1097:
another. Since
Moulton is already banned for disruptive editing, there's noting to bring up at AN/I. All there is for us to do now is compile any evidence of any further disruption he causes from offsite such as recruiting and directing meatpuppets, and keep it in a central location for any admin or editor seeking more detail can find it, and the right place for that is his RFC's talk page since some of the community is not comfortable with it on his talk page at the moment. I suggest you become better accquainted with the situation and the policies and conventions around dealing with banned editors and RFC before deleting the evidence presented there: That is the proper place for it as was suggested at the MFD.
1678:(whilst aimlessly following links from the William Demski page). Just one quick read-through of the contents revealed some alarming weasel words, and on giving it a more thorough looking-at, I thought I'd better add my concerns re its considerably NPOV stance onto the Talk Page - which I see has not been added to for over 2 years! I was only vaguely aware of the ID Wikiproject so followed the links, saw your name (which I recognized from just 'around') and hope you'll be able to help out. I'm probably not the best person to take this on but am prepared to do what I can. This article appears to have remained under radar for a very long time and I hope it can now be sorted. Thanks.
342:. Can you please provide an explanation for removing this information from the paragraph? Especially on a subject so controversial, it's important to articulate information in as neutral a fashion as possible. The previous version only presented a single side of the controversy, biased against R. Sternberg in the initial paragraph. Presenting Sternberg's position on the issue (with references) is not only more informative for the reader but also maintains an accurate account of the controversy itself.
1001:, so I made a couple tweaks to improve it. This is meatpuppetry? The "diffs" you claim to have are a canard. I was only tangentially aware that Moulton had his prints on the article on the past - I thought his ban was for creationist POV pushing in general. And as far as I can tell, Moulton when he was here was trying to rip out the whole section that I tweaked, not improve it. (And that random smartass quip on WR wasn't sanctioned or approved by me at all - "re-programmed?")
2038:
3421:
2664:
2409:
2314:
3207:
2793:
2506:
2117:
2220:
82:
2834:
2019:
1748:. Please do not reblock them under any circumstances. The block reason was not transparent, and there were concerns that you were too involved, as a party named in C68-FM-SV, to make this decision. If there are hidden reasons for the block, feel free to explain them to me and I will consider reblocking. In the alternative, you can go to an uninvolved administrator, such as
477:
Speech on
Evolution", and "Stand Up For Science"'. Neither of those sources even mentions this list, so they certainly could not be used to source the claim that the list is "intended" for such and such purpose. Now, I fully believe this claim, but it still needs to be cited. I'm looking for an adequate citation, but without one the tag must remain.
3257:
included several sources, many of which look fine. I'm specifically referring to the source with the title "Timeline, Climate Change and its
Naysayers". The url you added may have been fine at the time , but someone changed it later, possibly because it no longer worked. I checked, and it doesn't go
1269:
Would you mind commenting on the talk page what "undue weight issues" lead you to revert my change (which was also accompanied on the talk page by a thorough analysis of the section and its sources)? This section has been the subject of discussion and a turtle-paced edit war for well over a year, and
1003:
I'm kindly asking you to stop dragging me back into this. I was glad to see that woman's BLP improved in the end, through whatever roundabout means it ended up taking, and I don't want to squabble more. But it seems like you're just trying to continue this dispute and seek a pound of my flesh. Don't.
272:
FM, it may have come time to do something about that editor. He is basically a reincarnation of
Moulton, only with a different ID proponent. He has literally caused disruption on every single article he has edited with regards to Marks plus he has a serious COI that needs to be addressed. Should I
1851:
for cases where we are dealing with observable reality. It is needed because there are a lot of editors who don't seem to understand what entails best-practices when writing a reliable reference work about observable reality. I don't pretend that this version is perfect, and would appreciate any and
607:
as proposed solutions, such as the scientific theory of intelligent design." Oddly you have just strengthened the opposition to the point you are trying to prove by showing that the DI itself does not conflate those who challenge
Darwinian evolution (e.g. those who signed a petition to that effect)
521:
The source you have found does not substantiate either the disputed claim at the Picard page, that the petition promotes ID, or even the non-disputed claim that I have asked for sourcing for at the petition page, that the DI uses the petition in its campaigns. Would you care to explain what exactly
506:
Well its not the former since I believe the claim to be true ... that the DI is using the petition to further the promotion of ID. To your second point I suggest instead of calling other people clueless you help the project and just provide the sources. Clearly in my clueless naivete I cannot find
2131:
from
Knowledge. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
1378:
NPOV says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each. Now an important qualification: Articles that compare views should not give minority views as much or as detailed a
1081:
was nominated for deletion was because it linked to evidence collected by one user, instead of just linking to "official" pages like RFCs, ANI threads and arb cases. What you are doing amounts to trying to run around the discussion at the MfD. You are adding your evidence right behind the "enough"
662:
make changes word-for-word, but close to it, 2)I support
Moulton's unbanning and have edited Knowledge under another account, 3)I support Moulton's rewording of the text, and 4)Meatpuppeteering is when an editor is recruited, not when a person says something should be done and an editor feels it's
1651:
I'll look into it, but the main point is that his position on the topic is properly mentioned and remains, which it appears to. The fact that Time
Magazine is the source is good. The context of ID is not the most important point in that article at this time, perhaps, but covering the fact that he
1096:
That's your impression of why it was nominated for deletion, there are others. You don't seem to have a firm grasp of how RFCs work or this situation; individuals compile all the evidence in an RFC, period. And editing RFCs is open to all, with the one caveat that you do not alter the comments of
558:
Thank you for providing a source that actually connects the petition to "other campaigns." Unfortunately this is of no help to us at the Picard page where we need a source that connects the use of the petition directly to the promotion of ID, something not mentioned in the second source at all.
476:
Felonious, neither of the sources that are cited for the first half of the sentence provide any verification for the second half which states: '... the list is intended to lend support to other
Discovery Institute campaigns, such as "Teach the Controversy", "Critical Analysis of Evolution", "Free
982:
If you don't want to be seen as acting on behalf of a banned editor you shouldn't be making the exact edits at the exact article that a banned editor is calling for. And don't say you weren't aware of
Moulton's requests, I've diffs showing you were. You involved yourself the moment you started
1842:
I have drafted a new proposal and would like help in clarifying, adjusting, adapting, and improving it. It is based on five years of work here at Knowledge (not always the prettiest, I might add). I think it summarizes the opinions of a great majority of editors as to how to handle scientific
3048:
For a great many years there has been an almost-loophole at this policy "cite facts, including facts about opinions, but not opinions themselves." I have always interpreted this to mean that a verifiable account of someone's view is encyclopedic. However, some people read this to mean that
1694:
in Spring 2005. The Edit Summary noted it needed POV checking. This seems not to have been done. A short para (re slavery) was added shortly afterwards. Since then, the edits have been confined to several Category shuffles/additions and the like, some recent vandalism of the common-or-garden
1813:
The Arbitration Committee has rendered decisions passing a motion to apply discretionary sanctions remedies to the case linked above. Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict ("articles which relate to
372:
I am trying to figure out why you removed the POV notification I added to the Expelled article yesterday. The article reads like an enormous, exquisitely detailed and interlinked refutation of the film. It doesn't present any material in the film except for the purpose of debunking it.
1963:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are
1022:
If that's the story you want to stick to, then please, by all means go ahead. It's laughably improbable given your edits exactly match Moulton's requested edits verbatim and their precise and limited nature, but if that's what you want us to believe, it's your call.
3049:
Knowledge should emphasize facts, not opinions. And opinions = views. I think this line of thinking leads to a contradiction in the policy (that we must include all significant views from reliable sources) and undermines the dictum, "verifiability, not truth."
2636:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
2173:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Knowledge guidelines.
1135:. I'll just make a comment on the MfD for others with more knowledge of RfCs to review this matter. I think that adding the information there after removing it from the user page could not be totally correct, and I would like other people to take a look. --
877:
The manner in which you said it sounded like a threat to me, or else I wouldn't have brought it up with you. "Stop it or you will be blocked" is not a threat. "I'mma make sure you won't make another incivil comment again!" is a threat. See the difference?
1911:
This is not one of arbcom's better moments. My disappointment cannot be expressed loudly enough, but for sake of not trying to resurrect the issues, I won't go further than to simply but publically post my disappointment about your desysopping here. Best
805:
It would not be good for Knowledge if you and your friends were out-witted by yourselves. You guys are a great help in keeping Knowledge NPOV in evolution-related articles. But you are now involved in BLP articles. Ask for advise from friends. Please.
3061:
who is claiming that there is another policy called "state facts accurately" which he believes means that certain claims do not have to be attributable to any source (since they are "facts" - i.e. a total subversion of "verifiability, not truth."
3056:
who states excplicitly on his user page that he is opposed to our NPOV policy and wishes to change it. And he has been trying to edit the "loophole" I mention above to mean that we should strive to present the truth. He has teamed up with
1062:
I've included the recent evidence of Moulton engaging in meatpuppetry on the talk page of the RFC, not the RFC itself. Furthermore, doing so is established convention at Knowledge, not without precedent, and well within Knowledge policy.
1859:
but avoid some of the major pitfalls of that particular proposal. In particular, the idea that SPOV even exists is a real problem. However, I think it is undeniable that we should have some standards for writing about scientific topics.
376:
Not having seen the movie, I wanted to know if it was worth watching, but the article postively exudes POV. I didn't find out most of what I wanted to know, even after reading a few thousand words. It's just too long and too negative.
1440:? I agree with some of your evidence and if numbered that would make it easier for me to outline a response in which I go line by line by number and either stipulate to what you've presented or disagree and explain why. Thank you.
1778:
I'm not involved at all. You should have reported your concerns to the case clerks (Nishkid64 and myself) rather than blocking someone you're involved with vis a vis the arb case. In addition your reasoning was weak. I support the
3688:
represented in the article as commanders of the Green Island during the Israeli raid on the fortress in any Arabic, English or Hebrew accounts of the operation, so can you provide me with sources of these names, please? Thank you
1690:- Just checked out the History. Most of the article's text was from a 1914 work (this is mentioned in a line at the end of the article), added to the orignal version of the article (just a basic biog framework re Princeton) by
1242:
2918:
450:
2367:
1968:
247:
1082:
section that User:Moulton links to, which has almost the same effect as linking directly to a page with evidence collected by you. Please remove that evidence and post it on a page on your userspace or post it at ANI. --
3316:
edit from August, you restored sources to an article which included a blog. Could you explain why, as an experienced editor, you would sign off on using a blog as source that doesn't meet WP's definition as reliable?
1460:
3265:
about this and other issues, with the expectation that we need to find a good citation or remove the reference. I haven't yet posted at the Talk page, I'm giving you a heads up, in case you wanted to search for it
3069:
could benefit from the input of experienced editors with real institutional memory and I am asking that you consider participating in this discussion until this issue at NPOV is satisfactorally resolved. Thanks,
2325:
2254:
2239:
2231:
2213:
1814:
pseudoscience, broadly interpreted") if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Knowledge, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
3375:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
678:
Looks like this little meaty needs a block as well as the other account. Great job with being a front for a user who left the community only after exhausting every last shred of good faith possible. Awesome.
959:
Stop trying to drag me into the dispute with the blocked user Moulton by labeling me a "meatpuppet" or "WR editor." It's completely false, a personal attack, and I had no interest in dragging this out further.
663:
the right choice and does it. I don't see what's wrong with Moulton's proposal. Instead of attacking me for agreeing with his proposal, why don't you offer some constructive criticism on the proposal itself. --
3609:
3584:
3552:
904:
I guess the important thing to keep sight of is that you are talking to another person on the other end, not a dog or something you need to shame. People tend to like it when you treat them like people. :)
721:
What is this nonsense? There are no personal attacks on that page, and its not an article either btw. This template is nonsensical, could you possibly be trying to open discussion?If so, please try again.
3465:
2428:
Apparently defunct publishing house that only garnered a few very brief and insubstantial mentions in sources even when it was in existence, and whose profile it appears was so low that nobody noticed its
3221:
2308:
1297:
1722:
2632:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
1889:
589:
Two primary sources have been provided supporting the content and saying the same thing, you have simply just rejected them. I can keep adding sources and you can continue rejecting them. Fine by me.
3001:
2165:
1499:
3428:
3414:
603:
You are talking about the Picard page I assume. Neither of your sources say what you want them to. In fact, the one you just added states emphatically that "challenges to Darwinian evolution
3194:
3525:
3024:
2211:
2992:
2984:
2124:
2110:
1350:
There's no voting for content. It either is acceptable or not. MastCell is one of the best editors of medical articles out there, so I doubt you'll get support here or anywhere else.
3409:
1249:
353:
When you have a moment, could you userfy that article for me? I'd like to expand it and make it into an article that demonstrates his notability. (The closing admin seems to be AWOL)
3547:
a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Knowledge, then you should do one of the following:
1867:
for another failed proposal that dovetails with this one. I hope this particular proposal is more in-line with the hole I see in policy/guidelines for dealing with these situations.
2912:
220:. I hadn't heard that he was an ID proponent. Can you point me to an article about his connection to the ID movement? I've started a section on the McCain talk page about this (
1410:
The article compares no views. The article is about a minority view, that of the "denialists". Anyway, if you think that´s a good edit, that´s more feedback for me. Thank you.
559:
Providing such a source would be of great help. If you have one, or two, or ten please do post directly to the talk page there. As I said it would be a very big help. Thanks.
2459:
1561:(Ok, I was wrong, went all the way back to mid-06, shoulda gone a bit further, you see, when I'm wrong, I admit it.), just so you're aware and can correct your statement :)
1245:
that the parties might like to make a fresh statement now that the evidence has been thrown in, and the community is trying to decide what proposed remedies are appropriate.
997:
Someone mentioned the article in passing on IRC and I clicked on it - as a fellow woman in computing, her article piqued my interest - and I noticed it was a BLP mess and a
2982:
2267:
this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
2973:
1883:
2398:
2807:
726:
3506:
2810:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
2280:
1762:
Um, when it comes Dragon695, you're hardly impartial. In fact, you're far more involved than you claim I am. FT2? After his bogus one-man RFAR, he's not uninvolved.
945:
This is a move in the right direction. Thanks for taking the time to assemble the evidence. Somebody with a strong constitution is needed to clear the stables. --
3236:
2649:
2420:
2108:
1806:
2257:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
714:
544:
To anyone objective it does. But since you insist, I'll add another. I've literally a dozen more. You can reject them one by one and we'll see how this ends up.
3532:. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our
2242:
is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read
709:
850:
does not allow you to do "eye for an eye" and make threats against other users. Be the better person here, like is expected from everyone in such situations.
2780:
1437:
1220:
1216:
946:
253:
If I characterized your response incorrectly let me know and I will change them. Any background information or anything else you can give would be welcome.
3526:
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/21/national/21evolve.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=24bc7c9b16cac8a8&ex=1282276800&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
3313:
1204:
1047:? Please, if you have evidence that shows Moulton doing meatpuppetry, then use a proper forum, aka, one that is active and where sanctions can be taken. --
3664:
2622:
2613:
2403:
1552:
1330:
And no, this is not an issue of "denialists" versus "mainstreamers". This user summarized very well why "denialist" views should be detailed and refuted
3036:
3638:
3524:, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from
3241:
2465:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
2373:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
2070:
1730:
3573:
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org
3404:
3290:
2775:
1615:
949:
258:
3588:
2658:
2606:
2546:
2206:
1855:
Note that these standards would apply only when discussing matters directly related to observable reality. These standards are inspired in part by
1827:
1807:
3279:
2653:
1901:
1584:. I only thought it right to inform you. I know, I know... what in the world could I have possibly been thinking?!?! ;-) Mahalo, FeloniousMonk. --
1570:
926:
912:
899:
885:
872:
2512:
1523:
688:
167:
2822:
1878:
1640:
1631:
So far the consensus on the discussion page is that my edit was proper. I, of course, welcome the opinion of a wikipedia administrator as well.
1284:
1232:
1177:
1167:
186:
You'll want to keep an eye on NPOV/FAQ for pseudoscience issues, and oh, you might want to keep an eye on Mackan79: He's taken to deleting the
3511:
3186:
1144:
1130:
1127:
1106:
1091:
1072:
788:
492:
Pleanty of other sources do. Either you're promoting the Discovery Institute's obfucation line or you're clueless on the subject. Which is it?
2637:
2494:
1661:
743:
635:
617:
598:
568:
553:
531:
516:
501:
2520:
1771:
1726:
1454:
1419:
1390:
1188:
1161:
672:
346:
51:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than
3645:
3337:
3097:
3065:
Currently, the discussion is happening on the bottommost sections of the talk page (there was a convenience break). I think the discussion
1365:
3213:
3199:
1547:
1212:
1205:
1032:
1017:
992:
769:
254:
207:
3559:
and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name,
1704:
832:
301:
3349:
2933:
2846:
2579:
2535:
1535:
1488:
1044:
694:
1174:
233:
3698:
3170:
3165:
2900:
2626:
1832:
1133:
704:
292:
I agree, he has become disruptive. Let's give him another day or two to settle down, and then if he hasn't, bring it to the community.
1800:
1344:
3566:
3139:
3085:
2563:
2250:. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
1669:
439:
507:
a source to back the assertion that I believe is true, but you probably can, given how not clueless you are. So please do. Thanks.
3599:
1734:
1258:
3302:
3669:
2621:
but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to
2499:
2103:
1939:
1709:
1581:
325:
262:
3486:
3354:
3331:
3145:
2977:
2755:
2470:
2378:
2243:
2128:
1960:
1449:
163:
159:
37:
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than
31:
2268:
193:
You should probably have a look at the Marks article where a particular editor seems to have a COI issue and is edit warring.
2969:
2767:
362:
238:
213:
187:
2894:
1986:
979:
863:
Stopping an incivil editor from being uncivil is one of the jobs of an admin. Saying that you will do so is never a threat.
3400:
3338:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_participants_in_the_creation%E2%80%93evolution_controversy
3336:
An article you have edited List of participants in the creation–evolution controversy has been nominated for deletion. See
3284:
2303:
2291:
1427:
221:
3176:
1623:
1219:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page,
980:"That's right folks, I forgot to mention we re-programmed Krimpet a week or so ago and we are finally putting her to use."
3326:
3175:
Please be aware that a request to lift a restriction has been made in an ArbCom case in which you were an involved party.
2641:
2633:
653:
3387:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
3023:
for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
2890:
2645:
2053:
1279:
1129:. According to a comment by Krimpet, and older version of the page being discussed appears to have evidence against him
1124:
457:– it was an empty category that was left empty for several weeks. Feel free to re-create it, if appropriate. Cheers. --
340:
3017:
2958:
2031:
1518:
1305:
There´s no consensus at the talk page (we are tied 3 to 3), I am providing reasons for that text being in the article
623:
3631:
2558:
1964:
1956:
1150:
Well, I won't do the comment at MfD after seeing Fill's comment. If he thinks that it's ok, then that's enough for me
248:
Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/William_M._Connolley_2#William.27s_violation_of_Wikipedia:BLOCK.23Disputes_with_others
175:
168:
cordially, - Michael - 7576 Willow Glen Road, Los Angeles, CA 90046 - 323.363.1860 - http://larvatus.livejournal.com
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
1311:
1308:
1306:
2435:
2343:
2082:
857:
815:
466:
345:
3253:. One of the issues relates to sources. I noticed some footnotes link to Knowledge, which is not acceptable. Your
2940:
1695:
insertion of a line or two pertaining to the subjects sexual abilities - but no major revisions to the text else.
3660:
3490:
3396:
3254:
3078:
2781:
2759:
2601:
2474:
2439:
2382:
2347:
2087:
1959:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to
1588:
3622:
with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
1756:
917:
The road runs both ways, good acts beget good acts. That wasn't his first CIVIL warning, but I take your point.
421:
202:
155:
3529:
3307:
3261:
As you were the editor to add this, I assume you have special interest in keeping this link. I plan to post at
3005:
2863:
2570:
Hi there, as one of the main editors of the ID article, could you have a look at this discussion? All the best
1837:
1400:
1331:
668:
405:
286:
3652:
saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
3134:
3120:
2853:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
2423:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
2328:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
1056:
386:
3013:
2589:
I think there is a very dangerous section in the NPOV policy, which I deleted and discussed on the talk page
2285:
2178:
2008:
1916:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1298:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar#Removal_of_sourced_edits_made_in_a_neutral_narrative_is_disruptive
2997:
2136:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
1322:
1152:
Ah, I'm not sure, I'll sleep on it. I still think that you should ask an uninvolved admin to review this. --
3517:
2806:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
2564:
2141:
1493:
1176:. Notice that I later changed the section headings for technical reasons unrelated to the rest of the issue
486:
2042:
1290:
973:
3478:
3432:
3410:
3392:
2747:
2675:
2488:
2416:
2321:
2294:, accusing you of meatpupptery. I see you have not been notified by the editor making these accusations.
2200:
307:
48:
2906:
313:
3656:
3482:
3262:
2963:
2751:
2247:
2235:
2147:
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding
1945:
1874:
1593:
3627:
3537:
3217:
3182:
2827:
2803:
2771:
2540:
2516:
2443:
2351:
1636:
1433:
664:
622:
So you say, the person who thinks partisan primary sources are to be taken at face value and ignores
321:
844:
Keep it up and I'll take a personal interest in seeing that you are prevented from making one again.
774:
That was a nice message on my talk page. I enjoyed it. I mean, you still suck, but yeah, I had fun.
330:
3649:
3619:
3593:
3556:
3220:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
3009:
2881:
2871:
2728:
2519:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
1852:
all additions, suggestions people may have for getting to some well-regarded scientific standards.
1711:
909:
882:
854:
2458:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
2366:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
3536:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be
3345:
2688:
2590:
2013:
1931:
1897:
1123:
Notice that Random832 has blanked the page where the evidence was originally hosted as a courtesy
146:
2337:
and is also almost exclusively a list of external links. Nor is notability clearly established.
1580:
Since I listed you by name, I figured I'd alert you of my impending doom/request for adminship:
1467:
is now merged with this case and he is a named party. Also see my case disposition notes there.
3502:
3075:
2861:. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
2598:
2531:
2100:
2005:
1575:
1264:
782:
765:
1215:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page,
3626:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow
3250:
3243:
2684:
1870:
1700:
1683:
1531:
1525:
1379:
description as more popular views, and will generally not include tiny-minority views at all.
1275:
1184:
1157:
1140:
1087:
1052:
940:
1373:
3694:
3533:
3383:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3273:
3178:
2575:
2276:
2137:
2078:
2050:
1632:
1619:
829:
821:
800:
723:
613:
564:
527:
512:
482:
445:
410:
401:
367:
317:
198:
81:
8:
3655:
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Knowledge. Happy editing!
3521:
3494:
3388:
3130:
3116:
3093:
2763:
2739:
2716:
2671:
2478:
2451:
2386:
2359:
2265:
if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that
2069:
I thought I'd mention that I've nominated what I see as an attack page on you as part of
2064:
2057:
2027:
1566:
1415:
1340:
1327:
Maybe it is out of my naiveté, but I thought this kind of edits were frowned upon here.
906:
879:
851:
811:
462:
267:
1132:. From context, it appears to be the same evidence that Krimpet is removing from the RfC
3341:
3298:
3232:
3161:
2858:
2618:
2299:
1952:
1946:
1906:
1763:
1653:
1382:
1098:
1064:
1024:
998:
984:
918:
891:
864:
627:
590:
545:
493:
293:
171:
3578:
2133:
1502:- Moulton has made 31 comments on Slashdot, not 44,252 - 44252 is his user ID number (
1238:
3498:
3461:
3364:
3355:
3071:
2954:
2854:
2724:
2594:
2527:
2253:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
2177:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
2096:
2001:
1972:
1927:
1922:
I believe this is a massive miscarriage of justice, but I will not comment further.--
1739:
1351:
1011:
967:
775:
761:
358:
336:
3644:
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at
3448:
2705:
3641:
for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
3384:
3368:
3032:
2554:
2394:
2193:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
1793:
1696:
1679:
1543:
1481:
1271:
1180:
1153:
1136:
1083:
1048:
703:
Removed provocative and unjustified warning. Please don't template the regulars! —
684:
415:
Hi, would you be free for a Skype chat? Please e-mail and I'll give you my ID. :)
282:
229:
181:
2926:
3690:
3322:
3268:
3041:
2818:
2704:
While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
2584:
2571:
2272:
2262:
2227:
2152:
2074:
2046:
1534:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1445:
847:
838:
825:
609:
560:
523:
508:
478:
397:
391:
194:
3447:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
2545:
Since you have worked on Unification Church articles you might be interested in
2434:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
2342:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
454:
3380:
3372:
3258:
to the article in question, nor have I been able to find the original article.
3126:
3112:
3089:
3058:
3042:
2696:
2692:
2466:
2374:
2190:
2186:
2023:
1856:
1844:
1753:
1562:
1511:
1411:
1336:
1250:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Workshop#Reflection by the parties
890:
I try to proportion my tone to the level of disruption I'm addressing usually.
807:
757:
458:
382:
2867:
article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the
2734:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
2092:
3440:
3376:
3294:
3228:
3195:
3157:
3153:
2850:
2838:
2295:
2258:
2182:
2095:
when you have some time (concerns a proposal to Verifiability policy) Thanks,
1997:
1864:
1745:
1718:
1675:
1317:
and with no comment at the talk page just deletes again a new re-worked (and
954:
732:
428:
274:
3222:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate)
2968:
The link for reference 178 is dead. Changing .com to .org will do the trick
2140:. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the
3150:
3053:
2950:
2334:
1848:
1723:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination)
1599:
1078:
1006:
962:
696:
354:
3471:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
2238:
from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
1817:
The final text of the motions can be found at the case page linked above.
3028:
2550:
2390:
2163:
the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
1991:
1893:
1782:
1585:
1539:
1470:
1254:
1228:
680:
471:
416:
278:
225:
217:
2037:
1302:
If your answer is negative, could you please explain me why it is not?.
1126:, and note his comment on wheter the evidence should be posted anywhere
983:
editing the Picard article with the very edits Moulton was calling for.
3318:
2814:
2663:
2484:
2408:
2313:
2196:
1923:
1913:
1821:
1441:
760:
on that one. Of course, me ma always said I was a fast learner... :) --
224:); if you could reply there, that would be fantastic. Thanks much! --
3103:
FeloniousMonk, your recent edit accidently deleted this from ASF: "A
2799:
2785:
2617:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under
1691:
1506:
378:
2309:
Proposed deletion of List of Discovery Institute registered websites
1602:'s support of ID and the current legislation. However, one user has
846:
Please do not threaten other users because they attacked you first.
316:. I think I've done a better job of framing my concerns. Thanks!
3606:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "
3227:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
3206:
2813:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
2792:
2526:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
2505:
2219:
2116:
1749:
1464:
1211:
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located
3618:, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at
3371:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
3108:
62:
1503:
3555:(CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at
2837:
Hello FeloniousMonk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
2833:
147:
3107:
can be asserted without simon-says inline-text phrasing. An
2469:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
2377:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
2169:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
2138:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
3104:
2808:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Denialism (2nd nomination)
2446:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
2354:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
2018:
1744:
I have unblocked this user, per the emerging consensus at
1270:
undue weight has in fact been a point for keeping it out.
2593:. Now there is an RfC; please, I hope you will comment.
3520:! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as
2438:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
2346:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
1399:
THen, I do not understand why you restored that content
222:
Talk:John McCain#Category: intelligent design advocates?
3489:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1536:
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
3528:(dated 25 August 2005), and therefore to constitute a
3454:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
2925:
2711:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
2292:
Talk:Israel_Shahak#The 'lengthy_passage' NoCal removed
3125:
I forgot to let you know I restored the text myself.
1221:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Workshop
1217:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Evidence
451:
Category:Suspected Knowledge sockpuppets of Jinxmchue
3630:. For more information on Knowledge's policies, see
2234:, by another Knowledge user, requesting that it be
1843:
situations. This proposal serves as a nexus between
1505:). You may want to change that prior to submission.
3585:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License
3553:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License
3212:An article that you have been involved in editing,
3149:] we're discussing the removal of what seems to be
2640:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
2511:An article that you have been involved in editing,
1321:shortened) version of the stuff he deleted in 2007
1043:May I know why the heck are you adding evidence to
3639:Knowledge:Declaration of consent for all enquiries
3312:I know it has been a few months, but I noticed in
2845:of the articles that you created is tagged as an
2071:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Ed Poor subpages
3674:I couldn't find any name of Egyptian commanders:
3363:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
3291:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Richard Sternberg
2246:, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as
1310:and trying to rework the text to reach consensus
3156:from four years ago. I'm inviting your input.
2547:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Frederick Sontag
1808:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience
1432:Would you be able to number the bullets in your
658:I admit, I edited for Moulton. However, 1)I did
3610:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License
2758:can result in deletion without discussion, and
2326:List of Discovery Institute registered websites
2255:List of Discovery Institute registered websites
2240:List of Discovery Institute registered websites
2232:List of Discovery Institute registered websites
2214:List of Discovery Institute registered websites
1598:I have tried to add some information about Gov
1166:At the end I decided to add myself to the list
1884:Don't know if you're watching or around but...
3684:Captain Abbas Shehata (Signal Platoon Leader)
3681:Brigadier Butros Zaghloul (Brigade commander)
2939:
2521:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jerry Bergman
1252:. Please consider adding a statement there.
339:page, removing the contributions shown here:
3214:Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate)
3200:Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate)
1206:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV
624:Knowledge:Verifiability#Questionable_sources
3551:Have the author release the text under the
3530:violation of Knowledge's copyright policies
2404:Proposed deletion of Wethersfield Institute
2022:Wishing you the very best for the season.
1553:Factual error in your submission to the RfC
947:Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The
608:with those who support intelligent design.
3567:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission
2847:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person
396:...at my talk page. Thanks for the note.
3600:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials
3249:I'm trying to clean up some issues with
2659:Proposed deletion of Metanexus Institute
2611:Thanks for uploading or contributing to
2607:Fair use rationale for File:Lauren05.jpg
2036:
2017:
1500:User talk:FeloniousMonk/Arbcom evidence
1289:Excuse me. Could this edit by MastCell
1226:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
3460:notice, but please explain why in your
2723:notice, but please explain why in your
2419:template has been added to the article
2324:template has been added to the article
1582:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Ali'i
188:majority view from the Expelled article
60:. The original talk page is located at
3512:Copyright problem: Discovery Institute
3429:The Integration of Theory and Practice
3415:The Integration of Theory and Practice
3146:Talk:Sternberg peer review controversy
3111:can be attributed to so-and-so said."
427:Does one of youse own stock in Skype?
3084:Slrubenstein, please strike all your
2857:, all biographies should be based on
1455:JzG RFAR merged with Cla68-FM-SV case
1169:. Since the MfD is closed, I went to
1045:a RfC that closed almost 9 months ago
731:The puppy speaks wisely and kindly.
710:
214:category:Intelligent design advocates
3678:Major Saad Amin (Garrison commander)
3592:, and note that you have done so on
2290:Your name has been brought up here-
1725:- you might like to have a look. --
1717:I've replied to your comments about
1248:I have created a new area for this:
208:McCain: intelligent design advocate?
15:
3632:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
3543:If you believe that the article is
2802:, an article that you created, for
2142:guide to writing your first article
243:I mentioned your name in this RfC:
13:
3449:deleted for any of several reasons
3435:because of the following concern:
3419:
3171:Request for lifting of restriction
2993:Category:Dominionist organizations
2985:Category:Dominionist organizations
2706:deleted for any of several reasons
2695:notability criteria … nothing but
2678:because of the following concern:
2662:
2407:
2312:
2248:notability guidelines for websites
2218:
2125:Leadership University (web portal)
2115:
2111:Leadership University (web portal)
1890:your desysopping has been proposed
1833:New policy proposal and draft help
1372:Um, no, it's not disruptive. Read
756:Heck, I'm a newb, and even I know
14:
3709:
3389:review the candidates' statements
3140:Sternberg peer review controversy
3052:The problem is, there is a user,
2565:Talk:Intelligent_design#New_image
1674:I happened across the article on
1670:Article in need of NPOV seeing-to
1313:and then MastCell appears like a
3205:
2832:
2791:
2504:
2333:This article consists solely of
2244:our criteria for speedy deletion
80:
3670:In regard of operation Bulmus 6
3616:released into the public domain
3439:No evidence of notability, per
2500:AfD nomination of Jerry Bergman
1996:I just made three proposals at
1077:But one of the reasons because
522:you think this source tells us?
3589:GNU Free Documentation License
3395:. For the Election committee,
3365:Arbitration Committee election
3356:ArbCom elections are now open!
3332:creation–evolution controversy
2642:Media copyright questions page
2226:Hello, this is a message from
1917:22:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1902:19:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
1838:Knowledge:Scientific standards
1825:for the Arbitration Committee,
335:I see you made changes to the
1:
3405:22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
3280:15:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
2851:biographies of living persons
2477:, where it may be deleted if
2385:, where it may be deleted if
2304:15:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
2083:18:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
2032:23:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
1610:and has even removed what ID
1335:Thank you for your attention
331:Richard Sternberg controversy
239:Mentioned your name in an RfC
156:content agreed upon in ArbCom
3665:17:27, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
3507:17:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
3350:07:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
3285:AfD of article you worked on
2959:06:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
2823:05:30, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
2776:20:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
2638:criteria for speedy deletion
2281:09:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
2207:13:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
2134:criteria for speedy deletion
2104:17:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2009:01:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
1987:21:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
1940:19:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
1686:) 14:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
1428:ArbCom case evidence request
176:05:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
7:
3493:allows discussion to reach
3474:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
3457:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
3391:and submit your choices on
3327:11:11, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
3303:10:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
3086:false statements against me
2762:allows discussion to reach
2654:04:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
2444:Knowledge's deletion policy
2352:Knowledge's deletion policy
2261:. Feel free to contact the
2230:. A tag has been placed on
2159:to the top of the article (
2054:21:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
1888:just letting you know that
1879:20:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
1559:and never has been an admin
654:Re:Evidence of Meatpuppetry
10:
3714:
3485:exist. In particular, the
3397:MediaWiki message delivery
3263:Talk:Climate change denial
3121:03:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
3098:16:43, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
3079:13:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
2978:22:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
2877:tag. Here is the article:
2602:06:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
2495:15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
1967:. Reviewers' concerns are
406:03:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
387:00:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
363:21:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
326:14:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
312:Would you mind commenting
302:01:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
287:00:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
263:05:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
234:08:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
91:
79:
70:ki/User_talk:FeloniousMonk
3479:proposed deletion process
3237:12:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
3037:04:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
2748:Proposed Deletion process
2683:Article lacks sufficient
2625:and edit it to include a
2623:the file description page
2467:proposed deletion process
2399:13:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
2375:proposed deletion process
2123:A tag has been placed on
1955:has been nominated for a
1828:14:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
1801:15:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
1772:14:33, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
1757:13:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
1705:14:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
1662:06:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1641:17:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1624:18:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
1589:17:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
1571:05:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
3699:19:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
3650:Talk:Discovery Institute
3628:Knowledge article layout
3620:Talk:Discovery Institute
3594:Talk:Discovery Institute
3577:a postal message to the
3557:Talk:Discovery Institute
3187:06:24, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
3135:01:17, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
2882:Frederick M. Franks, Jr.
2580:18:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
2559:15:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
2536:06:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
2471:speedy deletion criteria
2379:speedy deletion criteria
2000:- feel free to comment,
1767:
1735:18:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
1712:Allegations of apartheid
1657:
1548:20:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
1519:14:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1489:21:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
1450:06:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
1420:07:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
1391:05:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
1386:
1366:20:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1345:20:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1280:01:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1259:14:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
1233:11:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1189:11:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1162:06:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1145:06:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1107:06:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1102:
1092:06:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1073:06:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1068:
1057:05:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1033:05:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1028:
1018:05:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
993:04:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
988:
974:02:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
950:01:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
927:22:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
922:
913:22:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
900:22:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
895:
886:22:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
873:22:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
868:
858:22:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
833:11:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
816:20:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
789:20:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
770:18:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
744:17:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
727:17:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
715:17:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
689:22:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
673:19:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
631:
594:
549:
497:
297:
212:Hi--I see you added the
3614:", or that the work is
3612:(CC-BY-SA), version 3.0
3466:the article's talk page
3166:18:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
2756:Speedy Deletion process
2729:the article's talk page
2166:the article's talk page
2088:request for suggestions
2058:Darwin's Rhea#Discovery
1957:featured article review
695:Attacks in the article
636:05:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
618:04:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
599:04:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
569:04:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
554:04:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
532:04:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
517:04:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
502:03:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
487:03:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
467:02:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
440:02:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
422:05:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
203:22:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
154:Please be advised that
3445:
3424:
3308:Using blogs as sources
3242:Citation clean up at
3216:, has been listed for
2667:
2515:, has been listed for
2481:to delete is reached.
2436:criteria for inclusion
2421:Wethersfield Institute
2412:
2389:to delete is reached.
2344:criteria for inclusion
2317:
2223:
2127:requesting that it be
2120:
2061:
2034:
3657:Justlettersandnumbers
3491:articles for deletion
3437:
3433:proposed for deletion
3423:
3369:Arbitration Committee
3251:Climate change denial
3244:Climate change denial
2782:Articles for deletion
2760:Articles for Deletion
2676:proposed for deletion
2666:
2475:Articles for Deletion
2473:or it can be sent to
2440:What Knowledge is not
2411:
2383:Articles for Deletion
2381:or it can be sent to
2348:What Knowledge is not
2316:
2286:You may be interested
2222:
2119:
2040:
2021:
1612:is leaving no context
1532:Template:Creationism2
1526:Template:Creationism2
1285:More AIDS "denialism"
824:may interest you. ..
822:WP:AN#Moulton (un)ban
3579:Wikimedia Foundation
3518:welcome to Knowledge
2056:(for story line see
1494:Arbcom evidence page
1374:WP:NPOV#Undue weight
1294:"disruptive editing"
706:Nearly Headless Nick
665:PlatanusOccidentalis
164:by a Knowledge admin
3646:this temporary page
3561:Discovery Institute
3522:Discovery Institute
3373:arbitration process
3025:the discussion page
2672:Metanexus Institute
308:When you have a sec
3648:. Leave a note at
3581:permitting re-use
3563:, in their email.
3483:deletion processes
3425:
3385:arbitration policy
2983:CfD nomination of
2964:Error in reference
2841:alerting you that
2752:deletion processes
2668:
2627:fair use rationale
2413:
2318:
2224:
2121:
2062:
2035:
1953:Intelligent design
1947:Intelligent design
1594:Jindal supports ID
1524:TfD nomination of
453:was deleted under
89:
47:you are viewing a
3602:for instructions.
3569:for instructions.
3411:Proposed deletion
2990:I have nominated
2945:
2828:Unreferenced BLPs
2798:I have nominated
2614:File:Lauren05.jpg
2541:AfD of UC article
2417:proposed deletion
2335:original research
2322:proposed deletion
1985:
1935:
1364:
785:
717:
337:Richard Sternberg
85:
78:
77:
3705:
3534:copyright policy
3476:
3475:
3459:
3458:
3422:
3278:
3276:
3271:
3209:
3022:
3021:
2944:
2943:
2929:
2885:
2876:
2870:
2859:reliable sources
2836:
2795:
2766:for deletion. —
2745:
2744:
2738:
2722:
2721:
2715:
2634:my contributions
2508:
2493:
2457:
2456:
2450:
2365:
2364:
2358:
2236:speedily deleted
2228:an automated bot
2205:
2158:
2157:
2151:
2129:speedily deleted
1984:
1982:
1977:
1961:featured quality
1936:
1933:
1871:ScienceApologist
1799:
1796:
1790:
1652:supports it is.
1487:
1484:
1478:
1434:evidence section
1363:
1361:
1356:
1257:
1231:
1173:complain to ANI
1014:
1009:
970:
965:
786:
784:
780:
741:
738:
735:
712:
707:
702:
605:are not the same
437:
434:
431:
419:
162:, most recently
96:
88:
84:
74:
71:
68:
65:
59:
58:
55:
46:
44:
41:
30:
29:
26:
16:
3713:
3712:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3704:
3703:
3702:
3672:
3514:
3487:speedy deletion
3473:
3472:
3456:
3455:
3420:
3418:
3393:the voting page
3359:
3334:
3310:
3287:
3274:
3269:
3267:
3247:
3210:
3203:
3179:Anythingyouwant
3173:
3142:
3046:
2995:
2991:
2988:
2970:129.241.215.249
2966:
2886:
2874:
2872:unreferencedBLP
2868:
2830:
2796:
2789:
2768:141.156.161.245
2742:
2736:
2735:
2719:
2713:
2712:
2697:primary sources
2661:
2609:
2587:
2568:
2543:
2509:
2502:
2491:
2482:
2454:
2448:
2447:
2406:
2362:
2356:
2355:
2311:
2288:
2217:
2203:
2194:
2179:for biographies
2155:
2149:
2148:
2114:
2090:
2067:
2016:
2014:Merry Christmas
1994:
1978:
1973:
1950:
1932:
1909:
1886:
1835:
1811:
1794:
1783:
1780:
1742:
1715:
1672:
1633:DanielZimmerman
1596:
1578:
1557:Sceptre is not,
1555:
1538:. Thank you. —
1529:
1496:
1482:
1471:
1468:
1457:
1430:
1357:
1352:
1315:Deus ex machina
1292:be regarded as
1287:
1267:
1255:John Vandenberg
1253:
1229:John Vandenberg
1227:
1209:
1012:
1007:
968:
963:
957:
943:
841:
803:
783:
776:
739:
736:
733:
724:KillerChihuahua
705:
700:
656:
474:
448:
435:
432:
429:
417:
413:
394:
370:
351:
333:
318:Angry Christian
310:
277:for a report?
270:
241:
210:
184:
152:
94:
86:
69:
66:
64:https://en.wiki
63:
61:
56:
53:
52:
42:
39:
38:
27:
24:
23:
12:
11:
5:
3711:
3686:
3685:
3682:
3679:
3671:
3668:
3624:
3623:
3604:
3571:
3540:from editing.
3513:
3510:
3499:Dr. Fleischman
3497:for deletion.
3477:will stop the
3417:
3408:
3362:
3358:
3353:
3333:
3330:
3309:
3306:
3286:
3283:
3246:
3240:
3204:
3202:
3198:nomination of
3193:
3191:
3172:
3169:
3141:
3138:
3101:
3100:
3059:user:QuackGuru
3045:
3040:
2987:
2981:
2965:
2962:
2947:
2946:
2829:
2826:
2790:
2788:
2784:nomination of
2779:
2746:will stop the
2702:
2701:
2660:
2657:
2608:
2605:
2586:
2583:
2567:
2562:
2542:
2539:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2487:
2432:
2431:
2405:
2402:
2340:
2339:
2310:
2307:
2287:
2284:
2252:
2251:
2216:
2212:Notability of
2210:
2199:
2113:
2109:Notability of
2107:
2089:
2086:
2066:
2063:
2015:
2012:
1993:
1990:
1949:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1908:
1905:
1885:
1882:
1834:
1831:
1810:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1775:
1774:
1741:
1738:
1714:
1708:
1671:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1595:
1592:
1577:
1576:Quick heads up
1574:
1554:
1551:
1528:
1522:
1495:
1492:
1456:
1453:
1429:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1394:
1393:
1369:
1368:
1286:
1283:
1266:
1265:AIDS denialism
1263:
1262:
1261:
1246:
1241:has suggested
1208:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1002:
956:
953:
942:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
840:
837:
836:
835:
802:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
749:
748:
747:
746:
740:sch•
734:•Jim
699:
693:
692:
691:
655:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
537:
536:
535:
534:
519:
473:
470:
447:
444:
443:
442:
436:sch•
430:•Jim
412:
409:
393:
390:
369:
366:
350:
344:
332:
329:
309:
306:
305:
304:
269:
266:
251:
250:
240:
237:
209:
206:
183:
180:
151:
145:
143:
141:
140:
139:
134:
129:
124:
119:
114:
109:
104:
98:
76:
75:
36:
32:user talk page
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3710:
3701:
3700:
3696:
3692:
3683:
3680:
3677:
3676:
3675:
3667:
3666:
3662:
3658:
3653:
3651:
3647:
3642:
3640:
3635:
3633:
3629:
3621:
3617:
3613:
3611:
3605:
3603:
3601:
3595:
3591:
3590:
3586:
3580:
3576:
3572:
3570:
3568:
3562:
3558:
3554:
3550:
3549:
3548:
3546:
3541:
3539:
3535:
3531:
3527:
3523:
3519:
3509:
3508:
3504:
3500:
3496:
3492:
3488:
3484:
3480:
3469:
3467:
3463:
3452:
3450:
3444:
3442:
3436:
3434:
3430:
3416:
3412:
3407:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3390:
3386:
3382:
3378:
3374:
3370:
3366:
3357:
3352:
3351:
3347:
3343:
3342:Kaptinavenger
3339:
3329:
3328:
3324:
3320:
3315:
3305:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3282:
3281:
3277:
3272:
3264:
3259:
3256:
3252:
3245:
3239:
3238:
3234:
3230:
3225:
3224:. Thank you.
3223:
3219:
3215:
3208:
3201:
3197:
3192:
3189:
3188:
3184:
3180:
3177:
3168:
3167:
3163:
3159:
3155:
3152:
3148:
3147:
3137:
3136:
3132:
3128:
3123:
3122:
3118:
3114:
3110:
3106:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3080:
3077:
3073:
3068:
3063:
3060:
3055:
3050:
3044:
3039:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3027:. Thank you.
3026:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2994:
2986:
2980:
2979:
2975:
2971:
2961:
2960:
2956:
2952:
2942:
2938:
2935:
2932:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2917:
2914:
2911:
2908:
2905:
2902:
2899:
2896:
2892:
2889:
2888:Find sources:
2883:
2880:
2879:
2878:
2873:
2866:
2865:
2860:
2856:
2855:verifiability
2852:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2835:
2825:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2811:
2809:
2805:
2801:
2794:
2787:
2783:
2778:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2741:
2732:
2730:
2726:
2718:
2709:
2707:
2700:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2689:Verifiability
2686:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2677:
2673:
2665:
2656:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2644:. Thank you.
2643:
2639:
2635:
2630:
2628:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2615:
2604:
2603:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2582:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2566:
2561:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2538:
2537:
2533:
2529:
2524:
2523:. Thank you.
2522:
2518:
2514:
2513:Jerry Bergman
2507:
2497:
2496:
2492:
2490:
2486:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2463:
2461:
2460:its talk page
2453:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2430:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2422:
2418:
2410:
2401:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2371:
2369:
2368:its talk page
2361:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2338:
2336:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2327:
2323:
2315:
2306:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2283:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2271:
2270:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2221:
2215:
2209:
2208:
2204:
2202:
2198:
2192:
2191:for companies
2188:
2184:
2183:for web sites
2180:
2175:
2172:
2168:
2167:
2162:
2154:
2145:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2130:
2126:
2118:
2112:
2106:
2105:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2059:
2055:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2039:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2020:
2011:
2010:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1989:
1988:
1983:
1981:
1976:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1948:
1941:
1937:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1915:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1892:at the RFAR.
1891:
1881:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1866:
1861:
1858:
1853:
1850:
1846:
1840:
1839:
1830:
1829:
1826:
1823:
1818:
1815:
1809:
1802:
1797:
1791:
1789:
1787:
1777:
1776:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1764:FeloniousMonk
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1713:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1676:Charles Hodge
1663:
1659:
1655:
1654:FeloniousMonk
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1608:mention of it
1605:
1601:
1591:
1590:
1587:
1583:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1527:
1521:
1520:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1510:
1509:
1504:
1501:
1491:
1490:
1485:
1479:
1477:
1475:
1466:
1462:
1461:arb vote here
1452:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1438:evidence page
1435:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1383:FeloniousMonk
1380:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1362:
1360:
1355:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1325:
1323:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1260:
1256:
1251:
1247:
1244:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1224:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1207:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:FeloniousMonk
1095:
1094:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:FeloniousMonk
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:FeloniousMonk
1021:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1010:
1000:
996:
995:
994:
990:
986:
985:FeloniousMonk
981:
978:
977:
976:
975:
972:
971:
966:
952:
951:
948:
941:Moral support
928:
924:
920:
919:FeloniousMonk
916:
915:
914:
911:
908:
903:
902:
901:
897:
893:
892:FeloniousMonk
889:
888:
887:
884:
881:
876:
875:
874:
870:
866:
865:FeloniousMonk
862:
861:
860:
859:
856:
853:
849:
845:
834:
831:
827:
823:
820:
819:
818:
817:
813:
809:
790:
787:
781:
779:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
745:
742:
730:
729:
728:
725:
720:
719:
718:
716:
713:
708:
698:
690:
686:
682:
677:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
661:
637:
633:
629:
628:FeloniousMonk
625:
621:
620:
619:
615:
611:
606:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
591:FeloniousMonk
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
570:
566:
562:
557:
556:
555:
551:
547:
546:FeloniousMonk
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
533:
529:
525:
520:
518:
514:
510:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
494:FeloniousMonk
491:
490:
489:
488:
484:
480:
469:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
441:
438:
426:
425:
424:
423:
420:
408:
407:
403:
399:
389:
388:
384:
380:
374:
365:
364:
360:
356:
348:
343:
341:
338:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
303:
299:
295:
294:FeloniousMonk
291:
290:
289:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:take this to
265:
264:
260:
256:
249:
246:
245:
244:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
205:
204:
200:
196:
191:
189:
179:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
149:
144:
138:
135:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
99:
97:
92:
90:
87:feloniousmonk
83:
72:
50:
35:
33:
20:
18:
17:
3687:
3673:
3654:
3643:
3636:
3625:
3615:
3607:
3597:
3582:
3574:
3564:
3560:
3544:
3542:
3515:
3481:, but other
3470:
3462:edit summary
3453:
3446:
3438:
3427:The article
3426:
3360:
3335:
3311:
3289:Please see:
3288:
3260:
3248:
3226:
3211:
3190:
3174:
3143:
3124:
3102:
3072:Slrubenstein
3066:
3064:
3054:user:Zaereth
3051:
3047:
2989:
2967:
2948:
2936:
2930:
2922:
2915:
2909:
2903:
2897:
2887:
2862:
2842:
2831:
2812:
2797:
2754:exist. The
2750:, but other
2733:
2725:edit summary
2710:
2703:
2682:
2670:The article
2669:
2646:72.88.68.185
2631:
2612:
2610:
2595:Slrubenstein
2588:
2569:
2544:
2528:Steve Dufour
2525:
2510:
2483:
2464:
2433:
2427:
2414:
2372:
2341:
2332:
2319:
2289:
2266:
2263:bot operator
2225:
2195:
2176:
2170:
2164:
2160:
2146:
2122:
2097:Slrubenstein
2091:
2068:
2002:Slrubenstein
1995:
1979:
1974:
1951:
1910:
1887:
1869:
1862:
1854:
1841:
1836:
1824:
1819:
1816:
1812:
1785:
1784:
1743:
1716:
1687:
1673:
1600:Bobby Jindal
1597:
1579:
1558:
1556:
1530:
1513:
1512:
1507:
1497:
1473:
1472:
1463:the RFAR on
1458:
1431:
1377:
1358:
1353:
1334:
1329:
1326:
1318:
1314:
1304:
1301:
1293:
1288:
1268:
1225:
1210:
1170:
1149:
1079:User:Moulton
1041:
1005:
961:
958:
944:
843:
842:
804:
801:User:Moulton
778:the_undertow
777:
762:Aunt Entropy
701:
697:User:Moulton
659:
657:
604:
475:
449:
446:Re: Question
414:
411:Skype invite
395:
375:
371:
368:Expelled POV
352:
349:userfication
334:
311:
271:
255:Inclusionist
252:
242:
211:
192:
185:
153:
142:
93:
67:pedia.org/wi
21:
3516:Hello, and
3266:yourself.--
2913:free images
2685:Attribution
2572:Tim Vickers
2075:Tim Vickers
2065:Attack page
1697:Plutonium27
1680:Plutonium27
1272:Someguy1221
1239:Dorftrottel
1181:Enric Naval
1154:Enric Naval
1137:Enric Naval
1084:Enric Naval
1049:Enric Naval
347:Tony Zirkle
268:ThomHImself
218:John McCain
49:mirror site
3691:Amr F.Nagy
3608:under the
3583:under the
3381:topic bans
3270:SPhilbrick
2740:dated prod
2717:dated prod
2452:dated prod
2360:dated prod
2273:CSDWarnBot
2161:just below
2047:dave souza
1907:Desysopped
1752:. Thanks.
1616:Paper45tee
826:dave souza
610:PelleSmith
561:PelleSmith
524:PelleSmith
509:PelleSmith
479:PelleSmith
398:Carcharoth
195:Odd nature
160:vandalized
137:/Archive_8
132:/Archive_7
127:/Archive_6
122:/Archive_5
117:/Archive_4
112:/Archive_3
107:/Archive_2
102:/Archive_1
22:This is a
3495:consensus
3431:has been
3377:site bans
3127:QuackGuru
3113:QuackGuru
3090:QuackGuru
2949:Thanks!--
2800:Denialism
2786:Denialism
2764:consensus
2699:provided.
2674:has been
2479:consensus
2387:consensus
2187:for bands
2043:Darwin200
2024:Guettarda
1912:wishes.--
1863:See also
1754:Jehochman
1740:Dragon695
1692:User:Flex
1563:SirFozzie
1412:Randroide
1337:Randroide
808:WAS 4.250
758:the rules
459:MZMcBride
455:WP:CSD#C1
178:larvatus
158:has been
150:Vandalism
3295:Wolfview
3229:Wolfview
3218:deletion
3158:Yopienso
3144:Hi. At
2804:deletion
2619:fair use
2517:deletion
2296:NoCal100
2045:Year! .
1779:unblock.
1750:User:FT2
1465:User:JzG
1459:Per the
999:COATRACK
848:WP:CIVIL
182:Heads up
95:Archives
3538:blocked
3109:opinion
3043:wp:NPOV
3006:history
2951:DASHBot
2919:WP refs
2907:scholar
2693:WP:CORP
2691:of the
2585:Urgent!
1857:WP:SPOV
1845:WP:NPOV
1710:AfD on
1688:Addenda
1604:removed
1436:on the
1008:krimpet
964:krimpet
910:Fierce!
907:Mike H.
883:Fierce!
880:Mike H.
855:Fierce!
852:Mike H.
839:Threat?
392:Replied
355:JoshuaZ
216:tag to
3464:or on
3441:WP:GNG
3367:. The
3340:FYI --
3154:WP:SYN
3067:really
3029:Prezbo
2891:Google
2849:. The
2727:or on
2551:Borock
2442:" and
2429:demise
2391:Huadpe
2350:" and
2259:WP:WMD
2171:speedy
2153:hangon
2041:Happy
1998:WP:NOR
1980:Marlin
1975:Orange
1894:Stifle
1865:WP:SCI
1746:WP:ANI
1727:ChrisO
1719:WP:NOR
1540:Neelix
1359:Marlin
1354:Orange
681:Baegis
418:Durova
279:Baegis
226:Narsil
3319:Cla68
3151:WP:OR
3014:watch
3010:links
2934:JSTOR
2895:books
2815:Unomi
2489:Stalk
2485:Hrafn
2201:Stalk
2197:Hrafn
2189:, or
1924:Filll
1914:MONGO
1849:WP:RS
1822:Coren
1788:levse
1586:Ali'i
1476:levse
1442:Cla68
1171:bitch
955:Stop.
148:WebEx
57:pedia
43:pedia
28:pedia
3695:talk
3661:talk
3637:See
3598:See
3587:and
3565:See
3503:talk
3401:talk
3346:talk
3323:talk
3314:this
3299:talk
3255:edit
3233:talk
3183:talk
3162:talk
3131:talk
3117:talk
3105:fact
3094:talk
3076:Talk
3033:talk
3018:logs
3002:talk
2998:edit
2974:talk
2955:talk
2927:FENS
2901:news
2819:talk
2772:talk
2687:for
2650:talk
2599:Talk
2591:here
2576:talk
2555:talk
2532:talk
2395:talk
2300:talk
2277:talk
2269:here
2101:Talk
2093:here
2079:talk
2051:talk
2028:talk
2006:Talk
1969:here
1965:here
1928:talk
1898:talk
1875:talk
1847:and
1795:Talk
1768:talk
1731:talk
1701:talk
1684:talk
1658:talk
1637:talk
1620:talk
1606:any
1567:talk
1544:talk
1508:Neıl
1483:Talk
1446:talk
1416:talk
1387:talk
1341:talk
1319:very
1296:per
1276:talk
1243:here
1213:here
1185:talk
1158:talk
1141:talk
1103:talk
1088:talk
1069:talk
1053:talk
1029:talk
989:talk
923:talk
896:talk
869:talk
830:talk
812:talk
766:talk
685:talk
669:talk
632:talk
626:...
614:talk
595:talk
565:talk
550:talk
528:talk
513:talk
498:talk
483:talk
463:talk
402:talk
383:talk
379:keno
359:talk
322:talk
314:here
298:talk
283:talk
259:talk
230:talk
199:talk
172:talk
54:Wiki
40:Wiki
25:Wiki
3545:not
3413:of
3361:Hi,
3196:AfD
3074:|
2941:TWL
2864:698
2839:bot
2597:|
2099:|
2004:|
1992:nor
1934:wpc
1721:at
1498:re
1376:: "
1324:.
711:{C}
660:not
472:Tag
275:ANI
166:.
3697:)
3663:)
3634:.
3596:.
3575:or
3505:)
3468:.
3451:.
3403:)
3379:,
3348:)
3325:)
3301:)
3235:)
3185:)
3164:)
3133:)
3119:)
3096:)
3088:.
3035:)
3016:|
3012:|
3008:|
3004:|
3000:|
2976:)
2957:)
2921:)
2884:-
2875:}}
2869:{{
2821:)
2774:)
2743:}}
2737:{{
2731:.
2720:}}
2714:{{
2708:.
2652:)
2629:.
2578:)
2557:)
2549:.
2534:)
2462:.
2455:}}
2449:{{
2415:A
2397:)
2370:.
2363:}}
2357:{{
2320:A
2302:)
2279:)
2185:,
2181:,
2156:}}
2150:{{
2144:.
2081:)
2073:.
2049:,
2030:)
1938:)
1930:|
1900:)
1877:)
1820:—
1798:•
1792:•
1781:—
1770:)
1733:)
1703:)
1660:)
1639:)
1622:)
1569:)
1546:)
1486:•
1480:•
1469:—
1448:)
1418:)
1389:)
1381:"
1343:)
1278:)
1223:.
1187:)
1179:--
1160:)
1143:)
1105:)
1090:)
1071:)
1055:)
1031:)
991:)
925:)
898:)
871:)
828:,
814:)
768:)
737:62
687:)
671:)
634:)
616:)
597:)
567:)
552:)
530:)
515:)
500:)
485:)
465:)
433:62
404:)
385:)
361:)
324:)
300:)
285:)
261:)
232:)
201:)
190:.
174:)
3693:(
3659:(
3501:(
3443:.
3399:(
3344:(
3321:(
3297:(
3293:.
3275:T
3231:(
3181:(
3160:(
3129:(
3115:(
3092:(
3031:(
3020:)
2996:(
2972:(
2953:(
2937:·
2931:·
2923:·
2916:·
2910:·
2904:·
2898:·
2893:(
2843:1
2817:(
2770:(
2648:(
2574:(
2553:(
2530:(
2393:(
2298:(
2275:(
2077:(
2060:)
2026:(
1971:.
1926:(
1896:(
1873:(
1786:R
1766:(
1729:(
1699:(
1682:(
1656:(
1635:(
1618:(
1614:.
1565:(
1542:(
1514:龱
1474:R
1444:(
1414:(
1385:(
1339:(
1274:(
1183:(
1156:(
1139:(
1101:(
1086:(
1067:(
1051:(
1027:(
1013:✽
987:(
969:✽
921:(
894:(
867:(
810:(
764:(
683:(
667:(
630:(
612:(
593:(
563:(
548:(
526:(
511:(
496:(
481:(
461:(
400:(
381:(
357:(
320:(
296:(
281:(
257:(
228:(
197:(
170:(
73:.
45:,
34:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
