Knowledge

User talk:Hike395/Archive 13

Source đź“ť

346: 220: 31: 108: 1110: 1042:. I am more or less sold on the idea that users editing articles about the hill of the British Isles should not have to display the geographical coordinates if they don't want to. They generally cling to the ordinance grids which are somewhat analogous to UTM. It works for them and is part of their tradition. I found out there is also an ordinance survey in this country. It seems the military uses it and no one else cares much. 1378:
I feel that there are enough galleries in Knowledge articles of various types that we don't need to ask for a consensus and spend a lot of time on this minor article. I am happy to simply compromise on a small gallery of a size that you can agree to (I will add 2 images for now). However, if you deal
1360:
From my perspective, simply deleting galleries to prevent them from becoming excessively large is a bit editor-centric; a more reader-centric approach would be to try to trim them as needed. Of course, that takes more effort. While I work with Wikimedia Commons a lot, I tend to look in it mainly when
1232:
Hi again, Hike395 (and thanks for the Barnstar). It looks to me like the guidance is open to interpretation in a given case. For an article on a mountain, I would tend to interpret that as not having multiple views of the peak from a similar vantage point. The same mountain can present very different
1050:
then the geographical coordinates don't display anywhere. The label doesn't display either. The coordinates are only used to mark the map. I doubt the option will be used much. About a year ago I wrote a comment on one of their discussion pages about the possibility of this option and got no response
750:
Thanks for the encouragement. I'm working on the mountain map sandbox just now. I want to get the superimpose thing back. As usual I'm over-thinking it. The problem with using pixel coordinates is that the location of the marker moves if the image is re sized. The Germans introduced the idea of using
197:
Hi, the article on altitude training discusses creating artificial high altitude conditions by altering the oxygen/nitrogen ratio. I thought it would be appropriate to add links to methods to accomplish this. Perhaps my choices were not the best, but I could find no better. I think having links about
1080:
P.S. Maybe it's like the feet and meters thing. I doubt I'll ever get the hang of meters. Many people know something about geological coordinates in the US and Canada, a few like to use UTM. My understanding is that in the British Isles they know about the grid reference system and aren't interested
1045:
If one of this editors in the British Isles wishes to use a map then, currently, he has few options. The easiest is to provide geographical coordinates and the name of a location map template as we do. The editor might not like the geographical coordinates being displayed together with the ordinate
686:
I like the idea of centralizing code. The downfall of geobox, I think, is its extreme generality. Given that it tries to cover all possible geographical entities, it doesn't check for parameter sanity. So, neophytes fill Geoboxes with all sorts of odd junk. I think that the underlying general code
700:
For example, the "lowest" parameter is quite ambiguous for mountains and ranges, not so for valleys and rivers. I tried to explain this to Caroig when he was creating Geobox, but he didn't listen, and the code for Geobox was so complex that I could not edit it, and had to rely on Caroig. That was
792:
for awhile today. I noticed that you where there before me. Fixed a problem with text alignment of the coordinates cell and a problem with the coordinate reference always wrapping to the next line. I generally got obsessive all over it. I added two alternate parameter names and changed the
1210:--- the gallery simply showed multiple views of the mountain, and hence was "repetitive or similar" and did not (IMO) illustrate "aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text". Not to worry, though: I added the images to the end of the Commons gallery at 1051:
at all. Their project appeared even dead although there is a vast number of articles. I was cleaning up the old parameters at the time. The response to that was interesting. All over the world people just started using the new parameter names with no questions asked.
899:. No one has said a word about it. The current version of the infobox is broken so there is some urgency. The coordinates data cell wraps if coordinates_ref is used. If neither you or RedWolf have no comments, I'll request a protected page edit in a few days.  – 620:
currently uses Infobox mountain as a meta template. I'm thinking that we can't just keep adding cells to Infobox mountain to satisfy related templates like Infobox valley, glacier, etc. I'll work up a simple version in in my user space and see if it
600:
I would never repeat the geobox thing. I'm thinking about a meta template where a template that transcluded it could create there own labels. So each template would have a degree of independence. It would be transparent to the template
1057:
Thanks for you comments at template:infobox coord/talk. I was at my wits end. I felt like I gave them the facts I thought they would need. I have to admit that at one point I was really hot under the collar. That's all I better say.
1261:, can we not do the same for it? A lot of casual readers are going to miss the Wikimedia link, and the infobox image itself is a measly 550 Ă— 357 pixels and doesn't show much detail. Can we compromise on a 3-image gallery? 866:
Any chance you or someone could come up with a better description of the northern boundary of the Sierra? "Fredonyer Pass and the Susan River" comprise a very small slice (about 14 miles worth) of that boundary.
234: 377: 380: 1300:
I tend to transwiki galleries on Mountain articles when I find them, because they tend to grow and grow with random photos that editors keep adding. That's why I'm reluctant to have even a short gallery.
133:
to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
386: 239: 472: 383: 1283:
Part of it is the shortness of the article -- I wouldn't mind more photos scattered in the article if it were longer. Any chance having you expanding the article? As you say, it's one of the
274:
Hello, and thank you for your application to be a flickr reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. Congratulations! Please see
389: 1361:
I'm in search of images to add to an article. I seldom look at it simply in conjunction with reading an article. I suspect a lot of other Knowledge readers don't use it very much, either.
442:. There were no articles that used the old parameter names the last I checked. That was more than a week ago. I asked for an opinion and you can find the the answer I got at 801:
since it is the width that the user specifies. I didn't really change anything really basic. I worked some on code readability which I probably worry to much about. –
1020: 991: 423: 495:
Funny thing is the display parameter has never be used. I didn't check to see if format was ever used. A while ago, I checked border and it was never used.  –
338: 1054:
I guess I think that we should not force editors to do thinks the American way. Even if we think that our way is the best. Any thoughts welcome as always.
279: 1061:
I light of recent events I realize that I might not have explained myself very well here. If there is any additional information you want, please ask. –
610:
The idea is to centralize. Bug prone code would be in one place rather than distributed. It would also facilitate a common look and feel. For example
1343:
If I had unlimited time I'd be happy to expand the article, which certainly deserves to be expanded. But I don't, and it's not high on my priorities.
576: 566: 372: 175: 517: 483: 1177: 1100: 556: 486:
and remove the tl from the edit editprotected template. As I mentioned on my talk page Infobox coord defaults to dms and inline,title. Thanks.
1392: 1326: 1270: 1223: 896: 751:
relative coordinates. I'm thinking of writing another template that would do the conversion for the editor. Oh well, sounds convoluted.  –
1214:(3 of them were not previously in that gallery). This way, editors of all languages (including es) can appreciate and use those images. — 582:
may have been too general, though -- it sounds like you are proposing combining just natural landforms. Which ones are you thinking of? —
443: 1006: 981: 964: 941: 853: 830: 765: 733: 673: 640:
because there are geological features that don't fit into a general category (like mountain, lake, valley, ...). Thinks its worth a try.
591: 932:, without even discussion, and then you can do the rest of the changes. I hate to leave 6000+ pages broken for hours, let alone days. — 509: 1233:
aspects when viewed from different angles, or in different seasons. When I look at Knowledge articles on other major peaks, such as
1200: 187: 164: 1030:
was set to some strange value nothing bad would happen. As you said, if I remember correctly, the only values recognized now are
649:
P.S. Lets talk on your page. This jumping around is making me dizzy. If I don't reply within a reasonable time you could use the
264: 198:
how it is or can be done would be of interest to some people interested in this subject. Maybe you can find better references. --
815: 1133:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 1149:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
885: 283: 1380: 1314: 333: 207: 1257:, etc., I see most of them have more than one image of the mountain. Given Pico de Orizaba's significance as one of the 1095: 1075: 913: 219: 291: 1116: 460: 479: 777: 1182: 403: 226: 1128: 614: 275: 244: 169: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 1317:? (which you are more than welcome to join, by the way) I'm happy to abide by consensus gathered there. — 192: 145: 1150: 1136: 160: 38: 718: 634: 536: 436: 149: 123: 562:
Hm. Other that the extreme bloatedness of the template and ugliness of the result, wasn't that what
155:
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
890: 786: 269: 102: 122:
on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a
861: 526: 413: 130: 1211: 1140: 532:. There's stuff in the sandbox. Are you familiar with the modular design in software. I created 1379:
with this issue repeatedly and want the feedback, then please go ahead and solicit opinions at
1284: 1258: 701:
very frustrating. And, to this day, I have to put up with IP editors misusing those parameters.
687:
should be shared, but shielded so that only sane parameters are used for each type of landform.
394: 298: 1109: 1121: 881: 308: 250: 183: 156: 328: 8: 1388: 1266: 1196: 259: 119: 429:. I cannot reproduce the bug you mentioned. Could you describe for me what you noticed. 345: 1146: 322: 1046:
grid reference but has no option. The sand box is set up so that if the editor enters
1322: 1254: 1238: 1219: 1002: 937: 826: 729: 587: 47: 17: 1170: 877: 179: 997:, that it would have shown up. I don't quite understand what's going on: do you? — 253:, less "tourist region" sounding and much better for type of info it contains. --- 212: 1188: 1089: 1069: 958: 907: 847: 809: 759: 667: 550: 503: 454: 366: 352: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1384: 1262: 1242: 1234: 1192: 923:
the mountains, rather than just write about them. I responded to your proposal.
254: 203: 144:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 137: 871: 317: 141: 1318: 1215: 1207: 998: 933: 822: 725: 583: 107: 1250: 1161: 653: 1187:
Hi Hike395, I'm in the dark as to why you removed the gallery from the
1082: 1062: 951: 900: 840: 802: 752: 660: 543: 496: 447: 359: 314:
to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your work on Commons! :)
1246: 199: 1081:
in learning how the rest of us to it. I could be wrong about this. –
444:
Help talk:Template#Questions about old parameter names and templates
542:
as a possible generic geologic infobox. I still have some ideas.  –
987:
not have coordinates? I would have thought with the reversion of
136:
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
419:
and fixed it so the sandbox version uses the sandbox version of
1191:
article. Could you explain the reason(s) for the edit? Thanks.
484:
Template talk:Infobox mountain#Fix bug in calling Infobox coord
928:
But, if the infobox is broken, let's just fix what we need
178:). I hope the I did not mess up your way of tackling it. -- 148:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 286:. A helpful script for easy-tagging flickr images is at 874:
article Talk page - but I suppose it works here, too).
919:
I was on an unofficial wikibreak: I've been trying to
129:
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
895:
I listed a number of changes in the sandbox version
278:
if you haven't done so already, and the backlogs at
724:. Looking forward to the results of your efforts! — 280:
commons:Category:Flickr images needing human review
1313:Would you like to ask for more editor opinions at 1016:Actually that has little to do with the edit to 176:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/71.219.177.7 821:Yes, I saw that you worked on it. Looks good! — 288:importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); 1038:. I had thought of the possibility of setting 1287:, and is too short for such a prominent peak. 1206:Hi, Wolfman. I was following the guidance at 950:Sounds right to me. I'll get on it tonight. – 339:Outer layer of Infobox mountain now obsolete? 126:at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). 870:(EDIT: Whoops, meant for this to go in the 977:Later --- why does the sandbox version of 114:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 1125:was updated with a fact from the article 982:Infobox mountain/testcases#Slieve Gallion 249:Hi, thanks for changing article title to 518:About the generic landform infobox idea 14: 1101:DYK for Ecology of the Rocky Mountains 284:commons::Category:Flickr review needed 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1104: 25: 174:I saw enough. I opened a SPI case ( 23: 468:I tweaked your sandbox version at 106: 24: 1410: 1108: 344: 218: 118:" userright, allowing you to to 29: 1026:. It did fix things so that if 714:Hopefully we can fix this with 482:. After you take a look, go to 432:In reply to you question about 1393:05:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1327:04:43, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1271:04:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1224:03:43, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1201:03:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1129:Ecology of the Rocky Mountains 13: 1: 473:Infobox mountain/main/sandbox 276:commons:Commons:Flickr images 7: 1178:18:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 1096:07:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 1076:07:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 1007:06:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 965:03:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC) 942:03:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC) 914:21:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC) 146:Knowledge:Reviewing process 10: 1415: 886:17:07, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 854:05:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC) 831:23:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 816:22:41, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 766:14:59, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 734:03:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 674:23:58, 2 August 2010 (UTC) 592:20:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC) 557:17:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC) 510:23:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC) 461:22:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC) 373:17:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC) 334:03:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 208:22:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 188:08:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 165:17:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 120:review other users' edits 1381:WT:WikiProject Mountains 1315:WT:WikiProject Mountains 793:documentation. They are 778:Template:Infobox glacier 265:06:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 1183:Pico de Orizaba gallery 1151:Did you know? talk page 659:template on my page.  – 1285:Volcanic Seven Summits 1259:Volcanic Seven Summits 404:Infobox valley/sandbox 290:(which you can add to 111: 615:Infobox mountain pass 356:at Droll's talk page. 251:Deserts of California 245:Deserts of California 230:at droll's talk page. 170:Trolling/Sockpuppetry 110: 42:of past discussions. 1212:Commons:Citlaltépetl 572:was supposed to do? 213:Re: Infobox mountain 399:OK. I synchronized 294:), and you can add 235:/High mountain list 193:artificial altitude 112: 1255:Aoraki/Mount Cook 1239:Mount Kilimanjaro 1157: 1156: 1144: 522:I was working on 378:/Oak Creek Canyon 124:a two-month trial 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Hike395 1406: 1176: 1173: 1134: 1112: 1105: 1093: 1087: 1073: 1067: 1025: 1019: 996: 990: 986: 980: 962: 956: 911: 905: 891:Infobox mountain 851: 845: 813: 807: 791: 785: 763: 757: 723: 719:Infobox landform 717: 671: 665: 658: 652: 639: 635:Infobox landform 633: 619: 613: 581: 575: 571: 565: 554: 548: 541: 537:Infobox landform 535: 531: 525: 507: 501: 477: 471: 458: 452: 441: 437:infobox mountain 435: 428: 422: 418: 412: 408: 402: 381:/OldInfoboxCoord 370: 364: 357: 355: 348: 330: 325: 320: 313: 307: 303: 297: 292:your monobook.js 270:Flickr reviewing 262: 257: 231: 229: 222: 157:The Rambling Man 117: 103:Reviewer granted 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1189:Pico de Orizaba 1185: 1171: 1159: 1103: 1090: 1083: 1070: 1063: 1023: 1017: 994: 988: 984: 978: 959: 952: 908: 901: 893: 875: 864: 862:Northern border 848: 841: 810: 803: 789: 787:Infobox glacier 783: 780: 760: 753: 721: 715: 668: 661: 656: 650: 637: 631: 617: 611: 579: 573: 569: 563: 551: 544: 539: 533: 529: 523: 520: 504: 497: 475: 469: 455: 448: 439: 433: 426: 420: 416: 410: 406: 400: 397: 367: 360: 350: 343: 341: 327: 323: 318: 311: 305: 301: 295: 272: 260: 255: 247: 224: 217: 215: 195: 172: 115: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1412: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1243:Mount Damavand 1235:Mount McKinley 1227: 1226: 1184: 1181: 1155: 1154: 1145:and add it to 1117:30 August 2010 1113: 1102: 1099: 1049: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 970: 969: 968: 967: 945: 944: 925: 924: 892: 889: 869: 863: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 834: 833: 800: 796: 779: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 679: 678: 677: 676: 644: 643: 642: 641: 625: 624: 623: 622: 605: 604: 603: 602: 595: 594: 527:Infobox valley 519: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 490: 489: 488: 487: 414:Infobox valley 396: 395:What happened? 393: 340: 337: 289: 271: 268: 246: 243: 214: 211: 194: 191: 171: 168: 142:BLP violations 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1411: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1180: 1179: 1174: 1168: 1167: 1165: 1152: 1148: 1142: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1124: 1123: 1122:Did you know? 1118: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1098: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1088: 1086: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1072: 1068: 1066: 1059: 1055: 1052: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1022: 1021:Infobox coord 1008: 1004: 1000: 993: 992:Infobox coord 983: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 966: 963: 961: 957: 955: 949: 948: 947: 946: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 926: 922: 918: 917: 916: 915: 912: 910: 906: 904: 898: 888: 887: 883: 879: 873: 872:Sierra Nevada 868: 855: 852: 850: 846: 844: 838: 837: 836: 835: 832: 828: 824: 820: 819: 818: 817: 814: 812: 808: 806: 798: 794: 788: 767: 764: 762: 758: 756: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 735: 731: 727: 720: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 675: 672: 670: 666: 664: 655: 648: 647: 646: 645: 636: 629: 628: 627: 626: 616: 609: 608: 607: 606: 599: 598: 597: 596: 593: 589: 585: 578: 568: 561: 560: 559: 558: 555: 553: 549: 547: 538: 528: 511: 508: 506: 502: 500: 494: 493: 492: 491: 485: 481: 474: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 459: 457: 453: 451: 445: 438: 430: 425: 424:Infobox coord 415: 405: 392: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 375: 374: 371: 369: 365: 363: 354: 353:a new message 347: 336: 335: 332: 331: 329: 326: 321: 310: 300: 299:user reviewer 293: 287: 285: 281: 277: 267: 266: 263: 258: 252: 242: 241: 237: 236: 232: 228: 227:a new message 221: 210: 209: 205: 201: 190: 189: 185: 181: 177: 167: 166: 162: 158: 153: 151: 147: 143: 139: 134: 132: 131:autoconfirmed 127: 125: 121: 109: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1186: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1127: 1126: 1120: 1091: 1084: 1079: 1071: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1048:display=none 1044: 1040:display=none 1036:inline,title 1015: 960: 953: 929: 920: 909: 902: 894: 876: 865: 849: 842: 811: 804: 782:I worked on 781: 761: 754: 669: 662: 552: 545: 521: 505: 498: 456: 449: 431: 398: 376: 368: 361: 342: 316: 315: 309:user trusted 273: 248: 238: 233: 216: 196: 173: 154: 135: 128: 113: 75: 43: 37: 1251:Mount Logan 1141:quick check 878:Kmmontandon 795:photo_width 387:/TestAlaska 240:/Biome test 180:Chris.urs-o 36:This is an 1137:here's how 930:right away 839:Thanks.  – 630:I created 384:/Cleveland 95:Archive 20 87:Archive 15 82:Archive 14 76:Archive 13 70:Archive 12 65:Archive 11 60:Archive 10 1385:WolfmanSF 1263:WolfmanSF 1247:Aconcagua 1193:WolfmanSF 799:map_width 480:this diff 351:You have 261:t a l k → 256:Look2See1 225:You have 138:vandalism 1147:DYKSTATS 116:reviewer 1319:hike395 1216:hike395 1028:display 999:hike395 934:hike395 823:hike395 726:hike395 584:hike395 390:/LocMap 349:Hello. 223:Hello. 39:archive 1032:inline 621:flies. 577:Geobox 567:Geobox 478:. See 1208:WP:IG 1166:levse 1085:droll 1065:droll 954:droll 921:enjoy 903:droll 843:droll 805:droll 755:droll 663:droll 601:user. 546:droll 499:droll 450:droll 409:with 362:droll 319:fr33k 16:< 1389:talk 1323:talk 1267:talk 1220:talk 1197:talk 1172:Talk 1034:and 1003:talk 938:talk 897:here 882:talk 827:talk 797:and 730:talk 588:talk 446:.  – 282:and 204:talk 200:AJim 184:talk 161:talk 150:here 1115:On 324:man 304:or 140:or 1391:) 1383:. 1325:) 1269:) 1253:, 1249:, 1245:, 1241:, 1237:, 1222:) 1199:) 1175:• 1169:• 1160:— 1139:, 1119:, 1024:}} 1018:{{ 1005:) 995:}} 989:{{ 985:}} 979:{{ 940:) 884:) 829:) 790:}} 784:{{ 732:) 722:}} 716:{{ 657:}} 654:wb 651:{{ 638:}} 632:{{ 618:}} 612:{{ 590:) 580:}} 574:{{ 570:}} 564:{{ 540:}} 534:{{ 530:}} 524:{{ 476:}} 470:{{ 440:}} 434:{{ 427:}} 421:{{ 417:}} 411:{{ 407:}} 401:{{ 312:}} 306:{{ 302:}} 296:{{ 206:) 186:) 163:) 152:. 91:→ 1387:( 1321:( 1265:( 1218:( 1195:( 1164:R 1153:. 1143:) 1135:( 1001:( 936:( 880:( 825:( 728:( 586:( 358:– 202:( 182:( 159:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Hike395
archive
current talk page
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15
Archive 20

review other users' edits
a two-month trial
autoconfirmed
vandalism
BLP violations
Knowledge:Reviewing process
here
The Rambling Man
talk
17:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/71.219.177.7
Chris.urs-o
talk
08:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
AJim
talk
22:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
You have new message/s
a new message

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑