User talk:MrOllie/Archive 8

3595:

In the real World. In real life the probability, that somebody throws my work away, is lower. I can understand that Knowledge has rules. But in this case I don't understand them. Are just TLS libraries allowed in the comparison, if they have a Knowledge article? I would consider this constraint as too strict. As a reader I would like to see all TLS libraries. There are not so many TLS libraries, so this would not blow up the article. Most TLS libraries are written in C, some in Java. When a library is written in Erlang or Seed7 it shows diversification (you know the thing that reduces the possibility that an animal becomes extinct). Ok, I digress. Basically I ask you for help to save my work on the

1891:

journalists they have much bigger stories to cover than some scam that we've seen in 1000 different forms. 2. Most of the specialised tech magazines themselves have gone rogue long ago... it's just advertising for their advertisers, no jorunalism. They actually do comparative tests of different scam software and then sell this junk to their readers. It's sad and ridiculous. When searching on Google News about this topic I find 500 copies of some obscure "system utilities market report" on 500 fake-business-news-sites. That's how the internet works nowadays. IMHO Knowledge should be a source of trusworthy information, not a cementation of fake news --

4800:

and quite stubborn at that. To reiterate my points above, you were removing a link to another en-wp page, while leaving other equivalent links in place. Furthermore, the links you were leaving were to pages of calculators by very "big" corporations, while the one you removed was of a calculator from a small corporation that threatens to disrupt huge interests of the big corporations, so it was possible to assume that your edits were made by someone linked to those interests. I am writing this just to try to bring you closer to my view of things here in the interest of alleviating the animosity that is present and in assumptions of good faith.

1381: 4137: 31: 736: 2774: 6524: 2919: 2621:, and at a minimum the promotional name dropping and external links to specific people and dance companies should be removed. But this technique is very fringey. Knowledge is really for writing about very well settled science and widely used methods. We don't write about new and unproven techniques, by design. What we really need is some actual evidence that the wider world has taken notice of this aside from the novelty factor. 2951:, review has a specific (somewhat jargon-y) meaning. You seem to be concerned that Knowledge doesn't reflect the most current research - this is by design. Knowledge deliberately waits for new medical research to become very well vetted in peer reviewed publications (hence the emphasis on review articles as sources). This makes Knowledge lag somewhat behind the latest developments, but increases reliability overall. - 6451: 4873:

because I prefer to keep threads in one place. However, I will not make any further replies in this thread at this page. If you wish to follow up with me, you are welcome to open a new thread at my user talk page. Otherwise, if you wish to discuss article content, I suggest you take such matters to the article's talk page (in this case,

4524:. Preliminary findings and mouse studies don't qualify, I'm afraid. Policy here is to wait until the medical community has largely finished work and new findings have reached wide acceptance. If there is improperly sourced content in the article, that is a reason to remove that content, not to add more improperly sourced content. - 1854:... finding such information in a newspaper seems rather unrealistic. Especially since such system optimization scam is done by 100 companies with 1000 names, so if it's covered by the media it's covered in bulk without naming 100 different names. By the way: Knowledge actually has a whole list of similar scammy software: 5040:

interesting, relevant information. These folks are invaluable and are some of our most respected community members. On the other hand, some academics show up on Knowledge and add short, low-content blurbs to articles for the primary purpose of linking their own writings. Which kind of contributor do you want to be? -

6201:

Official links An official link is a link to a website or other Internet service that meets both of the following criteria: The linked content is controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Knowledge article. The linked content primarily covers the

3633:

article itself are quite weak. I would worry about shoring that up first - you have one substantive source that looks like it had no editing or peer review, and one that is only a trivial mention. Everything else comes from the language designer. An article needs at least two high quality independent

2143:

my reasoning is if what the german team added was ok with whomever moderator reviewed it, while you dont, so either the other moderator was mistaking or you are mistaking, but the fact that you believe its a mistake and letting the other edits in places makes a new injustice, OR you are wrong, and my

1932:

Also I'd still be interested why the Knowledge List of Rogue Security Software (rightfully) contains dozens and dozens of programs that are documented by much less "quality" sources than the ones I presented for WinZip? At least I posted official information provided by a major IT security company...

1835:

I don't doubt that it's not a very good piece of software, but we have policies on this kind of thing for a reason, and to make value judgments in Knowledge's voice (or to use words like 'scam') we need high quality sources with editorial staff and such, like reputable newspapers, magazines, academic

6046:

This is incorrect. These were small contributions considered important. Hours of my time were taken up rethinking and reviewing the page. Your behaviour is very disrespectful. Each time coming up with something new to block the contribution. If you are unhappy with a contribution you should rather

3594:

In the past my focus was on many, mostly computer related, Knowledge articles. I invested some time on Knowledge. But in recent years I have not so much time to spend. This reduced my focus, such that it looks like I am singularly focused. Now I spend most of my time and energy outside of Knowledge:

2126:

Knowledge is built on independent reliable sources, as I indicated in the edit summary of that edit. We don't rely solely on marketing materials. I didn't review other content, so if there is other improperly sourced content that is a reason to remove that content, not to add more improperly sourced

1496:

1) As an employee you shouldn't be editing that article at all. 2) A summary of the scam AnyDesk is being used for absolutely is appropriate to place in that section. Readers shouldn't be expected to click somewhere else to get context that is vital for understanding why exactly ISPs are deciding to

5236:

Look, you were adding a bunch of citations to yourself, and you didn't realize it was a problem here. That's fine, now you know it's looked upon poorly by this community to insert mentions of yourself and your work into articles. But by no stretch of the imagination were the citations backing those

5143: 4799:

Look, I am not trying to make enemies with you, or get you sanctioned (unless you are a repeat offender). I am sure I made even worse errors in my life, and maybe even on Knowledge; but the facts are that your edits were indistinguishable from vandalism (because of no edit summaries or bogus ones),

4327:

Thank you for an explanation. I have no intention to hide anything so I do not mind disclosing I'm the creator of the software and use my own name. I just think that removing legitimate software used by thousands of people seems discrimination to me. So let's talk how to bring NetCrunch back to the

2527:

Reverted to revision 912501746 by Vermont (talk): WP:UNDUE reliance on a single source - Pastoral Care links to the human spirit - wikipedia source. Pastoral Ministry links to christian ministry - wikipedia source. There is a clear distinction between these two terms and is evident in the content

1947:

Your Microsoft link doesn't mention WinZip, unless I'm missing it. As to other articles: I don't know. Knowledge is a big place and there are only so many volunteers. There is probably lots of content that doesn't comply with policy, but that does not mean we should add more.You could bring that up

173:

As I pointed out, there are already a number of self-published blogs listed as citations. Clearly, they met some threshold that contradicts your opinion. They have been there for over a year yet they remain even during your "remove the self-published citation" editing. If this was a concern for you

2442:

I completely agree with and support what you're saying - and I'm not looking to create a marketing brochure at all - much of the information on our page is outdated or completely incorrect. What I'm asking is, how do I go about updating the information on the page? Do I have to put a COI caveat or

5367:

That list is of software that has a Knowledge article. You were re-adding a link to an article about a software company, which is not the same thing. Looking at your accounts contributions, all you have ever done on Knowledge is add links to Leadtools to various places, which is why it looks like

4872:

in your fellow editors and not accuse them of vandalism when they are making good-faith edits. Repeatedly making such accusations could be interpreted as harassment of an editor, especially if you continue to post to their talk page after they have requested you not to.Finally, I posted this here

4751:

What you did was vandalism and you are going to get another relevant template if you repeat it on any of the pages I watch. And that essay is wrong, templates are always useful. Also, please ping me in the future when addressing me so I could see your responses (I am not necessarily watching your

1927:

I'm not editing here to make myself happy. I'm editing here to protect naive users from an evil scam scheme. But I recognize that Knowledge obviously has a quite different understanding of "quality" than I do. Anyway, would you consider a support article from Microsoft (you might have heard about

1423:

Thank you for the reply. So, as a user of the product over several years, am I not a valid "source"? In an attempt to NOT be promotional (I am aware this is not a marketing doc), the edited description was carefully compared with other descriptions on the page. It did not seem to be out of bounds

202:

Yes, putting your edits in the context of Knowledge makes it seem overwhelming. However, we are talking about an article that has a few hundred words that you have invested a fair amount of time editing. I have to assume you are actually reading the article prior to edits. Your subjective editing

5982:

Yes, professional marketers and salespeople often don't understand why their style of communication is incompatible with building an encyclopedia - luckily, you don't necessarily have to understand, you just have to comply with the policies that were linked on your talk page. I didn't say a word

615:

No. I haven't added the two other references mentioned above ("Payload attribution via hierarchical Bloom filters" and "Payload Attribution via Character Dependent Multi-Bloom Filters"). While they aren't used in the page, I added a subsection for them. Actually, "traffic digesting" is the main

686:

guidelines that discourage such editing. It can be very easy for enthusiastic writing to be read by others as attempts at promotion. Please read our COI guidelines over, and proceed in the future by proposing changes on the talk pages associated with articles instead of adding them to articles

5039:

I'm sure what the policies mean. Let's put it a different way: Researchers are generally subject matter experts who are up to date on lots of developments in their fields. If they come to Knowledge to make it better, they will generally cite lots of different authors to add different sorts of

4605:

Some of your edits are factually incorrect - for example you're changing figures to the number of generally elected representatives without considering the seats reserved for women. In other places you are adding social media accounts that are already linked from the main official site, which

3918:

2) How are we defining layman in the context of this article? When making the change, I was working under the assumption that a reader knowledgeable about virtualization (virtual machines) also is informed on containerization (compute containers), and the word ephemeral is very important to

1890:

Where would it make news? We're living in 2019... 1. There is no relevant "tech journalism" in common newspapers/magazines. Their so called tech journalists are mostly clueless clowns that write cock-and-bully stories for a readership with age 70+. And the few cases where there are relevant

3774:

Thanks for your answer. Why is the source unreliable? I am not sure if you can check this within one minute. Only because of the reason that Bah2011 is a paid editor you can’t say that Bah2011 don’t understand Knowledge’s policies. When started writing the article Bah2011 took part in the

4867:

As a fellow editor, I remind you that the place to engage in discussions to build consensus (i.e., "bring you closer to my view of things") is the talk page of the article in question, so that consensus may be gained among a broader group of editors.As an administrator, I remind you to

5580:

I completely understand. Is it possible to edit those rows and somehow link them to a "stub" page that someone can create when they have time? Would that be better than just removing the entries on the list? I truly do appreciate your experience and time in answering my questions.

3891:. And if you're going to use industry jargon like 'ephemeral compute containers' you have to define it. What you did made the article harder for a layman to understand. Thanks for the blog link, but please be advised that Knowledge generally doesn't use blog posts as sources. - 203:

makes it unclear as to which citations in the post are "bad" as you described them. You refuse to engage in any constructive dialogue on these other examples, which is what the talk page is for. If you are actually concerned about quality, drive-by removals are helping nobody.

2920:

Question re: Sleep Disorder - Idiopathic Hypersomnia Characteristics and Diagnostics Criteria similar to the Fact Sheet cited for Narcolepsy (and edit to include a second inquiry about sharing a more current citation for Sleep Disorder, Type, Primary Hypersomnia, Idiopathic

378:

Knowledge policies don't draw any distinction between for- and nonprofit organisations. We also generally provide one link to an article subject's official site when we can. A family trust and/or an estate website is commonly used when the subject is a deceased person. -

4930:

MrOllie (talk)- Ok got you! But I am confused as I can see many other direct links which are endorsements but I am unable to understand what's pulling you back from stating them as "advertisement". Could you please explain! What is that you include in references??

5537:

Volunteer time is limited, as you just noted, it took a while for someone to notice the Leadtools entry - they apparently didn't check the whole list. If other stuff is improperly included, it should be removed, not used as a reason to keep other improper stuff. -

6317:- Medical articles on Knowledge have special sourcing requirements. In particular, they should be based on reviews (particularly systematic reviews) and not primary studies. Yes, this makes Knowledge lag a bit behind the latest developments. That is by design. - 6134:

MrOllie, fine, my Blog is not promoting a service or a product, but it is embedded in a software vendor website. I do not work for Talend at this time, but the definitions encapsulated on this page come from me. What would you propose as the proper citation?

1157:, I'd use them to add a sentence or two about it to one of the existing sections rather than starting a list section - especially since that article used to have a couple of list sections that were removed because they kept getting loaded up with spam links. - 174:

would I would expect you would also take the minute to remove the others. For example, why leave sonra.io? It was published to the entry by the Sonara company. What about equinox.com? I'm all for consistency, but clearly, there is a subjective interpretation.

4313: 372: 4514: 6098: 6342:

have been trying to add promotional material about Bloom Consulting for years. I suggest you get started on Knowledge and 'learn the ropes' on some topic that hasn't been tainted by attempts to advertise in violation of Knowledge's terms of service. -

4126:

or anything else. Knowledge doesn't link to blogs for promotional purposes. IF you want to edit Knowledge, I suggest you add information based on high quality sources, such as newspapers or peer reviewed scientific articles. - 11:10, 24 September 2019

1121:

Besides General Ization's paid editing concerns (which are very real, you should look over and abide by those guidelines) Knowledge needs independent references. We can't mention your organization based only on links to your organization's web site. -

3536:

It won't be speedily deleted. However, it does duplicate another article and someone may (or may not) start the full blown deletion process for that reason. If that happens, it'll run for at least a week and you'll have an opportunity to comment. -

3123:

No, I removed a number of inline external links that were not supporting the content in any meaningful way, and I tagged the entry for relying excessively on self published sources, which it does. The links I removed were self published as well. -

269:

Spamming means adding links which are not relevant and do not have good content, But i am adding links which are very much relevant and has almost the same content which is there in the previous links. Then, how is this spamming? Can you answer it

3775:“adopt-a-user” program. According to Knowledge's policies the article is written in a neutral way based on facts and figures. But if you think that the article is not correct at all than please help to improve it not only with deleting updates. 1239:

Sadly, the comparison article doesn't feature any information on featuresets, but I have read through all the documentation files. It's the only one ^^. I might get onto roughly outlining the focus and features of those libraries in the future,

5230: 5021:"Citation spamming is the illegitimate or improper use of citations, footnotes or references.... Variations of citation spamming include academics and scientists using their editing privileges primarily to add citations to their own work..." — 6242:

Knowledge is specifically designed to be a tertiary source. We summarize secondary sources, who in turn work off the primary sources. This is necessary so that Knowledge articles can represent everything in proper context and don't become an

3667:

you'll see a little comment at the top that says "Redirected from Godmother_(cocktail)" - click on that link and you'll be taken to the redirect page. Once there you can click the edit button and overwrite the redirect with a real article. -

971:

by creating a new article to house content that was rejected from a related article. Don't do this: you need to use the talk pages and gain consensus for your changes, not just move them to a new article and hope they fly under the radar. -

1928:

them, although they aren't a quality newspaper) as trustworthy source? Because Microsof actually has support article where the generally discourage the usage of topols like the "WinZip Registry Cleaner" even that kind that is less scammy:

3755:

You also added a product offering sourced to unreliable sources - and since you are a paid editor and apparently don't understand Knowledge's policies, you should not be editing the article directly *at all*. Use the talk page, please. -

993:

I can sort of understand what you're writing, but much of what you're writing is not in the source you provided, and as I indicated your english is very confusing - it would be best if you found someone to proofread your contributions. -

5434:

I mean the hyperlink. Leadtools has been on the list since at least 2010. Why remove the entire row when the only problem is the link? Sorry if I am asking noob questions; I am just trying to understand the politics/rules of Knowledge.

4350:. Medical claims should be sourced to review articles. That looks like either a primary study or a letter to the editor. For the second, no, never cite to other Knowledge articles. The third is a press release and should not be used. - 1024:. For starters, "With rare exceptions, external links should not be used in the body of an article." Any further messages here on this topic won't be responded to - this is what the discussion already on the article talk page is for. - 2120: 2669:

Knowledge is written for a general audience, it isn't an outlet for scientific news. Replicating research and confirming results are important to science, but not really the kind of thing that should go into a Knowledge article. -

1792:

It was a tautology. We could list just about every field by saying X Coaching: A coach who improves X. The other sections have standalone articles where readers can get more detail - without that summary sections aren't helpful. -

4365: 2930:, most of your questions are answered there. In particular primary studies should be avoided in favor of reviews and textbooks, and patient advocacy organisations such as the hypersomnia foundation shouldn't be used as sources. - 3399:

You have a massive conflict of interest and should not be adding to or updating that page. Please actually read the conflict of interest guidelines you have been linked and use article talk pages instead from here on out. -

6197:

Links normally to be avoided See also: Knowledge:External links/Perennial websites Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject, one should generally avoid providing external links to:

3019:- you should not link to your own papers. In the specific case of the article you edited there was also an edit comment you apparently missed warning users not to add additional links without using the article talk page. - 1933:

in the list of Rogue Security Software most of the entries are just some forum posts by random dudes or even worse. Wouldn't we have to delete this whole list because it was obviously not published in the New York Times? --

593: 4498:

Sorry, I got an error that I have to do at least 10 edits before I can upload an image. Only discovered Wikimedia commons after the upload form directed me there (after 10 edits). I hope you can see that I am a new user.

2255:

How about just removing the references I placed on the listings instead of removing the listings completely? I only placed the references there to help out but if they are disallowed, it makes sense to just remove them.

4055: 2914: 1757: 632:

It seems you have removed the two references! I suggest that you find the time at which the references had been added!! And also its account and IP. However, I cannot realize why you have removed the useful materials!

4964:

Knowledge is a very large site and volunteer time is limited. You may find bad references, but the existence of a bad reference is a reason to remove the bad ref, not a reason to add more links to advertisements. -

2786:

Hey Mr Ollie, I'm not doing promotional activity, I'm just sharing information through my blog. please suggestion me what i do it better way. if you feel its promotional please tell me & how can i improve it.

1962:

It seems to me that Malwarebytes is complaining about a "Potentially unwanted program" that does exactly the same as Malwarebytes itself does. "Scam" is a strong word and should not be used in Knowledge's voice.

133:

There are already too many photos on those articles, and yours didn't add anything new or improve on what was there. They also appeared to be added for the purpose of self promotion based on the image captions. -

5098:

The edits were very promotional. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a marketing space. Also, they were in violation of our terms of use, which prohibits undisclosed editing by paid advocates. Please read our

681:

It is very natural for one to be proud of one's own works (or the works of their organization) and assume that they will mean as much for others as they have for oneself - this is exactly why Knowledge has

5965:

Re 2: It it was (and is) accurate without your edit, which clearly indicated the sponsorship. Your edit just served to make the text more promotional. Knowledge isn't here to be a marketing publication. -

2368:, unless they're truly independent. That is, not directed or employed by you in any fashion. As to mentioning it as the first on the crowdfunding article: Maybe, if there are independent sources that meet 654:

If you want to be unblocked, go back to your original account and request it there. Right now you are evading that block, which means that your new account is a sock puppet (just like all the others). -

326:

But here i have replaced only those links which are dead, i did not replace any link which is up and running and by replacing dead links i thought that i was adding value but you say that it is spamming.

4263: 2947:

Your more recent studies are primary sources, not the sort of review articles we need. Neither are fact sheets or summary articles written for the general public - please do familiarize yourself with

5960:

Re 1: Ok, now you know to use talk pages instead of editing articles directly from now on. That you're being paid as an employee and not specifically to edit doesn't matter for Knowledge's purposes.

1183:, I guess it should be all right if I linked to that? However, since neither of the sections already in the text seem fitting, would it be advisable to create a "See also" section for that article? 1057:. Knowledge generally does not accept blogs as sources, especially not a blog belonging to the person making the edit. We need independently published sources with a reputation for fact checking. - 4559: 3704: 3219:

says about such sources. If there is no fact checking they are not reliable by definition. I suggest you familiarize yourself with the English Knowledge's sourcing policies. This is important - as

251:

You're spamming links on Knowledge. If you continue, you can expect your account to be banned and/or the links to be placed on our spam blacklist, preventing them from being added in the future. -

5672:, and editors regularly go from article to article using the same source when adding that sort of information. And "established editors"? – since when is there any sort of hierarchy on Knowledge. 1742:

It's a pretty minor detail, and the sourcing was only to a press release. If no independent media outlet has found something like that important enough to write about, neither should Knowledge. -

3683: 3040:

This is a book that has zero holdings in worldcat. To use as a reference, it needs to be available to readers. This also seems to be a primary source - I think we need a secondary source here. -

3621:

Yes, it is a list of things that already have a Knowledge article, which is the most common list inclusion criterion on Knowledge. I suppose you could make an argument of notability if you had

703:

This still looks like advocacy. Knowledge is expressly not a place to get the word out about things like this, even if they are worthy causes. We don't write about save the whales charities on

188:

Knowledge is a big site and there are only so many volunteers to make fixes. If you have found improperly sourced content, that is a reason to fix that sourcing, not to add more bad sources. -

2648:

They're an employee of Tektronix (though they have not made the required disclosures), editing articles directly to add external links to their employer. This is textbook spamming behavior. -

3102:

No, I don't think I will. In fact, I think that article needs less information about sponsorships and marketing relationships, not more. I'll make a note to trim more when I have the time. -

599:

You wrote "There are still related references in the page regarding the discussion I had added" - but that was your first edit. Have you been editing using a different account previously? -

2387: 2102: 6028:

You have not addressed the substance of disagreements on the talk page. The onus is on you to get consensus for your changes first Not to simply keep restoring them with minor tweaks. -

2136: 2101:

I'm sure there is more cleanup needed - I got fatigued after a while and slotted it lower in my to-do list. You can find some more details and a partial list of sock puppet accounts at

485:

point #1 draws a distinction when a source is making self-serving claims. Vieira is the only one who is trying to claim credit for himself. This is easily fixable, though. If this is a

388: 6226:

We'd need something published by an independent party in an outlet with some editorial control and fact checking reputation. An academic paper, book from a reputable publisher, etc. -

2733:

The English Knowledge isn't a place to promote Peter Hantz and his works. I can't speak for the Hungarian and German Wikipedias, they have separate policies and inclusion standards. -

1876:, though. They're a major software company, not a fly-by-night scam outfit. If some division of Corel has gone rogue and is producing malware it should be making the news somewhere. - 4447:

Either way it wasn't a proper news outlet with an editorial staff and a reputation for fact checking. But no big deal, now you know to use a newspaper or major news site next time. -

2424:

You can't turn a Knowledge article into a marketing brochure. You're also in violation of Knowledge's terms of service. You need to read the policies that have already been linked on

1708: 1557:

I’d rather have you answering my question. Why did you remove the photos of the non-branded navigation buoys? Besides discrimination, I can honestly not come up with a valid reason.

5939:

If you work for a company that sells duct cleaning services, you should not be using Knowledge to tell (or imply that) people need to get their ducts cleaned, even without links. -

6537: 2341:

1) Did you notice that every other crowdfunding site listed there already had a Knowledge article? It is not meant to be an exhaustive list. 2) As a co-founder you have a massive

866: 5122: 4163: 3201:

whatever information submitted by a third-party. In addition, I am kindly waiting an answer for the second question to understand why you caused plagiarism in an entry, please.

1250: 2814:, in particular you should not be writing about your own company or adding links to it elsewhere on Knowledge. Instead, make suggestions on article talk pages. Thanks again! - 4112: 4337: 1009: 4212: 3870: 3854: 1850:

Would it help if similar information were found on Malwarebyte's website and not in their forums (even if it was posted by Staff in the forums)? Because they have this:

5787:

They were adding a paper by the same author to a dozen of articles, in many cases referencing nonsensical content, such as the article's opening word. Textbook case of

5107:. Certain disclosures are required, and you can make suggestions for factual corrections on the article's associated talk page. Please do not edit it directly again. - 2636: 2604: 6332: 4553: 3576:), but I suggest that you invest some time in working on unrelated topics so you can gain some experience and perspective on how things generally work on Knowledge. - 2984: 2335: 208: 179: 3835: 5318: 4687:, it appears that the article is intended to focus on graphing calculator hardware, not software that has graphing functionality. So I endorse MrOllie's removal. — 2968:

Do not assume that because I have not removed a particular source it is 'OK' - Knowledge is a huge site and I haven't (yet) had time to review everything on it. -

2309: 1335: 1319: 4168: 4076: 3063: 1387: 889: 552:

You have the right to spread useful information to *your* readers on your own site, but you do not have the right to spam Knowledge's readers with links here. -

5056:

You can think that, but the Knowledge community has come to a different conclusion, which we have codified into the policies that were linked for you above. -

5016: 4656:

Not vandalism, thanks. Sometimes people have differences of opinion - in this case, my opinion is that we should not be linking to specific calculators on the

3882:

1) You failed to cite a source, and what you added was marketing babble. "Empowers users" isn't going to be acceptable anywhere outside some form of marketing.

2267: 1808: 1194: 1814:

It wasn't well written, the source is only a hair away from being self published, and the actual content was already well covered elsewhere in the article. -

5292: 2444: 2145: 1913:. Knowledge is explicitly designed to summarize quality sources. If you disagree with that philosophy you may find editing here won't make you very happy. - 6136: 3451: 2381: 2354: 922: 634: 617: 428:

We generally only link things when they have preexisting articles. As to whether you should create a separate article: probably not. See our guidelines on

5889:

Wow, that was more than 2 years ago! I don't really remember, so all I can do is paraphrase my edit summary: You added a bookstore link to an article, we

5144:/* Surgery */ I added information about scoliosis surgery. There are two types of surgeries that are different than fusion which there was no mention of. 2324: 1934: 1892: 1859: 1603: 1558: 4014: 3059: 2372:

that say it is first. We can't use anything written or published by ChipIn, or selfpublished youtube videos or blogs for that kind of thing, though. -

1929: 1823: 1425: 4020:

You can quibble about the definition of employed, but the fact is you're edit warring to put links to your own company into Knowledge. That's spam. -

3820:

Whatever is a fair summary of what the reliable sources say about the subject, but we don't have a reliable source that says anything about it yet. -

2290:. See also sections contain *only* links to existing articles. The problem is not only the references, but having any non-wikilink in that section. - 5137: 4938: 4061:

You can clearly see reflections in the display case, which distracts from looking at the intended subject of the photo. You shouldn't re-add them. -

3842: 2263: 1190: 642: 625: 3347: 851:

It is a blog written and hosted by a software vendor who would very much like us to buy their logbook software. In other words, an advertisement. -

353:

Even if you're not being paid, Knowledge is not a place to promote your organisation or DVD sales. We don't list stores where you can buy prints on

143: 5762:

I was serious, above. As long as you continue to believe I'm a vandal, no discussion here is going to be accomplish anything useful. Take it up at

5499:

The Leadtools row was no different than the AnyDoc Software, Scantron, and Readsoft rows. All of those point to articles about the corporation. --

4257: 4049: 4029: 2545: 1327: 1309: 1296:

On the Dota 2 article you added an inline link to an unofficial prize tracker. We don't do this. Your other two edits used poor sources. Read over

1116: 1100: 6326: 6050: 5169:

Knowledge isn't here to be a list of everything that exists. If there isn't yet good data Knowledge can't write about it, that is the crux of the

4157: 1003: 587: 561: 545: 6435: 6388:

The obvious pattern is that I leave links to other Knowledge articles and remove ones to external web sites. You can read about the reasoning at

5065: 5049: 5007: 4217: 3698: 3302: 2568: 2482: 449: 5873: 5859: 5286: 5266: 5246: 5032: 4384: 4236: 2908: 2758: 2467: 2452: 2089: 474: 335: 309: 279: 260: 212: 197: 183: 168: 6301: 6276: 6256: 6235: 6219: 6191: 6167: 6144: 6125: 5182: 4862: 4847: 4801: 4776: 4753: 4716: 4500: 4282: 3776: 3160:

As indicated at the top of that page, 'Companies House does not verify the accuracy of the information filed' - it is not a reliable source. -

2862: 2588: 2407: 2196: 844: 608: 498: 121: 5948: 5590: 5547: 5508: 5474: 5444: 5417: 5395: 5086: 4456: 4440: 4415: 4307: 3677: 3546: 3529: 3471: 3028: 2999: 2977: 2960: 2939: 2657: 1957: 1942: 1922: 1900: 1885: 1867: 1845: 1548: 1363: 1269: 798: 6416: 5307: 4619: 4070: 4003: 3976: 3950: 3928: 3900: 3067: 3049: 2477: 1802: 1459: 1433: 1418: 943: 664: 519: 405:, we're really not interested. Also, please stop cutting and pasting your comments into this talk page multiple times, it isn't necessary. - 6484: 6016: 5992: 5162: 4974: 4950: 4921: 4096: 3845:

Please consider registering a Knowledge account, you won't be able to find your user talk messages with a constantly changing IP address. -

3647: 3608: 3585: 2246: 1576:

I removed them because they added nothing valuable to the article that was not already demonstrated by the preexisting photos. Your turn. -

1179:

article that can perform those actions, and as far as I kow the only low-level implementation generally considered secure. Since it has its

1166: 414: 366: 6352: 5814: 5800: 5720:

I wouldn't be so super-sensitive to what someone says when they're referring to something really mindless I've done in article main space.

5224: 4359: 4087:

What does that have to do with anything? It's a list of games that have Knowledge articles, not a list of games that have youtube links. -

3409: 3392: 3376: 3322: 2823: 2685: 2538: 2521: 2221: 2021: 1786: 1512: 1131: 928: 720: 696: 5634: 4342:"Hair prosthesis". Knowledge. 5 October 2018. "Alopecia Market Size Worth $ 4.8 Billion By 2026 | CAGR: 8.3%". www.grandviewresearch.com. 4204: 4187: 3743: 3723: 3508: 3492: 3142:

You have indiscriminately removed citations, I am afraid. Therefore, the entry content has full of plagiarism. For example, was this link

2497: 2166: 2066: 2052: 1066: 823: 6405: 6381: 5927: 5902: 5775: 5755: 5610: 5324:

MrOllie, thank you for reverting. While I'm not sure the text was spam, it was a copyvio. I have revdel'ed the two infringing versions. —

4855: 4839: 4809: 4794: 4761: 4746: 4733:

This is obviously not vandalism. You should read the policies over again and refresh your memory as to what vandalism actually is. Also,

4669: 4593: 4508: 3909:

1) If a citation is required to list laravel tools under the tools section, should we removed the others (which don't include citations)?

3784: 3765: 3111: 2883: 2299: 1751: 1650: 1585: 1222: 1033: 981: 436:, which means that it has at least a couple of citations in reliable newspapers or similar, then you could create an article through our 239: 6088: 6058: 5791:. Also, I didn't 'demand to block it', I posted the standard user warning templates for the situation on their talk page, that's all. - 5353: 5203: 4888: 4724: 4698: 3440: 3284: 3270: 3236: 3210: 3169: 3155: 3133: 3090: 2716: 2437: 1986: 1780: 777: 6514: 5837: 5335: 5116: 5071: 4533: 3804: 2796: 2693: 2679: 1765: 1520: 1506: 1395: 675: 5729: 5715: 5689: 5663: 2418: 2114: 6358: 3562: 3334:

If the troupe has an independent article, you could list it in the see also section. If they don't, better not, it would probably be

2868: 1771:

Knowledge generally doesn't link to vendor or consultant sites in that fashion, it gives the appearance that we're promoting them. -

1039: 895: 4844: 4584:. Your citations didn't meet those requirements. Additionally, other parts of your additions appeared to be completely unsourced. - 4270: 3829: 2183:

The sources were terrible, and it was a fairly obvious violation of Knowledge's terms of service with regard to paid editing. Also,

4421: 3514: 1484: 2684:

Okay, I think this is more general than that, but then I'm a scientist so I probably err more on that side. Thanks for the reply.

5092: 4491: 4315: 4242: 3075: 2413: 2233:

Knowledge only links to existing Knowledge articles in see also sections. If these services are obviously notable, I suggest you

6264: 5615: 5377: 4734: 4332: 860: 567: 5368:

you're mostly here to promote Leadtools. If that isn't the case, I look forward to your future non-Leadtools contributions. -

1280: 3005: 2990:

This sounds like something that should be handled on the associated article talk page, other editors may want to weigh in. -

1087: 530: 5668:

That's absolute rubbish. In that link you provide, all of the other best-albums mentions are just as WP:UNDUE, particularly

2624:

RE: "Are you representing an organization with specific standards Michele can read?" I'm not representing any organizations.

967:, such as press releases and blogs (anything on forbes.com/sites is a blog, for example). You've also (twice now) created a 6263:

Ordinarily I'd say use the article's talk page, but it is a pretty low traffic article. I suppose you could bring it up at

5650:, especially since Muso805 seems set on systematically adding mentions in all 1000 album articles, even restoring them and 3876: 2663: 2172: 1693: 1213:

A see also would be fine, but I'd probably add the Comparison article there rather than favoring one particular library. -

1176: 1147: 204: 175: 6475:

Every link you added pointed to your own website. These were not 'legit references' - they were blatant self promotion. -

6037: 5975: 3994:

Knowledge is not a social networking site - please don't write about yourself or add any more photographs of yourself. -

3814: 3689:

Looks like reprinted press releases to me, but if you have a good source that isn't a press release, cite it directly. -

987: 759: 3629:

about the TLS library, but I took a quick look and didn't turn any useful sources up. As an aside, the refrences on the

1948:

on the talk page of the article you're concerned about, perhaps an interested editor there will discuss it with you. -

768:

Thanks. I notice a lot of this kind of thing by watchlisting the various 'list of X' articles in the computing space. -

5277:, but we both know it's tangential to the real issue, which is the inappropriate promotion of one particular author. - 5194:

It's one of the more promotional pieces of text I've seen, and you didn't include any usable independent references. -

3275:

Eventually, but for now I'll give the tags a while to work. Someone may want to spend the time to find good sources. -

2889: 2559:. You will need much stronger, independent sources if you want to claim that dancing is critical to cancer research. - 2157:

They were redundant with the stuff listed by the Curlie link, and the subsection was being targeted by linkspammers. -

1475:

We shouldn't be including any pricing info or using any providers as sources at all, so I've now cleaned it all out. -

1469: 422: 4644: 3483:

You're spamming Knowledge. Keep it up and you will be blocked and/or your site will be added to the link blacklist. -

3383:

No matter how you slice it, your position 'overseeing social medias' is not compatible with the goals of Knowledge. -

711:. Please use the associated article talk pages for this from here on out, so others will have a chance to weigh in. - 5846:? (I have also mentioned this in a previous note to Siihb, so they're aware not to add it elsewhere.) Appreciate it, 3596: 2742: 1072: 347: 149: 3887:

2) You also didn't cite a source here, and you reinstated your edit once another user objected to it. You should be

3367:, both of which you can also find on your own talk page. You should not be editing about your employer like this. - 1930:

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2563254/microsoft-support-policy-for-the-use-of-registry-cleaning-utilities

750:

Hey MrOllie, just wanted to say thank you for all of your work here with maintaining the articles here on the Wiki!

4946: 4472: 4009: 2330: 2271: 2227: 1198: 1858:... looking at the sources I feel according to your standards, a big part of this list would have to be deleted -- 1687: 6469: 3096: 2517: 2315:

Maybe you haven't noticed this, but all your edits are inserting junk HTML code into the pages you're editing. -

949: 670: 2874:

No, it's not good to link to videos, especially when you're linking your own videos to a half-dozen articles. -

5822: 5361: 4462: 3034: 2722: 2177: 829: 504: 373:

taking away restoration credits for a project, publicizing commercial painting sales but not nonprofit archive

4574: 4515:/* Other medication */ Showing that there is evidence for nutritional therapy in endometriosis and fertility. 4316:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Chadhury88?markasread=171743963&markasreadwiki=enwiki#September_2019

2749:

They're not important references. There's no need to mention the trade corporation on that article at all. -

1851: 1371: 1290: 297: 5625:. If this link is added again (by any account or IP), I expect it will be added to Knowledge's blacklist. - 2611:

RE: "you haven't responded to her question about that" She hasn't asked any actual questions that I can see.

4107: 3657: 2842: 2792: 2080:

Because you appear to be here to promote the works of David Schorr rather than to build an encyclopedia. -

1403: 783: 94: 86: 6099:

added reference to blog where elements of the definition of both data lake and data swamp were originated.

1602:

really? I hadn’t seen any photos of mooring buoys yet. A bit more constructive feedback would be helpful.

5883: 4678: 3800: 2764: 2074: 2006: 1323: 1275: 1180: 293: 102: 81: 69: 64: 59: 4395: 1346:

Thanks for the note about the Curlie link, I fixed it. Your other link doesn't meet our guidelines, see

6423: 5253:

I think I see the problem. You seem to mean something different than most people when you use the term

4178:. I didn't realize you'd also edited some prexisting text. I just restored that portion of the edit. - 3328: 2701: 2398:

Knowledge is not a fan site, changing the article to include promotional language isn't appropriate. -

1533: 1391: 1137: 127: 38: 5640: 5257:. The paper you cited presents new findings, therefore it is not a literature review by definition. - 3568:

Thanks for pointing the other two out, I removed them as well. RE: wasting your work - You seem to be

1678:. The purpose of Knowledge is to neutrally summarize sources, not to make anything look attractive. - 6411: 6022: 5954: 5908: 5313: 2847: 1105:, I urge you to heed the warnings on your Talk page and in my reply to your message on my Talk page. 726: 648: 5651: 4174:

I don't have any issue with your edits, I was trying to remove content added by Wbucklar, which was

3146:

self-published? Or could you please now indicate where all "Solvers" section information come from?

536:

Your links are obvious spam. We accept links to reputable publishers, such as major news outlets. -

6307: 5851: 4874: 4684: 3081:

The media on commons don't seem especially helpful to me, but I wouldn't revert you or anything. -

2448: 2425: 2095: 1021: 1014: 572: 331: 275: 224: 6267:, but I think it likely that the regulars there will tell you pretty much what I'm telling you. - 4520:

Knowledge has very stringent requirements for sourcing medical information, which you can read at

2443:

something at the beginning of the article? I just want to go through the proper channels. Thanks.

1709:"PMI and Pearson VUE partner to deliver full suite of certification exams in over 5000 locations" 6140: 4607: 4569: 4131: 3749: 3557: 3477: 2895:

It would be better if you didn't list brands and/or particular products, that's not reeally what

2788: 2392: 1490: 934:

It might take a long time, it might not. This is a volunteer project, no one is on a schedule. -

876:. Since this appears to be your own website, please also review our guidelines on editing with a 638: 621: 455: 1729: 5781: 5586: 5504: 5440: 5391: 4942: 4564: 4467: 3353: 1938: 1896: 1863: 1607: 1562: 1446:. If other descriptions are promotional, that's a reason to tone those down as required by the 804: 5149:

Knowledge has very stringent sourcing requirements for medical content, which you can read at

5209: 4906: 4625: 4248:

Please read what you're deleting again, then, because you are deleting referenced content. -

4102: 3972: 3924: 3599:. What is necessary to add the Apple, Erlang and Seed7 TLS libraries back to the comparison? 2513: 2458:

Please read the stuff on your talk page, including the links, it is all spelled out there. -

2202: 1429: 1142: 902: 2012:

You've already done that by reporting it on the COI noticeboard. Just have some patience. -

5188: 4934: 4657: 3664: 3604: 2727: 2534: 2505: 2365: 2259: 1186: 1107: 3789:

It replaced the more reliable Bloomberg reference, and used a weird-looking esports link.

2707:

I'm a volunteer here (like most everyone else), I'll respond on my schedule, not yours. -

872:

It was a link to a website promoting a book and Knowledge doesn't link to such sites, see

8: 6480: 6431: 6401: 6377: 6348: 6322: 6297: 6272: 6252: 6231: 6215: 6187: 6163: 6121: 6084: 6076: 6033: 6012: 5988: 5971: 5944: 5933: 5923: 5898: 5869: 5855: 5847: 5833: 5810: 5796: 5771: 5751: 5711: 5659: 5630: 5543: 5470: 5413: 5373: 5349: 5303: 5282: 5262: 5242: 5220: 5199: 5178: 5158: 5133: 5112: 5082: 5061: 5045: 5003: 4970: 4917: 4835: 4790: 4742: 4665: 4640: 4615: 4589: 4549: 4529: 4487: 4452: 4436: 4411: 4380: 4355: 4303: 4278: 4253: 4232: 4183: 4153: 4092: 4081: 4066: 4045: 4025: 3999: 3946: 3896: 3866: 3850: 3825: 3761: 3739: 3719: 3694: 3673: 3643: 3581: 3542: 3525: 3504: 3488: 3405: 3388: 3372: 3343: 3318: 3307: 3280: 3232: 3165: 3129: 3107: 3086: 3045: 3024: 2995: 2973: 2956: 2935: 2904: 2879: 2858: 2819: 2754: 2738: 2712: 2675: 2653: 2632: 2600: 2584: 2564: 2493: 2463: 2433: 2403: 2377: 2350: 2320: 2295: 2242: 2217: 2192: 2162: 2132: 2110: 2085: 2048: 2017: 1953: 1918: 1881: 1841: 1829: 1819: 1798: 1776: 1747: 1683: 1646: 1581: 1544: 1502: 1480: 1455: 1414: 1359: 1305: 1265: 1218: 1162: 1127: 1062: 1029: 999: 977: 939: 918: 885: 856: 840: 819: 794: 773: 716: 692: 660: 604: 583: 557: 541: 515: 494: 489:

then some unrelated ethnographer or dance historian will have made it, just cite that. -

481:

I'm not so sure they are primary sources, but even accepting for argument that they are,

470: 462: 445: 410: 384: 362: 327: 305: 271: 256: 235: 193: 164: 139: 117: 6054: 4580:

Medical content on Knowledge has stringent sourcing requirements, which you can read at

789:

Knowledge requires sources, it isn't a place for you to add your personal commentary. -

5788: 4995: 4599: 4390: 4197: 3223:

stands (and indeed as it stood before I started editing) it qualifies for deletion due

2184: 2062: 616:

function of "payload attribution systems". Please read the abstract of papers. Thanks.

525: 6000: 3429:

for the information you're trying to update. Where are you getting your information? —

3143: 6531: 6108:. Additionally, you should absolutely not be linking your own blog on wikipedia. See 5999:

And yet here you are, adding marketing content to Knowledge about your employer (and

5843: 5582: 5500: 5436: 5387: 5254: 4851: 4805: 4757: 4720: 4650: 4504: 4321: 4175: 3780: 3711: 2642: 2121:

Hy, you reverted what I added on 2 articles today, I would like to know the reasoning

2037: 1716: 1664: 1380: 814:

and do not add links to people's personal sites or self published content. Thanks. -

482: 402: 292:

Spamming means, for example, hijacking a reference to a high quality source like the

245: 47: 17: 5465:

Because (as I wrote above) it is a list of software that has a Knowledge article. -

4366:

Regarding independent sources for 2getheraudio example on the Pay-What-You-Want page

108:

1) You have no consensus for your changes and 2) Your sources are terrible. We have

6282: 6079:

again, your interpretation is backward. You need consensus to support your edit. -

5331: 5028: 4984: 4884: 4694: 4400: 4196: 3988: 3968: 3920: 3731: 3552: 3467: 3436: 3266: 3206: 3151: 3117: 2552: 2151: 1638: 1337: 1077: 755: 354: 2208:

Redwood used to have an article, but it was deleted because the topic didn't meet

2103:

Knowledge:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_141#Michael_Simkovic_references

6441: 6314: 6244: 5647: 5170: 5150: 4581: 4521: 4347: 4288: 3861:

It's the most common inclusion criterion for a stand alone list or comparison. -

3794: 3600: 3335: 2948: 2927: 2804: 2689: 2556: 2027: 1516: 968: 708: 486: 6178:

You should really read the whole guideline, blogs are specifically addressed in

5344:

The text wasn't bad, but the reference link seemed to be pretty clearly spam. -

4056:

Pictures of Philippine Eagles “Gemma” and “Tinuy-an” in Philippine Eagle article

397:

If you have factual corrections to make, sourced to independent publishers that

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

6393: 6369: 6206:

An official link is something akin to linking Coca-Cola's corporate website on

6179: 6109: 5806: 5725: 5685: 5622: 5104: 4632: 4274: 3420: 3360: 2833: 2529: 2509: 2488:

Ok, but none of that is a good reason to surprise readers with a piped link. -

2362: 2234: 1675: 1634: 1447: 1347: 811: 6048: 5231:

Overly aggressive edits and mis-categorization of valuable citations as "spam"

2057:

Thanks. Either way I was going to steal it but nice to know its in Twinkle. --

1629:

Constructively, I think it is very likely you are in violation of Knowledge's

1528: 594:

Why did you remove the interesting extension and application of Bloom filter?!

6389: 6365: 6339: 6289: 6113: 6072: 5915: 5763: 5743: 5702:

What an excellent loophole! If I were to say that your talk page comment was

5274: 5100: 4991: 4869: 4782: 4479: 4193: 3888: 3622: 3573: 3569: 3364: 3224: 3016: 2896: 2811: 2342: 2209: 2058: 1630: 1094: 1046: 956: 877: 683: 437: 433: 429: 3015:- videos and primary source papers generally aren't used as links. Also see 2915:

New unpaid contributor who needs your help (and patience as I try to comply)

1300:

and use high quality from now on and you should have no further problems. -

1285: 955:

The main problem is that you're writing it like an essay, which expresses a

6476: 6427: 6397: 6373: 6344: 6318: 6293: 6268: 6248: 6227: 6211: 6183: 6159: 6117: 6105: 6080: 6029: 6008: 5984: 5967: 5940: 5919: 5894: 5890: 5865: 5829: 5792: 5767: 5747: 5707: 5655: 5626: 5539: 5466: 5409: 5386:

Can we just remove the link since there is not an article for Leadtools? --

5369: 5345: 5299: 5278: 5258: 5238: 5216: 5195: 5174: 5154: 5129: 5108: 5078: 5057: 5041: 4999: 4966: 4913: 4831: 4786: 4738: 4661: 4636: 4611: 4585: 4545: 4525: 4483: 4448: 4432: 4428: 4407: 4376: 4372: 4351: 4299: 4295: 4249: 4228: 4224: 4179: 4149: 4145: 4123: 4119: 4088: 4062: 4041: 4037: 4021: 3995: 3942: 3892: 3862: 3846: 3821: 3757: 3735: 3715: 3690: 3669: 3639: 3626: 3577: 3538: 3521: 3500: 3484: 3426: 3401: 3384: 3368: 3339: 3314: 3276: 3228: 3216: 3161: 3125: 3103: 3082: 3041: 3020: 3012: 2991: 2969: 2952: 2931: 2900: 2875: 2854: 2815: 2750: 2734: 2708: 2671: 2649: 2628: 2618: 2596: 2580: 2576: 2560: 2489: 2459: 2429: 2399: 2373: 2369: 2346: 2316: 2291: 2238: 2213: 2188: 2158: 2128: 2106: 2081: 2044: 2013: 1949: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1877: 1837: 1815: 1794: 1772: 1743: 1679: 1671: 1642: 1577: 1540: 1498: 1476: 1451: 1443: 1410: 1355: 1315: 1301: 1297: 1261: 1257: 1214: 1158: 1154: 1123: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1025: 995: 973: 964: 960: 935: 914: 910: 881: 873: 852: 836: 815: 790: 769: 735: 712: 688: 656: 600: 579: 553: 537: 511: 490: 466: 441: 406: 398: 380: 358: 301: 252: 231: 189: 160: 159:

carefully and avoid self published blogs as sources from now on. Thanks. -

156: 135: 113: 109: 2773: 1852:

https://blog.malwarebytes.com/detections/pup-optional-winzipdriverupdater/

959:, and not like an encyclopedia article. I suggest you read a selection of 905:. Knowledge does not suppress content based on local laws or customs. PS: 6004: 5326: 5023: 4879: 4706: 4689: 4136: 3635: 3462: 3431: 3262: 3202: 3147: 2287: 1964: 1855: 1439: 1438:

Correct, personal knowledge does not comply with wikipedia's policies on

1318:. Highly appreciate your response. Reviewing the sourcing guidelines now. 751: 3456:

You've failed to provide a source that actually lists the cast members.

1836:

papers, etc. Malwarebytes forum posts are essentially self published. -

1386:

hi..sorry for the trouble. My intention is to just cite the reference.

510:

We don't use sales and/or marketing sites or vendor blogs as sources. -

6541:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3790: 6007:

with an edit request, if you must. My user talk isn't a good venue. -

2614:

RE: "What standard are you applying?" See the policies I linked above.

6523: 6504: 6207: 6158:

The CIO citation that's already on that sentence seems sufficient. -

5721: 5681: 4541: 2810:

Thanks for making the disclosure. Please read over the guidelines on

1759: 1260:, we don't use self published blogs as sources or external links. - 401:, Knowledge welcomes that. But if what you're really here for is to 5842:

Hi MrOllie, would you mind please editing out my surname above per

4712: 4264:

Regarding an image on unlimited scrolling on social media newsfeeds

3941:

As I said above, please take this up on the article's talk page. -

3220: 1758:

Perplexed by your decision to remove mergers and acquisitions from

1351: 230:

Magic Quadrants aren't awards, they're market research reports. -

4560:

Updated comparison table to follow changes in FEA-compare project

3705:

Subheading and Section Headers on the Knowledge article web page.

3261:

If it qualifies for deletion, please go on and delete the entry.

3191: 3187: 2345:

and should not be adding references to it to Knowledge anyway. -

963:

and try to match the style. You're also using sources that don't

906: 5237:

unnecessary self-name drops comprehensive literature reviews. -

4271:

Talk:Social media#Addition of an image for mental health effects

3841:

See the talk page of the IP address you were using at the time.

3684:

You cancelled the first web travel reality show - NomadCommunity

2043:, which is one of the warning templates available in Twinkle. - 4406:

Knowledge is not for advertising particular software, sorry. -

5828:

My thoughts are: Use the article talk page. Don't edit war. -

3520:

Someone else already removed the tag, don't worry about it. -

6422:

We don't use vendor blogs and/or advertising as sources, see

5298:

No, it's still an unsourced advert. The tag should remain. -

5153:. The sources you are citing do not meet these requirements. 3630: 2144:

entry should be left alongside the entry of the german team.

1873: 704: 5621:

This is obviously reference spam being added by a series of

4544:

doesn't have a lot of nice things to say about Knowledge. -

2853:

Bible study content should be kept on religious articles. -

2595:

I believe I've already addressed all specific questions. -

1511:

OK, I get your point (2) lets keep your revert. Thank you!

6490: 4144:

We don't use blogs as sources, I'm afraid. Please see our

3572:

on editing about Seed7. That's fine (provided there is no

6450: 6535:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

6210:. An abstract concept does not have an official site. - 4631:

Sorry, we don't add sites for promotional purposes. See

3710:

You failed to cite any sources, and your text contained

3194:. Companies House may not verify the content submitted, 1856:

https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_rogue_security_software

5123:

Regarding your feedback and wrongful removal of content

4164:

Adding the name Julan Shirwod Nueva(myself) in the list

2617:

RE: "What would be sufficient in your eyes?" Lots more

2388:

Chief Data Officer entry stating "Rv malformatted links

1539:

Are you an expert? Are you employed in the industry? -

707:, nor do we have a link to the ACLU's donation page on 578:

Asked and answered in the section you started above. -

403:

get links to your organisation and add promotional text

6202:

area for which the subject of the article is notable.

5408:

That's what happened, it was removed from the list. -

5077:

Because it's obvious link spam. Don't add it again. -

4113:

Removing the links of my last edit on WooCommerce page

5652:

calling established editors vandals in edit summaries

4912:

Knowledge doesn't use advertisements as reference. -

4338:

Kindly confirm if this is good to be used as citation

1251:

Inappropriate external links to Knowledge - June 2019

1010:

Inappropriate external links to Knowledge - June 2019

5706:

insulting garbage, would that be alright as well? -

835:

We don't use product advertisements as citations. -

5918:, you probably shouldn't be editing this at all. - 4371:Knowledge doesn't use blogs as sources either, see 4213:

Please Review George C. Marshall Foundation Article

2528:posted by others especially referring to religion. 913:if you really want to get offended by something. - 6333:Suggested further reading of freshly released book 2985:Somnolence Physical Health missing/removed entries 2336:Why did you revert ChipIn in crowdfunding history? 1153:If it's that important you should be able to find 465:. An interview with Vieira is a primary source. - 6104:We don't use blogs as sources for wikipedia, see 5101:guidelines on editing with a conflict of interest 4845:Knowledge:Keep_off_my_talk_page!#Why_not_to_do_it 3843:User_talk:2A02:A03F:4C58:BA00:C8AA:F1CC:6541:C561 3836:Comparison of computer-assisted translation tools 3499:No, I'm not going to put your spam links back. - 2212:. It doesn't look to me like that has changed. - 1354:would be overrun with links to local plumbers. - 1175:Well, it is currently the only one listed in the 5319:Vandalism warning - Hybrid mattress sub-category 2310:you just reverted my edit on meaningful learning 4169:Business process outsourcing in the Philippines 4077:Deleting Photos in the Philippine Eagle Article 6047:propose edits to improve the contribution. 5215:It was redundant with text already present. - 4431:, we don't use commercial blogs as sources. - 3313:It was redundant with text already present. - 1809:My edit on Mobile ticketing in Mobile Commerce 867:"Workplace Democracy" article editing question 5293:Satellite Enhanced Emergency Messaging System 4785:. But stay off my talk page in the future. - 4781:If you really think I'm a vandal, take it to 2832:Thank you for pointing me out these issues. 1409:The edits were promotional, and unsourced. - 909:is a fairly tame example. See something like 6292:. A citation is most definitely required. - 1350:. Being 'relevant' isn't enough, if it were 1155:independent sources that meet our guidelines 2502:It was a reference to a book and website. 5128:Why are you using plurals? Who is 'we'? - 4015:Medical Credentialing and Billing articles 3730:Nah. If you want to add text, it is up to 3714:, which is to be avoided on Knowledge. - 1637:, and most likely the FTC regulations on 5670:1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die 4269:Convenience link to centralized thread: 3889:discussing this on the article talk page 3734:, not up to others to fix your edits. - 2546:Bodystorming with dancers and scientists 6364:Knowledge is not a link directory, see 4218:Please check again the DataMelt article 4038:reliable source as Knowledge defines it 3919:accurately describing the architecture. 3303:I am not able to understand it properly 3011:In general read over our guidelines on 2483:Pastoral Care is not Pastoral Ministry. 2210:Knowledge's minimum inclusion standards 14: 6265:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard 5742:If you really think I'm a vandal, See 3186:"It is not a reliable source" is your 3017:the guidelines on conflict of interest 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6417:Removed Reference Link from Wiki page 6245:indiscriminate collection of factoids 4735:Knowledge:Don't template the regulars 3425:Further, you have failed to cite any 3225:lack of reliable, independent sources 3058:Thanks for your kind explanations :) 2478:Recent reverts of blogsareforever.com 6532:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 5173:guideline I keep linking for you. - 4223:I still don't see sources that meet 4118:No, that link isn't acceptable as a 1787:Remove section on surgical coaching? 1424:with the existing descriptions IMHO. 1177:Comparison of cryptography libraries 25: 5611:Multiplex polymerase chain reaction 3359:Please read over our guidelines on 432:. However, if your topic meets our 23: 6515:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 6505:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/4.1.21 5072:Why do you keep removing my edits? 4135: 1766:Removal of quality management link 929:Response to message from June 2019 676:Response to message from June 2019 24: 6553: 6359:FreePascal page - removal of link 3597:Comparison of TLS implementations 3563:Comparison of TLS implementations 2869:Yamaha DX1 External Link reverted 1093:notification to other editors at 1040:Authority on Bluetooth Low Energy 896:Posting porn related pics in wiki 298:link to your self published blog. 6522: 6449: 5805:OK. Thanks for the information. 5680:Vandal", anyway. God's sake ... 4683:Also, looking at the history of 4540:It's not really surprising that 4422:Why did you remove my reference? 4036:Your company's webstie is not a 3515:List of Cocktails (alphabetical) 2772: 1379: 1336:Inappropriate external links to 1281:The International Dota 2 article 734: 29: 5093:Scholars Strategy Network edits 4396:Regarding spelling of Nasaraean 4243:Fashion Week in LA Page updates 3076:Particle swarm external links 2 2419:Updating my organization's page 2414:SOCP Removal of Solvers section 2370:wikipedia's sourcing guidelines 6498: 6457:To my best friend on wikipedia 5676:Muso805 only said "removed by 5616:Content and citations question 4703:Read the relevant pages again 4385:13:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 4360:10:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 4333:Please explain Nespresso edit. 4308:14:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC) 4283:14:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC) 4258:01:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC) 4237:01:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC) 4205:17:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC) 4188:15:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC) 4158:12:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC) 4097:11:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC) 4071:22:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC) 4050:13:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC) 4030:13:41, 22 September 2019 (UTC) 4004:12:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC) 3977:20:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 3951:19:17, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 3929:16:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 3901:15:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 3871:19:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 3855:19:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 3830:14:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 3805:10:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 3785:12:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC) 3766:11:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC) 3744:19:27, 20 September 2019 (UTC) 3724:19:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC) 3699:13:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC) 3678:20:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC) 3648:17:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC) 3609:17:02, 18 September 2019 (UTC) 3586:14:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC) 3547:21:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC) 3530:20:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC) 3509:16:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC) 3493:15:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC) 3472:18:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 3441:14:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 3410:14:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 3393:15:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC) 3377:18:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC) 3348:11:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 3323:02:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC) 3285:16:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3271:15:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3237:15:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3211:15:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3199:veritably and tangibly publish 3170:15:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3156:15:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3134:15:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3112:13:30, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3091:13:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC) 3068:13:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 2836:Fri 30 Aug 2019 19:20:11 (UTC) 1701: 1633:, particularly the section on 1045:Please read over our pages on 568:Stop deleting important links! 399:meet our sourcing requirements 13: 1: 6485:12:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC) 6436:14:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 6406:13:00, 14 November 2019 (UTC) 6353:12:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC) 6327:18:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC) 6302:01:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC) 3050:11:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 3029:22:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 3006:Particle swarm external links 3000:22:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 2978:22:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 2961:20:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 2940:11:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 2909:18:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC) 2884:17:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC) 2863:14:15, 4 September 2019 (UTC) 531:About External Link Insertion 6382:19:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC) 6277:02:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 6257:02:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 6236:02:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 6220:02:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 6192:01:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 6168:01:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 6145:01:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 6126:01:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 6089:13:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC) 6059:12:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC) 6038:20:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC) 6017:19:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC) 5993:18:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC) 5976:18:54, 25 October 2019 (UTC) 5949:19:48, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 5928:13:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 5903:19:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 5874:15:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC) 5860:15:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC) 5838:22:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC) 5815:23:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC) 5801:21:12, 26 October 2019 (UTC) 5776:17:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 5756:16:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 5730:16:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 5716:16:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 5690:16:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 5664:15:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC) 5635:21:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 5591:19:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 5548:19:50, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 5509:19:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 5475:19:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 5445:19:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 5418:19:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 5396:19:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 5378:19:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC) 5354:19:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC) 5336:18:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC) 5308:21:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC) 5287:14:47, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 5267:13:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 5247:22:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC) 5225:14:46, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 5204:19:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 5183:17:29, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 5163:21:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC) 5138:00:16, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 5117:16:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC) 5087:19:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC) 5066:11:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC) 5050:01:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC) 5033:11:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 5008:01:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 4975:11:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC) 4951:06:19, 11 October 2019 (UTC) 4922:11:13, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 4889:17:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 4856:12:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 4840:12:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 4810:12:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 4795:11:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 4762:09:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 4645:11:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3877:Serverless computing reverts 2664:Radiocarbon dating reversion 2173:Response with some questions 1694:Project Management Institute 1448:neutral point of view policy 1148:TOTP Library implementations 1088:connected contributor (paid) 965:meet our sourcing guidelines 874:our external link guidelines 812:guidelines on external links 7: 5273:Feel free to take it up on 4747:18:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 4725:18:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 4699:14:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 4670:14:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 4620:13:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 4594:23:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC) 4554:00:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC) 4534:13:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 4509:21:30, 6 October 2019 (UTC) 4492:14:32, 6 October 2019 (UTC) 4457:16:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 4441:16:13, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 4416:13:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 3815:Learning Management Systems 2824:19:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC) 2797:08:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC) 2759:17:43, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 2743:13:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 2717:10:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC) 2694:22:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 2680:10:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 2658:16:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 2637:14:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 2605:16:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 2589:10:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 2569:11:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 2539:23:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 2522:03:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 2498:01:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 2468:15:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 2453:15:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 2438:15:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 2408:11:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC) 2382:23:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC) 2355:11:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC) 2325:11:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC) 2300:13:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC) 2247:02:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC) 2222:13:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC) 2197:19:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC) 2167:23:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC) 2137:17:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC) 2115:19:49, 12 August 2019 (UTC) 2090:10:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC) 2067:01:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC) 2053:01:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC) 2022:10:59, 11 August 2019 (UTC) 1987:06:47, 11 August 2019 (UTC) 988:To improve using your words 294:Centers for Disease Control 10: 6558: 6424:Knowledge:Reliable sources 4715:is hardware and software. 4606:Knowledge does not do per 4346:For the first, Please see 2890:Campy Agar - Campylobacter 1958:18:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1943:18:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1923:18:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1901:18:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1886:17:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1868:17:11, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1846:14:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1824:17:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC) 1803:17:34, 9 August 2019 (UTC) 1781:17:19, 9 August 2019 (UTC) 1752:09:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC) 1688:16:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1470:Magnetic Resonance Article 1298:our guidelines on sourcing 423:Need help with adding info 6448: 6003:). Anyway, take it up on 2771: 2235:write some articles first 1651:16:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 1586:15:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 1549:14:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 1521:20:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 1507:20:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 1485:15:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 1460:20:07, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 1434:19:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 1419:19:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 1396:10:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC) 1364:20:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC) 1328:06:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 1310:17:32, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 1270:10:33, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 1223:18:07, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 1167:16:48, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 1132:14:08, 24 July 2019 (UTC) 1117:14:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC) 1073:food history 21st century 1067:09:45, 22 July 2019 (UTC) 1034:12:55, 21 July 2019 (UTC) 1004:10:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 982:00:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 944:19:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC) 923:17:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC) 890:16:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 861:16:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 824:13:43, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 799:11:52, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 778:00:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC) 760:20:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC) 740: 733: 499:14:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC) 475:09:43, 27 June 2019 (UTC) 450:11:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC) 415:01:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC) 389:21:47, 24 June 2019 (UTC) 367:20:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC) 348:edits still being removed 336:15:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC) 310:14:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC) 280:14:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC) 261:10:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC) 240:11:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 213:12:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC) 198:02:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC) 184:01:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC) 169:00:07, 18 June 2019 (UTC) 150:Editing data lake article 144:17:47, 12 June 2019 (UTC) 122:09:58, 12 June 2019 (UTC) 5623:promotional sock puppets 4875:Talk:Graphing calculator 4685:Talk:Graphing calculator 4473:Edits on Medical Imaging 4010:Philippine Eagle article 3215:No, that's exactly what 2428:and comply with them. - 2361:'Have some other folks' 2331:Reversion on Async/await 2228:Notable usenet providers 1635:undisclosed paid editing 1022:Knowledge:External_links 845:01:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC) 721:20:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 697:23:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 665:19:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 643:14:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 626:12:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 609:10:36, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 588:14:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 562:14:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 546:11:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 520:14:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 434:guidelines for inclusion 155:Please read Knowledge's 6470:Removal of legit links. 6340:single purpose accounts 4225:our sourcing guidelines 3097:bet-at-home.com article 1724:line feed character in 1497:block this software. - 950:21 century food history 671:Charles Gasparino edits 6313:Please take a look at 6001:not for the first time 5983:about your English. - 5823:Steve Huffman edit war 5362:User talk:BonzoFestoon 5105:policy on paid editing 4830:Stay off this page. - 4463:Update bet-at-home.com 4140: 3967:Thanks for the help - 3625:independently written 3460:didn't mention them. — 3217:the relevant guideline 2723:External Links removed 2178:Inquiry regarding edit 1670:You added a number of 830:Paperless Office Edits 744:The Invisible Barnstar 505:VA Loan Limits in 2020 461:Knowledge is based on 6529:Hello! Voting in the 4575:/* Pain Management */ 4139: 3712:self referential text 3634:sources to establish 2780:The Original Barnstar 1450:, not to add more. - 1372:Some baklava for you! 1181:own Knowledge article 1051:sourcing requirements 878:conflict of interest. 810:Please read over our 438:articles for creation 42:of past discussions. 5648:undue weight at best 5646:I disagree. This is 4658:Graphing calculators 4480:conflict of interest 4108:Pressure measurement 3665:Godmother_(cocktail) 3658:Godmother (cocktail) 3574:conflict of interest 3365:conflict of interest 3035:Mountain car problem 2843:Mountain car problem 2812:conflict of interest 2343:conflict of interest 1872:We're talking about 1404:Imagix and Imagix 4D 1047:conflict of interest 784:Mantle cell lymphoma 684:conflict of interest 430:conflict of interest 5884:Intrusion Detection 4192:Okay, thanks. :) — 4146:sourcing guidelines 2765:A barnstar for you! 2426:your user talk page 2075:Conjectural history 2007:Edit on Hack Forums 1276:Revising my changes 157:sourcing guidelines 110:sourcing guidelines 103:About WebTV history 4141: 3732:you to add sources 3663:When you click on 3570:singularly focused 3329:Traditional dance? 2789:Neerajsinghbora321 2702:Bagholder and FPGA 1639:native advertising 1534:Aids to Navigation 1529:Managing Hair Loss 1138:Internet of Things 128:Body suit (tattoo) 6545: 6544: 6467: 6466: 6412:Supply Chain Page 6023:Recurring reverts 5955:Kotlin Page Edits 5909:Bluetooth history 5314:BeamXpertDESIGNER 5255:Literature review 4953: 4937:comment added by 4870:assume good faith 4682: 4679:talk page stalker 4201: 2926:Please read over 2848:Implicit metaphor 2802: 2801: 2541: 2524: 2508:comment added by 2275: 2262:comment added by 1401: 1400: 1320:Aurangzeb Durrani 1202: 1189:comment added by 1055:original research 961:featured articles 765: 764: 727:Woah, a barnstar! 649:Not a sock puppet 463:secondary sources 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:MrOllie 6549: 6526: 6519: 6518: 6507: 6502: 6453: 6446: 6445: 6308:Adding new parts 5020: 4932: 4866: 4780: 4710: 4676: 4608:WP:ELMINOFFICIAL 4478:Please read the 4203: 4198: 3455: 3427:reliable sources 3424: 3013:external linking 2897:Knowledge is for 2776: 2769: 2768: 2619:reliable sources 2532: 2503: 2257: 2096:Michael Simkovic 2042: 2036: 1984: 1734: 1733: 1728:at position 87 ( 1727: 1722: 1720: 1712: 1705: 1631:terms of service 1388:Ratnakar Lybrate 1383: 1376: 1375: 1338:Dream dictionary 1184: 1115: 1113: 1104: 1092: 1086: 1015:Autodesk article 738: 731: 730: 573:Need Information 355:Vincent van Gogh 225:Reference missed 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6557: 6556: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6548: 6547: 6546: 6517: 6512: 6511: 6510: 6503: 6499: 6493: 6472: 6444: 6419: 6414: 6361: 6335: 6310: 6285: 6203: 6199: 6101: 6025: 5957: 5936: 5911: 5886: 5825: 5784: 5643: 5641:Muso805's edits 5618: 5613: 5364: 5321: 5316: 5295: 5233: 5212: 5191: 5146: 5125: 5095: 5074: 5017:Mentalhealth123 5014: 4987: 4909: 4860: 4774: 4704: 4653: 4628: 4602: 4577: 4572: 4570:PHRs by country 4567: 4562: 4517: 4475: 4470: 4465: 4424: 4403: 4398: 4393: 4368: 4343: 4340: 4335: 4324: 4319: 4291: 4266: 4245: 4220: 4215: 4200: 4171: 4166: 4134: 4132:A goat for you! 4115: 4110: 4105: 4084: 4079: 4058: 4017: 4012: 3991: 3879: 3838: 3817: 3752: 3750:bet-at-home.com 3707: 3686: 3660: 3565: 3560: 3558:LA Fashion Week 3555: 3517: 3480: 3478:naanii.es links 3449: 3418: 3356: 3331: 3310: 3305: 3120: 3099: 3078: 3037: 3008: 2987: 2923: 2917: 2892: 2871: 2850: 2845: 2807: 2767: 2730: 2725: 2704: 2666: 2645: 2548: 2485: 2480: 2421: 2416: 2395: 2393:Dean Kamen Page 2390: 2338: 2333: 2312: 2230: 2205: 2180: 2175: 2154: 2123: 2098: 2077: 2040: 2034: 2030: 2009: 1965: 1832: 1811: 1789: 1768: 1763: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1725: 1723: 1714: 1713: 1707: 1706: 1702: 1696: 1672:unsourced facts 1667: 1536: 1531: 1493: 1491:AnyDesk Article 1472: 1406: 1374: 1341: 1293: 1288: 1283: 1278: 1253: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1108: 1106: 1098: 1090: 1084: 1083:I have added a 1080: 1075: 1042: 1017: 1012: 990: 952: 931: 898: 869: 832: 807: 786: 729: 709:Civil liberties 678: 673: 651: 596: 575: 570: 533: 528: 507: 458: 456:Capoeira debate 425: 375: 350: 248: 227: 152: 130: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6555: 6543: 6542: 6538:eligible users 6527: 6516: 6513: 6509: 6508: 6496: 6495: 6494: 6492: 6489: 6488: 6487: 6471: 6468: 6465: 6464: 6460: 6459: 6454: 6443: 6440: 6439: 6438: 6418: 6415: 6413: 6410: 6409: 6408: 6385: 6384: 6360: 6357: 6356: 6355: 6334: 6331: 6330: 6329: 6309: 6306: 6305: 6304: 6284: 6281: 6280: 6279: 6260: 6259: 6239: 6238: 6223: 6222: 6200: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6175: 6174: 6173: 6172: 6171: 6170: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6148: 6129: 6128: 6100: 6097: 6096: 6095: 6094: 6093: 6092: 6091: 6064: 6063: 6062: 6061: 6041: 6040: 6024: 6021: 6020: 6019: 5996: 5995: 5979: 5978: 5962: 5961: 5956: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5935: 5932: 5931: 5930: 5910: 5907: 5906: 5905: 5885: 5882: 5881: 5880: 5879: 5878: 5877: 5876: 5864:No problem. - 5848:16912 Rhiannon 5824: 5821: 5820: 5819: 5818: 5817: 5783: 5782:129.15.133.239 5780: 5779: 5778: 5759: 5758: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5736: 5735: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5692: 5642: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5617: 5614: 5612: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5554: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5550: 5522: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5486: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5481: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5447: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5381: 5380: 5363: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5339: 5338: 5320: 5317: 5315: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5294: 5291: 5290: 5289: 5270: 5269: 5250: 5249: 5232: 5229: 5228: 5227: 5211: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5190: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5166: 5165: 5145: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5124: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5094: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5073: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5053: 5052: 5036: 5035: 5011: 5010: 4986: 4983: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4954: 4925: 4924: 4908: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4891: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4813: 4812: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4673: 4672: 4652: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4627: 4626:Migraine edit 4624: 4623: 4622: 4601: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4576: 4573: 4571: 4568: 4566: 4565:Update figures 4563: 4561: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4537: 4536: 4516: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4495: 4494: 4482:guidelines. - 4474: 4471: 4469: 4468:Osteoarthritis 4466: 4464: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4444: 4443: 4423: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4402: 4399: 4397: 4394: 4392: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4367: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4341: 4339: 4336: 4334: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4323: 4320: 4318: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4290: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4265: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4244: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4219: 4216: 4214: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4199: 4170: 4167: 4165: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4133: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4114: 4111: 4109: 4106: 4104: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4083: 4080: 4078: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4057: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4033: 4032: 4016: 4013: 4011: 4008: 4007: 4006: 3990: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3904: 3903: 3884: 3883: 3878: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3858: 3857: 3837: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3816: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3769: 3768: 3751: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3727: 3726: 3706: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3685: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3659: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3589: 3588: 3564: 3561: 3559: 3556: 3554: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3533: 3532: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3496: 3495: 3479: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3413: 3412: 3396: 3395: 3380: 3379: 3355: 3354:Editing Issues 3352: 3351: 3350: 3330: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3309: 3306: 3304: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3137: 3136: 3119: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3098: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3077: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3053: 3052: 3036: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3007: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2986: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2922: 2918: 2916: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2891: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2870: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2849: 2846: 2844: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2827: 2826: 2806: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2783: 2782: 2777: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2746: 2745: 2729: 2726: 2724: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2665: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2644: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2625: 2622: 2615: 2612: 2608: 2607: 2592: 2591: 2572: 2571: 2547: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2537:comment added 2525: 2500: 2484: 2481: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2445:Johnfarmer1982 2420: 2417: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2394: 2391: 2389: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2358: 2357: 2337: 2334: 2332: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2311: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2250: 2249: 2229: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2179: 2176: 2174: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2146:Typhon Antaeus 2140: 2139: 2122: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2097: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2076: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1831: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1767: 1764: 1762: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1736: 1735: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1695: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1552: 1551: 1535: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1405: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1384: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1340: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1170: 1169: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1119: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1041: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 989: 986: 985: 984: 951: 948: 947: 946: 930: 927: 926: 925: 903:WP:NOTCENSORED 897: 894: 893: 892: 868: 865: 864: 863: 848: 847: 831: 828: 827: 826: 806: 805:Bitbucket link 803: 802: 801: 785: 782: 781: 780: 763: 762: 747: 746: 741: 739: 728: 725: 724: 723: 700: 699: 677: 674: 672: 669: 668: 667: 650: 647: 646: 645: 629: 628: 612: 611: 595: 592: 591: 590: 574: 571: 569: 566: 565: 564: 549: 548: 532: 529: 527: 524: 523: 522: 506: 503: 502: 501: 478: 477: 457: 454: 453: 452: 424: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 392: 391: 374: 371: 370: 369: 349: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 328:Saibaadshah167 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 285: 284: 283: 282: 272:Saibaadshah167 264: 263: 247: 244: 243: 242: 226: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 205:173.48.113.176 176:173.48.113.176 151: 148: 147: 146: 129: 126: 125: 124: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6554: 6540: 6539: 6534: 6533: 6528: 6525: 6521: 6520: 6506: 6501: 6497: 6486: 6482: 6478: 6474: 6473: 6462: 6461: 6458: 6455: 6452: 6447: 6437: 6433: 6429: 6425: 6421: 6420: 6407: 6403: 6399: 6395: 6391: 6387: 6386: 6383: 6379: 6375: 6371: 6367: 6363: 6362: 6354: 6350: 6346: 6341: 6337: 6336: 6328: 6324: 6320: 6316: 6312: 6311: 6303: 6299: 6295: 6291: 6287: 6286: 6278: 6274: 6270: 6266: 6262: 6261: 6258: 6254: 6250: 6246: 6241: 6240: 6237: 6233: 6229: 6225: 6224: 6221: 6217: 6213: 6209: 6205: 6204: 6193: 6189: 6185: 6181: 6177: 6176: 6169: 6165: 6161: 6157: 6156: 6155: 6154: 6153: 6152: 6147:Daletanderson 6146: 6142: 6138: 6137:DaleTAnderson 6133: 6132: 6131: 6130: 6127: 6123: 6119: 6115: 6111: 6107: 6103: 6102: 6090: 6086: 6082: 6078: 6074: 6070: 6069: 6068: 6067: 6066: 6065: 6060: 6056: 6052: 6049: 6045: 6044: 6043: 6042: 6039: 6035: 6031: 6027: 6026: 6018: 6014: 6010: 6006: 6002: 5998: 5997: 5994: 5990: 5986: 5981: 5980: 5977: 5973: 5969: 5964: 5963: 5959: 5958: 5950: 5946: 5942: 5938: 5937: 5929: 5925: 5921: 5917: 5913: 5912: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5892: 5891:don't do that 5888: 5887: 5875: 5871: 5867: 5863: 5862: 5861: 5857: 5853: 5849: 5845: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5827: 5826: 5816: 5812: 5808: 5804: 5803: 5802: 5798: 5794: 5790: 5786: 5785: 5777: 5773: 5769: 5765: 5761: 5760: 5757: 5753: 5749: 5745: 5741: 5740: 5731: 5727: 5723: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5713: 5709: 5705: 5701: 5700: 5699: 5698: 5697: 5696: 5691: 5687: 5683: 5679: 5675: 5671: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5661: 5657: 5653: 5649: 5645: 5644: 5636: 5632: 5628: 5624: 5620: 5619: 5592: 5588: 5584: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5564: 5549: 5545: 5541: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5527: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5510: 5506: 5502: 5498: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5487: 5476: 5472: 5468: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5455: 5446: 5442: 5438: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5426: 5419: 5415: 5411: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5403: 5402: 5397: 5393: 5389: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5379: 5375: 5371: 5366: 5365: 5355: 5351: 5347: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5340: 5337: 5333: 5329: 5328: 5323: 5322: 5309: 5305: 5301: 5297: 5296: 5288: 5284: 5280: 5276: 5272: 5271: 5268: 5264: 5260: 5256: 5252: 5251: 5248: 5244: 5240: 5235: 5234: 5226: 5222: 5218: 5214: 5213: 5205: 5201: 5197: 5193: 5192: 5184: 5180: 5176: 5172: 5168: 5167: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5148: 5147: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5127: 5126: 5118: 5114: 5110: 5106: 5102: 5097: 5096: 5088: 5084: 5080: 5076: 5075: 5067: 5063: 5059: 5055: 5054: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5038: 5037: 5034: 5030: 5026: 5025: 5018: 5013: 5012: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4988: 4976: 4972: 4968: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4959: 4958: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4926: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4910: 4907:rankme.online 4890: 4886: 4882: 4881: 4876: 4871: 4864: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4846: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4821: 4820: 4811: 4807: 4803: 4798: 4797: 4796: 4792: 4788: 4784: 4778: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4731: 4726: 4722: 4718: 4714: 4708: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4696: 4692: 4691: 4686: 4680: 4675: 4674: 4671: 4667: 4663: 4659: 4655: 4654: 4646: 4642: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4629: 4621: 4617: 4613: 4609: 4604: 4603: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4578: 4555: 4551: 4547: 4543: 4539: 4538: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4497: 4496: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4477: 4476: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4445: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4425: 4417: 4413: 4409: 4405: 4404: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4374: 4370: 4369: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4344: 4326: 4325: 4317: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4292: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4267: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4246: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4221: 4206: 4202: 4195: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4172: 4159: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4142: 4138: 4125: 4124:external link 4121: 4117: 4116: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4085: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4059: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4034: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4018: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3993: 3992: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3885: 3881: 3880: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3859: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3839: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3818: 3806: 3802: 3799: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3754: 3753: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3728: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3708: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3687: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3666: 3662: 3661: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3566: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3535: 3534: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3518: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3497: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3481: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3459: 3453: 3452:Julia Braidon 3448: 3447: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3433: 3428: 3422: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3411: 3407: 3403: 3398: 3397: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3381: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3332: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3311: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3122: 3121: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3100: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3079: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2988: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2924: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2893: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2872: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2851: 2835: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2808: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2770: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2747: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2731: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2668: 2667: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2593: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2573: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2540: 2536: 2531: 2526: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2501: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2486: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2422: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2396: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2364: 2360: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2339: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2313: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2206: 2203:Can you help? 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2155: 2147: 2142: 2141: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2125: 2124: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2078: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2039: 2032: 2031: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2010: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1980: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1968: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1931: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1834: 1833: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1812: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1791: 1790: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1761: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1740: 1731: 1718: 1710: 1704: 1700: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1610:)tamaradeprez 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1565:)Tamaradeprez 1564: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440:verifiability 1437: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1407: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1143:Edit Reversal 1133: 1129: 1125: 1120: 1118: 1114: 1112: 1102: 1096: 1095:Talk:Cornhole 1089: 1082: 1081: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1005: 1001: 997: 992: 991: 983: 979: 975: 970: 966: 962: 958: 957:point of view 954: 953: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 899: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 870: 862: 858: 854: 850: 849: 846: 842: 838: 834: 833: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 808: 800: 796: 792: 788: 787: 779: 775: 771: 767: 766: 761: 757: 753: 749: 748: 745: 742: 737: 732: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 701: 698: 694: 690: 685: 680: 679: 666: 662: 658: 653: 652: 644: 640: 636: 635:ZakharShomali 631: 630: 627: 623: 619: 618:ZakharShomali 614: 613: 610: 606: 602: 598: 597: 589: 585: 581: 577: 576: 563: 559: 555: 551: 550: 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508: 500: 496: 492: 488: 487:notable claim 484: 480: 479: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 459: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 426: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 395: 394: 393: 390: 386: 382: 377: 376: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351: 337: 333: 329: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 281: 277: 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 241: 237: 233: 229: 228: 214: 210: 206: 201: 200: 199: 195: 191: 187: 186: 185: 181: 177: 172: 171: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153: 145: 141: 137: 132: 131: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 106: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6536: 6530: 6500: 6456: 6338:A series of 6077:WP:CONSENSUS 6071:Please read 5914:Please read 5703: 5677: 5673: 5669: 5583:BonzoFestoon 5501:BonzoFestoon 5437:BonzoFestoon 5388:BonzoFestoon 5325: 5189:Home staging 5022: 4933:— Preceding 4878: 4752:Talk page). 4688: 3797: 3461: 3457: 3430: 3361:paid editing 3198: 3195: 2779: 2728:Kurtoskalacs 2504:— Preceding 2258:— Preceding 1981: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1969: 1966: 1935:B00nish w4rs 1893:B00nish w4rs 1860:B00nish w4rs 1703: 1604:Tamaradeprez 1559:Tamaradeprez 1185:— Preceding 1110: 911:Sex position 901:Please read 743: 687:yourself. - 357:, either. - 75: 43: 37: 6005:Talk:Kotlin 5934:Duct (flow) 5789:WP:CITESPAM 5210:Psychopathy 4996:WP:CITESPAM 4103:Alien Cabal 4082:Alien Cabal 3969:HarryLarold 3921:HarryLarold 3308:Psychopathy 3060:Zhiqingxiao 2921:Hypersomnia 2533:—Preceding 2288:MOS:SEEALSO 2185:WP:NOTHOWTO 1830:WinZip Scam 1641:as well. - 1426:Ksradcliffe 1291:Obfuscation 440:process. - 36:This is an 5844:WP:PRIVACY 4939:Himank0210 4600:Discussion 4391:Re message 3636:notability 3601:Hans Bauer 2366:won't work 2264:HarryGyles 1191:Mahlersand 526:Difiggiano 483:WP:SELFPUB 95:Archive 15 87:Archive 10 6208:Coca-Cola 5807:Pierre cb 4651:Vandalism 4542:Gary Null 4322:NetCrunch 4275:GermanJoe 4122:or as an 3623:2 or more 3421:SpringLDN 3144:Nabla Ltd 2834:Kuroshivo 2643:Tektronix 2553:WP:FRINGE 2127:stuff. - 1760:Skillsoft 1665:Brock1700 1101:Tryder707 246:June 2019 82:Archive 9 76:Archive 8 70:Archive 7 65:Archive 6 60:Archive 5 6491:ref spam 6315:WP:MEDRS 6283:Heads up 5704:possibly 5678:possible 5171:WP:MEDRS 5151:WP:MEDRS 5103:and our 4985:question 4947:contribs 4935:unsigned 4713:NumWorks 4660:page. - 4582:WP:MEDRS 4522:WP:MEDRS 4401:Kon-Boot 4348:WP:MEDRS 3989:Response 3801:Contribs 3553:My Edits 3458:Playbill 3336:WP:UNDUE 3221:OpenFOAM 3190:, not a 3118:OpenFOAM 2949:WP:MEDRS 2928:WP:MEDRS 2557:WP:UNDUE 2530:Fiaali'i 2518:contribs 2510:Fiaali'i 2506:unsigned 2363:probably 2272:contribs 2260:unsigned 2152:deletion 2059:CNMall41 2038:uw-paid1 1717:cite web 1676:opinions 1444:sourcing 1352:Plumbing 1199:contribs 1187:unsigned 1109:General 1078:Cornhole 6477:MrOllie 6442:MrOllie 6428:MrOllie 6398:MrOllie 6394:WP:ELNO 6374:MrOllie 6370:WP:ELNO 6345:MrOllie 6319:MrOllie 6294:MrOllie 6269:MrOllie 6249:MrOllie 6228:MrOllie 6212:MrOllie 6184:MrOllie 6180:WP:ELNO 6160:MrOllie 6118:MrOllie 6110:WP:ELNO 6081:MrOllie 6030:MrOllie 6009:MrOllie 5985:MrOllie 5968:MrOllie 5941:MrOllie 5920:MrOllie 5895:MrOllie 5866:MrOllie 5830:MrOllie 5793:MrOllie 5768:MrOllie 5748:MrOllie 5708:MrOllie 5656:MrOllie 5627:MrOllie 5540:MrOllie 5467:MrOllie 5410:MrOllie 5370:MrOllie 5346:MrOllie 5300:MrOllie 5279:MrOllie 5259:MrOllie 5239:MrOllie 5217:MrOllie 5196:MrOllie 5175:MrOllie 5155:MrOllie 5130:MrOllie 5109:MrOllie 5079:MrOllie 5058:MrOllie 5042:MrOllie 5000:MrOllie 4967:MrOllie 4914:MrOllie 4863:Notrium 4848:Notrium 4832:MrOllie 4802:Notrium 4787:MrOllie 4777:Notrium 4754:Notrium 4739:MrOllie 4717:Notrium 4662:MrOllie 4637:MrOllie 4633:WP:ELNO 4612:MrOllie 4586:MrOllie 4546:MrOllie 4526:MrOllie 4501:BigAndi 4484:MrOllie 4449:MrOllie 4433:MrOllie 4408:MrOllie 4377:MrOllie 4352:MrOllie 4300:MrOllie 4289:Chopard 4250:MrOllie 4229:MrOllie 4180:MrOllie 4176:refspam 4150:MrOllie 4089:MrOllie 4063:MrOllie 4042:MrOllie 4022:MrOllie 3996:MrOllie 3943:MrOllie 3893:MrOllie 3863:MrOllie 3847:MrOllie 3822:MrOllie 3777:Bah2011 3758:MrOllie 3736:MrOllie 3716:MrOllie 3691:MrOllie 3670:MrOllie 3640:MrOllie 3627:sources 3578:MrOllie 3539:MrOllie 3522:MrOllie 3501:MrOllie 3485:MrOllie 3402:MrOllie 3385:MrOllie 3369:MrOllie 3340:MrOllie 3315:MrOllie 3277:MrOllie 3229:MrOllie 3192:premise 3188:opinion 3162:MrOllie 3126:MrOllie 3104:MrOllie 3083:MrOllie 3042:MrOllie 3021:MrOllie 2992:MrOllie 2970:MrOllie 2953:MrOllie 2932:MrOllie 2901:MrOllie 2876:MrOllie 2855:MrOllie 2816:MrOllie 2805:CAEplex 2751:MrOllie 2735:MrOllie 2709:MrOllie 2672:MrOllie 2650:MrOllie 2629:MrOllie 2597:MrOllie 2581:MrOllie 2561:MrOllie 2535:undated 2490:MrOllie 2460:MrOllie 2430:MrOllie 2400:MrOllie 2374:MrOllie 2347:MrOllie 2317:MrOllie 2292:MrOllie 2239:MrOllie 2214:MrOllie 2189:MrOllie 2159:MrOllie 2129:MrOllie 2107:MrOllie 2082:MrOllie 2045:MrOllie 2028:Script? 2014:MrOllie 1950:MrOllie 1915:MrOllie 1878:MrOllie 1838:MrOllie 1816:MrOllie 1795:MrOllie 1773:MrOllie 1744:MrOllie 1726:|title= 1680:MrOllie 1643:MrOllie 1578:MrOllie 1541:MrOllie 1499:MrOllie 1477:MrOllie 1452:MrOllie 1411:MrOllie 1356:MrOllie 1348:WP:ELNO 1316:MrOllie 1314:Thanks 1302:MrOllie 1286:Lucifer 1262:MrOllie 1240:though. 1215:MrOllie 1159:MrOllie 1124:MrOllie 1111:Ization 1059:MrOllie 1026:MrOllie 996:MrOllie 974:MrOllie 936:MrOllie 915:MrOllie 907:Erotica 882:MrOllie 853:MrOllie 837:MrOllie 816:MrOllie 791:MrOllie 770:MrOllie 713:MrOllie 689:MrOllie 657:MrOllie 601:MrOllie 580:MrOllie 554:MrOllie 538:MrOllie 512:MrOllie 491:MrOllie 467:MrOllie 442:MrOllie 407:MrOllie 381:MrOllie 359:MrOllie 302:MrOllie 296:with a 270:please. 253:MrOllie 232:MrOllie 190:MrOllie 161:MrOllie 136:MrOllie 114:MrOllie 39:archive 6390:WP:NOT 6366:WP:NOT 6290:WP:NOR 6114:WP:COI 6073:WP:BRD 6051:Ultimâ 5916:WP:COI 5764:WP:ANI 5744:WP:ANI 5327:C.Fred 5275:WP:RSN 5024:C.Fred 4992:WP:COI 4880:C.Fred 4783:WP:ANI 4707:C.Fred 4690:C.Fred 4194:Æµ§œš¹ 4120:source 3463:C.Fred 3432:C.Fred 3363:, and 3263:17kuti 3203:17kuti 3148:17kuti 1711:. PMI. 1053:, and 752:Utopes 6106:WP:RS 5654:. - 4429:WP:RS 4373:WP:RS 4328:list. 4296:WP:RS 4127:(UTC) 3791:Nigos 3631:Seed7 2686:Kcrca 2577:WP:DR 2455:John 2033:It's 1911:WP:RS 1907:WP:OR 1874:Corel 1513:N0mfg 1258:WP:RS 705:Whale 16:< 6481:talk 6463:Hi, 6432:talk 6426:. - 6402:talk 6396:. - 6392:and 6378:talk 6372:. - 6368:and 6349:talk 6323:talk 6298:talk 6288:See 6273:talk 6253:talk 6247:. - 6232:talk 6216:talk 6188:talk 6182:. - 6164:talk 6141:talk 6122:talk 6116:. - 6112:and 6085:talk 6075:and 6055:talk 6034:talk 6013:talk 5989:talk 5972:talk 5945:talk 5924:talk 5899:talk 5893:. - 5870:talk 5852:Talk 5834:talk 5811:talk 5797:talk 5772:talk 5766:. - 5752:talk 5746:. - 5726:talk 5722:JG66 5712:talk 5686:talk 5682:JG66 5660:talk 5631:talk 5587:talk 5544:talk 5505:talk 5471:talk 5441:talk 5414:talk 5392:talk 5374:talk 5350:talk 5332:talk 5304:talk 5283:talk 5263:talk 5243:talk 5221:talk 5200:talk 5179:talk 5159:talk 5134:talk 5113:talk 5083:talk 5062:talk 5046:talk 5029:talk 5004:talk 4994:and 4990:See 4971:talk 4943:talk 4918:talk 4885:talk 4877:). — 4852:talk 4836:talk 4806:talk 4791:talk 4758:talk 4743:talk 4721:talk 4695:talk 4666:talk 4641:talk 4635:. - 4616:talk 4610:. - 4590:talk 4550:talk 4530:talk 4505:talk 4488:talk 4453:talk 4437:talk 4427:See 4412:talk 4381:talk 4375:. - 4356:talk 4314:Re: 4304:talk 4298:. - 4294:See 4279:talk 4254:talk 4233:talk 4227:. - 4184:talk 4154:talk 4148:. - 4093:talk 4067:talk 4046:talk 4040:. - 4026:talk 4000:talk 3973:talk 3947:talk 3925:talk 3897:talk 3867:talk 3851:talk 3826:talk 3795:talk 3781:talk 3762:talk 3740:talk 3720:talk 3695:talk 3674:talk 3644:talk 3638:. - 3605:talk 3582:talk 3543:talk 3526:talk 3505:talk 3489:talk 3468:talk 3437:talk 3406:talk 3389:talk 3373:talk 3344:talk 3338:. - 3319:talk 3281:talk 3267:talk 3233:talk 3227:. - 3207:talk 3166:talk 3152:talk 3130:talk 3108:talk 3087:talk 3064:talk 3046:talk 3025:talk 2996:talk 2974:talk 2957:talk 2936:talk 2905:talk 2880:talk 2859:talk 2820:talk 2793:talk 2755:talk 2739:talk 2713:talk 2690:talk 2676:talk 2654:talk 2633:talk 2601:talk 2585:talk 2575:See 2565:talk 2555:and 2551:See 2514:talk 2494:talk 2464:talk 2449:talk 2434:talk 2404:talk 2378:talk 2351:talk 2321:talk 2296:talk 2286:See 2268:talk 2243:talk 2237:. - 2218:talk 2193:talk 2163:talk 2133:talk 2111:talk 2105:. - 2086:talk 2063:talk 2049:talk 2018:talk 1954:talk 1939:talk 1919:talk 1909:and 1905:See 1897:talk 1882:talk 1864:talk 1842:talk 1820:talk 1799:talk 1777:talk 1748:talk 1730:help 1684:talk 1674:and 1647:talk 1608:talk 1582:talk 1563:talk 1545:talk 1517:talk 1503:talk 1481:talk 1456:talk 1442:and 1430:talk 1415:talk 1392:talk 1360:talk 1324:talk 1306:talk 1266:talk 1256:See 1219:talk 1195:talk 1163:talk 1128:talk 1063:talk 1030:talk 1020:See 1000:talk 978:talk 969:fork 940:talk 919:talk 886:talk 857:talk 841:talk 820:talk 795:talk 774:talk 756:talk 717:talk 693:talk 661:talk 639:talk 622:talk 605:talk 584:talk 558:talk 542:talk 516:talk 495:talk 471:talk 446:talk 411:talk 385:talk 363:talk 332:talk 306:talk 276:talk 257:talk 236:talk 209:talk 194:talk 180:talk 165:talk 140:talk 118:talk 112:. - 5858:) 5856:COI 5674:And 3196:yet 6483:) 6434:) 6404:) 6380:) 6351:) 6325:) 6300:) 6275:) 6255:) 6234:) 6218:) 6190:) 6166:) 6143:) 6124:) 6087:) 6057:) 6036:) 6015:) 5991:) 5974:) 5947:) 5926:) 5901:) 5872:) 5854:· 5836:) 5813:) 5799:) 5774:) 5754:) 5728:) 5714:) 5688:) 5662:) 5633:) 5589:) 5581:-- 5546:) 5507:) 5473:) 5443:) 5435:-- 5416:) 5394:) 5376:) 5352:) 5334:) 5306:) 5285:) 5265:) 5245:) 5223:) 5202:) 5181:) 5161:) 5136:) 5115:) 5085:) 5064:) 5048:) 5031:) 5006:) 4998:- 4973:) 4949:) 4945:• 4920:) 4887:) 4854:) 4838:) 4808:) 4793:) 4760:) 4745:) 4737:- 4723:) 4711:, 4697:) 4668:) 4643:) 4618:) 4592:) 4552:) 4532:) 4507:) 4499:-- 4490:) 4455:) 4439:) 4414:) 4383:) 4358:) 4306:) 4281:) 4273:. 4256:) 4235:) 4186:) 4156:) 4095:) 4069:) 4048:) 4028:) 4002:) 3975:) 3949:) 3927:) 3899:) 3869:) 3853:) 3828:) 3803:) 3783:) 3764:) 3742:) 3722:) 3697:) 3676:) 3646:) 3607:) 3584:) 3545:) 3528:) 3507:) 3491:) 3470:) 3439:) 3408:) 3391:) 3375:) 3346:) 3321:) 3283:) 3269:) 3235:) 3209:) 3168:) 3154:) 3132:) 3110:) 3089:) 3066:) 3048:) 3027:) 2998:) 2976:) 2959:) 2938:) 2907:) 2899:. 2882:) 2861:) 2822:) 2795:) 2757:) 2741:) 2715:) 2692:) 2678:) 2656:) 2635:) 2627:- 2603:) 2587:) 2579:- 2567:) 2520:) 2516:• 2496:) 2466:) 2451:) 2436:) 2406:) 2380:) 2353:) 2323:) 2298:) 2274:) 2270:• 2245:) 2220:) 2195:) 2187:- 2165:) 2135:) 2113:) 2088:) 2065:) 2051:) 2041:}} 2035:{{ 2020:) 1956:) 1941:) 1921:) 1899:) 1884:) 1866:) 1844:) 1822:) 1801:) 1779:) 1750:) 1721:: 1719:}} 1715:{{ 1686:) 1649:) 1584:) 1547:) 1519:) 1505:) 1483:) 1458:) 1432:) 1417:) 1394:) 1362:) 1326:) 1308:) 1268:) 1221:) 1201:) 1197:• 1165:) 1130:) 1097:. 1091:}} 1085:{{ 1065:) 1049:, 1032:) 1002:) 980:) 942:) 921:) 888:) 880:- 859:) 843:) 822:) 797:) 776:) 758:) 719:) 695:) 663:) 641:) 624:) 607:) 586:) 560:) 544:) 518:) 497:) 473:) 448:) 413:) 387:) 365:) 334:) 308:) 300:- 278:) 259:) 238:) 211:) 196:) 182:) 167:) 142:) 120:) 91:→ 6479:( 6430:( 6400:( 6376:( 6347:( 6321:( 6296:( 6271:( 6251:( 6230:( 6214:( 6186:( 6162:( 6139:( 6120:( 6083:( 6053:( 6032:( 6011:( 5987:( 5970:( 5943:( 5922:( 5897:( 5868:( 5850:( 5832:( 5809:( 5795:( 5770:( 5750:( 5724:( 5710:( 5684:( 5658:( 5629:( 5585:( 5542:( 5503:( 5469:( 5439:( 5412:( 5390:( 5372:( 5348:( 5330:( 5302:( 5281:( 5261:( 5241:( 5219:( 5198:( 5177:( 5157:( 5132:( 5111:( 5081:( 5060:( 5044:( 5027:( 5019:: 5015:@ 5002:( 4969:( 4941:( 4916:( 4883:( 4865:: 4861:@ 4850:( 4834:( 4804:( 4789:( 4779:: 4775:@ 4756:( 4741:( 4719:( 4709:: 4705:@ 4693:( 4681:) 4677:( 4664:( 4639:( 4614:( 4588:( 4548:( 4528:( 4503:( 4486:( 4451:( 4435:( 4410:( 4379:( 4354:( 4302:( 4277:( 4252:( 4231:( 4182:( 4152:( 4091:( 4065:( 4044:( 4024:( 3998:( 3971:( 3945:( 3923:( 3895:( 3865:( 3849:( 3824:( 3798:• 3793:( 3779:( 3760:( 3738:( 3718:( 3693:( 3672:( 3642:( 3603:( 3580:( 3541:( 3524:( 3503:( 3487:( 3466:( 3454:: 3450:@ 3435:( 3423:: 3419:@ 3404:( 3387:( 3371:( 3342:( 3317:( 3279:( 3265:( 3231:( 3205:( 3164:( 3150:( 3128:( 3106:( 3085:( 3062:( 3044:( 3023:( 2994:( 2972:( 2955:( 2934:( 2903:( 2878:( 2857:( 2818:( 2791:( 2753:( 2737:( 2711:( 2688:( 2674:( 2652:( 2631:( 2599:( 2583:( 2563:( 2512:( 2492:( 2462:( 2447:( 2432:( 2402:( 2376:( 2349:( 2319:( 2294:( 2266:( 2241:( 2216:( 2191:( 2161:( 2131:( 2109:( 2084:( 2061:( 2047:( 2016:( 1982:s 1979:r 1976:i 1973:f 1970:b 1967:D 1952:( 1937:( 1917:( 1895:( 1880:( 1862:( 1840:( 1818:( 1797:( 1775:( 1746:( 1732:) 1682:( 1645:( 1606:( 1580:( 1561:( 1543:( 1515:( 1501:( 1479:( 1454:( 1428:( 1413:( 1390:( 1358:( 1322:( 1304:( 1264:( 1217:( 1193:( 1161:( 1126:( 1103:: 1099:@ 1061:( 1028:( 998:( 976:( 938:( 917:( 884:( 855:( 839:( 818:( 793:( 772:( 754:( 715:( 691:( 659:( 637:( 620:( 603:( 582:( 556:( 540:( 514:( 493:( 469:( 444:( 409:( 383:( 361:( 330:( 304:( 274:( 255:( 234:( 207:( 192:( 178:( 163:( 138:( 116:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index