User talk:Kansas Bear

4973:

was known to have taken bribe from Hastings and would not join a war. Mahadji, himself was anxious that his forces were not divided and separated, which war both in Malwa and in the Deccan would have entailed. Moreover, both Mahadji and Nana faced acute financial distress. Under these circumstances, peace at the most favorable terms was the only course left open. After prolonged negotiations a treaty was signed between Mahadji and Anderson on 17th May, 1782. It was known as the Treaty of Salbai, after a small village of the same name where Mahadji was in camp." M. S. Narvane further quotes that, "The main clauses of the treaty were as follows: All territories captured by the Company would be returned, including Bassein but excluding Salsette and some small islands near Bombay. These would remain with the British. Territories in Gujarat would be returned to the Peshwa and Gaikwad, Bhadoch being given to Mahadji for services rendered. Raghoba was to be handed over to the Marathas. He would spend the remainder of his life at a secluded spot in Maharashtra on a pension of Rs. 25,000 per month. Thus ended the First Anglo-Maratha war. Politically the Company was a slight gainer. They retained Salsette whereas the Marathas got back only what they had lost earlier. The main gain from the Maratha point of view was the elimination of the threat posed by Raghoba." Raghoba is Raghunath Rao. All this information is in the talk page as well. 13:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

4468:"The power of the king of Mysore begins to grow weak because, violently attacked in his own dominions by the troops of Sambogi, he cannot sustain and reinforce the armies he had sent to those countries. The far-reaching consequence of this Maratha war was that Chikkadevaraja was driven to make friendhsip with Aurangzeb. Secondly, there were no powerful chieftains in the Karnataka to whom Chikkadevaraja could look as reliable allies in case of necessity against the Marathas. Basappa Nayak of Ikkeri in Shimoga District was the ally of the Marathas and as such he could not be expected to be the friend of Mysore Raja. Muthuvirappa Nayak of Madura was a weak ruler. More than that he was an ally of the Marathas. Harji Mahadik, a Maratha general of Sambhaji, was still pursuing the people of Mysore from their important strongholds in Madura. Ekoji was also up in arms against Mysore. Under these circumstances Chikkadevaraja was left with no other alternative but to win the support of Aurangzeb. 7079: 10897: 2175:- editors is forbiden to interpret sourced statements in own way. McLynn did not explicitly state that the Mongols lost "several hundred" in this battle, but only referred to the losses in the army of Batu, one of the many Mongol leaders who fought in this particular battle. This misleading part was initialy inserted by a banned user that was in conflict with you. And yes “few” or “several” hundreds: it makes no difference, I didn't quote (these are synonyms) - it’s just wrong to insert into the article what the sources doesen't say. I think there is no need for "noticeboard consensus" about wiki rules? This "few hundred" thing just should be deleted from atricle. 10883: 3290: 11222: 10876: 10869: 1140: 8591:

seem to consider a wide range of possibilities for basically all early Hungarian history (although I am far from an expert on them in particular). It's certainly possible, but a lot of English High-Quality Reliable Sources I've found seem to argue that Hungarians didn't really become a distinct group until they settled in the Carpathians. That certainly seems sensible to me: it's much harder to create a truly distinct culture as a migratory tribe in the steppe than settled in the middle of a mountain range.

4404:

content or recent changes. (Note: when I do notice something obvious, I do fix it of course:-) I realize this style of editing can hide problematic changes, but editors running AWB, bots, and vandalism itself and the associated reverts, all hide bad edits from watchlists. Not that it justifies anything, and your point is taken. Today, I just didn't notice anything but for my distraction of being reverted. Clearly I should have looked more closely at the history in that case, so my bad.

1080: 3065: 1036: 7875: 996: 7543: 12360: 11001: 10891: 10733: 6627: 3032: 563: 1788: 8141:(a scholar). I did check the reverts when you first linked them and found them to be irrelevant to our discussion. I stated my unfamiliarity with the topic of jurists and scholars, not with the reverts you linked. I'm not sure how you assumed that the tone of my question and your response were similar, let alone 'same'. I do not have the time or energy to report anyone, which is why I approached you on your talk page instead of a noticeboard. — 1661: 5514:

Persian maintained its position also during the early Ottoman period in the composition of histories and even Sultan Salim I, a bitter enemy of Iran and the Shi'ites, wrote poetry in Persian. Besides some poetical adaptations, the most important historiographical works are: Idris Bidlisi's flowery "Hasht Bihist", or Seven Paradises, begun in 1502 by the request of Sultan Bayazid II and covering the first eight Ottoman rulers.."

12730: 12515: 12382: 12296: 12185: 11755: 11286: 11130: 11058: 10802: 10191: 9988: 9795: 9095: 8884: 8815: 8713: 8641: 8354: 7921: 7613: 7428: 6686: 6483: 6286: 6133: 5671: 5607: 5029: 4903: 4839: 4535: 4218: 3960: 3358: 3223: 2958: 2707: 2424: 2360: 2066: 1992: 1879: 1731: 1586: 1522: 1253: 856: 442: 300: 206: 105: 33: 1003: 10994: 2499: 942: 3016: 12680:, Bernard S. Bachrach, "Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies", Vol. 16, No. 2, for Ermengarde's marriage(Henry II, Bachrach, page 117) which is stated as 970, cited to Arthur le Moyne de la Borderie, Histoire de Bretagne, (Rennes-Paris, 1898), vol. 2, page 423. Bachrach states Ermengarde's son Geoffrey is born after the death of her brother c.977.( 8590:

sort of connection between them, just given the relative co-location, and somewhat high Sarmatian admixture from historical Hungarian genome sequencing, but they seem to be distinct from each other (perhaps best understood as a steppe equivalent of Migratory Wave Theory?). Most of our present sources

4972:

Thanks, I have added all citations and quotes in article's talk page to explain that the result was a treaty with no particular winner or loser. Including this additional quote as well: M S Narvane in book "Battles of the Honourable East India Company: Making of the Raj", page 63 quotes that "Mudhoji

11438:

I now have access to my copy of 'Anne de France: Gouverner au féminin à la Renaissance' which has the benefit of being a far more recent work (2022) and have looked through it for references to Charles de Bourbon, comte de Clermont. No mentions in the index, nor in a brief flick through could I see

9933:

Tamerlane pursues Toktamish up the Volga River Valley, westward into Ukraine, and then through much of central Russia, annihilating cities and massacring their inhabitants as he proceeds. Among the destroyed cities are both Astrakhan and Sarai, the capital of the Golden Horde. Tamerlane then sets up

9405:

While your busy thinking you are so funny(must be a slow day on Discord), it up to YOU to PROVE the information supports YOUR change. Hence why you have to use the talk page and get consensus. Pity while getting others to tag-team edit war you did not learn about discussion or consensus. Imagine the

6599:

Again. Faulty logic can not replace a source. Find a source stating Catherine's birth year was later than 1428, since I found sources stating Radegund's birth year as 1425. Why are you unable to find any sources for either Radegund or Catherine? Why did you not search for more sources to confirm the

6546:

That does not need any source to say, it is a biology question, because from August, the month in which Radegunda was born according to one of the sources, to December is insufficient to complete a pregnancy. So if you admit that source, and leave open the possibility that Radegund was born in that

5356:

If you are confused about Persianate, well, culturally, they were. If it were not for the Ghaznavids, the Seljuqs would not have created and enhanced Turko-Persian culture. And if you are so ill-informed as to not know about the effect of Turko-Persian culture, I would highly suggest reading a book.

12435:

Well the IP's initial two changes were on 20 July while their latest change was on the 22nd, if they make another change I will ask for page protection. I've ran into more than a few of these types of editors/IPs lately(very interested in dob/dod/dates of battles, etc). Unfortunately these types of

11196:

Not to belittle your concerns, Mann Mann, but I seriously doubt admins could even begin to care what is said on any social media board. Considering the personal attacks directed at me on Knowledge(the non-American comment is actually quite amusing), what is stated on some social media wouldn't even

9677:

Thank you very much! I thought GA articles had to be fact-checked as well. So, that source does not provide any information concerning Mehmed's location during 1452. Cinderella157 did provide some information concerning infoboxes, along with the hows and whys for listing certain individuals. Sounds

6639:

She clearly deflates and miscalculates the percentage of the Azerbaijanis given her own estimate, although she was able to make more advanced calculations. This is a clear case of 1+1=11, so even if this source were 100.0 reliable, I wouldn't feel good about the inclusion of the percentage due to a

4467:

First, Sambhaji the son of Shivaji invaded Mysore in 1682 and perpetrated horrible cruelties. Even though he was bought off by paying tribute, his interference in Mysore politics was a constant anxiety to Chikkadevaraja. The Jesuit letter of 1682 describes the precarious position of Chikkadevaraja,

3456:

Okay. But the article of Seljuk empire, including other multiple articles all mentions Seljuks lost it's dominance after the losing their war in Qatwan to Khitans. The Kara-Khanid who were former vassals of Seljuks became vassals to Khitans. So I see nothing wrong mentioning their decline in 1140's

8551:

As with any non-English source, this information, especially when making these types of(possibly extraordinary) claims, need specific page numbers and quotes. The Hungarian claim seems extraordinary since prior to this addition, Hungarian was mentioned twice in the article and not in connection to

7517:

Are there no modern sources that state the same thing Bury mentions? With as much that has been written about the Roman Empire and Byzantine Empire using modern historiography, I see no reason to use sources so outdated. Granted if someone quotes directly from Gibbon, Pennell, or Bury then I would

7169:

The Guise family flirted with ultra Catholicism as it suited their political ends in the sixteenth century. After reconciling with the crown in 1594, I'm not aware of the family continuing that reputation. That said, they definitely didn't have any Protestants in their main branches (unusual for a

5513:

Persian Historiography and Geography, Bertold Spuler, page 68, "On the whole, the circumstance in Turkey took a similar course: in Anatolia, the Persian language had played a significant role as the carrier of civilization...where it was at time, to some extent, the language of diplomacy...However

5405:

LOL. The Ottoman Empire lasted over 600 years. All you see is the lead sentence of this article. You think an empire's culture might change over time? Check out the Ottoman Empire's culture in the 1500s. The Ottomans used Persian until the end of the 16th century, heavily. This is documented fact.

3142:

Ibn Battuta's reference to Yezid as the ancestor of the Sons of Germiyan, even if it is related by the traveler as a disparaging remark by their resentful neighbors, has thus led some modern scholars to deem the Germiyanids Kurds and occasioned a rebuttal by a Turkish historian: see Mustafa Cretin

4976:

Unbelievable that my above changes, citations and quotes were reverted as I have been told that "You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general." Is that right? If that is the case, a notification would have been reasonable so

12636:

I think you're on the right track, regarding both that the daughter's date of birth is wrong and the Adeles are getting mixed up. The only source for her daughter's dob is Bachrach and in his book he states that Adele(who marries Geoffrey of Anjou) is the daughter of Herbert II of Vermandois(her

10462:

page? If so, I have a question for you, why is the Georgian alphabet written there? if, according to the facts, the Georgian alphabet did not exist then and as you like to say “isnt writble at this time”. The Georgian alphabet was invented by Mesrop Mashtots immediately after the creation of the

10457:

Ok, let's support your opinion that the Armenian language did not have an alphabet at the time of the Great Tinran. But here the point is different, the Armenian alphabet may not have existed, but the Armenian language existed and there is a lot of information even about the fact that Tigran the

7336:

Some editors are here to enrich certain topics(battles, wars) as opposed to bios over French royalty and nobility. French nobility/royalty has been an area I have edited for years since no one had put much effort(ie.sourcing) into it, compared to English nobility/royalty. Oddly, there seem to be

4403:

Thanks. Well, guilty as charged on my part. The first edit of mine last month was part of large effort to sort "Battle of..." type pages. I probably sorted over a thousand at least. I think I've seen this referred to as drive-by-editing. None of the pages are on my watchlist, nor did I check any

2259:

and I got notified because of it. The revert is about some DNA studies. It's not my concern because it needs to be reviewed by the editors who are familiar with DNA and genetic studies. Currently I contribute to another WP project so I don't watch, edit, and patrol topics such as history, ethnic

12676: 8585:

Sorry to be so late to the party; sounds good. A truly exceptional amount of the Balkan part of the Sarmatian history is tied to contemporary ethnic conflicts in the 20th century and beyond, including a number of Sarmatian or other burial sites being labeled as being from the proto-contemporary

5252:

Nope, I am not really working for an "Anti-Iranian" agenda, I am just a wikipedia contributor who is obsverving that Turks are being less represented in Turco-Iranian civilizations. Turkic political entities have always been influenced native bureaucracy or traditions, for example Ottomans were

7292:

Thanks for giving it a look and workover, there's no need to change the names however, I like to keep peoples names unchanged, we don't go around making louis xiv into lewis xiv, nor would we change François Hollande into Francis Holland for the sake of an english readers sensibilities. If for

7321:

I'm glad its not a problem. Fortunately (in some regards, in other regards its a bit sad) my area of work on wikipedia is very lonely, the only other content editors I've encountered in the several years I've worked on these articles are yourself and Robin so I don't encounter many determined

3558:

Okay. I'm not claiming Khitans led to the full decline of the Seljuks but they definitely played the largest and most important in Seljuks decline in the 1140's. I just wanted to include Khitans as main factor of the beginning decline of Seljuks. Because they lose the war, lose Transoxania to

11938:

The article("Battle of Alinja") didn't reflect what had actually occurred. With no siege starting in 1387/1388 there would have been no skirmish(so called "battle") at all. So to ignore a 14 yr siege(which is what this is called by multiple sources) to highlight some minor skirmish is POV

11879:

12000:

I don't see enough evidence to check or block David IV 1121 based on what you've written here, and after taking a brief look at the account, there seem to be some differences in their editing style. Feel free to re-file if you have additional evidence, but I am archiving this filing for

12158: 6016:

In the previous biography Charles Verlinden (1935) based his dating for the Battle of Cassel (22 February) on the non-contemporary Lambert of Ardres, and he did not consider the necrological data. I bases my dating (20 February) on the contemporary Willem of Jumièges, plus a number of

9917:

Second war between Toktamish and Tamerlane (continued): Battle of the Terek River. While Tamerlane is campaigning in Georgia, Toktamish attacks him. Tamerlane drives off his adversary and then pursues him north across the Caucasus. The decisive battle of the war occurs at the Terek

9925:

Toktamish is again close to victory. His cavalry attack the right flank and the center of Tamerlane's army, but some Hordian emirs desert Toktamish and join Tamerlane, allowing him to defeat the left flank of Toktamish's army and then win the battle. Toktamish is driven from the

1202: 7181:

I suspect what has caused the mistake here in this Alexander book, is extrapolating the Thirty Years War Catholic vs Protestants beginning into an assumption that anyone who opposed Hapsburg interests during that conflict was doing so on religious grounds. Which is of course

12637:

grandfather!). I have yet to find any other source regarding Ermengarde's dob of birth. Let me do some digging through Bachrach's book and see if he gives any reference to where he gets his ideas regarding Adele's parentage and her daughter's dob. I don't have access to the

6763:

I do not know what you are talking about, since you have given no details(ie. title of book, page number, quotes). Why not start a discussion on the article talk page, state what you want added/changed in the article and show how your evidence supports said addition/change.

7351:

I've done my fair share of battles, edicts, massacres and assassination articles, but it is true my attention has for the moment turned to sorting out the biography section of the FWOR. I think I have another maybe 30-50 to do, and then I'll return to cover events like the

10500:

In your responses to the participants above, you switched the topic to the Roman Empire and said about the Italian name that it doesn’t exist. Despite this, I will say that today’s Italians and Romans are not related to each other. Even the Italians themselves admit this

11420:

I am looking forward to returning to more bitesize projects, though my library is now approaching the size where no project is bitesize haha. Biography articles that a couple of years ago would have been single footnote stubs, I could now produce several thousand words

8951:

Then, Khalid ibn al-Walid should be removed from the 'commander' parameter. The only commanders participated in the conflict should be displayed there. Khalid didn't participated in the battle as he came as a rescuer. It is not my opinion. It is clearly misleading.

10857: 10330:

The Latin form in the intro should not be there, in my opinion. As for "Tigran Met", how about a note next to it with the note containing the Armenian script and the explanation that this written form was used by "name of source" hundreds of years later. Thoughts?

3143:

Varhk, Germiyanogullan Tarihi: 1300-1429 (Ankara, 1974). The actual circumstances may indeed have been so complex as not to allow for a designation of some of those tribal confederations with a straightforward ethnic marker comfortably recognized by modern readers.

8586:

culture, even when they so very clearly are not (and those labeling them as such were almost certainly aware). Hardly surprising to see such a claim made in Hungarian sources, and perhaps even less so to see it not reflected in English sources. There is likely

5504:, Volume 10, edited by Ehsan Yarshater, Charles Melville, page 437;"...Persian held a privileged place in Ottoman letters. Persian historical literature was first patronized during the reign of Mehmed II and continued unabated until the end of the 16th century. 8044:

but how is Nasimi being Azerbaijani irrelevant when the majority of his works are written in Azerbaijani and it is his works in Azerbaijani that he is famous for? Why is the MOS:ETHNICITY guideline not being applied to poets of other ethnicities from the same

3895:

My problem is with certain editors that think they can bring anything(government websites, personal websites, blogs, personal opinions, et.al.) to write what they want an article to state, especially when third party academic published sources state something

12610:"Europäische Stammtafeln: Stammtafeln zur Geschichte der Europäischen Staaten, Neue Folge, Band III Teilband 1 (Verlag von J. A. Stargardt, Marburg, Germany, 1984), Tafel 49" this source is used on the daughters page for her family descent, should be a table. 5213:

Spuler, B. (1970). "The Disintegration of the Caliphate in the East". In Holt, P.M.; Lambton, Ann K.S.; Lewis, Bernard (eds.). Cambridge History of Islam. Vol. IA: The Central islamic Lands from Pre-Islamic Times to the First World War. Cambridge University

4283:

The problem would be having a first battle of Anandpur occurring in 1700, then a "second" showing up in 1704. On the template I chose the option of numbering all battles of Anandpur. However, if you(or I) want to change the two 1704 battles to 1st and 2nd

11407:

Hi Kansas, Glad to hear you're doing so well! Yes its quite a long project I've been working on since October. I am hoping to publish it before the end of April, though it is far too long to remain as a single article and I will be cutting it into three

4646:

Those of you pinged(and any talk page stalkers), the question, "Is the title "Queen consort of Navarre", a French royal title?". Which also begs the question, is the title, "King of Navarre" a French royal title? My sincerest thanks for your responses.

834: 10303:

OK, I concede that including the Armenian text in the intro without qualification could mislead some readers to think Armenian was a written language as the time. But there should at least be a clarifying note that says "Called Tigran (Տիգրան, also

7170:

family of their social rank in 1560), and it would be incredibly noteworthy for a member of a princely house to convert to Protestantism after 1562, which is when we begin to see a lot of the upper crust of the nobility beginning to abjure (such as

8112:

Therefore, by removing it under this premise, you imply that you do not find the subject's ethnicity to be relevant. If I was wrong in assuming that, then please tell me which other premise of MOS:Ethnicity you were referring to when you cited it?

2914: 6072:

Unfortunately I have only limited access to the study by Tait, but in the GoogleBooks fragments it can be seen that he firmly considers 20 February to be the date on which earl William FitzGerald died, while 22 February for the battle must be a

5253:

highly influenced by Byzantinians but their Turkic part is pretty much represented. But for example, what we see in Afsharids, their Turkic part is literally not being represented despite the empire is originated from the Turkic Afsharid tribe.

12161: 2829:

I have asked questions multiple times on the article talk page which you have blatantly ignored. Then you arrive on my talk page and threaten me and call me a vandal. Now you can stay off my talk page. Continue edit warring at your own peril.

4445:

The source for Martha victory, (Joshi, Pandit Shankar. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, 1657-1689 AD. New Delhi: S. Chand, 1980), has no page number(s) and is unverifiable from my area. What would be best for that article is to methodically use

12621:

going on here. I can't evidence this one, but the fact the women are aunt and niece with each other with the same name and Adèle de Meaux is referred to on her page as Adèle de Vermandois seems liable to cause confusion even for historians!

6065:

France 1994, p. 55: gives 22 February 1071 as the date, referring (note 8) to William of Jumieges (who has 20 February) and Gislebert, Ann. Egmund., Flandria Generosa, and Lambert of Hersfeld (neither of these four mention an exact date).

6985:

Yeah, I'm sure not everything he added was bad. A lot of it suffers from the POV he expresses here though, wherein he claims to be able to determine which scholars are "misinterpreting" the sources and should thus be kept out of Knowledge

10458:

Great and Artashes 1 spoke in the Armenian language, and turned to the Armenian pagan faith and not to Zoroastrianism. And even if you insist that the Armenian language cannot be written, then I have a question for you. have you seen the

6041:- Necrologium Messinis, N.-N. Huyghebaert (ed.), ‘Quelques inscriptions retrouvées du nécrologe de l'Abbaye de Messines’, Handelingen van de Koninklijke Geschied- en Oudheidkundige Kring van Kortrijk, NS 33, 1963-1964, 263-280 (p. 271). 2664:

On 8 May Theodosius I issues an edict imposing attainder upon Manichaeans and depriving them of the right to draw up a will. Renewed on 31 March 382 and applied to every "Manichaean" hiding behind the names Encratite, Saccophorus, and

11036: 7668: 11381:

A l'avenement de Louis XII, ayant une fille et n'esperant plus avoir de fils, elle avait obtenu de Louis l'annulation du pacte qui assurait a la couronne l'heritage de Bourbon, si le duc Pierre II, son mari, mourait sans enfant male

8619: 3559:

Khitans, and had Kara-Khanids changed it's vassalage to the Khitans. You can't just say it one of the number of factor, it is the most important and major factor in 1140's leading to multiple factors of Seljuks decline in the future.

11339:

Nice to hear from you Sovietblobfish! I see you've been busy on a French Religious War article and am quite impressed with your work. I am doing quite well, got a pay raise and getting another one in April, and am on vacation this

11588:

chances to include references with your edit, instead you called Aintabli "so lazy and dumb", compared them to idiots, and accused them of vandalism. None of which were necessary or productive. I'll let the admins deal with you.

9621:

Then do not get involved in matters that you do not regulate and do not know. If you are arguing that Mehmed was there, prove it with sources. If you have no idea about this subject, do not interfere with the editing of the page.

4076:

I would say, from a quick look at the sources in the article, that the result of the battle is disputed. The battle that occurs afterwards involving a Mughal force is a completely different conflict and should be treated as such.

10052:, Richard Vaughan, page 113;"..was happy to extend Burgundian influence over Guelders in these years by arranging for Adolf of Egmond's election to the Golden Fleece in 1461 and for his marriage in 1463 to Catherine of Bourbon.. 12606:

1) The daughters date of birth is wrong instead, just judging by the eye initially, both of Adèle's other children were born in the 970s, which matches a 950 birth. Alternate source (to Bachrach) to confirm daughters DOB would

9864:. That's really a matter of reliability of the sources cited. Plus Knowledge list articles do have same people on more than one article, and one can call it misleading only if sources cited are of poor quality or is unsourced. 2484: 8566:

Thank you, that helps. I wasn't able to pinpoint any translation or whatsoever of those Hungarian-language sources (I don't read Hungarian). I did a quick search, and it seems such claims are not supported by English-language

8117:

Also, in rebuttal to your second sentence, I posted, "I recently reverted the edits of Alihd23, who was adding Persian to articles." which contains a link where Alihd23 added Persian to numerous articles and then I reverted

11869:

Sorry to do all this but the article was created for the Battle of Alinja (1398) and I used Zaza Anchabadze's source for "the Georgian king refused to return the hostages on the grounds that this would be against Caucasian

10360:

The rationale of using a language that didn't exist in written form until the 5th century AD? I actually DID address the foreign language rationale, giving two possible languages: Greek and Aramaic. Guess that fell on deaf

637:

Yes, I have the book. Most of my library is still in disarray, so finding a particular book is usually a bit of a search(hence the "Found it" part). I can tell you the battle of Barevand/Bagavan is listed on pages 102-104.

10379:

Actually, the Artaxiad dynasty's usage of Greek and Aramaic is part of Armenian history. Their religion is also part of Armenian history. The shift from using these languages to using written Armenian is part of Armenian

6012:

The fact that I have a biomedical education does not mean that I am ignorant in the medieval history of my home ground. For my book, I studied all relevant primary sources and literature, which is mostly in French and in

3413: 2762: 9714:

As for your suspected sockpuppet, if all they are doing is page moving, I would say that may not be enough for an SPI. So, you may need to wait for more evidence. Sorry I was not of much help. Stay safe where you are!

5220:

Then you go to Encyclopaedia Iranica and cite Bosworth. So you accidentally changed Persian to Iranian, added Iranian academicians, and then used a source not associated with that paragraph? That is one hell of an

2920:

This appears to be outside my area of "so-called" expertise. Might I suggest Page Protection? Have you started a discussion on the talk page? If said editor continues to edit war, you may have to contact an Admin.

9156:

I deleted anachronistic flags, where the image itself states 1918. I also deleted mention of Ozanian, from infoboxes, where said individual is not mentioned in the article. Feel free to take your concerns to this

8083:

So yes, you did question my neutrality and even after I gave you a link to check what another POV pusher was adding you ignored that as well. I responded in the manner in which you spoke, so do not act like I did

9509:

Really, near Albania? How? Probably by means from that time period? Then prove Mehmed was elsewhere when the campaign was executed and then request a page move to something like "The Ottoman Albanian Campaign of

1338:

If I were interpreting anything, I would say Davies is stating a Russian victory, yet oddly I have not added Russian victory. On page 172, Davies is referring to the siege of Chyhyryn and not the war itself as a

1328:

by this test the first Muscovite-Ottoman War could be said to have ended on terms advantageous to Moscow, terms won through the action of the Muscovite and Left Bank Ukrainian armies following the destruction of

3441:

Is not completely correct, since it ignores Sanjar's capture and the continued Ghuzz incursions. Also, I would suggest bringing sources you have actually read and not something you have read in another article.

7154:

In the case of Urban VIII, many pope articles were literally copied from Encyclopaedia Britannica. The number of mistakes I have corrected from Encyclopaedia Britannica references on Knowledge are innumerable.

2639:

By p. 113 I can preview "An even more strictly worded edict against the Manichaeans was issued by Theodosius (31 March 381)". Does this continue and refer to the decree of 382 mentioned frequently in tertiary

7716:

An opinion of a medical doctor from 1879? No, I would not use it. Who is Georgi Vasilev? Another medical doctor? You want to write, "L.P. Brocketts, a medical doctor, called the Bogomils, "early protestants"?

9034:

Got it. But " "According to Muslim sources, after three of their leaders were killed, the command was given to Khalid ibn al-Walid and he succeeded in saving the rest of the force" shouldn't be considered?

3270: 2544: 586: 11439:

any mention of him that might have escaped the index. Of course doesn't mean he didn't exist, might just be too tangential to the authors study of the queen given he isn't supposed to have made it past 22.

11995: 9018:

According to that, Khalid made peace with the Hirans provided they delivered Karamah to him. ... in them. Then he went away, saying "When I fought on the Day of Mu'tah, nine swords were broken in my hand..

7816:

Neither has a page number and the link to a page in the Paul Joseph source does not present the incident as a battle. Axworthy mentions Chenab once and mentions ".. attacks by Yusufzai tribesmen.", but no

5799: 1325:

Warfare, State, and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500-1700, page 170;"Furthermore, already from late 1677 Moscow's primary objective in the war had become the protection of Kiev and the Left Bank, and

6970:

After removing those entries, the navbox should be removed from their articles too. However, if some of them are really Hun, then maybe it's not a bad idea to keep their entries (useful for the readers).

6069:

Douglas 1967, p. 225: gives 22 February 1071, referring (note 48) to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (no exact date), Orderic Vitalis (20 February) and J. Tait (1927) for a discussion of the date of the battle.

5899:

Third, you removed a university source stating "Removed obsolete literature: Douglas"(when you added sources dated 1846, 1891, 1904, 1851, 1879, and 1840!) clearly your "idea" of "obsolete literature" is

3116:

Well the sources presented check out. As for "first-hand sources", Knowledge is written using reliable sources. So, if those sources presented are deemed reliable then there is little anyone can do about

6591:

So if you admit that source, and leave open the possibility that Radegund was born in that year, you automatically have to accept that Catherine was born after 1428, because she leaves you no room to do

6020:

The date of 20 February (x. kalendas Martii, dominico septuagesime) for the Battle of Cassel is mentioned by Willem of Jumièges, the first chronicler to described the battle, working in the early 1070’s:

2479: 11183:

Meh. I'm not really involved with reddit, discord, twitter, or other social media. I have seen reddit posts claiming I'm a French nationalist and/or Kurdish, while some silly little sockpuppet stated, "

7307:

Honestly, I have no problems with that(leaving the names in their original French spelling), but it only takes a few determined editors to cause a stir on the article talk page over naming practices. --

6023:- Willem of Jumièges, Gesta Normannorum Ducum, E.M.C. van Houts (ed.), The Gesta Normannorum Ducum of William Jumièges, Orderic Vitalis, and Robert of Torigny, vol. II, Clarendon, Oxford, 1995 (p. 146). 12350: 8196:: Seyid Əli İmadəddin Nəsimi, سئید علی عمادالدّین نسیمی; c. 1369/70 – 1418/19), commonly known as Nasimi (Nəsimi, نسیمی), was a 14th and 15th century Hurufi poet. He is regarded as one of the greatest 7828:

All the other sources for that sentence are not Western sources, and one is cited even twice(#5 & #6):Bhangu, Rattan Singh (1914). Panth Prakash Vol.2 English Translation. Bhangu 1914, p. 127-129.

12351: 9472:

Because where and how the war was fought is unknown. It is only known as the first army that Mehmed sent to Albania. No source says that Mehmed took part in this war. Even the Knowledge description.

9260:

I find that your edit on the Battle of the Trench removed numerous references(Watt, Brockopp, Lapidus, Qureshi, Hoyland, Buhl/Welch(Encyclopaedia of Islam), therefore I will not be reverting my edit.

7759:

I'm glad you're tackling this project, I would entirely lose myself in something as big as trying to encapsulate the numerous facets of the Catholic Ligue from its various factions to manifestations.

160: 11351:

L'annee 1498, le jeune fils de ce Duc, nomme Charles de Bourbon, & communement appele le comte de clermont(2), lui mourut, &, par sa mort, causa une grande tristesse en la Maison de bourbon.

5297:

do you measure that, your personal opinion? Excuse me if I do not believe what you are posting here. When "someone" ignores multiple origins covering numerous groups of people while presenting only

12261:. Most appear to be Turkish/Azerbaijani government sites or blogs. One is an unpaged reference to an outdated work by a man(Hommel) that's been dead since 1936. I see nothing of value in your edit. 6835:

needs some cleanup too. I have stopped adding it to the related articles because some entries seem like dubious/questionable. Feel free to remove them. Plus the "Wars" could have wrong chronology.

6101: 11956:. Three times you've tried to distort the article. Consider this your last warning. Next time, I'll contact an admin. The evidence I have right here on my talk page is enough to get you blocked.-- 10937: 6111: 12761: 12745: 9826: 9810: 9700: 6164: 6148: 3502:

The Seljuks not only lost the war but also lost it's it's territory and former vassals. Which is obviously a huge blow to Seljuks. Only after that did the Khwarezm empire took over the Seljuks.

3482:

The Seljuks not only lost the war but also lost it's it's territory and former vassals. Which is obviously a huge blow to Seljuks. Only after that did the Khwarezm empire took over the Seljuks.

2738: 2722: 245: 237: 221: 11633:. No thanks. I have no need to interact with someone so belligerent, they can't even added references when they edit. Done here. Don't post here again. Further posts by you will be deleted. -- 11161: 11145: 10833: 10817: 10222: 10206: 7652: 7644: 7628: 6733: 6717: 6701: 6514: 6498: 4249: 4233: 3397: 3389: 3373: 3254: 3238: 1617: 1601: 1553: 1537: 887: 871: 473: 457: 9242:

This sentence is supported by Buhl & Welch(Encyclopaedia of Islam) and Bernard Lewis. It appears you have removed this similar information from the Battle of the Trench article, as well.

7293:

whatever reason quantity of english books supercedes naming people accurately, which I don't think it should, I'm pretty sure François and de bourbon are used in a majority of them as well.

7129:

In 1627, when there was no male heir to the ancient Gonzaga line of Mantua, he actually supported the succession of a Protestant, Charles Gonzaga, Duke of Nevers, over the Habsburg claimant.

11089: 11073: 10019: 10003: 7467: 7459: 7443: 6317: 6301: 3999: 3991: 3975: 3531:

Sultan Sanjar stayed in power in eastern Iran, ruling there from 1097 and serving as supreme sultan from 1118 to 1157. But his death ushered in the full decline of the Seljuq state in Iran.

2989: 2973: 1284: 1268: 331: 315: 12777: 12546: 12530: 9126: 9110: 7363:

Eventually it is my ambition to write articles for the individual wars in the FWOR, however that will be a formidable prospect, that I am putting off until everything else is above board.

5702: 5686: 2455: 2439: 136: 120: 4737:, but didn't see anything that shed light on the question. I don't have a good handle on what constitutes an "official" royal title, nor on how such titles were recognized historically. 12753: 11786: 11770: 11317: 11301: 9818: 8385: 8369: 7952: 7936: 6725: 6156: 4870: 4854: 4566: 4550: 2730: 2595:

about? It would appear said source did not support your edit? And why did you restore said information with a questionable online tertiary source when you could use Lieu, Samuel (1992)

1967: 1910: 1894: 1762: 1746: 229: 10405:

anachronistic form of any language can be used on any individuals, dynasties, etc. All one has to do is claim these individuals, dynasties, are part of their history. This would be an

12413: 12397: 12327: 12311: 11153: 10825: 10214: 8915: 8899: 8846: 8830: 7636: 6709: 6665:

The second editor responded twice, stating that the estimates vary widely and this is from a scholarly journal, but they wouldn't be against removing it, if it's indeed a fringe view.

6506: 5638: 5622: 5060: 5044: 4241: 4091:

right! If you would like, you can fix the article, might need new section for result of the battle as well. Or I can work on it once I get time after shoveling snow from my driveway.

3381: 3246: 2930: 2391: 2375: 2097: 2081: 1609: 1545: 879: 465: 166: 64: 48: 6936:

Ah, yes. That’s where most of his 75 articles are linked, so probably there are problems. For one thing, I think the idea that some of those individuals are Huns is sort of dubious.—

12216: 12200: 11081: 10011: 8937:

Per the Template:Infobox military conflict, states that only X victory or Inconclusive be in the result section of the infobox. Your opinion that it is misleading, means nothing. --

8744: 8728: 8672: 8656: 7451: 6309: 5284:

Nope, I am not really working for an "Anti-Iranian" agenda, I am just a wikipedia contributor who is obsverving that Turks are being less represented in Turco-Iranian civilizations.

4934: 4918: 3983: 3849:

Odd how all your sources/information/articles are not supported by any sources in Western academia. That is why articles should be written using third party(ie. neutral) sources. --

2981: 2281:

Looks like a sockpuppet. Their revert was of your revert back in October of 2020! They can take their concerns to the talk page. Would be a good idea to notify Beshogur, as well. --

2189:

Sorry, but unless the noticeboard states that the McLynn source is unreliable, it has to stay. It would be this way with any source. My like or dislike of a source is immaterial. --

2023: 2007: 1276: 323: 5260:

a Persian dynasty at all, their origins were Turkic, and even the article itself doesn't call them Persian. Also topic is not even researchers from Cambridge History of Islam here.

12538: 9834: 9118: 8525:

The second source(Az antropológusok álláspontját támasztja alá a magyarság őstörténetével kapcsolatos legújabb genetikai kutatások eredménye), has no author, and also needs to be

5694: 5357:

Hell, even on Turkish Knowledge the Great Seljuk Empires translates to virtually the same thing in the Lead sentence, and yet English Knowledge's version continues to be attacked.

3045: 2746: 2447: 928: 576: 128: 11835:

the article to emphasize a minor skirmish which occurred during a siege that lasted over a decade?? Using an unreliable source(Zaza Anchabadze), blatantly ignoring the fact that

11778: 11309: 10841: 10230: 8377: 7944: 6741: 6522: 4862: 4558: 1902: 1833: 1754: 481: 12405: 12319: 11889:

also when i asked for a discussion i wasn't trying to change to georgia victory and etc, if you don't want to discuss ok then i was just trying to expand the Siege of Alinja..

11097: 8907: 8838: 6325: 5630: 5052: 2383: 2089: 1292: 56: 7337:

plenty of sources in English for French nobility, so I do not believe that is the problem. Anyway, I am glad you are here. If you need anything, as always feel free to ask.--

12208: 9134: 8736: 8664: 5131:

Kansas, I have accidentally added the reference to the end of the paragraph instead of the first sentence. Editors could make mistakes, nobody is perfect writer. You should

4926: 2463: 2015: 144: 9528:

How can I prove something that doesn't exist? Shouldn't you be proving that Mehmed was at war by providing me with resources? Aren't you a moderator? Why don't you search?

4775:

I suggest you refrain from accusations since you clearly do not understand English. Read MOS:BIO. The next accusation will get you banned from my talk page and reported. --

11794: 10780: 9729:

That sounds terrible! I shall take your advice and wait, I suspect if there is grounds for one, a more experienced and well versed editor will make the first move anyway.

9333:

I honestly do not care who won the battle, but you can not change information, in a GA article, using 3 Turkish sources while ignoring what the rest of the article states.

3524:

MalikShah also died in the same year, not long after his Persian vizier. His death marked the end of stability in the Seljuq Empire and the beginning of a gradual decline.

960: 10745:

Yes, it is unsourced information. Knowledge pages(existing or otherwise) can not be used to reference other Knowledge articles. I see no reason for said information. --

5752:

It may be quite some time before I can do anything relevant in that particular area. You might drop Erminwin, Ermenrich, and HistoryofIran a note on their talk pages. --

5410:

reason the Ottoman Empire is not called a Persianate in the Lead is because the empire last 600 years and its culture changed from a Persianate to using Ottoman Turkish.

3010: 2231: 1453: 72: 12224: 12151: 8752: 8680: 6987: 5896:

Second, Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Robrecht de Fries. Graaf van Vlaanderen, held van Holland, Omniboek, Utrecht, 2022, appears to be a book written by a medical professional.

5528:

I don't want to replace the article, I want to support the article with my work on developing the encyclopedia. You could give your proposals at my talk page though.

5432:

What should it say? Where should it state "Turkic"? Exactly, how was the Afsharid Empire Turkic? Government? Culture? Language? Religion? Origin is already mentioned(

3899:

My problem is with editors that drag another editor's ethnicity(believed, suspected, stated) into an issue, instead of arguing the facts/sources/issues of the matter.

6079:

I would like to modify the Wiki-page on the Battle of Cassel (1071) on the basis of my research and my expertise on the subject. Please stop interfering. Thank you.

4958:

You should try and get all the facts on the talk page and start a discussion, to avoid edit warring. I will do some digging when I get home from work later today. --

3867:

Faruk Sümer is a historian from Turkey. There are many who use his sources in the articles of the Qaraqoyunlu state anyway. Muhsin Bahramnejad is Iranian, I think.

261: 6038:- Necrologium Insulensis, E. Hautcoeur (ed.), Documents liturgiques et nécrologiques de l'église collégiale de Saint-Pierre de Lille, Picard, Parijs, 1895 (p. 305). 3629:

Ibn al-Athir's bleak picture of the Seljuk Empire after Malikshah's death is replicated in much modern scholarship. The period is characterised as one of 'decline'.

3613:

You can't just say it one of the number of factor, it is the most important and major factor in 1140's leading to multiple factors of Seljuks decline in the future.

12642: 10552: 10478: 10459: 3275: 3201: 2901: 548: 420: 9648:, since you want to change what a GA article states(to repeat what I have said 4 times now). Judging from your lack of understanding, you should not edit English 7974:

MOS:Ethnicity. Also, most of the articles where you added Persian did not have any mention or references supporting Persian ethnicity in those articles.(violates

5571:

Heh, I mean it wasn't really hard to predict an editor is going to present a new version to the article & community when you already see it on his userspace.

2511:

Reviving an old classic. For lifting often impenetrable fogs so as to clear the skies, tirelessly and for countless years. Keep up the great work! Best wishes,

10275:

Whilst ignoring the facts that Armenian was not a written language during his reign, that the language used at his court was Greek, and he minted coins in Greek.

7366:

I feel confident I can always look to you when I have problems with sourcing information, as you appear to have a formidable library and the will to apply it :)

954: 949: 12136:

If the editor is obsessed about battle figures, simply post the figures for the battle along with the references on the article talk page, and go from there. --

9391:

I have openly expressed my opinions on the talk page. The rest is up to you. If you have any other issue in your mind (about the Targovishte war), you can ask.

11584:

You've had the opportunity to change the situation, instead you chose to continue to edit war. You could have added reference(s), you chose not to. You've had

6647:

Her seemingly-biased tone, such as the use of "alias" regarding the name of the Azerbaijanis, as if it's a criminal case. Plus, previous points of Beshogur at

4803: 189: 165: 11509: 10954:

Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way.

10252:

Why should we include a written form of Armenian for any King of Armenia whose name was never written in Armenian and never used the written form of Armenian?

7096:

Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way.

6059:

Now let’s have a look at the three ‘university sources’ that you came up with. I did not look at them before, since they only mention the battle very briefly.

5833:

Their bastard brother Henri, d'Angouleme, grand prieur of France, wrote sonnets that circulated in manuscripts, including one set to music by Farice Caietain.

4790: 11189:" All of which just proves their ability to do factual research is inept and puerile. No wonder they can't do historical research! I guess all my editing on 10764: 4665:

Neither title is a "French" title prior to 1620, when Louis XIII incorporated the kingdom of Navarre (what was left of it) into France. For a reference, see

2876:

No need to ping me on my talk page. I have responded. The only issue is Mehta, and properly referencing the gov.pk source(page number(s), title, author). --

12674:

Adeles of Vermandois!!! Despite this fact, Bachrach assigns Adele(daughter of Robert) to Herbert II of Vermandois! Bachrach cites his own journal article,

8307: 8275: 3809: 2906: 2044: 408: 3722:

You have not presented any source(s) that proves your edit. I have presented multiple sources that states difference reasons for the decline, you are now

11468: 4385:

I do find it odd that you did not notice either change by either IP, both which removed referenced information. Either way, the issue had been fixed. --

3803: 12343: 4142: 1569: 396: 12603:

What a puzzling state of affairs, but McKitterick is a historian I am familiar with by reputation, should be reliable for Adèle's DOB. New hypotheses:

8260:

I strongly suggest using the article talk page. Present your evidence(sources, quotes, page numbers) and get consensus for change(s) to the article.--

4815: 7776:

Well, considering everything I have going on irl and online, it may be some time before I work on the Catholic Ligue. Thanks for the offer though! --

6180: 715:

I recently obtained full, permanent access to most online databases (including most publications of Brill) through my university. That means no more

7489:

I honestly can not recall using any of Bury's Roman history works. My understanding is sources of that age should only be used when quoted directly.

4321:

I saw the change you made to the template, and its absolutely fine. But would it be possible to change the title on the article as well to include

3077:

Thank you for bringing many medieval people back by making valuable work! Iʻm so thankful youʻre improving the articles and I hope youʻll continue!

2801:" However, explaining to an editor the consequences of violating Knowledge policies, like being blocked for vandalism, is not considered a threat." 10289:

Sure. We can use Greek, since Tigranes the Great used Greek on his coins. Unless you want to use Aramaic, which was also used on Artaxiad coins. --

9743:

The first move did not take long to arrive, the account has now been banned as a sockpuppet of LouisPhilippeCharles. 22:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

1505: 374:

I have just realized that I misunderstood your last remark. I thought you had withdrawn the request for the review. Sorry for my misunderstanding.

6657:

The journal she was published in is run by Garnik Asatrian, her mentor and colleague, which may explain some aspects of the article to be ignored.

3937: 3858: 3832: 3104: 1827: 623:

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I understand x). I mainly need the source to expand Armenian-related articles, including the Bagravand one I guess. --

6106: 6080: 5585: 4201: 3943: 3341: 2690: 1961: 1952:

which, if you took the time to read it, explains everything. So all your "normal and logical" nonsense, means nothing. Do not post here again. --

1941: 6793:, which was created by Giray Altay. Similar cherry-picking of information, ignoring what was actually stated by sources, Stonewalling, etc, etc. 6053:- Lambert of Ardres, Historia comitum Ghisnensium et Ardensium dominorum ab anno 800-1203, I. Heller (ed.), MGH SS XXIV, 1879, 557-642 (p. 575). 3195: 2198: 2184: 2166: 10372:

monarchs are, regardless of language or religion, part of Armenian history and much has been written on them since the 5th century in Armenian.

8793: 7686: 6844: 3756:

I would suggest reading the information and references I have presented here. Judging from your continued comments, you have not read anything.

3206: 2039: 1236: 839: 10606:

In your responses to the participants above, you switched the topic to the Roman Empire and said about the Italian name that it doesn’t exist.

4195: 11363:

C'est ce petit Prince qui est represente avec sa mere & sa soeur Suzanne dans le vitrail de Sainte Catherine de la cathedrale de Moulins.

10621:" I don't see any reason to continue a conversation with you after your attempt to twist what was actually said in the previous conversation. 9150: 8410:

has done quite a bit of good work in battle articles. I am, however, uncertain if their interest runs as far as WWII. Never hurts to ask them

7833: 6538: 6382: 6029:- Orderic Vitalis, Historia Ecclesiastica, A. le Provost (ed.), Orderici Vitalis Angligenae, vol. II, Renouard, Parjs, 1840 en 1845 (p. 235). 4822: 4656: 4176: 2407: 647: 632: 618: 601: 425: 283: 12112: 8966:

No, Khalid ibn al-Walid was with the army and after the last leader was killed, took command and led the army away. He did not arrive later.

4784: 4768: 1225: 9458:

Then why is it called Mehmed II's Albanian campaign? Even Turkish Knowledge calls it that! "II. Mehmed'in ilk Arnavutluk seferi"! Weird. --

7851:

Thanks very much for your time and valuable response. I'm wondering if this event is notable enough to merit a Knowledge article or not.~~

5551:. In response you ignored all of them and starting writing virtually the same article in your sandbox. So much for offering "proposals". -- 4518: 4362: 2941: 2885: 2871: 2853: 2839: 2816: 2796: 2676: 2343: 1648: 1459: 1439: 1394: 801: 88: 2634: 2608: 2582: 2564: 1373: 1353: 983: 542: 183: 12729: 12514: 12381: 12295: 12184: 11754: 11285: 11185: 11129: 11057: 10801: 10190: 9987: 9794: 9187:

By the way, the user seems to qualify for number 4 of your "How to tell if you are dealing with a disruptive IP/editor" on your user page

9094: 8883: 8814: 8712: 8640: 8353: 7920: 7612: 7427: 6685: 6482: 6285: 6132: 6116: 5670: 5606: 5028: 4902: 4838: 4534: 4217: 4130: 3959: 3357: 3222: 3022: 2957: 2706: 2423: 2359: 2329: 2315: 2290: 2276: 2243: 2065: 2049: 1991: 1878: 1730: 1714: 1585: 1521: 1497: 1484: 1463: 1252: 1173: 1064: 855: 761: 695: 677: 553: 441: 299: 205: 104: 32: 9233:

Muhammad initially spread his new religion in Mecca, where he found no opposition from the local people until he attacked their beliefs.

8510:

The first source, by Magdolna Sz. Kispál can not be any more modern than 1984, the year they died. Therefore their sweeping statement, "

8288:

No. This is my talk page. Articles have tabs at the top of their pages(at least on the computers I use). There is a tab that says talk.

6431:

Ok. I am not too worried, it just made it sound like he existed during Sumerian times(to me at least). No problem. Stay safe Throast! --

5974:, your IP? The ones you failed to use an edit summary? And why use non-English sources when 3 university sources have been provided?? -- 5166: 5135:

and warn people at talk page of the related article or userspace to support the encyclopedia writing if you see a mistaken information.

5000: 4986: 4967: 4712: 4512: 4491: 4352: 4338: 4313: 4297: 4153: 4100: 4086: 4058: 4044: 4030: 3335: 3170: 3154: 2587:

I think we should avoid primary source(s) for this information and try to find secondary source(s) for it instead. Especially since the

1196: 1124: 828: 10427:

No idea who that is. Outside my area of interest. Although, I have yet to find a Roman emperor with the Italian version of their name.

7171: 4741: 4470:" --The Mysore-Mughal Relations (1686-87), B. Muddacharia, Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Vol. 29, PART I (1967), 168-169. 3308:

Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free.

1862: 1856: 1838: 1361: 1308: 1097:

Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free.

1026: 512: 383: 369: 12443:

Hope you are doing well, Sovietblobfish. I highly recommend watching the "Twisters" movies if you do that sort of thing. Stay safe! --

11190: 9267:

For the date of the battle, the Hadith of the battle taking place in Shawwal 5 AH was used as the evidence for the date of the battle.

7147:

I will remove the "protestant" part from the Urban VIII article. If Charles' religious views were so prominent in his life, I suspect

4427: 4413: 4394: 3902:

My problem is with certain editors that think other editors are just like them, editing to promote a specific ethnicity, nation, race.

3772: 3705: 3676: 3602: 3549: 3491: 3451: 12684:, Bachrach, page 14) If it took more than seven years for her to have her first child, how old was Ermengarde when she married Conan? 7357: 6269: 5012: 4886: 4690: 3909:

of the history of a region they are editing, instead simply adding what they have been told(either in school or by their government).

1975: 16: 6990:(he said somewhere he always only added those etymologies that made sense to him and ignored the others, but I can't find the quote) 3086: 2533: 12053: 12011: 11333: 6466: 3784: 2305: 1447: 913: 12662:

In searching Bachrach's book, he clearly equates Adele as daughter Herbert II, also, his citation for Adele being in her thirties(

8071:

I am simply stating what I have observed. I am not familiar with Alihd23 or the topic area in which you have reverted their edits.

6347: 5181:

So you were given a "good-faith" warning without it even being on your talk page, unlike the other numerous warnings you have had.

4991:

Sorry MehmoodS. The latest interrogation has convince me that I am not needed here. I wish you well in your editing. Take care. --

3681:

You used a source that talks about Seljuk's ultimate decline and was due to multiple factors. But not a single source about the

908: 12713: 12708: 12240: 9778: 5903:

Fourth, I would suggest bringing secondary sources to the article talk page, instead of using outdated and unreliable sources. --

5654: 5205: 523: 347: 10858:

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

9963: 9949: 9903: 7670: 5421:

Afsharids, their Turkic part is literally not being represented despite the empire is originated from the Turkic Afsharid tribe.

2260:

groups, and other related content anymore. I'm retired from editing those topics (personal reasons). Just wanted to notify you.

1425:

From the Kur to the Aras: A Military History of Russia’s Move into the South Caucasus and the First Russo-Iranian War, 1801-1813

12477: 12073: 11113: 10785: 10725: 10261:, used border stones, covered in Aramaic script, to separate villages and farms. The Artaxiads minted coins in Aramaic as well. 10174: 8916:

Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

8775: 7596: 6790: 6619: 2223: 2129: 10143:

In all seriousness, I own the previous Vaughan book but not the latter one, of which I have left you a link on archive.org. --

7119:

Oddly, I had just did a few edits to Charles' article and I had not even noticed the connection between those two. I did find:

1949: 12580:. Ermengarde's dob of birth is given as c.956 which is referenced by "Fulk Nerra, the Neo-Roman Consul", page 9(which I own). 11448: 11041: 9971: 9752: 9181: 8102:

I removed Azerbaijani under the premise of MOS:Ethnicity, nowhere did I state Azerbaijani language or ethnicity as irrelevant

8062:" which contains a link where Alihd23 added Persian to numerous articles and then I reverted them. Your response to this was, 7588: 7411: 6669: 4811: 266: 12457:

Ah yes, I see you are having a similar problem on the page of a king of Spain. How curious. Good to know your rule of thumb!

9427: 9278:

I would strongly suggest you use the article(s) talk pages to discuss, in detail, any issues you have with Kaalakaa's edits.

9175: 8129:

Your reverts of Alihd23 were not relevant to the question I posed. I asked why MOS:Ethnicity was not being applied to other

1423:-- Bournoutian, George (2020). "Georgia and the Khanates of South Caucasus in the Second Half of the Eighteenth Century" in 1316:

And the Russo-Turkish War 1676-1681 already has Ottoman victory(with Rhoads Murphey, Ottoman Warfare, 1500-1700 as a source)

12498: 11971: 11917: 10340: 10325: 10298: 9078: 8158:

our reverts of Alihd23 were not relevant to the question I posed. I asked why MOS:Ethnicity was not being applied to other

6096: 5844: 5809: 5590: 4582: 3471:

At Samarkand in 1141 they confronted and defeated the Seljuk armies. The Karakhanids now became vassals of the Kara Khitans

12654: 12631: 12598: 12483:

There was already an Origin section, there doesn't need to be another one. You also messed up the wording in a picture. --

12469: 12452: 12273: 11979: 11965: 11925: 11911: 11433: 11402: 10772: 10754: 10401:

form of a language can be used for individuals, dynasties, etc, that didn't use that language(written or otherwise), then

10166: 10152: 10081: 9873: 9766: 9738: 9724: 9326:

In the Netflix resource I gave, I wanted to point out that Romanian and Turkish historians said it was an Ottoman victory.

7785: 7771: 7751: 7375: 7346: 7331: 7316: 7302: 7287: 7248: 7234: 7220: 7194: 7164: 6259: 6245: 6228: 5971: 5967: 5952: 4674: 4379: 4372: 2303: 12492: 11738: 11269: 11030: 10493: 9694: 8696: 8337: 8315: 8301: 8283: 8269: 7904: 7896: 7393: 6785:

Yeah, Giray Altay wrote a lot of WP:OR and their POV tone is an issue as well. I am seeing a lot of similarities between

5824: 2780:

if you don't reply I will take it up with an admin and revert it back to my changes that you removed solely for no reason

1187:

It is out of my area of specialization. I would suggest contacting someone on Knowledge that knows linguistics. Sorry. --

1106: 10510: 10472: 10255:

Tigran the Great was, prior to the Parthian civil war, a Parthian client-king, a Zoroastrian, and minted coins in Greek.

8448:

MOS:Ethnicity. Which is exactly what I told you before. You should respond to EdJohnston's comment on your talk page. --

7582: 6773: 6613: 965: 12696: 12365: 12279: 12145: 11711: 11263: 10647: 10551:

And even if you insist that the Armenian language cannot be written, then I have a question for you. have you seen the

9661: 9631: 9614: 9537: 9519: 9481: 9467: 9453: 9439: 9415: 9400: 9386: 9372: 9029: 8867: 8798: 8580: 8561: 8498: 6422: 5718: 5482: 5097: 4288:

change the 1700 first battle of anandpur to simply "battle of Anandpur (1700)", then I see no problem. Your thoughts?--

4170: 10633: 10452: 9066: 9044: 8961: 8946: 7527: 6412: 6400: 6394: 6377: 6359: 5835:" --Brooks, Jeanice (2000). Courtly song in late sixteenth-century France. The University of Chicago Press, page 124. 5560: 5271: 5143: 1969: 1809: 785:

Here's the relevant passage from the source you linked. Please let me know if you need more text from the same source:

12168: 11732: 11206: 10921: 10115:

Page 61 has a family tree indicating Agnes marrying Charles and their children; Isabel, Louis, John II, Charles, and

8787: 8624: 7857: 7846: 7806:

Paul Joseph (2016). The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives. SAGE Publications. ISBN 9781483359908.

7061: 6860: 6809: 6648: 5989: 5791: 5761: 5536: 5245: 5232:, are a clear indication to push a certain point of view and gives me, if not others, the impression you are here to 5229: 5225: 5126: 4437: 4265: 11690: 10981: 10538:

Armenian is written in its own writing system, the Armenian alphabet, introduced in 405 AD by Saint Mesrop Mashtots.

8436: 7728: 7707: 7267: 6088: 6001: 5983: 5944: 5912: 5579: 2844:

Ah, I apologize, I see that you have put in questions now, I have not seen those so I apologize. will answer there.

2456:

Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying

1709: 11642: 11177: 10521:

Ok, let's support your opinion that the Armenian language did not have an alphabet at the time of the Great Tinran.

10106: 9649: 9293: 8607: 8471: 8457: 8058:

did I state Azerbaijani language or ethnicity as irrelevant. Also, in rebuttal to your second sentence, I posted, "

7999: 7047: 7007: 6980: 6945: 6915: 6886: 6458: 6440: 5881: 4270: 3317: 3176: 12124: 12104: 12065: 11245: 9671: 8244: 8147: 8123:

Meaning you did not check the link to Alihd23's edits and or my revertion of their edits. That was loud and clear.

8110:

Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless relevant to the subject’s notability.

8096: 8080:

Meaning you did not check the link to Alihd23's edits and or my revertion of their edits. That was loud and clear.

7105: 6904: 6558:

with your "logic" is assuming that August 1428 is the correct date of birth for Radegunda, when in actuality 1428

3466:" By Steppe, Desert, and Ocean: The Birth of Eurasia - Page 395 Barry W. Cunliffe · 2015. FOUND INSIDE – PAGE 395 3126:

Kafadar, Cemal (2007). "A Rome of One's Own: Reflections on Cultural Geography and Identity in the Lands of Rum".

11424:

Anyway, my thanks for finding these texts, it is curious how even these more real sources remain somewhat vague.

11350: 10987: 10715: 8997:

Khalid is said to have fought valiantly at the Battle of Mu'tah and to have broken nine swords during the battle.

8025: 7564: 7078: 6062:

Beeler 1971, p. 39 and 44, note 1: refers only to Verlinden 1935 and did not consult any primary sources himself.

4950: 3573:

Qara-Khitai subjugated the Qarakhânids and in 1141 annihilated a Seljuk army near Samarqand, seizing Transoxania.

2296: 2180: 1705: 11598: 11577: 9340:

When you are really a moderator on Knowledge, you become powerful. I hope one day you can learn to be Objective.

8386:

Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

5548: 4148: 3419:

I know, I wrote the article. However, you added information, without a source, and without an edit summary. AND,

2908: 2573:

I could instead provide the wikisource for the Gallic Chronicle directly, if I can find an English translation.

10406: 9959: 9199: 8274:

Is this not the article talk page? I signed up today, still trying to figure out how everything works on here.

7837:, goes into detail about Nader's battle with the Mughal Empire, but makes no mention of any battle vs Sikhs. -- 5935:

Who is the author of Robrecht de Fries. Graaf van Vlaanderen, held van Holland? Which would indication a COI.--

5522: 3055: 2592: 1020: 7175: 4977:

that I could have just shortened the quote. Anyways when you get chance later in the day, please take a look.

2515: 11696: 9301: 8602: 7381: 7380:

Hello Kansas Bear and Sovietblobfish! For the benefit of any talk page watchers, the page being discussed is

7208: 6454: 5301:

of those origins, I see POV pushing. While doing that, they even miss out on representing the actual "Turks".

3538:

The circumstance which led to the gradual decline and ultimate downfall of the Saljuqid empire were numerous.

3513:

The Seljuk's lost territory to the Khitan's which was one of a number of factors contributing to its decline.

1207: 1070: 11953: 11949: 11945: 11844: 11833: 11831: 11829: 11827: 11825: 11823: 11821: 11819: 11817: 8538:

The fourth source(A Magyarok őstörténetéről Bizonyosságok, Hipotézisek, Hiedelmek) has no page number. Thus

5211:

then included the term "Iranian academics". The sentence you copied and modified is directly referenced by ~

3526:" --Iran's Regional Relations: A History from Antiquity to the Islamic Republic, Seyed Mohammad Houshisadat. 918: 12577: 10905: 7892: 6848: 6580:

Do you have a reference that states Catherine's year of birth was 1431? If not, it(1431) can be removed as

5466:

to write information into articles. Nearly everything you try to push into an article appears to be simply

4136: 3082: 2539: 2208: 1805: 7278:

I am sure your grammar and writing are not as crude as you are letting on, but I can do a read-through. --

5727:: Needs review, copy-edit, and additional sources. The current revision is just based on two large quotes. 3663:

The references and information I have presented clearly indicates otherwise. Ignoring this information is

2625:

Agreed. I didn't read it from there as I don't have the book, but that looks like a better source to use.

11653: 7698:

So you don't believe LB Brocketts book as discussed in the Mcfarland book merits mention as an opinion??

7069: 6820: 5951:

And since we are on the subject of this battle. Why continue to change the date of the battle and remove

5132: 4807: 3110: 2257: 518: 10963: 10896: 1489:

Good. Please notify other admins who are familiar with the targeted topics/articles if you can. Cheers!

835:

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

11859: 10570: 10566: 10068:. I haven't been able, however, to connect Catherine to her father Charles or her mother Agnes through 8254: 6445:

No, you're right, that doesn't add up. A new user added it just a few weeks ago. Will restore. Cheers.

5887: 5233: 4108: 3874:

I do not care what the ethnicity is of an author. The books you linked are both non-viewable thus fail

2176: 11787:

Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes

10882: 10862: 4753: 4455:

The rest are complete guess work as to what page and if even the information they reference is correct

3928:

The day you stop seeing other editors as enemies, will be the first step towards opening your mind. --

2802: 1654: 11549: 10321: 9955: 9711:

We did have triple digit heat for a week here and I am considering moving to Nebraska after I retire.

9212:. Your comments indicate some hostility towards certain academics, if you believe said academics are 9166:

Also, this is your only warning. Another personal attack and you will be banned from my talk page. --

8235:

Wow, just wow. I have no need of anymore of your vague comments regarding my neutrality. Done here.--

6757: 5850: 5263:

I am too busy with many other issues right now. I will explain anything you ask later, if necessary.

4479: 4438: 4035:

Thanks. I made the update with citations. Watching Chiefs vs Bengals. Overtime... Its a crazy match.

1679: 1179: 1130: 606: 12670:, by Michel Bur. What is very interesting about this is the index(of what little I could see) shows 9311:

explicitly to take your concerns to the talk page. You are using Turkish sources to push a POV on a

6662:

One made a single comment: that she is a known editor, but her circumstances may influence her view.

5471:

In my opinion, admins should ban you from any Turkish, Turkic, Persian, or Iranian related articles.

5113:

I saw. I also saw where they called C.E. Bosworth an "Iranian academic". Besides, we already have a

3759:

Your continued reliance on what you read from another article and how you decide to interpret it is

3624:

And yet I have provided sources stating that the Seljuq Empire was in decline even prior to Qatwan.

12627: 12465: 12007: 11975: 11931: 11921: 11899: 11862:

Silly nationalism 101, brought to you by multiple IPs of a blocked user:Caucasian127 and გიორგი172.

11816:

Oh so now you want a discussion? After you changed through multiple edits(back on 21 December 2023)

11679: 11444: 11429: 11212: 10768: 10162: 9748: 9734: 8031: 7865: 7767: 7371: 7327: 7298: 7230: 7190: 6796:

The Hunnic invasion of the Sasanian Empire should probably be deleted and the information added to

6241: 5747:

are confusing and need better rewording/summary. Actually someone should rewrite the whole article.

4708: 4068: 3723: 2915:

Request for counsel/ assistance - user Snarcky1996 deleting entire sections of King Sihamoni's page

2772: 2300: 1669:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1151: 11860:

greatness of Georgia, the Georgian kingdom, and how Georgia was oh-so victorious against everyone.

6032:

The death of Arnulf III and William Fitz Osbern is recorded at 20 February in various necrologies:

5193:

I have accidentally added the reference to the end of the paragraph instead of the first sentence.

3584:

Like all I want to edit in the top of the Seljuk empire is this (provided with sources) -----: -->

10035: 8311: 8279: 7982:) In one article it stated either Arab or Persian ethnicity which makes your edit a violation of 7888: 7353: 6786: 6341: 6165:

Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

4951: 4475:

The other source with page numbers, the Bertrand source, is from 1847 written by a Jesuit priest.

3280: 3078: 2549: 1926: 1801: 903: 628: 410: 398: 349: 268: 12586:

Bouchard's book shows a family tree with Adela marrying Geoffrey of Anjou, but no date of birth.

10223:

Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats

9011:

In Bukhari Khalid bin al Waleed says: “During the battle of Mu'tah nine swords broke in my hand.

8768: 8620:

Seleucid Empire had a Greek Hellenic democracy (a bit different from American liberal democracy)

7225:

Robin agrees with our assessment that it is vanishingly unlikely that Charles was a Protestant.

12562: 12081: 11539: 10506: 10489: 10468: 10020:

Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

8462:

Ok I won't add Persian ethnicity anymore but wiki laws and instructions are difficult to learn

7560: 7533: 7113: 5440:

Not simply POV push Turkic into the Lead sentence because you feel it is not being represented!

4734: 4729:

I wish I could offer some perspective, but this is beyond my ken. I looked at our articles for

3183: 2489: 2113: 1671: 1379: 1203:

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

813: 662: 12659:

Sorry for the slow reply. My trip to Nebraska to watch the football game was quite exhausting.

11658:

Usually, a warning would be dropped on someone's talk page when it is more than 2 reverts per

9879: 9430:. Without discussion or consensus. Pity you seem unable to find the talk page for articles. -- 8931: 6219:

You are most welcome! I might dig around and see what I can find. Stay safe Sovietblobfish. --

686:

No. Is there any other way to access it? e.g. a list of Wikipedians who have Brill account. --

11241: 10763:

and I had no idea what an issue this was. I'll be deleting the other tables that I've added.

9627: 9533: 9477: 9449: 9396: 9382: 8576: 8494: 7483: 7272: 7262: 6779: 6633: 4678: 4631: 4588:

I am unconvinced by your argument. I think we should get the opinions of some other editors.

4497: 2867: 2849: 2812: 1435: 797: 757: 740: 657: 8532:

The third source(Az ősmagyarok genezisének szarmatakori etapjáról) has no page number. Thus

12247: 12077: 11717: 11686: 10317: 9869: 9444:

But no source writes that Mehmed was in this war. This is not even a matter of discussion.

9040: 8957: 8289: 7389: 6641: 6554:

Considering I am the father of four, I do not need biology explained to me, yet again. The

6373: 5375:

So? Nowhere near as much as the Persian language influenced the Ottoman Empire. See unlike

4799: 3568:

Source: A Companion to the History of the Middle East - Page 147 Youssef M. Choueiri · 2008

2630: 2578: 1839: 668:

Apparently not. And I checked Jstor and it is not listed there. Did you ask LouisAragon? --

414: 402: 332:

Nick-D on Franklin Roosevelt in World War II and Hog Farm on the Battle of Chancellorsville

174:

Oops. I forgot to add User in front of my name to create the sandbox version. Thank you. --

10697:

Vardanyan, Ruben; Vardanyan, Karen (2008). "Newly-Found Groups of Artaxiad Copper Coins".

9605:

Are you not capable of critical thinking? Are you incapable of doing your own research? --

8427:

Perhaps the latter two may know of some editors that specialize in WWII battle editing? --

8: 12623: 12618: 12461: 12092: 12085: 11440: 11425: 10760: 10158: 9744: 9730: 8407: 8181:

or not. Really? This gives you the right to question someone else's neutrality? Bullshit!

8138: 7763: 7367: 7323: 7294: 7226: 7200: 7186: 7043: 7003: 6976: 6941: 6911: 6882: 6856: 6237: 5787: 5544: 4704: 4591: 1701: 691: 8518:", seems unlikely since we are just ?now? hearing of this? This source also needs to be 7555:

Thank you for the help and patience resolving the error on my first wiki submission!

6236:

i greatly appreciate the effort you put into improving medieval history on wikipedia :)

11916:

I'm not ignoring it, I'd just change something and if I made a mistake, you'd reverted

11810: 11681:, it would be much more constructive to just copy-paste the reference if there is one. 11662:. But it is alarming that the conflict rises from your interpretation of a core policy 11358:, Tome 2, Jean-Marie de La Mure, Chez Potier, Libraire, Quai Malaquais, 1868, page 447. 10959: 10532:

No clue who the Great Tinran is. I'm assuming your referring to Tigranes the Great? My

8419: 7736: 7703: 7682: 7101: 6084: 5777: 5744: 4982: 4703:

The crown of Navarre isn't my historical specialty, but Smec's position seems logical.

4334: 4182:"Why is it that foolishness repeats itself with such monotonous precision?" --Leto II, 4096: 4040: 3838: 3313: 3161:

I guess you should post a concern on the article talk page and try to gain consensus.--

1406: 1102: 726: 624: 12639:

Europäische Stammtafeln: Stammtafeln zur Geschichte der Europäischen Staaten, Band III

11221: 3289: 12567: 12429: 12130: 11855: 10927: 10739: 10502: 10485: 10464: 10246: 9195: 9158: 8597: 8467: 8442: 8134: 8005: 7556: 6450: 5804: 5094: 4666: 4166: 3533:" --Seljuqs and Their Successors: Art, Culture and History, Sheila R. Canby, page 11. 3039: 1180: 733: 570: 391: 379: 10619:

Although, I have yet to find a Roman emperor with the Italian version of their name.

10617:

No, someone else switched the topic, suggesting Sejong the Great. To which I said, "

9894:), with me. I'm currently at work at won't be home for another 6.5 hours. Thanks. -- 8232:

this in the second(Turkic poets), followed by the mention of Azerbaijani literature?

7762:

If ever you have a FWOR query, or need any material for the period, my door is open

7211:. There is a chance, however slight, they might have some information. Stay safe! -- 6009:

Yes, I am Kees Nieuwenhuijsen, author of the recent biography of Robert the Frisian.

12688: 12646: 12590: 12484: 12444: 12265: 12137: 12116: 12096: 12057: 11957: 11903: 11724: 11703: 11663: 11634: 11590: 11569: 11394: 11255: 11237: 11198: 11022: 10973: 10913: 10746: 10639: 10625: 10555:

page? If so, I have a question for you, why is the Georgian alphabet written there?

10444: 10417: 10332: 10290: 10144: 10073: 9941: 9895: 9758: 9716: 9686: 9653: 9623: 9606: 9529: 9511: 9473: 9459: 9445: 9431: 9407: 9392: 9378: 9364: 9285: 9167: 9058: 9021: 9004:

Khalid distinguished himself in the Battle of Mu'tah of 629 against the Ghassanids.

8938: 8779: 8572: 8553: 8490: 8449: 8428: 8413: 8293: 8261: 8236: 8088: 8017: 7991: 7838: 7777: 7743: 7720: 7574: 7519: 7338: 7308: 7279: 7240: 7212: 7204: 7156: 7144:). Charles married a Guise did he not? They were known for their ultra-Catholicism. 7053: 6801: 6765: 6605: 6432: 6404: 6386: 6351: 6251: 6220: 6199: 5993: 5975: 5936: 5904: 5873: 5836: 5816: 5753: 5552: 5474: 5237: 5118: 4992: 4959: 4776: 4760: 4648: 4504: 4483: 4419: 4409: 4386: 4344: 4318: 4305: 4289: 4187: 4122: 4078: 4069: 4050: 4022: 3929: 3850: 3824: 3795: 3764: 3740: 3701: 3689: 3668: 3645: 3598: 3586: 3541: 3487: 3443: 3431: 3327: 3187: 3162: 3146: 3096: 2922: 2877: 2863: 2859: 2845: 2831: 2808: 2805: 2788: 2668: 2600: 2556: 2525: 2321: 2282: 2263: 2235: 2190: 2158: 1953: 1933: 1848: 1819: 1778: 1640: 1633: 1476: 1431: 1413: 1386: 1365: 1345: 1217: 1188: 1165: 1116: 1056: 1012: 989: 975: 820: 793: 753: 669: 639: 610: 593: 534: 504: 361: 175: 11494: 7026:

I just discovered that that page was actually a duplicate of the already existing

1618:

Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

1554:

Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

10945: 9938:

A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East

9865: 9705: 9274:

The date for this battle is cited by Watt, a secondary source, which you removed.

9036: 8953: 8332: 8221:

3.also second sentence states "most prominent figures in Azerbaijani literature."

7983: 7968: 7795: 7385: 7140:

only source I have found concerning Charles' religious orientation(though hardly

7087: 6369: 5572: 5529: 5462:

Then quit bothering me. Unfortunately, you appear to be someone unwilling to use

5264: 5136: 4686: 4623: 4015: 2626: 2574: 1139: 278: 11666:. Instead of expecting others to cite or verify your additions and calling them 10936: 7518:

expect a corresponding reference. But this is just my opinion on the matter. --

5169::"Calling an academic "Iranian" when in fact they are not could be construed as 2485:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

2128:

I do not care much for McLynn either. However, unless we get a consensus on the

12614: 11851: 11524: 9572:

Shouldn't you be proving that Mehmed was at war by providing me with resources?

9221: 8010: 7590: 7039: 6999: 6972: 6937: 6907: 6878: 6874: 6852: 6838: 6424: 5783: 5769: 5114: 4607: 4113: 3182:

Probably the same person(using a different IP) that posted personal attacks on

2309: 2270: 1697: 1491: 780: 747: 710: 687: 497: 10875: 10868: 10716:

https://www.quora.com/Are-modern-Italians-direct-descendants-of-ancient-Romans

9360:

Knowledge? One day you might learn to read what other editors are telling you.

7801:

Hi Wikaviani! Well, from the only 3rd party sources presented in that article:

7460:

Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II

2555:

I would suggest not using a primary source especially since that is a blog. --

12049: 11682: 10955: 10428: 9850: 9316: 9217: 8479: 8327: 8060:

I recently reverted the edits of Alihd23, who was adding Persian to articles.

7699: 7678: 7097: 6829: 6365: 6186: 5773: 5766:

They are not urgent cases. Just wanted to notify you about them. Let me ping

5174: 5173:. Just to let you know, since you are so keen on wisdom this applies to even 5086: 4978: 4730: 4330: 4092: 4036: 3843: 3818: 3414:

The Battle of Qatwan played a very large role on the decline of Seljuk empire

3309: 2936: 1475:

Thanks for making me aware of this situation. I will mention it to Oshwah. --

1098: 947:

Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and a beautiful and productive New Year!

716: 12159:

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

11037:

Orion Nimrod's Turanist "Scythian broders" tried to make a putsch in Hungary

5326:

You are side stepping the issue. You changed Persian to Iranian then stated

3426:

The Seljuk empire began to decline in the 1140s after being defeated by the

2763:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

1079: 12613:

2) The daughters date of birth is correct, but there is some mixup between

12437: 12258: 11659: 11630: 11563: 10069: 9281: 9213: 9191: 8592: 8568: 8486: 8463: 7987: 7979: 7975: 7823:

This battle occurred when Nader Shah was leaving India after looting Delhi.

7148: 7141: 6601: 6581: 6563: 6446: 5734: 5463: 5380: 5170: 5077: 4639: 4447: 4276:

I am not a KC Chiefs fan. I am a Chicago Bears fan. Hence the name, Kansas

4157: 3791: 3760: 3664: 3540:" -- The decline of the Saljuqid Empire, Mawlawi Fadil Sanaullah, page 1.-- 2767: 2588: 2172: 1689: 1088: 1035: 530: 375: 7874: 7125:

Infinitesimal: How a Dangerous Mathematical Theory Shaped the Modern World

6547:

year, you automatically have to accept that Catherine was born after 1428.

5800:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

3064: 2024:

Nick- D and Hawkeye7 look at intelligence gathering, doctrine and strategy

529:

It is a self-published source by a non-specialized author. So it is not a

12254: 11479: 10482: 9679: 9349: 8545: 8544:

The fifth source(Szkíta-magyar nyelvhasonlítás) has no page number. Thus

8539: 8533: 8526: 8519: 8401: 8142: 7692: 5866: 4454: 4405: 3875: 3697: 3649: 3594: 3590: 3483: 2215: 1231: 12547:

Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

5639:

Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

4796:

Sorry, I am not sure if I am coming of as too harsh. No offense meant!

2098:

Nick-D on RAAF aircraft, Hawkeye7 on mission command and nuclear secrecy

11566:

article, why didn't you add the reference(s) from that article as well?

11555:

So, now you want to talk? To repeat what you ignored on your talk page;

10993: 10258: 9315:

article. You think Netflix is a reliable source, take your concerns to

8513: 8218:

2.the second sentence calls him the "greatest Turkic poets of his time"

7542: 6877:, what’s up at Huns? I think GA only added to the first section there…— 5730: 4682: 4615: 4382:

and I reverted to a previous version, which removed your category edit.

4375:

and I reverted to a previous version, which removed your category edit.

3299: 3049:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

580:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

11629:

of this would have happened. Instead, you've wasted your time spewing

10890: 8215:

1.the poets name is written in Azerbaijani(no other languages present)

6102:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

5204:

Accident? You copied the information from the Ghaznavid article, then

3692:

that let to the beginning of decline of Seljuks in 1140's ( I repeat.

3271:

Survey about History on Knowledge (If you reside in the United States)

2545:

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

1787: 587:

Imperial Brothers: Valentinian, Valens and the Disaster at Adrianople.

12576:

I believe the IPs concern is derived from Adele's daughter's article

11998:. I reported, at the time, three IPs in the last SPI, but was told, " 11254:

Not sure what I've done to deserve this Noorullah21, but thank you.--

10732: 9884: 9857: 8862: 7027: 6797: 6626: 6112:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

6050:

The date of 22 February is mentioned one century after the battle by:

5076: 4738: 4599: 3031: 2512: 1154: 562: 12111:

Here's an interesting coincidence. You blocked IP109.242.73.191 and

11000: 10540:" Are you saying Mesrop Mastots didn't create the Armenian alphabet? 10140:

Probably due to buying books that interest me for the past 50 years.

10041:

I am doing well, Sovietblobfish. Hope things are good where you are.

9253:

I ask that you also undo your revertion on the Battle of the Trench.

2320:

You should notify EdJohnston and make him aware of this nonsense. --

1318:

AND Indecisive. Both with reliable sources. So what is your problem?

941: 11010: 10759:

Thank you, and I agree. I've been wading through the talk page for

10440: 10436: 10432: 10369: 9940:, Volume: One: ca. 3000BCE-1499 CE, Spencer C. Tucker, page 316. -- 9861: 9209: 7953:

Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

7052:

I would say I am surprised, but I am not. Nice catch, Ermenrich! --

6205: 6192: 5740: 5724: 2139:

The fact is that the source himself claims "several hundred losses"

1466:) plus the other articles; e.g. take a look at revision history of 995: 12003:" So I guess that means they checked the evidence against the IPs? 10312:'Tigran the Great') in Armenian." In any case, we shouldn't leave 9701:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

8087:

Feel free to take me to AN/I or whatever board of your choosing.--

2480:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

2121:

I don't care much about McLynn as a reliable or unreliable source.

1763:

Hawkeye7 on female computers, Nick-D on the Israeli Defence Forces

161:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

12778:

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

12048:

I'm guessing that the IP you blocked might be the same person as

11625:

You could have included reference(s) from your initial edit, and

8977:

Khalid didn't participated in the battle as he came as a rescuer.

6399:

Apparently user:Patrockk did not feel like responding and edited

6213: 5893:

First, primary sources have to be supported by secondary sources.

4759:

Do you know how to read? I explained why in my edit summaries. --

3427: 1467: 1213:

Yeah, Beshogur gave me the bad news. It is written in Persian. :(

1002: 474:

Nick-D & Hawkeye7 look at two aspects of 20th Century warfare

353: 272: 12460:

I don't watch many movies these days, but thanks for the rec :)

9934:

a vassal khan to rule the area. The Golden Horde never recovers.

8016:

Its all good. I thought that was your goal. Stay safe, Wtfiv! --

6906:

No issues there? Sometimes I visit it for patrolling purpose. --

5438:

The Lead of an article should summarize what the article states.

4935:

Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

3644:

Seljuk empire began to decline in the 1140s after losing in the

3585:

Seljuk empire began to decline in the 1140s after losing in the

1911:

Hawkeye7 on Montgomery's doctrine and Nick-D on Mussolini's wars

927: 9560:

Then prove Mehmed was elsewhere when the campaign was executed.

8228:

to state this poet was Azerbaijani in the first sentence, then

7199:

Anytime Sovietblobfish! If you feel up to it you might contact

5549:

4 editors that disagreed with the way you had wrote the article

5107: 4114: 2498: 11193:

and rewriting individual articles on Popes makes me Catholic!?

6573:

It's okay if I put the year of birth in the header as 1428/31?

5366:

for example Ottomans were highly influenced by Byzantinians...

4460:

The Muddhachari(1967) actually states this about the 1682 war.

3043:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

1666:

Hello, Kansas Bear. Please check your email; you've got mail!

574:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

12666:, Bachrach,page 11) by the time she has Fulk and Geoffrey is 7468:

Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

7035: 7031: 4000:

Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

3878:. Odd that you can not find any viewable third party sources. 3823:, who was involved in the discussion and can read Turkish? -- 3794:. Your opinion of the information presented is irrelevant. -- 2295:

Does not look new to me too and it could be a SPI case; e.g.

2132:

that McLynn is an unreliable source, it can and will be used.

65:

Nick-D on Hadrian's Wall and Hawkeye7 on the British military

12253:

Your sources, which you copied from Turkish Knowledge, fail

11481:

Charles de Bourbon, Comte de Clermont (ou d'Auvergne) (1488)

8037:

Well all "assumptions' aside, let us just see what you said.

6044:- Necrologium Uticensis, RHGF XXIII, 1894, 484-491 (p. 485). 5154:

warn people at talk page of the related article or userspace

4453:

As it stands right now, only two sources have page numbers.

4149:

ADA campaigning, with a familiar editor helping the campaign

3015: 9860:, and that's especially true for heterogeneous people like 8522:

by quote(s) and specific page number(not a range of pages).

8200:

poets of his time and one of the most prominent figures in

7669:

Eleanor of Aquitaine is my many great grandmother. Howard,

6056:

I think I have provided a solid foundation for my argument.

5473:

You need to learn to properly edit in other areas first. --

4021:

If the number of troops is referenced then that is fine. --

2591:

article is a GA-level article. Speaking of which, what was

11795:

Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

8753:

Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

8681:

Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

8054:

I removed Azerbaijani under the premise of MOS:Ethnicity,

6047:- Obituariis Lirensis, RHGF XXIII, 1894, 470-475 (p. 637). 3685:

of Seljuks decline was not mainly due to battle of Qatwan.

10781:

thanks for your reverts on the Mongol Samara Bend article

10316:

there with no explanation or indication of its language.

3743:

that let to the beginning of decline of Seljuks in 1140's

2990:

Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

12643:

Knowledge:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request

10353:

but you did not address the foreign language rationale..

5927:

Author, re-enactor and historical researcher at AXENHOWE

2739:

Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan

2597:

Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China

12152:

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

10157:

Thanks for the quick search :) I will move the article

7384:. This looks to be an exciting time in French history. 5502:

Persian Historiography: History of Persian Literature A

5394:..... but their Turkic part is pretty much represented. 4482:

article has more problems than some IP disrupting it.--

3398:

Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

1834:

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

12677:

Henry II and the Angevin Tradition of Family Hostility

10912:

Thanks Wikaviani! Happy Holidays to you! Stay safe! --

9363:

Continued tag-teaming to edit war will be reported. --

8292:, is the article talk page for the Battle of Mudki. -- 6035:- Chronicon Lirensis, RHGF XI, 1767, 366-367 (p. 471); 5165:

After your snide remark concerning wisdom, I told you

4871:

Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

4380:

response to another IP changing referenced information

2171:

I think that isn't the competence of the noticeboard.

2152:

too many, but he had only his own blundering to blame.

12746: