User talk:Mdann52/Archive 9

3615:

Microstructure" would have shown that the journal was based on a previous experience with publishing papers of that kind. "Scanning Microscopy International" had published very many books on all kinds of electron microscopy but there are almost no links to it either, since it also ceased to exist. In 2013, the interest in food structure has been revived and a new "Food Structure" journal has been established by Elsevier. The dates 1982-1993 had initially been added to distinguish the earlier journal from the recent publication. In spite of severe Knowledge editing, younger food microscopists are getting access to important information in this new Knowledge article. Thank you.

808: 2500: 2336: 1062: 110: 31: 710: 3560: 1122: 2668: 951: 3482: 3285: 1419: 2541: 2810: 2435: 1479: 215: 2473: 3362:

I dislike it when people give me grief about my AfC reviews, so I promise to be brief. I was just wondering if you had any suggestions for the submitter of the Granger Westberg AfC. When I found the article a few days ago, the references were a little scarce, but I feel like that's a lot better now.

2094:

Hi, I have made the changes after reading the article and going through sources. All the edit that I have done have and edit summary explaining why I have performed the actions. I would like to request you to restore my article and rollback the reverting of article. In case if you don't understand

3638:

article. Is it because it's poorly written, or do you think it was cut and pasted directly from the source, or did you have some other reason? If it's just that it's poorly written, I could take a stab at fixing it up, but if it's because of misappropriation, he should probably be told. He's been

2791:

Hi! As you closed the RfC at the Manual of Style, it might be best if you made any changes determined to the text itself. I think if anyone else does it, it may be contested as additional interpretation of your closing statements. Just a thought, but maybe you have a better idea of what's needed.

3281:. Due to inactivity and problems this discussion is inactive for more than 1 months. Now we heartily request you to come and share your thinkings. Your arrival and thinking is much needed for us and we'll really appreciate it if you come and give us some of your precious times. Thanks in advance. 2846:

With your last switch of reasoning, I fear you've made Identity a majority rules popularity contest, instead of weighting it toward respecting the people being named, an opinion found in the discussion, aposition held by people worried identity decisions would be decided by majority votes. "Most

2624:

I've put the GAN on hold. There is a fair amount of work to be done on the article. This is a fairly major BLP, attracting nearly 50,000 readers a month, so I do think it's important that the article is improved, and well done for making that attempt. I'll keep the review open as long as I see

3614:

Since it ceased to exist at the end of 1993, few links to it are available. Two have been added to its published form and a few former (surviving) authors have been asked to help. Effort will continue after Christmas in order to remove its "orphan" label. - Mentioning of the "Studies of Food

753:

Hi Mdann52, Firstly I'd like to apologize for taking longer than 7 days to come back after placing it on hold. However, you have made the fixes I felt were needed as well as many raised by others. While some weren't addressed, I felt these weren't appropriate to prevent GA (if it were an FA

2625:

positive progress being made, though I suspect that it may take some time unless there are others willing to help out, so it may be best to close the GAN, and nominate the article again later when it has been brought to GA standards. I'll check back in seven days to see what's happening.

1518:

Hi, not to spend too much time on a photo, but I only see 4 for keeping the old man shot in the infobox, 4 for the younger photo in the infobox. It's hard to see consensus for the old man photo in the infobox, and at any rate the consensus wouldn't need to follow a vote count. Thanks.

516:

1. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Creative Commons 2. Attribution-NonCommercial Creative Commons 3. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Commons 4. Attribution Creative Commons 5. Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons 6. Attribution-NoDerivs Creative Commons

2164:

The talk on that page is about single edit and talk is still going on while you have reverted the whole article and all my edits without any proper reason as edit summary was specified in all the edits. So I request to rollback changes and restore the version. Thank

2005:

I am not sure as to why a request for deletion has been put for the Sierra WiFi page. This is not an advert, but was intended to create a wikipedia page for Sierra WiFi. This is a very legit company in Sierra Leone and you can view our page here www.sierrawifi. com

1845:

and I didn't find a reason for it being declined. Could you please provide a reason. Note - I've now added a Talk section to the bottom of the article that may clarify some things (I'm struggling to understand the Talk function even watching the help video on

2900:

feature was added to all wikis. It creates metadata information about multimedia files (like their license) that can be read automatically by computer programs. It not only works for Commons, but for all wikis, and you can use it for files on your wiki by

1857:

Drafts are supposed to be in the "Knowledge Talk" namespace. The copy in the "Knowledge" namespace will be deleted soon. Please continue working on the copy at Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Omegawave. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2013

798: 2714:

could you first address my edit summary when I reverted your first close? Here it is for reference, "undid close since the conclusion involves a relatively recently raised proposal discussed only by a few without showing support for any specific 'XXXX'

3533: 2574: 2558: 2533: 821:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a brownie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. This brownie is your reward for accepting two articles,

1865:

However, I don't know if there was anything wrong with the actual article or in the way I submitted it in the Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/ namespace. Could you please let me know what, if anything, needs to be changed or corrected.

992:

Could you please specify your concerns? Actually this is a transformation of the German Knowledge page of the internationally renown artist Markus Heinsdorff. If you have any specific suggestions of improvement please let me know.

3696:

Congratulations on your increased German proficiency, as indicated by a recent change to your user page's babel status. I don't speak German but I do appreciate people who take the time and effort to learn additional languages.

842: 2307:

Hello. Thank you. Can you please help by removing the sign/message in front of my page. Several have reviewed and in fact found all to be appropriate. Pls do anything that might be needed and please remove that message.

3521: 2847:

common in sources" will not lead to choosing better expert sources over the general gut feelings of editors in any naming disputes to come. I was also surprised you could switch a found consensus to its opposite.

3517: 3211: 3363:

While not a nurse, Westberg created a significant nursing specialty and was fairly broadly covered because of that. Is there anything you would suggest to make this a successful article? Thanks!

1970:

Hi, I understand that you have removed me from the reviewers list as i am not experienced enough. I dint understand why i was removed from the newsletter mailing list as well. Please explain.

3639:

editing New Hampshire towns alphabetically with an 1875 source and has gotten up to towns starting with "C", so will probably be doing a lot more edits. I'd be happy to send him a message. --

513:

Hi there. I changed the licence on Flickr as well, but couldn't work out which one corresponded with what licence I had been asked to change it to here. Flickr gives me to following options:

2214:

Sir, I have told you that discussion is on single topic while all my edits were reverted. You haven't still provided the reason about reverting my OTHER changes. Hope for a reply. Thank you.

862: 1853:

2. I'm a Knowledge newbie, so I probably made more than one mistake trying to submit my article. One mistake was that I tried to submit it under Knowledge namespace, as noted by Dodger67.

2182:

While discussion is ongoing, it is customary to leave the page how it was before the dispute began. Considering the history on this page, I am wary of reverting myself in the meantime. --

2584: 2532: 381:(the program used by VisualEditor to convert wikitext to annotated HTML) on November 4, between 19:40 and 20:40 (UTC). Encoding issues caused non-ASCII characters (including those with 3384:

rereviewing the article, it looks ok. It turned out I looked at the wrong history page, so I didn't see the changes.... I have reverted, so feel free to accept if you feel like it. --

1734:

protocol to connect to accounts on Wikimedia sites. As a user, you can use those tools to make edits and other changes with your account without giving the tool your password.

401:

tool is now available on Commons and Meta-Wiki. With it, you can test new features before they're added for everyone. The plan is to add this tool to all wikis on November 21.

3262: 1657:

With over 400,000 edits to Wikimedia wikis, EdwardsBot has served us well; however EdwardsBot will no longer perform local or global message delivery after December 31, 2013.

2902: 2931:

You can now paste formatted content copied from external sources (not just as plain text) into VisualEditor; this includes copy/pasting from other VisualEditor windows.

2611: 1721:. VisualEditor is one of those features on sites where it works and isn't automatically enabled. There is also a new media viewer and changes in the article text style. 1331:, Wikimania and Wikisource wikis on November 19, and Wiktionary wikis on November 21 (except where it's already available). Once it is added, you can test it by adding 685:

My photo has been uploaded, thank you. Is there a way that I can remove the Full Res version ‎(4,474 × 3,356 pixels) and leave the remaining versions? Thanks, Edward.

2596: 696: 1457:

in which there is a poll and discussion of the elderly vs. younger photo. Could you please address that question, so that we can get closure on this issue? Thanks.

1025:, and should be removed. The rules on the German Knowledge are different to the ones on here, so an article on other Knowledge's are not always suitable for here. -- 1206:

Thanks for the cleanup. Unfortunately, I just tried the same basic edit (with a couple of additions) and the problem of losing all the footnotes still persists.

591: 3317: 2675:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See 1099: 2583:

has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the

2383: 2369: 2275:

Hey, I put a lot of work into this and it is interesting information, that a lot of people are looking for. would you please revert the deletion of my texts.

3231: 3142: 3106:

You can now use a basic tool to add special characters to your text. You can add more characters (useful in your language) by editing the MediaWiki interface

3008: 2884: 256:

Hi, I'm new here and finding my way to create an acceptable article. Can you help me to figure out the thingss I may need to change or make some corrections?

1751: 745: 3277: 1262: 1242: 663: 610: 532: 3251: 3028: 1816: 1381: 494: 1631: 1612: 541: 1153: 2042: 2020: 1449: 1001: 3196:

will be added to the English Knowledge to make it easier to create new pages. You will be able to use VisualEditor for drafts if you have enabled it.

3101:

The toolbar is now simpler; all text styles (bold, italics, underline, subscript, etc.) are in the same menu, and the "More" menu is called "Insert".

1894:

I have accepted the article; I declined the wrong version. The reason the other one was deleted was because it was a duplicate. The new article is at

1681: 793: 2215: 2166: 2125: 2103: 1943: 1889: 1873: 1626: 1470: 3413:

I appreciate your quick response. I ended up contributing to the article, so I'm not sure if I'll accept it, but I appreciate your revert. Cheers!

3371: 2302: 2283: 378: 3172: 2323: 739: 3463: 3450: 3421: 3408: 1838:

Briefly, I have two questions I hope you could help with: 1. Why was my article declined? 2. What should I change before I try to resubmit it?

3685: 3661:

bit of both... I misread the year as being 1975... Feel free to reinstate and cleanup as needed; I did feel it was a bit too linebreaky :) --

3616: 3579:

Right.... I have never actually written an article on my own. In addition, forging signatures on barnstars or any comment is frowned upon. --

3545: 2856: 2315: 2083: 1191: 1049: 324: 2778: 2764: 2260: 2206: 2158: 1955: 1922: 839: 3354: 2841: 2727: 2517: 2353: 1532: 1513: 1178: 1079: 2485: 2466: 1604: 1593: 2551: 2368:

Hi, I put 'MODERATE' in some of my edit summaries because I wanted them specific ones moderated and reviewed incase I was wrong, thanks.

1563: 1013: 935: 906: 2295: 2032: 3164:

was added to test wikis on December 12. It will be added to non-Knowledge wikis on December 17 and all Knowledge wikis on December 19 (

3094: 2924: 2701: 245: 1881: 1312:

was added to test wikis on November 14. It will arrive to non-Knowledge wikis on November 19 and all Knowledge wikis on November 21 (

3648: 2976:

was added to test wikis on December 5. It will arrive to non-Knowledge wikis on December 10 and all Knowledge wikis on December 12 (

1444: 700: 409:

was added to test wikis on November 7. It will arrive to non-Knowledge wikis on November 12 and all Knowledge wikis on November 14 (

361:(ULS) to display the name of languages (for example in navigation templates) in their correct script. To do this, add the CSS class 1221: 675: 3239: 3054: 3040: 3016: 2877: 2863: 2801: 1804: 1701: 1687: 1369: 1285: 1271: 595: 482: 345: 331: 3475: 2716: 2712: 2706: 1540: 3227: 3180: 3107: 3004: 1792: 1422:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1357: 470: 365:

to the elements that include language names. Note that this font only works for the name of languages, not for any other text.

3624: 2527: 2363: 1344:

tool will be added to all wikis on November 19 instead of November 14. It will make it simpler to send messages across wikis.

3235: 3171:

You will soon be able to select the language of SVG images that have translations using a drop-down menu on the image page. (

3012: 2270: 1989: 1800: 1365: 646: 571: 478: 3603: 3134:

The log-in system for external tools ("OAuth") was broken on wikis that tested the new search tool. It was fixed last week.

2513: 2349: 1227:

When I edited your page, the edit history says that this was minus 24,000 bites! I added bites, and did not delete them.

282: 268: 3572:

Hey man! You're soo good in writting articles! Good job and keep it up!!! The Game Expert 11:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

3347: 2645: 2391: 2377: 1554: 987: 978: 692: 1862:

Excirial actually declined that submission because it was a duplicate, rather than because it was in the wrong namespace.

2506: 2499: 2342: 2335: 2223: 2174: 2115: 1997: 671: 3053: