327:
perfect if we all did as he does, but, barring that, the least we can do is avoid taunting one another. I had not thought you had. Dr.Zen absolutely had. My ill-tempered remarks were meant in reply to those. Apologies if you were caught in the cross-fire. I assume you hadn't invited Dr.Zen's personal attack on me, so you shouldn't have, as we sometimes say, "gotten any on you" when the splatter followed.
318:
authors, and it's the job of Clean Up. An article on VfD is at a deliberative stage. Since all the votes but yours and his were deletes, and all were based on the truly pathetic nature of the article, I don't think I'm very renegade in this. When we do research on a topic to rescue it from VfD, we usually (sorry for the pronoun) make the changes, do the rescue, and
326:
article makes something no different than a white space. Dpbsmith, for example, always amazes me with the way that he will save articles from VfD, but note that he never utters a word about how we all ought to vote keep until after he has done the research and made the article passable. It would be
225:
Who are you and why are you the WikiProject nazi, and why won't you log in so I know who I am being harasased by? I typically am not interested in responding to anonymous people, especially high-pressure ones! Is there some rule I am violating? Please let me know -- but at least have the courtesy to
317:
Keith, I'm sorry about being snippy on VfD. You are, of course, entitled to counter a vote of mine. However, Dr.Zen's personal attack certainly poisoned the water. I profoundly disagree with your view of what VfD does. I don't think it is incumbent upon voters to do research: that's the job of
296:
and its section on user_talk pages in response to your question. I feel that deleting a few comments that have little or not content (such as "I responded to you over here"), or minor comments based on discussions elsewhere (such as "Thanks for doing what we talked about over there") are within the
243:
I think I am aware of what I edit and when. Thank you, now unless you plan to contribute to the project, please don't post messages to me again. I have posted a note about the project to all (US at least) school year pages, hopefully that will spur further interest. A project of one person to me is
335:
The alignment of bullets suggested that your comment was in response to mine. Anyway: Fundamentally I think that if one is not familiar with the subject, the default action should not be to delete. I do think that a lot of VfDers rush to delete when cleanup should be tried first. If it's a obscure
340:
a bad article, then deletion is probably warranted. But a bad article on a valid topic should be pushed towards improvement instead of destruction. And IMO one should not rely solely on their own horizons (or on those with similar horizons to themselves) to determine obscurity. Regards,
140:
to delete the article about the
Bradley Amendment because it was a POV rant. Even though the discussion period has run out, no one's acted on that thread yet. I've completely rewritten the article. I'd appreciate it if you'd take a read through and see if it's now worthy of a keep.
270:
Frankly, after this amount of annoyance I would much prefer not to have a talk page at all. I am deleting sections that I deem not to be useful or relevant to me any longer. If you know of a policy that I should be following that states otherwise, please point it out, otherwise please
244:
not a project -- the point of a project is to collaborate, not for one person to direct. I don't plan to fill the project solely with my own ideas. To date, you have only been harrassive instead of constructive or contributory and it is not helpful. Bye,
559:
Hi. I've seen your comments on a couple of the discussion pages I've been on, and I'm wondering if there might be something I should know about Samboy. Is he some sort of official monitor? He's really starting to creep me
546:
I've responded again on my page to your comments, but based on the many comments on my page, it seems like you've probably already read them and understand what we are discussing.
201:
You are the only participant in the school years project, yet you haven't made a single contribution to it for a full week. What happened?? Did you forget about it??
297:
spirit of fair stewardship of user talk pages as described in that article. I'm not removing critical comments or even constructive ones with useful content in them.
173:
You are creating lots of re-directs. To make sure you know this, I created a category for all 13 articles involving a year of education in the United States called
98:
189:
You are mentioned as the only participant in the
Education project called "Wikiproject School Years", yet you haven't made a single edit today. What happened??
460:
285:
261:
237:
232:
I'm just trying to make sure you know this. I just felt that you might forget about the projects. My User IP just changes a lot for some reason. What is a
218:
178:
202:
190:
427:
137:
69:
today! It's great to see another
Bostonian working on local articles -- even though I guess you're really from the home of Marshmallow Fluff.
260:
Why are you removing sections from your talk page?? Most registered
Wikipedians prefer simply to save them in a page titled "Archive1".
394:
all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the
44:
300:
But besides, anything I do "delete" is available for viewing via the edit history. After all, that is the point of a
37:
156:
430:
Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at
374:
Damn. I used to have to go to
Livejournal for this much drama and argument. I wonder if that's Jason's plan. -
524:
449:
387:
438:
174:
455:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "
444:
391:
196:
33:
403:
76:
if you have any questions about content, procedures, standards, or anything else for that matter.
434:
those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More
Information:
111:
472:
I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
17:
8:
414:
license is a true free documentation license that is similar to
Knowledge's license, the
293:
208:
490:
I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:
528:
515:
130:
312:
128:
395:
120:
Hi. I wrote it myself, as a review, based on the references listed at the bottom.
305:
276:
245:
227:
105:
86:
73:
497:
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "
365:
65:
article on
Government Center -- and congratulations on having it appear on the
561:
407:
121:
463:. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
381:
56:
547:
538:
535:
520:
168:
142:
116:
What is your source for this article? KeithTyler 17:01, Aug 31, 2004 (UTC)
51:
255:
148:
328:
184:
92:
26:
423:
102:
80:
360:
354:
66:
217:
when you focused on updating the education project. What happened??
163:
519:. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. --
459:" template into their user page, but there are other options at
506:
415:
301:
233:
554:
348:
101:
for discussion on reverting all of
Michael's edits.
426:, to use our articles. Since you are among the
322:ask everyone to reconsider. Simply being a
136:Good evening, KeithTyler. On 25 Aug, you
72:Please feel free to leave me a message on
213:This is the first time in no less than
14:
177:. Any improvements to this category??
292:In all fairness, I went and reviewed
23:
534:See my user page for my response.
509:, I would like to know that too.
47:, and, most importantly, have fun!
24:
573:
505:". If you only prefer using the
461:Template messages/User namespace
450:Free the Rambot Articles Project
157:User:KeithTyler/TeX_markup_tests
499:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
493:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
475:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
457:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
226:log in before you do! Thanks,
13:
1:
441:- Lots of questions answered
344:]] 19:49, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
7:
541:] 19:24, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
353:Glad you appreciated it :)
10:
578:
398:Attribution-Share Alike (
175:Category:Educational years
108:21:55, Aug 30, 2004 (UTC)
89:00:01, May 23, 2004 (UTC)
564:04:42, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
550:13:49, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
370:01:40, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
331:03:02, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
308:22:31, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
288:22:20, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
264:22:13, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
240:22:09, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
221:21:50, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
205:13:50, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
193:15:41, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
181:23:10, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
112:COX-2 selective inhibitor
145:01:17, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
97:Hey, Keith. Please see
45:be bold in editing pages
197:WikiProject:SchoolYears
124:14:29, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
38:Policies and Guidelines
513:what you think at my
445:Multi-Licensing Guide
410:if they prefer. The
313:VfD: Just for clarity
99:User talk:Michael/ban
32:Eventually, read the
18:User talk:KeithTyler
439:Multi-Licensing FAQ
294:Knowledge:User page
511:Please let me know
503:{{MultiLicensePD}}
382:Article Licensing
376:
343:
284:I am very sorry.
209:Education Project
131:Bradley Amendment
57:Government Center
569:
418:, but it allows
402:) v1.0 and v2.0
396:Creative Commons
390:to get users to
275:messaging me. -
256:For curiosity...
149:Tex Markup tests
85:
577:
576:
572:
571:
570:
568:
567:
566:
557:
388:started a drive
384:
368:
351:
315:
258:
211:
199:
187:
171:
166:
151:
134:
114:
95:
93:Re User:Michael
83:
59:
34:Manual of Style
29:
27:Welcome message
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
575:
556:
553:
552:
551:
543:
542:
495:
494:
491:
488:
477:
476:
473:
470:
453:
452:
447:
442:
420:other projects
383:
380:
379:
378:
366:
363:
350:
347:
346:
345:
314:
311:
310:
309:
304:, isn't it? -
298:
282:
281:
280:
279:
257:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
210:
207:
198:
195:
186:
183:
170:
167:
165:
162:
150:
147:
133:
127:
126:
125:
113:
110:
94:
91:
58:
55:
49:
48:
41:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
574:
565:
563:
549:
545:
544:
540:
536:
533:
532:
531:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
512:
508:
504:
500:
492:
489:
487:
484:
483:
482:
481:
474:
471:
469:
466:
465:
464:
462:
458:
451:
448:
446:
443:
440:
437:
436:
435:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:public domain
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:multi-license
389:
375:
373:
372:
371:
369:
362:
359:
356:
355:
342:
339:
334:
333:
332:
330:
325:
321:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
289:
287:
286:66.245.74.145
278:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
263:
262:66.245.74.145
247:
242:
241:
239:
238:66.245.74.145
235:
231:
230:
229:
224:
223:
222:
220:
219:66.245.74.145
216:
206:
204:
194:
192:
182:
180:
179:66.245.98.246
176:
161:
160:
159:
158:
146:
144:
139:
132:
123:
119:
118:
117:
109:
107:
104:
100:
90:
88:
82:
77:
75:
70:
68:
64:
54:
53:
46:
42:
39:
35:
31:
30:
19:
558:
514:
510:
502:
498:
496:
485:
479:
478:
467:
456:
454:
431:
419:
411:
406:or into the
399:
385:
357:
352:
337:
323:
319:
316:
283:
272:
259:
214:
212:
203:66.245.29.53
200:
191:66.32.255.91
188:
172:
164:School years
154:
153:
152:
135:
115:
96:
78:
74:my talk page
71:
62:
61:Hi Keith --
60:
50:
424:WikiTravel
422:, such as
306:KeithTyler
277:KeithTyler
246:KeithTyler
228:KeithTyler
169:Re-directs
516:talk page
386:Hi, I've
324:potential
185:Education
67:Main page
63:Excellent
43:Explore,
562:Centauri
555:Question
501:" with "
486:Option 2
468:Option 1
428:top 2000
412:CC-by-sa
404:Licenses
400:CC-by-sa
122:Gzuckier
79:Thanks,
539:Ram-Man
525:comment
521:Ram-Man
432:minimum
336:topic,
215:2 weeks
143:Rossami
52:Jrdioko
560:out.--
349:Jscott
329:Geogre
87:Брайен
529:talk)
138:voted
81:BCorr
16:<
507:GFDL
416:GFDL
367:HELO
361:leif
320:then
302:Wiki
273:stop
234:nazi
155:See
129:re:
103:Rick
36:and
338:and
236:??
548:RM
537:–
527:|
480:OR
377:]]
364:☺
523:(
358:~
106:K
84:|
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.