Knowledge

User talk:Onetwothreeip/2018

Source đź“ť

1417:, I've made a start on a couple of them. One of them was taken up with a redirect so I had to sort that out, and then I essentially just put a placeholder sentence there instead of an empty page. I wouldn't mind at all if other people contributed things like categories and further information but I'll see how much I can get done. I'm a bit preoccupied this morning but I'll see what I can do, I'll probably use the ABC list of changing electorates as the reference and I hope to get a template for one and copy that through to the others. 1462:
get reverted. We have a list of his cantatas, and one of his motets, - I think for those just the number and the title would be enough. - Back to the beginning: I hate article tags, but am quite open for discussion. The main editor of the article will not be able to participate, unfortunately. It's not without irony, me removing a tag (compare
1116:. It was well sourced, accurate and notable to add the news of the Senator identifying as a woman, it was WP:NOTABLE and well sourced. If one truly wishes they could add a section on why some believe that this specific instance of being transgender is invalid -- but that's bizzarre, we don't have that on any other transgender persons page. 1483:
I welcome your spirit here but I'm not sure what your concern is. Yes, these is something wrong with the article, it's too long. The article tag brings that to people's attention and should direct some of them to the talk page to help resolve the issue. Every article on Knowledge should be accessible
807:
I already said I didn't intend on making another revert, as I take the three reverts policy seriously, so you are being needlessly disruptive now. Other edits were not reverting. Since you are clearly pursuing this from having an editorial disagreement (you are not "warning" WWGB and nor should you),
1066:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
549:
not that I disagree with you (either post the list on the main PM article, size isn't an issue, or keep it separate, but not both. Perhaps consensus should decide?). I'm just curious as to why you're addressing this here instead of the article talk page (and why ping an editor on their own user talk
946:
Re this Australian politician, he is a bit of a neanderthal, and did make provocative statements in the Federal Parliament. So, we should allow pertinent edits that faithfully reflect his commentary, and reported analysis. Obviously we should not allow the vandalism. I have reverted the article to
1646:
Thank you for your concern regarding the presidential timelines. On the talk pages, splitting the articles seem to be either largely approved or there are no discussions so I did them boldly. I've only split years with very large amounts of data, I don't intend on splitting years with few entries.
1461:
that something is wrong with the article? I am the strongest supporter of a short article BWV which explains what the abbreviation means and how it is organized, and a long article - possibly the one we have as a list of all these, for those who really want to know. I avoid links to BWV, but often
746:
I am well aware of the three revert rule, I believe I have only made one revert, which was a revert of one of your recent edits. I intended for this to be my only revert, at least for 24 hours. I completely reject that I am engaged in an edit war and I have already started a discussion at the talk
102:
But whatever the word is, it doesn't *add* anything. It is obvious in the next sentence that all 5 by-elections follow a common timeline of events. Please, avoid superfluity, acronyms, and the longer sentences superfluity creates. Brevity is king. Lastly, please don't throw around clearly baseless
1566:
Ok, I'll repeat: independent of any discussion topic, when you are reverted, you don't revert back, but discuss and seek consensus on the talk page. If you think that two vs. two is a clear consensus, we have different opinions about a consensus. I have other topics on my mind, see you next year.
572:
One because they Pinged ME on MY talk page, and two, it seemed like the right thing to do at the time. Does anyone disagree with us on this? It's been separate for years and years, and there are several interations, such as length of term, ages of various PMs, ratings, and such. NO problem with
151:
You raise a very fair point, but I think my "intervention" was well past the point of an otherwise constructive appeal, something like their fifth request. I did not consider they would think I am an administrator, and that is my mistake. I was not proposing this as a condition for them to be
83:
Yes, subsequently. First of all, you're assuming bad faith, I ask you not. They all technically resigned on the 10th, but Sharkie's only was effective from the 11th. Hammond asked for the resignation shortly after the dual citizens did and was effective the same day. I don't have a particular
152:
unblocked, I was genuinely seeking to understand if they intended to further make satirical edits and that's him calling the edits satirical (and also admitted they weren't meant to stand), not me or anyone else. Genuinely thank you for linking me to this essay, I have not seen this before.
1145:
It's very blatantly vandalism, these editors are not serious. There is no source saying O'Sullivan is a woman or transgender, or that he regards himself as either. The sources only show that he made some sort of stunt about it. Stop wasting other people's time with this nonsense.
48:
Not sure if you were referencing Bornon or I with the not pinging comment. I intentionally didn't ping you and Drmies as I was trying to strike a balance (not successfully) to minimize Bornon feeling attacked. No offense was intended and I'm sorry if I stepped on your toes. Best,
660:
posted a standard template notice on your user talk page, after they reverted you. Then 123ip requested that you go to the article talk, but for some reason you came here instead. All the discussion about the article should be there, not here. Perhaps 123ip should
1073:
You have made more than 3 reverts in a 24 hour period, violating Knowledge's 3RR rule. Please refrain from doing this and use the talk page if you would like to dispute the accuracy of the reports regarding Barry OSullivan's gender identity.
919:
You haven't started a discussion on the talk page yet about removing the infobox. I didn't remove the infobox either. If there was a section on the talk page about what you're proposing, removing the infobox, I would be discussing it there.
852:
I'm copying over the information from German Knowledge, which says 205 seats and the seat totals add up to 205. The template said 203 because I counted 83 seats for the CSU instead of 85. Thank you for bringing this to my attention!
482:
You have unilaterally made this removal without any consensus on the talk page, it was contested by another user. It is most definitely not a recent addition to the article. There are articles with ten times the size over at
1130:
If any editor can get away with 3RR by just claiming that they were reverting vandalism, that policy wouldn't work at all lmao. Disagreements aren't vandalism, and 3RR is there to prevent disagreements becoming edit wars.
573:
those, as they have five or six for pretty much every other country. But putting the full list here isn't necessary or desired. Unless someone can give me a good reason why to KEEP it, I'll try again to remove it tomorrow.
1589:
I did not revert what you had reverted, I reverted only the NSA column per a minor consensus on the talk page. Unless you are talking about a conflict you have with someone else on your talk page, which I am not aware.
964:
I'm aware of his comments and I'm aware that I reverted some explanation of the day's events. I felt they should not be written in the way they were written by the same people carrying on the vandalism, if at all.
1397:
acceptable under any circumstances. It's not that hard to just put together a standard stub with infobox, succession box and templates and adapt it for each new MP. I'll be looking at it later today otherwise.
304: 761:
Be as ignorant as you want but you have undertaken more than one revert in the last 24 hours, it doesn't matter how much of the edit it was or what the content was, nor who the editor was!
241:
I just found out the first one can be automated but the others must be manual! I had assumed it was the other way around. I can only find eight of these articles though, or I can't count.
905:
But it's confusing, and doesn't really work. PS: You ignored the request to discuss this on the Talk page. That's poor manners. And that's where we should be having this conversation.
299: 294: 289: 284: 279: 274: 269: 264: 464:
Page. Someone decided to put it there recently, I decided to remove the copy and keep the link to the original. Why, may I ask, do you want to waste extrainious bandwith?
979:
Not worried about what you have done, and I just took it way back. I was more commenting that we should be aware of and alert to valued commentary among the dross. —
451: 354: 1431:
Thanks for adding the refs. I know they're only stubs but otherwise an admin would be quite within their rights to delete them on sight as an unreferenced BLP.
473: 682: 68:
Speaker accepted Perth resignation 10 May, and Mayo resignation 11 May. But why use incorrect superfluous words that don't add anything? Brevity is key.
1372: 1359: 1345: 1332: 1285: 1272: 1225: 629: 599: 534: 517: 496: 1599: 1576: 1557: 1493: 1172: 1007: 990: 974: 615: 582: 567: 443: 417: 342: 250: 236: 214: 1200: 112: 97: 1656: 1025:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 862: 849: 835: 700:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 1440: 1426: 1548:
That looks like a discussion about a topic that I'm not involved in so I don't think I should contribute to the discussion about those issues.
1515: 1155: 1140: 1125: 1103: 929: 914: 900: 817: 802: 756: 1503: 834:
The image in the article says 2018 seat distribution is 200 but the seat totals in the template add up to 203. Do we know which is correct?
1633:
Please stop splitting the presidential timelines (at least a few editors disagree with all of your recent presidential timeline splits).
843: 882: 422:
I don't know much about it, other than that some unapporved automated processes can be a real pain in the ass here. Best to check with
408:
I was speaking of them, yes. I have no idea if they were an approved bot, probably not. Does script assisted editing count as a bot?
219:
Manually for each. I saw two were done, so I figured you started doing it, but just didnt know if you were doing all nine. Cheers -
205:
I intend to since that's what "Option B" was. Is there an automated way to do it, or must it only be done manually on each article?
1637: 1317: 1257: 958: 868: 665:
and we should all direct any further posts about the article to the article talk page. Keep it all in one place. Sound good? -
1184: 1034: 827: 765: 709: 1484:
to the public, we don't need a page of indiscriminate information that only a few very enthused readers can make use with.
457: 77: 1623: 1323:
You're just upset that others have warned you for disruptive editing on your user talk page. This is not civil behaviour.
1205:
The assumption that it was humor in the first place and not a serious attempt at a serious contribution is a violation of
1407: 1085: 172: 733: 395: 58: 1539: 1059: 136: 375: 1180: 1477: 327: 192: 161: 37: 139: 1628: 1026: 701: 360::For what it's worth, the words were copied from other Knowledge articles, seemingly by some automated program. 32: 828: 371: 1464: 1619: 1294: 1234: 1042: 785: 778: 771: 717: 126: 1037:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
712:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
1453:
You say you second it (a shortening), as if I didn't. Can we please discuss it on the article talk among
1046: 721: 461: 939: 947:
an early form, and put in place light protection on the article. Thanks for your earlier vigilance. —
370:? If you believe they were running a bot or some kind of script, do you know if it was approved by the 1652: 1595: 1553: 1489: 1422: 1355: 1328: 1306: 1268: 1246: 1196: 1151: 1099: 1054: 1003: 925: 896: 858: 813: 752: 625: 595: 530: 492: 413: 338: 246: 210: 157: 1498:
It's hardly unfortunate that the editot who RUINED the article can't participate. (And it's not the
1615: 1384: 1369: 1342: 1314: 1282: 1254: 1222: 970: 611: 578: 513: 469: 93: 17: 1572: 1535: 1473: 1302: 1242: 1176: 1038: 1022: 985: 953: 713: 697: 687: 63: 133: 747:
page (which you are yet to engage), so the automated Twinkle message isn't very applicable.
1168: 662: 501: 108: 73: 8: 1298: 1238: 1214: 1113: 1030: 705: 54: 43: 1648: 1591: 1549: 1485: 1418: 1365: 1351: 1338: 1324: 1310: 1278: 1264: 1250: 1218: 1192: 1147: 1095: 999: 966: 921: 892: 854: 839: 809: 748: 645: 621: 607: 591: 587: 574: 546: 541: 526: 522: 509: 488: 479: 465: 409: 334: 242: 206: 153: 89: 1389:
Hey there - good to see stubs going up for new MPs, but you should know by now that a
1568: 1545: 1531: 1511: 1469: 1436: 1403: 1305:
by moving the section on fake vandalism warnings into the closed section, you may be
1112:
Your disagreement with the content added by many editors doesn't make it vandalism.
1018: 995: 980: 948: 940: 668: 553: 484: 429: 403: 381: 313: 222: 200: 178: 426:. If it's an issue, they'll deal with it, if not... then no harm, no foul. Cheers - 1136: 1121: 1081: 910: 878: 798: 729: 348: 146: 130: 1364:
If you were exercising greater civility, nobody would have to warn you to do so.
1210: 104: 69: 1071:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 1033:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
708:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
1614:
And now you've been immediately reverted without explanation as well. Le sigh.
1609: 1521: 1063: 50: 1337:
You are receiving this warning because you need to exercise greater civility.
1094:
3RR doesn't apply to reverting vandalism and BLP violations. Nice try though.
1643: 1634: 1527: 1390: 1206: 423: 1165:
you don't get to determine how barry self-identifies xem or herself bigot.
1507: 1432: 1414: 1399: 364: 1448: 1132: 1117: 1091: 1077: 906: 888: 874: 794: 741: 725: 166: 88:
though. I'm happy with meanwhile, at the same time, et cetera. Regards,
693: 120: 1277:
I'm not making a joke, so there is no reason to consider it funny.
1502:
page that's an issue though I's say it is kinda redundant with
1062:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 1530:
means, I don't want to repeat it here, - you'll find it. --
1526:
On my talk, I explained today to a seemingly new user what
1499: 1053:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
508:
article in this one? That's what the thing is about.
1045:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 720:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 873:There is no such rule in Knowledge that I know of. 456:Did you see the link? There is an article called 1029:to work toward making a version that represents 704:to work toward making a version that represents 103:bad faith accusations, it serves neither of us. 1069:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 487:if you want to dedicate yourself to that task. 452:removing copies of articles from other articles 653:...because they Pinged ME on MY talk page... 1021:shows that you are currently engaged in an 891:, to quickly display relevant information. 808:I recommend leaving this to other editors. 696:shows that you are currently engaged in an 504:Please explain WHY we need a FULL COPY of 374:? Just curious, as I've seen others users 1393:without any references or categories is 14: 333:Wasn't aware of the last one, thanks! 305:List of box office bombs (1910s-1930s) 550:page?). Like I said, just curious. - 458:List of Prime Ministers of Australia 175:of the lists for deletion, right? - 23: 525:Take it to the article talk page. 363:". I take it you were speaking of 24: 1668: 590:Yes, someone disagrees with you. 460:and it is copied in FULL on the 300:List of box office bombs (1940s) 295:List of box office bombs (1950s) 290:List of box office bombs (1960s) 285:List of box office bombs (1970s) 280:List of box office bombs (1980s) 275:List of box office bombs (1990s) 270:List of box office bombs (2000s) 265:List of box office bombs (2010s) 1058:—especially if you violate the 1017:Your recent editing history at 998:I agree, but what do you mean? 692:Your recent editing history at 1350:That's not at all the reason. 869:Why should we have an Infobox? 818:09:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC) 803:09:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC) 793:Next revert will be reported. 766:05:36-05:37, 11 September 2018 757:08:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC) 734:08:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC) 125:I suggest you read this essay 13: 1: 1657:06:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC) 1638:06:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC) 1624:09:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC) 1494:07:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC) 1478:07:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC) 1441:01:37, 25 November 2018 (UTC) 1427:00:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC) 1408:00:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC) 1373:23:44, 30 November 2018 (UTC) 1360:23:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1346:23:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1333:20:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1318:20:39, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1286:16:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1273:03:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1258:02:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1226:19:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC) 1201:20:28, 16 November 2018 (UTC) 1185:14:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC) 1156:21:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC) 1141:09:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC) 1126:09:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC) 1104:09:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC) 1086:09:40, 15 November 2018 (UTC) 1008:10:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 991:10:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 975:10:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 959:09:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 829:Bavarian state election, 2018 1600:22:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 1577:21:39, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 1558:21:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 1540:20:56, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 1516:14:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 930:05:49, 23 October 2018 (UTC) 915:05:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC) 901:05:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC) 883:05:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC) 863:04:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 844:04:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 378:for that sort of thing... - 7: 683:00:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC) 630:23:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 620:Ask them on the talk page. 616:23:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 600:23:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 583:23:23, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 568:23:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 535:23:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 518:23:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 497:22:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 474:22:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 462:Prime Minister of Australia 444:21:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC) 418:21:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC) 396:13:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC) 129:to understand the actions. 10: 1673: 1191:This isn't funny anymore. 343:15:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 328:14:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 251:14:05, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 237:14:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 215:13:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 193:13:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 162:12:47, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 140:12:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 1301:Knowledge, as you did at 1241:Knowledge, as you did at 786:08:25, 11 September 2018‎ 779:06:48, 11 September 2018‎ 772:06:02, 11 September 2018‎ 113:03:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC) 98:02:50, 30 June 2018 (UTC) 78:02:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC) 59:02:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC) 788:(undoing Bidgee revert) 171:Hi, you're tagging all 84:attachment to the word 18:User talk:Onetwothreeip 1629:Presidential timelines 1506:we ARE talking about. 372:WP:Bot Approvals Group 1457:, instead of telling 1303:Talk:Barry O'Sullivan 1297:. If you continue to 1243:Talk:Barry O'Sullivan 1237:. If you continue to 781:(undoing WWGB revert) 774:(undoing WWGB revert) 127:WP:Editors have pride 1508:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1307:blocked from editing 1247:blocked from editing 1055:blocked from editing 353:Hey, at the AfD you 1366:Jason Harvestdancer 1339:Jason Harvestdancer 1311:Jason Harvestdancer 1279:Jason Harvestdancer 1251:Jason Harvestdancer 1219:Jason Harvestdancer 1295:disruptive editing 1235:disruptive editing 1043:dispute resolution 718:dispute resolution 663:close this section 606:Okay, tell me why. 38:July–December 2019 1616:The Drover's Wife 1293:Please stop your 1233:Please stop your 1187: 1171:comment added by 1060:three-revert rule 678: 563: 545: 502:Onetwothreeip#top 485:Special:LongPages 439: 391: 323: 232: 188: 33:January–June 2019 1664: 1467: 1166: 1019:Barry_O'Sullivan 988: 956: 941:Barry O'Sullivan 745: 681: 676: 649: 566: 561: 539: 442: 437: 407: 394: 389: 369: 326: 321: 235: 230: 204: 191: 186: 150: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1631: 1612: 1524: 1463: 1451: 1387: 1385:Gentle reminder 1047:page protection 984: 952: 944: 871: 832: 739: 722:page protection 690: 674: 666: 643: 559: 551: 454: 435: 427: 401: 387: 379: 367: 351: 319: 311: 228: 220: 198: 184: 176: 169: 144: 123: 66: 46: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1670: 1660: 1659: 1630: 1627: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1561: 1560: 1523: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1496: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1128: 1107: 1106: 1072: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 943: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 870: 867: 866: 865: 831: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 791: 790: 789: 782: 775: 762: 689: 688:September 2018 686: 673: 670: 656:" - Actually, 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 604: 603: 602: 558: 555: 537: 453: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 434: 431: 386: 383: 376:get in trouble 350: 347: 346: 345: 318: 315: 308: 307: 302: 297: 292: 287: 282: 277: 272: 267: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 227: 224: 183: 180: 168: 165: 122: 119: 118: 117: 116: 115: 65: 64:Subsequent...? 62: 45: 42: 41: 40: 35: 30: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1669: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1649:Onetwothreeip 1645: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1592:Onetwothreeip 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1550:Onetwothreeip 1547: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486:Onetwothreeip 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1466: 1460: 1456: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419:Onetwothreeip 1416: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1396: 1392: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1352:Onetwothreeip 1349: 1348: 1347: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1325:Onetwothreeip 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1265:Onetwothreeip 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1245:, you may be 1244: 1240: 1236: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193:Onetwothreeip 1190: 1189: 1188: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1148:Onetwothreeip 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1129: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1096:Onetwothreeip 1093: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1009: 1005: 1001: 1000:Onetwothreeip 997: 994: 993: 992: 989: 987: 982: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 967:Onetwothreeip 963: 962: 961: 960: 957: 955: 950: 942: 931: 927: 923: 922:Onetwothreeip 918: 917: 916: 912: 908: 904: 903: 902: 898: 894: 893:Onetwothreeip 890: 887: 886: 885: 884: 880: 876: 864: 860: 856: 855:Onetwothreeip 851: 848: 847: 846: 845: 841: 837: 830: 819: 815: 811: 810:Onetwothreeip 806: 805: 804: 800: 796: 792: 787: 783: 780: 776: 773: 769: 768: 767: 763: 760: 759: 758: 754: 750: 749:Onetwothreeip 743: 738: 737: 736: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 685: 684: 680: 679: 675: 671: 664: 659: 655: 654: 647: 646:Arglebargle79 631: 627: 623: 622:Onetwothreeip 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 608:Arglebargle79 605: 601: 597: 593: 592:Onetwothreeip 589: 588:Arglebargle79 586: 585: 584: 580: 576: 575:Arglebargle79 571: 570: 569: 565: 564: 560: 556: 548: 547:Arglebargle79 543: 542:edit conflict 538: 536: 532: 528: 527:Onetwothreeip 524: 523:Arglebargle79 521: 520: 519: 515: 511: 510:Arglebargle79 507: 503: 500: 499: 498: 494: 490: 489:Onetwothreeip 486: 481: 480:Arglebargle79 478: 477: 476: 475: 471: 467: 466:Arglebargle79 463: 459: 445: 441: 440: 436: 432: 425: 421: 420: 419: 415: 411: 410:Onetwothreeip 405: 400: 399: 398: 397: 393: 392: 388: 384: 377: 373: 366: 362: 361: 356: 344: 340: 336: 335:Onetwothreeip 332: 331: 330: 329: 325: 324: 320: 316: 306: 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 291: 288: 286: 283: 281: 278: 276: 273: 271: 268: 266: 263: 262: 261: 252: 248: 244: 243:Onetwothreeip 240: 239: 238: 234: 233: 229: 225: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 207:Onetwothreeip 202: 197: 196: 195: 194: 190: 189: 185: 181: 174: 164: 163: 159: 155: 154:Onetwothreeip 148: 142: 141: 138: 135: 132: 128: 114: 110: 106: 101: 100: 99: 95: 91: 90:Onetwothreeip 87: 82: 81: 80: 79: 75: 71: 61: 60: 56: 52: 39: 36: 34: 31: 29: 26: 25: 19: 1632: 1613: 1569:Gerda Arendt 1546:Gerda Arendt 1532:Gerda Arendt 1525: 1470:Gerda Arendt 1458: 1454: 1452: 1394: 1388: 1292: 1263:Very funny. 1232: 1215:WP:ADHOMINEM 1167:— Preceding 1164: 1114:WP:ADHOMINEM 1076: 1068: 1052: 1051: 1016: 996:billinghurst 983: 981:billinghurst 951: 949:billinghurst 945: 872: 833: 691: 669: 667: 658:someone else 657: 652: 651: 642: 554: 552: 505: 455: 430: 428: 404:Thewolfchild 382: 380: 359: 358: 352: 314: 312: 309: 260:Here ya go; 259: 223: 221: 201:Thewolfchild 179: 177: 170: 143: 124: 86:subsequently 85: 67: 47: 27: 1465:Der Messias 1039:noticeboard 714:noticeboard 368:BornonJune8 147:Kingsindian 131:Kingsindian 44:Not Pinging 1370:Talk to me 1343:Talk to me 1315:Talk to me 1283:Talk to me 1255:Talk to me 1223:Talk to me 1173:Imperial12 764:Main edit 694:Joe McGirr 355:commented; 1299:vandalize 1239:vandalize 1031:consensus 1027:talk page 706:consensus 702:talk page 105:Timeshift 70:Timeshift 51:Barkeep49 1644:Ethanbas 1635:Ethanbas 1504:the page 1211:WP:CIVIL 1181:contribs 1169:unsigned 1067:warring— 1041:or seek 1023:edit war 850:Kingjeff 836:Kingjeff 716:or seek 698:edit war 349:Question 1468:) ;) -- 1459:readers 1455:editors 1433:Frickeg 1415:Frickeg 1400:Frickeg 1064:reverts 986:sDrewth 954:sDrewth 506:another 1610:Beamer 1528:WP:BRD 1522:WP:BRD 1213:, and 1207:WP:AGF 1133:L32007 1118:L32007 1092:L32007 1078:L32007 907:HiLo48 889:HiLo48 875:HiLo48 795:Bidgee 742:Bidgee 726:Bidgee 424:WP:BAG 1395:never 677:child 562:child 438:child 390:child 365:User: 322:child 231:child 187:child 16:< 1653:talk 1620:talk 1596:talk 1573:talk 1554:talk 1536:talk 1512:talk 1490:talk 1474:talk 1437:talk 1423:talk 1413:Hey 1404:talk 1356:talk 1329:talk 1269:talk 1197:talk 1177:talk 1152:talk 1137:talk 1122:talk 1100:talk 1082:talk 1004:talk 971:talk 926:talk 911:talk 897:talk 879:talk 859:talk 840:talk 814:talk 799:talk 753:talk 730:talk 672:WOLF 626:talk 612:talk 596:talk 579:talk 557:WOLF 531:talk 514:talk 493:talk 470:talk 433:WOLF 414:talk 385:WOLF 339:talk 317:WOLF 247:talk 226:WOLF 211:talk 182:WOLF 173:nine 158:talk 109:talk 94:talk 74:talk 55:talk 28:2018 1500:BWV 1449:BWV 1391:BLP 1309:. 1249:. 1049:. 1035:BRD 710:BRD 650:- " 167:AfD 1655:) 1622:) 1598:) 1575:) 1567:-- 1556:) 1538:) 1514:) 1492:) 1476:) 1439:) 1425:) 1406:) 1368:| 1358:) 1341:| 1331:) 1313:| 1281:| 1271:) 1253:| 1221:| 1209:, 1199:) 1183:) 1179:• 1154:) 1139:) 1124:) 1102:) 1084:) 1006:) 973:) 928:) 913:) 899:) 881:) 861:) 842:) 816:) 801:) 784:3 777:2 770:1 755:) 732:) 724:. 628:) 614:) 598:) 581:) 533:) 516:) 495:) 472:) 416:) 341:) 310:- 249:) 213:) 160:) 121:Hi 111:) 96:) 76:) 57:) 1651:( 1618:( 1594:( 1571:( 1552:( 1534:( 1510:( 1488:( 1472:( 1435:( 1421:( 1402:( 1354:( 1327:( 1267:( 1217:. 1195:( 1175:( 1150:( 1135:( 1120:( 1098:( 1080:( 1002:( 969:( 924:( 909:( 895:( 877:( 857:( 838:( 812:( 797:( 751:( 744:: 740:@ 728:( 648:: 644:@ 624:( 610:( 594:( 577:( 544:) 540:( 529:( 512:( 491:( 468:( 412:( 406:: 402:@ 357:" 337:( 245:( 209:( 203:: 199:@ 156:( 149:: 145:@ 137:♚ 134:♝ 107:( 92:( 72:( 53:(

Index

User talk:Onetwothreeip
2018
January–June 2019
July–December 2019
Barkeep49
talk
02:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Timeshift
talk
02:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Onetwothreeip
talk
02:50, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Timeshift
talk
03:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
WP:Editors have pride
Kingsindian
♝
♚
12:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Kingsindian
Onetwothreeip
talk
12:47, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
nine
WOLFchild
13:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Thewolfchild
Onetwothreeip

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑