1260:, but do not necessarily leave a lasting impact on society. Application of this author's poetic theory to his work only tells the reader something about this man, but not about what he left in the world. On the other hand, it may be noted that Whitman actually made some unique decisions in other areas of his poems. His free verse certainly inspired later authors. For this reason, several sentences that I moved do fit in the legacy section. I see your objection in regards to: "He also used unusual images and symbols in his poetry, including rotting leaves, tufts of straw, and debris. He also openly wrote about death and sexuality, including prostitution." This suggests a more hybrid section which mentions both how he wrote and how others were influenced by his writing. A tricky debate that involves valid concerns over redundancy especially.
2172:") was because when I first read the quote, it seemed obscure to me, like some sort of mystical metaphor. But then I remembered that "sheepskin" is an American metaphor for diploma. (see definition #2 of "sheepskin" on wiktionary). I thought others might be similarly confused, and thought that the reminder of this (now obscure) fact might help add insight to the quote. My intention was to do no more than to define an archaic usage of the word sheepskin. I do not assert that that was what Thoreau meant (though Ockham's razor would suggest it was highly likely) which is why I used the word "presumably". Of course, if I had not used the word "presumably", I would thoroughly agree with your objections.
145:. I think there is a problem in his bibliography article, currently the short stories without an article link directly to Wikisource. This is bad form for a number of reasons. As other editors create new articles, they won't show up; it's also good to have red links as it encourages users to create the article, it's a void waiting to be filled. With the blue links, it sort of looks complete and doesn't encourage users to start writing. It sort of feels like one editor decided if the article doesn't exist, than it never will, until I do it myself, so I might as well link to Wikisource for now. Wikisource links could be added to the notes section, freeing up the article as a red link.
1035:
published widely. I found one Web site that indicates the poem and a print of his daughters was found on the body of a soldier at
Gettysburg in 1863. I'd like it included somewhere in the body of the article. This was a poem my grandfather, a school superintendent, had memorized in elementary school and used to read to his kids and grandkids. It's also one of the poems that was listed a few years ago by Americans as one of their favorite poems. I'm surprised you weren't familiar with it, as the big Longfellow poems always seem to be "Paul Revere," "Evangeline," "Hiawatha," and "The Children's Hour." Are you a newspaper reporter too, by any chance, or teach journalism? --
2288:
jointly, in 1827, Edgar Allen and
William Townshend Washington (nephew of the late president) who misbehaved and fell seriously ill while in Greece, 1823-24, returned to the States, visited John Allen summer 1825 to obtain a new "identity". Edgar replaced him returning to Greece as his brother George , spring 1827 and, among others, "fixed" William's death. That's how their early publication efforts materialised (by WHLP) and that's why "cadet Williams" T.Washington, in Paris 1822, "died" as William Townsend Washington April 1827 in Napoli, Campagna, Italy (US sources) or as George Townsend Washington, philhellene, in Napoli di Morea, Greece (greek and US sources).
245:. I am mystified by your classifying an article on this crucially important figure in European literature as of "low importance". Some questions: Do you read Mallarmé in French? Have you read any studies of his poetry? Have you studied his influence on later French, English, and other European literature (Eliot and Pound, for a start), or his importance as a mentor of later poetic giants like Valéry? Or the inspiration he gave such artists as Duchamp, or such composers as Ravel, Debussy, and Boulez? Or his role as a transmitter of the aesthetic of Baudelaire, in the eyes of many French critics? Or the impetus that his
176:, before we start adding articles on ridiculously unknown works, including Bon-Bon. Now, keep in mind that I'm the biggest Poe fan and scholar you'll meet, so I don't mind saying it: less is more if those less are high quality. Think of it that way. Even so, just because there's a Wikisource link doesn't prevent anyone from creating an article; give people credit for being at least a little smarter than that. And it's not like those ws links can't be changed to Knowledge links when a new article is created. So, again, if we want to be comprehensive, Wikisource will do it. --
278:
not for
Knowledge in general, so it really only affects the dozen or so members of WP:Poetry. I would presume that Mallarme should be of a higher rating for a Wikiproject relating to France but I'm not a member of one. Either way, I always say this to people: ignore the assessment. It's hardly relevant to anyone besides the handful of us in the Wikiproject.
2402:
after it died. And also, it wasn't exactly the same - its physical appearance is somewhat different. So, it is all highly uncharacteristic for the doppelganger theme. But hey, I'm merely a begginer in reading Poe, so if you say there is scholarly work supporting the idea, put some reference in the article and that'll be fine with me. Cheers,
1050:
courses in college. My exposure was strictly familial. When I covered the "America's favorite poetry" reading in this area several years ago, "The
Children's Hour" was one they picked to recite. It looks like you're also a Poe enthusiast. I always loved "Annabel Lee," but "The Raven" is pretty high on the list too. --
2325:"Secrecy shall knowledge be in the environs of heaven" huh? No, there was just one Edgar Allen Poe who declared his part in a conspiracy in his "Al Aaraaf". His con-spirator, John Allen was "The Raven's" fatherinlaw. Midnightdreary rimes with weak and weary and responds in this fashion too! Cheers!
2401:
article, all examples are like that) and also, doppelgangers are doubles of living creatures - living character has its double in the real world. Once he is dead, well, then this relation does not exist any more. So this second cat was not the doppelganger of the first one when it was alive, but only
1597:
Thanks for the nice note. I've actually started working on some AmLit articles. Although I can see it's not your century, do you have any interest in F. Scott
Fitzgerald or Ernest Hemingway? I'm sort of bracing myself psychologically for a summer run on one of them. I know how tough articles that
871:
I'm happy to help with the
Washington Irving entry, and actually made a number of significant edits to the page, then realized later that I had not logged in. (I'm also the author of an Irving book, so I'm not sure if referencing my own work on the page is considered bad form or not. I'll leave that
682:
and I will make the edit you suggested putting the first instance of "for want of a nail" in quotes. As far as the history section is concerned, that's mostly the work of the person / website who is noted in the references - I was hesitant at first to modify it more than it already is, due to having
379:
If you say so. I still think a mountain was being made out of a mole hill here. Keep in mind that anyone else can still add their own assessment. Then someone could still change it. And another could change it again. I don't claim to be an expert on this particular poet, or on poetry in general, but
360:
I take no pleasure in lecturing, except where lecturing is my official role (which is not here). Thank you for removing the assessment, which I think is a highly responsible course of action. If the matter were entirely trivial, I think there would not be a system for rating – and you would not have
277:
assessment from WP Poetry. I hesitated on assessing that one... I wouldn't mind bumping him up to Mid-level importance - these kinds of questions, though, should probably go on the Poetry project talk page. Remember not to take it personally either: the ratings are solely for the use of the project,
2381:
It seems pretty clear to me: there are two cats, one of which is a doppelganger of the other. Why does it have to relate to the main character? Not sure what's confusing and, besides, most of the scholarly work I have seen about "The Black Cat" mentions the doppelganger theme and any scholarly work
2365:
Please enlighten me where in this story is the doppelganger theme? The main character is a killer, driven by alcohol etc. He doesn't imagine having a double! There is a second cat similar to the first one, but how is this a doppelganger theme related to the main character? William Wilson is a clear
2068:
I see now in the history that my first effort removed stuff - but I don't know why. I reverted what as far as I could see was a simple deletion. When I used search to see if the text were in the article this time, it didn't show up, so I went back to the original material and location and copied
2417:
I'm not sure a (mostly unsourced) Knowledge article is a good source. Even so, this article doesn't seem to say that a doppelganger only counts if it's the main character (though it does say supernatural doubles are often a symbol of impending doom... i.e. "The Black Cat"). I'm living out of boxes
2287:
You "have no idea" because your Edgar's father was David Poe jr, mine's David Poe sr, your's foster father was a John Allan, mine's John AllEn (of
Allenwood, Tennessee, friend of Andrew Jackson, a fillibusterer and shrewed businessman as well). As for "William henry Leonard Poe": They invented him
2251:
Your answer at my "talk" page-thanks-does not really address the issue: "It" is bigger than anything written on Poe so far, my "bad english" did not prevent me from solving his mystery, the ball is in your park now, I am done with Edgar, it's Henry Poe's turn next: Does the name "George
Washington
1805:
1. = CRYPTOGRAM. a1849 POE Tales, Gold Beetle, I could not suppose him capable of constructing any of the more abstruse cryptographs. 1879 FARRAR St. Paul I. 641 note, Much of the Talmud consists of cryptographs which designedly concealed meanings from persecutors and heretics. (OED3, 2R version)
755:
Well, my suggestion would be not to worry about it too much. The thing with the "thumb" command is that it varies from user to user. For me, for example, the image looks fine and it's perfectly sized for its subject matter in relation to the article. And for those users who see it a bit too small,
497:
Ah, yes, good point... can't argue there. But, even so, considering the large print version is sort of non-standard (it's all my library had), and considering the cite book template leaves room for it, we might as well...? Anyway, the two of us should put our heads together and collaborate on this
2175:
I take your point that it would be better still to have original evidence about what
Thoreau meant in this specific context. But failing that, it seems to me we would better serve readers to say what "sheepskin" meant in the context of 19th century diplomas than to not include that information at
1622:
I don't think a featured topic on Edgar Allan Poe would be unreasonable, but perhaps it should encompass his works as well as just the articles on his life? I'm not sure what the average standard is there, but looking at a few they look like they're not bad and could be brought up to a high level
1517:
Hi... when you put images on
Commons, (as you recently did for some Rufus Wilmot Griswold related ones) you probably shoud try to put them in at least one subject related category if at all possible, not just put them on on a gallery page. My AWB bot id Larbot and I went around and sorted out the
1049:
Could be. "The Skeleton in Armor" doesn't come first to my mind, though I know I've heard it. But then Longfellow was decidedly out of fashion, at least when I was in college 15 years or so ago. I majored in English, but I don't recall stumbling across him in any of my American literature survey
291:!), it is often not clear what significance they have. I would suggest that people not assess an article if they are unfamiliar with the literature concerned, and with the status of the poet within and beyond that literature. Better to have no assessement than one that is insufficiently informed.
1933:
Great work on that article, especially since you were skeptical as to whether it should be kept or not. I think it will prove useful to folks who want to learn more about Poe, and I was envisioning a short article exactly along those lines when I came across it in AfD but had no way to actually
1034:
I added the poem to the list of his works in the main body of the article, but that list may actually be a list of publications rather than individual poems. Add it wherever you think it fits in best. The poem was apparently published first in a magazine in 1860 and became quite popular and was
2160:
Hi Midnightdreary, thanks for your comment on my talk page. I thought that by adding two links to other wiki pages that explain that diplomas were formerly made from sheepskin I had addressed your concern of a lack of citation. I thought of adding a third link to wiktionary as well, but then I
1522:
I think, but you may want to check my work. There are a number of tools that can help you find good categories and add them quickly, I commend "CommonSense" to find categories and "HotCat" to add them... These and others can be added via the Gadgets tab in your prefs. Please ask if I can be of
313:
These things are rough, of course: but Google finds 410,000 hits for "Stéphane Mallarmé", and 294,000 for "Robert Penn Warren". How's that, for a predominantly English-speaking web? Amazon.com finds 400 books with "Mallarmé" in the title; 205 with "Penn Warren" in the title. How's that, for
2291:
Re "Cass": Secretary Lewis Cass wrote a letter to David Douglas at West Point June 1827 recommending his nephew, son of his sister, yet named George Washington "Cass". Secretary L.Cass and professor D.Douglas are Edgar's two aquaintances NOT spoken about by "Poe scholars" repeating the same
1255:
In a sense, the information belongs in neither section! Theory is more opinions, thoughts, and feelings about poetry as a medium, or specific styles or applications of poetic language. These opinions, thoughts, and feelings are proven with the performance of actual work, as in his famous
2309:
This is still mostly incoherent to me. What does this have to do with "Al Aaraaf". This sounds like a conspiracy theory that there was an "Edgar Allan Poe" and an "Edgar Allen Poe" with very similarly-named foster-fathers. I'm responding with a more relevant response on your talk page.
2438:
A few things....Thanks for the help with the Ellet article. I have been looking everywhere for some images to use for Poe's brother, no luck yet. And I still plan to work on Ann Stephens, one of these days. Feel free to shorten my name. (Lar usually just calls me E.) :)-
1938:? I think it easily qualifies now and it would probable be easy to make up an interesting hook for the article. If you don't want to nominate the article I might do it myself, but since you wrote the thing I figured it would be more appropriate if you nominated it yourself.
2185:
I see you have a huge amount of experience on wikipedia, and I really admire and respect that. I wish I had the time to have done a fraction of what you have. But I am still just learning the ropes. In that context, perhaps you can help guide me on a couple of points.
2069:
it to the place where the search function took me (I just looked at the html, with-out checking). I assumed it would be the same spot as whence it originally came. Sorry if it messed things up. No, of course, the material should not be repeated in the article.
1876:
of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of
990:
of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of
712:
of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of
2292:
falsitudes over and over. G.W.Cass outlived Edgar but Edgar Allen Poe may have had his reasons to dissappear following the death of Tampico captain John Allen. (Also of interest a George Washington Poe, Edgar's penpal and the Raven's-Sam Houston-lieutenant!)
2132:
Hi Midnightdreary. You currently have yourself listed as a participant in the Pennsylvania WikiProject. If you are still active in the project then ignore this message. However if you are busy or no longer wish to be involved, please remove yourself from the
140:
You've done a nice job on the article and others. Keep up the good work. I'll contribute here and there as I work my way through reading the stories but I don't have a lot of time to get into doing any major revisions, perhaps a few here and there, I wrote
117:
Thanks for the kind words! Honestly, the article looks pretty good to me. I'm going to run through it a bit later to see if there's anyway to improve, but honestly I think you've done an awesome job....and this is coming from another Steelers fan ;)
1275:
Are you thinking "Writing" in terms of style? I don't feel "poetic theory" would have much of any place in that section, although there should certainly be plenty of information as it relates to his transitional work and great influence.
31:
I'm sorry to have to do this, but it looks like the meetup is going to have to happen some other time, since we only have 3 RSVPs (my and ImmortalGoddezz count as one in my book). It'll probably be rescheduled for a month or so from now.
310:. Why should we think this reflects anything other than the relative knowledge you have of each? Yet most editors looking at the top of the talk page, and wherever the rating is reproduced, are going to think it means far more than that!
2458:
No problem, I'd love to help. I'm living a crazy life at the moment (school deadlines, brand-new-house-fiddling stress), however, so I may not get to it until tomorrow, but I'll definitely do a copy-edit and then check in on the FAC.
813:
Thanks for restructuring my contributions to this article. I considered combining the performance and publication history as you have done, but wasn't sure of the recommended practice. Your edit makes the article flow better.
2192:
2) If one person makes a change, and then a second deletes that change, isn't the appropriate course of action to raise the matter on the talk page to resolve the matter, rather than to change the change back once more?
1227:
I didn't say Griswold was going nowhere; I asked that you recognize that the FAC instructions help prevent both reviewers and nominators from being stretched too thin. As I said, I'll check back tomorrow; no hurry.
216:
No problem. We don't seem to be working well together, I'll stop contributing for a while and do stuff elsewhere, it's not worth it for me to be in constant conflict. Keep up your goo work on the Poe articles. --
1711:
No one ever denied the existence of the poem... just a Wiki article on it. In other words, you were trying to link to a non-existent article. If you have research to do, try a library instead of the internet.
2490:
Hello, Midnightdreary, I need two or three 'good' titles on the subject critic about Poe´s tales (in English, of course). Is it posible? Thank you very much. Best wishes. Your friend of the es:wik, Sürrell.
2155:
346:
Thanks for the lecture. I have removed the assessment because, frankly, it is so incredibly irrelevant, it's hardly worth the discussion. I think you've added more weight to its value than it is due. --
1689:
Yea it is his poem because thats what I am researching on a Poem called Days by Ralph Waldo Emerson. It is very complicated too bad yall dont have info on it because I need history on the poem :(
1809:
OED records first usages rather rigorously, and is an authorative source of first uses in English. They don't quote anyone about usages, only directly from the texts usages were discovered in.
786:
You beat me to the punch (I was writing the review), but I just wanted to congratulate you on writing an excellent article. If you want help ce or improving the content, just drop me a message.
708:
63:
1910:
2224:
2205:
1872:
986:
775:
2211:
Hi again, thanks for your quick and friendly reply to my above listed concerns/thoughts. I was not aware that wikipedia was not considered a reliable source. (How ironic!) :)
2104:
420:
Hey there, I just wanted to say thanks for your work on this article. I'm studying the story in school, and your work has been a big help, so thanks. Keep it up! :) Cheers,
1357:? I'm at work right now (don't tell the boss I'm on Wiki) so I'm away from my library. Once I have access to my books I should be able to address some of this confusion. --
937:- the author could be "last = Poe" and "first = Edgar Allan", which would make it "Poe, Edgar Allan" if you prefer. Let me know if you have more questions, hope this helps
800:
1017:
is one of his better known poems. As such, it deserves mention in the Henry Wadsworth Longfellow article. I do not agree that it should not be mentioned in the lead. --
2120:
2559:
2502:
1934:
expand it myself (I haven't even read Poe since high school, which is a shame actually). Would you consider nominating the article to be listed on the Main Page at
1059:
1044:
701:
474:
452:
1865:
911:
979:
2196:
As they might have said in the 19th Century, I am, respectfully yours in the dissemination of accurate, reliable and (not least of all) accessible knowledge,
2049:
Thanks for the Poe plaque praise. I've been trying to get some of my images into the Common section. I was having some difficulties with an earlier attempt.
1860:
1422:
1408:
1394:
1380:
1366:
1344:
1326:
1122:
1104:
294:
I don't mean to be derogatory, but you have not bothered to answer the questions that I have taken the trouble to formulate above. I note that you have rated
211:
2542:
2105:
1846:
226:
185:
2090:
Virginia looks like a solid FAC candidate to me. Interesting article! If you want, I can put a few comments that occurred to me on the article's talk page.
127:
112:
2334:
2303:
2266:
1752:
1721:
1240:
1222:
1205:
2427:
2391:
2319:
2281:
2024:
546:
437:
838:
507:
1673:
401:
374:
355:
1922:
769:
2229:
1456:
518:
Hmm, just noticed your comment on my talk page about how you let that one edit slip. Actually, it was reverted by someone but you somehow managed to
1285:
1210:
Well, please add co-noms or decide which to withdraw; I'll check back tomorrow. Griswold has not garnered support, so the second nom is premature.
973:
1550:
829:
This is the only article on a play that I've worked on so I'm not sure it's the set standard... but it seemed logical to me! I'm glad you agree! --
1652:
Ha ha, no worries. I've been having a similar discussion with another user regarding Poe's works being part of the featured topic. There are just
194:
does point out that we are not a collection of plot summaries. An encyclopedia article should be more of the other stuff and less of summary. See
75:
2134:
1452:
2525:, both of which are collections of Poe literary criticism and analysis. There are also two journals you might find in a good scholarly library:
1647:
641:
531:
337:
696:
168:
status, it's sort of a requirement. So, the Wikisource links should probably stay. Having redlinks encouraging the creation of new articles is
1895:
1611:
1026:
1535:
852:
This article will be on the front page soon and I may need help handling vandalism and grammar problems as they get added in. Can you help?
665:
1574:
1089:
487:
not that it really matters, but the use of the isbn was specifically designed to accomplish such issues with pages and versions. cheers! --
2480:
1623:
with some work. Then again, I'm fairly new to wikipedia (as you know, having just put a welcome post on my talk page - thanks again btw)!
1307:
1269:
895:
687:
comments in the past. Let me think about that for a while to see how best to approach it. Once again, thanks so much for the feedback! -
2182:
Would adding a footnote link to the Wiktionary definition of sheepskin (defn 2 = "(US) a diploma") have addressed your concerns at all?
2099:
1171:
Users should not add a second FA nomination until the first has gained support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed.
1144:
823:
52:
2150:
740:
page? It is far too small to see anything now. I think it was too large before. Perhaps a fixed pixel width smaller than before? --
625:
522:-- to be fair, I don't think an actual vandal could have done a better job at hiding it :D (no harm meant, I just found it funny...) --
97:
2563:
2506:
1187:
1851:
I left you a note there... Thanks for taking the time to communicate with me. I just want to make the article as strong as possible.
2355:
491:
154:
1512:
283:
Well, I would happily participate in that project myself. But I am not happy about such ratings. Especially given the ambiguity of
1955:
1632:
2418:
right now so most of my library is packed away and out of reach. But, if you feel strongly about this, go ahead and remove it. --
1591:
1507:
2411:
2375:
2164:
The reason I put the extra half sentence in there (i.e., "presumably a reference to the tradition of diplomas being written on
2039:
2001:
1638:
Ooohkaaay... automatic triple posting - that'll be a reason never to seriously edit wiki from work again. I hate this computer.
891:
513:
262:
1941:
Regardless, thanks for working on that. I always find it heartening when the AfD process results in much-improved articles. --
1764:
1973:
566:
413:
2448:
2058:
1818:
1486:
872:
up to you to determine.) Many of the additions I sumbitted to the page are based on my own short online bio of Irving over
585:
2078:
1987:
1096:
1081:
673:
1841:
1353:'s involvement. But, this definitely looks like a hardcover book. Could I recommend, for now at least, we rename the page
1113:
been broken for some time. I just noticed it and was about to fix it when the phone rang. Thanks for taking care of it! --
952:
2555:
2498:
2473:
1964:...I just created the crumbly basis for your aka(compared to mine) masterpiece. Great job and thanks for all of the help.
1523:
further assistance... Good luck with your FA... I think there are just a couple loose ends left before I can support. ++
218:
146:
57:
1787:
1741:
1704:
749:
519:
1951:
1469:
861:
1696:
635:
to GA or FA would be a great help. Literature is outside my area of editing expertise. Thanks for the offer to help.
172:
necessarily a good thing. We have dozens of Poe-related articles that are at crappy quality that need to be improved
2125:
2083:
1473:
1250:
653:
1903:
1896:
1755:
that might be helpful, other than that there isn't that much i can think of. I will look at Emerson's article. --
805:
590:
161:
26:
457:
Oh, yes, of course ;) It's just that sometimes a wiki article makes a lot more sense than an olde english book!
1009:
324:
All of this is meant collegially and without judgement of anything else about you or about the poetry project.
1519:
647:
465:
428:
414:
199:
1774:
Yes, schools and organizations named for Emersom does sound better, or however you want to phrase it. Also,
2453:
2189:
1) Shouldn't we be having this discussion on the Thoreau talk page rather than on each other's talk pages?
1556:
1069:
679:
1298:
Hi, I started a stub article for The Opal. It seems to have been founded/published by John C. Riker??? -
384:
can take part. Either way, the task now should really be to improve the article beyond Start class - if I
249:
gave to the entire modernist programme? Or those other roles he played that are mentioned in the article?
2339:
1291:
1055:
1040:
1022:
1014:
482:
2538:
2423:
2387:
2315:
2277:
2020:
1717:
1669:
1617:
1546:
1390:
1362:
1322:
1130:
1118:
907:
887:
834:
777:
765:
760:
to see when it's most appropriate to have a forced pixel width; I'm not sure if any make sense here. --
542:
503:
448:
443:
Thanks for the kind words... I'm glad I could help! I hope you read the actual story too, though! :) --
397:
351:
207:
181:
108:
80:
1961:
1588:
1532:
1150:
866:
2485:
2444:
2084:
1570:
1503:
1498:
Started the gift book article, would appreciate any input. (I'm off to find a nice image) Thanks -
1418:
1404:
1376:
1340:
1303:
1100:
1085:
661:
632:
581:
459:
422:
71:
17:
1928:
2467:
1140:
902:
By the way, did you know Irving met John Allan and young Edgar Poe in London around 1818 or so?--
796:
596:
364:
Well resolved! A proper use of Knowledge consultation, for which we have talkpages like this one.
236:
222:
150:
2397:
Well, the confusing thing is that doppelganger is ALWAYS related to the main character (look at
2366:
doppelganger theme, and so is Dostoevsky's the Double for example but this can hardly qualify...
2126:
1947:
1465:
1236:
1218:
1201:
1183:
1175:
Griswold has been up five days and has not garnered any support; would you like it withdrawn?
1051:
1036:
1018:
303:
274:
242:
135:
123:
93:
88:
Oops, I didn't mean to mess up the referencing of the article. I reverted my subsequent edits.
2360:
1746:
1700:
1562:
1164:
903:
883:
599:. It did indeed take some time to put this article together. I have already nominated it for
552:
142:
2551:
2494:
2220:
2201:
1835:
1692:
1077:
1070:
879:
692:
603:. You can find it under the Feb. 10 articles near the bottom. I have also nominated it for
195:
1602:
in preparation. When the moment of truth draws nigh, I might be asking for your eye :) --
1313:
I'll have to do more research... that name sounds familiar. But my understanding was that
8:
2534:
2440:
2419:
2407:
2383:
2371:
2346:
I finally got around to doing a review of Irving - it is posted on the peer review page.
2330:
2311:
2299:
2273:
2262:
2245:
2054:
2035:
2016:
1997:
1795:
1737:
1713:
1665:
1566:
1542:
1499:
1414:
1400:
1386:
1372:
1358:
1336:
1318:
1299:
1292:
1281:
1265:
1114:
963:
942:
830:
761:
657:
577:
538:
527:
499:
444:
393:
347:
203:
177:
104:
67:
2461:
2351:
2116:
2095:
2074:
2063:
2044:
2007:
What the--? Do you even know what you are talking about? Everything in that article is
1918:
1888:
1856:
1814:
1783:
1760:
1607:
1350:
1136:
1002:
819:
792:
736:
Just curious if you could suggest the best thing to do with the Jamestown image on the
724:
488:
295:
47:
2340:
1969:
1942:
1643:
1628:
1541:
Okay, that makes sense - thanks for the info. I'll try to be more mindful of that! --
1491:
1477:
1460:
1354:
1229:
1211:
1194:
1176:
931:
844:
731:
371:
334:
259:
119:
89:
1727:
757:
317:
Better not to rate at all than rate without sufficient knowledge. Even a shift to a
103:
No worries, no harm done - oh, and your copy edits have been a great improvement! --
2517:, which should always be at the top of any list of Poe inquiries. I also recommend
2145:
1775:
1599:
922:
745:
608:
191:
2216:
2197:
1983:
1830:
1828:
Thanks for the invisible barnstar you posted on my page, I really appreciate it!—
1823:
1769:
1438:
1332:
806:
737:
688:
160:
The redlink/wikisource situation has been discussed before. As we attempt to get
2403:
2367:
2326:
2295:
2258:
2241:
2050:
2031:
2008:
1993:
1733:
1481:
1448:
1277:
1261:
959:
938:
857:
523:
2433:
2347:
2112:
2091:
2070:
1914:
1884:
1878:
1852:
1810:
1779:
1756:
1603:
1584:
1528:
1317:
was a hardcover book, not a magazine. Maybe the terminology is deprecated? --
1156:
998:
992:
815:
720:
714:
600:
571:
558:
33:
2234:
Did you remove it from the "current" version of the article and if so, why?
2398:
2237:
Nevertheless, you'd propably need do something about "it" sooner or later!
2137:
so we can get an updated count on the number of active members. Thank you!
2012:
1965:
1684:
1661:
1639:
1624:
1444:
1160:
684:
637:
621:
616:
612:
604:
562:
165:
81:
2513:
Critiques of the tales? Well, you'll find plenty in Arthur Hobson Quinn's
537:
HA! Now I find it funny too! :) Hey, I never claimed I was perfect...! --
2382:
that discusses Poe's use of the doppelganger mentions "The Black Cat". --
2139:
741:
1664:
or better but, realistically, it's not going to happen any time soon! --
1979:
873:
557:
Thanks so much for the barnstar, I really appreciate it! I'd recommend
392:
what would bother me, not the silly little importance rating!!! :) --
2169:
1492:
853:
607:
if you or someone you know would like to review it. I also worked on
1443:
Congratulations on getting what appears to be your first successful
1399:
I would like to link The Opal to Griswold now, what do you think? -
2179:
Does that answer your concern about this being original research?
1911:
Knowledge:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list
1580:
1524:
756:
they can always click on the image to get a better look. Read over
1796:
321:
rating is not good, if it is from a baseline that is ill-founded.
1992:
Great job, undoubtably the result of original research! Cheers!
1455:
or nominate your list for consideration to be a LOTD in June at
2165:
2161:
thought that was a bit of overkill (and it was getting late).
1935:
1656:
articles, where do we start? It would be nice someday to have
1451:
experiment. Feel free to help us select next months lists at
1349:
I think you've got the right one... I completely forgot about
1371:
Yes, the name should be changed, I will take care of that. -
702:
WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VI (February 2008)
361:
done a rating, and I would not have commented on that rating.
2111:
Thought you would like to see this little mention of Edgar!
2015:. That's a hell of an accusation to be throwing around... --
1866:
WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VIII (April 2008)
1447:
during the last month. You may want to get involved in our
980:
WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VII (March 2008)
845:
498:
article and beef it up to GA quality! What do you think? --
2156:"Let every sheep keep its own skin" -- Henry David Thoreau
2030:
Your response reads original but greek to me nevertheless!
1193:
There aren't three co-nominators listed; only your name.
1135:
I did follow your suggestion ofn Hale, honors. Thank you.
916:
Thanks for the cleanups on the article. You do good work!
656:, it has been put on the main page of Wikisource today. -
1799:
1385:
Thanks! By the way, it's great working with you again! --
241:
Hi M. I see that you have done a rating for the article
1778:
might need work possibly starting of with an infobox.--
1331:
I am finding conflicting information, for instance see
1095:
Don't worry. I fixed it. I'm only trying to help here.
380:
that's one of the things that Knowledge is founded on:
2106:
Lives of the Most Eminent Literary and Scientific Men
1598:
high visibility will be. I've been chipping away at
561:
for fighting vandalism, if you don't already use it.
1413:
Added more information about gift books to Opal. -
576:
Thanks for the encouragement, its appreciated. :) --
1155:Midnightdreary, did you notice the instructions at
615:at the moment. I'm hoping that one day I can get a
62:Have you seen this? You might find it interesting.
1978:Yes, great job on improving this article. Thanks!
287:in talk about these things (Knowledge is called a
2548:Thank you very much. You're very kind. Sürrell.
1909:You're getting this invitation because you're on
1457:User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/Nominees/200806
1453:User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200805
2272:I have no idea what you are trying to say. --
1847:Discussion for A Tale of the Ragged Mountains
1561:Congratulations on your well deserved FA for
1333:http://books.google.com/books?id=f68QAAAAYAAJ
595:Thanks for your comment about my work on the
1080:for one of its milestones with your revert.
2533:. That should start you off pretty well. --
1960:Yeah you did a great job of elaborating on
997:Delivered on 18:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC) by
2519:The Cambridge Companion to Edgar Allan Poe
1906:has begun. We would appreciate your input.
1751:I suppose if you want to write an article
958:I just weighed in on the FLC - well done.
719:Delivered on 19:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC) by
1883:Delivered on 21:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC) by
14:
2523:A Historical Guide to Edgar Allan Poe
2515:Edgar Allan Poe: A Critical Biography
1897:Planning for the 7th Knowledge Meetup
1449:List of the Day and List of the Month
1159:about multiple noms when you put up
678:I really appreciate the feedback on
23:
2252:Cass" sound familiar to you btw?
1660:of Poe's works represented with a
314:English-speaking, US-based Amazon?
24:
2575:
1513:Images and categories on commons
619:on the Beauchamp-Sharp Tragedy.
2230:Re my "Al Aarraf" contribution!
162:Bibliography of Edgar Allan Poe
1904:the summer Philadelphia meetup
514:Re: Great catch and a welcome!
13:
1:
697:20:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
666:20:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
654:A Valentine (Poe)/highlighted
642:19:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
626:05:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
586:23:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
567:15:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
415:The Murders in the Rue Morgue
200:The Murders in the Rue Morgue
1579:Yes, congrats, well done! ++
776:Congrats on GA promotion of
680:For Want of a Nail (Proverb)
674:Thanks! (For want of a nail)
636:
620:
547:14:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
532:12:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
508:23:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
492:23:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
475:08:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
453:14:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
438:08:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
402:00:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
375:23:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
356:23:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
338:21:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
263:06:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
227:15:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
212:15:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
186:15:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
155:15:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
128:14:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
113:04:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
98:04:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
76:02:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
53:01:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
7:
1076:You just broke the time on
652:You might appreciate this:
58:first reading of the Raven?
10:
2580:
2531:The Edgar Allan Poe Review
1788:20:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
1765:20:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
1742:20:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
1722:01:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
1705:01:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
1674:14:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
1648:13:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
1633:13:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
1612:05:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
1592:02:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
1575:23:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1551:19:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
1536:19:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
1508:03:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
1487:18:20, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
1423:19:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
1409:17:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
1395:16:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
1381:16:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
1367:16:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
1345:16:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
1327:16:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
1308:15:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
1015:The Children's Hour (poem)
974:21:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
953:11:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
896:15:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
862:19:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
839:18:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
824:18:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
801:00:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
778:Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
2564:11:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1962:William Henry Leonard Poe
1286:01:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
1270:00:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
1241:03:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
1223:03:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
1206:02:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
1188:02:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
1145:14:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
1123:17:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
1105:17:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
1090:17:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
1060:19:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
1045:19:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
1027:14:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
912:16:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
770:22:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
750:21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
2543:17:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
2507:17:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
2481:21:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
2449:17:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
2428:16:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2412:16:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2392:23:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2376:20:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2356:17:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
2335:04:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2320:23:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2304:15:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2282:13:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2267:19:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
2225:03:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
2206:03:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
2151:19:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
2127:WikiProject Pennsylvania
2121:00:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
2100:18:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
2085:Virginia Eliza Clemm Poe
2079:04:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
2059:23:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
2040:03:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2025:21:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
2002:18:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
1988:12:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1974:00:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
1956:18:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
1879:WikiProject Universities
1251:legacy or poetic theory?
993:WikiProject Universities
715:WikiProject Universities
18:User talk:Midnightdreary
1923:21:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1861:18:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1842:04:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1819:01:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
683:been stung by a lot of
597:Beauchamp-Sharp Tragedy
591:Beauchamp-Sharp Tragedy
27:Philly meetup postponed
1163:when you already have
927:I switched one ref to
633:Scenes From 'Politian'
280:
2248:) 31 May 2008 (UTC)
1563:Rufus Wilmot Griswold
1165:Rufus Wilmot Griswold
648:Happy Valentines Day!
271:
143:Bon-Bon (short story)
2454:re: Request for help
2255:Cheers again!
2168:, a paper made from
1557:Another bronze star!
1078:Talk:Edgar Allan Poe
1071:Talk:Edgar Allan Poe
196:Eureka: A Prose Poem
1293:The Opal (magazine)
1010:The Children's Hour
783:Hi Midnightdreary,
709:February 2008 issue
483:Ralph Waldo Emerson
460:dihydrogen monoxide
423:dihydrogen monoxide
388:a Mallarme expert,
1753:The Thoreau Reader
1618:Poe featured topic
1351:Sarah Josepha Hale
1131:Sarah Josepha Hale
296:Robert Penn Warren
2566:
2554:comment added by
2509:
2497:comment added by
2479:
2341:Washington Irving
1954:
1925:
1902:The planning for
1892:
1707:
1695:comment added by
1485:
1355:The Opal (annual)
1151:Multiple FAC noms
1052:Bookworm857158367
1037:Bookworm857158367
1019:Bookworm857158367
1006:
970:
949:
898:
882:comment added by
867:Washington Irving
728:
611:, which is under
473:
436:
304:Stéphane Mallarmé
275:Stéphane Mallarmé
252:Just curious! :)
243:Stéphane Mallarmé
2571:
2549:
2492:
2486:Request for help
2476:
2470:
2465:
2464:
1945:
1908:
1882:
1873:April 2008 issue
1838:
1833:
1776:Orestes Brownson
1690:
1600:Zelda Fitzgerald
1463:
1233:
1215:
1198:
1180:
996:
987:March 2008 issue
968:
947:
936:
930:
904:Federalistpapers
884:Federalistpapers
877:
718:
640:
624:
609:Solomon P. Sharp
463:
426:
370:
333:
258:
50:
45:
42:
39:
36:
2579:
2578:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2488:
2474:
2468:
2460:
2456:
2436:
2363:
2344:
2232:
2158:
2130:
2109:
2088:
2066:
2047:
2013:reliable source
1931:
1900:
1868:
1849:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1803:
1772:
1749:
1730:
1687:
1620:
1565:! Well done! -
1559:
1515:
1496:
1441:
1296:
1258:Leaves of Grass
1253:
1231:
1213:
1196:
1178:
1153:
1133:
1109:Actually, that
1074:
1012:
982:
967:
946:
934:
928:
925:
869:
850:
811:
807:Politian (play)
781:
738:Lydia Sigourney
734:
704:
676:
650:
593:
574:
555:
516:
485:
469:
432:
418:
368:
331:
256:
239:
237:Rating Mallarmé
138:
86:
60:
48:
43:
40:
37:
34:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2577:
2546:
2545:
2535:Midnightdreary
2487:
2484:
2455:
2452:
2441:Epousesquecido
2435:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2420:Midnightdreary
2395:
2394:
2384:Midnightdreary
2362:
2359:
2343:
2338:
2323:
2322:
2312:Midnightdreary
2285:
2284:
2274:Midnightdreary
2242:User:Gioachino
2231:
2228:
2213:
2212:
2157:
2154:
2129:
2124:
2108:
2103:
2087:
2082:
2065:
2062:
2046:
2043:
2028:
2027:
2017:Midnightdreary
1930:
1927:
1907:
1899:
1894:
1867:
1864:
1848:
1845:
1825:
1822:
1802:
1794:
1792:
1771:
1768:
1748:
1745:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1714:Midnightdreary
1686:
1683:
1681:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1666:Midnightdreary
1619:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1567:Epousesquecido
1558:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1543:Midnightdreary
1514:
1511:
1500:Epousesquecido
1495:
1490:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1415:Epousesquecido
1411:
1401:Epousesquecido
1387:Midnightdreary
1373:Epousesquecido
1359:Midnightdreary
1337:Epousesquecido
1319:Midnightdreary
1300:Epousesquecido
1295:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1252:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1173:
1172:
1152:
1149:
1147:Yankee Scribe
1132:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1115:Midnightdreary
1097:99.244.115.169
1082:99.244.115.169
1073:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1011:
1008:
981:
978:
977:
976:
964:
943:
924:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
868:
865:
849:
843:
842:
841:
831:Midnightdreary
810:
804:
789:Best regards,
780:
774:
773:
772:
762:Midnightdreary
733:
730:
703:
700:
675:
672:
670:
658:Epousesquecido
649:
646:
645:
644:
617:featured topic
592:
589:
578:CyberGhostface
573:
570:
554:
551:
550:
549:
539:Midnightdreary
515:
512:
511:
510:
500:Midnightdreary
484:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
467:
445:Midnightdreary
430:
417:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
394:Midnightdreary
365:
362:
348:Midnightdreary
341:
340:
328:
325:
322:
315:
311:
292:
281:
269:
247:Un coup de dés
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
204:Midnightdreary
178:Midnightdreary
137:
136:Metzengerstein
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
105:Midnightdreary
85:
79:
68:Epousesquecido
59:
56:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2576:
2567:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2556:85.53.143.152
2553:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2499:85.53.136.217
2496:
2483:
2482:
2477:
2471:
2463:
2451:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2400:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2361:The Black Cat
2358:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2342:
2337:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2321:
2317:
2313:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2253:
2249:
2247:
2243:
2238:
2235:
2227:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2194:
2190:
2187:
2183:
2180:
2177:
2173:
2171:
2167:
2162:
2153:
2152:
2148:
2147:
2142:
2141:
2136:
2128:
2123:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2107:
2102:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2086:
2081:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2061:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2042:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1990:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1958:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1937:
1929:Poe's Brother
1926:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1905:
1898:
1893:
1890:
1886:
1880:
1875:
1874:
1863:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1844:
1843:
1840:
1839:
1834:
1821:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1807:
1801:
1798:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1767:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1747:Henry Thoreau
1744:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1682:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1521:
1510:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1494:
1489:
1488:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1294:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1148:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:Yankee Scribe
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1072:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1007:
1004:
1000:
994:
989:
988:
975:
972:
971:
961:
957:
956:
955:
954:
951:
950:
940:
933:
915:
914:
913:
909:
905:
901:
900:
899:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
875:
864:
863:
859:
855:
847:
840:
836:
832:
828:
827:
826:
825:
821:
817:
808:
803:
802:
798:
794:
793:Malachirality
790:
787:
784:
779:
771:
767:
763:
759:
758:WP:MOS#Images
754:
753:
752:
751:
747:
743:
739:
729:
726:
722:
716:
711:
710:
699:
698:
694:
690:
686:
681:
671:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
643:
639:
634:
630:
629:
628:
627:
623:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
588:
587:
583:
579:
569:
568:
564:
560:
553:Thanks v. 2.0
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
534:
533:
529:
525:
521:
509:
505:
501:
496:
495:
494:
493:
490:
476:
471:
462:
461:
456:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
441:
440:
439:
434:
425:
424:
416:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
373:
366:
363:
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
339:
336:
329:
326:
323:
320:
316:
312:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
286:
282:
279:
276:
270:
268:You answered:
267:
266:
265:
264:
261:
253:
250:
248:
244:
228:
224:
220:
219:71.191.42.242
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
188:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
166:featured list
163:
159:
158:
157:
156:
152:
148:
147:71.191.42.242
144:
129:
125:
121:
116:
115:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:
100:
99:
95:
91:
83:
78:
77:
73:
69:
65:
55:
54:
51:
46:
19:
2547:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2489:
2457:
2437:
2399:Doppelganger
2396:
2364:
2345:
2324:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2257:
2254:
2250:
2239:
2236:
2233:
2214:
2195:
2191:
2188:
2184:
2181:
2178:
2174:
2163:
2159:
2144:
2138:
2131:
2110:
2089:
2067:
2048:
2029:
1991:
1977:
1959:
1943:Bigtimepeace
1940:
1932:
1901:
1871:
1869:
1850:
1829:
1827:
1808:
1804:
1791:
1773:
1750:
1731:
1688:
1680:
1662:Good Article
1657:
1653:
1621:
1578:
1560:
1518:ones in the
1516:
1497:
1461:TonyTheTiger
1442:
1314:
1297:
1257:
1254:
1174:
1161:Walt Whitman
1154:
1134:
1110:
1075:
1013:
985:
983:
962:
941:
926:
870:
851:
812:
791:
788:
785:
782:
735:
707:
705:
677:
669:
651:
594:
575:
556:
517:
486:
458:
421:
419:
389:
385:
381:
318:
307:
299:
288:
284:
272:
254:
251:
246:
240:
190:By the way,
173:
169:
139:
120:Lazulilasher
90:Lazulilasher
87:
82:Walt Whitman
61:
30:
2550:—Preceding
2527:Poe Studies
2493:—Preceding
1697:71.96.0.236
1691:—Preceding
878:—Preceding
613:peer review
520:put it back
192:WP:NOT#INFO
2217:Boxter1977
2198:Boxter1977
2064:Longfellow
2045:Poe Plaque
1478:WP:CHICAGO
689:Timmccloud
273:Regarding
2404:Velimir85
2368:Velimir85
2327:Gioachino
2296:Gioachino
2259:Gioachino
2170:sheepskin
2051:Swampyank
2032:Gioachino
1994:Gioachino
1734:Appraiser
1493:Gift book
1278:CaseyPenk
1262:CaseyPenk
966:<: -->
960:Ruhrfisch
945:<: -->
939:Ruhrfisch
742:Matthew K
732:Sigourney
524:Sgt. Salt
2552:unsigned
2495:unsigned
2348:Awadewit
2240:Cheers!
2215:Cheers,
2113:Awadewit
2092:Awadewit
2071:Kdammers
1952:contribs
1915:BrownBot
1885:MiszaBot
1853:Dashfast
1811:Fifelfoo
1780:Briaboru
1757:Briaboru
1693:unsigned
1604:JayHenry
1315:The Opal
999:MiszaBot
932:cite web
923:Web refs
892:contribs
880:unsigned
816:Tjarrett
721:MiszaBot
631:Getting
489:emerson7
2244:06:47,(
1966:Corpus1
1824:Thanks!
1797:Goldbug
1770:Emerson
1654:so many
1640:Adacore
1625:Adacore
1520:gallery
1482:WP:LOTD
1439:WP:LOTD
1232:Georgia
1214:Georgia
1197:Georgia
1179:Georgia
809:cleanup
638:Acdixon
622:Acdixon
563:Keilana
369:Noetica
332:Noetica
289:project
285:project
257:Noetica
2166:vellum
2140:Monobi
1832:Noetic
1728:Thanks
1157:WP:FAC
559:Huggle
390:that's
382:anyone
319:middle
302:, but
2469:habla
2462:María
2434:Ellet
2176:all.
2011:to a
2009:cited
1980:Nsk92
1445:WP:FL
1335:. -
1230:Sandy
1212:Sandy
1195:Sandy
1177:Sandy
1167:up?
965:: -->
944:: -->
685:WP:OR
572:Flagg
174:first
84:cites
16:<
2560:talk
2539:talk
2529:and
2521:and
2503:talk
2475:migo
2445:talk
2424:talk
2408:talk
2388:talk
2372:talk
2352:talk
2331:talk
2316:talk
2300:talk
2278:talk
2263:talk
2246:talk
2221:talk
2202:talk
2146:talk
2135:list
2117:talk
2096:talk
2075:talk
2055:talk
2036:talk
2021:talk
1998:talk
1984:talk
1970:talk
1948:talk
1919:talk
1889:talk
1870:The
1857:talk
1837:Sage
1815:talk
1784:talk
1761:talk
1738:talk
1718:talk
1701:talk
1685:yeaa
1670:talk
1644:talk
1629:talk
1608:talk
1571:talk
1547:talk
1504:talk
1419:talk
1405:talk
1391:talk
1377:talk
1363:talk
1341:talk
1323:talk
1304:talk
1282:talk
1266:talk
1237:Talk
1219:Talk
1202:Talk
1184:Talk
1141:talk
1119:talk
1101:talk
1086:talk
1056:talk
1041:talk
1023:talk
1003:talk
984:The
908:talk
888:talk
874:here
858:talk
854:Wrad
848:help
846:SGGK
835:talk
820:talk
797:talk
766:talk
746:talk
725:talk
706:The
693:talk
662:talk
582:talk
543:talk
528:talk
504:talk
449:talk
398:talk
386:were
372:Talk
352:talk
335:Talk
300:high
260:Talk
223:talk
208:talk
202:. --
182:talk
151:talk
124:talk
109:talk
94:talk
72:talk
64:here
2472:con
1950:|
1936:DYK
1881:! —
1800:OED
1658:all
1581:Lar
1525:Lar
1474:bio
1459:.--
1111:had
995:! —
876:.
717:! —
601:DYK
308:low
306:as
298:as
198:or
170:not
164:to
2562:)
2541:)
2505:)
2447:)
2426:)
2410:)
2390:)
2374:)
2354:)
2333:)
2318:)
2310:--
2302:)
2280:)
2265:)
2223:)
2204:)
2149:)
2119:)
2098:)
2077:)
2057:)
2038:)
2023:)
2000:)
1986:)
1972:)
1946:|
1921:)
1913:.
1859:)
1817:)
1786:)
1763:)
1740:)
1732:--
1720:)
1712:--
1703:)
1672:)
1646:)
1631:)
1610:)
1583::
1573:)
1549:)
1527::
1506:)
1484:)
1421:)
1407:)
1393:)
1379:)
1365:)
1343:)
1325:)
1306:)
1284:)
1268:)
1239:)
1221:)
1204:)
1186:)
1143:)
1121:)
1103:)
1088:)
1058:)
1043:)
1025:)
935:}}
929:{{
910:)
894:)
890:•
860:)
837:)
822:)
799:)
768:)
748:)
695:)
664:)
605:GA
584:)
565:|
545:)
530:)
506:)
451:)
400:)
367:–
354:)
330:–
327::)
255:–
225:)
210:)
184:)
153:)
126:)
111:)
96:)
74:)
66:-
44:ex
41:sD
38:xa
35:Te
32:--
2558:(
2537:(
2501:(
2478:)
2466:(
2443:(
2422:(
2406:(
2386:(
2370:(
2350:(
2329:(
2314:(
2298:(
2276:(
2261:(
2219:(
2200:(
2143:(
2115:(
2094:(
2073:(
2053:(
2034:(
2019:(
1996:(
1982:(
1968:(
1917:(
1891:)
1887:(
1855:(
1813:(
1782:(
1759:(
1736:(
1716:(
1699:(
1668:(
1642:(
1627:(
1606:(
1589:c
1587:/
1585:t
1569:(
1545:(
1533:c
1531:/
1529:t
1502:(
1480:/
1476:/
1472:/
1470:c
1468:/
1466:t
1464:(
1417:(
1403:(
1389:(
1375:(
1361:(
1339:(
1321:(
1302:(
1280:(
1264:(
1235:(
1217:(
1200:(
1182:(
1139:(
1117:(
1099:(
1084:(
1054:(
1039:(
1021:(
1005:)
1001:(
969:°
948:°
906:(
886:(
856:(
833:(
818:(
795:(
764:(
744:(
727:)
723:(
691:(
660:(
580:(
541:(
526:(
502:(
472:)
470:0
468:2
466:H
464:(
447:(
435:)
433:0
431:2
429:H
427:(
396:(
350:(
221:(
206:(
180:(
149:(
122:(
107:(
92:(
70:(
49:★
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.