User talk:David Levy/Archive1

6369:

discussions, and keeping precise track of mis-wording issues is sometimes difficult. I did not understand why you did reply to any of the comments, it was not until your last reply on my discussion page, that you worded it in such a matter, and we were not discussing many other issues, that you mererly wanted a retraction from what you fealt was a demeaning comment towards you. This is the reason I stated in the first lines, that I am not that type of person. Even if you or someone had "pissed me off", to be blunt, I would not resort to demeaning a user. I am sorry you fealt that way, as I was truely only trying to summarize. My wording could have been chosen better, but that states nothing about my character. I attempted to clarify the reply to Idont Havaname, to better represent the discussion and quotes I left on your page. As far as the other users commenting on the same situation, I did not respond to them about any of the issues, as to not encourage further discussion, I fealt it better not to respond to anyone in this reguard. I explained this better on the modified Rfa page. I am replying to these comments, only because you approached me in good faith, not to say the other times were not, but during the heat of a discussion, all things can have a skewed view, as some of the reasoning for my request to end the discussion.

5552:

reasoning, I could see atm, for you to leave it on my page, is to continue to state your concern over my RFA, on my discussion page. I feel you have conveyed that to me quite effectively, and to further to state those concerns on my talk page, in response to another users comments, does not solve anything. So I kindly asked you to voice your concerns to them, as I need not be a party to your conversations, as I feel a personal note I left for Splash and vice/versa, other Wikipedians need not to be involved. If those notes had pertained to some type of vandalism or wrong doing, then I would have welcomed other users involvement. I hope this explains my reasoning. If you wish to discuss other matters with me, that is quite acceptable, but the issue of that particular revert war is past. Thank you.

4904:. He had not even responded to any of the comments I made. I am only attempting to let the community decide. This is not an ownership issue, as I plainly stated. The point is, the template will be edited again to conform to template standarization, and my last RV was to that original proposed version, currently the template does not conform. I do not appreciate the comments he made, and was polite and consise with my reasoning. The fact that I am not an admin should not effect waiting for a consensus and reverting back to his version. I have followed all the policies and am now being punished for it? Please review the history and the links I provided. Thank you 5900:

someone obviously close to the subject in question, was subject to repeated sockpuppetry, and it took some time for the actual facts of the case to be brought up. My suggestion is to wait a few weeks then relist the page on VfU. Hopefully by that time the people at Digg.com will have lost interest and we can have a clean vote without sockpuppets and the inevitable backlash against them. Contact me at that time and I will vote for undeletion, but I do not have the power to unilaterally undelete a page that has failed two VfU bids. -

7268:

policies. My assumption was that you were attempting a quick-fix alteration of the image and vouching for it on Commons simply to shut me up about the copyright violation of an image I am extremely familiar with. If you refuse to provide me with greater proof that the image is yours, you're right -- I will just have to take you at your word and trust that your image is a remarkable replacement for the original image, in which case I have to congratulate you, because it's almost pixel perfect.

7014:

I'm pretty familiar with it. Now, if you managed to reconstruct that yourself from new sources, I've just got to tip my cap to you for an excellent job. If it's not an exact copy of the original, it's a perfect reconstruction. But I have to admit it seems less likely to me that you made an original shot using a TV model that looks pixel-for-pixel identical to the infringing image. Hence my assumption. If it is based on a real source photo, it should be easy for you to clear up any doubts.

4638:"ID eNTITY is a manwha about a young boy who is a master of a virtual reality computer game. After his character expired and he needed to renew it (a lengthy process), he decided to use a different character (using an identification card he found on the floor), instead. He then amuses himself by using his new, female character to talk to people with a whole new light. However, the original player wants her character back..." 3723:, class="notice noprint" means simple that this is a text notice and that it shoudn't be printed - they each have their own "rules" defined that apply very broadly. "ID" on the other hand refers to a specific usage. So id="merge" refers to the merge-based templates. This is used for a more narrow scope of changes. In CSS, class characteristics are applied before ID, so you go from general settings to specific ones. -- 606:

If I can be of any help here (short of kneecapping of course) please let me know, my patience is at a lower threshold than yours. However, I'm also committed to this project first and the community second so long as it supports the first objective. There are those, who in this matter don't seem to care about anything but supporting a pre-scripted agenda, no matter the merits. In fact they just recently show up saying

7275:(By the way, if I wrote a story that was identical to the topic that another person had written a day before, with the same quotes from the same people, people would accuse me of plagiarism. Even if I claimed to have gone back to those sources and asked them the same questions and gotten the same answers. Because that would be extremely suspicious.) 6105:

is, I have been attempting to move on from the situation and again have not even discussed you with other users if they mentioned it. I am attempting to continue with my daily routine. I am sorry if this does not address your concerns or questions fully, but I feel I have nothing else to discuss with you on this topic.

874:. There wasn't any opposition to that particular move, however anybody could have easily rounded up enough die-hard pure AE supporters to keep it at the "original" page no matter how well anyone proved the appropriateness of "Cheque". ...Wow, I didn't plan to write this much and now my apology seems like a 4900:, you would see I was plainly trying to avoid a revert war. This template is still in discussion, and the reason for the discussion was becuase users were just changing and removing templates without any discussion. I proposed the redesign of the template, as well as proposed going back to the old version 7013:

if you're willing to privately send me a 300-pixel-wide version of your photograph to prove that it's not based on the copyrighted image. But as far as I can tell, it's a pixel for pixel duplication of the original image, which I've been using for eight years now on my own site in a licensed form, so

6618:

Perhaps the setup should be changed, but this is something that would need to be discussed. IIRC, the main argument against this is that casual readers needn't be informed of (and distracted/confused by) such a message. Merge notices, conversely, provide useful information to readers (by linking to

6408:

Thank you for addressing my concern. My initial belief was that your incorrect statement probably was unintentional, but the fact that you hadn't amended it (after I originally brought it to your attention) was beginning to generate some doubt on my part. Thanks also for recognizing that my replies

6053:

had posted on my talk page? I merely thanked him for voting on my Rfa, his comments were his own and not spurred by anything I said. If not, the only other remarks I made about you continuing to reply, was I believe about your responses to me responding directly to other users on my Rfa. I have not

5917:

I'm not requesting undeletion; I'm requesting unprotection (thereby enabling an entirely new article to be authored). I never saw any of the deleted versions, but it's my understanding that they were comprised primarily of POV content that needn't be restored. (Perhaps you could verify the accuracy

5883:

website is not as strong as that of several other users who have attempted to resurrect this page. I am, however, qualified to contribute some information to such an article, and I volunteer to monitor it for any illicit activity (such as insertion of the type of POV content that has been deleted on

5729:

I understood your reasoning after you explained it in the last comment, thats why I replied and said "at the moment (atm)". As far as the issue being past, I merely meant, you stating the same thing you stated on the other discussion pages, is not further discussing the issue, I saw no "constructive

5527:

I will avoid replying to others on your talk page in the future (now that I'm aware that you object to this), but that isn't all that you wrote. You accused me of "constantly hound" you, simply because I discussed your misdeeds. No offense, that level of sensitivity to constructive criticism is not

4818:

is far from unacceptable, and I realize that there are other factors in play (which is why, after noticing this flaw in my examples, I didn't ask you not to implement the changes). I was just hoping that you might be able to somehow eliminate this issue without compromising anything else. If not, I

2910:

The vote was initially cast without "Xs here and Ys there" and should not be changed now. There was a little interaction from vote to vote agreeing or disagreeing with previous votes that loses it sense when reformatted. I think that loss is unhelpful both to the vote-closer and to others who want to

2853:

You made an edit with no edit summery. When i did a diff, it shownd the only change beign the removal of gkhan's remarks, it did not show them being inserted eslewhere. It also did not show any new commetns from you. Either the diff was in error or I mis read it badly, or possibly your edit didn't do

2493:

Sorry, if it wasn't clear, I meant my comment for Radiant, and wasn't replying to you. As for reverting the page to the "consensus" version and then protecting it, that would be even more out of line. Violetriga was in fact only marginally involved, and hadn't taken part in the edit war. Anyway, this

1906:

single vote. When you comment on votes you agree with, you're being remarkably redundant (essentially "me too!"). When you comment on votes you disagree with, you tend to just repeat your previous comments and also tend to be abrasive and condescending. I invite you to return your concentration and

1070:

switched "programme" to "program." I was going to revert it (because spellings should not be changed purely for the sake of conforming to a particular variety of English), when I noticed several entries that didn't fit this description. (When these have been weeded out, maybe the word "programming"

5971:

led me to believe that the page consisted of nothing more than a brief "advertisement" that had been restored repeatedly by persistent newbies who didn't know any better.) Knowing now that there was a semi-appropriate article at some point, I agree that the best course of action is to wait a while,

4986:

As I commented on 3RR, I was not in violation. The first edit, I just listed as a RV, as it had nothing to do with the template or design, but in order to fix a link. If you do not believe me, you can make a copy and test the version I fixed, and you will see it did not work. It was merely a fix.

2628:

Users can be notified via documentation on the template's talk page. Also, the loss of the image is minor, correctable, and a separate consideration. The vote already shows that there is a significant divide. Would you force your preference onto others, or consider an option which allows everyone

2075:

1. Your idea of addressing the issue is to ignore a clear consensus, repeatedly state your minority opinion as though it's a widely accepted belief, impose this decision upon the community (while announcing your intention to revert any and all contrary edits), and dismiss all pertinent criticisms as

861:

which puts me at odds with the original author "policy" (which is actually just a suggestion). I understand it's potential benefits for the community; that being the prevention of drawn-out debates over such minimally important things like spelling, however it is my belief (and many others) that it

306:

behind the woodshed today. Your point by point rebuttal of his comments were ... well, ... on point. I found myself feeling however, that you had him on the ropes long enough. On another topic, your editing skills and your "street smarts" here seem to belie your time on board. I really don't care on

6763:

like, but in the case of Kim B, we know that he is not an intentional vandal and we also know that it was just a misguided attempt at sorting out a "ForestFire". I don't see any real need to penalise them for the full 24 hours. Especially when they could be contributing to this site in a productive

6368:

At this point, it is hard to describe to you, I am not the type of person that jumps to conclusions, or argumentative. If you disagree, I understand, and wish not to argue over any differing point of views, I am just offering this to you in good faith. We have both written very long and topic wild

6245:

I also said in our discussion, that I didn't necessarily mind the further discussion on my page, what I did not appreciate was you continually to defend/offend/etc. the 3RR with other users on my discussion page. So I kindly asked you to take your conversation to their page, as you had already made

6104:

I did not reply to you on my Rfa when I addressed a users comment, I replied to them, whether or not your name or other users names were mentioned, did not mean I was addressing you, only answering a concern to the user who asked it. So therefore you did reply when not directly responded to. As it

6087:

5734:

ground. So at this point, I feel our discussion on that topic is past, unless there are other areas you wish to discss that have not already been covered. This is the reason I asked you to respond to the user, rather than my page. It is not necessarily because I completely object to discussions on

4795:

At most resolutions, everything looks fine being that is just one line. Even at small resolutions or with large text, the effect is minimal (compared to many other things that look bad) and I think that top and left aligning it is good. Removing it from a table is a trade-off for those of us that

1236:

The majority of the items under broadcasting are either stations, channels, networks, towers, or companies. My reasoning for not splitting radio and tv is that for many of these a person in a particular geographical area would be familiar with both a tv station and a radio station in the same area

605:

dissenters require a lifetime of keystrokes to keep them (the dissenters) under control or will they (the dissenters) kind of die out after a while. While I continue to be impressed by you're patience in this matter, I'm also confident that you could be contributing in other more constructive ways.

264:

My sincere congratulations. While some (including me) were becoming silly and frivolous, you held fast and especially held your (our) ground in the face of some pounding criticism. I'm impressed with your integrity and regard for this project. You have, by your example, shown more than you imagine.

7703:

By "inaccurate information," I was referring to the claim that G4 stands for "games, gear, gadgets and gizmos." Firstly, the word "gizmos" never appeared in the G4techTV/G4 advertising. (The fourth "G" word was "gigabytes," and later "girls.") Secondly, this was merely an advertising slogan; it

6040:

As you're well aware, I posted precisely one reply to another user on this page. You requested that I refrain from doing so, and I've complied (even when Kbdank71 posted a reply to me here). Therefore, I don't know why you claimed that I have been "continuing to reply to other users on discussion

3745:

I understand that there are differences, but your id-based code failed to duplicate the template's appearance. If you can modify it to correct this problem, that will be fine. Otherwise, mine is the only CSS implementation that will function properly. The other option is to simply hard-code the

6669:

is the exact spirit of the Wiki. A good Wikipedian can do as he thinks best, as long as he judges that it would be beneficial to the wiki, and that the consensus would agree with his actions. The definition of a good Wikipedian is one that is almost always correct in judging where consensus would

6652:

was cited to me last night by Kimm B as a reason or basis for the action involved with the policy page deleteion and the removal of content from VfU. I have posted on the relevant talk page arguing that this page need to be modified to make it clear that IAR does not apply to the kinds of "rules"

5899:

As the person who deleted the page I have no special power to undelete it. I stand by my original VfD decision, but since the page was deleted its Alexa ranking has passed 10,000 and there is very much a legitimate argument for undeletion. The most recent one likely failed because it was begun by

5362:

Hi, I appreciate your concern over my current RFA. However, if you have comments you wish to make to users, please do so on their discussion page. I monitor other users pages to revert vandalism, and do not think it polite to constantly hound someone on an issue that is past. If you have further

4746:

The article began with the sentence "ID eNTITY is a manwha about a young boy who is a master of a virtual reality computer game." This was followed by a brief (but presumably accurate) plot summary, the syntax of which was fairly decent. No offense, but the author is not to blame for your false

2999:

Because the changes were so extensive. By all means you can archive old talk page comments, but you should never strip down what people have said. In doing so you can easily lose the original context that it was written in. If there is to be a second round of voting (which by all means you can

625:

I wholeheartedly agree with all of the above, and I don't intend to continue investing time and effort in this discussion ad infinitum. There are some other articles that I'd like to work on, and I also have plenty of real-life matters to address. Hopefully, we're witnessing the debate's death

7163:

What if I were to publicly accuse you of plagiarizing one of your Macintosh articles and lying about its origin (without warning or prior discussion)? How would you feel if I were to subsequently demand that you submit proof of authorship, as though you were on trial (and had unilaterally been

6335:

As it is, I have been attempting to move on from the situation and again have not even discussed you with other users if they mentioned it. I am attempting to continue with my daily routine. I am sorry if this does not address your concerns or questions fully, but I feel I have nothing else to

5941:

I'm not sure if this impression is correct. The version deleted back in March, while not a model of neutrality, was not overtly POV. With its long history (it has been deleted on twelve separate occasions) any new version of this article is certain to be listed on VfD, if it isn't speedied as a

5551:

I appologize that I was not clear on the reasoning. You asked what my point was about monitoring users pages. If you were not monitoring my discussion page, you would have not known that he had left me a message, although it is Wiki and everything is open, your response was to Splash. The only

4722:

I was not familiar with the term "manwha". But, it read like nonsense also, and that needs to be addressed. I got the impression it was about a person who plays video games, who had to renew his character, only to have it stolen by somebody else. Now, thats CSD criteria. I'm not sure if the new

354:

Regarding the latter topic, this is my first and only Knowledge identity. I have, however, contributed to various Internet communities (and occasionally dabbled in webmastery) since late 1996. And of course, before diving in, I attempted to learn as much about the Knowledge editing process as

7267:

I'm sorry you've gotten so upset about this. The image you posted is essentially identical to the one that was replaced. It was replaced almost immediately upon the old one being deleted. The old one was clearly posted with utter disregard to copyright regulations, in an abuse of Knowledge's

6783:

It's absolutely true that Kim is not a vandal, but the same can be said of most other users who are blocked for violating the 3RR. As in Kim's case, the usual cause is an overzealous (but well-intentioned) desire to leave a page in a particular state — one that the user honestly believes is

6428:

Not to nit-pick, but you haven't corrected the wording to which I object the most. The phrase "continuing to reply" conveys that I did so more than once ("continuing" after you asked me not to). If you could please change this to "replying", I would sincerely appreciate it. Thanks again!

3103:

1. Why shouldn't the round-one votes for "B" and "E" be carried over? Unless he/she makes a statement to the contrary, it's reasonable to assume that anyone who voted for a wording from among five options would continue to support the same wording when three of the non-selected options are

3042:

The primary votes for wordings "B" and "E" are to be carried over from the first round. The point was to simply retain a list of such votes, thereby reminding the voters that they needn't vote again (unless they've changed their minds). In no way did I create the appearance that this list

6702:

This is to stop revert wars. The revert wars had ceased, I wanted some help to contribute to Knowledge. I unblocked Kim after securing a promise not to continue the edit war. Based on their previous actions, I accepted this. Any admin can do this, if they feel that the problem is resolved.

3662:

Lifeisunfair screwed this up. "merge" is supposed to be a CSS "id" (designated with #merge), not a CSS "class" (which he gave as .Merge). Looks he just mistakenly copied the "Talk-Notice" class, but that is not technically right in this case. Please fix it by copying the CSS code from

6280:

1924:

As for redundancy, the purpose of these discussions is not to list each viewpoint once, but to establish consensus. This occurs when most members of a group convey the same or similar opinions. Agreement should be expressed, not repressed. But of course, you're welcome to interact (or

7487:"If you refuse to provide me with greater proof that the image is yours, you're right -- I will just have to take you at your word and trust that your image is a remarkable replacement for the original image, in which case I have to congratulate you, because it's almost pixel perfect." 3118:

3. Wording "B" defeated wording "A" by 1 ½ votes, but the exact number is irrelevant. The terms of the voting (to which no one objected) indicated that "if one wording not receive a majority of votes, a one-week runoff vote be held between the two most popular wordings." The

2976:

The first round of voting has ended, so I archived all the comments. For the sake of convenience, I copied over the votes for wordings "B" and "E" (leaving behind the comments that pertained to the other wordings), and I explicitly noted this fact (providing a link to the full

853:. I'm saying this now just incase your new replies cause me to feel, shall we say , "less apologetic" :) If so, however, I understand your motivation. That page seems to bring out the aggressive side of me because I've already had to apologize recently to another editor ( 141:

Sure, I'm glad to help. I learned of this dispute via the request for comment, but I ended up becoming as passionately involved as many of the original parties. I'm glad that it (hopefully) has concluded. Now we just have to wait for an admin to move the article back to

6180:

If not, the only other remarks I made about you continuing to reply, was I believe about your responses to me responding directly to other users on my Rfa. I have not further continued to discuss anything with you or anyone else, so I am curious at why you bring this up

7150:"But I have to admit it seems less likely to me that you made an original shot using a TV model that looks pixel-for-pixel identical to the infringing image. Hence my assumption. If it is based on a real source photo, it should be easy for you to clear up any doubts." 4987:

Also, the version I reverted to last (3rd) was to a version that is actually in proposal, you reverted to a version that is not part of the Template standarisation, my proposed version was different because I had proposed it, I did not make the change drastically.

1800:

I've omitted redirects (for the sake of convenience) and the Hong Kong / Singapore stub templates (because I'm unsure of the extent to which these should be subdivided). Shouldn't some additional English-speaking countries (such as Australia and New Zealand) be

3692:

screw anything up. Your proposed code results in a significantly different appearance (with considerably larger boxes). The original code was directly based upon the aforementioned "Talk-Notice" class, so I asked Radiant to add an equivalent "Merge" class to

1013:? Differential use of Tv-stub vs. Radio-stub for "all topics" vs. "programmes" is quite confusing and I'd not gotten around to moving non-program items out of Tv-stub into Broadcasting-stub yet since the change of scope. A sub-template/category could be made 5348:...and then resume edit warring? I'd like to think that a potential admin's ordinary participation would be sufficiently upstanding (without the need for special effort to be on his/her best behavior until it's too late for people to change their votes). — 6202:(posted 22:23, 18 July 2005), you claimed that I have been "continuing to reply to other users on discussion page." I noted that this is entirely false, and I've patiently awaited your retraction. You haven't issued one, so I'm replying to you here. 4587:

I carefully customized the merge templates used in this proposed merge so that all the discuss links pointed to teh section of the talk page where discussion is already in progess. your recent change undoes this. I also discussed what I did and why on

1252:

regionally specific (meaning that North American stations were divided by market) would that make sense to me. (Obviously, that would be highly impractical.) Even then, many people follow one broadcast medium and not the other. I, for example, know

7065:

have been willing to oblige. At this point, my principles dictate that I adamantly refuse to bow to your demands. To do so would be tantamount to condoning your reckless accusations, and would reinforce the notion that the onus is on me to disprove

2614:

That's interesting, and I sincerely appreciate your effort, but this doesn't replace the other design to my satisfaction. The images are missing, and I seriously doubt that many users are aware of this feature's existence. (I certainly wasn't.)

5094:'s nomination and vote were based in part upon a misunderstanding of Google's hit count system, and this is far from a "valid VfD." And as I mentioned earlier, the website subsequently has become unquestionably notable. In voting for deletion, 2171:

I recommend you and the other party (Netoholic) to initiate a mediation procedure. The other party has received the same request. I hope you will be wise enough to agree to collaborate. If you agree to undergo the procedure, please state so on

2906:

You wrote in edit summary: "I don't see how the reordering was a problem." I agree with Netoholic here. Reformatting the votes was unnecessary and whoever closes the vote can count the votes just as easily as the time it took to reformat it.

3026:

extensive, but you objected only to a single section. You could have simply modified that section (by either removing the abbreviated remarks or copying the full remarks over), but you reverted the entire page (which I worked very hard to

7500:

Thank you, but there's nothing remarkable about the similarity. Don't you realize that such television sets are extremely common? Don't you also realize that reducing two similar images to a tiny display size leaves very little room for

5595:

I always check the "Watch this page" box when posting to a talk page, in case I receive a reply there. I noticed the "RfA" subject on my watchlist, and read the discussion (because it pertains to a topic that interests me). I replied to

1969:

On the other hand, on a User's talk page, like this one, it is entirely appropriate to refer to "you" more often, since that is the context. In the future, if you want to discuss my behavior or attitude, please do so on my talk page. On

7184:

Sorry about not bringing this to your talk page, by the way. It's so long that I thought you would miss it. In any event, don't worry about the image -- I have generated a new TV icon which will hopefully defuse the situation altogether.

7368:

2. I uploaded my icon more than two days after you removed the infringing icon from the template. How is that "almost immediate," and how long do you think that it takes to photograph a TV set and create an icon? (How long did it take

6216:

I was not trying to discredit anyone, I stated what a summary of what occurred, and gave each user involved the opportunity to preview everything for themselves. I have the right to respond to users comments, concerns or questions on my

6070:

4645:

Not only does it read like nonsense (CSD criteria), but its about the master of a VR computer game who's character expired, and he had to renew it. Isn't that vanity too? If its notable, then recreate freely, but so that it makes sense.

178:

and nobody noticed for a while (about a month). And then when a user tried to move it back all hell broke loose. The difference being that not as much attention was paid to the vote as was in the Gasoline/Petrol debate and of course the

3169:

I repeatedly invited you to supply any specific objections to the actual, final voting terms (as opposed to fact that I wrote them). You did not (nor did anyone else). Had "A" placed second in the voting, you wouldn't be complaining

4286:

Your coding causes the box to be nearly 34.5% taller. This significant difference throws off the templates' aesthetic balance (and wastes space in the process). If you can find a way to eliminate this disparity, go right ahead.

1034:

I'm not going to revert your reversion of scope at this time until I've had a chance to do the re-stubbing of appropriate articles from Tv-stub to Broadcasting-stub, which won't be for a while (call it an eternity in Wiki-time).

3043:

constituted the full remarks that were posted during the first round (most of which do not apply to the current round of voting). The original context was not lost, because readers were invited to view the full comments.

2296:

For someone who frequently complains about people "stalking" him, you've demonstrated an unusual propensity to revert my changes (on pages that you haven't edited before). A colored box and icon were first added to the

362:

Well anyway your contributions from day one didn't appear to be the work of a neophyte but then I didn't realize/realise that you had the benefit of pre-study. I'm sure our paths will join and cross over time. Regards,

150:

faction. (Of course, that applies to most situations of this nature.) Ideally, someone from the UK or another British English country (Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, etc.) will do the honors...er, I mean honours.

6230:

Of course you do, but you should do so in an honest, factual manner. Your "summary of what occurred" contains a patent falsehood. (I'm trying very hard to assume good faith, by not referring to it as an "outright

5942:

recreation. I feel it is important that this page should go through VfU before it is unprotected. Wait a few weeks or months for the situation to calm down and the page can then hopefully be given a fair hearing. -

4782:

contained this problem, but I was under the impression that you had corrected it. (Your previous revisions looked fine.) I wish that I could help more, but I really don't know very much about this type of coding.

307:

way or the other as to whether you are a reincarnation or not, I'm just happy to see someone being as constructive as you have been. And, if you're not a reincarnation then you're one hell of a fast study! ;-)

2548:

There exists significant disagreement regarding which design is "well enough" to leave alone; hence the voting. If you prefer my design, you can vote for it, but there's no sense in reverting back and forth.

6619:

related articles that they otherwise might miss), and notify users of a considerably more significant potential occurrence (given that it impacts the article's actual content, rather than merely its title). —

1918:

I'm sorry that my remarks seem abrasive and condescending. From my perspective, yours have come across as arrogant and dismissive, but I'm willing to assume that my interpretations are as inaccurate as yours

6096:(For the record, this is the first time that I've ever addressed you via a talk page message that wasn't a direct reply to a message that you posted on my talk page.) —Lifeisunfair 21:55, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 7220:

You believed that I would be more likely to notice your message on a talk page to which I'd never posted a single remark? Does the orange "you have new messages" notification banner seem inconspicuous to

2588:#merge { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center; background:#f5edf5; width:85%; border:1px solid #cf9fff; border-collapse: collapse; margin-bottom: 1em } 7554:

Replied in my own User Talk page, and dropped copyright complaints for your image. (In addition, added reference to your image in the original infringing image, so that people know to use yours instead.)

4777:

The new code causes the icon to always remain in the upper left-hand corner of the box (a trait that's especially visible when viewed with a text size larger than the default). I recently realized that

4723:

criteria passed yet, but articles on a notable subject which read nonsensically can be speedied under it. Thats why a speedied it, and even if I was familiar with the term, I may of considered doing so.

3360:

template and suggested holding a vote. The purpose was to resolve the edit war by determining the templates' general direction — not to etch their designs in stone, thereby precluding future discussion.

889:

Ok, I've read everything and am pleased to say that all is well. I respect your rebuttals and have replied to most of them (apologies included when necessary). Sorry about the "unfair" analogies; they

7124:"Now, if you managed to reconstruct that yourself from new sources, I've just got to tip my cap to you for an excellent job. If it's not an exact copy of the original, it's a perfect reconstruction." 761:. Sorry to press you into service again but what do you think? We may not be as adept as you at fixing things but we'll give it a go if you if you think this article is misnamed. Thanks in advance, 2250: 1237:

and I thought it best to serve the geographical axis over the transmission mode axis with respect to persons expanding stubs. Does this rationale for keeping them together seem reasonable to you?

6876:

indicates that we should "follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner encourages special treatment." (Note the "REALTOR" / "Realtor" example.) —

7111:

One especially notable difference is the fact that my icon contains two "pixel-for-pixel identical" dials; the bottom dial (which doesn't exist in real life) is an unaltered copy of the top one.

7079:"But as far as I can tell, it's a pixel for pixel duplication of the original image, which I've been using for eight years now on my own site in a licensed form, so I'm pretty familiar with it." 5172:

closed that VFD, you should ask him what his reasons were. The reason I removed the VFU was that, despite your good arguments, after ten days, the majority of VFU votes was to keep it deleted.

3719:

Yes, you did screw it up by having a basic misunderstanding about CSS usage. "Class" refers to an generic range of similarly formatted text. They are "general rules". In my latest version of

3088:

Don't copy the old votes. It's essentially vote-stacking. Do the run-off. My calculation shows A was only one vote behind B, and the closure was a bit early. A should be in the run-off. --

2685:

I'm not attempting to force my preference on others. I'm allowing the eventual voting results to determine the template's wording and style. If the options that I oppose prevail, so be it. —

3242:

alone defined the format and the options given in the vote. A vote that was extremely premature because the best choice may be something entirely different than just the five+two options. --

333:

I've never been able to allow standing arguments to remain uncontested. I don't need to have the last word, but I can't resist countering substantive (or even seemingly substantive) retorts.

88:! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the 7514:"Finally, I apologize for not bringing it to your Talk page. Frankly, nobody's ever posted to my talk page before -- I wasn't aware that Knowledge sent up a flare when someone posted to it." 1239:

this did go by ths Stub Sorting WikiProject forum and was approved as it currently stands ... not that this stands in the way of changing it, just pointing out it wasn't a quick fix decision

7278:

Finally, I apologize for not bringing it to your Talk page. Frankly, nobody's ever posted to my talk page before -- I wasn't aware that Knowledge sent up a flare when someone posted to it.

7137:

I used precisely one source image. Aside from the aforementioned copy-and-pasted dial and standard cleanup, I did nothing to alter the actual appearance of my grandmother's television set.

355:

possible (via observation). I still ended up making some silly mistakes in the beginning (such as "moving" an article by copying and pasting it), but I haven't done too much damage. :-) —

6814:

I've seen you have some issues with Louis Epstein before, so I thought I'd invite you to comment on the RfC I've set up. He's crossed the line into edit warring over the em-dash thing. —

5730:

criticism", just a re-iteration of the topic. I in no way feel that the issue is past with any other Wikipedian that has not yet had a conversation, or even you, as long as its covering

1272:

has been misnamed, because many elements of radio and television (such as production and some technologies) have little or no connection to broadcasting. A more suitable name would be

283:

Your praise means more to me than I can possibly express. It feels wonderful to know that someone appreciates my efforts and cares enough to convey such warm sentiments. Thank you! —

1359: 5492:

talk page, as our conversation is ours. If you wish to have a conversation with that user, please do so on their talk page, whether or not it pertains to me is irrelevant. Thanks.

2096:

3. Your uncalled-for (in my assessment) editing is a relevant editorial issue. How am I supposed to discuss this without referencing the fact that you're responsible for these acts?

2141:, because, having just noticed it, I can see there may be some validity to it. I still think we can get by with just two templates if we tweak a bit. Are you willing to discuss? -- 1554: 1444: 1569: 502:

If there is no doubt at all that the dispute is over, you can just remove it. It is helpful when people do this, as otherwise RFC becomes very congested. You should list it at

1514: 503: 2670:

The image is a major part of the design (not a minor, separate consideration). Please explain how its loss is correctable. (If you mean via CSS, the above objection applies.)

1826: 1027:

as a "proposed stub type". For a full discussion of the thinking and actions around the whole broadcasting/station stub type area, see the "Category:Station-stubs" section of

5841:

asked me to undo this so that he could write a new article on the topic. Since you originally deleted the article I thought it best to leave that decision up to you (see also

5090:'s vote? It appears that the correct tally (after all anonymous votes and votes from new accounts are disregarded) is 5d–4k (hardly a consensus). Combine that with the fact 3746:

template (as was voted upon), but I honestly want to accommodate those who dislike the colored box to the greatest extent possible (within the boundaries of the consensus). —

1399: 1374: 7339:

Again, that was the idea (to closely match the appearance of the original, while eliminating the copyright violation). Here at Knowledge, this is not an uncommon occurrence.

1484: 1459: 1319: 6027:(For the record, this is the first time that I've ever addressed you via a talk page message that wasn't a direct reply to a message that you posted on my talk page.) — 5446:"Hound"? You accepted a nomination for adminship, and then proceeded to violate a Knowledge policy. This is highly relevant to the RfA. If you can't stand the heat... 3185:

By default, runoff voting of any kind is not customary in this situation; had I not introduced such a rule, wording "E" (for which I voted) would be the outright winner.

1719: 1529: 1344: 1119: 7641:

Stop being a G4 fanboy. The CEO was fired and the network is be revised. Listen to episode 23 of This Week in Tech, www.kevinrose.com and even the forums on g4tv.com.

1429: 5141:

article (which might not have been worthy of undeletion), but the situation calls for the page to be unprotected (allowing users to author a non-ad, NPOV article). —

5098:

stated that it would be worthy of an article "maybe later on, when their user base is bigger and there's some verifiable cultural impact somewhere." A top-10,000

2706:

You don't want an edit war, yet you start one on my talk page. If I want something deleted from my talk page, I'll delete it. I don't need you reposting it there.

1856: 1767: 1499: 1304: 1276: 1129: 1017: 834: 5789:'s recommendation that you "just steer clear of one or two users for 6 more days" is new ground. Your apparent proclivity for rushing to judgement is another. — 5735:

my user page, it just seemed there was nothing more to discuss with you on that topic, so using my talk page, was in perceived as you hounding me on the subject.

5047:

It doesn't matter why you reverted, or to which version you reverted. You made four reverts to a single page in less than seven hours, and that's a violation. —

1287:

I also feel that national television networks and cable/satellite channels should not be lumped together with local broadcasters (in the United States, at least).

3668: 6725:

do this, but it's widely considered inappropriate for admins who are directly involved in the relevant conflict (or any other conflict with the user) to do so.

4700: 4681: 2235:

You're welcome. After changing the template's name (to conform to all of the other cleanup tags), it would have been rather irresponsible for me not to have

6199: 1709: 6438:

Did not consider it a nit-pick, you only wish to be viewed impartially, as I. I am glad to clarify the discussion. Thanks for the catch and your comments.

2392:

You mean the merge templates that you never edited until after I did, despite the fact that others had implemented the types of changes to which you object?

1231: 6891:

Thanks for the reply! I didn't even think to check the history to see the reason you gave (which I should have), so I didn't see the excellent explanation.

6004:

As you're well aware, I posted precisely one reply to another user on this page. You requested that I refrain from doing so, and I've complied (even when

6980: 6921:

Nah, the confusion is entirely understandable. The problem is that the MediaWiki software inserts the comment only in the source location's history (and

3929:

Sigh. I was experimenting earlier. You must have copied by monbook.css when I had the width removed. Use the current version (17:20, 11 July 2005). --

6487: 1689: 1579: 966: 554: 550: 481: 6788: 6768: 6748: 5277: 6929: 6906: 6880: 6266:

with another user (id est, me) on your page. Evidently, you're willing to tolerate this infraction when the offending party happens to agree with you.

935:

I'm really a kind, loving, sweet and wonderful person. Yama is just the type that brings out the absolute worst in me. Thanks for letting me share.

6825: 3886:

As I mentioned earlier, your code causes the box to be considerably larger. It's taller, and spans the entire page width (instead of 85%). Here's a

6805: 6623: 5976: 5922: 5207: 5157: 3622: 3553: 5394:

Hi, I appreciate your concern over my current RFA. However, if you have comments you wish to make to users, please do so on their discussion page."

4189: 4146: 4088: 4045: 3062: 3007: 2988: 1981:

If you want to move the conversation from the Spoiler talk page to my talk page, do so and then reply to my original message as I'm suggesting. --

4868: 4845: 4823: 4803: 4540: 4353: 4291: 4239: 3983: 3936: 3894: 3855: 3817: 3780: 3750: 3730: 3708: 3499: 3410: 3249: 3219: 3154: 3147:

I think you forget... I objected to the entire vote itself, including pointing out that you did not solicit comments on how it was to be run. --

3136: 2881:

I accept your apology, but I was aware of the fact that you made an honest mistake (and didn't intend to remove my comments.) No worries. :-) —

757:, what is your gut feel. I'm hard pressed to discern a strong preference (except along the usual party lines) as to which is the more appropriate 5203:

page be unprotected (not for the purpose of restoring the previous, deletion-worthy text, but to enable users to author a legitimate article). —

3272:

1. Yes, the outright winner. Out of twenty-three respondents, eleven (almost half) selected wording "E" as their first choice . . . from among

2935:

Okay, I see what you mean. As you may already realize, I didn't perform the reformatting (and certainly didn't think that it was necessary). —

1023:(consistent with US-bcast-stub, Canada-bcast-stub, and UK-bcast-stub} for specific Tv-related technology, but that would need to be proposed at 7559: 7539: 7251: 7168: 4751: 4727: 4707: 4650: 3678: 3095: 2404: 2336: 1067: 689:

Indeed, as you noted previously, I'm being optimistic (and perhaps unrealistic). If this nonsense continues beyond the immediate future, I'll

6846:

CITGO changeover, even though I can't find one shred of proof "Citgo" was ever used (did you look at their corporate website? They use CITGO)

5168:

Well, like I said on that VFU discussion, I was just going by the vote, I hadn't double-checked the edit history of all those involved. Since

4901: 4724: 4647: 3813:

a requirement of the consensus), but that simply isn't good enough for you. You'd rather "screw up" the template's appearance for others. —

111:

If I did it was a mistake. I'm terribly sorry. I'll be more careful next time. I did have trouble uploading before. Can it be restored?

6458: 6433: 6389: 6353: 6125: 5793: 5755: 5702: 5572: 5532: 5512: 5465: 5051: 5007: 4975: 2419:

Prove it. You can't, just as you can't prove that others are "stalking" your edits (as opposed to simply encountering them coincidentally.)

7670:

I was ZDTV/TechTV fan from the very beginning. I never even saw G4 until the merger occurred, and I dislike the changes as much as anyone.

4787: 7048:

if you're willing to privately send me a 300-pixel-wide version of your photograph to prove that it's not based on the copyrighted image."

4596: 2430:

And if you're so familiar with that page, why are you disregarding the fact that almost all of the cleanup templates use colored boxes? —

5199:

Despite my disagreement with the outcome, I'm not contesting the vote closure. (Your assessment was accurate.) I'm requesting that the

3697:, which he did. I did this, by the way, purely for the benefit of users who wish to manually override the template's default appearance. 42:

to Knowledge. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

5265: 3079: 2874:

I didn't include an edit summary, because I posted replies in two different sections. I'm sorry if this contributed to the confusion.

2057:

arguing facts. You engaged in behavior that I deem inappropriate, and I addressed this behavior. I didn't say, "I'm intelligent and

6806: 6143:

had posted on my talk page? I merely thanked him for voting on my Rfa, his comments were his own and not spurred by anything I said."

5352: 3514:

They show up as white, left-justified boxen on my computer (as opposed to centrified purple which I was expecting). Is the CSS okay?

2961:

and mean well but you simply cannot change what people say on talk pages. You have done this many times and it is not appropriate.

6744:

of impropriety is precisely why involved admins should recuse themselves from such decisions (even if otherwise 100% legitimate). —

6031: 5972:

and then relist the page for undeletion (hopefully without the participation of sock puppets). Thanks very much for your advice. —

7234:"In any event, don't worry about the image -- I have generated a new TV icon which will hopefully defuse the situation altogether." 6711: 6853: 2184:

FYI, Neto was blocked for 3RR. I also had a lengthy conversation with him and one of his mentors. I hope that it'll have effect.

993:

I saw you changed the scope of this template back to what it was originally. Could you consider tagging technical articles with

811:. For now, it appears that the formal debate has ended, and I wouldn't feel comfortable stirring things up (no pun intended). — 795: 610:. Clearly this is an orchestrated attempt to corrupt the process under which they (the dissenters) don't approve of the result. 7708: 6873: 6017:

Were you attempting to discredit me by deliberately conveying false information? If not, why haven't you issued a retraction?

4577: 61: 6490: 6409:

to you were good faith efforts to communicate (for the purpose of resolving the issue), and not attempts to fuel a petty feud.

7461:"and vouching for it on Commons simply to shut me up about the copyright violation of an image I am extremely familiar with." 6551: 6062:

Were you attempting to discredit me by deliberately conveying false information? If not, why haven't you issued a retraction?

5383: 7282: 7189: 7018: 6957: 6195: 6014:

here). Therefore, I don't know why you claimed that I have been "continuing to reply to other users on discussion page."

5403:

I was replying to a message on your talk page. For the sake of context, that's where I posted. (I also left a pointer on

5303:

As Kbdank71 says, there are times and users where conflict avoidance is impossible, it's just unfortunate it had to be now.

2134: 931:

bait me anymore. Isn't it obvious that since I don't have any drama in my own life, I fall right into it here? Just say,

4932:

You were trying to avoid a revert war by reverting the template four times in less than seven hours (in violation of the

4770: 4623: 2458: 7692:

Yes, and I didn't remove this information; I cleaned up the wording and moved it to a different location in the article.

7092:

Have you actually tried reducing the image in question (minus the rabbit ears) to 30x22 pixels? I just did, and it did

4924: 2968: 2896: 2367: 464: 7595: 6603:(aside from a handful of misplaced instances). Note that the wording explicitly refers to the proposal listed "below." 6540: 7622: 5888: 2158: 4408:

Indeed, your new CSS code displays properly. I support its use in the templates as soon as an admin has added it to

2110:

Please stop. You're going way too far in your "fight". I have some ideas, but your premature vote and attitude are

2035:

Since when is declaring the equivalent of "I'm right, and everyone else is wrong!" the gold standard of productivity?

7474:

On the contrary, I took your report very seriously, and responded by rushing to create a suitable replacement image.

7382:"The old one was clearly posted with utter disregard to copyright regulations, in an abuse of Knowledge's policies." 5145: 5114: 2864: 2843: 7400: 5827:

Hi there! After the VFD discussion, some recreation and a failed VFU request, the Digg article is now protected on

527:

I can't honestly say that "there is no doubt at all that the dispute is over," so I think that we should leave the

6764:

manner, and also he is now fully aware that we want him to continue reverting and will no longer be doing this! -

6657: 5865: 5698:

past. You're a candidate for adminship, so such incidents remain relevant for significantly longer than a day. —

5290: 5128: 5029: 4661:

I'm unconnected to this article’s creation (and entirely unfamiliar with its subject), but it makes perfect sense.

2327:

To be clear, you have every right to monitor my contribution log. Just stop objecting when others act in kind. —

3890:(viewed in Firefox at the default text size). I removed the image from mine (on top), for the sake of parity. — 2732: 6733: 6054:

further continued to discuss anything with you or anyone else, so I am curious at why you bring this up again.

2576: 2173: 2138: 2082: 2043: 1971: 1951: 1810:

include, but you get the idea. This merely is a rough outline (and I'm not asserting any sort of authority). —

1773:(media companies stubs — encompassing all aspects of media production and publication, which typically overlap) 1071:

should be substituted, so as to accommodate readers of both British and American English. This applies to the

528: 1947:

I'd like you to read the above page, because I fear you really don't understand how to interact productively.

115: 7207:"Sorry about not bringing this to your talk page, by the way. It's so long that I thought you would miss it." 5261:

You are of course right about my string being unbreakable. I misunderstood your point. Peace and friendship!

3080: 7365:

1. The infringing icon has not yet been deleted. (Not enough time has elapsed since you filed your report.)

3000:

arrange) then it should start again and not include comments from a previous poll that have been cut down.

2805:

What deleted material did you believe that I'd reposted here, and why? —Lifeisunfair 6 July 2005 03:51 (UTC)

6544: 5997: 5252: 4779: 4680:

a real-life person. You might have been unfamiliar with the word "manwha" (as I was, prior to reading the

4468: 2068:"This means that you should probably direct your comments (like I have) towards the issue, not the people." 1619: 66: 46: 39: 4616: 2137:

is probably the clearest you've described your position. I really wish you would do something similar on

7445: 7415: 5842: 5318: 5221: 4933: 4343: 3664: 2335:

Don't flatter yourself. In order to see at a glance what the state of the Merge templates is, I monitor

2119: 7587:

to the old name, because when double-redirected templates are transcluded, it looks completely SNAFU. --

7042: 7007: 4796:

will want to remove the box and colors in our personal CSS settings. I think it is very workable. --

641:

have a calming effect with your strait-forwardness. With crossed fingers then, cheers and best wishes,

4084:

Aside from the coloring and margin-bottom, the "Talk-Notice" and "Merge" classes are 100% identical. —

3111:

2. How was the vote closure early? I didn't perform it until three hours after the announced deadline.

1266: 997: 693:

to pull myself away. (Again, that might be unrealistic, given my apparent gluttony for punishment.) —

56: 7247:

Why would removing my icon (while maintaining that I'm a thief and a liar) "defuse the situation"? —

6993: 6439: 6370: 6106: 5736: 5553: 5493: 5364: 4988: 4905: 4887: 532: 71: 4696: 862:

also has the potential to compromise the quality of the encyclopedia. While the original author of

7576: 7100:

photograph of a similar TV model (which I deliberately selected) when reduced to such a small size.

6695: 6079:

And out of curiosity, why was it perfectly okay for Kbdank71 to reply to another user on this page?

1679: 1669: 1634: 1106:

used interchangeably), and I agree that major reform is in order. There are, however, some issues.

7644: 7632: 6835: 4027: 2311:

design (one month later) that you took an interest in maintaining the "longer-standing version."

1729: 1654: 1414: 77: 4960:

Indeed, the fact that aren't an admin (yet) has no bearing on the issue. Who claimed otherwise?

3809:

display properly (at least, not in Firefox). I went out of my way to accommodate you (which is

2166: 6954: 6479: 5458: 3770: 3694: 3546: 3489: 3446: 1100: 659:

Jeez! Are you confidant about the "death throes" part? I recall some time ago our Secretary of

130:

Thanks for getting this one off the dime (finally). I just didn't know how it should be done.

93: 6849:

I figured I would ask you why you reverted before we end up in a revert war by accident... ;)

1852: 7532: 6500: 2213: 2206: 1907:

energy back to the encyclopedia articles, and not get so stressed about silly templates. --

1787: 1604: 1199: 85: 7096:

turn out "pixel-for-pixel identical" to my icon. It's close, but the same could be said of

5869: 146:. I can understand why some might be reluctant to do so, lest they invoke the wrath of the 6765: 6708: 6294:

I explicitly said, "via a talk page message," so why are you citing a project page message?

6163: 6140: 6050: 5831: 5262: 5253: 4409: 4143: 4128: 4127:

Netoholic's personal version of Notoce noprint seems fine but it would need to be added to

4042: 3004: 2984:

If you felt that this was inappropriate, why didn't you simply restore the full remarks? —

2965: 2926: 2854:

what you intended it to do. Sorry. i should have checked with you and assumed good faith.

2273: 2228: 1941: 1589: 970: 17: 6925:

in that of the destination location). I hope that this is changed in a future version. —

2518:. I was just adding my 2¢. And yes, the voting should take care of this dispute. :-) — 8: 6903: 6850: 6821: 4968: 4897: 4842: 4800: 4589: 4350: 4236: 3933: 3852: 3777: 3727: 3675: 3246: 3151: 3092: 2958: 2898: 2845: 2633: 2605: 2343: 2145: 2126: 1985: 1911: 1173: 1075: 439:

I'm not sure, but I wouldn't feel comfortable removing it without some sort of mandate. —

166:

my eyes but maybe that's just me. Kind of the same thing happened there. Some user moved

6759:

Hey... didn't know you could restrict the search like that... Anyway, I realise what it

5646:

2. I felt that it would be rude to reply to a message addressed to you behind your back.

5153:

Oh, and I see that the Digg podcast has climbed to #16 at Apple's iTunes Music Store. —

2580: 6674: 6576: 6523: 5848: 5231: 5176: 5107: 4592:. Please revert your recent change or otherwise alter it to restore the section link. 3645: 3583: 3518: 3456: 2950: 2598: 2568: 2499: 2188: 1958:". This means that you should probably direct your comments (like I have) towards the 1902:

I understand you have strong feelings on certain issues, but please stop commenting on

1755: 1329: 1209: 947: 51: 3704:

And I don't know where you got the idea that the image wasn't included in the vote. —

531:

in place for the time being. The page move has transpired, however, so I will remove

7705: 7536: 7248: 7165: 6977: 6926: 6877: 6785: 6745: 6620: 6548: 6430: 6350: 6028: 5973: 5919: 5885: 5838: 5790: 5699: 5529: 5462: 5349: 5274: 5204: 5154: 5142: 5111: 5048: 4972: 4888: 4865: 4820: 4784: 4748: 4704: 4620: 4606: 4578: 4537: 4288: 4186: 4085: 3980: 3891: 3814: 3747: 3705: 3619: 3550: 3496: 3407: 3216: 3133: 3059: 2985: 2936: 2882: 2776: 2736: 2686: 2616: 2550: 2519: 2468: 2457:

tag had used a colored box since May (well over a month). If you've been monitoring

2431: 2328: 2281: 2242: 2102: 1930: 1888: 1840: 1811: 1644: 1539: 1469: 1384: 1257:

more about television (including that of some other countries) than I do about radio.

1221: 1161: 908: 838: 812: 794:

On the other hand, it's obvious that the vote was unfairly stacked by members of the

772:

Again, your words are too kind. Indeed, I do believe that the article is misnamed.

694: 627: 580: 536: 440: 356: 284: 248: 152: 6246:

your point clear to me, and I no longer wished to continue to discuss it with you. "

2205: 1042:

I'm watching this page, so you can respond here to maintain conversation continuity.

7605: 7037: 7002: 6736:

remove intentionally imposed blocks for substantiated infractions, so it certainly

4676:

vanity. As the text plainly states, it describes a manwha (Korean graphic novel),

4475: 3618:

Same here. Try holding down the shift key while reloading one of the templates. —

3479: 3436: 2594: 2249: 1962:, not the people. These talk pages last for a long time, and comments directed at 1699: 1165: 1090: 1060: 1056:

I'm new to this discussion, so please bear with me. My attention was drawn to the

1007: 984: 765: 724: 671: 645: 618: 565: 520: 492: 405: 367: 311: 269: 213: 199: 134: 7164:

deemed guilty until proven innocent)? Would you comply? I certainly hope not. —

6869: 6088:

your point clear to me, and I no longer wished to continue to discuss it with you.

5407:'s talk page.) This is a wiki, and that generally isn't considered inappropriate. 4699:. I suggest that you immediately undelete it and apologize for your error on the 1827:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Criteria#Suggested_changes_from_another_quarter

807:

If a new vote begins, you can rest assured that I'll make my opinion known on the

7633: 7619: 6562:

Why exactly is this a 'talk page template'? It seems to have the same purpose as

5091: 4132: 4031: 3347: 3306: 3001: 2962: 2915: 2788:

Be grateful. Not everybody apologizes, though. Hey, you said it: life is unfair.

2262: 2217: 2091:, thereby disregarding the content of my previous reply that you claim is absent. 1822: 1028: 1024: 7431:"My assumption was that you were attempting a quick-fix alteration of the image" 6740:

as though you gave Kim special treatment. Perhaps this isn't the case, but the

5436:

and do not think it polite to constantly hound someone on an issue that is past.

5363:

concerns, please take it up with those particular users or at RFC. Thank you.

3432:

I've updated the templates per your suggestion. Could you please take a look at

2914:

Furthermore, monkeying with vote/discussion pages should be discouraged anyway.

7528: 6946: 6816: 6640: 6572:("this article should be moved here" vs "this article should be merged here"). 6566: 6513: 5818: 5103: 5099: 4944: 4839: 4797: 4347: 4233: 3976: 3930: 3849: 3774: 3724: 3720: 3672: 3354: 3243: 3148: 3089: 2630: 2602: 2451: 2340: 2318: 2301: 2142: 2123: 2058: 1982: 1908: 106: 89: 76:

If you're ready for the complete list of Knowledge documentation, there's also

4896:

If you took a moment to read all of the comments and discussion I had left on

3887: 742: 7615: 7403:) obviously mistook the image for a NASA creation. It was an honest mistake. 7326:"The image you posted is essentially identical to the one that was replaced." 7061:

Had you privately and politely requested such evidence in the first place, I

6671: 6666: 6654: 6649: 6641: 6600: 6573: 6520: 6501: 6447: 6378: 6259: 6114: 6021: 6005: 5845: 5744: 5561: 5501: 5372: 5228: 5173: 4996: 4913: 4815: 4593: 3642: 3580: 3515: 3453: 3314: 3310: 2855: 2515: 2495: 2185: 1996: 1830: 1241: 1153: 1046: 936: 595: 558: 466: 239:

debate, but my curiosity finally drew me in. It isn't quite the same as the

124: 97: 3305:

alone in defining the format and options. While I drafted the initial RfC,

1292:

As I see it, we should have the following templates or ones similar to them:

979: 205:

Oh, and take a look at the "See also" bs that's I seem to have triggered at

6973: 6677: 6579: 6526: 5968: 5851: 5234: 5179: 5087: 5068: 3648: 3586: 3521: 3459: 2494:

is no big deal, since the issue will presumably be resolved by the vote. —

2191: 878:, so once more; I'm sorry for possibly promoting hostility between us. — 808: 754: 547: 470: 303: 2021:"because I fear you really don't understand how to interact productively." 917:

Thanks for the supporting words. :) The archive2 page has been deleted. --

720:

are correct. Oh rats. I hope we aren't being "watchlisted". Cheers, ;-)

7556: 7396: 7279: 7186: 7015: 6902:

That's what I get for looking up My Contributions so late in the night! -

6318: 5943: 5901: 5786: 5597: 5481: 5454: 5404: 5224: 5169: 1881: 1872: 1806:

I might have gone slightly overboard with some of the subdivision that I

918: 895: 879: 866:

happened to choose the best name for the article, the original author of

850: 762: 721: 668: 642: 615: 562: 517: 507: 489: 402: 364: 308: 266: 210: 196: 131: 5273:

No worries! That was just a harmless and silly misunderstanding. :-) —

4684:), but that isn't a valid reason to assume that something is "nonsense." 4615:

Would you mind explaining why you believed that this article (which you

822: 7313:

Yeah, being branded a liar and a thief tends to have that effect on me.

3383:

4. I'm still waiting for you to explain how the vote closure was early.

2823: 2789: 2766: 2731:

Huh? I didn't revert any deleted remarks on your talk page. I merely

2707: 2532: 2381:"In order to see at a glance what the state of the Merge templates is," 2177: 601:

When does it (if ever) end? WTF is wrong here. Does the agenda of the

6539:

I'll try to create a similar icon when I have the time, but this is a

5967:

I wasn't aware that there was any substantive content. (A comment by

4838:

I am going to work on it. Just gotta find all the right balances. --

2775:

Apology accepted. Please try to be more careful in the future. :-) —

2486: 2291: 1086:

I recall that the TV stub templates were extremely disorganized (with

6349:

I merely ask that you retract the aforementioned defamatory claim. —

5095: 4607: 4481:, because I couldn't figure out how to add it properly (no big deal). 1185: 1149: 1111:

Firstly, it's my opinion that radio and television broadcasts should

928: 854: 849:

I read them I want to apologize for contributing to the animosity on

845:

No, I haven't read them yet as I don't usually wiki on weekends, but

802:

because they were rallied to action on the basis of national loyalty.

561:. It adds nothing but a little more confusion where none is needed. 112: 7352:"It was replaced almost immediately upon the old one being deleted." 6976:'s problem is, but he's been pulling some bizarre stunts of late. — 5623:

1. I felt that this was the most contextual, least confusing method.

5102:

traffic rank and a top-25 podcast (out of over 3,000 selections) at

4232:

That height fits with most other boxes. Are you really so picky? --

2531:

This whole issue is just stupid. Why not leave well enough alone? --

1897: 1866:

The text {{spoiler-other|other ] entities}} produces the following:

1325:(Radio & television technologies stubs — also a sub-template of 123: 7606: 7588: 7583:

When you move templates, such as your move of Template:Importance,

7414:

If you wish to be a member of the Knowledge community, you need to

6444: 6375: 6111: 5741: 5558: 5498: 5369: 4993: 4910: 1575:(United States national television broadcaster stubs) 863: 823: 485: 240: 143: 5077:

I would sincerely appreciate a reply to the message copied below:

3848:

what you see is the problem rather than continuing to be rude? --

3769:

Mine works perfectly, or at least will once an admin copies it to

3238:"outright winner"? You have a lot to learn. The problem is... 2655:

see the templates' talk pages? I'd be surprised if it exceeds 1%.

2152: 1140:

Secondly, some of the technical stubs to which I was referring do

780:

more common spelling. Even in the UK, it seems to be catching on.

5461:

for raising the issue. Evidently, you only welcome agreement. —

3576: 2758: 875: 799: 786: 743: 236: 206: 171: 159: 2114:

interfering. I removed your vote because there is no consensus

960: 5488:

talk page. I just ask that you please, reply to other users on

3276:

options. Wording "A" was the first choice of only four people.

2280:

Thanks very much! You've helped to brighten my weekend. :-) —

1974:, please talk to the issue -- describe your position and don't 1177: 871: 837:, dated 01:34, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)? You responded to only one. — 827: 773: 747: 504:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Article content disputes archive

244: 232: 167: 147: 1940: 6837: 6670:

lie. That is the spirit of progress, and the spirit we need.

6486:

Thanks for chipping in - it does seem very unfair to me too.

2314:

Just today, you reverted my thirteen-hour-old changes to the

2046:, you should be polite and 'argue facts, not personalities'." 1825:, where I've put a link to this discussion under the heading 1189: 1181: 1157: 867: 480:

How does an article listed on these pages (specifically: was

247:

situation, but it's very similar. See my assessment below. —

789:

was not entirely without merit, given the Turkish etymology.

191:. I just don't like the stealthy way that it is being done. 6311:

has been a direct reply to a message that you've posted on

5880: 5819: 5200: 5138: 5069: 1995:

Netoholic, you're lecturing again. It doesn't become you.

1640:(United Kingdom television programming stubs) 1535:(United Kingdom television broadcaster stubs) 1169: 6861:

Hello, Michael! Thanks for inquiring before reverting. :)

5220:

Given its lengthy history of being deleted and undeleted (

4902:

Wikipedia_talk:Template_locations#Design_and_layout_issues

4695:

Without consultation, you deleted a stub pertaining to an

1675:(United States television programming stubs) 594: 231:

Yeah, I've been trying not to involve myself in the great

33: 7614:

Thanks for your response, I've set up some discussion at

5669:

3. As I said, I didn't realize that you objected to this.

4953:

violated a policy (and in a rather hypocritical fashion).

2957:

I'm sorry, I know you've spent a lot of time refactoring

2405:

Knowledge:Template messages/Cleanup#Merging and splitting

2337:

Knowledge:Template messages/Cleanup#Merging and splitting

6305:

My point was that almost every message that I've posted

5335:

Just steer clear of one or two users for 6 more days..."

2307:

template in May, but it wasn't until after I introduced

2212:

Thank you for taking the time to so carefully update my

1144:

belong in the category of "broadcasting." Examples are:

6162:. What would give you the idea that this pertained to 2733:

copied your comment from my talk page and added a reply

870:

didn't, which you know because you voted to move it to

6845:

Hi Lifeisunfair. I noticed you reverted my Citgo-: -->

2324:

tag — another template that you hadn't edited before.

1650:(British Broadcasting Corporation stubs) 1465:(United Kingdom radio programming stubs) 1380:(United Kingdom radio broadcaster stubs) 6139:

First, I am not sure, are you stating this from what

6049:

First, I am not sure, are you stating this from what

1560:(United States local television broadcaster stubs) 7395:You must truly enjoy hurling baseless accusations. 7040:-- I'm absolutely willing to drop my objections to 7005:-- I'm absolutely willing to drop my objections to 6519:

and such. Do you know where to get a suitable icon?

6020:

And out of curiosity, why was it perfectly okay for

1880:(Mentally replace "Lifeisunfair" with the name of a 608:

Hey, I didn't know 'bout this so lets have a do-over

4022:The one that seems to look best in Firefox and IE, 2601:, which I've converted to use open CSS styling. -- 7681:"The CEO was fired and the network is be revised." 5417:I monitor other users pages to revert vandalism," 2579:or equivalent based on your skin preference (see 1695:(Public Broadcasting Service stubs) 2014:I read it before I made my first Knowledge edit. 1232:About lumping radio and tv broadcasting together 907:Apologies accepted; please see my new replies. — 52:Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial 6317:talk page. The two exceptions are my reply to 4947:'s design. No matter which of you is correct, 4864:Thank you for investing the time and effort. — 4536:Thanks very much for addressing my concerns. — 933:"Bastique, leave it alone. Just don't repond." 7300:"I'm sorry you've gotten so upset about this." 5223:), I thought it best to defer your request to 4971:, but that's how I learned of this dispute. — 4967:And FYI, not only did I read your comments on 857:). I have a strong belief in the doctrine of 776:was the original title, and appears to be the 516:Go for it! You deserve the satisfaction. ;-) 5227:, who originally closed the VFD vote. Yours, 158:To see deja vu all over again take a look at 28:Archive #1 (3 April 2005 – 21 September 2005) 3058:Nevertheless, I shall honor your opinion. — 2865:This is the "diff" page that you referenced. 2467:edit it until thirteen hours after I did? — 2261:for your efforts above and beyond the call. 2061:'s a crazy moron!" (which is not my belief). 1929:interact) to the extent that you see fit. — 2649:What percentage of users do you think will 2159:User:Netoholic/mentoring#Community_comments 1585:(Public Broadcasting Service stubs) 1545:(British Broadcasting Corporation stubs) 1475:(British Broadcasting Corporation stubs) 1390:(British Broadcasting Corporation stubs) 96:or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! 7704:isn't the origin of the channel's name. — 3975:The height remains more than 1/3 greater, 3495:for conformity. Thanks again, Radiant! — 1793:(Website stubs) should be moved elsewhere. 1490:(United States radio programming stubs) 1405:(United States radio broadcaster stubs) 84:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 7041: 7006: 6807:Knowledge:Requests for comment/12.144.5.2 637:OK I'll be as optimistic as you are. You 2248: 1625:(Canada television programming stubs) 1520:(Canada television broadcaster stubs) 6024:to reply to another user on this page? 5692:And no, the issue of the revert war is 3125:most popular wordings were "E" and "B." 2085:reply (in its entirety) to criticizing 476:The following Q & A is from WP:HD: 14: 5453:And as you noticed, I was replying to 4619:) qualified as "nonsense"? Thanks. — 3549:file. Which browser are you using? — 2009:"I'd like you to read the above page," 859:"encyclopedia first, community second" 785:I will say, however, that the move to 5879:To be clear, my familiarity with the 6545:ClockworkSoul's "Coffee Roll" scheme 4185:The height is over 1/3 too great. — 2259:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 1715:(Star Trek episode stubs) 6547:, along with indicative wording. — 4342:Not hard at all. Use my now latest 2822:Doesn't matter. It's a dead issue. 2459:Knowledge:Template messages/Cleanup 1450:(Canada radio programming stubs) 1420:(Radio biographical stubs) 1365:(Canada radio broadcaster stubs) 753:After you review the discussion at 23: 6599:It's a talk page template because 6509:I've changed this layout to match 5028:a revert, as is clearly indicated 4469:the code for the various templates 2081:2. You dedicated your most recent 1705:(Star Trek stubs) 1595:(Television biographical stubs) 401:from WP:RFC, anyone or an admin? 24: 7723: 6336:discuss with you on this topic." 4346:(18:55, 11 July 2005 version) -- 3545:Your browser needs to reload the 3200:Please address questions 1 and 2. 1610:(Television programming stubs) 1505:(Television broadcaster stubs) 1310:(Radio & television stubs) 195:I mean regards of course, ;-) 2253:Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 1821:I would suggest we take this to 1685:(Buffyverse stubs) 1248:Only if the stub templates were 6321:and my post from earlier today. 4697:internationally published story 2911:follow the course of the vote. 2514:clear that you were addressing 2241:the resultant redirects. :-) — 1735:(Soap opera character stubs) 7709:03:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 7623:11:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC) 7596:23:03, 10 September 2005 (UTC) 5476:Yes, I indeed notice you were 5317:Edit warring is unavoidable? 2577:User:Lifeisunfair/monobook.css 2174:Knowledge talk:Spoiler warning 2139:Knowledge talk:Spoiler warning 2083:Knowledge talk:Spoiler warning 2044:Knowledge talk:Spoiler warning 1972:Knowledge talk:Spoiler warning 1956:argue facts, not personalities 1952:Knowledge talk:Spoiler warning 1725:(Nickelodeon stubs) 1205:(perhaps as a sub-template of 1135:would be a logical separation. 965:I have incorporated this into 187:) side won out, so it remains 13: 1: 5137:To be clear, I never saw the 2629:to make their own choice? -- 835:my most recent replies to you 488:) ultimately get de-listed? 397:BTW, Who gets to remove this 3323:contributed to its revision. 1954:, you should be polite and " 1435:(Radio programming stubs) 1350:(Radio broadcaster stubs) 796:UK Wikipedians' Notice Board 62:How to write a great article 7: 7560:01:17, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 7540:19:32, 22 August 2005 (UTC) 7283:18:11, 22 August 2005 (UTC) 7252:07:45, 22 August 2005 (UTC) 7190:05:25, 22 August 2005 (UTC) 7169:07:45, 22 August 2005 (UTC) 7019:04:48, 22 August 2005 (UTC) 6981:14:37, 15 August 2005 (UTC) 6958:14:16, 15 August 2005 (UTC) 6930:14:28, 14 August 2005 (UTC) 6907:13:44, 14 August 2005 (UTC) 6881:09:07, 14 August 2005 (UTC) 6868:As I noted when performing 6854:08:52, 14 August 2005 (UTC) 6601:that's how been implemented 6543:, and therefore should use 6533:14:50, July 20, 2005 (UTC) 5884:more than once occasion). — 5858:10:01, July 18, 2005 (UTC) 5321:violations are unavoidable? 4471:. I omitted the icon from 4344:User:Netoholic/monobook.css 3665:User:Netoholic/monobook.css 2735:(just as I'm doing now). — 2167:Recommendation on Templates 2120:Knowledge:Survey guidelines 10: 7728: 7533:standard "welcome" message 6826:01:59, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 6705:This is all I have to say. 6684:17:36, July 20, 2005 (UTC) 6586:17:23, July 20, 2005 (UTC) 5946:14:42, July 18, 2005 (UTC) 5904:14:07, July 18, 2005 (UTC) 5600:on your talk page because: 5241:10:02, July 18, 2005 (UTC) 5186:22:22, July 17, 2005 (UTC) 3655:13:08, July 11, 2005 (UTC) 3593:12:45, July 11, 2005 (UTC) 3528:12:33, July 11, 2005 (UTC) 3466:11:41, July 11, 2005 (UTC) 2133:I'd also like to add that 921:22:11, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) 7659:"Stop being a G4 fanboy." 6953:Thanks for the revert :) 6789:00:57, 21 July 2005 (UTC) 6769:00:15, 21 July 2005 (UTC) 6749:00:08, 21 July 2005 (UTC) 6712:22:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 6658:15:41, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 6624:18:00, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 6552:15:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 6491:07:00, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 6459:03:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 6434:03:20, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 6390:03:00, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 6354:23:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 6126:22:15, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 6032:21:55, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 5977:15:03, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5923:14:23, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5889:12:24, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5794:08:01, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5756:07:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5703:07:38, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5573:07:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5533:07:04, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5513:06:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5466:06:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5384:06:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5353:06:15, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5278:03:46, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5266:03:42, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 5208:22:34, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 5158:20:31, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 5146:20:26, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 5115:08:18, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 5052:09:29, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 5008:09:22, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 4976:09:18, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 4943:That's why I reverted to 4925:08:42, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 4869:21:52, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 4846:21:50, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 4824:21:45, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 4804:21:29, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 4788:21:25, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 4752:21:12, 13 July 2005 (UTC) 4728:21:02, 13 July 2005 (UTC) 4708:19:13, 13 July 2005 (UTC) 4701:Votes for undeletion page 4651:15:24, 13 July 2005 (UTC) 4624:04:31, 13 July 2005 (UTC) 4597:18:02, 12 July 2005 (UTC) 4541:21:15, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 4354:18:58, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 4292:18:50, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 4240:18:30, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 4190:18:29, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 4147:18:13, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 4089:18:29, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 4046:18:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3984:18:29, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3937:17:58, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3895:17:43, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3856:17:08, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3818:17:07, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3781:16:38, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3751:16:36, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3731:16:24, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3709:16:08, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3679:15:43, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3623:12:50, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3554:12:43, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3500:12:32, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3411:06:40, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3250:06:18, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3220:06:09, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3155:05:53, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3137:04:31, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3096:04:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 3063:22:22, 10 July 2005 (UTC) 3008:22:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC) 2989:21:54, 10 July 2005 (UTC) 2969:21:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC) 2769:July 6, 2005 03:37 (UTC) 2608:July 4, 2005 03:44 (UTC) 2355:"Don't flatter yourself." 2276:15:47, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2231:15:27, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2198:23:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC) 2180:17:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2129:14:32, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC) 1988:23:36, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC) 1914:17:27, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC) 1891:16:43, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1833:16:32, 2005 Jun 20 (UTC) 1751:And as a sub-template of 1244:00:52, 2005 Jun 20 (UTC) 1215:) would be more suitable. 1049:17:09, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC) 973:03:42, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 944: 938: 841:04:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) 768:03:37, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 621:03:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 523:22:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) 359:20:14, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 302:Well, you certainly took 202:21:11, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) 155:18:36, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) 137:15:50, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) 7444:Again, such assumptions 3081:"Merge" templates voting 2929:9 July 2005 05:42 (UTC) 2858:6 July 2005 17:10 (UTC) 2826:July 6, 2005 03:54 (UTC) 2792:July 6, 2005 03:44 (UTC) 2765:i'm being a jerk. sorry 2710:July 6, 2005 02:46 (UTC) 2636:July 4, 2005 04:03 (UTC) 2535:July 6, 2005 02:17 (UTC) 2502:4 July 2005 01:00 (UTC) 2346:July 3, 2005 14:45 (UTC) 2331:2 July 2005 18:45 (UTC) 2284:15:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2245:15:37, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2148:14:44, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC) 2116:even on the format of it 2105:01:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1999:00:50, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC) 1933:18:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1843:16:33, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1819:to continue conversation 1814:08:27, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1224:19:02, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) 951:02:40, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 911:05:03, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 900:10:58, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) 884:08:03, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) 815:04:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 798:, who blindly supported 727:00:59, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) 697:04:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 674:23:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 648:04:20, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 630:03:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 583:18:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 568:18:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 539:02:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 510:20:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) 495:20:39, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) 443:15:58, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) 408:15:39, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) 370:21:16, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 314:19:14, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 287:04:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 272:02:14, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 251:04:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 216:21:35, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) 116:00:31, 13 May 2005 (UTC) 100:08:06, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC) 92:, add a question to the 7401:Knowledge administrator 5870:discussion with Radiant 5528:an admin-like trait. — 4672:And no, the article is 4028:User:DoubleBlue/Sandbox 2939:9 July 2005 05:54 (UTC) 2885:6 July 2005 17:30 (UTC) 2779:6 July 2005 03:43 (UTC) 2739:6 July 2005 03:00 (UTC) 2689:4 July 2005 04:40 (UTC) 2619:4 July 2005 04:00 (UTC) 2553:6 July 2005 02:25 (UTC) 2522:4 July 2005 01:07 (UTC) 2471:4 July 2005 03:41 (UTC) 2434:3 July 2005 18:54 (UTC) 2042:"On a public page like 1360:Canada-radio-bcast-stub 1125:and the aforementioned 78:Knowledge:Topical index 7527:Apology accepted, but 4631:Well, the content was: 4026:, is Talk-Notice. see 4024:as Monobook stands now 3771:MediaWiki:Monobook.css 3695:MediaWiki:Monobook.css 3547:MediaWiki:Monobook.css 2254: 2030:the condescending one. 1950:On a public page like 1884:series or character.) 1871:{{spoiler-other|other 1555:US-tv-bcast-local-stub 1445:Canada-radio-prog-stub 7643:(comment unsigned by 7446:are frowned upon here 6653:violated last night. 5291:Who's discussion page 5110:certainly qualify. — 4969:Netoholic's talk page 4682:undeletion discussion 3669:MediaWiki:onobook.css 2252: 2207:Template:Cleanup-date 1660:(Doctor Who stubs) 1570:US-tv-bcast-natl-stub 1115:be lumped together. 894:pretty juvenile. — 663:Defense referring to 7585:update the redirects 5998:Continued discussion 5426:Your point being...? 5254:User talk:12.144.5.2 5086:Why did you exclude 4410:MediaWiki:Common.css 4129:MediaWiki:Common.css 3641:That works! Thanks. 3022:Indeed, the changes 2897:Reordering votes on 1515:Canada-tv-bcast-stub 18:User talk:David Levy 4898:User talk:Netoholic 4590:Template talk:Merge 2959:template talk:merge 2899:Template talk:Merge 2867:Please scroll down. 2846:Template talk:Merge 2257:I hereby award you 2176:. Yours sincerely, 1620:Canada-tv-prog-stub 1400:US-radio-bcast-stub 1375:UK-radio-bcast-stub 1174:Television director 1081:template, as well.) 6972:I don't know what 6965:You're welcome. :) 6541:talk page template 6156:I directly quoted 6008:posted a reply to 5918:of this claim.) — 5872:for justification. 5129:(View in context.) 5108:iTunes Music Store 4780:my sample versions 3844:Why don't you try 2844:Recent changes on 2599:Template:Mergefrom 2255: 1966:are of low value. 1485:US-radio-prog-stub 1460:UK-radio-prog-stub 1320:Radio-tv-tech-stub 546:How about pulling 67:Naming conventions 47:How to edit a page 7648: 7593: 7592: 7416:assume good faith 7036:"In reference to 6994:TV icon.png image 6955:Www.wikinerds.org 6665:Ah, but it does. 6308:on your talk page 5839:User:Lifeisunfair 5319:Three-revert rule 4934:three-revert rule 4889:Template:Reqimage 4771:"Merge" templates 4579:The Wheel of Time 3888:direct comparison 2581:m:Help:User style 2575:Add this to your 2076:personal attacks. 1839:Understood. :-) — 1267:Broadcasting-stub 1162:High-key lighting 1066:template because 998:Broadcasting-stub 967:Template:Personal 927:Please don't let 809:Yoghurt talk page 665:a few dead-enders 555:petrol (gasoline) 551:gasoline (petrol) 482:Petrol (Gasoline) 7719: 7715: 7697: 7686: 7683: 7675: 7664: 7661: 7653: 7642: 7638: 7629: 7611: 7602: 7591: 7590: 7580: 7577:double redirects 7573: 7568: 7546: 7521: 7516: 7506: 7494: 7489: 7479: 7468: 7463: 7453: 7438: 7433: 7423: 7408: 7389: 7384: 7374: 7359: 7354: 7344: 7333: 7328: 7318: 7307: 7302: 7292: 7287: 7271: 7263: 7258: 7241: 7236: 7226: 7214: 7209: 7199: 7194: 7180: 7175: 7157: 7152: 7142: 7131: 7126: 7116: 7105: 7086: 7081: 7071: 7055: 7050: 7047: 7045: 7044:File:TV Icon.png 7038:Template:Tv-stub 7028: 7023: 7012: 7010: 7009:File:TV Icon.png 7003:Template:Tv-stub 7001:In reference to 6997: 6990: 6985: 6968: 6961: 6950: 6943: 6938: 6913: 6896: 6885: 6872:, the Knowledge 6864: 6857: 6842: 6832: 6811: 6802: 6797: 6775: 6753: 6728: 6715: 6699: 6696:Blocking for 3RR 6692: 6687: 6682: 6661: 6646: 6637: 6632: 6610: 6591: 6584: 6571: 6565: 6556: 6535: 6531: 6518: 6512: 6506: 6497: 6483: 6476: 6471: 6456: 6453: 6450: 6442: 6418: 6398: 6387: 6384: 6381: 6373: 6360: 6343: 6338: 6326: 6299: 6288: 6283: 6271: 6253: 6248: 6236: 6224: 6219: 6207: 6188: 6183: 6171: 6150: 6145: 6130: 6123: 6120: 6117: 6109: 6100: 6091: 6083: 6074: 6066: 6057: 6045: 6035: 6001: 5994: 5989: 5955: 5931: 5909: 5893: 5875: 5860: 5856: 5836: 5830: 5824: 5815: 5810: 5770: 5753: 5750: 5747: 5739: 5715: 5680: 5657: 5634: 5611: 5583: 5570: 5567: 5564: 5556: 5541: 5519: 5510: 5507: 5504: 5496: 5470: 5449: 5442: 5439: 5429: 5422: 5419: 5410: 5399: 5396: 5387: 5381: 5378: 5375: 5367: 5359: 5342: 5337: 5326: 5311: 5306: 5294: 5287: 5282: 5269: 5258: 5249: 5244: 5239: 5216: 5191: 5184: 5162: 5149: 5133: 5124: 5119: 5082: 5074: 5065: 5060: 5039: 5014: 5005: 5002: 4999: 4991: 4980: 4963: 4956: 4939: 4928: 4922: 4919: 4916: 4908: 4893: 4884: 4879: 4854: 4830: 4808: 4791: 4774: 4767: 4762: 4747:"impression." — 4736: 4714: 4689: 4666: 4655: 4641: 4634: 4627: 4612: 4603: 4584: 4574: 4569: 4508: 4480: 4474: 4439: 4380: 4316: 4262: 4210: 4165: 4140: 4137: 4109: 4064: 4039: 4036: 4004: 3955: 3911: 3870: 3830: 3791: 3759: 3737: 3713: 3700: 3682: 3658: 3653: 3637: 3604: 3591: 3564: 3535: 3526: 3506: 3494: 3488: 3484: 3478: 3469: 3464: 3451: 3445: 3441: 3435: 3428: 3423: 3394: 3371: 3359: 3353: 3334: 3287: 3260: 3228: 3207: 3192: 3177: 3161: 3141: 3128: 3114: 3107: 3099: 3085: 3076: 3071: 3050: 3034: 3014: 2993: 2980: 2972: 2954: 2947: 2942: 2931: 2923: 2920: 2903: 2893: 2888: 2877: 2870: 2860: 2850: 2840: 2835: 2812: 2797: 2782: 2771: 2762: 2755: 2750: 2719: 2696: 2677: 2662: 2641: 2622: 2610: 2595:Template:Mergeto 2590: 2585: 2572: 2565: 2560: 2540: 2525: 2504: 2490: 2483: 2478: 2456: 2450: 2439: 2424: 2409: 2383: 2357: 2323: 2317: 2306: 2300: 2270: 2267: 2225: 2222: 2196: 2135:this explanation 2070: 2048: 2023: 2011: 1877: 1876: 1861: 1855: 1792: 1786: 1772: 1766: 1760: 1754: 1745: 1740: 1734: 1728: 1724: 1720:Nickelodeon-stub 1718: 1714: 1708: 1704: 1698: 1694: 1688: 1684: 1678: 1674: 1668: 1665: 1659: 1653: 1649: 1643: 1639: 1633: 1630: 1624: 1618: 1615: 1609: 1603: 1600: 1594: 1588: 1584: 1578: 1574: 1568: 1565: 1559: 1553: 1550: 1544: 1538: 1534: 1530:UK-tv-bcast-stub 1528: 1525: 1519: 1513: 1510: 1504: 1498: 1495: 1489: 1483: 1480: 1474: 1468: 1464: 1458: 1455: 1449: 1443: 1440: 1434: 1428: 1425: 1419: 1413: 1410: 1404: 1398: 1395: 1389: 1383: 1379: 1373: 1370: 1364: 1358: 1355: 1349: 1345:Radio-bcast-stub 1343: 1340: 1334: 1328: 1324: 1318: 1315: 1309: 1303: 1300: 1281: 1275: 1271: 1265: 1214: 1208: 1204: 1198: 1166:Jib (television) 1134: 1128: 1124: 1120:Radio-bcast-stub 1118: 1105: 1099: 1096:and the defunct 1095: 1089: 1080: 1074: 1065: 1059: 1022: 1016: 1012: 1006: 1002: 996: 989: 983: 946: 940: 898: 882: 465:De-listing from 57:Picture tutorial 7727: 7726: 7722: 7721: 7720: 7718: 7717: 7716: 7698: 7687: 7679: 7676: 7665: 7657: 7654: 7639: 7637: 7634:G4 (television) 7630: 7612: 7610: 7603: 7581: 7579: 7574: 7569: 7547: 7522: 7512: 7507: 7495: 7485: 7480: 7469: 7459: 7454: 7439: 7429: 7424: 7409: 7397:Jennifer Godwin 7390: 7380: 7375: 7360: 7350: 7345: 7334: 7324: 7319: 7308: 7298: 7293: 7288: 7272: 7264: 7259: 7242: 7232: 7227: 7215: 7205: 7200: 7195: 7181: 7176: 7158: 7148: 7143: 7132: 7122: 7117: 7106: 7087: 7077: 7072: 7056: 7043: 7034: 7029: 7024: 7008: 6998: 6996: 6991: 6986: 6969: 6962: 6951: 6949: 6944: 6939: 6914: 6897: 6886: 6874:Manual of Style 6865: 6858: 6843: 6841: 6833: 6812: 6810: 6803: 6798: 6776: 6766:Ta bu shi da yu 6754: 6729: 6716: 6709:Ta bu shi da yu 6700: 6698: 6693: 6688: 6679: 6662: 6647: 6645: 6638: 6633: 6611: 6592: 6581: 6569: 6563: 6557: 6536: 6528: 6516: 6510: 6507: 6505: 6498: 6484: 6482: 6477: 6472: 6454: 6451: 6448: 6440: 6419: 6399: 6385: 6382: 6379: 6371: 6361: 6344: 6332: 6327: 6300: 6289: 6277: 6272: 6264:very same topic 6254: 6242: 6237: 6225: 6213: 6208: 6189: 6177: 6172: 6164:Pavel Vozenilek 6151: 6141:Pavel Vozenilek 6136: 6131: 6121: 6118: 6115: 6107: 6101: 6092: 6084: 6075: 6067: 6058: 6051:Pavel Vozenilek 6046: 6036: 6002: 6000: 5995: 5990: 5956: 5932: 5910: 5894: 5876: 5864:Please see the 5861: 5853: 5834: 5828: 5825: 5823: 5816: 5811: 5771: 5751: 5748: 5745: 5737: 5716: 5681: 5658: 5635: 5612: 5584: 5568: 5565: 5562: 5554: 5542: 5520: 5508: 5505: 5502: 5494: 5471: 5450: 5443: 5433: 5430: 5423: 5414: 5411: 5400: 5391: 5388: 5379: 5376: 5373: 5365: 5360: 5343: 5332: 5327: 5312: 5300: 5295: 5293: 5288: 5283: 5270: 5263:Oleg Alexandrov 5259: 5257: 5250: 5245: 5236: 5217: 5192: 5181: 5163: 5150: 5134: 5125: 5120: 5083: 5075: 5073: 5066: 5061: 5040: 5022:The first edit 5015: 5003: 5000: 4997: 4989: 4981: 4964: 4957: 4940: 4929: 4920: 4917: 4914: 4906: 4894: 4892: 4885: 4880: 4855: 4831: 4809: 4792: 4775: 4773: 4768: 4763: 4737: 4715: 4690: 4667: 4656: 4642: 4635: 4628: 4613: 4611: 4604: 4585: 4583: 4575: 4570: 4509: 4478: 4472: 4440: 4381: 4317: 4263: 4211: 4166: 4138: 4133: 4110: 4065: 4037: 4032: 4005: 3956: 3912: 3871: 3831: 3803:Your code does 3792: 3760: 3738: 3714: 3701: 3683: 3659: 3650: 3638: 3605: 3588: 3565: 3536: 3523: 3507: 3492: 3486: 3482: 3476: 3470: 3461: 3449: 3443: 3439: 3433: 3429: 3424: 3395: 3372: 3357: 3351: 3335: 3288: 3261: 3229: 3208: 3193: 3178: 3162: 3142: 3129: 3115: 3108: 3100: 3086: 3084: 3077: 3072: 3051: 3035: 3015: 2994: 2981: 2973: 2955: 2953: 2948: 2943: 2932: 2921: 2916: 2904: 2902: 2894: 2889: 2878: 2871: 2861: 2851: 2849: 2841: 2836: 2813: 2798: 2783: 2772: 2763: 2761: 2756: 2751: 2720: 2697: 2678: 2663: 2642: 2623: 2611: 2591: 2589: 2586: 2573: 2571: 2569:CSS alternative 2566: 2561: 2541: 2526: 2505: 2491: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2454: 2448: 2440: 2425: 2414: 2401: 2379: 2353: 2321: 2315: 2304: 2298: 2294: 2268: 2263: 2223: 2218: 2210: 2193: 2169: 2155: 2066: 2040: 2019: 2007: 1945: 1900: 1870: 1869: 1864: 1859: 1853: 1790: 1784: 1770: 1764: 1758: 1752: 1746: 1741: 1736: 1732: 1726: 1722: 1716: 1712: 1706: 1702: 1696: 1692: 1686: 1682: 1680:Buffyverse-stub 1676: 1672: 1670:US-tv-prog-stub 1666: 1661: 1657: 1651: 1647: 1641: 1637: 1635:UK-tv-prog-stub 1631: 1626: 1622: 1616: 1611: 1607: 1601: 1596: 1592: 1586: 1582: 1576: 1572: 1566: 1561: 1557: 1551: 1546: 1542: 1536: 1532: 1526: 1521: 1517: 1511: 1506: 1502: 1496: 1491: 1487: 1481: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1462: 1456: 1451: 1447: 1441: 1436: 1432: 1430:Radio-prog-stub 1426: 1421: 1417: 1411: 1406: 1402: 1396: 1391: 1387: 1381: 1377: 1371: 1366: 1362: 1356: 1351: 1347: 1341: 1336: 1332: 1326: 1322: 1316: 1311: 1307: 1301: 1296: 1279: 1273: 1269: 1263: 1234: 1212: 1206: 1202: 1196: 1132: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1103: 1097: 1093: 1087: 1078: 1072: 1063: 1057: 1020: 1014: 1010: 1004: 1000: 994: 991: 987: 981: 971:Ta bu shi da yu 963: 896: 880: 831: 751: 599: 474: 128: 109: 72:Manual of Style 36: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7725: 7714: 7713: 7712: 7711: 7696: 7695: 7694: 7693: 7685: 7684: 7674: 7673: 7672: 7671: 7663: 7662: 7651: 7636: 7631: 7627: 7609: 7604: 7600: 7578: 7575: 7571: 7567: 7566: 7565: 7564: 7563: 7562: 7545: 7544: 7543: 7542: 7535:on June 23. — 7520: 7519: 7518: 7517: 7505: 7504: 7503: 7502: 7493: 7492: 7491: 7490: 7478: 7477: 7476: 7475: 7467: 7466: 7465: 7464: 7452: 7451: 7450: 7449: 7437: 7436: 7435: 7434: 7422: 7421: 7420: 7419: 7407: 7406: 7405: 7404: 7388: 7387: 7386: 7385: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7370: 7366: 7358: 7357: 7356: 7355: 7343: 7342: 7341: 7340: 7332: 7331: 7330: 7329: 7317: 7316: 7315: 7314: 7306: 7305: 7304: 7303: 7290: 7286: 7285: 7276: 7270: 7269: 7261: 7257: 7256: 7255: 7254: 7240: 7239: 7238: 7237: 7225: 7224: 7223: 7222: 7213: 7212: 7211: 7210: 7197: 7193: 7192: 7178: 7174: 7173: 7172: 7171: 7156: 7155: 7154: 7153: 7141: 7140: 7139: 7138: 7130: 7129: 7128: 7127: 7115: 7114: 7113: 7112: 7104: 7103: 7102: 7101: 7085: 7084: 7083: 7082: 7070: 7069: 7068: 7067: 7054: 7053: 7052: 7051: 7026: 7022: 7021: 6995: 6992: 6988: 6984: 6983: 6967: 6966: 6948: 6945: 6941: 6937: 6936: 6935: 6934: 6933: 6932: 6912: 6911: 6910: 6909: 6904:RealMontrealer 6895: 6894: 6893: 6892: 6884: 6883: 6863: 6862: 6851:RealMontrealer 6840: 6834: 6830: 6809: 6804: 6800: 6796: 6795: 6794: 6793: 6792: 6791: 6774: 6773: 6772: 6771: 6752: 6751: 6727: 6726: 6697: 6694: 6690: 6686: 6685: 6644: 6639: 6635: 6631: 6630: 6629: 6628: 6627: 6626: 6609: 6608: 6607: 6606: 6605: 6604: 6590: 6589: 6588: 6587: 6555: 6554: 6504: 6499: 6495: 6481: 6480:Guy Montag Ban 6478: 6474: 6470: 6469: 6468: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6462: 6461: 6417: 6416: 6415: 6414: 6413: 6412: 6411: 6410: 6397: 6396: 6395: 6394: 6393: 6392: 6359: 6358: 6357: 6356: 6342: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6325: 6324: 6323: 6322: 6298: 6297: 6296: 6295: 6287: 6286: 6285: 6284: 6270: 6269: 6268: 6267: 6262:discussed the 6252: 6251: 6250: 6249: 6235: 6234: 6233: 6232: 6223: 6222: 6221: 6220: 6206: 6205: 6204: 6203: 6200:Idont Havaname 6187: 6186: 6185: 6184: 6170: 6169: 6168: 6167: 6149: 6148: 6147: 6146: 6129: 6128: 6099: 6098: 6090: 6089: 6082: 6081: 6073: 6072: 6065: 6064: 6056: 6055: 6044: 6043: 5999: 5996: 5992: 5988: 5987: 5986: 5985: 5984: 5983: 5982: 5981: 5980: 5979: 5954: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5949: 5948: 5947: 5930: 5929: 5928: 5927: 5926: 5925: 5908: 5907: 5906: 5905: 5892: 5891: 5874: 5873: 5866:VfU discussion 5822: 5817: 5813: 5809: 5808: 5807: 5806: 5805: 5804: 5803: 5802: 5801: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5797: 5796: 5769: 5768: 5767: 5766: 5765: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5759: 5758: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5676: 5675: 5674: 5673: 5672: 5671: 5670: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5652: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5610: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5469: 5468: 5448: 5447: 5441: 5440: 5428: 5427: 5421: 5420: 5409: 5408: 5398: 5397: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5338: 5325: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5292: 5289: 5285: 5281: 5280: 5256: 5251: 5247: 5243: 5242: 5215: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5161: 5160: 5136: 5132: 5131: 5122: 5118: 5117: 5104:Apple Computer 5080: 5072: 5067: 5063: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5013: 5012: 5011: 5010: 4979: 4978: 4962: 4961: 4955: 4954: 4938: 4937: 4891: 4886: 4882: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4853: 4852: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4848: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4819:understand. — 4807: 4806: 4772: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4732: 4731: 4730: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4654: 4653: 4640: 4639: 4633: 4632: 4610: 4605: 4601: 4582: 4576: 4572: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4467:I've prepared 4438: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3721:Template:Merge 3712: 3711: 3699: 3698: 3661: 3657: 3656: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3468: 3467: 3426: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3350:protected the 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3140: 3139: 3127: 3126: 3113: 3112: 3106: 3105: 3083: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 2992: 2991: 2979: 2978: 2952: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2940: 2901: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2886: 2876: 2875: 2869: 2868: 2848: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2781: 2780: 2760: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2621: 2620: 2587: 2570: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2524: 2523: 2488: 2487:Merge template 2485: 2481: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2461:, why did you 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2366:You mean like 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2348: 2347: 2293: 2292:An observation 2290: 2288: 2286: 2285: 2247: 2246: 2216:page. Cheers, 2209: 2204: 2202: 2200: 2199: 2168: 2165: 2163: 2154: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2109: 2107: 2106: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2092: 2078: 2077: 2072: 2071: 2063: 2062: 2050: 2049: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2031: 2024: 2016: 2015: 2012: 2003: 2001: 2000: 1991: 1944: 1939: 1937: 1935: 1934: 1921: 1920: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1863: 1851: 1849: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1816: 1815: 1803: 1802: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1730:Soap-char-stub 1655:Doctorwho-stub 1415:Radio-bio-stub 1295: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1259: 1258: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1226: 1225: 1217: 1216: 1193: 1192: 1146: 1145: 1137: 1136: 1108: 1107: 1083: 1082: 1052: 990: 978: 976: 962: 959: 957: 955: 954: 953: 952: 915: 914: 913: 912: 902: 901: 886: 885: 830: 821: 819: 817: 816: 804: 803: 791: 790: 782: 781: 750: 741: 739: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 716:It seems that 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 667:in Iraq. ;-) 652: 651: 650: 649: 632: 631: 598: 593: 591: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 572: 571: 570: 569: 541: 540: 514: 513: 512: 511: 497: 496: 473: 463: 461: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 276: 275: 274: 273: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 127: 122: 120: 108: 105: 103: 82: 81: 74: 69: 64: 59: 54: 49: 35: 32: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7724: 7710: 7707: 7702: 7701: 7700: 7699: 7691: 7690: 7689: 7688: 7682: 7678: 7677: 7669: 7668: 7667: 7666: 7660: 7656: 7655: 7652: 7649: 7646: 7645:67.165.72.137 7635: 7628: 7625: 7624: 7621: 7617: 7616:Talk:Lateline 7608: 7601: 7598: 7597: 7594: 7586: 7572: 7561: 7558: 7553: 7552: 7551: 7550: 7549: 7548: 7541: 7538: 7534: 7530: 7526: 7525: 7524: 7523: 7515: 7511: 7510: 7509: 7508: 7499: 7498: 7497: 7496: 7488: 7484: 7483: 7482: 7481: 7473: 7472: 7471: 7470: 7462: 7458: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7447: 7443: 7442: 7441: 7440: 7432: 7428: 7427: 7426: 7425: 7417: 7413: 7412: 7411: 7410: 7402: 7399:(a respected 7398: 7394: 7393: 7392: 7391: 7383: 7379: 7378: 7377: 7376: 7367: 7364: 7363: 7362: 7361: 7353: 7349: 7348: 7347: 7346: 7338: 7337: 7336: 7335: 7327: 7323: 7322: 7321: 7320: 7312: 7311: 7310: 7309: 7301: 7297: 7296: 7295: 7294: 7291: 7284: 7281: 7277: 7274: 7273: 7266: 7265: 7262: 7253: 7250: 7246: 7245: 7244: 7243: 7235: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7228: 7219: 7218: 7217: 7216: 7208: 7204: 7203: 7202: 7201: 7198: 7191: 7188: 7183: 7182: 7179: 7170: 7167: 7162: 7161: 7160: 7159: 7151: 7147: 7146: 7145: 7144: 7136: 7135: 7134: 7133: 7125: 7121: 7120: 7119: 7118: 7110: 7109: 7108: 7107: 7099: 7095: 7091: 7090: 7089: 7088: 7080: 7076: 7075: 7074: 7073: 7064: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7057: 7049: 7046: 7039: 7033: 7032: 7031: 7030: 7027: 7020: 7017: 7011: 7004: 7000: 6999: 6989: 6982: 6979: 6975: 6971: 6970: 6964: 6963: 6960: 6959: 6956: 6942: 6931: 6928: 6924: 6920: 6919: 6918: 6917: 6916: 6915: 6908: 6905: 6901: 6900: 6899: 6898: 6890: 6889: 6888: 6887: 6882: 6879: 6875: 6871: 6870:the page move 6867: 6866: 6860: 6859: 6856: 6855: 6852: 6847: 6839: 6831: 6828: 6827: 6824: 6823: 6819: 6818: 6808: 6801: 6790: 6787: 6782: 6781: 6780: 6779: 6778: 6777: 6770: 6767: 6762: 6758: 6757: 6756: 6755: 6750: 6747: 6743: 6739: 6735: 6731: 6730: 6724: 6723: 6718: 6717: 6714: 6713: 6710: 6706: 6691: 6683: 6676: 6673: 6668: 6664: 6663: 6660: 6659: 6656: 6651: 6643: 6636: 6625: 6622: 6617: 6616: 6615: 6614: 6613: 6612: 6602: 6598: 6597: 6596: 6595: 6594: 6593: 6585: 6578: 6575: 6568: 6561: 6560: 6559: 6558: 6553: 6550: 6546: 6542: 6538: 6537: 6534: 6532: 6525: 6522: 6515: 6503: 6502:Template:Move 6496: 6493: 6492: 6489: 6475: 6460: 6457: 6446: 6443: 6437: 6436: 6435: 6432: 6427: 6426: 6425: 6424: 6423: 6422: 6421: 6420: 6407: 6406: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6391: 6388: 6377: 6374: 6367: 6366: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6355: 6352: 6348: 6347: 6346: 6345: 6337: 6331: 6330: 6329: 6328: 6320: 6316: 6315: 6310: 6309: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6293: 6292: 6291: 6290: 6282: 6276: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6265: 6261: 6258: 6257: 6256: 6255: 6247: 6241: 6240: 6239: 6238: 6229: 6228: 6227: 6226: 6218: 6212: 6211: 6210: 6209: 6201: 6197: 6193: 6192: 6191: 6190: 6182: 6176: 6175: 6174: 6173: 6165: 6161: 6160: 6155: 6154: 6153: 6152: 6144: 6142: 6135: 6134: 6133: 6132: 6127: 6124: 6113: 6110: 6103: 6102: 6097: 6094: 6093: 6086: 6085: 6080: 6077: 6076: 6069: 6068: 6063: 6060: 6059: 6052: 6048: 6047: 6042: 6038: 6037: 6034: 6033: 6030: 6025: 6023: 6018: 6015: 6013: 6012: 6007: 5993: 5978: 5975: 5970: 5966: 5965: 5964: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5945: 5940: 5939: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5935: 5934: 5933: 5924: 5921: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5913: 5912: 5911: 5903: 5898: 5897: 5896: 5895: 5890: 5887: 5882: 5878: 5877: 5871: 5867: 5863: 5862: 5859: 5857: 5850: 5847: 5843: 5840: 5833: 5821: 5814: 5795: 5792: 5788: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5757: 5754: 5743: 5740: 5733: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5704: 5701: 5697: 5696: 5691: 5690: 5689: 5688: 5687: 5686: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5661: 5660: 5659: 5645: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5636: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5599: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5585: 5574: 5571: 5560: 5557: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5534: 5531: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5514: 5511: 5500: 5497: 5491: 5487: 5483: 5479: 5475: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5467: 5464: 5460: 5456: 5452: 5451: 5445: 5444: 5437: 5432: 5431: 5425: 5424: 5418: 5413: 5412: 5406: 5402: 5401: 5395: 5390: 5389: 5386: 5385: 5382: 5371: 5368: 5354: 5351: 5347: 5346: 5345: 5344: 5336: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5320: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5304: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5296: 5286: 5279: 5276: 5272: 5271: 5268: 5267: 5264: 5255: 5248: 5240: 5233: 5230: 5226: 5222: 5219: 5218: 5209: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5193: 5185: 5178: 5175: 5171: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5159: 5156: 5152: 5151: 5148: 5147: 5144: 5140: 5130: 5127: 5126: 5123: 5116: 5113: 5109: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5093: 5089: 5085: 5084: 5081: 5078: 5071: 5064: 5053: 5050: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5031: 5027: 5026: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5009: 5006: 4995: 4992: 4985: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4977: 4974: 4970: 4966: 4965: 4959: 4958: 4952: 4951: 4946: 4942: 4941: 4935: 4931: 4930: 4927: 4926: 4923: 4912: 4909: 4903: 4899: 4890: 4883: 4870: 4867: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4847: 4844: 4841: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4825: 4822: 4817: 4814:I agree that 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4805: 4802: 4799: 4794: 4793: 4790: 4789: 4786: 4781: 4766: 4753: 4750: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4738: 4729: 4726: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4709: 4706: 4702: 4698: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4683: 4679: 4675: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4660: 4659: 4658: 4657: 4652: 4649: 4644: 4643: 4637: 4636: 4630: 4629: 4626: 4625: 4622: 4618: 4609: 4602: 4599: 4598: 4595: 4591: 4580: 4573: 4542: 4539: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4477: 4470: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4411: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4355: 4352: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4293: 4290: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4241: 4238: 4235: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4191: 4188: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4148: 4145: 4141: 4136: 4130: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4090: 4087: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4047: 4044: 4040: 4035: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 3985: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3938: 3935: 3932: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3896: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3857: 3854: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3819: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3807: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3782: 3779: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3752: 3749: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3732: 3729: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3710: 3707: 3703: 3702: 3696: 3691: 3690: 3685: 3684: 3681: 3680: 3677: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3654: 3647: 3644: 3640: 3639: 3624: 3621: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3592: 3585: 3582: 3578: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3555: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3527: 3520: 3517: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3501: 3498: 3491: 3490:mergedisputed 3481: 3475:I've updated 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3465: 3458: 3455: 3448: 3447:mergedisputed 3438: 3431: 3430: 3427: 3412: 3409: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3356: 3349: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3322: 3321: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3303: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3275: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3251: 3248: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3221: 3218: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3156: 3153: 3150: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3138: 3135: 3131: 3130: 3124: 3123: 3117: 3116: 3110: 3109: 3102: 3101: 3098: 3097: 3094: 3091: 3082: 3075: 3064: 3061: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3025: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3009: 3006: 3003: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2990: 2987: 2983: 2982: 2975: 2974: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2964: 2960: 2946: 2938: 2934: 2933: 2930: 2928: 2924: 2919: 2912: 2908: 2900: 2892: 2884: 2880: 2879: 2873: 2872: 2866: 2863: 2862: 2859: 2857: 2847: 2839: 2825: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2778: 2774: 2773: 2770: 2768: 2754: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2709: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2688: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2654: 2653: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2635: 2632: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2618: 2613: 2612: 2609: 2607: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2593:Then go view 2584: 2582: 2578: 2564: 2552: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2534: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2497: 2482: 2470: 2466: 2465: 2460: 2453: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2433: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2408: 2406: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2382: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2369: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2345: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2330: 2325: 2320: 2312: 2310: 2303: 2289: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2275: 2271: 2266: 2260: 2251: 2244: 2240: 2239: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2215: 2208: 2203: 2197: 2190: 2187: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2179: 2175: 2164: 2161: 2160: 2147: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2094: 2090: 2089: 2084: 2080: 2079: 2074: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2045: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2022: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2010: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1998: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1989: 1987: 1984: 1979: 1977: 1973: 1967: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1948: 1943: 1938: 1932: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1913: 1910: 1905: 1898:Vote comments 1895: 1892: 1890: 1885: 1883: 1878: 1874: 1867: 1858: 1857:spoiler-other 1850: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1799: 1798: 1789: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1769: 1768:Media-co-stub 1763: 1762: 1757: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1739: 1731: 1721: 1711: 1701: 1691: 1681: 1671: 1664: 1656: 1646: 1636: 1629: 1621: 1614: 1606: 1599: 1591: 1581: 1571: 1564: 1556: 1549: 1541: 1531: 1524: 1516: 1509: 1501: 1500:Tv-bcast-stub 1494: 1486: 1479: 1471: 1461: 1454: 1446: 1439: 1431: 1424: 1416: 1409: 1401: 1394: 1386: 1376: 1369: 1361: 1354: 1346: 1339: 1331: 1321: 1314: 1306: 1305:Radio-tv-stub 1299: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1278: 1277:Radio-tv-stub 1268: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1243: 1240: 1229: 1223: 1219: 1218: 1211: 1201: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154:Digital cable 1151: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1131: 1130:Tv-bcast-stub 1121: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1102: 1101:Tvseries-stub 1092: 1085: 1084: 1077: 1069: 1062: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1030: 1026: 1019: 1018:Tv-bcast-stub 1009: 999: 986: 977: 974: 972: 968: 958: 950: 949: 943: 942: 934: 930: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 920: 910: 906: 905: 904: 903: 899: 893: 888: 887: 883: 877: 873: 869: 865: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 843: 842: 840: 836: 833:Did you read 829: 825: 820: 814: 810: 806: 805: 801: 797: 793: 792: 788: 784: 783: 779: 775: 771: 770: 769: 767: 764: 760: 756: 749: 745: 740: 726: 723: 719: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 696: 692: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 673: 670: 666: 662: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 647: 644: 640: 636: 635: 634: 633: 629: 624: 623: 622: 620: 617: 613: 609: 604: 597: 592: 582: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 567: 564: 560: 557:listing from 556: 552: 549: 545: 544: 543: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 525: 524: 522: 519: 509: 505: 501: 500: 499: 498: 494: 491: 487: 483: 479: 478: 477: 472: 468: 462: 442: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 407: 404: 400: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 369: 366: 361: 360: 358: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 313: 310: 305: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 286: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 271: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 215: 212: 208: 204: 203: 201: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 177: 175: 169: 165: 161: 157: 156: 154: 149: 145: 140: 139: 138: 136: 133: 126: 125:Talk:Gasoline 121: 118: 117: 114: 104: 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 79: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 63: 60: 58: 55: 53: 50: 48: 45: 44: 43: 41: 31: 29: 19: 7706:Lifeisunfair 7680: 7658: 7650: 7640: 7626: 7613: 7599: 7584: 7582: 7570: 7537:Lifeisunfair 7513: 7486: 7460: 7430: 7381: 7351: 7325: 7299: 7289: 7260: 7249:Lifeisunfair 7233: 7206: 7196: 7177: 7166:Lifeisunfair 7149: 7123: 7097: 7093: 7078: 7062: 7035: 7025: 6987: 6978:Lifeisunfair 6952: 6940: 6927:Lifeisunfair 6922: 6878:Lifeisunfair 6848: 6844: 6829: 6820: 6815: 6813: 6799: 6786:Lifeisunfair 6784:superior. — 6760: 6746:Lifeisunfair 6741: 6737: 6721: 6720: 6704: 6701: 6689: 6648: 6634: 6621:Lifeisunfair 6549:Lifeisunfair 6508: 6494: 6488:62.253.64.15 6485: 6473: 6431:Lifeisunfair 6351:Lifeisunfair 6334: 6313: 6312: 6307: 6306: 6279: 6263: 6244: 6215: 6179: 6158: 6157: 6138: 6095: 6078: 6061: 6039: 6029:Lifeisunfair 6026: 6019: 6016: 6010: 6009: 6003: 5991: 5974:Lifeisunfair 5920:Lifeisunfair 5886:Lifeisunfair 5826: 5812: 5791:Lifeisunfair 5731: 5700:Lifeisunfair 5694: 5693: 5530:Lifeisunfair 5489: 5485: 5477: 5463:Lifeisunfair 5435: 5416: 5393: 5361: 5350:Lifeisunfair 5334: 5302: 5284: 5275:Lifeisunfair 5260: 5246: 5205:Lifeisunfair 5155:Lifeisunfair 5143:Lifeisunfair 5135: 5121: 5112:Lifeisunfair 5079: 5076: 5062: 5049:Lifeisunfair 5024: 5023: 4973:Lifeisunfair 4949: 4948: 4895: 4881: 4866:Lifeisunfair 4821:Lifeisunfair 4785:Lifeisunfair 4776: 4764: 4749:Lifeisunfair 4705:Lifeisunfair 4677: 4673: 4621:Lifeisunfair 4614: 4600: 4586: 4581:Merge notice 4571: 4538:Lifeisunfair 4289:Lifeisunfair 4187:Lifeisunfair 4134: 4086:Lifeisunfair 4033: 4023: 3981:Lifeisunfair 3977:as seen here 3892:Lifeisunfair 3845: 3815:Lifeisunfair 3810: 3805: 3804: 3748:Lifeisunfair 3706:Lifeisunfair 3688: 3687: 3660: 3620:Lifeisunfair 3577:the best one 3551:Lifeisunfair 3497:Lifeisunfair 3425: 3408:Lifeisunfair 3319: 3318: 3301: 3300: 3273: 3239: 3217:Lifeisunfair 3134:Lifeisunfair 3121: 3120: 3087: 3073: 3060:Lifeisunfair 3023: 2986:Lifeisunfair 2956: 2944: 2937:Lifeisunfair 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2890: 2883:Lifeisunfair 2852: 2837: 2777:Lifeisunfair 2764: 2752: 2737:Lifeisunfair 2687:Lifeisunfair 2651: 2650: 2617:Lifeisunfair 2592: 2574: 2562: 2551:Lifeisunfair 2520:Lifeisunfair 2510: 2509: 2492: 2480: 2469:Lifeisunfair 2463: 2462: 2432:Lifeisunfair 2402: 2380: 2354: 2329:Lifeisunfair 2326: 2313: 2308: 2295: 2287: 2282:Lifeisunfair 2264: 2258: 2256: 2243:Lifeisunfair 2237: 2236: 2219: 2211: 2201: 2170: 2162: 2156: 2153:re:Netoholic 2115: 2111: 2108: 2103:Lifeisunfair 2087: 2086: 2067: 2054: 2041: 2027: 2020: 2008: 2002: 1990: 1980: 1975: 1968: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1949: 1946: 1936: 1931:Lifeisunfair 1926: 1903: 1901: 1893: 1889:Lifeisunfair 1886: 1879: 1868: 1865: 1848: 1841:Lifeisunfair 1818: 1817: 1812:Lifeisunfair 1807: 1788:Website-stub 1742: 1737: 1662: 1627: 1612: 1605:Tv-prog-stub 1597: 1562: 1547: 1522: 1507: 1492: 1477: 1452: 1437: 1422: 1407: 1392: 1367: 1352: 1337: 1312: 1297: 1262:I feel that 1254: 1249: 1238: 1235: 1227: 1222:Lifeisunfair 1200:Tv-tech-stub 1141: 1112: 1051: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1003:rather than 992: 975: 964: 956: 948: 937: 932: 916: 909:Lifeisunfair 891: 858: 846: 839:Lifeisunfair 832: 818: 813:Lifeisunfair 777: 758: 755:Talk:Yoghurt 752: 738: 717: 695:Lifeisunfair 690: 664: 660: 638: 628:Lifeisunfair 611: 607: 602: 600: 590: 581:Lifeisunfair 537:Lifeisunfair 533:that request 515: 475: 460: 441:Lifeisunfair 398: 357:Lifeisunfair 285:Lifeisunfair 249:Lifeisunfair 192: 188: 184: 180: 173: 163: 153:Lifeisunfair 129: 119: 110: 102: 94:village pump 83: 37: 27: 25: 6166:in any way? 5832:deletedpage 5457:, whom you 5225:User:SimonP 5170:User:SimonP 3667:and fixing 3348:Violet/Riga 3307:Violet/Riga 3002:violet/riga 2963:violet/riga 2403:"I monitor 1882:Whedonverse 1873:Whedonverse 1743:R = renamed 1590:Tv-bio-stub 961:Good change 851:Talk:Petrol 579:Done. :-) — 506:. Cheers, 484:and is now 38:Hello, and 7620:Brendanfox 7501:disparity? 6836:CITGO vs. 6742:appearance 6719:Any admin 5844:). Yours, 5092:DaveTheRed 3846:describing 2951:Talk pages 2447:Also, the 2238:cleaned up 1942:Wikiquette 1875:entities}} 1710:ST-ep-stub 1076:Radio-stub 626:throes. — 548:Uncle Ed's 183:(or is it 90:help pages 86:Wikipedian 7531:posted a 7529:Craigy144 4945:Netoholic 4840:Netoholic 4798:Netoholic 4608:ID eNTITY 4348:Netoholic 4234:Netoholic 3931:Netoholic 3850:Netoholic 3775:Netoholic 3725:Netoholic 3673:Netoholic 3299:2. I was 3244:Netoholic 3149:Netoholic 3090:Netoholic 2977:remarks). 2759:i'm sorry 2631:Netoholic 2603:Netoholic 2341:Netoholic 2143:Netoholic 2124:Netoholic 2059:Netoholic 1997:Courtland 1983:Netoholic 1976:challenge 1909:Netoholic 1831:Courtland 1801:included? 1756:Corp-stub 1330:tech-stub 1242:Courtland 1210:tech-stub 1186:VideoPlus 1150:Boob tube 1047:Courtland 265:Thanks, 185:organised 181:organized 7607:Lateline 6260:Kbdank71 6194:In your 6022:Kbdank71 6006:Kbdank71 5478:replying 3104:removed. 3027:update). 1862:template 1823:WP:WSS/C 1690:PBS stub 1645:BBC-stub 1580:PBS stub 1540:BBC-stub 1470:BBC-stub 1385:BBC-stub 1038:Cheers. 1029:WP:WSS/C 1025:WP:WSS/C 864:Gasoline 824:Gasoline 759:Pagename 596:Gasoline 486:Gasoline 399:Pagename 241:Gasoline 144:Gasoline 98:Hyacinth 34:Welcome! 6738:appears 6181:again." 5969:Mysidia 5868:and my 5459:thanked 5088:Jkf6030 4617:deleted 4476:Merging 3480:merging 3437:merging 2516:Radiant 1738:N = new 1700:ST-stub 1091:Tv-stub 1068:EdwinHJ 1061:Tv-stub 1008:Tv-stub 985:Tv-stub 941:astique 876:soapbox 800:Yoghurt 787:Yoghurt 744:Yoghurt 304:poor Ed 237:Yoghurt 209:. ;-) 207:Yoghurt 189:Yoghurt 160:Yoghurt 40:welcome 7557:Jsnell 7280:Jsnell 7187:Jsnell 7016:Jsnell 6947:thanks 6734:seldom 6675:adiant 6667:WP:IAR 6650:WP:IAR 6642:WP:IAR 6577:adiant 6524:adiant 6319:Splash 6231:lie.") 6041:page." 5944:SimonP 5902:SimonP 5849:adiant 5787:Splash 5598:Splash 5482:Splash 5455:Splash 5405:Splash 5232:adiant 5177:adiant 4725:Hedley 4648:Hedley 4135:Double 4034:Double 3686:I did 3646:adiant 3584:adiant 3519:adiant 3457:adiant 2918:Double 2265:Double 2220:Double 2189:adiant 2122:). -- 2112:really 2026:Yeah, 1964:people 1178:V-chip 980:About 919:Golbez 897:Teknic 881:Teknic 872:Cheque 847:before 828:Petrol 774:Yogurt 763:hydnjo 748:Yogurt 722:hydnjo 669:hydnjo 643:hydnjo 616:hydnjo 612:Cheers 563:hydnjo 559:WP:RFC 518:hydnjo 508:smoddy 490:hydnjo 467:WP:RFC 403:hydnjo 365:hydnjo 309:hydnjo 267:hydnjo 245:Petrol 233:Yogurt 211:hydnjo 197:hydnjo 193:Cheers 168:Yogurt 148:Petrol 132:hydnjo 107:Allies 7369:you?) 7066:them. 7063:might 6838:Citgo 6822:Welch 6761:looks 6681:|< 6680:: --> 6583:|< 6582:: --> 6567:merge 6530:|< 6529:: --> 6514:merge 6217:Rfa." 6196:reply 5855:|< 5854:: --> 5490:their 5238:|< 5237:: --> 5183:|< 5182:: --> 5100:Alexa 4144:Talk) 4043:Talk) 3773:. -- 3671:. -- 3652:|< 3651:: --> 3590:|< 3589:: --> 3525:|< 3524:: --> 3463:|< 3462:: --> 3355:merge 2927:Talk) 2824:Zpb52 2790:Zpb52 2767:Zpb52 2708:Zpb52 2533:Zpb52 2464:never 2452:split 2339:. -- 2319:split 2302:merge 2274:Talk) 2229:Talk) 2214:tools 2195:|< 2194:: --> 2178:Sikon 2118:(see 1960:issue 1904:every 1190:W-VHS 1182:VHS-C 1158:D-VHS 868:Check 661:State 471:WP:RM 164:hurts 162:. Yog 16:< 7589:Joy 7221:you? 6817:Phil 6732:You 6281:to." 6071:Rfa. 5881:Digg 5820:Digg 5201:Digg 5139:Digg 5096:Wyss 5070:Digg 5030:here 4816:this 4703:. — 4139:Blue 4038:Blue 3979:. — 3485:and 3442:and 3317:and 3274:five 3170:now. 3024:were 2922:Blue 2652:ever 2597:and 2500:Talk 2368:this 2269:Blue 2224:Blue 2157:see 1978:me. 1919:are. 1335:) 1250:very 1170:SCTE 969:. - 929:Yama 892:were 855:Yama 766:talk 746:vs. 725:talk 672:talk 646:talk 619:talk 566:talk 553:and 521:talk 493:talk 469:and 406:talk 368:talk 312:talk 270:talk 214:talk 200:talk 135:talk 113:Nobs 7098:any 7094:not 6923:not 6722:can 6655:DES 6445:Who 6376:Who 6198:to 6159:you 6112:Who 5742:Who 5732:new 5695:not 5559:Who 5499:Who 5484:on 5480:to 5370:Who 5106:'s 5025:was 4994:Who 4950:you 4911:Who 4678:not 4674:not 4594:DES 3811:not 3806:not 3689:not 3346:3. 3320:you 3315:Dan 3311:DES 3302:not 3240:you 3122:two 3005:(t) 2966:(t) 2856:DES 2583:): 2511:was 2508:It 2496:Dan 2028:I'm 1927:not 1808:did 1255:far 1142:not 1113:not 778:far 718:you 691:try 614:, 603:few 535:. — 529:RfC 176:urt 172:Yog 170:to 7618:-- 6974:Ed 6707:- 6570:}} 6564:{{ 6517:}} 6511:{{ 6314:my 6011:me 5837:. 5835:}} 5829:{{ 5486:my 4936:)? 4479:}} 4473:{{ 4131:. 4030:. 3579:. 3493:}} 3487:{{ 3483:}} 3477:{{ 3452:? 3450:}} 3444:{{ 3440:}} 3434:{{ 3358:}} 3352:{{ 3313:, 3309:, 2498:| 2455:}} 2449:{{ 2407:." 2322:}} 2316:{{ 2309:my 2305:}} 2299:{{ 2088:me 2055:am 2053:I 1860:}} 1854:{{ 1829:. 1791:}} 1785:{{ 1771:}} 1765:{{ 1761:: 1759:}} 1753:{{ 1733:}} 1727:{{ 1723:}} 1717:{{ 1713:}} 1707:{{ 1703:}} 1697:{{ 1693:}} 1687:{{ 1683:}} 1677:{{ 1673:}} 1667:{{ 1658:}} 1652:{{ 1648:}} 1642:{{ 1638:}} 1632:{{ 1623:}} 1617:{{ 1608:}} 1602:{{ 1593:}} 1587:{{ 1583:}} 1577:{{ 1573:}} 1567:{{ 1558:}} 1552:{{ 1543:}} 1537:{{ 1533:}} 1527:{{ 1518:}} 1512:{{ 1503:}} 1497:{{ 1488:}} 1482:{{ 1473:}} 1467:{{ 1463:}} 1457:{{ 1448:}} 1442:{{ 1433:}} 1427:{{ 1418:}} 1412:{{ 1403:}} 1397:{{ 1388:}} 1382:{{ 1378:}} 1372:{{ 1363:}} 1357:{{ 1348:}} 1342:{{ 1333:}} 1327:{{ 1323:}} 1317:{{ 1308:}} 1302:{{ 1280:}} 1274:{{ 1270:}} 1264:{{ 1213:}} 1207:{{ 1203:}} 1197:{{ 1188:, 1184:, 1180:, 1176:, 1172:, 1168:, 1164:, 1160:, 1156:, 1152:, 1133:}} 1127:{{ 1123:}} 1117:{{ 1104:}} 1098:{{ 1094:}} 1088:{{ 1079:}} 1073:{{ 1064:}} 1058:{{ 1031:. 1021:}} 1015:{{ 1011:}} 1005:{{ 1001:}} 995:{{ 988:}} 982:{{ 639:do 7647:) 7448:. 7418:. 6678:_ 6672:R 6580:_ 6574:R 6527:_ 6521:R 6455:? 6452:¿ 6449:? 6441:∞ 6429:— 6386:? 6383:¿ 6380:? 6372:∞ 6333:" 6278:" 6243:" 6214:" 6178:" 6137:" 6122:? 6119:¿ 6116:? 6108:∞ 5852:_ 5846:R 5752:? 5749:¿ 5746:? 5738:∞ 5569:? 5566:¿ 5563:? 5555:∞ 5509:? 5506:¿ 5503:? 5495:∞ 5438:" 5434:" 5415:" 5392:" 5380:? 5377:¿ 5374:? 5366:∞ 5333:" 5305:" 5301:" 5235:_ 5229:R 5180:_ 5174:R 5032:. 5004:? 5001:¿ 4998:? 4990:∞ 4921:? 4918:¿ 4915:? 4907:∞ 4843:@ 4801:@ 4783:— 4412:. 4351:@ 4287:— 4237:@ 4142:( 4041:( 3934:@ 3853:@ 3778:@ 3728:@ 3676:@ 3649:_ 3643:R 3587:_ 3581:R 3522:_ 3516:R 3460:_ 3454:R 3406:— 3247:@ 3215:— 3152:@ 3132:— 3093:@ 2925:( 2634:@ 2615:— 2606:@ 2549:— 2370:? 2344:@ 2272:( 2227:( 2192:_ 2186:R 2146:@ 2127:@ 2101:— 1986:@ 1912:@ 1887:— 1663:R 1628:R 1613:N 1598:R 1563:N 1548:N 1523:N 1508:N 1493:N 1478:N 1453:N 1438:N 1423:R 1408:N 1393:N 1368:N 1353:N 1338:N 1313:N 1298:R 1282:. 1220:— 945:▼ 939:ℬ 826:/ 243:/ 235:/ 174:h 151:— 80:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index