User talk:LtPowers

5080: 1088:

Accepting for the sake of argument that the current TfD nomination has advanced a "new argument," it now appears that the opponents of the "like" template have exhausted any objection based on the TfD guidelines or policy. Unless something very unusual happens in the present TfD, it also appears that the overwhelming numerical majority will reject the new argument posited by the nominator. Four consecutive "keep" consensus TfD closes is a consensus, whether one agrees with it or not. And while consensus certainly can and will change over time, the community consensus in this particular case has not varied much in the last year. Opponents are left hoping that this will finally be the "lucky shot" where a different group of editors shows up at the latest TfD.

4261: 8747: 591: 1518: 3565:

lots of people don't know where places outside their own country are located). I've also never heard the *19* appended to the *77* before, either. It's the Blizzard of '77, period. If there were any other blizzards that year, they were doomed to obscurity by the sheer size of this sucker crippling a major metropolitan area of nearly 2 million people. Americans who are old enough to remember it know exactly what it means when referred to in conversation. It was national news for

8757: 8409: 2772:, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Knowledge has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 4729: 4514: 9586: 8514: 8027: 10131: 9919: 9844: 9663: 9483: 9073: 9021: 7845: 7501: 7303: 6889: 6643: 6587: 6300: 6121: 6065: 5983: 5559: 5236: 5176: 4628: 6179: 3724: 10063: 9423: 8134: 7558: 7450: 7250: 9973: 9758: 9384: 9346: 9256: 9129: 8869: 8241: 7611: 6227: 4017: 3470: 3368: 604:: Female Knowledge editors are less likely to contribute to Knowledge due to the high level of conflict involved in the editing, debating, and defending process." ("Controlling for other factors females were 26% more likely to select 'I got into conflicts with other Knowledge contributors' as a reason for no longer contributing. The coefficients for being afraid of being 'criticized' , 'yelled at', and 'getting into trouble' are all significant".) 5797: 5463: 831: 7903: 1276:. Secondly, however, the passages you quote are referring explicitly to vertical lists, with well-considered advice that aims to avoid breaking the HTML that will be generated from the wikicode. When I said that "I don't see anything on those policy pages that prohibits line breaks to break up a long horizontal list," I meant it exactly as I said it -- referring only to horizontal lists, which are not the main thrust of either page. 8612: 7417: 7361: 4885: 3833: 3805: 533: 2572:), to avoid the confusion even when disambiguation is necessary, but I have backed away from that because consensus is clearly against that. I have accepted that the comma convention is the standard form used for disambiguating place names in WP titles. But I still think we would be much less misleading on the name issue if we used it only when necessary, like with all other cases of disambiguating names. -- 5346: 4357: 2198:. That makes disambiguation seem unnecessary, since (per WP:D) the only purpose of disambiguation is to obtain a unique title -- not a fully contextualized one, but simply unique. Remember, although this simple title seems "ambiguous" colloquially, it's important to understand that WP:D defines ambiguity specifically as "refer to more than one topic covered by Knowledge articles" (emphasis added). 4849: 9539: 6357: 5616: 8330: 7700: 7115: 6961: 6715: 6419: 683: 112: 2841:) 03:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC) This can all be explained in the mediation, but as I see it a couple of people a few years ago without realizing the unintended consequences thought that it would logically make more sense to use Mexican American War with an endash instead of with a hyhen. One of the clues that was the wrong choice is the megabytes of discussion that it created. 3557:

accumulation), so much so that mere mention of a big storm heading in WNYs direction gets immediate media hype & starts comedians cracking all the old chestnuts. The Blizzard of '77 got a total media rehash during the course of the October Surprise ice storm (2006) that once again saw most of the same WNY counties declared federal disaster areas. Buffalo=lots of snow

5007:; arguably, the Clinton example falls into the same class, but if that's what the article-level consensus is, so be it. For the reasons mentioned above, Abby Wambach is a closer call, but it's the level of obvious relationship between the given name and diminutive nickname that should be determinative. Good examples of nickname inserts that may make sense are 4969:. In the case of Wambach, an argument can be made because her nickname is a derivative of her middle name, and because Abigail is not a particularly common name, that inserting the nickname has some value to our readers. If, however, you are attempting to enforce a non-existent MOS consensus across all articles, it should be removed. So, what's your logic? 1218:. I see I should have given you a detailed explanation from the start, instead of links. You don't seem to have understood these two guidelines. I take it as a sign that these pages should be clarified, and made easier to understand. Improving these pages is my responsibility as an active member of the accessibility project, and as one of the main authors of 3104:.) How is it a mishmash to format titles the same way they are always found outside of Knowledge? All that is required is an addition to NCCAPS/MOS:CT along the lines of "If a title is exclusively or near-exclusively represented (by the producers as well as independent sources) in a style of capitalization that differs from MOS:CT, we should follow the 2614:, if you will. But, whatever you call it, that's also Noetica's argument about adding more information to titles like Catholic Memorial School, and it's not always information in parentheses. But you rightfully reject his arguments. We reject them not because they're unreasonable, but because they're inconsistent with how we title articles on WP. 10148:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 9936:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 9861:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 9680:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 9500:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 9090:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 9038:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 7862:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 7518:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 7322:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6908:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6662:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6606:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6319:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6140:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6084:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6002:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5578:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5255:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5195:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4647:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1092:

demonstrated change of applicable guidelines, policy, or other applicable community consensus, no further TfDs on topic should be accepted for at least 12 months. Established consensus should be respected, and further TfDs on topic should be summarily closed for some discrete period of time (absent evidence of changed circumstances).

1490:, which will help improve articles regarding WNY. I believe that articles for WNY deserve a group of people who are willing to contribute to their upkeep, so I created the project. Currently we are still in development, but since I noticed on your talk page you are from Rochester I thought you may have some interest in the project. 901: 8988:

when the photo was taken, rather than the location of the subject. I was indeed standing on the Parker Street bridge when I took the photo. We usually geotag camera location because a camera's field of view is so wide it's usually hard to pinpoint its subject to a single coordinate. Hope this helps!

4984:

Sorry, I probably added that once before and I failed to realize someone had recently removed it. I thought it was important to include because "Abby" is how she is listed on official rosters and scoresheets (etc). The fact that it's based on her middle name and not her first name also contributed to

4956:

LtPowers, I recently removed the "Abby" nickname from the lead of the Abby Wambach because it is the commonly understood diminutive form of Abigail. It is a commonly misunderstood misinterpretation of MOS that this insertion of redundant nicknames into the bolded statement of the subject's full name

4859:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about

4145:

You need to behave properly towards other editors, and that includes not abusing them—especially behind their back. The terms of use are quite clear, and there is a procedure outlined where I take the matter to the Wikimedia Foundation as a complaint. I will complain to the Foundation, as anyone else

4116:

I'm not going to argue about semantic subtleties as you might try to construct them to save yourself. I'll take action at a higher level if you breach the terms of use. In particular, "Intentionally or knowingly posting content that constitutes libel or defamation" represents a serious breach. I will

2955:

redirect to the article. MediaWiki permits an automatic move to a title that redirects to the page, but only if the redirect's creation is the sole revision in its page's history. If any other revisions (e.g. prior usage of the title or the subsequent addition of a category) exist, an administrator

2596:

it were just disambiguation, you're quite right that we probably should use a parenthetical. But rather than see this state of affairs as cause for reevaluating your position, you instead see it as misleading other people away from your position. Maybe, just maybe, you're wrong and everyone else is

1971:

I wish you had indicated sooner that you were addressing how the stylization is presented in prose rather than re-arguing the article naming debate. We could have saved a lot of verbiage. On that note, then, "stylized as" is customary whenever we use an alternative orthography; it's standard. It's

1087:

In the current TfD, you're just forcefully advocating a position you support. I understand that. The problem is that you're late to the table. Four TfDs for the same template in the space of 11 or 12 months is preposterous; and that's not even counting the two Commons TfDs in the same time frame.

1083:

Powers, I just wanted to let you know that the indignation expressed in the "like" template TfD is really not about you. Quite the contrary. My first contact with you was early in my WP editing career (something like 33 months ago), and you were one of the logical editors who found a sound solution

9453:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of

4740:

I still think it is the more used term, but I recognize now that I am unable to say why the shift happened. Thanks for challenging me. The only response that I can give to your questions is that I am less sure now than I was before and that I will have to think more about what you asked, because the

2268:

disambiguation when it's not necessary for purposes of creating a unique identifier. There is no, and has never been any, consensus for expanding the purpose of article titles to include full contextualization; as long as that consensus doesn't exist, we should treat this article's title as we would

1107:

Be that as it may, I'm still not sure what you want me to do. The way I see it, someone asked my opinion (not personally, but as a member of the community) on the merits of a proposal, and I expressed my opinion. I have expressed no complaint against those of you arguing that it should be speedily

1091:

IMO, this pursuit of the white whale has reached a stopping point. Filing a new TfD every 90 days or so ignores the established consensus, is disruptive, abuses the TfD process, and is discourteous to fellow editors. Assuming this TfD ends in yet another consensus "keep" close, in the absence of a

3157:

Look, if you're just here to rehash the argument, this isn't the place for it. I have no personal control over the manual of style. But there is great value in maintaining a consistent style, and our MOS allows us to do that if it's followed correctly. If you can garner a consensus to change it,

3052:

That makes sense. However, there's resistance at those RMs, and this will remain a controversial matter. At some point, a centralized discussion will probably be required to determine if WP:NCCAPS/MOS:CT should be amended. Right now, basically all of the people supporting application of the current

2587:

You know the difference between "President Obama" and "Chittenango, New York" is that the former is generally used after the full name has been established; the latter is used on first use. That's one (of several) significant difference between the two use cases. In addition, the fact that we use

2422:

of the subject. They are disambiguation, but not only disambiguation. They are also additional identifying information about the topic, subject (not name) matter that is usually left out of WP titles... instead we normally rely on the lede sentence and the infobox to inform readers as to what the

2125:

You've never mentioned any other article in this entire discussion. You've come to my talk page, accused me of losing focus, accused me of trolling, all the while you continue writing sentences rife with misspellings and grammatical ambiguities that make it difficult to understand you. I've asked

1584:

That it alters the title for effect but not trully the actual title. Officially it is "Fun." We could say that the miniscule is stylization but not the period because it sughest that the name is "Fun" officially. And yes im aware of WP:OFFICIAL however that is only concerned for naming conventions.

804:

that is narrower in scope, and concerns only whether the older Voodoo and newer Romero zombie pop culture should be included in the same article or whether it should be separated. These are articles that receive a lot of hits, and should probably get more input than just the two editors having the

8700:

Hello LtPowers! I'm a new member of the Disney WikiProject. I'm trying to confirm who is still interested in the WikiProject in hopes to build a team of that can revamp the project. Please let me know if you would like to stay on the list of active members, or if I can go ahead and move to you the

8667:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

7996:

7391:

Sorry about the "one minute" thing. It's better to add the rationale before adding the file to an article because there's no way of knowing what your intentions are. The edit sum you left did not state you were going to add a rationale for the season article. As for the logo's non-free use itself,

3572:

I'd hazard the main issue with this back & forth is that those who insist otherwise were likely not even born at the time, have no memory of it, & believe if Jim Cantore wasn't there to give it a name, it should have one anyway. It doesn't. It is what it is. (And as a name, it beats the

3564:

I've never heard it called *The Great Lakes Blizzard of 1977* in my life - which doesn't pinpoint geography rather well, either, as there are 5 of them sprawling across several states. For all our friends across the pond know of American geography, it could've occurred anywhere (no offense meant;

2660:

You acknowledge that ", state" is usually not added in reliable sources when referencing a US city in a context where the state is already known? Not even for "first use"? That the state is normally only specified (with the comma convention or some other means) in order to inform the reader what

2504:

Okay, you caught me there; just trying to appeal to your usual bailiwick. =) But my broader point stands; the consistency with which U.S. placenames are associated with their state in both popular and professional discourse is overwhelming, to the point that it becomes the best way of satisfying

2167:

We have, in the past, consistently found that when an undisambiguated ("base") name redirects to a disambiguated name, the redirection should be reversed. Examples are almost too numerous to count, and they are, indeed, generally considered "uncontroversial" at the Requested Moves page -- that is,

2045:

Not exactly. Lets put standard aside especially when its not. Just a common accepted form that hasnt been properly looked into. There is no guideline or policy stating we should write it as such. And if we arent in the business of declaring proper then we are also not in the bussiness of declaring

2384:

I'll admit it's not black and white. U.S. placenames occupy a strange little niche where WP:D and WP:CN overlap. Basically it boils down to the state name being such a COMMON way to DISAMBIGUATE that the DISAMBIGUATION itself becomes part of the COMMONNAME. I understand you disagree, but I and

2086:

Its not an observation, its interpreting a name. Stylized nature doesnt mean its stylization. Again i fel like you forget the point. Using stylized suggests the name we use now is more acccepted than the trademarked one. Plus stylization should be done by alternate spellings that arent the actual

9216:

This would be a 45 minute conversation about your past experience with other Wikimedia projects and thoughts about the future of this new initiative. I'm hoping to gather a wide range of perspectives so I'd be interested in your opinion regardless of whether you plan to have further involvement.

6763:

is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia user group: please submit comments and suggestions, and whether you would like to be a member in such a group. Prime goal for the group is the creation of a new, free, genealogy wiki, but there is also a discussion weather we

5002:

in the article lead because that was the de facto consensus at the article level, not because it's required or even best practice. My concern (and that of quite a few others) is that we now have gnomers attempting to uniformly enforce a non-existent rule that results in redundant silliness like

2563:

is just the name of the city. Because it is a confusing issue, I think it makes it particularly important to get it right, and not leave the wrong impression that the name is "Beverly Hills, California". In fact, that is exactly why I have long supported not even using the comma convention for

1956:

That has gone and past. I already said i would let it slide, however if the name was addressed correctly in prose. This discussion is about avoiding "stylized as" and what using that in an article suggests. We need to find to work it out more bluntly. Like a tag saying "due to sentence structure

1652:"look, if its officially spelled that way? then its not stylization." -- You've said this countless times but have yet to provide any evidence for it. I dispute the truth of this statement, because I am not aware of any definition of the word "stylization" that excludes "official" renderings. 2206:

topic covered by a Knowledge article: this one. (And that is evidenced by the fact that the undisambiguated title redirects here.) Certainly a hatnote pointing to appropriate other articles or disambiguation pages is in order, as it is now. That would not change. In fact, the way that a reader

3075:

Yes, because we value having a consistent editorial style. If someone wants to propose that we change the rule to words of five letters or more instead of four, that'd be one thing. But instead people are making spurious arguments about "following the sources", which, if done throughout the

3556:

I found the back & forth on naming this article a bit strange. This storm is what *made* the Buffalo area's national reputation as a place that regularly gets dumped on with insane amounts of snow (even though that isn't really true - Syracuse is the *snow capital* of NY going by annual

1600:

Again, though, the key piece you're missing is some sort of proof that it's not stylization if it's "official". "fun." has apparently made their stylization (with the period) "official", but that doesn't make it not-stylization. It's still a stylization, it's just an official stylization.

3665:

I hope these couple of edits I found are judged as improvements, especially if you have contributed to these muppet pages. I feel they are augmentary and needed to improve the article but I could be wrong. I am newer here but I have done pages and edits for a few weeks now. Thanks for your

1992:

I couldnt have said it any sooner. You just had a temporary loss of focus. Regardless you just proved my point. "This is how the entity itself styles in their brandb that suggest that "the alternate given here is merely for style and it is not the actual name". There needs to be a clearer

7623:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

8253:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3187:

You voted "oppose" on move proposal. However, if you would like to change your vote, do so before the discussion closes. There have been two 'support's, but you can still stick with "oppose" if you want. Nevertheless, I'm using the "Precious (film)" because I like to be concise.

1670:

You can just determine it by looking it up in the dictionary. But thays not even the point. Saying "stylized as" suggest that the name of the article is the actual name amd that it could be either thay or the other when actually were avoiding a name due to sentence structure

1957:

issues we will be refering the subject to its least common name". Its original research to say "stylized as" because it shows more original research l. I can understand a name to avoid sentence structure confusion, however im concerned by what the article suggests in prose.

4135:

Oh for crying out loud. There is nothing libelous about my statement, which involved a factual assessment of the community opinion of your behavior. I have little interest in escalating this "dispute", but neither will I stand by while you make legal threats against me.

2418:, etc. That is, when referring to people, sources often indicate the person's profession. Similarly, when referring to US cities, sources often indicate the state the city is in. But in neither case the additional information - profession or state - becomes part of the 1154:

Hi LtPowers, we may not always agree, but you seem to be a pretty great Wikipedian. I noticed someone wanted to nominate you for adminship quite some time ago, and I wondered if you'd reconsidered. I think you'd be a good admin, and I'd be happy to nominate you. Best,

4076:

You need to be very very careful indeed. Someone has alerted me to your defamatory statement, calling me "a jerk", apparently. You will find that there are ramifications beyond, on WM sites more generally, if you persist with your breaches of the WMF's terms of use.

1225:

Now for the explanation. When inserting a blank line in a list, the list gets separated into two smaller lists. We group items that are related. It doesn't make sense anymore if we separate lists into random smaller lists. That is the main accessibility problem.

1585:

And yes it exist and i showed plenty of proof. Your comment is saying "oh i see what you mean but for some random reason it doesnt mean its true". Many bands add something to their name. I just showed you two bands that have an official name and a stylized one.

8160:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3158:

more power to you. But right now, it says -- and years of consensus backs this up -- that the style should be followed consistently. I don't see any reason to make an exception because other sources use different styles; that's rather the point, isn't it?

595:

has now delved further into the data of the UNU-MERIT study, examining the responses to questions such as "Why don't you contribute to Knowledge?" and "Why did you stop contributing to Knowledge?", finding strong support for the following three hypotheses:

3618:

has no period. This article is not about Truman, it is about a national park, and both the official and common use of the national park name does not include the period. Using the period in reference to the park would put Knowledge in a distinct minority.

1398:

Last solution I can offer is to forget the whole "list idea", and to separate each item by a simple coma. With this you can make line breaks, it won't cause problem to screen reader users. Now if you absolutely want bullets, I have nothing more to say.

8045:

First of all, the article that was nominated for deletion with this name was a music album and not a show of this title, the result was delete, but the article was since recreated for a very different purpose and the article is now about a TV show, so

6239:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

7943:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of 5371: 4381: 3384:

regarding a pesky little I. At the end of the day, it may not have been resolved but we all did work together to try and get it sorted, even if we did feel at times we were banging our heads on our desks and calling our computer screens idiots.

7584:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

7476:

7276:

4268:

Hi! Since you commented on the redesign project for the "Welcome to Knowledge" brochure, I wanted to let you know that we've got a draft PDF now. Any feedback you have at this point will be much appreciated. You can let us know what you think

5667:. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Knowledge, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. 4604:"Check the dictionary" doesn't really work, by the way. Dictionaries usually acknowledge that misuse and many people have argued just the opposite with me - that the dictionary gives them permission to use "comprise" to mean "compose". 8054:

as significant coverage from reliable secondary sources is not present. References listed here are a now dead link to an official site, dead link to a promotional side with Dell and RIT University is also a dead link and not a reliable

237:

Hi! You said "The recent Philip J. Fry move is, as far as I can tell, an abberation influenced by other titles of Futurama characters. That shouldn't be a problem here, as we have James T. Kirk, Leonard McCoy, and Pavel Chekov already"

4738:. You made me understand that regardless of which term is correct, I was unable to provided evidence of the use of the term "STI" in activism, and that I was unable to provide an explanation for why I thought that term was more used. 1493:

Also, if you know anyone else interested in WNY on Knowledge could you inform yhem on this project? They could be helpful in maintaining these articles, and helping Knowledge's relevancy in general. Thank you for your consideration.

6991:

In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well as taking new, important steps towards a creation of a new project site, we need to make communication between the users easier and more effective.

572:, other studies found similarly low ratios). A new paper titled "Conflict, Confidence, or Criticism: An Empirical Examination of the Gender Gap in Knowledge" Collier, B., & Bear, J. (2012). Conflict, criticism, or confidence. 4783:

whether to recapitalize the name or keep it in lowercase. You participated in the 2012 vote, and may want to voice an opinion or comment on this one. I'm writing this to the voters from 2012 who may not know about this vote.

2871: 2791: 1972:

not original research to look at it and say "this is a stylization"; the word is a neutral term devoid of value judgements, and it's perfectly acceptable to use it to mean "this is how the entity itself styles their brand".

1918:

It is when your doing it to a title because even though titles may use english words within them doesnt mean they are bound by english ortography. Putting "stylized as" is original research. Its not a nuetral way of handling

6348: 1202:” be moved back to its old title of “Robert F. Kennedy Bridge”. (Again.) You voiced an opinion during the last move discussion (a few weeks ago, I know), so I wanted to bring it to your attention. This new discussion is at 6036:

Thank you for catching my mistake. I accidently used "image" (lowercase) when the template called for "Image" (capital I). I reverted your reversion but also fixed it so that both lowercase and capital now work. Thanks!!!

7854: 5671: 5663: 3475: 3463: 2488:

and all other US city articles where the city is the established primary topic for the city name, proposals to bring those titles into alignment with other WP titles per your argument should get unanimous support too.

7351: 2959:

A workaround, which I employed in this instance, is to delete the redirect's page and restore (or recreate) only the most recent revision. The resultant redirect is then recognized by MediaWiki in the manner described

461: 7839: 6745:

In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well talking in chat mode about the potential new wiki, a new irc channel has been setup, and you are welcome to visit and try it out at:

2385:

many others see the distinction here between the comma-convention placename issue and other forms of disambiguation. It would behoove you to be a little more understanding on that point, and a little less dogmatic.

9212:

Hi there, I'm a researcher for the Wikilambda project. Last month we held a naming contest and I'm following up with those who voted to see if you might be willing to provide some feedback to help guide the project.

9853: 8956:

to Wikimedia Commons. I believe the coordinates on that page need correction. The coordinates listed are those of the nearby Parker Street Bridge. The correct coordinates of the Fairport List Bridge are given on

6598: 4295:

is *THE* National Association for Cattery and it is recognized by the Italian Government whicj also delegated to that association to manage the genealogical book of every recognized feline breed. It is part of FIFè

634:

However, the paper's authors argued that this conjecture was not borne out by the data, instead finding that "men are 19% more likely to select 'I didn't have time to go on' as a reason for no longer contributing."

527: 1123:

My objection was that the link was red. Now that the page exists, that's not a problem. In fact, it's probably a good idea, since some people pick the wrong thing from the drop-down list when it gets autocomplete.

8164:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

7588:

7480:

7280:

1777:

the study of spelling amd how co.binaations make certain sounds. Again its irrelevamt as far as naming conventions and as far determining stylized. Becaise basimg it on english ortography is original research and

4377: 2221:

context provides no improvement in access, and no improvement in disambiguation. The only possible improvement presented by opposers is to clarity: that it tells a reader immediately that this is an article on a

6579: 6311: 6076: 5305:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 465: 9672: 1024: 664:

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the

346: 4435: 3301: 6292: 6057: 5551: 4791: 3295: 2143:

For the record, you have. I mentioned stylization only and only that. You bring up the band name. This is for more general. And you continue to change your opinion and point in which i still manage to work

5656: 4676: 4547:

Thanks! Certainly there's some nostalgia about the old plaza location but trust me, no one who's been to their new flagship location just down the street misses this old one. =) It's really something.

1084:

to a solvable problem. You were completely divorced from the emotions of the situation, and applied your personal knowledge and Knowledge experience. I've admired your editing and admin work ever since.

919:

intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse

9838: 4431: 9529: 6372: 2721:

Any objections to moving all of the comet articles from endash to hyphen? Out of 40 books at Google books (using preview only) produces 36 using a hyphen and 4 an endash. 32 used Comet and 8 used comet.

1367:

Yeah, right. You can adjust the em values however you like. It's "do it yourself" from this point onwards. I do value aesthetics, but in a simple fashion. This is going too far on my opinion. See you !

3922:, in a discussion you participated. Note there was a discussion of PDAB at WT:D the last weeks (everything is explained in the RFC). You are welcome to give ideas about the future of this guideline at 1279:

That said, I can see the point. The technique I described in the documentation does indeed produce two independent HTML lists. I maintain, however, that that is sometimes desired behavior, is it not?

10002:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 9787:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 9283:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 9156:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 8896:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 8265:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 7635:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 6251:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4482: 3049:, for that matter) is resolved. If those are decided in favor of the current MOS wording, then I believe a request for moving Cuckoo's Nest will have a stronger basis. 15:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 1792:

No, it's not. The application of a particular style -- which is how wiktionary defines "stylization" -- must be seen in relation to standard English orthography. If we did not take that view, then

1395:

I left because I felt your request was not reasonable. MediaWiki is made to edit actual content, it's no Photoshop pixel design. The place of the bullet is a trivial matter really, just bear with it.

5719:! But not cool that they want to delete it. I tried adding a bunch of fair use rationale and other items. Would be great if you could look it over and maybe check that we satisfy the requirements. 2240:

disambiguation should be added for the sole purpose of enhancing said clarity. Article titles are intended to be unique identifiers, not fully contextualized descriptors. For example, we do not use

1386:

do it myself; you didn't like what I did, but the only alternative you offer doesn't actually do what I want. When I explain that, you wave cheerily and say I'm on my own? What's your problem?

1170:

I appreciate your kind words, but at this point I don't really have the time to devote to adminship tasks (if I did, I should be doing it on Commons where I'm already an admin). Thanks, though!

611:: Female Knowledge editors are less likely to contribute to Knowledge due to gender differences in confidence in expertise to contribute and lower confidence in the value of their contribution. " 9657: 6132: 5247: 3530: 1712:

I'm sorry, I have no idea what you mean. "fun.", as the name of a band, is designed in accordance with a particular style. It is a stylized name, deviant from traditional English orthography.

1464:, the year 2012 in the infobox (for NCAA Tournament) was showing up as red. I do not know how to change the infobox. By changing the name, I simply did it so that the red was gone. My apologies. 4331:

PS ANFI exists from 1934 and is one of the FIRST Feline Associations in Europe. It founded FIFè, the European Association, in 1949 with the French and Swiss associations. You can find its story

510: 5228: 4529:

warmed my heart; I have good memories of getting delicious food from that very shop. I'm sad to hear it's closed, but it's good to know there's a larger one awaiting me nearby should I return.

3666:

contributions Oh I wanted to ask should I contact the Puppet center in Georgia to see if they have information regarding the citation of the creation of Kermit I may try the chat help to ask --

9357: 4188: 2522:. Apparently the frequency with which the form is used makes it common to mistakenly see it as a name, but it's still a mistake. But it is an understandable mistake; I'll give you that. -- 1301:

Yes, one might wish to create two lists with this syntax. But the syntax is going to confuse editors even further. It's not going to be easy to distinguish when line breaks are allowed or not.

10077: 6113: 5038:

I do admit that, Lt. I just wanted to make sure we did not have an influential public opinion leader such as yourself enforcing a non-existent MOS requirement. Sorry to belabor the point.

2017:

for example we could put "properly written as" or so. Or add a tag on top of the article saying "due to sentence structure issues "only" we will be writing the entity as (add new name here)".

5367: 1455: 9374: 7510: 4476: 1753:

Titles and names dont have to do with english ortography. To label something as stylization is original research and suggests that the bame being used is the actual name not the proper one.

1005:

If you can explain the meaning of a title with and without ellipsis, then I might withdraw a nomination, but I must be convinced that removing "..." is not a good idea due to other reasons

9395: 561: 389:

Following your query about scope, and the intervention of two other editors of ice hockey articles, I've made a further general point today about projects and bannering. You'll find it in

9082: 9067: 7547: 4639: 4601:

essay, which has a lot of information on that particular point of grammar. When I refer to this page in edit summaries of "comprised of" fixes, I hardly ever get objections to the edit.

3122:

It's far more parsimonious to have a consistent house style that can easily be applied to any article without having to do extensive research on how other sources format their language.

9220:

As a way of saying thanks, the research team is offering a $ 35 gift card (in your local currency) for participation. We could chat by phone or through a website for audio conferencing.

8440:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. 1272:

First, neither page you list presents a policy; they are both guidelines, and the difference is significant. Even if I were to agree with your interpretation, I was in no way violating

10140: 9492: 9336: 9030: 7495: 5097: 3634:

As I said, I don't think COMMONNAME is the operative guideline. Our use of punctuation is subject to our manual of style, with sources merely informing the usage, not determining it.

2624:. At least as common is "Chittenango, NY". Further, if the context of New York is already established, then it's never qualified with the state, not even in the first use. Examples: 1298:

horizontally or vertically trough CSS, but their underlying structure remains the same. Line breaks produces the same result in each and every kind of list. Maybe I should clarify this.

2786:

has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Mexican-American War". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.

10018: 9803: 9387: 9376: 9349: 9338: 9299: 9172: 8912: 8281: 7651: 6267: 4620: 2761: 195: 4563:

Hello there, I'm pushing to try and get a closure date field added to Video Game Infobox for many MMOs that have closed, and I think I could use your help. I asked for it to be done

3131:

So someone could put in the effort and sift through sources and make a compelling case that all or almost all sources capitalize a title the same way, but you'd just ignore his work

10068: 10054: 10053: 9477: 9015: 8554: 8157: 7581: 7314: 7295: 5994: 4270: 1796:

would be stylization, rendering the term meaningless. It only makes sense to read the guideline as indicating that deviations from standard English orthography should be avoided.

1030:

I have created a page that may or may not be a guideline. This discusses naming a fictional character for a Knowledge article, different from notability of a fictional character. --

407: 9987: 9772: 9269: 9142: 8882: 6169: 4843: 4049:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 3502:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 7965:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you

7735:

and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records.

5975: 4698: 4480:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 3993: 3955: 3299:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 2453:

its name". Since so many placenames in the U.S. are duplicated, it just makes sense to maintain consistency and avoid the endless naming controversies you detest so much. =)

2102:

Look, I gave you a source (two, actually) that describe the name as stylized. I don't know what else you want. If that's not enough for you, then please just leave me alone.

6390: 3519: 2236:, allowing them to know immediately whether or not it is the one they're looking for. While clarity is a laudable goal, it has never been the consensus of Knowledge users that 1434: 7273: 6654: 4045:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3498:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

7385: 5079: 3895:

Gee, thanks. I don't suppose you could at least provide a list of the pages on which you made the error so I don't have to check every page you've edited in the last year?

38: 5705: 1624:

look, if its officially spelled that way? then its not stylization. The only reason why we can't use "fun." is merely because it would cause confusion in sentence structure.

651: 10125: 9551: 8521: 8507: 7407: 6635: 6211: 3413: 2031:

We should not be in the business of declaring what is "proper", and I strongly disagree that it is "only" due to "sentence structure issues". "Stylized as" is standard.

6490:

The future of the Genealogy project on the English Knowledge, and a potential creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input.

5631: 7886: 6343: 4022: 4010: 2790:

is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the

2317:

of your hometown", I suggest the answer is much, much more likely to be just "Beverly Hills", and almost certainly not "Beverly Hills, California". The long version is

506: 4807: 3919: 2313:

they are from, they are likely to reply "Beverly Hills, California", especially if the context is out of state or out of country. However, if they are asked, "what is

8367: 5908:

I am removing your request for a photo of the Disney Springs water tower on the Disney Springs talk page, because I have uploaded images of it to the Commons category

6937: 6630: 420: 9928: 9569: 6765: 5607: 3148: 3113: 3066: 3031: 7598: 6108: 5824:

requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and

5602: 3097:? (Just using that as an example case where it took some time to get people to stop mindlessly applying made-up rules and keep them from creating their own private 8502: 6900: 6473:

in 2008. Over the years a number of articles has been written, with more or less association to genealogy. And, very exciting, there is a proposal made on Meta by

6193: 6185: 5412: 5187: 4693: 3419:

Hello, and thanks for tagging this for notability, back in 2008. The tag's still there; you may want to take it to the Notability Noticeboard or AfD. Best wishes,

2505:

our naming criteria. I don't expect everyone to agree that that's the case, but I do expect others to understand that it's not an unreasonable position to take.

2402:

disambiguation for US states is commonly used in reliable sources... but it's still disambiguation of the actual name of the topic. This usage doesn't make it the

9369: 3840:. Since you participated in this discussion on the rename of Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton, you are invited to offer your opinion at the move review. 2737:

Absolutely I object. Even if I believed we should determine our own punctuation style by reference to sources (which I don't), I don't trust Google Books' OCR.

277: 5505: 4417: 639: 132: 7091: 4792: 9407: 8349:

for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

7719:

for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

7134:

for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

6980:

for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

6881: 6734:

for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

6438:

for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

5926: 5168: 4818: 4526: 2757: 2479: 2297: 1461: 777:

Paul Stella provided me this image for the purpose of putting it on wikipedia as a CC3.0. If he doesn't have authority to do that, than I don't know who does.

2747: 1473: 450: 267:. I personally think the old title is better, but I don't know if the wider community agrees, nor do I know how they would "make that occur" spontaneously. 5279: 3491:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1909:

the original research prohibited by policy. The policy prohibits use of original research in stating facts within the content of an article, nothing more.

1023: 673:, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on 83:

The text was unrecoverable in my opinion. I couldn't make sense of it enough to copyedit it. A proper copyediting would have required a complete rewrite.

9643:

If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -

9457:

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit

8185: 6164: 4034:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 3737: 3487:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1698:

exactly. Do you see now? Of we were to say something was stylized it would be original research. It also suggests that the name is actually "Fun" not "fun."

10094: 9885: 8600: 7365: 7353: 5123: 4951: 4873: 3289: 656: 9114: 6285: 4671: 1438: 618:: Female contributors are less likely to contribute to Knowledge because they prefer to share and collaborate rather than delete and change other's work." 9704: 8792: 8123: 7542: 7439: 7434: 5029:

Well I certainly didn't make the change out of a belief that it was required. You admit it's a closer call -- what else would you like to hear from me?

4714: 4255: 3740:, I award you the Barnstar of Diplomacy. Thank you for being a thoughtful voice of reason in a simple conversation that most would have just overlooked. 2963:

In 2004, someone accidentally created a duplicate article about the supermarket chain, which was redirected to the existing article a few weeks later. —

2545:

In general, yes, it's the word or words by which something is known. Yet "President Obama" is how he is frequently called, but that does make that his

1061: 884:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

5223: 4826: 4038:

if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

349:. If you nominate all 35 at once, everyone who cares about any of these templates will be alerted. If you do them one at a time, it is inappropriate.-- 215: 9913: 9524: 9237: 9062: 7891: 7457: 7441: 7346: 6814: 6523: 6466: 5746: 5470: 4812: 3332:

and the request to move, it appears that the film's official title is "dot the i". Do you want to keep the article at its present location or move to "

2158: 977: 969: 560:

study, which was based on the first global, general survey of Knowledge users, conducted in 2008 with 176,192 respondents using a methodology that had

549: 248:

trumps the consensus of a small group of editors. So if the wider community thinks "Philip J. Fry" is better, then the community would make that occur

9326: 9198: 4989:'s nickname similarly, even though it is based on his first name. Presumably this was done because he was listed as "Bill" even on official ballots. 4568: 63: 44: 9899:

in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers.

8938: 8692: 8299: 7669: 6026: 3773:. I thought he was normally a sensible debater, but I hadn't noted the number of previous discussions that were essentially the same discussion. -- 3246: 1311:

As for creating multi-line horizontal lists, it is currently impossible. I still have to see an example where such a feature would be needed though.

940:

The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

7473: 7239: 6031: 4564: 4282: 4208: 4066: 3771: 2651:

You're not telling me anything I don't already know. I realize you reject that claim, but you seem to think everyone else should too. We don't.

47: 6686: 1810:

False, if we didnt take account of english ortography, then none would be considered stylization. And its still a strong original research issue.

8453: 8306: 7257: 7241: 6395: 6216: 5334: 2867: 1579: 701: 8714: 8648:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

8595: 8174: 5674:, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on 5452: 4978: 1838:

Hypothetical content is what im talking about. It shows strong signs of original research to say a name is stylized based on english prtography.

1308:

clearly shows the bad use of line breaks. The items of the list are intended to be grouped together, and you have separated them into two lists.

384: 293: 10169: 8947: 8828: 7164: 6760: 5651: 5570: 4465: 1078: 1039: 278: 8687: 5970: 5546: 2833:

FYI, it is never "forum shopping" to bump the issue up a step, for example, to go from talk page discussion to RfC, or RfC to mediation, etc.

2163:

I'm curious how you reconcile your positions on these two RMs. Why doesn't your eloquent CMS argument apply to Beverly Hills? I paraphrase:

8015: 7490: 5909: 5727: 5457: 4423: 4369: 3652: 3638: 2282: 772: 670: 10045: 9830: 8118: 8010: 6932: 5163: 3788:

Yes, this has been hashed over multiple times already; I don't see any cause to open another RM so quickly after a Move Review was closed.

3070: 3022:). If you could spare a moment, would you mind doing so? It should probably be filed as a multiple move request, including all the pages at 2484:

Note that your CMS proposal is currently getting unanimous support. If folks like you would just realize that the same argument applies to

630:: Female contributors are less likely to contribute to Knowledge because they have less discretionary time available to spend contributing". 8485: 8389: 7789: 7771: 7744: 7222: 7195: 7074: 7047: 6864: 6837: 6551: 6052: 4699: 3690: 3318: 3242:

that Dicklyon has moved to close the RFC/U, with a summary on the talkpage. Editors may now support or oppose the motion, or add comments:

2153: 2096: 2055: 2002: 1899: 1847: 1819: 1762: 1680: 1594: 1328:. There's no need to extend the table all the way across the page, so I want the (will-be) twelve nominees listed in three rows of four. 1209: 805:

current discussion. I'm flagging all old move discussion participants regarding the new discussion, and your input would be appreciated.

7017: 6192:. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more 5786: 4838: 2678:

Lots of things are called differently depending on context; we tend toward a general, though not universal, context when choosing names.

1101: 9246: 9119: 6569: 6364: 4470: 4250: 3837: 3534: 3180: 2775: 1305: 819: 402: 105: 8819: 8731: 8649: 7833: 7290: 5096:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting 4344: 3600: 2825: 2412:

I suggest a close analogy is specifying one's profession when referring to someone, as in "Lawrence J. Burke, owner of Outside magazine"

2170:

Indeed, just a few days ago, a user moved the page to the undisambiguated title, presumably because this is indeed so routine an action.

1647: 1633: 1180: 9574: 8999: 8979: 8962: 8859: 8810:. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive 8233: 7603: 6996: 4966: 3989: 3899: 3203:

I am puzzled why you wrote this. I appreciate your offer to let me "stick with 'oppose' if want", but I don't need your permission.

3162: 3152: 3126: 3117: 3080: 2806:

Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 22 November 2012.

981: 783: 4943: 4768: 3008: 1044: 890: 766: 376: 340: 9617:

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

9439: 9412: 8672:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 8146: 7974: 7570: 7462: 7262: 6784:

The future of the Genealogy project, and creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input.

5950: 5766: 5432: 5143: 5056: 5047: 5033: 5024: 4993: 4889: 4445: 4054: 3765: 3686: 3507: 3197: 3035: 2133: 2120: 2106: 2074: 2035: 2026: 2012: 1976: 1966: 1949: 1928: 1913: 1880: 1871: 1857: 1832: 1800: 1787: 1772: 1739: 1730: 1716: 1707: 1693: 1656: 1638:

And all stylization is official stylization. But the difference is stylization is for effect only. if its the actual name, then what?

1619: 1605: 1266: 1143: 1112: 965: 858:

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

336:

Well let's at least wait and see what happens to the New York one first; no point nomming the other 34 if this one fails, is there?

271: 8225: 8211: 7676: 7401: 6999:

is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia email list. In order to request the creation of such a list,

2976: 2967: 2937: 2682: 2672: 2655: 2645: 2605: 2581: 2540: 2531: 2509: 2498: 2457: 2443: 2389: 2378: 2304: 622:

A fourth hypothesis likewise tested a conjecture that has been brought up several times in discussion about Knowledge's gender gap:

9960: 9890: 9472: 9430: 9414: 8645: 7970: 7010:, we need to put a request it in Phabricator, and add a link to reasoning/explanation of purpose, and link to community consensus. 5791: 4856: 4678: 3882:

Alright I'll use RIT from now on. If you want the previous pages I've made/edited altered to reflect that I'll leave it up to you.

3792: 3782: 3225: 3207: 2398:

disambiguation and parenthetical disambiguation - the former being much more common in standard usage. There is no doubt that the

2126:

you twice to please leave me alone and you have ignored me; if you do it again, I am going to have to take more drastic measures.

390: 78: 10160: 9948: 9873: 9692: 9512: 9102: 9050: 8970: 8641: 7874: 7530: 7334: 7172: 6920: 6674: 6618: 6331: 6152: 6096: 6014: 5590: 5267: 5207: 4774: 4659: 4499: 4305: 4297: 3977: 3143:

doubt, it remains entirely nonsensical to insist on ignoring the real world out there, the one we're pretending to write about. --

2850: 2008:

I disagree that it needs to be clearer, but if that's all you're saying, feel free to propose a change to our standard practice.

1408: 1390: 1377: 1362: 1353: 1332: 1320: 1289: 1073: 345:

That is my point. If you nominate all 35, more people who are interested in this issue will be alerted. E.g., I never knew about

3905: 3233: 2087:

name, not by personal deduction. Because personal deduction is...original research. Youre not seeing the names in a nuetral form.

796:

Hi - You recently participated in a move proposal discussion regarding articles about zombies and zombie pop culture archived at

87: 8807: 8376:

and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and

5898: 3849: 2741: 1203: 9965: 9750: 9729: 9652: 9450: 8601: 8575: 8397: 8098: 7892: 7752: 7203: 7055: 6845: 5875: 5817: 5526: 5284: 4168: 4159: 4140: 4130: 4111: 3944: 3821: 3708: 3266: 2855: 2799: 2343: 2174:

But here, what is normally routine has been anything but. To acknowledge the point of those opposed, there certainly are other

1558: 1487: 1450: 1133: 1018: 9908: 7973:. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see 4438:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3284: 1562: 1108:

closed, nor have I threatened to raise the issue in the future. So I'm just not clear what you're trying to convince me of.

9007: 8993: 8780: 8772: 5946: 5943:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5762: 5759:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5428: 5425:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5139: 5136:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4754: 4552: 4441: 3239: 2874:, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the 1215: 1195: 1174: 998: 8811: 8795:, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. 6450: 3809: 1506: 895: 10041: 9826: 9322: 9194: 8934: 8852: 8449: 8295: 8110: 7815: 7665: 6794: 6500: 6281: 6207: 5330: 4705:

You participated in previous related discussion. There is an ongoing move discussion, and I invite you to comment there. --

3860: 2923:

Thanks for adding the hatnote. "Wegmans" already redirected to the article, so it should have been included either way. —

2795: 2413: 2070:(I found another at www.examiner.com/article/friday-freebies-fun-offers-download-of-its-debut-cd-and-preview-of-new-one). 1478: 1428: 1282:

As well, if you could provide an alternate method of creating multi-line horizontal lists, I'd appreciate knowing about it.

5921: 2909: 2899: 2821: 2633: 10082: 9618: 9241: 6807: 6801: 6516: 6507: 5675: 4487: 3826: 3428: 3306: 3144: 3109: 3062: 3027: 1531: 1118: 859: 720: 51: 9733: 8727:: I'm not very active on Knowledge at the moment so it's probably best if I was listed as inactive on the WikiProject. 8346: 7716: 7186: 7131: 7038: 6977: 6828: 6731: 6691: 6435: 4093: 3404: 2629: 10105: 9547: 9531: 9391: 9353: 9207: 7428: 6350: 5903: 5821: 5609: 5317:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4071: 3798: 3412: 1574: 735: 478: 433: 359: 313: 10144:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 9932:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 9857:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 9744: 9676:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 9496:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 9086:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 9034:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 8355: 7858:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7514:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7318:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6904:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6658:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6602:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6315:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6136:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6080:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5998:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5574:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5251:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5191:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4643:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3586: 3020: 3014: 2254:

Austria may be unfamiliar with the name; instead we rely on the lede sentence and the infobox to inform readers as to

2068: 556:

article that cited the estimate that only 12.64% of Knowledge contributors are female. That figure came from the 2010

10120: 8844: 8803: 8799: 7565: 7549: 4301: 3923: 8998:

Thanks for explaining. I should have thought of that, because I've contributed photos to Mediawiki Commons myself.

7728:

Dear members of WikiProject Genealogy, this will be the last newsletter for 2017, but maybe the most important one!

5118: 3546: 2625: 1060:. You are being notified since you participated in a previous discussion on this topic. Please join the discussion 8737: 7179: 7031: 6821: 6772: 6530: 6478: 6045: 4719: 4538: 3996:

which may interest you. If you have not done so, please consider contributing to the survey or discussion. Thanks!

3872: 3628: 3023: 2875: 2863: 1250:

After reading these pages, at the very least you should have known you were going against the policy. Did you not?

993: 751: 482: 437: 363: 317: 4926: 4900: 4209: 3757: 3458: 1241:"Line breaks : This method is deprecated as it does not meet web standards and can cause accessibility problems." 462:

Knowledge:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 24#Template:New York cities and mayors of 100.2C000 population

10099: 10037: 9822: 9318: 9190: 8930: 8848: 8579: 8492: 8445: 8342: 8317: 8291: 8197: 8102: 7821: 7778: 7712: 7687: 7661: 7229: 7127: 7102: 7081: 6973: 6948: 6871: 6727: 6702: 6558: 6458: 6431: 6406: 6277: 6203: 5879: 5756: 5739: 5530: 5326: 4735: 4504: 4189:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style § RFC: Proposed amendment to MOS:COMMA regarding geographical references and dates

4031: 3524: 3484: 3042: 2991: 2514:

The strong association has never been disputed. The disagreement is about whether the association constitutes a

1358:

20em ends up being too skinny on my screen, and it includes an unnecessary bullet at the end of the first line.

742:. Adding a link there is a great initiative. If you can advise me what to do, I will gladly get it done. Cheers 522: 466:

Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2012 February 27#User:TonyTheTiger/New York cities and mayors of 100,000 population

257: 164: 46:. You have eliminate all my work without any discussion with me. I inform you that the text is in discussion on 8322: 7692: 7107: 6953: 6707: 6411: 5407: 4615: 3889: 3569:, for Pete's sake. This was one of those *once in a lifetime* storms & unprecedented in collective memory. 1547: 227: 10071:

has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

9896: 9554:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards,

8393: 7936: 7748: 7199: 7051: 6841: 5690: 4591: 4412: 4164:

Just for the record, could you clarify precisely which statement of mine you feel is libelous and/or abusive?

4046: 4026:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3675: 3499: 3479:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1825: 999: 814: 495: 10149: 9937: 9862: 9681: 9501: 9091: 9039: 7863: 7519: 7323: 6909: 6663: 6607: 6320: 6141: 6085: 6003: 5579: 5256: 5196: 4648: 4039: 3611:

I would invite you to reconsider your opposition, based on the significant evidence I have collected that the

3492: 8784: 8216:

I thought that I saw your name in a similar discussion some time ago, but its possible that I was wrong... --

8207:? I don't think I've had any input on that topic in the past, nor do I have any particular expertise in it. 5931:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

5751:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

5417:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

5128:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4598: 4422:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3714: 3704:

I apologize, but I lack the background knowledge necessary to evaluate the quality of the sources involved.

3698: 3648: 3624: 2783: 33: 29: 25: 21: 17: 9740:

That's not for us to decide, and even if it was, my talk page is not the proper venue for that discussion.

8806:. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on 5370:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

4580: 4380:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2882:. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see 2482:. So, to fix all those, there should be very few if any controversies whatsoever, much less endless ones. 2168:

the situation is so commonly encountered that in most cases no discussion is necessary to perform the move.

1337: 10011: 9796: 9725: 9709: 9292: 9165: 8984:. Thanks for noticing. Please note that the coordinates on that file are identified as the location of the 8905: 8621: 8425: 8274: 7912: 7644: 6462: 6260: 5735: 5088:

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the

4316:. If you delete ANFI you should delete all of them, otherwise it would be a geographical discrimination. -- 3442: 2883: 2347: 1552: 921: 5482:

Non notable sports team. Never played in a league that would be notable. Appears to be a pay-to-play team.

3181: 2927: 347:

Knowledge:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_March_12#Template:KS_cities_and_mayors_of_100.2C000_population

284:

Hello LtP. The article is already at the title you requested (somebody moved it this afternoon). Regards,

10023: 9808: 9458: 9304: 9177: 8917: 8567: 8525: 8503: 8461: 8286: 8090: 8038: 8016: 7656: 7020:

where you can support the creation of the mail list with your vote, in case you haven't done so already.

6272: 5867: 5816:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

5808: 5643: 5518: 5474: 5322: 5217: 5070: 4005: 3358: 820: 10075:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

4325: 1721:

Names dont habe to do with English ortography to be a stylized name. That alone shows original research.

953: 330: 69:

It's generally better to copyedit text that you believe is poorly written, rather than deleting it all.

10145: 9933: 9858: 9677: 9497: 8669: 8571: 8094: 7998: 5932: 5871: 5710: 5685: 5542: 5522: 4309: 3967: 3433: 3349: 1768:

Titles and names have everything to do with English orthography. Do you know what orthography means?

8746: 7168: 7007: 4203: 3551: 3353: 9443: 8150: 7958: 7594: 7574: 7466: 7266: 5701: 4780: 4278: 4260: 3574: 3045:. I'd be reluctant to start another one addressing the capitalization of "Over" until that one (and 2731: 2471: 2264:

Considering all of these factors, it's clear that longstanding site consensus points toward avoiding

1543: 1189: 1164: 959: 925: 716: 706: 171: 4571:, and I see that you tried for the same thing. Could we bring this up again and try to get it done? 1222:. I would like to know how you understood these guidelines, so that I can improve them accordingly. 590: 10090: 10072: 9365: 8710: 8628: 8114: 7919: 7810: 7421: 7409: 4914: 4910: 3644: 3620: 3582: 2879: 2475: 729: 175: 8827:

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions

4825:

in which you expressed an interest. FYI there is a similar debate taking place at the moment, see

4399:, has expressed an interest in the property, feeling that it can spark a similar revitalization in 4103:

like a jerk. There's a difference. Your above statements, on the other hand, closely resemble a

3003: 1890:

Youre saying original research isnt prohibited by wikipedia,s policy. What more can i say to that?

968:. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at 95: 9633: 4905: 3910:

Through this way, I inform there is a discussion about partially disambiguated titles, known as "

3886: 3854: 3680: 3660: 3381: 801: 791: 182: 5015:-- the nicknames are not obvious and common diminutives of the subject's given or middle name. 4684:

You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic.

3271:

Per AP RM, I was beginning to think that if I ever wanted to be certain that an RfA etc. was to

2559:

In this case the subject is cities in general, and US cities in particular. For US cities, the

2361:) of this topic is totally unsupported by actual usage in reliable sources. You are conflating 1524: 1517: 1229:

Still, I'm afraid you might have been a little reckless here. Let me quote the first lines from

264: 9601: 8388:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from

8179: 8170: 7743:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from

7431: 7194:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from

7046:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from

6836:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from

6753: 5418: 5211: 4749: 3845: 3817: 3394: 2944: 2870:. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the 2817: 2194: 1139:

Yeah, it took a bit more time than I thought to write the dab page. Have a little faith. =)

697: 500: 474: 429: 398: 355: 309: 8674: 5836:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

5487:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

241:

Hmm... Was there actually a formal move request? Or was it just held on the WikiProject page?

9999: 9784: 9721: 9543: 9435: 9280: 9153: 8893: 8262: 8077: 7940: 7632: 6775:

where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you haven't done so already.

6474: 6470: 6248: 5538: 5339: 5043: 5020: 4974: 4878: 4611: 4340: 4321: 4080:

You should become familiar with them unless you want to risk action being taken against you.

3868: 3213: 2610:

I agree it's not unreasonable to say adding the state is more than just disambiguation; it's

2288:

Because, and I'm certain I've mentioned this before, adding states to placenames is not just

2149: 2116: 2092: 2051: 2022: 1998: 1962: 1924: 1895: 1867: 1843: 1815: 1783: 1758: 1726: 1703: 1676: 1643: 1629: 1615: 1590: 1341: 1254: 1230: 1129: 1097: 933: 916: 253: 232: 205: 8953: 5395: 5359: 1862:

At this point you knew it was wrong from the beginning but now youre choosing to be a troll.

1404: 1373: 1349: 1316: 1262: 10117: 10010:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 9904: 9795:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 9717: 9291:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 9164:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 8958: 8904:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 8653: 8273:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 8221: 8193: 7978: 7643:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7590: 6481:

where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you havnt done so already.

6339: 6259:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5723: 5697: 5403: 5313:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4939: 4922: 4869: 4585: 4558: 4408: 4350: 4274: 3612: 3515: 3054: 2668: 2641: 2577: 2527: 2519: 2494: 2439: 2374: 2358: 2325: 2293: 2278: 1570: 1539: 1469: 1446: 1185: 1069: 888: 762: 747: 712: 647: 518: 289: 223: 59: 7012:

Therefore we need your vote for this now, so we can request the creation of the mail list.

2416: 2067:

I don't see why not; it's simple observation. And if you insist on a source, here's one:

1009:

officiality and a "lousy" (as people called it) premise of treating things differently. --

8: 10086: 9648: 9622: 9468: 9403: 9361: 8815: 8722: 8706: 8683: 8644:, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not 8583: 8106: 8006: 7982: 7796: 7486: 7397: 7381: 7373: 6565: 6386: 5883: 5716: 5534: 5318: 4861: 4803: 4710: 3778: 3578: 3221: 3216:

still exists, but it always endorses closers' decisions. I've made reply to your post. --

3193: 3046: 2809:

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.

2787: 1234: 1035: 1014: 989: 900: 863: 216:

Knowledge:AN#Should_editors_be_discouraged_from_asking_admins_to_justify_their_actions.3F

6752:(In case you are not familiar with IRC, or would prefer some info and intro, please see 3531:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 8#Apparent conflict of guidelines

3441:

Just thought you'd like to know that her DYK is now in a queue awaiting submission. See

9593: 9579: 9562: 8429: 7788: 5114: 4239: 4216: 4001: 3963: 3883: 3877: 3105: 2933:

I thought it might have, but I wasn't sure and couldn't tell from the edit histories.

2765: 2462:

But that argument fails too, since we're only talking about those cities for which the

1905:

Using one's own researching skills to determine what correct English orthography is is

909: 739: 455: 8701:

list of inactive members. You can do so by replying to this message and including the

1325: 9981: 9766: 9597: 9575: 9263: 9136: 8876: 8788: 8591: 8550: 8484:

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from

8249: 8166: 8073: 7770:

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from

7619: 7425: 7286: 7221:

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from

7073:

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from

6863:

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from

6550:

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from

6235: 6217: 5966: 5957:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

5917: 5892: 5850: 5782: 5773:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

5501: 5448: 5439:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

5294: 5285: 5159: 5150:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

4895: 4834: 4822: 4742: 4667: 4576: 4461: 4452:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

4182: 4062: 3841: 3813: 3671: 3452: 3387: 3337: 3323: 3058: 2956:

must manually delete the target page (and the "over redirect" notation won't appear).

2905: 2813: 2769: 2749: 1502: 1199: 1149: 974:

Please add your evidence by October 8, 2012, which is when the evidence phase closes.

874: 842: 810: 693: 486: 469: 441: 424: 394: 367: 350: 321: 304: 74: 8664: 8637: 8605: 8537: 8060: 7151: 6188:, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the 5837: 5488: 2663:

How is it consistent with title policy, then, to specify the state in the title? --

1053: 1046: 845:

because it appears to have no references. Under Knowledge policy, all newly created

577: 511:

Talk:Catholic_Memorial_School_(West_Roxbury,_Massachusetts)#Reverse_or_start_anew.3F

54:. Can you maintaining to present to the group your arguments and opinions. Thanks -- 10030: 9995: 9815: 9780: 9311: 9276: 9184: 9149: 8924: 8889: 8694: 8258: 8141: 8125: 8034: 8020: 7628: 6244: 5854: 5731: 5314: 5298: 5039: 5016: 4970: 4741:

article should give information about the different terms and it does not do that.

4607: 4495: 4336: 4332: 4317: 3983: 3864: 3596:, but I fear it would backfire and it'd get moved back to the "Great Lakes" name. 3593: 3424: 3314: 3280: 2846: 2838: 2727: 2466:

already currently redirects to the overly-long title disambiguated by state (e.g.,

2145: 2112: 2088: 2047: 2018: 1994: 1958: 1920: 1891: 1863: 1839: 1811: 1779: 1754: 1722: 1699: 1672: 1639: 1625: 1611: 1586: 1511: 1437:

and think that you might be interested in joining the discussion on capitalization

1219: 1125: 1093: 249: 8361: 5390:: the slovenly, overfed Viking ]. Hägar is both a fierce warrior and a family man— 2804:

please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.

1876:

If you're going to accuse me of trolling, you're no longer welcome to post here.

1689:: "The process or result of designing or presenting in accordance with a style." 1686: 1400: 1369: 1345: 1312: 1258: 10109: 9956: 9900: 9881: 9700: 9626: 9611: 9520: 9110: 9058: 8217: 8204: 8189: 8184:

Hello. Would you be interested to say your opinion about the issue raised here —

7932: 7882: 7538: 7342: 6928: 6682: 6626: 6335: 6160: 6104: 6038: 6022: 5598: 5399: 5350: 5275: 4935: 4918: 4865: 4785: 4689: 4404: 4361: 4154: 4125: 4088: 3939: 3694: 3606: 3511: 3098: 3086: 2999: 2964: 2924: 2918: 2897: 2664: 2637: 2573: 2523: 2490: 2435: 2370: 2274: 1566: 1465: 1442: 1065: 885: 867: 852: 758: 743: 643: 514: 285: 219: 160: 55: 8668:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

8640:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

8536:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

8059:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

7997:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

7931:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

1610:

that has been clear from the very beginning. You can check the official website.

10007: 9792: 9644: 9463: 9399: 9288: 9161: 8901: 8776: 8679: 8270: 8047: 8002: 7955:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 7640: 7482: 7393: 7377: 7369: 6561: 6454: 6376: 6256: 5825: 5623: 5394:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

5310: 5302: 5091: 4799: 4706: 4199: 4035: 3949: 3911: 3774: 3689:? It involves whether material from a source should be included in an article. 3542: 3488: 3435: 3345: 3217: 3189: 2866:

concerning Mexican-American War, to which you were listed as a party, has been

2716: 2620:(and all similar forms for US cities) is so commonly used that it's a de-facto 1031: 1010: 985: 838: 824: 779: 569: 490: 445: 371: 325: 8424:

Hello LtPowers, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this

964:

An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at

545: 537: 10003: 9788: 9741: 9606: 9555: 9284: 9157: 9003: 8990: 8966: 8897: 8728: 8266: 8208: 8051: 7830: 7636: 6252: 6189: 5860:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

5752: 5511:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

5306: 5110: 5053: 5030: 4990: 4765: 4549: 4534: 4228: 4165: 4137: 4108: 4104: 3997: 3974: 3959: 3896: 3789: 3705: 3635: 3597: 3464:

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rochester International Jazz Festival logo.gif)

3204: 3159: 3123: 3094: 3077: 2973: 2934: 2890: 2738: 2679: 2652: 2602: 2565: 2557:

of your home town?). So the answer to your question depends on the subject.

2537: 2506: 2485: 2467: 2454: 2386: 2301: 2130: 2103: 2071: 2032: 2009: 1973: 1946: 1910: 1877: 1854: 1829: 1797: 1769: 1736: 1713: 1690: 1653: 1602: 1565:. You're receiving this notice because you participated in the last one. -- 1387: 1359: 1329: 1286: 1171: 1160: 1140: 1109: 946: 847: 666: 583: 574:

Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

412: 337: 303:

Yes please nominate all of them. I don't want to have 35 different debates.--

268: 153: 84: 8756: 7827: 548:" has received much attention from Wikimedians, researchers and the media – 421:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard#WP:TFD_deletions_by_admin_User:Fastily

10164: 9610:

will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a

9087: 9035: 8587: 8408: 8352:(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) 7993: 7928: 7896: 7859: 7840:

Orphaned non-free image File:Rochester International Jazz Festival logo.gif

7722:(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) 7515: 7319: 7282: 7137:(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) 6983:(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) 6905: 6737:(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) 6659: 6603: 6316: 6137: 6081: 5999: 5962: 5958: 5936: 5913: 5888: 5829: 5778: 5774: 5575: 5444: 5440: 5252: 5192: 5155: 5151: 5129: 4986: 4830: 4663: 4644: 4572: 4457: 4453: 4313: 4287: 4058: 4027: 3927: 3667: 3480: 3447: 3252:

Please consider adding your signature, so that the matter can be resolved.

2986: 2569: 1498: 806: 408: 211: 70: 8560:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

8083:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

4300:. In Knowledge there are already other associations as ANFI, for example, 3994:

Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Commas_in_metro_areas

3956:

Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Commas_in_metro_areas

2207:

accesses this article would not change in any way, as a search or link to

800:. That proposal was not approved, and a new discussion is taking place at 528:

Gender gap connected to conflict aversion and lower confidence among women

9233: 9225: 8620:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

7911:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

5804: 4913:

is being planned for July 26, 2015. You can find more information here:

4491: 4224: 4220: 3915: 3537:. You may (or may not) want to express an opinion at the new discussion. 3420: 3310: 3276: 2842: 2834: 2723: 2289: 1945:

to choose titles that hew most closely to standard English orthography.

1057: 797: 565: 298: 10014:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

9799:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

9295:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

9168:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

8908:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

8383:

And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!

8277:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7738:

And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2018!

7647:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

6580:

Orphaned non-free image File:JPMorgan Chase Corporate Challenge logo.jpg

6263:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4728: 4513: 1735:

You're still not making sense to me. Is English your native language?

9991:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

9952: 9877: 9839:

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill Gray's Regional Iceplex logo 2013.jpg

9776:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

9714:

She needs to be a member of the Disney Princesses for me to be happy.

9696: 9552:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 9#Rochester RazorSharks

9516: 9273:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

9146:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

9106: 9054: 8886:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

7878: 7534: 7338: 6924: 6678: 6622: 6178: 6156: 6100: 6018: 5637: 5594: 5271: 4685: 4147: 4118: 4081: 3723: 3101: 2995: 8659:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

7988:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

6293:

Orphaned non-free image File:North Dakota Fighting Hawks logo 2016.png

6058:

Orphaned non-free image File:Rochester Red Wings 2013 cap insignia.jpg

5552:

Orphaned non-free image File:Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra logo.jpg

4793:

Talk:Coach Ernie Pantusso/Archives/2013#Requested move 15 January 2015

3367: 3135:? Don't get me wrong, it's good to have MOS:CT as a fallback position 2951:

But note that its absence doesn't necessarily indicate that the title

2335: 2181:

with which this one may be confused, by name. But none of those other

505:

Remember when you expressed concern that the no consensus decision at

9972: 9757: 9658:

Orphaned non-free image File:Roberts Wesleyan College logo - 2016.png

9255: 9128: 8868: 8840: 8433: 8240: 7610: 6226: 5657:

Image tagging for File:Hang in there baby cat motivational poster.jpg

4764:

Thanks for your thoughts and your diligence in improving Knowledge!

4335:. You may want to use Google Translate to read it in your language.-- 4195: 3747: 3538: 3341: 3333: 3329: 2273:

So, I'm curious. Why is your own argument not compelling to you? --

1828:

applies to article content, not to discussions between Wikipedians.

557: 8186:

Talk:List of heads of state of Angola#Requested move 2 November 2018

6766:

propose a new project or support the adoption of an existing project

6441:(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, see below) 1246:"Lists : Do not separate items by leaving blank lines between them." 9223:

If you're interested just pick a time slot from this calendar link:

8652:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 8437: 8362:

list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project

4965:. Such practice is not required by MOS -- please see discussion @ 4530: 4427: 3076:

encyclopedia, would result in an inconsistent mishmash of styles.

1156: 8158:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/We Mean Business (2nd nomination)

6430:

This is the very first newsletter sent by mass mail to members in

5355: 4855:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

4365: 3529:

The topic of an inconclusive discussion that you participated in (

2764:, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that 2762:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage

2269:

any other of its form, and reverse the current redirect direction.

8373: 7732: 7582:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/North American Premier Basketball

5301:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

5133: 2449:

It's more like "it's used so often to refer to the topic that it

1941:

use English orthography when considering article titles. We are

1340:, without any line breaks. :-) Now could you revert your edit at 711:

Check back I have the screen shots for you as a reliable source.

10104:

Hi LtPowers :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview

10027:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 9812:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 9308:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 9181:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 8921:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 7828:"The state of being current; general acceptance or recognition." 7152:

https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-genealogy

2394:

We agree much, actually. I certainly see a distinction between

1853:

Even if it did, that's not prohibited by any Knowledge policy.

532: 198:

and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

10017:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

9985:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

9802:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

9770:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

9542:

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

9298:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

9171:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

8911:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

8280:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

7795:

In your PROD on said article, what do you mean by "currency"? –

7650:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

7274:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Daniel Spivak (2nd nomination)

6540:

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy founder and coordinator

6477:

to found a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, read more at Meta;

6266:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

5681:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

5363: 5229:

Orphaned non-free image File:Procter & Gamble logo 2013.png

4957:

in the lead is required, leading to such silly redundancies as

4373: 2432:

it's used so often to refer to the topic it seems like its name

2339: 2338:, not the "Beverly Hills, California Chamber of Commerce"; the 2245: 1934: 9538: 9267:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

9140:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

7392:

feel free to comment at the aforementioned FFD discussion. --

7366:

Knowledge:Files for discussion/2017 June 5#File:RIT Hockey.svg

7354:

Knowledge:Files for discussion/2017 June 5#File:RIT Hockey.svg

7126:

This is the fourth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in

6938:

Genealogy project need your vote for creation of an email list

6726:

This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in

6356: 6114:

Orphaned non-free image File:Rochester Red Wings 2013 logo.jpg

5615: 4827:

Knowledge talk:Article titles#Stylization of the "common name"

3592:

Baffling, isn't it? I should probably try to get it moved to

2111:

this isnt just about just one article. You tend to lose focus.

194:

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the

8961:. I regret I don't know how to make the correction myself. 8372:

You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at

8341:

This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in

7731:

You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at

7711:

This is the fifth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in

6972:

This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in

6363:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

5622:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

5422: 3095:

some page titles are repeated in boldface, and others are not

2588:

the comma convention should have been instructive: we use it

509:

might be used as some kind of precedent? Well, it has. See

7969:

verify that externally by one of the processes explained at

4848: 3810:

Talk:Deadmaus#Requested_move_3_.28to_.22Joel_Zimmerman.22.29

1534:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

908:

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at

188:

Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

9641:

Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.

7496:

Orphaned non-free image File:Roc City Thunder logo 2013.jpg

7092:

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.4: Mail list created!

5940: 2760:, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, 2350:, not the "Beverly Hills, California Police Department". 1456:

2012 NCAA National Collegiate Women's Ice Hockey Tournament

882:

Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.

507:

Talk:Catholic Memorial School (West Roxbury, Massachusetts)

111: 9068:

Orphaned non-free image File:First Niagara Bank - logo.jpg

7941:

https://cuse.com/roster.aspx?rp_id=1782&path=mlacrosse

4621:

Orphaned non-free image File:First Niagara Bank - logo.jpg

4590:

I saw that you had a minor dispute with another editor on

4292: 3108:

and use the style the reader would most likely expect." --

2994:, hope they're ok for you! (just a great logo, btw! :-) -- 2346:, not the "Beverly Hills, California Public Library"; the 576:- CSCW ’12 (p. 383). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. 10126:

Orphaned non-free image File:SUNY Brockport logo 2022.jpg

9478:

Orphaned non-free image File:Marina Auto Stadium logo.png

9016:

Orphaned non-free image File:Vitamin Shoppe logo 2013.png

8880:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

8475: 8050:

should apply to this version. Not a notable show, fails

7761: 7212: 7064: 6854: 6810:

with the following code: {{User WikiProject Genealogy}}.

6542: 6519:

with the following code: {{User WikiProject Genealogy}}.

6512:

Check the goal, tasks and see if something interest you.

6170:

Knowledge:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

4844:

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

3958:, in case you want to be counted one way or the other. 9998:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

9783:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

9428:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

9279:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

9152:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

8892:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

8578:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

8261:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

8139:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

8101:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

7631:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

7563:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

7455:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

7296:

Orphaned non-free image File:RIT Tigers Hockey logo.jpg

7255:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

7146:

The project email list is now created and ready to use!

6761:

m:Talk:Wikimedia_genealogy_project#Wikimedia_user_group

6247:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5976:

Orphaned non-free image File:RIT Tigers Hockey logo.jpg

5935:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 5878:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

5755:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 5529:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

5421:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 5132:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4864:. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 4700:

Talk:Sexually transmitted disease#Requested move (2014)

4426:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1204:

Talk:Triborough Bridge#This article needs to be renamed

692:

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :).

644:

Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève

640:

Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2012-02-27/Recent research

56:

Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève

9438:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to 8543:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

8066:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

6673: