User talk:Packerfansam/Archive 1

1250:

I, too, was never a resident of Mount Holly. Dave and I grew up in Mount Laurel Township, attended the same school in Moorestown, and played on the same athletic teams. He and I are friends and I spoke with him extensively at a Moorestown High School football reunion less than two years ago. While it is difficult to prove a negative- Dave Robinson was not a resident of Mount Holly- it's impossible to prove that he was because the evidence does not exist. However, ample evidence that he was a resident of Mount Laurel does exist. Please do the right thing and remove his name from the list. Thank you.

834: 760: 684: 410: 31: 3729: 3253: 585: 2973: 2792: 2374: 2000: 1898: 1788: 1678: 100: 2600: 2200: 1593: 364: 316: 268: 997: 3207: 3155: 3078: 2897: 2683: 2528: 2256: 1435: 2728:? As a hard and fast rule, if the person has only won a second-tier award like the DSO or Navy Cross, and haven't done anything else in their military or civilian career, then they're probably non-notable and will be deleted, either through AfD or by being prodded. However, there are a number of articles you've created that won't be deleted, and that I would defend at AfD. To take two examples you recently created: 1651:). I don't necessarily agree with this policy as I believe that a Silver Star is reasonably notable decoration especially when compared against awards that other people receive who are considered notable (e.g. certain types of actors, etc.). Nevertheless, what I'm saying is just be careful when creating articles for similar subjects as, while I don't object, other people might and they might end up at 1271: 1311:! I usually skip reviewing your edits because they're always high quality. Just be a bit more careful to only use high quality references like newspapers, magazines, etc. In cases like these, you can use official city websites for city nicknames. Normally you shouldn't use official sources to add content. 3476:

This still needs done, can do after we get them all in the table though. Also, I think we should limit the list to generals during or because of the war; not only will this keep it in line with the Confederates, but it will keep the list to a manageable size. So I've move du Pont and Mackenzie to the

2495:

for deletion. You may visit the appropriate page and make a case for why you believe a DSC recipient is inherently notable. Now I don't know how this will go, but I think it may be found as non-notable due to the number of recipients. In the mean time I'd recommend you perhaps stop adding articles on

3361:

for just over a year now. So I really appreciate the help. AF has one list, Navy several an, and West Point a many. AF and Navy are all FLs. WP I'm still working on, only some are FLs. The next one I want to get to FL is the WP Union Army one. FYI, lists are done in a bullet sort of format. Complete

2286:

from Knowledge. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an

2102:

Hey there. I just wanted to come and say that I hope you don't take all these Prods of your articles personally. It's just that if anyone hasn't won something like the Medal of Honor or Victoria Cross, and haven't done anything else notable (ie, gain a rank like General or command a large unit) then

1018:

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The

1014:

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask

2744:

of high rank and also being the commander of an escort carrier - both of which would probably again grant him non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. I hope this helps, and you're not downhearted by the AfD nominations so far, and the prod deletions of other articles that will come after the AfDs

1493:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page

1249:

Please remove Dave Robinson from the list of Notable Residents because he was never a resident of Mount Holly. He, along with countless other Burlington County residents, were born in Mount Holly because that was the location of the area's hospital. I, too, was born at the same hospital in 1941 and

1229:

Can I please request that you add sources to support the individual athletes that you have been adding to articles for cities. I'm sure that you're getting the list of teams from a source and all material added should be backed by reliable and verifiable sources. Finding sources after the fact only

2649:

Please note, the majority of the articles you are currently creating are likely to be deleted shortly as recipients of second level military awards are not inherently notable as per Wikiproject Military History and general notability guidelines. If these people are not independantly notable other

2133:

As you've removed the Prods on the articles, I'll start taking them to AfD in the next few days, once I have some RL issues out of the way. Once again, please be assured that it's nothing personal, and AfD is actually the best thing to do; once and for all sort out whether such individuals are

509: 1083:

I knew it was in the article, too All I meant was that in the infobox he should probably be listed as beingg in WWI and WWII (he served despite the fact he was well into his fifties at the time). He was that kind of guy. Not trying ot harass you, just trying to make sure that any entry is

3906:

authorizes 302 Army + 216 Navy + 279 Air Force + 80 Marines + 12 joint duty + 10 activated reserve, for a possible 899 active at the same time, and that's just current, not retired; and just the United States, not the other 150+ countries. I'm not sure that criterion would survive elevating

2177:

Howdy. Could you please change your script or whatever you're using to add people to the UWM list of people in athletics and not on the regular list page? I moved Bill Callahan for you, but if if you could put them on the right page to begin with, it would be a big help. Thanks, in advance

3803:. I redirected the article you did with limited results. Nothing serious but you might want to check the categories of the members of the Wisconsin Legislature to see if there is an existing article. I asked RoyalBroil for some help-you are doing an excellent job-Many thanks- 3883:, for example, doesn't seem to assert any specific notable office. (The claim of "United States Department of Defense Counsel General" is ambiguous: he was actually not the General Counsel, but just a member of the General Counsel's staff.) That third criterion in the 3417:

In the interests of consistency with the part of the Union Army I've already done, the CSA article that's already FL and the others I've already done, can we leave out "brevet"? Otherwise we'd have to go back and change the stuff that's already done. Your help has been

1381:

For all of your work adding notable Wisconsin people to the articles for their hometowns and residences, I hereby award you the WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar. Your additions have come up on my watchlist daily for several weeks. Your efforts are appreciated!

2328:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Knowledge guidelines.

1655:. A way that you can help stop this from happening is by adding multiple sources and by finding other things that make the subjects notable, e.g. significant coverage in books, films, other awards, other work that is notable, etc. Hope this helps. Cheers. — 3636: 3507: 1306:

include references. The problem is that you used blogs. There are plenty of other reliable sources that could easily be found in the cases that I checked. Packerfansam, your contributions are valued! I frequently see your edits come up on my watchlist.

2625:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

2225:

1618:

967:

I think the current method of laying out the members of a family is confusing and should be changed. You have bulleted hierarchical lists, but they don't really represent relationships among the family, just the generation change. For example, see

385:

337:

289:

2618:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our 2218:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our 1611:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our 951:

First, obviously, the article somehow needs to be shortened. I did suggest splitting the article on the talk page, but on second thought, I think that needs reconsideration. It might be preferable to split the article into state articles, like

956:, since most of the families are from one state. This might be better than creating lots of family political line articles, which provide little context. Also, I think it would be better to incorporate the political lines into articles like 382:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. 334:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. 286:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. 1449:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1646:

in the unassessed category. While I make no judgements on the subject, please be advised that in the past the Knowledge community has held that receiving a Silver Star does not by itself make a subject notable (by Knowledge standards in

3563:

The other two refs you added should be okay but when I saw "fortunecity" my antenna went up. So I clicked on that link and my security software said the site is unsafe and has 15 computer threats, so I'm changing that one. Just FYI.

1570:

I put the Biography, Football, Wisconsin WikiProject templates on the articles you started. I think there are templates for some of the pro & college football teams but I decided not to put them on.I hope this helps-Thank

1367: 1063:

FYI, he also served in WWI. If you would add that where you think it belongs, it would be appreciated and help make the article better (It is in the text, but not in the other areas in the article). Happy editing. Thank

795: 1807:

Seems to be notable for only one thing. Unlikely to meet general notability requirement unless a decision has been taken that all recipients of the medal are automatically notable. Please expand or clarify, if

1697:

3907:

WP:MILPEOPLE from essay to guideline status. Perhaps there needs to be a discussion about that third criterion in general? I could understand if it said 4-star/O-10 was automatically notable— but 1-star? --

1149:

Hmm, that's surprising, that was back in April if I'm reading the source correctly? I've readded your previous reference, and change the new one to point to the original source. I've also started a thread at

1015:

each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

1495: 2745:

are closed. If you'd like to run any future articles past me first, before creating them, to see if they'd be notable, I'd be more than happy to help, as well as answer any questions about this. Cheers,

1000:, if you would like any lookups done. Also, I did spend a while separating the page into lists by state, and once I incorporate additions/modifications since I downloaded a version, I may upload it.-- 3754:

to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

3014: 1131: 1939: 455: 3514:

next, then WWII. I noted your huge contribution in the nom. Many thanks~ Now we double check for errors and consistency, do the auto checks on the FLC page, fix the find a grave refs, etc.

2496:

DSC recipients just in case this determines they are not notable and they are subsequently deleted. I don't want you to waste time on all your hard work, which is excellent work by the way.

972:

for a more intuitive use of indented lists. Since most of the families, which include both ancestors and descendants, are not merely descendant lists for which a bulleted hierarchical list

953: 873: 2689: 2675: 3092:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 2911:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 2542:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 2172: 3103:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

2980: 2966: 2922:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

2697: 2553:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

2720:

Hey. I was wondering if you might like some advice on which articles might be notable, so that your hard work isn't lost when they're unfortunately deleted for being non-notable per

1905: 487: 423: 141:

I must echo the above. Please stop adding "Electoral history" sections to presidential articles. It is redundant and unneccessary, especially in articles that are already too long (

1643: 2187: 2961: 3061: 3640: 2670: 1892: 786:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

719: 710:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

1986: 3511: 3194: 1982: 1206:

received one electoral vote in the 1956 US presidential election, served in the Alabama House of Representatives and was a state judge. His father was Alabama governor

3612:

Some of the notability sections you've added don't mention what they did in WWI. See what I added to March as example. I should have more time to work on this tonight.

2876: 3224:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 3172:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 2710: 2041: 3235: 2736:

and there will undoubtedly be Reliable Sources giving him more than trivial coverage, like all Medal of Honor/Victoria Cross/ Hero of the Soviet Union winners. And

495: 3189: 3142: 703: 677: 592: 578: 2167: 1108: 1093: 131:

You don't have to ad the Electoral History-sections to the articles about the presidents. Al the presidents have references to elections within their articles.

3674: 2357: 3692: 2434: 2320: 1837: 1516: 848:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's 2833: 2244: 2007: 1727: 1536: 252: 2149: 491: 892:

to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add

474:

to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add

2880: 1423: 876:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 458:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 399: 2088: 3213: 3199: 1664: 1239: 1042:

Thanks for contributing. Would it be possible for you to start using the "Edit summary" box? Doing so would help others make improvements. Thanks.--

823: 752: 2154:

It seems somewhere along the line that recipients of Distinguished Service Cross (United States) are being added to (United Kingdom). I think it is

1774: 1417: 2539: 2521: 2492: 2381: 2367: 2279: 2249: 1795: 1604: 1586: 569: 544: 3916: 2481: 1884: 979:

Also, I think it would greatly help the size issue if every single office a politician held was not listed; just list the highest office attained.

499: 3864: 3838: 3680: 3221: 2799: 2785: 2587: 2211: 2193: 2108: 1994: 1685: 668: 161: 3872: 2143: 1164: 2775: 2554: 1395: 1224: 303: 3137: 2956: 3161: 3147: 3089: 3071: 2908: 2890: 135: 3662: 3631: 3607: 3583: 3558: 3496: 3406: 914: 121: 3827:

I notice that you have been creating a few articles on members of the armed forces, however it is not clear how they meet WP:MILPEOPLE or

649: 351: 3169: 3104: 2923: 2511: 2362: 1782: 1259: 1004: 987: 3347: 3785: 2780: 1672: 356: 3306: 2639: 779: 753: 1143: 2516: 1632: 1073: 944: 747: 524: 126: 2665: 2239: 2759: 404: 240: 178: 1192: 794:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge or discuss the relevant issues at 718:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge or discuss the relevant issues at 3041: 2860: 2461: 2283: 2245: 2068: 1966: 1864: 1754: 1637: 1499: 1424: 1357: 1299: 881: 828: 463: 1560: 1352: 3066: 2885: 1978: 1219: 3357:

Hi. Thanks for all the help on the various Academy alumni lists. Others have helped too, but mainly it's been me working on

1274:

Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without

1051: 3846: 2872: 3381: 3243: 2754: 976:

be useful, I think the list should not be hierarchical. It should just be a flat list of members and how they are related.

3470: 1032: 3812: 3715: 3533: 3437: 2127: 933: 3900: 1324: 375: 357: 260: 87: 1340: 1580: 849: 431: 79: 71: 66: 1547:

Hello Packerfansam. Don't forget to categorize your articles, please. It would save time of others. An example is

3325: 3195: 3143: 3067: 3045: 2886: 2864: 2517: 2465: 2072: 1970: 1868: 1758: 885: 853: 811: 787: 735: 711: 676: 600: 467: 435: 196: 1548: 1366: 3723: 961: 905: 845: 618:

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

214:

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

2333: 1458: 1117: 577: 308: 2291:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 109:

are provided to coordinate the article's improvement, not for engaging in discussion for discussion's sake.

3220:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 3168:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 2296: 2158:

classing Distinguished Service Cross (without country) into Distinguished Service Cross (United Kingdom).--

1335:

Hi! Many of the information about the United States political families is getting interesting. One example

1330: 1244: 3766: 3442: 3033: 2984: 2962: 2852: 2803: 2781: 2486: 2453: 2385: 2363: 2265: 2060: 2011: 1958: 1909: 1856: 1799: 1746: 1689: 1197: 1170: 841: 783: 707: 427: 174:

Are you still working on the Nicky Parsons article? I want to make sure you are not still expanding it.

3412: 3387:

Right now putting the names at the bottom into the table on the Union Army list would be very helpful.

3128:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 3085: 3057: 3037: 2947:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 2904: 2856: 2578:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 2535: 2457: 2302:

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding

2064: 1962: 1860: 1750: 1660: 1556: 1532: 1279: 1151: 1104: 1089: 1069: 1020: 938: 608: 279: 261: 204: 38: 3508:

Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of United States Military Academy alumni (Union Army)/archive1

2764:

You might also find this source useful when creating articles on Wisconsin Medal of Honor recipients:

3770: 3744: 3313: 3217: 3165: 2725: 2693: 2658: 2592: 2504: 2183: 857: 523:

I award you this barnstar for the diligence with which you have worked to increase the informaton at

439: 3776:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

3358: 603:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

199:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

2696:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 2635: 2615: 2235: 2163: 2115: 1628: 1291: 1275: 1255: 645: 619: 395: 347: 299: 215: 3743:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a

2215: 872:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

454:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

3831:

can you please make sure the ones that you ahve created meet that before you continue to create.

3751: 1283: 1230:

adds needless additional work. Please contact me on my talk page if I can help with this matter.

612: 561: 536: 208: 947:. I also have some questions for discussion and suggestions that I would like your opinion on. 3880: 3790: 2112: 1585: 1464:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1287: 47: 17: 1177:

Any idea whether the recently deceased judge is descended from or related to the Cobb family?

599:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 195:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 3703: 3352: 3184: 3053: 2353: 2192: 1770: 1656: 1552: 1527: 1522:

I've declined this speedy deletion and removed the tag; Mr. Daanen meets the requirements of

1512: 1127: 1118: 1100: 1085: 1065: 1001: 984: 327: 309: 167: 156: 3114:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

2933:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

2564:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1526:

in that he played professional football at the highest level available in the US, the NFL.

3912: 3817: 3781: 3133: 3093: 2952: 2912: 2707: 2651: 2644: 2619: 2583: 2543: 2497: 2292: 2219: 2179: 1612: 1542: 1454: 1411: 1389: 1318: 1203: 1133:

doesn't confirm it, and Blastro doesn't strike me as particular reliable. I hope that's OK.

1056: 1037: 969: 791: 715: 604: 200: 1023:, as it has yet to have been moved into the Knowledge namespace. Thank you for your help. 8: 3884: 3852: 3818: 3740: 3502: 3049: 3025: 3002: 2868: 2844: 2821: 2772: 2715: 2631: 2607: 2469: 2445: 2422: 2231: 2207: 2159: 2076: 2052: 2029: 1974: 1950: 1927: 1872: 1848: 1825: 1762: 1738: 1715: 1624: 1600: 1251: 1210:

who also served in the Alabama House. I work on the Walter Burgwyn Jones article. Thanks-

1171: 1047: 1009: 889: 865: 641: 471: 447: 430:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's

391: 371: 343: 323: 295: 275: 2394: 2104: 3868: 3842: 3711: 3688: 2750: 2477: 2139: 2123: 2084: 1880: 1565: 1336: 1235: 929: 897: 554: 529: 479: 249: 237: 175: 3084:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

2903:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

2534:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

2288: 1450: 596: 595:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under the 192: 191:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under the 3800: 3697: 3262: 3118:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

3010: 2937:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

2829: 2729: 2611: 2593: 2568:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

2430: 2332:

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

2097: 2037: 1935: 1833: 1723: 1523: 1485: 1483:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1028: 919: 909: 248:

Someone else has already done it. I would appreciate your comments on the talk page.

89: 2991: 2810: 2411: 2018: 1916: 1814: 1704: 3861:

received significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources.

3655: 3624: 3600: 3576: 3551: 3526: 3489: 3463: 3430: 3399: 3374: 3340: 3176: 2765: 2737: 2349: 2348:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 1766: 1505: 1187: 379: 331: 283: 147: 118: 2264:

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the

1608: 640:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 236:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 3908: 3903: 3892: 3777: 3229: 3129: 2990:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2948: 2809:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2704: 2627: 2579: 2410:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2307: 2227: 2017:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1915:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1813:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1703:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1620: 1469: 1406: 1384: 1313: 1290:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with

1207: 957: 819: 810:

template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to

743: 734:

template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to

628: 622:

wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template

387: 339: 291: 224: 218:

wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template

1446: 1445:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3895:, or their historical equivalents", seems to be rather broad: that's anyone at 3796: 3765:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 3758: 2769: 2733: 2398: 2345: 2341: 1264: 1043: 877: 833: 759: 683: 637: 459: 409: 233: 142: 106: 2440: