User talk:Onetwothreeip/2019 II

629:@123, I think you'd do better, instead of just reinstating your edit again, to honestly try to understand the objections of Soibangla and look for a compromise that satisfies those objections. Looking at the edit I can see why people would have problems with it. While it removes some unnecessary trivia (like Trump predicting 3% and the economy only growing 2.9%) it also seems aimed at trying to validate Trump's talking point about this being the best economy ever. I also sympathize with Soibangla's argument that raw numbers without some point of reference aren't particularly helpful. (Is 25% mediocre? normal? good? really good?) So why don't you start with that, try to find out specifically what parts of the edit Soi disagrees with, and then implement the parts that you're in agreement with? 1474:

adding one of the splitting templates will display a notice on the article and list it at Category:Articles to be split. This will help bring it to the attention of editors who may assist in establishing consensus, in deciding if a split is appropriate, or in carrying out the split. Templates used without an accompanying rationale, and where there is no obvious reason for the split request, may be removed at any time. Note: To conform with Knowledge's licensing requirements, which require that all content contributors receive attribution, the page receiving the split material must have an edit summary noting "split content from

1892:. In that instance, Onetwothreeip split a Knowledge article without first discussing the proposed split on the article's Talk page and informing other editors about the proposal and without correcting errors that the split had created. As a result, both pages that Onetwothreeip created from the split are either inacessible from other Knowledge pages or contain many error notices. As you can read on Onetwothreeip's talk page, Onetwothreeip has had many similar complaints from other editors. If Onetwothreeip does not adequately respond to our complaints within 24 hours, I will designate Onetwothreeip as a repeated 3863:

and do it manually. I would put the errors in one window/tab and an edit session in another, and toggle between them. If you want to avoid the possibility of an edit conflict when you hit Publish, copy the References section to a personal sandbox first and edit that; then edit the article's References section and copy the result back. At HD BullRangifer suggested 30 minutes, but that's eight seconds per LDR and seems low. Perhaps one hour, and the LDR issue goes away, freeing you to respond to

978: 2321:, like my son. That's not an insult, just a recognition that it would explain your untraditional way of dealing with this and with your uncollaborative, solo, editing patterns. I can AGF about that. Otherwise, you're just being uncollaborative and disruptive, and there's no AGF for that. It would also explain why you don't react normally to all the complaints about your behavior. Normal people try to mesh in and edit collaboratively, but you push on like a bull in a china shop." 946:

reads most of the article, and that the serious events are overlooked. There is clearly far too much in this timeline, when each time that somebody is introduced to somebody else is given the same weight as the real actions that occurred to influence the election. If all these details really must be documented on Knowledge, we can do so on other articles, particularly those of individuals where the events pertain largely to those individuals rather than more broadly.

4119: 3916: 1458:") and from other Knowledge articles that link to "Mythology and Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker". You have therefore made "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" into an orphan that few users will be able to access. In addition, you created "cite errors" within "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" that notices within the page's reference section identify as "Cite error: The named reference (citation) was invoked but never defined (see the help page)". 1019: 1349: 3821:

appear to blithely brush it all aside and continue as you please. And now you act oblivious to all the feedback you've received for months, as though we're all being unfair to you now. If I were now in your position, being confronted by a good number of other editors, I would take it as a signal that I need to take a time out and engage in some introspection, lest a time out be imposed upon me.

923: 3152: 735:. You made several dubious/false assertions to justify your edit, and I knocked them down one by one, as you pivoted from one to the next, ignoring them all, then made no effort whatsoever to incorporate any of it into your edit to reach consensus. And I'm the one being obstinate here? Awilley is suggesting you demonstrate a modicum of flexibility here, and you are resisting that as well. 919:. ("Fringe" is here used in the sense of false opinions which are contrary to what RS say, even if 99% of the population holds those false opinions. At Knowledge RS, not popularity, is the determinative factor we go by.) As editors, we should show a positive learning curve, IOW we change our opinions by bringing them into line with what RS say. That is sometimes a painful process. 684:

President Barack Obama became “the first president in modern history” never to reach in a single year. New government data on Thursday morning show that Trump, too, has failed to reach the 3 percent promised land, according to one major metric. The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis measured 2018 growth at 2.9 percent, matching the peak Obama enjoyed in 2015."

85:

faction being liberal philosophically and economically. However, I feel like edge cases like the one you brought up will be a recurring issue with the infobox series. I'll create a discussion in the Australian politics Wikiproject so there can be a consensus on how to properly classify organisations that don't fit clearly into one specific subsection.

2456:"You're the one trying to compel me to make these edits that you clearly want done. I don't see why you don't them yourself, especially since you seem to know about them in more detail than I do, and you would also get to solve the issues in exactly the way that you wanted. It's not collaborative to make me do the edits that you want done." 1417:. Apologies for my misunderstanding; I have restored your changes. Perhaps in the future it would be a good idea to put a quick explanation in every edit summary, like "see article talk page"; I had to scroll down a fair way to see your explanation in the first edit of the series. Thank you for your work. Best regards 3836:

look at the process, I much prefer to look upon the results of my edits throughout my years on Knowledge, for which I take great pride. I'm not surprised that people who make edits that I disagree with also disagree with me, but what I am surprised by is the level of incivility that editors are permitting themselves.

1462:

accomplishments throughout the years since he lived." However, because of the split that you created, "Mythology of Benjamin Banneker" does not contain any information about these commemorations, and further, does not contain citations to reliable sources that support information about commemorations.

3715:

should speak for themselves. Knowledge articles exist in a live, published medium. Our credibility as a serious educational work rests on the quality and integrity of our articles. The red citation errors scream that something is amiss and erode readers' confidence. This is such a basic concept, that

3679:

This is ridiculous hysteria. Even though you've been trying to preserve fringe scientific racialism in our articles on race and intelligence, I have been very patient in discussing the issues. As for the references imbroglio, I'm in the process of getting the automated scripts to resolve them. To put

2500:

I'm not going to be instructed to, or otherwise told what to do. That is decidedly uncollaborative. I have never said that anybody else should clean up some mess that I have made. I have not made a mess with regards to splitting that particular article. I won't go into much detail but the article did

2222:

Since most of the article previously was incredibly hard to read due to its size, and the lack of readers there generally, it had much the same problems that an orphan article would. I linked to the split article from the article it was split out from, so it has at least the same amount of connection

949:

As for the allegations, I am obviously very aware that the issue you raised is that an edit was made that seemed to suggest that the involvement of the Russian government was not factually established. Unfortunately, we are also including many mere allegations and unproven claims in the article. I am

865:

My block log is really weird. The first, second, and last are the only real blocks. The first one (that admin is blocked) was given to me and another editor, and the admin couldn't even explain how we had violated 3rr. The second was an April Fool's joke. The last one was rather short, and that admin

753:

This is really needlessly combative. Myself and the rest of the participants of that discussion obviously aren't swayed by what you have said, and don't agree that we have made dubious or false assertions. I have repeatedly asked you to suggest alterations but you simply have not. I can ask you again

712:

I'm wondering if you have certain personal opinions about me or if you have confused me with somebody else. I have consistently asked them very much what you think I should be asking them, and I can show you those instances if you want. As you can see, Soibangla is simply unmoved from their proposal.

506:

They would have been incorrect if they meant that the proposed paragraph didn't have consensus, which it clearly does. They would be correct to say that removing the last sentence did not have consensus, as that was not discussed there. They also could've done what Awilley did and looked at the wrong

221:

I would say that is a change to content rather than copyediting, although relatively minor. It seems that the overwhelming amount of changes I made in that edit comprised of copyediting and removing citations, so the edit summary can't be described as deceptive. As for the actual content, the section

3835:

I am always grateful for good faith feedback that I have received, but I can't be expected to genuinely accept criticism from people who have insulted me personally. None of these issues are so intractable that they can't be discussed, without commenting on the editors themselves. Rather than simply

3820:

What you are observing recently is a long-simmering frustration with various aspects of your editing style now reaching a rapid boil. Several editors have expressed serious misgivings about your editing for many months now, but you do not appear to have taken any of it into consideration, but rather

3805:

When everyone else tells you that you're screwing things up, maybe they are right. How about acting collegially and collaboratively for once and see things from our POV. You need to accept and act on all the criticisms. You need to correct the errors you have left behind. You need to stop doing what

3790:

These last few days are genuinely unprecedented in terms of the incivility I've experienced on Knowledge, which I generally thought was far better than what can happen in real life. So much condescension, anger, insult and presumptions, as well as refusing to acknowledge what I am saying, and at the

3761:

Thank you for your answer but I am stunned at how hostile you and others are being here. I agree with your answer that the errors make it look like a rather serious problem to readers who would not be aware what the issues are. This is a very significant departure from the civility that I am used to

945:

If you're looking for me to confirm again that the Russian government was involved in the 2016 election then that's what I'm doing right now. I have not come across any editors who believe otherwise. We should not be doing what they want, which is to include so many irrelevant details so that nobody

3862:

about an automated method for removing those 226 LDRs, which demonstrates good faith in addressing the problem (and it might have helped a little if you had conveyed that here). I would propose that you pursue that for another 48 hours and then, if there is no automated method, just bite the bullet

2471:

I have provided you with explicit instructions that describe the procedures that you can use to correct these errors. Although I can make these corrections myself in less time than I am spending in my communications with you, I consider it to be more productive for all concerned to convince you of

2327:

As it is, your actions are extremely disruptive, uncollaborative, deceptive, and one of the worst cases of consistent and constant IDHT behavior I've seen since I started editing here in 2003. No matter what your diagnosis really is, the consequences of your being here are destructive, and you have

2236:

You're the one trying to compel me to make these edits that you clearly want done. I don't see why you don't them yourself, especially since you seem to know about them in more detail than I do, and you would also get to solve the issues in exactly the way that you wanted. It's not collaborative to

2229:

An incomplete split is simply not vandalism. I also performed a complete split, even though the articles still need work, but they needed work before the split anyway. This is plainly not vandalism and I would strongly recommend that you don't accuse anybody of vandalism who you are talking to. Not

1293:

and have been reverted each time. The next time you are think that citations should be removed, would you please consult other editors on the talk page first? Every citation added to the article is there for a reason, so there needs to be an equally valid reason for removing them. At a minimum, you

910:

We're talking about the proper and improper use of the word. The thread is about a specific misuse of the term. We must not label proven facts as mere allegations. That's a policy violation. Those who refuse to accept what RS say should not allow their personal beliefs to influence their editing by

107:

I think the best way to categorise Labor Right specifically would be in a social democracy template, and then categorising Labor Left in a socialism template. I'm not sure how much use categorising the factions would be though, since there isn't much to divide them ideologically and since we do not

2482:

I have attempted to make you aware of the consequences of not cleaning up the messes that you repeatedly create and of claiming to act collaboratively when you are actually are doing the opposite (whether you recognize it or not). Please therefore note: The 24-hour clock that I set in my previous

2003:

However, when an editor who has made such an incomplete split refuses requests by other editors to correct these errors in a timely manner, this does indeed constitute vandalism. Such refusals destroy the collaborative nature of Knowledge and compel others to correct errors that the page splitter

1473:

If an article meets the criteria for splitting and no discussion is required, editors can be bold and carry out the split. If unsure, or with high-profile or sensitive articles, start a "Split" discussion on the article talk page, and consider informing any associated WikiProject(s). Additionally,

84:

Hi, I was just wondering your opinion on the ideology of Labor Right. The page states that the faction is socially liberal, economically liberal, and is aligned with the liberal Third Way. I agree that the inclusion of the faction may be contentious, but the evidence on the page points towards the

3776:

I wasn't trying to be hostile, and I apologize if that's how it was received. I was, however, trying to be blunt because when someone doesn't seem to understand or accept what they have been told more collegially by several other experienced editors, a direct approach is sometimes a better way to

3716:

I'm stunned that I have to even explain it. While Knowledge is a work that anyone can edit, there is an expectation that editors will familiarize themselves with the community's norms and that they have the competence to edit in manner that improves, not damages, the encyclopedia. In other words,

2287:

I wrote "Leaving an unfinished split leaves a mess similar to, and often worse than, vandalism." I did not call you a "vandal", but I can understand if you are called that, because "When it quacks like a duck...". What you've done is worse than simple vandalism, and your uncollaborative responses

1725:

It's not necessary to merge the articles back in order to split them in a different way. We can modify the current articles to address the issues that you raise. It's not true that the editor performing the split has to be the editor that does the things you mention. I'm happy to work with you on

914:

I don't know your position on the matter, but we actually have editors here who don't accept that Russia interfered in the election, but who are wise enough to keep those beliefs to themselves and not edit according to those beliefs. Even using talk pages to advocate those beliefs is forbidden as

826:

I am always willing to accept friendly advice but this is most decidedly unfriendly. You should not act as if you are a higher moral authority than others, and your demands are not appreciated. I hope, if you continue to participate in discussion, that it involves content rather than drama, and I

343:

Who's "everybody"? The only person I see agreeing with your proposal is Markbasset, who if I'm being honest, is not a great person to listen to if you're interested in neutral editing. Starship.paint seemed fine with the status quo, and MelanieN commented once with a mixed reaction to a different

562:

consensus to significantly alter longstanding, unchallenged content in one of the most heavily-monitored articles, but you don't have it. And making flatly false assertions that the edit contains "factual errors which misrepresent economics" does not help you to establish overwhelming consensus.

2504:

I have fixed some of the linking that I thought was done when I made the split, and I can now confirm this is no longer an issue. I'm afraid I don't think I can help you with the references. Most importantly I just want to say that we certainly do encourage editors to act boldly, and not simply

1527:

You justified your reversions with statements such as "Blanking the article or merging the article into another article is most decidedly not an appropriate way to address the issues of context in the article" and "No need for commemorations to be in the same article as mythology. If one of the

796:

The only personal attack was you accusing me of personal attacks. If you actually were concerned about such a personal attack, you would not have publicised it further by posting that here, where more people can see. I did not name any individual or individuals. I correctly characterised what I

297:

edit, and continuing to revert it back every day or two will likely result in some sort of sanction against you. Concision is a worthy goal, but what you need to do here is to better identify the objections people have with your edit, and then find a way to make the paragraph more concise while

2240:

None of these are actually questions you asked me, so I didn't feel a need to respond, but given that you feel very strongly that I should respond, I have done so. If you would like a direct response from me, it would be easier to question me. Unlike some other editors, I am completely open to

683:

Throughout the 2016 campaign and since, the president and his party have vowed to kick-start tepid Obama-era economic growth. Specifically, they insisted tax cuts and deregulation would return growth to its post-World War II average of 3 percent — a level, candidate Trump said derisively, that

182:

Thank you for bringing this to my talk page. I have reviewed the edit being presented here and I find it to be very much an instance where the edit constituted copyediting and removing citations. It would be strongly appreciated if either of you could explain what was deceptive about this edit

1555:

Remove the sentence in the lead to "Mythology of Benjamin Banneker" that states: "A United States postage stamp and the names of a number of recreational and cultural facilities, schools, streets and other facilities and institutions throughout the United States have commemorated Banneker's

1547:

Please therefore correct all of the errors that your changes have introduced. Add context to "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker". Define the named references (citations) that the page now invokes. Provide links to "Commemorations of Benjamin Benneker" in other Knowledge articles that now

2883:

has links to it from other articles. This means that when you are on another article, you can use an internal link that will take you to that article. Please read the definition again, and you will find that this is not an orphan article. I have no objections to you adding further links.

3107:. This title (which is within the main article namespace) has four words: "Commemorations", "of", "Benjamin" and "Banneker". Direct links from pages containing only one of these words except "Banneker" would need to be disambiguated. "Banneker" would be redirected to "Benjamin Banneker". 3651:

Please review the comments that other editors have left on this page. He's been making edits like these for months, and has consistently refused to acknowledge that there's a long-term problem with his behavior. Quite a few editors have agreed this pattern of behavior needs some sort of

1519:

When preparing to move a Knowledge page, a message entitled "Move Mythology and commemorations of (page)" appears. This message states: "This can be a drastic and unexpected change for a popular page; please be sure you understand the consequences of this before proceeding. Please read

1461:

The lead to "Mythology of Benjamin Banneker" states: "A United States postage stamp and the names of a number of recreational and cultural facilities, schools, streets and other facilities and institutions throughout the United States have commemorated Banneker's documented and mythical

1535:

Editors that make comments such as "split or move pages merging the article into another article is most decidedly not an appropriate way to address the issues of context in the article" need to provide an "appropriate way" for others to correct the errors that they have created.

2382:

When other editors point out errors that I have made or raise issues regarding my edits, I either correct the errors or resolve the issues in interactions with the other editors. In some instances, I request third-party assistance or decisions and then comply with the responses.

298:

avoiding the problems that led to the objections. You might try making the edit sentence by sentence, one edit per day, beginning with the bits that are least likely to be objectionable. Start by re-reading the objections on the talk page and trying to understand the root cause.

1729:

As for the procedure of splitting, the steps I took are those that I felt were appropriate, and may not completely align with all the steps that are listed on certain project pages. I'm only going to place this response here, but I have given you a notification about this.

3858:, rather than expressing that frustration by overstating what is a relatively minor, short-term problem (readers rarely look at the References section and Knowledge's reputation will not suffer irreparable damage if a few readers see those errors).You have inquired at 1910:

Yes, and I'm not surprised. In such a case, just revert back. A split must be done properly or not at all. Leaving an unfinished split leaves a mess similar to, and often worse than, vandalism. We can't have that. We have procedures, and they must be followed. --

236:

Can you please not do that again? I don't care what percentage of your edit is copyediting or citekill removal. If you make substantive changes to an article, don't use an edit summary that suggests otherwise. It doesn't matter how minor you feel the changes were.

3629:

This isn't semantic, my edits are not errors. What is the problem, to you, with these errors being displayed in the references section? All that this means is there are defined references which aren't used in the article. This doesn't actually affect the article.

2328:

shown no signs of a positive learning curve. Instead, you double down and get worse. AGF is not a suicide pact. Your intentions may seem good in your own eyes, but your actual actions are not good. Any good you ever do here is not worth the damage you do. --

3806:

irritates others. Your failures to do those things are extreme IDHT behavior, and it's very disruptive. You are a net negative to the project. We no longer want you here because you are not showing a positive learning curve. You just dig deeper. --

2219:

An editor does not correct obvious new citation errors that the split created because they are marked in red in the "Notes" section of one of the new pages, and, an editor does not revise existing wikilinks, thus creating orphan pages that few will

705:

There is no such special kind of consensus necessary to "overturn" something that was in the article without any consensus. The fact that it remained in the article for however long you are claiming it remained is immaterial since eventually it was

3215:

This is far too much for me to read, honestly. You keep making these comments that are more than 2,000 characters each time and I can't be expected to read them all completely. Please keep your comments shorter going forward, and avoid repetition.

717:

discussion, so if anybody has told you that I am not a constructive editor heavily involved in talk page discussions seeking to combine people's edits to reach as broad a consensus as possible, that's simply a malicious and easily disprovable lie.

381:

The best way to determine concensus is a Rfc on each major change. Its cumbersome but that's pretty much the only way a concensus can be reached on that particular article. With that in mind, I did agree much more with your version than the other

1515:

I therefore reverted the changes that you made to restore the original text of "Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" to correct the errors that you made. However, you subsequently reverted my edits without an adequate explanation.

3597:

First of all, it's not true that I created any errors with the references. They were automatically generated as a result of those references becoming unused in the article. There isn't any problem for readers when these errors are displayed.

797:

identified as disruptive to the process which was still taking place. Please do not attempt to derail the conversation any further, and I am aware that you have attempted this in the past. I want to stay purely on the content of the article.

2655:

However, "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" presently does not contain links to Knowledge pages for either "Commemoration" or "Benjamin Banneker". Therefore, "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" is an "orphan" as defined by Knowledge.

1556:

documented and mythical accomplishments throughout the years since he lived". If you do not wish to do this, add a link to "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" to the lead, or add citations to reliable sources that support this sentence.

1312:. The only citations I removed were those that are there for no reason. I can confirm that the remaining sources supported the text as well. I intend to discuss this at the talk page but I invite you to respond with your thoughts here. 3582:

Ditto. If you want to split article, make sure that you haven't generated citation errors before you click submit. You can do this in your sandbox for convenience. Leaving citation errors is disruptive. You have to stop doing this. -

1939:

I can't see what questions you have asked me that I have not answered, but please feel free to put them to me again. Per the above section, you stated that would like to make certain changes to those articles, and I have no objection.

2241:

working collaboratively and am completely willing to discuss these issues with you. Please do not take any delay in my responses as any personal reflection, as I believe you genuinely do have the best interests of Knowledge in mind.

1531:

Editors that split or move pages bear the responsibility of appropriately addressing issues of context in the article that they have created and for adding context. They should not expect other editors to assume this responsibility.

1249:, it's certainly reasonable that the articles for those games has information on when they were released in different regions, but it's a lot of information that the lists of video games don't need. They're incredibly large already. 4075:

about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

543:

consensus when there is any disagreement, as myself and others have spoken. I don't feel this is really about you or the paragraph you've written, it's just a natural development of content where people prefer a newer version.

811:

Then stick to discussing content and don't accuse anyone, even in general, of editing in bad faith. If I had written what you wrote I could be blocked for an "extended period". Be more careful. Don't use those two words. --

44: 1434: 3657: 320:

Can you look at this further? I started a talk page discussion and everybody there agreed with my proposal, except for the person who wrote the previous version. I waited a few days for the discussion to take place.

1559:

If you do not wish to make these corrections, please revert the page split that you created from "Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker". If you do not do so, you will have failed to follow the steps in

907:. Of course there are allegations in the article as that is content it must have per our rules and purpose, and they are labeled as allegations. We do not remove unproven allegations if they are properly sourced. 1726:

this but I'm not aware enough of Benjamin Banneker so I didn't feel it would be appropriate for me to create new paragraphs. I did my best to use the already existing content and shape them into new articles.

3014:"Article namespace" means every single article. A namespace refers to pages with a certain prefix, like "Talk:", "Category:" or "User:". Pages without these prefixes are articles, in the article namespace. 2420:. If you make an effort to do this, you will find that readership reaches a peak each February and is low during school vacation periods. There are reasons for this pattern, which you may not understand. 1669:

only contain information relevant to the page that contains the lead, and not to the other page. Further, the lead for each new page needs to contain some of the information that the lead paragraphs of

4034: 3068:

The main namespace, article namespace, or mainspace is the namespace of Knowledge that contains the encyclopedia proper—that is, where "live" Knowledge articles reside, as opposed to Sandbox pages.

1396: 4057: 2094:

Please do the following, which do not involve any specialized knowledge about Benjamin Banneker. These are editorial changes that are essential to adequately complete the split that you created:

1763:

Please do the following, which do not involve any specialized knowledge about Benjamin Banneker. These are editorial changes that are essential to adequately complete the split that you created:

1230:. I put the regional releases on them because there are games on the list that were published and distributed by Electronic Arts in Europe only or in Japan only. Are you sure this edit is okay? 911:

adding content which undermines what RS say. We see that all the time at Knowledge, and experienced editors waste a lot of time having to undo such disruptive editing. It's a perennial problem.

2303:

I'm not going to be baited by you calling me autistic on your talk page and I'm not going to be baited by this on my talk page either. This pointless arguing is worth neither your nor my time.

2297: 2501:

not have many readers. It was not easy to read the article, and the accessibility of sections through the contents does not make much difference if readers don't know what to be looking for.

3616:. I didn't come to to your talk page to play semantic games. If you continue making edits that result in citation errors, I will bring the issue to ANI and request administrative action. - 1624:

However, the editor performing the split needs to assure that the split does not result in the loss of relevant information, including wikilinks in other Knowledge pages (such as those in

1392: 3908: 1395:, which refers to the talk page where myself and others have discussed this further. The content hasn't been removed from Knowledge, it has been moved to the state articles, such as with 3409: 2691: 1577: 3371: 2432: 2403:

editors to act boldly, but, more importantly, instruct editors to use caution when acting boldly and to work collaboratively to resolve issues that may have resulted from bold actions.

3952: 2408:

Since most of the article previously was incredibly hard to read due to its size, and the lack of readers there generally, it had much the same problems that an orphan article would.

953:

Informing me that reliable sources and not popularity is what "we go by" and of other such basic principles is not welcome at all, especially given your previous conduct towards me.

3117:

Because links from the pages ""Commemorations", "of", "Benjamin" and "Banneker" would need to be disambiguated or to be redirected, the only procedure that can adequately de-orphan

2479:

have requested at your earliest convenience. It is your choice as to whether you should affirmatively respond to these requests. Neither of us can compel you to make those changes.

1007: 563:

Ironically, you called my edit a "factual mischaracterization" while factually mischaracterizing it. And then you wonder how I could take any of this personally. Just unbelievable.

4107: 3945: 3706: 3689: 2716:. If you do this, ou will find that, an article is an orphan (according to the definition of "orphan") if the article has no links to a subject that is in its namespace (title). 2227:

However, when an editor who has made such an incomplete split refuses requests by other editors to correct these errors in a timely manner, this does indeed constitute vandalism.

3932:

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

2007:

Another editor can sometimes simply revert a split. However, this is often not possible when subsequent edits have occurred; only an admininistrator can then revert the split.

2079: 1889: 4029: 3653: 2324:

If you are autistic or have Asperger syndrome, it would really be good for you to tell us so we know how to deal with you. If we understood you, we'd be better able to help.

3937: 43: 1540:" describes such "appropriate ways" to undo a move (or a split). However, it is difficult to undo a page move (or a split) when a subsequent edit has changed a page (see 778: 3674: 3661: 2213:

An editor splits a Knowledge article without prior discussion on the article's Talk page, and an editor does not notify the article's prior editors of the proposed split

108:

have much information on them. Another issue that comes to mind is whether to categorise One Nation as far-right, and it may also be difficult to categorise the Greens.

132:? You changed some language in substantive ways and deleted some information outright. This cannot be accurately characterized as "Copyediting and cutting overciting." 1120: 3960: 2829:

However, "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" presently does not contain links to the Knowledge pages for either "Commemoration" or "Benjamin Banneker". Therefore,

904: 74: 3933: 1977:

An editor does not correct obvious new citation errors that the split created because they are marked in red in the "Notes" section of one of the new pages, and,

3536: 476:

You're clearly the only one who disagrees. The edit was reverted because I had inadvertently removed a sentence that I wasn't aware was added to the paragraph.

4005:

As mentioned in the template, these notices are just for your information based on your apparent areas of interest on Knowledge. They do not imply wrongdoing

253:

I don't accept that edit summary was deceptive, even unintentionally. I can call this rewriting if you have an objection with these being called copyediting.

3464: 2946:

Please recognize that the namespace of a Knowledge article contains the article's title, and sometimes additional information. Neither the name of the page "

1482:". The "Copied" template can also be placed on the talk page of both articles. For further information, refer to the main Copying within Knowledge guideline. 1357: 2546:. No Knowledge articles (including the main article) presently link to the page. Further, the top of the page also still contains a message that states: " 3815: 3450: 2929:

an article that has no links to it. According to the definition, an orphan article is one that contains no links to pages that are within its namespace.

2339: 2312: 1949: 962: 836: 821: 806: 280: 262: 248: 231: 216: 192: 3555: 525:

without any of the 2468 article watchers initiating a challenge against it. Not MONGO, not JFG — not even MarkHassett. The silent majority has spoken.

841:

BullRangifer, you have not been blocked in a long time so its highly unlikely unless you do something awful that you would face an "extended" block.--

117: 3845: 3830: 3520: 3500: 3194: 2442: 2417: 1925:

This is not true at all, I performed a complete split. I'm not responsible for maintaining the articles once they are split. Both fo you should read

1684: 1612: 1440: 763: 748: 727: 572: 553: 534: 516: 501: 485: 471: 3882: 3791:

worst possible time of year as well. Do you understand and accept what I have told you, at least? Maybe people are just more stressed at this time.

3170: 1276: 1258: 1207: 1190: 1173: 1156: 1139: 166: 4123: 3317: 3299: 3249: 3210: 3023: 3009: 2893: 2581: 2559: 2514: 2250: 2199: 1905: 1866: 1739: 1713: 1599: 1426: 1408: 680: 457: 440: 426: 376: 358: 330: 2495: 1920: 312: 3666:

Yes, I did review them. That's why I gave a final warning. Obstinance of this magnitude does not work well on a collaborative editing project. -

2458:

Please recognize that I know about the corrections that I asked you to make only because I searched for errors that the split may have produced.

412:

Apparently. I was looking at #The economic expansion that began in June 2009. I'm going to bed now. I may have some time to look again tomorrow.

405: 391: 3680:

it bluntly, concurring with concerns over editing processes is not a reasonable way to get a certain editorial outcome on a particular article.

889: 875: 850: 3800: 3785: 3771: 3756: 3639: 3624: 3607: 3304:

I already told you how you can identify for yourself the pages that have links to that article. Orphan articles regard a lack of links that go

1479: 1475: 1334: 1321: 643: 3963:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 2132:

now contains several red "Cite error:" notifications. As a result of these errors, readers cannot access some of the citations in the text of

1796:

now contains several red "Cite error:" notifications. As a result of these errors, readers cannot access some of the citations in the text of

2925:. That sentence contains Knowledge's definition of the word "orphan". If you read that definition, you will learn that an orphan article is 2874: 1360:

without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an accurate

936: 790: 3527:

where the reference is defined in the References section. When removing content, the reference must be removed from the reference list or

2288:

everywhere at Knowledge are worrying and downright pathological. You are a net negative to this project and deserve an indefinite ban. --

1478:". (Do not omit this step or omit the page name.) A note should also be made in the edit summary of the source article, "split content to 1130:, do you propose merging the content back into the original article, or simply deleting the content entirely from the main space? Thanks. 202: 3201:) is now an orphan that has insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please therefore perform this simple procedure. 539:

That's not how consensus works. Do you think it's only allowed to remove something from an article when 2000 editors agree? There is no

3231:

are linked from. Go to the "What links here" link in the Tools section of the sidebar, on whatever article you think may be an orphan.

1079: 3478: 94: 4053: 4036: 1701: 1050: 880:

Yes, but there is only one block in last decade and that was removed after 2 days. No, block logs are permanent features sorry.--

269:

That would be an improvement. Even better would be "copyediting, cutting overciting, and some deletions" or something like that.

3431: 3577: 2660: 2416:

You stated that the article had a lack general lack of readers. That is not correct. Look closely at the readership history of

2234:

Such refusals destroy the collaborative nature of Knowledge and compel others to correct errors that the page splitter created.

2187: 2154: 2129: 1849: 1818: 1793: 1649: 1100: 2057:

stated: "I can't see what questions you have asked me that I have not answered, but please feel free to put them to me again."

1451:"). When doing this, you removed context from the new "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" that existed before your split. 999: 866:

is also blocked. Most of the rest is just repairing the damage; there is apparently no way to remove a block from the log. --

1364:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the 1239: 2800:

Please therefore please read my message again. Please also read Knowledge's definition of "orphan" in the first sentence at

950:

dispelling of this fiction that anything reliable sources say not only belongs on Knowledge, but on this article especially.

4135: 3101:

In the Knowledge glossary, an orphan is defined as "an article with no links from other pages in the main article namespace

1046: 1026: 1012: 151: 1381: 3441:. I have been busy recently. I am currently in transit but I will respond to you there in hopefully less than two hours. 3383: 3364: 3358: 3347: 3284: 3268: 3228: 3224: 3198: 3141: 3137: 3122: 3118: 3110: 3104: 2982: 2960: 2955: 2951: 2880: 2862: 2842: 2778: 2729: 2725: 2633: 2619: 2569: 2539: 2472:

the need for you to clean up the messes that you repeatedly create by your editing, which I consider to be irresponsible.

2448: 2428: 2178: 2174: 2150: 2133: 2116: 2108: 2104: 1842: 1838: 1814: 1797: 1783: 1775: 1771: 1697: 1666: 1645: 1641: 1629: 1448: 1042: 222:

is about Donald Trump's racial views so it's not relevant that he has asserted Hillary Clinton originated those rumours.

3591: 696: 859: 197:

Sure, here's an example. You removed the fact that Trump falsely asserted that the birther rumors had been started by

3179: 2412:

Readers could easily access the sections in which they were interested by clicking on links in the table of contents.

2137: 1801: 773: 2390:

You do not appear to recognize that a person that creates a mess bears the responsibility for cleaning up the mess.

68: 3419: 3394: 3375: 3351: 3041:

Articles" belong to the main namespace of Knowledge pages (also called "article namespace" or simply "mainspace").

2112: 2100: 1779: 1767: 363:

Are you talking about a previous discussion? There is a much more recent discussion currently on the talk page at

157:

I share this concern, among other concerns about Onetwothreeip's editing style, and I am aware others do as well.

137: 3956: 3854:

I know little of that situation. But if that's the case, I think editors should be more direct in addressing the

1104: 1541: 3422:, but you haven't responded yet. Please respond and self-revert before real damage occurs at the talk page. -- 3387: 2947: 2787: 2717: 2629: 2565: 2436: 2170: 2166: 2146: 2120: 1834: 1830: 1810: 1787: 1683:

If you can perform all of the above, please do this. If you cannot do this, please revert the split to restore

1662: 1637: 1633: 1549: 1444: 32: 3531:. After editing content, please check the Reference section for possible cite error messages. You can see the 1302: 3456: 2861:

be in the article. I therefore again suggest that you add one or both of those links to the lead section of

1227: 490: 294: 129: 1289:

Hi Onetwothreeip, I've noticed that over the past several months you have repeatedly removed citations from

4092: 79: 27: 1489:

describes the following six steps that editors need to take when considering and conducting a page split:

3166: 1092: 1030: 1008: 968: 3941: 2186:

Repeat this for each red "Cite error:" notification. Be sure that no red error notifications remain in

1848:

Repeat this for each red "Cite error:" notification. Be sure that no red error notifications remain in

1263:

Okay. I'll get back to you if the page split for the list comes to see if it's acceptable then or not,

1096: 3841: 3796: 3767: 3702: 3685: 3635: 3603: 3496: 3446: 3313: 3264:

applies to all editors. It especially applies to editors such as yourself that boldly split articles.

3245: 3019: 2889: 2702: 2577: 2510: 2308: 2246: 1945: 1735: 1595: 1404: 1317: 1254: 1203: 1198:

I don't think it's a good idea to merge it back. I won't be able to much trimming myself, if at all.

1169: 1135: 958: 832: 802: 759: 723: 549: 512: 481: 453: 436: 401: 372: 364: 326: 258: 227: 188: 113: 50:

I did not create the chart; I just expanded it as new people voted. It is now hidden with a comment.

3467:

closed as no consensus. Please start another AfD if you still think this article should be deleted.

3227:

is not an orphan, because it has articles that link to it. In other words, there are articles where

2663:"Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" by adding to the lead section of that article links to either 1294:

have to carefully read the remaining sources to ensure that they support all of the article text. -

4052:

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,

3261: 3237: 1561: 1486: 1466: 396:

I don't think it's major enough for RfC, and I don't think my version should be the final version.

3852:

a long-simmering frustration with various aspects of your editing style now reaching a rapid boil.

491:

Undid revision 906456466 by Onetwothreeip (talk) - I do not see consensus for this version on talk

3506: 2215:. I don't mind making bold edits, and Knowledge must continue to encourage editors to act boldly. 1537: 1521: 1454:

You have also not created links to "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" from the main article ("

1221: 17: 2989:

link to the page "Commemoration" or to a page with a similar but less ambiguous title (such as "

2950:" nor the name of any other Knowledge page (or synonym of any such page) that are linked within 4103: 4026: 3811: 3745: 3427: 3414: 3036: 2397:

I don't mind making bold edits, and Knowledge must continue to encourage editors to act boldly.

2334: 2293: 1916: 1524:

for more detailed instructions." The same is true for splitting a page into two or more pages.

932: 871: 817: 786: 275: 243: 211: 146: 3308:

the particular article from other articles, not links on the article going to other articles.

1980:

An editor does not revise existing wikilinks, thus creating orphan pages that few will access.

1971:

An editor splits a Knowledge article without prior discussion on the article's Talk page, and,

4131: 3457: 2169:

and searching for the term "ref name=stamp2". You can then copy the complete reference from

1833:

and searching for the term "ref name=stamp2". You can then copy the complete reference from

1368:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 1342: 3998: 3990: 3982: 3974: 3922:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

4072: 3568: 3144:

and perhaps justify the removal of the following tag that is now at the top of the article:

1186: 1152: 1116: 90: 62: 3103:". The main article namespace of the article that we are discussing contains the title of 1636:, but not to both pages. In addition the editor performing the split needs to assure that 713:

I was surprised that you thought I had reinstated my alternative paragraph after only the

8: 3826: 3473: 2463: 2410:" That is not correct. The original article was long, but it was not difficult to read. 1893: 1565: 1108: 744: 692: 681:

Trump and GOP promised economic growth much better than Obama’s. That’s not what happened

568: 530: 497: 467: 162: 3113:

is presently "an article with no links from other pages in the main article namespace".

2827:

is defined as "an article with no links from other pages in the main article namespace".

2697:

It's not an orphan, the mythology article has a link to it, as I intended at the start.

2653:

is defined as "an article with no links from other pages in the main article namespace".

2317:

I did not call you autistic. I wrote: "I'm really beginning to wonder if you might have

4112: 3877: 3837: 3792: 3763: 3721: 3698: 3681: 3631: 3599: 3492: 3442: 3341: 3309: 3256: 3241: 3136:

It is preferable to add links to one or both of those two pages to the lead section of

3030: 3015: 2914: 2900: 2885: 2820: 2765: 2751: 2698: 2646: 2636:" in response to my message, "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" is still an orphan. 2613: 2599: 2573: 2535: 2521: 2506: 2372: 2358: 2304: 2242: 2087: 2083: 2054: 2029: 1956: 1941: 1758: 1731: 1606: 1591: 1414: 1400: 1313: 1272: 1264: 1250: 1235: 1199: 1178: 1165: 1144: 1131: 954: 916: 828: 798: 755: 719: 545: 508: 477: 449: 432: 397: 368: 322: 254: 223: 184: 109: 3346:

You are wrong. However, even if you were correct, you have not correctly de-orphaned

448:

It's time for me to restore my proposed paragraph to the article, per the discussion.

4099: 4046: 4010: 3807: 3729: 3438: 3423: 3405: 3295: 3280: 3206: 3130: 3005: 2994: 2907: 2870: 2850: 2758: 2737: 2687: 2672: 2668: 2606: 2555: 2528: 2491: 2476: 2376: 2365: 2329: 2318: 2289: 2195: 1963: 1912: 1901: 1883: 1862: 1709: 1671: 1625: 1573: 1455: 1422: 1377: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1075: 1054: 1038: 942: 928: 867: 813: 782: 637: 420: 352: 306: 270: 238: 206: 173: 141: 123: 3140:, rather than to later sections in the article. This procedure would add context to 2230:

only is this not assuming good faith, it's simply not anything to do with vandalism.

1687:. I will then perform the split and do the above, to the extent to which I am able. 1164:

If you can sufficiently trim the content, I would let the proposed deletion happen.

1062: 4127: 3717: 2623: 2543: 1926: 540: 1661:

The editor performing the split also needs to assure that lead paragraphs in both

205:. On what basis do you characterize that "copyediting and/or cutting overciting?" 3741: 3559: 3276: 3126: 2846: 2664: 2548:

This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject.

995: 885: 846: 387: 198: 102: 86: 55: 3697:

Please answer my question on why you think the references errors are a problem.

2626:. No Knowledge articles (including the main article) presently link to the page. 1974:

An editor does not notify the article's prior editors of the proposed split, and

1615:

is too long and should be split. We are therefore in concurrence on this matter.

1061:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

990:

I think your efforts to streamline articles deserves a commendation. Thank you.

858:, I wish that were the case, but I live under a custom-made sanction. See here: 128:

Hello, could you please try to avoid using deceptive edit summaries, as you did

3822: 3725: 3613: 3486: 3468: 3096: 2922: 2814: 2801: 2713: 2640: 2032:

undid my reversion without providing an adequate justification for this action.

1857:

I will make all of the other changes that I identified in my previous message.

740: 702: 688: 564: 526: 493: 463: 177: 158: 2677:

The split created at least 11 redlinked references/notes which you should fix.

2538:: The 24-hour clock that I set in my previous message is still ticking. Also, 2115:

to change each relevant wikilink to enable each to directly connect to either

1782:

to change each relevant wikilink to enable each to directly connect to either

4064: 3868: 3781: 3752: 3733: 3670: 3620: 3587: 3547: 3543: 3524: 3516: 3397:. You need to correct this ambiguity. Don't ask or expect others to do this. 2831:"Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker" is an "orphan" as defined by Knowledge. 1330: 1298: 1284: 1268: 1246: 1231: 1195: 1182: 1161: 1148: 1127: 1112: 133: 1544:). In some instances, only an administrator can resolve these difficulties. 977: 521:

My edit has overwhelming consensus by virtue of the fact it remained intact

4079:

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with

3859: 3737: 3401: 3291: 3202: 3001: 2866: 2733: 2683: 2551: 2487: 2207: 2191: 1934: 1897: 1858: 1720: 1705: 1585: 1569: 1528:

articles lacks context, context should be added, not the articles merged."

1418: 1388: 1373: 1353: 1290: 736: 709: 632: 445: 415: 347: 317: 301: 2399:". Knowledge does not "encourage" editors to act boldly. Knowledge rules 1929:

and understand that a vandal is not simply someone that you disagree with.

1085:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

3551: 3528: 3491:

I don't think the article should be deleted though. It should be merged.

2981:

As I have previously informed you, the only procedure that can de-orphan

2177:. When doing this, replace "ref name=stamp2/" with "ref name=stamp2" in 1888:

Onetwothreeip has also not adequately responded to my messages regarding

1841:. When doing this, replace "ref name=stamp2/" with "ref name=stamp2" in 4058:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/NATO involvement in the Yemeni Civil War

3915: 3865:

a long-simmering frustration with various aspects of your editing style

3221:

an article with no links from other pages in the main article namespace

1512:

You performed Step 5, but did not perform any of the other five steps.

991: 881: 855: 842: 383: 293:

OK, that's enough reverting. You obviously haven't found consensus for

3558:

will help you to fix the multiple cite error message you made. Thanks.

2392:

Instead, you tell others to clean up the messes that you have created.

2159:"Cite error: The named reference stamp2 was invoked but never defined" 1823:"Cite error: The named reference stamp2 was invoked but never defined" 2425:

I linked to the split article from the article it was split out from

3778: 3749: 3694: 3667: 3646: 3617: 3584: 3161:

provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject

2990: 2080:

Your changes to "Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker"

1968:

It is not inherently vandalism when, as occurred in this instance:

1890:

Your changes to "Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker"

1435:

Your changes to "Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker"

1327: 1309: 1295: 779:

Your accusations of "bad faith" are inappropriate personal attacks.

675:

Your comments are well taken, except it's not trivia, it's vital:

183:

summary or what else this edit could be characterised as. Cheers.

3980:

My very best wishes gave you a notice about American Politics on

2813:

As I stated in my previous message to you, the lead paragraph of

2145:

To correct these errors, please copy the complete citations from

1809:

To correct these errors, please copy the complete citations from

1674:

now contain. This will place each new page in its proper context.

3928:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

3513:

Unused references should be removed from the article as a result

3095:

None of this has any relevance to the definition of "orphan" in

3374:) at the end of the first sentence of the second paragraph of 2845:

is to add to the lead section of that article links to either

1648:

are now incomplete (as indicated in the red error messages in

1348: 3972:

Robert McClenon gave you a notice about American Politics on

3193:

An editor added that tag to the article soon after you split

1181:, I'll merge it back and we can work on trimming together. – 3909:

Discretionary Sanctions Notification - Race and Intelligence

2427:". That is not correct. The lead paragraph of the new page 1696:

Please place your response to this message in this page, in

1147:, I think the content needs to be trimmed, not split out. – 4126:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

4045:

Welcome to Knowledge! I edit here too, under the username

3748:. I have to be honest with you, that does not bode well. - 1391:, I appreciate the concern. I explained the edits in this 3724:. You have been given similar advice about your edits by 2505:

permit this, but yes we do encourage this with caution.

2153:. For example, the red error message for reference 2 in 2136:. The complete citations are now present in the text of 1817:. For example, the red error message for reference 2 in 1800:. The complete citations are now present in the text of 1502:

Step 4: Close the discussion and determine the consensus

2790:, while perhaps useful, does not de-orphan the article. 1103:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3996:

NinjaRobotPirate gave you a notice about infoboxes on

3236:

If you want anything more done regarding this, please

2475:

I advise you to make the corrections/edits that I and

2111:

is now an orphan that few will read. Therefore, edit

1778:

is now an orphan that few will read. Therefore, edit

1068:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2161:. You can find the complete reference (identified as 1896:

and will notify Knowledge administrators about this.

1825:. You can find the complete reference (identified as 1611:

Thank you for responding to my message. I agree that

1568:"Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker". 1552:", rather to "Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker". 1358:

2020 United States House of Representatives elections

3273:

links from other pages in the main article namespace

344:

proposal that you (AFAICT) didn't try to implement.

45:

Polling for the next United Kingdom general election

2462:, although it is an essential part of editing that 1644:contain complete references, as some references in 1356:. I noticed that you recently removed content from 4056:, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at 2879:An orphan article is one that has no links to it. 2086:to make. In the spirit of collaboration, I expect 2028:In this instance, I reverted the split. However, 1326:OK, thanks I will join the talk page discussion.- 431:No problem, I was just surprised by your message. 3521:American-led intervention in the Syrian Civil War 3195:Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2443:Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2418:Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1685:Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1613:Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1441:Mythology and commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 4124:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3968:I see that you've received past notifications: 3275:". If you do not wish to do this, add links to 3271:is not an orphan, please identify one or more " 3550:must be removed from the reference section or 3395:Benjamin Banneker#Mythology and commemorations 3376:Benjamin Banneker#Mythology and commemorations 3370:Then click on the wikilink in the phrase (see 3352:Benjamin Banneker#Mythology and commemorations 3197:into two articles. One of those two articles ( 2113:Benjamin Banneker#Mythology and commemorations 2101:Benjamin Banneker#Mythology and commemorations 2090:to make the following changes within 24 hours: 1780:Benjamin Banneker#Mythology and commemorations 1768:Benjamin Banneker#Mythology and commemorations 860:User_talk:BullRangifer#Actual_text_of_sanction 737:When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging 2447:No other articles presently link directly to 827:invite you to fully participate nonetheless. 4083:. And, don't forget to sign your reply with 3363:You will find that this wikilink directs to 3219:This is indeed the definition of an orphan: 2223:with the rest of Knowledge as it did before. 3951:For additional information, please see the 3936:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 3539:(scroll down), from the removal of content 2435:. That wikilink presently directs users to 3988:Abecedare gave you a notice about BLPs on 3948:, when making edits related to the topic. 2999:There is no alternative to this procedure. 2451:. As a result, that page is now an orphan. 2276:The following discussion has been closed. 3180:Learn how and when to remove this message 2921:Again, please read the first sentence in 2849:(a specific type of "Commemoration"), to 2667:(a specific type of "Commemoration"), to 2379:is correct. You need to recognize this. 2188:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 2155:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 2130:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 1850:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 1819:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 1794:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 1650:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 1226:Hello. I was curious about your edit for 4054:NATO involvement in the Yemeni Civil War 4037:NATO involvement in the Yemeni Civil War 3744:and others, but for some reason, you're 3378:. You will find that this wikilink does 2431:contains an ambiguous wikilink entitled 2237:make me do the edits that you want done. 1702:Talk:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1051:2019 National League Championship Series 3654:2600:1004:B142:875B:5D89:909A:D062:FE61 1074:notice, but please explain why in your 14: 3940:on editors who do not strictly follow 2441:The wikilink does not direct users to 1590:What exactly would you like me to do? 1542:Knowledge:Moving a page#Undoing a move 3856:various aspects of your editing style 3393:You have created an ambiguity within 3171:providing more context for the reader 2082:the most recent changes that I asked 1628:) that should direct users to either 3350:. To see what you have done, go to: 3145: 2138:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 1802:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker#Notes 1465:Further, you have not complied with 1047:2019 National League Division Series 1027:2019 Washington Nationals postseason 1013:2019 Washington Nationals postseason 920: 4122:There is currently a discussion at 4067:usually run for seven days and are 3953:guidance on discretionary sanctions 3384:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3372:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3365:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3359:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3348:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3285:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3269:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3229:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3225:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3199:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3142:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3138:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3123:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3119:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3115:The article is therefore an orphan. 3111:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 3105:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2983:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2961:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2956:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2952:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2881:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2863:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2843:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2779:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2730:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2726:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2634:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2620:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2570:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2540:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2449:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2433:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2429:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2179:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2175:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2151:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2134:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2117:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2109:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2105:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 2078:I have therefore copied below from 1843:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1839:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1815:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1798:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1784:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1776:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1772:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1698:Talk:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1667:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1646:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1642:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1630:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1449:Commemorations of Benjamin Banneker 1043:2019 National League Wild Card Game 23: 3612:This seems to be an acute case of 3283:, or both, to the lead section of 1063:deleted for any of several reasons 1033:because of the following concern: 1017: 24: 4146: 4095:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) 4063:You might like to note that such 3515:- of your removal of content and 903:I'm not sure of the relevance of 365:Talk:Donald Trump#Economic policy 4117: 3914: 3150: 2855:There are no other alternatives. 2460:You apparently failed to do this 1347: 976: 921: 462:I don't see you have consensus. 3711:The word "error" and the color 2671:, or to both. Additionally, as 2616:: My previous message stated: " 1037:Too much information violating 4049:and it's nice to meet you :-) 3388:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2948:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2788:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2718:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2630:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2566:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2437:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2171:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2167:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2147:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 2121:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1835:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1831:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1811:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1788:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1663:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1638:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1634:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1550:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1445:Mythology of Benjamin Banneker 1308:Thanks for getting back to me 13: 1: 4136:12:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 4108:10:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 4030:19:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC) 3883:09:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC) 3846:23:29, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3831:23:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3816:23:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3801:23:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3786:23:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3772:22:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3757:22:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3707:21:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3690:21:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3675:21:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3662:21:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3640:21:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3625:21:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3608:21:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3592:19:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3578:06:29, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3501:00:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3479:00:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3451:05:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3432:20:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3410:18:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3318:11:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3300:09:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3250:08:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3211:08:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3024:05:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3010:05:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 2894:21:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 2875:20:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 2705:) 10:42, 21 December 2019 (U 2692:09:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 2582:04:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 2560:03:52, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 2515:01:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 2496:01:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 2340:22:42, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2313:22:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2298:22:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2251:22:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2200:21:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1950:07:26, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1921:06:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1906:06:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1867:04:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC) 1740:01:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC) 1714:01:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC) 1600:23:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC) 1578:08:46, 17 December 2019 (UTC) 1562:Knowledge:Splitting#Procedure 1505:Step 5: Perform the splitting 1487:Knowledge:Splitting#Procedure 1467:Knowledge:Splitting#Procedure 1335:12:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC) 1228:List of Electronic Arts games 3386:. The wikilink redirects to 3354:. Click on the wikilink in: 3125:links to the pages entitled 2628:" Although you have linked " 2099:* None of the wikilinks in 1427:08:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 1409:08:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 1382:08:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 1322:22:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC) 1303:18:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC) 1277:04:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC) 1259:09:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 1240:06:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 1208:02:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC) 1191:16:59, 26 October 2019 (UTC) 1174:03:04, 26 October 2019 (UTC) 1157:03:02, 26 October 2019 (UTC) 1140:02:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC) 1121:01:56, 26 October 2019 (UTC) 917:advocacy of fringe positions 7: 4091:(Message delivered via the 2857:One or both of those links 2712:Read the first sentence in 1493:Step 1: Create a discussion 1107:allows discussion to reach 1088:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1071:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 733:Soibangla is simply unmoved 10: 4151: 4035:Deletion discussion about 3946:page-specific restrictions 3356: 2841:The only way to de-orphan 2661:suggest that you de-orphan 2385:You refuse do any of this. 1766:None of the wikilinks in 1443:into two separate pages (" 1099:exist. In particular, the 203:2008 presidential campaign 2165:) by editing the text of 1829:) by editing the text of 1093:proposed deletion process 1000:17:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 984:The Copyeditor's Barnstar 975: 963:01:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 937:15:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC) 890:03:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 876:02:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 851:17:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 837:07:07, 27 July 2019 (UTC) 822:00:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC) 807:00:36, 27 July 2019 (UTC) 791:00:17, 27 July 2019 (UTC) 774:Stop the personal attacks 764:23:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 749:23:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 728:23:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 697:22:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 644:20:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 573:17:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 554:07:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 535:02:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 517:23:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 502:23:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 486:23:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 472:23:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 458:22:56, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 441:03:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 427:03:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 406:03:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 392:03:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 377:02:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 359:01:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 331:01:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 313:01:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 281:00:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC) 263:23:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 249:23:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 232:23:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 217:23:17, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 193:23:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 167:17:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 152:17:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 3262:Knowledge:Do it yourself 3238:Knowledge:Do it yourself 2954:are within the title of 2279:Please do not modify it. 118:01:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC) 95:01:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC) 75:17:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 3957:Arbitration Committee's 3934:discretionary sanctions 3652:administrative action. 3548:list defined references 3544:list defined references 3533:hundreds of cite errors 3525:list defined references 3517:list defined references 2271:Inappropriate remarks. 2053:In the above response, 1538:Knowledge:Moving a page 1522:Knowledge:Moving a page 1080:the article's talk page 1041:. Totally redundant to 18:User talk:Onetwothreeip 2639:The lead paragraph of 1484: 1059: 1022: 715:The economic expansion 686: 4042:Hello, Onetwothreeip 3458:Differential K theory 3357:Further information: 2777:You are not correct. 2103:presently connect to 1770:presently connect to 1548:incorrectly link to " 1471: 1105:articles for deletion 1035: 1031:proposed for deletion 1021: 677: 523:for weeks into months 3999:17:19, 2 March 2019‎ 3991:01:30, 3 April 2019‎ 3942:Knowledge's policies 3267:If you believe that 2919:You are not correct. 140:my concern as well. 80:Labor Right question 4081:{{Re|Slatersteven}} 4071:ballot-polls. And, 3762:experiencing here. 3535:you created in the 3167:improve the article 2483:message is ticking. 2464:Knowledge:Splitting 2190:when you are done. 969:A barnstar for you! 3983:01:16, 4 May 2019‎ 3975:15:21, 25 May 2019 3511:You are correct - 2821:Knowledge glossary 2647:Knowledge glossary 1852:when you are done. 1496:Step 2: Add notice 1097:deletion processes 1023: 38:July–December 2019 4096: 3850:I can't speak to 3537:Reference section 3281:Benjamin Banneker 3190: 3189: 3182: 3131:Benjamin Banneker 3099:, which states: " 2995:Benjamin Banneker 2993:"), to the page " 2851:Benjamin Banneker 2669:Benjamin Banneker 2564:That's not true, 2349: 2348: 2319:Asperger syndrome 1672:Benjamin Banneker 1626:Benjamin Banneker 1456:Benjamin Banneker 1055:2019 World Series 1009:Proposed deletion 1005: 1004: 641: 424: 356: 310: 279: 247: 215: 150: 53: 33:January–June 2019 4142: 4121: 4120: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4023: 4020: 4017: 4014: 4001: 3993: 3985: 3977: 3918: 3880: 3875: 3714: 3650: 3575: 3566: 3519:. The article - 3490: 3476: 3471: 3345: 3260: 3185: 3178: 3174: 3154: 3153: 3146: 3034: 2911: 2904: 2762: 2755: 2724:in the title of 2610: 2603: 2532: 2525: 2369: 2362: 2281: 2268: 2267: 2211: 1967: 1960: 1938: 1887: 1762: 1724: 1610: 1589: 1508:Step 6: Clean up 1469:, which states: 1439:You have split " 1351: 1111:for deletion. – 1090: 1089: 1073: 1072: 1020: 980: 973: 972: 926: 925: 924: 642: 635: 558:An editor needs 425: 418: 357: 350: 311: 304: 273: 241: 209: 181: 144: 106: 71: 65: 58: 51: 4150: 4149: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4118: 4115: 4084: 4080: 4040: 4021: 4018: 4015: 4012: 3997: 3989: 3981: 3973: 3966: 3965: 3919: 3911: 3878: 3869: 3777:communicate. - 3746:WP:NOTGETTINGIT 3712: 3644: 3569: 3560: 3509: 3484: 3474: 3469: 3461: 3417: 3399:Do it yourself. 3361: 3339: 3289:Do it yourself. 3277:Memorialization 3254: 3186: 3175: 3164: 3155: 3151: 3127:Memorialization 3037:WP:ARTICLESPACE 3028: 2997:", or to both. 2905: 2898: 2847:Memorialization 2756: 2749: 2665:Memorialization 2604: 2597: 2526: 2519: 2363: 2356: 2277: 2205: 2163:ref name=stamp2 2107:. As a result, 1961: 1954: 1932: 1881: 1827:ref name=stamp2 1774:. As a result, 1756: 1718: 1604: 1583: 1499:Step 3: Discuss 1437: 1345: 1287: 1224: 1222:Electronic Arts 1101:speedy deletion 1087: 1086: 1070: 1069: 1018: 1016: 971: 922: 776: 630: 413: 345: 299: 199:Hillary Clinton 171: 126: 100: 82: 69: 63: 56: 48: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4148: 4114: 4111: 4039: 4033: 4003: 4002: 3994: 3986: 3978: 3920: 3913: 3912: 3910: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3818: 3692: 3677: 3642: 3508: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3465:AfD discussion 3460: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3416: 3415:Please respond 3413: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3265: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3191: 3188: 3187: 3158: 3156: 3149: 3134: 3108: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2912: 2853:, or to both. 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2763: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2732:is an orphan. 2710:You are wrong. 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2533: 2502: 2484: 2480: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2452: 2421: 2414: 2404: 2393: 2387: 2370: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2325: 2322: 2283: 2282: 2273: 2272: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2238: 2231: 2224: 2216: 2183: 2142: 2125: 2091: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2005: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1930: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1846: 1806: 1805: 1791: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1727: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1564:and will have 1510: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1091:will stop the 1015: 1006: 1003: 1002: 987: 986: 981: 970: 967: 966: 965: 951: 947: 915:it's improper 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 863: 839: 775: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 707: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 443: 410: 409: 408: 336: 335: 334: 333: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 267: 266: 265: 169: 125: 122: 121: 120: 81: 78: 47: 42: 41: 40: 35: 30: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4147: 4138: 4137: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4110: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4094: 4093:Page Curation 4088: 4077: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4061: 4059: 4055: 4050: 4048: 4043: 4038: 4032: 4031: 4028: 4025: 4024: 4008: 4000: 3995: 3992: 3987: 3984: 3979: 3976: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3964: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3949: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3930: 3929: 3927: 3917: 3884: 3881: 3876: 3874: 3873: 3866: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3838:Onetwothreeip 3834: 3833: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3819: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3793:Onetwothreeip 3789: 3788: 3787: 3783: 3780: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3764:Onetwothreeip 3760: 3759: 3758: 3754: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3699:Onetwothreeip 3696: 3693: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3682:Onetwothreeip 3678: 3676: 3672: 3669: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3648: 3643: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3632:Onetwothreeip 3628: 3627: 3626: 3622: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3600:Onetwothreeip 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3589: 3586: 3580: 3579: 3576: 3574: 3573: 3567: 3565: 3564: 3557: 3553: 3552:commented out 3549: 3545: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3529:commented out 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3507:December 2019 3502: 3498: 3494: 3493:Onetwothreeip 3488: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3477: 3472: 3466: 3459: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3443:Onetwothreeip 3440: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3412: 3411: 3407: 3403: 3400: 3396: 3391: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3368: 3366: 3360: 3355: 3353: 3349: 3343: 3342:Onetwothreeip 3319: 3315: 3311: 3310:Onetwothreeip 3307: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3263: 3258: 3257:Onetwothreeip 3253: 3252: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3242:Onetwothreeip 3239: 3235: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3217: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3184: 3181: 3172: 3168: 3162: 3159:This article 3157: 3148: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3121:is to add to 3120: 3116: 3112: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3069: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3042: 3038: 3032: 3031:Onetwothreeip 3027: 3026: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3016:Onetwothreeip 3013: 3012: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2964: 2963:is an orphan. 2962: 2958:. Therefore, 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2915:Onetwothreeip 2913: 2909: 2902: 2901:Onetwothreeip 2897: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2886:Onetwothreeip 2882: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2832: 2828: 2826: 2822: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2803: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2791: 2789: 2783: 2780: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2767: 2766:Onetwothreeip 2764: 2760: 2753: 2752:Onetwothreeip 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2728:. Therefore, 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2706: 2704: 2700: 2699:Onetwothreeip 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2680: 2678: 2675:has stated, " 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2657: 2654: 2652: 2648: 2642: 2637: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2625: 2621: 2615: 2614:Onetwothreeip 2611: 2608: 2601: 2600:Onetwothreeip 2583: 2579: 2575: 2574:Onetwothreeip 2571: 2567: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536:Onetwothreeip 2534: 2530: 2523: 2522:Onetwothreeip 2518: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2507:Onetwothreeip 2503: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2450: 2446: 2444: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2423:You stated: " 2422: 2419: 2415: 2413: 2409: 2406:You stated: " 2405: 2402: 2398: 2395:You stated: " 2394: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2381: 2380: 2378: 2374: 2373:Onetwothreeip 2371: 2367: 2360: 2359:Onetwothreeip 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2341: 2337: 2336: 2331: 2326: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305:Onetwothreeip 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2285: 2284: 2280: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2269: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2243:Onetwothreeip 2239: 2235: 2232: 2228: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2214: 2209: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2184: 2182: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2143: 2141: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2126: 2124: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2089: 2088:Onetwothreeip 2085: 2084:Onetwothreeip 2081: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2056: 2055:Onetwothreeip 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2031: 2030:Onetwothreeip 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1979: 1976: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1958: 1957:Onetwothreeip 1953: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942:Onetwothreeip 1936: 1931: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1885: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1851: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1792: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1759:Onetwothreeip 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1732:Onetwothreeip 1728: 1722: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1704:. Thank you. 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1686: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1673: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1614: 1608: 1607:Onetwothreeip 1603: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1592:Onetwothreeip 1587: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1557: 1553: 1551: 1545: 1543: 1539: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1523: 1517: 1513: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1488: 1483: 1481: 1477: 1470: 1468: 1463: 1459: 1457: 1452: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415:Onetwothreeip 1412: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1401:Onetwothreeip 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1350: 1343:December 2019 1336: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1314:Onetwothreeip 1311: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1297: 1292: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1265:Onetwothreeip 1262: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251:Onetwothreeip 1248: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1200:Onetwothreeip 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1179:Onetwothreeip 1177: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1166:Onetwothreeip 1163: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145:Onetwothreeip 1143: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132:Onetwothreeip 1129: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1083: 1081: 1077: 1066: 1064: 1058: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1034: 1032: 1028: 1014: 1010: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 988: 985: 982: 979: 974: 964: 960: 956: 955:Onetwothreeip 952: 948: 944: 941: 940: 939: 938: 934: 930: 918: 912: 908: 906: 891: 887: 883: 879: 878: 877: 873: 869: 864: 861: 857: 854: 853: 852: 848: 844: 840: 838: 834: 830: 829:Onetwothreeip 825: 824: 823: 819: 815: 810: 809: 808: 804: 800: 799:Onetwothreeip 795: 794: 793: 792: 788: 784: 780: 765: 761: 757: 756:Onetwothreeip 754:if you wish. 752: 751: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 731: 730: 729: 725: 721: 720:Onetwothreeip 716: 711: 708: 704: 701: 700: 699: 698: 694: 690: 685: 682: 676: 645: 639: 634: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 574: 570: 566: 561: 557: 556: 555: 551: 547: 546:Onetwothreeip 542: 538: 537: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 519: 518: 514: 510: 509:Onetwothreeip 505: 504: 503: 499: 495: 492: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 478:Onetwothreeip 475: 474: 473: 469: 465: 461: 460: 459: 455: 451: 450:Onetwothreeip 447: 444: 442: 438: 434: 433:Onetwothreeip 430: 429: 428: 422: 417: 411: 407: 403: 399: 398:Onetwothreeip 395: 394: 393: 389: 385: 380: 379: 378: 374: 370: 369:Onetwothreeip 366: 362: 361: 360: 354: 349: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 332: 328: 324: 323:Onetwothreeip 319: 316: 315: 314: 308: 303: 296: 292: 291: 282: 277: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255:Onetwothreeip 252: 251: 250: 245: 240: 235: 234: 233: 229: 225: 224:Onetwothreeip 220: 219: 218: 213: 208: 204: 200: 196: 195: 194: 190: 186: 185:Onetwothreeip 179: 175: 170: 168: 164: 160: 156: 155: 154: 153: 148: 143: 139: 135: 131: 119: 115: 111: 110:Onetwothreeip 104: 99: 98: 97: 96: 92: 88: 77: 76: 72: 70:contributions 66: 60: 59: 52:--Comment by 46: 39: 36: 34: 31: 29: 26: 25: 19: 4116: 4100:Slatersteven 4098: 4089: 4078: 4068: 4062: 4051: 4047:Slatersteven 4044: 4041: 4011: 4006: 4004: 3967: 3950: 3931: 3925: 3923: 3921: 3871: 3870: 3864: 3855: 3851: 3808:BullRangifer 3730:BullRangifer 3581: 3571: 3570: 3562: 3561: 3540: 3532: 3512: 3510: 3462: 3439:BullRangifer 3424:BullRangifer 3420:I pinged you 3418: 3398: 3392: 3379: 3369: 3362: 3338: 3305: 3288: 3272: 3220: 3176: 3165:Please help 3160: 3114: 3100: 3067: 3040: 2998: 2986: 2985:is to add a 2959: 2926: 2918: 2917:: I repeat: 2908:BullRangifer 2858: 2854: 2830: 2824: 2818: 2786:The link to 2785: 2781: 2759:BullRangifer 2721: 2709: 2681: 2676: 2673:BullRangifer 2659:I therefore 2658: 2650: 2644: 2638: 2622:is still an 2617: 2612: 2607:BullRangifer 2596: 2547: 2542:is still an 2529:BullRangifer 2477:BullRangifer 2459: 2455: 2454:You stated: 2440: 2424: 2411: 2407: 2400: 2396: 2389: 2384: 2377:BullRangifer 2366:BullRangifer 2333: 2330:BullRangifer 2290:BullRangifer 2286: 2278: 2233: 2226: 2218: 2212: 2185: 2162: 2158: 2144: 2127: 2098: 2093: 1964:BullRangifer 1913:BullRangifer 1884:BullRangifer 1826: 1822: 1558: 1554: 1546: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1485: 1480:article name 1476:article name 1472: 1464: 1460: 1453: 1438: 1370:my talk page 1362:edit summary 1346: 1291:Donald Trump 1288: 1225: 1095:, but other 1084: 1076:edit summary 1067: 1060: 1036: 1025:The article 1024: 983: 943:BullRangifer 929:BullRangifer 913: 909: 905:that comment 902: 868:BullRangifer 814:BullRangifer 783:BullRangifer 777: 732: 714: 687: 678: 674: 560:overwhelming 559: 522: 507:discussion. 174:Ahrtoodeetoo 127: 83: 54: 49: 37: 4128:SharabSalam 4065:discussions 3722:WP:RECKLESS 3463:A previous 2784:an orphan. 2682:Thank you. 2486:Thank you. 1352:Hello, I'm 706:challenged. 201:during her 57:Selfie City 4113:Your split 4087:. Thanks! 3742:Isaidnoway 3563:Isaidnoway 3470:Jalen Folf 3437:Thank you 3382:direct to 3133:, or both. 2708:I repeat: 2466:describes. 1566:vandalized 1399:. Cheers, 1372:. Thanks. 1039:WP:NOTNEWS 103:Catiline52 87:Catiline52 4073:our guide 3959:decision 3944:, or the 3938:sanctions 3823:soibangla 3726:soibangla 3718:WP:BEBOLD 3556:This page 3546:. Unused 3487:JalenFolf 3039:states: " 2817:states: " 2643:states: " 2568:links to 1927:WP:VANDAL 1397:this edit 1109:consensus 1029:has been 741:soibangla 703:Soibangla 689:soibangla 565:soibangla 541:WP:SILENT 527:soibangla 494:soibangla 464:soibangla 178:Soibangla 159:soibangla 136:seems to 124:July 2019 67:about my 3955:and the 3924:It does 3872:Mandruss 3734:Akld guy 2991:Memorial 2157:states: 2004:created. 1821:states: 1413:Kia ora 1269:Lacon432 1247:Lacon432 1232:Lacon432 1196:Muboshgu 1183:Muboshgu 1162:Muboshgu 1149:Muboshgu 1128:Muboshgu 1113:Muboshgu 134:Scjessey 3738:Corker1 3614:WP:IDHT 3402:Corker1 3292:Corker1 3203:Corker1 3097:WP:ORPH 3002:Corker1 2923:WP:ORPH 2867:Corker1 2819:In the 2815:WP:ORPH 2802:WP:ORPH 2734:Corker1 2714:WP:ORPH 2684:Corker1 2645:In the 2641:WP:ORPH 2552:Corker1 2488:Corker1 2220:access. 2208:Corker1 2192:Corker1 1935:Corker1 1898:Corker1 1859:Corker1 1721:Corker1 1706:Corker1 1700:and in 1586:Corker1 1570:Corker1 1447:" and " 1419:Kiwi128 1393:summary 1389:Kiwi128 1374:Kiwi128 1366:sandbox 1354:Kiwi128 710:Awilley 633:Awilley 446:Awilley 416:Awilley 348:Awilley 318:Awilley 302:Awilley 4027:(talk) 4007:per se 3572:(talk) 3475:(talk) 2987:direct 2825:orphan 2651:orphan 2632:" to " 2624:orphan 2618:Also, 2544:orphan 2401:permit 2119:or to 1894:vandal 1786:or to 1632:or to 1078:or on 1053:, and 382:one.-- 3860:WP:HD 3523:uses 2823:, an 2649:, an 2173:into 2149:into 1837:into 1813:into 1285:Cites 992:MONGO 882:MONGO 856:MONGO 843:MONGO 384:MONGO 276:bleep 244:bleep 212:bleep 147:bleep 138:share 16:< 4132:talk 4104:talk 4085:~~~~ 3961:here 3842:talk 3827:talk 3812:talk 3797:talk 3768:talk 3720:not 3703:talk 3686:talk 3658:talk 3636:talk 3604:talk 3497:talk 3447:talk 3428:talk 3406:talk 3314:talk 3296:talk 3246:talk 3207:talk 3020:talk 3006:talk 2890:talk 2871:talk 2859:must 2738:talk 2703:talk 2688:talk 2578:talk 2556:talk 2511:talk 2492:talk 2335:talk 2309:talk 2294:talk 2247:talk 2196:talk 1946:talk 1917:talk 1902:talk 1863:talk 1736:talk 1710:talk 1665:and 1640:and 1596:talk 1574:talk 1423:talk 1405:talk 1378:talk 1318:talk 1273:talk 1255:talk 1236:talk 1204:talk 1187:talk 1170:talk 1153:talk 1136:talk 1117:talk 996:talk 959:talk 933:talk 886:talk 872:talk 847:talk 833:talk 818:talk 803:talk 787:talk 760:talk 745:talk 724:talk 693:talk 638:talk 569:talk 550:talk 531:talk 513:talk 498:talk 482:talk 468:talk 454:talk 437:talk 421:talk 402:talk 388:talk 373:talk 353:talk 327:talk 307:talk 295:this 259:talk 228:talk 189:talk 176:and 163:talk 130:here 114:talk 91:talk 64:talk 28:2018 4069:not 4060:. 4022:Fir 4019:een 4016:rgr 4013:Eve 3926:not 3867:. ― 3784:🖋 3755:🖋 3713:red 3695:MrX 3673:🖋 3647:MrX 3623:🖋 3590:🖋 3541:and 3390:. 3380:not 3169:by 2927:not 2722:not 2720:is 2550:" 1387:Hi 1333:🖋 1310:MrX 1301:🖋 1245:Hi 1126:Hi 1011:of 927:-- 781:-- 4134:) 4106:) 4009:. 3844:) 3829:) 3814:) 3799:) 3779:Mr 3770:) 3750:Mr 3740:, 3736:, 3732:, 3728:, 3705:) 3688:) 3668:Mr 3660:) 3638:) 3618:Mr 3606:) 3585:Mr 3554:. 3499:) 3449:) 3430:) 3408:) 3367:. 3316:) 3306:to 3298:) 3287:. 3279:, 3248:) 3240:. 3223:. 3209:) 3129:, 3035:: 3022:) 3008:) 2892:) 2873:) 2865:. 2782:is 2690:) 2679:" 2580:) 2572:. 2558:) 2513:) 2494:) 2375:: 2338:) 2311:) 2296:) 2249:) 2198:) 2140:. 2128:* 2123:. 1948:) 1919:) 1904:) 1865:) 1738:) 1712:) 1652:). 1598:) 1576:) 1425:) 1407:) 1380:) 1328:Mr 1320:) 1296:Mr 1275:) 1267:. 1257:) 1238:) 1206:) 1189:) 1172:) 1155:) 1138:) 1119:) 1082:. 1065:. 1049:, 1045:, 998:) 961:) 935:) 888:) 874:) 849:) 835:) 820:) 805:) 789:) 762:) 747:) 739:. 726:) 695:) 571:) 552:) 533:) 515:) 500:) 484:) 470:) 456:) 439:) 404:) 390:) 375:) 367:. 329:) 271:R2 261:) 239:R2 230:) 207:R2 191:) 165:) 142:R2 116:) 93:) 73:) 4130:( 4102:( 3879:☎ 3840:( 3825:( 3810:( 3795:( 3782:X 3766:( 3753:X 3701:( 3684:( 3671:X 3656:( 3649:: 3645:@ 3634:( 3621:X 3602:( 3588:X 3495:( 3489:: 3485:@ 3445:( 3426:( 3404:( 3344:: 3340:@ 3312:( 3294:( 3259:: 3255:@ 3244:( 3205:( 3183:) 3177:( 3173:. 3163:. 3070:" 3033:: 3029:@ 3018:( 3004:( 2910:: 2906:@ 2903:: 2899:@ 2888:( 2869:( 2804:. 2768:: 2761:: 2757:@ 2754:: 2750:@ 2740:) 2736:( 2701:( 2686:( 2609:: 2605:@ 2602:: 2598:@ 2576:( 2554:( 2531:: 2527:@ 2524:: 2520:@ 2509:( 2490:( 2445:. 2439:. 2368:: 2364:@ 2361:: 2357:@ 2332:( 2307:( 2292:( 2245:( 2210:: 2206:@ 2194:( 2181:. 1966:: 1962:@ 1959:: 1955:@ 1944:( 1937:: 1933:@ 1915:( 1900:( 1886:: 1882:@ 1861:( 1845:. 1804:. 1790:. 1761:: 1757:@ 1734:( 1723:: 1719:@ 1708:( 1609:: 1605:@ 1594:( 1588:: 1584:@ 1572:( 1536:" 1421:( 1403:( 1376:( 1331:X 1316:( 1299:X 1271:( 1253:( 1234:( 1202:( 1185:( 1168:( 1151:( 1134:( 1115:( 1057:. 994:( 957:( 931:( 884:( 870:( 862:. 845:( 831:( 816:( 801:( 785:( 758:( 743:( 722:( 691:( 679:" 640:) 636:( 631:~ 567:( 548:( 529:( 511:( 496:( 480:( 466:( 452:( 435:( 423:) 419:( 414:~ 400:( 386:( 371:( 355:) 351:( 346:~ 325:( 309:) 305:( 300:~ 278:) 274:( 257:( 246:) 242:( 226:( 214:) 210:( 187:( 180:: 172:@ 161:( 149:) 145:( 112:( 105:: 101:@ 89:( 61:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index