:because of the following concern: 683: 352: 24: 3259: 2660:Bombay Progressive Artists' Group 2589:http://en.wikipedia.org/Page_move 2502:The article will be discussed at 372:scheduled to end 15 August 2010. 3074: 2478: 2019:other editors, as you did here: 2010: 807: 573:The Chrysanthemum and the Sword 2023:. If you continue, you may be 1488:your recent user contributions 1305:16:46, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1274:01:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1250:15:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC) 1234:15:09, 18 September 2010 (UTC) 1209:20:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1190:08:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 1109:Media copyright questions page 913:Media copyright questions page 13: 1: 3249:22:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC) 3227:23:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC) 3213:22:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC) 2582:Blackamoors (decorative arts) 2546:22:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC) 2524:02:07, 18 December 2010 (UTC) 2464:13:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 2445:01:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 2412:15:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC) 2390:13:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC) 2375:19:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC) 2355:19:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC) 2338:18:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC) 2310:18:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC) 2287:13:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC) 1931:15:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC) 1916:15:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC) 1890:23:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 1875:23:18, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 1842:15:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 1826:15:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 1811:14:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 1796:14:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 1425:Paul, you're not replying to 1163:18:56, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 1148:18:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 1121:07:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 364:" userright, allowing you to 3194:22:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC) 3174:03:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 3143:08:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 3119:17:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 3105:16:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 3089:16:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 3059:21:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3041:User wikipedia/autopatrolled 3026:You may wish to display the 2981:04:40, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 2967:23:17, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2940:23:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2926:22:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2895:22:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2880:22:15, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2852:22:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2828:http://politicworm.com/blog/ 2823:21:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 2803:15:13, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2768:21:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 2753:20:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2730:23:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 2689:16:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2674:10:29, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 2642:11:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 2318:Paul Barlow : which agenda ? 2252:17:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC) 2238:17:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC) 2220:17:03, 9 December 2010 (UTC) 2205:16:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC) 2167:17:05, 9 December 2010 (UTC) 2137:16:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 2113:15:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 2099:14:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 2085:14:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 2070:14:28, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 2056:14:25, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 2037:13:49, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 2001:11:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 1982:03:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC) 1961:13:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 1776:17:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 1751:21:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 1724:21:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 1704:07:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 1659:04:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 1639:21:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC) 1611:21:21, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 1589:13:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 1563:22:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 1543:00:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 1523:19:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 1500:18:54, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 1477:16:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 1461:12:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 1439:12:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC) 1416:19:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC) 1402:17:47, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1373:11:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC) 1356:10:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC) 1330:18:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC) 1153:No, I reverted three times. 1081:criteria for speedy deletion 909:criteria for speedy deletion 7: 2808:Re User talk:Charles Darnay 2714:Knowledge:Arbitration guide 2621:01:16, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 2605:22:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 2591:for a further explanation. 2567:05:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC) 2210:Silly child has a tantrum. 1041:22:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1024:22:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1008:22:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 976:22:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 955:22:22, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 925:13:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 866:12:16, 14 August 2010 (UTC) 843:06:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC) 789:04:19, 13 August 2010 (UTC) 771:allows discussion to reach 555:etc.), as Chinese shame (恥 435:Image:Ashbourneshakespeare- 400:Knowledge:Reviewing process 67:02:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 10: 3264: 1317:Hi Paul. Would you please 660:Template talk:Italic title 381:a small number of articles 3046:userbox on your user page 2027:from editing Knowledge. 1967:Art of the United Kingdom 964:http://www.astrojyoti.com 896:and edit it to include a 894:the file description page 757:proposed deletion process 669:00:16, 29 June 2010 (UTC) 665:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 647:09:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 614:16:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 596:16:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 523:07:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC) 507:22:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 479:07:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC) 457:21:35, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 418:02:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 366:review other users' edits 344:15:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 324:14:13, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 302:13:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 272:13:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 249:13:14, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 229:12:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 207:12:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 171:11:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 135:11:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 102:11:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 3184:to nominate it for DYN? 2495:or whether it should be 1599:Bardauthor navbox needed 1509:Paul, would you look at 1057:Thank you for uploading 816:The Scapegoat (painting) 802:The Scapegoat (painting) 693:The Scapegoat (painting) 679:The Scapegoat (painting) 427:While revising the page 385:Special:OldReviewedPages 47:Please cite citation of 2695:Request for Arbitration 2648:Someone plagiarized you 2578:Blackamoors (sculpture) 885:File:Daniojean haas.jpg 765:speedy deletion process 738:the article's talk page 622:william james blacklock 562:1977), Japanese shame ( 329:william james blacklock 309:william james blacklock 277:william james blacklock 262:regards and thankyou -- 254:william james blacklock 234:william james blacklock 214:william james blacklock 178:william james blacklock 142:william james blacklock 109:william james blacklock 73:william james blacklock 3201:nominated your article 3005: 2275:A Beast With Two Backs 2262:A Beast With Two Backs 1865:Peter ("Ashwinushas") 1262:Dante Gabriel Rossetti 1054: 879: 688: 536: 441: 429:The Ashbourne portrait 423:The Ashbourne portrait 357: 349:You are now a Reviewer 3004: 1053: 878: 798:Articles for deletion 769:articles for deletion 697:proposed for deletion 687: 532: 487:re griggson blacklock 433: 356: 150:regards wjblacklock 35:sources. Thank you. 18:User talk:Paul Barlow 3036:top icon and/or the 1711:Well, I think *I*'m 1580:please take a look. 3162:Donald Wayne Foster 3128:Kildare Street Club 3016:. Please remember: 3014:new page patrollers 2363:user:sleeping water 3006: 2516:The Celestial City 1087:. If the image is 1073:in your upload log 1055: 898:fair use rationale 880: 761:deletion processes 689: 358: 2801: 2628:suggest you read 2328:comment added by 2296:I have nominated 2135: 2097: 2068: 2035: 1999: 1594:Bardauthor navbox 1379:Homo floresiensis 1346:comment added by 1280:Armenian_language 1224:comment added by 1033:Elen of the Roads 1016:Elen of the Roads 1011: 994:comment added by 968:Elen of the Roads 958: 941:comment added by 848:Mitanni talk page 814:I have nominated 675:Proposed deletion 650: 633:comment added by 549:James M. Redfield 497:comment added by 305: 288:comment added by 210: 193:comment added by 174: 157:comment added by 138: 121:comment added by 105: 88:comment added by 57:comment added by 3255: 3078: 3045: 3039: 3035: 3029: 2957: 2916: 2870: 2800: 2798: 2482: 2481: 2340: 2306: 2131: 2093: 2064: 2031: 2014: 2013: 1995: 1585: 1358: 1236: 1079:per Knowledge's 1010: 988: 957: 935: 905:my contributions 841: 839: 834: 811: 787: 785: 780: 775:for deletion. — 754: 753: 747: 731: 730: 724: 666: 649: 627: 560:Wolfram Eberhard 553:Bernard Williams 509: 414: 363: 304: 282: 209: 187: 173: 151: 137: 115: 104: 82: 69: 3263: 3262: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3237: 3181: 3160:link should be 3150: 3131: 3067: 3065:undisinterested 3043: 3037: 3033: 3027: 3010:"autopatrolled" 2999: 2947: 2906: 2860: 2835: 2810: 2794: 2775: 2737: 2697: 2650: 2574: 2553: 2551:Happy New Year! 2534: 2483: 2479: 2476: 2424: 2361:Oh I see, it's 2323: 2320: 2304: 2294: 2264: 2230:109.212.120.109 2197:109.212.120.109 2188:KillerChihuahua 2129:KillerChihuahua 2091:KillerChihuahua 2062:KillerChihuahua 2029:KillerChihuahua 2011: 2008: 1993:KillerChihuahua 1989: 1970: 1941: 1904: 1850: 1783: 1763: 1666: 1646: 1619: 1596: 1583: 1573: 1507: 1484: 1423: 1381: 1341: 1337: 1315: 1283: 1258: 1219: 1197: 1171: 1128: 1101:speedy deletion 1048: 989: 936: 932: 873: 850: 837: 832: 830: 812: 805: 783: 778: 776: 751: 745: 744: 728: 722: 721: 708:for notability. 682: 664: 656: 628: 624: 531: 492: 489: 425: 412: 370:two-month trial 361: 351: 331: 311: 283: 279: 256: 236: 216: 188: 180: 152: 144: 116: 111: 83: 75: 52: 45: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3261: 3236: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3180: 3177: 3149: 3146: 3130: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3024: 3021: 2998: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2973:Jack Sebastian 2945: 2932:Jack Sebastian 2904: 2887:Jack Sebastian 2858: 2844:Jack Sebastian 2834: 2831: 2815:LessHeard vanU 2809: 2806: 2774: 2771: 2736: 2733: 2722:LessHeard vanU 2718: 2717: 2711: 2696: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2666:84.220.167.207 2649: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2624: 2623: 2573: 2570: 2552: 2549: 2533: 2527: 2477: 2475: 2470:Nomination of 2468: 2467: 2466: 2423: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2358: 2357: 2330:188.138.32.165 2319: 2316: 2314: 2293: 2290: 2279:Absurdtrousers 2268:Play for Today 2263: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2223: 2222: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2007: 2004: 1988: 1985: 1969: 1964: 1940: 1938:Walter Sickert 1935: 1934: 1933: 1903: 1897:Mother goddess 1894: 1893: 1892: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1814: 1813: 1782: 1781:Celtic Nations 1779: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1743:Jack Sebastian 1734: 1696:Jack Sebastian 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1665: 1662: 1651:Jack Sebastian 1645: 1642: 1618: 1615: 1595: 1592: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1506: 1505:DYK submission 1503: 1483: 1482:Edit summaries 1480: 1464: 1463: 1449: 1422: 1419: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1336: 1333: 1314: 1308: 1297:Aryamahasattva 1282: 1277: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1196: 1193: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1127: 1124: 1113:Magog the Ogre 1060:File:Laing.jpg 1047: 1044: 982: 981: 978: 931: 928: 872: 869: 849: 846: 806: 804: 800:nomination of 795: 793: 755:will stop the 711: 710: 681: 672: 655: 652: 623: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 541:Gilbert Murray 530: 527: 526: 525: 499:89.204.251.235 488: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 466: 424: 421: 396:BLP violations 350: 347: 330: 327: 310: 307: 278: 275: 255: 252: 235: 232: 215: 212: 179: 176: 143: 140: 110: 107: 74: 71: 44: 41:Barnstar award 37: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3260: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3176: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3148:Workshop link 3145: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3129: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3077: 3072: 3071:disinterested 3060: 3057: 3053: 3052: 3048: 3042: 3032: 3031:Autopatrolled 3025: 3022: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3015: 3011: 3003: 2997:Autopatrolled 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2958: 2956: 2953: 2950: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2922: 2917: 2915: 2912: 2909: 2902: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2871: 2869: 2866: 2863: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2840: 2837:Your comment 2833:What the hey? 2830: 2829: 2825: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2805: 2804: 2799: 2797: 2790: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2770: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2755: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2715: 2712: 2709: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2702: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2662: 2661: 2656: 2653: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2626: 2625: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2592: 2590: 2585: 2583: 2579: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2557: 2548: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2532: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2512: 2508: 2505: 2500: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2473: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2431:in Icelandic 2430: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2396: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2308: 2299: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2271: 2269: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2193: 2189: 2186:Don't worry, 2168: 2164: 2160: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2017:do not attack 2006:December 2010 2003: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1968: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1943:I think your 1939: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1901: 1898: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1863: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1778: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1761:Money images? 1752: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1688: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1614: 1612: 1609: 1605: 1600: 1591: 1590: 1587: 1578: 1577:Latin America 1571:Latin America 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1390:ScienceDirect 1386: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1348:58.168.136.97 1345: 1332: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1320: 1313: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1281: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1218: 1214: 1213:Is this you? 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1178: 1176: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1111:. Thank you. 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1052: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1012: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 996:Theismcontrib 993: 985: 979: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 960: 959: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943:Theismcontrib 940: 927: 926: 922: 918: 915:. Thank you. 914: 910: 906: 901: 899: 895: 891: 887: 886: 877: 868: 867: 863: 859: 855: 845: 844: 840: 835: 827: 825: 821: 817: 810: 803: 799: 794: 791: 790: 786: 781: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 750: 741: 739: 735: 727: 718: 716: 709: 707: 702: 701: 700: 698: 694: 686: 680: 676: 671: 670: 667: 661: 651: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 615: 611: 607: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 593: 589: 584: 580: 575: 574: 569: 568:Ruth Benedict 565: 561: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 535: 524: 520: 516: 512: 511: 510: 508: 504: 500: 496: 480: 476: 472: 467: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 454: 450: 445: 440: 438: 432: 430: 420: 419: 416: 415: 407: 405: 401: 397: 393: 388: 386: 382: 378: 377:autoconfirmed 373: 371: 367: 355: 346: 345: 341: 337: 326: 325: 321: 317: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 274: 273: 269: 265: 260: 251: 250: 246: 242: 231: 230: 226: 222: 211: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 184: 175: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 148: 139: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 106: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 81:Regards SB 79: 70: 68: 64: 60: 59:71.245.164.83 56: 51:this means. 50: 42: 36: 34: 19: 3238: 3182: 3154:SAQ workshop 3151: 3132: 3068: 3007: 2961: 2954: 2951: 2948: 2920: 2913: 2910: 2907: 2874: 2867: 2864: 2861: 2836: 2826: 2811: 2795: 2791: 2776: 2756: 2738: 2719: 2698: 2663: 2657: 2654: 2651: 2593: 2586: 2575: 2554: 2535: 2513: 2509: 2501: 2488:George McCoy 2486: 2485:The article 2484: 2474:for deletion 2472:George McCoy 2425: 2399: 2321: 2313: 2295: 2274: 2272: 2267: 2265: 2185: 2125: 2009: 1990: 1971: 1942: 1905: 1864: 1862:Sincerely, 1861: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1815: 1784: 1764: 1737: 1730: 1686: 1683: 1673: 1664:Re: language 1647: 1620: 1597: 1574: 1508: 1485: 1465: 1424: 1421:your comment 1408:Dudley Miles 1405: 1394:Dudley Miles 1382: 1338: 1319:take a look? 1316: 1310:Calling the 1287:Armeno-Aryan 1284: 1259: 1226:178.98.53.77 1216: 1215: 1212: 1198: 1179: 1172: 1129: 1096: 1076: 1070: 1058: 1056: 1027: 1013: 986: 983: 933: 902: 883: 881: 854:Talk:Mitanni 851: 828: 813: 792: 763:exist. The 759:, but other 742: 734:edit summary 719: 712: 703: 691:The article 690: 657: 654:Italic title 625: 582: 578: 571: 563: 556: 537: 533: 490: 446: 442: 436: 434: 426: 410: 408: 389: 374: 359: 332: 312: 280: 261: 257: 237: 217: 185: 181: 149: 145: 112: 80: 76: 46: 30: 3069:Actually, “ 2572:Blackamoors 2382:90.9.174.65 2324:—Preceding 2301:discussion. 2298:Nordic race 2292:Nordic Race 2195:on wiki. -- 1949:User:Kory58 1867:Ashwinushas 1713:dispensable 1692:battlefield 1531:We made it! 1342:—Preceding 1312:Expendables 1220:—Preceding 1140:93.82.8.124 1132:93.82.8.124 1089:copyrighted 990:—Preceding 937:—Preceding 629:—Preceding 529:Hindu Shame 493:—Preceding 336:Wjblacklock 316:Wjblacklock 290:Wjblacklock 284:—Preceding 264:Wjblacklock 241:Wjblacklock 221:Wjblacklock 195:Wjblacklock 189:—Preceding 159:Wjblacklock 153:—Preceding 123:Wjblacklock 117:—Preceding 90:Wjblacklock 84:—Preceding 53:—Preceding 3241:Dougweller 3158:Don Foster 3135:Moonraker2 1923:Dougweller 1908:Dougweller 1900:Matriarchy 1738:disposable 1731:disposable 1623:User:Tajik 1617:User:Tajik 1335:Oh dear... 1103:criterion 917:Sfan00 IMG 858:Dougweller 749:dated prod 726:dated prod 437:lordoxford 3235:Good work 3219:Tom Reedy 3205:Tom Reedy 3186:Tom Reedy 3179:Pig files 3056:Acalamari 2901:boomerang 2741:Modernism 2630:WP:merger 2559:Tom Reedy 2422:Mona Lisa 1953:Groomtech 1945:reversion 1768:Tom Reedy 1687:extremely 1555:Tom Reedy 1535:Tom Reedy 1515:Tom Reedy 1469:Tom Reedy 1453:Tom Reedy 1431:Tom Reedy 1322:Tom Reedy 1195:ARYA page 1175:P. N. Oak 1065:copyright 773:consensus 695:has been 606:Nishidani 588:Nishidani 545:E.R.Dodds 471:Nishidani 449:Nishidani 392:vandalism 3166:Johnuniq 2456:Amandajm 2437:Amandajm 2429:Psalm 23 2326:unsigned 2303:·Maunus· 1852:Hello, 1834:Ghmyrtle 1818:Ghmyrtle 1803:Sheodred 1788:Sheodred 1717:Bishonen 1644:Civility 1604:Bishonen 1582:·Maunus· 1344:unsigned 1256:Rossetti 1222:unsigned 1182:mukerjee 1093:non-free 1004:contribs 992:unsigned 951:contribs 939:unsigned 890:fair use 820:deletion 643:contribs 635:SGBtruth 631:unsigned 495:unsigned 465:Library. 362:reviewer 298:contribs 286:unsigned 203:contribs 191:unsigned 167:contribs 155:unsigned 131:contribs 119:unsigned 98:contribs 86:unsigned 55:unsigned 3156:, your 3152:At the 2952:ean–Hun 2911:ean–Hun 2865:ean–Hun 2613:Johnbod 2597:Wmpearl 2556:Cheers! 2538:Johnbod 2497:deleted 2270:pages. 2025:blocked 2015:Please 1974:Johnbod 1492:Snowman 1292:augment 1201:Rajkris 1169:P N Oak 469:though. 413:MBisanz 2681:Paul B 2634:Paul B 2404:Paul B 2367:Paul B 2347:Paul B 2244:Paul B 2212:Paul B 2192:Paul B 2159:Paul B 2133:Advice 2105:Paul B 2095:Advice 2077:Paul B 2066:Advice 2048:Paul B 2044:WP:DTR 2033:Advice 1997:Advice 1882:Drmies 1427:warshy 1365:Paul B 1242:Paul B 1155:Paul B 1126:Revert 736:or on 706:WP:GNG 515:Paul B 3111:Xover 3097:Xover 3081:Xover 2955:ter—► 2949:⋙–Ber 2914:ter—► 2908:⋙–Ber 2868:ter—► 2862:⋙–Ber 2529:FYI: 2433:Runes 1631:Jrkso 1511:this? 1446:here. 930:Vedas 833:raeky 779:raeky 583:trapa 579:lajja 33:WP:RS 16:< 3245:talk 3223:talk 3209:talk 3190:talk 3170:talk 3139:talk 3115:talk 3101:talk 3085:talk 2977:talk 2936:talk 2891:talk 2848:talk 2839:here 2819:talk 2779:here 2764:talk 2749:talk 2726:talk 2685:talk 2670:talk 2638:talk 2617:talk 2601:talk 2563:talk 2542:talk 2520:talk 2460:talk 2441:talk 2408:talk 2400:care 2386:talk 2371:talk 2351:talk 2334:talk 2283:talk 2248:talk 2234:talk 2216:talk 2201:talk 2163:talk 2109:talk 2081:talk 2052:talk 2042:See 1978:talk 1957:talk 1927:talk 1912:talk 1886:talk 1871:talk 1838:talk 1822:talk 1807:talk 1792:talk 1772:talk 1747:talk 1721:talk 1700:talk 1655:talk 1635:talk 1627:here 1621:The 1608:talk 1559:talk 1539:talk 1519:talk 1496:talk 1473:talk 1457:talk 1435:talk 1412:talk 1398:talk 1369:talk 1352:talk 1326:talk 1301:talk 1270:talk 1246:talk 1230:talk 1205:talk 1186:talk 1159:talk 1144:talk 1136:talk 1117:talk 1099:per 1091:and 1037:talk 1020:talk 1000:talk 972:talk 947:talk 921:talk 862:talk 639:talk 610:talk 592:talk 564:haji 519:talk 503:talk 475:talk 453:talk 404:here 340:talk 320:talk 294:talk 268:talk 245:talk 225:talk 199:talk 186:SB 163:talk 127:talk 94:talk 63:talk 39:WTF 27:Arya 2962:(⊕) 2921:(⊕) 2875:(⊕) 2796:AGK 2760:dpw 2745:dpw 1902:etc 1266:PKM 677:of 581:or 570:'s 557:chǐ 394:or 49:WTF 3247:) 3225:) 3211:) 3199:I 3192:) 3172:) 3141:) 3117:) 3103:) 3087:) 3044:}} 3038:{{ 3034:}} 3028:{{ 2979:) 2965:) 2938:) 2924:) 2893:) 2878:) 2850:) 2821:) 2789:. 2766:) 2751:) 2728:) 2687:) 2672:) 2664:M 2640:) 2619:) 2603:) 2565:) 2544:) 2522:) 2499:. 2462:) 2443:) 2410:) 2388:) 2373:) 2353:) 2336:) 2285:) 2250:) 2236:) 2218:) 2203:) 2190:. 2165:) 2111:) 2083:) 2054:) 2046:. 1980:) 1959:) 1929:) 1914:) 1888:) 1873:) 1840:) 1824:) 1809:) 1794:) 1774:) 1749:) 1726:. 1719:| 1702:) 1657:) 1637:) 1613:. 1606:| 1561:) 1541:) 1521:) 1498:) 1490:. 1475:) 1459:) 1437:) 1414:) 1400:) 1371:) 1354:) 1328:) 1303:) 1272:) 1248:) 1232:) 1207:) 1188:) 1161:) 1146:) 1119:) 1105:F7 1095:, 1085:F4 1083:, 1075:. 1039:) 1031:-- 1022:) 1006:) 1002:• 974:) 953:) 949:• 923:) 900:. 864:) 752:}} 746:{{ 740:. 729:}} 723:{{ 717:. 645:) 641:• 612:) 594:) 566:, 551:, 547:, 543:, 521:) 505:) 477:) 455:) 406:. 387:. 342:) 322:) 314:-- 300:) 296:• 270:) 247:) 227:) 205:) 201:• 169:) 165:• 133:) 129:• 100:) 96:• 65:) 3243:( 3221:( 3207:( 3188:( 3168:( 3137:( 3113:( 3099:( 3095:— 3083:( 3079:— 2975:( 2959:( 2934:( 2918:( 2889:( 2872:( 2846:( 2817:( 2762:( 2747:( 2724:( 2716:. 2710:; 2683:( 2668:( 2636:( 2615:( 2599:( 2561:( 2540:( 2518:( 2458:( 2439:( 2406:( 2384:( 2369:( 2349:( 2332:( 2307:· 2305:ƛ 2281:( 2246:( 2232:( 2214:( 2199:( 2161:( 2107:( 2079:( 2050:( 1976:( 1955:( 1925:( 1910:( 1884:( 1869:( 1836:( 1820:( 1805:( 1790:( 1770:( 1745:( 1698:( 1653:( 1633:( 1586:· 1584:ƛ 1557:( 1537:( 1517:( 1494:( 1471:( 1455:( 1433:( 1410:( 1396:( 1367:( 1350:( 1324:( 1299:( 1268:( 1244:( 1228:( 1203:( 1184:( 1157:( 1142:( 1134:( 1115:( 1035:( 1018:( 998:( 970:( 945:( 919:( 860:( 838:T 784:T 637:( 608:( 590:( 517:( 501:( 473:( 451:( 338:( 318:( 292:( 266:( 243:( 223:( 197:( 161:( 125:( 92:( 61:( 43:?

Index

User talk:Paul Barlow
WP:RS
Barnstar award
WTF
unsigned
71.245.164.83
talk
02:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
unsigned
Wjblacklock
talk
contribs
11:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
Wjblacklock
talk
contribs
11:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
Wjblacklock
talk
contribs
11:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
Wjblacklock
talk
contribs
12:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Wjblacklock
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.