338:
sources, as per
Knowledge rules I am trying to improve my edits all the time. In academia, primary resource sources are generally accepted if the sources are given and enlisted properly and in detail. It is also not right to imagine that all reliable sources are available online on the Net as that is just not correct. I have always cited the sources time and again and anyone can check them up with a little bit of research in various libraries and archives. I dont know why this editor is so inimical and making many personal attacks that make no sense. Knowledge is an open encyclopedia and many people edit it and its not anyone's personal property. Anyway I am not here to quarrel and I shall continue to do my work on articles of my interest and I am thankful to all, for their feedback and help.
319:
make them look authentic. Can
Knowledge essay be cited with unpublished papers? or even primary sources published over unknown websites? These concerns od mine were always taken as disruptive editing, vandalism and even some would counter my good faith edits with vandalisms on other pages also. I hope these pages are rephrased the way anyone could learn something from. I wil myself abstain from edits on these pages because I know what purpose they serve but would leave these to be corrected by other editors.
424:
52:
318:
I am grateful for the help and time you gave to the pages that many others apart from me tried to correct on account of the same observations as yours. However, it would be very disrespectful and immature response one would get from an editor who's now answering your swiftly and still thinks he can
272:
Hello and thanks for your edits to this article . I am working on it also and have tried to make some amendments and edits as suggested and hope to make more , and add further reliable secondary sources after some research. It is very much a work in progress and I hope to be able to expand and
337:
I am sorry to see that the editor
Azmarai76 is still making rather negative comments. Why is he assuming that only he is doing things in good faith? I have been editing here on Knowledge for some time now and my edits can all be seen and checked. Maybe other editors dont agree with some of my
293:. Kindly advise if the references are ok? Also, I have given a longish explanation to one reference which related to the interest on poet Tarin in Buddhism and Japanese culture and a comparison with the similar work of
451:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
297:(another Pakistani origin poet and writer) , as compared in a published monograph. I am not sure is this is too verbose and lengthy. I would appreciate your help, in improving this too, thanks.
93:
467:
66:
I, Weebiloobil, of sound mind and body, award you with this barnstar for many edits, dating back 3 years, without seeking any kind of recognition for your good work. Well deserved! -
437:
123:. Just maybe, someday, I might have something more to say. For the time being, I don't have time to study the article, the Talk page, or Forrest himself with enough care to help.
373:
230:
21:
Hello to all
Wikipedians. and welcome to my talk page. Please add any entries in a new section at the bottom of the page. Thanks for leaving me your messages.
359:
Dear Frank! I have understood what you mean ... you have been a great help won't ignore your guidance on the subject from now on. Many regards and thanks.
164:
OK, I'll try. If you want me to understand what you are SHOUTING AT ME about, how about letting me know which edit you mean? Sorry if I made a mistake.
210:
313:
493:
393:
137:
290:
414:
331:
151:
382:
347:
306:
375:
184:
Hi there. Just wanted to say thanks for agreeing to give a 3rd
Opinion and taking the time to do so. Have a great new year. --
89:
408:
261:
173:
106:
489:
132:
83:
209:; I greatly appreciate it. I am now very hopeful the article will move forward constructively thanks to your efforts.
368:
381:
Please be careful. Editors are supposed to copy & paste template anew instead of overwriting preceding request
282:
193:
485:
226:
112:
239:
70:
460:
354:
472:
267:
179:
25:
102:
220:
120:
448:
214:
459:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
128:
30:
98:
8:
364:
343:
327:
302:
289:
Hello, please see the changes and additions of references I have made to this article on
278:
189:
16:
389:
399:
Yes, sorry about that. I did it too hastily. Point taken, thanks for letting me know.
431:
147:
479:
444:
67:
124:
456:
360:
339:
323:
298:
294:
274:
185:
24:
I generally archive content from this page when it is no longer relevant - see
452:
385:
142:
Please make sure your edits on this STILL MAKE GRAMMATICAL SENSE!!! Thanks,
247:
235:
206:
199:
159:
143:
400:
253:
165:
463:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
441:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
229:
edit, I just wanted to notify you that no section has been created in
94:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Swiss sovereign money referendum, 2018
423:
51:
476:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
466:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
435:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
205:
Very many thanks for your tireless and diligent mediation at
119:
Thank you for inviting me to contribute to the Talk page for
252:
There is now. I was writing it as you left this message.
447:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
198:
314:Thanks for Help on Omar Tareen and others
376:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
90:Swiss sovereign money referendum, 2018
49:
138:Talk:Climate_change_(general_concept)
432:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
415:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
13:
14:
508:
422:
50:
470:and submit your choices on the
273:develop over time. Many thanks
1:
494:01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
449:Knowledge arbitration process
174:00:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
152:00:26, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
71:16:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
409:20:55, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
394:22:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
369:01:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
348:20:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
307:21:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
7:
332:10:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
283:05:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
262:09:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
240:09:14, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
194:18:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
10:
513:
486:MediaWiki message delivery
133:00:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
107:14:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
88:For your information, see
84:Sovereign Money Initiative
26:User talk:FrankP/Archive 0
56:
484:to your user talk page.
404:
322:Regards and Many Thanks
257:
169:
17:Welcome to my talk page
121:Nathan Bedford Forrest
113:Nathan Bedford Forrest
60:The Invisible Barnstar
445:Arbitration Committee
429:Hello! Voting in the
231:Talk:Qassem Soleimani
355:Advice on Category X
461:arbitration policy
268:Omer Tarin article
180:3O - TNIV - Thanks
500:
499:
80:
79:
76:
75:
504:
483:
426:
419:
418:
383:as you did here.
251:
221:Soleimani titles
163:
54:
47:
46:
40:Extended content
36:
35:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
477:
417:
379:
357:
316:
270:
245:
223:
203:
182:
157:
140:
115:
86:
81:
41:
33:
19:
12:
11:
5:
510:
498:
497:
468:the candidates
438:eligible users
427:
416:
413:
412:
411:
378:
372:
356:
353:
352:
351:
315:
312:
311:
310:
295:Zulfikar Ghose
269:
266:
265:
264:
225:Hi, regarding
222:
219:
202:
197:
181:
178:
177:
176:
139:
136:
118:
114:
111:
97:
85:
82:
78:
77:
74:
73:
63:
62:
57:
55:
43:
42:
39:
34:
32:
29:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
496:
495:
491:
487:
481:
475:
474:
469:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
440:
439:
434:
433:
428:
425:
421:
420:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
384:
377:
371:
370:
366:
362:
349:
345:
341:
336:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
320:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
287:
286:
284:
280:
276:
263:
259:
255:
249:
244:
243:
242:
241:
238:
237:
232:
228:
218:
216:
212:
208:
201:
196:
195:
191:
187:
175:
171:
167:
161:
156:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
135:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:Dear FrankP,
110:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
72:
69:
65:
64:
61:
58:
53:
48:
45:
44:
38:
37:
28:
27:
22:
471:
465:
442:
436:
430:
380:
374:Bad edit at
358:
321:
317:
271:
234:
224:
207:Anita Carter
204:
183:
141:
116:
99:Adèle Fisher
87:
59:
31:Appreciation
23:
20:
473:voting page
211:Dorsetonian
68:Weebiloobil
457:topic bans
291:Omer Tarin
285:AsadUK200
125:Oaklandguy
453:site bans
361:Azmarai76
350:AsadUk200
340:AsadUK200
324:Azmarai76
309:AsadUK200
299:AsadUK200
275:AsadUK200
186:Sirfurboy
386:NedFausa
480:NoACEMM
248:ZxxZxxZ
160:Johnbod
144:Johnbod
401:FrankP
254:FrankP
166:FrankP
200:WP:3O
490:talk
443:The
405:talk
390:talk
365:talk
344:talk
328:talk
303:talk
279:talk
258:talk
233:. --
227:this
215:talk
190:talk
170:talk
148:talk
129:talk
103:talk
92:and
492:)
482:}}
478:{{
455:,
407:)
392:)
367:)
346:)
330:)
305:)
281:)
260:)
217:)
192:)
172:)
150:)
131:)
109:.
105:)
488:(
403:(
388:(
363:(
342:(
326:(
301:(
277:(
256:(
250::
246:@
236:Z
213:(
188:(
168:(
162::
158:@
146:(
127:(
101:(
96:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
