332:
Religions of
Central Asia, pg. 53. Regards, Smart Nomad" <- it still doesn't prove anything. You're talking about century 10-11 which you don't know. Cumans were nomads, and they've come to Eurasia after Khazars(Turkic tribe) left the Eurasia, there are no tribes that they fought.. Cumans have even joined the armies of Khazar Khaganate(The warriors of the Khazar Khaganate who used masks) 4-) Kemenche Khan(Cuman leader) and Mongols have united and invaded Kindom of Hungary&Romania together, then the Mongols(empire) were kicked by the Cumans from eastern Europe. Cuman culture = Mongol culture(Nomad, steppe warriors).. Cumans left the war during Mongol invasion of Rus empires(Result from: The Cuman commander was Kemenche Khan, he has invaded Hungary during Mongol invasions, he also fought during Rus vs Mongol). Kemenche Khan has reached to Hungary together with Mongols. There were Cuman/Kipchak/Turks in Eastern Europe(Romania, Southwest Russia) anyway and you said "they escaped the Mongol invasion" it's a comic thesis, I declare you a historian. After the Mongol invasion, there Cumans in Golden Horde Khanate, the Cumans have migrated to Kindom of Georgia(Kubasar Khan) and Northeastern Anatolia, my paternal ancestors were from the Cumans. Look at the borders of Golden Horde Khanate and Kindom of Georgia..
2616:. There's no real information to go on (other than the account being used for a comment in poor English). Considering that the last year's events in Ukraine have brought in a tidal wave of trolls and POV IP hoppers, it would be impossible for me to identify anything other than the fact that the user's English is very poor (or they're putting it on, as I've encountered before), and that they have definitive POV opinions. If it is a good faith choice of name, I'd be extremely surprised: choosing a name that would crop up in a lot of Eastern European articles (particularly as I've been prominent in a lot of talk pages and articles) seems more opportunistic than coincidental. At least the user has the opportunity to create another username should they be sincere about contributing to Knowledge. --
1602:
that which takes precedence for me: POV pushing and blatant disregard for the most fundamental principles of
Knowledge. As I've evolved into taking on the role of watching articles (ex-Soviet areas in particular) under attack from the escapees from current affairs articles, it's become the mainstay of my work on Knowledge. The question, then, is whether I like this role. I loathe and love it because I must follow policy above and beyond my 'self'. Whether I am made of the right stuff to be a good sysop is a question I can't know the answer to without trying the hat on. I would assume there would be reliable supervision and plenty of constructive criticism from the outset if I were regarded a reasonable potential candidate? --
431:"Self-identification-How the group self-identifies should be considered. If their autonym is commonly used in English, it would be the best article title. Any terms regarded as derogatory by members of the ethnic group in question should be avoided." As noted by Paul Robert Magosci, there is an ethnic group known in English as Ruthenians, but which self identifies as Carpatho-Rusyns, or simply Rusyns. They do not self-identify as Ukrainians. In fact, they find the Ukrainian label offensive. You are hereby warned that continuing to refer to Carpatho-Rusyns as Ukrainians may result in complaints being lodged against you in appropriate Wiki forums.
1582:
with the staff of several faculties, he had endorsed it. I found it embarrassing but, under duress, ended up at the next postgrad ceremony in the robes I'd technically earned only to be greeted by a standing ovation I didn't fully believe was merited. In the minds of my colleagues, I was the one who didn't fall apart; understood the big picture as well as the details; did not shirk my responsibility; did not play at favourites (even if it was at their expense because I could always justify my position despite its not being my preference).
541:
31:
201:
oaths it was done with swords in the hands that touched the body of a dog cut in two. The
Italian Franciscan monk, traveler and historian John of Plano Carpini says that when the Hungarian prince married married the Cuman princess, ten Cumans swore over a dog cut in half with a sword, that they would defend the Kingdom of Hungary." look at the word, can you find me from a serious source? no. I though it's an edit by ordinary person, perhaps by a nationalist, so I want my edit back..
1149:
2063:
2004:
1412:
861:
His
Majesty's government condoned Stalin's actions in the region. Why was that? A failed attempt to keep a racist empire? Perhaps you might consider why your concept of the term Ruthenian was so completely different from the Latin origin of the word, and its continued usage in academics? In any event the rules here at WP don't change because the truth hurts. Also, perhaps, just perhaps, you Brits might consider not perhapsing so much perhaps?
277:, if I've offended you by being a little uncomfortable about how quickly you've developed the article. It's very rare for Knowledge, but certainly not unheard of. Whatever the circumstances, anyone challenging your content must discuss it and produce sources contesting the content in place. Removing sourced content, or content that is justifiable in order to assist the reader's comprehension of the subject of an article is considered blanking/
384:
1965:
1931:
1889:
1825:
1777:
1310:
1230:
1380:
129:". The first sentence was referring to the VTsIK, which was elected in the Second Congress of Soviets, and consisted of a coalition of Bolsheviks and Left SRs. There is literally no other thing which this could be referring to, and in any case there should be no unclear information in Knowledge. I understand someone not knowing whether it is true or not, but then why involve in reverts?
687:. I'm not interested in edit warring with you or anyone else. Personally, I'm not concerned as to which system is used, so long as there is community consensus to use one or the other across the board for all articles about current nation-states. It's your hobby-horse, not mine: therefore it is up to you to present solid arguments to
1540:
to mediate disputes as a sysop would be a great help to the project. I've noticed the dearth of proactive sysops around, as I'm sure you have, and we really need more who are willing to step into the fray. As such, when I was reading the administrators' noticeboard for the sake of some other matters, I noticed
1659:(not to imply that being overly hard-nosed is desirable). I'll see what TParis has to say on the matter. It could quite simply be that I still need broader experience, and that suggestions as to how to broaden my experience of applicable prerequisites could be improved in order to apply at a future date. --
2447:
In which case, if you've added it to Polish
Knowledge, I'd suggest you remove it there. The two sources for the articles (maxpark.com and novorosinform.org) are definitely not reliable sources. I don't have any vested interest as to whether Poroshenko is depicted as being a saint or a sinner, so long
1591:
Now to the not-so-funny part. Had someone other than RGloucester suggested this to me, I would have taken it as an insult to my intelligence, knowing that the person suggesting it was thinking about guarantees that they'd always have someone on 'the inside' taking their side. As it was RGloucester, I
1053:
I'm going to go back further. There are a couple of users blocked way back, but who have regularly returned as short term IP users and under various user names identified as multiple socks. I'll run through them when my brain is functioning properly. Personally, I'd like to just make major reverts to
1012:
from last year who displays a very similar pattern of disruptive editing under a number of IP addresses, but then disappears when things get heated up. I haven't tracked back any further to other articles worked on, but
Faustian may recall him/her. The IP addresses have long since been abandoned, but
875:
Oh, yes! I'm glad to be held responsible for the actions of a
British government seventy or so years ago. I don't have any "concept" of the term Ruthenian. Words change over time, their meanings shift. I apologise if you can't handle that, but it is what it is. Ruthenian has not meant "all the people
336:
Century 12-13(1100-1200 years) 5-) The same Cumans that you said "They escaped the Mongol invasion" fought a few times against
Mongols(empire) in Egypt and they crushed the Mongol armies. (Mameluke-Mongol war, Dawla-Al-Turkiyya, Baibars), can you tell me how many armies were in the world that crushed
166:
behaviour. The article has been worked on consistently since 2008. The fact that no one has used the talk page is more likely to be indicative of editors trying to fly under the radar, as you are, than any reflection on its being abandoned. Try to do the right thing, and let other editors follow your
2211:
I did not obfuscate anything. Instead you did obfuscate content/context, by not distinguishing between province and region. And I did not post a complaint. You misrepresent the case. If anyone did forum shopping it was you, because you went to an unrelated article talk (Oblasts of
Ukraine) to spread
1623:
You're welcome hold BR's T against me as much as you wish to. In fact, I have quite a large number of articles on religions on my watchlist in order to halt POV refactoring of content. The duties of a Harpy are clear, so just consider me a benign lower deity, despite religion being the opiate of the
1601:
I started working on
Knowledge as a challenge to my many years of having a free hand to interpret research and throw myself into a new learning curve demanding the opposite of me. I had pretty visions of developing articles on visual artists. Instead, I've spent more and more of my time dedicated to
1539:
Have you ever considered becoming a sysop? I imagine it is a bit of a drag in some respects, however, you seem like the perfect candidate. You have a good knowledge of policies, a level-head, an ability to compromise, to deal with problem editors, to help resolve disputes, and so forth. Your ability
1461:
Hi Iryna, you may remember me from my (unfortunately wasted) efforts at combating bias and POV-pushing in articles related to Poland. It looks like someone else has taken up my cause, but he is facing the same resistance of edit warring and refusal to accept change as I did. Would it be possible for
597:
I don't think you got what i meant. IMF's data is mostly estimation based on OUT OF DATE economic data. That's one of the reasons it messed up Russia's economic forecast. And Russia isn't the only one. World Bank is a more reliable up to date source. That's why i changed the economic data for Russia
137:
sentence, simplification of historical events. There was no "ban on all parties", and non-Bolshevik parties operated for a long time after the Constituent Assembly was dissolved. There is no justification for keeping a completely unsourced sentence in Knowledge which is challenged by another editor;
107:
You tell me to take the issue to the talk page where the last message which had a response is from 2008 just because you don't have any arguments anymore, so you pretend that the edit would be controversial. Knowledge is not a democracy; it's elaborated based on sources, it is not in accordance with
2510:
Responding to: Why are you mangling my re-pings? Please read WP:TPO. If you wanted to amend the text in the barnstar you awarded, make the change to your own text and mark it as being a minor edit, and provide a relevant edit summary such as "ce - amending wording in barnstar". --Iryna Harpy (talk)
1581:
A funny thing happened to me on the way to work one day. I received a call asking me to see the Vice Chancellor of my uni before i took my first seminar for the day. I was told that I'd been nominated by a few Deputy Vice Chancellors for an Honorary Doctorate in Logistics and that, after consulting
1478:
as well as letting the first sentence of the Poland article see some much-needed (and long overdue) change? If you do not have the time and/or authority on Knowledge to assist us in this, I would be very grateful if you could pass this on to someone else who could see it through (feel free to quote
972:
Yep. Identical issues being dredged up... and, obviously, trying to enlist editors for support. I'm convinced this double IP + new user is not a newbie. Any time I've encountered 'new' users who hit the ground running and appear to be confident of their knowledge of policies and guidelines, they've
200:
you have no any sources about marrying of Cumans, Cumans were invader nomads.. they've come to Hungary with Mongol empire and it came to me as a changed by ordinary someone because there are two words there "married married", it was one of the causes why I've changed. "When the Cuman-Kipchaks swore
2295:
Oh, yeah. All articles surrounding Eastern Europe have been tricky territory, but the last year of events in Ukraine have stirred the compost heap... and attracted a new layer of disgruntled contributors. Watch where you tread: you never know when a big bit is going to pop up and thwack you in the
860:
We are all products of our environment. Some of us can transcend it, but that first requires that we are cognizant of what our formative environment is or was. It is without question that His Majesty's government appeased first Hitler before, and then Stalin, during after the war. In the later,
829:
Use the contemporary language for the people in history pages, not post-war Soviet nomenclature designed to hide ethnic cleansing, internal Soviet colonization, and ethnic homogenization. Don't hide from the British government's acquiescence to the same. Make an effort to maintain a NPOV. By all
331:
1-)Can you define me the source. 2-)You're an admin here and you're accept to editing which one you like.(%75 with your feelings-bigot informations, %25 with your informations) 3-)You said: They escaped the Mongol invasion - that is why they came to Hungary. The source: Animal and Shaman: Ancient
1658:
I've only ever observed RfA procedures, but am aware of how tough the process is. If I can't withstand that atmosphere, I don't believe I'd be a good candidate. I have no illusions as to being Ms Popularity. That's no how I perceive the function of being a good contributor, much less a good sysop
1280:
articles, it would be worth opening an account. I'll leave a template message for you on your talk page in order for you to evaluate whether you'd prefer to have an account. There are also additional resources available through Knowledge if you wish to develop these articles with sources (such as
1279:
Both articles have been developed without sources and, as such, I think it is time to par them back to stubs, or tag them for deletion. If you have sources, it would be greatly appreciated if you could add them. If you're truly interested in developing them as genuinely informative, encyclopaedic
146:
Added. It's pretty obvious that the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly transferred power to the Congress of Soviets. Even before my edits, the article we're speaking about already listed the All-Russian Congress of Soviets as the successor entity in the infobox. Exactly what is controversial
300:
I agree. I'm not offended at all, thank you for your recognition - I put a lot of effort and time into researching all of that. The article was neglected compared to other articles like the Khazars and so I decided to improve it. Thank you for your input into all this, it's appreciated. Regards,
1013:
were apparently from the same location. The user we're currently dealing with is located in Oman, which would lead me to believe that the person works on contract wherever their job takes them. I've not done very much in the way of investigating due to being caught out by some dreaded lurgy (it
641:
with your arguments. I'm simply abiding by that which has been established as the reliable source to be used across the board so if I don't revert you, another editor will. This isn't a matter for page consensus, but should be discussed at the appropriate venue. Thank you for your co-operation.
2349:
BBC writes ONLY goodUkarine/badRussia? Hmm...have you actually read the BBC/NYT? Sounds to me like more RT justification. I am open to reasoning that might convince me that you are correct, but it seems that your post is self defeating on the face of it. IH seems to be pretty even handed IMHO.
1254:
My contributions to these pages weren't test edits. I'm also confused as to why my edit was tagged as "not constructive". I'm using the sources from the 2010 Census already given there. The list originally had some cities that did not match up with the Census at all. I was fixing those. I also
492:
I saw your message and I believe I left out the map on East-Central Europe. The reason why I deleted the map is because it's inaccurate and does not translate into text. Croatia as a whole is in The Alpine-Carpathian zone, and even the text has a few mistakes such as naming Croatia and then
2517:
If I interfered with your re-ping in any way, I do apologize. I was not simply editing the wording in the barnstar, but also attempting to move it out of the "talkback" section of the page where I thought I had inadvertently intruded. Something must have gotten lost in the translation...
891:
LOL! Sorry, but this is getting too funny for words. Claims of being able to 'transcend' their 'formative environment' by someone whose entire ontological security is based on the perfection and righteousness of the Poles throughout history? Just a quick look at the special contribs of
1642:
is more knowledgeable on these matters than I am. I do think that your comments above reinforce my personal opinion that you are suited to the task, and I hope others can potentially agree. I suppose his evaluation is more useful than mine, and hence, I shall leave it up to him.
2266:
Hmm. Yes, I'll weigh in when I get a moment. I've noted some goings on surrounding that article on a couple of noticeboards. I'm currently a little bogged down in other issues (whiffs of POV pushing are floating around all over the place at the moment). Cheers for the heads up.
2418:
Being an 'experienced editor' in Polish Knowledge is not the equivalent of being an experienced, neutral and cautious editor for English Knowledge. If these sources would pass Polish Knowledge's criteria, then Polish Knowledge must be way under par for a Knowledge project.
779:
Maybe you two should simply learn to read Polish so you can understand the original census? Please be advised that this correspondence is evidence of WP:WIKIHOUNDING and WP:CTDAPE and your continued course of conduct will result in referring this matter to the appropriate
844:
Perhaps you shouldn't make inflammatory and outrageous statements like " simply the product of a British culture which has attempted to distance itself from the results of its nation's approval of what we now call ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity", then.
229:
I have no argument with you, but this is really an issue to be brought up on the talk page of the article in question. It has been recently developed by one contributor. I'm suspicious of this contributor's work, as is at least one other editor with their eye on the
1335:
1494:
Yes, I do remember you. I've taken a cursory look at the 'discussion'. No surprises there. Rather than weighing in, I suspect that the best I could do for the integrity of the article is to take the issue of 'Eastern or Central Europe' before a
514:
are a good way of informing other editors of policy or guideline motivated changes, as well as brief explanations as to the accuracy of information, etc. In this instance, this is something that should be brought up in a new section on the
1980:, so it has been removed. Knowledge needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
493:
mentioning inland parts as exceptions, which is very wrong. Abruptly deleting the map may be a mistake, but it was in good intention. I propose making a new (similar map) where the mistake is corrected and replacing it with the old one.
2532:
Okay. I've taken a look at the earlier edit and can see what you were trying to accomplish. As it was my re-ping, I'll move the mucked up bit down to the latest talkback so that the sections are obviously separated. Cheers!
422:
1255:
noticed that it was reverted because it was unsourced? That whole page lacks sources, why was my edit the main focus in that? If that were a legitimate reason to revert my edit then that whole page should've been deleted.
802:
Sorry I haven't been around to help counter the marauding "pan-Rus' people" IP. I have a feeling it is worth taking it to AE, though I don't know how that'd work with an IP. Either way, his behaviour is nothing more than
268:
should also have taken it to the relevant talk page if he wished to dispute the content... as I recommended above. Instead s/he simply reverted to their own redacted version. Such behaviour is not in keeping with
1036:
1009:
1155:
Hopefully, it's back to the correct data. There appear to have been a large number of unsourced changes to figures over the last couple of months. Please check and let me know. Cheers for the notification!
1548:
said that he'd like to nominate someone for adminship. Of course, it is up to you as to whether you'd be interested in this "no big deal" affair, but I do think that you'd be a great help to the project.
1054:
the POV rubbish rewrites of a couple of articles, but want to ensure that my backside is well and truly covered when I citekill the cherry picked sources and OR interpretations of primary documents. --
454:? Resorting to issuing very personalised warnings based on a guideline (not a policy)? Please note that, per that guideline, the issue is determined first and foremost by page consensus. How many more
1249:
660:
What's your issue then? WB data is also used extensively, alongside IMF, and it's a reliable source. I don't get why it HAS TO BE ONLY IMF data, even when there are more reliable up to date sources?
1128:.Many times this number has been vandalized in the past times i noticed because the citation aside 2092 is wrong.Here is the correct source that testifies it and that should be citated aside 2092.
440:
1674:
I have no illusions as to being Ms Popularity. That's no how I perceive the function of being a good contributor, much less a good sysop (not to imply that being overly hard-nosed is desirable).
1441:! Working on articles which are POV battlefields as I do, it was a rare pleasure to be able to work constructively with an editor whose aim is to improve the Knowledge project. Warm regards. --
2334:. It's obvious you won't find this information on BBC or New York Times, because they write only good information about Ukraine and only negative about Russia (often it isn't true). Regards,
2565:
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it; if you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Iryna Harpy}} on your talk.
2326:
1264:
921:
Yes, an AE may be problematic for someone who uses two IP addresses, RGloucester. I think it might be appropriate to bring in one of the AE admins as a third party at this point. --
235:
My suggestion would be to challenge the content in question on the talk page by asking for the name of the reference and the page number. I'll be keeping my eye on the talk page. --
1855:
250:
Hi Iryna Harpy - this is taken from a source, Sonerbcrc should have looked more. The source: Animal and Shaman: Ancient Religions of Central Asia, pg. 53. I have notified him/her.
2480:! In which case, it's sorted for the moment. As already noted, if this information is backed up by reliable sources at some point, I have no problems with its being reinstated. --
1129:
583:
IMF's projections have been erratic concerning Russia recently. They've been also proven wrong on it. World Bank data is more consistent and possibly less politically motivated.
1331:
1193:
I only just received the notification of the change to the infobox for the Russia article and have reverted it. The issue has been discussed at length and clarified on the
2322:
For me, it's reliable source. I know the rules, I'm experienced user (editing mostly on pl.wiki). Here are few another sources, maybe one will be reliable enough for you:
1197:
there throughout the year. There are several editors aware of these changes, so one of us will pick up on it whenever the data is changed. Thank you for your vigilance. --
1831:
From what I've seen you do about the crisis and the war in Ukraine, and not only ... This white dove, which I don't have, I would donate to you immediately if I had one.
2392:
without a jot of integrity (ergo, not even worthy to be considered as a reasonable biased source: I might as well cite graffiti written on toilet walls as a source).
372:
1) I'm not an admin. Where do I say I'm an admin? I'm an experienced editor on Knowledge with no prejudices one way or the other regarding the Cumans. It's known as
2329:
2505:
2401:
I have no doubt that you consider it to be an RS, particularly when I look at the calibre of your other RS. Find some reliable sources, or stick to writing in to
1592:
know there can be no such expectations from an editor who develops content following policies and guidelines despite their own political/moral/personal compass.
716:
2527:
395:
until such a time as I could access a copy for confirmation. In fact, I was being forgetful as I remembered having cite checked this a while ago. If you have
451:
1526:
1512:
2563:
on me misrepresenting my comment and tone on on your talk page. Also, please read user talk page notes. If you take a look, you will see that I specify —
1700:
1686:
886:
870:
855:
839:
789:
479:
399:
suggesting the contrary to what it in the article, feel free to discuss it on the talk page of the article in question. Discuss means discuss, not being
111:
If you have a lack of knowledge or are not prepared to involve yourself in arguments, then DO NOT REVERT. It's simple. Editing is not based on emotions.
1297:
1243:
1206:
1165:
630:
1943:
1488:
700:
678:
651:
388:
302:
274:
251:
2576:
1668:
1653:
1633:
1106:
1026:
1003:
930:
325:
294:
2594:
1396:
558:
2428:
2305:
2290:
2276:
1813:
1764:
416:
244:
2225:
2206:
2172:
2154:
2070:
can easily be misinterpreted. Knowledge is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you.
2055:
2020:
1063:
1048:
986:
967:
774:
366:
345:
265:
209:
2625:
2542:
2489:
2471:
2457:
2442:
1723:
Good call reverting the attempt to sweep under the rug that, despite Vlad's on-again off-again denials, he actually laid legal groundwork for the
1611:
1576:
1450:
1221:
1187:
1141:
528:
2359:
184:
1424:
Dear Iryna Harpy, thank you for your recent teamwork effort. I really appreciate it and hope this barnstar brightens your day! With regards,
1008:
Hmm. It could be one of many (we're not exactly in short supply). I've only checked through the history quickly, and noticed a resemblance to
1749:
2137:
Would you care to point out where the nonsense is that I've inserted into the Grodno Region article?... Please demonstrate this via use of
1840:
607:
592:
2384:, which is why you won't find it in a reliable source. If I were to assess the tone in which these 'articles' are written, they're all
633:. Check across all of the articles for nation-states. It is IMF data which is used exclusively. If you don't believe that the IMF is a
156:
727:
2448:
as any BLP information is based on RS. If you do manage to find reliable sources for this information, please feel free to add it. --
1499:
while I'm still uninvolved. In fact, because this has been an ongoing and contentious issue, it may be better to take it before the
2260:
1178:
that with 2171 is the true 8th.Thanks a lot!I hope you'll change that false 8th aside 2092.Not for me but for a right information).
830:
means notify AE that you want to use a British dictionary as the basis for your edits which are contrary to academic publications.
742:
1456:
2606:
1428:
504:
2343:
817:
2597:
solely because of their user name being too close to yours. However, if you suspect a sockpuppet, please address that ASAP.
1371:
1115:
132:"Within a few months of its dissolution, all other parties had been banned, thus marking the onset of Bolshevik rule" --: -->
2160:
1934:
Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you
1718:
897:
893:
862:
831:
781:
715:
He failed to get his way on various forums so is now going into other articles with his POV-pushing and original research:
573:
432:
108:
any guideline to demand consensus for an edit for which you have no arguments and has not been proven to be controversial.
102:
2433:
On pl.wiki it wouldn't pass if it didn't pass here. If it isn't reliable source, than OK, it don't have to be in article.
1997:
1959:
1730:
1270:
Apologies if you felt that I was targeting you specifically. In both instances, I asked for sources for the changes in my
1790:
1256:
1213:
1179:
1133:
554:
2036:
310:
259:
1559:
823:
Try actually giving academic references for your personal opinions, and don't just use bad language like you did here:
2189:. Further advice: posting complaints (particularly when you are deliberately misrepresenting the context) is known as
900:
provides a definitive background to this IP's neutrality and conscientious attempts to bring THE TRUTH to the project.
738:
618:
357:
221:
138:
if it is unclear whether something actually happened or not and there is no source, then it should simply be removed.
1897:
2567:
There is no need to cut and paste my entire missive and retitle it on my talk page. Thank you for your attention. --
2131:
2079:
2032:
1993:
1955:
1921:
2083:
94:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
710:
353:
217:
142:
2372:
suggests that it's rumour-mongoring and being used blatantly as propaganda (see what Knowledge is not, such as
1819:
2247:
You seem pretty up on these things I wonder if you can offer advice on how to fix this very subtle POV in the
1925:
1739:
to suggest it was "never acted on". <trying hard not to laugh given the tragic nature of the situation: -->
1522:
1484:
2008:
578:
2216:. Brest is not Ukraine, that's it. Maybe you better edit articles in an area where you have more knowledge.
1334:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
519:
so that other editors can participate in a discussion of what is accurate and what is inaccurate. Cheers! --
2378:"Мало кто знает, что президент Украины Петр Порошенко, помимо владения стране владельцем похоронных бюро."
824:
2242:
2177:
Interesting to see how you quickly obfuscated the red links you'd created in the Brest article I'd noted
1402:
485:
2178:
1017:
springtime in Melbourne), so I'm finding it difficult to focus over a headful of snot and a migraine. --
2588:
1731:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2014_Russian_military_intervention_in_Ukraine&action=history
467:
38:
993:
Any leads on a potential master, then? Best thing to do is go through the same pages and take a look.
737:
on a grand scale, and using both of his IP addresses. The initial changes on that article began with
1845:
1518:
1480:
2315:
1638:
That's my presumption, Iryna. RfA doesn't appear to be the most friendly process, but imagine that
1354:
paramilitary units to combat internal threats to the government, such as insurgencies and mutinies.
866:
835:
785:
516:
436:
281:
behaviour. Any further instances of removing this content without justification will be considered
278:
1541:
734:
2621:
2572:
2538:
2485:
2453:
2424:
2301:
2272:
2202:
2194:
2190:
2182:
2150:
2115:
2051:
2012:
1973:
1939:
1809:
1760:
1696:
1664:
1629:
1607:
1508:
1446:
1392:
1293:
1260:
1239:
1217:
1202:
1183:
1161:
1137:
1059:
1022:
982:
974:
926:
770:
696:
647:
524:
475:
412:
321:
290:
240:
180:
2467:
2438:
2339:
2142:
674:
603:
588:
428:
404:
163:
1908:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
1836:
1755:
Indeed, herrings don't have the teeth to growl and intimidate with. Red wolf-fish, anyone? --
1650:
1556:
1103:
1000:
883:
852:
814:
306:
255:
47:
17:
1359:
2248:
1678:
1367:
1303:
1285:
797:
569:
547:
540:
341:
205:
8:
2373:
2355:
2332:
2286:
2256:
1786:
1745:
1691:
Just a note to establish that I didn't accidentally click on the 'thanks' feature, VM. --
486:
349:
213:
1904:
because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
1463:
1274:. What I placed on your page are standard templates, an are not intended as indictments.
825:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Ruthenians_in_Galicia
2402:
2381:
2221:
2168:
2127:
2075:
2067:
2066:
Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to
2028:
1989:
1981:
1977:
1951:
1917:
1909:
1044:
963:
723:
2602:
2552:
2523:
2477:
2463:
2434:
2385:
2335:
2019:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
1905:
1770:
1566:
670:
626:
599:
584:
463:
447:
400:
2185:, you'd better familiarise yourself with what is and is not acceptable according to
757:. I'm sorely tempted to change the new 'list' to reflect the French: Polish becomes
617:
article, I have left a message for you asking you to look at the "Russia" talk page
2617:
2568:
2534:
2481:
2449:
2420:
2389:
2316:
2297:
2268:
2198:
2146:
2047:
1832:
1805:
1801:
1756:
1692:
1660:
1644:
1625:
1603:
1573:
1550:
1504:
1442:
1388:
1289:
1235:
1198:
1157:
1097:
1055:
1018:
994:
978:
922:
877:
846:
808:
766:
692:
643:
534:
520:
500:
471:
459:
408:
317:
286:
236:
176:
876:
of the Rus'" in English since the 18th century, and reliable sources verify that.
1500:
1363:
1314:
754:
565:
622:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2351:
2282:
2252:
2138:
1797:
1782:
1741:
1358:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
629:
and, finally, the outcome of a dispute resolution that shouldn't have occurred
462:? If anyone has demonstrated beyond the shadow of a doubt they're motivated by
373:
190:
152:
1565:
I'd be happy to do a review of your contribs for candidacy. I won't hold the
423:
WARNING regarding Wiki naming policy for ethnic groups and self-identification
2560:
2406:
2365:
2217:
2186:
2164:
2123:
2119:
2099:
2071:
2043:
2024:
1985:
1969:
1947:
1935:
1913:
1901:
1893:
1534:
1496:
1040:
959:
719:
684:
638:
455:
429:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(ethnicities_and_tribes)
392:
377:
270:
168:
956:
391:
stated it was. I do cite check sources. Even if I couldn't find it, I would
2613:
2598:
2548:
2519:
2213:
1281:
1271:
804:
765:; etc. This is pure tendentious editing by a POV single purpose account. --
634:
511:
396:
282:
172:
1348:
Troops of Russia|Russian Internal Troops]] (VV), successor to the Soviet ]
2462:
I didn't add it to Polish Knowledge, so I don't have anything to remove.
1736:
1639:
1618:
1570:
1545:
1438:
1425:
1194:
496:
1466:
and see whether anything can be done to moderate the behaviour of users
1148:
1411:
2062:
2003:
1724:
148:
117:
2159:
I just come from writing what could be an answer for your question:
2409:, not a collection of any subversive scandal you wish to introduce.
1854:
1323:
2364:
Considering that these sources cite their information coming from
1946:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
1319:
1250:
List of Hispanic neighborhoods / Dominican American edits reverted
1035:
Wow, good catch! It is almost certainly the same person as the IP
376:. Try to pay attention to information: you're being emotional and
121:
1174:
with 2092 is 9th as nominanl GDP estimate by IMF in 2014 behind
1130:
List_of_IMF_ranked_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(nominal)
669:
PS: i don't care for ranking. My issue is with economic output.
613:
I 'got' what you meant entirely. As per my second revert on the
1327:
1171:
1121:
614:
191:
1964:
1930:
1888:
2323:
1824:
1776:
1175:
1125:
333:
126:
561:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1938:
while interacting with other editors, which you did not on
2118:. Also don't insert nonsense in articles like you did on
427:
Just a reminder of Wiki naming policy for ethnic groups:
403:
towards other contributors. Do not treat Knowledge as a
2161:
Talk:Grodno Region#Controversial changes to the article
1896:. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
2559:
Not only is "accusation" unwarranted, it is a blatant
2249:
presentation of Stephen Cohen as a belaguered underdog
1124:
is according to the official IMF data only 9th behind
2369:
1740:
but a red herring of a new sort...red piranha maybe.
1330:
by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
2042:
One more of these and I'm taking you straight to an
510:
Okay. As noted on your talk page by another editor,
385:
Animal and Shaman: Ancient Religions of Central Asia
2023:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
1972:. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
1343:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
197:
162:Take it to the relevant talk page and stop your
2555:. I'm referring to the header for the section:
1804:. Your sentiments are greatly appreciated. --
955:He most likely has started using an identity :
546:Hello, Iryna Harpy. You have new messages at
2380:I'm not surprised that "few know" about this
2181:. As for removing my comment twice from from
745:where he draws on the French translation of
334:https://en.wikipedia.org/Kipchaks_in_Georgia
2557:"Never use headings to attack other users."
450:to work on the Knowledge project, are you,
2114:Please stop your harassment as you did on
1875:Spam Twinkle notifications by blocked used
1569:userbox against you - too much ;) --v/r -
1852:
1212:Wiki should thank you.You'd merit a star.
691:. Neither you nor I are the community. --
1132:. Could you restore this please?Thanks.
380:, as well as the content of an article.
14:
2506:Reply to your accusation of "mangling"
1387:Additional bracket removed. Thanks! --
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1479:anything I wrote in this message). --
1317:. I have automatically detected that
114:The edit has the following elements:
1676:- that right there gets you my vote.
1227:
1120:Close 2092 data somebody posted 8th.
383:2) The referenced source is here in
378:jumping to conclusions about editors
25:
458:are you planning on in order to be
23:
1823:
1775:
539:
337:the armies of Mongol empire?? :D
24:
2637:
316:Cheers. Keep up the good work! --
171:as I've already explained in the
2281:Oh THAT'S what that smell was...
2061:
2002:
1963:
1929:
1887:
1853:
1410:
1378:
1308:
1228:
1147:
29:
1457:Seeking assistance with editing
749:(rather than the actual Polish
198:https://en.wikipedia.org/Cumans
143:All-Russian Congress of Soviets
2110:Harassment, nonsense insertion
973:inevitably been found out for
775:01:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
728:15:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
529:23:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
505:12:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
480:03:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
441:14:06, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
417:23:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
358:09:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
326:01:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
311:00:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
295:00:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
260:00:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
245:00:39, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
222:15:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
185:05:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
157:05:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
13:
1:
2511:03:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
2011:other editors, as you did on
1462:you to review the content of
1116:Close 2092 data Russia is 9th
2626:04:57, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
2607:13:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
2577:23:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
2543:04:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
2528:04:14, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
2490:22:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
2472:18:21, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
2458:22:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
2443:13:43, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
2429:23:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
2360:16:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
2344:13:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
2306:03:50, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
2291:01:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
2277:23:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2261:05:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2226:03:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2207:03:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2173:02:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2155:02:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2132:02:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2080:04:25, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2056:02:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2033:02:25, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1994:01:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1956:01:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1922:01:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1841:02:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1814:04:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1791:02:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1765:00:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1750:23:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
1719:Thanks that was a good edit.
1701:02:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
1687:02:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
1669:00:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
1654:18:49, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
1634:04:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
1612:04:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
1577:02:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
1560:01:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
1527:20:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
1513:22:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
1489:18:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
1451:21:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
1429:14:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
1397:02:25, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
1372:00:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
446:Oh, dear. You're definitely
365:Two quick and easy answers,
124:coalition government --: -->
103:Russian Constituent Assembly
7:
2163:. Cheers and good editing.
1298:05:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
1288:. Cheers, and good luck! --
1265:01:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
1244:09:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1222:09:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1207:09:06, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1188:08:50, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1166:08:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1142:07:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1107:04:24, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1064:04:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1049:04:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1027:03:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
1004:01:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
987:00:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
968:06:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
931:01:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
887:20:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
871:20:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
856:14:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
840:11:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
818:21:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
790:12:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
701:00:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
679:10:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
652:10:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
639:Reliable source noticeboard
608:10:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
593:09:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
574:18:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
555:18:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
141:"transferring power to the
10:
2642:
2102:violations by blocked user
1800:! ... and thank you, too,
1360:these opt-out instructions
285:on behalf of Sonerbcrc. --
1898:your recent contributions
1859:
1409:
733:Noted. The same goes for
175:and on your talk page. --
1503:. Let me think on it. --
637:, please take it to the
2195:this is a prime example
2183:Talk:Oblasts of Ukraine
2141:, and desist from your
2116:Talk:Oblasts of Ukraine
2013:Talk:Oblasts of Ukraine
1974:Talk:Oblasts of Ukraine
1940:Talk:Oblasts of Ukraine
1336:my operator's talk page
958:in addition to the IPs.
711:The IP is branching out
517:corresponding talk page
1976:that didn't seem very
1828:
1820:My own prize for peace
1780:
548:LittleWink's talk page
544:
1942:. Take a look at the
1863:The Barnstar of Peace
1827:
1779:
1418:The Teamwork Barnstar
743:this 1938 publication
735:Polish census of 1931
579:Regarding Russia edit
543:
167:example. It's called
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Iryna Harpy
2212:word about edits on
1517:Thanks very much! --
1326:may have broken the
1286:various google tests
1096:Good catch, indeed.
683:Then take it to the
133:Removed. Completely
2405:. The article is a
2243:Request for comment
1437:Thank you so much,
1403:A barnstar for you!
761:; Rosyjski becomes
487:East-Central Europe
283:tendentious editing
2589:Block of user name
2068:User_talk:Derianus
1829:
1781:
1735:Rather a bit of a
741:using table 10 of
559:remove this notice
545:
2366:novorosinform.org
2239:
2238:
2090:
2089:
1936:assume good faith
1868:
1867:
1519:Samotny Wędrowiec
1481:Samotny Wędrowiec
1434:
1433:
393:assume good faith
361:
344:comment added by
279:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT
225:
208:comment added by
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2633:
2403:blogs and forums
2317:Petro Poroshenko
2191:WP:FORUMSHOPPING
2094:
2093:
2065:
2006:
1967:
1933:
1891:
1871:
1870:
1857:
1850:
1849:
1685:
1683:
1681:Volunteer Marek
1647:
1622:
1567:Russell's teapot
1553:
1414:
1407:
1406:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1353:
1339:
1312:
1311:
1282:Resource Request
1233:
1232:
1231:
1151:
1100:
997:
975:WP:BLOCK EVASION
880:
849:
811:
562:
456:personal attacks
397:reliable sources
360:
338:
224:
202:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2641:
2640:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2591:
2561:personal attack
2508:
2320:
2245:
2240:
2143:WP:BATTLEGROUND
2103:
2091:
1876:
1848:
1822:
1793:
1773:
1727:in Ukraine ...
1721:
1679:
1677:
1645:
1616:
1551:
1537:
1464:this discussion
1459:
1405:
1379:
1377:
1349:
1318:
1309:
1306:
1252:
1229:
1118:
1098:
995:
878:
847:
809:
807:at this point.
800:
780:administrators.
739:this major edit
713:
635:reliable source
581:
563:
552:
537:
490:
425:
339:
203:
195:
164:WP:BATTLEGROUND
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2639:
2629:
2628:
2590:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2551:, please read
2547:Incidentally,
2507:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2319:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2244:
2241:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2193:. An example,
2112:
2111:
2105:
2104:
2097:
2092:
2088:
2087:
2059:
2058:
2007:Please do not
1984:. Thank you.
1885:
1884:
1878:
1877:
1874:
1869:
1866:
1865:
1860:
1858:
1847:
1844:
1821:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1720:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1536:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1432:
1431:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1404:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1356:
1355:
1345:
1344:
1305:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1276:
1275:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1210:
1209:
1169:
1168:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1110:
1109:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
898:37.200.224.204
894:85.154.245.171
863:85.154.245.171
832:37.200.224.204
827:
799:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
782:85.154.245.171
712:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
664:
663:
662:
661:
655:
654:
580:
577:
553:Message added
551:
538:
536:
533:
532:
531:
512:edit summaries
489:
484:
483:
482:
452:85.154.245.171
433:85.154.245.171
424:
421:
420:
419:
381:
370:
329:
328:
298:
297:
248:
247:
232:
231:
194:
189:
188:
187:
125:Changed into "
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2638:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2554:
2550:
2546:
2545:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2455:
2451:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2440:
2436:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2426:
2422:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2330:
2327:
2324:
2318:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2145:behaviour. --
2144:
2140:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2120:Grodno Region
2117:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2101:
2096:
2095:
2086:
2084:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2064:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2037:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2015:. Comment on
2014:
2010:
2005:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1966:
1961:
1960:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1932:
1927:
1926:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1902:Grodno Region
1899:
1895:
1890:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1873:
1872:
1864:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1843:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1826:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1778:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1738:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1726:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1684:
1682:
1675:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1652:
1648:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1624:masses. ;) --
1620:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1575:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1554:
1547:
1543:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1419:
1416:
1413:
1408:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1385:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1352:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1337:
1333:
1332:edit the page
1329:
1325:
1321:
1316:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1257:209.6.194.232
1245:
1241:
1237:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1214:151.40.29.113
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1180:151.40.29.113
1177:
1173:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1134:151.40.29.113
1131:
1127:
1123:
1113:
1108:
1105:
1101:
1095:
1094:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1011:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1002:
998:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
976:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
932:
928:
924:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
899:
895:
890:
889:
888:
885:
881:
874:
873:
872:
868:
864:
859:
858:
857:
854:
850:
843:
842:
841:
837:
833:
828:
826:
822:
821:
820:
819:
816:
812:
806:
791:
787:
783:
778:
777:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
731:
730:
729:
725:
721:
717:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:the community
686:
682:
681:
680:
676:
672:
668:
667:
666:
665:
659:
658:
657:
656:
653:
649:
645:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
611:
610:
609:
605:
601:
595:
594:
590:
586:
576:
575:
571:
567:
560:
556:
549:
542:
530:
526:
522:
518:
513:
509:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
494:
488:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
430:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
375:
371:
368:
364:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
335:
327:
323:
319:
315:
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:. Apologies,
272:
267:
264:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
228:
227:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
199:
193:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
165:
161:
160:
159:
158:
154:
150:
144:
139:
136:
130:
128:
123:
119:
115:
112:
109:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2592:
2564:
2556:
2509:
2377:
2374:WP:NOTGOSSIP
2321:
2246:
2214:Brest Region
2113:
2060:
2035:- Evidence:
2016:
2001:
1982:my talk page
1962:
1944:welcome page
1928:
1910:my talk page
1886:
1883:October 2014
1862:
1830:
1734:
1729:
1722:
1680:
1673:
1646:RGloucester
1552:RGloucester
1538:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1460:
1417:
1383:
1357:
1350:
1307:
1304:October 2014
1272:edit summary
1253:
1211:
1170:
1152:
1119:
1111:
1099:RGloucester
1014:
996:RGloucester
879:RGloucester
848:RGloucester
810:RGloucester
801:
798:Marauding IP
762:
758:
750:
746:
714:
688:
671:Lugnuthemvar
600:Lugnuthemvar
596:
585:Lugnuthemvar
582:
564:
495:
491:
468:would be you
426:
405:battleground
340:— Preceding
330:
299:
249:
204:— Preceding
196:
173:edit summary
140:
134:
131:
116:
113:
110:
106:
75:
43:
37:
2618:Iryna Harpy
2612:Thank you,
2569:Iryna Harpy
2535:Iryna Harpy
2482:Iryna Harpy
2450:Iryna Harpy
2421:Iryna Harpy
2382:WP:BOLLOCKS
2370:maxpark.com
2298:Iryna Harpy
2269:Iryna Harpy
2199:Iryna Harpy
2147:Iryna Harpy
2082:- Evidence
2048:Iryna Harpy
1996:- Evidence
1968:Hello, I'm
1958:- Evidence
1924:- Evidence
1892:Hello, I'm
1833:Mondolkiri1
1806:Iryna Harpy
1802:Mondolkiri1
1796:Thank you,
1757:Iryna Harpy
1737:red herring
1693:Iryna Harpy
1661:Iryna Harpy
1626:Iryna Harpy
1604:Iryna Harpy
1542:this thread
1505:Iryna Harpy
1443:Iryna Harpy
1389:Iryna Harpy
1313:Hello, I'm
1290:Iryna Harpy
1236:Iryna Harpy
1199:Iryna Harpy
1158:Iryna Harpy
1056:Iryna Harpy
1019:Iryna Harpy
979:Iryna Harpy
923:Iryna Harpy
767:Iryna Harpy
693:Iryna Harpy
644:Iryna Harpy
521:Iryna Harpy
472:Iryna Harpy
409:Iryna Harpy
389:Smart Nomad
318:Iryna Harpy
303:Smart Nomad
287:Iryna Harpy
275:Smart Nomad
252:Smart Nomad
237:Iryna Harpy
177:Iryna Harpy
36:This is an
2595:IrynaHappy
2593:I blocked
2553:WP:TALKNEW
2386:WP:PUFFERY
2251:. Thanks.
1912:. Thanks!
1476:Poeticbent
1364:BracketBot
1362:. Thanks,
1315:BracketBot
566:LittleWink
557:. You can
464:WP:BIGOTRY
387:, just as
374:neutrality
145:." --: -->
95:Archive 20
87:Archive 15
82:Archive 14
76:Archive 13
70:Archive 12
65:Archive 11
60:Archive 10
2390:WP:WEASEL
2352:Wikidgood
2283:Wikidgood
2253:Wikidgood
2021:stay cool
1798:Wikidgood
1783:Wikidgood
1771:Well done
1742:Wikidgood
1725:Anschluss
1320:your edit
1195:talk page
1037:this user
1010:this user
460:WP:POINTy
367:Sonerbcrc
346:Sonerbcrc
266:Sonerbcrc
210:Sonerbcrc
135:unsourced
118:Bolshevik
2476:Cheers,
2296:face. --
2218:Derianus
2165:Derianus
2124:Derianus
2072:Derianus
2025:Derianus
1986:Derianus
1970:Derianus
1948:Derianus
1914:Derianus
1894:Derianus
1544:, where
1501:WP:ARBEE
1324:Spetsnaz
1284:and the
1041:Faustian
960:Faustian
759:Polonais
755:WP:SYNTH
720:Faustian
535:Talkback
448:not here
354:contribs
342:unsigned
230:article.
218:contribs
206:unsigned
2614:Bearian
2599:Bearian
2549:Kenfree
2520:Kenfree
2478:Żyrafał
2464:Żyrafał
2435:Żyrafał
2336:Żyrafał
2017:content
1906:sandbox
1472:Boston9
1122:Russia
747:Ruthene
466:, that
401:uncivil
122:Left SR
39:archive
2407:WP:BLP
2187:WP:TPO
2100:WP:NPA
2044:WP:ANI
2009:attack
1640:TParis
1619:TParis
1546:TParis
1497:WP:DRN
1439:Anupam
1426:Anupam
1328:syntax
1172:Russia
1126:Italy
685:WP:RSN
615:Russia
497:Tanper
271:WP:BRD
192:Cumans
169:WP:BRD
147:here?
2139:diffs
2098:More
1978:civil
1846:Peace
1535:Query
1468:Xx236
1176:Italy
1153:Fixed
805:WP:TE
763:Russe
753:) as
751:Ruski
598:page.
127:VTsIK
16:<
2622:talk
2603:talk
2573:talk
2539:talk
2524:talk
2486:talk
2468:talk
2454:talk
2439:talk
2425:talk
2388:and
2368:and
2356:talk
2340:talk
2302:talk
2287:talk
2273:talk
2257:talk
2222:talk
2203:talk
2197:. --
2179:here
2169:talk
2151:talk
2128:talk
2076:talk
2052:talk
2046:. --
2029:talk
1990:talk
1952:talk
1918:talk
1837:talk
1810:talk
1787:talk
1761:talk
1746:talk
1697:talk
1665:talk
1630:talk
1608:talk
1523:talk
1509:talk
1485:talk
1474:and
1447:talk
1393:talk
1384:Done
1368:talk
1294:talk
1261:talk
1240:talk
1218:talk
1203:talk
1184:talk
1162:talk
1138:talk
1060:talk
1045:talk
1023:talk
983:talk
977:. --
964:talk
927:talk
867:talk
836:talk
786:talk
771:talk
724:talk
697:talk
675:talk
648:talk
631:here
627:here
623:here
619:here
604:talk
589:talk
570:talk
525:talk
501:talk
476:talk
470:. --
437:talk
413:talk
407:. --
350:talk
322:talk
307:talk
291:talk
256:talk
241:talk
214:talk
181:talk
153:talk
149:Zozs
2376:).
1900:to
1322:to
2624:)
2605:)
2575:)
2541:)
2533:--
2526:)
2488:)
2470:)
2456:)
2441:)
2427:)
2419:--
2358:)
2342:)
2331:,
2328:,
2325:,
2304:)
2289:)
2275:)
2267:--
2259:)
2224:)
2205:)
2171:)
2153:)
2130:)
2122:.
2085:.
2078:)
2054:)
2038:.
2031:)
1999:.
1992:)
1954:)
1920:)
1839:)
1812:)
1789:)
1763:)
1748:)
1699:)
1667:)
1649:—
1632:)
1610:)
1555:—
1525:)
1511:)
1487:)
1470:,
1449:)
1395:)
1370:)
1296:)
1263:)
1242:)
1234:--
1220:)
1205:)
1186:)
1164:)
1156:--
1140:)
1102:—
1062:)
1047:)
1025:)
1015:is
999:—
985:)
966:)
929:)
896:/
882:—
869:)
851:—
838:)
813:—
788:)
773:)
726:)
699:)
677:)
650:)
642:--
625:,
621:,
606:)
591:)
572:)
527:)
503:)
478:)
439:)
415:)
356:)
352:•
324:)
309:)
293:)
258:)
243:)
220:)
216:•
183:)
155:)
91:→
2620:(
2601:(
2571:(
2537:(
2522:(
2484:(
2466:(
2452:(
2437:(
2423:(
2354:(
2338:(
2300:(
2285:(
2271:(
2255:(
2220:(
2201:(
2167:(
2149:(
2126:(
2074:(
2050:(
2027:(
1988:(
1950:(
1916:(
1835:(
1808:(
1785:(
1759:(
1744:(
1695:(
1663:(
1651:☎
1628:(
1621::
1617:@
1606:(
1574:P
1571:T
1557:☎
1521:(
1507:(
1483:(
1445:(
1391:(
1366:(
1351:)
1338:.
1292:(
1259:(
1238:(
1216:(
1201:(
1182:(
1160:(
1136:(
1104:☎
1058:(
1043:(
1039:.
1021:(
1001:☎
981:(
962:(
925:(
884:☎
865:(
853:☎
834:(
815:☎
784:(
769:(
722:(
718:.
695:(
673:(
646:(
602:(
587:(
568:(
550:.
523:(
499:(
474:(
435:(
411:(
369::
348:(
320:(
305:(
289:(
254:(
239:(
212:(
179:(
151:(
120:-
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.