User talk:Sirfurboy

4725:

off a general impression. It is unnecessary to answer every single point they make, or to look at all of their 237 linked articles, because even if you do so, no one is going to read it all, and HpH is clearly not going to be dissuaded from their settled preconception. I think the discussion elicited the key takeaway when HpH stated that their view was that we should not use wording that suggests she is convicted by a court, because that is not strong enough. Something you also noticed. I wrote my source analysis (and folded away all the detail so people would read the analysis) to answer a specific claim that sources were saying something, even though we had no such analysis. HpH's "analysis" is all just an objection to mine because they were already persuaded of what sources must be saying. There is a word for that, and the word is not "analysis".As to how it works: the RfC closer (who may not be an admin) must, sadly, read the whole RfC. This is why HpH's section is unfortunate, and why disengaging with it will be appreciated by the closer. However they won't take a view on that analysis, nor on mine, except inasmuch as the analysis supports arguments in the survey section, which may remain unanswered. It is emphatically not a vote, and survey responses that just say "option E" with no basis for that would be low weighted by a closer. It is the arguments that are evaluated, and unrebutted arguments should be weighted more strongly. It would be a bold closer who would close for a minority view based only on arguments, but that does happen where the minority arguments are clearly superior. It is often the case that the side with the most votes will also have the best arguments. There is a certain amount of judgement by the closer, and closes sometimes go through a review process as it is not an exact science. But in general the best arguments win.

4717:

for an edit, you can then add it, and if the other editor keeps reverting to their version despite the consensus on a talk page, and if they still refuse to talk, then you can now raise that with an admin. Finding a friendly admin editing in the area works well, but this might be the point you would make a trip to the admin noticeboard. But make sure you have the consensus first. If you cannot form a consensus using the above means for any reason, then you do have the option of the dispute resolution noticeboard, but I would generally go to an RfC. The downside of an RfC is that it will take a month. Also RfCs can go wildly out of control. But they will bring in more editors and form a solid consensus. If you are thinking of writing an RfC, feel free to run your question past me or other editors that have done one before. An RfC question must be neutrally phrased. You don't make your case for your preferred option in the RfC question. You respond to your own RfC after you ask the question. See

1185:. You agreed on that talk page to bear the need for discussion in mind but you continue to make moves without them. It is 74 this year (and we are only in March), but I didn't count further back. This year is not unusual. On that same talk page link, you see me asking (in another context) to slow down and allow for discussion and consensus to emerge. You are in a great hurry, and again just this week, a different editor pointed out that you make big changes and move on, leaving half a job. In your wake people have to pick up the pieces. This particular move discussion is a time sink that is distracting me from cleaning up history pages where you have (as you do) simply copy and pasted text from one page to another so that we say the same thing in lots of places. Many words but no new information, and inevitable inconsistency creeping in. And regarding the bold moves, examples of the clean up in your wake include this RM undoing one of your previous bold moves that was not spotted at the time: 4170:

certainly a sock. As you say, no one finds their way to an issue like that, on pages like that, if they are brand new to Knowledge. However, as I don't know who the master is, I can't take it to SPI. To be clear: in my view you have every right to express some frustration on your user page. I might not do it myself, but on that page we are saying something about ourself. We all have views and we are free to express those views (within certain bounds) on our user pages. As I said on the new user's talk page, that is perfectly fine. It is our editing that must be neutral. If no one can tell your actual views on a matter from the way you edit, you are doing it right. And I think you

298: 2371:

sure at this point. Weird spacing, visible formatting problems, inconsistent or conflicting information or odd wording being shown, misspellings, tags, etc... It gives the impression that those who might be "opposed" to it or at least someone else's version of it, are so hasty to revert or tear down the work of others, that they don't care about the state or quality in which the article is left in. Just saying, please look at this aspect of the debate too. I'm trying to leave at least a presentable article, that the public can read. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.

136:, thanks for that. Twinkle throws in the templates, so I will see if I can find a way around that. I agree that many of these can be expanded. I have looked at all the Ceredigion SSSIs, and where they are co-extensive with a single named feature or otherwise notable I have left them alone. I will try to expand a few that can be expanded (the Aberporth - Carreg Wylan coastal one is by a beautiful bit of coastal path, and I think there is information on the marine features so hoping that one would be easy to expand). Anyway, apologies for all the templates! 4369:, but those would accept original research. But ideally you would find a way to publish this to the world, whether it be through working with an academic institution, writing a book, or submitting the information to some edited journal. In this case, perhaps a local historical society? Croydon has the Bourne Society - but I am not sure what the equivalent for Orpington would be. But if you presented the information to such a society, they could edit and publish, and then you would have created the secondary source from which an article could be based. 4575:

information for a general audience, it is certainly possible to include some advanced information on a Knowledge page that would require quite a lot of background to understand. I mean, bear in mind that most readers won't even understand what integrals and differentials - so any page that includes such symbols is over the heads of many readers, presenting what looks like gobbledygook. But I would argue that such information is just fine in the body of the article. Where maths articles often (but not always) fall down is in the lead. At a glance,

4009:, adding information to a quote that I wanted in and just hadn't copied in the first time. Being my own post on a talk page, I can put what I want to say in there (providing its compliant with site rules etc). You then reverted it, reinstating my edit later but nonetheless... No-one had replied to my post so there's no problem of invalidating answers to my post. Just couldn't work out why you'd stepped in to alter what I write in my compliant post on a talk page. Maybe you hadn't realised I was both the editor and author. 2155: 3028: 917: 2623: 3444: 3125: 1961: 2482: 1600: 368: 1642:

statement put the reference back in minutes later. If you feel I should have left the statement I will leave the reinserted statement about using cannabis when younger in. If you think it is something that might be an issue, could you please help me avoid a war. I did read one of the messages on this page that said it's possible to post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Where and how do I do this?

4779: 752:

it is clear who the subject is and we have a short potted history of his life (Arun Midha's is missing quite a lot of that btw). Simply labelling a page as start class when it has seen no improvement in over a decade is not really helpful. We can talk specifics on the talk pages. I have no problem with you putting back the WP Wales assessment - it was only my intention to revert back in the stub class into pages that are clearly stubs.

4748:, then you are correct, I believe, on all points. This is a very rare case where "sibling with 2 X chromosomes" is better than "female sibling". But as you note the extremely small but probably non zero population of sisters in Ancient Greece that did not have two X chromosomes, another solution in this case would be to simply change the example for a different one. I'll stick the page on watch though, as it is an interesting subject. 2918: 4786: 81: 4225:- as was the whole of Orpington. But it's not now, is it. Why add Kent to the hospital heading? I don't know what you are saying regarding Hockendon or Swanley. I have not edited those pages. I have not removed anything about clubs from the Pett's Wood page, although I think others have. Your club is probably not notable, but I did not remove it. Please discuss specific edits on the article talk pages. 97: 2391: 1282: 3624: 521:). You are mass editing. You are the common denominator. You say the "guidelines are quite clear" but your interpretation of them quite clearly differs from mine and that of plenty of other editors. I would argue that many of your edits "do not conform". The lead wording you are mass editing across Greater London articles, the majority of which neither I, you, nor 734:. That page has 4 sentences, which is only one more than when it was created in 2010. There is very little there to justify the notability of the subject, and certainly nothing very much about him. The addition of one sentence is certainly not enough to justify moving from stub to start class, but let's look at the quality scale being used, which is here: 1530:

a bus reading on a phone (which is not my usual editing mode). Despite that, I can't say I am impressed by the above template being landed on my page, whilst letting off someone who has reverted in challenged material 5 times (challenged by two different editors, each with full talk page rationales). I think you have misread that situation.

202:& Sirfurboy: thanks for the pings and humorous characterisations, although I'm actually immune to hangovers, and self-identify as a hoodlum, not a reprobate 😀. I've been a bit overwhelmed for a couple of weeks, but should be back in action in a couple of days hopefully. I'm looking forward to editing with you both again. All the best, 1877:

including cockney, as spoken in the four countries of the realm. Nobody in Britain with any reasonable education says "had got"; it's either "got" or "had gotten". I note Google attributes "gotten" to North American English, but look it up in the Cambridge or Oxford dictionaries and you'll see I'm right.

3568:

even a doctoral thesis in some cases. You mention being quoted by historians. Talk to them about your ideas. The very best way you could make this information known to the world would be to have it published - whether by yourself or by someone else. Once published, of course, Knowledge could cover it.

3567:

But your aims are laudable. You want to make information available to the world. There are a couple of ways you can do this. If you actually have a cache of information that is unpublished and expertise on a subject, you might want to consider whether there is a valid historical project here. Perhaps

2370:

Yet, another aspect about this issue is the continous visible errors left on the article. Seeing them just left there, also pulls me in, as belive how an article looks (any article) is important too. I think what was done were just editing mistakes, but it has happened so many times, I'm really not

1824:

Thanks for this and for stopping by. And yes, if Titus Gold is reading here, I would reiterate what I said in the ANI: demonstrating an ability to edit collaboratively with a neutral point of view over a period is all that is required, and then I would be among the first to argue for a lifting of the

1661:

to try to establish a consensus, but the best thing to remember is that there is no hurry - don't be tempted to constantly revert. A consensus eventually prevails. Using talk pages, a good hint is to try to be brief. State your case and try not to answer every message. Others will join a conversation

751:

fuller, so let's go with May 2008, as here. The difference is significant. Not only is this longer, it now has a lead too. It tells us about the subject and about his life, sets him in a context and is heavily linked to other information. It could do with more, but notability is well established, and

599:

Hi Roger, I don't say I am removing historic counties. The guidelines say they should be mentioned where different from current county. Guidelines also say that leads summarise main text so I tried removing them on a couple of pages that had no such history, and ended up putting in the history in the

4514:

I like that. Makes me wonder if you've an opinion on the Knowledge mathematics articles: I see people complain about them sometimes on, e.g., Reddit, for being uselessly incomprehensible & filled to-the-brim with Jargonese; but (at least on the mathematics sub-Reddit) the majority opinion often

3309:

You seem like a reasonable person. Could you read the latest discussion on Stephen C. Meyer’s talk page where we are discussing the opposite of what I am recommending for Ken Ham? While I think Ken Ham deserves the term “Pseudoscientist”, I think that Stephen Meyer deserves the opposite where he has

2895:

Yes, that all looks fine. You could have added "withdrawn by nom." in the rationale, but that all seems pretty clear so it is not necessary. If you prefer, you can withdraw a nomination by simply striking through the nom. statement and an admin will close for you, but you saved them some work there.

2233:

Hey, i am trying to add some useful clues for the decryption of Linear-A using Dolkos' work. I used external links for the pictures of a pin and a ring which i describe specificaly (museum item number etc.) Was it the only error ? I need you to please specify what made you delete my additions so i

1876:

Regarding your reversal of my edit just now, I am Irish, have lived in England, (primarily London), for the past 49 years. I've even taught English for a time. My favourite poet is Dylan Thomas, (for his lyricism), and my first my first wife was Welsh, ergo you can be certain I know British English,

1529:

and thought it reverted in the challenged material he had already reverted in 5 times. It did not, although it did contain a retaliatory and unexplained revert of some unrelated cleanup. If I had read that more carefully I would not have reverted that one, so I apologise for that. As I say, I was on

1163:

Like I've said before, bold moves are allowed if not likely to be controversial. I don't think it's constructive to look into other users editing history. I have been attempting to update many out of date groupings for Wales related articles, of course. In future, I welcome a comment on my talk page

540:

Hi Sirfurboy, I was pinged so I'm here. I am also here because I think you're able to argue your point and discuss the issues constructively, unlike many editors on Knowledge. I do not want to return to the Project page you suggest above - for this topic it is stale with rigid opinions set in stone.

4762:

Thanks! I, ah, *cough* was perhaps secretly hoping you'd take a gander & alert me if I was just completely off-base, heh. (I tried engaging on the user's talk page before "publicly" giving my interpretation, just in case I was confused about intension vs. extension / the point of the example /

4724:

As you say, HpH has stopped posting for now. I disengaged from that a while ago as I felt like I had already written quite enough to the RfC. HpH writes a lot, and sometimes this works for them and sometimes it doesn't. Because when you write too much, people don't read what is written, and just go

4707:

This is a common problem and can be quite frustrating. There is not a one size fits all solution, but my usual goto is to try to build a consensus despite the editor's non-engagement. Start in the talk page and see who else agrees with your edits. On quiet articles you may find no one responds, but

4680:

will read through it all & decide based on argumentation" (in which case it might be worth adding the comment, so as to ensure awareness that the links aren't necessarily as strong an argument as they might appear)? Or perhaps more "in practice it's basically majority vote, no need to continue,

4464:

My feeling is create an article section, let it grow organically and then perhaps split off as a new page when you feel it merits it. Definitely deserves a section though. As to the uses: it is being redeveloped now, so those plans are still afoot, but it is taking a long time. Pretty sure they did

3542:

Hi and welcome to Knowledge. I completely understand where you are coming from, but I am sorry to say that I cannot support your proposed edit, which is fundamentally against what Knowledge is. I have some suggestions for you below, but first, let me explain. Knowledge is an encyclopaedia, and thus

2366:

Sirfurboy, I know we are all busy, so please don't take this the wrong way. It's not referring to just you, but what had been going on previously. You have also given me (and others) lots of guidance, so you have my full respect. By the way, really don't like to be forced into the edit battle on

650:

for resolving this issue and getting noticeable editors banned by the Admin-board. I left WP for nearly 2 years because of the endless edit wars by this user, to force HC into the lead. WP:NOTHERE was certainly qualified by years of bold edits whose only reason was to claim HC still exist with the

525:

have had anything to do with, had been stable for years until they fell within the scope of your mass edits based on Google searches. What "consensus" do you claim there actually is, by the way? Is it that historic counties were abolished? Is it that they should be mentioned in a certain way? Is it

484:

We both know that it was my edits to the Croydon article that triggered your edits across Greater London area articles...and your edits triggered a series of edits from me across Greater London articles. Rather than us following each other around, leaving angry talk page replies/edit summaries, and

4716:

where a fringe theory is being pushed. Just ask for eyes on the article. Editors will then read the talk pages and make their own decisions. But avoid the administrator boards unless you are very confident that there is clear wrongdoing. If you can get an editor or two engaged and form a consensus

4583:

has a short lead in English, but I fear the general reader who just wants to know what this is will perhaps be lost by "the work done by the set P through the displacements produced by the set Q is equal to the work done by the set Q through the displacements produced by the set P." And then there

4509:

I am annoyed when a page or section is incomprehensible to me or when I recognise it would be incomprehensible to me if I were not well versed in the subject. Knowledge is there to make difficult stuff understandable and to make knowledge available to all. I therefore will challenge stuff that is

4364:

thing in its correct context. Assuming you are Box32, posting while logged out, then I refer you to what I tod you before about Knowledge. Knowledge is an encyclopaedia, a tertiary source. It is the wrong place to publish original research, but if the original research is published somewhere, then

4143:

I am apparently being stalked by single-purpose accounts, that was the third account to do so. And for edits to my userpage, something the average reader would never click, so just put whatever I felt at the time not expecting this, so they have some background connection to Wiki imo. I don’t wish

3230:

Would you like me to open a discussion about which flags we include in the encyclopedia before you open the RfC on infoboxes? As I said in the main discussion, I think it would be helpful to get that resolved before we open the RfC, as in my experience flag discussions tend to sprawl once they get

3199:

I just wanted to ask what your plan was with the whole county flags discussion. I know the topic can be a bit tiring, but now that there's some momentum I'm quite keen to try and find a resolution. The status quo is clearly not going to hold in the long-term, so we'd just be kicking the can to let

2321:

in flag of Wales, and if you think so, feel free to just revert it from that article. I would be somewhat in agreement and would certainly not edit war to put it in. If you think it belongs in Welsh Nationalism, you could also bold move it there, and I would be supportive of that. No idea what the

1840:

I was about to say the same thing. Thanks for pulling things together to raise the issue formally. It needed to happen, judging from the huge animosity expressed from such a broad range of editors. Such a shame the small number of useful and constructive edits were dwarfed by the problematic ones.

713:

Hi, you have reverted some of my recent assessments in WP Wales. Can we discuss? I may be persuaded by your opinion, but your reverts have also removed the articles from the WP Wales project in some cases rather than just disagreeing with the assessment. I've done 1000s over the past few days, and

608:

an established consensus there (and my edits are in line with it), but any consensus can be challenged. We could certainly discuss on your talk page, but even if we found agreement, any edits we made against that project consensus would meet opposition. Ultimately the discussion has to be taken to

4574:

Thanks for stopping by, and especially for the kind comments. Yes, I agree with you regarding the mathematics articles - too far on the incomprehensible side is quite right. A Knowledge page does have space to go beyond a paper encyclopaedia. Whereas an old style encyclopaedia should only present

4024:

I self reverted minutes after doing that. It looked like you were adding an address of a business to a paleopost (August 2023) on a talk page. On reviewing it, I realised that this business address was very old and thus unlikely to be actually spammy at all, and yes, it was in the article you had

3555:

to understand that more. Knowledge, being an encyclopaedia, is a tertiary source and should be written from reliable independent secondary sources. If those don't exist, Knowledge can't cover the subject. You mention research papers. These may be primary sources but they may be secondary sources.

1808:

A brief note of thanks for bringing this to ANI. That forum can be a challenging place, and you have done myself, other editors and the Wales pages a considerable service. Hopefully, a period away from the Welsh area will enable TG to reflect, and begin to understand why their editing was of such

791:

I will respect your reverts and maybe reinstate the WP Wales assessments. I value discussing the general point about when/how articles transition from Stub (inadequate) to Start (adequate). I am aware of the Quality Scale documentation - I have never relied on the examples but rather refer to the

2040:

Hello. Using the information you provided in your corrected edit of mine, on the 11th. July, at 06:59, of my citing Lewisham as Edward Lanchesters's place of birth, (which I, in my turn, took from his page because it was stated by someone unknown to me), I've now put your provided information on

1730:

No need to apologise - and also I wasn't meaning to discount the need for further investigation. Just that there could be other explanations too. Although - I'm not entirely sure what the practical options are for investigating it further are. Btw, thanks and well done for biting the bullet and

1459:

who had a content dispute (admittedly bordering on edit warring) with the other editor about the addition of one sentence. @Sirfurboy then removed the passage contested by me, accompanied by a lengthy explanation in the talk page. Consider this his first revert. Subsequently, @Sirfurboy made two

4139:

Thanks for the revert concerning me. Although accept the constant POV handling is getting to me, and was frustrated enough to put it on my userpage, but accept it was a mistake and regret it. While we are allowed to add such, in the end it led to this. I do have opinions but I ignore them in my

2812:

look similar? I get the impression, although not concrete in such accusation with such weak evidence, and not willing to escalate it from my side. But find it odd for a new single-edit editor to just have it suddenly prepared. Could indeed be someone new, but still odd. Not encouraging anything

1919:

gotten. 1 Few uses mark out the Americanness of a person more readily than their natural use of got and gotten as alternative past participles of get. (These uses are also spreading to Australia and New Zealand, as some of the examples given below will show.) Gotten is no longer used in Britain

584:

To me that is absolutely clear as day. I am not passing any opinion on why, if, how, right, wrong or whatever, about those guideline, I am just seeing what they say. For the settlement articles in which you have removed the HC from the lead, the current county, GL, is different from the HC. So,

2781:

The 'm' tends to intrude in Welsh (when spoken) where 'n' comes before 'p' (compare 'penblwydd hapus', which is often realised as 'pemblwydd hapus' when spoken quickly). However, I agree entirely with you after considering it further that it doesn't warrant inclusion, as it is not the standard

603:

I will contribute on your page if you wish to host discussion there, but I would suggest any user talk discussion should be meta. We spoke about workshopping an RFC, and discussion about how you would go about the discussion is appropriate, but the content discussion itself should be either on

4169:

No problem. I am not convinced we have disputes, in any case. No-one ever agrees with anyone else all the time, and on those occasions we disagreed, that was always perfectly reasonable. It was very clear when I reverted that new editor that it was a single purpose attack account, and almost

1641:

I don't want to get into an editing war and would appreciate your guidance and opinion. Please see the discussion on the talk page regarding cannabis under the heading personal life. I removed a statement after concern about it was raised and explained the reasons. The person who wrote the

3341:" is sufficient, and especially as the wikilink takes the reader to a page that explains why ID is pseudoscientific. That would, in my view, read more neutrally. I suspect it would take a lot of work to remove the word though - the label "pseudoscientific" tends to engender long debates. 3034:

You are the greatest. Thanks for your diplomacy early on and for your patience and willingness to help and teach a newbie. I have been studying and even learned wikitext. I'm currently having fun and learning new things while working on the Unreferenced Articles WikiProject. Thank you!

4483:

there was rather confused, and confusing, but I hope it's straightened out. The plans suggest an important heritage/cultural centre, of considerable significance to the town and to Wales more widely, so it will certainly need further expansion, as and when they progress. All the best.

4874:(...I couldn't seem to get the "subst" thing to work, so I tried to spruce the images up this way, heh. Please feel free to remove it if you feel it clutters up the page—just my little thank-you for your help navigating Knowledge / the pleasant conversation / the cogent arguments! :) 2567:

I hadn't sen a ref cited like that before in all my years here. Can you bring up another example? I'm not doubting it in any way just it'd be very useful for at least a few articles. Would the rp template also work in the context of chapters or is there a separate one there for such?

4140:

editing as much as I can and open to corrections. I value Welsh and include it where I can inline with policy. I am not some anti-Welsh person as I’ve been told at Wici (hence my overreaction), but I am getting agitated by certain edits as well as politics, and now this against me.

3515:

3) I've uploaded source audio from David Schoch's Bethany Chapel church to YouTube, with further uploads in the works. The audio comes direct from Bethany Chapel (which hasn't existed in over 25 years). I possess audio cassettes from Bethany Chapel, complete with original labeling.

2745:

to reflect the Standard Welsh pronunciation (as opposed to colloquial pronunciation). However, I am not at all dogmatic about this, and the colloquial pronuncuation is very common, so I think one could argue both ways. Either way, I'm happy for it to be whatever the consensus is :)

1093:

Now that's a scary thought. Actually meeting someone I met online! :) Thanks for the invitation, although I am not really a pub person. I am more often found walking alone in Elenydd! Interesting though - being that close, I think some kind of meet up will inevitably be called for.

2401:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is

1895:

Content discussions should really be on the article talk page, but as this is about grammar rather than content, OK, I will answer. No, gotten is not the standard past participle in modern English, but dialect is a continuum and guides may be overly prescriptive. E.g. grammarly

517:

Needless to say I am disappointed with your response here. Thought it was a perfectly reasonable idea to discuss your mass editing of Greater London area articles on your talk page, instead of repeating the same discussion across different pages (as you again tried to do here

729:

Happy to discuss on the talk pages of the articles which is where content discussion should be. I only reverted a few that I have on my watchlist, but suspect that many of those 1000s you did probably are stub class too, if those were anything to judge by. Let's just look at

4445:

p.s. Do you happen to know to what use the university now puts the Old College? The article peters out around 2012/15 when they had plans to make a cultural and post-grad centre, and applied for £19M of Lottery funding? Did they get that, and if so what did they do with it?

1662:

more easily if they don't have a large volume of comments to read through. As for the edit itself, I will have comment there, but we can say bad or controversial things about the subject, but only if good secondary sources do. If the sources don't, then neither do we.

776:

Sure it may not be complete (who knows - it's a living person), but (in my mind) it's a Start, length not being the ultimate decider. (I don't see the Stub template as a flag to editors that improvement is needed, but rather than the article is at a starting point but

4340:

Another issue I have is I have actual historic papers handed to down to me as part of a collection in scrap book which are primary and secondary sources, however some don’t have dates or titles! But I have the physical papers articles / so what do I do in this case ?

1407:(which is in no way related to the disputed passage) constitutes edit warring. Restoring the status quo ante is about restoring the pre-dispute version of the contested part, not about brushing aside unrelated edits without an explanation as if they were vandalism. – 600:

main text instead. But no, that is not my intent. My intent is to fix a minority of little visited pages that have been edited against guidelines and an established consensus largely unnoticed. But these are content discussions, not appropriate for my user talk page.

3523:

I ask that you consider these points and if you still disagree with reverting to include this non-fiction book as citation / bibliography, please let me know the best course of action to pass my knowledge of David Schoch / Bethany Chapel to Knowledge and the world.

3332:. Not because I don't think ID is pseudoscientific. It is almost classically pseudoscientific, and the reason this is necessarily so comes down to the whole philosophy and epistemological basis of science. You can argue with the epistemology of science itself (c.f. 4081:

Maybe something for the article talk page, rather than here. But Knowledge pages are never a reference for other Knowledge pages. If another page asserts this, check out its references. If the references on that page bear out the information then it can go back in

3500:

I'm new to Knowledge editing, having come here to provide greater knowledge to the world through my cache of source information on a narrow range of topics. I recognize that you are an experienced editor and ask your guidance on my "Latter Rain David Schoch" edit.

457:

Having logged back into Knowledge after a week offline, I see you've been continuing to go through Greater London area articles that mention their relevant historic county in the lead. In some cases you've removed mention of the relevant historic county altogether

4763:

some such thing; but when the only response was an edit revert, I began to be worried... but it does look like they're willing to talk, though! Hopefully, my game-but-lame attempts at another example will show I'm not trying to be a pisser about it, so to speak—)

2857:

Thanks for the heads up on these. Definitely worth keeping in mind, but as you say, there could be perfectly good explanations, and we don't want to chase new and enthusiastic editors away. I expect I would take a harder look if there were any disruption though.

3468:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

795:

I have more I could share about moving articles from Stub to Start when it looks like little more information is available to avoid perpetual Stub status. I would welcome further discussion before you revert any more of my edits if you feel that necessary.

3547:- that will link you to a page discussing original research. If you want to share knowledge from a cache of source information that is not peer reviewed, edited or published, then what you will be doing is original research. Note that this is often a very 877:. I've been looking to create pages for notable Welsh artefacts, particularly ones that have relatively consistent names e.g Mold Cape, Moel Hebog, Nanteos Cup etc and using the category "Welsh artefacts", which I have also added to pre-existing articles. 3508:

1) The non-fiction book referencing David Schoch and his church "Bethany Chapel" is a first-hand account of events from a currently living person who attended that church and interacted with David Schoch. It is a true story and identifies itself as such.

4651:

Suppose one finds an editor reverting changes made by other users on a page -- not "three in a day", just spaced out over a year or two as others find the page and attempt to change it. Attempting to engage the editor in discussion is, so far, ignored.

1685:

You are incorrect in your edit re Buckinghamshire and the 12 plus. It was called the 12 plus in Buckinghamshire from the 1960's until the 1990's and the Hansard link was the discussion in Parliament re changing the 12 plus to the 11 plus in 1995/1996.

2440:

You became involved somewhat obliquely, and this template doesn't say it's reserved exclusive for those directly involved. Apologies if this isn't how it's meant to be used though, I figured third-party opinions would be welcome. Feel free to ignore.

2096:, which you proposed for deletion, as the article now includes one or more sources. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please feel free to nominate it for deletion with a regular 3259:

Great, I'll get that worked up and aim to start it over the weekend. Let's say it runs for a week (which is possibly optimistic), that should give you time to prepare the RfC, which can run shortly after and be informed by the outcome of the first

3336:

who argues against empiricism) but you can't say ID is scientific as science is defined. The reason I don't like that lead is because it is making an up front judgement in a lead that is supposed to be a summary. I'd think "He is an advocate of

2249:

Thanks for the message. There were a few issues there, but worth having a chat about it on the talk page. I'll go and start a discussion there. You are welcome to contribute. Please note that you can access your edit from the page history here:

4674:...however, since discussion appears largely over with therein, and since s/he hasn't responded to my other two comments arguing similar points, I'm not sure it's worth posting -- don't want ol' Housie to feel harassed or to beat a dead horse. 117:

Thanks for sorting out the protected areas. I'll take your word for it that they can't be expanded. Some you can expand to start class but I am aware that there are a lot of duds. Try to avoid mass templating me on my talk page though! :-) ♦

4097:

particularly, both have references beside these sentences and in neither case does the reference verify the claim made. I hope that helps - but again, specific discussion of the sources and page content should be at the article talk pages.

4429:

What do you think? Sufficiently notable in their own right, or a section would be enough? Incidentally, the story behind their design, and the outrage they caused among the college's dons, is quite entertaining. Hope you are keeping well.

3504:

I understand that the cited non-fiction book is independently published, which is by-and-large frowned upon (and for good reason in many cases). However, please hear my argument for reverting to include this particular non-fiction book.

3471:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

1493:. I have made 2 recent edits on that page so worries about 3RR seem rather premature (and unnecessary). The other user on the other hand, has made the following 7 reverts, the last of them being after you dropped this warning on my page. 485:

changing each other's edits to achieve our preferred wording, I thought we'd be better off discussing anything historic county-related in the same place. Hopefully this will bring some calm to what has been a rather heated disagreement!

3681:

Yeah, it is just calling someone an idiot. Back in the days when I was learning Cornish we had great fun calling people that. It's been years since I heard it, but it shows up in the learner books. Welsh equivalent is probably twpsyn.

3592:

Thank you Sirfurboy, your reply is very helpful. Yes a doctoral thesis is where my previous work was cited (and a chapter was devoted to that work). Thank you again, I'll develop a correct plan for making this information available.

4595:. But that was as much history as it was Mathematics. I expect if I tried editing the maths pages I would break all the integral signs! Anyway, thanks again for stopping by, and for your input at the Lucy Letby page. Happy editing. 183:, yes I enjoy his straight-talking style and clear insights. Having a bit of a discussion with someone we have both disagreed with before in another place (will leave it vague) but I recall Tewdar giving him what-for in the past. 3215:

Hi there, yes, I can put together an RfC, but I am still not entirely clear what options we have consensus for. Should I base it on the 4 options? The wording might need tweaking too. I'll try to put together the candidate text.

541:

If you are willing to discuss, but not here, my talk page is free to use. I have a simple question. You say you are removing historic counties from a place's article lead because that accords with guidelines. The guidelines are

4317: 453:

Hi Sirfurboy. Thought I'd take this to your talk page, as it makes more sense than continuing the same discussion across talk pages (and angry edit summaries!) on the many articles we've both made the same sorts of edits to.

4266:

Editors must be mindful of fostering and/or introducing anachronism into former county articles. Use language that asserts past tense - We do not take the minority view that the historic counties still exist with the former

4538:

is that we've got it too far on the "incomprehensible" side, a bit... (I'm hardly an expert--just a Numerical Dilettante™--but I find that even when I'm familiar with a perhaps-late-undergrad-level technique, the page will

1551:

I didn't warn them on their talk page because I assumed they had already been warned by one of you 2, otherwise I would have. You are correct that I misinterpreted the edit history because it was reverts back and forth. ―

3053:

Thanks for stopping by, Kiwatts, and thanks very much for the goat, who will no doubt enjoy eating my roses. I am very glad you are enjoying your time on Knowledge, and great work so far. Thanks for persevering with it.

2787: 2757: 4116:

Got it, thanks for the clarification. I am often disappointed that interactions on Knowledge sound more like playing cops and robbers rather than a collaborative encyclopedia, but I see that was not the case here.

3519:

4) I've been cited in university-published scholarly research. I can provide further detail if that will sway you towards including my edit on David Schoch / Bethany Chapel, although I prefer remaining anonymous.

2357: 1709:

This discussion belongs on the article talk page, not here. When you start it, please post a source that demonstrate (1) that it was called that at that time and (2) that it was only Buckinghamshire that did so.

4931:"William tells Danny a bedtime story sequence of a "Big Friendly Giant" who captures good dreams and blows them into children's bedrooms at night. Dahl would later use the same concept in the full-length novel 4043:

Yep, saw the apology - it was the logic behind stopping me editing my own words that I was after. You'd have to admit that on its own seems somewhere between wrong and alarming but I understand now, thanks :-)

503:. The consensus and the guidelines are quite clear and I am merely fixing pages I have found that do not conform. I am not following you around as I already made clear. I am using Google to find the errors. 3267:, so everyone's informed of what's happening. I've a feeling this will either be one of the best-orchestrated series of discussions in Knowledge history or absolute carnage, can't wait to find out which! 1912:

Some of the more significant differences are due to uses that disappeared in BrE but survived in AmE (such as the use of gotten as a past participle of get, and the use of theater and other spellings in

3376:

No problem. You might want to consider a couple of other templates rather than simply removing information in such circumstances. If you find a statement is not verified by the reference, try adding:

2511:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 397:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 714:

I'm sure they will not all be right (and it's subjective), but I have found there are very many Stub tags in articles that are no longer justifiable vs a Start assessment category on the Talk page.

2595:. I could bring up many other examples. But it is under used. The use of a colon before a page number in in-text citations is one of two ways this is done in academic referencing. See for instance 1164:

and more constructive and co-ordinated editing. This is something I can improve upon too. We have managed to make vast improvements working together on some pages, which I hope we can continue.

4840:: consistently display a towering—yet clear-headed—intellect, such as the normie may only dream of; and (with a few wise words, judiciously applied) have: helpfully advised another user (e.g. 160:

that Joe has invited me to. It's intended to be taylored for archaelogical articles, but I'm thinking of a similar guide for archaeogenetic articles in general. Though I'm still waiting for

4955:

This should be on the talk page of the article for all editors to see. If you want to put the category back, that is fine. I don't think it is very helpful as a category but don't object.

1471:

edits unrelated to the content dispute without any substantial rationale. Then @Sirfurboy made his second(!) revert. IMHO, reverting unexplained reverts does not constitute edit-warring. –

747:. There is an error on the quality scale page, btw, where it says "as of March 2019", it links to May 2008, which is what it used to say until March 2019. If it is March 2019, the page is 2880:

Hello again! I was wondering if you had the time, if you could take a look at our conversation & consensus to see if i closed everything correctly per the Knowledge rules. Thank you!

2403: 2767:

Diolch, thanks. I'll leave what you put back as you removed the /m/ which I disagreed with. It would need a source for the /m/. I am not sure I have ever heard it pronounced that way.

4356:

If you have a cache of unpublished historical material, these are all primary sources. If you want to take these sources and synthesise them into something, what you will be doing is

2527: 1983: 413: 3089:

Ah, I see. Yes. It became (Rasmussen, 1937) when another editor consulted their edition for the requested page number. I've fixed the in text citation now. Sorry for missing that.

4086:. That is, the same reference you just found to verify the information. If the other page doesn't have a reference either then it needs challenging there, not reintroduction here. 3924: 3464: 2496: 2426:

Thanks, I saw that, but I am not involved in that dispute. I have never (to my knowledge) edited that page. I did read the sources earlier though, as well as the dispute history.

2072: 382: 3885:

Thanks. I have been watching it, albeit with some bemusement. A little short of time right now but I would like to make some more substantive edits to reduce the news reporting.

3927:. I thought it was a very clear and valuable contribution to that discussion, and one I've found myself using in subsequent discussions, so I thought it was worth an essay :)) 3610: 1783:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 1189:. This happens a lot. So again, please slow down. Not everyone edits Knowledge every hour of every day. Rather than mess up many pages, why not concentrate on improving a few? 4621:

my father: I was helping her with her physics coursework and, becoming confused on an item therein, said something like "oh, hm, that's not right... we might have to ask Joe."

1750:

Thanks, yes. Its probably not a big deal about the investigation anyway. You are right though, other explanations are available :) Thanks for the support and for stopping by.

3427: 4554:

Talk-page is now the second time I've seen you around on WP; and both times, I've thought: "hey, here's a fella who makes a lot of sense." Don't think it's unappreciated!

4342: 2783: 2753: 2596: 3399: 3074:

Hi, you reverted an edit I had made, correctly I assume, to fix a harv no-target error. However, the error returned because a footnote points to Rasmussen 1988. Thanks.

3643: 2820:, then completely disappearing within a few days of each other. But could be legitimate but still odd. Ofc, they do not seem to have caused any disruption afterwards. 1902:

1653 H. Holcroft tr. Procopius War with Vandals ii. 46 in tr. Procopius Hist. Warres Justinian Maximinus..had gotten many of those mutiners with a design to usurp.

2380: 3733:

Yep - those are the one's you don't see so much in the learner books! 😜 Although I do seem to recall that we found a wonderful term for a urinal in the dictionary.

2239: 4517:"well, Knowledge isn't a textbook; it's fine as long as an expert can use it to get a quick overview of a concept s/he isn't familiar with or needs a refresher on" 2718:

14:47, 31 December 2023 Aoidh talk contribs blocked 24.186.196.239 talk with an expiration time of 31 hours (anon. only, account creation blocked) (Block evasion)

1217:

to Afd. I thought I should formally notify you, because I notice to made a lot of edits last month in an attempt to improve the article. The AfD discussion is at

892:

Thanks, I will take a look. On those others, Moel Hebog is a mountain near Beddgelert, so perhaps you mean an artefact found there? (Presumably the shield). The

16:

I have hunted out my login details (not the easiest of tasks) as I find myself doing more than wiki-gnoming lately and guess I should therefore actually log in.

1023: 2385: 4550:, it's not really important, heh--just got reminded when reading your "Editing Philosophy" section, there. Really just wanted to drop by & say that the 3147: 1940: 1218: 1046: 4671:

and counted up how many actually supported the position they were adduced as supporting, and how many didn't, and wrote up a reply outlining this finding...

780:

I am assessing WP Wales. Should it be in the Project? I judge yes. I judge Start assessment and copy that to the other project assessments on the Talk page.

2042: 4392:

I have no problem with your recent edit to the first sentence of the lead except that it introduces some repetition with the final paragraph of the lead.

1925:

I have an older Fowler somewhere I could check, but there is a simple solution, which is to recast the sentence. "he had become estranged..." or similar.

3314: 4272:

4. I asked you to discuss this on the article talk page. There you will get input from other editors. This is not the page to continue this discussion.

4239:

Orpington Hospital when built was in Kent, and as the NHS website it’s in Kent. So for it’s own website to say it’s in get then it’s should state kent.

1899:

states it is got in the UK - but you hear variations all the time in our globalised world. You are right the the OED lists usages of "had gotten", e.g.:

3598: 3532: 2341: 2303: 3310:

been listed as such, and I think that people are emotionally involved there, and I need someone who can take a look without their emotion in the way.

3384:. In general it is better to give editors a chance to deal with any issues identified rather than removing information that is likely to be correct. 735: 4147:

That account on WP:WALES is likely connected to the other account that posted to my usertalk yesterday, so likely the same person trying to get me.

3414: 4346: 3423: 2177: 4588:. And if that doesn't want to make you cry, you have no soul! :) I haven't, to date, edited many mathematics pages. I did once completely rewrite 3656: 3612: 2782:

pronunciation, but a more colloquial one. And if we included one colloquial pronunciation, the number would soon increase to an unwieldy degree!

2420: 2372: 991: 1323:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to 1182:

of bold page moves, and not a single RM. You continue to make them despite an editor bringing this to your talk page just a couple of weeks ago,

4579:

looks good. An understandable lead but the section "Equivalent statements of the theorem" containing stuff that makes some people want to cry.

4010: 2183:

Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Knowledge’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.

546:

The lead (see also WP:LEAD) is the text before the first heading. It should not exceed four paragraphs and should normally cover the following:

4378: 2805: 2791: 2776: 568:

Name of settlement: if in doubt follow WP:COMMONNAME; use translated names in national languages where recognised officially or in common use.

3594: 3528: 2809: 2554: 2173:

team is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles and redirects needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.

440: 519: 4302: 4240: 4208: 3432: 2971:

Thanks and likewise. There were a run of edits recently and they were too many for me to look at all at once. Hopefully we will get there!

1357:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

157: 467:) for example. In others you have removed mention of "historic county" and the article instead reads that the place was once in a county ( 3487: 3419: 4721:. I am no RfC expert, but I have seen how they can be derailed, so may be able to offer advice, or point you to more experienced voices. 4296: 2026: 741:- notice that is a touch fuller than Arun Midha's page! (or indeed this version. See below that the quality scale examples seem confused 477: 3405: 1765: 987: 965: 473: 682: 578:

Historic county (if in England or Wales and if different from current county), and a brief paragraph about historical roots / founding

4708:

you may be able to ask a question on a related wikiproject page, but if that's not an option, you can request editor assistance, see

3453: 1577: 1103: 1088: 1061: 700: 2398: 1631: 1519:

I note that you did not bother drop a warning on his page, but berated me about taking this to talk; yet I had done so, at length:

1149:, especially those targeting anything that puts the words England and Wales together, and wonder which editor here has the agenda. 665: 4655:

What's the "Wikidiomatic" way to proceed if a dialog can't be established? Request for Comment, Dispute Resolution Noticeboard...?

4144:

for you or anyone else to get involved in my breakdown, so open to any sanctions, although fear how far those against me take it.

3361:

I dunno how I missed what it said on that article about Malkinson not being freed as he didn't confess lol. Cheers for correcting

2654:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 1186: 4479:

Thanks, I think that's right. I'll start by working up the Old College page, and see where that goes. Incidentally, the existing

3153: 1999: 1305: 1251: 1118:

You seem to be making confrontational edits and seem to be targeting any proposals I make. There is no real logic behind keeping

526:

that your interpretation of the guidelines is the correct one? There has been plenty of discussion about this, but no consensus.

4198:

Orpington Hospital was in Kent , Farnborough hospital as per its own website gives its address as kent, so please don’t remove.

1285:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1126:

concern. Please try to be more constructive rather than confrontational and frustrating discussions with unnecessary processes.

964:

a page of its own. Also, please used the article talk page where all editors can see and join in the discussion. That would be:

459: 2761: 2474: 1366: 1078: 1036: 360: 4404: 1798: 475: 468: 4350: 983: 594: 3946:

Thanks for that. I am very glad it was helpful. Best wishes as you develop the essay - just made some minor tweaks for you.

766:

OK, I see your argument. And my treatment of Arun Midha was challengeable as it likely is missing significant content. Take

4253:

1. Postal counties do not exist. You can write any county you like in a postal address. The post office no longer use them.

2701: 2550: 2442: 2412: 705: 436: 3923:

Hello! Just to drop a note to say that this essay is, very much, as you might have suspected, a write-up of your !vote at

3543:

it is a tertiary source. An encyclopaedia is not the place for publishing original research, and so a core policy here is

2219: 773:

The article has basic structure: an infobox, categories, an image, references, categories, an intro para and some content.

4918: 2235: 1774: 535: 512: 179:

Oh yes, thanks. And I would certainly be interested in the archaeogenetics guide, which I think is long overdue. As for

4946: 4126: 4107: 3955: 4568: 3634: 3616: 3362: 3113: 2050: 1949: 1594: 1119: 652: 542: 3894: 3880: 3847: 3833: 3808: 3794: 3761: 3713: 3691: 2905: 2730: 2464: 2450: 2435: 723: 355: 2261: 2243: 2065: 1657:

I'll go take a look. People reverting their challenged stuff back in is a constant problem, and we can refer them to

1480: 1443: 1416: 1236:

Thanks for the heads up, I don't oppose it. I'll save the information I would copy to the more appropriate articles.

1073: 1031: 632: 618: 3551:

thing to be doing - just not on Knowledge. This is the wrong project for hosting such research. You could also read

3393: 3350: 2124: 1909:

correct, but is it considered correct now? Well Fowler tells me (and I checked this out before reversing your edit):

1539: 742: 192: 63: 49: 4924: 4902: 4888: 4739: 4699: 4604: 4384: 2940: 2889: 2610: 2349: 2331: 1520: 334:}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. 145: 3186: 2839:

On a second thought the history ones can just be three students working together in real life at the same school.

2139: 1905:, but look at the dates on these. None of these are modern except one that is from an American source. So yes, it 1563: 1522:. I made a point in that talk message that his reassertion of the material in the lead should not be restored per 1198: 1173: 1158: 905: 854: 739: 4757: 4503: 3675: 3104: 3098: 2546: 2107: 1703: 1135: 1123: 432: 4964: 4688:

Cheers -- I 'preciate it, if you've input; I appreciate the friendly & interesting reply above, even if not!

3994: 3290: 3276: 3254: 3240: 3225: 3083: 1934: 1719: 1145:

the one I had opened was disruptive editing. As for an agenda, one might look at your 74 bold page moves so far

1122:

and it seems as though you have an agenda of keeping "England and Wales" formats wherever you can, suggesting a

1013: 999: 4187: 4034: 3063: 2867: 2145: 1759: 1671: 1428:

I'm sorry, I'm not following. Both users were editwarring. Neither edit was vandalism so neither was immune to

957: 479: 463: 274: 260: 246: 3940: 3742: 3728: 3602: 3587: 3536: 2322:

original editor will think - but I'm not trying to foist content onto a page where it doesn't belong. Cheers.

2228: 1611:

failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

465: 126: 4329: 4281: 4248: 4234: 2852: 2071: 2035: 1865: 1794: 1651: 1245: 934: 805: 761: 4493: 4474: 4465:

get the grant funding. I doubt they would be proceeding without it, but I'll have to hunt out the evidence.

4075: 3012: 2998: 2980: 2816:

Also while we're on the topic, still not forgotten the bunch of students? all appearing at the same time at

2340:

Thanks! I won't do anything immediately - it would be good to hear what Hogyncymru (already pinged) thinks.

1834: 1527: 1514: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1465: 1405: 494: 461: 3936: 3512:

2) Knowledge contains virtually no information on Latter Rain's David Schoch or his church Bethany Chapel.

3483: 3175: 2520: 2251: 2015: 1677: 1362: 1328: 406: 173: 1230: 109: 4400: 3492: 3322: 2532: 886: 531: 490: 418: 4256:

2. The hospital is in the London Borough and thus in Greater London. It has not been in Kent since 1965.

4018: 3370: 3245:

Anything that will help keep the actual RfC discussion on point would be helpful, yes. Please go ahead.

2311: 1889: 822:, just for transparency, I have made additions of my text that previously featured in "Welsh dragon" to 470: 4459: 4122: 4071: 3069: 2705: 2650:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user

2577: 1324: 1113: 660: 348: 310: 297: 3164:

You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

3046: 2694:: Could you add the non-compliance with the GPL2 and the lawsuit section to one of the GPL articles? 2008:

You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

986:

that don't have their own wikipedia page or meet the previously claimed criteria. Please refer to the

4310: 4297:

https://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/24361882.orpington-district-amateur-boxing-clubs-pre-wwii-history/

3457: 2817: 2680: 2215: 1636: 1372: 1028:

I probably butchered that! Where about in Wales are you based/from? I'm an expat Scot in Ceredigion.

693: 501: 284: 210: 3209: 1391: 4639:

Also... heyyyy there, amigo!... *ahem* well, apropos of nothing, but: couple o' questions for you,

4415: 3876: 3829: 3790: 3757: 3709: 3671: 2936: 2885: 2875: 2749:

The only one I'd not really give weight is the less common Anglicized 'pen-park-ee' pronunciation.

2446: 2416: 2359: 1335:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 1208: 1183: 977: 839: 744:- still fuller though). So then, let's look at an example of a start class article, which is here: 472:

for example). In others you have written that the place "was in the historic county" "until 1965" (

4025:

previously mentioned, which is why I self reverted and placed an apology there. Did you see that?

3404:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at

2041:

Lanchesters's own page, and cited you in the Edit Summary as the information's provider). Thanks.

2709: 2660: 2046: 1916:- that from Pocket Fowler, Second edition, page 42. Also page 45. And indeed page 308 which says: 1627: 1608: 1579: 1301: 1264: 1253: 911: 628: 590: 4766:

In recognition of your service, I am pleased to be present at the momentous occasion wherein...:

4439: 1731:

opening that thread. It's crossed my mind to do it a few times, but successfully getting across

982:

I happen to look at this page again, and have found a number of languages which are included on

4576: 4396: 3661: 3366: 3318: 2965: 2833: 1476: 1412: 1358: 1316: 870: 767: 656: 527: 486: 169: 71: 45: 4712:. There may be other places to get help in specific cases, by going to a noticeboard, such as 4216: 2601:

as just two guides. So it is a perfectly normal way to describe page numbers in a reference.

745: 4884: 4695: 4564: 4175: 4163: 4118: 4067: 3979: 3967: 3928: 3917: 3475: 2573: 2508: 2345: 2307: 1850: 1214: 585:

please tell me, why are you saying that guidelines allow you to do remove mention of the HC?

394: 342: 304: 119: 4593: 4365:

Knowledge can cover it. I don't know if there is an appropriate place you could put this in

1818: 925:

Diolch, thanks. :) Also thanks for your input elsewhere that potentially breaks a deadlock.

231: 4260: 4207:

orpington was in Kent now Greater London however due to boundaries , Hockenden is swanley.

4000: 3868: 3821: 3264: 2989:

and revert back to that version, but I'll let it be for now. Thanks again for the efforts!

2697: 2519:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2211: 2119: 1558: 1526:. I did make one error though. I read this sixth revert of his on my phone while on a bus: 1438: 1386: 1178:

I counted your page moves this year because I am frankly astounded that you have conducted

1169: 1131: 882: 874: 835: 783:

Given I've judged it as a Start article, I remove the Stub template from the article space.

687: 405:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 331: 2953: 1744: 8: 4291: 3872: 3825: 3786: 3753: 3705: 3667: 3079: 2932: 2881: 2191: 1871: 1780: 1767: 1604: 1332: 2197:

If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider

34: 4942: 4893:

Oh thanks. I think I'll leave it right there! I am glad I was able to help. Take care.

3975: 3638: 3629: 3338: 3272: 3236: 3205: 3022: 2647: 2376: 2198: 1887: 1699: 1691: 1623: 1618: 1297: 1292: 995: 949: 860: 624: 586: 522: 327: 151: 4704:

Thanks for the comments. I was amused by the anecdote. You ask a couple of questions:

3356: 786:

I've not looked at the edit history, as I'm assessing what I see in front of me today.

4447: 4157: 4014: 3916: 3042: 2846: 2827: 2674: 2636: 2616: 2490: 2299: 2086: 1790: 1740: 1647: 1472: 1423: 1408: 1052:

Nope, you have it spot on, and yes it is! :) I'm in Aberystwyth, so also Ceredigion.

678: 376: 256: 227: 199: 165: 105: 41: 4360:. Per that link, we don't do that on Knowledge, but even so, original research is a 2691: 2583:

Hi there. Yes, you can use it for chapters using the "at" parameter. Take a look at

2176:

I believe that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the

4880: 4771: 4709: 4691: 4580: 4560: 4201:

Hockenden a hamlet of Orpington is in the Swanley boundary and Swanley is in Kent.

3749: 3651: 3304: 3171: 2599: 2569: 2539: 2504: 2267: 2011: 1614: 1464:

to the content dispute. After that, @Chafique restored an older version of the page

1288: 671: 425: 390: 133: 1141:

Your insertion of a second requested move discussion on that page, and placing it

738:. We have examples of stub and start class articles. A stub class article is here: 4409: 4306: 4244: 4212: 4049: 3817: 3449: 3434: 3380:. Where the source does verify but there are other problems with it, you can use 3191: 2813:

further unless you wish, nor wish for it to be seen as censoring the other side.

2562: 2367:

V, because want to look at other programming language pages that are in draft.

2318: 2277: 2111: 1846: 1732: 1553: 1486: 1450: 1433: 1399: 1381: 1354: 1276: 1226: 1165: 1127: 878: 831: 827: 801: 719: 707: 500:

No need to have the discussion here. You can find it at the London Project here.

4956: 4894: 4749: 4745: 4731: 4627:"Can't believe he decided to major in physics. People who love math like that 4596: 4489: 4466: 4455: 4435: 4370: 4321: 4273: 4226: 4179: 4099: 4094: 4063: 4026: 3986: 3947: 3886: 3839: 3800: 3734: 3683: 3579: 3385: 3342: 3282: 3246: 3217: 3090: 3075: 3055: 3004: 2994: 2986: 2972: 2961: 2945: 2897: 2859: 2768: 2722: 2651: 2643: 2602: 2516: 2456: 2427: 2323: 2253: 2131: 2057: 1975:

On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

1926: 1857: 1826: 1814: 1751: 1711: 1663: 1590: 1583: 1546: 1531: 1523: 1490: 1268: 1257: 1237: 1190: 1150: 1095: 1070:

I live down by the castle... will have to meet up for a pint. Ship and Castle?

1053: 1005: 969: 926: 897: 866: 846: 819: 753: 647: 610: 504: 448: 402: 266: 238: 184: 137: 55: 26: 3139:

On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

2154: 20: 4938: 4718: 4713: 4610: 4589: 3971: 3853: 3561: 3552: 3268: 3232: 3201: 2806:

Talk:Snowdonia#Request to rename page to Welsh name Eryri being the dominant.

2512: 2287: 2268: 2187: 2170: 2100: 1897: 1879: 1695: 1687: 1658: 1429: 1310: 940: 398: 3003:

I won't revert if you do. It would be easier to fix that one than this one.

4614: 4585: 4357: 4193: 4152: 4055: 3718: 3544: 3409: 3333: 3038: 2841: 2822: 2736: 2669: 2631: 2592: 2283: 2093: 2076: 1785: 1736: 1643: 1272: 813: 252: 223: 101: 3867:

new users. After all, as you know, Knowledge is a friendly place where we

2910:

Thank you for the information & tips. I appreciate the help! Here’s a

1489:

I have just returned from a day out to this. I see you don't subscribe to

4633:

Made me laugh. It's true: something ain't right with 'em, I say...! (:P)

3858: 3721: 3648: 3180: 3027: 2946: 2804:

Just asking and speculating, but do the sources comments (aside ours) at

2799: 2584: 2455:

No worries. I am watching it. I'll probably say something at some point.

2020: 1803: 945: 893: 318: 286: 203: 180: 161: 4744:

Incidentally, on point 1, if the issue is the one you are discussing at

2622: 2523:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1343:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

916: 409:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4335: 3124: 2588: 2500:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2298:

itself? I wonder if the text in question really belongs somewhere like

2130:

Thanks for that. I don't intend to nominate for deletion at this time.

1960: 1842: 1222: 797: 731: 715: 386:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4643:

you've the time (as you've been here quite a bit longer than I have!):

2358:

Visible formatting and miscellaneous errors continuously left on the

4778: 4485: 4451: 4431: 4366: 4134: 4090: 4059: 3572: 2990: 2957: 2911: 2742: 2481: 1810: 1320: 651:

same importance of those estibalished in 1965. Thank you, so much!

367: 3575:. That might be a more appropriate wikiproject for what you propose. 3560:

be suitable in the article, but not a self published book. See also

3328:

A long read is right. I took a look. I don't like this in the lead:

1809:

concern to a wide range of editors. At least, one can live in hope.

3961: 3644:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Monadic plane

3641:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at 2692:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grsecurity

2294:. I think it was right to move it, but is it even about the actual 215: 2397:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

1378:

Both of you are edit warring and need to discuss on the talk page.

164:

to recover from his Halloween hangover before starting with it :)

4933: 4785: 4667:

I went through ~20x more of friend Houseplant's news-media links

4395:

Happy to discuss here or on the article Talk page if you prefer.

2917: 80: 2536:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 422:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3925:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination)

3782: 3701: 3697: 3465:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination)

3281:

Best laid plans... my money will be on carnage! But good luck!

2685: 2526:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

2494:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

1725: 1404:

I fail to see how reverting this entirely rationale-free revert

823: 677:

Hello! This is a courtesy note that, following your request at

412:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

380:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

4617:, your comment reminds me of what my (ex-)wife (☹️) commented 3623: 1920:(except in ill- gotten), although it was once in regular use. 1353:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

222:

Should I undo my PROD as you've improved the article? Thanks,

3330:

He is an advocate of the pseudoscience of intelligent design

2207:

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

216: 21:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/212.159.115.41

2390: 4613:

page is fantastic, especially as compared to the old! Re:

4450:

suggests some ambitious plans, but where have they got to?

3382:{{Better source needed|reason=Your reason|date=March 2024}} 1856:

Thanks. Yes, it is a shame. Maybe that can change. Diolch.

1455:

Please follow then and scrutinize the edit history. It was

683:

a proposed merge discussion on the talk page of Gallic Wars

3378:{{Failed verification|date=March 2024|reason=Your reason}} 2190:

before making your decision, and feel free to post on the

2056:

Thank you, and thanks for letting me know. Happy editing.

4150:

Thanks for the help, even if we have disputes ourselves.

2810:

Talk:Brecon Beacons National Park#Bannau Brycheiniog name

968:. Finally, please stop edit warring and await consensus. 960:. Clearly that is a draft and not in mainspace, so it is 4425:

they need a separate section in the Old College article.

3400:

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

2587:

for more details. It can also be done as a parameter in

736:

Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/Assessment#Quality scale

604:

guideline talk pages or the London project pages. There

3448:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2741:

Shwmae! I've reverted and changed slightly the IPA for

2507:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

393:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3816:*....that Lowndes Lane is barely a stone's throw from 3527:

Thank you Sirfurboy and I look forward to your reply.

2956:

it was a nice article, now it's a promotional mess...

1187:

Talk:Britains (toy brand)#Requested move 23 March 2023

321:

to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

4836:

is given, in sincere appreciation, only to those who

4534:

too. Not sure where the line ought be drawn, but my

4204:

You have also removed clubs from the Pettswood page.

2404:

Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Horst_Wessel

1219:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/English rule in Wales

3637:

to determine whether its use and function meets the

3452:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

2409:

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

25:

Thanks all for the kind messages on this talk page.

4006: 3666:I guess that's some kind of Cornish insult, then?? 2386:

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

623:Ok, I've contiued on the Project London talk page. 4058:saying that it was not sourced. The two articles ( 1941:August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive 1348:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 4677:How do these things work -- is it like "an admin 4054:Hello there, I saw that you reverted my edits on 1024:Shwmae, mae hi'n bwrw glaw pob amser yng nghymru! 869:. You may be interested in the following drafts, 4532:to get an entirely-unversed reader up to speed", 2292:text is about the flag and not the dragon per se 4519:-- ...which seems a bit wrong-headed, t'me! 2663:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 1263:Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've 54:Thanks, and lovely to hear from you again. :) 4522:On the other hand, I can see an argument for 4510:just incomprehensible, even if it is sourced. 792:Basic and More Detailed Criteria definitions. 93:No hard feelings. I value your disagreement 3852:Would be great to "get some fresh eyes" on 4592:from scratch. This is how it used to look 3420:Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ 3406:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement 2591:. You can see it in use on, for instance, 2234:fix them and do it properly. Thank you. 1365:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to 1319:according to the reverts you have made on 988:Talk:List of programming languages by type 966:Talk:List of programming languages by type 237:Thanks, no worries. I already removed it. 2952:Thanks for trying to salvage the page :) 1315:You currently appear to be engaged in an 265:It's late here. I will do more tomorrow. 4584:are some truly opaque articles, such as 2399:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 915: 19:I claim these edits back to early 2016: 4848:destroyed monstrously bad arguments... 3578:I hope that is helpful. Happy editing. 3497:Hi Sirfurboy, I hope your day is well. 3263:I'm tempted to lay out the timeline at 1560: 1440: 1388: 4343:2A02:C7C:52A1:1200:107B:C2ED:16A2:D125 3571:The second thing you could look at is 2784:2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:859:8379:EBEB:EF99 2754:2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:859:8379:EBEB:EF99 2646:! This greeting (and season) promotes 2000:Join the conversations on our talkpage 3408:regarding a possible violation of an 984:List of programming languages by type 770:as another example. My thinking was: 326:To give a Dobos torte and spread the 4923:As clearly explained in the article 4859:Or, in some rare cases—the legendary 4669:(because something is wrong with me) 4418:expansion, the more I think either: 4066:) referenced on Knowledge say it?!? 3799:If so, I'll contribute to GoFundMe. 2491:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 1369:. If you engage in an edit war, you 1213:You may have noticed I've nominated 377:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 94: 3454:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3145:Interested in taking part? You can 2475:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 1981:Interested in taking part? You can 361:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 13: 4784: 4777: 4259:3. Knowledge policy is clear. See 4007:https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:ZX81 3857:(but not when she's flirtatiously 3123: 3026: 2916: 2621: 2389: 2153: 1959: 1120:List of ports in England and Wales 14: 4978: 4414:The more I delve into these, see 3462:The article will be discussed at 2317:It is a good question. It may be 1367:request temporary page protection 4925:Danny, the Champion of the World 4919:Danny, the Champion of the World 3622: 3442: 3200:the current discussion die out. 2480: 1598: 1280: 366: 296: 95: 79: 4422:they warrant their own article; 3647:until a consensus is reached. 2530:and submit your choices on the 2108:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1124:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 416:and submit your choices on the 4842:noted genius "Humble" Himaldr) 1327:with others, to avoid editing 958:Draft:V_(programming_language) 1: 4965:10:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 4947:10:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 4730:Take care and happy editing. 4385:Your recent edit to Black War 3871:for the good of the project! 3719:A few more helpful phrases... 3187:02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 3099:15:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 3084:15:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2731:18:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC) 2710:01:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC) 2681:09:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC) 2659:Spread the cheer by adding {{ 2611:15:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC) 2578:15:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC) 2555:00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 2509:Knowledge arbitration process 2465:21:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC) 2451:21:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC) 2436:21:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC) 2421:21:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC) 1004:And now they are cleaned up. 952:) 09:29, March 13 2023 (UTC) 906:12:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 887:12:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 701:18:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC) 513:07:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 495:00:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 441:00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 395:Knowledge arbitration process 356:22:34, 23 November 2022 (UTC) 275:22:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC) 261:22:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC) 247:22:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC) 232:21:57, 23 November 2022 (UTC) 211:09:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC) 193:10:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC) 174:21:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC) 146:17:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC) 127:17:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC) 40:What a delightful surprise! - 4681:consensus is clear already"? 4504:Editing philosophy & a ✪ 4005:Hi, I edited my own post on 3863:. Maybe we can attract some 3105:March 2024 GAN backlog drive 3064:16:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 3047:01:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 3013:17:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2999:17:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2981:17:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2966:17:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 2941:18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 2906:18:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 2890:17:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 2868:14:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 2853:13:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 2834:13:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 2381:02:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 2350:18:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC) 2332:18:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC) 2312:17:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC) 2262:18:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 2244:18:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC) 855:18:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC) 845:Thank you for the heads up. 840:18:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC) 633:13:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC) 619:08:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC) 595:07:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC) 536:00:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC) 110:18:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC) 7: 4903:11:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 4889:09:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 4758:10:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 4740:08:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 4700:00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 4605:17:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 4569:15:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 4515:ends up along the lines of 3696:Ah thanks. I always prefer 2792:21:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 2777:20:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 2762:20:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 2752:Diolch, a dymuniadau gorau 2220:20:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC) 2146:New pages patrol invitation 1735:at that venue is not easy. 1694:) 09:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)) 806:21:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC) 762:20:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC) 724:20:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC) 156:You might be interested in 64:11:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC) 50:11:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC) 35:20:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC) 10: 4983: 4494:14:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 4475:14:10, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 4460:13:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 4440:13:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 4035:17:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 4019:17:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 3995:09:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 3985:Watch out for boomerangs. 3980:09:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 3956:16:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC) 3941:16:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC) 3848:20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC) 3834:19:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC) 3809:19:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC) 3795:19:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC) 3781:Is Elon doing tickets for 3762:19:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 3743:19:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 3729:19:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 3714:10:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 3692:10:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 3676:10:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 3428:17:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC) 3394:20:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 3371:16:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 3351:09:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 3142:Barnstars will be awarded. 2547:MediaWiki message delivery 2140:10:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC) 2125:08:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC) 2036:Lanchester Place of Birth. 1995:Other ways to participate: 1978:Barnstars will be awarded. 1971:August 2023 Backlog Drive: 1632:14:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC) 1564:22:17, 24 April 2023 (UTC) 1540:22:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC) 1481:22:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC) 1444:21:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC) 1417:21:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC) 1392:13:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC) 1306:20:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC) 1246:20:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC) 1231:19:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC) 1199:06:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC) 1174:00:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC) 1159:17:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC) 1136:17:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC) 1104:09:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC) 1089:21:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 1062:19:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 1047:18:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 978:09:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC) 433:MediaWiki message delivery 4543:be hopelessly advanced!) 4405:05:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 3748:Nah! Surely, you're just 3657:15:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC) 3603:16:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC) 3588:07:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC) 3537:05:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC) 3488:11:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC) 3323:23:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC) 3313:FYI: it’s a long read 😳 3291:13:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3277:12:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3255:11:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3241:11:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3226:10:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3210:09:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 3163: 3135:March 2024 Backlog Drive: 3122: 2818:teaching of Welsh history 2152: 2066:16:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 2051:16:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 2027:05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC) 2007: 1993: 1958: 1955:August 2023 Backlog Drive 1935:16:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1890:14:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC) 1678:12 plus - Buckinghamshire 1467:, thus reverting in full 1275:-status according to the 1014:07:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 1000:01:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC) 935:10:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC) 706:Reverting assessments in 661:12:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 78: 4416:Old College, Aberystwyth 4379:07:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC) 4351:05:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC) 4330:09:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 4311:09:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 4282:08:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC) 4249:06:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC) 4235:12:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC) 4217:12:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC) 4188:10:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC) 4164:09:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC) 3895:19:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC) 3881:11:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC) 3869:all work collaboratively 3854:the Shaw Heath tax-exile 3635:redirects for discussion 3617:Redirects for discussion 3493:Latter Rain David Schoch 3456:or whether it should be 3412:decision. The thread is 3119:March 2024 Backlog Drive 3114:Good article nominations 2985:I'm honestly tempted to 2544:to your user talk page. 2274:You moved text added by 2229:Dolkos' work on Linear A 1950:Good article nominations 1866:20:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC) 1851:16:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC) 1835:11:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC) 1819:10:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC) 1799:00:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC) 1773:An editor has asked for 1760:22:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC) 1745:22:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC) 1333:try to reach a consensus 430:to your user talk page. 4844:, mediated a conflict, 4127:16:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 4108:16:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 4076:15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 3859:crossing and uncrossing 3070:List of areas of London 2178:guidelines for granting 1720:12:00, 6 May 2023 (UTC) 1704:09:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC) 1672:06:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC) 1652:21:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC) 1359:appropriate noticeboard 1114:Problematic discussions 4789: 4782: 4528:topic simply won't be 4269: 3968:WP:ANI#Talk:Ceredigion 3820:? Curtain-twichers of 3128: 3031: 2921: 2720: 2626: 2394: 2158: 1964: 1922: 1915: 1904: 1637:Ren (British musician) 921: 871:Draft:St Brynach Cross 768:Alys Williams (singer) 609:the established fora. 563:Geographic description 4788: 4781: 4577:Fermat's Last Theorem 4264: 3818:Stockport Crematorium 3410:Arbitration Committee 3127: 3030: 2920: 2876:Articles for Deletion 2716: 2625: 2505:Arbitration Committee 2488:Hello! Voting in the 2393: 2157: 1963: 1917: 1910: 1900: 1841:Amser i fynd ymlaen. 1613:Message delivered by 1287:Message delivered by 1215:English rule in Wales 1209:English rule in Wales 920:Happy St. David's Day 919: 391:Arbitration Committee 374:Hello! Voting in the 4834:highly-coveted award 4174:doing it right. See 3861:her legs, of course) 2661:subst:Happy holidays 1766:Deletion review for 912:Dydd Gwyl Dewi Hapus 875:Draft:Penmon crosses 4850:with icy-cool ease. 3639:redirect guidelines 3633:has been listed at 2721:I'll pass, thanks. 2082:I have removed the 1781:William Street Bird 1768:William Street Bird 1605:Talk:Purley, London 1593:you nominated as a 956:I presume you mean 685:. Happy editing! — 72:A barnstar for you! 4817:Barnstar of Wisdom 4790: 4783: 4774:presents you with: 4524:"a Wiki page on an 3339:intelligent design 3154:ask questions here 3129: 3032: 2922: 2690:As mentioned in : 2627: 2521:arbitration policy 2395: 2159: 1965: 1363:dispute resolution 1271:you nominated for 922: 407:arbitration policy 4823:Owl of Wise Words 4397:Aemilius Adolphin 4358:original research 4001:Edits to own post 3168: 3167: 2954:Back in September 2712: 2700:comment added by 2557: 2300:Welsh nationalism 2226: 2225: 2192:project talk page 2165:Hello, Sirfurboy. 2033: 2032: 1886: 1776:a deletion review 1621: 1295: 1085: 1043: 528:PlatinumClipper96 487:PlatinumClipper96 443: 339: 338: 332:subst:Dobos Torte 115: 114: 87:The Half Barnstar 4974: 4292:Secondary source 4160: 4155: 4119:Vincent Lextrait 4084:with a reference 4068:Vincent Lextrait 3934: 3929:IgnatiusofLondon 3865:more sockpuppets 3862: 3814:Did you know ... 3764: 3726: 3632: 3626: 3481: 3476:IgnatiusofLondon 3446: 3445: 3183: 3120: 3109: 3108: 2849: 2844: 2830: 2825: 2695: 2677: 2672: 2639: 2634: 2545: 2543: 2484: 2281: 2171:new pages patrol 2166: 2150: 2149: 2122: 2117: 2114: 2105: 2099: 2091: 2085: 2023: 1956: 1945: 1944: 1884: 1878: 1872:Kenneth Williams 1612: 1607:for reasons why 1602: 1601: 1550: 1454: 1427: 1403: 1338:Points to note: 1286: 1284: 1283: 1084:and the soapdish 1083: 1081: 1076: 1042:and the soapdish 1041: 1039: 1034: 699: 696: 690: 681:, I have closed 672:Talk:Gallic Wars 431: 429: 370: 354: 344:7&6=thirteen 317:has given you a 316: 306:7&6=thirteen 300: 293: 292: 208: 124: 100: 99: 98: 83: 76: 75: 4982: 4981: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4921: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4827: 4826: 4812: 4811: 4629:have no souls." 4581:Betti's theorem 4506: 4412: 4387: 4338: 4316:I'll answer on 4294: 4196: 4158: 4153: 4137: 4052: 4003: 3964: 3932: 3921: 3856: 3750:taking the piss 3747: 3722: 3664: 3654: 3653:it has begun... 3628: 3620: 3495: 3479: 3473: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3418:. Thank you. 3402: 3359: 3307: 3194: 3181: 3118: 3107: 3072: 3025: 3023:A goat for you! 2950: 2943: 2923: 2878: 2847: 2842: 2828: 2823: 2802: 2739: 2688: 2675: 2670: 2666: 2642:is wishing you 2637: 2632: 2619: 2565: 2560: 2559: 2537: 2485: 2477: 2388: 2364: 2275: 2272: 2231: 2212:Hey man im josh 2194:with questions. 2164: 2148: 2120: 2115: 2112: 2103: 2097: 2089: 2083: 2080: 2038: 2021: 1954: 1943: 1880: 1874: 1806: 1771: 1728: 1680: 1639: 1617:, on behalf of 1599: 1587: 1562: 1561:Blaze Wolf#6545 1544: 1460:edits entirely 1448: 1442: 1441:Blaze Wolf#6545 1421: 1397: 1390: 1389:Blaze Wolf#6545 1313: 1291:, on behalf of 1281: 1265:begun reviewing 1261: 1211: 1116: 1079: 1074: 1037: 1032: 1026: 943: 914: 863: 861:Welsh artefacts 828:European dragon 816: 711: 698: 694: 689:Red-tailed hawk 688: 686: 675: 451: 446: 445: 423: 371: 363: 341: 330:, just place {{ 303: 291: 220: 204: 154: 152:Archaeogenetics 120: 96: 74: 12: 11: 5: 4980: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4950: 4949: 4920: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4905: 4878: 4875: 4872: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4828: 4814: 4813: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4776: 4769: 4767: 4764: 4746:Talk:Intension 4728: 4727: 4726: 4722: 4689: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4672: 4660: 4659: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4644: 4637: 4636: 4634: 4631: 4622: 4545: 4505: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4427: 4426: 4423: 4411: 4408: 4386: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4337: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4293: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4270: 4257: 4254: 4223:...was in Kent 4195: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4176:WP:INSCRUTABLE 4136: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4111: 4110: 4095:Ziziphus lotus 4087: 4064:Ziziphus lotus 4051: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4038: 4037: 4002: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3963: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3920: 3918:WP:MERITPRONGS 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3873:Martinevans123 3826:Martinevans123 3787:Martinevans123 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3754:Martinevans123 3716: 3706:Martinevans123 3668:Martinevans123 3663: 3660: 3652: 3619: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3576: 3569: 3565: 3494: 3491: 3450:Where is Kate? 3441: 3440: 3438: 3435:Where is Kate? 3433:Nomination of 3431: 3401: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3358: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3306: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3261: 3193: 3190: 3166: 3165: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3143: 3140: 3131: 3130: 3121: 3106: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3049: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 2949: 2944: 2933:Elvisisalive95 2931: 2929: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2915: 2882:Elvisisalive95 2877: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2801: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2738: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2702:24.186.196.239 2687: 2684: 2655: 2652:Happy Holidays 2644:Happy Holidays 2629: 2620: 2618: 2617:Happy Holidays 2615: 2614: 2613: 2564: 2561: 2528:the candidates 2497:eligible users 2486: 2479: 2478: 2476: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2443:47.219.237.179 2413:47.219.237.179 2387: 2384: 2363: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2335: 2334: 2271: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2223: 2205: 2204: 2195: 2184: 2181: 2174: 2161: 2160: 2147: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2079: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2037: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1979: 1976: 1967: 1966: 1957: 1942: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1923: 1873: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1838: 1837: 1805: 1802: 1770: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1727: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1679: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1638: 1635: 1609:the nomination 1591:Purley, London 1586: 1584:Purley, London 1582:nomination of 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1517: 1494: 1351: 1350: 1345: 1312: 1309: 1269:Purley, London 1260: 1258:Purley, London 1256:nomination of 1250: 1249: 1248: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1065: 1064: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 942: 939: 938: 937: 913: 910: 909: 908: 862: 859: 858: 857: 815: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 793: 789: 788: 787: 784: 781: 778: 774: 710: 704: 692: 674: 666:Courtesy note 664: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 601: 582: 581: 580: 575: 570: 565: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 481:for example). 450: 447: 414:the candidates 383:eligible users 372: 365: 364: 362: 359: 337: 336: 323: 301: 290: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 219: 214: 196: 195: 181:that reprobate 153: 150: 149: 148: 113: 112: 90: 89: 84: 73: 70: 69: 68: 67: 66: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4979: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4954: 4953: 4952: 4951: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4935: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4926: 4904: 4900: 4896: 4892: 4891: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4879: 4876: 4873: 4867: 4866: 4861:"Sirfurboy", 4860: 4854: 4851: 4847: 4843: 4839: 4835: 4831: 4824: 4821: 4818: 4809: 4808: 4804: 4801: 4800: 4796: 4787: 4780: 4775: 4773: 4768: 4765: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4755: 4751: 4747: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4723: 4720: 4715: 4711: 4706: 4705: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4697: 4693: 4690: 4687: 4679: 4676: 4675: 4673: 4670: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4661: 4654: 4653: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4645: 4642: 4638: 4635: 4632: 4630: 4626: 4623: 4620: 4616: 4612: 4611:Mathematicism 4608: 4607: 4606: 4602: 4598: 4594: 4591: 4590:Mathematicism 4587: 4582: 4578: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4555: 4553: 4549: 4544: 4542: 4537: 4533: 4531: 4525: 4520: 4518: 4512: 4511: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4482: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4449: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4424: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4417: 4407: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4393: 4390: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4363: 4359: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4348: 4344: 4331: 4327: 4323: 4319: 4318:the talk page 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4299: 4298: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4268: 4262: 4261:WP:UKCOUNTIES 4258: 4255: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4205: 4202: 4199: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4162: 4161: 4156: 4148: 4145: 4141: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4085: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4008: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3957: 3953: 3949: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3938: 3930: 3926: 3919: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3860: 3855: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3727: 3725: 3720: 3717: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3659: 3658: 3655: 3650: 3646: 3645: 3640: 3636: 3631: 3630:Monadic plane 3627:The redirect 3625: 3618: 3614: 3613:Monadic plane 3604: 3600: 3596: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3563: 3559: 3556:Those papers 3554: 3550: 3546: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3490: 3489: 3485: 3477: 3470: 3467: 3466: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3436: 3430: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3416: 3411: 3407: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3311: 3305:Stephen Meyer 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3197: 3189: 3188: 3185: 3184: 3177: 3173: 3162: 3156: 3155: 3150: 3149: 3144: 3141: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3133: 3132: 3126: 3117: 3115: 3111: 3110: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3029: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2948: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2919: 2913: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2845: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2832: 2831: 2826: 2819: 2814: 2811: 2807: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2750: 2747: 2744: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2719: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2693: 2683: 2682: 2679: 2678: 2673: 2665: 2664: 2662: 2656: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2640: 2635: 2624: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2558: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2541: 2535: 2534: 2529: 2524: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2501: 2499: 2498: 2493: 2492: 2483: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2407: 2405: 2400: 2392: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2368: 2361: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2320: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2288:Flag of Wales 2285: 2279: 2270: 2269:Flag of Wales 2263: 2259: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2236:109.242.96.37 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2208: 2202: 2201: 2200:applying here 2196: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2182: 2179: 2175: 2172: 2168: 2167: 2163: 2162: 2156: 2151: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2123: 2118: 2110:. Thanks! –– 2109: 2102: 2095: 2088: 2078: 2074: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2043:Heath St John 2029: 2028: 2025: 2024: 2017: 2013: 2006: 2001: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1992: 1986: 1985: 1980: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1969: 1968: 1962: 1953: 1951: 1947: 1946: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1921: 1914: 1908: 1903: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1782: 1778: 1777: 1769: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1683: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1624:Mike Christie 1620: 1619:Mike Christie 1616: 1610: 1606: 1596: 1592: 1585: 1581: 1565: 1559: 1557: 1556: 1548: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1518: 1515: 1512: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1463: 1458: 1452: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1439: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1379: 1376: 1375:from editing. 1374: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1298:Mike Christie 1294: 1293:Mike Christie 1290: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1259: 1255: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1077: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1035: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 980: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 954: 953: 951: 947: 936: 932: 928: 924: 923: 918: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 890: 889: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 856: 852: 848: 844: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 807: 803: 799: 794: 790: 785: 782: 779: 775: 772: 771: 769: 765: 764: 763: 759: 755: 750: 746: 743: 740: 737: 733: 728: 727: 726: 725: 721: 717: 709: 703: 702: 697: 691: 684: 680: 673: 669: 663: 662: 658: 654: 649: 634: 630: 626: 625:Roger 8 Roger 622: 621: 620: 616: 612: 607: 602: 598: 597: 596: 592: 588: 587:Roger 8 Roger 583: 579: 576: 574: 571: 569: 566: 564: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 547: 543: 539: 538: 537: 533: 529: 524: 523:Roger 8 Roger 520: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 502: 499: 498: 497: 496: 492: 488: 482: 480: 478: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 462: 460: 455: 444: 442: 438: 434: 427: 421: 420: 415: 410: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 387: 385: 384: 379: 378: 369: 358: 357: 352: 351: 346: 345: 335: 333: 329: 324: 320: 314: 313: 308: 307: 302: 299: 295: 294: 288: 276: 272: 268: 264: 263: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 236: 235: 234: 233: 229: 225: 218: 213: 212: 209: 207: 201: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 177: 176: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 130: 129: 128: 125: 123: 111: 107: 103: 92: 91: 88: 85: 82: 77: 65: 61: 57: 53: 52: 51: 47: 43: 39: 38: 37: 36: 32: 28: 23: 22: 17: 4960: 4932: 4922: 4898: 4864: 4862: 4858: 4852: 4849: 4845: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4822: 4819: 4816: 4806: 4805: 4802: 4798: 4797: 4794: 4770: 4753: 4735: 4678: 4668: 4662: 4646: 4640: 4628: 4624: 4618: 4615:Strong monad 4600: 4586:Strong monad 4559: 4556: 4551: 4547: 4546: 4540: 4535: 4529: 4527: 4523: 4521: 4516: 4513: 4508: 4507: 4480: 4470: 4428: 4413: 4410:Vosey murals 4394: 4391: 4389:Hello there 4388: 4374: 4361: 4339: 4325: 4300: 4295: 4277: 4265: 4230: 4222: 4206: 4203: 4200: 4197: 4183: 4171: 4151: 4149: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4103: 4083: 4056:Lotus-eaters 4053: 4050:Lotus-eaters 4030: 4004: 3990: 3965: 3951: 3922: 3890: 3864: 3843: 3813: 3804: 3738: 3723: 3698:the Scottish 3687: 3665: 3642: 3621: 3615:" listed at 3583: 3557: 3548: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3496: 3474: 3463: 3461: 3437:for deletion 3415:A Wider Lens 3413: 3403: 3389: 3381: 3377: 3363:82.18.162.80 3360: 3357:You're right 3346: 3334:Gordon Clark 3329: 3315:Chrisallen87 3312: 3308: 3286: 3250: 3221: 3198: 3195: 3192:County flags 3179: 3169: 3152: 3148:sign up here 3146: 3134: 3112: 3094: 3073: 3059: 3037: 3033: 3008: 2976: 2951: 2928: 2901: 2879: 2863: 2840: 2821: 2815: 2803: 2772: 2751: 2748: 2740: 2726: 2717: 2696:— Preceding 2689: 2668: 2667: 2658: 2657: 2630: 2628: 2606: 2593:Welsh Dragon 2566: 2563:Bibliography 2531: 2525: 2502: 2495: 2489: 2487: 2460: 2431: 2411: 2408: 2396: 2369: 2365: 2327: 2295: 2291: 2284:Welsh dragon 2273: 2257: 2232: 2209: 2206: 2199: 2188:the tutorial 2186:Kindly read 2135: 2094:Johnnie Lynn 2081: 2077:Johnnie Lynn 2061: 2039: 2019: 2009: 1994: 1984:sign up here 1982: 1970: 1948: 1930: 1918: 1911: 1906: 1901: 1881: 1875: 1861: 1839: 1830: 1807: 1784: 1775: 1772: 1755: 1729: 1715: 1684: 1681: 1667: 1640: 1595:good article 1589:The article 1588: 1554: 1535: 1473:Austronesier 1468: 1461: 1456: 1434: 1424:Austronesier 1409:Austronesier 1382: 1377: 1370: 1352: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1329:disruptively 1314: 1267:the article 1262: 1241: 1212: 1194: 1179: 1154: 1146: 1142: 1117: 1099: 1072: 1071: 1057: 1030: 1029: 1027: 1009: 973: 961: 944: 930: 901: 896:has a page. 864: 850: 817: 777:inadequate.) 757: 748: 712: 676: 667: 653:81.98.196.96 645: 614: 605: 577: 572: 567: 562: 545: 544:. They say: 508: 483: 456: 452: 417: 411: 388: 381: 375: 373: 349: 343: 340: 325: 322: 311: 305: 270: 242: 221: 205: 200:Austronesier 197: 188: 166:Austronesier 158:this project 155: 141: 121: 116: 86: 59: 42:Austronesier 30: 24: 18: 15: 4957:Sirfurboy🏄 4895:Sirfurboy🏄 4881:Himaldrmann 4863:they say—: 4772:Himaldrmann 4750:Sirfurboy🏄 4732:Sirfurboy🏄 4692:Himaldrmann 4597:Sirfurboy🏄 4561:Himaldrmann 4467:Sirfurboy🏄 4371:Sirfurboy🏄 4322:Sirfurboy🏄 4274:Sirfurboy🏄 4267:boundaries. 4227:Sirfurboy🏄 4180:Sirfurboy🏄 4100:Sirfurboy🏄 4089:Looking at 4027:Sirfurboy🏄 3987:Sirfurboy🏄 3948:Sirfurboy🏄 3887:Sirfurboy🏄 3840:Sirfurboy🏄 3801:Sirfurboy🏄 3735:Sirfurboy🏄 3702:the Cockney 3684:Sirfurboy🏄 3580:Sirfurboy🏄 3386:Sirfurboy🏄 3343:Sirfurboy🏄 3283:Sirfurboy🏄 3260:discussion. 3247:Sirfurboy🏄 3218:Sirfurboy🏄 3091:Sirfurboy🏄 3056:Sirfurboy🏄 3005:Sirfurboy🏄 2973:Sirfurboy🏄 2947:Eric Lerner 2898:Sirfurboy🏄 2860:Sirfurboy🏄 2769:Sirfurboy🏄 2723:Sirfurboy🏄 2603:Sirfurboy🏄 2585:Template:Rp 2570:Kung Fu Man 2533:voting page 2457:Sirfurboy🏄 2428:Sirfurboy🏄 2342:Dorsetonian 2324:Sirfurboy🏄 2304:Dorsetonian 2254:Sirfurboy🏄 2132:Sirfurboy🏄 2058:Sirfurboy🏄 1927:Sirfurboy🏄 1858:Sirfurboy🏄 1827:Sirfurboy🏄 1752:Sirfurboy🏄 1712:Sirfurboy🏄 1664:Sirfurboy🏄 1615:ChristieBot 1597:has failed 1532:Sirfurboy🏄 1325:collaborate 1289:ChristieBot 1238:Sirfurboy🏄 1191:Sirfurboy🏄 1151:Sirfurboy🏄 1096:Sirfurboy🏄 1054:Sirfurboy🏄 1006:Sirfurboy🏄 970:Sirfurboy🏄 927:Sirfurboy🏄 898:Sirfurboy🏄 894:Nanteos Cup 847:Sirfurboy🏄 754:Sirfurboy🏄 648:Sirfurboy🏄 646:Thank you, 611:Sirfurboy🏄 505:Sirfurboy🏄 449:Counties... 419:voting page 319:Dobos torte 287:Dobos torte 267:Sirfurboy🏄 251:Thank you. 239:Sirfurboy🏄 185:Sirfurboy🏄 138:Sirfurboy🏄 134:Dr. Blofeld 122:Dr. Blofeld 56:Sirfurboy🏄 27:Sirfurboy🏄 4865:all three! 4552:Lucy Letby 3822:Shaw Heath 3700:, or even 3649:* Pppery * 2589:Template:R 2517:topic bans 2278:Hogyncymru 2073:Deprodding 1555:Blaze Wolf 1487:Blaze Wolf 1451:Blaze Wolf 1435:Blaze Wolf 1400:Blaze Wolf 1383:Blaze Wolf 1311:April 2023 1166:Titus Gold 1128:Titus Gold 941:Vlang page 879:Titus Gold 832:Titus Gold 732:Arun Midha 679:WP:RFCLOSE 403:topic bans 4710:WP:ASSIST 4526:advanced 4367:Wikibooks 4194:Orpington 4091:Date-plum 4060:Date-plum 3838:Love it. 3662:"ty woki" 3573:Wikibooks 3472:finished. 3076:Andy02124 2912:Toblerone 2743:Penparcau 2737:Penparcau 2513:site bans 2092:tag from 1547:Sirfurboy 1462:unrelated 1355:talk page 1331:, and to 1321:Ethnicity 1147:this year 946:V (Vlang) 867:Sirfurboy 830:. Thanks 820:Sirfurboy 814:Additions 399:site bans 4939:Dimadick 4799:Perfecta 4625:Ex-wife: 4609:The new 4557:Cheers, 3972:Summer92 3269:A.D.Hope 3265:WT:UKGEO 3233:A.D.Hope 3202:A.D.Hope 2896:Thanks. 2800:Similars 2698:unsigned 2648:WikiLove 2373:Wukuendo 2319:WP:UNDUE 2210:Thanks, 2087:prod blp 1804:ANI - TG 1795:contribs 1733:WP:CPUSH 1696:Mabbs001 1688:Mabbs001 1361:or seek 1317:edit war 1277:criteria 1180:hundreds 992:Wukuendo 950:Wukuendo 708:WP:Wales 328:WikiLove 289:for you! 4934:The BFG 4877:Cheers, 4536:feeling 4481:History 4336:Sources 4011:ToaneeM 3966:Hello! 3824:unite! 3724:Tewdar 3458:deleted 3231:going. 3196:Hello! 3039:Kiwatts 2987:WP:BOLD 2540:NoACEMM 2362:article 2290:as the 2106:or via 1786:JML1148 1737:DeCausa 1644:Kiwatts 1524:WP:ONUS 1491:WP:DTTR 1373:blocked 1371:may be 1075:Catfish 1033:Catfish 426:NoACEMM 253:Knitsey 224:Knitsey 206:Tewdar 102:Curbon7 4846:and/or 4807:Wisdom 4719:WP:RFC 4714:WP:FTN 4548:Anyway 4135:Thanks 4062:, and 3933:he/him 3595:APCMDG 3562:WP:SPS 3553:WP:NOT 3529:APCMDG 3480:he/him 3182:buidhe 2808:, and 2121:(talk) 2113:Formal 2022:buidhe 1659:WP:BRD 1603:; see 1430:WP:3RR 824:Carnyx 695:(nest) 162:Tewdar 4832:This 4619:in re 4541:still 4303:Box32 4241:Box32 4209:Box32 3785:yet? 3783:Venus 3752:.... 3704:.... 3545:WP:OR 2282:from 1843:Sionk 1825:ban. 1682:Hi, 1578:Your 1252:Your 1223:Sionk 1143:above 798:welsh 716:welsh 668:in re 217:Muhre 132:Hi, @ 4961:talk 4943:talk 4899:talk 4885:talk 4838:both 4754:talk 4736:talk 4696:talk 4663:(#2) 4647:(#1) 4601:talk 4565:talk 4530:able 4490:talk 4486:KJP1 4471:talk 4456:talk 4452:KJP1 4448:This 4436:talk 4432:KJP1 4401:talk 4375:talk 4362:good 4347:talk 4326:talk 4307:talk 4278:talk 4245:talk 4231:talk 4213:talk 4184:talk 4154:Dank 4123:talk 4104:talk 4093:and 4072:talk 4031:talk 4015:talk 3991:talk 3976:talk 3952:talk 3891:talk 3877:talk 3844:talk 3830:talk 3805:talk 3791:talk 3758:talk 3739:talk 3710:talk 3688:talk 3672:talk 3599:talk 3584:talk 3549:good 3533:talk 3424:talk 3390:talk 3367:talk 3347:talk 3319:talk 3287:talk 3273:talk 3251:talk 3237:talk 3222:talk 3206:talk 3095:talk 3080:talk 3060:talk 3043:talk 3009:talk 2995:talk 2991:Broc 2977:talk 2962:talk 2958:Broc 2937:talk 2902:talk 2886:talk 2864:talk 2843:Dank 2824:Dank 2788:talk 2773:talk 2758:talk 2727:talk 2706:talk 2671:Dank 2633:Dank 2607:talk 2574:talk 2551:talk 2503:The 2461:talk 2447:talk 2432:talk 2417:talk 2406:". 2377:talk 2346:talk 2328:talk 2308:talk 2296:flag 2258:talk 2240:talk 2216:talk 2169:The 2136:talk 2116:Dude 2101:prod 2062:talk 2047:talk 1931:talk 1913:-er) 1882:Mark 1862:talk 1847:talk 1831:talk 1815:talk 1811:KJP1 1791:talk 1756:talk 1741:talk 1716:talk 1700:talk 1692:talk 1668:talk 1648:talk 1628:talk 1536:talk 1513:and 1477:talk 1469:four 1432:. ― 1413:talk 1302:talk 1242:talk 1227:talk 1195:talk 1170:talk 1155:talk 1132:talk 1100:talk 1058:talk 1010:talk 996:talk 974:talk 931:talk 902:talk 883:talk 873:and 865:Hi @ 851:talk 836:talk 826:and 818:Hi @ 802:talk 758:talk 749:much 720:talk 657:talk 629:talk 615:talk 591:talk 532:talk 509:talk 491:talk 437:talk 389:The 271:talk 257:talk 243:talk 228:talk 189:talk 170:talk 142:talk 106:talk 60:talk 46:talk 31:talk 4937:." 4795:The 4172:are 4159:Jae 3962:ANI 3558:may 3151:or 2848:Jae 2829:Jae 2686:GPL 2676:Jae 2638:Jae 2598:or 2286:to 2075:of 1907:was 1779:of 1726:ANI 1622:-- 1296:-- 1080:Jim 1038:Jim 962:not 573:etc 4963:) 4945:) 4927:: 4901:) 4887:) 4815:↢ 4803:of 4756:) 4738:) 4698:) 4641:if 4603:) 4567:) 4492:) 4473:) 4458:) 4438:) 4403:) 4377:) 4349:) 4328:) 4320:. 4309:) 4301:? 4280:) 4247:) 4233:) 4215:) 4186:) 4178:. 4125:) 4106:) 4074:) 4033:) 4017:) 3993:) 3978:) 3970:. 3954:) 3939:) 3937:☎️ 3935:• 3893:) 3879:) 3846:) 3832:) 3807:) 3793:) 3760:) 3741:) 3712:) 3690:) 3674:) 3601:) 3586:) 3535:) 3486:) 3484:☎️ 3482:• 3460:. 3426:) 3392:) 3369:) 3349:) 3321:) 3289:) 3275:) 3253:) 3239:) 3224:) 3208:) 3178:) 3174:· 3097:) 3082:) 3062:) 3045:) 3011:) 2997:) 2979:) 2964:) 2939:) 2904:) 2888:) 2866:) 2790:) 2775:) 2760:) 2729:) 2708:) 2609:) 2576:) 2553:) 2542:}} 2538:{{ 2515:, 2463:) 2449:) 2434:) 2419:) 2379:) 2348:) 2330:) 2310:) 2302:? 2260:) 2242:) 2218:) 2138:) 2104:}} 2098:{{ 2090:}} 2084:{{ 2064:) 2049:) 2018:) 2014:· 1933:) 1864:) 1849:) 1833:) 1817:) 1797:) 1793:| 1758:) 1743:) 1718:) 1702:) 1670:) 1650:) 1630:) 1580:GA 1538:) 1510:, 1507:, 1504:, 1501:, 1498:, 1479:) 1457:me 1415:) 1380:― 1304:) 1279:. 1273:GA 1254:GA 1244:) 1229:) 1221:. 1197:) 1172:) 1157:) 1134:) 1102:) 1060:) 1012:) 998:) 976:) 933:) 904:) 885:) 853:) 838:) 804:) 760:) 722:) 670:: 659:) 631:) 617:) 606:is 593:) 534:) 511:) 493:) 439:) 428:}} 424:{{ 401:, 285:A 273:) 259:) 245:) 230:) 191:) 172:) 144:) 108:) 62:) 48:) 33:) 4959:( 4941:( 4897:( 4883:( 4853:✧ 4830:✧ 4825:↣ 4820:♔ 4810:™ 4752:( 4734:( 4694:( 4599:( 4563:( 4488:( 4469:( 4454:( 4434:( 4399:( 4373:( 4345:( 4324:( 4305:( 4276:( 4263:: 4243:( 4229:( 4211:( 4182:( 4121:( 4102:( 4070:( 4029:( 4013:( 3989:( 3974:( 3950:( 3931:( 3889:( 3875:( 3842:( 3828:( 3803:( 3789:( 3756:( 3737:( 3708:( 3686:( 3670:( 3611:" 3597:( 3582:( 3564:. 3531:( 3478:( 3422:( 3388:( 3365:( 3345:( 3317:( 3285:( 3271:( 3249:( 3235:( 3220:( 3204:( 3176:c 3172:t 3170:( 3157:. 3116:| 3093:( 3078:( 3058:( 3041:( 3007:( 2993:( 2975:( 2960:( 2935:( 2914:! 2900:( 2884:( 2862:( 2786:( 2771:( 2756:( 2725:( 2704:( 2605:( 2572:( 2549:( 2459:( 2445:( 2430:( 2415:( 2402:" 2375:( 2360:V 2344:( 2326:( 2306:( 2280:: 2276:@ 2256:( 2238:( 2214:( 2203:. 2180:. 2134:( 2060:( 2045:( 2016:c 2012:t 2010:( 1987:. 1952:| 1929:( 1860:( 1845:( 1829:( 1813:( 1789:( 1754:( 1739:( 1714:( 1698:( 1690:( 1686:( 1666:( 1646:( 1626:( 1549:: 1545:@ 1534:( 1516:. 1485:@ 1475:( 1453:: 1449:@ 1426:: 1422:@ 1411:( 1402:: 1398:@ 1300:( 1240:( 1225:( 1193:( 1168:( 1153:( 1130:( 1098:( 1056:( 1008:( 994:( 990:. 972:( 948:( 929:( 900:( 881:( 849:( 834:( 800:( 756:( 718:( 655:( 627:( 613:( 589:( 530:( 507:( 489:( 458:( 435:( 353:) 350:☎ 347:( 315:) 312:☎ 309:( 269:( 255:( 241:( 226:( 198:@ 187:( 168:( 140:( 104:( 58:( 44:( 29:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index