User talk:CurryTime7-24/Archive 1

5909: 6805: 4814:. I could go to the talk page - as for Sibelius and Cosima W. - but wouldn't, as for Solti (who was on the Main page, and I just failed to check who the authors were. I did for Schnittke, and saw none of the rather few who still have strong feelings against a little box). - I really wonder what could lead to peace on the topic. From what I've seen: if everybody just left feelings behind and edited normally per BRD, all could be fine. I make a bold edit, I'm reverted, I accept that or discuss - it could be rather easy. A little grain of " 5194: 4933: 5330: 6056: 5468: 5851: 1605: 202: 5537: 1948:, you don't take a hint, do you? I was willing to give you a lot of leeway and not block you for a series of quite poor edits that I have just been going through, but, after seeing this post here (which I view as wiki-hounding), I have now just blocked you from editing for a short period. If you do not improve your approach to editing, I will extend this for any further infringements of our policies. You were warned; you continued, and you have inevitably been blocked. 3638: 2839: 1195: 1259: 2881:

Background: I told N and the world several times that I am short for time due to joy in real life. I postponed a RD (Peter Fleischmann) for so many days now that his death is no longer recent. I want to improve him still enough for DYK, feeling obliged after my first intention to bring him to RD. That will take most of the time I have today. After that: I'll look for ALTs to the rescue if still neccessary. I hate spending any time on useless discussions about

4503: 3099: 1935: 1390: 811: 679: 606: 533: 460: 2200: 7155: 6703: 6603: 6369: 6284: 5758: 5675: 5383: 5244: 4843: 4381: 4287: 4115: 3702: 3540: 3414: 3187: 2628: 2501: 2413: 2325: 1803: 1681: 1510: 2977:. I created this and other stubs on a large number of easy listening albums last year -- albums that were among the most popular of their day but which have been neglected by Wikipedians as they seem to be no longer appreciated by modern tastes. I have memories of many of these albums being played by my dad on his very "high tech" hi fi system in the 1960s. I enjoyed learning more about this one from your rewrite. Cheers. 4712: 4469: 4248: 4210: 3375: 2272: 7119: 1124: 5971:

infoboxes are substantial, well-considered, and merit being heard. Out of respect for their views, I firmly believe that the inclusion of infoboxes ought to be debated on a case-by-case basis. If consensus favors including them, great. If not, great. Ideally, there would be a project-wide RfC to decide this issue once and for all. —

5128:

difficult (months of waiting as one's packages traveled along the most bafflingly circuitous and unlikely shipping routes ever dreamed of); now it's pretty much impossible. Still, I'm hoping something turns up. When I'm finally done, the article will probably be around 5 times larger than where we started.

3314:

IPs) who wanted the article to reflect darker aspects of the theories which are either largely speculative or not reported in reliable sources, which was maybe another reason I didn't take so well to your edit summaries). And in retrospect that stuff about the Cecil's past is less relevant today, as well.

6023:. I seem to recall that the liner notes for some of the CD reissues of his EMI Brahms cycle mention his wife as well (who died in the middle of the recording sessions). Maybe one of the Testament liner notes also mentions. Have to look on my shelves. At the moment, I'm finishing up a vast expansion of 5989:

to be, and "inviting trivia" which isn't any more dangerous for infoboxes than other material, and needs to be dealt with. The ratio of debate to what is debated - often just additional five lines - is saddening, and to have the same arguments article after article hasn't improved editor relations. -

3313:

more recentist and made more sense to have in the article back in 2014 when it was less of a settled issue that her death was an accident (which, for the record, is what I believe now as well as the official conclusion ... I have made a lot of reverts to the article over the years of editors (usually

5131:

My only wish is for more time, or better put, two or three lives to do everything I want to do. After family, work, concerts, etc., what little time I have left practically dissolves the moment I try to grasp it. And then there are a number of new articles I'm planning for the next weeks and months.

2880:

Instead of even more ALTs made in good intentions, you could just approve ALT0d. If you can't do that, you could at least strike support for ALT1. I'd rather withdraw - and possibly leave DYK - than say about a wonderful woman who did a great thing no more than that she was undecided in her youth. -

2726:

A "curveball" is an American idiom derived from baseball whereby a process or device produces a startlingly different outcome than the one expected. And I get where you're coming from, believe me. I also agree with Naruto, however, in that at the very least just a bit of context would fix the issues

1005:

Thanks for being far more patient than I ever could. I too thought they just copy-pasted the lead from the main composer article, and on top of having seen MANY composer work list articles with a simple lead like that (and not at all understanding what the supposed grammatical error was), it's why I

951:

with your points on the Shostakovich article, but that reusing the header from his main article is a bad idea. No other page listing the compositions of a composer does this. What is required is a wholly new header dealing with the cataloging of his music, not his biography. I even encouraged you to

5149:

Well said, especially "she deserves". My impression is that what you collected is already good enough for GA, so without further work and need of time, you could nominate, and see how it goes. The extra from awaited books are for FA then. March is women's month, and to see her with green decoration

2864:

I proposed what I thought the perfectly composed hook: a name which is hooky itself, as saying "I come from somewhere unusual" + "you will not know if I'm a man or woman", then something about the familiar Mozart with the additional concept of "for children", adding sympathy, then the key fact that

6227:

occasionally dipped my Wiki-toes into the Wiki-pool, so to speak. Ideally, this matter with the infoboxes would be decided by a WikiProject Classical Music-wide RfC once and for all. It seems too much to have to fight it out composer by composer; the same arguments, pro et contra, again and again.

2761:

Past midnight, but at least I managed the third DYK nom of the day, sigh. Adding the post-lockdown bit to the article seems problematic to me, because then we would have to add it to all who do some post-lockdown bit, no? Tooo tired for more, so this will be another night I go to bed unhappy about

2710:

Please, what's a "curveball". - Did you ever read that when wording a DYK hook I try to say something that can be said only about that particular subject, not also about thousand others? ... that I want to say something that tells something worth to be known to the millions of Main readers of whom

6973:

CurryTime7-24, will you be returning to this review soon? The nominator responded to your latest comments over a month ago now, though unfortunately they didn't ping you. If you're no longer interested in continuing the review, please ping me and I'll see about getting a new reviewer for it. Many

6242:

Until that once-and-for-all, which was demanded in the 2013 arb case, we will have to use our uncommon sense. I asked in the Sibelius discussion how many more RfCs we'll need to call the infobox wars over. From 2013, many composers got an infobox without previous RfC (which is against Knowledge's

5970:

Thanks for sharing your post abut infoboxes with me. I'm not invested in the debate one way or another, as you may know. Since late 2021 or so I've been including them in all articles that I've newly created or extensively rewritten. That said, I also believe the arguments made by editors against

5127:

I would like to expand the article further. There are a few sources which I have not used yet, more information relating to her biography and career. I'm also working on finding a copy of Sintovskaya's book, but this is proving hard. Importing books and music (or anything) from Russia was already

4588:

I'm still worried about Tchaikovsky. I fear it'll need a huge rewrite at some point—it's just not near the quality of our other composer FAs. Hugely choppy and messy life section (Childhood section is nine paragraphs???); pretty awful and surface-level music section; and barely informative Legacy

7272:

Well, it seems that I deleted the discussion instead of adding an answer. Sorry. By the way, could you explain how to change a title of a page, I'm afraid that I have met some Japanese nationalist-extremist who doesn't want to follow the processes (referring to the Tokkō article.) I am currently

5062:

I was going to bring Pisarenko up with you. Starting tomorrow, I'll be adding any relevant and interesting information about her I can find from Russian sources. However, I would strongly prefer that you please look over my additions and devise your own ALTs from them. It wasn't my intention to

7011:

is weeks late for its QPQ, which should be posted within seven days of nominating, and absolutely must be posted within seven days of a review requesting it. (The request date was in March.) If you don't want your nomination closed, you definitely want to provide a QPQ right away. Thank you.

3317:

I am also glad we seem to have been able to meet halfway on the lede phrasing ... I have insisted for years that it makes BLP1E work better if, when an article is not about an individual person, especially one not notable enough for their own article, but an event (usually their death or

3950:

Your edit summaries do not make me hopeful for understanding and respect on this point, but maybe you will surprise me. It is moot anyway. Although the history of colonial Chōsen (especially its musical and popular culture) is one of my areas of professional expertise, the belligerence,

545:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3876:

Between 1910–1945, Korea was an internationally recognized legal constituent of Japan. Because of this, Japanese readings of place names were promulgated and recognized for official international use during this period, although a few endured in popular use as late as the 1950s (e.g.

691:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

618:

952:

write one yourself and provided a number of links to other composition list articles for you to use as models. Please, if you'd like to rewrite that section in such a way that would be relevant to the article at hand, I strongly encourage you to do so, and would be glad if you did.

3352:

My friend, it’s OK. If anything, I apologize and hope that you don’t hold it against me in the future. You did tremendous work on that Elisa Lam article and I’m honored that my contributions are useful enough to stand with yours. Thank you very much for your kind message.

6926:

Fortunately, I had a little extra time on my hands to work on it. As I've said, I'd like to do more for Schoenberg and Webern, but I only have so much time! As it is, I'm behind schedule, so to speak, on my newest article (non-musical this time). Currently listening to

1900:, it’s fine. Just please understand that my use of citation templates forced that issue on me. Had you just told me politely what the matter was, I would’ve gladly fixed it. Had no idea until I looked at the diffs closely. Your edit summaries didn’t make it clear. — 6150:

came about. God willing, I hope to have time to add more articles for him in the coming year, as well as Webern. I can't sufficiently express how profoundly I love their music. But there is still so much to do and they only give you so much time to do it all... :)

5588:

as I discovered only now! I don't believe that her hook captures how great she was, but that seems to be just old-fashioned me. - My introduction to early 20th-century music was a Webern string quartet (in a youth concert, possibly age 13), which was a revelation.

2160:

Thanks! I’ll get around to it this weekend. I just didn’t want to barge in and knock things around, especially as a lot of good work went into the article in recent days. Thank you so much for allowing this lifelong Shostakovich nerd to collaborate with you! :)

6143:

Thank you, Gerda. I hope you're well wherever you are. Reger... his music, which for a long time made no sense to me, is now very dear to me. And what a lovely title Pärt gave to his work! I'm swimming in Schoenberg's music for work at the moment, which is how

2071:

famous than the great auk, i.e. a reference that explicitly states so, which I suspect would be hard to find (whereas the statement that the dodo "is famous" is trivially apparent from just following the article link, and if necessary very easy to source).

2039:, he asked to have the score back from her (which must’ve been awkward; she seems to have developed what can charitably be put as mixed feelings about her relationship with Shostakovich), which partially explains the extensive quotation of the opera in his 3010:. So it was a pleasure to expand the article. There’s a few more touch-ups I had in mind for it today. Hope you like those too! And, yes, I had a DYK nom in mind too! :D Thank you very kindly for your appreciation. Reading your comments made my week. :) — 472:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

6442:

Hey there! I'm curious to hear your suggestion. The best Fujita hook is her ALT0, which I think would be the most immediately enticing to general readers unfamiliar with classical music. But if there's a better idea, I'm definitely open to them! :)

3997:

article. I presume that when you mention "the latest Schenker quarrel," you mean that on the talk page itself. I fear that reopening the discussion will lead to reopening the quarrel. What I think personally is that the section of the article on

4763:

Please check out the Sibelius talk, where I asked "How many more RfCs do we need to call the infobox wars over? - I asked that a year ago, and I read the discussion again today in honour of his birthday, not without pleasure. Please check also

6004:

I just saw your post for OK, shortly after I put his wife on my to-do-list for next week. Can we do that together? Do you have better sources than the German Knowledge, perhaps? Next plan: the Hungarian who brought him to the Budapest Opera.

2099:—I think you have me mistaken with someone else. The only thing that I changed in the auk article was replacing “L. A.” with Los Angeles. Looking at the auk edit history, the change you’re referring to was not made by me, but by an IP user. — 6090:- on the Main page until yesterday. - A recording session explains why she died in Munich, a place so far not mentioned in the article. Did they live in Budapest when he was at the opera there? Can't see such things in the sources I have. -- 1174: 4023:

And the idea that Schenker's views "have drawn increased scrutiny in the 21st century" is not documented: there is only Ewell's own view and criticism against it. The scrutiny had been more active in the 20th century, despite the idea of

990:

Honestly, I agreed with them: the article needed a new lead. Glad that they served as a catalyst to get that started, if perhaps not in the fashion they intended. Thank you for jumping into that debate and giving your perspective. Very

6551:

On second thought, you could run into objections over "god of the piano" even though it's in scare quotes...we don't say it in wikivoice, etc. Solving for that could mean saying "Leo Sirota, once called the 'god of the piano'".

3297:(Just think about that, and the effect it might have on newer editors). And with that many concerns, it's probably better to bring things up on the talk page first ... that's what I try to do in that sort of situation. 4019:

The quotations from John McWorther and from Kofi Agawu concern another point, Ewell's claim that a hierarchical theory (such as Schenker's) is racist; both authors answer in substance that most musics in the world are

5880:

I disagree with the edit notice for your revert on Prokofiev. There is no "warning template", but a hidden notice. The notice doesn't "warn" or "urge" but request. It's a recommendation, no more, the result of a 2010

4628:

Good to know, and I'm happy to help with Tchik as well (if that wasn't implied). Glad to hear you're still tackling Shostakovich; strange to me how little Taruskin is cited in it. Would be happy to held review in any

1109: 4091:

Oh, hey, no worries! I hope my edit summaries didn't seem jerky. It's hard to convey levity sometimes in one of those. But, like you, I stumbled upon the article and popped in for a bit. Great work, by the way! :) —

2780:. I didn't mean for my input to add to the proverbial tire fire. If it's any help, I added two more ALTs to the DYK which I hope are more agreeable for you. Please get some rest and come back to it in the morning. — 2868:

Comes N saying we should rather say she was undecided when she was young. Well, who wasn't. In this "interesting to a broad readership" there's "interesting". How would that ever be interesting?? GA trying to stay

3308:

that. In the wake of the poorly-received (but still highly rated, which drove up the traffic and edits on the article) Netflix docuseries back in February, I have to admit that a lot of what you took out actually

6384: 415:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4076:— I’m doing my best but it’s a hairy topic. I had no intention to write this but I found the mention of him in the Laning article and it’s escalated! Anyway I appreciate the additional eyes and typing fingers. 4787:

have strong opinions on this issue; my caution on adding them to composer articles was out of deference to them. By all means, though, please feel free to revert me (if you haven't already) and give our boy

5081:

Thank you, - we'll see. DYK and I don't go well together, or should I say one particular reviewer. I'll retire, or strike, whatever it may be called, but those I began I want to get to a good conclusion.

4052:

Hi, do you think that you could add entries to disappeared people lists. I have my hands full with editing and can only do so much at a time. I would be very thankful for any help that you could give me.

141: 3860:

Hello thanks for the invitation to engage politely. Could you explain to me your viewpoint on why using Japanese is appropriate for Korean place names, with supporting materials? I am genuinely curious.

253: 7194: 7008: 6989:

I am interested. I'm sorry about that. Lost track of things and have been grappling with a bunch of problems that arose one after another last week. Please let me get back to the DYK tomorrow (PDT). —

4532:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3126:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1417:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 838:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 703:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 630:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 557:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 484:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 249: 4882: 5567:

Happy birthday to your mother! Hope you had a happy time. :) My own introduction to music was accidental, at age 12 by way of Webern and late Stravinsky. Love at first hearing, believe it or not!

6461:

How about: ...that pianist Fujita Haruko (pictured), who was among the first 19 female students enrolled at the University of Tokyo, was taught by Leo Sirota (pictured), the "god of the piano"?

5625:

Thank you for your greetings. Hope you've been well. Concert life has been active here, but I might be the one person choosing to sit out "The Event" of the season (not a fan of the soloist).

156:! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Knowledge where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 7047:, you can certainly donate a QPQ for Begleitungsmusik zu einer Lichtspielscene, which would satisfy the requirement. (Monster Max already has a QPQ that was completed by the nominator.) 5063:

hijack your DYK; I only added my ALTs because it had been requested of me. I agree that the ones I devised were more about Shostakovich than Pisarenko. Hopefully, what I add will serve

2590:

I noticed you edited Shostakovich so I clicked on your user and saw that you speak Armenian. It was interesting to me to know where you learned because it’s rare. Are you from Armenia?

2364: 6165:

thank you! - sharing impressions from vacation on Madeira 20-30 March, pics now at 24 Mar from the peaks - your double DYK of piano student and teacher pictured today is lovely! - The

1780:

Thank you. And it’s just force of habit. I’m an American and typically write out dates in this fashion. It’s hard to “rewire” myself, but I’m happy to be corrected if needed. (⌒-⌒; ) —

1212: 4548: 3142: 2727:

with some of the ALTs. You and I may know how rare operatic performances are these days (although quickly becoming less rare, admittedly), but most people who can't tell Poulenc from

1433: 854: 719: 646: 573: 500: 3951:

intransigence, and bad-faith of Korean nationalists and Korean pop culture nerds on Knowledge led me to stop contributing any further to articles related to that historical period. —

1303: 5858: 2865:

she conducted a great opera from the 20th century by a conductor with a FA at the opera house of the year 2020. We don't have to say all these things, they can find out by clicking.

1632: 6027:. Now I'm finally getting to his experiences in wartime Japan and postwar America. Hopefully, I'll be finished by Monday (PST), after which I can help out with Johanna Geisler :). 4517: 3112: 1403: 1296: 824: 4783:

It's fine! I honestly have no strong opinion one way or another. If anything, you convinced me to include them invariably in all my new or expanded articles. But a lot of people

2029:! Actually was reading a lot about it last night while working on an article about an unrelated, but chronologically adjacent work of his. He eventually gifted the manuscript to 6869: 5154:

to GA last year, and nothing happened, only DYK discussions ;) - Did you notice that Tchaikovsky is about to have an infobox? Would that prompt action on Schnittke, perhaps? --

7210: 6770: 6670: 6339: 5813: 5726: 5434: 5295: 4898: 1352:

Thanks for letting me stop by! :) You’re right. I guess the way I rationalized the italicization was that Poulenc’s Gloria is a musical work based on, but independent of the

4420: 4261: 1987:. However, I don't want to rub anybody the wrong way if there's a necessity for keeping the opus number in the title. So I apologize if my edit was considered bothersome. -- 7213:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

6773:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

6673:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

6342:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

5816:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

5729:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

5437:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

5298:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

4901:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

6223:

I wouldn't mind one for him at all. I'd add it myself, were it not for how contentious the issue is. Admittedly, this puzzled me at first many years ago, back when I only

4016:

What follows concerns some of the claims made by Ewell, not all of them about Schenker's views – his claim concerning the "whitewashing" does not concern Schenker himself.

1723: 1288: 2143:

Hi, thanks so much for your knowledgeable suggestions on the Shostakovich article. If you're keen to apply those edits yourself, that would be much appreciated I'm sure.

5797: 928:

Your repeated lies about me and my editing have gone way beyond a joke. Get a grip, grow up, stop behaving disruptively, and start by withdrawing your dishonest post at

518: 7204: 5418: 4815: 4725: 2595: 1623: 1154: 5045:, - Enjoy the season! - I wish you plenty of resilience with a reviewer who thinks people unaware of Shostakovich need to be taken into account when making a hook. -- 1656:

Thank you so very much for your kind words. They are sincerely appreciated. I’m glad to collaborate with editors like yourself for the sake of the music we love. :) —

737: 4892: 3866: 3169: 1459: 1217: 235: 4029:

The modern discussion concerning Schenker's views, if any, is mainly about whether his racism was biological or nationalistic, but the section says nothing of that.

880: 664: 591: 3747: 3581: 2230:, thank you kindly for the flowers. Your praise means a lot, especially so coming from an editor whom I admire very much. The flowers are always appreciated! :) -- 341: 288: 3232: 1311: 1284: 1246: 444: 283: 6427:

hooks can be combined into one, which might make them more interesting to the readers. What do you think...? If you don't like the idea I won't insist though.

6243:

principle of everybody can edit anyway). I gave Schnittke an infobox, you reverted, - your turn ;) - He could be in a league with Stravinsky and now Mozart. --

3679:

Thank you for your kind words. Been very busy and my reply was slow, but please know that I did read them. Wonderful music too. More to come soon, hopefully. —

2374: 1468: 389: 336: 131: 3813:

But during those days, his pianism, sharply idiosyncratic and rhythmically impulsive, multi-timbered yet graphically defined, merged in its concentrated form.

1497: 184: 5517: 5499: 2614: 7147: 4575: 4156: 2762:

that nomination which would have been so different if another reviewer had seen it first. It was such a joy, in many respects, to be at the performance! --

2400: 918: 889: 3688: 2950: 2933: 2819: 2805: 2789: 2771: 2756: 2257: 2239: 2185: 2170: 2154: 2052: 2018: 1996: 1909: 1789: 1665: 1094:

would all be compelling reason to keep the article. Removing the article seems to me excessive. A "more citations needed" tag would have been sufficient.

796: 4957: 4753: 4430: 3362: 2919: 2605:

I'm not, but I might be in spirit. :) Honestly, I'm self-taught. I've used books I've found online, my own handmade flash cards, and videos on YouTube. —

2452: 2277: 1372: 744: 1733: 1327: 5807: 5710: 5279: 4835: 4482: 2540: 1957: 1251: 1103: 1090:. The fact that he has a substantial page in that language going back to 2005, as well as an article in Russian, and was designated by his nation as a 215: 6983: 5428: 1774: 1000: 2317: 2130: 2108: 1838: 1015: 961: 7230: 5390: 5251: 4918: 4388: 4294: 3849: 3757: 3591: 3084: 1080: 359: 306: 7274: 7142: 6966: 6323: 4850: 4435:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 4347:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 4241: 4171:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 3972: 3762:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 3596:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 3476:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 3461: 3401: 3388: 3247:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 3242: 3194: 3019: 2678:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 2555:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 2467:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 2379:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 2312: 2009:

of adding the Op. number was. Funny: I have a Shostakovitsch work on the German Main page today and tomorrow - they keep there DYK for 48 hours. --

1549: 968: 140: 3673: 3655: 6654: 5765: 5682: 4122: 3421: 1853:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 1760: 1738:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 1564:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 1517: 449: 6170: 4166: 355: 302: 4614:

some time in the next couple of months, once I get some time off. After that, I would love to collaborate on doing the same for Tchaikovsky. —

4274: 3268: 2462: 2138: 933: 5720: 5289: 3623: 2550: 1968:

The move of the preludes is ok, but the reasoning is not. I believe that the opus was added to distinguish from the same composer's Op. 87. --

1314:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 6967: 4705: 4332: 4223: 3784: 2635: 1848: 6333: 3834: 3471: 1559: 7162: 6842:

and her story of protest against discrimination by singing on Easter Sunday 9 April 1939 on the Main page yesterday. Impressions of Easter

6754: 6710: 6664: 6610: 6291: 3990: 3027: 3001: 2663: 2488: 1688: 671: 5229: 5216:, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 3870: 1810: 7259: 7088: 5124:

Thank you very much for your kind words. Originally, I had just wanted to make some minimal additions—well, you saw how it turned out. ;)

4342: 3089: 1874: 1619: 1380: 1023: 6796: 6764: 6047: 5900: 5833: 5528: 4924: 4457: 4041: 3947:, etc. My concern is not with utilizing Japanese place names merely for the sake of using them, but with chronicling history accurately. 3629: 3497: 3285:

Having largely developed the article to its present extent since 2014 or so, I was sort of rubbed wrong by some of your edit summaries (

2830: 2673: 2508: 2420: 1585: 241: 6843: 5985:

I am quite willing to listen to well-considered arguments, but those I hear most frequently are "redundant to the lead" which they are

5369: 3960: 2599: 2577: 2332: 1673: 801: 598: 525: 6958: 6944: 6252: 6237: 6218: 6204: 6186: 6160: 6036: 6014: 5999: 5980: 5655: 5637: 5620: 5598: 5579: 5453: 5163: 5144: 5119: 5105: 5091: 5076: 5054: 5032: 5018: 5004: 4990: 4972: 4827: 4805: 4490: 2901: 2720: 1938: 1356:

from the Ordinarium Missæ; therefore italics. But I’ll change them back in a bit. Thank you again and hope to chat with you again! ;)

7187: 7174: 7021: 6998: 6146: 6138: 6120: 5415:

played at the 50th anniversary of his professional debut despite broken ribs and a torn muscle incurred from a fall a few days prior?

5183: 3709: 3547: 776: 369: 316: 263: 6169:

RfC with the non-neutral invitation to fight was closed, and went rather peacefully - what can we learn from it? - I saw today that

3071:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 2286: 1346: 1067:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 6510: 6492: 6470: 6452: 3368: 2875:

Gr tries to help with ALTs, good intentions, but all with flaws, explained. N hovers over the nomination. Joy is leaving the place.

762: 6575: 6561: 6542: 6528: 4236: 2986: 1137:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

7245: 7074: 7056: 7039: 4871: 4862: 4749: 4610:

I agree; it definitely needs some care. Would try a hand at it myself, except that I'm preparing to do a rewrite and clean-up of

2700: 2209: 7122:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5315: 4439:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4351:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4198: 4175:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4101: 3766:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3600:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3480:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3251:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 2682:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 2559:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 2471:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 2383:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 1891: 1857:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 1742:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 1568:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4673: 4655: 4623: 4495: 4373: 3789: 3694: 3532: 3527: 2221: 1977: 394: 230: 6409: 6099: 5961: 5944: 5932: 5894: 5875: 5745: 4963:

Many thanks for your kind words. I am glad that my vast knowledge of otherwise useless trivia can be of use to Knowledge. ;) —

4032:

I could repeat the above in the section that you created, but I fear that the reaction wouth come immediately. Wuddyathink? —

2113:

Oops. You are correct, I seem to inadvertently have undone your edit together with theirs in that revert. Sorry 'bout that! --

362:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 309:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 256:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6359: 4604: 4462: 4062: 3825:

Please pardon the doubt, but I've repeatedly come across quotes that weren't faithful to the source, sometimes laughably so.

3179: 772: 365: 312: 259: 126: 7250:

Thank you very kindly. Coming from you, an editor whose work I've long admired, your compliment is an extraordinary honor. —

6920: 6902: 6881: 6859: 6833: 4640:—some of these SPAs and IPs are crazy! They had been edit warring for years it seems... but both appear somewhat stable now 3980: 1648: 5750: 4571: 4368: 3165: 1478: 1455: 876: 733: 660: 587: 514: 440: 72: 7282: 3346: 5375: 3862: 1983:

Please revert my move if you prefer, I won’t mind. The way I saw it, 24 Preludes seems different enough from 24 Preludes

36: 6690: 5885:

RfC, and in no way binding. The first step to overcome the silly infobox wars is watching language ;) - We can do it. --

1086:

I kindly request that this decision please be reconsidered. My page was a quick translation of highlights from Sonoda's

111: 5561: 4699: 3855: 1337:

Thanks for coming over. Why would you have Gloria with italics? Requiem. Magnificat. These words became English, no? --

427:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

5351: 2992:

Do you object to my nominating the rewrite for DYK? Of course, if you intend to do so yourself, I will defer to you.

1884:

Nothing personal at all, just please don't claim you are keeping date consistency when the dates were inconsistent...

6790: 4436: 4348: 4172: 3763: 3597: 3477: 3290: 3286: 3248: 2679: 2556: 2468: 2405: 2380: 2357: 2344: 2265: 1854: 1739: 1565: 984: 6436: 6129:, who saw the horrors of a world war right when it began in 1914, while others were still in high patriotic moods -- 3075:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

1071:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

941: 6401: 5491: 5217: 4203: 2493: 2285:

is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in

758: 5707:

studied economics, English, and Norwegian at the same time she was studying to become a professional opera singer?

5505: 4777: 4684:

We will have to add Schnittke to our list after Tchaik... I think I might be obsessed with his 1st cello concerto

2089: 1765:

Thank you for another good one. Minor question: why is the date format md, while the composer's article has dm? --

4567: 3161: 1795: 1451: 1307: 1186: 1165: 1111: 872: 729: 656: 583: 510: 436: 3802: 4194: 3619: 3406: 1720:

was said to depict the "private world of modern man against the terrifying machinery of universal destruction"?

1502: 1223: 6886: 5949: 5924: 5643: 3999: 6126: 5544: 4940: 4583: 4107: 3801:

I came across a sentence that as-quoted seems very odd, but might be simply one letter dropped in the quote?

2966: 2300: 2125: 2084: 1150: 750: 346:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

293:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

240:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

57: 7197:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6824:, - I went away from DYK but it's the last one from last year. - The songs are about vacation, continued. -- 6757:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6657:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6326:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5800:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5713:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5421:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5342:

Thank you for helping on the Hammersmith article, it's one of my first articles and I really appreciate it!

5282:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4885:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4423:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4335:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4159:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3750:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3664:(actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! -- 3584:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3464:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3235:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2861:

Some stages of me leaving DYK, as something no longer taking what I'm fired to say, eating my limited time:

2666:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2543:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2455:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2367:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1841:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1726:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1552:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1181:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

6847: 5628:

Work kept me away from Wiki the past month, but now I finally have time to, uh, get back to work here. ;) —

4541: 4037: 3135: 2308: 1426: 1182: 1161: 1006:

reverted. Then they, as you noted, just acted with a very hostile tone which I which I just ignored them.

847: 712: 639: 566: 493: 62: 5038: 3840:

It was a typo. Just checked Moshevish; Bogdanov-Berezhovsky said "emerged." Thank you for catching that! —

1590: 1035:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 7101: 5667: 5236: 4793: 4745: 4553: 4409: 4400: 4252: 3147: 2854:

Understand, and just waking up, so haven't checked if N answered the question if mentioning the pandemic

2040: 1438: 859: 724: 651: 578: 505: 432: 2743: 1283:, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called 7214: 7200: 6774: 6760: 6674: 6660: 6343: 6329: 6079: 5916: 5817: 5803: 5730: 5716: 5608: 5438: 5424: 5299: 5285: 4902: 4888: 4765: 4440: 4426: 4352: 4338: 4176: 4162: 4013:(refered to also in the lead of the article!) are about that and not at all about Schenker's own views. 3767: 3753: 3601: 3587: 3481: 3467: 3252: 3238: 2705: 2683: 2669: 2620: 2560: 2546: 2472: 2458: 2384: 2370: 1915: 1858: 1844: 1743: 1729: 1709: 1700: 1569: 1555: 1292: 7179:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 6727:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 6627:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 6308:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5782:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5699:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5407:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5268:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4867:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4405:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4311:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4139:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4085: 3806: 3726:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3564:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3438:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3211:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2810:

I know... not accurate, to put it mildly. It was just an informal example I came up with on the fly. —

2652:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2525:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2437:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2349:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1827:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1705:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1534:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 7273:

using an Android application which allows less possibilities than using Knowledge on a computer. Thx

7255: 7241: 6994: 6940: 6515:

Instead of "who was among the first", suggest simply saying "one of the first" which is clearer. Cc:

6488: 6448: 6276: 6233: 6200: 6156: 6032: 5976: 5786: 5777: 5633: 5575: 5513: 5365: 5140: 5072: 5042: 5028: 4968: 4801: 4723:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

4669: 4619: 4480:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

4259:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

4221:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

4097: 3956: 3845: 3684: 3661: 3386:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

3358: 3015: 2929: 2907: 2815: 2785: 2752: 2610: 2582: 2245: 2235: 2166: 2104: 2048: 1992: 1905: 1785: 1661: 1099: 996: 957: 749:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

226: 122: 6108: 3337:

Anyway, once again, I did not conduct myself entirely the way I should have, and I am sorry for it.

2361:

as a "trifle, something impromptu", he would later consider it his most important piano composition?

6595: 5411: 5402: 4981:

for RD (just above the other)? - I discovered Tchaikovsky's favourite opera yesterday: exciting! --

4977:

Lovely response ;) - Thank you for the two below, and not trivial to me. - Can you perhaps support

4716: 4058: 3966: 2005:

was ok?? Just the reasoning (that there are not many 24 Preludes Op. 34) didn't seem to grasp what

1332: 1091: 161: 66: 5908: 208: 201: 7138: 7090: 5838: 5347: 4033: 3896: 3327: 3318:

disappearance) that centers around them makes clear from the very beginning that it is about the

2304: 1149:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 39:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 17: 7007:

Thanks for your quick response. There's an even more important issue at DYK: your nomination at

5360:

You're welcome! Glad I could help with your wonderful article. And that curry looks delish! :) —

7267: 6954: 6916: 6898: 6877: 6855: 6829: 6557: 6524: 6248: 6214: 6182: 6134: 6116: 6095: 6010: 5995: 5957: 5940: 5890: 5871: 5651: 5616: 5594: 5557: 5159: 5115: 5101: 5087: 5050: 5014: 5000: 4986: 4953: 4823: 4773: 4730: 4279: 4002:

is not about what is claimed in its title, rather about the dispute between Ewell and the JSS:

3971:

FYI There is more discussion on the Talk page of the Schenker article about Schenker and race.

3739: 3721: 3669: 3651: 3573: 3559: 3036: 3028: 2946: 2915: 2897: 2801: 2767: 2716: 2253: 2217: 2181: 2150: 2014: 1973: 1929: 1888: 1770: 1644: 1368: 1353: 1342: 94:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 43: 32: 6083: 2938: 2737: 2067:

If you really need that explained: because "more famous" requires some proof that the dodo is

7167: 7052: 7017: 6979: 6812: 6715: 6695: 6615: 6296: 6063: 5770: 5687: 5395: 5256: 5132:

But I hope to return and give Galina Alexeyevna the final topping off she deserves by spring.

4855: 4729:

and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

4529: 4486:

and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

4393: 4299: 4265:

and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

4227:

and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

4127: 3920: 3714: 3552: 3523: 3426: 3397: 3342: 3224: 3206: 3199: 3123: 2973: 2910:, including that the author dedicated a summer story to a license plate number ;) - enjoy! -- 2640: 2513: 2425: 2337: 1815: 1693: 1522: 1414: 1032: 1024: 895: 835: 700: 627: 554: 481: 87: 79: 5482:

Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023!

2735:

is intrinsically notable. If you made an ALT that said something to the effect of "... that

1265:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

7237: 6397: 5509: 5311: 5203: 4540:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4364: 4047: 3566:... that one music critic said that despite being "noisy, banal, fundamentally insincere", 3502: 3493: 3264: 3134:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3064: 2484: 2396: 2025: 1953: 1879: 1870: 1581: 1425:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1146: 1060: 846:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 766: 711:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 638:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 565:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 492:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 423:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 222: 83: 6177:

in 2014, edit summary "risk" - should it still be a risk in 2023 to follow his example? --

2885:

for DYK hooks. When I composed a nice menu, I don't want to hear "but they want a burger."

1835:

is considered one of the founders of Bulgaria's modern professional musical establishment?

8: 7278: 7070: 7035: 6890: 6736: 6636: 6571: 6538: 6506: 6466: 6432: 6355: 5829: 5585: 4611: 4414: 4314: 4054: 3976: 3798: 3790: 3733: 3567: 3515: 2591: 2352: 2190: 1963: 1076: 428: 95: 5570:

Hope to get back to work on articles soon, but real life has been busy this week. Oof! —

3928: 769:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 7251: 7134: 7129: 7105: 7094: 6990: 6936: 6804: 6484: 6444: 6229: 6196: 6152: 6028: 5972: 5742: 5629: 5571: 5450: 5361: 5343: 5211: 5185: 5136: 5068: 5024: 4964: 4797: 4665: 4615: 4326: 4188: 4148: 4134: 4093: 3986: 3952: 3841: 3680: 3613: 3509: 3354: 3323: 3279: 3080: 3011: 2925: 2811: 2781: 2748: 2606: 2528: 2231: 2162: 2100: 2044: 2030: 1988: 1920:

This is a last warning, if you continues your odd behaviour, you force me to make some

1901: 1781: 1657: 1095: 992: 977: 953: 947:

I'm unsure why you're behaving so belligerently. As I've stated repeatedly, I actually

168: 153: 152:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge. Please join other people who edit Knowledge at 118: 107: 48: 7182: 6950: 6912: 6894: 6873: 6851: 6825: 6553: 6520: 6498: 6244: 6210: 6178: 6130: 6112: 6091: 6087: 6006: 5991: 5953: 5936: 5886: 5867: 5647: 5612: 5590: 5553: 5487: 5458: 5155: 5111: 5097: 5083: 5046: 5010: 4996: 4982: 4949: 4914: 4819: 4769: 4720: 4511: 4477: 4453: 4256: 4232: 4218: 3994: 3780: 3665: 3647: 3383: 3106: 2942: 2911: 2893: 2797: 2777: 2763: 2712: 2696: 2573: 2441: 2432: 2282: 2249: 2227: 2213: 2177: 2146: 2121: 2080: 2010: 1969: 1945: 1925: 1897: 1885: 1766: 1756: 1640: 1493: 1397: 1364: 1338: 1242: 1011: 937: 914: 818: 792: 783:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

754: 687: 614: 541: 468: 450: 404: 395: 385: 376:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

332: 323:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

279: 270:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

180: 3392:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

2445:

said she found in dying was the hope of being reunited with her uncle, the composer

7125: 7062: 7048: 7027: 7013: 6975: 6865: 6821: 6414: 6317: 5791: 5703: 5694: 5522: 5276:

told friends that "what matters most is what you are, not who your ancestors were"?

5272: 5263: 5225: 5193: 4876: 4789: 4637: 4560: 4525: 4487: 4473: 4142: 4081: 3989:, I didn't really understand the purpose of the new section that you opened on the 3936: 3878: 3830: 3519: 3393: 3338: 3154: 3119: 2533: 2520: 2289:. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with 2035: 2033:, I think sometime in the late 1940s. In 1974, after the successful revival of the 1714: 1543: 1445: 1410: 1323: 866: 831: 696: 623: 550: 477: 424: 408: 195: 26: 5023:

Thank you. I'm hoping that Chirstmastide has brought you lots of joy too so far! —

4632:

On a different note, I was happy to see your name appear in the edit histories of

1546:

described his future wife as "just some girl who wants me to read her bad poetry"?

7226: 7113: 6839: 6786: 6686: 6393: 5604: 5329: 5307: 5151: 4692: 4661: 4648: 4597: 4360: 4153:

has been called "Kremlin music" and "Stalinist era kitsch at its most egregious"?

3489: 3451: 3273: 3260: 2997: 2982: 2480: 2446: 2392: 1949: 1866: 1831: 1822: 1615: 1577: 1207: 1194: 1130: 1115: 1087: 971:

and was impressed by your patient attempts to try to work with the other editor.

347: 294: 157: 5850: 3006:

I happen to be a nut for easy-listening music and have an especial fondness for

1604: 7066: 7044: 7031: 6567: 6548: 6534: 6516: 6502: 6462: 6428: 6351: 6312: 6303: 6104: 5825: 5320: 5110:

More precisely: I believe you could go for GA with it, and possibly even FA. --

4932: 4537: 4270: 3729: 3455: 3442: 3433: 3379: 3218: 3131: 3039:, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 2293: 1611: 1538: 1529: 1474: 1422: 1072: 843: 708: 635: 562: 489: 420: 412: 351: 6055: 5990:

All this isn't a matter of life and death - I just returned from a funeral. --

5467: 7030:

I'm willing to donate QPQs for Monster Max and the other one. Is it allowed?

6731: 6631: 6622: 6420: 5739: 5447: 5150:

then would be quite pleasing for me (and Women in green). I wanted to expand

4978: 4811: 4533: 4184: 3940: 3912: 3900: 3892: 3888: 3817:

I can't find the quoted book online but I have got to believe it really said

3609: 3304:

on the right track anyway. A lot of what you removed and minimized, well ...

3294: 3214: 3127: 3076: 3072: 1636: 1418: 1068: 972: 923: 899: 839: 704: 631: 558: 485: 416: 103: 1359:

Thank you! Musical talk today, birthday of a soprano singer who plays bass (

1160:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

7195:

Template:Did you know nominations/Begleitungsmusik zu einer Lichtspielscene

7109: 7009:

Template:Did you know nominations/Begleitungsmusik zu einer Lichtspielscene

6932: 6405: 6192: 6174: 5928: 5483: 4910: 4449: 4228: 4073: 3776: 3447: 3331: 3050: 3044: 3040: 2858:

in the little room we have in a hook improved the hook. (I don't think so.)

2692: 2569: 2115: 2096: 2074: 1752: 1489: 1485: 1238: 1234: 1046: 1040: 1036: 1007: 929: 910: 906: 788: 784: 381: 377: 328: 324: 298: 275: 271: 245: 176: 98:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place 53: 3904: 6928: 5536: 5221: 4883:

Template:Did you know nominations/Concerto for Piano and String Orchestra

4758: 4633: 4320: 4306: 4214: 4077: 3826: 3060: 3056: 2062: 1319: 1056: 1052: 5067:. She was more than a decoration embroidered into the lives of others. — 4544:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3138:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1429:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1258: 1164:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

850:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

715:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

642:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

569:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

496:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7222: 6782: 6741: 6722: 6682: 6641: 6424: 6316:, a child prodigy called an "absolute genius", was killed in the final 6024: 4687: 4643: 4592: 4521:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3637: 3116:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2993: 2978: 2838: 2656: 2647: 1407:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1280: 1204: 828:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

175:

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood

4417:

was a "manifestation of conformity" that was "better not to remember"?

6383:

Your hook reached 7,532 views (627.7 per hour), making it one of the

4502: 4266: 3932: 3908: 3282:. I had meant to say this yesterday but my real life got in the way. 3098: 1389: 810: 678: 605: 532: 459: 7154: 6872:, thanks to great colleagues. - a few pics added, one day missing -- 6702: 6602: 6368: 6283: 5757: 5674: 5382: 5243: 4842: 4380: 4286: 4114: 3701: 3539: 3413: 3186: 2627: 2500: 2412: 2324: 1802: 1680: 1509: 5584:

Thank you today again for what you added to Pisarenko, and also to

2365:

Template:Did you know nominations/Piano Sonata No. 2 (Shostakovich)

2199: 1193:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

5508:(third paragraph), we may unify the translation and add a ref-. -- 4711: 4468: 4247: 4209: 3374: 3278:

I'm sorry for some of the language I used in my edit summaries on

2271: 4816:

grant each other the presumption that we are acting in good faith

3944: 3326:, even unintentional. (It still galls me that the article is not 2728: 1276: 1227: 1133:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 411:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

5270:... that despite his distinguished family history, musicologist 4557:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3151:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1473:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1442:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1271:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

1222:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

894:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

863:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 6166: 5794:

has been called one of the most depressing pieces ever written?

4547:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

4515:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

3916: 3141:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

1432:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

853:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

718:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

645:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

572:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

499:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

6086:, a Czech who sang German music in Japan. - I loved improving 3744:

were said to have "achieved new levels of ludicrous flattery"?

3110:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2872:

After some debate, N. requests a new reviewer. GA is relieved.

2537:

left behind an unfinished song bidding farewell to his family?

1401:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

4421:

Template:Did you know nominations/March of the Soviet Militia

4067: 3924: 91: 6911:- always disliked that it had no article but was too lazy -- 5952:: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! -- 4948:

Thank you for your great expertise put into this article! --

2660:

is considered the "father of Korea's classical music world"?

1724:

Template:Did you know nominations/Symphony No. 6 (Prokofiev)

1618:, for removing irrelevant and pov things, for improving the 218:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

6195:

recently got an infobox. Change comes, however slowly. :) —

5798:

Template:Did you know nominations/Piano Quintet (Schnittke)

1123: 967:

I just wanted to say that I read through the discussion on

5419:

Template:Did you know nominations/Harvey Shapiro (cellist)

2176:

That's an absolute pleasure man, thank YOU for your input

6019:

I have the two volumes of the Heyworth biography and the

5552:

just my mother's birthday - she introduced me to music --

1171:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

3748:

Template:Did you know nominations/Loyalty (Shostakovich)

3582:

Template:Did you know nominations/October (Shostakovich)

3055:

Information that can't be referenced should be removed (

1051:

Information that can't be referenced should be removed (

822:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

6497:

OK I'll be combining them into that double-hook then. @

6419:

Hi Curry! (One of my favorite dishes btw.) I think the

5096:

What you do expanding the article is just wonderful! --

4528:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3233:

Template:Did you know nominations/Music for Lovers Only

3122:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1477:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1413:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1226:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 898:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 834:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

753:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 699:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

626:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

553:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

480:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

350:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 297:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 244:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 6735:, one of the first 19 female students enrolled at the 6635:, one of the first 19 female students enrolled at the 4664:

may help to cool some heads on the latter article. :)

2001:

I think we have a misunderstanding. Didn't I say that

1622:, - user who "lives for classical music", you are an 7193: