Knowledge

User talk:Ohnoitsjamie/archive10

Source đź“ť

3966:'closed-end funds' to the 'exchange-traded funds' when CEFs are the investment company structure that ETFs were formed from. I will work to stay inside the guide lines of Wiki, George Scott, who has co-authored the only hard back book, (500 pages) on CEFS and it is used in gradute level finance classes, "Investing in CEFs: Finding Value and Building Wealth" is the editior and publisher of The Scott Letter, in print 1988-1996 and online since 2001. The newsletter is very well read and endourced by the industry. It has interviews with CEF fund managers and other pertinent articles. The only "marketing-esk notation" on the back page above our logo it simply says that we do mange money in 4 styles. (and it lists them). The Closed-End Fund Forum, is run by Capital Link, which is a shareholder relations comapany. They are private and In it to make money - how are we different. The reason I added the links to our website, is we do offer a valuable primary info service, which does expose people to our company. George was first a journalist and then a invemtment manager. Meybe the link needs to be reworded - in regrds to our links, I want people to know there is this information avialable to help them learn about the funds. In regards to the info I added on the ETF, MF, REIT and CEF pages that didnt 'pomote our newsletter or website' I believe the bulk of it was valuable. I do understand that being new I have some to learn. I am not one for spamming. It is a fact that there are two private firms (w/ websites) that are the "CEF Gurus". Tom Herzfeld in Miami, and us in Richmond, Va. The CEF association is also a great resource (and we have worked closley with them since their formation.) In conclusion, I will be more careful on what I type, but I feel the editor(s) have been a little overreaching in deleting worthwhile content and info. Thank you for your understanding.- John Cole Scott, CFS - (800) 356-3508 or 2090:... Suspicion and scrutinizing is good, complete rejection just because is not, as everything that is absolute without exceptions. You don't know me yet, which is fine. You will notice that I am a heavy content producer on and off Knowledge. I write a lot about the things I know and/or care about. Virtually always is the material serving educational purposes. Some of my off Knowledge writing is original research, but many of it isn't. I understand what Knowledge's purpose is and what its not. Unlike many writers am I not very protective of my work and don't mind if it is used and altered/improved by others (I lack the ego for that I guess). My drive and motivation is the education of people and the preservation of information, which is not the same as opinionating people, because that would require a specific agenda and goal outside the information itself. Such agenda also tends to cause the suppression of non-favorable information for the sake of pushing a specific point of view. I don't like that. I want that people make up their own mind. In order to ensure that people can make educated decisions and form an opinion for themselves is it necessary to provide them with as much factual correct information as possible. The fun thing is that by doing what I do is that I continue to learn new things about stuff myself, which impact my opinions about a subject as well. Anyhow, I can write what I want here, but I guess the things I did and do will reinforce what I just said. You can see for yourself. I am pretty open about who I am and what I do so it is not hard to check for yourself, if I mean what I said or if I am just "full of crap" (figure of speech). Cheers! -- 2250:. These two men have broken records regarding Internet real estate, and on top of that, they have worked with The Grateful Dead, Diana Ross, The New England Patriots, and Time Warner. Mr. Zapolin has co-written with Deepak Chopra, and became one of the youngest Vice Presidents (24-years-old) at the Investment Bank Bear Stearns in the 100+ years of the company's history. Mr. Zapolin and Mr. Miller each teach a class at Harvard Business School's Executive Program and Boston University's School of Communication, respectively, and they have gained more credibility to their names than most people regarding the development of the Internet. Moreover, Internet development is only one accomplishment they have on their resume; they were both VPs at Bear Stearns, and after leaving their positions there, they revolutionized television by creating Revenue Enhanced Programming, or REPs. They are both extremely accomplished, while maintaining a strong sense of community as seen by their need to donate time and money to various charities. Why shouldn't I be allowed to share their stories with the world? I look up to these two men because of their strong work ethic and innovative ideas; two qualities which have made them co-keynote speakers at the T.R.A.F.F.I.C. East conference October 18, 2005. If you don't believe me, then just look them up on Business Week, the New York Times, the Boston Globe, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Boston Business Journal, or really any major newspaper or business journal around. 1555:
can be a conflict of interest for the wikipedia. However, I would like to point out that there are some external links that do point out to resources like a personally run web-site that promote negative information about the industry. The entire page on Network Marketing (MLM) seems like fear-mongering content page and hence I wanted to post some credible information on the entire industry. At my site, I am not promoting any company's compensation plan or product. The primary information source on the website are links to 2 movies that put the industry in the right perspective. What I would like to do is post links to the movies directly, rather than my personal website. Would that be all-right with the policies and can I be certain that the movie link will not be deleted. On clicking the link, users will be directly led to a 20 minute flash presentation that explains the network marketing industry as taught by Tim Sales and Dr. Charles King, who holds a Ph.D in business administration from Harvard school of business and teaches Network Marketing as a part of the MBA curriculum at University of Chicago at Illinois. There is no company promotion nor any compensation plan that it touches upon, just explains what are the components involved in Network Marketing as an industry and how they run. Waiting for you reply.--
2246:
everything so that my work is cited, you see that everything I am writing is coming from outside sources. I feel like you have taken this too far, and that you are erasing people's work that they spend time on just to get your kicks. I am not accusing you of being a bad person, and I honestly do not want to have any problems with you because I am sure that you do feel very strongly about this website, and I respect you for that. With that said, I also get the feeling that you are starting to have a personal grudge against me and I am worried that you are trying to seek out my articles, simply to erase them. Internet real estate is a HUGE industry right now and it's only growing, especially since the Internet is considered to be the future of our nation's economy. Mr. Miller and Mr. Zapolin literally created the term 'internet real estate' and although YOU feel that my source is outdated, you can look them up on DNJournal's September 2005 issue where they held the cover story. In fact, let me give you the site
1855:
sure on the correct way to add links. Just to re-assure you on that end, I have been adding links to articles which were relevant to the main articles on wikipedia... you'd notice they are all links to articles on Indian or Asian art, and the articles that I am adding would most often be written by the famous art-historian Benoy K. Behl. I have not been doing this as promotional stuff for any commercial organization or for the art-hitorian or any other such personal interest. The links have been added by me, only for the purpose of relevant information that i think should be available to more people. I wish to pass on only valid information, and am stricly scared of misinformation. I trust wikipedia in that. Cheers! -Pooja
1527: 3907:
extra edits - apparently by Andrew Scolt, who currently works for the commercial quiz organization firm the O'Briens run - to add a lot of advertising content to the article about various O'Brien quizzes, I have largely reverted these over the past few months. However, removing their names, and those of Harsha Bhogle (who is a prominent TV commentator for cricket matches, and a regular quizmaster on sports themed quizzes) as non notable - you might want to reconsider that. Remove Andrew Scolt's name with my blessing - his dad Alban Scolt was notable as one of the earliest members of the quizzing scene in India, he isnt all that notable.
2183:
that if you think that I am marketing a certain individual or group, then please erase all names and corporate references because that too is marketing. If you looked at the website that I cited, you would see that everything I wrote was facts. Nothing was biased. Moreover, if you looked at the individuals that I referred to, then you would see that they deserve to be on Knowledge. In fact, I would appreciate it if you would look up the individuals I spoke about, so that you would have knowledge of them and see that everything I wrote was true, instead of simply assuming that what I wrote is made up or not worthy of public knowledge.
3108:
for dinner. The "blog" page that I cited (www.survivalblog.com) is widely-read (with more than 52,000 weekly unique visitors in more than 50 countries) and is considered a technical reference by many shooting enthusiasts and preparedness-minded individuals. This blog's related static pages include several FAQs that LONG pre-date the advent of "blogs", and that even pre-date the Internet as we now know it. (Three of the FAQs authored by Rawles got their start on Usenet in the late 1980s, before "WWW" browsing was extant.)
3139: 3350: 3315: 291: 1067: 611: 1580:] and view the presentation "Brilliant Compensation" and check out the presentation about the Network Marketing Industry. Once you have gone through it, you can let me know if a direct link to the presentation (and not to my website) would be useful to the users of wikipedia in exploring the industry. My intention is to help people with their research on any opportunity that they would like to evaluate. Thanks. 3504:
my attempts to link our video to relevant artists such as the Arcade Fire and Lil Jon. Both interviews are of a high quality and discuss information that is not included in the Wiki itself. I was under the impression that if our videos contain information that is not accessible in the wiki itself and are directly related to the artist they would therefore be valid under the Knowledge guidelines.
772: 877: 2850:
different. Lastly, the judgement of whether your site is helpful enough to include as a link is best done by other users, not yourself ;-) It is entirely possible there are other links which should be removed as well; which ones in particular did you see? These are added quite frequently and (like yours) are usually aggressively deleted.
3824:
economical force (source:wikipedia EU article). 'The dominant cultural force' is a subjective term since assigning a weight to cultural aspects is very viewpoint dependent. The US culture has significant global influence, but so do other cultures (that are much older and therefore survivable, an important measure of 'cultural strength'.
4121:
wait until someone gets around to it? Will the polar ice caps melt away and we pass the 1M member mark until we're finally added to the simple list called social networks? We have countless press clippings on our site, so we're a bit confused. If you could lend us some help or assistance that would be great. Thanks for listening.
575:
around. In this example, non-government links carry much more knowledge, detailed information and are more accurate and up-to-date than government links. What policy? I think it is clearly stated that Knowledge is a common effort and NOTHING is set in stone and one has to use common sense over ANY guideline (real name for
2142:
However, today I wrote a couple of sentences about domain names, in which a domainer, Andrew Miller, spoke to DNJournal about the selling of domain names. These sentences were cited and had no biases in them whatsoever. Why did you erase this, and why are you continuing to erase everything that I write on Knowledge?
424:. I have contributed to this article and feel stronlgy that links in question are beneficial to the readers and provide additional details to this very ambigious immigration topic. Also, would you agree to revert your edit for the duration of this discussion with a follow-up upon its conclusion? Please answer here. 717:
virtualafghan link to it. Now Why and Who chooses what sites to have here. And Why such bias. Is it based on your mood? Is it based on how you feel? Or there are some set rules?. Please visit my site and their site. There is nothing that my site lacks then their site. Its as informative (INFACT MORE) as them.
4120:
Hi.. I think I'm doing this right. Quick question - if a site has been written up in many papers and is a leading site in it's industry, but the site itself cannot write it's own page.. how the heck is a page going to be formed? :) Do we ask our members to write up a page on our behalf? Do we have to
3503:
Hi Jamie, You're a very efficient Knowledge administrator. I just wanted to ask how i would attempt to get our website's artist interviews included in the external links of said artists? We're a small independent publisher aiming to spread the word about the artists we interview. You recently removed
3107:
I guess that we just disagree on relevance. I will defer to your judgment. However, in the future, please consider that not every website with "blog" in its name is merely a daily personal missive about the writer's mood, the weather, their passionate love of Paris, and what they are planning to make
2819:
Unsure why my site has been removed has it has no commercial content and pertains specifically to the subject matter. I do understand that you are God in such matters but hope you attempt to be fair. Sad to say other links of lesser quality do contain adverts so I am baffled as to why I am excluded.
2802:
I noticed what a bad job I had done with your userpage so I tweaked it a bit. And then some more. I tried to maintain the same color scheme. I'd do the same to your talk page but I'm just checking in to see if you'd like anything else changed. And, of course, feel free to revert any changes I made if
2734:
How am I not following wiki standards? I fail to see how you've "shown that inclusion of this material is not permissible." First you say "you'll keep adding the material until someone in authority tells you not too." Then it becomes "until there's a consensus with other admins." You're grasping at
2662:
Go ahead. Try to block me for keeping you from trashing my university's wiki page to further your agenda. Do you have any authority to do this? By the way, your little icon near the top of your page regarding your "strive to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues" is laughable, as
2437:
Also, the "plain old C++ object" description in DDD article is obviously not an interest conflict. Because it is the only link to a wiki article. Concept of domain objects should not be limited to Java and CLR. Please also let me know which rule I should look into in this case. Thanks again. kjin101
1854:
Dear Jamie, I appreciate your vigilance over the addition of links to wikipedia. I was quite unsure before as to how the additions are being controlled, but was relieved on receiving your notification. Accordingly, I have read the policies and rules to adding external links. So now I am a little more
1397:
You know, you can change stock prices yourself. Here's how: (1) Create a blog (2) a day or two before a particular company is due to release an earnings announcement or guidance, say something really bad about the company in your blog (3) there's always a chance that the earnings announcement will be
978:
banned from editing wikipedia.. oh my the horror.. how can such a thing happen.. what shall I possibly do.. maybe step outside into the fresh air like you should once in awhile you dumb ass think Im cool cause Im a pussy administrator that works for free moron. Go fuck your self pussy.. I have about
716:
Recently i put my site (afghanbuzz.com) in afghan related pages. My site has lots of stuff about afghans and afghanistan. And you removed me and warned me. Okay. Now, if you look at those pages, sites such as virtualafghans.com or eafghans.com are all linked. Absolutely anything afghan related have a
34:
The other links on these sites, for places like SLKWorld and Benzworld are for web sites that display paid advertisements and also have paid subscriptions. MBRoadsters.com is a FREE site with no subscriptions given for forums and information for Mercedes-Benz Roadsters. It is also a site that meets
2865:
So it wasn't deleted because of commercial content as I was informed - thought you lot were concerned with accuracy - no matter. The judgement of whether a site is helpful is down to each individual user and not just you. You only decide to deny users access to the site via wikipedia, obviously in a
2565:
Regarding Giant Pandas, it's generally accepted that Pandas will eat just about anything. There's nothing inaccurate about listing doughnuts as part of a Giant Pandas diet. Doughnuts are of Chinese origin - fried dough is a commonly coupled with porridge, and you would be hard pressed to deny that
2467:
First: you wrote: I'm not sure I understand the confusion regarding leaving me messages. You can either click "Edit this page", scroll down and leave a message, or edit the last section header and make a new section. Most talk pages (user or article) use the convention of leaving new messages at the
2141:
I have written only a few things on Knowledge.com and by the time I am able to merely check them, they are erased by you. Concerning the first article that I wrote, I immediately contacted the members who work for the Knowledge webiste, because I have comments concerning some of their regulations.
1980:
Though your extensive contributions to Knowledge are welcome, the links I removed (including yours) were all commercial (yours has quite a few advertisements, I should note). The immigration process may indeed be "broken," but it's not Knowledge's job to "curate" the best "how-to" links, especially
1622: 3111:
IMHO, the static reference page in question--the reference page on whether or not certain types of ammunition are corrosively primed--provides valuable data for many shooters. But again, I am deferring to your judgment and won't attempt to re-post or argue this any further. Based on on your log, I
2849:
While there is no commercial content, there is also little or no information offered which is not already on Knowledge (we already have complete listings of majors winners). If more content was there, such as round-by-round scores and complete results (every golfer, not just the winner), it may be
2436:
Thanks for the explaination. The rule says there is such potential but not necessary to be the case for all such kind of links. As suggested by the rule, I would appreciate you could read the white paper and let me know whether it is truely a interest confict. Let me know if you have any questions.
2022:
Quick response at the talk page :). I posted a question for you. What would your assessment of the reference be as RS, if I remove ALL ads from the page entirely? As I stated repeatedly, the intent of the page is not commercial, so if this is the minor change needed to shift the consideration as RS
1938:
for having a limited number of other resources included in this article at the moment. At least for the time being. If things change after the election to the better, those links could probably be removed. I agree with you in general, but I think it is a bad idea to do this at the current time and
1790:
Hi There: I received the following email below from you in regards to links you consider spam. In the 2-3 areas where links where placed. They were placed next to other companies with similar products. So I'm not sure why those companies should be listed with their links and we are able to list
1450:
I received this message: "However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others". I am unsure why. I edited the page to correct
1393:
Deleting unsourced material has nothing to do with an edit war. A humor site claiming they affected a stock price does not constitute a reliable source. The numerous other sources cited (Forbes, Motley Fool, etc), all make it clear that the price change was related to the financial of the company.
1163:
I would like to know why you deleted a link to IndexUniverse.com's ETF Data Screener on the 12th of November. The ETF Data Screener is the most comprehensive, free and open ETF performance data tool available anywhere on the Internet. Professional and sophisticated retail investors use it to screen
499:
Yes, it is encyclopedia, but "internet encyclopedia" I must emphasize. It DOES need external links. More content? Well, lets wait for more content and then purge some external links. One is replacing the other, natural flow. The article as it is today lost some of its informational value after your
3507:
Obviously we don't have the clout of someone such as a Rolling Stone (who are in the external links page of the arcade fire wiki) quite yet but i do feel that our content contributes to the environment and isn't purely about Spam - which we are also firmly against. Our website is www.pedestrian.tv
2525:
Who are you to block Stick Figures indefinitly? I'm asking a serious question. I was just messing round. That should not mean I shouldn't be able to edit ever again. Also I wanted to know why you and others spend time reverting vandalism? I really would like to know. Do you get paid for it? Please
2197:
I am anxiously awaiting a response to this. Can you please explain to me why some people/corporations are allowed to have facts about them on this website, and others are not. Although I already sent a letter to the CEO of Knowledge about my concerns, I would like to know what your response is.
1554:
Thanks Jamie for ensuring that the wikipedia stays free of spam and any commercial promotions. I edited one of the pages on Network Marketing and provided an external link that points to a web-site which has information on how the industry works in general. But I own that site and I can see how it
1086:...thank you for your participation. I withdrew with 83 supports, 42 opposes, and 8 neutrals. Your kind words and constructive criticism are very much appreciated. I look forward to using the knowledge I have accrued through the process to better the project. I would like to give special thanks to 545:
amounts of advertising". Not a case with any of these links. One or two unobtrusive banners. Not material. Shopping section? Have you ever followed that link? Innocent. Not material. One site is commercial. As long as it contibutes to further expand atricle's subject and educate the reader, let it
475:
if for some editors they qualify as purely commercial or "with heavy advertisement". Policy should be applied with common sense. Reasonable number of external links that are legit, known, reputable and recognized by the immigration community is absolutely necessary to accompany this arrticle. Yes,
38:
This site is a community for those cars, and not a money making venture. It is ramping up with many articles of how to fix things, and about the history. Why would it not belong in there, and money making sites that Mercedes-Benz does NOT appove of, especially ones using thier trademarks to make
3906:
Hi. As the guy who edited most of that article .. and as someone who has been involved in the Indian quizzing scene for over a decade now, (1) The O'Brien brothers (Derek, Barry and Andy) and their father Neil are very notable. Derek and Barry are regular TV quizmasters. There have been a lot of
3367:
IN fact, this is the kind of news source that couldn't have existed before the web. And I think by removing the link you are depriving Dachshund lovers of a source of news they'd like. Instead of interpreting Knowledge's rules in the most narrow minded way -- use of Flickr, Youtube and Ads do not
3277:
After spending some time checking the accuracy and fact, I found the article is a reliable source and a good complement to the current wp article. If you find anything on the article inaccurate and unreliable, please let everybody know, and we will happy to see it removed. For now I'm putting the
2182:
I disagree with this. How can a reference be out of date? If it's a fact, which it is, then it's not out of date at all. If you choose to support your editing in this way, then all documents, including the Constitution and anything else written before 2007 is out of date. Additionally, I feel
574:
There is no policy. Why do you need a policy for something like this? Everything is much more easier. You include links when you believe in good faith they are useful, you don't include any links if there is no need for them. I am not sure why official links are fine. Actually, it is all the way
383:
I don't have time to check whether you removed all of the links I added last night. These are useful links for other people to continue refining the articles. They are real time reflections of the issues under discussion (while wikipedia article is static). On one hand, you have a flag citing no
106:
2 The store will be selling Polo shirts with the Roadsters logo and other logos approved by Mercedes Benz. These logos will be sewn on by a seniors group in Texas with the money from the shirts going to pay their material costs and any extra going as a donation for their not-for-profit senior
3965:
I have spent the last 20 minutes trying to figure out how to "myTalk" I am not even sure if this is how to do it. I just saw the comments on the links and content I added on Friday and today. I am new to Wiki updates, and am sorry for the hassel. I see that you have deleted update where I added
3942:
Lets say it is catch 22. There is a very large, very active community that has been around for about 40+ years now, but the only mainstream "media" attention you might get is for TV quizzes or gameshows, quite a lot of which arent regarded as serious quizzing.. Derek O'Brien isnt respected as a
2388:
Also, similar, the extenal link to a whitepaper on how to use DSL for application modeling based on IoC framework is also removed from the the DSL article. I see Martin Fowler's DSL and workbanch article and Jebbrains links were there. I would very appreciate your could give me an explaination.
2362:
I would appreciate if you could explain why you removed my external link in the DDD article? Before I adding the link, I did checked the rules and also saw other equivalent solutions (e.g. Spring) are listed in external links. Is DDD only about Java and CLR and not include C++? Thanks! kjin101
1414:
Thanks for answering, but... was all that necessary? I didn't say anything about the sources or content or anything. I just noticed you reverted a few edits and then protected the page. I'm still learning about Knowledge and my adopter has gone AWOL, so I was just curious. I'm glad you at least
172:
You are so annoying. Every page has an External LINK and my external links are VALID !!!... Why do you keep removing them. My website is a genuine site.. please go check it out... it has ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING about afghans, afghan culture, afghan history, afghan music, afghan videos, afghan TV,
3476:
Dont you think you should just keep your business on wikipedia's matters related to dogs and cats??? you seems to be specialised in it.... you are not specialised in everything... please be humble, and let the world evolve without feeling you should have your word to say on every matters. your
2245:
I am NOT Mr. Zapolin, however I am an enormous fan of his work and I admire both Mr. Zapolin and Mr. Miller because if you did research you would see that they are two brilliant men who deserve to be put on this website. I don't understand why you are having trouble with this. I have changed
3823:
Ohnoitsjamie, your undo makes the article factually incorrect. The source (ref 10) is mainly on imperrialism an military power, for which I kept the article saying 'the largest', so far we agree. But you cannot state that the US is THE dominant economic or cultural force. The EU is a larger
2735:
straws. There is indeed a discussion on the talk page to resolve the dispute, and the page shows a clear consensus for listing Shepard as an alumni. He is an alumni, and he's notable, whether you like it or not. Feel free to file another RFC on the matter; I doubt the consensus will change.
3237:
I'm curious about why you removed the above external link. It appears that the external site has very legitimate and helpful reference to the original article about Chinese Cuisine. It also looks like the external site is commercial free (compared with other existing external links full of
3024:
Well I understand the basics, professionals contribute where knowledge is acceptable, however it still clearly states the rule I quoted. This isn't a moan, I'm generally a bit confused on this one. So do you have a real explination, e.g. Explaining "How wiki works". Thankyou for replying so
929:
I agree it is important for controversial or potentially controversial material to be sourced. At the time of your deletion, the article already had references both to Kaplan(2003) and to George(2001) with an inline citation (in the paragraph just before the two that you deleted) explicitly
2663:
your obvious lack of neutrality on a controversial topic shows otherwise. I am not the only editor who thinks that Matthew Shepard should not be included on the University of Wyoming wiki page, as evidenced by the numerous discussion postings on its talk page over the past several years.
4158:. What is the difference between the already added links and the link I added today? I read the guidelines and by those same guidelines all the other external links should be removed as well. It's not my site, so it can't be considered as spam. I just thought it would add to the content. 1021:
not at the beach? Wi-Fi access at the Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne extends all the way down to the water's edge. And if you put up the little flag beside your cabana, they'll bring you a mojito to sip while you're using your notebook to block trolls. (Yes, I'm a geek, but I'm a geek with
1593:
Hi. I am trying to put together a checkuser request in relation to the "Pee Wee Herman" vandal, with a view to getting the underlying IPs blocked (I have range blocked some IPs used by the vandal(s) with limited success). I am putting together a list of sockpuppets and their edits
516:
had ads on them except the lawyer site, which is obviously commercial. I have an ad-blocker plugin that lists them for each site. PathtoUSA only had on ad link, but it has a "shopping" section. And where does it say that "An article needs links"? Articles need references from
2618:
Please stop including Matthew Shepard from University of Wyoming. There is no consensus to include him, and the burden is on the proponent of information to show that it is accurate and conforms to wiki standards. By the way, who are you to post a warning on my talk page?!?!
3363:
Hmmm. The Daily Dachshund and Dog News is indeed a blog but not a personal one. It's an aggregator that adds value. It covers Dachshund news, as it happens, and it is not, as an earlier Wikipedean suggested, just a Google feed. A cursory glance will show it has a lot to offer.
2869:
Which other sites? Thought that was your job. Too many other sites to list and you have completely missed the point of the site which offers a unique way of comparing major winners. You’re obviously too busy aggressively deleting links to actually notice the content on offer!
4129:, though I'm sure there are many articles on Knowledge about sites/companies that were created by someone involved with the site/company. That said, I wasn't able to find any "press clippings." (News releases or other articles written by Bakespace do not qualify). Thanks, 1961:
of the TALK PAGES archive template, which is optimized for user talk pages rather than generic to be used for any kind of talk pages. A simple to follow step-by-step guide to how to implement it was also provided. I hope you find this information useful. Cheers!
3224: 1770:
article, removing all references of the word "Ultra-luxury" when the references (#54 in particular) clearly supports that, and even cutting off sentences and title descriptions to do so. I have reverted this IP twice now. Thanks for any help stopping him.
2645:
I posted a warning to your talk page because there is no consensus to omit his entry. Furthermore, you are incorrect regarding your "burden is on the proponent" statement. If you continue to remove content without regard to consensus, you will be blocked.
951:
I'm not disputing the material anymore. I checked out the references, and found a few others. The only discrepancy I saw was that some sources say it was Chisso factory workers, not yakuza, but that distinction may not be important in the larger context.
2765:'s Spanish which I consider it's a good way to look inside their deep culture. I'm learning Spanish and if you want I can help you to understand the ref!! Well, anyway thanks for reverting me because you've made I signup here (despite I always liked it).-- 3084:
on various pages. It has gone unnoticed for some time and thought I would contact an admin considering he has had 2 warnings about nonconstructive edits. I'll try to revert what he's done so far but I just thought I might let someone else know. Thanks!
487:
I will not revise my position. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, first and foremost. As such, it could use more content, not links. If someone wants to find immigration info, any search engine can provide that information. If you want curated links,
462:
is a commercial lawyer website Kolken & Kolken (which goes into great lengths to explain immigration concept and does not push any of their services onto a user). Are you just scratching the surface in your "link validity" judgement?
325:
and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the Wikilove by melting the clouds of sin and sadness that weigh down someone else. Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing!
3368:
automatically disqualify site nor does the fact that it's a blog -- why not ask yourself, "If I were someone looking for information on Dachshunds, would it help to know about this site?" If the answer is yes, please restore the link.
1537:. I am happy to say it was successful, 55/0/0, and I am looking forward to getting to work. Thanks for your vote of confidence. By all means, feel free to check in on my work to come. Suggestions and advice are always appreciated. 1312:
Wow, thanks. Yes, I have been throwing myself back into contributing. But it's only because all of the really great encouragement I've gotten from everyone after the RFA. Thank you again, if you need anything you know where to find me.
3854:
This user has sent an email to the unblock list acknowledging that they now understand our spam policies and requesting an unblock. I'm inclined to do so, but will keep a close eye on them. I wanted to let you know as a courtesy. -
2707:. I have already suggested a means for resolving this dispute, namely that you refrain from including controversial material until you have a consenus with other "admins." What have you suggested as a means to resolve this dispute? 3398:
Actually, there is no rule that Knowledge can't link sites with advertisements. Otherwise it couldn't link the New York Times or any other major publication. If the site in question meets link criteria, advertisements are irrelevant.
2476:
by Kjin101 to some robot software development. I have no association with him/her so have no personal reaction but the link seemed ok to me. It was a novel new robot software development. What did you think was wrong with it?
2468:
bottom. - well for some reason when I tried to edit it did not show the whole page so I thought you had some special arrangement. Must have been a glitch because it works ok now! Sorry to intrude. I have been maintaining
797:, which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your kind words of strong support are very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to 4004:
So Jamie, what is wrong with the edit that I added? There is no advertising and I spent a lot of time developing the page that the link points too. I believe that there is very informative material at that link.
2509:
OK, but it didn't seem any worse than many other links and it seemed like a novel new software project. I was quite interested in it. Note: I have no axe to grind; just trying to understand the processes better.
1695:. Ferrari uses Flash, and there is no way to link exactly to the 599 part on their site. I was going to remove some of the unnecessary links, replacing them with a link to Ferrari. I really appreciate your help. 173:
afghan EVERYTHING. And in each appropriate section..i have placed EXTERNAL LINK. But nOoOooOo JAMIE has to come and remove it. Man...u suck :-( ... afghanbuzz.com is starting to hate u... no treats for u :-(
2023:
in favor to be accepted as such, so be it. The actual content and background should speak for itself, but I have no problem with a compromise to avoid misconceptions and wrong interpretations of intentions. --
3099: 3508:
and while there are some ads on the site - i feel that as the content of the interviews provides valuable insights that aren't available on the Wiki page the interviews may be allowable as external links?
2267:). Being affiliated with someone also counts as a conflict of interest. If you're so dead-set on mentioning them (in the context of a two-year old quote), take it to the talk page of the article. 3818: 1383:
Why was the Crocs page protected? "During edit wars, administrators should not protect pages when they are involved as a party to the dispute." That's not an accusation, I just want to understand.
284: 3247: 1791:
ours. I've read the policies. So, if you are deleting ours then you need to delete our competitors as well. If you aren't familiar with them I'd be more than happy to delete them personally.
3540:
Knowledge is not a promotional vehicle. If your site becomes notable enough, editors unaffiliated with your site will add the links independently. Please do not add links to your own site per
2284:
How is it wrong to mention pure facts about people? I am not saying that they are the best or even that their company is the best, I am merely mentioning the contributions that they have made.
2069:
I left a small comment at the articles talk page. I wanted to post the following there as well, but realized that it is a bit too much off topic and better be posted at your personal talk page.
2002: 3677:
Prove the information to be false. What suggest that Christ wasn't just a mentally ill man? Who's to say that their God isn't just a lame excuse for an imaginary friend? Well? Prove me wrong.
2917:
Oh good; there was me thinking you were more concerned about users going of to more interesting sites! That's now three different reasons you have given for the deletion; any more to offer?
1493:
Oh... I see. That wasnt me! I have only had this internet connection for a few months. I went and read up on this and registered to avoid this kind of confusion in the future. Thanks!
3127: 3727:
Actually, the user was also adding new links to that site...looked like canvassing to me. I'm OK with the unblock, but I think they should be reblocked if they start canvassing again.
467:
might seem to have some ads in the right pane but any "negative impact" on the reader is not material in comparison to all immigration information resourses this website has to offer.
2780:
I used a translation tool to check it out....looks fine to me. I was unaware that non-English refs were acceptable, and the site in question doesn't appear to be commercial. Cheers,
1923: 1370: 2164:
Because most of your contributions appears to be veiled advertisments for individuals or groups. Furthermore, the information from the edit in question is a bit out of date (2005).
3477:
attitude will lead us backward. you are too conservative.... smells like censorship to me.... What a brave new world! And the worst part of it is that i like cats and Lynch too!!!
3358: 3843: 2330: 942:
to the corporation's website containing their 2004 accounts and their "historical overview". Do you have any references that dispute any of the facts stated in the article? -
359: 476:
Knowledge is not a link directory but again, we are talking about only 8 links, not a hundred or thousand. I will appreciate your comments and hope you revise your position.
2320: 1974: 1951: 3424: 3387: 2566:
a Giant Panda would pass up a warm bowl of porridge accompanied by doughnuts. In light of your threats, I will withdraw my scholarship on Giant Pandas from wikipedia.
503:...And what happened with your original claim about "...links either have heavy advertising or are otherwise commercial sites"? I thought I proved it wrong. Thank you. 1240: 364: 3994: 3749: 2973: 1562:
I'd personally lean toward "no," but you're welcome suggest the direct links on the talk page for that article. I'll respect whatever consensus results from that.
1133: 824: 644:, please affix the template ?{{hangon}}? to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 558:
Obviously, official links are fine (and the article in question has plenty of those). Can you find a policy that says articles require links? (Non-citation links)?
3564:
Also, creating new accounts and pretending to be an independent contributor does not work either. Further attempts to do so will result in immediate blocking per
373: 2695:
Fine. Block me for following wiki standards, especially when I have shown that inclusion of this material is not permissible, and I'll be referring you to the
891:" that can be instantly deleted. Your edit has been reverted. Please consider using ?{{fact|date=}}? to tag content that may require an inline citation to meet 439: 4186: 4162: 3511:
If you have any tips on how we might be able to get our interviews incorporated into the external links of relevant Wikis i'd really appreciate the feedback.
329: 4031: 2548:
I regularly block accounts indefinitely when it's clear they are being used for vandalism only. I don't get paid. I just enjoy keeping crap out of Knowledge.
2492:
I removed the links because that user was canvassing them to multiple articles, which made it appear that they were using Knowledge for promotional purposes.
1935: 3525: 1236: 2962:
Shame I like a good debate, but it is difficult to argue with someone who doesn't see the need to connect the various statements made to support his case.
677: 435: 3745: 3332: 2770: 1822: 1504: 3812: 3163: 1266: 4061: 3412: 3375: 3268: 2714: 2664: 2626: 1998: 1435: 1419: 1409: 1297: 757: 703: 694: 407: 4081: 3579: 3462: 3405:
Also, it seems clear from this page, that your mission is deletion not assessing whether the link is suitable for inclusion in an ONLINe encyclopedia.
3293: 2746: 2726: 2690: 2672: 2657: 2559: 1394:
The page was protected for the same reason that a page might be protected if Colbert made a comment on his show that "everyone should change X article."
1012: 4038:
You've been warned about adding links to your own site numerous times. If you'd like to contribute to Knowledge, try contributing contents, not links.
3066: 3032: 2607: 2573: 1488: 1342: 3738: 2017: 1992: 1932: 1917: 1806: 1415:
answered, but I didn't need all the extra sharpness. After reading up on everything I agree with you about the article, so it was really unnecessary.
1283: 1034: 156: 83: 4064: 3559: 2956: 2503: 1892: 118: 49: 3893: 3880: 3795: 3642: 2791: 2305: 2278: 2239: 2175: 2102: 2052: 2035: 1733: 1724: 1598:. As I see that you have been involved in dealing with this vandalism, I am letting you know and please feel free to contribute to the list. Cheers 1512: 1218: 994: 253: 3521: 3090: 2948: 2851: 2430: 1862: 1680: 1048: 963: 946: 924: 664: 4049: 3988: 3952: 3937: 3218: 2911: 2809: 583: 569: 553: 532: 480: 453: 428: 210: 3324: 2285: 2254: 2205: 2186: 2155: 1500: 1180: 3710:
Just wanted to let you know, I undid your block here. It was a simple misunderstanding: this user wasn't spamming, he was fixing broken links.
3116:
I would've deleted all links to it if I thought that it was not notable. I just objected to it being canvassed to a large variety of articles.
2859: 2444: 2396: 2370: 659: 378: 42:
So, Jamie, why haven't you removed the links for the CLEARLY MONEY MAKING SITES? Did you not even check the sites to see what they are for?
4019: 2877: 2830: 930:
confirming the claims, such as the threatening activities of yakuza that were invited by the company. None of the claims are disputed by any
735: 580: 550: 504: 477: 425: 413: 4055: 3492: 2040:
Ads removed entirely. Comments added to discussion with focus on RS for the inclusion as "further resource" (and not as cited reference). --
507: 236: 979:
1000 other IP addresses and automated software to boot.. you want to play..tempt me bitch. You can erase all day.. i'll be at the beach.
1573: 3696: 3671: 3603: 3086: 1785: 1534: 2638: 1373: 3094: 4195: 3533: 549:
Yes, articles do need links. Remember, Knowledge is a function of internet. I think of "External links" as "Further reading" section.
3863: 3624: 1229:
You said i was editing wrongly when i wasn't so i want an opology u silly cunt you can f**k off for all i care get a life dick head
1077: 973: 790: 252:
article that includes Image:Michele Merkin 1.jpg, you may wish to participate in the discussion on Image:Michele Merkin 1.jpg at the
4179: 3721: 3016: 2988:
Thankyou, I have noticed you have reverted some idiots vandalism on wiki. However I noticed you also have a personal page on here,
2541: 1322: 279: 3177:
I got your message about the links "". I wrote the article, and I based the information on it and the categories upon my website,
3044: 2585: 1756: 61: 3960: 3744: 2977: 913:
I stand by my edit. I saw no citations supporting the claim. It's important for potentially controversial claims to be sourced.
513: 166: 3189: 2940: 2932: 2519: 2486: 2323: 1780: 1691:
Hello, I have a question for you: is it deemed acceptable to have an external link to a site that uses Flash? Case and point...
1192: 130: 3146: 1607: 602: 3916: 2823:
I simply ask that you reconsider and allow those keen on golf records to enjoy the benefits offered by my site. Many thanks.
2774: 654:
this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
3339: 1925: 1874: 1699: 720:
They placed all links in each and every afghan section. So did I. Yet you and some other newbie mod only noticed my links?.
414: 384:
reference to these important topics. On the other hand, you don't let me add useful references. Not sure what you stand for.
3967: 2134: 3072: 1844: 1248: 1244: 2889: 2842: 1888:
it says i can link to wikiclassifieds, and that is exactly what i was doing, and yet, you keep reverting my changes, why?
1466: 907: 3755: 3239: 3112:
can see that you have more experience about judging deletion criteria than I do. -- Jeff Trasel, 1604 EST , 23 Dec. 2007
2969: 2126: 1387: 1354: 727: 4140: 3869:
That's fine; I blocked them indef as they ignored talk messages and seemed to be a single purpose spam account. Thanks,
1544: 1167:
Is there a policy that only corporate owned portals like Money.com or Yahoo.com can be linked to in the External Links?
836: 4107: 3420: 3383: 3285: 2797: 2722: 2634: 2533: 2288: 2257: 2217: 2189: 2158: 1398:
negative and the price will tank. If it does, claim that you caused it. (4) Make a graph, because graphs prove things.
986: 2348: 1660: 4185:
Alright. I noticed you removed the other links as well. Everything clear. Thank you for pointing this out. Cheers, -
3471: 3322:
Hello Jamie, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ~
3040: 2581: 1458: 1350: 711: 3394:
Knowledge is not a link directory nor a vehicle for promoting sites with advertisements. 01:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
1900: 3714: 2456: 2408: 2382: 1958: 1795:
Feel free to remove any links that violate link policies. However, please don't delete internal links to articles.
1526: 673:. The information I added should be present on the page, and it was discussed in the Something Awful "talk" page. 126: 57: 192: 3529: 2704: 2696: 1870: 1549: 895:. This gives other editors a chance to provide inline citations. I will be adding additional inline citations to 3849: 3839: 3616: 3498: 2213: 1839: 1508: 1188: 274: 1705:
I'm not aware of any policies forbidding external links that use Flash, especially if that site is official.
492:
is the place for that. As far as using "common sense," I did leave a few links, even though they all violate
2613: 2452: 2404: 2378: 1651: 350: 312: 2699:
for abusing your position as an "admin." You are clearly not following wiki standards, especially those on
4027: 2996: 2885: 2838: 2700: 1981:
advert-heavy ones. Google in theory should give primacy to the most popular ones. I stand by my deletions.
1710: 1307: 243: 232: 188: 3238:
commercials) and a wiki. Hopefully, you can take a deeper look and apply your judgement more judiciously.
3169: 3161: 2807: 2419:
problem. Regardless of whether Spring is "equivalent" is not so much the issue; Spring is quite notable.
3653: 2997:"4. Please don't create pages about yourself or your friends, pages that advertise, or personal essays." 538: 3923: 3702: 3436: 3254: 2944: 2001:
at the articles talk page, because I believe that other editors might also have an opinion about this.
1741: 626: 518: 458:
Nonsense. Are you overreacting? I am sorry but none of the links has any "heavy advertising" and only
3901: 3885:
I would have done exactly the same thing you did. I just hope this is a chance for a reform. :-) -
1293: 1155: 854: 393: 68:
It has a store. Do stores not make money? If you feel there are other links in articles that violate
26: 4146: 3790: 2983: 2462: 199:
If you add the link again, or continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked from editing.
1335:
WHY ARE YOU ALWAYS SO HAPPY???? EVEN IF SOMEONE TELLS YOU TO **** OFF YOU GIVE THEM A SMILE!!!!!
885: 3926:
indicating such notability. In fact, the article has very few sources other than quiz websites.
3243: 3133: 2752: 2130: 1692: 1474: 731: 89: 3631:
Thanks for the enlightenment. Vandalize or post abusive comments again, and you'll be blocked.
4176: 4137: 4078: 4046: 3985: 3934: 3877: 3809: 3735: 3693: 3668: 3639: 3600: 3576: 3556: 3489: 3459: 3416: 3379: 3305: 3289: 3265: 3215: 3180:. The link is relevant, as it provides a sample of websites listed on the page. Please reply, 3158: 3124: 3063: 3013: 2929: 2908: 2804: 2788: 2743: 2718: 2687: 2668: 2654: 2630: 2604: 2556: 2537: 2500: 2427: 2345: 2302: 2275: 2236: 2172: 1989: 1914: 1803: 1761: 1721: 1686: 1677: 1595: 1588: 1570: 1485: 1451:
non-factual information. Could you let me know how this is NOT improving the owrk of others?
1432: 1406: 1263: 1215: 1009: 990: 960: 921: 846: 754: 691: 579:) or authority or policy. Because we all make mistakes and everything under this Moon changes. 566: 529: 489: 450: 404: 207: 153: 80: 17: 3257:
guidelines. If you feel other links on that page are inappropriate, feel free to remove them.
3077: 3036: 2814: 2577: 1849: 1776: 1462: 1346: 3005:
I think you need to spend a little bit more time reading about how Knowledge works. Cheers,
888: 4191: 4117:
NOTE: I don't think I'm doing this right...my comment became a link on your page. Help! :)
4103: 4015: 3827: 3612: 3517: 3432: 3408: 3371: 3281: 3028: 2965: 2873: 2826: 2710: 2622: 2569: 2529: 2440: 2392: 2366: 2201: 2122: 2097: 2047: 2030: 2012: 1969: 1946: 1896: 1858: 1812: 1603: 1496: 1454: 1338: 1289: 1277: 1232: 1200: 1176: 1028: 982: 870: 723: 434:
The links either have heavy advertising or are otherwise commercial sites (laywers, etc.)
220: 176: 122: 114: 53: 45: 8: 3786: 2952: 2855: 2515: 2482: 1866: 1581: 1556: 1044: 887:
The content you deleted is supported by the existing references and does not qualify as "
652:
if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that
3999: 3890: 3860: 3835: 3620: 2415:
When one user adds links to the same site to multiple articles, it suggests a possible
2209: 1833: 1416: 1384: 1184: 1139: 830: 700: 674: 641: 630: 622: 604: 322: 268: 3226: 2992:
and this is against the rules of wiki? Any explination? It just seemed hypercritical.
2329:
One more thing, I've been getting some flak over my name. Maybe I should change it to
4170: 4131: 4072: 4040: 3979: 3928: 3871: 3803: 3729: 3704: 3687: 3662: 3633: 3594: 3570: 3550: 3483: 3453: 3259: 3209: 3118: 3057: 3007: 2989: 2923: 2902: 2782: 2737: 2681: 2648: 2598: 2550: 2494: 2448: 2421: 2400: 2374: 2339: 2296: 2269: 2247: 2230: 2166: 1983: 1908: 1797: 1715: 1671: 1646: 1564: 1479: 1426: 1400: 1257: 1209: 1003: 954: 915: 806: 798: 763: 748: 685: 640:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
560: 523: 444: 398: 345: 307: 201: 147: 74: 1039:
Jamie's response to the guy rates as one of the funniest things I've seen all week.
4155: 4023: 3948: 3912: 3185: 2881: 2834: 2469: 2114: 2088:"I'm always suspicious when an editor intent on including links to their own site." 1772: 1612: 1445: 1093: 1087: 228: 184: 4098:
Purplepickle10 works on the edge of plausibility, making it more of a challenge.
4099: 3711: 3682: 2757:
G'day Ohnoitsjamie! you removed what I wrote about the unique characteristics of
2091: 2041: 2024: 2006: 1963: 1940: 1599: 1541: 1521: 1330: 670: 656: 649: 618: 3609:
All Caps Means shouting, idiot. and tell me why the fuck you reverted my edit!
1934:(diff) of external resources from the mentioned article, please have a look at 1636:
For being with us for so many years, and for many years to come, raise a glass.
1424:
Sorry, didn't intend to be "extra sharp." Just trying to make my actions clear.
634: 4087: 3565: 3444: 3143: 3052: 2511: 2478: 2473: 1751: 1578:
Thanks for your consideration. I would be glad if you can go to the my website
1360: 1224: 1040: 385: 370: 290: 35:
Mercedes-Benz requirements as being a helpful site to their product's owners.
4126: 4112: 3974: 3886: 3856: 3831: 3657: 3541: 3448: 3204: 3196: 2897: 2766: 2416: 2354: 2264: 2225: 1826: 1730: 1696: 1378: 1314: 1204: 1127: 1109: 818: 645: 261: 165: 142: 2896:
We're more concerned about good content at Knowledge; it's an encyclopedia,
3545: 3440: 3200: 3081: 3055:. Furthermore, I don't promote anything on my page, including my identity. 2593: 1637: 943: 939: 931: 904: 743: 576: 493: 468: 421: 336: 298: 138: 69: 4168:
Feel free to remove other links that you feel violate the policy. Thanks,
1939:
in this particular case though. Thanks for your time and consideration. --
629:
from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
392:
Yes, I did remove all of them. Your commercial site does not qualify as a
101:
1. The store is currently closed pending final approval by Mercedes Benz.
3944: 3908: 3181: 2311: 1883: 1706: 1066: 935: 900: 892: 224: 180: 3801:
That's kinda funny, actually. "Hey, whaddayknow, I'm not blocked yet!"
3349: 3138: 137:
As I said before, feel free to remove other links that you feel violate
3943:
quizzer or a good quizmaster to be frank, for all that he is notable.
3314: 2762: 683:
Not sure, actually...it was late, and I was tired. I reverted it back.
256:
since listing the image on the Main Page may bring more traffic to the
1746:
Wanted to say "thank you" for your vandal patrolling, particularly of
1957:
p.s. you have a very long and full talk page. I suggest to check out
1621: 4070:
Thanks! Friends typically acknowledge that it's appropriate enough.
1821:, please consider creating one or more of the requested articles at 2758: 1767: 1766:
Hi, just to let you know, an anonymous IP has been vandalizing the
610: 369:
Thanks for your encouragement, Jamie, and I will try to remember.--
880:
Please do not delete sourced content from articles, as you did to
3819:
US THE dominant economic, political, cultural, and military force
2472:
and put some of the content. I noticed you had removed a link in
285:
Melt the clouds of sin and sadness, drive the dark of doubt away!
1164:
for and compare ETFs, Index Funds and their underlying Indexes.
111:
However, the other links for profit stores are up and running.
3779: 3767: 1747: 896: 881: 257: 249: 3592:
I'll discuss the issue as soon as you fix your caps-lock key.
876: 420:
Hello! Please elaborate on how these external links "violate"
3178: 1818: 1366: 771: 3588:
WHAT THE HELL? WHY'D YOU REVERT THE PAGE "CHRISTIANITY"?!?!
3100:
Not Everything on a "Blog" Site is Necessarily Blog Material
2294:
Please take it to the talk page of the article in question.
889:
random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information
4125:
Creating an article about your own site is discouraged per
813:
for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.
471:
is a recomendation, and doesn't restrict per se any links,
4009: 3402:
So, please expain the criteria for deletion of this link.
1729:
Thanks, I will link to both but take out the other links.
464: 145:, Knowledge is not the place to promote your new website. 3230: 3648:
I'm sorry,... Please tell me why you reverted my edit?
3359:
Deletion of External link to Daily Dachund and Dog News
1823:
Knowledge:Articles_requested_for_more_than_a_year#Music
217:
Personal Attack???.. Aight you are way too sensitive.
1058: 4000:
http://www.dinofun.com/database/dinosaurdatabase.html
3681:
I'm not going to debate theology. Please don't make
2145:
Please get back to me at your earliest convenience.
903:
or here (I will watch your talk page). Thank you. -
625:, by another Knowledge user, requesting that it be 1533:Howdy Ohnoitsjamie, thanks for participating in my 2263:Knowledge is not a promotional tool (and also see 2253:Please get back to me once you've looked them up. 1906:It means put your stuff on classifieds, not here. 365:Encouragement and reminder on using Minor Edit Box 3995:External Link to Dinosaur matrix from user ToSoft 1271:Maybe it's the opposite of an apology, which the 742:Feel free to remove other links that do not meet 3777:Oh wait, did I just give it away in the header? 2316:It wasn't my edit that was reverted...  ?;{ 332:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 2337:I reverted your size change of the flag icon. 1669:Thanks Marlith, I think I will raise a glass! 4154:Regarding the removal of an external link at 3922:The issue is that the article has hardly any 669:Please explain why you reverted the edits to 438:a link directory. I've moved the discussion 3660:edit, which goes against Knowledge policy. 3142:Wishing you the very best for the season - 248:In view of your many contributions to the 97:But as far as making money, it does not. 4010:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Tosoft 3137: 3104:Regarding one of your recent deletions: 2526:answer, I really want to know. Thanks. 1931:Hi Ohnoitsjamie, regarding your removal 321:hopes that you are joyful! Joy promotes 3231:http://en.wikipedia.org/Chinese_cuisine 2943:(especially items #1 and #4), and also 14: 3225:Reason for removing the external link 1997:Hi Jamie, I responded to your comment 1817:In view of your many contributions to 1619: 633:is a redirect to a non-existent page ( 379:On Unit Trust, ETF, Mutual Fund Family 1926:United States Permanent Resident Card 1750:. Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU! 415:United_States_Permanent_Resident_Card 3481:Please follow Knowledge's policies. 3451:explain the rationale sufficiently. 3080:is spamming false information about 789:Thank you for your participation in 396:. Knowledge is not for advertising. 3207:. Please don't add the link again. 1786:Deletion of Links you consider Spam 72:, please feel free to remove them. 23: 4056:Just thought I'd stop by to say... 2803:you don't like/want them. Cheers, 2248:DNJournal's Sept. 2005 Cover Issue 1525: 1107:Thank you again and, best regards. 609: 539:WP:EL#Links_normally_to_be_avoided 289: 24: 4207: 3253:The site does not appear to meet 1255:I'm not sure what an opology is. 974:OH NO NOT THAT YOU FUCKING RETARD 934:, and the claims were completely 3348: 3344: 3321: 3313: 1620: 1288:Quite an apposite comment... -- 1126:This RFA thanks was inspired by 1065: 938:by these two references and the 875: 844:This RFA thanks was inspired by 770: 541:, #6 says: "Links to sites with 512:Proved me wrong how? All of the 3961:various links from user JCSCEFA 3227:Four Schools of Chinese Cuisine 2945:WP:SPAM#How not to be a spammer 2705:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 2697:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee 1123: 1119: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1085: 1075: 899:. Feel free to discuss this on 4060:...great name. Made me smile! 1140: 1134: 1128: 781:Click there to open your card! 665:Reversion of "Something Awful" 617:Hello, this is a message from 351: 346: 313: 308: 13: 1: 3294:00:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 3269:23:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 3248:17:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 3219:17:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 3190:16:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 3164:05:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 3147:05:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 3128:22:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 3095:04:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 3067:17:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 3045:11:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 3017:03:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 2978:23:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 2957:17:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 2933:00:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 2912:23:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 2890:21:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 2860:17:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 2843:10:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 2810:05:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 2103:12:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 2053:19:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 2036:19:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 2018:18:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 1918:19:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 1901:19:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 1875:12:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 1845:02:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 1807:23:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 1781:01:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 1757:00:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 1734:23:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1725:23:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1700:23:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1681:18:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1661:05:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1652: 1647: 1639: 1608:23:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1574:21:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1545:05:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1513:22:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1489:15:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1473:The warning was in regard to 1467:10:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1436:17:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1420:15:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1410:04:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1388:04:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1374:02:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1355:01:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1323:21:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1284:17:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1267:16:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1249:16:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1219:15:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1193:15:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1049:17:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 1035:16:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1013:19:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 995:19:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 964:16:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 947:16:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 925:15:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 908:15:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 855: 847: 837:20:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 807: 799: 791: 4196:09:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 4180:20:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 4141:04:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 4108:23:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 4082:20:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 4065:20:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 4050:18:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 4032:18:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 3989:17:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 3973:Please refer to Knowledge's 3953:03:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 3938:02:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 3917:01:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 3894:04:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 3881:00:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 3864:22:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 3844:10:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 3813:22:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 3796:20:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 3739:19:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 3722:18:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 3697:21:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 3672:21:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 3643:21:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 3625:21:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 3604:21:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 3347: 3312: 3073:False Information everywhere 2921:That's all I have to offer. 2792:01:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 2775:01:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 2747:05:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 2727:02:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 2701:Knowledge:Resolving disputes 2691:01:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 2673:01:36, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 2658:01:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 2639:01:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 2608:21:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 2586:21:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 2560:21:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 2542:21:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 2520:21:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 2504:18:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 2487:18:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 2457:05:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 2431:02:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 2409:02:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 2383:00:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 2349:00:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 2324:00:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 2306:17:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 2289:16:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 2279:16:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 2258:15:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 2240:22:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 2218:22:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 2190:21:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 2176:19:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 2159:19:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 2135:14:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 1993:15:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 1975:12:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 1952:12:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 1298:11:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 758:22:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 736:22:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 704:18:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 695:17:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 678:16:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 660:11:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 584:19:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 570:19:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 554:19:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 533:19:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 508:18:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 481:18:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 454:17:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 429:16:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 408:15:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 374:02:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 360:03:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 338: 328:Smile at others by adding {{ 300: 280:21:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 237:22:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 211:17:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 193:11:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 157:17:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 131:17:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 84:17:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 62:17:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 7: 3580:15:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 3560:16:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 3534:07:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 3493:16:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 3463:15:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 3439:. Your blogs are neither. 3425:11:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 3388:00:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 3340:07:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 2939::-) Please see policies on 2331:User:Ohnoit'sCharlesManson! 2224:Mr Zapolin, please see our 1371:IttyBittyGrittyindaShteCiti 648:. Feel free to contact the 621:. A tag has been placed on 10: 4212: 2798:Bwahahaha, experimentation 2592:You may want to check out 2138:Dear user 'Ohnoitsjamie,' 1098:for their co-nominations. 3472:Deletion of External link 2866:fairly arbitrary manner. 1626: 1365:... for your help on the 712:Question to OhNoits Jamie 3431:The New York Times is a 2898:not a directory of links 3762:Guess who came back to 2947:(especially item #5). 1693:Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 1550:Thanks for your efforts 94:So do the other sites. 3850:User:Allaboutboygeorge 3656:is pretty obviously a 3499:Legible External Link? 3149: 2321:THIS IS CHARLES MANSON 1630:The Invisible Barnstar 1530: 1275:obviously is... :-) — 853:which was inspired by 614: 295: 39:money, be allowed in? 18:User talk:Ohnoitsjamie 3141: 2614:University of Wyoming 1924:WP:EL and Article to 1535:request for adminship 1529: 1199:Yahoo! and Money are 613: 293: 3975:Conflict of interest 2417:conflict-of-interest 2226:Conflict-of-interest 1999:on my user talk page 1713:on the 599 as well. 1308:Muchas gracias amigo 244:Michelle Merkin POTD 4095:You beat me to it. 3255:WP:Reliable sources 3170:Get Paid to website 2194:Dear OhNoitsJamie, 2119:OMFG EMO!!!1!!!1! 1959:my modified version 1557:User_talk:Vishalhkd 1076:If you voted in my 519:WP:Reliable sources 3150: 1742:Just saying thanks 1531: 1369:article. Rock on! 1149: 1148: 1071: 1017:And what's to say 864: 863: 776: 642:Crunk Energy Drink 631:Crunk Energy Drink 623:Crunk Energy Drink 615: 605:Crunk Energy Drink 296: 4198: 4034: 4018:comment added by 3902:Quizzing In India 3846: 3830:comment added by 3627: 3615:comment added by 3536: 3520:comment added by 3427: 3411:comment added by 3390: 3374:comment added by 3356: 3355: 3296: 3284:comment added by 3159:Master of Puppets 3153:Merry Christmas! 3047: 3031:comment added by 2990:User:Ohnoitsjamie 2980: 2968:comment added by 2892: 2876:comment added by 2845: 2829:comment added by 2805:Master of Puppets 2729: 2713:comment added by 2641: 2625:comment added by 2588: 2572:comment added by 2544: 2532:comment added by 2459: 2443:comment added by 2411: 2395:comment added by 2385: 2369:comment added by 2220: 2204:comment added by 2137: 2125:comment added by 1877: 1861:comment added by 1666: 1665: 1657: 1515: 1499:comment added by 1469: 1457:comment added by 1357: 1341:comment added by 1251: 1235:comment added by 1195: 1179:comment added by 1156:IndexUniverse.com 1145: 1118: 1104: 1063: 997: 985:comment added by 862: 848:The Random Editor 839: 816: 782: 768: 738: 726:comment added by 546:be. Not material. 521:, but not links. 356: 330:subst:Joy message 318: 254:admin noticeboard 239: 223:comment added by 195: 179:comment added by 133: 117:comment added by 107:education center. 64: 48:comment added by 27:Roadsters Link... 4203: 4189: 4174: 4156:Stencil_graffiti 4147:Stencil graffiti 4135: 4076: 4044: 4013: 4008:Retrieved from " 3983: 3977:policy. Thanks, 3932: 3875: 3825: 3807: 3794: 3733: 3719: 3691: 3666: 3637: 3610: 3598: 3574: 3554: 3515: 3487: 3457: 3406: 3369: 3352: 3345: 3342: 3335: 3327: 3317: 3310: 3309: 3279: 3263: 3213: 3156: 3122: 3061: 3026: 3011: 2984:Thankyou, but... 2963: 2927: 2906: 2871: 2824: 2786: 2741: 2708: 2685: 2652: 2620: 2602: 2567: 2554: 2527: 2498: 2470:industrial robot 2463:industrial robot 2438: 2425: 2390: 2364: 2343: 2300: 2273: 2234: 2199: 2170: 2120: 2003:See my post here 1987: 1936:my detailed case 1912: 1856: 1842: 1836: 1831: 1801: 1754: 1719: 1675: 1658: 1653: 1648: 1643: 1624: 1617: 1616: 1568: 1494: 1483: 1452: 1430: 1404: 1336: 1319: 1282: 1261: 1230: 1213: 1174: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1136: 1130: 1124: 1117: 1114: 1108: 1103: 1099: 1081: 1069: 1033: 1007: 980: 958: 919: 879: 859: 849: 843: 833: 827: 821: 811: 803: 795: 780: 774: 752: 721: 689: 627:speedily deleted 619:an automated bot 564: 527: 448: 436:Knowledge is not 402: 388:7 November 2007 357: 352: 347: 342: 319: 314: 309: 304: 277: 271: 266: 218: 205: 174: 151: 112: 78: 43: 4211: 4210: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4187:Checkthewrapper 4172: 4163:Checkthewrapper 4149: 4133: 4115: 4090: 4074: 4058: 4042: 3997: 3981: 3963: 3930: 3924:reliable source 3904: 3873: 3852: 3821: 3805: 3793: 3787:CobaltBlueTony™ 3785: 3760: 3731: 3715: 3708: 3689: 3664: 3635: 3596: 3572: 3552: 3501: 3485: 3474: 3455: 3437:reliable source 3361: 3333: 3325: 3308: 3261: 3235: 3211: 3172: 3154: 3136: 3134:Merry Christmas 3120: 3102: 3075: 3059: 3009: 2986: 2925: 2904: 2817: 2800: 2784: 2755: 2753:Non-English ref 2739: 2683: 2650: 2616: 2600: 2552: 2496: 2465: 2423: 2357: 2341: 2314: 2298: 2271: 2232: 2168: 2117: 1985: 1929: 1910: 1886: 1852: 1840: 1834: 1827: 1815: 1799: 1788: 1764: 1752: 1744: 1717: 1689: 1673: 1615: 1591: 1566: 1552: 1524: 1481: 1448: 1428: 1402: 1381: 1363: 1333: 1317: 1310: 1290:David Broadfoot 1276: 1259: 1227: 1211: 1158: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1112: 1082: 1070: 1061: 1027: 1005: 1001:999 IPs to go. 976: 956: 917: 873: 868: 867: 866: 865: 831: 825: 819: 784: 775: 766: 750: 714: 687: 671:Something_Awful 667: 608: 562: 525: 514:links I removed 446: 418: 400: 394:reliable source 381: 367: 334: 287: 275: 269: 262: 246: 203: 170: 149: 92: 90:HAve a store... 76: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4209: 4183: 4182: 4148: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4114: 4111: 4089: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4057: 4054: 4053: 4052: 3996: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3962: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3903: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3851: 3848: 3820: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3789: 3772:one more time. 3759: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3707: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3675: 3674: 3646: 3645: 3607: 3606: 3587: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3500: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3473: 3470: 3468: 3466: 3465: 3396: 3395: 3360: 3357: 3354: 3353: 3346: 3318: 3307: 3306:Happy New Year 3304: 3302: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3272: 3271: 3234: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3135: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3101: 3098: 3074: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3025:efficiently. 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3000: 2999: 2985: 2982: 2960: 2959: 2941:External links 2936: 2935: 2915: 2914: 2863: 2862: 2816: 2813: 2799: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2754: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2615: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2563: 2562: 2524: 2507: 2506: 2474:robot software 2464: 2461: 2434: 2433: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2328: 2313: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2282: 2281: 2243: 2242: 2181: 2179: 2178: 2151:Kind Regards, 2148: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2038: 1956: 1928: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1885: 1882: 1880: 1851: 1848: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1787: 1784: 1763: 1762:Vandalism help 1760: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1688: 1687:Flash question 1685: 1684: 1683: 1664: 1663: 1633: 1632: 1627: 1625: 1614: 1611: 1590: 1589:Pee Wee Herman 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1551: 1548: 1523: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1395: 1380: 1377: 1362: 1359: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1237:Shabba Natalie 1226: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1157: 1154: 1121: 1102: 1083: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1064: 1062: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 975: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 872: 869: 861:'s RFA thanks. 814: 788: 787:Dearest Jamie, 785: 779: 778: 777: 769: 767: 765: 762: 761: 760: 713: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 666: 663: 639: 638: 607: 601: 599: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 547: 501: 485: 484: 483: 417: 412: 411: 410: 380: 377: 366: 363: 327: 288: 286: 283: 245: 242: 241: 240: 214: 213: 169: 164: 162: 160: 159: 141:policies. Per 109: 108: 103: 102: 91: 88: 87: 86: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4208: 4199: 4197: 4194:was added at 4193: 4188: 4181: 4178: 4177: 4175: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4159: 4157: 4152: 4151:Hello Jamie, 4142: 4139: 4138: 4136: 4128: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4118: 4110: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4096: 4093: 4083: 4080: 4079: 4077: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4063: 4051: 4048: 4047: 4045: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4011: 4006: 4002: 4001: 3990: 3987: 3986: 3984: 3976: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3968: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3936: 3935: 3933: 3925: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3895: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3879: 3878: 3876: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3862: 3858: 3847: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3814: 3811: 3810: 3808: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3792: 3788: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3774: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3757: 3754: 3751: 3747: 3746:Oba.umpire.42 3740: 3737: 3736: 3734: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3718: 3713: 3706: 3698: 3695: 3694: 3692: 3684: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3673: 3670: 3669: 3667: 3659: 3658:point-of-view 3655: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3644: 3641: 3640: 3638: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3605: 3602: 3601: 3599: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3581: 3578: 3577: 3575: 3567: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3558: 3557: 3555: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3512: 3509: 3505: 3494: 3491: 3490: 3488: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3469: 3464: 3461: 3460: 3458: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3403: 3400: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3365: 3351: 3343: 3341: 3337: 3336: 3329: 3328: 3319: 3316: 3311: 3303: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3266: 3264: 3256: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3240:63.166.226.83 3232: 3228: 3220: 3217: 3216: 3214: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3165: 3162: 3160: 3152: 3151: 3148: 3145: 3140: 3129: 3126: 3125: 3123: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3083: 3079: 3068: 3065: 3064: 3062: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3018: 3015: 3014: 3012: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2998: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2991: 2981: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2970:86.155.27.239 2967: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2949:Carl Lindberg 2946: 2942: 2938: 2937: 2934: 2931: 2930: 2928: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2913: 2910: 2909: 2907: 2899: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2867: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2852:Carl Lindberg 2848: 2847: 2846: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2821: 2815:Golf Database 2812: 2811: 2808: 2806: 2793: 2790: 2789: 2787: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2742: 2733: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2689: 2688: 2686: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2656: 2655: 2653: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2609: 2606: 2605: 2603: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2561: 2558: 2557: 2555: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2505: 2502: 2501: 2499: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2475: 2471: 2460: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2432: 2429: 2428: 2426: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2386: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2360: 2350: 2347: 2346: 2344: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2332: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2317: 2307: 2304: 2303: 2301: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2287: 2280: 2277: 2276: 2274: 2266: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2256: 2251: 2249: 2241: 2238: 2237: 2235: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2188: 2184: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2171: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2157: 2154:User Luvbug18 2152: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2139: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2127:24.190.151.66 2124: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2094: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2045: 2044: 2039: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2027: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2015: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1991: 1990: 1988: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1960: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1937: 1933: 1927: 1919: 1916: 1915: 1913: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1889: 1881: 1878: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1850:reply to talk 1847: 1846: 1843: 1837: 1832: 1830: 1825:. Thanks. -- 1824: 1820: 1808: 1805: 1804: 1802: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1769: 1759: 1758: 1755: 1749: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1723: 1722: 1720: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1676: 1668: 1667: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1649: 1645: 1644: 1642: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1623: 1618: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1582: 1579: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1569: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1538: 1536: 1528: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1484: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1431: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1418: 1417:SouperAwesome 1413: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1407: 1405: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1385:SouperAwesome 1376: 1375: 1372: 1368: 1358: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1262: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1214: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1171: 1168: 1165: 1161: 1144: 1143: 1137: 1132: 1131: 1122: 1116: 1115: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1091: 1090: 1079: 1068: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1025: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1008: 1000: 999: 998: 996: 992: 988: 984: 965: 962: 961: 959: 950: 949: 948: 945: 941: 937: 933: 928: 927: 926: 923: 922: 920: 912: 911: 910: 909: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 884:in this edit 883: 878: 860: 858: 852: 851:'s RFA thanks 850: 842: 838: 835: 834: 828: 823: 822: 815: 812: 810: 804: 802: 796: 794: 773: 759: 756: 755: 753: 745: 741: 740: 739: 737: 733: 729: 728:142.58.242.47 725: 718: 705: 702: 701:192.31.106.35 698: 697: 696: 693: 692: 690: 682: 681: 680: 679: 676: 675:192.31.106.35 672: 662: 661: 658: 655: 651: 647: 643: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 612: 606: 600: 585: 582: 578: 573: 572: 571: 568: 567: 565: 557: 556: 555: 552: 548: 544: 543:objectionable 540: 536: 535: 534: 531: 530: 528: 520: 515: 511: 510: 509: 506: 502: 498: 497: 495: 491: 486: 482: 479: 474: 470: 466: 461: 457: 456: 455: 452: 451: 449: 441: 437: 433: 432: 431: 430: 427: 423: 416: 409: 406: 405: 403: 395: 391: 390: 389: 387: 376: 375: 372: 362: 361: 358: 355: 348: 344: 343: 341: 333: 331: 324: 320: 317: 310: 306: 305: 303: 292: 282: 281: 278: 272: 267: 265: 259: 255: 251: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 216: 215: 212: 209: 208: 206: 198: 197: 196: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 168: 163: 158: 155: 154: 152: 144: 140: 136: 135: 134: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 105: 104: 100: 99: 98: 95: 85: 82: 81: 79: 71: 67: 66: 65: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 36: 32: 19: 4184: 4169: 4160: 4153: 4150: 4130: 4119: 4116: 4097: 4094: 4091: 4071: 4059: 4039: 4007: 4003: 3998: 3978: 3964: 3927: 3905: 3870: 3853: 3822: 3802: 3778: 3776: 3771: 3770: 3763: 3761: 3752: 3728: 3716: 3709: 3686: 3676: 3661: 3647: 3632: 3608: 3593: 3586: 3569: 3549: 3513: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3482: 3475: 3467: 3452: 3413:Boisblaireau 3404: 3401: 3397: 3376:Boisblaireau 3366: 3362: 3334:bananabucket 3331: 3323: 3320: 3301: 3286:209.159.64.4 3278:link back. 3258: 3236: 3208: 3176: 3173: 3117: 3110: 3106: 3103: 3082:Serj Tankian 3076: 3056: 3023: 3006: 2987: 2961: 2922: 2916: 2901: 2868: 2864: 2822: 2818: 2801: 2781: 2756: 2736: 2715:Slyjackalope 2680: 2665:Slyjackalope 2647: 2627:Slyjackalope 2617: 2597: 2594:Uncyclopedia 2564: 2549: 2534:24.115.4.169 2523: 2508: 2493: 2466: 2435: 2420: 2387: 2361: 2358: 2338: 2327: 2318: 2315: 2295: 2283: 2268: 2252: 2244: 2229: 2196: 2193: 2185: 2180: 2165: 2153: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2140: 2118: 2098: 2096:<sac: --> 2092: 2087: 2048: 2046:<sac: --> 2042: 2031: 2029:<sac: --> 2025: 2013: 2011:<sac: --> 2007: 2005:. Thanks. -- 1982: 1970: 1968:<sac: --> 1964: 1955: 1947: 1945:<sac: --> 1941: 1930: 1907: 1890: 1887: 1879: 1853: 1828: 1816: 1813:Old requests 1796: 1789: 1765: 1745: 1714: 1711:good article 1690: 1670: 1654: 1640: 1638: 1629: 1592: 1563: 1553: 1539: 1532: 1478: 1449: 1425: 1399: 1382: 1364: 1334: 1326: 1315: 1311: 1278: 1272: 1256: 1228: 1208: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1159: 1138: 1125: 1120: 1110: 1094: 1088: 1084: 1029: 1023: 1018: 1002: 987:24.253.46.31 977: 953: 914: 874: 871:October 2007 856: 845: 840: 829: 817: 809:Phoenix-wiki 808: 801:The_undertow 800: 792: 786: 747: 746:guidelines. 719: 715: 684: 668: 653: 650:bot operator 616: 603:Redirect of 598: 559: 542: 537:Sure I did: 522: 472: 465:Immihelp.com 459: 443: 419: 397: 382: 368: 353: 339: 337: 335: 315: 301: 299: 297: 263: 260:article. -- 247: 200: 171: 161: 146: 110: 96: 93: 73: 41: 37: 33: 30: 4190:—Preceding 4014:—Preceding 3826:—Preceding 3703:Unblock of 3611:—Preceding 3516:—Preceding 3407:—Preceding 3370:—Preceding 3280:—Preceding 3195:Please see 3078:68.38.15.69 3033:Dosedmonkey 3027:—Preceding 2964:—Preceding 2872:—Preceding 2825:—Preceding 2709:—Preceding 2621:—Preceding 2574:Jvollebregt 2568:—Preceding 2528:—Preceding 2439:—Preceding 2391:—Preceding 2365:—Preceding 2200:—Preceding 2121:—Preceding 1857:—Preceding 1773:SynergyStar 1707:Edmunds.com 1495:—Preceding 1459:24.56.8.189 1453:—Preceding 1343:O smart one 1337:—Preceding 1231:—Preceding 1203:. Also see 1175:—Preceding 1095:Wikidudeman 1089:Tim Vickers 981:—Preceding 901:Talk:Chisso 722:—Preceding 219:—Preceding 175:—Preceding 113:—Preceding 44:—Preceding 4100:Wanderer57 3766:vandalize 3568:policies. 3548:. Thanks, 2900:. Thanks, 2763:New Mexico 1893:Rymegkasri 1600:TigerShark 1542:TeaDrinker 1279:Satori Son 1207:. Thanks, 1173:Fernando 1160:Hi Jamie, 1030:Satori Son 936:verifiable 657:CSDWarnBot 119:RacerCub68 50:RacerCub68 4092:Hi Jamie 3522:Chriswira 3144:Guettarda 2679:Will do. 2512:Robotics1 2479:Robotics1 2389:Thanks! 1863:Poojakaul 1829:Jreferee 1753:Montanabw 1475:this edit 857:Phaedriel 764:Thank you 386:Stevelihn 371:Parkwells 264:Jreferee 4173:itsJamie 4134:itsJamie 4075:itsJamie 4043:itsJamie 4028:contribs 4016:unsigned 3982:itsJamie 3931:itsJamie 3887:Philippe 3874:itsJamie 3857:Philippe 3840:contribs 3832:Mhesselb 3828:unsigned 3806:itsJamie 3756:contribs 3732:itsJamie 3690:itsJamie 3683:WP:POINT 3665:itsJamie 3652:Because 3636:itsJamie 3617:63.3.7.1 3613:unsigned 3597:itsJamie 3573:itsJamie 3553:itsJamie 3530:contribs 3518:unsigned 3514:Thanks 3486:itsJamie 3456:itsJamie 3421:contribs 3409:unsigned 3384:contribs 3372:unsigned 3326:Blnguyen 3282:unsigned 3262:itsJamie 3212:itsJamie 3157:Cheers, 3121:itsJamie 3060:itsJamie 3041:contribs 3029:unsigned 3010:itsJamie 2966:unsigned 2926:itsJamie 2905:itsJamie 2886:contribs 2874:unsigned 2839:contribs 2827:unsigned 2785:itsJamie 2767:Knadaves 2759:Colorado 2740:itsJamie 2723:contribs 2711:unsigned 2684:itsJamie 2651:itsJamie 2635:contribs 2623:unsigned 2601:itsJamie 2582:contribs 2570:unsigned 2553:itsJamie 2530:unsigned 2497:itsJamie 2453:contribs 2441:unsigned 2424:itsJamie 2405:contribs 2393:unsigned 2379:contribs 2367:unsigned 2342:itsJamie 2299:itsJamie 2286:Luvbug18 2272:itsJamie 2255:Luvbug18 2233:itsJamie 2228:policy. 2214:contribs 2206:Luvbug18 2202:unsigned 2187:Luvbug18 2169:itsJamie 2156:Luvbug18 2123:unsigned 2115:My Facts 1986:itsJamie 1911:itsJamie 1871:contribs 1859:unsigned 1800:itsJamie 1768:Lexus LS 1731:Zach4636 1718:itsJamie 1697:Zach4636 1674:itsJamie 1613:Barnstar 1567:itsJamie 1509:contribs 1501:Canopy2k 1497:unsigned 1482:itsJamie 1455:unsigned 1446:G18 Page 1429:itsJamie 1403:itsJamie 1351:contribs 1339:unsigned 1260:itsJamie 1245:contribs 1233:unsigned 1212:itsJamie 1189:contribs 1181:Friveraz 1177:unsigned 1170:Thanks, 1006:itsJamie 983:unsigned 957:itsJamie 918:itsJamie 841:Credits: 751:itsJamie 724:unsigned 699:thanks! 688:itsJamie 563:itsJamie 526:itsJamie 447:itsJamie 401:itsJamie 323:WikiLove 233:contribs 221:unsigned 204:itsJamie 189:contribs 177:unsigned 150:itsJamie 127:contribs 115:unsigned 77:itsJamie 58:contribs 46:unsigned 4192:comment 4161:Yours, 3705:Deadrom 3685:edits. 3566:WP:SOCK 3445:WP:SPAM 3433:notable 3174:Hello. 3053:WP:USER 2445:Kjin101 2397:Kjin101 2371:Kjin101 2086:Quote: 1641:Marlith 1522:Thanks! 1331:JEEZ... 1201:notable 944:Neparis 905:Neparis 340:Marlith 302:Marlith 31:Jamie, 4127:WP:COI 4088:mexico 4020:Tosoft 3780:BLAST! 3768:Cattle 3542:WP:COI 3449:WP:COI 3447:, and 3205:WP:COI 3203:, and 3197:WP:OWN 3182:Lgolos 2878:Miswod 2831:Miswod 2265:WP:COI 2101:.oOo. 2051:.oOo. 2034:.oOo. 2016:.oOo. 1973:.oOo. 1950:.oOo. 1748:cowboy 1709:has a 1361:Thanks 1225:Why??? 1205:WP:COI 1141:Love's 1059:my rfa 1041:Enigma 897:Chisso 882:Chisso 793:my RFA 646:WP:WMD 635:CSD R1 581:Maksdo 551:Maksdo 505:Maksdo 500:purge. 478:Maksdo 426:Maksdo 258:Beauty 250:Beauty 225:Mqrasi 181:Mqrasi 143:WP:COI 4113:Links 3717:juice 3712:Mango 3546:WP:EL 3441:WP:EL 3201:WP:EL 2359:Hi, 1819:Music 1379:Crocs 1367:Bitch 1318:Tucky 1273:above 1113:Tucky 1026:.) — 1024:class 1019:we're 940:WP:EL 932:WP:RS 783:→ → → 744:WP:EL 577:WP:EL 494:WP:EL 469:WP:EL 422:WP:EL 167:UFFFF 139:WP:EL 70:WP:EL 16:< 4171:OhNo 4132:OhNo 4104:talk 4073:OhNo 4041:OhNo 4024:talk 3980:OhNo 3949:talk 3929:OhNo 3913:talk 3891:Talk 3872:OhNo 3861:Talk 3836:talk 3804:OhNo 3791:talk 3784:) - 3764:edit 3750:talk 3730:OhNo 3688:OhNo 3663:OhNo 3654:this 3634:OhNo 3621:talk 3595:OhNo 3571:OhNo 3551:OhNo 3544:and 3526:talk 3484:OhNo 3454:OhNo 3417:talk 3380:talk 3290:talk 3260:OhNo 3244:talk 3210:OhNo 3186:talk 3119:OhNo 3091:talk 3087:NTFS 3058:OhNo 3051:See 3037:talk 3008:OhNo 2974:talk 2953:talk 2924:OhNo 2903:OhNo 2882:talk 2856:talk 2835:talk 2783:OhNo 2771:talk 2761:and 2738:OhNo 2719:talk 2703:and 2682:OhNo 2669:talk 2649:OhNo 2631:talk 2599:OhNo 2578:talk 2551:OhNo 2538:talk 2516:talk 2495:OhNo 2483:talk 2449:talk 2422:OhNo 2401:talk 2375:talk 2340:OhNo 2297:OhNo 2270:OhNo 2231:OhNo 2210:talk 2167:OhNo 2131:talk 1984:OhNo 1909:OhNo 1897:talk 1867:talk 1798:OhNo 1777:talk 1716:OhNo 1672:OhNo 1604:talk 1596:here 1565:OhNo 1505:talk 1480:OhNo 1463:talk 1427:OhNo 1401:OhNo 1347:talk 1294:talk 1258:OhNo 1241:talk 1210:OhNo 1185:talk 1129:Lara 1092:and 1045:talk 1004:OhNo 991:talk 955:OhNo 916:OhNo 893:WP:V 832:Love 820:Lara 805:and 749:OhNo 732:talk 686:OhNo 561:OhNo 524:OhNo 490:Dmoz 473:even 445:OhNo 440:here 399:OhNo 229:talk 202:OhNo 185:talk 148:OhNo 123:talk 75:OhNo 54:talk 4012:" 3945:srs 3909:srs 3229:on 2355:... 2333:;) 2312:... 2093:roy 2043:roy 2026:roy 2008:roy 1965:roy 1942:roy 1884:hey 1316:Van 1111:Van 1080:... 1078:RFA 637:). 460:one 294:Joy 4106:) 4062:gb 4030:) 4026:• 3969:. 3951:) 3915:) 3889:| 3859:| 3842:) 3838:• 3623:) 3532:) 3528:• 3443:, 3435:, 3423:) 3419:• 3386:) 3382:• 3338:) 3292:) 3246:) 3199:, 3188:) 3155::) 3093:) 3043:) 3039:• 2976:) 2955:) 2888:) 2884:• 2858:) 2841:) 2837:• 2773:) 2725:) 2721:• 2671:) 2637:) 2633:• 2596:. 2584:) 2580:• 2540:) 2518:) 2485:) 2455:) 2451:• 2407:) 2403:• 2381:) 2377:• 2319:-- 2216:) 2212:• 2133:) 1962:-- 1899:) 1891:-- 1873:) 1869:• 1779:) 1606:) 1540:-- 1511:) 1507:• 1477:. 1465:) 1353:) 1349:• 1296:) 1247:) 1243:• 1191:) 1187:• 1047:) 993:) 734:) 496:. 442:. 235:) 231:• 191:) 187:• 129:) 125:• 60:) 56:• 4102:( 4022:( 3947:( 3911:( 3834:( 3775:( 3758:) 3753:· 3748:( 3619:( 3524:( 3415:( 3378:( 3330:( 3288:( 3242:( 3233:? 3184:( 3089:( 3035:( 2972:( 2951:( 2880:( 2854:( 2833:( 2769:( 2717:( 2667:( 2629:( 2576:( 2536:( 2514:( 2481:( 2447:( 2399:( 2373:( 2208:( 2129:( 1895:( 1865:( 1841:c 1838:/ 1835:t 1775:( 1655:C 1650:/ 1602:( 1503:( 1461:( 1345:( 1292:( 1239:( 1183:( 1135:❤ 1043:( 989:( 826:❤ 730:( 354:C 349:/ 316:C 311:/ 276:c 273:/ 270:t 227:( 183:( 121:( 52:(

Index

User talk:Ohnoitsjamie
unsigned
RacerCub68
talk
contribs
17:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
WP:EL
OhNoitsJamie

17:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
unsigned
RacerCub68
talk
contribs
17:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
WP:EL
WP:COI
OhNoitsJamie

17:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
UFFFF
unsigned
Mqrasi
talk
contribs
11:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
OhNoitsJamie

17:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
unsigned

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑