User talk:Centrepull

1582:

influence my writing (for Wiki or anyone else)!!!. The facts are, in short, that at least three Biggles books are inexcusably racist (as reading for modern children, at least) - this needs mentioning (and it is) and the books need "naming" (they are). A good many others have casual remarks about mixed race people being inherently second-rate, especially if the "black side predominates" - this seems to be an airing of Johns' own little pet prejudice and is also petty inexcusable (in any context, actually). On the other hand there are instances of quite an "advanced" attitude for the time that (in the interests of NPOV) must get a mention (and do). Attitudes in a community at a particular time ARE RELEVANT - to say they are not, and there is some kind of absolute standard of racial "non-prejudice" that is utterly timeless and to which all writers past and present must (retrospectively!) follow is in itself highly prejudiced, and is positively vicious in its unfairness (to put it another way, it is every bit as ignorant, stupid and nasty as most other kinds of prejudice). The past is a different country, as a great writer has remarked.

881:(as opposed to a discussion page), is just not the place. The article does already mention the negative racial aspect of some of the Biggles books - as well as some of the aspects (like positive non-white characters) that could have been deeply disturbing and upsetting to a typical 30s racist. I suggest it probably does so quite enough. The question is not a simplistic one - one DOES have to be fair and cover both sides - to do this really well would mean a MUCH londer article, and would leave no room for anything about the books themselves at all. I am not prejudging your intended edits before you write them, I might even be an enthusiastic supporter of what you eventually say. I am just asking you to preserve a sense of proportion - and to keep your own POV in its place. Otherwise what you say is (rightly) almost certain to be promptly reverted. I will now proceed to state my own POV on this question (which would be, very correctly, reverted on the spot if it intruded into a Wiki article, incidentally). 451:

have been added by myself or JeffEspo20 (the other member of the VistaPrint pr team). These changes and edits have been made by independent people who have taken it upon themselves to make the changes. There is nothing on this page that is in any way inaccurate or misleading, and each section is backed up fully by independent articles as sources, including the New York Times and the Boston Globe, which is why I'm confused about your tag. We have also been very up front about our ties to the company with editors and in explaining any changes or edits we have made to the page. I would appreciate a fuller explanation as to why you think VistaPrint's page is any different from any other company page like Staples, OfficeMax, or FedEx in terms of layout and content.

470:

of it is pulled from public documents and statements, as VistaPrint is a public company and is therefore mandated to file results publicly. As for the tone of the article being overly superlative and lacking in other areas, why haven't the people who have made extensive edits to the page addressed this? They are the ones that built it up in the first place. And again I ask you, in what way is this article any different in tone, style, and content than similar ones from Staples, OfficeMax, and FedEx. I would appreciate a little more than your own opinion in this matter - perhaps some facts to back up your previous statements. I can't see how we're differing from other similar pages and topics.

675:

with your comment on the DDD discussion page. First, the term implies a connotation, what is this connotation to you or are you specifically referring too (just to remove any ambiguity)? Second, The occupations you listed are all referenced as DDD occupations. Are there any occupations referenceable as DDD that are not included in the article? Can you elaborate on why this categorization is dependent on the region? Once again, your interest and efforts to improve the content of the article and better define the scope of the terms use academically, commonly and by Non-government Organizations (NGO) are appreciated. (sorry for the red link, it upsets Mostlyharmless)

980:

all kinds of damage to young minds. The is NOT totally unjustified - but it isn't entirely justified either. If you can think of a better way to say this - by all means! On the other hand the Biggles books are not always free from thirties racial attitudes (the period marked the rise of Hitler, and racism DID hit a peak) and this does need to be stated clearly and fairly. I hope I now have the balance about right? I am not entirely happy with the sentence about the very worst of the Biggles books being indefensible (although they are, of course) - again, if you think you have a better, less POV way of putting it then (I'm sure there is one) then let's have it!

1373:

generally considered nonsense by historians. ) From this, I saw the inclusion of scattered "defining" cultural references from particular aspects of culture without any attempt at selecting the true characteristic ones--a method otherwise known as making a linkfarm. Then, there was the overlapping and multi-meaning nature of the terms. and the arguments about just what went where was which--as if there were only one possibility, and as if there were only one definition. As I see it the terms refer to aspects, not the entire cultural background. I never meant that such articles could not be written. I'll comment at the article if I have a chance.

422: 1029:

Catholic heterosexual men, as many of them might already be celibate in line with Catholic doctrine. I certainly can remember reading that gay priests are more likely to remain in the church, as in the past they would not have been able to marry. Perhaps irrelevant, but I believe that there are issues under discussion within the Anglican church also regarding their reliance on gay men as clerics in difficult parishes such as inner-cities that are regarded as unsuitable for families.

1236: 1137: 1070: 7404: 1445: 14989: 14266: 12958: 12261: 12188: 10635: 7308: 4553: 3190: 488:

And when I say releases I mean publicly filed SEC and earnings releases where facts are pulled from, not run of the mill press releases. You'll note that none of the material in the article has been pulled from any press releases (outside of ones we are legallly obligated to provide such as earnings, SEC filings, etc.). We were told early on that they were not considered a legitimate source and followed the guidance appropriately.

1962: 14706: 14386: 13984: 13680: 13384: 13078: 12700: 12397: 11919: 11615: 11334: 11048: 10742: 10355: 10044: 9715: 9345: 8775: 8470: 8159: 7803: 7494: 6982: 6676: 6378: 6066: 5750: 5380: 5066: 4689: 4269: 3963: 3653: 3292: 2920: 2614: 2308: 1645: 891:

than obscuring modern racism, which is sometimes really more subtle, but mostly just "looks" better (to us) because we are so used to it. Leave past racism in the dustbin of history where it belongs - tackle the racism of now head on, rather than dissipating well-intentioned efforts with unfair judgmentalism about people who lived in a totally different world. Just imagine how we might be judged, "forty years on"!--

11301: 11015: 10709: 10322: 10011: 15095: 14690: 14370: 13968: 13664: 13368: 13062: 12684: 12381: 11903: 11599: 11318: 11032: 10726: 10339: 10028: 9699: 9329: 8759: 8454: 8143: 7787: 7478: 6966: 6660: 6362: 6050: 5734: 5364: 5050: 4673: 4257: 3951: 3641: 3280: 2908: 2602: 2296: 1633: 9231: 9068: 15078: 14673: 14353: 13951: 13647: 13351: 13045: 12667: 12364: 11886: 11582: 9682: 9312: 8742: 8437: 8126: 7770: 7461: 6949: 6643: 6345: 6033: 5717: 5347: 5033: 4656: 4240: 3934: 3624: 3263: 2891: 2585: 2279: 1616: 550:{{RFCecon| section=RFC VistaPrint !! reason= I tagged the page as I perceived NPOV issues, extraneous material and unwarranted minimising/omission of well-known ongoing consumer complaints issues. Editors of page are self-admitted PR workers for VistaPrint. As I have limited experience, please help adjudge/convert this page to WKP norms !! time=~~~~~ }} 7423:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 406:"horrified" to DISCOVER that a "site" of various Inc - of the FFNetwork - had "Heisted" two of my (NZ) Company's HAND DRAWN (by me) Colour graphics. I came back here - AND YES... all my "question - comments were "ERAZED" well something mysterious has happened folks. THAT has come back - to bite them - BIG TIME. 2225:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

1339:

I remember the first time she came here to Toronto, the newspaper -- if I remembered which one, I would cite it -- interviewed her, and the interview was all about her hoodie. The clothing style/culture, to my recollection, mattered as much as her music, and she was all about how her clothing defined

1046:

I think I meant abnormal, not non-abnormal. I don't think the inner-city explanation is really enough to explain the whole phenomenon. One interesting theory however is that the priesthood is sectarian by nature, and that homosexual and pederastic groups are also very sectarian. Therefore, since both

674:

Hello, I see this discussion topic is already started. Thank you for your kind words Mostlyharmless, it is nice to read your intuitive comments once again. Centrepull, your interest in the DDD article is welcome, it is nice to have someone to discuss the issues of this topic. I have two notes to make

580:

for some extra-fancy finetuning: the "section=" part of the template is supposed to match the name of the talk-page section where the RfC is to be held - the way you've filled out your template above, the section on the talk page would be called "RFC VistaPrint". that way, when your RfC is listed on

487:

I still see no justification for the claims that you have made or the tag that you put on the article, including the article being too full of superlatives, etc. As you can see we have had some very unbiased contributors to our page and they have done what they felt was necessary to make it neutral.

979:

Preparing for this rewrite I read up on what the political correctness brigade had to say about Biggles (several sources - not just the one I ended up citing) - and "simplistic" is excactly what some of them were - Biggles is completely unreservedly unacceptable in their eyes, and is liable to cause

469:

So I have to ask then based on your previous assertion that we somehow coerced reputable media outlets like the New York Times and the Boston Globe to write positive stories on us, what IS a good source? The fact is that none of the information in the article is in any way inaccurate. In fact most

450:

This page was first created by members of the VistaPrint public relations team (myself included) and we have worked diligently with WKP editors who have closely monitored the page to keep the page very neutral in its content. As you can see by the extensive edits, none of the new content or changes

416:

Those two drawings "publicaly display - Upwards of 9.3x & 10.5 channel "ANALOGUE" suround sound systems... thus BLOWING both Dolby & SRS Labs - clean outa the water. (& Various Inc did it... UNWITTINGLY - for ME). Cheers Various Inc. Thats one huge piece of free advertising. (Keith) QUIX

241:

The Farivar article has been nominated for deletion twice, and obviously has survived both. The last nominaiton wasin August 2005, so it is not too soon to renominate it. However since you are still learning the ropes I'd suggest waiting until you've mastered talk pages. I'd also suggest reading the

627:

Hi there, YEs, you may be right as I have just realized I have uploaded to wikipedia an unknown, alternate cover of the album not to mention i haven't mentioned all the tracks on the articles either, This is due to the fact that when Idownloaded a Bob Marley torrent previously it was incomplete and

245:

I have no special interest in the article. There was a contrhttp://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_image.png Embedded imageoversy about the article that attracted my attention, and I've just been in a maintenance mode. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page once you've figured

1332:

I suppose there were a couple of issues. The original phrasing tended to imply that she was some sort of anomaly, that her choice in dress was some sort of personal and original statement. Straight from East Coast to Lady Sov. I considered that phrasing to be incorrect. She is part and parcel of a

658:

that page. Look at the talk page. The phrase "dirty, dangerous and demeaning" has nothing to do with any of the things mentioned in the article. It is a very specific phrase, probably not notable. My life is too important, and no-one's going to die from being misinformed about this concept. If you

524:

page i've concluded that you're the editor who's trying to request an RfC in the "economy & trade" section - but you've placed the template on the RfC list itself, rather than on the talk page of the article you want the RfC to be about. the result is that no one can see which article they're

997:

My own family is mixed racially - and I am very concerned that well intentioned people often see racism is a thing of the past and either fail to notice current racism, or actually think it is not worth mentioning or tackling. That what I was talking about when I said we'd be better off bothering

890:

It is, alas, NOT the racism of the first half of the last century (or that of the eighteenth or nineteeth centuries for that matter) that we are (or should be) concerned with - but the racism of today. I cannot feel that self righteous posturing about figures of the past has any real effect other

869:

without basis. None the less, I have answered you on the article talk page as follows - please do not take offence, and don't fall into the racist's trap of "labelling" me becaue I am not an exact clone of yourself. Calm down, and be sensible, or you'll end up bashing your head against a wall of

1581:

The problem, as ever, is NPOV. We are all racist about someone, I fear - as an Australian I tend to have negative feelings about Poms and Yanks, especially white ones. The black ones are mostly OK, mind you, but even them... So long as I recognise this nonsense for what it is and don't let it

1028:

number of Irish clerics were homosexual men? I wonder on what grounds you think this. Due to traditional discrimination and disapproval of active homosexuality in Catholic-dominated cultures, I would suspect that more Catholic homosexual men might be willing to accept celibate priesthood than

845:

According to our own article on Discogs, they accept submissions that take effect immediately which would make it equally unreliable as wiki sites that we generally shouldn't cite. I'd add a discog link to the external links section, but cite any reliable references discogs offers directly. -

828:

I'll have to look into the first bit of your response in more detail, but regarding YouTube: it is indeed their responsibility to remove it if it is a copyright violation, but there is a policy that explicitly prohibits linking to material you know to be a copyright violation (I think it was

572:

hello Centrepull - thanks for your note, and i'm glad my instructions made sense to you. the RfC looks better now ... except that normally the template should be put in its own section of the talk page (not at the top), with a brief statement of what the RfC is supposed to resolve, space for

1372:

My main concern with this group of articles was the implication that one particular arrangement was a an accepted standard (the Strauss & Howe scheme-- a scheme which extended to much more than just a set of generations, but was proposed as a multi-century cyclic historical theory, &

1346:

So, as far as citations go, your article is higher profile than the ones I edit. In mine, if I have imperfect sourcing on essentially valid information, I let it sit there since the sourcing may appear spontaneously at some point. Your case is somewhat different since you're dealing with a

405:

Hi - I AM the "KIWI" audiophile (music fanatic) at QUIX - NZ whom entered the discussion page yesterday - on the FFN Various Inc saga... Well - I actually "HAVEn't been to sleep yet - as I did some more research late last night - & in looking for a trademark name of mine - was slightly

12200:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

916:

I was waiting for you to rewrite this section (on the whole - in spite of what I said above - I agree it needed rewriting) - I've inserted a more or less totally new section which may serve as a basis for further discussion, at least! Have a look at it and let me know what you think.

12273:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

876:

Knowledge would cease to exist tomorrow if POV took over. NPOV is a very important concept. Many of us (probably all of us - at least all of us capable of independent thought) have strong opinions on various subjects, but there are (generally) other places to air them - and a Wiki

529:; but again the heart of the error is that the {{RFCecon}} template (filled out per the instructions, of course!) should be placed on the talk page of the article of concern. after you do that, a bot automatically enters the article on the RFC list. hope that helps ... 695:. Please review and continue the conversation as I also agree the issues illustrated by the article are not fully developed or properly represented. It would be nice to articulate the root causation, emotional aspects and meta issues, as well as provide examples. 3584:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 3221:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 961:

I am glad to be mistaken about your feelings about the article - I'm sure on reflection you can understand why I thought you were more "anti-Biggles" than is the case. I am not especially "pro-Biggles" for that matter - it was just a part of my (very distant)

1587:

While there is probably a good case for hacking away at the section, and I will do so a bit later - this section (while I agree it needs to avoid whitewashing over unpleasant facts) also MUST be fair and balanced - nothing to do with sacred moo-moos at all.

10647:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

9286: 1565:

consistently edit the article to present the books in what they see as a better light. Biggles really appears to be a sacred cow to some subjective eyes, and the results are clearly deleterious to the article. I welcome your input in particular here.

9093: 9274: 943:

Thank you for your very detailed reply - I am really (at least for the moment) only interested in the questions you raised in so far making a reasonably accurate and balanced article, so I won't do a complete or detailed reply - just a couple of

400: 833:). YouTube would be responsible for hosting but the person linking it would be responsible for the material's dissemination by giving it a larger audience. That's part of the reason why most YouTube links are not suitable references. - 356: 864:

You are obviously very upset by the Biggles article - I assume you would much rather it (the article) wasn't there at all. We all feel like that about some Wiki articles of course. I admit that (sadly) you comments are not

1560:

I have made comments on the state of the racism section of this article. I thought you might be interested to have a look at some stage. I'm concerned that editors who evidently have no understanding of the definitions of

1303:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our 1204:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our 1296:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

1197:

409:

Today - I sent two emails - detailing the two picks (and several mirror image profles they had instigated on "other sites" had been discoverecd by me. Most importantly - I tod the to remove my (NZ) Company drawings.

3184: 267:

think that the final decision to delete was the correct one. It was a self-produced vanity page, and nothing more than that, and such articles degrade the perception of WKP, and act as a poor precedent for others.

9639:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1257:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1158:

3207: 3198: 1183: 1131: 363: 525:

being invited to comment on - instead, it lists the RfC list itself as the subject of the RfC. so i thought you might want to remove the listing and try again. the instructions for listing an RfC are

3580:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3217:

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

794:

I'm not convinced you're right that the name is StreetSounds, most of the references you've added to the new article show it as Street Sounds (with a space), as does the company's official website. --

15211: 15016:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 14293:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 12985:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 12285:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 12212:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 10659:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5338: 191:

These discussions are preserved for the historical record and are not intended to be edited once closed, so I've removed your comments. If you wish to take issue with the decision, bring it up at

12341:. This article categorises databases by type and I don’t know what type GDFS is. Do you? I can’t find any sources for it. If you’ve any thoughts on how to deorphan they’d be very welcome. Thanks. 15069: 1064: 174:. I think you should let the dust settle on this issue for a while (perhaps another year) before bringing it up again for another AfD. Adding {{notability}} to the page is not really helpful. 1164: 1146: 9270: 8216: 7860: 7551: 7039: 6733: 6435: 6123: 5807: 5437: 5123: 4746: 4326: 4014: 3704: 3343: 2971: 2665: 2359: 1696: 15192: 14796: 14476: 14074: 13770: 13474: 13174: 12796: 12493: 12015: 11711: 11430: 11144: 10838: 10451: 10140: 9805: 9435: 8865: 8560: 8255: 7899: 7590: 7078: 6772: 6474: 6162: 5846: 5476: 5162: 4785: 4365: 4053: 3743: 3382: 3010: 2704: 2398: 1735: 375:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

812:

Your rewrite has issues. Discogs is not really a reliable sources as far as I remember from previous discussions and linking to the news report directly presents possible problems with

1394:

Hi there. Your nomination of this article appeared to be incomplete, so I finished it by tagging the article with the AfD tag. More information on listing articles for AfD is found on

15032: 14309: 13001: 12301: 12228: 10675: 9089: 7350: 1437: 1282: 1230: 9179: 8072: 7296: 2010: 1483:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1420: 395: 15002: 14664: 14344: 14279: 12971: 12355: 11877: 11292: 11006: 10700: 10313: 10002: 9673: 9303: 8733: 8428: 8117: 7761: 7452: 6020: 5704: 5020: 4643: 4227: 3921: 3611: 3250: 2878: 2572: 2266: 14820: 14505: 14098: 13794: 13493: 13197: 11444: 11163: 9829: 9464: 9134: 8884: 8579: 8274: 7918: 7607: 7102: 6493: 6181: 5865: 5495: 4072: 3766: 3401: 3029: 2723: 2417: 1980: 1974: 1754: 14500: 14495: 11732: 11726: 1479:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1047:

have this sectarian character, there is a good chance that they will end up encountering each other, something that would eventually cause the kind of damage that we've seen.

186: 15206: 14815: 14093: 13789: 13488: 13188: 11158: 10852: 10470: 10159: 9824: 9459: 8879: 8574: 8269: 7913: 7315: 7301: 7243: 7092: 6488: 6176: 5860: 5490: 5176: 4963: 4379: 4067: 3757: 3396: 3024: 2718: 2412: 1749: 1263: 1245: 1078: 1106:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

14806: 14486: 14084: 13780: 10465: 10154: 9815: 9450: 7097: 5651: 1336:

I believe if you check the article on "chav" you will find her mentioned as an exemplar of the style. I don't believe in duplicating a citation in instances such as that.

307:

Sorry for the delay, I've been on wikipedia break (but not mediawiki). The main reason I removed that AfD because the article had just survived an AfD a few days before.

13942: 12334: 12327: 4599: 3551: 1456: 209:

If you excise everything else and judge him by his credentials as a journalist, Knowledge's standards say keep. Why this sudden, strong interest in a year-old debate? :)

15361: 15197: 14801: 14481: 14079: 13775: 13479: 13179: 12801: 12498: 12020: 11716: 11435: 11149: 10843: 10456: 10145: 9810: 9440: 8870: 8565: 8260: 7904: 7595: 7083: 6777: 6479: 6167: 5851: 5481: 5167: 4790: 4541: 4370: 4058: 3748: 3387: 3015: 2709: 2403: 1740: 5669: 3242: 9264: 1428: 14974: 14659: 12653: 12175: 11568: 11287: 11001: 10619: 10308: 9978: 9613: 9033: 8728: 8423: 8067: 7756: 15331: 15313: 14940: 14922: 14625: 14607: 14218: 14200: 13914: 13896: 13613: 13595: 13317: 13299: 12923: 12905: 12620: 12602: 12142: 12124: 11852: 11834: 11524: 11243: 10972: 10954: 10624: 10590: 10572: 10279: 10261: 9949: 9931: 9584: 9566: 9004: 8986: 8699: 8681: 8394: 8376: 8038: 8020: 7727: 7709: 7396: 7222: 7204: 6915: 6897: 6613: 6595: 6301: 6283: 5985: 5967: 5615: 5597: 5303: 5285: 4928: 4910: 4506: 4488: 4192: 4174: 3886: 3868: 3521: 3503: 3149: 3131: 2843: 2825: 2537: 2519: 1874: 1856: 1414: 6634: 5665: 1019: 413:

Then later - I sent another - telling them - Oh - don't worry - forget it? Why - well gee - they did - (by heisting those two drawings) More GOOD than any harm.

14251: 4560: 4546: 5643: 1472:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

870:

reversion. Of course you may end up wrecking a perfectly good article (albeit one you don't approve) - which somehow I think is actually not what you intend.

15098: 14701: 14693: 14381: 14373: 13979: 13971: 13675: 13667: 13379: 13371: 13073: 13065: 12695: 12687: 12392: 12384: 11914: 11906: 11610: 11602: 11329: 11321: 11043: 11035: 10737: 10729: 10350: 10342: 10039: 10031: 9710: 9702: 9340: 9332: 8770: 8762: 8465: 8457: 8154: 8146: 7798: 7790: 7489: 7481: 6977: 6969: 6671: 6663: 6373: 6365: 6061: 6053: 5745: 5737: 5375: 5367: 5061: 5053: 4684: 4676: 4264: 4260: 3958: 3954: 3648: 3644: 3287: 3283: 2915: 2911: 2609: 2605: 2303: 2299: 1640: 1636: 1126: 10693: 6336: 1468:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 14979: 14256: 7391: 1225: 301: 167:) shown in that discussion and consider it anti-community, one should note that it has been clarified since then that the Articles for Deletion process is 11573: 6936: 15327: 15309: 14936: 14918: 14621: 14603: 14214: 14196: 13910: 13892: 13609: 13591: 13313: 13295: 12948: 12919: 12901: 12616: 12598: 12253: 12180: 12138: 12120: 11848: 11830: 11520: 11239: 10968: 10950: 10586: 10568: 10275: 10257: 9945: 9927: 9580: 9562: 9260: 9000: 8982: 8695: 8677: 8390: 8372: 8034: 8016: 7723: 7705: 7218: 7200: 6911: 6893: 6609: 6591: 6297: 6279: 5981: 5963: 5611: 5593: 5299: 5281: 4924: 4906: 4502: 4484: 4188: 4170: 3882: 3864: 3517: 3499: 3145: 3127: 2839: 2821: 2533: 2515: 1870: 1852: 1320: 367:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 15059: 14335: 15298: 15102: 14907: 14697: 14592: 14377: 14185: 13975: 13881: 13671: 13580: 13375: 13284: 13069: 13027: 12890: 12691: 12587: 12388: 12319: 12246: 12109: 11910: 11819: 11606: 11325: 11039: 10939: 10733: 10557: 10346: 10246: 10035: 9916: 9706: 9551: 9336: 8971: 8766: 8666: 8461: 8361: 8150: 8005: 7794: 7694: 7485: 7189: 6973: 6882: 6667: 6580: 6369: 6268: 6057: 5952: 5741: 5582: 5371: 5270: 5057: 4895: 4680: 4473: 4159: 3853: 3488: 3116: 2810: 2504: 1841: 628:

only had these 10 tracks. So yes as it is a torrent I'll take the information i get from an unknown but very well seeded torrent with a grain of salt.

160: 15343: 14952: 14637: 14230: 13926: 13625: 13329: 12935: 12632: 12154: 11864: 11551: 11270: 10984: 10602: 10291: 9961: 9596: 9016: 8711: 8406: 8050: 7739: 7234: 6927: 6625: 6313: 5997: 5627: 5315: 4940: 4518: 4204: 3898: 3533: 3161: 2855: 2549: 1886: 1504: 289:

I wasn't the one who put that in the article, I was merely quoting that from the existing article so that my comments about that would make sense. --

15322: 15280: 14931: 14889: 14616: 14574: 14209: 14167: 13905: 13863: 13604: 13562: 13308: 13266: 12914: 12872: 12611: 12569: 12133: 12091: 11843: 11801: 11533: 11252: 10963: 10921: 10581: 10539: 10270: 10228: 9940: 9898: 9575: 9533: 9224: 8995: 8953: 8690: 8648: 8385: 8343: 8029: 7987: 7718: 7676: 7415: 7213: 7171: 6906: 6864: 6604: 6562: 6292: 6250: 5976: 5934: 5606: 5564: 5294: 5252: 4919: 4877: 4497: 4455: 4183: 4141: 3877: 3835: 3512: 3470: 3140: 3098: 2834: 2792: 2528: 2486: 2261: 2041: 1865: 1823: 1340:

people's impressions of her, and how she liked to hang out in malls with her hood up just to create a provocation, daring security to kick her out.

9668: 696: 676: 9219: 8112: 4638: 3546: 1007: 926: 9618: 6331: 6015: 5333: 4958: 4536: 4222: 3916: 3179: 2873: 2567: 95: 13638: 13342: 13036: 9174: 1996:

Good job on the Roxxxy edit. This has needed some attention for some time, and I think the changes you've made are appropriate and even-handed.

203: 15289: 14898: 14583: 14176: 13872: 13571: 13275: 12881: 12578: 12100: 11810: 10930: 10548: 10237: 9907: 9542: 8962: 8657: 8352: 7996: 7685: 7180: 6873: 6571: 6259: 5943: 5573: 5261: 4886: 4464: 4150: 3844: 3605: 3479: 3107: 2801: 2495: 1832: 1603: 1432: 7291: 5015: 3585: 3222: 1488: 15294: 14903: 14588: 14181: 13877: 13576: 13280: 12886: 12583: 12105: 11815: 10935: 10553: 10242: 9912: 9547: 8967: 8662: 8357: 8001: 7690: 7185: 6878: 6576: 6264: 5948: 5699: 5578: 5266: 4891: 4469: 4155: 3849: 3484: 3112: 2806: 2500: 1837: 1597: 710: 379: 250:

PS: Reading this talk page I see you seem quite concerned about this article, and it lookslike you may have a personal bias in the matter. -

15318: 15276: 14927: 14885: 14612: 14570: 14205: 14163: 13901: 13859: 13600: 13558: 13304: 13262: 12910: 12868: 12607: 12565: 12129: 12087: 11839: 11797: 11529: 11515: 11248: 11234: 10959: 10917: 10577: 10535: 10266: 10224: 9936: 9894: 9571: 9529: 8991: 8949: 8686: 8644: 8381: 8339: 8025: 7983: 7714: 7672: 7209: 7167: 6902: 6860: 6600: 6558: 6288: 6246: 5972: 5930: 5602: 5560: 5290: 5248: 4915: 4873: 4493: 4451: 4179: 4137: 3873: 3831: 3508: 3466: 3136: 3094: 2830: 2788: 2524: 2482: 1861: 1819: 1038: 704: 684: 371:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

9255: 7447: 442: 221: 1532: 554:

if you want to initiate an RfC, you need to put that template on the talk page of the article the RfC is about - i gather that would be

12326: 9298: 3572: 3211: 2210: 105:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

12658: 853: 840: 823: 15285: 14894: 14579: 14172: 13868: 13567: 13271: 12877: 12574: 12096: 11806: 10926: 10544: 10233: 9993: 9903: 9538: 9199: 9154: 8958: 8653: 8348: 8092: 7992: 7681: 7271: 7176: 6869: 6567: 6255: 5939: 5679: 5569: 5257: 4995: 4882: 4460: 4146: 3840: 3475: 3103: 2797: 2491: 1979:, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of PBS Kids articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the 1828: 1290: 1269: 1191: 1170: 9997: 9988:

Hi. I now longer have any interest in that article - please do what you like with it. Also please stay off my Talk page. Thank you

7435: 1056: 145: 7261: 4985: 998:

less with the past and more with the present. Probably the less we get bogged down with that one the better though. Regards - --

593: 546:

i've gone ahead and removed the RfC template from the page it was erroneously listed at, but just in case here's what it said:

378:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

15246: 14855: 14540: 14133: 13829: 13528: 13232: 12838: 12535: 12057: 11767: 11483: 11202: 10887: 10505: 10194: 9864: 9499: 9038: 8919: 8614: 8309: 7953: 7642: 7371: 7137: 6830: 6528: 6216: 5900: 5530: 5218: 4843: 4620: 4421: 4107: 3801: 3436: 3064: 2758: 2452: 1910: 1789: 508: 479: 460: 372: 129: 7264:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5672:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4988:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 803: 789: 15255: 14864: 14549: 14142: 13838: 13537: 13241: 12847: 12544: 12066: 11776: 11492: 11211: 10896: 10514: 10203: 9873: 9508: 9195: 9192:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9150: 9147:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8928: 8623: 8318: 8088: 8085:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7962: 7651: 7267: 7146: 6839: 6537: 6225: 5909: 5675: 5539: 5227: 4991: 4852: 4430: 4116: 3810: 3445: 3073: 2767: 2461: 2156: 1798: 435: 7257: 4981: 3567:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to 1510:

Yes, given the rendering software that it being used, png files have better scalability. You can find some more details at

742: 526: 148:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

15357: 15055: 14970: 14655: 14331: 14247: 13023: 12649: 12350: 12315: 12242: 12171: 11564: 11283: 10997: 10689: 10615: 10304: 9989: 9974: 9664: 9609: 9029: 8724: 8419: 8063: 7752: 3206:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to

900: 3593: 3230: 1424: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1254: 1209: 1205: 1155: 1114: 692: 383: 300: 1289:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

1190:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

10789: 10402: 10091: 9651:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1555: 9408: 8838: 8533: 8228: 7872: 7563: 7419:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7051: 6745: 6447: 6135: 5819: 5449: 5135: 4758: 4338: 4026: 3716: 3355: 2983: 2677: 2371: 1708: 1460:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 15242: 14851: 14536: 14129: 13825: 13524: 13228: 12834: 12531: 12053: 11763: 11479: 11198: 10883: 10501: 10190: 9860: 9495: 9056: 8915: 8610: 8305: 7949: 7638: 7133: 6826: 6524: 6212: 6022: 5896: 5706: 5526: 5214: 5022: 4839: 4645: 4417: 4229: 4103: 3923: 3797: 3613: 3589: 3432: 3252: 3226: 3060: 2754: 2448: 1785: 1605: 1299: 1200: 859: 622: 599: 311: 15251: 14860: 14545: 14138: 13834: 13533: 13237: 12843: 12540: 12062: 11772: 11488: 11207: 10892: 10510: 10199: 9869: 9504: 8924: 8619: 8314: 7958: 7647: 7142: 6835: 6533: 6221: 5905: 5535: 5223: 4848: 4426: 4112: 3806: 3581: 3441: 3218: 3069: 2763: 2457: 1794: 504: 348: 168: 13125: 13119: 12747: 12741: 12444: 12438: 11966: 11960: 11662: 11656: 11381: 11375: 11095: 11089: 10783: 10396: 10085: 9756: 9386: 8816: 8511: 8200: 7844: 7535: 7023: 6717: 6419: 6107: 5791: 5421: 5107: 4730: 4310: 4004: 3694: 3333: 2961: 2655: 2349: 1686: 1575: 254: 15353: 15143: 15051: 14966: 14747: 14651: 14427: 14327: 14243: 14025: 13721: 13425: 13019: 12645: 12311: 12238: 12167: 11560: 11279: 10993: 10685: 10611: 10300: 9970: 9660: 9605: 9025: 8720: 8415: 8059: 7748: 7375: 4624: 2151: 641: 617: 277: 196: 9129: 1947: 1921: 1538: 1095: 332: 94: 7424: 1473: 1409: 1333:

style in the UK. She comes organically out of a UK style so her connection to the US is indirect, not direct.

327: 181: 9184:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9139:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8077:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7248:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

5656:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1389: 227: 9092:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1395: 668: 15025: 14302: 12994: 12294: 12221: 10668: 9061: 1367: 1362: 769: 749: 722: 711: 632:

Check out this link - I hope to hear back from you with more evidence and facts about this album =] Cheers

316: 295: 114: 102: 2005: 323:

Thank you, thank you thank you for removing the idiotic pseudo political claptrap from Somers Town article

15165: 15037: 14769: 14449: 14314: 14047: 13743: 13447: 13147: 13006: 12769: 12466: 12306: 12233: 11988: 11684: 11403: 11117: 10811: 10680: 10424: 10113: 9778: 9656: 7363: 7319: 7297: 4612: 4564: 4542: 1384: 1107: 777: 757: 753: 730: 718: 282: 9983: 7387: 7367: 4616: 2046: 1931: 1325: 1250: 1151: 368: 12337:

which has been an orphan ever since. I’m trying to deorphan it and it looks like the best prospect is

4576:. Sources do not use the term at all, and I can't find anything supporting the use of this as a term. 1593: 1551: 1003: 922: 896: 566: 538: 192: 134: 16: 5657: 2249: 1069: 664: 391: 195:

or propose it for deletion again by starting a new discussion by following the instructions on the

6489:

Feature: One person's cruft is another person's pleasure: How to address listless list management

6177:

Feature: One person's cruft is another person's pleasure: How to address listless list management

401:

Question on deletion of comments- Discussion of FriendFinder article - (my comments removed - yep)

15264: 14873: 14558: 14151: 13847: 13546: 13250: 12856: 12553: 12075: 11785: 11501: 11220: 10905: 10523: 10212: 9882: 9517: 8937: 8632: 8327: 7971: 7660: 7155: 6848: 6546: 6234: 5918: 5548: 5236: 4861: 4439: 4125: 3819: 3454: 3082: 2776: 2470: 1989: 1807: 1480: 1316: 851: 838: 821: 581:

the RfC page, when people click on it they will be whisked off to that exact section of the page.

217: 1235: 1136: 646:

PS I'm wondering if youre into Bob Marley, Damian Marley or Ziggy Marley and the Melody Makers?

9294: 2179: 2081: 109: 7332:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

15013: 14290: 12982: 12282: 12209: 10656: 7383: 2096: 1122: 604:

i'm sorry, i have no experience at all with images on wikipedia - i'd suggest you ask at the

515: 344: 141: 9117: 15118: 15024:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 14722: 14402: 14301:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 14000: 13696: 13400: 13094: 12993:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 12716: 12413: 12293:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 12220:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 11935: 11631: 11350: 11064: 10758: 10667:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 10371: 10060: 9731: 9647:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 9460:

Feature: GamerGate, Or How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love Bare Rule-Level Consensus

9361: 9242:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

9125: 8791: 8486: 8175: 7819: 7510: 6998: 6692: 6394: 6082: 5766: 5639: 5396: 5082: 4705: 4285: 3979: 3669: 3601: 3592:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

3308: 3238: 2936: 2630: 2324: 2257: 2234: 2138: 1661: 1589: 1547: 1526: 1514: 1498: 1082: 999: 918: 892: 649: 500: 492: 475: 456: 68: 40: 3229:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the

8: 9652: 7379: 4628: 3568: 3559: 2205: 2116: 2086: 2001: 1291:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

1249:. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of 1192:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

1150:. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of 700: 691:

It has taken a year but I have finally been able to formulate a response to your post on

680: 660: 605: 387: 261:

Hmmm, I took no further part in the Farivar controversy while I learnt the ropes, but I '

149: 1081:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge takes 768:. When that page has been deleted by an admin you could withdraw the AfD nomination for 15260: 14869: 14554: 14147: 13843: 13542: 13246: 12852: 12549: 12338: 12071: 11781: 11497: 11216: 10901: 10519: 10208: 9878: 9513: 9144: 8933: 8628: 8323: 7967: 7656: 7151: 6844: 6542: 6322: 6230: 6006: 5914: 5544: 5324: 5232: 5177:

Features: "Is the Newsletter important?" and "Request for new writers and interviewers"

4949: 4857: 4527: 4435: 4213: 4121: 3907: 3815: 3543: 3450: 3170: 3078: 2864: 2772: 2558: 2466: 2192: 2066: 2031: 1803: 847: 834: 817: 428: 421: 213: 164: 124: 14996: 14273: 12965: 12346: 12269: 12196: 10643: 10625: 9628: 9619: 9290: 9235: 9215: 9206:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

9170: 9161:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

8108: 8099:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

7443: 7346: 7287: 7278:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

5695: 5686:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

5011: 5002:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

4595: 2242: 2161: 2071: 1942: 1421:

Talk:A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man#Joyce's location while writing the novel

1358: 7333: 4582: 765: 15044: 15009: 14321: 14286: 13013: 12978: 12278: 12205: 10652: 9648: 9632: 9140: 9081: 8078: 2174: 1465: 1118: 637: 613: 589: 562: 534: 340: 251: 15159: 15153: 15137: 15131: 14763: 14757: 14741: 14735: 14443: 14437: 14421: 14415: 14041: 14035: 14019: 14013: 13737: 13731: 13715: 13709: 13441: 13435: 13419: 13413: 13141: 13135: 13113: 13107: 12763: 12757: 12735: 12729: 12460: 12454: 12432: 12426: 11982: 11976: 11954: 11948: 11678: 11672: 11650: 11644: 11397: 11391: 11369: 11363: 11111: 11105: 11083: 11077: 10805: 10799: 10777: 10771: 10418: 10412: 10390: 10384: 10107: 10101: 10079: 10073: 9772: 9766: 9750: 9744: 9402: 9396: 9380: 9374: 9121: 9072: 9052: 9044: 8832: 8826: 8810: 8804: 8527: 8521: 8505: 8499: 8222: 8206: 8194: 8188: 7866: 7850: 7838: 7832: 7557: 7541: 7529: 7523: 7045: 7029: 7017: 7011: 6739: 6723: 6711: 6705: 6441: 6425: 6413: 6407: 6129: 6113: 6101: 6095: 5813: 5797: 5785: 5779: 5635: 5443: 5427: 5415: 5409: 5129: 5113: 5101: 5095: 4752: 4736: 4724: 4718: 4581:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

4332: 4316: 4304: 4298: 4020: 3998: 3992: 3710: 3688: 3682: 3597: 3349: 3327: 3321: 3234: 2977: 2955: 2949: 2671: 2649: 2643: 2365: 2343: 2337: 2253: 2215: 2061: 2015: 1702: 1680: 1674: 1567: 1520: 1492: 1219: 1100: 1030: 799: 785: 761: 738: 555: 521: 496: 471: 452: 269: 82: 756:(remembering not to remove the AfD template at the top). Then you could request 15021: 14298: 12990: 12290: 12217: 10664: 9644: 9636: 9282: 9116:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

3564: 3203: 2187: 2076: 2056: 2036: 1997: 1927: 1469: 1444: 574: 9281:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

156:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

15017: 14294: 12986: 12286: 12213: 10660: 9640: 7356:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

5861:

Feature: Featured Pictures and why the project should focus on obtaining more

4605:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

4573: 2133: 2121: 1380: 1052: 655: 333: 324: 308: 200: 119: 11445:

Interview with Coin945 and Deltasim about the edutainment video gaming genre

12342: 9211: 9207: 9166: 9162: 8104: 8100: 7439: 7420: 7283: 7279: 6938: 6327: 6011: 5691: 5687: 5329: 5007: 5003: 4954: 4532: 4218: 3912: 3175: 2880: 2869: 2574: 2563: 2268: 2238: 2197: 1935: 1902: 1461: 1399: 1354: 830: 629: 357:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Longbow in city scrshot 4 wikiped.jpg

290: 2106: 1967:

Hello Centrepull, thank you for your contributions on articles related to

1952: 339:

Hello, I posted an answer to your query on the talk page of this article.

7253: 633: 609: 585: 558: 530: 317: 178: 15207:

Survey: How does WikiProject Video games determine character notability?

15028:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

14816:

Survey: How does WikiProject Video games determine character notability?

14305:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

12997:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

12297:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

12224:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

10671:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

8575:

Feature: Shove It in a Table: How to Write Featured Lists of Video Games

2018:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

15006:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

14283:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

12975:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

9247: 9048: 2111: 2101: 2091: 1213: 795: 781: 734: 283: 232:

I replied to your email, but it keeps bouncing, so I'll post it here:

15342: