User talk:CurryTime7-24

7462:

broadening it substantially in various ways, e.g., more recently Julian Johnson and Björn Heile, more nascently J. Peter Burkholder and Arnold Whittall, more unfortunately polemically Richard Taruskin. I guess I tend to favor the more recent view, if only because it has the virtue of better connecting things across times, places, camps, and disciplines, and gets beyond structure. Robert P. Morgan considers expression and intention but spends most of his time on the firm ground of structure (understandably so, especially given his context). Anyway, I didn't mean to write this much, and I'm sure you know much of this or more. (And it's always easier to write about it than it is to do it. It would be a huge task. Probably the later one would have to be folded into the prior one somewhat in order for the later one to be updated.)

4467: 4340: 5817: 1493: 4310: 897:

write. In this case, as the photo contest is an important part of Patagon Journal I included a reference about the photo contest in a clearly reliable source (El Mercurio). Again, the photo contest is founded and organized by Patagon Journal so it seems relevant to me that there should be references for that, which, as a project of the magazine, is relevant to the listing...That seems to be what other listings do too when they provide references about aspects of a magazine or other organization's work. So, its not there to be a passing reference, but for their photo contest.

5657: 5924: 6354: 346: 6654: 5034: 6914: 5825: 7175: 4155: 4048: 4303: 4296: 2286: 6158: 969: 5360: 4794: 5538: 2246:- which I missed, I did my Bach cantatas in my corner, not much connected to any group. Of those who were against infoboxes, some died, some left, some are still there. They are the big names writing featured articles, Debussy, Wagner etc. - I don't want personal collision with them, they are also people. But for other articles, we could just use the common sense that a link to the list of works is more informative than a signature ;) - I grant myself only 1RR, so will not revert, same for Schnittke. -- 3950: 3080: 7382: 3894: 3422: 3636: 6110: 22: 6321: 4591: 7408: 7327: 7315: 7303: 7159: 7147: 7067: 6305: 6293: 6281: 6269: 6257: 6209: 6142: 6094: 6077: 6065: 6053: 5970: 5958: 5899: 5887: 5875: 5863: 5794: 5782: 5641: 5629: 5617: 5605: 5593: 5526: 5514: 5502: 5490: 5412: 5347: 4180: 4085: 4073: 4027: 4015: 3881: 3869: 3843: 3822: 3810: 3772: 3532: 3520: 3508: 3496: 3484: 3472: 3460: 3370: 3290: 3278: 2999: 2987: 2968: 2956: 2944: 2854: 2842: 2830: 2818: 2806: 2794: 1042:

America's Test Kitchen, a show that is well known for conducting analysis of recipes to determine the best technique to reach the final dish perfectly" and "Her commitment bringing people together and making a positive impact on society has earned her respect within the culinary world". "Well known" isn't explained or cited, "perfectly" is very subjective; the last passage is simply too promotional. The term "underserved" also needs to be changed per

5439: 2132: 4318: 3989: 6643: 4814: 5697:

here. The last couple weeks I haven't been on at all. Things stabilized with that situation, at least, but I learned today that one of my most cherished musical friends died over the weekend. Losing somebody like that with such a sincere devotion to music, wide erudition, and kind heart really took a lot out of me today. I pray that my friend is now sharing eternity with those great composers and musicians she loved so dearly in life. —

6987: 6898: 6884: 6245: 5913: 5335: 4970: 4956: 4735: 4696: 4682: 4139: 4003: 3857: 3564: 3304: 3064: 3013: 2726: 2715: 2648: 2212: 2193: 1894: 1635: 953: 934: 395: 4527:, where I've assembled some sources and began work on his early life. I don't expect too much from you right now, since you're working on Weinberg and others, but I'll let you know when I've finished the bits I'm familiar with. Feel free to and anything whenever! Once we're done with the bio and music sections, we can discuss a possible subsection about his personality, like the one that was present in the pre-FAC version. 7016: 5997: 6721:

press. In addition, I have a couple of books on him. The problem is that one of the newspaper archives I utilize for research is down at the moment; no word on when service will be restored. Still, I will try to do what I can. Although I don't speak Portuguese, I can understand it well when written/spoken. I'll see if anything good turns up in that language. Is there a timetable for this? —

3785: 648:= The Jerusalem Cinematheque was established in 1974. At its heart lies the Israel Film Archive, which works to collect, preserve, and showcase local cinematic creations from the beginning of Israeli cinema till contemporary works. The Cinematheque screens new Israeli films, classics, unknown works, and is a unique stage for these films and filmmakers. 543:

1 for having had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline. Several other pieces of evidence were included, for instance the subject appearing in the top 20,000 of Elsevier's ranking by citations of ALL scientists (all disciplines) worldwide since 1788. There are 8.8 million scientists in the world today, so this would be in the top 0.24%.

1770:

or general movement within the Church. Then there's "transform the understanding of women's place in the Catholic Church"—what does that mean exactly? When is "early in the new millennium"? The draft lead needs to concisely explain the subject and summarize the corresponding draft body, such as with the article for

6559: 7465:

Maybe the template could be sort of more precisely defined, but that can be where things get difficult (in ways that aren't always as productive as they are needlessly constraining). Maybe the template could be more chronological somehow. Maybe it could qualify composers (e.g., late Falla), but maybe

6735:

Great to hear, and you are free. I knew nothing about the three works, so in the morning just linked No. 1, and from there, there's a link to the other also. Meneses is still on the Main page as I write this, so chances that a few readers see an expansion is higher than without that. If you could add

6382:

and of various opera excerpts, but was not too familiar with his work otherwise. The liner notes from the cited Japanese SACD was the first reissue of those NHK recordings since the LP era. Had to buy it since I enjoy collecting all kinds of odds and ends by musicians who've flown under fame's radar,

3732:

Thank you for sharing Brian Boulton's thoughts with me. Although I opened a Knowledge account in 2012, I used it only very sporadically until 2020. Therefore, I never interacted with Brian, unfortunately, although I see and appreciate his lasting work on the project. He was right about infoboxes and,

2894:

Of course! To clarify what my edit summaries did not, I had nothing against the review itself. My only concern was that its citation for the Sachs entry was not necessary. I should've moved the review to "Further reading", etc. myself, but I've been busy this week and just reverted. I'm sorry for the

2260:

A gem from the long thing: "The question at hand is not whether advice pages are common, but whether a small group of editors can actually require other editors to follow the advice the first group wrote -- not, please note, by explaining why this infobox is inappropriate for this article, but merely

2224:

If you want to revert me, go for it; I won't dispute it. But I wish you worded your edit summary in a less adversarial sort of way. It's not like I was trying to bully that new user. I don't care about infoboxes one way or another; partisans of both sides of this issue seem to make good points to me.

1041:

Thank you for contacting me! Some of the uncited claims I spotted were her birthday and where she went to high school. None of these were cited anywhere, including in the only citation in the "Early life and education" section. As for the PR language, I had in mind the passages, "This is bolstered by

542:

I think that page makes it clear that the draft subject does meet the criteria for academic notability (and that has been independently verified for me). For example, an h-index of 64 and 26,000 citations (reliably and independently evidenced by google scholar page) easily passes the criterion number

7449:

Absolutely no hard feelings! I appreciate it. I'll probably just leave it as-is for now. You are definitely right about Albéniz, and I probably would've gone back and removed him myself in short order. I feel much more comfortable about Falla; there is some much older work that lends support to this

7258:

Perhaps it will help you to know that all it takes for the violinist nom is saying if ALT3a works or not. It is the only possibility that works for me. The one who stuck it pinged Launchballer to perform that tasks, but I see no reason why not anybody could do it. Something cute and tangential works

6720:

I would absolutely add to the Villa-Lobos concerto for sure. He was a frequent guest here in Southern California and, as a result, was often programmed here in the immediate postwar decades. It's possible that it may have been among the works played here and, consequently, written about in the local

5696:

It's been a difficult few weeks. I may have mentioned this to you, but a family member had a severe medical emergency earlier this year, which resulted in drastic changes to their life. We've been trying to help out here and the situation was such that I did not have as much time as I'd like to edit

4881:

Just wanted to let you know that I did see your message and haven't forgotten about our boy! Right now, I'm neck deep in Weinberg. Good progress so far, but I'm still maybe 30% or 40% away from completion, at which point it will be an entirely new article. Kind of waded into that one by accident. It

4360:

That the article has been mostly stable doesn't mean that it's not sub-standard and in need of work. I'm not a Tsvetayeva expert and only came across her article because of a related article I had created about a late Shostakovich setting of some of her poetry. Upon reading her article, I identified

660:

is an independent daily newspaper with a broadly liberal outlook both on domestic issues and on international affairs. It has a journalistic staff of some 330 reporters, writers and editors. The paper is perhaps best known for its Op-ed page, where its senior columnists - among them some of Israel's

410:

Understood. It was because of the points that you bring up that my inclination was to accept the draft. However, the possibility of a merge persuaded me to leave a comment instead. An eventual reviewer may disagree with it. If one does not come forward in the next few weeks, please let me know and I

4924:

thing I work on because per the MOS it is a summation of everything that will succeed it. In order for me to fix the lead, I need to complete the article body. Now I'm not sure what you thought I was up to with Weinberg, but it isn't hard to see my work, whether in creating or improving articles; a

4192:

Just to be on the safe side, I think it would be best to avoid adding the kind of "See also" you're proposing, whether for one nationality or the other. As you can see on the talk page and article edit history, there is an ongoing and sometimes acrimonious debate about the subject's nationality. At

2044:

Your kind words are appreciated, but "honored" is too big a word; I'm just some dork on the internet. Let me take a look at your draft again some time Friday (tomorrow is a busy day). The review can't be removed; it's supposed to remain there as a record. You've made good progress on improving your

1769:

was a call, early in the new millennium, to transform the understanding of women's place in the Catholic Church." "Call" is vague; it confused me because I wasn't sure if the manifesto in question referred to an actual religio-political tract, treatise, pamphlet, etc. or was the name of a symposium

1759:

Thank you for your patience. My concern with tone had to do with the wording and phrasing used in the article, which doesn't read like an objective and encyclopedic description, but is promotional in intent. You might not be aware of that and that's OK. Sometimes it's hard to notice these things up

514:

My choice to "decline" isn't final insofar as it terminates the possibility of this draft making it to mainspace. It is possible that the draft can be accepted, whether by me or another reviewer, provided that improvements are made in response to the concerns in the review. I strongly encourage you

6678:

Gerda, thank you kindly for mentioning me among the contributors that got Meneses into ITN. I didn't do very much; just minor touch-ups to the heavy lifting done by other editors. Glad to be thought of in good company, nonetheless! Sorry for not replying to you sooner. Work (writing and conducting

4479:

From Igor and I, here's to 2024! Thank you so much for the guidance you've given me this year- I've grown as an editor and writer in great ways, and you've helped this happen. Life has gotten in the way of me starting work on Stravinsky's article, and I do apologize for the extreme delay, but I've

3740:

Awhile ago, a television actress from long ago came up in conversation with a friend and we were debating who one of their spouses were. A few seconds later, we were on Knowledge and found our answer in her article's infobox. It was a small, but personally valuable experience that demonstrated how

1257:

A lot of the prose in the draft reads like promotional material. For example: "His wit, clever wordplay, and willingness to engage with controversial topics are notable characteristics of his comedy." This is a very subjective statement. If somebody or some media outlet said such a thing about the

1099:

Ah... I see that the website, e-mail domain names, and magazine cover all refer to the "Portland Monthly", but the parent company is called "Portland Magazine". Without being able to see a print version for myself, I can't say how its masthead differs from the online version, but I think it can be

7461:

Overall, I honestly kind of think that the modernism and contemporary music articles are a bit dated, maybe vaguely pre-1980s/1990s (about when Schoenberg dips and Stravinsky rises) in their musicology (especially the Dahlhaus), and need some work first. There's been some great work on modernism,

5711:

Thank you for sharing personal grief and joy, and it matches the music around death and life that Bach perhaps captured deaper than any other. These days, I had the sad record of three articles among those who recently died on the Main page at the same time, including giants as Pollini and Eötvös

2341:

Not without amusement I saw - after the weddings - that I told you (everybody, in the Classical music discussion) that the hidden notices are not binding on 9 March. I suggest you - neutral! - now raise the question about the parameters there, not in an rfc for just one composer. I'd go for DOB,

896:

Hello, thanks for your reply. I'm a professional writer, and I studied closely how other such listings have been done in Knowledge for magazines. Nearly all of them include info about what they do, giving references that provide further background from reliable sources about the things they do or

3389:

is to not only provide a catalog of all his documented creative work, but to also explain when he started personally cataloguing his music, and why his numbering is messed up, for lack of a better term. It would also include information about his creative process: how he tried ideas out first by

740:

My friend, please understand that I am not some bot who reviews and accepts articles upon your command "ASAP". I have a busy life outside of Knowledge, especially this week. Furthermore, I stated and explained my reasons for rejection. You are welcome to disagree with them and improve your draft

4562:

This is great news! Please bear with me for a little bit, because what I had originally intended as some minor clean-up at the Weinberg page has turned into an ongoing massive rewrite. I also had been too optimistic in my estimate for when that would be completed. On December 31, I had thought

3396:

What keeps me from realizing these ideas is free time, or lack thereof, I should say. Even when I have some, there are other new topics which do not exist here that I tend to give priority to before helping to improve existing articles. So believe me, your offer to collaborate is very welcome.

4928:

When you removed the template, it seemed to me that it was the latest in your pattern of inexplicable hostility to me. If I'm wrong, I apologize sincerely. However, if you have a concern in the future with what I'm doing at the Weinberg article (or anywhere), by all means please let me know,

817:

You're right. I wasn't totally familiar with the Knowledge conventions on this. Typically I've used the D. Kern Holoman writing guide, which differs a bit. And I also based the italicization of the title based on the books by Laurel Fay and Sofia Khentova. But please go ahead and revert.

3096:

I met Walter Arlen in 2010. We talked about music in Los Angeles during the mid-20th century. Incredible to think that he lived for so long and with his mind vibrant and fresh as ever! Reminds me of a mentor of mine who was still alive back in 2010. In his boyhood, he had met both

300:

It's not an adaptation, it's an orchestration. Think of it as a colorization of a black-and-white image. It doesn't change anything otherwise; it's still the same song. And I suppose it could be added, but his is one of many orchestrations made of that song (off the top of my head

5212:

You're welcome. :) I hope to return to more in-depth Wiki-ing about soon, but work and other circumstances have kept me away from making labor-intensive edits. Maybe next week. I have a couple of large-scale projects to help out with, not to mention some more ideas for articles.

1719:

Hi there, it looks like the issues raised in my review will not be addressed by the deadline set, and the GAN will be failed. You seem pretty busy out there in the real world—however, if you get time to sort out the article's remaining issues, I would renominate it. There's a

1340:

Good job on improving the draft! It's on its way, but there are still a few wrinkles that need ironing out. For example, the paragraph that begins "In their formative years..." lacks any citations attesting to the awarding of those prizes. Each one needs to be confirmed by a

401: 1349:

citation is perfect: it is a reputable secondary source that attests to the intrinsic notability of the draft subject, while also being unconnected to it. Which is why the citations from Philadelphia Chamber Music Society and Opus 3 Artists are a problem, on account of

1677:

Thank you!! I'm using them as preparatory work for our collaborative try at bringing Stravinsky's article to FA. There's one more article, a major one, coming this week, maybe as soon as Tuesday (PDT). After that, we should begin to hash out what we need to tackle for

6383:

so to speak. Great sound and really fine playing. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any usable material to further expand the section about his Japanese career. Lot of blog posts in Japanese about him, though, including some from people who heard him conduct in person. —

3610:

No worries! I'm kind of in the same boat myself. :) Thank you for your kind remarks. Popov is a favorite of mine. This is the last of his symphonies not to be recorded. But at least now there's a wiki article for it! ;) Whenever you're ready, let me know. No rush!

3346:

Thank you! Not my usual sort of subject, at least according to my editing history, but I have a great fondness for American television of the 1950s and 1960s, as well as its history. Was surprised that this theme did not have an article, so I gave it my best. :)

5744:

Thank you! I will try today. Please forgive the delay, but a family member has recently been suffering a health crisis that has further taken my attention away from Knowledge. Please hang on just a bit and I'll complete the review. I appreciate your patience.

3109:

in the 1930s; later on he met and worked with countless others. Remarkable people whose destinies brushed against those of men who, to me at least, were starry names in a glittery distant past by the time I discovered music. Nothing but the memories remain...

678:

I urge you to please go back and read the reviewer comments again. Nationality of a subject has nothing to do with its eligibility for Knowledge. What does determine eligibility is significant and sustained coverage, not passing mentions, of the subject from

6736:

a little bit more, I suggest you link to both from Meneses, or only to No. 2 as the more mature work. After that, all is free ;) - I'll go to bed now, and tomorrow focus on the update of the FAC - note to self. I made progress since my last comment here. --

5716:

is worth listening. - It was moving to hear the tenor-only version again that I followed when it happened in 2020, and such an honour that he will sing with us, Bach, in May. The most touching thoughts about music-making together in eternity came from

2756:

There are regional varieties, as well as a style known as keema that is based on Indian curries, rather than traditional Japanese curry, which is a hybrid that somewhat resembles English stew. J-curry and curry pans are kind of an obsession of mine!

882:, do include those too. Citations from other languages are more than OK on the English Knowledge (and, if it helps in this case, Spanish is my native language anyway). You're also more than welcome to resubmit your draft and try another reviewer. — 6221:

My friend, thanks for letting me know! It's been a rough year here. Not in the right head space to make any major edits for awhile, but please know that I'll be cheering you on as you take Stravinsky to FA. Proud of all the good work you do here!

6187:

CurryTime7-24, this nomination has finally been transcluded by someone else. You will need to provide a QPQ right away, since it's over a month late; if it hasn't been provided within seven days, the nomination may be closed. Thank you very much.

7236:, and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. (I didn't even try this year, - I just brought him to OTD instead.) - See 6679:

interviews) has been busy lately. Surprised I was able to time to do some improvements here... and catch up on my reading and listening for my own pleasure! Which cello concerto are we talking about? Warmest from all-too warm Los Angeles! —

4563:

everything would be done by the end of the first week of January; now, it's more likely that work will continue until the end of the month. When I'm done there, expect me to do my part for Igor. Then after, hopefully, we move on to Dmitri! —

507:, the draft subject did not meet the threshold of notability. There were also a number of other problems with the draft. For example, the draft is categorized under "1972 births", but neither a mention of a birth year nor a citation from a 6490:

I'd like to, but I want to avoid any potential COI and self-promo issues. We weren't friends by any means, but I did interview her twice and, as a result, would briefly chat with her occasionally when we crossed paths at local concerts.

2363:

As I mentioned earlier, I get both sides. Thanks to your counseling, however, I include them almost invariably in articles I create (except when they're on the stubby side) because the issue is bound to come up sooner or later, with

5109:

Unfortunately, I only heard Ozawa in concert once, about 20 years ago. At the time, his reception tended to be negative in the US, sometimes very. Hearing him in concert was a personal revelation. I mentioned this a little later to

1842:, for example, does not specifically refer to your draft subject, but a symposium about it. (Incidentally, it further confused me as to what your draft subject was about as it repeatedly mentioned "lectures" rather than a document.) 1239:

If the former, the biographical details need to be properly sourced and cited. (I could find no mention of his birthplace anywhere.) If the latter, this fictional background needs to be explained and, again, properly sourced and

6705:

did a lot of groundwork for his compositions, but I could add a bit already. How about doing the same for the second? Or the Fantasia ... - I found a ref for my FAC which will turn it upside down, - don't tell the reviewers ;)

1075:

OK those are fair... To be honest, I've never had to cite a birthday or high school. However, I'm always learning!. Appreciate your help and I will rewrite the sections, so hopefully get this through. Thank you for the help!

4392: 3442: 3260: 2741: 900:

The Guardian article is also not there to provide a passing reference about Patagon Journal, but the reference is listed after the name "Douglas Tompkins," providing background on that person who has been featured in the

5227:

Just take your time! - The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and

4224: 2385:

The two weddings were great, just - because two on two consecutive days at places with some distance in between - I missed the dances of the couples both times. Pics to come, I promise one cake, the other was too large!

5155:

I'm not surprised, unfortunately. One of the things that motivated me to reengage with Knowledge starting in 2020 was the state of a lot of classical music articles. You did a good thing by helping Ozawa-san out! :)

1421:

I'm not concerned with notability; draft subject probably passes on that account. Rather, the main concern of my review was that the draft was written like a press release, which is unacceptable. Again, please see

4361:

deficiencies, and added templates accordingly. These are useful because they allow other editors to address and rectify any identified problems, such as OR and personal speculation, which this article contains a

1921: 741:

accordingly, but I am not obliged to accept anything just because you feel I should. Four other editors rejected your draft based on similar reasons to mine; feel free to ask any of them to re-review your draft. —

426: 7434:

If you want to revert me, please feel free; I won't contest it. That template, however, could be helped by parameters that strictly define who gets to go in it. Hope there are no hard feelings over my revert. :)

2406:. I like all: topic (should become GA, no?), "hook", connected article (a GA on its way towards FA), image and the music "in the background". Just returned from a weekend of weddings, I also like the spirit ;) -- 2261:

by saying "We, the members of this WikiProject, say infoboxes are evil, and we WP:OWN this article, so you have to follow our rules". WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)" But they did it anyway. --

1138: 464: 567: 1448:

Hi, I'm not associated with the film at all, not sure which parts sound like promotional materials. I've seen the film twice and tried to write a neutral, just facts article. I will go over it again, thanks.

5291:

celebrates a woman's birthday. She sat right in front of me when I took the picture at a lovely concert, celebrating her son's 60th. I thought she was 90 today, - no, 91 already. You can listen, starting at

1808:

Thanks for the prompt reply. I will consider all that and consult the sources you provide. Meanwhile, aside from the tone issues you addressed, what's your concern about the sources? Much appreciated.

5964: 5341: 4174: 3502: 3364: 3284: 4859:

I know and I'm very sorry, truly. In my not-so-very-good defense, I literally had just woken up and didn't have my bearings totally straight yet. Thank you for your understanding and hard work. Cheers!

6794:

You're welcome re. Weinberg. Not done with him yet. Significant work remains to be done. I'm going to try starting on that tomorrow. Once it's finally done, I'll be nominating it first for GA, then FA.

1787:

Although your subsequent edits are steps in the right direction, the draft still needs to be rewritten. Submitted as it stands right now, I would decline; very likely other reviewers would do the same.

455: 2605:, and not worried about my future here but Andy's. - It passed, and I could write the DYK about calling to dance, not battle, and Andy could write the DYK mentioning about peace and reconciliation, - 2225:

The only reason I reverted that user's edit was because I was led to believe there was a project-wide consensus against including infoboxes, unless consensus dictated otherwise at individual articles.

3390:

improvising at the piano, which he notated as rough sketches that he eventually elaborated into final drafts. There would also be information about where surviving manuscripts are known to be stored.

2938: 3132:("stand and sing ...", I sang tenor at the time) the day before my grandfather was buried - a lasting memory. - One of two where I knew pricately that he died before there was an official notice. -- 7203:, for example, utilizes ALTs that barely scrape the surface of its subject (admittedly, a marginal and chimerical work). Readers will learn more if they're enticed by the hook, which function like 3241:, in general a Schnittke supporter, says some surprisingly negative things in his overview of Soviet music. (Then again, he also occasionally has some harsh words for Prokofiev and Shostakovich!) — 7402: 4933:. When you talk to people like they're hanging on hooks here waiting for you, it's not exactly conducive to friendly responses. Criticism is OK, but rudeness does not help. Politeness, please. — 2204: 492:

I get where you're coming from, but please understand that I had no say in how the aforementioned articles made it to mainspace. It is possible that those articles may not have gone through the

7297: 6203: 5952: 5788: 5776: 3766: 3490: 3272: 759:

No no no you misunderstood me. I just wrote I want to resolve this ASAP, not that you should nor was it a command! I hope this is understood. I will continue with it and not bother you again.

661:

leading commentators and analysts - reflect on current events. Haaretz plays an important role in the shaping of public opinion and is read with care in government and decision-making circles.

7388: 7381: 7200: 1776:. The first sentence concisely explains what kind of document it is, what it is about, who wrote it, and when it was published. The lead continues by summarizing the contents of the document 4917:

No kidding. Now you have an idea of how your continued nipping at my heels about the lead—illustrating your point to me in one condescending, excruciating "dad joke" after another—felt like.

7041: 3393:

I'm also contemplating making a related list that would catalog every recording that Shostakovich ever made, including ones documented to have existed at some point, but which are now lost.

2848: 4207:

Hmm...Wasn't Bortkiewicz Polish? or at least his parents/background was Polish and the spirit of his work seems more Polish to me having looked at most of his piano music over the years.

2327:

Thank you so much for the Tarantella below. How fitting, a dance on my brother's wedding day, the one who played in The Firebird. - Please watch my pages and articles - I'm away today. --

988:

I'm currently gathering the needed material in order to give it a go soon. Stravinsky is one of my great loves, particularly his late music, but I tended to shy away from his articles as

7360:

I understand! Also, I just read your discussion about Tom Hull's reviews at WikiProject Jazz and agree with your views on them. So please feel free to revert me on all the articles! :) —

5266:, and the November concert (at a different church) raised a truckload of winter clothes. My story today is also from my life: I heard the singer in 3 of the 4 mentioned musical items. I 667:

is the Tel Aviv International Documentary Film Festival is the largest film festival in the city of Tel Aviv, and the only festival in Israel dedicated exclusively to documentary films.

2154: 1721: 2305:

is played by my brother's orchestra, conducted by two very young men on their way up, - the picture was taken shortly after the invasion of Ukraine began, shortly before they played

1906:

I have a few more articles projected for this year that would fall under WikiProject Women in Red, so I may as well make my participation official. Thank you for the encouragement! —

7259:

for me in some cases, but for someone who recently died I prefer something substantial about their life (and better no DYK than saying that some competition is prestigous), and for

4801: 1121:

Yep, it seems a bit of a mess. It does look like the online copies and the print are consistent, so I suppose that's good. I'll add in that page reference. Thanks for your time!

6022: 4885:

I'm trying to finish Weinberg before travels next week. Once I return in the second week of February, I will begin to help out with Igor. White is solid, although our guy and

4746:

yet? Lovely, lovely music! A friend of mine tipped me off to Ivanovs a couple of years ago. One of the recordings I discovered through him was that Melodiya recording of the

1380:, and cited the prizes in the "in their formative years..." paragraph. Would you consider these sources to be considered for article creation purposes? Appreciate your help! 1213: 2045:

draft, which is why I refrained from reviewing your draft a second time yesterday and left a comment indicating what needed to be polished instead. So please don't stress. —

1959: 3237:

Kremer! Glad he's keeping Schnittke alive. I feel that the international enthusiasm for his music has dimmed since his death. (He is still highly regarded in Russia.) Even

2926: 2914: 2099: 1706: 7084:

Please feel free to revert me if needed. My logic was that this seems to be the only work typically referred to as the "Symphony in C-sharp minor". Compare with Franck's

1845:

If you need further clarification, please keep in mind that I'll be unable to respond promptly until at least early next week. Again, please do feel free to seek help at

3448: 3266: 1251:

would be solid, except that they only mention the subject of the draft in passing. Notability needs to be attested by articles where the draft subject is the main focus.

5141:

Thank you! - It was a surprise how bad the article was. It's better but still not good. - Strange that I don't remember what else was on the program with the Mozart. --

5012:

Thank you, my friend. Real life has been hectic, but after a brief trip that begins today, I'll be back and ready to finish up on Weinberg, then start on Stravinsky! —

2496:

I didn't know that when I wrote it, about nine years ago ;) - It featured prominently in criticising our founder, - if you follow the link for "see?", - or - faster -

1466: 7073: 2655:

Again, thank you very much for this article, in addition to the other Stravinsky works. I've seen your progress on Yekaterina as well, and I'm thoroughly impressed.

2371:

Hope the wedding was fun. It's been hot and humid here in Los Angeles. Like a lizard, I've been trying all week to lay low and find relief under cool, dark places. —

1790:

Please don't be discouraged. My availability is a bit spotty, but it you have further questions, I will try to reply post-haste. I strongly urge you to seek help at

1176: 605: 7309: 7061: 7008: 5869: 4097:

I thought the banner shell rating automatically revised all the ratings. Thanks for letting me know. I'll make sure to remove the separate ratings in the future. —

4079: 3428: 3421: 1950: 511:

confirming it are found in the body of the draft. Some other biographical details are mentioned in the draft, but cited sources are not presented to confirm them.

546:

Perhaps, given this, I should just try to make the presentation more neutral and re-submit for comment/re-evaluation. I am quite happy to ask at the tearoom too.

4208: 2962: 1282:. I would encourage you to contact the other reviewers and see if they'd be willing to offer you more insight into their concerns and, possibly, a solution. — 5555:

You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.

1254:

The book citations lack page numbers and do not adequately convey the context in which the draft subject is mentioned. Page numbers are crucial for reference.

7321: 7153: 7141: 6397:

I heard him conduct in person but I'm not a reliable source ;) - First symphony concert ever for me, he conducted from memory, a Wieniawski Violin Concerto (

6299: 6287: 6275: 6263: 6251: 6136: 6088: 6071: 6059: 6047: 5893: 5881: 5857: 5635: 5623: 5611: 5599: 5587: 5520: 5508: 5496: 5484: 5461: 5406: 4067: 4021: 4009: 3875: 3863: 3837: 3816: 3804: 3526: 3514: 3478: 3466: 2974: 2111: 1608:

from the Bayreuth Festival, close to the scene pictured, - the image (of a woman who can't believe what she has to see) features also on the article talk. --

1794:

and to carefully read over the reviews for your draft. Especially do try and click the links included therein, which contain a lot of helpful information. —

7280:

is about a man who played jazz when it was banned by the Nazis, with a hook to my liking but that was 2017 - you can listen to how they played it later. --

7088:, which is commonly referred to in a similar fashion to Sohy's, despite other famous symphonies in the same key by Beethoven, Bruckner, and Shostakovich. — 7053: 6419: 6034: 5848: 4402: 3454: 2993: 2981: 2950: 2836: 2824: 2812: 2800: 1557: 1167: 1122: 596: 3799: 6476:

I just started it - someone had to. Many helped, especially one who has access to the Washington Post, which meant a big difference. Feel free to add. --

4387: 3900: 3893: 2482:

Thank you for that article. Very interesting! I admit to having a lifelong fondness for Catholic iconography, which seems to intensify the older I get. —

1273:(e.g. "suggesting a reach beyond the conventional entertainment industry"—what is the "conventional entertainment industry" and who is suggesting this?). 905: 6617:

Ah! Got it. Thanks for letting me know. I've been editing here for 12 years and it embarrasses me to admit how much is new to me about this place! :) —

3538: 2975: 2788: 2243: 1450: 77: 1642:

Thank for creating articles on Stravinsky's smaller works, they're definitely worthy of articles and I'm happy to see them featured on the main page!

1886: 1509:

Thank you for your kindness. It's all preparatory work for the coming new attempt to restore the Stravinsky article to FA status. Will be contacting

866:

Your draft as it currently stands is unacceptable for inclusion in mainspace. I strongly encourage you to seek help on how to improve your draft at

6993: 5375: 4234: 1057:. Please don't hesitate to contact me again if you need further clarification and advice. If you haven't yet, do also consider seeking advice from 3179:, who still helps me, five years after he died, per what he said in my darkest time on Knowledge (placed in my edit-notice as a reminder), and by 1430:

and needs to be replaced. If you need help on how to rewrite your draft in a neutral and encyclopedic tone, please don't hesitate to seek help at

3778: 3238: 2497: 2022: 1931: 5577: 5381:

Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Knowledge’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.

4674: 5552:

not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.

5127:

I had heard that Ozawa was in declining health for awhile, so it wasn't a surprise when the news broke, although it is very sad nonetheless. —

2501: 1322:

Hey there! Once you re-submit, the draft can be reviewed by anybody with permission to do so. Since you mentioned it, let me go take a look! —

7210:

Please forgive the delayed reply. It's been over 100°F all week hereabouts (115°F yesterday). I can barely think, much less work... -_____- —

1381: 1337: 1258:

subject, that would be acceptable to include in the draft, so long as the statement is properly quoted and attributed (e.g. According to the

5565:, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the 3219:("company" with a double meaning, but angelic company in the end). - Pictures of the one more day yes, but no others yet, it's a week with 2690:

Your comment really means a lot to me. Thank you and, again, thanks for your everything you do to improve articles on classical music. :) —

1513:

in the next week or so in order to coordinate what needs to be tackled and how. Some more Stravinskyana is on the way this month and next.

843:. Unfortunately, I'm not a podcast person; never have listened to them, so I have no idea how notable the latter's is. Had you cited other 4372:

will take the initiative. If you dispute the usefulness of the templates, I would be glad to discuss this through arbitration or an RfC. —

4111:

Thank you. One day we'll be able to remove all the ratings from separate banners but we're in kind of a transition period now :) — Martin

3830: 1345:. If for whatever reason you can't find sources confirming some of those prizes, just stick to mentioning the ones that do have them. The 1278:

Having poked online briefly to see if I could find any useful sources for this draft, my gut feeling is that the subject may be a case of

5071: 5067: 3653: 3386: 926: 65: 7190: 6669: 6369: 6173: 5939: 5672: 5049: 4829: 3941: 3715: 3627: 3180: 3071: 2277: 1484: 960: 6336: 5545: 4146: 4039: 3920:

I'll get back to it later today. Been busy, unfortunately, then got distracted with creating a new article. Thanks for your patience. —

7420:

Probably Gerhard would be better, also Montsalvatge strictly. Let me know what you think. (Albéniz is more like a Fauré, to be sure.)

5083: 7485: 6505: 5976: 5841: 5800: 5712:

which took a lot of my energy, but at least to a good cause. Today we remember the forth, created by Yoninah - missed much. The RIAS

4962: 2403: 3409: 870:. I also urge you to carefully read over the useful advice included in my decline template. If there is significant coverage of the 241:

The original Russian does not begin with an article. The article "the" is also not included in numerous authoritative sources (e.g.

7395: 3907: 3435: 1579: 1553: 811: 7102:

Oh, duh! My w/l above proved your point for the need of a disambiguator. Sorry for being a nuisance. Reverting myself shortly... —

4925:

handful of these I've managed to get to GA. Hopefully, these are sufficient evidence that I'm not going to be just tooling around.

2054: 7375: 6890: 5467: 4635:

but no ... - thank you for the Armenian composer whose name I find hard to remember, came as a surprise, - good combination with

3296: 2170: 2070: 1222:

Thanks again for your patience! The draft has a number of issues that need to be fixed before it can be accepted into mainspace:

4838:

Enjoy your travels, dear Gerda. I'm leaving in a bit myself and will be away for several days. I can really use this break! :) —

2342:

POB, DOD, POD as a must, list of works also if there is one, and perhaps establish criteria on what else to use. If you look at

985:

Thank you! Again, I think the Stravinsky FAN process could've been handled better; the outcome was unexpected and disappointing.

827: 7369: 6632: 5353: 5088: 4889:

seemed to poke fun at him in private. For what it's worth, White's overview was the first book on the composer I ever read, or

4216: 3981: 3548: 1372:

Thanks for pointing out the COI sources - I have removed them. I've also added additional sources, including references to the

4333: 2904: 2889: 2875: 1516:

What a lovely party! It is heartening to know that such beauty can still thrive in this world. Also, I enjoyed learning about

1443: 1262:, "his wit, clever wordplay, and willingness to engage with controversial topics are notable characteristics of his comedy".). 1085: 1070: 480: 7111: 6231: 6181: 5561:

Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using

5021: 4905: 4781: 4721: 4572: 4557: 3620: 3575:! Apologies on the delay regarding Stravinsky- it may be a couple weeks before I get started, life has gotten busy recently. 3571:

A symphonic article with such quality use of Russian sources? I knew it could've only been one... excellent work here and on

3415: 3356: 2699: 1803: 1745:

Thanks for the revision and getting back to me! Please give me a few hours to reply in full; currently puttering about. :) —

1698: 1367: 1291: 1130: 1116: 7289: 7272: 7253: 7219: 6860: 6846: 6820: 6806: 6789: 6767: 6745: 6730: 6715: 6688: 6533: 6500: 6485: 6471: 6457: 6439: 6410: 6392: 5730: 5706: 5305: 5283: 5253: 5222: 5207: 5193: 5179: 5165: 5150: 5136: 4869: 4847: 4773: 4759: 4630: 4612: 3975: 3929: 3828: 3750: 3727: 3705: 3683: 3665: 3250: 3232: 3206: 3192: 3170: 3141: 3119: 2618: 2589: 2572: 2542: 2513: 2491: 2477: 2451: 2433: 2415: 2380: 2322: 2270: 2255: 2237: 1617: 1595: 1573: 1547: 1529: 1027: 1001: 913: 891: 6754:, and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in 5681:

Dear Gerda, thank you kindly for your messages. They were very cheering to find on my return. Yesterday, I listened to the

5104: 4662: 4648: 3795: 2355: 2336: 2093: 2076: 2038: 2003:. Please read my review comment for more details. If you need help improving your draft, I strongly suggest that you visit 1733: 1627: 1458: 7052:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

6605: 6033:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

5768: 5754: 5371:

is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.

4202: 403: 7498: 7478: 7444: 6197: 4942: 4412: 3543: 2780: 2766: 2084:

I'm sorry. I'm new to the GAN process. Please give me a few hours to fix this. Will be away from my desk most of today. —

992:

took good care of his articles. (His very last edit was in response to one of mine; not sure how to feel about that...) —

708:

I still cannot understand why an awawrd winning director isnt eligible and the sources for that are in the page already.

528: 326: 295: 269: 219: 205: 179: 165: 135: 4381: 3605: 3341: 2685: 2030: 2016: 1672: 420: 6876: 6698: 6626: 5427: 2640: 2120: 1915: 1093: 768: 750: 717: 696: 387: 381: 7348: 6971: 6957: 6758:. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. -- 5263: 1872: 1858: 1818: 1754: 1403: 1389: 1331: 805: 468: 7429: 7131: 7097: 5233: 5007: 3887: 3556: 3050: 2932: 2920: 2594: 2465: 2105: 2077: 1712: 1472: 1316: 1103:

As for whether the eponymous Oregonian periodical needs a disambiguator, that might be a question better answered by

561: 106: 38: 6777: 6378:

You're welcome. Sorry for not replying to you sooner. Been busy here. :/ I've always loved Schüchter's recording of

4123: 4106: 3733:

thanks to you, I've come around to them myself. Partly because there is no use stopping them, but also because they

3220: 476: 5184:

I added at least some operas - silently hoping that someone better in English can add about his conducting style --

2707: 2387: 2185: 496:

process. It is also possible that those articles may be seriously deficient and could potentially be deleted in an

460: 351: 7033:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

6128: 6014:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

4466: 2606: 6979: 6124: 5418: 4394: 4244: 4226: 3995: 3791: 1923: 1140: 735: 569: 446: 428: 289: 199: 159: 100: 4514: 1685:

Your work on that article was impressive and very instructive for me; I was hoping to do what you did there for

363: 4727: 4688: 1941: 519:. My availability is sporadic, but if you have any further questions, please do feel free to contact me here. — 1204:

Please give me a few hours; I'll reply in detail later tonight (PDT). Busy day! Thank you for being patient. —

788:

No, I declined the correct one, but accidentally used the wrong template. My decision to decline was based on

6939: 5721:. I may have told you but good to remember again and again. (follow link In Freundschaft - in friendship). -- 5111: 2556: 1158: 587: 7277: 7225: 6830: 6826: 6773: 6751: 6517: 6513: 6427: 6415: 5288: 5267: 3711: 3652:

It's amazing what you find and how you treat it! - My story today is about an amazing woman (also mentioned

3212: 3149:

is about a great pianist with an unusual career, taking off when he was 50. It's the wedding anniversary of

3146: 2598: 2577: 2552: 2518: 2457: 1583: 1535: 1015: 1007: 7414: 6694: 5947: 5532: 5063: 4348: 4186: 4131: 2421: 2399: 2302: 6780:, - music by 16 composers. In the latest cloudy pictures: a hidden deer, a cat and a blaze of a sunset. -- 5237: 3966:

Thank you for the messages and memorial. Lovely things to read upon my return from Thanksgiving travels. —

3692:

today with a small body and a great voice whose portrayal of a role with different aspects I enjoyed! And

2548: 2456:

done, smiled, smiled less for Cosima W. - One more day uploaded, with a wedding cake - I couldn't resist.

6237: 4524: 3129: 3005: 2066: 1739: 1236:

The draft doesn't make clear whether the subject is a real person or a puppet in the persona of a writer.

945: 472: 404:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Regional_reactions_to_China%27s_maritime_activities_in_the_South_China_Sea

5816: 4339: 3935: 7002: 5689: 5293: 4430: 1975: 782: 254: 5478:

You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

4446: 4309: 3790:

There is a backlog of over 1200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help!

2179:

You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

7186: 6927: 6665: 6365: 6332: 6169: 5985: 5935: 5713: 5668: 5229: 5045: 4825: 4278: 4262: 4212: 4166: 4059: 3849: 3550: 2218: 1492: 1011: 1900: 1358:

one, your draft would be ready for approval. Please let me know if you have any further questions! —

7450:

view of Falla in particular as grasping the modern via France and Stravinsky (e.g., William Austin

6577: 6448:

or improving one is all I can do. Three are on the Main page today, and three others planned ... --

6100: 3106: 2885: 1963: 1192: 1081: 833: 621: 336: 274:

If Shostakovich's is an adaptation, then it can be added as a section as with other song articles.

5583:

Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

5120: 4434: 4368:

I'm not planning an overhaul as, again, I'm not a Tsvetayeva expert. My hope is that somebody who

6445: 5558:

If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.

5327: 4982: 4532: 4489: 4406: 4266: 3580: 3444: 3316: 3262: 3025: 2928: 2916: 2660: 2101: 1971: 1708: 1647: 1468: 1126: 921: 302: 67: 6693:

Thank you! The Meneses story, today's story, just click on story (below the flowers). Tomorrow:

4442: 1955: 85:

Is there another song of the flea? Can it be renamed to just that without the disambiguation?

7285: 7268: 7249: 6904: 6856: 6842: 6816: 6785: 6763: 6741: 6711: 6529: 6481: 6453: 6435: 6406: 5726: 5573: 5301: 5279: 5249: 5203: 5189: 5175: 5146: 5100: 5079: 4875: 4769: 4658: 4644: 4626: 4426: 4274: 3723: 3701: 3661: 3228: 3202: 3188: 3166: 3137: 3056: 2614: 2585: 2568: 2538: 2509: 2473: 2429: 2411: 2351: 2332: 2318: 2266: 2251: 2062: 1729: 1613: 1591: 1569: 1561: 1543: 1180: 1023: 909: 609: 242: 5170:

thank you, that's nice - today I had three among the RD, not at the same time but still ... --

4258: 7182: 6755: 6661: 6361: 6328: 6193: 6165: 5931: 5718: 5664: 5041: 4911: 4821: 4421: 4365:

of (e.g. the entire "Satire" and "Translators" sub-sections, which entirely lack references).

4162: 4091: 4055: 3957: 3670:

I'm glad you like it too, Gerda. I have something else planned for another favorite of mine,

3643: 3216: 3197:

Congratulations to your latest GA! - Did you see who played Chopin's Piano Concerto No. 1? --

3087: 2293: 1586:, describing what I just experienced, pictured. I began the article of the woman in green. -- 1500: 1454: 1188: 976: 642:

is a big site as well and deals with people, movies and digital. you cant pay to be in there.

617: 283: 193: 153: 94: 1172: 601: 6083: 5764: 4253: 2602: 2522: 1605: 1415: 1035: 847:, I would've AGF on the podcasts. However, your other citations are no good. One is from a 119: 6398: 4750:. Its beauty had me practically mouth agape. How is this music not more often performed? — 4712:; they have copies there. Good luck and let me know if I can help with anything else! :) — 317:

also orchestrated it). If another editor wants to add those with citations, they should. —

8: 7494: 7474: 7425: 7354: 7204: 7085: 6811:

click on places (below the pic), - the deer is very hidden, and the cat is grown-up ;) --

6215: 6120: 6042: 5905: 5759:

I'm sorry to hear that; the review can of course wait until you have time. All the best.

5683: 5389: 4948: 4238: 3914: 3020:

Been a while in the queue, so it's nice to finally see it on the front page! Great work!

2881: 2776: 2530: 2395: 2391: 2365: 2000: 1772: 1686: 1354:. If you could find one or two more citations of similar quality and reputability as the 1351: 1230: 1077: 844: 680: 557: 508: 504: 440: 257: 7199:

I will try, but it is difficult to convey so much within the limited parameters of DYK.

5395:

If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider

7436: 7361: 7340: 7211: 7103: 7089: 6949: 6798: 6722: 6680: 6618: 6597: 6492: 6463: 6384: 6223: 5923: 5746: 5738: 5698: 5656: 5396: 5214: 5157: 5128: 5013: 4978: 4934: 4897: 4861: 4839: 4751: 4713: 4604: 4564: 4528: 4485: 4457: 4373: 4325: 4289: 4194: 4098: 3967: 3921: 3742: 3675: 3612: 3576: 3401: 3348: 3312: 3242: 3111: 3021: 2896: 2867: 2758: 2691: 2656: 2483: 2443: 2372: 2229: 2085: 2046: 2026: 2008: 2004: 1999:. The latter can be used, but selectively; the former need to be discarded in favor of 1935: 1907: 1850: 1846: 1835: 1795: 1791: 1746: 1690: 1643: 1521: 1510: 1435: 1431: 1423: 1395: 1359: 1342: 1323: 1283: 1205: 1108: 1104: 1062: 1058: 1010:: a woman caught by the iron curtain (improved with SusunW and GRuban), yesterday: the 993: 883: 819: 797: 756: 742: 723: 702: 688: 520: 516: 412: 373: 318: 306: 261: 250: 211: 171: 127: 71: 6913: 6634: 6524:, should be better, help wanted. - Plenty of music on my parents anniversary day ;) -- 6353: 3098: 1967: 1689:. Hopefully, if you like, we can also work on that article together later this year! — 7281: 7264: 7245: 7036:

Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

6852: 6838: 6812: 6781: 6759: 6737: 6707: 6525: 6477: 6449: 6431: 6430:. If that's not enough my talk offers the chamber music from two amazing concerts. -- 6402: 5722: 5297: 5275: 5245: 5199: 5185: 5171: 5142: 5096: 5075: 4882:

was at the back of my mind to improve that article, but kept putting it off. No more!

4765: 4654: 4640: 4622: 4438: 4033: 3719: 3697: 3657: 3572: 3224: 3198: 3184: 3162: 3133: 2610: 2581: 2564: 2534: 2505: 2469: 2425: 2407: 2347: 2328: 2314: 2262: 2247: 1996: 1777: 1725: 1609: 1587: 1565: 1539: 1279: 1152: 1019: 1006:

Thank you for that. I treat the Stockhausen articles with care in respect for him. -

793: 789: 764: 731: 713: 581: 359: 345: 6653: 5824: 5033: 4270: 7174: 7165: 6967: 6935: 6611: 6189: 5562: 5374:

We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the

4853: 3693: 3397:

Likewise, if you ever need an extra pair of hands, please don't hesitate to ask me.

2533:

in London, only four years after her stage debut in a Mozart opera in Stockholm. --

2439: 2310: 1868: 1814: 1385: 705:, I read it and this is why I detailed a few wesites... maybe you can revisit this? 141: 7030:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

6444:

Just a look at music (on my talk) shows remembrance of three people who died, and

4154: 4047: 3671: 1995:

notable, but the problem is that the draft currently relies on press releases and

1184: 1107:. Whether one is more notable than the other might have something to do with it. — 613: 7124: 6344: 5760: 5271: 5115: 4995: 4709: 4618: 4545: 4502: 4480:

been impressed with your work elsewhere. Best of luck on Weinberg's article- his

3593: 3329: 3154: 3038: 2673: 2464:

who returned to "her place" 9 years ago, and also has aspects of early learning,

1679: 1660: 1601: 1270: 310: 6948:

Thank you, my friend. Glad to do my part to make this place a little nicer! :) —

4893:, I should say. The thing was practically grafted to me in my junior high years! 4793: 3124:

Those memories of Arlen must be great! I fondly remember - on a smaller scale -

2866:

Thanks for letting me know. I posted a reply back at the Schoenberg talk page. —

2285: 1517: 126:. All these settings are unrelated to each other, despite using the same text. — 7490: 7470: 7421: 7260: 7241: 7233: 7078: 7027:

On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.

6834: 6570: 6157: 6116: 5647: 4702: 4118: 3176: 3150: 3102: 2772: 2526: 2461: 2146:

On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

1849:. I can personally attest to their speed in replying and general helpfulness. — 1781: 1427: 1054: 553: 436: 275: 236: 185: 145: 123: 113: 86: 5537: 5453:

On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

5359: 5259: 5241: 4481: 4302: 4295: 3311:

Great to see this on DYK- an interesting hook, and a unique article from you!

1724:, and I'm your article will be picked up by someone, perhaps myself. Regards, 1049:

Bridget Lancaster is definitely a notable subject, so no issues there. But as

968: 726:

Please let me know the status.. I would like to resolve this asap. thank you.

54: 50: 7263:

I also didn't want to mention that he sang in an ecumenical youth choir ;) --

6590: 6521: 6311: 5566: 5549: 5385: 5368: 5002: 4552: 4509: 3689: 3600: 3336: 3045: 2860: 2750: 2680: 2560: 2343: 1824: 1667: 1478: 1050: 1043: 940: 867: 848: 684: 497: 493: 314: 21: 6109: 3949: 2601:, I heard a symphony, with a heavy heart because of the pending decision in 7229: 6509: 6148: 4886: 4636: 4354: 3125: 3079: 2306: 2228:

I had no idea that hidden notices are not binding. So why are they there? —

1373: 1266: 1219: 1148: 760: 727: 709: 577: 355: 6583:

backlog drive, earning you this citation barnstar. Thanks for helping out!

3635: 6963: 6931: 6702: 5092: 4193:

least I would wait out the RfC about this issue before putting it back. —

3674:. None of his works have any articles... that is, until later today. :) — 2420:

I like that she had more clicks than the average TFA! - Again not by me:

1864: 1810: 989: 118:

No, there are at least two other notable settings of that Goethe text by

6008:

On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

5834: 4590: 2740:

Your hook reached 37,390 views (1,557.9 per hour), making it one of the

2309:

Suite, that is, - more detail on my talk. Images reached the day of the

1760:

close, so it's good to have an extra pair of eyes to check these things.

56: 7224:

Nothing to forgive, just take your time. - Today, as you will know, is

7119: 6549: 6423: 6320: 5965:

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

5438: 5342:

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

4175:

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

3503:

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

3365:

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

3285:

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

3128:, who was the first in my life fascinated by Mahler, and who conducted 2939:

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

2559:, in Zürich, with my brother's orchestra) , and succeeded in preparing 2131: 7389:

Template:Did you know nominations/String Quartet No. 16 (Shostakovich)

4317: 3741:

Knowledge is an invaluable tool for "deep" and casual readers alike. —

5687:, as I do every Easter. After mass, we went to go see a screening of 4114: 3988: 3376: 2402:- a first - isn't about an article by me, but by you! For the album: 1377: 6986: 6897: 6883: 6642: 6244: 6011:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

5912: 5334: 4969: 4955: 4734: 4695: 4681: 4138: 4002: 3856: 3563: 3303: 3063: 3012: 2725: 2714: 2647: 2211: 2192: 1893: 1634: 952: 933: 859:, but a photography contest it held), and an irrelevant citation to 394: 6776:

about another of Bach's chorale cantatas, listen, as I listened to

4988: 4920:

Any time I've ever expanded and improved articles, the lead is the

4813: 4538: 4495: 3586: 3322: 3183:. - Latest pics from a weekend in Berlin (one more day to come). -- 3031: 2666: 1653: 52: 7403: