1457:). I decided to initiate this RfC over the actions of two users who I believe to be seriously impeding the constructive development of this article into an encyclopedia-quality description of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. In one case the editor's behavior was long term. In the other, the editor responded to negotiation efforts I initiated with him on the talk page with unprovoked personal hostility against me, which in turn led me to first warn him of the potential need for an RfC and then follow through as his belligerence continued. I am hopeful that this process will assist in working out the differences that exist on the LVMI article and help to direct the responsible editors toward making their future contributions in compliance with the neutrality mandate and with other Knowledge standards and policies.
1202:
or what he was thinking on the subject. If that were true, then
Buddhism would technically be born when the first Buddhist text was published or the first disciple began preaching Buddhism to another disciple or perhaps the first Buddhist temple. Although from a Buddhist's perspective, it matters not where the Buddha was born but when he passed away as he reached enlightenment then. But most historians, tibetans, southeast asians, and Nepalese believe that Nepal is the Birthplace of Buddhism. Nepal and Tibet have a longer history of Buddhism than India, if I remember correctly.
1273:"My friends tell me" is not a valid argument, and your argument Nat, is simply a play on words. Of course anarchism and Bakunin socialism are virutally equivalent - but for that matter so is left libertarianism. Youre saying that left libertarianism is indistinct from socialism, but forgetting to say that right libertarianism is equally equivalent to capitalism. How can "libetarianism" = capitalism. Your "I agree with this sentence completely" is likewise insincere and disingenous - you know the anon intented to say "POV," for which he would be correct. -SV|t
322:
which he refered to himself as an anarchist or explicitly accepted the title, even though he is often introduced as one. However, it is a matter of controversy, I've seen debates go on and on about this, and I don't think there is any really solid evidence one way or the other, mostly because so many of his statements are qualified and conditioned like this one. I honestly wish someone on Zmag would just ask him, "do you consider yourself an anarchist, yes or no?" so that he can say no and there will be no more debate about it.
630:
hope that handing over this matter, which tantamounts to indirect edit war to the larger community of wikipedians shall be a better solution. What do you feel? Please carefully read what you reverted and what you have placed now. I am sure that you will agree that your reversal has made this bluechip article again read like a half baked bread? You being so senior should surely understand the difference. Am I wrong? Thanks.--
522:. What made you think it was okay to move it to an odd title (I've much more usually heard of him as "Peter Philarges," or "Pietro Philarghi" anyway) I have no idea. The single exception to this is the Duke of Savoy who became antipope, since he was better known as a duke of Savoy than as an anti-pope. At any rate, making a move without even attempting to discuss it, on a page where there was,
100:
little bit of the
Classical definition is original but the rest is not.) I will not let Sparta be called anything but a republic! I will not let the British wikipedian modern republicans strip Sparta, (my heritage and roots) of her rightful name. She is a Classical republic and needs to be called such! At the least, where is the damage in having an external link?
466:
about
Buddhism. Have a nice time ... One thing more, I would suggest all persons editing articles on Buddhism should try that some articles related to Buddhism get featured article status. Actually, we should move towards that objective. As and when I get pictures, say within a month, I will upload them for use by others interested in the same. byee ...--
1268:"In my view, the naming of this article and the introduction are NPOV." I agree with this sentence completely. The rest of what you say is quite debatable. The anarchists I've talked to, other than anarcho-capitalists, are enthusiastically in favor of being regarded as socialists. - Nat Krause 11:04, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)"
1485:
Thank you for the feedback. Indeed I have been authorised by the website (exoticindiaart.com) for the content that I have posted on the
Knowledge pages, you are welcome to restore the edits. Also I have been careful to add only those links that will add value to the content of the page. Most of these
1302:
My compromise was totally ignored by individuals on both sides of the divide, and RJ and Hogeye actually seem to enjoy having the article tossed about. I'm willing to accept your compromise of having both a disambiguation and an anarcho-capitalism section, but I think there need to be some specifics
1201:
Most historians would state that the area where the Buddha was born and lived would be considered the birthplace of the Buddha and thus the birthplace of
Buddhism. It's difficult to state where Buddhism or any religion was truly born then if you use definitions depending on the Buddha's mental state
827:
As for what you added to the Crips article, I do not doubt that is what that particular book said about the origin of the name, but that is only one of the dozens of versions of where the name came from. I personally don't think that particular theory deserves any more or less prominence than some of
777:
is known in
English by the use of the Thai word for a respected teacher combined with his name). Because of this, I think for future edits we should keep the reference to Buddhadasa Bhikkhu in the article text even if the article is located at Buddhadasa. Also, do you have access to the Thai language
646:
at present. There's only so much you can write about one single basketball position - is there enough to write an entire article on each one? Get back to me with your opinion, thanks (I ask you because you contributed to each of the position pages and I've asked you about these pages on a different
337:
Look at his 1970 talk on "government in the future" he states there that he believes in anarchism or as it is sometimes called libertarian socialism. It is actually a fascinating talk, you can even listen to the full original recording on zNet. Behind that there is a recent book published by AK press
304:
I figured as much. There is absolutely nothing there saying that
Chomsky supports the draft. What he does say is that he didn't oppose it. You do recognise that there is a difference between supporting something and not opposing something, right? Further, he even explains why, " If there is to be
629:
I would request you to please take care that your reverting to an earlier position does not wash away the edits by a series of other users – that also, without giving any cogent reasons. Please assist in maintaining the wiki traditions of discussions/consensus, before taking such major reversals. I
214:
I'm glad you mentioned him. (I see this titles thing as a minor calling; i gave "HH Pope JP" a Nhat-Hanh-like treatment a week or so ago, tho i dread to look at the article in the midst of all this.) I don't know right off how to deal with his case; his publicity machine may have made his title/name
465:
I fully agree with you, I will use only few pictures, very few in the
Mahabodhi Temple article. Pictures will not come by next sunday, but by sunday, I will edit the article, taking all information from your edit, which I reverted today. By the way, it is great to learn that you know so many things
321:
Actually, I tend to agree. I don't think
Chomsky is an anarchist, he seems to think of anarchism as a far future ideal rather than something to push for today, which makes his position more akin to the less authoritarian communists than an anarchist. In fact, I've never seen a single interview in
99:
be the modern meaning and a to describe the ancient republics of Hellas and Rome and their influence. To say the least the "Republic section" is all messed up. We need some clarification. I have new information but User:Snowspinner won't let me bring this back up for undelete. (I do grant that a
862:
I know that there is still garbage in the article, but I haven't done enough research to know what to keep and what to weed out. And worse yet, the subject matter is a perfect example of why you often can't rely upon the information that you find on the internet. At least the Crips article usually
750:
On the suject of: Bodhisattva.. specifically that image that you uploaded to the site on the subject. With the caption of "Image of a bodhisattva, relief, from
Jiuhuashan in China's Anhui province. Photograph taken by uploader June 2004" I need some more information about this photo and where it's
540:
is completely irrelevant - I did not use the word "fuck" in main name space, but only in edit summaries and talk space. As to wikiquette, I suppose you have me there. But I'm certainly not going to apologize. I certainly might have expressed myself in a less offensive manner, but I particularly
1315:
The section on anarcho-capitalism does not appear under "schools" and is relatively small. Maybe two sentences for what it is, one sentence from prominent folks, one sentence explaining why it isn't discussed in this article and a link to both the anarcho-capitalism article and whatever debate
1468:. A formatted area is also provided on the RfC for the named editors to respond to the complaint. Thank you for your continued work on the LVMI article and for your patience during this process, as it is my hope that we will be able to produce an agreeable quality product upon its conclusion.
1194:
Nat, Buddhism originated in Nepal, not India. Many Indians believe that it originated in South India, but the vast majority of people in the world, including those who write the encyclopedia brittanica and other textbooks dealing with the history of Buddhism agree that it orginated in Nepal.
1460:
You are also welcome to contribute to this RfC, and as a participant in the LVMI article development your participation here may be beneficial. To those who are unfamiliar, participants may contribute by endorsing (or declining to endorse) the RfC case regarding the problem users as stated.
856:
article that I was doing a little work on. It seems to be a regular target for adding urban myths and misinformation from wannabes, so I've kept it on my Watchlist. As I've read more about the various theories about the origin of the Crips name, I have decided that one of the more credible
242:
mentioned him before now, my own inclination orally would in practice be "the Maharishi" and probably using "Maharishi Mahesh Yogi" only to answer a properly phrased direct question. But i'm gonna scratch my head some more, and do at least a little more Google research. Thanks again;
618:
to consider all these factors. His reversal has taken down the templete conveying that it is a world heritage site. This is highly awkward. In case, you want to edit the article, it is ok, but always reverting to a particular point of time is against the wiki principles, I feel so.
230:
MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI, SPIRITUAL GURU AND AUTHOR: Title, I think. People begin to call significant of the characteristic of the word "Maharishi." "Maha" means great and "Rishi" is a seer. The seer of reality. The seer, that's what people called, and it became a sort of
1346:
I hope this sounds reasonable to you, but I seriously doubt that RJ, Dtobias, Hogeye, or ChuckO would agree to any of it. I'm hoping that the combination of outside editors, a few reasonable caps, and a few reasonable anarchists, would allow this compromise to work.
658:
My concern is that there won't be enough to write an entire article on any one position (i.e. the article will be doomed to shortness) - I say this because, as far as I can see, the only things left to write are how the positions work together (btw I will create the
663:
page after this). Sorry if I'm bothering you, but I just wanted to ask someone with more knowledge than me specifically what there is else to write on one particular position - I'm thinking even history and development would require all positions in one article.
574:, which Einstein defined as “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.” (my emphasis) I wouldn't make a big deal about it, but I don't like having things as vague as "some anarcho-capitalists" if it can be avoided.
526:, a discussion on the talk page about whether it should be moved, and in a manner completely inconsistent with every other article about an antipope or pope on wikipedia, is out of line, especially for someone who's been around for a long time.
1449:
article, I wanted to inform you that I have started a "Request for Comment" (RfC) proceeding over this article in light of continued disruptive and abusive editing behavior by two other participants there. The RfC is located at the link here
1341:
The link and books section will not contain information on anarcho-capitalism, again because this article has been disambiguated and all those links can go on their page which is linked both directly and through the prominent warning at the
1048:! I'm assuming this was an error rather than some cunning plan to trap wikipedians in a never ending redirect cycle. Just wannted to inform you so you could replace the redirect with whatever you originally intended it should be.
737:
What you say or think about buddhism is not always right, please allow others to contribute to the articles on the wiki, and please don't assume you have the finally say on the articles and revert comple version of the articles.
91:
doesn't refer to the Classical republics of Crete, Sparta, Solonic Athens, or Rome but to Machiavelli's ideology. How can that be when Venice in the 13th century instituted a mixed government and called herself a "Republic".
1329:
The disambiguation warning which states what this article is about is not to be defined by anarcho-capitalists, this article would not at that point be about them regardless of the fact that it mentions them, because it is
567:
is pretty clear about it: "Give state officials a monopoly on the use of force and they will abuse that monopoly to advance their power, wealth, and prestige. Depending on government to protect liberty is not tragedy, but
397:
Stop interfering/deleting my text. That behaviour is hypocritical and innacurate - You are only trying to deny me my voice and my opinion that "anarcho-capitalist"/right-wing vandalising and TROLLING is going on. -
452:
14:00, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) PS: Ok I got your message right now on the Mahabodhi Temple discussion page. But, please allow me time till sunday. I will do a "medium path" - I promise and keep everything, which you had
1126:
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in
1453:. In case you have not participated in an RfC before, it is the first step after the talk page in Knowledge's dispute resolution process for articles in which an agreement cannot be easily reached (outlined at
281:
I do not agree with what you've done, since many people must have collaborated to that specific section you just deleted. I ask you to please open a thread on the talk page and put back what you've deleted.
1540:
page was originally a redirect for the other (and thus had already been created), the quickest way to do so was to C&P everything. It wasn't my intention to obscure the authorship. Again, apologies.--
778:
version of his name? I don't know how to upload Thai-language scripts and I also have lost my source material which spelled his name in Thai. Any other info on his life is also greatly appreciated. Best. --
1335:
There will not be mention of anarcho-capitalism throughout the article, including historical precursors that only apply to anarcho-capitalism, constant comparisons, and history of anarchism through the AC
742:
Anyway, you asked for copyright information on the images that I have put on the buddhism article. I state that they are my images that I have taken, if you require further information please let me know.
59:
1310:
The dismabiguation, which indicates that this article is about anarchism as it is traditionally defined (or whatever), points to the anarchism disambiguation article, saying that this is not the only use.
1378:
1464:
per the RfC page's instructions and entail the use of a tilde signature in the normal fashion. RfC participants may also contribute by way of discussion of the RfC case and all pertinent materials here
813:). I have never seen anywhere a connection between the two, appart from some vague suggestions from time to time. I really don't think the articles should be merged. Thanks for the notice. Best regards.
642:
Hi, do you think it would be better to have basketball positions on separate pages as they are now, or as one article outlining each one in turn as well as their interactions? There is no article on
682:
Haii guy Nat Krause, I stumbled on your user page and saw several topics waiting - on which you wanto2make article. I alredy starto worko - u may finish and updateo ok .. by bye tata - with a basket
828:
the other theories. I do think, however, that you should add Leon's book to the article as a new References section. The Crips article needs lots of work to improve it, but I haven't had the time.
899:
I just found out your change to my user page :-) Thanks a lot for it, it means a lot to me, in particular since I am so little on en.wikipedia now. I honestly feel warmed up by it. I appreciated.
1554:
Well, I never know if I will stick around - WP is something I have to monitor -- so many things need doing! But indeed, everything is copacetic, and my life is complete. Good to hear from you! (
560:, "attacks on Virginia Postrel, Brink Lindsey, Tom Palmer, David Boaz (heck, just about the whole Cato staff) and other alleged apostates galore are constant, vitriolic, ad hominem, and vicious."
702:
Suggestions - requesting assistance in improving articles suggested by you, please continue to expand your list of article you want to write, so that I am not short of topics. I would call you
370:
706:- I am sure you must be feeling light at me having shared a lot of your responsibility and work. Now, I will also concentrate on your existing articles - please allow me, please.--
725:
Thanks for the NPOV edits, I've been resisting doing it for a while so as not to provoke another edit war, I think they were sorely needed though. Hopefully they will stick. --
1486:
links are to the articles on exoticindiaart.com, which are essentially non-commercial pages. As you have suggested, I will not be linking to any page that is selling anything.
1168:
1321:
The disambiguation page, once it is unprotected, is strengthened to indicate clearly what anarcho-capitalists percieve the term to mean, and again points to their article.
1094:
1061:
1025:
971:
1055:
152:
with a note to the effect that saying nothing is better than asserting two apparently contradictory versions without acknowledging the appearance of contradiction.
1408:
1081:
942:
507:
1435:
1131:? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. --
992:
You are right, it's good to explain why the article was tagged as a copyright violation, but I didn't tag this article. I just do a lot of maintenance on
707:
691:
687:
382:
87:
instead. The official title of mixed government is a Republic and the Romans translated "politiea" as Republic. And then to top it off the new article
1525:
511:
180:
hasn't put you off editing on Buddhist topics; if it did, that would be, at the least, information i would want to weigh in the long run. Be well. --
79:. They won't even allow an external link! SimonP really doesn't know what he is doing. They deleted the Classical definition of republic and created
1203:
1196:
788:
779:
710:
990:...but it would be good if you would describe your reasons for nominating it on the page itself, on the talk page, or at least in an edit summary...
690:
11:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)postscript: in case, you r short of time, i will continue to exapand the topics to the best of my knowledge. bai bai ta ta --
174:
it is not high on my priorities, but knowing you don't want to now do so may raise it, and if so i expect your assessment to be valuable guidance.
1409:
885:
460:
1286:
to a blank page. Your edit summary suggests you had something reasonable in mind, could you please take a look and see if you can fix this? --
358:
101:
588:
Sorry it took so long for me to reply--I had final exams and my computer broke down. I'll defer to you on the issue. Thanks for your reply.
238:
I can't decide whether "Maharishi" (as if it were a name) or "the Maharishi" (explicitly a title) is more PoV! While i can't remember if i've
614:
I just donot fine the reason for reverting an article to earlier position when the article has passed through several hands. I would request
410:
I responded to your concerns on the property section. I hope you don't mind that I reformatted your entry to make it easier to respond to.
488:
Perhaps, given the confusion engendered by moves, I am falsely accusing you. If so, I'm sorry. That said, whoever moved the article out of
1248:
1462:
773:
because, as you say, bhikkhu is a job description. However, Buddhadasa Bhikkhu is the name by which he is known in English (just as
671:
752:
310:
In order for you to demonstrate that he supports the draft you will need an answer to the question, "should there be an army?"
1510:
1233:
1544:
440:
I saw your nice and informative articles on various topics, pertaining to Buddhism. I am sure to learn from you. As regards
556:
I have to disagree with you about Rockwellians not being hostile to minarchists: according to one of the articles cited in
392:
694:
791:
782:
1515:
342:
116:
The Dalai Lamas, however, never had authority over every region of Tibet nor over the other sects of Tibetan Buddhism.
211:"a thieving Albanian dwarf"! Otherwise i might tell you my feelings, based on my inadequately supported suspicions.
1558:
1351:
1128:
977:
Hi Nat, two things; 1) don't remove copyright violation tags. 2) your reason for removing the copyright violation,
846:
541:
can't stand it when somebody does something stupid and then hides behind wikiquette when someone calls them on it.
244:
817:
1472:
729:
278:
bibliographies. And as far as I can see the majority of good articles and papers do include recommended reading.
857:
possibilities is one that is not in the article right now—that the name came from "crib" streets or cul-de-sacs.
261:
without even trying to discuss it at the talk page for the referred article. I don't think that's very healthy.
514:. If you'd bothered to look at the talk page, you'd have seen that Alexander V had just been the subject of a
47:
You had asked on my user page about copyright for the photo of Lama Surya Das. I obtained this image from his
1454:
993:
637:
1521:
809:(the Buddha's tribe) are totally unrelated, although both were probably Indo-Aryan (since the Shakya were
72:
734:
I can see you have modified other articles without thinking about it and reverting to previous version.
1466:
1446:
1399:
930:
1283:
999:
In this case, no explanation was necessary, since the article noted what was copied and from where. --
435:
107:
1415:
I thought I had explained. This was Mr Kinsella's vanity page, deleted a while ago. He recreated it
1398:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on
1227:
1029:
155:
158:. I recall you as a very responsible discussant, and i'd bet you can fix this without a lot of fuss.
1531:
1498:
1390:
1167:
751:
located etc.. If you could contact me perhaps we could speak on the subject a bit.. E-mail me at:
496:
might be appropriate, and there was discussion of the move, but Pietro di Candia is simply wrong.
338:
called "Chomsky on Anarchism" which is collection of works all about his thoughts on anarchism.--
88:
1361:
If you are knowledgeable on the subject, could u add the Yin Shun view of what the Maitreya is?
1121:
787:
Update: I found someone to upload his Thai name. Any other info you have is still apreciated. --
853:
1377:
1174:
I dont know, its hard to tell what the image is although it is "explosive" warning I believe.
220:
1384:
913:
852:
I stumbled upon the Crips article as I was following all the "What links here" links for the
561:
545:
530:
500:
492:
to one based on his original name deserved it, since this is utterly unsupported by policy.
482:
200:
1451:
970:
71:
Need your help and/or advice. The British Wikipedian Republican Party sought fit to delete
1432:
1362:
1223:
1182:
1137:
1045:
1041:
962:
880:
841:
665:
648:
519:
493:
204:
17:
371:
Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Che_y_Marijuana#Users_certifying_the_basis_for_this_dispute
8:
1524:
to validate some of the assertions made there as well as to expand, if possible? Thanks.
1507:
1256:
1155:
796:
660:
643:
537:
1277:
1178:
Maybe you're right, mystery man. The image doesn't look so good in such a small size. -
564:
405:
249:
51:
of the website. There are no stated restrictions on the usage of the photo. Thanks! --
1114:
766:
760:
592:
581:
414:
190:
1297:
677:
430:
936:
1291:
1110:
1077:
607:
600:
542:
527:
497:
489:
479:
441:
339:
80:
1549:
1537:
1503:
Question, how was the image vandalized? But thanks for doing what you have done.
1469:
1428:
1416:
1179:
1132:
1106:
1102:
1069:
950:
868:
829:
668:
651:
615:
291:
184:
164:
149:
1255:
1024:. As you commented on the article's talk page, I'd appreciate your comments at
95:
With Jwrosenwieg and Kim Bruning there was a tacit agreement a year ago to have
1504:
1492:
1098:
1073:
557:
426:
399:
386:
362:
257:
I couldn't help but notice that you wiped out an entire section of the article
208:
1214:
As you are never LOGIN to do EDITS please use following to sign your comments
606:
My Dear Nat Krause, I would invite your attention to the following message on
369:
You apparently certify the RfC, but you also need to add your signature here:
1555:
1541:
1424:
1325:
However, if I went with such a solution I would be firm about the following:
1049:
1021:
946:
921:
822:
726:
718:
589:
578:
411:
154:
But i searched back thru the edits, and was rewarded by finding your name at
129:
76:
36:
929:. If you have another interesting fact to submit, then please suggest it at
1161:
1154:
has officially taken it upon himself to officially accuse you of vandalism
1017:
1008:
900:
631:
620:
467:
454:
449:
374:
285:
133:
52:
1085:
599:
473:
305:
an army, it would be best, I think, for it to be mainly a citizen’s army."
1440:
1420:
1348:
1287:
1151:
323:
311:
297:
1477:
448:, and shall be inserted in due course of time. Wish you happy editing.--
42:
1394:, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the
925:, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the
867:
article on my Watchlist for awhile, which regular gets bullshit added.
774:
770:
181:
161:
420:
235:
So at least i know what to say to stubborn supporters in this case.
26:
1395:
981:, has nothing to do with whether its a copyright violation or not. --
926:
810:
445:
177:
906:
1000:
982:
814:
429:
page is up for deletion by Che. You might want to vote to keep it:
96:
84:
32:
1007:
551:
444:
article, original pictures are being arranged from my contacts in
48:
1445:
Greetings - as an active participant in the ongoing edits to the
864:
296:
Chomsky supports the draft? Didn't know that. Have a source?
274:
As far as I can see, wikipedia articles, many and many of them,
806:
1056:
Condorcet Voting for the next Arbitration Committee Elections?
996:
and noticed that the copyvio tag had been improperly removed.
719:
141:
132:
from when the Gelugpas began to control the country (the mid-
125:
1062:
Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005
66:
1026:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/W. Mark Felt/archive1
802:
703:
137:
1356:
1189:
1158:
1035:
258:
945:, which you created, has been nominated for deletion at
863:
doesn't get a whole lot of racist shit added. I had the
245:"I wanted a mission, and for my sins they gave me one."
1145:
891:
60:
Image talk:Anhui Province Dongzhi County.jpg#Copyright
1244:
I am Sorry to use your talk page to talk to Kenneth.
1306:I'm willing to compromise on the following points:
461:
Buddhism related articles - Featured article status
383:
Knowledge talk:Requests for comment/Che y Marijuana
203:? It's probably lucky that i lack the eloquence of
75:from Knowledge. There is a terrible brouhaha at
1417:to illustrate a point, thus disrupting Knowledge
1368:
1068:I strongly recommend that we should change from
352:
1410:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Stephan Kinsella 2
1419:, so I speedy deleted it for him. The proper
1157:. I took him to task for it on his talk page
359:Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Che_y_Marijuana
270:section. Does Knowledge usually have those?
176:I hope our difficulty getting closer about
1388:has been updated. A fact from the article
478:What the fuck do you think you're doing?
754:. Thanx for the info btw.. good stuff ;)
35:! Come and visit if you get a chance...
1086:Condorcet Internet Voting Service (CIVS)
393:Stop vandalising my Talk:Anarchism entry
73:Wikinfo:Classical definition of republic
31:I'm back on Knowledge and have moved to
1074:Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping
14:
1536:Sorry about that. However, since the
1516:Guru/disciple relationship in Buddhism
1040:just to let you know, on the article
140:, when the Dalai Lama had to flee to
1461:Endorsements should be placed here
1113:. But their proposal came to late.
686:ful of thanks for the topic bank.--
23:
24:
1570:
1522:Guru-shishya_tradition#In_Budhism
124:The Dalai Lama has been ruler of
1376:
264:You wrote in your edit summary:
1220:It will output something like.
1082:Arbitration Committee Elections
610:discussion page, posted by me:
357:Your help and certification at
227:Is Maharishi a title or a name?
1282:You appear to have redirected
436:Your nice articles on Buddhism
112:My first impulse was to move
108:Political power of Dalai Lamas
13:
1:
1400:the "Did you know?" talk page
1044:, you created a redirect, to
577:Let me know what you think.
1528:19:06, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
1455:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
1169:Template:Revertwarinprogress
994:Knowledge:Copyright problems
919:and a fact from the article
7:
1559:08:42, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
1545:05:49, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
1365:02:33, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
1150:I thought you should know,
1122:lots of edits, not an admin
1084:. We can use Andrew Myers'
170:Thanks for your response.
10:
1575:
1447:Ludwig von Mises Institute
1294:June 29, 2005 05:20 (UTC)
1142:17:42, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
1097:, it has been proposed by
1032:15:02, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
584:20:28, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
343:09:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
1520:Could you take a look at
1511:22:12, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
1473:00:19, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
1436:13:20, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
1352:05:33, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
1316:articles ACs want linked.
1217:{{user|kennethtennyson}}
1164:12:10, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1052:12:08, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
985:01:03, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
972:Definitions of capitalism
967:11:23, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
910:
801:Hi Nat, as far as I know
654:12:42, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
634:09:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
548:05:52, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
533:05:39, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
503:03:38, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
485:03:27, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
470:14:26, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
457:14:05, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
417:18:28, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
104:15:15, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1391:Ali bin Hussein of Hejaz
1251:15:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1185:15:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1093:Already during the last
1003:07:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
903:21:00, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
886:06:26, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
847:15:33, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
818:11:32, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
792:11:33, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
783:18:11, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
623:08:07, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
595:16:20, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
402:22:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
389:17:48, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
365:05:47, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
300:06:45, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
288:20:02, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
187:17:08, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)
167:14:21, 2005 Apr 1 (UTC)
39:7 July 2005 14:48 (UTC)
1284:Libertatis Æquilibritas
1278:Libertatis Æquilibritas
931:the section's talk page
765:I'm fine with changing
730:16:55, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
711:18:42, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
695:11:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
672:10:50, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
406:libertarianism/property
377:10:15, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
326:09:00, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
314:08:05, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
89:Classical republicanism
854:Long Beach, California
518:attempt to move it to
361:would be appreciated.
1088:to count the ballots.
943:Template:Disinfo-test
937:Template:Disinfo-test
506:All antipopes are at
201:Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
1046:Flemish independence
1042:Flemish independence
1030:PedanticallySpeaking
666:User talk:Neonumbers
649:User talk:Neonumbers
638:Basketball positions
520:Antipope Alexander V
508:Antipope Name Number
494:Antipope Alexander V
266:Removing the entire
205:Christopher Hitchens
58:Discussion moved to
18:User talk:Nat Krause
1423:is for it to go on
1257:Talk:Libertarianism
661:basketball position
644:basketball position
538:Knowledge:Profanity
219:as Gandhi-ji's. I
767:Buddhadasa Bhikkhu
49:Press Room section
1406:
1405:
1141:
1566:
1532:Sadako page move
1499:Uładzimir Karvat
1380:
1373:
1372:
1135:
1111:Condorcet voting
1078:Condorcet method
1060:I wrote this at
965:
960:
955:
916:has been updated
883:
878:
873:
844:
839:
834:
608:Mahabodhi Temple
601:Mahabodhi Temple
512:Pope Name Number
510:. Popes are at
490:Pope Alexander V
474:Pietro di Candia
442:Mahabodhi Temple
156:the relevant one
81:mixed government
1574:
1573:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1552:
1538:Sadako Yamamura
1534:
1518:
1501:
1480:
1478:exoticindia.com
1443:
1413:
1371:
1363:freestylefrappe
1359:
1300:
1280:
1260:
1237:
1224:kennethtennyson
1218:
1204:kennethtennyson
1197:kennethtennyson
1192:
1172:
1148:
1124:
1107:approval voting
1105:to change from
1080:, for the next
1070:approval voting
1058:
1038:
1012:
975:
963:
956:
951:
939:
934:
918:
909:
894:
881:
874:
869:
842:
835:
830:
825:
805:(Scythian) and
799:
763:
723:
680:
647:matter before)
640:
616:User:Nat Krause
604:
554:
476:
463:
438:
432:Thanks. (RJII)
423:
408:
395:
355:
294:
268:further reading
252:
193:
150:Talk:Dalai Lama
110:
69:
45:
43:Image copyright
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1572:
1551:
1548:
1533:
1530:
1517:
1514:
1500:
1497:
1495:July 30, 2005
1489:Thanks again.
1479:
1476:
1442:
1439:
1412:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1381:
1370:
1367:
1358:
1355:
1344:
1343:
1338:
1337:
1332:
1331:
1330:disambiguated.
1323:
1322:
1318:
1317:
1312:
1311:
1299:
1296:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1245:
1239:
1222:
1216:
1211:Dear Kenneth,
1208:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1171:
1166:
1147:
1144:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1115:Markus Schulze
1090:
1089:
1057:
1054:
1037:
1034:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1005:
1004:
997:
974:
969:
938:
935:
911:
908:
905:
893:
890:
889:
888:
859:
858:
824:
821:
798:
795:
762:
759:
757:
746:
741:
722:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
679:
676:
675:
674:
639:
636:
603:
598:
597:
596:
558:Libertarianism
553:
550:
524:a few days ago
475:
472:
462:
459:
437:
434:
427:left anarchism
422:
421:left anarchism
419:
407:
404:
394:
391:
379:
378:
354:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
330:
329:
328:
327:
316:
315:
307:
306:
293:
290:
251:
248:
233:
232:
228:
209:Mother Theresa
192:
189:
175:
159:
153:
146:
145:
118:
117:
109:
106:
68:
65:
44:
41:
28:
27:Hows it going?
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1571:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1529:
1527:
1523:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1506:
1496:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1483:
1475:
1474:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1458:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1438:
1437:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1411:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1387:
1386:
1385:Did you know?
1382:
1379:
1375:
1374:
1366:
1364:
1354:
1353:
1350:
1340:
1339:
1334:
1333:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1320:
1319:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1304:
1303:worked out.
1295:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1261:
1258:
1250:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1235:
1232:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1215:
1212:
1209:
1206:
1205:
1199:
1198:
1184:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1165:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1143:
1139:
1134:
1130:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1053:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1010:
1002:
998:
995:
991:
988:
987:
986:
984:
980:
973:
968:
966:
961:
959:
954:
948:
944:
932:
928:
924:
923:
922:Joseph Rainey
917:
915:
907:Did you know?
904:
902:
897:
887:
884:
879:
877:
872:
866:
861:
860:
855:
851:
850:
849:
848:
845:
840:
838:
833:
820:
819:
816:
812:
808:
804:
794:
793:
790:
785:
784:
781:
776:
772:
768:
758:
755:
753:
748:
744:
739:
735:
732:
731:
728:
721:
712:
709:
705:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
693:
689:
685:
673:
670:
667:
662:
657:
656:
655:
653:
650:
645:
635:
633:
627:
626:
622:
617:
613:
609:
602:
594:
591:
587:
586:
585:
583:
580:
575:
573:
572:
566:
562:
559:
549:
547:
544:
539:
534:
532:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
504:
502:
499:
495:
491:
486:
484:
481:
471:
469:
458:
456:
451:
447:
443:
433:
431:
428:
418:
416:
413:
403:
401:
390:
388:
384:
381:I replied on
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
364:
360:
344:
341:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
325:
320:
319:
318:
317:
313:
309:
308:
303:
302:
301:
299:
289:
287:
283:
279:
277:
272:
271:
267:
262:
260:
255:
250:"Zen" article
247:
246:
241:
236:
229:
226:
225:
224:
222:
218:
212:
210:
207:, who called
206:
202:
198:
188:
186:
183:
179:
173:
168:
166:
163:
157:
151:
143:
139:
135:
131:
130:Head of State
127:
123:
122:
121:
115:
114:
113:
105:
103:
98:
93:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:Talk:Republic
74:
64:
63:
61:
55:
54:
50:
40:
38:
34:
19:
1553:
1535:
1519:
1502:
1491:
1488:
1484:
1481:
1459:
1444:
1414:
1389:
1383:
1360:
1345:
1324:
1305:
1301:
1281:
1238:
1230:
1219:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1200:
1193:
1173:
1149:
1125:
1117:20 June 2005
1059:
1039:
1018:W. Mark Felt
1016:I nominated
1013:
1009:W. Mark Felt
989:
978:
976:
957:
952:
940:
920:
914:Did you know
912:
898:
895:
875:
870:
836:
831:
826:
800:
786:
764:
756:
749:
745:
740:
736:
733:
724:
708:MissingLinks
692:MissingLinks
688:MissingLinks
683:
681:
641:
628:
624:
611:
605:
576:
570:
569:
563:For example
555:
552:Rockwellites
535:
523:
515:
505:
487:
477:
464:
439:
424:
409:
396:
380:
356:
295:
284:
280:
275:
273:
269:
265:
263:
256:
253:
239:
237:
234:
216:
213:
196:
194:
171:
169:
147:
134:17th century
119:
111:
94:
70:
57:
56:
46:
30:
1508:(Sound Off)
1421:bureaucracy
941:The unused
797:Saka/Shakya
340:Fluxaviator
223:quickly!:
217:untouchable
1470:Rangerdude
1133:Rick Block
1103:Nat Krause
789:Alabamaboy
780:Alabamaboy
775:Ajahn Chah
771:Buddhadasa
761:Buddhadasa
669:Neonumbers
652:Neonumbers
221:found this
199:about the
1526:≈ jossi ≈
1505:Zscout370
1493:Seemagoel
1396:Main Page
1298:Anarchism
1180:Nat Kraus
1129:this list
1099:Johnleemk
1095:elections
927:Main Page
811:Kshatriya
678:Thank you
565:this post
446:Bodh Gaya
400:max rspct
387:Philwelch
363:Philwelch
195:How do i
178:Nhat Hanh
67:Republics
1556:20040302
1542:Mitsukai
1482:Hi Nat,
1357:Maitreya
1234:contribs
1190:Buddhism
1050:Grunners
1036:redirect
727:Wgfinley
571:insanity
215:as, uh,
97:republic
85:politeia
33:Jinghong
1550:Hi too!
1162:Saswann
1014:Salve!
901:Anthere
865:Kwanzaa
632:Bhadani
625:Unquote
621:Bhadani
468:Bhadani
455:Bhadani
453:done.--
450:Bhadani
375:Viajero
292:Chomsky
286:Porcher
276:do have
254:Hello,
191:...etc.
102:WHEELER
53:Evandra
1425:WP:VFU
1288:Jmabel
1263:Copied
1152:Alfrem
1146:Alfrem
1022:WP:FAC
979:no url
947:WP:TFD
892:thanks
807:Shakya
593:(talk)
582:(talk)
516:failed
415:(talk)
172:Fixing
136:until
1249:Bijee
1240:Nat~
1020:as a
958:Verse
953:Blank
876:Verse
871:Blank
837:Verse
832:Blank
823:Crips
747:==
720:ACORN
612:Quote
536:BTW,
231:name.
182:Jerzy
162:Jerzy
160:TIA,
142:India
126:Tibet
120:and
16:<
1429:Dunc
1342:top.
1336:pov.
1292:Talk
1228:talk
1138:talk
1101:and
1076:, a
803:Saka
704:Guru
684:fool
590:Dave
579:Dave
543:john
528:john
498:john
480:john
425:The
412:Dave
240:ever
197:feel
138:1959
128:and
83:and
37:prat
1441:RfC
1369:DYK
1349:Kev
1109:to
1072:to
1028:.
1001:Duk
983:Duk
896:Hi
815:PHG
769:to
373:--
353:Che
324:Kev
312:Kev
298:Kev
259:Zen
185:(t)
165:(t)
148:to
1561:)
1427:.
1402:.
1290:|
1236:)
1160:.
1064::
949:.
933:.
619:--
385:.
144:).
1433:☺
1431:|
1247:-
1231:·
1226:(
1183:e
1140:)
1136:(
964:∅
882:∅
843:∅
546:k
531:k
501:k
483:k
62:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
