1593:
31:
912:
1515:
634:
731:
1790:
could be taken as abuse but anyway theres no point seeking out dapi since hes left, So it would be completely illogical on your part to recommend a retired user over me because as i told the other people (whos comments you removed) he probably isnt coming back so take your unessarary comments elsewhere please. Goldblooded (talk) 08:04, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
1780:"I saw your comments on Dapi's talk page and I thought they were completely unnecessary, out of line, with too much of the flavor of dancing on the grave after a victory over an opponent. I disagree 100% with your recommendation that people seek you out instead of Dapi. I agree with the removal by Parsecboy. Binksternet (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC"
1789:
Anyway ive already discussed with some people and i was in the right and i put a message on his talk page instead but on regards to WP:STICK I will leave this matter here. And of coruse you would disagree because you dont even know me , dont be so narrow minded and actually a smirky comment like that
592:
situations), but just because the category removal happened within a BLP does not make it a BLP violation. It's your black and white interpretation of
Knowledge policies that keep tripping you up - there seems to be little room for nuance. An unstated but absolutely invaluable trait that can get you
1665:
Although at any rate, he decided to retire due to personal problems/stress. It happens. We'll all experience it from time to time. Theres plenty of other editors anyway, if you want some advice or any quieries/questions regarding modern history (i.e ,1900-1982 although i do know a fair bit about the
1137:
No, it's not because I'm accusing you of sockpuppetry, but because your article violates our biographies of living persons policy. I accused you of sockpuppetry based on the fact that you said that person was on a (S**T) list, and that the topic you are editing is currently the target of a long-term
1436:
Hey Jasper, It's been a long time since we've interacted. Welcome back to the SDA world. I know have mentors just like you, only I follow them more than I think Bello ever did. Do you have any suggestions about how I can proceed with the problems at the
Southern Talk page, specifically with closing
1235:
Thanks for the correction on my page and ive got another question i might of asked before but i just want to clarify; For the user boxes templates such as this user uses windows 7 and this user would like to be a admin someday etc , How do you get them? Is there a big list of all the different user
1804:
Anyway i posted the one paragraph that got deleted to the guy in question's appropiate talk page, at any rate i was rather insulted that i was treated like a piece of shit on here by some stuck up admins, paticulary since im one of the up and coming members/newbies. Since a lot of them seem to get
1737:
its called good faith and helping out in the community- and indeed i do have better things to do such as college and writing my novels/books among other things. Leave the page as it is, if you must ive removed the first thing since you were grumbling about that. It really isnt no
Sudetenland ; Yet
1722:
Its also ironic how they seemd to get defensive (paticulrary
Parsecboy who was the other editor involved and he told me politely to "piss off") it irriates me how just because they have admin preferences (which they are using as an exscsue to twist peoples words and threaten them) that they think
138:
Please can you write you
Tachfin: (Undid revision 444646229 by 87.217.106.39 (talk)Bokpasa we've been over this stop you're POV edits motivated by anti-Moroccan sentiment). I do not have anti-Moroccan sentiment, and this is insult to me (and in Spain can be a delit of xenofobia)Bokpasa 22:28, 15
1730:
Ed accused me of personal attacks and then he changed his tune and said that im hassling month old comments which is ridiculous anyway they cant possibly treat me like this. I was sticking up for Dapi and offering my help to other users , i thought thats what wikipedia and pretty much any good
1108:
I'm a little confused about this. You think that I've got multiple usernames? Where did you get that idea from? This is my first time trying to make an article, ever. I've been up all night trying to figure it out and now I can't publish it because you think I'm a sockpuppet? Please
1845:
Oh my contribs? Thanks! that means a lot. I try my best :) But yeah sorry i havent been active for the past few days i was up in Derby having a ceremony + a speech for my gran who has recently passed. and doing things such as cleaning out the house with my father and his wife etc.
962:
In that regard, use of x64 and x86-64 is just a matter of style. As long as the entire article is using only one these two terms, it does not matter which is used. The matter is, once the first major contributor used one of these two, the other users should not change it.
1793:
And how is it possibly "dancing on the grave" of my opponent i didnt even win. I was genuinelly trying to help and redirect that guy, but anywho as ive already stated this matter is resolved. You win. congratulations. Goldblooded (talk) 08:05, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
977:
You surely know this, but I am writing this for people who read this and are prone to misuse it: Use of "i386" and "x86" to refer to "IA-32" is not always okay. i386 is the first Intel microprocessor that used IA-32 and x86 is a superset of IA-32. Yes,
1163:
No, you may write an article. I find it to be a BLP violation because the statement you wrote can be viewed as disparaging by the subject of the article, and also, you have many unsourced statements like the section on "Middle East bureau". Please act
557:
Jasper - the accidental removal of categories by a brand new editor is absolutely unequal to your reinsertion of the BLP violating material (especially given that the user had explained what they were removing in their edit summary!).
1723:
they are superior than anyone else and dont give the newbies a chance. No wonder 100s of possible new wikipedians get scared away by admins. they should be greatfull that i actually bothered to stay on wikipedia and put up with this.
1808:
On a side note Its funny really because even though your not an admin , your probably one of the most genuine and accommodating people on here. How come your getting so much abuse off people as of which i observed via my watchlist?
680:
is a perfect example of why we have an option on blocks to allow them to simply create a brand new username, rather than the technical rename. He should simply have created a new username, and linked the accounts accordingly :-)
1705:
edis I was helping out that guy out and directing him to the relevant pages ,Besides i found it unfair that everyone is moaning at dapi to come back, hes probably having a hard time; something that i know all to well myself.
1805:
scared off by admins such as these. Im surprised i actually waste my time on here trying to help others and improve this site , and on many pages im the only person who actually bothers to edit/improve them.
1709:
I asked both admins who seem to have some sort of alliance between themeselves and a few others and they didnt give me a clear reply , at fist Ed removed both edits and said (in the chat history thing)
1687:
If he doesn't want to come back then he wont, If he does then he'll come back of his own accord; by the sounds of things he seemed rather stressed and worn out and moaning at him isn't going to help.
1310:
I think ive figured out how to do it but for some reason they are too far to the right , How did you get them so they are next to each other on the left and the blank boxes to make each colum equal ?
735:
On a serious note, I'm about if you want to chat about anything, otherwise I'll spend a little time getting to know you (reading through your archives and so on) and see if I've got any suggestions.
269:
The IP 41.92.85.242 (located in
Morocco) isn't included in the range 41.200.0.0/18 (located in Algeria). As I see, this IP wasn't involved in any EW since it only reverted once Bokpasa's edits.
1726:
Then i put it back and i asked him again why he removed it and he grumbled something obscure about that the other persons post was over a month old , even though it was barely 2 weeks old.
576:
It's unequal, but I'm just pointing out that removing the category about living persons can be considered a mild but unintentional BLP violation. Otherwise, I agree with Reaper on this.
1716:
Which doesnt really make any sense because i honestly dont see how explaining what happened and putting myself forward to help them has anything remotely to do with "personal attacks"
385:. My intervention is perfectly neutral. Edit warring violations are independent of whose point of view it is. This isn't the normal kind of edit war, it's one that spans many pages.
459:
Also, some of them aren't really notable, but I think we could put the non-notable ones on a page such as "List of
Windows stop errors" or something and keep the common ones.
200:
351:
My justification here was a 41.105.* IP I saw earlier, making similar edits. But it does not matter which side of the dispute the IP is on. Edit warring is not acceptable.
1734:
I tried to reason with them that i remove one of them but nope , Parsecboy backed him up with what came across as a rather smirky remark telling me to politely get lost.
843:
It'll help to restrict that to the talk page only, where it's less visible. It'll get him less attention, and will be less rollbacks per sock. After all, we're trying to
593:
far in this huge
Knowledge community is the ability to say "I screwed up" without reaching for excuses. A heartfelt "mea culpa" every once in a while can do wonders. --
1643:
Hey Jasper sorry to bother you again, also im sorry to hear about the trouble you've been receiving lately but i need your better judgement (along with my adoptee)
959:, the only thing that is required for an article is to use one style consistently. Otherwise, the article can use whatever of the multiple allowed forms of style.
1573:
Quite a few disillusioned users bandy those words around. JA's mainly interested in torquing off the admins enforcing his ban, and blanking TP doesn't do that. —
155:
If other people are thinking you have an anti-Moroccan sentiment, it's because your edits to those pages imply that you do. You will have to explain to them on
1650:'s page and they were good faith edits and i was responding to a couple of peoples queries abotu what happened to him on the page etc. This is what i said.
1282:
Oh and also, do you know of a template to sort out user boxes into categories or something because i tried to do it myself but it looks a little... jumbled.
1719:
Concerning the other paragraph i was pointing out that if hes gunna come back he'll do it if not he wont , moaning at him wont help. And it wont either.
768:
1632:
1460:
1580:
1568:
552:
1158:
page. So, what policy am I violating? And what do I have to do with some long-term vandal? Does that mean nobody gets to talk about Israel-Palestine?
1024:
1010:
1839:
1771:
1411:
1333:
1304:
1262:
332:
undoing every revert of
Bokpasa's edits, and on the other side a lot of users reverting these edits, and as I see the IP 41.92.85.242 is on of these.
888:
876:
854:
831:
809:
392:
374:
358:
346:
303:
287:
1224:
1193:
1175:
1145:
1117:
727:
I've had a word with 28bytes, who mentioned he may not be around for a bit. As such, I've volunteered to hang around and poke you when I'm bored.
713:
1081:
956:
949:
507:
493:
468:
451:
261:
1474:
618:
606:
583:
571:
328:, making disruptive edits despite the discussions (since 2006) where everybody oppose these edits, using a series of IPs based in Spain, with
1185:
Okay. I won't shout in the future. I still don't understand the BLP violation thing, but the article is published now nonetheless. Cheers.
1738:
they kept making it into a big deal but they STILL didnt fully explain themselves. And it wasnt even a month old , it was barely 2 weeks.
1376:
940:
1339:
Two of the columns are correct but for some reason the 3rd column is at the bottom , even though i arranged them left center and right :S
1661:
From what i gather/believe Dapi had a dispute with one or more administrators which eventually led to him being banned for a week or so.
273:
1829:
1531:
225:
1040:
1647:
1050:
539:
1446:
1616:
430:
1777:
True. I suppose ill leave it since im the only person trying to ride on the horse although bink put a rather unessary comment
1555:
993:
796:
755:
1786:"So was your comment here. Anyway of course your going to agree with him because from what ive observed. Your his best buddy.
1205:
1129:
859:
I haven't declined the requests, so you might want to modify them according to the above and see whether you get any takers.
1855:
1818:
1750:
1696:
1675:
1348:
1319:
1291:
1277:
1245:
1068:
530:
just because the user removed categories and part of a PERSONDATA template in addition to the BLP violations. Thank you.
1437:
and some sources. I've done decent with the sources( I think) but I don't want to hit 3RR. Thanks for your involvement--
1426:
1398:
1150:
How does it violate the biographies of living persons policy? The list is a real thing, very famous. You can find it at
700:
1389:
Hey jasper, could i have your opinion on something? Do you think this edit is grammatical enough to be on wikipedia?
1032:
324:
Again you intervene in this "dispute" without understanding what is going on: A notorious Pov-Pusher and edit warrior,
219:
1500:
706:
I was going to leave a more elaborating welcome message (on the previous one), but my internet cut off and I was busy.
169:
1404:
Probably not since "form" (in most form of attack) is supposed to be plural. In general, too, avoid run-on sentences.
1098:
902:
761:
I think that you might make a good mentor. As for now, I think I need a reverse-topic-ban (restricted topics only).
588:
Removal of categories from a BLP may be disruptive (if occurring without consensus across multiple articles, or in
94:
86:
315:
309:
1201:
1125:
81:
69:
64:
59:
779:
It won't work because he's burning sock accounts created in 2008 and getting them autoconfirmed with ten edits.
107:
Hi!, I wrote
History, because I study History in Spain at University, but and I do not like false information.
694:
1033:
193:
1828:
when you make changes to Knowledge. Keep it up :) ! Concerning the abuse, I'm one of the people dealing with
489:
527:
249:
1359:
tags to float it. I think I had something like that on my page with userboxes, or maybe it was a table. --
814:
If he wants to use up his old sock accounts, I'm inclined to let him. Others may have different opinions.
237:
1064:
I semied your talk page for a day as you seem to be attracting attention from some very childish people.
644:
412:
611:
Kinda universal, you know. As shown by the only entry in my block log, it has been an issue in the past.
751:
243:
38:
1368:
1612:
1505:
1442:
652:
181:
1731:
community supports, Guess i was wrong. Then they said i could be banned or "face the consequences"
1662:
1526:
642:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
535:
231:
1520:
Hello Jasper Deng! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian,
921:
and helping remove the incessant promotional material that keeps finding its way back in. Kindly
418:
1666:
Napoleonic wars and the german and italian unifcation wars in the 1800s) Then im the guy to ask.
931:
918:
774:
500:
No, please don't add them unless you use a bulk citation. I think a list would be good, actually.
1797:
And actually your comment is rather contradictory since thats practically what your doing. See
1103:
1059:
1020:
989:
517:
213:
1851:
1836:
1814:
1768:
1761:
1746:
1692:
1671:
1629:
1565:
1457:
1422:
1408:
1394:
1344:
1330:
1315:
1301:
1287:
1273:
1259:
1241:
1221:
1172:
1142:
1078:
1074:
Thanks. If I were an admin, I wouldn't be afraid to make difficult blocks, so that's perfect.
1007:
948:
885:
851:
806:
802:
Then let's go with full on the article and semi on the talk page. It's the maximum we can do.
765:
736:
710:
615:
580:
549:
504:
448:
389:
355:
300:
258:
166:
47:
17:
1608:
1438:
1431:
1252:
1189:
1113:
868:
823:
788:
677:
477:
370:
342:
283:
184:
puzzled me. I don't see an edit war; can you help me understand why you left that message?
111:
1713:"rm post, people are allowed to put posts like that on this page, no need to attack them"
8:
1798:
1684:
1654:
1638:
1545:
1539:
1521:
1496:
1197:
1121:
531:
456:
Do I need inline for every one, or a "bulk" citation? And if so, how (would I do a bulk)?
444:
template. I don't really consider those errors very notable, but I may be wrong on those.
1561:
I based the assertion of the presence of words like "cretin" and "nazi" on the userpage.
1658:
1357:
isn't a float. You need to use some <div style="float:center or left or right;": -->
1297:
I simply organized them into a table. I think there's a template, but I don't remember.
1230:
955:
Hello, Jasper. I'd like to attract your attention to the stability issue: According to
922:
838:
682:
672:
1087:
1016:
985:
719:
485:
464:
439:
426:
329:
318:
312:
208:
189:
982:
is not banned in Knowledge, but "supported on both x86 and x64" is hardly metonymy.
1847:
1833:
1810:
1765:
1742:
1688:
1667:
1626:
1562:
1548:
the page wouldn't have been reverted to read "fail!" It would have been goatse'd. —
1470:
1454:
1418:
1405:
1390:
1340:
1327:
1311:
1298:
1283:
1269:
1256:
1237:
1218:
1169:
1139:
1075:
1004:
882:
848:
803:
762:
707:
612:
577:
546:
501:
445:
386:
352:
297:
255:
163:
118:
363:
A one revert edit isn't an edit warring. Your interventions are still not neutral.
1757:
1702:
1482:
1384:
1165:
862:
817:
782:
604:
589:
569:
366:
338:
279:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1825:
1592:
1492:
293:
204:
148:
417:
I do have a source for all of them; I added it as reference 3 in the article (
689:
523:
382:
102:
1488:
1151:
1065:
662:
481:
460:
422:
325:
185:
129:
1487:
Hi, there is a reply to your discussion between you and Slatedorg over at
1466:
1213:
If you're writing an article on a living person, you must make sure that
545:
The categories removed included those of living people. A tradeoff it is.
911:
1155:
1093:
594:
559:
147:
Besides, using multiple IPs to continue edit warring is a violation of
1092:
Many thanks Jasper for reverting the edit on my user page. Take care.
1453:
Besides the 3RR warning, I'm not going to be involved in this. Sorry.
999:
We can go with that, but I prefer not to use x86 because it can mean
175:
1514:
1361:
1325:
To make the center one right in the center, use the <center: -->
1044:
979:
276:
to avoid, as you did before, warning and reporting the wrong users.
1756:
Admins are only human, and they sometimes will get stressed. See
419:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff542347(v=VS.85).aspx)
1236:
boxes which i could use or do you have to make them and how?
639:
Hello, Jasper Deng. Please check your email; you've got mail!
1625:
Thanks. I hope that no more admin time is wasted by this guy.
125:
1168:(that means don't shout (all caps is considered shouting)).
151:. If you think the information is false (I do not), please
966:
Of course, same does not go for EMT64 or AMD64. EMT64 is
1417:
Oops , that was a mistake. Thanks for pointing that out
1041:
http://www.mediawiki.org/Extension_talk:GlobalUserGroups
143:
Whatever the conflict is, please stop edit warring and
1607:Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page
1801:Goldblooded (talk) 08:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)"
207:of FAIZGUEVARRA. These IPs are block evasion of
1217:is cited, and all statements are very accurate.
254:, who is a prolific edit warrer on this topic.
1741:You got a verdict on this? What should i do?
1465:That's a good decision, Jasper. Well done. -
1154:Or you can read about it ON WIKIPEDIA at the
1268:Thanks thats the one i was looking for :)
1590:
296:. The edit war here is on multiple pages.
1152:http://www.masada2000.org/shit-list.html
335:I still disagree with you intervention.
292:It still looks like block evasion, per
14:
1326:tag. I don't know much about the left.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
199:This is an IP-hopper, according to a
728:
643:
317:, then it is NOT a block evasion of
114:in 1040, is in 1031 disapeared?...
25:
311:is the opposite of the one made by
23:
632:
436:Please cite the source, using the
24:
1866:
1762:Knowledge is not a social network
473:For now, I'll keep adding them.
308:The edit made by IP 41.92.85.242
1680:And the other thing i said was:
1591:
1513:
910:
881:Done. Full protection requested.
729:
29:
1830:a long-term and prolific vandal
1701:Both of them were clearly Good
1646:Basicially i made two posts to
1039:Hi Jasper. Look to my reply on
124:And only one sucessor??¿¿¿ and
1856:18:31, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
968:x64 in an Intel microprocessor
522:Please do not restore blatant
421:and as a comment in the page.
13:
1:
1840:17:08, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
1832:, and I don't really mind it.
1824:I like the fact that you are
1819:08:22, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
1772:22:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
1751:19:19, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
1697:01:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
1676:01:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
1653:Im afriad people move on see
1633:21:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
1617:21:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
1581:13:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
1569:04:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
1556:01:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
1532:21:42, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
1501:08:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
1475:16:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
1461:16:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
1447:05:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
917:Thanks for keeping an eye on
972:x64 in an AMD microprocessor
648:at any time by removing the
7:
1427:18:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
1412:17:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
1399:12:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
1377:01:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
1349:23:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1334:22:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1320:22:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1305:22:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1292:17:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1278:15:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1263:14:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1246:12:41, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1225:14:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1206:05:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1176:04:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1146:04:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1130:04:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1099:18:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
1082:21:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
1069:06:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
1051:09:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
1025:15:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
1011:15:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
994:13:16, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
941:04:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
889:04:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
877:03:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
855:03:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
832:03:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
810:03:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
797:03:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
769:22:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
756:14:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
714:22:56, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
701:14:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
619:22:49, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
607:22:47, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
584:22:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
572:22:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
553:22:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
540:19:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
508:03:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
494:22:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
469:22:41, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
452:22:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
431:22:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
393:03:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
375:02:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
359:19:48, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
347:18:37, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
304:17:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
288:16:17, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
262:03:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
194:22:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
170:03:51, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
10:
1871:
1683:Give the guy a break, See
1034:Extension:GlobalUserGroups
153:provide a reliable source.
1597:
110:Tell me how is possible,
1663:Knowledge:Banning_policy
903:A cup of coffee for you!
919:DeepFlight Super Falcon
149:the sockpuppetry policy
637:
383:assume good faith more
636:
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Jasper Deng
1783:and as i replied ,
1358:Content</div: -->
1253:Knowledge:User boxes
678:User_talk:Possesseva
112:Caliphate of Cordoba
1655:Knowledge:VOLUNTEER
1601:The Userpage Shield
1356:The <center: -->
526:and vandalism like
413:Blue screen article
1659:Knowledge:Retiring
645:remove this notice
638:
157:article talk pages
139:August 2011 (UTC)
1622:
1621:
1537:
1536:
1506:A cookie for you!
1374:
1209:
1192:comment added by
1133:
1116:comment added by
1097:
1053:
946:
945:
873:
842:
828:
793:
497:
480:comment added by
201:recent ANI thread
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1862:
1595:
1588:
1587:
1579:
1554:
1529:
1524:
1517:
1510:
1509:
1375:
1371:
1366:
1364:
1208:
1186:
1132:
1110:
1096:
1049:
1047:
938:
929:
914:
907:
906:
874:
871:
867:
865:
836:
829:
826:
822:
820:
794:
791:
787:
785:
749:
745:
744:
734:
733:
732:
697:
693:
685:
669:
667:
661:
657:
651:
647:
635:
602:
567:
496:
474:
443:
381:I'd like you to
253:
226:deleted contribs
161:do not edit war.
119:Almoravid empire
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1641:
1609:5 albert square
1574:
1549:
1542:
1527:
1522:
1508:
1485:
1439:Fountainviewkid
1434:
1387:
1373:
1369:
1362:
1360:
1233:
1187:
1111:
1106:
1090:
1062:
1045:
1037:
1003:32- or 64- bit.
953:
932:
923:
905:
869:
863:
861:
824:
818:
816:
789:
783:
781:
777:
775:Semi-protection
747:
738:
737:
730:
722:
695:
687:
683:
675:
670:
665:
659:
655:
653:You've got mail
649:
641:
633:
600:
565:
520:
475:
437:
415:
211:
178:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1868:
1843:
1842:
1775:
1774:
1729:
1640:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1620:
1619:
1604:
1603:
1598:
1596:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1541:
1538:
1535:
1534:
1523:SwisterTwister
1518:
1507:
1504:
1484:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1433:
1430:
1415:
1414:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1367:
1337:
1336:
1308:
1307:
1266:
1265:
1232:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1148:
1105:
1104:Sockpuppeting?
1102:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1061:
1060:Semi protected
1058:
1056:
1036:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
952:
947:
944:
943:
915:
904:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
776:
773:
772:
771:
724:Heya Jasper.
721:
718:
717:
716:
674:
671:
640:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
532:Reaper Eternal
524:BLP violations
519:
518:BLP violations
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
471:
457:
414:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
364:
336:
333:
322:
277:
270:
267:
177:
174:
173:
172:
159:and I repeat,
136:
135:
134:
133:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1867:
1858:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1841:
1838:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1806:
1802:
1800:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1784:
1781:
1778:
1773:
1770:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1739:
1735:
1732:
1727:
1724:
1720:
1717:
1714:
1711:
1707:
1704:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1651:
1649:
1644:
1634:
1631:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1599:
1594:
1589:
1582:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1567:
1564:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1552:
1547:
1533:
1530:
1525:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1503:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1459:
1456:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1429:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1413:
1410:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1378:
1372:
1365:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1335:
1332:
1329:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1264:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1226:
1223:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1167:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1083:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1042:
1035:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1017:Fleet Command
1014:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
996:
995:
991:
987:
986:Fleet Command
983:
981:
975:
973:
970:and AMD64 is
969:
964:
960:
958:
957:MOS:STABILITY
951:
950:MOS:STABILITY
942:
939:
937:
936:
930:
928:
927:
920:
916:
913:
909:
908:
890:
887:
884:
880:
879:
878:
875:
872:
866:
858:
857:
856:
853:
850:
846:
840:
839:edit conflict
835:
834:
833:
830:
827:
821:
813:
812:
811:
808:
805:
801:
800:
799:
798:
795:
792:
786:
770:
767:
764:
760:
759:
758:
757:
753:
746:
743:
742:
725:
715:
712:
709:
705:
704:
703:
702:
698:
692:
691:
686:
679:
664:
654:
646:
620:
617:
614:
610:
609:
608:
605:
603:
599:
598:
591:
587:
586:
585:
582:
579:
575:
574:
573:
570:
568:
564:
563:
556:
555:
554:
551:
548:
544:
543:
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
509:
506:
503:
499:
498:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
472:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
454:
453:
450:
447:
441:
435:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
394:
391:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
365:
362:
361:
360:
357:
354:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
337:
334:
331:
327:
323:
320:
316:
314:
310:
307:
306:
305:
302:
299:
295:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
278:
275:
271:
268:
265:
264:
263:
260:
257:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
197:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
171:
168:
165:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
131:
127:
123:
122:
120:
117:
116:
115:
113:
108:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1844:
1807:
1803:
1799:WP:DEADHORSE
1796:
1792:
1788:
1785:
1782:
1779:
1776:
1740:
1736:
1733:
1728:
1725:
1721:
1718:
1715:
1712:
1708:
1700:
1685:WP:VOLUNTEER
1682:
1679:
1652:
1645:
1642:
1600:
1575:
1550:
1543:
1489:Talk:ReactOS
1486:
1435:
1432:Welcome back
1416:
1388:
1338:
1309:
1281:
1267:
1234:
1214:
1188:— Preceding
1184:
1112:— Preceding
1107:
1091:
1063:
1055:
1038:
1000:
984:
976:
971:
967:
965:
961:
954:
934:
933:
925:
924:
860:
844:
815:
780:
778:
740:
739:
726:
723:
688:
676:
596:
595:
561:
560:
528:you did here
521:
476:— Preceding
416:
330:FAIZGUEVARRA
319:FAIZGUEVARRA
313:FAIZGUEVARRA
272:Please read
246:
240:
234:
228:
222:
216:
209:FAIZGUEVARRA
179:
160:
156:
152:
144:
137:
130:Banu Ghaniya
121:¿1040–1147?
109:
106:
75:
43:
37:
1848:Goldblooded
1834:Jasper Deng
1811:Goldblooded
1766:Jasper Deng
1743:Goldblooded
1689:Goldblooded
1668:Goldblooded
1639:Any advice?
1627:Jasper Deng
1563:Jasper Deng
1544:If it were
1540:Guess again
1455:Jasper Deng
1419:Goldblooded
1406:Jasper Deng
1391:Goldblooded
1341:Goldblooded
1328:Jasper Deng
1312:Goldblooded
1299:Jasper Deng
1284:Goldblooded
1270:Goldblooded
1257:Jasper Deng
1238:Goldblooded
1219:Jasper Deng
1170:Jasper Deng
1140:Jasper Deng
1076:Jasper Deng
1043:. Regards,
1005:Jasper Deng
883:Jasper Deng
849:Jasper Deng
847:disruption.
804:Jasper Deng
763:Jasper Deng
708:Jasper Deng
613:Jasper Deng
578:Jasper Deng
547:Jasper Deng
502:Jasper Deng
446:Jasper Deng
387:Jasper Deng
353:Jasper Deng
298:Jasper Deng
256:Jasper Deng
180:Hi Jasper.
164:Jasper Deng
36:This is an
1231:User boxes
1215:everything
1156:Masada2000
864:Acroterion
819:Acroterion
784:Acroterion
673:Quick Note
367:Omar-Toons
339:Omar-Toons
280:Omar-Toons
244:block user
238:filter log
95:Archive 15
87:Archive 10
1493:LoneRifle
1194:Rockinbow
1118:Rockinbow
1088:Thank you
720:Hi There!
668:template.
597:Jezebel's
562:Jezebel's
250:block log
182:This edit
82:Archive 9
76:Archive 8
70:Archive 7
65:Archive 6
60:Archive 5
1760:. Also,
1758:WP:STICK
1703:WP:Faith
1370:contribs
1202:contribs
1190:unsigned
1126:contribs
1114:unsigned
1015:Me too.
980:metonymy
690:BWilkins
590:WP:POINT
490:contribs
478:unsigned
440:cite web
220:contribs
203:, being
145:discuss.
1483:ReactOS
1385:Opinion
1166:civilly
1138:vandal.
1109:advise.
1066:Spartaz
845:prevent
482:Riking8
461:riking8
423:riking8
326:Bokpasa
294:WP:DUCK
205:WP:DUCK
186:28bytes
39:archive
1837:(talk)
1769:(talk)
1648:Dapi89
1630:(talk)
1576:Jeremy
1566:(talk)
1551:Jeremy
1467:Sitush
1458:(talk)
1409:(talk)
1331:(talk)
1302:(talk)
1260:(talk)
1222:(talk)
1173:(talk)
1143:(talk)
1079:(talk)
1008:(talk)
1001:either
935:Waters
926:Calmer
886:(talk)
870:(talk)
852:(talk)
825:(talk)
807:(talk)
790:(talk)
766:(talk)
711:(talk)
696:←track
616:(talk)
581:(talk)
550:(talk)
505:(talk)
449:(talk)
390:(talk)
356:(talk)
301:(talk)
266:Hello,
259:(talk)
167:(talk)
126:taifas
1578:v^_^v
1553:v^_^v
1094:Dr.K.
684:talk→
601:Ponyo
566:Ponyo
103:Block
16:<
1852:talk
1826:bold
1815:talk
1747:talk
1693:talk
1672:talk
1657:and
1613:talk
1528:talk
1497:talk
1471:talk
1443:talk
1423:talk
1395:talk
1345:talk
1316:talk
1288:talk
1274:talk
1251:See
1242:talk
1198:talk
1122:talk
1021:talk
990:talk
752:talk
741:Worm
536:talk
486:talk
465:talk
427:talk
371:talk
343:talk
284:talk
274:this
232:logs
214:talk
190:talk
132:?¿¿?
128:and
1546:him
1046:SVG
663:ygm
658:or
1854:)
1817:)
1749:)
1695:)
1674:)
1615:)
1499:)
1491:.
1473:)
1449:.
1445:)
1425:)
1397:)
1347:)
1318:)
1290:)
1276:)
1244:)
1204:)
1200:•
1128:)
1124:•
1023:)
992:)
974:.
754:)
699:)
666:}}
660:{{
656:}}
650:{{
558:--
538:)
492:)
488:•
467:)
442:}}
438:{{
429:)
373:)
345:)
286:)
192:)
91:→
1850:(
1813:(
1764:.
1745:(
1691:(
1670:(
1611:(
1495:(
1469:(
1441:(
1421:(
1393:(
1363:Σ
1343:(
1314:(
1286:(
1272:(
1255:.
1240:(
1196:(
1120:(
1019:(
988:(
841:)
837:(
750:(
748:·
681:(
534:(
484:(
463:(
425:(
369:(
341:(
321:.
282:(
252:)
247:·
241:·
235:·
229:·
223:·
217:·
212:(
188:(
176:?
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.