User talk:Soibangla

6425:

computers. It's not worth the trouble bringing my old account out of retirement as my edits here are vanilla ones, and I was okay with debating on the talk page(s), etc. My account was in good standing, and I'm just coming on for this little stint to address this controversy as it just happened to be in my wheelhouse. What started this drama today was an editor "telling me to f*** off" and you are fine with that, and the other red flags you brought up, that's on you. But as I told another idealistic liberal-minded editor over at the other page, and said idealism rubbing the wrong way, if it makes you feel better, I'm wrapping up my little adventure as I feel like I've done all that I can here, and done my part to contribute to a better wikipedia in these dark times. My etiquette comes form the Wild West days of wikipedia, another reason why I'm not too keen on jumping back in. The world is just too emo for my tastes. So, other than a few token edits here or there, I'm happy to go back to my collection of books and my analogue life and leave you digital warriors to this brave new world. Nothing personal, and I say "cheers", because my ma in England raised me so well, but I was also raised a Star Trek geek by my pa so to paraphrase Spock Prime, cheers is like my customary farewell "live long and prosper" but that would be self-serving so instead I leave you with "Good luck".

373:@soibangla Thank you for your response. Agree that Stephanie Grisham could have provided the list in her Op-Ed. In fairness and to see this objectively, in the Op-Ed Grisham talks specifically about The Washington Post Report "Trump's lost summer" - How the WaPo authors skipped many things including the DMZ story, which Washington Post had originally reported on. Grisham's op-ed has the link to the WaPo DMZ story to make the case that Washington Post had originally reported on the DMZ story but then choose to not include the DMZ story in the "Trump's lost summer" report. Coming back to my original request to not refer the mediate link in this wiki article - my point is that mediate article doesn't refute Grisham's Op-Ed on factual merit instead commits a straw-man fallacy by making it sound like as if in the Op-Ed Grisham is talking about WaPo not covering Trump stories over the summer, which is not the case. 7239:

suggestion that economic issues are merely narratives that cloak political agendas is profoundly distressing and offensive. It's no different than the politicization of public health policy or any of a number of other recent eviscerations of accumulated scholarship and knowledge. Soibangla has said he is a trained economist with deep knowledge in macroeconomics. The assertion of two Admins now that he was acting to promote a political POV is unintelligible. He, and I and several other editors who may be trained economists repeatedly tried to oppose politicization of the page, not to promote any political view pro or con. Those who made arguments and comments about the (red herring, false, uninformed) purported political issue are the ones who might arguably be sanctioned under AP2, not the editor who repeatedly tried to explain why this was not a political issue.

9199:, rather than simple inadvertent too-tight paraphrasing, and I find it difficult to fathom how editors with special privileges evidently don't draw this distinction by now. This egregiously false allegation goes well beyond a mere personal attack; it impugns my integrity such that it might well lead others to distrust my work, and perhaps even conclude this should disqualify me from further participation on Knowledge. Plagiarism has ruined careers in journalism and academia. Now, Voorts has apologized for calling it plagiarism, whereas you just concurred with it. At this point of discussion, if I was in your and Voorts's position, I would strike any statement of or allusion to plagiarism and explain in the edit summary that such an allegation is false and improper. But that's just me. Alternatively, perhaps we can discuss this further in another venue. 4018:, given RSP language, you raise a reasonable question that I think deserves a broader discussion on the article Talk page, and perhaps beyond. Fox News is reporting what their own paid employees are saying, people who work squarely and unambiguously on the opinion side of their organization, and who have for years consistemtly supported the Trump agenda during Fox News primetime. In this light, they are arguably (and I would argue strongly) "agents" of the larger Trump political operation, and as such should be excluded in this case. If you like, you may have the first word by starting a topic on this on the article Talk page, or if not, maybe I will in the next day or two (or...several? I dunno). 4035:, thanks for your response. I would prefer if you started the talk page discussion on the DC storming article since you were the one that deleted the Fox News content and brought up this issue in the first place. I also agree that the issue is interesting enough to warrant a bigger discussion as well. I'll be on the talk page of the DC Storming article to discuss the issue if you decide to create a discussion surrounding this. I also noticed that the RSP language is vague on Fox News when it comes to sourcing it as opinion in politics and that the language should definitely be clarified, which in and of itself is worth an entirely different and bigger discussion on 1595:@Soibangla, yes, I see that now. I had missed it before. So technically that once sentence should not have been part of the "procedural revert", but it's also understandable that JFG removed the whole paragraph. I also see now that JFG was correct in saying that you are in violation of the BRD sanction. You added material, JFG challenged it by reversion, and you added it back without waiting the required 24 hours. Although the revert was only 45 minutes from the 24-hr mark, close enough that asking you to self-revert or placing a sanction would be more punitive than preventative. I've stricken my incorrect comment to JFG above (sorry JFG, my bad). 7077:

intent on deescalating -- he has not even appealed the ban yet. Strictly speaking only he and the blocking Admin have standing, I suppose, but I think it would be helpful to go to ARCA. Just to give another example of a somewhat related set of events: We have anti-abortion activists, gun control, or gender issues activists editing Politics articles even after being banned from their specific topics. Could an editor be banned for violating a gun control TBAN for Ted Cruz content? Could a gender TBAN'ed editor be sanctioned for Matt Gaetz content? In both cases, without explicitly mentioning the banned topic.

6486:, and my brief history (since I’ve been back) shows my consistency in this matter. Despite your ego, I’m not worried about your about-face- you would likely be reverted if you arbitrarily tried to remove the word “falsely” like you were the last time. So with your grandiose statements, or out-there interpretations aside, (amusing as they are) the simple truth is that I’m offended at any effort to undermine a democracy in any country, and there would be something wrong with me if I were not offended. Hopefully now that you got all that all off your chest you can go back to being a useful contributor. Cheers 5299:(even though the source had one). You also objected to cut/paste, but laziness is no good reason to object, because it applies in each article. What's lazy is not making a modicum of effort to find a source, or at least adding a CN tag, but rather making wholesale removals, which I might add were in only Republican BLPs in every case, in a very significant matter. In the Posey case, you were not objecting to cut/paste, but again you didn't make an effort to find a secondary, which again took me 5 seconds, but you again made the invalid objection that it's a list, but it also has narrative. 5363:, the text is based primarily off of a primary source with no synthesis/analysis of how it pertains specifically to the subject of the article. By your logic, we could potentially include any and all votes that have "list" secondary sources, no? In today's age, we can find a proper "secondary" list source for nearly any vote, so to what end? If there is not a reasonable explanation for how the vote/legislation itself is pertinent to the BLP subject, then how is adding that vote due? If it were due, then there would be appropriate synthesis and analysis of such vote and the subject. -- 7970: 9584: 1354:@Soibangla, Re: "it was not BOLD". We're not talking about the dictionary definition of "Bold" (i.e. confident, courageous, daring, etc.), we're talking about the Knowledge definition, which is basically "any edit changes the status quo". A WP:BOLD edit is not a bad thing that needs to be reverted, it's a good thing, and it's how the encyclopedia gets written. Every BOLD edit has the potential to start a BRD cycle if it is reverted, but most BOLD edits go unchallenged and go on to become the new status quo. Please accept this and move on. Everybody else gets it. 3266:, you may recall that I long reflexively used reFill/Reflinks with each edit, but a certain editor pestered me about the fact that sometimes those tools malfunction and I moved on without noticing it, so I gave up on it. I will resume doing it and show this thread to anyone who subsequently complains. If the tools are not reliable, they need to be revisited. I'm also unclear as to how some editors appear able to fix the refs without apparently running those tools, as far as I can tell. Ideally, a bot should be built to roam the site and do this automatically. 8050:, I am not RoyLeban, I do not follow his Talk page, and I am not aware that my edit is contravening the established consensus. To my knowledge, my edit simply includes something that had not been previously included and thus consensus has not been established to exclude it. To my knowledge, it has not been established that Hunter dropped off the laptop, and this should have been included long ago. I challenge your assertion the edit is disruptive. In any case, you have reverted it and it will remain excluded unless consensus is reached to include it. 9729: 4898: 1443:. Forget BOLD. There's no contradiction. Any edit, including simple punctuation, can be challenged, but "BRD" itself, as you pointed out numerous times, isn't a valid reason for challenging. BRD is just a roadmap for what to do when an edit is challenged. Take a minute and read the "active arbitration remedy" at the top of the Donald Trump talk page. It says, "Enforced BRD: If an edit you make is challenged by reversion you must discuss the issue on the article talk page and wait 24 hours...before reinstating your edit." That's 1162:. I strenuously disagree, in general and most certainly in this specific instance. Many editors have noted that the other individual who voiced disagreement is often nearly incomprehensible in their arguments, and in this specific case s/he insisted that I talk to you about the factual basis of the edit, which I pointed out I already had. Twice. And now there is a discussion underway about "tag-team reversions." Oh the irony. And you just made a bogus accusation that I was cherrypicking, when in fact it was 9591: 5657: 9577: 9599: 4938: 958:

cycle...the edit that changed the status quo. You need to stop trying to make this be about process and start addressing the actual concerns of the people who reverted the edit. For example, since the main concern is that the addition is UNDUE, you might start by finding a way to word the addition that gives it less WEIGHT or by providing more sources that are more explicit about this is a major/important thing and not just the news of the day, to be forgotten tomorrow.

4977: 3608: 3189: 458: 6611: 3672:) over the past 24 hours. Also the notice of the split was up on the article during the entire "NY Post" problem yesterday. If any other editors wanted to put their vote, they had the chance and the notice. I even made a comment about moving it without an oppose 4 hours before the split. No other comments. I determined consensus based on all that. At this point with all the extra edits done to the new article, it was worth it to go ahead and split. 10239: 6732: 9378: 3091: 10205: 7571: 5106: 3777: 3111: 355:. Note they did not provide the list in the op-ed. The Trump White House has a fascinating tendency to characterize as "successes" what objective observers would not interpret that way, and that's why they aren't reported, because journalists aren't the president's gullible shills. The White House is spinning, and the press ain't buyin' it. Meanwhile, the op-ed provides a handful of examples of what they claim the Post didn't report, but Mediaite 6121: 3384: 8683: 8461: 7953: 4240: 3153: 7455: 7111: 6298:, rather than attack me with vulgar language.lol When you drop the f-bomb, and a personal threat, over what was ultimately a misunderstanding, that is a big flag. You've been around long enough to know better. If you check the history of 2000 mules, you will see that moments earlier a troll had vandalized the page and I mistakenly reverted your edit while trying to revert that one. In any case, I am indeed transparent 6767:, I'm a bit confused. Have I been sanctioned pursuant to DS? If so, wouldn't there be a DS banner on the article page to warn editors? I don't see it. Or do admins have universal DS authority regardless of any banner notice? If not, shouldn't this have proceeded via ANI/AE? I'm not as well-versed in policies as others are, so I'd appreciate some guidance on this to preclude any future sanctions. Thank you. 7284:

for reinserting challenged content instead of using the talk page, or why they would change the lead without reference to the article text that remained unchanged. Do you disagree that this interpretation and application of AP/DS is unprecedented? As I said above, there are many analogous situations where no Admin has taken such action, even when the analogous relation has been discussed on talk pages.

2215:. The rule of thumb is one reference per each fact that could be contested, so definitely "just one ref saying that" is a nonsense argument for someone to make. We can address those issues when we get there though, for now I'm happy to restore the word "persistently" as long as have just one source that makes that case. We can't use the existence of multiple sources as evidence of anything itself. 3966: 6784:, just one other question and I'll drop this. Isn't it pretty much standard procedure here to warn an editor on their Talk page (which did not happen here) and if the warning goes unheeded an editor can pursue ANI/AE remedies, or an admin can exercise immediate DS authority if the matter involves a DS area? In American law, this is called due process, but I understand we're not in a courtroom. 4056:, upon further thought, if your sole objective is to restore your content, BRD says you should initiate the article Talk discussion. That said, since we agree the RSP language may need clarification, either of us or anyone else can take it straight to RSN for resolution, though I think the best approach is to discuss on article Talk, see how that goes, then consider going to RSN from there. 2097: 7524:. It's not clear when the next phase of the process will begin, but I imagine you might care to contribute some feedback next time the community is consulted. During this period of review (more than a year now), I have seen some DS reform occur, and other proposals have been waved off with a "major changes coming, don't sweat the details just now"-type response. 8721:. You should substantively discuss the content dispute on the article talk page (saying there is "no consensus" is not substantive discussion if you haven't provided policy-based arguments before) and you should listen to complaints about behaviour (you certainly don't have to agree with the complaints, but at least try to listen). When you say 1855:, at least, as long as I'm around it, you could save yourself the effort of using any script, since none of them comes close to the high standard established for that article. You could just drop in a bare URL within ref tags and I'll see to the full cite usually within 48 hours. On the other hand, the status quo works too, if you prefer it. ― 6700:

neutral lead to a politically slanted lead, following the lead of conservative media. It is a disgrace to this encyclopedia. All that needs to happen is the long-standing lead be restored to its original neutral tone and everyone who is not trying to inject political POV into the article will be happy. In any event, I'm outta there.

8698:: I disagree with your interpretation, in significant ways. In the future, please immediately challenge what you consider tendentious editing rather than allege on a retrospective basis that I demonstrate a pattern of such without evidence. What little evidence you do provide here is specious. I do not wish to discuss this further. 4808:"A and B, therefore C" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published the same argument in relation to the topic of the article. If a single source says "A" in one context, and "B" in another, without connecting them, and does not provide an argument of "therefore C", then "therefore C" cannot be used in any article. 4550:. That's fair enough, given the length of the description, but dates are normally encouraged. As you say, the US president has an ordinal and so each one (except Cleveland, ha!) is unique. British prime ministers don't have an ordinal so they need the dates per SDDATES. I was tending to think in PM terms. Thanks again. 8793:, but evidently you did not read in depth, or were unable to read a NYT source due to a paywall, which showed my contribution was fully supported by a highly reliable source. It was not remotely OR. Perhaps you were just mistaken because you didn't adequately examine the source, but if you figured this was a 8005: 8437:

the exuberance over Durham's indictments of Sussmann and Danchenko, particularly among Trump supporters, was, if not irrational, then exaggerated.... Durham may well be convinced that the Trump–Russia narrative was a hoax and that the Alfa Bank angle was similarly bogus,... His indictments, however,

7283:

The content that was inserted directly into the lead was not about current economic conditions of the US. It was about scientific methodology and a definition. It was others who falsely and disruptively claimed it was a political issue. And I join those who do not understand why Endwise was not cited

6810:

responded with what I consider appropriate caution and seriousness that such an interpretation would best be done with more than a single Admin's discretion. I was quite surprised to see this sanction on Soibangla, who was initially the singlehanded bastion against vandalism -- not a content dispute,

6453:

be included, essentially demanding it, and effectively browbeating anyone who dares to disagree. I specifically went out of my way to compliment your "compelling points," not mentioning your abrasive tactics for which you cannot be held accountable because you're posting IP. And then I came along and

2788:

Earlier I quoted Mueller. I meant Comey. Sorry for the confusion. The Mueller Report cites the "Netyksho Indictment ¶¶ 28-29" as the source for the "FBI later received images of DNC servers...". That document says nothing about the DNC giving up forensic images of its servers. According to this:

1707:

I'm not getting the diff, you know what went down. As I stated in the edit, it is a "small or moderately negative effect," and the full context of the edit is that Trump says "up" while everyone else, including Kudlow, says "down." That's the whole point, and my edit was faithful to it. And if anyone

937:

For the avoidance of doubt, I did not remove your newer content by mistake. My revert included BOTH the bit that has been edit-warred over by several editors (procedural revert), AND the bit that you added later (normal BRD revert). I should have made two separate reverts to make it clear this was my

9286:

You had copied text. Whether that was done purposefully or by accident is irrelevant. It was still copied text, and still a copyright violation. Nobody has accused you of fraud. The only person who has brought up fraud is you. Your copying is inadvertent. I accept that. That should be the end

2686:

It doesn't say that he makes the statements until September 2018, it just says that he generally does. The reference just happens to be published then and it's not as if we're saying these statements by him stopped afterwards, nor is there any implication of that. We obviously don't need a reference

1679:

Do you continue to assert that you merely fixed the formatting of my citation on Crossfire Hurricane, rather than fully reverted it unnecessarily, as you actually did? Do you agree with MONGO that I cherrypicked what Kudlow said in my edit, when in reality he cherrypicked? I am finding it increasing

793:

Given your accusations of bad faith directed at other editors when your edits are questioned I think this falls into one of two buckets. Either you did mean this as a personal attack or you don't understand why a reasonable editor would see it as such. If the latter is true then this is a question

46:

Knowledge is anything but "sentiment-free," given the biased wording of many pages regarding political topics or figures. Additionally, the reasons for removal are vague blanket statements to practice censorship against POVs providing objective counterbalance, lest people read an actual neutral page

9883:

Incidentally, the primary reason I oppose a shorter lead is because it would be tantamount to a whitewash, a term another active editor of the article has used, an evisceration of vital information in a highly contentious topic, which might inspire the motivation for proposing the shortening of the

7011:

should go to ARCA to get clarity for now and the future. I'm not seeing how Endwise was helping out by reinserting contentious material after it had been BRD-reverted. BTW, I'm kind of perplexed that you have accused me of accusing Endwise....etc. I don't think that was at all related to what I was

6424:

I know conspiracy theories are the rage about EVERYTHING these days but, if you really must know, I am a former editor from many MANY moons ago. A reputable one from WAY back during the W.Bush years. I walked away because of family and travel and just decided to reduce my connection to life through

6363:

and have a proper formal discussion on the matter. In that spirit- Please stop asking me about 'my formal account', which is just creepy. There is a reason they let us use anonymity on talk pages because maybe, with contentious articles like this, I don't want to be harassed by unstable editors who

5331:

Yes it is, you just don't like it, perhaps because instead you are determined to make sweeping wholesale removals across numerous BLPs, seeing as you made no effort to even add a CN tag, let alone find a source, for any of those BLPs. There are countless narrative sources that mention an individual

1726:

is exactly what MONGO did (on the economic policy page, not on the Trump biography page). On your first point, I sincerely don't "know what went down". I edit a lot, you too, I don't remember each and every thing I've ever typed. If you have a concern, show me the diffs of what happened. Otherwise,

554:

I don't have any opinion about your edits. I haven't even looked to see if you are pro or anti-Trump, for instance. If I had a specific complaint I'd have made it. No one should be intimidated into silence by an alert which explicitly says it doesn't imply any problems. I helped write some of these

73:

others to challenge my edits, but they gotta have skin in the game. No one is being censored, all anyone has to do is comply with the non-partisan rules that apply to all, but some refuse and think they're entitled to their own rules. So they come to Talk pages to anonymously shoot spitballs, which

10296:

I’m sorry if anything that I said had anything to do with this, me calling you a conspiracy theorist is something I have learned to regret, even if I don’t agree with you ideologically and I hope that you get unbanned from the subject, as I genuinely believe that you want to spread what you see as

9046:

I hadn't even finished my first pass, and was preparing for my second pass to tighten things up. Your action was precipitous and unwarranted by the evidence you cited, your fixes were poor, then you put a tag at the top of the article suggesting my work was so bad that it required revdel, which is

8733:

another user explained you how OR works, but you didn't give an inch. Now, this case and the cases I mentioned in the opening post are different because now you have used at least pseudo-reliable sources; sources that have been published by respectable publications, but that don't directly support

6883:

Are you talking about the two times I reverted Endwise and asked they follow BRD, but they did not and restored the edits anyway? And would you also like to discuss the registered user who logged out so they could launch into a personal tirade against me with no accountablity, and when I told them

6836:

called "discretionary sanctions" for a reason; a one-week limited-scope TBAN seems like a reasonable exercise of administrative discretion, and I think Soibangla is lucky that it's so narrow and for such a short period of time, giving their consistently inflammatory contributions on this topic and

6831:

3 hours after Soibangla removed it, this comment seems tantamount to accusing Endwise of vandalism and being canvassed. I don't know I'd call this a single admin's discretion, since I already cautioned Soibangla above, only to be rebuffed; if you want a second admin to countersign this, then I do.

5298:

No policy has been formulated from that discussion as yet. The other day you said the sources didn't specifically mention the subject, so I got a valid secondary that did in every case, then you said a list isn't good enough, but it's perfectly fine for that purpose, it doesn't require a narrative

2613:(Talk) pages are clunky and inefficient, trying to reuse the generic page editing approach for a multithreaded discussion. It may be possible to use it effectively, but it is very difficult to discover how to do so. (Discussion forums might be a better way to talk about articles and their content.) 2126:

Soibangla, I've also tried to engage with MarkBassett on article talk pages and I know how mindnumbingly frustrating it can be (I was warned ages by an admin for questioning his competence). Just try to be as level-headed and robotic as you can. You do good edits, so don't get yourself blocked for

1533:

That's not a rule violation, JFG, and you know it. Soibangla, despite not seeming to have a clue about what BRD means, is following the BRD cycle to the letter. They made a bold edit that was reverted, they discussed that on the talk page, and then they made a new edit that only added back half of

9061:

I responded to your message on my talk page but for keeping messaging together, I will repeat myself. You cannot copy text and fix it up. Copyright violations are copyright violations even in intermediate versions. The revdel template is not a badge of shame; it is a request for administrative

8917:

Durham said there had been inadequate predication to open a full investigation in July 2016, but that only an assessment or preliminary investigation was warranted by that time. Although the report concluded the FBI had showed confirmation bias and a "serious lack of analytical rigor", it did not

7238:

This may be unnecessary, but I think I need to add it to avoid any doubt. Economics is a well-established social science and an academic discipline with a vast literature that is self-critical, reason-based and constantly developing. It is not a political point of view. To trained economists, the

7221:

Tamzin, we know you are operating in good faith. But consider the assessment of the first 3 experienced AP editors who happened to see these sanctions -- each of us voicing concern verging on disbelief that such sanctions would be imposed and surprise at the novel theory of the first TBAN with an

6463:

And you evidently ignore all the content I added to the article that rips the film to shreds, not to mention ignoring my extensive edit history which clearly demonstrates I have no patience for right-wing conspiracy theories and propaganda. I'm just absolutely gobsmacked by what you've done here.

6458:

comment and came to my Talk page to get in my face, then went to another editor's Talk page in an effort to recruit them against me, suggesting I am a plant or shill, but instead were told you were way outta line. Then you baselessly accuse me of gaming to somehow draw you into a slow-motion edit

2590:

I haven't used the word "disruptive", although one might if you did it more often. At this point I would soften to "confusing". I think the cost exceeds the benefit, considering the acceptable alternatives, and I'm fairly confident that a majority of experienced editors would agree. If you remain

387:

Grisham/Gidley use sleight of hand to suggest that the Post’s “lost summer” article should have been some sort of recital of Trump accomplishments, to suggest that the Post ignored important stories, but that was not the purpose of the article. Other articles might be lists of stuff, but this one

325:

In case you hadn't noticed, we are now living in a remarkable time, an unprecedented time, a golden age of journalism. There is a firehose of information hitting us every day about this president. I have chosen to help document this era, and there's a very good reason why very few of my edits are

7076:

Well, I said "initially..." But there was also more vandalism on the talk page, where Soibangla was a hero. Endwise was not a vandal, but they inflamed the situation greatly, and showed very poor judgment IMO and were arguably an edit-warrior given the context and the canvassed mob. Soibangla is

2471:

Would you say that raising an issue in Talk, seeing the issue refuted, ignoring that refutation and pivoting to another issue, seeing that issue refuted, ignoring that refutation and pivoting to another issue, seeing that issue refuted, over and over, garnering no support for your position, then

9862:

Has nothing to do with awards. FA articles get featured on the front page of Knowledge. Considering the importance you attribute below, I would think getting the article on the front page might be important to you. If the lead is five paragraphs, or we IAR other rules, there is no chance of the

8263:

Yes. Appreciate the documentation in real time of your attempt to continue a dispute not involving you and create more division when others have sought to cool the situation. Also may want to read again as I see no boomerang aimed at my head nor call for one from uninvolved parties or soibangla

8153:

I'm now realizing the edit was related to who abandoned it and not the ownership topic. I was so used to seeing the "purportedly" added to the question of the ownership. That issue has also been discussed several times, and the results have been to simply say that it had been abandoned without

7036:

I'm not sure that the broad topic of "economics in the United States" would fall under AP2 DS, and just "economics" definitely wouldn't, but I think "the current economic conditions of the United States" does. I find that things like ARCA threads are better started as adversarial (in the legal

6975:

No, you said I was engaged in ""consistently inflammatory contributions" on the Recession talk page. The admin who sanctioned me presented none, you have presented none. Instead, I receive a threat that I'm pushing my luck by even making reasonable requests, and instead of considering even the

6699:

Well, I don't know about anyone else's backgrounds, and I don't mean to boast, but I studied economics at the #1 program in the world and I have been fully aware of this issue for decades. I know all about it. The bottom line is the article was opportunistically gamed to change a long-standing

5313:

Having a "secondary source" that only mentions the subject once, and includes a parroted list from a primary source is not a secondary source. I shouldn't have to do extra research on what a vote is or why it's significant to the subject because the sources fail to do so. And narrative? If the

7348:

Setting aside the intricacies of procedures and acronyms for just a moment, blocking someone after they have announced they are disengaging from the Talk page that is the source of the dispute is ... well, I've tried out various adjectives here, and I think I'll go with "baffling". As for the

6439:

You said you accidentally removed my Talk edit as vandalism because you confused it with a previous edit that was vandalism. I don't see you subsequently corrected your "error" and removed any previous edit that you say was vandalism, which makes me skeptical of your rationale for removing my

9172:

You copied text from several sources, and did not either paraphrase it or put it in quotes. As I have said three times now, I do not believe that you did this intentionally, but it is nonetheless not allowed on Knowledge. If your method involves copying things while you're working on writing

6998:

Tamzin, I saw your supportive comment to Soibangla elsewhere on this page, and thanks for that -- although I disagree with what you said about what you see as "deescalation." I commented on that editor's talk page about the RfC, without any response. But do you feel that AP2 authorized DS on

6857:

You say I rebuffed you but in fact I said I was with you until you pinged a certain editor to praise them (I will not elaborate further on why I objected to that). You suggested I take a break, that was the entire thrust of your edit, and I said I was. Please provide me with my "consistently

4818:

material that calls him a conspiracy theorist, or more importantly that Human Events hired a "conspiracy theorist". Which is getting into BLP infractions. What is presently on the article needs to be changed period. Removing conspiracy theorist seems to be the most accurate way to keep it in

2555:

is far from universal, so it's never a very reliable indicator of context or intent (which is not to say that we shouldn't do it!). Some editors even sometimes change their indent level within a single comment, for no apparent reason. Editors are accustomed to the idea that all text between

957:

Soibangla, you've asserted several times on the talk page that your edit was not BOLD and that the rationale for reversion was procedural BRD. These are both false. Your edit was reverted because people thought it was WP:UNDUE, and your edit was BOLD because it was the first edit in the BRD

486:

On the basis you are editing relevant high profile articles - anyone editing in both American politics and BLPs should have both, really. I'm not clear why you are asking me about this when you normally just remove alerts without a comment, so far as I can see. Remember it's just an alert.

7353:

page that have been called "inflammatory", everything I can see is barely tepid. A claim of subject-matter expertise, "I reverted so-and-so and asked that they follow such-and-such common practice, but they didn't" ... if that's "inflammatory", then we might as well block everyone who ever

6949:

I produced evidence: Your comments on this page. I could also just link to your contributions for the past few days. And I would not call that threat veiled. But if you'd like something more explicit: If you continue talking about a dispute in the topic area you are banned from, outside of

8166:

with sourcing where nobody really challenged that the laptop had been abandoned or bothered to question by whom. I think a separate RFC would be necessary to find consensus to add a qualifier to the "abandoned" part, as looking back the random talk page discussions don't seem productive.

4772:"If one reliable source says A, and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C that is not mentioned by either of the sources. This would be improper editorial synthesis of published material to imply a new conclusion, which is original research" 4719:

he is a conspiracy theorist, it's just that he happens to be commonly described as a conspiracy theorist, which is consistent with his lead, which characterizes him as neither a "conservative commentator" nor a "thought leader." The Beast and NYT refs are there simply to show he has been

2859:

According to Federal Court documents, Crowdstrike does not have forensic images or any evidence of a DNC hack. Under the Rule of Discovery, Stone's attorneys received only redacted drafts of the Crowdstrike forensic report. There is no "Chain of Evidence" here, only redacted drafts.

1698:, which diff are you talking about? Re:Kudlow, MONGO's version is more neutral, as it reflects that Kudlow stated both that tariffs have a moderate negative effect on GDP, and that this is a risk worth taking in comparison to other expected benefits on trade balance and domestic jobs. — 6837:

rejection of efforts to deëscalate. Frankly—and this isn't a critique of Guerillero by any means, but rather our general culture as applies to political disruption—I think we would have already indeffed or fully TBANned an editor behaving this way in the opposite direction politically.

3144: 555:

sanctions when I was an Arbitrator and was involved in changing the wording later so they would make it explicit that they were "standard messages" and didn't imply any problems. Have I missed something or have you also asked the same question when given the AP and gun control alerts?

8399:

described their reactions as "if not irrational, then exaggerated". He provided context when he urged them to be cautious, as Durham's indictments "narrowly allege that the defendants lied to the FBI only about the identity or status of people from whom they were getting information,

8638:

I did not misrepresent anything. I may have misunderstood, which is why I asked for a clarification. You gave it and I did not see merit in it. In any event, I was most certainly not stonewalling. I do not wish to discuss this further as you appear to be moving into aspersions now.

938:

intent. Now please move to the discussion page, on which I have opened a section to discuss the merits of your additions. Again, I have not yet formed an opinion on your proposed content, and I'm waiting for you and other people to make their case. The most important part of BRD is

7423:

And it gets into the very fraught area of imputing motives or agendas to editors in just about every topic area on this site. Clearly defined limits and alignment of expectations among the population are absolutely required for any social system to sustain itself as an functioning

304:

At this point, you are discussing your changes on the article talk page, you need to concentrate on that. Be specific about what changes you want to make and where. It's worth breaking your edit into several separate changes, with specifics about why you think they should be made.

6858:

inflammatory contributions" as opposed to my extensive constructive contributions, because none have been presented as a basis for sanction. There was no warning, no evidence presented, but like a bolt from the blue one admin tbans me on the basis of DS where DS is not in effect.

6667:

I was with you until you pinged JPxG to praise them as a deëscalator. I'll just say I vehemently disagree with that characterization and leave it at that. Nevertheless, I've said about all I want to say there and I will now step back and observe my inevitable vindication unfold.

675:

I'd suggest that the warning include the words "Sent to you by an editor that knows more about these things than you because I suspect that your future edits may not meet Knowledge's standards. There is nothing that you have done to make me suspect this, it is just a hunch."

6914:. (If you go with the former, a word to the wise, since there's no designated format for AN appeals: In my experience it's most effective to preëmptively make "Statements" and "Discussion among uninvolved editors" sections, lest all the statements from parties get mixed in.) 2827:

On March 20, 2017 during a House Intelligence Committee hearing and while he was still FBI director, Comey evidenced some considerable discomfort as he tried to explain to the committee why the FBI did not insist on getting physical access to the DNC computers and do its own

8619:

Your "ask for clarification" fully misrepresented what I had said prior, so I assumed you had not read it. And if you hadn't read my prior comments with much care, I didn't see the value in providing much additional detail upon your request. Discussion here involves writing

2181:

Not at all, one reference would have to be enough to show if that's the case. Otherwise it would be inappropriately synthesis for us to say that four or five examples constituted persistently. That's something reliable sources have to say themselves, we can't infer that.

7395:? Is Shakespeare under the jurisdiction of AP2 discretionary sanctions? Suppose that incident had led to people brigading over here to argue over whether Brutus was a hero or a villain. Would a Shakespearean scholar be topic-banned under AP2 for reverting the lede of 5779: 2402:

Speaking of concision, I've seen onetwothree's edits as a good faith attempt at that, nothing more. You are welcome to criticize the substantive details of the edits, explain the problems you see, propose alternate wordings, etc., but accusations of bad faith like

7401:? I think reasonable people can disagree about what rules ought to come into play under such conditions. (In the past, I've argued for broad interpretations of various restrictions myself.) Consequently, the decision of what sanctions are in force should be made 9101:

Again, you copied text and closely paraphrased. Voorts took the appropriate action under our copyright policy which includes notification of an admin to revision delete the material. Voort has made no accusation of fraud that I can see. I consider your post a

1085:

No, that was not my real reason. I further explained my reasoning on the article talkpage. I did however omit in my latest comments there that I am strongly opposed due to recentism issues and prognostications including what people think the future holds, see

2894:

Mueller Report, page 40: "As part of its investigation, the FBI later received images of DNC servers and copies of relevant traffic logs." The Mueller Report cites its source as . That court document does not say anything about "images" or "FBI" or "traffic

8751:

Yes, once. 4.5 years ago. I've improved a bit since then. If you believe I persistently demonstrate improper editing, I suggest you seek to have me sanctioned. In lieu of that, you can revert my edits that seem problematic to you and we can go through BRD.

8125: 7769: 632:

That's correct. A number of experienced editors worked hard to make sure the alert did not suggest that there was evidence of a specific problem. They should be given widely, else they might be seen as suggesting a problem or being used for intimidation.

8676: 8547: 1558:

discuss the merits of the part they left in the article, and has instead resorted to personal attacks against editors who disagree with him/her. Not cool. I don't even care about this content, but I do care about civility, good faith, and process. —

10079:

Yes. Edits with inaccurate or misleading edit summaries should be reverted on-sight. Thank you for providing an unambiguous one this time for your contribution, one which does not imply that the previous editor had reading comprehension issues.

5340:

But it is. It's like a WP list article: narrative followed by list. Simply because the secondary's narrative is briefer than what might be found in a full-narrative article doesn't make it illegitimate. It's not as if the source is no more than a

7203:

That was clearly about the dispute that led to the TBAN being imposed—a dispute that falls under the TBAN's scope. I gave two warnings. If Soibangla had any confusion about whether that fell under the TBAN's scope, they had two chances to ask.

2196:

I'm not sure I agree, because we properly have 8 refs to support that Trump "repeatedly and falsely" asserts his economy is the best in history. If we use just one ref, some other editor is bound to say, "hey, that's just one ref saying that!"

7037:

term-of-art sense, not as in "hostile") than as self-reviews, so I'd encourage you to start one if you disagree. As to my comments on Endwise, my point is just that not everyone reverting Soibangla was a vandal. Endwise, for instance, is not.

3437: 3295:

It would be nice if a bot would clean these up but I'm not aware of one. I do it semi-manually, using the "cite" link at the edit window. Anyhow, thanks for saying you will provide full references, and you can blame me if anyone complains. --

7222:

unprecedented broadening the previous interpretation of AP/DS. Now that you are directly involved, I urge you to go to ARCA for validation and clarification so that editors will understand the environment in which we are editing henceforth.

5019: 10148:

But you are choosing to call one of those two plausible explanations "dubious" in Knowledge's voice without providing a reference to a reliable source calling the bullet graze explanation "dubious" or any reasonable synonym of dubious.

7409:, followed by a topic ban, followed by that ban being co-signed. Is this a good decision-making process? If anyone wants to quote me as saying that it seems a backwards way of going about the matter, well, here's the comment for you. 7126:

from editing for the duration of the TBAN (until 12:52 on 6 August 2022). You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

3280:

Soibangla, the standard editor window has a "Cite" menu. Look at Templates. Under there you will see cite web, cite news etc. It's not quite has handy as a auto complete bot but it allows you to reliably fill in the information.

2853:

HURD: …So, Director FBI notified the DNC early, before any information was put on Wikileaksand when — youhave still been — never been given access to any of the technical or the physical machines that were — that were hacked by the

8854: 7168:

would lead to a block." (Underlining added.) The dispute here was over the non-warning and block itself, not about "the dispute it was imposed over". This block is based on a misunderstanding and should be reversed immediately. --

3146: 7300:

We're talking in circles here, SPECIFICO. Everything you've just said, I've either already answered, or is a misrepresentation of my previous comments. I have nothing further to say on this matter except in response to an appeal.

1578:

is inaccurate. It was a wholly separate, second edit, then JFG reverted the whole shebang as though the second edit was subject to the same reversion justification as the first edit. Can you see how I don't see this as fair play?

4126:, I use the links under Tools in the left sidebar of articles, but yes, it stalls a lot. It sometimes seems to work more consistently after waiting a few seconds to allow the article page to fully load (that’s my theory, anyway) 6448:

comments, but I did not tell you to f-off, as you assert. I dropped an f-bomb. The far more plausible explanation for your reversion is that you have spent days persistently, repetitously and vociferously arguing that "falsely"

2821:

COMEY: It is, although what was briefed to me by my folks — the people who were my folks at the time is that they had gotten the information from the private party that they needed to understand the intrusion by the spring of

6133:

I previously said on article Talk that I withdrew my PAYWALL concern, which was in error. I continue to have concerns about OR from primaries and I look forward to collegially colloborating with you in that and other matters.

2794:

BURR: And the FBI, in this case, unlike other cases that you might investigate — did you ever have access to the actual hardware that was hacked? Or did you have to rely on a third party to provide you the data that they had

22:

sort of getting on my soapbox for a second. The fact that so few of your contributions are reversed I feel is more of an indictment of the increasingly biased state of Knowledge, than it is evidence of the NPoV nature of your

8674: 4690: 8545: 5873: 4711:'It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit.' 529:

I am aware that some partisan editors use this alert in an attempt to intimidate others into silence. Unless you have a specific complaint about my edits, I suggest you refrain from sending generic alerts without cause

3818:

conduct improper but not the conduct of the other editor. If you're gonna inject yourself into this, the least you could've done was to restore my content which the other editor improperly removed. Reverting someone's

8105: 4738:

This is an article about Human Events, which has no history of Conspiracy Theories. Yes, you are correct,the original edit does not imply "Conspiracy Theorist", it blatantly states "Conspiracy Theorist". There is no

440: 8730: 7255:

Neither the TBAN nor the block is for POV-pushing. The TBAN is for treating Knowledge as a battleground, and the block is for breaching the TBAN after two warnings. And, just as in an edit war, being right (assumed

3510: 1961:

I'm inclined to stop using the currently available tools altogether and just leave bare URLs. I sure wish someone could write "RefBot" to uniformly format refs sitewide so no one has to deal with this anymore. cc:

1236:

I have a buddy! Hallelujah! I do not know who the "incomprehensible" editor is, perhaps you'd like to insult them more publicly. The fact you only included one part of Kudlow's comments on the tariff issue is pure

8865: 5314:"narrative" isn't found within the source that includes the subject, then it shouldn't be mentioned at all. Encyclopedia articles shouldn't be including narratives that aren't extremely relevant to the subject. -- 2800:

COMEY: In the case of the DNC, … we did not have access to the devices themselves. We got relevant forensic information from a private party, a high-class entity, that had done the work. But we didn’t get direct

2502:

If that's indeed what's going on, probably not, but edit summaries and article talk pages still aren't a good place to hash that out. I noticed that onetwothree has made another revert today and I've warned them.

1023:

I have no problem with any of the 3 bullet points above, but don't see how they relate to the current situation. Could you maybe be more specific about what you fundamentally disagree with? Are you disputing that

9446:

since these matters have been previously discussed at length, and the challenged phrasing remains, I recommend one of the editors now raising these questions open an RfC to solicit input from a broader audience

6359:, which yes is very much "a threat" not to mention a red flag of an unstable editor, which in these here parts you'd be insta-banned for less, partner. I am willing to let it go but, if you'd prefer, we can do a 4910:

Presented to Soibangla on September 17, 2021 for your tireless persistence in editing with precision and style and defending the difficult articles while encouraging others to do the same. A true Wikipedian! --

9250:

statement that my work "has a good amount of plagiarism." Is it too much trouble to strike it, noting in the edit summary that the allegation is false and improper, such that any future discussion is precluded?

9001:

and placed in quotes my paraphrasing of a source that did not contain such a quote. You made other changes that were trivial in my view, such as "current or former" to "serving or had served," just to name one.

8893: 8716:

you reinstated – without consensus and in violation of page restrictions – a source that does not mention the laptop at all, and removed one that does (even if doesn't support the content).Please read the essay

7054:

Why aren't you talking to Endwise for violating BRD twice to ram into the lead contentious content that did not exist there for years, in the midst of a political firestorm, and nobody so much as sniffed at it?

6514:

Yeah, but you got triggered again, and tried to put words in my mouth, so I wanted to go record in case someone else reading this was mislead. But, please, have the last word if that is important to you. Cheers

3445: 8797:("again," you said in your edit summary, after just taking something resembling a swipe at me on Talk without pinging me) I suggest you do better. I seek no conflict with you, and I hope one does not develop. 8113: 7200:

4662: 1836:

Yes, sometimes it appears to do more harm than good, and I try to keep an eye out for that. Mostly I use it rather than the original reFill when I cite a WaPo ref, because reFill doesn't handle them right.

9784:

I'm done with that editor, but many have come to that Talk to complain how it's all-so-unfair, so maybe others will see my response and think a bit more about it. I want to leave my Talk as it is, thanks.

3310:

I will use reFill/Reflinks and revert it if it appears mangled, but manually filling out forms to do it is a bit much. I'm very surprised that WP has existed this long without someone botifying this task.

3471: 1139:

I am not the only editor that has reverted and or expressed disagreement with the edit(s) in question that you performed. I still suggest you post an Rfc at the Trump talkpage and gain concensus for your

8454: 8332: 5868: 2359:

These are just helpful pointers to make sure that the content you add will be kept in articles. If it's too verbose and has too many sources, the chances increase that it will be cut from that article.

746:

I am referring in generic terms to organized groups, to which I did not associate either of the two editors. Note my reference to the gun lobby. Also note my references to "they," rather than to "you."

1397:

edit can be considered BOLD, Knowledge would descend into a mayhem of reversions and endless Talk and the whole show would come to a screeching halt. I'm pretty sure "Everybody else gets it" that BOLD

65:

who gets pissed off. Always, no matter how words are phrased. Also, as we've learned quite clearly in recent years, there are lotsa people who hold beliefs that aren't reality-compliant, and they get

10231: 5332:

only once, and by your reasoning a source that includes a quote from that individual is "parroting." Similarly if a secondary references a primary, say, a government document, which is commonplace.

6724: 3933: 3080: 4532:

says keep it to 40 characters or less. Barack Obama is the only person who is the "44th president of the United States". There is no reason to add DOB or term of service in a short description. –

2345:

I diligently strive for concision, and I don't have perfect recall here, but I seem to remember that one needed multiple sources for some reason. I assure you I am not in the habit of overciting.

6906:

as vandalism.Your comments here are pushing at the edge of the TBAN you just received. If you wish to continue discussing the circumstances that led to the TBAN, you should do so in an appeal at

9863:

article getting featured on the front page. So I would suggest we try to follow the guidelines for GA and FA and see if getting the article featured can be done later this year, say in October?

6931:

So, instead of honoring my request to produce any evidence of "consistently inflammatory contributions" that might justify this sanction in the first place, instead I receive a veiled threat of

3668:

The vote was over 24 hours and the topic was in the news. What is truly "Consensus". The topic of a "Joe Biden - Ukraine conspiracy" has been in international news (And 3 things listed on the

1921:

This is why widely-used citation scripts should be vetted by the community. Barring that, editors who choose to use them should clean up after them rather than creating work for other editors. ―

7554:

discussions or suggestions about weather-related topics anywhere on Knowledge, for instance a deletion discussion concerning an article about a meteorologist, but also including edit summaries

3369: 8343: 8109: 6098:

I missed your citation farther down. Sorry. Based on this article, I think it wouldn't out of line to cite inside the lede. For my part, when I see a very long edit summary, my hackles go up.

2848:

COMEY: Well we never got direct access to the machines themselves. The DNC in the spring of 2016 hired a firm that ultimately shared with us their forensics from their review of the system. …

8325: 7521: 8117: 6302:

since apparently I'm not the only one you are raising red flags with. As for your 'compliments', it honestly feels like you are grooming me for what is a slow-motion edit war in service of

4318:

We need not repeat and effectively amplify every lunatic claim - we already know that the Clintons are major targets, we don't need to include every grossly offensive BLP-violating detail.

5827: 3429: 6879:

Given that the sentence most at-issue here was restored by Endwise 3 hours after Soibangla removed it, this comment seems tantamount to accusing Endwise of vandalism and being canvassed.

4170: 5275: 8837:

Wow. Thanks for the notice, I must have missed my RT subscription renewal date. Very distinguished company, and we now have a link to show the Arbs Admins and ANImals who don't get it.

418: 6410:

The editor is clearly knowledgable and experienced, thus likely has an account but has chosen to be anon. I have a sense of who the editor is and I think an admin should have a look.

5801: 5747: 450: 9887:. I don't see a consensus forming for shortening, rather I see consensus for the status quo. This topic is of such momentous importance at this point that in some respects I believe 6898:

Well, I think your second post answers the question in your first post. To answer the question in your second post, Endwise's revert was not vandalism, thus it was inappropriate for

8452: 6746:, all any editor had to do was come to my Talk page and ask me to tone it down or risk sanctions, as a preemptive, corrective warning. No one did. Instead, I am being retroactively 5821: 441:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-lost-summer-aides-claim-victory-but-others-see-incompetence-and-intolerance/2019/09/01/f6f74f86-ca8a-11e9-be05-f76ac4ec618c_story.html

100:

The rules could not possibly be more partisan. If one is only allowed to quote from left wing corporate media, then by definition Knowledge exercises censorship on a massive scale.

359:

to Post articles reporting about each of them. And, quite hilariously, the op-ed actually links to a Post article about something Grisham/Gidley said the Post didn't report. Oops.

7120:, and for violating the TBAN that was just imposed, immediately after I warned you that continuing to discuss the dispute it was imposed over would lead to a block, you have been 5119: 3790: 3201: 3124: 1413:? This seems inherently contradictory. I submit that this policy is profoundly ambiguous, and ambiguity can be exploited to GAME, as I maintain is what has happened in this case. 2833:

HURD: So there was about a year between the FBI’s first notification of some potential problems with the DNC network and then that information getting on — getting on Wikileaks.

8330: 4720:

characterized as a conspiracy theorist, not to support that HE had hired him, which their included statement makes clear. I concede my edit summary could've elaborated on that.

6254:

for what was essentially a misunderstanding. I don't buy for a second that he "was hacked". Also, take into account his history of edit warring above. I think he's engaging in

5811: 6250:

Heads up, I think there is more to this editor than he is letting on. There are many plants and shills that plague wikipedia, as you know, and then this editor slipped and

264:

You asserted you had consensus for the edit on Talk. Confirm that with others there and restore it yourself. Do you actually expect me to advocate for you now? We're done.

8438:

make no such claim. Instead, they narrowly allege that the defendants lied to the FBI only about the identity or status of people from whom they were getting information,

6516: 6426: 6365: 6307: 6263: 5863: 591: 9978:

Neither of those comments are incivil, in my opinion. They are not about you, but rather about the writer of the comments themselves, perhaps with implications about the

9079:

I was not making wholesale lifts of copyright content. Some phrases may have been too-tight paraphrases which I intended to quickly ameliorate. it was not plagiarism and

6478:

I was already over it, but you couldn’t let it go. So sometimes when you stare into the abyss, it stares back, eh? As for the rest, if I truly thought you were guilty of

8869: 8861: 7388:

can be politicized for a few days, editors will in good faith be coming at those topics from their prior background. Remember when people got upset that a production of

5669:

Just want you to know I appreciate all of the work you do, have done, and that it really is amazing to see what you've accomplished with so much going on all the time.

5414:

If users are adding content that is barely relevant to the subject without authentic secondary source analysis and pertinence, that content is undue and screams onus. --

3960: 3481:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 6320:

There was no personal threat from me. You are extremely adamant about this issue and I disagreed and now you're comin' after me. Please login so I can see who you are.

4854:

There is no source material that states Human Events hired him because he is a conspiracy theorist...or more importantly that Human Events hired a "conspiracy theorist"

8889: 4368: 3689: 52: 6884:

that was not appropriate for an article Talk page and instead take it to my Talk page, they continued with the tirade anyway until another editor asked them to stop?

3395:

This is an unlikely search term; please provide citations to show that this term is used on a wide enough scale to warrant the creation of a redirect being necessary.

2965:

Yes, it appears that I am being singled out and attacked on my talk and elsewhere. I am only trying to improve Knowledge but apparently others prefer the status quo.

2591:

unconvinced, by all means keep doing it and see if you get any more complaints (you already have two, from me and that other editor by virtue of their refactoring). ―

8067:, "disruptive" is a term that suggests my edit may be sanctionable, so unless you can demonstrate my edit contradicts established consensus, I ask you to strike it. 4883: 3614: 3554: 3501: 1904: 1900: 183: 153: 239:

This drama could've been avoided had you simply added an edit summary, but you left it blank. And I will choose what topics to participate in, thank you very much.

10030:, you may think the edit summary "serves to make me look incompetent," but that was certainly not my intent, I merely intended to condense two steps into one. the 5774: 5769: 5764: 5048:

That's simply not how we do things here. Take this to the article Talk page and maybe others will explain it to you. Don't continue talking about it here, please.

4416: 4393: 4374: 3927: 3729: 3512: 3461: 3397:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

125: 10163:

I did not create the dubious tag, you know who did. I find the claim now disputable due to Wray's statement, and the lead should reflect that for the time being.

8559:

I asked you to clarify the substance of your proposed change, you gave it, I didn't find it necessary. Does this have anything to do with you previously making a

6524: 6473: 6387: 6373: 6350: 6329: 6315: 6285: 5796: 5032:

your interpretation of a primary source. Get a secondary source. And you should bring this up on the article Talk page so everyone can see and discuss, not here.

7117: 3176: 3134: 3096: 1708:

wanted to enhance the language to their better liking, that would be the preferred option rather than make a wholesale delete. We're here to collaborate, right?

9218: 6434: 6271: 4610: 1485:, revert, discuss cycle? Why doesn't the banner simply say "any edit" without reference to BRD? So it's BRD but actually it's not? And below you said I "made a 9366: 5619: 5568:

Verifiable information, yes. Should all verifiable information be included, when it lacks the analysis and close connection to the subject of a BLP article? --

4584: 4141: 3364: 69:

pissed off when sources don't confirm their beliefs. If people think it's all-so-unfair, the solution is the same as it's ever been: participate. As always, I

7406: 4207: 1401:, in fact, mean "confident, courageous, daring, etc," hence the reason it can be used as justification for reversion. And in this case, my edit was not BOLD. 8338: 8163: 6016: 5838: 5495:

Is there an analysis or synthesis of information in the Mercury list source you found that are pertinent to the subjects of the BLPs we are talking about? --

3483: 2632:. I was aware of some discussion a couple of years ago (and probably participated a little), but I didn't know it resulted in an addition to the guideline. ― 1071:

mean? The individual who reverted has not been shy about expressing his/her strong political persuasions. The real reason for the revert was WP:IDONTLIKEIT.

378: 5380:

We aren't talking about brevity, we are talking about substance and relevance to the subject of the article. I would invoke onus, due, npov, ad absurdum. --

3880:

I know that very well. Now, Knowledge is not a battleground, and you should not respond in kind. Simply revert their edit, warn them about it, and move on.

2612: 10321: 9885: 9019:

This was not in quotes before I added quotes: "stealing more than 10,000 rounds of ammunition and several grenades from a weapons depot at Camp Pendleton".

8487: 5843: 5292: 4675: 4165: 4073:

My sole objective isn't to restore the content, it's to get consensus on this issue. I'll set up the talk page discussion on the article's talk page soon.

2147: 898:...and you restored it. JFGs removal appears to be the BRD and you need consensus to restore. I suggest you remove it and post an Rfd and gain concensus.-- 8320: 5201:

Are you accusing me of acting in bad faith, or thinking you were acting in bad faith? Neither if the case, of course. I did fix it; you reverted the fix.

6149: 5963:

Well, I think you've both been a bit foolish; as have I. This discussion, and any offshoots, will not be the last we as a community have on this matter.

4098: 3705: 3624: 2142: 1624:. I suggest this whole BOLD and BRD thing needs some serious rethinking, it's ambiguous and contradictory, and I really don't think it's because it's my 10282:

I may have more to say about this episode on this page in 90 days, and then I may leave. I am not a conspiracy theorist. that's all I got here for now.

5974: 2789:

the FBI asked for forensic copies but received none. Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) asked Comey during a congressional hearing about the forensic images:

1875: 1005:

BRD is never a reason for reverting. Unless the reversion is supported by policies, guidelines or common sense, the reversion is not part of BRD cycle.

8129: 8101: 7380:

I'm willing to accept the possibility that sanctions about American politics should apply when a topic in economics has become politicized. That's not

4094:: Yes, Fox News mostly supported Trump, but they called the election for Biden quite soon. Since then, Trump hasn't been happy with Fox News. See e.g. 3972: 2704: 10316: 9361: 8713: 5806: 4233: 4215: 3412: 3405: 3375: 419:

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/white-house-press-secretaries-publish-op-ed-claiming-washington-post-didnt-cover-stories-the-paper-actually-did-cover/

5173:

I did, I moved it to the body (which you reverted). Only one of us is mashing the revert button and sniping personal attacks in article talk space.

1125:

Given your frequent and open expressions of your strongly-held political views on various Talk pages, I find it challenging to AGF in your actions.

10209: 9773: 6520: 6430: 6369: 6311: 6267: 5922: 4764:

No source listed says "'conspiracy theorist' Jack Posobiec." The Source *DOES SAY " hiring of the extremely talented and influential Jack Posobiec"

4454: 1212:

edits are BOLD. And it didn't happen here. The edit was not BOLD, it was not UNDUE. It's simply information that causes some to experience extreme

374: 75: 7618:

That's where I noticed it several times. How can that happen if you aren't doing it deliberately? It looks like you're revising previous sigs. --

5078: 9022:

Likewise, the original article said "shadow, stand-by army", which is a too close paraphrase of the source, which says "shadow or stand-by army".

5586:

edit that you're just gonna do what you wanna do, regardless of flawed reasoning and shifting rationales. I'm not wasting any more time on this.

1087: 863: 326:

reverted. You can edit what you want, and I can edit what I want, and we can peacefully coexist here. All you had to do was add an edit summary,

79: 2947:. Other editors may not see your comments if you don't. It appears you are singling-out editors and not focusing on improving Knowledge, i.e. 9428:

Why is it not possible that it is both synth and editorial? Specifically, do ANY of the sources mention the laptop? If not, then its SYNTH. In

6021: 5989: 5958: 5940: 5848: 5389: 4864:

Well of course they would say that. Take this to the article Talk page so others may participate. Please do not continue this discussion here.

2053: 1764: 872:

As I mentioned in my edit summary, you did not provide an explanation for your reversion other than some "Procedural removal," but referred to

5329:

Having a "secondary source" that only mentions the subject once, and includes a parroted list from a primary source is not a secondary source.

4622: 4135: 9268:

I can understand that those who have made false and grave allegations that impugn another's integrity might not find it a productive use of

8883: 8419: 7842:, glad you found it. I gave the wrong link here, sorry. For anyone who's looking for it: The relevant section on the Donald Trump article is 4448: 4432: 4409: 4386: 4298:, I honestly don't understand what the controversy is here. The edit simply described yet another false narrative spread by QAnon followers. 3411:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

10264:

Yes, I too appreciate your understanding. I noticed what was going on, but didn't get involved. I had other things on my plate, and now the

8897: 7604:

Is that still happening? Dammit. It takes too long to explain but I'll fix it. Did you see it only on the Trump Talk page or elsewhere too?

5069:

I typically circle back and fill the blanks reFill leaves, but I concede sometimes I don't, especially when I moving fast. I'll try better.

3723: 2723: 2387: 2369: 2354: 2340: 2322: 8997:

serious allegation that has been known to ruin careers, but the evidence you cited did not find that. You placed in quotes the common term

8181:

That is nonsense. It only requires an RfC when there is insistent refusal to listen to and compromise with other editors' considered views.

7759: 7012:

addressing. Almost immediately there was rampant vandalism on that page, and Soibangla was standing against it. That, I think, is the crux.

4578: 4514: 4497: 4479: 3711: 2277: 1534:

the material that was removed. (They left out the bit about the tariffs being equal to a tax increase.) That's how BRD is supposed to work.

9213:

I archived the threads on my page because the conversation was done there. I also don't intend to discuss this anymore here because both @

7505: 6509: 6495: 5641: 5595: 5577: 5555: 5541: 5518: 5504: 5490: 5468: 5454: 5440: 5423: 5409: 5372: 5354: 5323: 5308: 4559: 4541: 2740:

Mueller Report, page 40: "As part of its investigation, the FBI later received images of DNC servers and copies of relevant traffic logs."

2421: 2136: 685: 95: 56: 10250:

I appreciate your awareness and self-reflection. That is what I was hoping for when I went with a narrow-scope fixed duration topic ban.

10121: 6228:??? Have you been hacked? Don't you realize you deleted properly-sourced content and the sources? This isn't about changing one word. -- 5754: 5481:, I will certainly comply with that, but if you can't please stop insisting it's not authentic simply because you personally believe it. 5096: 5057: 5041: 4873: 4828: 4729: 4231: 3854: 3767: 3681: 3663: 3642: 2696: 2681: 2245: 2224: 2206: 2191: 2172: 496: 16: 9025:

I am sorry for using the word plagiarism; I am not accusing you of intentional misconduct and hope we can work together constructively.

7714:

I have fixed the ones I could find. I haven't done an extensive search. Now User:Me shouldn't get anymore pings and other confusion. --

6570: 6556: 5140: 3072: 3058: 2298: 2033: 2019: 670: 642: 339: 273: 248: 223: 37: 8247:

Yep, calm the flames at your feet when you were at risk of a boomerang sanction. No point trying to spin it. This is all on the record.

8036: 7641: 7393: 6053: 6039: 3903: 3889: 3875: 3836: 3219: 3101: 756: 741: 656: 578: 564: 539: 517: 481: 8725:, do you refer to TE or NOR? If it's about the latter, please expand.I have complained about your OR editing before. Back in the 2019 6010: 5378:

Simply because the secondary's narrative is briefer than what might be found in a full-narrative article doesn't make it illegitimate.

4352: 4335: 4272: 4159: 3987: 3546: 3528: 3247: 3233: 2926:

You initially responded to my posting here. Why did you attempt to rebut my information here on your talk page if it's not allowed?

855: 841: 603: 318: 9387: 7533: 5954: 5286: 5187:

In fact you did not fix it in an AGF fashion, I did not edit war, and I did not engage in personal attacks. Look in the mirror, bud.

4488:. The Roosevelt dates were wrongly formatted in any case because you only use ccyy–yy for adjoining years, as for a football season. 4213: 4001: 1689: 401: 382: 368: 8019:

For keeping conspiracy theories and debunked bullshit off Knowledge. You know you've earned it when the liars panic and target you.

6258:

and between this edit and his other one, sorry, that is too many coincidences for me. If it does this again, I will launch a formal

6185: 5219:

Well, since you object to lead cites, presumably you'll get right on with removing all the other lead cites in those three articles

4109: 4082: 4065: 4048: 4027: 3352: 3338: 3320: 3305: 3290: 3275: 2647: 2623: 2606: 2585: 2571: 2546: 1870: 807: 727: 9287:

of it. There is nothing to strike through. We all make mistakes. I suggest you learn from this one and get back to editing. --

6500:

If you were already over it, you would have stopped editing on my Talk page with any expectation that I wouldn't need to respond.

6419: 6245: 6223: 6209: 6154: 6107: 6093: 6076: 5729: 5713: 4664: 4656: 4311: 4286: 2921: 2904: 2886: 2750: 2663: 2517: 2481: 2466: 2439: 2117: 2089: 1637: 1609: 1588: 1502: 1465: 1422: 1080: 1050: 1014: 9173:

something (which I myself do), I recommend immediately putting the copied text in quotation marks to avoid accidental plagiarism.

8159: 5228: 5214: 5196: 5182: 5168: 3866:

action with action. The former would not have happened without the latter. Removing someone's Talk comments is a provocative act.

2005: 10196: 8233:

I notice you are trying to cause trouble and fan the flames while others have worked to calm things. Perhaps skip the commentary

5816: 5334:

I shouldn't have to do extra research on what a vote is or why it's significant to the subject because the sources fail to do so.

5136: 5013: 3030: 2935: 2869: 1549: 1315: 1301: 1283: 1266: 1185: 1175: 1149: 1134: 1113: 1099: 932: 907: 823: 788: 774: 129: 8158:

was the most recent discussion with SPECIFICO saying "dropped off" (but not by who) was reliably sourced. It was also discussed

7929:. But in this case the edit removing "content of the Files is supposed to demonstrate that" makes it less accurate. see source. 6364:

sometimes liberally use the f-bomb when they get triggered.*wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge* Just move on, the drama is over. Cheers

6143: 3326: 2672:

I intend to restore it tomorrow to show that his assertions have extended well into his second year, not just through Sep 2018.

9758: 8770:

Politrukki, the SYNTH bit has been rejected on talk. I see no reason to repeat it, certainly not in terms of editor misconduct.

8155: 7563: 6214:

I object to it solely on stylistic grounds, but it's not worth enough to me to debate it. I did it, it was reverted, so be it.

5152: 4036: 3082: 2404: 1991: 1974: 1887: 1846: 1782: 1758: 1742: 1731: 1717: 1702: 1229: 1195: 946: 889: 109: 8442:. It is therefore irrelevant to Durham's prosecutions whether the Trump–Russia narrative was true or false. (italics original) 7355: 6444:

page edit, which in my book is a great big no-no. If anything really ticks me off here, it's people removing another editor's

3238:

Read the thread. After all that concocted drama, Ad Orientem walked away with nuthin'. I didn't even have to say a word. LOL!

1950: 1936: 1916: 10259: 8668: 7946: 4628: 3648: 2992: 2974: 2960: 2783: 2077: 2058: 1563: 972: 4950:

For consistently anchoring contentious pages with reliable sources I award you this fresh quill and well-deserved barnstar.

4100:. We should still be careful with opinions aired by Fox, but I don't think they must be completely excluded in this case. — 4039:, which I would suggest you set up as well. P.S. I don't really care too deeply what decision is made on this issue either. 1184:

to discuss the impact of Trump tariffs on U.S. consumers. Please go discuss there. 3) You still have not self-reverted this,

10000:

know that those comments can be perceived as uncivil, especially by newer editors, even if most experienced editors do not

8648: 8633: 8614: 8600: 8572: 7537: 7266:, I don't see it as in quetion that "the current economic conditions of the United States" falls under AMPOL jurisdiction. 6629: 6487: 5790: 4756:"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources" 3573: 2979:

You're not being "singled out". This is what we do with everyone who adds poorly sourced contentious material to articles.

2472:

falling silent for a day or two, before reverting long-standing content without consensus, exemplifies good faith editing?

2328: 1800: 48: 10268:

is threatening us. I was a bit worried as your behavior seemed atypical. Tunnel vision can do that. Now let's move on. --

9106:

on voorts and it unacceptable behaviour. Don't do it again, and I suggest you apologize for the unfounded accusation. --

5678: 3019: 9520: 9461:

Before, as I read the history, it was challenging the entire sentence, which I am not doing. This is a different matter.

8817: 8718: 8359: 7799: 7773: 7760: 7447: 5991: 5784: 5431:

You might have plausibly made that argument as basis for your removals, but you didn't. You're making that argument now.

4743:

that connects "Conspiracy Theory" with Human Events. So, this is problematic because exactly what you just described is

3691: 1181: 179: 149: 101: 8516: 8502: 8162:

with not really a clear conclusion how to handle it, but keep as status quo (without saying who). It was also discussed

3497:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 9519: 7926: 7811: 7785: 6976:

possibility that one admin made a bad call, I'm told to go jump through hoops in an appeal where everyone can pile on.

4221: 2259: 1002:

BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes.

157: 121: 9831:. Also taken into account in GA reviews, and should certainly not be exceeded without a talk page consensus to do so. 6641: 4959: 1680:

difficult to AGF with you guys, so I suggest you act in ways to induce me to and then we can all get along just fine.

1254: 647:

Please consider changing the language to "This is a standard message periodically sent to all BLP editors..." Cheers.

143: 10107: 10089: 10074: 10060: 10046: 9397: 8832: 7975:

Well, this is the largest cake on the barnstar menu, but I thought I would join the party. Thanks for your good work.

7855: 7833: 6595: 5269: 2063: 876:, though this particular edit is separate from MONGO's previous edit predicated on BRD, so it has nothing to do with 429: 187: 173: 8395:

Trump's supporters reacted strongly to these reports of Danchenko's arrest, but conservative columnist and attorney

6299: 4920: 1253:

article where you had placed the same one sided content, but instead added an expansion to help maintain neutrality

919:

revert, and I challenge your rationale unless you can explain precisely why the edit was BOLD rather than, say, WP:I

8905: 8563:

change of longstanding content in the article without discussion, which I reverted? A statement is not discussion.

7418: 2944: 2771: 1187:

and that's still a rule violation, irrespective of whether the content has merit. I might even support it, but the

10306: 10188: 10143: 9965: 9933: 8806: 8781: 8761: 8743: 8707: 7435: 6793: 6776: 6759: 6356: 6251: 4569:, but that's not the first way you did it. You used Obama's birth year and made it seem FDR became POTUS in 1882. 1056: 10255: 10172: 10158: 10009: 9991: 9208: 8962: 8848: 8790: 8553: 8273: 8258: 8242: 8076: 8059: 7751: 7515: 6822: 6620: 5735: 5084: 4009: 3390: 3371: 3329:, and two of the refs came out fine but one was totally thrashed. Who runs reFill? Is there anyone in charge? -- 1292:

of what he said...you omitted the rest, but I added it to the article where it is better suited. I'm done here.--

10225: 9904: 9872: 9857: 9840: 9818: 9750: 9619:

if it's occurring in your area of the world. Thank you for your amazing effort to maintain, improve, and expand

9484: 9470: 9456: 9441: 9423: 8228: 8212: 8192: 7478: 7375: 10291: 10277: 9794: 9647: 9562: 9544: 8860:

Also if you want to discuss why you object to my edit, I'm happy to do so but please do not delete it again...

8726: 8539: 8530:

P.S. I would have restored a comment I disagreed with too. I felt somebody was silenced for tone, not content.

8312: 8298: 8176: 8144: 7938: 7919: 7731: 7709: 7687: 7667: 7661: 7635: 7613: 7592: 7186: 5740: 4602: 4259:, perhaps the edit may have been better received had I done a better job of making clear the "speculation" was 779:

It is neither direct nor unambiguous, and your previous tone toward me should disqualify you from this matter.

9711: 9687: 9281: 9260: 9238: 9186: 9056: 9038: 9011: 8984: 8945: 7331: 7313: 7295: 7278: 7250: 7233: 7088: 7064: 7049: 7023: 6985: 6970: 6944: 6926: 6893: 6867: 6849: 6709: 6694: 6677: 2711: 392:

report the stories Grisham/Gidley said the Post didn’t, just not in that particular article they didn’t like.

330:, and we wouldn't even be talking here. If you persist with this nonsense, you're just engaged in harassment. 8971:

There was language that was directly copy-pasted from several of the articles cited that were not in quotes.

8629: 8596: 7883: 7529: 5950: 5647: 4967: 4928: 4095: 3452: 3165: 3139: 2531: 1033: 1025: 10065:

it wasn't enough to complain to me here? you also had to revert it again and make me add it right back? smh

9513: 9329: 9167: 9153: 9139: 9115: 9096: 9071: 7216: 5780:

Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian interference in the 2016 United States presidential election

4699:

In May 2021, Human Events announced that conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec had been hired as senior editor.

3393:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

2211:

That is also far too many references, when one or two solid references would be enough. This is why we have

1204:

edits are BOLD? Your interpretation of the BRD does not actually support it. It simply says that BOLD edits

353:

the White House proudly provided it with a detailed list of the administration’s 26 most important successes

9609: 9234: 9182: 9034: 8980: 8481: 7987: 7915: 5970: 4277:

Perhaps you could explain why you would add "speculation" to Knowledge even if you explained it was false.

3181: 877: 873: 8823:

Hey, where's my paycheck? Earflaps is also mentioned -- blocked in 2016 and mostly edited music articles.

7843: 6799: 6168:

It almost appears this account was hacked, but one strange edit proves nothing. I corrected the error. --

4302:

the edit was inadequately explicit is that respect, but any suggestion of improper behavior is incorrect.

3063:

thanks, I got that, I had you in the list of people that opposed when I closed the discussion :) regards

2843:

HURD: …when did the DNC provide access for — to the FBI for your technical folks to review what happened?

61:

Writing about political topics is hard. It's challenging to thread the needle and there's always gonna be

28:

Alternatively, ”The fact that so few of your contributions are reversed” means they are objectively true.

10035: 10031: 9809:: "As a general rule of thumb, a lead section should contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs" 9641: 9296: 9144:

Voorts statement is accurate. You did copy text. That's it. There is nothing more to read into it. --

8217:

I note a lot of strikethrough backpedaling here to avoid boomerang blocks for these attacks on Soibangla.

7795: 5858: 5249: 4888: 4637: 3040: 2212: 1941:

If either of you find a way to help correct this continuing and increasing problem, please tell me too.

1274:

What a total load. You cherrypicked to omit what he said. My edit was faithful to what he actually said.

1220:

it is. And that's why others restored it, because they saw the reversion for the bullshit it really was.

585: 284: 134:

I would take that as a compliment, coming from someone that vomits uncivilized dribble such as yourself.

9317:

representation of another person's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work.

9130:

representation of another person's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work

4200:

idea #3: 2021 Insurrection at the United States Capitol AND/OR Insurrection at the United States Capitol

2943:, keep your discussion regarding Knowledge content only at appropriate Talk pages, in this case only at 2329:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Presidency_of_Donald_Trump&diff=901743453&oldid=901705201

895: 10251: 8512: 7770:

United States Justice Department investigation into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election

6661: 6637: 5965:

soibangla, after the dust settles, I would be happy to do a bit of brainstorming on what happens next.

5686: 3428:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

3160: 2365: 2336: 2132: 1250: 1245:

of a RS on your part. To show why I meant this is better placed in a daughter article so we can follow

9391: 7851: 7807: 7781: 7577: 7263: 7122: 6601: 6291: 6061: 5853: 5445:

Maybe I had difficulty finding the most poetic way to articulate my argument in a succinct manner. --

4670: 4555: 4493: 4226: 1830: 345: 10094:

the edit summary was not misleading, you just objected to me condensing two steps into one in a way

9939: 9938:

Here are two recent examples that came across as a tad aggressive/dismissive of good faith edits on

9195:? I cannot overstate the gravity of falsely alleging an editor has engaged in willful and unethical 5626: 9719: 9383: 9368: 8625: 8592: 8469: 8028: 7525: 6491: 5946: 5573: 5537: 5500: 5450: 5419: 5385: 5368: 5319: 4246: 7159: 3710:

That's a Yahoo news-aggregation link to a Fox video. Fox is not considered generally reliable per

2537:

It's threaded, it efficiently makes it obvious who is responding to who, about specifically what.

10085: 10056: 8828: 8689: 5966: 5085: 4824: 4633: 4594: 4123: 3735: 3719: 3677: 2692: 2304: 2220: 2187: 1797: 771: 105: 9768: 8928: 8524: 7598: 7139: 6566: 5342: 5063: 4788:(LA TIMES), it doesnt actually call him a Conspiracy theorist anywhere (unless you account the 4685: 3922: 3619: 3600: 3068: 2576:

I don't see how it's disruptive, esp when responding to long edits that cover multiple topics.

2271: 2029: 2001: 1771: 666: 7262:) is not a defense to either of those. As to a clarification request, that's up to Soibangla. 7164:

This trigger finger block violates its own premises: "I warned you that continuing to discuss

3031:

https://www.scribd.com/document/413428947/Stone-De-123-DOJ-Response-to-MTC-Crowdstrike-Reports

2816:

BURR: Isn’t content an important part of the forensics from a counterintelligence standpoint?

1104:

As I explained to you, CNBC used actual data, as the source states. They are not speculating.

9746: 9411: 8508: 8024: 7960: 7700:

a browser script I was running did not function as I anticipated, turned it off, won't recur

7414: 7371: 6656: 6633: 6049: 5674: 5261: 5020:/* Defamation case */ added the decision of the Arizona State Court of Appeals, Division One 3885: 3850: 3805: 3669: 3560: 3542: 3425:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 2361: 2332: 2310: 2128: 1775: 738: 709: 681: 639: 561: 493: 139: 9320:

What part of "fraudulent" don't you get? And then you say I owe Voorts an apology. lol, smh

8303:

Possible. I was confused as to who the preceding poster was, as the his moniker is missing.

6335:

it honestly feels like you are grooming me for what is a slow-motion edit war in service of

10302: 10184: 10005: 9961: 9778: 9763: 9636: 8739: 8605:

I asked for a clarification. You gave it. I did not find it meaningful. That's discussion.

7969: 7934: 7847: 7803: 7777: 7397: 6479: 6127: 4566: 4551: 4537: 4525: 4502: 4489: 4467: 4327: 3915: 3229: 2152: 1213: 851: 599: 9583: 8855:

If someone makes a good faith, honest, and fair edit, you don't have a right to revert it!

5429:

If users are adding content that is barely relevant to the subject...that content is undue

8: 10154: 9526: 9432:, you will see the word "despite" is specifically called out as a word to watch out for. 8953:

is there a way I can see the cooyvio detector results from before you made your changes?

8929: 8923: 8843: 8776: 8269: 8253: 8238: 8223: 8207: 8187: 7982: 7746: 7484: 7430: 7384:

unreasonable. But by the same token, we have to acknowledge that in an environment where

7326: 7290: 7245: 7228: 7154: 7083: 7018: 6817: 6483: 5898: 5569: 5533: 5496: 5446: 5415: 5381: 5364: 5315: 4744: 3697: 2729: 2687:

every month when we have one reference reporting that he states these repeatedly anyway.

312: 201: 168: 7866:

Okay, now I've added a section 7 for investigations, but now section 8 doesn't show. --

6547:: Your edit didn't describe anything the source said. Did it find the emails were fake? 6482:

then I’d have reverted you for the same reason I reverted your other edits with the tag

10220: 10081: 10052: 10027: 9987: 9868: 9836: 9703: 9682: 9570: 9466: 9437: 8824: 8535: 8396: 8172: 8140: 7877: 7827: 7725: 7681: 7655: 7629: 7474: 7180: 6239: 6203: 6179: 6115: 6001:, you're free to alert an admin of your choosing that I made two reverts within 23h 4m. 5984: 5759: 5025: 4820: 4789: 4586: 4529: 4459: 4105: 4078: 4044: 3800: 3715: 3673: 3630: 3493: 3348: 3334: 3301: 3286: 3171: 3020:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-director-comey-agency-requested-access-to-dnc-servers/

2688: 2669: 2642: 2601: 2566: 2229: 2216: 2183: 2160: 1931: 1865: 803: 120:

You are correct. "Soibangla" is simply a propaganda maintainer. Truly a bottom feeder.

9728: 9535:

I have asked you a specific question there and I would appreciate a specific response

7358:, it's hard for me to see the comment that triggered the block as anything other than 4897: 4862:

The Source *DOES SAY " hiring of the extremely talented and influential Jack Posobiec"

3147:

File:Letter from President Trump to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — December 17, 2019.pdf

10273: 9697: 9649: 9558: 9222: 8662: 8308: 7871: 7821: 7719: 7675: 7649: 7623: 7174: 6805: 6719: 6562: 6544: 6233: 6197: 6173: 6103: 5874:

Timelines related to Donald Trump and Russian interference in United States elections

5583: 5157: 5113: 4995: 4955: 4916: 4485: 4460: 4377:, source does not mention Clinton Foundation, nor does any other because it's false. 4282: 3784: 3257: 3118: 3064: 3046: 2970: 2948: 2931: 2900: 2865: 2511: 2460: 2415: 2266: 2111: 2025: 1997: 1963: 1603: 1543: 1531:@JFG, Re: "You still have not self-reverted this, and that's still a rule violation" 1459: 1406: 1362: 1238: 1068: 1044: 985: 966: 795: 662: 291: 259: 234: 209: 569:

I suggest these alerts be used sparingly and only if a specific problem is evident.

10021: 9800: 9742: 9230: 9225:, so be it, but I don't think that that will be a productive use of anyone's time. 9178: 9030: 8976: 8910: 8364: 8020: 7909: 7889: 7410: 7367: 6336: 6303: 6255: 6045: 6027: 5670: 5627:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Statutes_as_sources

5210: 5178: 5148: 4781: 4204: 3881: 3859: 3846: 3842: 3811: 3538: 2552: 733: 677: 634: 556: 524: 503: 488: 467: 135: 10179:

Whelp this one has been debunked, can you not remove it from your page this time?

9272:

time to later discuss it. I've given you a very easy out, I recommend you take it

7148:

Good news! Now you have standing to ask ARCA's guidance on the DS TBAN authority!

5802:

Foreign policy of Donald Trump (2015–2016)#Trump viewed as under Putin's influence

3841:

Thank you for your information. I will look into it. In the meantime, please read

3827:

edits rarely is. It is exceptionally improper and makes it very difficult to AGF.

999:

BRD is not a justification for imposing one's own view or for tendentious editing.

430:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/the-washington-posts-lost-summer

86:, which you were confident was an example of me removing plainly neutral content. 10298: 10180: 10127: 10001: 9957: 9921: 9628: 9615: 9407: 8786: 8735: 8695: 8424: 8384: 7930: 7895: 7006: 6955: 6781: 6764: 6743: 6579: 6561:

Thanks, I have updated the article to show that NBC has now verified the laptop.

6538: 6300:

so if you'd like you can discuss your grievances here, maybe it is a better place

5998: 5254: 5244: 5202: 4780:

Also you have only one article that says he is a conspiracy theorist that is the

4692: 4340: 4321: 4295: 4252: 4147: 3579: 3498: 3458: 3225: 2283: 2076:

Please refrain from calling me "clueless" for raising legitimate questions about

1791: 1297: 1262: 1145: 1095: 1029: 903: 847: 829: 765: 595: 4747:, Pulling from Posobiecs lead or not.(Which is a whole other problem on its own) 10283: 10164: 10150: 10135: 10099: 10066: 10038: 9997: 9982:

being addressed, but without any reference to another editor such as yourself.

9925: 9896: 9849: 9810: 9786: 9590: 9536: 9505: 9476: 9448: 9415: 9406:: the phrase is not editorializing as you initially asserted. now you say it's 9321: 9292: 9273: 9252: 9217:

and I have reassured you that neither of us are accusing you of fraud (indeed,

9200: 9159: 9149: 9131: 9111: 9088: 9067: 9048: 9003: 8954: 8937: 8875: 8838: 8812: 8798: 8771: 8753: 8699: 8640: 8606: 8564: 8494: 8473: 8389: 8290: 8289:, you mean the indentation? IIRC it was indented that odd way before I edited. 8265: 8248: 8234: 8218: 8202: 8182: 8068: 8064: 8051: 8047: 7977: 7846:(with an -s). Without an -s, it's the section about the Mueller investigation. 7791: 7741: 7701: 7605: 7584: 7507: 7425: 7321: 7285: 7240: 7223: 7149: 7078: 7056: 7031: 7013: 6977: 6936: 6899: 6885: 6859: 6812: 6785: 6768: 6751: 6701: 6669: 6587: 6548: 6501: 6465: 6411: 6379: 6342: 6321: 6277: 6215: 6135: 6085: 6068: 6031: 6002: 5932: 5833: 5721: 5705: 5633: 5587: 5547: 5529: 5510: 5482: 5460: 5432: 5401: 5346: 5300: 5278: 5255: 5220: 5188: 5160: 5070: 5049: 5033: 5005: 4865: 4721: 4648: 4614: 4570: 4506: 4471: 4440: 4424: 4401: 4378: 4344: 4303: 4264: 4151: 4127: 4117: 4091: 4070: 4057: 4032: 4019: 3993: 3979: 3895: 3867: 3828: 3655: 3634: 3520: 3419: 3312: 3267: 3239: 3211: 3050: 2956: 2913: 2878: 2779: 2742: 2715: 2673: 2615: 2577: 2538: 2473: 2431: 2379: 2346: 2314: 2290: 2237: 2198: 2164: 2081: 2011: 1987: 1979: 1966: 1946: 1912: 1883: 1838: 1750: 1709: 1681: 1629: 1580: 1494: 1414: 1382: 1307: 1275: 1242: 1221: 1188: 1167: 1126: 1105: 1072: 1006: 924: 881: 833: 780: 748: 719: 648: 570: 531: 509: 473: 393: 360: 331: 265: 240: 215: 163: 87: 29: 5656: 5477:

If you can find policy or get a ruling that shows the source I used is not an

2163:

Well, if it says persistently, don't we need to show that with multiple refs?

10213: 9983: 9892: 9888: 9864: 9845: 9832: 9806: 9673: 9655: 9576: 9498: 9462: 9433: 9429: 9403: 9103: 8531: 8168: 8136: 7545: 7469: 6586:

And then a different "Elijah" quickly appears. Coincidences are fascinating.

6360: 6259: 6155: 4849: 4796:), it says he was spreading a 'conspiracy theory'. Not the same thing, again 4547: 4533: 4101: 4074: 4053: 4040: 4015: 3946: 3534: 3344: 3330: 3297: 3282: 3263: 2987: 2951:. Stay on content Talk pages, it is there were discussion is consolidated. 2891: 2763: 2739: 2633: 2629: 2592: 2557: 1958: 1922: 1896: 1856: 1378: 799: 715: 297: 5869:

Topical timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

3224:

To be fair that is just MastCell though, so take that for what it is worth.

10269: 9828: 9693: 9663: 9598: 9554: 9550: 9532: 8304: 8286: 7867: 7839: 7817: 7715: 7671: 7645: 7619: 7489: 7193: 7170: 7104: 6911: 6907: 6828: 6649: 6229: 6193: 6169: 6099: 6081: 5129: 4951: 4912: 4843: 4815: 4797: 4793: 4785: 4740: 4644: 4629: 4291: 4278: 4256: 3939: 3916: 3343:

P.S. I'll fix it. No extra charge. I appreciate your making the effort. --

2966: 2940: 2927: 2909: 2896: 2874: 2861: 2757: 2735: 2506: 2455: 2410: 2153: 2106: 2071: 1852: 1746: 1614: 1598: 1570: 1538: 1470: 1454: 1372: 1357: 1246: 1039: 979: 961: 306: 5338:

If the "narrative" isn't found within the source that includes the subject

4937: 4647:, thanks for your comment, but I'm really not very good with such things. 9915: 9265: 9226: 9174: 9080: 9043: 9026: 8972: 8950: 7995: 7901: 7305: 7270: 7208: 7131: 7071: 7041: 6962: 6918: 6872: 6854: 6841: 6686: 6578: 5879: 5206: 5174: 5144: 5091: 4976: 3934:

Disputes surrounding the 2020 United States presidential election results

3762: 3195: 2767: 8004: 6933:

Your comments here are pushing at the edge of the TBAN you just received

6610: 3607: 3188: 2556:

successive signatures comprises a single comment from a single editor. ―

457: 10232:

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

9310: 9196: 9123: 8990: 6628:

Congrats and thank you for drafting and launching the first version of

6160: 5509:

Despite your insistence that Mercury needs to provide that, it doesn't

5336:

The WP article text provides that information, the source verifies it.

5123:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5001: 4680: 4203:

Maybe it's pointless, but maybe it's a good idea, what do you think? —

3794:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3748: 3128:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1788: 1767: 1293: 1258: 1141: 1120: 1091: 899: 762: 10238: 7522:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/2021-22 review

6731: 6725:

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

3491:

questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the

10265: 10212:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

9910: 9741:

Your ethic and edits are exemplary, so I think this is long overdue.

9620: 9301: 9288: 9243: 9214: 9192: 9145: 9107: 9076: 9063: 7570: 6903: 6650: 5361:

The WP article text provides that information, the source verifies it

5263: 5105: 3952: 3776: 3470: 3110: 2952: 2775: 1983: 1955: 1942: 1908: 1879: 7952: 7454: 5828:

Inspector General report on FBI and DOJ actions in the 2016 election

5546:

In no way have I suggested that verifiability guarantees inclusion.

2912:, Please stop talking to me here. Take it to the article Talk page. 8677:

Draft:House Oversight Committee investigation into the Biden family

8548:

Draft:House Oversight Committee investigation into the Biden family

8326:

License tagging for File:Dominion brief with Fox communications.pdf

7258: 6120: 6084:

Do you mean in the lead? I also put it in the body with two cites.

3383: 2981: 1779: 1736: 1728: 1699: 1674: 1560: 1272:

you only included one part of Kudlow's comments on the tariff issue

1192: 1155: 943: 869: 798:. Delete the statement or expect to defend your behavior at ANI. 83: 7899: 5748:

Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections

4505:, then please do it right. The way you did it was quite peculiar. 9475:

that is not my recollection, though I don't claim perfect recall

8344:

Excellent source about Durham's own failures and political biases

5822:

Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation

5720:

On second thought, maybe Snyder should come last in the section.

5398:

which is what we, as editors, provide. That's why we're all here.

3152: 2877:, take it to the relevant Talk page so everyone can scutinize it 2265:

Hmm however I fail to find any mention of derangement there... —

761:

You said "including here." That's pretty direct and unambiguous.

592:

Knowledge:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions#Awareness

4263:. I thought that was evident, particularly given the reference. 1770:

has already explained his rationale: he considers this analysis

594:

requirements. Pretty much everyone in the topic area gets them.

8360:"John Durham's Investigation Has Disclosed Corruption: His Own" 8041: 7461: 7110: 4856:

I already told you the edit does not say or imply he was hired

4704: 3754: 3741: 3592: 3566: 3404:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

1996:

I have pinged you to my talk page so we can deal with this. --

1427:

Soibangla, I don't know why you're getting so hung up on BOLD.

9954:, but I see no need to as it seems quite straightforward to me 5698:

you immediately say it's the other side that tells the big lie

5117:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

3788:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

1028:

was a bold addition of new material, or are you claiming that

5812:

Donald Trump's disclosure of classified information to Russia

5797:

Foreign policy of Donald Trump (2015–2016)#Russia and Ukraine

3586: 1618:

it's also understandable that JFG removed the whole paragraph

9047:

tantamount to putting a badge of shame on me, right up top.

7520:

soibangla, you might like to sign up for the update list at

6044:

Apologies, I'm referring to Legitimate Political Discourse.

5864:

Social media in the 2016 United States presidential election

5139:

the content back out of the article body, then accuse me of

4784:

Daily Beast Article, that third source, while coming from a

4439:

I suggest you discuss this on article Talk first, not here.

3965: 6827:

Given that the sentence most at-issue here was restored by

1385:

page. "Any edit that changes the status quo" would include

9504:

this request was declined 11 Apr 2024, no cause was found

2313:

Please would you provide an example of me "overdoing it?"

1696:

fixed the formatting of my citation on Crossfire Hurricane

451:

Discretionary sanctions alert concerning BLPs, please read

9083:

should be admonished for that very serious allegation of

7405:

the topic bans start getting handed out. Here, there was

6750:

after I already stated I was disengaging from the topic.

5902: 4792:

breach, which explicitly says *Not to count headlines as

4182:

idea #2: 2021* Insurrection at the United States Capitol

4171:

Let's merge our insurrection options in the table somehow

3415:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 1306:

Nope. Your reading of what he said is incorrect. Period.

508:

Are you suggesting there is a problem with my BLP edits?

9848:: I'm not too concerned about nominations for an award. 8789:, today you suggested I misused sources to create OR on 8321:

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

8126:

a thread at ANI claiming the lead was a policy violation

6802:

I asked whether AP/DS might be applied to the page, and

5775:

Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections

5770:

Russian interference in the 2018 United States elections

5765:

Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

3513:

Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections

3453:

Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors

3435:

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the

3122:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1389:

edit, including simple punctuation. Are you saying that

9382:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3714:

for political topics and this is definitely political.

9549:

I've responded by changing my position at your RFC on

8420:"John Durham Probe: Michael Sussmann Case Collapsing?" 7772:". From that article, just now I linked to the newer " 7003:? As I said at AN.. maybe. But I think perhaps you or 9120:

Voorts said my work "has a good amount of plagiarism"

6875:, please elaborate on what you're talking about here: 6811:

just off-wiki canvassed vandalism to change the lead.

5839:

Category:Conspiracy theories promoted by Donald Trump

4715:

The edit doesn't say or imply Human Events hired him

3823:

edits is commonly acceptable, but removing someone's

3408:

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

10130:, is the FBI director spreading conspiracy theories? 9386:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

9307:

Alleged: your work "has a good amount of plagiarism"

5844:

List of conspiracy theories promoted by Donald Trump

3325:

I see what you mean. You used reFill for three refs

1622:

should not have been part of the "procedural revert"

1180:

1) I am not MONGO's or anyone's "buddy". 2) There's

9016:

I don't remember every case, but here are a couple:

8493:yesterday was not a good day for me, very stressed 5459:You couldn't simply say UNDUE? Color me skeptical. 4470:, I don't think your changes are necessary at all. 4176:idea #1: Insurrection at the United States Capitol 3961:

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

1057:

UNDUE was not a reasonable rationale for the revert

8874:I apologize if I hurt your feelings, kinda sorta. 8411: 8339:Conclusion of Durham special counsel investigation 7898:, what do you want explained? It seems fine to me. 7407:uncertainty about whether AP2 DS should be applied 6192:That's what made the edit so out of character. -- 4369:Clinton Foundation and DNC paid for steele dossier 1740:exactly what MONGO did on the economic policy page 661:That would be a good addition to the template. -- 10322:Disambiguation link notification for September 19 8918:find political motivation or a "deep state" plot. 8488:Please provide your thought process on talk pages 8351: 8110:a close review at the administrators' noticeboard 6958:, I will block you for the duration of the TBAN. 6290:Well, if you were indeed "praising me",lol, then 5807:Foreign policy of the Donald Trump administration 5566:That's why we're all here. The sources verify it. 5143:in article talk space?? Look in the mirror, bud. 5004:, no need to come here, I saw your edit summary. 4884:Disambiguation link notification for September 17 3654:You do not have consensus for this major change. 3615:Disambiguation link notification for September 20 3555:Disambiguation link notification for September 13 3202:For the record, for anyone looking for dirt on me 2010:Thanks, but I'd like to be done with the matter. 794:of competency. Either way, it is a violation of 9062:action and appropriate for the circumstance. -- 3928:Disambiguation link notification for December 20 3730:Disambiguation link notification for November 17 1628:(was that really necessary?). That's all I got. 1576:added back half of the material that was removed 1166:who was clearly cherrypicking. I call bullshit. 10210:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3177:Disambiguation link notification for February 7 3135:Disambiguation link notification for December 5 3097:Disambiguation link notification for October 26 718:I did not call you or the other editor a liar. 9996:It's a bit nitpicky but I just wanted to let @ 9362:Disambiguation link notification for October 9 8749:I have complained about your OR editing before 8729:I should prove an evidence-free claim. In the 8201:No consensus is required prior to a Bold edit. 7583:Yeah, I botched that. I just did the article. 5849:Russia investigation origins counter-narrative 5620:2021 Maricopa County presidential ballot audit 4750:Here is what Knowledge describes Synthesis as: 4142:Fix Citations on Michael Ellis article, please 3365:Disambiguation link notification for August 13 1489:edit that was reverted." Why call it bold, if 1377:I do not see the words "status quo" on either 9774:Disambiguation link notification for April 25 9221:is a thing). If you want to take this to the 6306:behavior. Just saying it like it is. Cheers. 6017:Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion 5562:we are talking about substance and relevance 4846:material that calls him a conspiracy theorist 1982:, I have been think along those lines also. 214:Please note "per Talk" in your edit summary. 10317:Disambiguation link notification for July 26 9895:, as most readers seldom get past the lead. 7816:I added it to the section devoted to it. -- 7354:participates at ANI. And, delving back into 6902:to describe all of the edits against you on 5395:we are talking about substance and relevance 5293:Political BLPs and content on votes; sources 4676:Disambiguation link notification for July 26 3712:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources 2148:Disambiguation link notification for June 14 1787:Agree, it's UNDUE and will add CRYSTALBALL. 1249:I did not remove the same addition from the 10098:made you look incompetent. enough of this. 8507:Sorry to hear that. I hope it gets better. 6952:legitimate and necessary dispute resolution 6150:Disambiguation link notification for May 16 5755:Business projects of Donald Trump in Russia 2143:Disambiguation link notification for June 5 1724:enhance the language to their better liking 846:Dramatically better. Thank you very much!! 302:Comment on content, not on the contributor. 8455:Draft:Trump alternate electors controversy 8333:Draft:Trump alternate electors controversy 7794:, the Donald Trump article has a section " 7642:Talk:Mueller Special Counsel investigation 6341:is complete, total and absolute nonsense. 5899:"Trump and the media – Is it war or love?" 5560:Right, that was my response to you saying 5530:Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion 4989:Going for a record 5 in a row. 3 down... 4166:2021 storming of the United States Capitol 3973:2021 storming of the United States Capitol 2892:https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf 2774:instead of editor's personal Talk pages. 2705:Far-right conspiracy website mentioned you 2331:. Four sources don't seem necessary here. 2236:, but feel free to add back persistently. 8418:McCarthy, Andrew C. (December 11, 2021). 7198:The comment that triggered the block was 5702:Republicans tried to appropriate the term 1554:Sorry to split hairs here, but Soibangla 10297:the truth, as all of us Wikipedians do. 10122:Please don’t spread conspiracy theories. 9668:Multiple ways, including my preference: 8417: 5923:Thoughts on the prospect of a future RfC 4665:Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump 4455:I will be AFK for a short amount of time 1481:edit when BRD literally means Knowledge: 590:Generally they are given to fulfill the 8357: 8264:himself but by all means keep digging. 8037:I mentioned you in this talk discussion 5891: 5817:Crossfire Hurricane (FBI investigation) 5582:Look, you just made it clear with your 3978:No idea what happened there, I'll undo 1763:Sorry, that was on the presidency page, 878:Talk:Donald_Trump#Reversion_explanation 874:Talk:Donald_Trump#Reversion_explanation 9891:should considered to some degree, per 9158:Are you saying my work is fraudulent? 7556:and the user's own user and talk pages 6517:2601:282:8100:D3E0:F8B4:39E9:B84D:70FF 6427:2601:282:8100:D3E0:F8B4:39E9:B84D:70FF 6366:2601:282:8100:D3E0:F8B4:39E9:B84D:70FF 6308:2601:282:8100:D3E0:F8B4:39E9:B84D:70FF 6264:2601:282:8100:D3E0:F8B4:39E9:B84D:70FF 6022:NYT new article regarding LPD language 5564:which is what we, as editors, provide. 5345:text list, as you seem to portray it. 4691:You reverted an edit with substantial 3083:Ukrainian corruption conspiracy theory 2054:Regarding adding content to leads only 915:is clearly false. You invoked BRD for 9884:#3 viewed Knowledge article yesterday 8862:2601:648:8800:3B70:438:8F2E:7B2A:D5BD 8734:the statements they are attached to. 8723:"I disagree with your interpretation" 7927:WP:Editing policy#Be helpful: explain 7558:(including sandboxes) (emphasis mine) 2024:That's what I'm hoping we can do. -- 1257:and I used the same source you had.-- 832:I added language to connect the dots 10197:I concede defeat to reliable sources 8890:2601:648:8800:3B70:2A:9BFF:65E1:AA20 8669:User:Valjean/Wikipedia's credibility 8100:But just to be fair, there has been 7264:Like Bill Clinton and James Carville 6630:Trump alternate electors controversy 6454:disagreed, whereupon you removed my 5114:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 3785:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 3574:Brian Murphy (intelligence official) 3119:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 2551:Not really. Correct indentation per 1393:edit can be challenged as BOLD? If 47:and end up thinking for themselves. 10208:There is currently a discussion at 9759:Adding to ledes while ignoring body 9388:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 8719:Knowledge:Communication is required 8358:Wheeler, Marcy (October 27, 2022). 7800:Smith special counsel investigation 7774:Smith special counsel investigation 7761:Smith special counsel investigation 7564:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 7392:had a Caesar who looked like Trump 6378:I encourage you to take it to ANI. 5785:Trump Tower wiretapping allegations 5097:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 4819:compliance with Encyclopedic tone. 4343:, are you saying I made a BLP vio? 3768:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 3519:Looks like MelanieN beat me there. 3049:, I oppose your proposed addition. 1411:BRD is never a reason for reverting 1065:BRD is never a reason for reverting 1032:(policy) was not the rationale for 472:On what basis do you send me this? 17:On the General Nature of your edits 13: 9589: 9582: 9575: 8681: 8459: 7951: 7947:Very much appreciate your insights 7798:". Do you want to try to link to " 7109: 6119: 5532:, surely you are aware of this. -- 4238: 3964: 3389:Your recent article submission to 3382: 3151: 3102:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 2628:FWIW, see the fourth paragraph at 1774:for the main Trump biography, and 984:I fundamentally disagree based on 913:JFGs removal appears to be the BRD 894:Procedural or not, JFG removed it 14: 10332: 9735:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 4904:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 3625:Question about "reliable sources" 2710:haha, thanks for that. I am also 1876:reFill continuing to leave errors 1191:is on you to obtain consensus. — 1063:in BRD means "revert," what does 74:accomplishes nothing. Please see 10237: 10203: 9940:Talk:Project 2025#clunky writing 9727: 9597: 9376: 8818:RT mentioned me a few years back 8440:not about the information itself 8402:not about the information itself 8003: 7968: 7569: 7453: 7448:DYK for Trump fake electors plot 7360:addressing a legitimate concern 6730: 6609: 6296:when I accidentally reverted you 5791:2018 Russia–United States summit 5655: 5104: 4975: 4936: 4896: 4178:(year inclusion discussed later) 4150:, no worries, I'm not done yet. 3775: 3606: 3469: 3187: 3109: 3089: 2945:Talk:List of conspiracy theories 2772:Talk:List of conspiracy theories 2664:Trump characterising the economy 2095: 1433:edit can be challenged as BOLD?" 456: 10051:Yeah, don't do that. Thanks. 9623:. You are greatly appreciated! 9521:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory 8791:Hunter Biden laptop controversy 8106:a 3RR thread reviewed by admins 7166:the dispute it was imposed over 6067:Which assertion, specifically? 5992:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory 4707:has this to say about reverts.: 3992:Looks like it was already done 3692:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory 3484:Articles for creation help desk 3439:Articles for creation help desk 3145:Unspecified source/license for 1200:Do you continue to assert that 824:Economic policy of Donald Trump 732:Then who are you referring to? 9605:Season's greetings, Soibangla! 9398:Hunter Biden laptop discussion 8591:How was I meant to take that? 7844:Special counsel investigations 7740:Where can I get that script?😼 4960:18:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 4921:23:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 4874:00:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 4829:00:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 4730:22:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC) 4663:Good Article Reassessment for 4597:, I see no reason to admonish 4189:year inclusion discussed later 3814:I am fascinated that you find 3024: 3013: 2887:01:47, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 2870:00:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 2784:19:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC) 2751:22:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC) 2232:Well, I'm still not persuaded 1451:edit you make is challenged." 434: 423: 412: 162:Dribble is a subset of drivel. 1: 9945:I find this change mystifying 9751:23:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC) 9642:15:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC) 9563:04:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC) 9545:04:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC) 8936:Thank you, I'll take a look. 8906:You may find this interesting 8577:So when I said the following: 7988:16:42, 26 December 2022 (UTC) 7939:01:06, 17 December 2022 (UTC) 7920:21:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC) 7884:16:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 7856:15:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 7834:15:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 7812:02:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 7796:Special counsel investigation 7786:01:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 6355:Well, speaking of "nonsense" 5975:22:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC) 5959:20:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC) 5941:20:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC) 5229:20:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 5215:19:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 5197:19:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 5183:19:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 5169:19:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 5153:19:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 4860:he is a conspiracy theorist. 3904:02:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC) 3890:02:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC) 3876:02:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC) 3862:, I submit you have confused 3855:02:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC) 3837:02:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC) 3649:Following Knowledge Protocol. 3547:00:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC) 3529:00:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC) 3166:Knowledge:File copyright tags 2059:Investigate the investigators 1745:. And why didn't he do it on 864:"Enforced BRD" rule violation 402:03:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 388:wasn’t. The fact is the Post 383:03:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 369:01:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 38:19:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 9712:23:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 9688:23:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 9485:02:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC) 9471:02:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC) 9457:23:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC) 9442:22:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC) 9424:20:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC) 8731:article talk page discussion 8554:Stonewalling article content 8029:04:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 7802:" from there? Just an idea. 7752:16:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 7732:15:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 7710:04:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 7688:04:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 7662:04:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 7636:03:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 7614:03:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 7593:22:29, 7 December 2022 (UTC) 7538:21:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC) 7516:20:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC) 7479:03:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 5730:03:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) 5714:01:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC) 5679:07:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC) 5642:23:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC) 5596:22:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5578:22:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5556:21:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5542:20:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5519:22:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5505:22:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5491:21:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5469:22:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5455:22:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5441:21:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5424:19:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5410:15:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5390:15:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5373:15:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5355:15:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5324:14:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5309:05:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 5079:17:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC) 5058:15:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC) 5042:14:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC) 5014:01:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC) 4814:In review, there is not any 4208:02:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC) 4160:00:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 4136:19:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC) 4110:05:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC) 4083:02:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 4066:00:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC) 4049:02:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 4028:00:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 3724:20:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC) 3682:18:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC) 3664:18:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC) 3643:18:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC) 3399:when they have been resolved 2034:04:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC) 2020:01:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC) 2006:01:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC) 1992:00:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC) 1975:00:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC) 1951:23:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 96:15:34, 28 January 2022 (UTC) 57:20:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC) 7: 9924:, how have I been incivil? 9330:23:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9297:23:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9282:22:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9261:22:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9239:21:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9209:20:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9187:19:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9168:18:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9154:18:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9140:18:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9116:18:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9097:18:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9072:18:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 9057:16:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC) 9039:16:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC) 9012:15:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC) 8985:14:55, 4 October 2023 (UTC) 8963:04:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC) 8946:02:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC) 8898:21:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 8884:04:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 8870:04:48, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 8849:13:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC) 8833:13:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC) 8807:02:21, 12 August 2023 (UTC) 8468:That was an early draft of 8154:mentioning by who. I think 7768:Great. FYI, there is also " 5859:Spygate (conspiracy theory) 5704:. But yes, it's not ideal. 5287:21:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC) 4002:02:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC) 3988:02:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC) 3502:22:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC) 3462:22:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC) 3073:16:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 3059:00:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 2993:13:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 2975:22:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC) 2961:22:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC) 2936:21:47, 1 October 2019 (UTC) 2922:17:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC) 2905:05:51, 1 October 2019 (UTC) 2213:Knowledge:Citation overkill 1937:23:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 1917:22:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 1447:edit. It doesn't say "if a 1405:And again, I ask: why does 10: 10337: 9514:22:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC) 8274:22:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8259:21:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8243:21:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8229:21:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8213:08:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8193:20:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8177:17:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8145:12:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8077:06:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 8060:05:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 7026:19:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6054:22:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC) 6040:20:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC) 6030:I'm not sure what LPD is. 6011:02:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC) 5625:Feel free to participate: 5479:authentic secondary source 4695:with edit summary of 'nah' 4585:William Barr reversion of 4449:14:54, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 4433:14:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 4419:, your edit is incorrect. 4410:14:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 4387:14:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 4353:01:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 4336:01:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 4312:01:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 4287:01:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 4273:23:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC) 4222:100% formal apology to you 3161:Knowledge:Image use policy 2724:22:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC) 2260:Trump derangement syndrome 1626:not seeming to have a clue 1251:Presidency of Donald Trump 1158:says "all" edits are BOLD 1055:Yes, it was not BOLD, and 110:17:17, 6 August 2023 (UTC) 10307:02:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 10292:02:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 10278:22:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 10260:18:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 10226:21:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 10221: 10189:03:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 10173:08:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 10159:08:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 10144:06:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 10108:10:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 10090:10:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 10075:10:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 10061:10:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 10047:10:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 9726: 9670:{{nowrap|July-Oct. 2016}} 9246:just concurred with your 8782:16:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 8762:17:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 8744:15:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 8708:13:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 8649:17:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC) 8634:16:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC) 8615:16:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC) 8601:16:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC) 8573:16:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC) 8540:08:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC) 8517:01:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC) 8503:01:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC) 8472:that I forgot all about. 8013:The Barnstar of Diligence 8009: 8002: 7436:16:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 7419:15:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 7376:14:59, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 7332:00:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 7314:23:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7296:23:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7279:23:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7251:22:33, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7234:22:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7217:21:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7187:20:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7160:19:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7140:19:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7089:19:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7065:19:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7050:19:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 7024:19:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6986:19:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6971:19:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6945:19:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6927:18:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6894:17:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6868:17:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6850:17:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6823:15:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6794:15:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6777:14:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6760:14:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6710:00:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6695:00:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6678:00:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6642:18:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC) 6615: 6608: 6596:23:34, 12 July 2022 (UTC) 6252:dropped this attack on me 6108:17:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 6094:16:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 6077:16:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 5663:The Barnstar of Diligence 5654: 5359:Okay... but when you say 5270:Ted Cruz recent statments 4974: 4935: 4895: 3951:added a link pointing to 3938:added a link pointing to 3753:added a link pointing to 3740:added a link pointing to 3591:added a link pointing to 3578:added a link pointing to 3565:added a link pointing to 3353:17:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC) 3339:17:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC) 3321:23:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 3306:23:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 3291:23:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 3276:22:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 2697:00:11, 24 July 2019 (UTC) 2682:00:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC) 2648:04:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 2624:01:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 2607:01:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 2586:01:17, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 2572:01:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 2547:01:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 2518:01:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 2482:21:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC) 2467:20:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC) 2440:20:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC) 2422:00:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC) 2388:18:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC) 2370:18:35, 14 July 2019 (UTC) 2355:18:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC) 2341:17:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC) 2323:17:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC) 2299:22:50, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 2278:19:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC) 2246:00:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 2234:in these particular cases 2225:00:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 2207:00:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 2192:00:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 2173:23:59, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 2064:Content, not contributors 1899:and Soibangla; check out 1888:20:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC) 1620:Welp, I disagree because 188:21:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC) 174:13:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC) 158:13:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC) 10287: 10168: 10139: 10103: 10070: 10042: 10010:04:27, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 9992:04:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 9966:04:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 9934:04:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 9929: 9905:11:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 9900: 9873:20:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 9858:12:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 9853: 9841:11:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 9819:11:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 9814: 9795:13:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC) 9790: 9540: 9509: 9480: 9452: 9419: 9410:. perhaps it's actually 9390:or whether it should be 9384:Election denial movement 9369:Election denial movement 9325: 9277: 9256: 9204: 9163: 9135: 9092: 9052: 9007: 8958: 8941: 8879: 8802: 8757: 8703: 8644: 8610: 8568: 8498: 8482:22:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC) 8477: 8470:Trump fake electors plot 8313:01:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC) 8299:01:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC) 8294: 8072: 8055: 7705: 7609: 7588: 7511: 7060: 6981: 6940: 6889: 6863: 6789: 6772: 6755: 6705: 6673: 6591: 6571:23:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC) 6557:22:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC) 6552: 6525:01:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC) 6510:01:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC) 6505: 6496:00:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC) 6474:00:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC) 6469: 6435:23:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6420:21:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6415: 6388:21:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6383: 6374:19:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6351:19:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6346: 6330:19:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6325: 6316:19:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6286:19:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6281: 6272:19:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 6246:20:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 6224:19:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 6219: 6210:16:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 6186:16:41, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 6139: 6089: 6072: 6035: 6006: 5936: 5929:I would be glad to do it 5725: 5709: 5637: 5591: 5551: 5514: 5486: 5464: 5436: 5405: 5350: 5304: 5282: 5224: 5192: 5164: 5074: 5053: 5037: 5009: 4869: 4725: 4657:15:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC) 4652: 4623:14:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 4618: 4579:15:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 4574: 4560:15:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 4542:15:41, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 4515:15:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 4510: 4498:15:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 4480:15:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 4475: 4444: 4428: 4405: 4382: 4348: 4307: 4268: 4155: 4131: 4061: 4023: 3997: 3983: 3899: 3871: 3832: 3659: 3638: 3524: 3316: 3271: 3248:23:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 3243: 3234:23:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 3220:22:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 3215: 3054: 2917: 2882: 2746: 2719: 2677: 2619: 2581: 2542: 2477: 2435: 2383: 2350: 2318: 2294: 2241: 2202: 2168: 2137:00:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC) 2118:21:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC) 2090:17:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC) 2085: 2015: 1970: 1871:02:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC) 1847:17:34, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 1842: 1801:12:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC) 1783:02:47, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1759:02:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1754: 1732:02:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1718:01:34, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1713: 1703:01:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1690:01:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1685: 1638:02:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1633: 1610:02:03, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1589:01:27, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1584: 1564:23:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1550:23:04, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1503:01:57, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1498: 1466:01:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1439:edit can be challenged, 1423:01:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 1418: 1316:22:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1311: 1302:22:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1284:22:15, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1279: 1267:22:09, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1230:22:23, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1225: 1196:22:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1176:21:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1171: 1150:21:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1135:21:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1130: 1114:20:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1109: 1100:20:22, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1081:20:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1076: 1051:18:35, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1015:17:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 1010: 973:12:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 947:06:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 933:01:56, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 928: 908:23:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC) 890:21:54, 19 May 2019 (UTC) 885: 856:18:34, 19 May 2019 (UTC) 842:18:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC) 837: 808:18:46, 11 May 2019 (UTC) 789:17:45, 11 May 2019 (UTC) 784: 775:17:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC) 757:17:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC) 752: 742:16:39, 11 May 2019 (UTC) 728:16:31, 11 May 2019 (UTC) 723: 686:19:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC) 671:16:53, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 657:16:07, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 652: 643:14:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 574: 535: 513: 477: 397: 364: 335: 328:that's all you had to do 269: 244: 219: 144:07:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC) 130:13:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC) 91: 33: 9827:for an article to make 7364:in an appropriate forum 6954:or other provisions of 6662:On becoming the villain 6144:19:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC) 5736:A known quantity to RT? 5400:The sources verify it. 5086:Kenosha unrest shooting 4010:Fox News on DC storming 3736:Dominion Voting Systems 2378:strive for concision. 604:19:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 579:19:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 565:18:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 540:17:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 518:16:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 497:16:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 482:16:20, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 340:00:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 319:23:57, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 274:23:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 249:23:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 224:17:21, 6 May 2019 (UTC) 84:your specious complaint 10245: 10134: 9594: 9587: 9580: 8686: 8588: 8581: 8464: 7956: 7578:Page move not finished 7561: 7550: 7496: 7494: 7114: 6738: 6602:Barnstar of Democracy! 6124: 5741:We need a meta-article 5692: 4243: 3969: 3633:See article Talk page 3387: 3210: 3156: 2806:BURR: But no content? 1493:edit can be reverted? 1473:So why does "Enforced 10252:ScottishFinnishRadish 10244: 10133: 9607:I hope you enjoy the 9593: 9586: 9579: 9219:accidental plagiarism 8685: 8587: 8580: 8463: 7955: 7551: 7549: 7495: 7493: 7113: 6737: 6123: 5854:Trump–Ukraine scandal 5751:(intelligence report) 5691: 5111:Hello! Voting in the 4983:The Editor's Barnstar 4968:A barnstar for you! 3 4944:The Citation Barnstar 4929:A barnstar for you! 2 4242: 3968: 3782:Hello! Voting in the 3670:Portal:Current events 3561:2020 Oregon wildfires 3391:Articles for Creation 3386: 3372:Articles for creation 3209: 3155: 3140:Image without license 3116:Hello! Voting in the 2532:Interleaving comments 1429:"Are you saying that 10202:Third-party filing: 8690:No original research 8675:Your draft article, 8453:Your draft article, 7362:about the ban itself 7118:arbitration decision 4611:I disagree it is POV 4232:Your draft article, 3447:reviewer's talk page 3182:DS alert refresh: AP 1214:cognitive dissonance 9720:A barnstar for you! 8930:Active Club Network 8626:PhotogenicScientist 8593:PhotogenicScientist 8525:That rude IP editor 7599:Change of signature 7526:Firefangledfeathers 5947:Firefangledfeathers 5876:(all the timelines) 5787:(conspiracy theory) 5648:A barnstar for you! 5250:Are you kidding me? 4889:A barnstar for you! 3894:That's what I did. 3690:Alert to a vote on 3370:Your submission at 3041:Hunter Biden salary 2078:an ambiguous policy 9595: 9588: 9581: 8989:You accused me of 8687: 8546:Concern regarding 8465: 8397:Andrew C. McCarthy 8331:Concern regarding 7961:A cupcake for you! 7957: 7320:Excellent, thanks. 7115: 6657:Protection request 6125: 5967:Mysterious Whisper 5884:More articles..... 5760:Trump Tower Moscow 5687:Quote out of place 4848:Yes there is, see 4595:Quaerens-veritatem 4400:, not Foundation. 4244: 4214:Concern regarding 4124:AleatoryPonderings 3970: 3511:Recent removal at 3487:. If you have any 3388: 3157: 2766:by not discussing 2762:you are violating 2712:"a known quantity" 2426:"nothing more?" I 1182:a talk page thread 9779:A few suggestions 9769:New legal article 9764:New legal article 9756: 9755: 9692:Cool. Thanks. -- 9650:Lawfare (website) 8727:you insisted that 8034: 8033: 7993: 7992: 6800:this thread at AN 6647: 6646: 6292:you could've had 6062:Long edit summary 5945:I appreciate it. 5684: 5683: 5584:Guy Reschenthaler 5127: 5126: 4993: 4992: 4965: 4964: 4926: 4925: 4842:there is not any 4671:Carlson reversion 4423:, not Foundation 4417:MisinformationFix 4394:MisinformationFix 4375:MisinformationFix 4332: 4227:Reaganomics Intro 3798: 3797: 3508: 3507: 3132: 3131: 2991: 2838:COMEY: Yes, sir. 2515: 2464: 2419: 2407:are not helpful. 2115: 1831:reFill 2 problems 1794: 1607: 1547: 1463: 1403:It simply wasn't. 1366: 1239:Confirmation bias 1048: 970: 768: 586:talk page stalker 351:The op-ed states 346:Stephanie Grisham 285:talk page stalker 10328: 10241: 10223: 10218: 10207: 10206: 9823:Yup, but it's a 9731: 9724: 9723: 9706: 9685: 9680: 9671: 9667: 9639: 9634: 9631: 9601: 9527:Trimming the hat 9380: 9379: 8924:Undid Biden Edit 8684: 8584:And you replied: 8509:The void century 8462: 8445: 8444: 8434: 8432: 8415: 8377: 8376: 8374: 8372: 8365:The New Republic 8355: 8007: 8000: 7999: 7972: 7965: 7964: 7922: 7906: 7573: 7485:recession update 7477: 7457: 7312: 7310: 7308: 7277: 7275: 7273: 7215: 7213: 7211: 7197: 7138: 7136: 7134: 7075: 7048: 7046: 7044: 7035: 7010: 6969: 6967: 6965: 6925: 6923: 6921: 6848: 6846: 6844: 6809: 6734: 6693: 6691: 6689: 6634:NewsAndEventsGuy 6619:The Barnstar of 6613: 6606: 6605: 5915: 5914: 5912: 5910: 5905:. March 10, 2017 5895: 5659: 5652: 5651: 5108: 5101: 5100: 4979: 4972: 4971: 4940: 4933: 4932: 4900: 4893: 4892: 4333: 4330: 4326: 4324: 4247:QAnon/Ever Given 4241: 3779: 3772: 3771: 3709: 3610: 3473: 3466: 3465: 3450: 3442: 3424: 3418: 3191: 3113: 3106: 3105: 3093: 3092: 3033: 3028: 3022: 3017: 2985: 2811:COMEY: Correct. 2761: 2645: 2640: 2604: 2599: 2569: 2564: 2516: 2509: 2465: 2458: 2420: 2413: 2362:Snooganssnoogans 2333:Snooganssnoogans 2311:Snooganssnoogans 2274: 2269: 2129:Snooganssnoogans 2116: 2109: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2075: 1934: 1929: 1868: 1863: 1792: 1678: 1608: 1601: 1574: 1548: 1541: 1464: 1457: 1376: 1367: 1360: 1241:and is textbook 1124: 1049: 1042: 983: 971: 964: 766: 736: 637: 589: 559: 528: 507: 491: 471: 460: 443: 438: 432: 427: 421: 416: 315: 296:- To quote from 295: 288: 263: 238: 213: 10336: 10335: 10331: 10330: 10329: 10327: 10326: 10325: 10324: 10319: 10247: 10246: 10242: 10234: 10214: 10204: 10199: 10124: 10024: 9918: 9913: 9803: 9781: 9776: 9771: 9766: 9761: 9722: 9704: 9683: 9674: 9669: 9661: 9658: 9653: 9645: 9644: 9637: 9632: 9629: 9624: 9616:winter solstice 9602: 9573: 9571:Happy Holidays! 9529: 9524: 9501: 9400: 9395: 9381: 9377: 9373: 9364: 9104:personal attack 8933: 8926: 8913: 8908: 8857: 8820: 8815: 8692: 8682: 8680: 8665: 8556: 8551: 8527: 8490: 8460: 8458: 8450: 8449: 8448: 8430: 8428: 8425:National Review 8416: 8412: 8392: 8387: 8382: 8381: 8380: 8370: 8368: 8356: 8352: 8346: 8341: 8336: 8328: 8323: 8118:a close review 8044: 8039: 7998: 7963: 7958: 7949: 7902: 7892: 7848:Tuckerlieberman 7804:Tuckerlieberman 7778:Tuckerlieberman 7765: 7601: 7580: 7575: 7574: 7566: 7548: 7492: 7487: 7473: 7464: 7459: 7458: 7450: 7306: 7303: 7302: 7271: 7268: 7267: 7209: 7206: 7205: 7191: 7145: 7144: 7132: 7129: 7128: 7107: 7069: 7042: 7039: 7038: 7029: 7004: 6963: 6960: 6959: 6919: 6916: 6915: 6842: 6839: 6838: 6803: 6740: 6739: 6735: 6727: 6722: 6687: 6684: 6683: 6664: 6659: 6654: 6604: 6583: 6541: 6276:Why not login? 6165: 6152: 6130: 6118: 6064: 6024: 6019: 5995: 5987: 5931:is fine by me. 5925: 5920: 5919: 5918: 5908: 5906: 5897: 5896: 5892: 5743: 5738: 5700:dovetails with 5693: 5689: 5650: 5622: 5295: 5276:"clarification" 5272: 5267: 5259: 5252: 5247: 5205:is policy BTW. 5132: 5099: 5094: 5089: 5066: 5022: 4998: 4970: 4931: 4891: 4886: 4809: 4773: 4757: 4712: 4700: 4697: 4688: 4683: 4678: 4673: 4668: 4641: 4591: 4567:No Great Shaker 4552:No Great Shaker 4526:No Great Shaker 4503:No Great Shaker 4490:No Great Shaker 4468:No Great Shaker 4464: 4457: 4371: 4328: 4322: 4320: 4249: 4239: 4237: 4234:Draft:TRUMPECON 4229: 4224: 4219: 4216:Draft:TRUMPECON 4173: 4168: 4144: 4120: 4012: 3975: 3963: 3930: 3925: 3920: 3808: 3803: 3770: 3765: 3732: 3703: 3700: 3695: 3651: 3627: 3622: 3617: 3612: 3611: 3603: 3557: 3516: 3504: 3464: 3444: 3436: 3422: 3416: 3413:Draft:TRUMPECON 3406:Draft:TRUMPECON 3396: 3380: 3367: 3260: 3198: 3193: 3192: 3184: 3179: 3174: 3150: 3142: 3137: 3104: 3099: 3094: 3090: 3087: 3043: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3029: 3025: 3018: 3014: 2755: 2732: 2707: 2666: 2643: 2634: 2602: 2593: 2567: 2558: 2534: 2504: 2453: 2408: 2307: 2305:Concise writing 2286: 2272: 2267: 2262: 2157: 2150: 2145: 2104: 2096: 2094: 2069: 2066: 2061: 2056: 1932: 1923: 1866: 1857: 1833: 1796: 1727:case closed. — 1672: 1596: 1568: 1536: 1535: 1452: 1435:No. I'm saying 1370: 1355: 1118: 1037: 977: 959: 866: 826: 770: 734: 712: 635: 583: 557: 522: 501: 489: 465: 462: 461: 453: 448: 447: 446: 439: 435: 428: 424: 417: 413: 348: 313: 289: 282: 257: 232: 207: 204: 19: 12: 11: 5: 10334: 10323: 10320: 10318: 10315: 10314: 10313: 10312: 10311: 10310: 10309: 10262: 10243: 10236: 10235: 10233: 10230: 10229: 10228: 10198: 10195: 10194: 10193: 10192: 10191: 10177: 10176: 10175: 10131: 10123: 10120: 10119: 10118: 10117: 10116: 10115: 10114: 10113: 10112: 10111: 10110: 10023: 10020: 10019: 10018: 10017: 10016: 10015: 10014: 10013: 10012: 9971: 9970: 9969: 9968: 9956: 9947: 9942: 9917: 9914: 9912: 9909: 9908: 9907: 9881: 9880: 9879: 9878: 9877: 9876: 9875: 9802: 9799: 9798: 9797: 9780: 9777: 9775: 9772: 9770: 9767: 9765: 9762: 9760: 9757: 9754: 9753: 9738: 9737: 9732: 9721: 9718: 9717: 9716: 9715: 9714: 9657: 9654: 9652: 9646: 9626: 9625: 9610:holiday season 9603: 9596: 9574: 9572: 9569: 9568: 9567: 9566: 9565: 9528: 9525: 9523: 9518: 9517: 9516: 9500: 9497: 9496: 9495: 9494: 9493: 9492: 9491: 9490: 9489: 9488: 9487: 9412:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 9399: 9396: 9375: 9374: 9372: 9367:Nomination of 9365: 9363: 9360: 9359: 9358: 9357: 9356: 9355: 9354: 9353: 9352: 9351: 9350: 9349: 9348: 9347: 9346: 9345: 9344: 9343: 9342: 9341: 9340: 9339: 9338: 9337: 9336: 9335: 9334: 9333: 9332: 9318: 9308: 9305: 9284: 9263: 9189: 9121: 9023: 9020: 9017: 8968: 8967: 8966: 8965: 8932: 8927: 8925: 8922: 8921: 8920: 8912: 8909: 8907: 8904: 8903: 8902: 8901: 8900: 8872: 8856: 8853: 8852: 8851: 8835: 8819: 8816: 8814: 8811: 8810: 8809: 8784: 8768: 8767: 8766: 8765: 8764: 8691: 8688: 8679: 8673: 8672: 8671: 8664: 8663:Essay critique 8661: 8660: 8659: 8658: 8657: 8656: 8655: 8654: 8653: 8652: 8651: 8589: 8585: 8582: 8578: 8555: 8552: 8550: 8544: 8543: 8542: 8526: 8523: 8522: 8521: 8520: 8519: 8489: 8486: 8485: 8484: 8457: 8451: 8447: 8446: 8409: 8408: 8407: 8406: 8405: 8391: 8388: 8386: 8383: 8379: 8378: 8349: 8348: 8347: 8345: 8342: 8340: 8337: 8335: 8329: 8327: 8324: 8322: 8319: 8318: 8317: 8316: 8315: 8283: 8282: 8281: 8280: 8279: 8278: 8277: 8276: 8215: 8199: 8198: 8197: 8196: 8195: 8151: 8150: 8149: 8080: 8079: 8062: 8043: 8040: 8038: 8035: 8032: 8031: 8016: 8015: 8010: 8008: 7997: 7994: 7991: 7990: 7976: 7973: 7962: 7959: 7950: 7948: 7945: 7944: 7943: 7942: 7941: 7925:Well firstly, 7891: 7888: 7887: 7886: 7863: 7862: 7861: 7860: 7859: 7858: 7788: 7764: 7758: 7757: 7756: 7755: 7754: 7738: 7737: 7736: 7735: 7734: 7693: 7692: 7691: 7690: 7664: 7638: 7600: 7597: 7596: 7595: 7579: 7576: 7568: 7567: 7565: 7562: 7560: 7559: 7547: 7544: 7543: 7542: 7541: 7540: 7518: 7500: 7499: 7491: 7488: 7486: 7483: 7482: 7481: 7467:Welcome back. 7463: 7460: 7452: 7451: 7449: 7446: 7445: 7444: 7443: 7442: 7441: 7440: 7439: 7438: 7356:the procedures 7346: 7345: 7344: 7343: 7342: 7341: 7340: 7339: 7338: 7337: 7336: 7335: 7334: 7236: 7162: 7143: 7142: 7116:To enforce an 7108: 7106: 7103: 7102: 7101: 7100: 7099: 7098: 7097: 7096: 7095: 7094: 7093: 7092: 7091: 7067: 6996: 6995: 6994: 6993: 6992: 6991: 6990: 6989: 6988: 6881: 6876: 6870: 6779: 6762: 6736: 6729: 6728: 6726: 6723: 6721: 6720:Very long lead 6718: 6717: 6716: 6715: 6714: 6713: 6712: 6663: 6660: 6658: 6655: 6653: 6648: 6645: 6644: 6625: 6624: 6616: 6614: 6603: 6600: 6599: 6598: 6582: 6577: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6573: 6540: 6537: 6536: 6535: 6534: 6533: 6532: 6531: 6530: 6529: 6528: 6527: 6488:216.200.84.231 6422: 6407: 6406: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6399: 6398: 6397: 6396: 6395: 6394: 6393: 6392: 6391: 6390: 6332: 6262:. Good catch. 6189: 6188: 6164: 6153: 6151: 6148: 6147: 6146: 6129: 6126: 6117: 6114: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6110: 6079: 6063: 6060: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6056: 6023: 6020: 6018: 6015: 6014: 6013: 5994: 5988: 5986: 5983: 5982: 5981: 5980: 5979: 5978: 5977: 5964: 5924: 5921: 5917: 5916: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5886: 5885: 5882: 5877: 5871: 5866: 5861: 5856: 5851: 5846: 5841: 5836: 5834:Steele dossier 5831: 5824: 5819: 5814: 5809: 5804: 5799: 5794: 5788: 5782: 5777: 5772: 5767: 5762: 5757: 5752: 5742: 5739: 5737: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5717: 5716: 5690: 5688: 5685: 5682: 5681: 5666: 5665: 5660: 5649: 5646: 5645: 5644: 5630: 5629: 5621: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5611: 5610: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5570:PerpetuityGrat 5534:PerpetuityGrat 5527: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5497:PerpetuityGrat 5475: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5447:PerpetuityGrat 5416:PerpetuityGrat 5382:PerpetuityGrat 5365:PerpetuityGrat 5316:PerpetuityGrat 5294: 5291: 5290: 5289: 5271: 5268: 5266: 5260: 5258: 5253: 5251: 5248: 5246: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5131: 5128: 5125: 5124: 5120:eligible users 5109: 5098: 5095: 5093: 5090: 5088: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5065: 5064:Citing sources 5062: 5061: 5060: 5045: 5044: 5021: 5018: 5017: 5016: 4997: 4994: 4991: 4990: 4986: 4985: 4980: 4969: 4966: 4963: 4962: 4947: 4946: 4941: 4930: 4927: 4924: 4923: 4907: 4906: 4901: 4890: 4887: 4885: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4807: 4806: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4748: 4733: 4732: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4698: 4696: 4689: 4687: 4686:September 2021 4684: 4682: 4679: 4677: 4674: 4672: 4669: 4667: 4661: 4660: 4659: 4640: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4590: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4463: 4458: 4456: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4436: 4435: 4413: 4412: 4390: 4389: 4370: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4248: 4245: 4236: 4230: 4228: 4225: 4223: 4220: 4218: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4201: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4180: 4172: 4169: 4167: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4143: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4119: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4011: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4004: 3974: 3971: 3962: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3929: 3926: 3924: 3923:Quote in lede? 3921: 3919: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3839: 3807: 3804: 3802: 3799: 3796: 3795: 3791:eligible users 3780: 3769: 3766: 3764: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3731: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3699: 3696: 3694: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3650: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3626: 3623: 3621: 3620:Blocked editor 3618: 3616: 3613: 3605: 3604: 3602: 3601:Content notice 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3580:Robert O'Brien 3571: 3570: 3569: 3556: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3515: 3509: 3506: 3505: 3476: 3474: 3457: 3456: 3433: 3430:may be deleted 3426: 3409: 3394: 3381: 3379: 3368: 3366: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3341: 3293: 3259: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3206: 3205: 3197: 3194: 3186: 3185: 3183: 3180: 3178: 3175: 3173: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3163: 3149: 3143: 3141: 3138: 3136: 3133: 3130: 3129: 3125:eligible users 3114: 3103: 3100: 3098: 3095: 3088: 3086: 3081:Nomination of 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3042: 3039: 3035: 3034: 3023: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2924: 2856: 2855: 2850: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2824: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2803: 2802: 2797: 2796: 2791: 2790: 2786: 2753: 2731: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2706: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2665: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2285: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2176: 2175: 2156: 2151: 2149: 2146: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2065: 2062: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1873: 1832: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1790: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1566: 1532: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1288:"faithful" to 1243:Cherry picking 1234: 1233: 1232: 1116: 1088:WP:SPECULATION 1018: 1017: 1003: 1000: 992: 991: 990: 989: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 865: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 825: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 764: 711: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 545: 544: 543: 542: 520: 484: 455: 454: 452: 449: 445: 444: 433: 422: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 371: 347: 344: 343: 342: 323: 322: 321: 277: 276: 254: 253: 252: 251: 227: 226: 203: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 118: 117: 116: 115: 114: 113: 112: 49:174.65.152.153 41: 40: 25: 24: 18: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 10333: 10308: 10304: 10300: 10295: 10294: 10293: 10289: 10285: 10281: 10280: 10279: 10275: 10271: 10267: 10263: 10261: 10257: 10253: 10249: 10248: 10240: 10227: 10224: 10219: 10217: 10211: 10201: 10200: 10190: 10186: 10182: 10178: 10174: 10170: 10166: 10162: 10161: 10160: 10156: 10152: 10147: 10146: 10145: 10141: 10137: 10132: 10129: 10126: 10125: 10109: 10105: 10101: 10097: 10093: 10092: 10091: 10087: 10083: 10082:Marcus Markup 10078: 10077: 10076: 10072: 10068: 10064: 10063: 10062: 10058: 10054: 10053:Marcus Markup 10050: 10049: 10048: 10044: 10040: 10037: 10033: 10029: 10028:Marcus Markup 10026: 10025: 10022:What is this? 10011: 10007: 10003: 9999: 9995: 9994: 9993: 9989: 9985: 9981: 9977: 9976: 9975: 9974: 9973: 9972: 9967: 9963: 9959: 9955: 9953: 9946: 9941: 9937: 9936: 9935: 9931: 9927: 9923: 9920: 9919: 9906: 9902: 9898: 9894: 9890: 9886: 9882: 9874: 9870: 9866: 9861: 9860: 9859: 9855: 9851: 9847: 9844: 9843: 9842: 9838: 9834: 9830: 9826: 9822: 9821: 9820: 9816: 9812: 9808: 9805: 9804: 9801:Lead sections 9796: 9792: 9788: 9783: 9782: 9752: 9748: 9744: 9740: 9739: 9736: 9733: 9730: 9725: 9713: 9709: 9708: 9707: 9699: 9695: 9691: 9690: 9689: 9686: 9681: 9679: 9678: 9665: 9660: 9659: 9651: 9643: 9640: 9635: 9622: 9618: 9617: 9612: 9611: 9606: 9600: 9592: 9585: 9578: 9564: 9560: 9556: 9552: 9548: 9547: 9546: 9542: 9538: 9534: 9531: 9530: 9522: 9515: 9511: 9507: 9503: 9502: 9486: 9482: 9478: 9474: 9473: 9472: 9468: 9464: 9460: 9459: 9458: 9454: 9450: 9445: 9444: 9443: 9439: 9435: 9431: 9430:MOS:EDITORIAL 9427: 9426: 9425: 9421: 9417: 9413: 9409: 9405: 9402: 9401: 9393: 9389: 9385: 9370: 9331: 9327: 9323: 9319: 9316: 9312: 9309: 9306: 9303: 9300: 9299: 9298: 9294: 9290: 9285: 9283: 9279: 9275: 9271: 9267: 9264: 9262: 9258: 9254: 9249: 9245: 9242: 9241: 9240: 9236: 9235:contributions 9232: 9228: 9224: 9220: 9216: 9212: 9211: 9210: 9206: 9202: 9198: 9194: 9190: 9188: 9184: 9183:contributions 9180: 9176: 9171: 9170: 9169: 9165: 9161: 9157: 9156: 9155: 9151: 9147: 9143: 9142: 9141: 9137: 9133: 9129: 9125: 9122: 9119: 9118: 9117: 9113: 9109: 9105: 9100: 9099: 9098: 9094: 9090: 9086: 9082: 9078: 9075: 9074: 9073: 9069: 9065: 9060: 9059: 9058: 9054: 9050: 9045: 9042: 9041: 9040: 9036: 9035:contributions 9032: 9028: 9024: 9021: 9018: 9015: 9014: 9013: 9009: 9005: 9000: 8996: 8992: 8988: 8987: 8986: 8982: 8981:contributions 8978: 8974: 8970: 8969: 8964: 8960: 8956: 8952: 8949: 8948: 8947: 8943: 8939: 8935: 8934: 8931: 8919: 8915: 8914: 8911:Re Deep State 8899: 8895: 8891: 8887: 8886: 8885: 8881: 8877: 8873: 8871: 8867: 8863: 8859: 8858: 8850: 8847: 8846: 8842: 8841: 8836: 8834: 8830: 8826: 8822: 8821: 8808: 8804: 8800: 8796: 8792: 8788: 8785: 8783: 8780: 8779: 8775: 8774: 8769: 8763: 8759: 8755: 8750: 8747: 8746: 8745: 8741: 8737: 8732: 8728: 8724: 8720: 8715: 8711: 8710: 8709: 8705: 8701: 8697: 8694: 8693: 8678: 8670: 8667: 8666: 8650: 8646: 8642: 8637: 8636: 8635: 8631: 8627: 8623: 8618: 8617: 8616: 8612: 8608: 8604: 8603: 8602: 8598: 8594: 8590: 8586: 8583: 8579: 8576: 8575: 8574: 8570: 8566: 8562: 8558: 8557: 8549: 8541: 8537: 8533: 8529: 8528: 8518: 8514: 8510: 8506: 8505: 8504: 8500: 8496: 8492: 8491: 8483: 8479: 8475: 8471: 8467: 8466: 8456: 8443: 8441: 8427: 8426: 8421: 8414: 8410: 8403: 8398: 8394: 8393: 8367: 8366: 8361: 8354: 8350: 8334: 8314: 8310: 8306: 8302: 8301: 8300: 8296: 8292: 8288: 8285: 8284: 8275: 8271: 8267: 8262: 8261: 8260: 8257: 8256: 8252: 8251: 8246: 8245: 8244: 8240: 8236: 8232: 8231: 8230: 8227: 8226: 8222: 8221: 8216: 8214: 8211: 8210: 8206: 8205: 8200: 8194: 8191: 8190: 8186: 8185: 8180: 8179: 8178: 8174: 8170: 8165: 8161: 8157: 8152: 8148: 8146: 8142: 8138: 8134: 8132: 8127: 8123: 8121: 8115: 8114:a BLPN thread 8111: 8107: 8103: 8098: 8097: 8095: 8094: 8092: 8091: 8089: 8088: 8086: 8085: 8083: 8082: 8078: 8074: 8070: 8066: 8063: 8061: 8057: 8053: 8049: 8046: 8045: 8030: 8026: 8022: 8018: 8017: 8014: 8011: 8006: 8001: 7989: 7986: 7985: 7981: 7980: 7974: 7971: 7967: 7966: 7954: 7940: 7936: 7932: 7928: 7924: 7923: 7921: 7917: 7914: 7911: 7907: 7905: 7897: 7894: 7893: 7890:Twitter Files 7885: 7881: 7880: 7879: 7873: 7869: 7865: 7864: 7857: 7853: 7849: 7845: 7841: 7837: 7836: 7835: 7831: 7830: 7829: 7823: 7819: 7815: 7814: 7813: 7809: 7805: 7801: 7797: 7793: 7789: 7787: 7783: 7779: 7775: 7771: 7767: 7766: 7762: 7753: 7750: 7749: 7745: 7744: 7739: 7733: 7729: 7728: 7727: 7721: 7717: 7713: 7712: 7711: 7707: 7703: 7699: 7698: 7697: 7696: 7695: 7694: 7689: 7685: 7684: 7683: 7677: 7673: 7669: 7665: 7663: 7659: 7658: 7657: 7651: 7647: 7643: 7639: 7637: 7633: 7632: 7631: 7625: 7621: 7617: 7616: 7615: 7611: 7607: 7603: 7602: 7594: 7590: 7586: 7582: 7581: 7572: 7557: 7553: 7552: 7539: 7535: 7531: 7527: 7523: 7519: 7517: 7513: 7509: 7506: 7504: 7503: 7502: 7501: 7498: 7497: 7480: 7476: 7472: 7471: 7466: 7465: 7456: 7437: 7434: 7433: 7429: 7428: 7422: 7421: 7420: 7416: 7412: 7408: 7404: 7400: 7399: 7398:Julius Caesar 7394: 7391: 7390:Julius Caesar 7387: 7383: 7379: 7378: 7377: 7373: 7369: 7365: 7363: 7357: 7352: 7347: 7333: 7330: 7329: 7325: 7324: 7319: 7318: 7317: 7316: 7315: 7311:(she|they|xe) 7309: 7299: 7298: 7297: 7294: 7293: 7289: 7288: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7276:(she|they|xe) 7274: 7265: 7261: 7260: 7254: 7253: 7252: 7249: 7248: 7244: 7243: 7237: 7235: 7232: 7231: 7227: 7226: 7220: 7219: 7218: 7214:(she|they|xe) 7212: 7202: 7195: 7190: 7189: 7188: 7184: 7183: 7182: 7176: 7172: 7167: 7163: 7161: 7158: 7157: 7153: 7152: 7147: 7146: 7141: 7137:(she|they|xe) 7135: 7125: 7124: 7119: 7112: 7090: 7087: 7086: 7082: 7081: 7073: 7068: 7066: 7062: 7058: 7053: 7052: 7051: 7047:(she|they|xe) 7045: 7033: 7028: 7027: 7025: 7022: 7021: 7017: 7016: 7008: 7002: 6997: 6987: 6983: 6979: 6974: 6973: 6972: 6968:(she|they|xe) 6966: 6957: 6953: 6948: 6947: 6946: 6942: 6938: 6934: 6930: 6929: 6928: 6924:(she|they|xe) 6922: 6913: 6909: 6905: 6901: 6897: 6896: 6895: 6891: 6887: 6882: 6880: 6877: 6874: 6871: 6869: 6865: 6861: 6856: 6853: 6852: 6851: 6847:(she|they|xe) 6845: 6835: 6830: 6826: 6825: 6824: 6821: 6820: 6816: 6815: 6807: 6801: 6797: 6796: 6795: 6791: 6787: 6783: 6780: 6778: 6774: 6770: 6766: 6763: 6761: 6757: 6753: 6749: 6745: 6742: 6741: 6733: 6711: 6707: 6703: 6698: 6697: 6696: 6692:(she|they|xe) 6690: 6681: 6680: 6679: 6675: 6671: 6666: 6665: 6652: 6643: 6639: 6635: 6631: 6627: 6626: 6623: 6622: 6617: 6612: 6607: 6597: 6593: 6589: 6585: 6584: 6581: 6572: 6568: 6564: 6560: 6559: 6558: 6554: 6550: 6546: 6543: 6542: 6526: 6522: 6518: 6513: 6512: 6511: 6507: 6503: 6499: 6498: 6497: 6493: 6489: 6485: 6481: 6480:WP:SOAPBOXING 6477: 6476: 6475: 6471: 6467: 6462: 6457: 6452: 6447: 6443: 6438: 6437: 6436: 6432: 6428: 6423: 6421: 6417: 6413: 6409: 6408: 6389: 6385: 6381: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6371: 6367: 6362: 6358: 6354: 6353: 6352: 6348: 6344: 6340: 6338: 6333: 6331: 6327: 6323: 6319: 6318: 6317: 6313: 6309: 6305: 6301: 6297: 6295: 6289: 6288: 6287: 6283: 6279: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6269: 6265: 6261: 6257: 6253: 6249: 6248: 6247: 6243: 6242: 6241: 6235: 6231: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6221: 6217: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6207: 6206: 6205: 6199: 6195: 6191: 6190: 6187: 6183: 6182: 6181: 6175: 6171: 6167: 6166: 6163: 6162: 6157: 6156:False balance 6145: 6141: 6137: 6132: 6131: 6122: 6109: 6105: 6101: 6097: 6096: 6095: 6091: 6087: 6083: 6080: 6078: 6074: 6070: 6066: 6065: 6055: 6051: 6047: 6043: 6042: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6026: 6025: 6012: 6008: 6004: 6000: 5997: 5996: 5993: 5976: 5972: 5968: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5956: 5952: 5948: 5944: 5943: 5942: 5938: 5934: 5930: 5927: 5926: 5904: 5900: 5894: 5890: 5883: 5881: 5878: 5875: 5872: 5870: 5867: 5865: 5862: 5860: 5857: 5855: 5852: 5850: 5847: 5845: 5842: 5840: 5837: 5835: 5832: 5830: 5829: 5825: 5823: 5820: 5818: 5815: 5813: 5810: 5808: 5805: 5803: 5800: 5798: 5795: 5792: 5789: 5786: 5783: 5781: 5778: 5776: 5773: 5771: 5768: 5766: 5763: 5761: 5758: 5756: 5753: 5750: 5749: 5745: 5744: 5731: 5727: 5723: 5719: 5718: 5715: 5711: 5707: 5703: 5699: 5695: 5694: 5680: 5676: 5672: 5668: 5667: 5664: 5661: 5658: 5653: 5643: 5639: 5635: 5632: 5631: 5628: 5624: 5623: 5597: 5593: 5589: 5585: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5575: 5571: 5567: 5565: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5553: 5549: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5539: 5535: 5531: 5528: 5520: 5516: 5512: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5502: 5498: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5488: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5470: 5466: 5462: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5444: 5443: 5442: 5438: 5434: 5430: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5412: 5411: 5407: 5403: 5399: 5396: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5387: 5383: 5379: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5370: 5366: 5362: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5352: 5348: 5344: 5339: 5335: 5330: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5297: 5296: 5288: 5284: 5280: 5277: 5274: 5273: 5265: 5257: 5230: 5226: 5222: 5218: 5217: 5216: 5212: 5208: 5204: 5200: 5199: 5198: 5194: 5190: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5180: 5176: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5166: 5162: 5159: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5142: 5138: 5134: 5133: 5122: 5121: 5116: 5115: 5110: 5107: 5103: 5102: 5087: 5080: 5076: 5072: 5068: 5067: 5059: 5055: 5051: 5047: 5046: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5027: 5026:SterlingSpots 5024: 5023: 5015: 5011: 5007: 5003: 5000: 4999: 4988: 4987: 4984: 4981: 4978: 4973: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4948: 4945: 4942: 4939: 4934: 4922: 4918: 4914: 4909: 4908: 4905: 4902: 4899: 4894: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4863: 4859: 4855: 4851: 4850:Jack Posobiec 4847: 4845: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4830: 4826: 4822: 4821:MaximusEditor 4817: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4799: 4795: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4749: 4746: 4742: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4734: 4731: 4727: 4723: 4718: 4714: 4713: 4706: 4702: 4701: 4694: 4666: 4658: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4643: 4642: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4593: 4592: 4588: 4587:LikkerdySplit 4580: 4576: 4572: 4568: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4524: 4523: 4516: 4512: 4508: 4504: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4477: 4473: 4469: 4466: 4465: 4462: 4450: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4437: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4415: 4414: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4392: 4391: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4373: 4372: 4354: 4350: 4346: 4342: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4334: 4331: 4325: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4254: 4251: 4250: 4235: 4217: 4209: 4206: 4202: 4199: 4191: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4181: 4179: 4175: 4174: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4146: 4145: 4137: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4122: 4121: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4096: 4093: 4090: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4063: 4059: 4055: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4014: 4013: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3967: 3954: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947:Peter Navarro 3945: 3941: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3932: 3931: 3918: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3845:. Thank you. 3844: 3840: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3817: 3813: 3810: 3809: 3806:December 2020 3793: 3792: 3787: 3786: 3781: 3778: 3774: 3773: 3756: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3734: 3733: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3716:IHateAccounts 3713: 3707: 3702: 3701: 3693: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3674:Elijahandskip 3671: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3652: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3631:Elijahandskip 3629: 3628: 3609: 3594: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3559: 3558: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3517: 3514: 3503: 3500: 3496: 3495: 3490: 3486: 3485: 3480: 3475: 3472: 3468: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3454: 3449: 3448: 3441: 3440: 3434: 3431: 3427: 3421: 3414: 3410: 3407: 3403: 3402: 3400: 3392: 3385: 3377: 3373: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3340: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3294: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3262: 3261: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3208: 3207: 3203: 3200: 3199: 3190: 3167: 3164: 3162: 3159: 3158: 3154: 3148: 3127: 3126: 3121: 3120: 3115: 3112: 3108: 3107: 3084: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3045: 3044: 3032: 3027: 3021: 3016: 3012: 2994: 2989: 2984: 2983: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2858: 2857: 2852: 2851: 2847: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2831: 2826: 2825: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2809: 2805: 2804: 2799: 2798: 2793: 2792: 2787: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2764:Knowledge:BRD 2759: 2754: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2737: 2734: 2733: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2689:Onetwothreeip 2685: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2670:Onetwothreeip 2668: 2667: 2649: 2646: 2641: 2639: 2638: 2631: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2614: 2611:Fair enough. 2610: 2609: 2608: 2605: 2600: 2598: 2597: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2570: 2565: 2563: 2562: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2535: 2519: 2513: 2508: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2462: 2457: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2417: 2412: 2406: 2401: 2400: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2327:For example: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287: 2279: 2275: 2270: 2264: 2263: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230:Onetwothreeip 2228: 2227: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2217:Onetwothreeip 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2184:Onetwothreeip 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2161:Onetwothreeip 2159: 2158: 2155: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2125: 2124: 2119: 2113: 2108: 2102: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1965: 1960: 1957: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1930: 1928: 1927: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1874: 1872: 1869: 1864: 1862: 1861: 1854: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1835: 1834: 1802: 1799: 1795: 1789: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1605: 1600: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1545: 1540: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1461: 1456: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1432: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1374: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1359: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160:by definition 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1122: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1046: 1041: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 987: 981: 976: 975: 974: 968: 963: 956: 948: 945: 941: 936: 935: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 911: 910: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 868: 867: 857: 853: 849: 845: 844: 843: 839: 835: 831: 828: 827: 809: 805: 801: 797: 792: 791: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 776: 773: 769: 763: 760: 759: 758: 754: 750: 745: 744: 743: 740: 737: 731: 730: 729: 725: 721: 717: 714: 713: 710:Please strike 687: 683: 679: 674: 673: 672: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 654: 650: 646: 645: 644: 641: 638: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 605: 601: 597: 593: 587: 582: 581: 580: 576: 572: 568: 567: 566: 563: 560: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 541: 537: 533: 526: 521: 519: 515: 511: 505: 500: 499: 498: 495: 492: 485: 483: 479: 475: 469: 464: 463: 459: 442: 437: 431: 426: 420: 415: 411: 403: 399: 395: 391: 386: 385: 384: 380: 376: 372: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 349: 341: 337: 333: 329: 324: 320: 316: 310: 309: 303: 299: 293: 286: 281: 280: 279: 278: 275: 271: 267: 261: 256: 255: 250: 246: 242: 236: 231: 230: 229: 228: 225: 221: 217: 211: 206: 205: 189: 185: 181: 180:97.119.134.32 177: 176: 175: 172: 171: 167: 166: 161: 160: 159: 155: 151: 150:97.119.134.32 147: 146: 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 131: 127: 123: 119: 111: 107: 103: 102:185.182.71.18 99: 98: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 72: 68: 64: 60: 59: 58: 54: 50: 45: 44: 43: 42: 39: 35: 31: 27: 26: 21: 20: 10276:) (PING me) 10215: 10095: 10032:edit summary 9979: 9951: 9949: 9944: 9824: 9734: 9702: 9701: 9676: 9675: 9614: 9608: 9604: 9551:Donald Trump 9371:for deletion 9314: 9269: 9247: 9127: 9084: 8998: 8994: 8916: 8844: 8839: 8794: 8777: 8772: 8748: 8722: 8621: 8560: 8439: 8436: 8431:December 13, 8429:. Retrieved 8423: 8413: 8401: 8385:A revelation 8369:. Retrieved 8363: 8353: 8254: 8249: 8224: 8219: 8208: 8203: 8188: 8183: 8130: 8119: 8099: 8096: 8093: 8090: 8087: 8084: 8081: 8012: 7983: 7978: 7912: 7903: 7876: 7875: 7826: 7825: 7747: 7742: 7724: 7723: 7680: 7679: 7654: 7653: 7628: 7627: 7555: 7468: 7431: 7426: 7402: 7396: 7389: 7385: 7381: 7361: 7359: 7350: 7349:comments on 7327: 7322: 7291: 7286: 7257: 7246: 7241: 7229: 7224: 7199: 7179: 7178: 7165: 7155: 7150: 7121: 7084: 7079: 7019: 7014: 7000: 6951: 6932: 6878: 6833: 6818: 6813: 6806:Dennis Brown 6747: 6618: 6563:RonaldDuncan 6545:RonaldDuncan 6484:WP:NOTAFORUM 6460: 6455: 6450: 6445: 6441: 6334: 6293: 6238: 6237: 6202: 6201: 6178: 6177: 6159: 6128:Your reverts 5928: 5907:. Retrieved 5893: 5826: 5746: 5701: 5697: 5662: 5563: 5561: 5478: 5428: 5397: 5394: 5377: 5360: 5337: 5333: 5328: 5118: 5112: 5029: 4982: 4943: 4903: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4841: 4745:WP:SYNTHESIS 4716: 4630:William Barr 4606: 4603:edit warring 4598: 4420: 4397: 4319: 4299: 4260: 4190: 4177: 3940:Mark Meadows 3917:William Barr 3863: 3824: 3820: 3815: 3789: 3783: 3706:208.88.4.211 3492: 3488: 3482: 3478: 3446: 3438: 3398: 3123: 3117: 3085:for deletion 3065:RonaldDuncan 3047:RonaldDuncan 3026: 3015: 2980: 2636: 2635: 2595: 2594: 2560: 2559: 2427: 2375: 2233: 2154:Donald Trump 2100: 2026:BullRangifer 1998:BullRangifer 1964:BullRangifer 1925: 1924: 1907:junk, too. 1901:this example 1859: 1858: 1853:Donald Trump 1772:undue weight 1747:Donald Trump 1739: 1723: 1695: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1575: 1555: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1430: 1428: 1410: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1289: 1271: 1217: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1163: 1159: 1064: 1060: 939: 920: 916: 912: 663:BullRangifer 436: 425: 414: 389: 356: 352: 327: 307: 301: 292:Princetoniac 260:Princetoniac 235:Princetoniac 210:Princetoniac 169: 164: 122:97.85.181.12 70: 66: 62: 9825:requirement 9248:unqualified 9197:fraudulence 9191:Yes or no, 8825:O3000, Ret. 8561:significant 8390:Another one 8021:Heavy Water 6357:so was this 6028:Darknipples 5880:Carter Page 4790:WP:HEADLINE 4609:Talk page. 4530:WP:SDFORMAT 4205:Alalch Emis 3882:Firestar464 3860:Firestar464 3847:Firestar464 3812:Firestar464 3378:(August 24) 2730:CrowdStrike 2428:strenuously 2127:outbursts. 1778:to boot. — 1776:speculation 1722:Right, and 1208:, not that 1154:Your buddy 1034:this revert 923:DONTLIKEIT 735:Doug Weller 678:Gandydancer 636:Doug Weller 558:Doug Weller 525:Doug Weller 504:Doug Weller 490:Doug Weller 468:Doug Weller 202:Wiliam Barr 10299:MrMcOrange 10181:MrMcOrange 10128:MrMcOrange 10036:misleading 10002:Superb Owl 9958:Superb Owl 9922:Superb Owl 9656:Line break 9648:Update of 9499:CCI Notice 9315:fraudulent 9311:Plagiarism 9128:fraudulent 9124:Plagiarism 8999:white race 8991:plagiarism 8787:Politrukki 8736:Politrukki 8696:Politrukki 7931:Albertinon 7896:Albertinon 7546:topic bans 7424:community. 7411:XOR'easter 7368:XOR'easter 7007:Guerillero 6782:Guerillero 6765:Guerillero 6744:Guerillero 6461:Excuse me? 6294:good faith 6161:2000 Mules 6116:April 2022 5999:PackMecEng 5985:RfC on GOP 5793:(Helsinki) 5158:WP:SOFIXIT 4703:Side-note, 4613:or UNDUE. 4486:WP:SDDATES 4461:WP:SDDATES 4341:Acroterion 4323:Acroterion 4296:Acroterion 4253:Acroterion 4148:HighAtop94 3801:Affidavits 3749:Smartmatic 3539:XOR'easter 3499:Nathan2055 3459:Nathan2055 3226:PackMecEng 3172:Biden talk 2949:WP:NOTHERE 2828:forensics: 2795:collected? 2714:to Putin. 2430:disagree. 2376:diligently 1407:WP:BRD-NOT 1069:WP:BRD-NOT 986:WP:BRD-NOT 942:iscuss. — 848:Anastrophe 830:Anastrophe 796:WP:POLEMIC 596:PackMecEng 82:regarding 10284:soibangla 10266:Park Fire 10165:soibangla 10151:Cullen328 10136:soibangla 10100:soibangla 10096:you think 10067:soibangla 10039:soibangla 9998:Soibangla 9926:soibangla 9897:soibangla 9850:soibangla 9811:soibangla 9787:soibangla 9621:Knowledge 9537:soibangla 9506:soibangla 9477:soibangla 9449:soibangla 9416:soibangla 9322:soibangla 9274:soibangla 9253:soibangla 9201:soibangla 9160:soibangla 9132:soibangla 9089:soibangla 9049:soibangla 9004:soibangla 8955:soibangla 8938:soibangla 8876:soibangla 8840:SPECIFICO 8813:Recession 8799:soibangla 8773:SPECIFICO 8754:soibangla 8714:this edit 8700:soibangla 8641:soibangla 8624:reading. 8607:soibangla 8565:soibangla 8495:soibangla 8474:soibangla 8291:soibangla 8266:Slywriter 8250:SPECIFICO 8235:Slywriter 8220:SPECIFICO 8204:SPECIFICO 8184:SPECIFICO 8069:soibangla 8065:Slywriter 8052:soibangla 8048:Slywriter 7979:SPECIFICO 7792:Soibangla 7743:SPECIFICO 7702:soibangla 7606:soibangla 7585:soibangla 7508:soibangla 7490:fixing DS 7427:SPECIFICO 7323:SPECIFICO 7287:SPECIFICO 7242:SPECIFICO 7225:SPECIFICO 7151:SPECIFICO 7105:July 2022 7080:SPECIFICO 7057:soibangla 7032:SPECIFICO 7015:SPECIFICO 7001:Economics 6978:soibangla 6937:soibangla 6904:Recession 6900:SPECIFICO 6886:soibangla 6860:soibangla 6832:And they 6814:SPECIFICO 6786:soibangla 6769:soibangla 6752:soibangla 6702:soibangla 6670:soibangla 6651:Recession 6621:Democracy 6588:soibangla 6549:soibangla 6502:soibangla 6466:soibangla 6412:soibangla 6380:soibangla 6343:soibangla 6337:WP:GAMING 6322:soibangla 6304:WP:GAMING 6278:soibangla 6256:WP:GAMING 6216:soibangla 6136:soibangla 6086:soibangla 6069:soibangla 6032:soibangla 6003:soibangla 5933:soibangla 5909:March 11, 5722:soibangla 5706:soibangla 5634:soibangla 5588:soibangla 5548:soibangla 5511:soibangla 5483:soibangla 5461:soibangla 5433:soibangla 5402:soibangla 5347:soibangla 5301:soibangla 5279:soibangla 5264:Kari Lake 5221:soibangla 5189:soibangla 5161:soibangla 5071:soibangla 5050:soibangla 5034:soibangla 5006:soibangla 4996:Kari Lake 4866:soibangla 4782:WP:GUNREL 4722:soibangla 4649:soibangla 4615:soibangla 4571:soibangla 4507:soibangla 4472:soibangla 4441:soibangla 4425:soibangla 4402:soibangla 4379:soibangla 4345:soibangla 4304:soibangla 4265:soibangla 4152:soibangla 4128:soibangla 4092:Soibangla 4071:Soibangla 4058:soibangla 4033:Soibangla 4020:soibangla 3994:soibangla 3980:soibangla 3953:Hatch Act 3896:soibangla 3868:soibangla 3843:WP:KETTLE 3829:soibangla 3698:A request 3656:soibangla 3635:soibangla 3521:soibangla 3479:Soibangla 3443:, on the 3376:TRUMPECON 3313:soibangla 3268:soibangla 3258:A request 3240:soibangla 3212:soibangla 3051:soibangla 2914:soibangla 2879:soibangla 2854:Russians. 2743:soibangla 2716:soibangla 2674:soibangla 2616:soibangla 2578:soibangla 2553:WP:THREAD 2539:soibangla 2474:soibangla 2432:soibangla 2380:soibangla 2347:soibangla 2315:soibangla 2291:soibangla 2238:soibangla 2199:soibangla 2165:soibangla 2082:soibangla 2012:soibangla 1980:soibangla 1967:soibangla 1839:soibangla 1751:soibangla 1710:soibangla 1682:soibangla 1630:soibangla 1581:soibangla 1495:soibangla 1415:soibangla 1308:soibangla 1276:soibangla 1222:soibangla 1216:. That's 1168:soibangla 1127:soibangla 1106:soibangla 1073:soibangla 1007:soibangla 925:soibangla 882:soibangla 834:soibangla 781:soibangla 749:soibangla 720:soibangla 649:soibangla 571:soibangla 532:soibangla 510:soibangla 474:soibangla 394:soibangla 375:Rtarizona 361:soibangla 332:soibangla 266:soibangla 241:soibangla 216:soibangla 165:SPECIFICO 88:soibangla 71:encourage 30:soibangla 10216:Remsense 10034:was not 9984:Skyerise 9916:Civility 9865:Skyerise 9846:Skyerise 9833:Skyerise 9807:Skyerise 9677:Mandruss 9463:Epachamo 9434:Epachamo 9408:WP:SYNTH 9404:Epachamo 8888:thx xxx 8532:RoyLeban 8169:Mr Ernie 8137:Mr Ernie 7996:Barnstar 7640:Also at 7534:contribs 7386:anything 7382:a priori 7259:arguendo 6956:WP:BANEX 6748:punished 6580:WP:RAPID 6339:behavior 6158:edit to 5955:contribs 5203:WP:CIVIL 5137:edit war 4693:WP:SYNTH 4632:nom for 4548:Muboshgu 4534:Muboshgu 4421:Campaign 4398:campaign 4102:Chrisahn 4075:X-Editor 4054:X-Editor 4041:X-Editor 4016:X-Editor 3535:MelanieN 3533:Thanks, 3494:Teahouse 3345:MelanieN 3331:MelanieN 3298:MelanieN 3283:Springee 3264:MelanieN 2637:Mandruss 2596:Mandruss 2561:Mandruss 1959:Mandruss 1926:Mandruss 1905:reFill 2 1897:Mandruss 1860:Mandruss 1030:WP:UNDUE 800:Springee 716:Springee 10270:Valjean 9980:writing 9705:PING me 9694:Valjean 9664:Valjean 9555:GoodDay 9533:GoodDay 9392:deleted 9313:is the 9223:CESSPIT 9126:is the 8371:May 17, 8305:GoodDay 8287:GoodDay 8131:another 7878:PING me 7868:Valjean 7840:Valjean 7828:PING me 7818:Valjean 7726:PING me 7716:Valjean 7682:PING me 7672:Valjean 7656:PING me 7646:Valjean 7630:PING me 7620:Valjean 7194:Valjean 7181:PING me 7171:Valjean 7123:blocked 6829:Endwise 6539:and...? 6240:PING me 6230:Valjean 6204:PING me 6194:Valjean 6180:PING me 6170:Valjean 6100:BusterD 6082:BusterD 5990:1RR on 5696:To me, 5256:WP:ARCA 5245:Mistake 5141:"drama" 4952:BusterD 4913:Valjean 4858:because 4717:because 4645:Curbon7 4589:‘s edit 4546:Hello, 4292:Moriori 4279:Moriori 4257:Moriori 3821:article 3477:Hello, 3451:or use 2967:8675309 2941:8675309 2928:8675309 2910:8675309 2897:8675309 2875:8675309 2862:8675309 2801:access. 2758:8675309 2736:8675309 2507:Awilley 2456:Awilley 2411:Awilley 2284:Epstein 2273:Neonate 2107:Awilley 2072:Awilley 1615:Awilley 1599:Awilley 1571:Awilley 1556:did not 1539:Awilley 1477:" mean 1471:Awilley 1455:Awilley 1383:WP:BOLD 1373:Awilley 1358:Awilley 1189:WP:ONUS 1140:edit.-- 1040:Awilley 980:Awilley 962:Awilley 314:discuss 308:Tarl N. 148:Drivel 63:someone 9911:Snopes 9893:WP:5P5 9889:WP:IAR 9638:(talk) 9630:Formal 9553:page. 9266:Voorts 9227:voorts 9175:voorts 9081:Voorts 9044:Voorts 9027:voorts 8973:voorts 8951:Voorts 8795:gotcha 8128:, and 8120:review 8102:an RFC 7904:Nythar 7403:before 7307:Tamzin 7272:Tamzin 7210:Tamzin 7133:Tamzin 7072:Tamzin 7043:Tamzin 6964:Tamzin 6920:Tamzin 6873:Tamzin 6855:Tamzin 6843:Tamzin 6688:Tamzin 6361:WP:ANI 6260:WP:ANI 5207:VQuakr 5175:VQuakr 5145:VQuakr 4705:H:FIES 4601:about 4329:(talk) 4118:reFill 3755:Antifa 3742:Antifa 3593:Antifa 3567:Antifa 2895:logs". 2630:WP:TPO 1441:period 1409:state 1379:WP:BRD 1206:happen 921:REALLY 298:WP:NPA 67:really 23:edits. 9270:their 9085:fraud 8122:at AN 7763:is up 7670:. -- 7644:. -- 7470:Andre 6912:WP:AE 6908:WP:AN 6682:Wow. 6632:! ... 6459:war. 5028:, it 5002:FMSky 4844:WP:RS 4816:WP:RS 4798:WP:OR 4794:WP:RS 4786:WP:RS 4741:WP:RS 4484:Read 4300:Maybe 4261:false 3587:QAnon 3489:other 3420:Db-g7 2988:help! 2822:2016. 2289:LOL! 2268:Paleo 1768:MONGO 1395:every 1294:MONGO 1259:MONGO 1247:WP:SS 1142:MONGO 1121:MONGO 1092:MONGO 1059:. If 900:MONGO 357:links 10303:talk 10288:talk 10274:talk 10256:talk 10185:talk 10169:talk 10155:talk 10140:talk 10104:talk 10086:talk 10071:talk 10057:talk 10043:talk 10006:talk 9988:talk 9962:talk 9930:talk 9901:talk 9869:talk 9854:talk 9837:talk 9815:talk 9791:talk 9747:talk 9698:talk 9633:Dude 9613:and 9559:talk 9541:talk 9510:talk 9481:talk 9467:talk 9453:talk 9438:talk 9420:talk 9326:talk 9302:Whpq 9293:talk 9289:Whpq 9278:talk 9257:talk 9244:Whpq 9231:talk 9215:Whpq 9205:talk 9193:Whpq 9179:talk 9164:talk 9150:talk 9146:Whpq 9136:talk 9112:talk 9108:Whpq 9093:talk 9077:Whpq 9068:talk 9064:Whpq 9053:talk 9031:talk 9008:talk 8995:very 8993:, a 8977:talk 8959:talk 8942:talk 8894:talk 8880:talk 8866:talk 8845:talk 8829:talk 8803:talk 8778:talk 8758:talk 8740:talk 8704:talk 8645:talk 8630:talk 8611:talk 8597:talk 8569:talk 8536:talk 8513:talk 8499:talk 8478:talk 8433:2021 8373:2023 8309:talk 8295:talk 8270:talk 8255:talk 8239:talk 8225:talk 8209:talk 8189:talk 8173:talk 8164:here 8160:here 8156:this 8141:talk 8073:talk 8056:talk 8025:talk 7984:talk 7935:talk 7872:talk 7852:talk 7822:talk 7808:talk 7782:talk 7748:talk 7720:talk 7706:talk 7676:talk 7668:here 7666:And 7650:talk 7624:talk 7610:talk 7589:talk 7530:talk 7512:talk 7432:talk 7415:talk 7372:talk 7351:this 7328:talk 7292:talk 7247:talk 7230:talk 7175:talk 7156:talk 7085:talk 7061:talk 7020:talk 6982:talk 6941:talk 6890:talk 6864:talk 6819:talk 6790:talk 6773:talk 6756:talk 6706:talk 6674:talk 6638:talk 6592:talk 6567:talk 6553:talk 6521:talk 6506:talk 6492:talk 6470:talk 6456:Talk 6451:must 6446:Talk 6442:Talk 6431:talk 6416:talk 6384:talk 6370:talk 6347:talk 6326:talk 6312:talk 6282:talk 6268:talk 6234:talk 6220:talk 6198:talk 6174:talk 6140:talk 6104:talk 6090:talk 6073:talk 6050:talk 6036:talk 6007:talk 5971:talk 5951:talk 5937:talk 5911:2017 5726:talk 5710:talk 5675:talk 5638:talk 5592:talk 5574:talk 5552:talk 5538:talk 5515:talk 5501:talk 5487:talk 5465:talk 5451:talk 5437:talk 5420:talk 5406:talk 5386:talk 5369:talk 5351:talk 5320:talk 5305:talk 5283:talk 5262:Re: 5225:talk 5211:talk 5193:talk 5179:talk 5165:talk 5149:talk 5135:You 5130:Lead 5075:talk 5054:talk 5038:talk 5010:talk 4956:talk 4917:talk 4870:talk 4825:talk 4726:talk 4653:talk 4619:talk 4575:talk 4556:talk 4538:talk 4511:talk 4494:talk 4476:talk 4445:talk 4429:talk 4406:talk 4383:talk 4349:talk 4308:talk 4294:and 4283:talk 4269:talk 4255:and 4156:talk 4132:talk 4106:talk 4079:talk 4062:talk 4045:talk 4024:talk 3998:talk 3984:talk 3900:talk 3886:talk 3872:talk 3851:talk 3833:talk 3825:Talk 3720:talk 3678:talk 3660:talk 3639:talk 3543:talk 3525:talk 3349:talk 3335:talk 3327:here 3317:talk 3302:talk 3287:talk 3272:talk 3244:talk 3230:talk 3216:talk 3069:talk 3055:talk 2971:talk 2957:talk 2932:talk 2918:talk 2901:talk 2883:talk 2866:talk 2780:talk 2768:this 2747:talk 2720:talk 2693:talk 2678:talk 2620:talk 2582:talk 2543:talk 2512:talk 2478:talk 2461:talk 2452:OK. 2436:talk 2416:talk 2405:this 2384:talk 2366:talk 2351:talk 2337:talk 2319:talk 2295:talk 2242:talk 2221:talk 2203:talk 2188:talk 2169:talk 2133:talk 2112:talk 2101:Done 2086:talk 2030:talk 2016:talk 2002:talk 1988:talk 1971:talk 1947:talk 1913:talk 1884:talk 1843:talk 1793:Talk 1766:and 1755:talk 1743:Nope 1714:talk 1694:Re: 1686:talk 1634:talk 1604:talk 1585:talk 1544:talk 1499:talk 1487:bold 1483:BOLD 1460:talk 1449:BOLD 1419:talk 1399:does 1363:talk 1312:talk 1298:talk 1290:part 1280:talk 1263:talk 1255:here 1226:talk 1172:talk 1146:talk 1131:talk 1110:talk 1096:talk 1077:talk 1045:talk 1026:this 1011:talk 967:talk 929:talk 917:your 904:talk 896:here 886:talk 852:talk 838:talk 804:talk 785:talk 767:Talk 753:talk 739:talk 724:talk 682:talk 667:talk 653:talk 640:talk 600:talk 575:talk 562:talk 536:talk 514:talk 494:talk 478:talk 398:talk 379:talk 365:talk 336:talk 270:talk 245:talk 220:talk 184:talk 178:No. 170:talk 154:talk 140:talk 126:talk 106:talk 92:talk 80:this 78:and 76:this 53:talk 34:talk 9952:can 9948:2) 9943:1) 9700:) ( 9672:. ― 8712:In 8622:and 8133:RFC 8042:HBL 7874:) ( 7824:) ( 7776:". 7722:) ( 7678:) ( 7652:) ( 7626:) ( 7462:heh 7304:-- 7269:-- 7207:-- 7201:it? 7177:) ( 7130:-- 7040:-- 6961:-- 6917:-- 6910:or 6840:-- 6834:are 6798:In 6685:-- 6236:) ( 6200:) ( 6176:) ( 5903:BBC 5343:CSV 5092:AfD 4636:or 4605:on 4037:RSN 3763:BRD 3196:ANI 2982:Guy 2953:X1\ 2776:X1\ 2770:at 1984:X1\ 1956:X1\ 1943:X1\ 1909:X1\ 1903:of 1880:X1\ 1878:. 1851:At 1780:JFG 1749:? 1737:JFG 1729:JFG 1700:JFG 1675:JFG 1561:JFG 1491:any 1479:any 1475:BRD 1445:any 1437:any 1431:any 1391:any 1387:any 1381:or 1218:all 1210:all 1202:all 1193:JFG 1164:you 1156:JFG 1090:.-- 1067:in 944:JFG 870:JFG 390:did 10305:) 10290:) 10258:) 10187:) 10171:) 10157:) 10142:) 10106:) 10088:) 10073:) 10059:) 10045:) 10008:) 9990:) 9964:) 9950:I 9932:) 9903:) 9871:) 9856:) 9839:) 9829:FA 9817:) 9793:) 9749:) 9743:DN 9710:) 9627:–– 9561:) 9543:) 9512:) 9483:) 9469:) 9455:) 9440:) 9422:) 9414:? 9394:. 9328:) 9295:) 9280:) 9259:) 9237:) 9207:) 9185:) 9166:) 9152:) 9138:) 9114:) 9095:) 9087:. 9070:) 9055:) 9037:) 9010:) 8983:) 8961:) 8944:) 8896:) 8882:) 8868:) 8831:) 8805:) 8760:) 8742:) 8706:) 8647:) 8632:) 8613:) 8599:) 8571:) 8538:) 8515:) 8501:) 8480:) 8435:. 8422:. 8404:." 8362:. 8311:) 8297:) 8272:) 8241:) 8175:) 8143:) 8135:. 8124:, 8116:, 8112:, 8108:, 8104:, 8075:) 8058:) 8027:) 7937:) 7918:) 7916:❄️ 7910:💬 7900:— 7882:) 7854:) 7832:) 7810:) 7784:) 7730:) 7708:) 7686:) 7660:) 7634:) 7612:) 7591:) 7536:) 7532:/ 7514:) 7475:🚐 7417:) 7374:) 7366:. 7185:) 7063:) 6984:) 6943:) 6935:. 6892:) 6866:) 6792:) 6775:) 6758:) 6708:) 6676:) 6640:) 6594:) 6569:) 6555:) 6523:) 6508:) 6494:) 6472:) 6433:) 6418:) 6386:) 6372:) 6349:) 6328:) 6314:) 6284:) 6270:) 6244:) 6222:) 6208:) 6184:) 6142:) 6106:) 6092:) 6075:) 6052:) 6046:DN 6038:) 6009:) 5973:) 5957:) 5953:| 5939:) 5901:. 5728:) 5712:) 5677:) 5671:DN 5640:) 5594:) 5576:) 5554:) 5540:) 5517:) 5503:) 5489:) 5467:) 5453:) 5439:) 5422:) 5408:) 5388:) 5371:) 5353:) 5322:) 5307:) 5285:) 5227:) 5213:) 5195:) 5181:) 5167:) 5151:) 5077:) 5056:) 5040:) 5030:is 5012:) 4958:) 4919:) 4872:) 4852:. 4827:) 4728:) 4681:Hi 4655:) 4638:FA 4634:GA 4621:) 4607:my 4599:me 4577:) 4558:) 4540:) 4528:, 4513:) 4496:) 4478:) 4447:) 4431:) 4408:) 4396:, 4385:) 4351:) 4310:) 4285:) 4271:) 4158:) 4134:) 4108:) 4097:, 4081:) 4064:) 4047:) 4026:) 4000:) 3986:) 3902:) 3888:) 3874:) 3864:re 3853:) 3835:) 3816:my 3722:) 3680:) 3662:) 3641:) 3545:) 3537:! 3527:) 3423:}} 3417:{{ 3401:. 3374:: 3351:) 3337:) 3319:) 3304:) 3289:) 3274:) 3246:) 3232:) 3218:) 3071:) 3057:) 2973:) 2959:) 2934:) 2920:) 2903:) 2885:) 2868:) 2782:) 2749:) 2738:: 2722:) 2695:) 2680:) 2622:) 2584:) 2545:) 2480:) 2438:) 2386:) 2374:I 2368:) 2353:) 2339:) 2321:) 2297:) 2276:– 2244:) 2223:) 2205:) 2190:) 2171:) 2135:) 2088:) 2080:. 2032:) 2018:) 2004:) 1990:) 1973:) 1949:) 1915:) 1886:) 1845:) 1798:📧 1757:) 1716:) 1688:) 1636:) 1587:) 1501:) 1421:) 1314:) 1300:) 1282:) 1265:) 1228:) 1174:) 1148:) 1133:) 1112:) 1098:) 1079:) 1036:? 1013:) 931:) 906:) 888:) 880:. 854:) 840:) 806:) 787:) 772:📧 755:) 726:) 684:) 669:) 655:) 602:) 577:) 538:) 516:) 480:) 400:) 381:) 367:) 338:) 317:) 300:, 272:) 247:) 222:) 186:) 156:) 142:) 136:DN 128:) 108:) 94:) 55:) 36:) 10301:( 10286:( 10272:( 10254:( 10222:诉 10183:( 10167:( 10153:( 10138:( 10102:( 10084:( 10069:( 10055:( 10041:( 10004:( 9986:( 9960:( 9928:( 9899:( 9867:( 9852:( 9835:( 9813:( 9789:( 9745:( 9696:( 9684:☎ 9666:: 9662:@ 9557:( 9539:( 9508:( 9479:( 9465:( 9451:( 9436:( 9418:( 9324:( 9304:: 9291:( 9276:( 9255:( 9233:/ 9229:( 9203:( 9181:/ 9177:( 9162:( 9148:( 9134:( 9110:( 9091:( 9066:( 9051:( 9033:/ 9029:( 9006:( 8979:/ 8975:( 8957:( 8940:( 8892:( 8878:( 8864:( 8827:( 8801:( 8756:( 8738:( 8702:( 8643:( 8628:( 8609:( 8595:( 8567:( 8534:( 8511:( 8497:( 8476:( 8375:. 8307:( 8293:( 8268:( 8237:( 8171:( 8147:, 8139:( 8071:( 8054:( 8023:( 7933:( 7913:- 7908:( 7870:( 7850:( 7838:@ 7820:( 7806:( 7790:@ 7780:( 7718:( 7704:( 7674:( 7648:( 7622:( 7608:( 7587:( 7528:( 7510:( 7413:( 7370:( 7196:: 7192:@ 7173:( 7074:: 7070:@ 7059:( 7034:: 7030:@ 7009:: 7005:@ 6980:( 6939:( 6888:( 6862:( 6808:: 6804:@ 6788:( 6771:( 6754:( 6704:( 6672:( 6636:( 6590:( 6565:( 6551:( 6519:( 6504:( 6490:( 6468:( 6429:( 6414:( 6382:( 6368:( 6345:( 6324:( 6310:( 6280:( 6266:( 6232:( 6218:( 6196:( 6172:( 6138:( 6102:( 6088:( 6071:( 6048:( 6034:( 6005:( 5969:( 5949:( 5935:( 5913:. 5724:( 5708:( 5673:( 5636:( 5590:( 5572:( 5550:( 5536:( 5513:( 5499:( 5485:( 5463:( 5449:( 5435:( 5418:( 5404:( 5384:( 5367:( 5349:( 5318:( 5303:( 5281:( 5223:( 5209:( 5191:( 5177:( 5163:( 5147:( 5073:( 5052:( 5036:( 5008:( 4954:( 4915:( 4868:( 4823:( 4800:. 4724:( 4651:( 4617:( 4573:( 4554:( 4536:( 4509:( 4492:( 4474:( 4443:( 4427:( 4404:( 4381:( 4347:( 4306:( 4281:( 4267:( 4154:( 4130:( 4104:( 4077:( 4060:( 4043:( 4022:( 3996:( 3982:( 3898:( 3884:( 3870:( 3849:( 3831:( 3718:( 3708:: 3704:@ 3676:( 3658:( 3637:( 3541:( 3523:( 3455:. 3432:. 3347:( 3333:( 3315:( 3300:( 3285:( 3270:( 3242:( 3228:( 3214:( 3204:: 3067:( 3053:( 2990:) 2986:( 2969:( 2955:( 2930:( 2916:( 2899:( 2881:( 2864:( 2778:( 2760:: 2756:@ 2745:( 2718:( 2691:( 2676:( 2644:☎ 2618:( 2603:☎ 2580:( 2568:☎ 2541:( 2514:) 2510:( 2505:~ 2476:( 2463:) 2459:( 2454:~ 2434:( 2418:) 2414:( 2409:~ 2382:( 2364:( 2349:( 2335:( 2317:( 2293:( 2240:( 2219:( 2201:( 2186:( 2167:( 2131:( 2114:) 2110:( 2105:~ 2084:( 2074:: 2070:@ 2028:( 2014:( 2000:( 1986:( 1969:( 1945:( 1933:☎ 1911:( 1882:( 1867:☎ 1841:( 1753:( 1712:( 1684:( 1677:: 1673:@ 1632:( 1606:) 1602:( 1597:~ 1583:( 1573:: 1569:@ 1546:) 1542:( 1537:~ 1497:( 1462:) 1458:( 1453:~ 1417:( 1375:: 1371:@ 1365:) 1361:( 1356:~ 1310:( 1296:( 1278:( 1261:( 1224:( 1170:( 1144:( 1129:( 1123:: 1119:@ 1108:( 1094:( 1075:( 1061:R 1047:) 1043:( 1038:~ 1009:( 988:: 982:: 978:@ 969:) 965:( 960:~ 940:D 927:( 902:( 884:( 850:( 836:( 802:( 783:( 751:( 722:( 680:( 665:( 651:( 598:( 588:) 584:( 573:( 534:( 527:: 523:@ 512:( 506:: 502:@ 476:( 470:: 466:@ 396:( 377:( 363:( 334:( 311:( 294:: 290:@ 287:) 283:( 268:( 262:: 258:@ 243:( 237:: 233:@ 218:( 212:: 208:@ 182:( 152:( 138:( 124:( 104:( 90:( 51:( 32:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index