User talk:Bugboy52.40

3372:

place, as it is not conspicuous, and someone might well stumble onto the correct spelling by entering the misspelling. Then I began to check the usage in google and I was shocked to see that inappropriate and unchecked reliance on WP's text had inflated the refs to the incorrect spelling to over 1000, vs <200 for the correct spelling! If there is one terrifying about WP, it is the responsibility for propagating errors. So I would like a deletion of the redir for the incorrect spelling. Now, I was about to put in a request for deletion myself, (having already put in a redir for the correct spelling, that I might inflate to an article in the near future) but I thought it might be better to find whether you would not prefer to do the deletion yourself; I for one prefer to correct my own finger troubles, and I assumed you might feel the same way about such things.

4460:

most destubs for each of the 55 African countries, so should be enjoyable! Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African wildlife articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance. If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing any article related to a topic you often work on, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Might be a good way to work on fleshing out articles you've long been meaning to target and get rewarded for it! Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --

3797: 114: 4127: 561:

so quickly as I am guessing you used some sort of tool/script to extract the info from external websites. This might be a bit tricky in that there are multiple external websites (which is good for the genus page as more quality references the better) but yeah, any info you can provide would be much appreciated. Oh and feel free to help out as an example so I can see for myself what the process looks like (i.e. using your programs/scripts to make a multitude of articles based from the list). Oh and see this for background information:

1640:

derivatives as I understand it. I am sure Resh & Cade took permission from the authors Kristensen etc. The publishing industry does this as a matter of routine. Secondly I still recommend changing the diagram as I proposed reducing some information, say the early, middle, late divisions for each geological age, switching to horizontal etc so that your claim is stronger. Please realise it is not me that you have to convince but to get your position explicitly clarified and to follow the right course of action.

4430:. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $ 1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ -- 580:

to add them on? Do you think you would be able to extract info from more than one website though (as in just the basic layout of the article followed by all the references at the end? Then I can look through the pages and add more info like location and distribution once I read through the refs). Currently I am waiting on Raul to perfect the list (as at the moment there are multiple names that are not to be made into articles) but yeah, it wont be long before he gets it in order. Kind regards!

3748: 3441: 2452: 2228: 1670: 530: 3222: 3133: 865: 103: 1370:

resources once a week and some books of my own including an ancient copy of Imms recently borrowed. Keeping this in mind, please improve it but dont put it under GA. If it is put up for GA with incomplete material as of now, my conscience would require me to quick fail it till I feel it is suitably done. The reason I am delaying is I plan to use all lessons learnt from the current GA on the next one - Lepidoptera -so that its tackled in a better fashion. Hope this helps.

4968: 4706: 1464: 277: 1133: 138: 938: 5072: 4910: 4646: 4587: 5126: 4291: 4490: 3964: 3040: 149: 92: 3535: 81: 2475: 21: 3012:

Administrator should look in first into quality of the edit instead who accuse anybody for something "unpleased". 3. I return automatically my paragraph (which is with reasonable resources) if the ERASER do not start with arguments and proposed changes. 4. I am not going to start discussion if somebody start and continue with repeated ERASEANINGS. Administrator should block the ERASER instead RETURNER of resourced scientific info.

4814: 801: 991: 2149: 945: 1597:

understand that Copyright Violation is reproducing someone else's work without permission while Plagiarism is passing off someone else's work/information as your own. To be on the safe side, you could also post on Knowledge:Media copyright questions to check if anything more needs to be done. And yes, upload the new diagram with own work tag not copyright holder release tag. Hope this helps.

395: 2399:'s talk page. Striking and beautiful. Eye-catching! I ask that I could present your fine barnstar to all future 100K editors. It is a vast improvement over what is now presented to them. It is like comparing parchment to tissue paper. Further, I may retreat and replace your barnstar for the one previously placed at about a dozen 100K editors, with your sanction. Thanking you in advance. 125: 2623: 3576: 1813: 2006:, and I was wondering if you remembered or could find out what references you used when writing it. With unreferenced stubs, I will often find a new reference and write a new sentence or two to replace what we had, but this article is too detailed for that kind of treatment, I think. If you could provide it with inline references, that really would be great. -- 1188: 2653: 2607: 4459:

which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most geography, wildlife and women articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to

3144:

until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Knowledge about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate

1574:

Hi Bugboy, your creating this file and claiming copyright is incorrect. This is a copyright violation. I am removing this image till its status is above dispute. The image is virtually identical to that in Resh & Carde where they have stated that their image is modified/based on Labandeira et al.

579:

Hey that is no problem Bugboy! Hmmm, do you think if I give you a list of genera and species you to get your hand busy on creating a whole bunch of articles? Maybe we can do 100 at a time and have them placed on a subfolder out of mainspace and once I take a look through them then use another program

560:

and within it, there being a list of ~18 million names (note not species but names: see the link above for explanations) and with each name, comes an external reference and sometimes multiple references. I was wondering if you would be willing to show me/tell me how you managed to create the articles

2423:

Thanks, Bugboy. What I need is a template of the award that I can personalize the message, etc. and then I cut-n-paste and add to the recipiants page. Feel free to add a designer recognition mention somewhere, probably in small font. Unless there is a different way. I'm not a tech so I may be doing

1962:

Hi Bugboy, Just wanted to check in and say thanks for the invite to work on Lepidoptera. I am a better copy-editor than entomologist, so you may want to look over any edits I have made to make sure I did not unintentionally change the content in correcting the grammar! Also, I voted in support of

1057:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page

4403:

article (rather than the Eremiaphila article, or Eremiaphilidae). I found that proposal to be rather odd, and have removed the template, as it hardly seemed to merit a discussion. At least, not without giving the person who created the article a chance to weigh in. I'm assuming you had not seen the

4214:

The purpose of this study is to better understanding the coordination practices of Wikipedians active within WikiProjects, and to explore the potential for tool-mediated coordination to improve those practices. Interviews will be semi-structured, and should last between 45-60 minutes. If you decide

1639:

Why don't you get the issue clarified on the message-board I told you about to be sure? You may have missed out some finer nuance of understanding. One question which may arise is whether prior permission is required else it may be a case of copyright violation as copyright prevents you from making

4869:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

2394:

Great user page! I ask a favor. Recently, User:WereSpielChequer has asked me to begin congratulating editors as they reach the 100K plateau. I have been using the Tireless Contributor Barnstar which was OK but, to tell the truth, a bit boring. I was searching for a new more appropriate barnstar or

2763:

Why is there are asterisk behind the binomial name? I cannot think of a reason why that should be there. Furtermore, I am wondering what the point of these stubs is. There is no info in them at all, even less than there is in the genus, because you left out the binomial authority as well. Are you

1481:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient

3554:

for more information on uploading your material to Knowledge. For legal reasons, Knowledge cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a

1314:

By working in article mainspace, I could contribute by overseeing your edits, giving suggestions, adding stuff etc. I did not even know you were working on Lepidoptera till I saw your merge notice and checked your recent contribs. I try to add material to that article whenever I get a chance. By

4218:

You must be over 18 years old, speak English, and you must currently be or have been at one time an active member of a WikiProject. The interview can be conducted over an audio chatting channel such as Skype or Google Hangouts, or via an instant messaging client. If you have questions about the

4210:

We’d like to invite you to participate in a study that aims to explore how WikiProject members coordinate activities of distributed group members to complete project goals. We are specifically seeking to talk to people who have been active in at least one WikiProject in their time in Knowledge.

3371:

Hello Bugboy. Someoneone pointed out (but did nothing about) the fact that Phloeophagy was the correct spelling. Though this was true, I did not get too excited, and just applied a few corrections (it is hardly a term in frequent use, after all!) In fact I began by leaving the existing redir in

1596:

I dont exactly know. Perhaps the first thing to do is to redraw the diagram in a different way, maybe reducing some data, by converting it to horizontal, relabelling headings, including other information. After that you have to state in the page its sources to avoid WP:PLAGIARISM. Im sure you

1369:

Please go ahead with your edits. However on no account put it through GA because as of now it lacks completeness to the standard required by GA. I plan to work on the completeness checking, sectio by section as soon as I complete my GAN on External morphology. Plus I have access to university

4215:

to participate, we will schedule an appointment for the online chat session. During the appointment you will be asked some basic questions about your experience interacting in WikiProjects, how that process has worked for you in the past and what ideas you might have to improve the future.

3011:

Hi, You seems to be more reasonable than the other bunch of "friends". Who got in ownership the article: INSECT. 1. I found the talk page entrance regarding my edit by accident only. Nobody was kind of to give me a clue: somebody finally decided to discus with me changes to the article. 2.

2800:

editing processes" (my emphasis)? It seems like these articles would most certainly be covered by the bot policy, and should have received prior approval. Also, like Ruigeroeland, I cannot quite see what purpose these articles fill that could not be filled by a list and redirects. BTW,

3359:

Hello, your entomological knowledge is appalling, I would appreciate if you stopped vandalising Knowledge with false information. For instance, there is no such thing as a "Harvest Mite Larva" as mites are arachnids and thus hemimetabolous - undergoing incomplete metamorphosis.

2918:

4105:

Hi, I just thought I'd let you know that I have added a comment to the Talk page for the Lepidoptera article, suggesting that a small correction to the phylogeny diagram is needed. I'm not sure if you are editing that page still, but I thought I'd let you know anyway. Regards,

2276: 1398:

Oh sorry, sometimes I forget where to reply. BTW :-) you definitely want to arouse the interest of your reader, not curb it, he he. If you feek yo have done your bit, why not try modifying that phylogeny diagram like I told you so as t make your claim even stronger?

1751: 1144: 5096:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4934:

4672:

4613:

1840:

Internal morphology is still not complete imho. We need to learn what are the characteristics of Lepidopteran internal morphology as compared to that of a generic insect and portray them. Only reproduction is not enough. Perhaps GAN notice is premature.

1125: 3286:

to Knowledge editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Knowledge editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

1575:(1994). For you to claim it as your creation, it has to e a completely new visualisation of the data and has to be different in the way the info is depicted. You also still need to acknowledge the source of the information which has not been done. 4938:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

1864:

In many species, the female may be able to produce anywhere from 200 to 600 eggs, while in some others it may go as high as 30,000 eggs in one day. which leaves a large number of caterpillars, which in effect can mow down entire acres of

1458: 5099:

1333:, I tried to keep only morphological attributes in the morphology section while development, and other natural history issues were restricted to life cycle. You are welcome to change the structure as you deem fit as it does feel clunky. 555:

Hey there. I noticed you have created a whole bunch of articles over time re: genus/species on insects etc. (among many other classes and species I am sure). I recently started a sub list over at the missing encyclopedia wikiproject

1765: 3847:, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of 3247:

Hey, could the first insect wing-related thing you do when you get back be to fix the colors in the text? They are distracting me a bit too much to do a thorough content review. I'll review for content right after they are fixed.

1485:

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

2206:

Ah great! You signed too.. I dont know exactly how and when we are receiving access. I am guessing they are waiting until 400 have signed up before sending the details over to Credo. We will just have to wait and see..! Cheers

239:¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨``°º¤ø„¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨``°º¤ø„¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨``°º¤ø„¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸ 5116: 4676:

4617:

3301:

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through

4351:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4478: 3688: 3661: 3637: 3424:

hello there! just saw you're a participant in the insects project. i created a few stubs recently, and was wondering if the project needed some assistance in that regard. i hope you can let me know. cheers!

1059: 4802: 2928:

I appreciate your criticism, however there are more constructive ways of going about this. Also, not to contribute to your nonsensical banter, you clearly know mites are arachnids therefore it would be

1047:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 3732:

saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Knowledge. Happy editing!

890:

to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

1860:

I would be pleased to help in any way you would like. Fresh from the February Wikification Drive, would you like me to go through the article making trivial changes such as improving this statement:

4898: 4284: 2356:

I think I have a great source for you. It is entirely CC-3.0, so you can use every scrap of info including pictures. It is a catalogue of all beetle family group names including fossils, see:

4530: 557: 256:

I've heard that you participate in most of the insect-related WikiProjects. Could you please join WikiProject Beetles? Your work there will be much valued and appreciated. Please join today!

4694: 2053: 2778:

I only know he turned tons of articles similar to the ones you created into redirs. Dont know about consensus... Anyway, it would be better to at least at some basic info I think. Cheers!

3274: 5137: 4635: 5129: 5118: 2425: 4576: 3630:

a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Knowledge, then you should do one of the following:

4497: 4483: 1568: 2933:

not entomolgical, as that involves the study of insects. If have an argument to project, please use resources to back yourself up, as clearly I have done in the article I written (

1911:

I'm leaving the references for you to deal with but I have made various minor alterations. You can see which sections I have worked on and what I have done by viewing the History.

1223: 3608: 5060: 3405:

Hello BB, I don't know whether my talk page is on your watchlist, so I don't know whether you have seen that I have posted a response to your Insect feeding habits idea there.

4302: 4229: 4448: 4385: 3475: 3203: 3607:, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from 2875: 4330: 2156:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See 1695:

Thank you for the invit, but I am not the man. I have not an overvue of the order. Books on this subject exist with about thousand pages... It is not easy to resume.

3772: 3017: 732: 550: 4956: 3093: 3088: 3083: 3078: 822: 740: 2731: 1237:

You're best reading the PDF file, as the HTML conversion isn't wonderful. The part I was discussing on the reference desk is in sections 4 & 5. Best wishes.

959: 2095: 3914: 3901: 3783: 3615:. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our 3198: 2889:

Thanks for your offer (several months ago now!) to help identify insect photos. Here are a couple from a suburban environment near the Aegean coast of Turkey:

1092: 3319: 1160:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

5170: 3852: 3589: 3527: 1523:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created

1285:, not in user space. Also, polymorphism is adequately covered in Lepidoptera and does not need expansion. So don't merge that Polymorphism article back into 1156:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 5165: 5014: 4571: 3184: 4086:

Are you still actively editing? If so, I have some questions about the Lepidoptera article AND why is there almost no activity going on in this project?

3192: 4455: 4294: 3921: 3677:

If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org

1289:. Other sections such as behaviour, etc need development. What is needed is not rewriting at this point but addition of more referenced material. After 3197:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1977:

I find I have no patience for the tons of talk you need for getting these type of proposals through. I tire very soon. I wish you all the best, though!

1120: 4931: 1105:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —

2374:

Ah yes, it would be best suited for a Taxonomy of Coleoptera article, but you might be interested in that later on. Cheers and keep up the good work!

1100: 610:, which results in the rest of the page being centered. I fixed it, but I wanted to let you know in case it was from a template or something. Cheers, 4325: 1427:

I have addressed all the GAN issues at present. Waiting for any additional comments by reviewer. Great job on Lepidoptera. Boy are you one WikiOgre!

4893: 4380: 762: 5151: 4473: 4100: 3692: 3111: 979: 573: 5077: 5062: 4975: 4961: 3268: 2713: 4951: 4850:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

4689: 4120: 3563:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 3211: 726: 4797: 4630: 4202: 3178: 321: 4261: 4115: 1081: 5092: 3609:

http://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=%22Patterns+of+beetle+diversity+can+illustrate+factors+that+have+led+to+the+success%22

2787: 2383: 2773: 2580:

Well on the commons it is categorized in "Unidentified flags" and I was hoping to place it where it could be found by a descriptive search.

853: 4669: 4467: 4437: 4251: 2758: 2725: 2707: 2635: 1086: 692: 665: 4610: 4076: 3952: 3644:

and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name,

2357: 1920: 1906: 1892: 4851: 2818: 2424:

it like the 63 year old that I am. Nice to meet you. I have some other barnstars that I will need help with. More about that later. See

2169: 3855:. There's lots of news this month for the Knowledge Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... 2589: 2570: 1875: 1473: 967: 953: 927: 317: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 4062: 1482:

information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

5081: 4921: 4874:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 4658: 4599: 3651: 3547: 3518:

is a research paper from 2008). Not having access to the book/s currently cited, I have not attempted to verify the sourcing myself.

2597: 2126: 1855: 1532: 385: 2937:) which is backed up by numerous books which also states the lower nymphal stages as larvae before there are fully grown to adults. 2764:

going back to flesh them out? If not I fear they will be turned into redirects when user stemonitis spots them... Just warning.. :)

1584: 653: 465: 4847: 4413: 3703: 3551: 3000: 2444: 2337:

Thanks for the comment on my page about copyediting Lepidoptera. I ran out of time to do much more, but am glad to see it made GA.

789: 5111: 4843: 4161:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 3761: 2899:

of adequate quality and not duplicating existing shots) if I were to upload them to Commons. Can you identify arachnids as well?—

2326: 1963:

your proposal at the RFC-- it makes sense to me, and I think it would help, not hinder, the insect articles on this site. Best,

1649: 1634: 1620: 1606: 1536: 1436: 1422: 1408: 1393: 1379: 1364: 1342: 1324: 748: 589: 5035: 4803: 4771: 4551: 4035: 3765: 3725: 3454: 3021: 2461: 2245: 2118: 1683: 1063: 980: 808: 696: 543: 3947: 3313: 1967: 4427: 4195: 4191: 3741: 826: 431: 5055: 2861: 1986: 1306: 921: 627: 4376: 3928: 3581: 3519: 2871: 2837: 2396: 2100: 2015: 595: 4443: 4418: 3170: 2346: 2216: 4321: 3255: 3013: 2857: 1952: 1556: 3309:

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

2748: 1881:

At the moment there is a reference error for ref no 26. It currently says that the authority is "ref name="Gullan"/: -->

1513: 700: 380: 5133: 4363:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4298: 3813: 2143: 1972: 1348: 1290: 1276: 1113: 818: 373: 3414: 2908: 1148:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3718: 3594: 2972:

I have no intention of getting into an edit war with you, so, please can you revert your own reversion of my edit to

2106: 1552: 1271: 1244: 605: 476: 182: 102: 4279: 2985: 2368: 265: 3392: 3150: 2957: 2544: 2196: 2048: 1413:

Thanks for letting me know. Its a great diagram. Good that we got that issue cleared up before we went in for GAN.

1078: 3298:

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

2691: 2305: 1254:

I have recently started editing in Knowledge. I have just added my name to the and have expanded the articles on

5039: 4775: 4372: 4247: 4039: 3146: 2550:"Wow, that was uploaded more then 3 years ago. I haven't got the slightest clue for what though, why do you ask? 1829: 1006: 290: 286: 3434: 2084:

for me. Is "transverse orientation" in moths well-attested in the literature, or should we just work around it?

1704: 339: 4555: 3754: 3747: 3612: 3470: 3447: 3440: 3006: 1930: 1850: 1517: 1329:

The morphology of an insect, strictly speaking includes not only the adult but also the development stages. In

859: 3354: 2879: 2105:

On this page, you've added lots of terms that are linked to redirects back to this page. How is this helpful?

1355:

itself. I just deleted some unnecessary subheadings. I think the article looks better now. What do you think?

1161: 4219:

research or are interested in participating, please contact Michael Gilbert at (206) 354-3741 or by email at

4056: 1991: 1957: 1938: 1714: 1507: 1107: 795: 601: 250: 226: 148: 27: 3161:

page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation!

1676: 1669: 4823: 3827: 3600: 3376: 3188: 2802: 2687: 2261: 2183:

Thanks for all your input on the stubs. You said you have a program to create articles. I forgot all about

1096: 4220: 4095: 2416: 1524: 926: 5027: 4979: 4957: 4763: 4717: 4695: 4543: 4501: 4479: 4461: 4431: 4368: 4270:, I want to put Feautered nominee, but would like to name them. This insects also jump a bit. Regards, -- 4157:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

4027: 3975: 3953: 3885:

Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

3237: 3158: 3154: 2976:... that paragraph is unsourced and utter rubbish! If not, I will have to seek advice of admins. Thanks, 2830: 2719: 2701: 2451: 2241: 1022: 902: 562: 523: 249: 1755: 5031: 4871: 4767: 4750: 4547: 4031: 3508: 3118: 2521: 2332: 2201: 1728: 1501: 1477:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1014: 773: 501: 4067:

Thanks for doing that I did not know how. Sorry if I look like i'm messing the place up on purpose. --

3375:

In case you are wondering about my justification for these views, you can look up the refs I added to

2358:

http://www.pensoft.net/journals/zookeys/article/807/abstract/family-group-names-in-coleoptera-insecta-

5085: 4925: 4684: 4662: 4625: 4603: 4187: 4139: 3873:

Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

3714: 3620: 3566: 2965: 2739: 2493: 2030: 1805: 906: 880: 1009:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

912:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

4830: 3937:'s programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this 3879:

OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

3585: 3523: 3265: 3252: 2643: 2631: 2532: 2526: 2483:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2266: 2192: 415: 344: 215: 204: 137: 3490: 3488: 1743: 879:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a

4317: 3987:. Article is non-notable and has very little comment about a non-notable animal. Does not meet 3867:

Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

3619:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be 3430: 3242: 3141: 2853: 1794: 1774: 1249: 1228: 1018: 887: 769: 357: 193: 113: 2077: 2068:

Normally, I'd jump in and start the article and let the experts sort it out, but in view of the

4267: 3807: 3466: 3410: 3400: 3388: 3166: 2904: 2895:(a scarabaeus? of similar size). Please advise also whether or not you think they’d be useful ( 2884: 2783: 2769: 2700:

FYI, I can save you some headaches and create those talkpages for you with AWB, if you like. --

2485: 2379: 2364: 2342: 2212: 2073: 2059: 1028:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

480: 368: 3996:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

3504: 1897:

I don't understand your referencing system. For example, what does (in curly brackets) mean?

1005:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 349:

Hello active member of Wikiproject Cats. There is currently a discussion as to whether or not

4876: 4713: 4699: 4567: 3938: 3713:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow

3347: 2165: 2002: 1993: 1835: 1126:

Orphaned non-free image File:Stop! Before It's Too Late and We've Destroyed it All sample.ogg

1021:

their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the

91: 4987:

Species does not exist; per Preliminary Checklist of the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the World,

536: 529: 4855: 4387: 4359:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4235: 4183: 4179: 4134: 4111: 4072: 3616: 3543: 3327: 2913: 2893: 2351: 2234: 2227: 2011: 1916: 1902: 1888: 1871: 1459:

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Phylogenetic chart of Lepidoptera.svg

1267: 1241: 1074: 1010: 917: 814: 659: 419: 309: 4211:

Compensation will be provided to each participant in the form of a $ 10 Amazon gift card.

3891:

WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

1555:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the

8: 5043: 4792: 4779: 4559: 4364: 4243: 4043: 4014: 3897:

Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

3796: 3366: 3262: 3249: 2627: 2188: 1700: 1690: 1564: 876: 507: 423: 310: 2890: 1234: 5107: 5051: 4916: 4900: 4888: 4866: 4839: 4807: 4680: 4621: 4308: 4154: 3737: 3426: 3303: 3233: 2844: 2718:

Any time. The barnstar wasn't mine, actually - but I support it wholeheartedly. :-) --

1964: 1540: 1490: 440: 354: 332: 3682: 1663: 5010: 4947: 4746: 4526: 4409: 4340: 4331: 4010: 3918: 3803: 3512: 3497: 3493: 3462: 3406: 3384: 3261:

Just a reminder that there is one day left for the "on hold" phase of the GA review.

3162: 2996: 2981: 2973: 2966: 2900: 2814: 2779: 2765: 2585: 2540: 2436: 2408: 2375: 2360: 2338: 2208: 2174: 2114: 2091: 1948: 1809: 1760: 1347:

That I would not recommend as discussion of head, thorax, abdomen is in the scope of

1255: 1219: 1206: 785: 758: 470: 461: 449: 363: 4997: 4733: 4513: 3997: 3724:

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at

3026: 1180:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

833:

Famous? thanks.. but yea, I'll give it a try even though I don't speak German well.

5147: 4563: 4423: 4360: 4344: 4275: 4091: 4081: 3821: 3380: 3342: 2942: 2793: 2755: 2745: 2555: 2517: 2322: 2301: 2221: 2161: 2157: 2044: 1982: 1846: 1800: 1789: 1784: 1779: 1645: 1630: 1616: 1602: 1580: 1432: 1418: 1404: 1389: 1375: 1360: 1338: 1320: 1302: 1259: 1153: 838: 711: 638: 585: 569: 513: 276: 160: 80: 4126: 4107: 4068: 3984: 3419: 3312:

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at

3283: 3279: 2806: 2389: 2257: 2007: 1912: 1898: 1884: 1867: 1717:

is a great source for communication relating to insects, and the insect article.

1315:

encyclopedia do you mean Resh & Carde? I have that too! Got access recently.

1263: 1238: 1202: 1070: 1049: 1033: 913: 411: 407: 261: 4996:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

4870:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

4842:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

4732:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

4512:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

4404:

proposal, so you might want to keep an eye on this, in case they re-propose it.

3336:, not the everyday term of "bug" as a refernce to what we should call "incests". 2652: 1546: 1529:

Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

1002: 1001:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

4784: 4356: 4348: 4239: 4166: 3971: 3957: 2153: 1724: 1696: 1560: 1157: 1132: 901:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 894: 744: 620: 495: 403: 386: 3861:

706:

lol, I'm use to it by now, in fact I actually stole it from someone myself :P

5159: 5103: 5047: 4881: 4846:, because the article appears to be about an individual animal that does not 4352: 4020:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

3988: 3934: 3837: 3733: 3229: 3216: 2934: 2468: 2184: 2025: 1817: 1174: 898: 399: 325: 3228:

Hi, in this image the tag 'costa' should actually be 'nodus', greetz, Bart -

4943: 4653: 4637: 4405: 4147: 4047: 3515: 3500: 3221: 2992: 2977: 2866: 2810: 2581: 2536: 2503: 2428: 2400: 2293: 2128: 2110: 2087: 2069: 1944: 1215: 1149: 864: 781: 754: 457: 5020:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

4756:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

3913:

only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the

1715:

http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/course/ent425/tutorial/Communication/viscomm.html

5143: 4822:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

4725: 4594: 4578: 4395: 4271: 4087: 3944: 3817: 3729: 3697: 3671: 3641: 3476: 3337: 3316: 3132: 3106: 2680: 2606: 2513: 2318: 2297: 2289: 2187:. I've used it before, and it is very effective and easy to use. Cheers. 2139: 2132: 2081: 2055: 2040: 2036: 1978: 1842: 1739: 1641: 1626: 1612: 1598: 1576: 1428: 1414: 1400: 1385: 1371: 1356: 1352: 1334: 1330: 1316: 1298: 1294: 1286: 1282: 777: 581: 565: 350: 3550:

from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read

3292: 2667:

Thanks for making lots of fantastic articles about insects in the genus

2395:

for someone that could create one...and then I saw your work of art at

2253: 1043: 998: 984: 811:- may be you have a idea concerning your famous icon?! Thanks! Markus 558:

Knowledge:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Global Names Index

257: 4861:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

4393:

Just so you're aware; another editor proposed merging one of the many

4225:

We cannot guarantee the confidentiality of information sent by email.

3039: 4158: 4150: 3636:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the

3333: 2668: 2176: 1478: 1145:

File:Stop! Before It's Too Late and We've Destroyed it All sample.ogg

937: 613: 487: 2020: 1823: 1281:

Hi Bugboy52.40, I recommend that you work in main article space for

4854:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 3658:

If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "

3534: 1735: 990: 800: 670: 418:. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your 2892:(something like a shield-bug, fairly large: about 25 mm long) and 2035:

Thank you, I just loved that infestation! It's your turn now with

1709: 20: 4347:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

893:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

479:, using templates as signatures is forbidden. Could you at least 398:

Hey there Bugboy52.40, thank you for your contributions! I am a

4400: 3604: 3539: 3484: 1187:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

956:

will be July 5-9. Please join us for serious content creation!

3511:

series of edits, sourced to a book published in 1993 (whereas

3145:

since you are interested in entomlogy! Sign up to participate

2480:

Hello, Bugboy52.40. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2148: 1625:

Loved the Gypsy moth image. Trust its your own original idea.

394: 4991:

is a monotypic genus. This should be an unambiguous deletion.

3153:. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the 3149:

and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our

2744:

You're not running a bot to create all those stubs, are you?

1201:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

4230:

m:Research:Means_and_methods_of_coordination_in_WikiProjects

3768: