User talk:BrownHairedGirl/Archive/Archive 014

5463:: "The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge is verifiability, not truth—meaning, in this context, whether readers are able to check that material added to Knowledge has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true." Here's where I have some problems: Buster's biography - apart from the very recent years - is based exclusively on his words or his PR reps' words, as published by UK newspapers and UK TV. His biographical data - birth, marriage, wife, huge number of children, grandchildren and greatgrandchildren, long military career, including last year's incident where he says that he singlehandedly fought off three attackers late at night - have never been verified by an independent third party. What's astonishing for example is the complete absence of any family member at his 100th and 101st birthday party and at the London Marathon. Yet people - including journalists I guess - use information from this Knowledge article as if it were fact and propagate it. Is there any way to put a tag or other warning into the article to make this clearer? Sorry if this is not the right place for discussing this issue - if not please point me to the right place. -- 6915:

to a page and find an uncommented tag by someone 200 edits before, who often never returned to the page (in history) again, and editors who were bewildered at what it meant. Since my research into WP:POV and related pages showed me that WP "policy" is otherwise anyway -or so it says - I thought it would be useful to address that. I still do, but I consider myself spanked, and won't continue on that path, or be much more sensitive if I do. I never took the posture that "WP says so, so it must be so" though I can see it might seem so. My feeling is that when WP:POV states that a tag must be documented in the discussion page, that that is good for WP not out of pedantry but because it leaves a paper trail for the future. Anyway, that is only philosophy - I would hope that you can take the "you're acting in good faith, and your enthusiasm" part as being my main motivations. There is much to do in WP, as you know, and I was trying to pitch in. If I perhaps was TOO enthusiastic, then I guess I need to consider myself spanked.

7820:(ec) BHG, sorry to budge in, but "premature and unilateral" is a summary of my unblock that is inaccurate as well as being unfair. As such it is just like the evidence you posted on AN/I when you announced it, and like your unfortunate and as it turns out ironically clairvoyant accusations of wheel-warring. You also blocked just after I said I could restore the block ... but why did you have to rush things when he'd already promised not to edit? What was the big rush? There were lessons about the unblock that I apparently should learn (not rushing), but you did it and announced it at the same time. I don't think you should be surprised then that there is criticism here, esp. as your actions contradicted your and other people's recommendations to me. I think it would be best if you - esp. having a history of involvement - restore the unblock for present. This isn't personal, and there's no, btw, hard feelings here I hope you understand. Regards, 8141:

a similar history, and using your admin powers to restore this block in that context could be seen to border on abuse, or certainly can be construed as such without stretching the imagination too much. This is in addition to the other particular relevant circumstances outlined above. VK, or any other ordinary user, has to be able to trust the system that hangs over him if you expect him to respect it. Therefore this is not such a distinct issue as all that ... it could be part of it (and arguably admins perceived as being biasedhave been part of it for a while, but that's another matter). If you are not going to overturn your decision, I hope you will at least let FloNight organize some kind of decent way out of this situation and co-operate with her request for discussion if she still regards this as useful. None of us want this situation to take up more time than it has to. Again, no hard feelings I hope. Regards,

10301:

it. I assure you, there's no anti-British agenda, and my edit record shows that a very very high proportion of my edits remain. I'm always happy to discuss my edits, and give the logic and reasons behind each edit. If I get it wrong, I apologize and move on. But as I said, most of the time, I'm right. There was an RfC some time ago on this same issue, and it fizzled out but generally upheld that I was editing in good faith and that my edits were fine. Recently, there's been a number of incidents involving a user, TharkunColl, who has been blindly reverting my edits without discussion or explanation. I reported an incident at ANI, but nothing was done as it was deemed a content dispute (although I'm still puzzled as to this being a reason to OK his behaviour). Today, Tharky has done the same thing. There are a couple of threads on his Talk page and my Talk page.

3414:

Louth, Laois, Kilkenny, Waterford, and part of County Cork (the Cork Albert Street to Crosshaven line, the Cork Glanmire Road to Youghal and Cóbh line, Cork Capwell to Macroom, Schull to Skibberreen, Ballinascarthy to Courtmacsherry, and Kanturk to Newmarket. The reason being is if i do it alphabetically, all i get is a list of stations, where as if i go by county, i get more of a story, so.....the East Coast line, Greystones was built when the DSE extended the line from Bray to Wicklow etc, Abbeyfeale was closed when the line from Tralee to Limerick was closed. I do appreciate your comments though, i just don't get much time to actually do anything o here. A "list" with only one article just looks silly, but i thought, why have lists, if they just lead to red links (ie doesnt exist), i'm trying to balance the two at the moment, any suggestions?

4611:

references that can back this up as well. The "spy " allegations as refuted by Erskine Hamilton's daughter, are a smoke screen of sorts for a larger revisionist agenda trying to find reason to connect Robert Erskine and Molly to Lloyd George/Churchill/MI5 . There's simply no good argument for this as far as I've researched, other than attempts to hype up people's "new books" on the subject. The British papers are sealed and the one's that've been released have been blue inked, so it's uncertain that we'll ever find the truth on this issue till 2016-2022, when it's said, that the Queen will open up the Irish Files, and with it the proverbial pandoras box of pro and anti treaty hysteria. They will be interesting times ahead. Thanks for all your work once again! Talk soon,

8079:

remarkable that, in the face of such overwhelming opposition to the unblock and The Deacon's apparent dismissal of them, no-one had reblocked for so long. I didn't really expect it top survive that long. I just wish you could have held out a little bit longer, especially when The Deacon had indicated he would reconsider sometime today, the calls for him to reverse his unblocking had increased overnight and Vk has already indicated he would not edit anyway. But whats done is done and at least the status quo has been resumed. My feeling is that this had left some wounds and that there will be more to said about this at a later time - but for the moment I echo your call, one thing at a time and lets focus on Vk's conditions now.

10904:, I have read and re-read the section. Frankly, if any warnings are due, they are due to both you and Snappy; both of you for edit-warring, you for pushing your POV as the only legitimate one, and deriding anything else as non-neutral. You goaded Snappy into sarcastically calling you "petal", so maybe Snappy deserves a warning for that ... but frankly, rather than cluttering up both your talk pages with warnings, I prefer to hope that you can start actually discussing things. So far you are the only editor seeking one outcome, and three editors agree on another. A majority isn't always right, but simply telling the others that their view is an "error" does not help build consensus. 4223:

the necessary functionality. Please, realize that by blocking the bot indefinitely, knowing that it will stop editing immediately after the block goes into effect it is effectively saying that I, as the bot operator, wouldn't fix the issues raised which I have always done and will continue to do (please assume that I run my bot in good faith). The only thing accomplished by an indefinite block is to delay my getting back to work. Anyway, thanks again for blocking the bot and pointing out the enhancement. I have cleaned up all of the erroneous edits and would like to continue the run, so I would appreciate if you would unblock the bot at your earliest convenience.

1110:, yes I did initially assess it as B-class, but reviewed later and reckoned that I had been slightly too generous, because some of it was unreferenced, so I downgraded it. A borderline case, but when I checked again, it seemed to fall the other side of the line. I'm afraid that with the sheer number of assessments to be done (I have done over 6000 in the last few weeks), there just isn't time to write an explanation in most cases, but I have now tagged one of the unreferenced sections as an indication of the problems (referencing is the only thing I can see that holds it back from B-class). 6740:

they can just put it back...." Your point of AGF is well put and well taken, and I do not see this as a personal issue myself. My own feeling is that when Finbar Wright asks, "Does this really need to be spelt out before the article can be tagged (and thereby categorised) as being need in need of POV attention?" That the answer to that re:WP policy is, and should be, "Yes, it does" in order to have that dscussion and consensus. Anyway, just my thoughts. I'll take your advise seriously, and please understand that I have no desire to be disruptive, just helpful.

10570:. I try to take great care that I assume good faith and keep my cool - I do not believe I have posted any heated rhetoric (although it can get very tempting at times). Can you point out somewhere? Finally, you say we may both end up at arbcom - I feel like I'm going round in circles sometimes while trying to get a "fair" hearing and some "neutral" advice. I'm not breaching any policies, I'm remaining very civil, I'm always assuming good faith, my edits are good, I don't vandalize. Yet other editors and admins appear to assume that I must be doing 10700:- it repays reading today). As I wrote on WP:AN/I, to me the single most serious aspect of this case is the off-Wiki harassment of Rockpocket. If it is ever traced back, whoever the perpetrator is should face instant banning; no ifs, no buts. Frankly, I think Rockpocket has done a magnificent, and wholly under-appreciated job; I also think that, although he's had plenty of support from you and the other 'involved Admins', he's been precious little from the ArbCom itself or, indeed, some of the cheerleaders involved in this issue. 6162: 507: 45: 4915: 5490:

problems to talk in the edit notes. I was rather quickly reverted (and shouted at!) by the same user. Rather than reverting I would appreciate your view! I must point out that I don't at the end of the day really care if it is there or not as the symbol will soon pass into history with the merger with the Women's Union. My main concern is that if it cannot be there then I will need to remove from all the other articles too. The article as it stands is still a work in progress anyway. Thanks

7712:: I have clearly explained that my intention was solely to restore the status quo ante, and to allow the community to make a decision on whether a conditional unblock was acceptable. The reversal of a premature and unilateral reblock is not needless, it's a matter of allowing discussions to take their course, rather than being bounced into any particular outcome. You clearly disagree with that assessment, but please can you have the manners not to accuse me of intentional provocation? -- 9953:

were done with the good of the project in mind. We cannot in good conscience ascribe living people an ethnicity, whose only connection with Ireland is having an Irish surname. 90% of the entries I removed were like that. If someone's ethnicity is important and significant, it will be easy to find reliable sources stating why it is important and significant, if the reliable sources cannot be found, the category does not belong in the article at all. Just basic

1085:

While all the details added can be expanded and elaborated on, beyond mention of the parties internal structures and organisation there aren't many other details that can be added. It could very well be a case of many of the B class articles being reassessed for consistency purposes. If you ever have a chance it would be good if you could add a few lines identifying strengths and weaknesses of the VUPP article so that the article can be improved. Thanks,

6960: 3556: 4987: 2324: 10740:

collating and connecting information, understanding probabilities and putting them all together to understand how things happen. Therefore I am pretty confident that I now know roughly how this happened and who is behind it. That is going to stay off-wiki for now, though if you would like more information feel free to email me. Would I like some "natural justice"? Sure. But I'd rather look at the bigger picture. The person (or people) do not hate

4113:

it is that he agrees that the Buster Martin story is tabloid journalism - they built him up and equally they are tearing him down. I think he is also saying that the media misrepresented what he said, which was that without birth or marriage certificates, or other acceptable documentation, the claim of 101 can't be confirmed. He also explained the "unofficial" bit, and it seems he may be in more newspaper articles soon, so watch this space! :-)

10728:

volunteer to this great project. I believe it is only a matter of time until things get out of hand and wiki-harassment turns into something more serious for someone. When that happens, I expect we will begin to see moves to address this problem. But there are efforts behind the scenes to help, and if someone is suffering from harassment then they should let someone know about it (email me, if there is no-one else).

10779:(Sorry for taking up so much of your Talk page, BHG, but just to wrap up this thread - ) To come back on a couple of points; to be fair to him, Vintagekits has always denied being responsible for the harassment. I don't know the details of it, nor do I particularly want to, but it rather seems to be an example of a teenage 'good idea at the time' as opposed to something more deeply unpleasant - I hope so, anyway. 10566:. Remember, this was after close to 30 reverts by Tharky the previous day, and I opened an AN/I thread and he started to discuss his reasons. He then chose to continue his disruptive behaviour with fresh articles. Actually, I still believe I would mark them as vandalism. He has since started to give reasons in his edit summaries. On a related issue, this is the 2nd time that someone has used the phrase 7515:. I had a chat with Brion Vibber last weekend, and he thinks category intersection will be happening fairly soon. Since it is already available in search, I'm hoping we can reach some sort of consensus about a way to create broadly populated categories that can be used both now with search and latter with a full featured version of category intersection. I'd appreciate your opinions about 4050:

Data Protection Act (and if identified face prosecution as well as dismissal), it's amusing to see Young relying on a wink from some contact rather than on documentation. It all confirms my general impression that (which was reinforced by my conversation with Stan Primmer) that Young's research methods have more in common with those of a tabloid journalist than of an academic researcher.

10652:

pressure he might ever have, as it would be for anyone.:) I can't understand people who fight on wiki for fun, some people genuinely seem to enjoy it (this wasn't aimed at the lot above, but in general) for instance some people are nearly at 3RR limit every day, and stuff like that. It would be healthier for them if they took up

10704:

the canard, which has been repeated by both Vintagekits and Giano, that I and the rest of 'the Kittybrewster axis' have been winding-up Vintagekits (and that this somehow justifies his behaviour) is demonstrably false, because since the ending of the ArbCom case we have all been very careful to keep apart from each other.

10629:, where attitudes tend to be polarised and passions run high. Vk did some very good editing, but also indulged in some outrageous misconduct, so the polarisation of opinion is not solely on political lines. Anyway, if we can all draw a line under it all, it'll be a big step forward. :) Fingers crossed! -- 7227: 10459:

Actually, probably more a case to say that you've turned up again. And again, with nothing useful or helpful to add to the discussion. But I suspect you're probably being entertained or getting a kick out of it. Funny how I ask one neutral for advice, and two editors pop in with nothing helpful to

10136:

You only have to take a look at the Scotland and Wales page to see what kind of guy he is! I've already left him a message on his talk page that thank god he is not a typical Irishman, and if he was my Grandparents would turn in their graves(they came from bray). Might sound cruel, but I don't really

7615:

This is a complete misunderstanding of a consensus based decision. There was not agreement ironed out that either the unblock or the reblock were correct based on consensus. Both were untimely, and ill thought out. Two wrongs do not make a right. That is why we sanction admins for undoing each others

4187:

and related misdemeanours, so I tend to check new contributors in this field more thoroughly than I would elsewhere. In this case, I saw a new editor who seemed to be very well clued-up on wikioedia policy and practice, which is unusual, and it is often one of the marks of someone who has previously

4049:

I have no problem with quoting Young as the source if he has been reported in a reliable source, though I'm disappointed that the said Reliable Sources use such a flaky informant. I was amused to see Young relying on "his sources" in the NHS. Apart from the fact that the said sources have broken the

3875:

Yes, they evidently know how to use the undo button, so just removed their silliness without reinstating the words deleted in the vandalism. But when I saw that, I was amazed: I have never before seen a vandal try to undo the damage, even if the fix wasn't entirely successful. I know that there have

1169:

All clear now - thanks for the reply. I logged back in after a gap to find half my watchlist filled with your assessments :) so I know you've been busy on those. The VUPP thing can easily be fixed - wish the same could be said for my p.c. so I'll probably ask you for a reassessment when that happens.

10735:

From my point of view, it really isn't worth making an issue out of it any more because it simply can't be resolved. Moreover presenting all the evidence for the community to draw their own conclusion would mean revealing the personal information publicly, which was the goal of the harassment in the

10703:

Re-reading my submission, it does seem pretty harsh and fixated on 'ancient history' (ie. the events of the last six months), and I rather regret that tone. That said, and I'm sure that I don't need to provide you with diffs, since the ArbCom the two sides have managed to keep apart from each other:

10359:

Recently, there has been an escalating campaign by many editors to stop Bardcom - even though they don't try to (can't) fault his edits. Several anon IP addresses have been involved, and a number of brand new editors have appeared that are taking an interest. Several anon IP addresses were blocked

10300:

Hi, I don't think we've had reason to communicate before now, but I see you are very active in a lot of articles I have in interest in, and you are an admin. My edit history shows that I look at articles that use the term British Isles, and where it is used incorrectly or inappropriately, I correct

9635:

I am using Firefox. I tried subst'ing earlier and playing around, but I got nowhere. I just do not understand the code. It has to be in the ifeq clause. What do 5em and 1em do? Actually I did not try tweaking that clause, but I still really do not know where to start. Where is ifeq documented? I can

9528:

The german one isn't too bad, the only perk of Schumacher winning so much was I got to listen to that :) Well, thanks for the patience and hopefully this will all settle down. I am still suprised to see an Irish editor with their head over the parapit, I've got so used to dealing with a select group

9301:

way to verify that he was a journalist at RTÉ was to go to the RTÉ site and see that he's listed as a journalist there. I understand that it's often better not to use sources affiliated with the subject, but I would have thought that for something like this (Does he present the News at One, or not?)

8832:

I don't know how you find it these days but I've been dealing with trolling since I started whacking moles on WP in early 2007 but since November (and all its drama) the level of trolling has just gone through the roof. Every week I see, or hear about, another sysop who's sick of the drama. Sooner

8140:

I agree with FloNight's concerns. Rockpocket and John have been highly uncivil to me for my unblock, which I think given their long history of negative relations is highly understandable. However, they kept their tools to themselves. BHG, in fairness, you were in an extremely delicate situation with

8078:

way out of this was for Vk to hold off from editing (which to his credit he did) and The Deacon to come around to the community consensus and right his mistake, which he appeared just about to do. The timing of your intervention was unfortunate. Nevertheless, I do understand. I thought it was pretty

7940:

Yes, I strongly agree that no more blocking and unblocking should be done until Vk and the Community can agree on his status. But discussing BHG actions is a separate issue. Administrators need to get clear feedback when they do something that is problematic. Otherwise they will repeat the mistakes.

7783:

Furthermore, putting stringent and wikilawyer-proof provisions into place before considering an unblock will actually be in Vk's own interests, as even his supporters acknowledge. Deacon's unblock was premature and disruptive; restoring the block pending real consensus to unblock was a good move and

7094:

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The

7090:

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask

6872:

uses. I appreciate you're acting in good faith, and your enthusiasm for the minutiae of the project is welcome, but please familiarise yourself with the way things work here before you start lecturing everyone on how to do their jobs (while editcounting is A Bad Thing, BHG and myself between us have

6647:

In particular, do not make accusations that a POV tag has been added "frivolously and/or arbitrarily", as you did not Talk:Finbar Wright; if you had stopped to read the article, the problems would be self-evident. Drive-by removal of tags warning of breaches of a basic wikipedia policy can be viewed

5928:

That's why some of us try for a while and then give up. I'm around 6 months away from being away from it all. Its a noble cause, I think Blair's final words to the commons were important ones, but its tiring. There are just too many semi literate half wits around to make the pond suitable to swim

5747:

True, although it was changed from Derry to Londonderry in 1603 and it's 2008. I'm not from Derry/Londonderry and thats probably why I don't understand the sensitivity and I'm young so I don't get some Northern Ireland things. You're right, childish wasn't the right word to use. Sorry and thanks for

5489:

article. I re-inserted together with what I felt was a reasonable fair use rationale on the image page. The Union is the clubs and the clubs are the Union, so it was my opinion (admittedly) that they (the clubs) could use the symbol of their own organisation. I inserted a request to take any further

4704:

I dunno, and I don't want to put words in his mouth, but Jim was quite prepared to say that a particular historian was very skilled but started from a perspective which wouldn't work with that subject. And he was very scathing about misuse of sources; he's still alive, and I doubt he has changed his

4663:

PS Professor James Lydon of TCD used to insist that the most dishonest type of historian was the was the one who was not open and honest about his or her own prejudices; he argued that there was no such thing as impartiality in a discipline requiring so much selection and weighting of evidence, and

4291:

No need for such hostility. The only reason it was "left to others last time" is that they got to it before I went online. You should realize though that just because the bot doesn't do something you think it should does not show that it is malfunctioning. This is the first run that it has even been

4112:

To be fair, I should let you know what Robert's response was - you couldn't really expect him to enjoy being compared to a tabloid journalist. In the case of most of his e-mails, I have not passed on the outline of his response to you, but this should be fairly innocuous, I hope. Anyway, the gist of

4045:

Buster Martin has been all over the news here today, and BBC Radio 4's "PM" programme concluded that there was no proof he was 101. Personally, I thought at the time that all the scrutiny was a bit mean, and that whether he was 94 or 101 made little difference: it's still amazing that he's so active

3959:

Hi BHG, you've been vocal on the BC/BCB issue, can you think of any new way forward to resolve this? Seems like we've devolved long ago into endless shouting and thread-forking, I can't keep track of where it's all happening anymore. Can you think of any ways to segment these issues, get some groups

2898:

I doubt whether a reference to ethnic groups in the context of equal ops monitoring can be counted as racism; in England and Wales, it is a legal requirement that ethnicity is explicitly monitored by employers. The issue here is that wikipedia should put words into peoples mouths, so the description

1627:

On a related query, is it appropriate to cover minor local councillors in articles on their parties in such detail? A seperate article on people like Ciaran Mussen would almost certainly bite the dust in a deletion review but what's the policy on their inclusion in the party articles, where they may

1561:

Hello I am writing to you regarding the page Green Party in Northern Ireland I am trying to update the page with information This is my first time editing on wiki so forgive me if I've crossed the line However I believe you have incorrectly removed pieces I posted yesterday regarding Brian Wilson

10751:

I really appreciate, Major, that you see how unfair our system can be and, particularly that you are willing to speak up for me. But you are fighting something pretty fundamental: that Knowledge is a left-leaning institution. We, as a community, are not about punishment or ensuring people have paid

10731:

That said, there is no way one can prove involvement of Vk or any current editor in the anonymous harassment of me. The only person (or people) that can reveal that information are simply not going to. We are therefore left with the balance of probabilities. But as Vk repeatedly points out, even if

10707:

I've now edited the post; however I do still see Option 1 as a climb-down; there's been no punishment for his sock-puppetry and multiple voting: he will have got away with it. This hardly sends a message to behave well in the future and nor does it support other editors who have behaved themselves.

10574:

wrong since there is such activity on my Talk page - and yet despite this, my edits are still good and still holding up, I still remain civil, etc. I was hoping that a new admin, who is neutral, would give me a fair crack of the whip. I'm not looking for an admin to come wading into the middle of

9952:

BHG, what do you imagine the relevance of Short's support of Troops Out would be to her having Irish ethnicity? The category I removed was not ]. I'd be pleased if you could withdraw your angry words above; my edits (which involved a great deal of work, and were discussed at the category talk page)

9712:

Many thanks for that explanation. If the 5em used if cat=yes is changed to 4em, then it only overlaps a little with the last line of text and it is still readable. If it isvchanged to 3em it does not overlap with the last line of text, but overlaps with the top line of the category box. I recommend

8355:

only used basketball as a cover for their real work of collectively writing deconstructionist academic papers on 19th-century Argentinian literature, and that they publish it in peer-reviewed journals under pseudonyms culled at random from the 1938 Buenos Aires phonebook? (They are believed to have

8069:

Hi BHG. I (and others) spent the best part of 6 hours cajoling yesterday behind the scenes trying to hold this together by email, stop the various sides from escalating the meta-discussion, keep the probation discussions on track, and stop someone else from reblocking. Not because it was wrong that

8034:

Yawn. I heard you first time, Giano, and while I'm always ready to admit my mistakes I simply don't agree that it's a mistake, and you and Flo repeating yourselves like a pair of broken records won't change my mind. If either of you (or anyone else) believes that VK should be unblocked pending the

7903:

Administrators should not use the tools in ways that likely to cause conflict when other viable ways of fixing a situation exist. Yes, originally many people noticed the unblock and spoke out saying the unblock was premature, but there was not agreement to fix that by reblocking. That is because it

7487:

I think we could wander into trouble however if we started including too many facts. It would overshadow the intent of the article which is simply to report the bomb in an encyclopedic way. I came across this information when writing an item for the UDR page. Unfortunately I didn't consider that

7417:

Thanks for the kind words, but I'm actually not being particularly trusting of any of the participants in that discussion. That's why I haven't unprotected the page, because there doesn't yet seem to be an actual consensus. I think that a consensus could be found, and I hope you'll all get there,

7329:

I dispute that it's the wrong version you've protected. It's the content of my link which seems to be the problem and you're right it is part of an edit war which has spilled over from the Ulster Defence Regiment website. I have mediation going on there so I'll have to wait and see what happens.

6914:

Sorry, BHG - I was led here by a post from Irisdescent on my talk page, so here we are. I'll say to both of you and all that I consider myself spanked. I will say in my defense that I am not WL, am quite AGF and a very rational and reasonable person. My path in this is pretty simple: I would go

6757:

Thanks for your reply, but I'm afraid that I still think you are missing the point here. This isn't a heavily article with lots of discussion on the talk page; it's a short article which has never been discussed between editors before on its talk. Adding a POV tag without comment to an article with

5505:

I'm very sorry, but I really don't know much at all about the details of fair use policy, beyond that it's a difficult area (in that the Wikimedia Foundation has to be tough on this for legal reasons, but that its enforcement is contentious and difficult). May I suggest that you first try to discus

4640:

It will be very interesting to see what is revealed in 2016-2022, but I have a gut suspicion that a lot of material will still be withheld as politically sensitive. In any case, intelligence files need to be taken with large pinches of salt, as a lot of British politicians found out the hard way in

4344:

I think that we are looking at this from difft angles, and probably getting caught up in terminology. My concern is with the outcome, and so far as I am concerned a bot which does a bad edit is malfunctioning. There are of course many ways in which something like that can happen — a coding error, a

4222:

I appreciate that there was a need to block my bot so I thank you for doing so. However you should understand that this was not a malfunction. You created the Template redirect after the bot entered operation so I could hardly be expected to know about it. I'm glad you pointed it out and have added

4131:

a new editor. A friend forwarded me a newspaper article about the "101 year old marathon runner" and I got intrigued and started to search for information. I am fascinated by the way information is produced by the media ... how the media manipulate and how they are manipulated. Most of the original

11289:

Cowen doesn't appear to be likely to die soon, and when he does the article will get plenty of attention, so I wouldn't worry about that. In the meantime, the collection of null templates as parameters merely adds complexity to the markup, increasing the possibility that someone will inadvertently

11048:

tab), and I think that if you have that tab set to a particular format, you'll see no effect. I have set it to "no preference", so that I can see how the dates appear to unregistered readers, who I presume are the overwhelming majority (and even if they ain't, we are creating this for readers, not

10727:

a serious matter. It is to me, anyway, and in more general terms the problem of editor harassment is something we as a project are failing to address adequately. My experience is actually rather tame compared with what some editors have, and continue to put up with all because they contribute as a

10651:

Yes I had a lot of bullying- yes I was scarred for life maybe lol but perhaps got some (usually imperceptible) positive qualities from it, you never know.:) Editing articles such as those wouldn't be my idea of fun lol. Hopefully Vk's being banned from them will be better for any stress or blood

6739:

I will change that language. It is my feeling that what is pretty clearly written as WP policy - discussion and consensus of editors within a topic - is not just a law-and-order attitude, but the right way to behave in this arena. And in the POV cleanup pages it also states, "If anyone disagrees

5894:

A long time ago, a senior NI journalist told me that crucial thing to remember about Northern Ireland politics was that a huge number of people get out of bed in the morning with the sole intention that in the course of the day they will find something to be offended about. I think he was probably

4329:

Definitely resolved. I'm saying that the action doesn't denote a malfunction because the function was not part of the specification for what the bot is supposed to do. I spec'd out the exact regex I used when I first requested to use the bot and the regex itself was part of what got approved. Not

3845:

The reason I reverted it was that I double-checked and noticed the edit by that IP had been self-reverted, so I removed my warning. If you feel it's appropriate to make a warning of your own, you are of course free to do so ... but I don't see why you felt it appropriate to obscure the fact that I

1830:

No problem, and thank you for your intelligent comment there. I've responded too; I don't think it will be helpful to get too deeply into the legal niceties of the jurisdictions of the various courts on this article about a person. The article on the court would be a better venue for such detail I

1541:

I am sort of apologizing to you for what I see may have been the mess I made, changing imambayildi to imam bayildi, and screwing up the redirects. I guess I really did not know how to do that correctly. In the page history I see that you had to do quite a number of things to clear it all up. Thank

10595:

I was in Brownies and guides but had to leave both because I was bullied lol. Your suggestion 1.5 is good, but it looks like 1. will go ahead- I don't know VK's work much or the stuff involved. He must be popular with some people at least for people to be doing all this for him- not the average

10260:

The problem is that the more articles which are included in a category as well as sub-category, the harder the categories are to use, and it also creates category clutter on articles. I quite appreciate you wanting to raise the prominence on articles you have worked on, but if that approach was

9399:

I wondered if I could bother you for some background, as it seems I got dragged into the subject I tend to avoid (It makes the Irish and English parts of me glare at each other). Is there any kind of strong 'rawr' feeling over the use of Ireland/RoI, I mean, since Ireland/RoI gave up claim to NI,

6818:

You are still saying that is "policy" that such a note has to be added, but so far as I can see there is no policy which says that. I use template:pov as a guide - perhaps policy is a strong word. But this is just FYI - I get your point, and I get your point about process/substance. Thanks for

5195:

This is subject to an afd in which I have voted. In retrospect I wonder if it should be renamed but I am very uncertain what it should be renamed. I remember you cast your analytical ability very effectively in a massacre case a while back and you managed to avoid upsetting anyone. Maybe this is

4787:

and the splitters and stooges in the Saddleworth Liberation Front and the Democratic Front For The Liberation Of Saddleworth (pah, it hurts even mentioning their names). Once the programmers are satisfied that my code has been perfected, the bot will be used to restore Saddleworth to its historic

4633:

I know that there all sorts of agendas at work in Irish history, not least because so many of the issues involved still have direct bearing on contemporary politics. However, that doesn't mean that all Irish historical writing is flawed, just that it needs to be scrutinised carefully, which is of

3477:

Hey, if you are stuck into the project and intend to populate the lists more fully, then I have no concerns at all, and can only wish you good luck :) My concern was simply that there might be a collection of one-item or two-item lists, which is a nuisance for readers, but I see that you have

1921:

Two of three "reliable sources" are in fact breaking-news stories, the instant report of a judgement not yet fully digested. It would be much more persuasive if you could refer to more substantial reports in the reliable sources, rather than to the first take off the newswires. Additionally, the

1084:

which contains most of the necessary info that a reader needs but is only graded as start class. The VUPP article has a fair amount of refs and covers all the essential details. This was after all a party which existed for less than five years and was only a significant player for half that time.

1063:

Hello, firstly good job on assessing a lot of these. However looking at some of the assessments that you and others have placed there does unfortunately seem to be a fair bit of inconsistency. The difference between a stub and good article is obvious and even between a good article and a featured

10969:

I see you've put some useful remarks about our badly written article on Michael McGlynn - I've removed the Peacock Terms... and accidently your notification of them. Apologies for my lack of wikiliteracy... To add to this I have cleaned up the article and added a discography. Please feel free to

6790:. But I really think that you would be better advised to spend more time editing and creating content and familiarising yourself with wikipedia's conventions (and especially with how editors use them) before setting off to enforce all apparent breaches of what you think is a policy but isn't. -- 4756:

I've been doing some tag cleanup work, and have come across your handle here and there - British Isles stuff. I have noticed you seem to have your head on straight, and then went to your page and saw you have a great sense of humor, too. Just wanted to say hi and it's nice to see a real person

2858:

Biographies of living persons (BLPs) must be written conservatively... Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. An important rule of thumb when writing biographical

1876:

Yes, I share your understanding of the legal situation. The problem is how to present it in a clear, coherent and NPOV way while remaining accurate. It is inherently difficult to summarise, even without all the partisanship that such an issue attracts. Yet to go beyond a summary leads us to even

11367:

A "please vote to delete this rubbish" would be unacceptable no matter what the circulation list ... and a message sent only to selected participants would be unacceptable no matter what the content ... but a neutrally-worded "see this AFD" is fine if sent to all participants in a previous AFD.

3453:

I do beleieve i've found a way around the matter, bear with me a few days though. This has been a pet project of mine for years, i just didnt realise i could have it online And the lists of each letter should hoepfully just get longer as i fill them up. If i just concentrate on the lists at the

3413:

Well, i'm not sure which route to take, the alphabetical list i started off with, but i do get a bit lost, so i've drawn up a few maps of the network at its highest extent, and then i'm going county by county, so far i'm starting off with County Wexford and County Wicklow, then Counties Carlow,

2976:

TU, as an uninvolved editor that wasn't how I read BigDunc's comments - I read them as simply pointing out that calling Hussey a loyalist, while arguably inaccurate, isn't a violation of WP:BLP. Looking at that and other conflicts on Ireland related articles, there seems to be an increasing and

2902:

To take a fictitious example by way of illustration, if X said that "not enough people born in London are being employed in the city's public services", it would be wrong for wikipedia to say "X championed London ethnicity" (X did not use the tern "ethnicity"), but quite fair to report both X's

1849:

article shouldn't be misleading, and the NYT report is demonstrably wrong in saying that Farell was "unlawfully killed". If the article is going to mention those reports (and I think it should), then it also needs to clear about what the court actually did. The distinction is subtle, but it is

1210:

I've now got around to expanding the article and adding multiple references so could you reassess please? Also the article is currently at Vanguard Progressive Unionist Party but none of the sources use that, with Vanguard Unionist Progressive Party being the common title, so could you move the

10739:

Very likely as a consequence of all this, certain other "campaigners" have taken an interest in me. Therefore its no great revelation for me to tell you that my occupation is as a researcher. And, one of the good things about being a researcher is that I am pretty good at researching: finding,

6816:

in other words, your complaint is about process rather than substance. I get it, and probably this has gone on enough. My "complaint" (wrong word, but close enough) isn't the process, it's the confusion I've seen that it brings without having some. But I will take your words to heart. I've

3230:

I started writing the report yesterday, but in the end I decided that what with all the diffs required, it would take more time than I could be bothered to commit to this issues. I may file such a report in the future if this sort of spat arises again, but for now I'm going to leave this one.

2485:

I hope we will be in more luck with the pereages, Can either of you find any direct links from peerage articles to the peerage lists on Rayment's old angeltowns site, so that I can check the link format? If I can figure out another handy regex, I can throw the peerage categories into the mix:

2466:

However, there are other direct links to Rayment pages; the main ones I can think of are for peers and privy councillors, and since there is a significant overlap between them and the MPs+Baronets set, it would be most efficient to do the lot as one big job (to avoid beating up the server with

2347:

Oh, drat. It's a big job, and may not be easy. It won't suffice to simply change the refs into template calls, because the templates can't replicate links to precise pages. I'll have to look and see it the site structure has changed in the moves, and whether it is possible to update the URLs.

1034:

You're welcome! I'm just glad that it did come across as tongue-in-cheek, because irony is notoriously difficult to communicate online. Anyway, I'll leave off the barnstars if you insist, and just enjoy seeing a steady accumulation of your chronology-building work popping up on my watchlist.

10755:

So, this is a very long winded way of saying I don't believe my problems should be a central issue to the debate. Vk has a documented record of harassment under his own name. When presented, that wasn't sufficient for ArbCom to block him at the time. So my feeling is that if editors take that

10355:

appears to have escalated - probably because the result of the RfC upheld my edits and showed that my behaviour was in good faith (and still is). I'd like to point out that there are 3 separate things going on here, and it is best to treat them separately while understanding the connections.

5533:

Thanks for the quick response. I'll probably just let it drop, I don't have the time to invest in the area of image copyright and hate the arguments that spiral endlessly on here. A friend of mine invested a lot of time taking photographs for insertion here and finally gave up after continued

3625:

Don't ever use the word 'woman' because it is derived from the Anglo-Saxon 'wifeman' which not only indicated a married person of the XX genotype(unmarried was 'maegen' - maiden), and thus defined a 'female human' (neatly avoids the use of the word woman again - oh dear! this is difficult) in

10684:

I've been meaning to drop you a line at some stage to say how thoughtful I found your commentary on (what we might call) 'the Vintagekits situation'; not just recently, but in past discussions - it's been consistently precise, humane (always a plus), and usually you manage to illuminate some

9905:

issue here (being of Irish descent is not a form of criticism), and the edit summary you added about this being "unverifiable" is patently false, as you could have determined with a moment's checking. Only controversial or disputed points need to be removed if unreferenced; are you seriously

8292:

If I post down here in very small letters, perhaps no-one will notice that I'm here. For what it's worth, I think that it was the right decision (and I would support an unblocking); the last thing that's needed is any raising of the temperature, though, which is what the premature unblocking

5559:

I know it's probably not your usual area, but you wouldn't mind having a look at the above page would you? It's an upcoming album, but a tracklisting hasn't yet been released. Thus the only songs listed on it are three which have been confirmed by reliable sources. An anon user (so far using

4610:

I've seen both your notes on Molly Childers. I agree with you that she's notable, and was going to expand the page when I had some more time. Molly was involved substantially with the IVF (Irish Volunteers) and she was named secretary of that group alongside Alice Stopford Green. I have some

1777:

removed substantial content from the page; the same thing happened to me once and I believe it to be a weird glitch in the software. Just letting you know; I've repaired the damage. Any substantive help or advice you can offer on the dispute on the talk page would be very welcome. Keep well,

11641:

Thanks for assessing the Sermons page. I still need to add a few more resources. After that, I will try to put up some pages for Swift's "Irish tracts" and then one on the other Irish pamphlets. Also, work on Molyneux. That way, there will be a greater resource on early Irish constitutional

7863:

I don't know why you'd expect repeating these assertions would make any difference. The unblock was performed in reaction to the opinions on a discussion on his page. In that way it was certainly not unilateral and I've not heard any convincing reason why it was premature (though lots have

4306:

I'm sorry you think I was being hostile. That wasn't my intention, and I'm sorry if my reply came across that way. I'm surprised that you don't think that adding a duplicate banner is a malfunction, but I'm glad that things are now all sorted, so please can we both count this as resolved?

3429:

Hmm. Would it be better to start with one list, divided into alpahabetic sections, and then split it if and when it becomes unwieldy? That way there wouldn't be these one-item lists, and it'd be easier for others to add stations to the list, so it might not have to be only your own work.

4046:

at 90+, and that he deserves his place in the sun even if he was golding the lily a bit. He seemed commendably unfazed by all the fuss, but his boss was hilarious, citing on air three or four different dates of birth for Buster. It didn't help that two of them began "two thousand and ..."

10752:

for their transgressions. If we can ensure that they will not happen again then whether someone has gotten away with it doesn't really matter. If Vk is back editing then I'm pretty sure my personal issues will not continue, if only because there is no longer a fall guy to take the heat.

4553:

myself and added the county for geographical reasons after extensive field-work established it was not connected to the contiguous urban area. Aplgies for seemng unchilld but I was only usng the 2by4 on de dnky apprch and wsn't rlly srious abt the vapriztn. Btw I'm nt sayn ur a dnky :)

10859:

and some other like-minded editors are expected to be civil? (As I have stated before, Wiki-civility is simply a tool used to attack those the Admins would seek to supress). Also; it does take two (at least) to edit war - so why are we not pointing this fact out to the other warrior?

8852:

The community doesn't presently appear to have any mechanism for dealing with this, and maybe in the end it is the sort of thing that has has to be a police matter, but I'm hearing too many accounts of this for my liking. Knowledge really does need to step up its own response to it.

7459:

I suggest that the ideal outcome of discussion like that one would be to have a fully sourced section on the target of the bombing, in which the positions of the various parties are set out, with appropriate sourced interpretations of the parties' positions. As I have just noted at

2277:

I've noticed that Twinkle is failing that one step, putting the template on the article itself. It's creating the discussion, adding to the log, and notifying the creator, but missing that one final step. It seems to be a known bug, but there hasn't been much movement on it lately.

8726:

As regards that email - I'm happy to let the first half (wikistalking etc) lie and see how all that pans out in future. The second half - the meat-puppetry stuff - might be old but I think it could be a factor in cases like the above IP. Especially the targeting of myself and of

1895:" (emphasis added), and that was found to be violated. Now as I said there, if it was an editor using that to come up with "unlawfully killed" there would be problems, but there's three separate reliable sources (and I've not even looked at offline sources yet) stating just that. 9551:

This template is a great idea, but it tends to appear on top of some text at the bottom of my talk page. Take a look at my talk page as it is now. If the window is large it is OK, but if you make Firefox smaller it overlays the text. I can not see a way of fixing this. Can you?

4823:

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I've more work to do on the Department infoboxes and I understand at the minute they look like Ministers infoboxes! I plan to have the relevant Departments logo at the top of each one. I'm new to this so if I've done anything wrong help!!!

7989:

Flo, I have patiently explained at great length and now my patience has run out. If you still believe that I am spawn of satan for restoring the block pending the outcome of discussions, you are free to open an ANI complaint, but please stop repeating yourself on my talk page.

3161:

I dont mind BHG let the dice roll, I feel I have nothing to answer for on this. I asked you to have a look at the situation to which you did, and thanks for that, and then I posted on the aticle talk page and then get accused of defamation and libel and legal threats are flung

7272:

Rather than put words or thoughts forward at this juncture could I ask you to read this reasonably short article and advise me who you think the target of the bomb was? Should your findings not agree with mine then I will voluntarily withdraw from the editing on the article.

6696:

is pretty well spelled out. I won't quote more passages, but POV also talks clearly about discussion and consensus among editors - ? One of the common issues I have found on discussion pages is the question raised, "Who put that tag, and why? - We have no such issues here."

4188:

been an editor under a different ID. Of course it's not necessarily so, and there are other possible explanations ... so it was no more than a questionmark. And as Carcharoth noted, all your edits seem to be very good work, which is very welcome! Keep up the goos work :) --

1917:

I don't think it was at any point in dispute that those rights were protected by law. The issue in dispute was a much narrower one: whether the necessary safeguards required by the convention had been adequately applied in this situation (the court found that they had not

7067:

Thank you for the offer to nominate me for Admin (it isn't the first time someone has suggested it to me ... and I appreciate the vote of confidence each time I'm asked). But, honestly, I prefer to stay a regular old editor. If I ever change my mind, I'll let you know.

2331:

Rayment has moved from angeltowns to leighrayment.com. That is fine so far as the templates are concerned (they have been changed) but none of the links to the old references work any more. Please would you do your thing with a bot and change them all to the template. -

10179:

I fear that Scotland and Ireland have much in common. Unfortunately many of my countrymen were used or were too happy to take part in some things I am ashamed of. Thats the problem with being a proud Scotsman with mostly Irish blood, but things are changing in Scotland!

3124:

Also, the article in question I have edited once in the past three days. So no edit warring, just dicsussion in which I have been subject to accusations of rule breaking, and criticised for not edit warring. And I'm being reported. Doesn't really make much sense does

1850:

important that reader should not be misled: the does not make a judgement based on domestic law, so it cannot offer a judgement that something was unlawful. The ECtHR rules on convention rights, and that what it did here, ruling that a convention right had been violated.

7953:

Flo, you have made your view clear, that you are one of the few people who believe that it was a mistake to undo a premature and inappropriate unblock. You're entitled to your view, but now you are not discussing, you are just repeating yourself. It's time to move on.

9757:

John, what's going on here? I noticed on my watchlist that you were depopulated a whole categtory on the grounds that it was "unverifiable", and I was doing some expoloration of the extent of this before messaging you to ask you to stop. The reference I cited is to

8255:

things, but you still want to snipe by suggesting that an action you think was faulty was the result of some not thinking twice, then you haven't bothered to AGF ... and you can go and talk to yourself somewhere else. I'm not wasting more time on such petty sniping.

813:

Domer48 to lose his temper later on, but it was right out of order and didn't help at all, even though he was clearly deeply offended. But Gibnews, surely it wouldn't have hurt you to promptly apologise for any offence unintentionally caused? For goodness sake, can

1853:

In short: if the killing had been lawful under a British "Shoot Lots of Irish People on Sight Act", that wouldn't have effected the court's decision. What mattered to the ECtHR was that convention rights had been violated, regardless of what donestic law might say.

5334:

Thanks! I probably should just have done that at in the first place rather than AFDing, but the AFD seemed to indicate support for the merger, so it seemed a legitimate response and less bureaucratic than a DRV (the no-consensus closure was just vote-counting).

8637:

from 80.192.60.134. Looks like the RFCU came back as "unlikely". 68.2.74.58 might be a proxy - I'll check that out. Other than dealing with 80.192.60.134 I'm going to leave the sock-puppet issue sit unless it continues. If that happens I will then bring it

4520:, since that's what it too is known as. Outside the city boundaries, the only place known as "foo, Dublin" are those within postcodes, and I quite agree we don't need those in the article names (though it wld probaly be a good idea to have them as redirects). 9913:

I don't know why you are doing this, whether it's vandalism of POV-pushing or what, but it's definitely an abuse of AWB. I am very surprised and disppointed that an admin should be doing this, and since you don't want to be sensible I'll now take this to ANI.

3097:

warned to stop this disruptive dispute, which has now spiralled away from the substance of the article into a which-editor-offended-who dispute. TU, I'm not singling you out; I will be listing all the participants in this dispute, and leave it up to others at

1018:

Hi BHG - very many thanks for the final warning - I knew this excessive civility thing would get me into trouble. No more barnstars please - you can get too much of a good thing. Good to hear from you. Just keeping my head down and getting on. Thanks again.

8259:

I started drafting a long reply to Rock's thoughtful comments before I saw yours, but at this stage I'm not going to post it in public, because if this conversation remains open it will only be abused by folks like you who prefer hectoring and attacking.

2460: 10304:

So, can you take a neutral look? Let me know if I'm being an ass or if (as I feel) some editors are trying to bully me from performing perfectly legit edits. I'm not trying to drag you into this, although I would welcome your involvement. Thank you.

6877:

times your number of mainspace edits — I think you can trust us to be familiar with WP policies...) While I don't want to sound too patronising, if you're going to go round citing policy to everyone you probably ought to familiarise yourself with the

2793:, who has checkuser rights and so may know her way around that technical side of wikipedia. When this happens, I have seen some editors leave a note on their user pages, though personally, I haven't bothered on the few occasions it has happened to me. 794:

I consider it resolved as on seeing someone was unhappy I reworded the last paragraph to reflect that the terrorist threat remains present but now comes from a different, closer, direction. However, the comments from Domer48 are totally out of order.

6758:

active editors can be disruptive, but the point you are missing is that this article is a blatant hagiography. There's nothing subtle about it, no nuance: it's the sort of thing that is written by a publicity agent, and that breaches the fundamental

3577:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

10237:

What I was trying to do was broaden the range, as it were, of the articles. The more categorys they are listed in the less chance they remain obscure names and dates. Did'nt think of the problem inherent; sorry for putting you through so much work!

9612:

Are you using Internet Explorer? ISTR a few glitches with that browser, which I didn't pursue. If you want to experiment, you could just subst the template and try tweaking the bottom position until it works for you. Sorry I can't be more helpful.

7571:

I was merely restoring the status quo ante, undoing a unilateral action which pre-empted a decision at ANI. There may well be a decision by the community to lift that block, but until that decision has been made, the block should remain in place.

3260:

Hi BHG. When you have time could you have a look at this newly created article. For a number of reasons I do not wish to give an opinion on this article. I don't really wish to say any more but trust in your judgement implicitly on this. Thanks -

4727:

Understood. It's sometimes difficult to separate wearing the encyclopedic hat you must wear while writing these pages; versus your own privately researched conclusions on the matter. I'm learning how to do it. :) Thanks again for your comments.

8654:

Oh dear. While there may be an arguable case for some of the edits, it's not easy to discuss them when the editor concerned jumps between IP addresses and a registered username. There has also been a spate of trivial vandalism to the article

10620:

I think you may be right that option 1 will proceed, but we'll see; the discussion still has a bit to run yet. Yes, Vk is popular with some, but also v unpopular with others, partly because a lot of his editing involved articles relating to

8949:. I'd like to run through the evidence of disruption here quickly. 80.192.60.20 blocked for vandalism on April 24. Returned and blocked (for a week on April 25th). A checkuser declares 80.192.60.20/80.192.60.134 obviously the same person 10363:

Bardcom is examining articles with the term "British Isles" and changing those articles that he believes are using the term incorrectly. Is this wrong? Is his behaviour against policy? Are his edits bad? Is he being abusive/aggressive?

4249:

periodically (particularly before a major run), and not to simply assume that no new redirects exist, because it is critical to the bot's operation (I run a wikiproject banner bot myself, and this was one of the first issues which arose).

8825:

Ah it's okay, I've been getting hang-up phone calls tonight and text messages (from unknown numbers) that just say "hello" - so I'm a little on edge. In this case I could be wrong about it being the above IP - SorsImmanis1 has a myspace

9984:

The discussion page for this article appears to be corrupted, at least when I view it; as you seem to have been the last to alter it I wonder if you could work out what has gone wrong - me I'm a computer illiterate ;) so have no chance.

4492:. I think this is a matter of style and standardisation, not policy - and you have vapourised existing practice without a word of consultation. There is no need for postal addresses - where else are they used? Desist I tell you. Recant. 2687:

to Monkstown, County Dublin etc) as they are going against agreed practice for Dublin suburbs and I realise that if you proceed unchecked you are quite capable of having changed 500 articles by the time I get up in the morning!. Say ten

8703:

I did indeed get your email, and I'm sorry for not replying. Every time I read it, I reckoned it needed more thought, so I marked it again as unread, but I should at least have given you an acknowledgement of it. I'll look again now.

10801:

Finally, there's nothing particularly wrong with being 'left leaning' (although I probably sway a bit more the other way!); in particular, the 'letting bygones be bygones' characteristic is an attractive one. Ultimately, as I wrote on

7145:) and I tried to install it on my monoskin. I haven't done something right as the tool doesn't show up when I'm on article pages. I see that you added your name to the list of users for this tool on March 13th. Can you look at my 5906:(or whoever has the power) to rename the town and all its institutions to some bizarre and unpronounceable set of letters. That way, you will all have something to agree on, which would be a thoroughly productive state of affairs :) -- 5023:

Rayment has moved his site, as you are no doubt aware, and all links to the old site are now dead. The templates have been updated to point to the new suite, but when there is a direct link to a specific page, as there was with the

11347:

Hi, BHG. Is it permitted to post a neutral 'please see here' message on the talkpages of users who've voted on a previous AfD for a particular article (I'd be posting to all participants, for and against) - or is that a breach of

5094:

If there were a driving school, you would be an instructor. Further to the above, can I draw to your attention 2 very similar templates one of which might prefer to be a redirect, namely rayment-b and rayment-bt. I am not feeling

10575:

this issue and scold the bullies, I'm looking for feedback, and advice. Perhaps a public forum like this isn't the place - feel free to mail me if that is appropriate. And thank you for taking the time to look at the edits. --

8198:

Because given the time that had passed since the unilateral and premature unblock, and the ongoing meta-dispute over the unblock, Deacon's statement that he was merely "considering" an unblock offered no hope a prompt end to the

5724:

Well, I'm sure that some folks would argue that prefixing the name with "London" was childish, just as others would argue that taking it off was childish, but it's best to avoid such terms when discussing such a sensitive topic.

2773:

Hi BHG, I have accidentially made some wiki edits while not logged in to my account. Are you aware of a way to reassign them to my user-name or anyone else I could ask? I only know of the defunct "changing attribution" request

6765:

Now, that's the core point here: the issue is the flaws in the article. However, your only concern seems to be that there wasn't a note on the talk page ... in other words, your complaint is about process rather than substance.

1136:. I saw two deficiencies there: some unreferenced sections, though not much, and a lead section which needs splitting up (it's a big wall of text). The latter isn't really enough to hold it back from B-class (it's more of a 6493: 9898: 7676:

I support the idea of putting aside the meta discussion about if there was consensus to unblock or consensus to reblock and pursuing the more productive discussion on what the community expects from VK when unblocked.

3192:

You will be able to see what I report, and you can comment there, as can any other of the five participants listed. However, I'm not going to set out the case twice just so that you can add more comments here as well.

7976:

Administrators need to discuss their actions. Patiently explain why they used their tools in a particular manner. You did not seem willing to discuss. Instead you wanted to "move on". I want to discuss this with you.

8179:

Vk should be unblocked; b) once it was removed, we only had Vk's word on his conduct, and the whole discusion on conditions would be unnecessary if there wasn't a strong consensus that the community cannot AGF with

4330:

doing something that is not in the spec cannot really be called a "malfunction." It can easily be called a lack of planning on my part and I'll agree that it was, but it's not the bot's problem, it's the operator's.

2711:

Sarah, the postal address of the place has always been "Monkstown, County Dublin". How and where was it agreed (by who?) that it should be called "Monkstown, Dublin"? That usage would be unknown to anyone from that

6770:, but I'm sorry to say that you seem to be approaching this as if it was :( You are still saying that is "policy" that such a note has to be added, but so far as I can see there is no policy which says that. (see 4349:

that the bot was created for. I don't see that it matters much whether the cause was glitch in the bot's code or a glitch in the parameters set by the bot operator; either way such a bot is doing the wrong thing.

2796:

BTW, it's been good to see your username popping up again on my watchlist recently, after a bit of break. There aren't many editors working conscientiously on Irish politics articles, and your absence was a loss.

10826:

PS - the other thing that I find badly-organised is the way in which ArbCom hands down its decision and then provides no support or other monitoring; it's just dumped on the Admins to deal with as best they can.

3856:

When I saw that you had reverted your warning thinking the vandal reverted their work, I was too lazy to issue my own warning. Your warning was still valid, so I just reinstated it. If you look at the edits to

2876:

I'm not sure that loyalist vitriol is a helpful term to use in describing the comments there, and everyone editing these topics should take not to use terminology which unnecesarily polarises discussions. I have

10151:

I'm afraid that there has been so much distressing stuff in Ireland (not all of it arising from the 800-year tangle with our nearest, and much larger, neighbour) that most Irish graves see a lot of spinning :(

6715:

OK, POV-check would have been a better template to use, and I have no problem with that being pointed out. My objection is that you said that the tag has been added "frivolously and/or arbitrarily". It wasn't.

9937:

That's fine; I am confident that I am in the right. Maybe think a little before you go to a central venue on this one, as I'd hate to see you looking silly. I'm going out for the next few hours. See you then.

7091:

each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

6234:

Just as well this thread is taking place after the 9pm watershed, or else I would have to censor myself from recalling how the British journalist Andrew Moncur used to wage battle with the typesetters of his

4383:

BHG, would you please stop edit warring and put Monkstown back to "Monkstown, Dublin". Making such a change to established practice re suburbs in Dublin and using Admin powers to force your pov is an abuse.

5130:

It has direct links to a Baronets list, a commons list, and a privy council list, which i think are all within the scope I have already identified. I'll try to get a bot on the case over the next few days.

5031:

I'm going to try bot-updating all the specific page links (by converting hem to the format used on Rayment's the new site), and it'd be helpful not to have them all converted to templates in the meantime :)

9597:

I have just realized that it is only with "cat=yes" that this happens. With no cat parameter it is fine, if I comment out the stuff that puts a cat on my talk page, which I probably should not have anyway.

10372:

I requested neutral advice because I respect the Knowledge community and would like to avoid an edit war. I am trying to be reasonable, and I recognize that sometimes it takes an outside view to advise.

5318:

I had to chuckle. The moment the KGVF afd closed "no consensus keep" you did the sensible thing and moved, merged and redirected as if ut had never happened at all. I think you made the right decision.

3012:

Valenciano makes a good point. That debate has seen far too much throwing around of labels and also far too much taking of offence, as well as inappropriate accusations of vandalism, libel and disruption.

9343:

There's no prob at all with adding a reference to the primary source (and it's probably a good idea), but the problem is that this article has nothing other than primary sources. If the only coverage of

8796:) coming here to post abuse in response to his mass emails denouncing me in all sorts of terms; some of the posts were more weird than abusive, like this one you received. Amyway, they eventually stopped. 7352:

Despite your reluctance to become involved it seems you may have been the catalyst for concensus on this matter. I can't thank you enough for that. To paraphrase WSC, It may be the end of the beginning.

8998:

Thank you for your earlier help. I cannot figure out how to set up references to webpages so that I get the publisher and the date I retrieved the page. For example I want a footnote to look like this:

5880:

be pissed off much more than you are for something to be worthwhile. At least at Stormont the less sensory aware politicians have minders. Illiterate Cllrs just make fools of themselves and the system.

9228:

Rehashing a dead conversation - but there's now a ticky-box under "gadgets" on preferences, that adds a "cite" button - when you click it, it fills out the access date (among other things) automatically

10524:

However, I also see a series of edits in which you have reverted Tharkuncoll's edits as vandalism, which they clearly were not. For example, you may have grounds for questioning the appropriateness of

9487:

Hrm. Having read over the history of this (rather idiotic) debate this morning....y'think I can deny my Irish ancestry, hand in my British passport and just declare myself to be french or something?

4428:". I'm not aware of any widespread use "County Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown" as a location identifier; since the Act somehow used that convoluted name it's techincally correct, but it's not common usage. 4936:

be allowed? Does the placeholder system and graphic image need to be improved to satisfy policies and guidelines for inclusion? Is it appropriate to some kinds of biographies, but not to others?"

3378: 3360: 911:

You added an NPOV tag to this article and I would like to clean it up. I'm a bit of a newbie, but I'd like your opinion on what, in general, needs to be changed. Does it sound like an ad? Cheers!

10944:. Isn't that what I'm saying? "You goaded Snappy into sarcastically calling you 'petal' " - I'd have to quibble with that as from my perspective he was goading me. But I'm currently ungoadable. 8641:

As a matter of interest did you get the email I sent a few weeks ago about old (but live) calls for meat-puppets by a leading men's rights activist? If not I'll make a short post about it here--

4839:

Thanks for your note, but that change wouldn't alter my view that all these templates are misleading and inappropriate, and serve no useful purpose. For a fuller explanation, see my comments at

3178:

But you're the one doing the reporting - so clearly you feel I have a prima facie case to answer. When I question that all you say is "enough". That'd not good enough to base an accusation on.

7923:

Surely we can agree that it is best that no further blocking/unblocking should be done until there is a clear consensus and put the whole "who was wrong" game in the closet for a little while.

1064:

article, but the difference between a start article and a B class article isn't and often seems subjective and arbitrary depending on whoever reviewed it. To give one example, you assessed the

8020:

No, Flo is not one of the few. You have made a big mistake, you always seem very keen for others to admit their mistakes, obviously you are not of that inclination. You have abused you tools.

1490:

Sorry for my mistake, and glad to see you got it sorted. I had spotted that there was a Turkish letters issue, but I must have got in the wrong way round. Don't forget the double-redirects! --

703: 5667:

I prefer a separation of powers in these matters, and as the admin who protected the page I prefer to leave it to others to unprotect or to perform a requested it. May I suggest that you use

7839:

Now, let's get back to the substantive discussion of whether VK's block should be lifted, and on what terms, from which we were all sidetracked by the premature and unilateral unblocking. --

4637:

However, it's not wikipedia's job to take a view on the merits or otherwise of the claims, just to report them as accurately as possible, to report the commentary in a fair and balanced way.

1129:

as B-class was probably slightly over-generously rated even on the old criteria, though at that point it was a bit marginal, but it clearly doesn't meet the newer, stricter B-class criteria.

6402: 6134: 11646:

is up for FA review. There are some complaints by some grammarians to specific parts, but you might be interested in checking out the page and/or commenting on the Feature Article Review.

9843:(editconflict) For goodness sake, John, hold on -- this is much wider than Clare Short. Clare Short's Irishness has frequently been a factor in her political career, and the same goes for 4840: 9681:. If you are not familiar with CSS, beware: some people find the concepts which underly it quite difficult to understand, and while I;m sure you'd get there, it might be a lot of work. -- 8236:"You really need to think twice before using your tools. While a block can be easily undone, the damage from a premature and ill thought out use of the tools can not be easily repaired." 6499: 6487: 6481: 6430: 5854:, noting that the city council website isn't much help. Sometimes, though, I think that a new name for the place should be chosen at random, just so that everyone is equally offended. -- 3960:

working on them, and get them at least partly resolved? An ArbCom case is going to take a whole lot of our time and likely end up with a finding of "editors should be civil". Any ideas?

8121:

You really need to think twice before using your tools. While a block can be easily undone, the damage from a premature and ill thought out use of the tools can not be easily repaired.

5787:

Tempers can flare on wikipedia about Northern Irish issues, but you are clearly very careful to listen to what's going on and not take offence, so I'm sure you'll do fine. Good luck! --

4945:

Conclusions to centralized discussions are either marked as 'policy', 'guideline', 'endorsed', 'rejected', 'no consensus', or 'no change' etc. We should now decide for this discussion.

10732:

he is entirely uninvolved, the finger would get pointed at him and the real culprit would be well aware of that. So does that make it more or less likely that he is innocent or guilty?

7519:. I know we've had some different ideas about categorization in the past. If you and I can come up with something we both like, we can probably convince a good many other people. -- 6644:

Hello Grownhairedgirl - replying to your message to me this morning. I am confused. First I want you to take my thoughts here as a desire to understand, not an argument. You wrote:

9502:

You wouldn't be first to want to want that. But I think that most nationalities carry their own bits of idiocy, and the French have their moments too. On the other hand, they do have

7142: 6834:

Seeing as I'm here, I'll also comment here rather than open a fresh thread elsewhere, as I have a virtually identical concern regarding your removal of the "frivolous and arbitrary"

8356:

adopted this cover to avoid any prejudice against intellectual past-times, and retained it because the grants available for sports are much better than those for literary criticism)

10744:. They hate what I represent. And I am a willing representative of a system that is flawed with its own inherent biases. So if we can resolve some of the issues that contribute to 6132:← We know where it is; we just can't see any reason to go there since it's a bit tricky to find and there are a lot of more interesting places to visit nearby. Is it anywhere near 7366:

If I have helped in some way to build a consensus, that will be a successful outcome, but it doesn't look like it's there yet. Good luck to all involved in reaching agreement. --

7141:

BHG, I'm seeking tool techno help. I've been participating in the WPMILHIST Tag & Assess drive, and will start doing the same work for WPBIO. I saw there's a T&A tool (

3842:

Why did you revert my edit to User talk:86.43.184.115? I was removing a warning which I had issued myself, and I don't see that it's appropriate for another editor to restore it.

9798:; the key test is whether the person's ethnicity is relevant to their notability. In this case I do not believe that the reference establishes this. If you disagree, let's go to 4963: 3025: 2572:

Hi BHG, following on from the Phoenix Park article changes, my user page is being repeatedly vandalised, it a bit annoying. I was wondering if you (being an admin) can help? Tx,

2073:

so I'm guessing your part of that project too, if you are there are a few articles me and some other fellow have been working on that u may wanna add to WikiProject Numismatics.

1393:, but I saw that it was used before and I wouldn't make the move without the help of an administrator. Now I would much appreciate your helping me move the relevant article from 593:

Unfortunatly it is something that really annoys me, I have lived in England and had to put up with racist quips and when challenged they all give the same response as Major gave

5979:

BTW, that's a traditional Northern Irish gambit as a conversation starts to escalate towards a fight: whataboutery. I introduce it here merely to conform to local customs ;) --

4388:

There is no longer any such legal entity as "County Dublin"; if you insist in tagging the Local Authority after the name it should be "Monkstown, County Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown".

2482:. This is a good idea, because the old privy councillor lists were so long that my browser found them uncomfortable to digest, but it means that a bot can't update the links :( 1794: 926:

Thanks for your msg, and sorry I didn't leave a more detailed explanation at the time. Yes, in a few places it does read just a little bit like an ad :) I'll add a few notes at

7879: 7868:

stated it). It was unilateral in the sense that only I performed it, but that is meaningless as only one person can ever hit the block or unblock button, as you yourself know.

7856: 5938: 5923: 5889: 5871: 3210: 3156: 3134: 3119: 3088: 2941: 1943: 882: 857: 11458: 10697: 10060: 3099: 1531: 1232:

assessment; I do hope you'll submit it. If you have the energy for a more rigorous review, I think you'll find that it's not far off making the grade as a featured article. --

611:

I still live in England, and I have had it too :( I also live in a predominantly muslim area, so I also know well how offensive that sort of thing can be to my muslim friends.

3471: 3423: 4939: 4909: 4262: 4246: 3574:. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. 1415:

Hi again, I hope there is nothing confusing with the subject. If you would like to ask any questions regarding the matter, I will be around here a bit more while. Thanks. --

1287:

The message doesn't seem to me to be partisan, and having looked at the contribs list there doesn't appear to be have been any extensive notification, so I see no breach of

6196: 3591: 1562:

and John Barry. There people are important people in the Green party and reference to them must be included in the page for it to be acurate Can you please replace them ?

7211: 6975: 6229: 5257: 4681: 3723: 3495: 3447: 3000: 2986: 1519: 723: 4737: 4658: 4506:

Sarah, please chill a bit -- I have not "vapourised existing practice without a word of consultation". I moved one article, and when you unmoved it back with replying to

3614: 11431: 8152: 7694:

I consider the re-block to have been unnecessary and deliberatly provocative. Vintagekits had agreed not to edit pending terms being discussed, this was a needless act.

7689: 7610: 5403: 5301: 5275: 5231: 5168: 5148: 5108: 4903: 4722: 4699: 3398: 3370: 3350: 2561: 2365: 1616: 1513: 1114: 769: 737: 697: 3323: 3187: 2969: 2955: 614:

However, it doesn't help to escalate unless it's persistent. A firm but polite request to desist often does the trick, and is certainly worth trying as a first step. --

10212: 10169: 10146: 10127: 7904:

is well understood that reversing another admin block or unblock is drama provoking in and of itself. There was no need for an immediate reblock to protect Knowledge.

7488:

the disagreement from there would spill over into here. Despite sticking up for myself I've really had enough of the bickering and am looking for an easier ride here.

6304: 5125: 1507: 1447: 1355: 1094: 10671: 10646: 10412: 10289: 9477: 9268: 9223: 9200: 9168: 8093: 6547: 6521: 6474: 6452: 6423: 6264: 6110: 6088: 6061: 6031: 5996: 5971: 5455:

Thank you for the page you created for me. Lots of links to helpful information that I had looked for but did not find when I initially started to add content to the

5450: 4205: 4122: 4107: 3301: 2672: 2383: 1667: 1249: 1220: 1205: 1179: 1164: 643:

At the risk of prolonging this discussion, I only came here to say 'Amen' to your wise remarks, BHG. May I suggest that you tag the discussion with a 'Resolved' tag?

571:

You're welcome. Editors certainly should take care not to cause offence, but it's also important to try not to take offence, and not to let these things esacalate. --

11618: 11596: 11582: 11514: 11492: 10367:

Tharky is blindly reverting Bardcom's edits without discussion or explanation. Several times. I've tried to discuss edits, etc, but Tharky just keeps on reverting.

7831: 7185: 5804: 5757: 5742: 5527: 4860: 2655:

If anything was know an about him, or even if there were substantive accounts of the hunt for him, it could be an article. But "we know nothing" isn't an article. --

2310: 2245: 1912: 1715:

Done. I don't like making an importance rating for other projects, but quality-class assessments are fairly consistent across projects, so I should have uprated the

10953: 10935: 10836: 10815: 10770: 10033: 9388: 9133: 9107: 9093: 8052: 8007: 7984: 7971: 7776: 7747: 7729: 7648: 7598:

There did seem to be an agreement that the unblock was incorrect. BHG seemed to be acting on the decision of a wider community discussion, not acting unilaterally.

7589: 7558:, please undo this block, quickly. You are absolutely the wrong person to block this user. And Vk had agreed not to edit, for now. There was no reason to re-block. 7077: 7062: 5694: 5662: 5647: 5547: 5499: 5472: 5352: 4950: 4871:

Edited an archive of your talk page without looking at the notice at the top. Sorry. How on earth do you revive archived discussions anyways? Thanks for responding.

4588: 4563: 4544: 4501: 4467: 3940: 3914: 3900: 3831: 3663: 3542: 2732: 2604: 2056: 1760: 1746: 1637: 1001: 987: 961: 947: 11470: 10736:

first place. The best I can do is for the harassment to stop, and that appears to have happened (though I can't be sure, due to the nature of some of the tactics).

10584: 10426: 8770: 7481: 7435: 7383: 7339: 7320: 7019: 4339: 4324: 4301: 4286: 3171: 2927: 2814: 1308: 1052: 835: 804: 631: 606: 588: 11385: 11330: 11310: 11284: 11194: 11119: 11102: 11080: 11066: 9538: 9523: 8939: 8870: 8841: 8816: 8735: 8721: 8649: 8626: 8586: 8491: 8478: 8359:

Seriously, I'm sorry, that was a clumsy mistake by me. I must have clicked the wrong button on twinkle, and it's now fixed. Thanks for pointing out my mistake! --

7948: 7935: 7703: 7623: 6623: 6350: 6333: 5089: 5063: 5049: 3768: 1113:

We have in general started to be a bit stricter on B-class than we were in the eraly days, and are now working off a checklist borrowed from another project (see

10788:

I agree with you that 'something needs to be done' to protect editors, although that's going to be difficult to arrange. There's a case in the UK at the moment (

10495: 9698: 9645: 9630: 9607: 9592: 9246: 8376: 6807: 6733: 5376: 4809: 2129: 2124: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2099: 9947: 9885: 9871: 9811: 9789: 9529:

of Irish editors who generally decide to push an anti-British POV on Falkland articles that I was starting to lose my good faith. I thank you for restoring it.

7793: 4039: 2899:

of Anderson's words should follow her use of terminology, by using a direct quote if necessary ... and the same principle should be applied to criticism of her.

2762: 2705: 1886: 1871: 1840: 1825: 1584: 11544: 11498: 10272:, which didn't just include the articles you had added; I dispersed lots of other articles to the appropriate sub-categories. So it's a win-win all round :) -- 10044:

I don't mean to stir things up, but how did Wikipeire manage to get this discussion to mediation when as far as I can see the vast majority did not want it? --

8318: 7908:

had said that he was reconsidering whether to reblock but wanted more time to decide. Given this, your actions was not based on consensus, and also premature.

7268:

I can't thank you enough for your timely intervention on this article. I would be equally grateful for your opinion on the problem. The link in question is

5976:

What about English placenames: long collections of letters, many of which are randomly omitted from the pronunciation. Ever tried asking the way to Leominster?

5769:, which I think summarises things rather well. I think that these symbolic things remain sensitive when the underlying issues are unresolved, and despite the 4173: 4155: 3687: 3248: 3073: 3045: 2882: 2509:

I can then either ask for permission to run BHGbot to do this job, or (if I'm feeling too lazy to code the job) I'll ask another BOTmeister to do it for us. --

920: 10469: 10454: 10382: 10342: 6780:

Finbar Wright asks, "Does this really need to be spelt out before the article can be tagged (and thereby categorised) as being need in need of POV attention?"

4183:

Kath, I'm sorry if my earlier guess was misplaced, and I'm quite happy to withdraw it with apologies. The reason it arose is that this area has seen a lot of

3375:

It's been just-round-the-corner for so long that I won't hold my breath ... but if it does start to surface, the interesting issue will be what form it takes.

1068:

article as B class and then returned to it later and changed that to start class without any intervening edits. A quick glance through B class articles shows

9455: 8444: 8029: 7628:

Flo, please re-read what I posted at ANI, where I have shown that there was a consensus that the unblocking was inappropriate while a discussion was ongoing.

5709:

Wow! Not even pre-1972? Thats a bit childish but I suppose everything Northern Ireland is! Thanks for the information I'll remember to keep things neutral.--

2370:

Don't think the bot will actually do this will it? We have references to Rayment in so many different formats that this is going to be a horrendous job :( -

6948: 6908: 5844: 2189:

Heya - how you? I can't find the Emergent Party in the list of articles for deletion...is it somewhere else these days, I've not done a AfD for years, heh.

1185: 1144: 10521:

replaces a link to an article on people with a link to a geographical article, which in the context seems strange, and I see some similar troubling edits.

9838: 8893: 8632: 8604: 8566: 8545: 7361: 3741: 1572: 1381:. And he provided me with a link proving that the term is in fact within the English vocabulary, and hence it should have been spelled accordingly, namely 1143:

Thanks again for raising those queries, and please let me know if there are any others you want clarification on or re-assessment, or you can list them at

566: 8239:

In response to that, Flo, all I can say is that you can get the hell off my talk page and go and take some basic civility lessons before starting to read

6700:

I do desire to do things properly and with AGF, but I'd appreciate it if you could help me see the light in this seeming contradiction of policy...Thanks.

2977:

depressing trend towards throwing out kneejerk 'vandalism' and 'disruption' related warnings to rival editors without trying first to find common ground.

2178: 8987: 8962:. Is there anything that can be done about the fact that this account is created to evade a block, to game semi-protection and is actively povpushing?-- 8885: 8766: 8499: 8408: 5784:

to film all the bombings, there was a standing joke amongst the journalists that if you thought you understood was happening, it was time to get out. :)

4922: 3408: 2903:

actual words and a scathing response from someone else which said "X's comments were nakedly racist in their effect in the city's immigrant population",

2621: 2293:

Thanks for the pointer. I must make sure to check my other recent AFDs. The articles I returned to had had all worked OK, but I must check the others. --

2157:

I'm not actually a part of that project, I just added their banner to an article I was assessing, as a courtesy to them. You may want to leave a note at

1370: 10556: 9306:

reliable way, better even than finding a third party. If you have a minute, could you explain to me what you would consider a good source here? Thanks!

6996: 4086:

of question marks. Clifford is a very clever tabloid publicist who has invented things before, and I'd take anything with his fingerprints on it with a

2743:

Dear BHG Thanks for your message. I've just taken a look at the article, and the Discussion Page. I'll post a response to the Discussion. Cheers, Pat

11534: 9014: 6590: 5485:

Forgive me for bothering you but I thought you could advise - given your interest in all things Irish? The above symbol was removed yesterday from the

4345:

design error, a change in circumstances or whatever — but I think it's a great mistake to look only at the details of the spec without considering the

3548: 2870: 2087: 2082: 2077: 2070: 2015: 8115:

Why did you do the re-block "yourself" when you are aware that you doing it would cause more conflict than another totally uninvolved administrator?

1877:

worse problems. I'm still thinking about what compromise I would like to see adopted there. I still think that a draft would be the best next step. --

663: 10539:

You really both need to cool the rhetoric and try a centralised discussion on this, or you are both likely to end up at arbcom on conduct grounds. --

9966: 8950: 8428: 8314: 4258:

questioning the care with which the bot was being run, particularly since since it was left to others to tidyup after the bot's previous malfunction.

2092: 1996: 1058: 11040:

Anyway, the effect of the revert was to restore day-first date format ("10 January 1960" rather than "January 10, 1960"). That can be overridden in

10879: 8849:

I'm horrified, though, to hear that you are getting harrassed in real life, and I quite understand that you must be feeling on edge. How horrible :(

8206:

Why did you do the re-block "yourself" when you are aware that you doing it would cause more conflict than another totally uninvolved administrator?

3861:, you will see the vandal didn't completely revert their work, they just changed it, and ommitted information, constituting vandalism. I apologize. 3640: 2783: 2536:. And a number who should be in rayment-hc as well as rayment-b but are not. And others who should be in rayment-hc or rayment-b but are instead as 646:

As BD is here, I'd like to make it clear that I don't mean to be rude or belittle him, but really sometimes it's better to turn the other cheek and

9722: 9561: 7039: 6182: 3984: 3519: 2205: 11071:

I had intended to add the df switch when I created the template but the then got lazy, thanks for giving me the kick up the ass too finish it off

9098:

Thanks! So I have to fill in everything myself, including access date etc.? I thought there was some mechanism to have this done automatically. --

7531: 7497: 7450: 7410: 7282: 7255: 7191: 7162: 6394: 6156: 4571:

BTW, I like donkeys. Very gentle and kind characters with little drama: they are high up my list of creatures-I'd like to be reincarnated as :) --

1125:

both have lots of detail, but few refs. On earlier criteria, they were probably just B-class, but on the stricter criteria they are start-class.

10756:

behaviour into consideration and still decide to !vote to unblock, then it doesn't really matter whether there was additional harassment or not.

5480: 5328: 5205: 4833: 4164:

a new editor", but don't worry if she doesn't. Just continue to contribute good content, and that will be all that most people will worry about.

3307: 10314: 10247: 10232: 7131: 6138:. (This map square must have the single highest concentration of ridiculous placenames in the world — "Tongue of Gangsta, near Mid Ho", anyone?) 5427: 4620: 3748: 2526: 2198: 967: 551: 9996: 7045:

You efforts are indeed very much appreciated! You shown wonderful patience and persistence in maintaining calm in a highly contentious area. --

3870: 3281: 2838: 2649: 2617: 9931: 8035:

outcome of discussions, go ahead and propose that at ANI, but please stop this repetition here. (I may delete any more of it from you two). --

7441:

My intentions are honourable. I'm just stubborn when I think I have justification. I made some mistakes and paid for them but I'm wiser now.

7395:

We'll get there and as the newbie I really appreciate your considered opinion and advice. I hope I can justify the trust you've placed in me.

2341: 1973: 1725:

assessment at the same time as I did the others. Thanks for the reminder, and congrats again on improving the article. Go on, nominate it for

1646:

They should have brief mentions in the main article, but should not overwhelm it, and of course the content should be referenced. I have just

650:. Sometimes taking offense only serves to inflame the situation and, frankly, most of us are sick to death of the great Anglo-Irish edit war. 11449: 11408: 10985: 8391:

last night but I think he might be away. Would you mind reviewing this disruption by User:Edgerunner2005 and the IPs making the same edits--

7168:

The problem is you haven't filled in the blanks, as it were. Gimme a minute or two, I'm just testing a setup that I hope may work for you. --

6924: 6828: 6749: 6709: 4411: 3571: 2826: 2287: 466: 459: 454: 449: 444: 439: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 409: 404: 399: 394: 389: 384: 379: 374: 369: 364: 359: 354: 349: 344: 339: 334: 329: 324: 319: 314: 309: 304: 299: 294: 289: 284: 279: 274: 269: 264: 259: 254: 249: 244: 239: 234: 229: 224: 219: 214: 209: 204: 199: 194: 189: 184: 179: 174: 169: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 139: 129: 124: 119: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 79: 74: 69: 9029:{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/somestory |title=Myanmar: Death toll more than 15,000 |publisher=CNN |date=], ] |accessdate=2008-05-05}} 4004: 3274: 10977: 8616: 8277: 5156: 5007: 4435: 2678: 8846:

I think that community is slowly moving in that direction — arbcom is now getting a wee bit tougher — but it's far too slow for my liking.

7516: 6654:

Does this really need to be spelt out before the article can be tagged (and thereby categorised) as being need in need of POV attention?

4507: 4421: 4232: 2907:

that the criticism did not receive undue prominence in the article (relative to its significance in the subsequent debate on X's remarks).

1484: 1470: 1424: 1410: 1365:. I saw that the article's name was based on the original Turkish spelling. According to that spelling, I should have changed the name to 1332: 9326: 8970: 8955:. They then waited until their account matured and thus by-passed semi-protection and have continued to perform the same edit as the IPs 8916: 8759: 8556: 8399: 8302: 5028:, it makes more sense to convert it to a link to the new URL for that page rather than just a template pointing at the site's index page. 4269:

if such checks are going to be made routinely in the future. I'm delighted to hear that the first point is done; how about the second? --

3793: 904: 10189: 10053: 8216:

administrator who does anything with regard to Vk automatically gets labelled as partisan. The mud gets thrown regardless of who does it

5718: 1551: 1028: 10806:'s page, the policy ought to be to encourage good editors and try to remove or reform unpleasant or disruptive ones: time will tell! -- 8538: 8322: 4010: 3567: 3549: 3381:

link really is interesting. Hideous syntax, inelegant results, but in some circumstances it could be useful. Thanks for the pointer! --

1461:, namely the pure English spelling. Or maybe your keyboard doesn't allow you to see the difference. Could you notice the difference? -- 11358: 10887: 10883: 10717: 7108: 5616: 5602: 1709: 1681: 11017: 10611: 4880: 3669: 3021: 2581: 1281: 10869: 8128: 7915: 7565: 4292:

an issue and I already thanked you for pointing it out. I was also not aware of that particular tool and will use it in the future.

2629: 2478:... but when I look at Rayment's new Privy Council lists, I see that they have been restructured, and that that he is now listed in 11558: 9751: 9496: 9409: 8345: 7631:

Please let's return to discussing the substance of whether or not there is consensus on a set of conditions for Vk's unblocking. --

5358: 927: 8333: 7269: 2267: 11562: 11364:

So long as the message is neutral in both content and in distribution, that's fine, and I think it's actually a good thing to do.

10897:

edit-warring, but you were the one who chose to complain about it, so the observation was inevitably in a reply addressed to you.

4766: 3525:

Hi Snappy, yes, lots of tedious vandalism. It all seems to be from anon IPs, so I have semi-protected the article for 1 month. --

2738: 1556: 480: 11530: 9848: 8829:

and he's German - so either he's a different person or he's using proxies or he's somehow connected to one of my adopted Trolls.

1751:

Thanks for the assessment and for the encouragement. I want to polish it a bit more and then I probably will have a go at GA.

1647: 10392: 10321: 9816:

Is this a wind-up? Before 1997, Clare Short was famous for two things; the anti page 3 campaign, and parliamentary support for

8105:

BHG, you have yet to answer my and other peoples specific concerns. Why was this block needed when Vk had agreed not to edit?

6270: 5367:) as a huge amount of this info is only stuff that current staff/students/parents know. It is not written anywhere. Thank you. 5113: 9179:... which is the wrong format for the accessdate field, which is supposed to be in YYYY-MM-DD format (see the instructions at 2215:

If you disagree with the PROD, just remove the tag, giving your reason in the edit summary; if you agree with it, you can add

1787: 11613: 11577: 11487: 11445: 11426: 11404: 11380: 11305: 11189: 11097: 11061: 10930: 10641: 10551: 10407: 10284: 10207: 10164: 10122: 10028: 9926: 9866: 9784: 9693: 9625: 9587: 9518: 9472: 9430: 9383: 9263: 9195: 9128: 9088: 8934: 8865: 8811: 8716: 8581: 8473: 8371: 8272: 8047: 8002: 7966: 7851: 7771: 7724: 7643: 7584: 7476: 7430: 7378: 7315: 7206: 7180: 7057: 7014: 6954: 6802: 6728: 6585: 6542: 6469: 6418: 6289: 6259: 6105: 6056: 5991: 5918: 5866: 5799: 5737: 5689: 5642: 5522: 5445: 5398: 5347: 5296: 5252: 5226: 5143: 5084: 5044: 4898: 4855: 4804: 4717: 4676: 4664:

so many different types of interpretation. That has always struck me as good advice: there's two ways to tell every story. --

4653: 4583: 4539: 4462: 4362: 4319: 4281: 4200: 4102: 3999: 3935: 3895: 3826: 3799:

The reason I reverted the commentary was that it was unsourced criticism of a living individual, which is not permitted: see

3763: 3658: 3609: 3537: 3490: 3442: 3393: 3345: 3296: 3243: 3205: 3151: 3114: 3068: 3040: 2960:

Thats quite a leading question isn't it? Clearly I'm not, so why would you ask? Your attitude to wikipedia needs to change.

2922: 2892: 2809: 2727: 2667: 2599: 2521: 2360: 2305: 2240: 2173: 2051: 1938: 1866: 1820: 1741: 1662: 1611: 1502: 1442: 1350: 1303: 1244: 1200: 1159: 1047: 982: 942: 877: 830: 764: 718: 692: 626: 583: 8457:) has not broken 3RR, but the edit pattern of this SPA is almost identical to that of the IPs. I suggest that you request a 7464:, so far there are only two sources under discussion, which seems completely inadequate for such a widely-reported event. -- 3363:? We do have category intersects right now. I never knew that, but I won't be so surprised if world and dog knew for years. 1774: 8454: 7547:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5677:

to request the change? I know this sounds a bit bureaucratic, but I think it's the fairest way of handling these things. --

5607: 5561: 2843: 2545: 2499: 1475:

I could manage it myself hopefully. So there is no need for any further action. Thanks a lot for your help. Happy edits. --

516: 8286:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

3054: 3051: 2878: 1798: 11414:

Thanks, I have commented there. Betacommand is basically right, you were making it more complex than it needs to be :) --

8993: 8609: 8607: 8513: 8511: 8070:

Vk be reblocked (quite the opposite), but because for this to have the best chance of working things have to be done the

7502: 6786:

Look, you have only been editing wikipedia for a few weeks. New editors are very welcome, and we have specific policy of

5368: 4872: 3722:

for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

3696: 3691: 2758: 2149: 2001: 1580: 1107: 1065: 905: 9738:

is an adequate reference for the subject belonging to the category you restored. Please find a better reference or, per

9851:

even though he is best known as Labour's Northern Irish spokesperson who was sacked by Blair for being too nationalist.

9795: 9546: 8776: 8418: 7836:

Deacon, just read the responses to your unblock. "Premature and unilateral" is a reasonable summary of that discussion.

5903: 5814: 5585: 5569: 5565: 4391:

All suburbs of the continuous urban area have the same naming convention - "X, Dublin" - if you disagree with that the

3700: 10912:"policy requires that where multiple or conflicting perspectives exist within a topic each should be presented fairly" 10265:, so it would be self-defeating. The best way to increase the prominence of an article is by appropriate interlinking. 10089: 6692:

I'm afraid that I want to do right by WP, and adhere to WP policy, but I am confused. It seems quite clear to me that

5780:

Don't worry too much about not getting it all. Back in the 1970s, when the world's journalists were camped out in the

4019: 3359:

You frightful cynic, but if the category ids are there now it shouldn't be far off. And did you see the message about

2715:"Dublin" is fine for the places within the city boundaries, but it's simply wrong for places outside City boundary. -- 31: 10518: 10514: 8118:

Why did not you not make a comment about the block and leave it to a completely uninvolved administrator to decide?

7119: 5415: 2768: 2158: 1978: 11551: 10529: 10525: 1891:

Sorry, but the NYT isn't demonstrably wrong. Direct from the case - "Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by

8635: 8438: 8223:

Why did not you not make a comment about the block and leave it to a completely uninvolved administrator to decide?

5593: 4030:

added. All quite legitimate, as it is sourced, but I saw this and wondered what your opinion would be on all this?

3683: 3620: 10875:

Sarah, if you want to make a complaint, please can you provide some links and/or diffs rather leaving me to guess?

10395:. If this isn't resolved it may be time for an arbcom case, but I don't want to try to be a one-woman arbcom :) -- 9338:"Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" 8521: 5572:) has been continually inserting a fourth, which they claim to have heard at some "secret album listening party" ( 2640:

Now I think you're right about deletion; it seems a pity to remove the most famous non-person in Irish politics...

2225:

tag to endorse it: {{prod-2}} will endorse a prod with no further comment; {{prod-2|}} will add a further comment.

1922:

Irish Times and NYT reports cited do not tie their use of the phrase "unlawful killing" to article 2, and it is a

1269: 10103:

as the outcome is obviously flawed. What he really wants is arbitration, but there is no arbitration for content.

8793: 8748: 7263: 7025: 5486: 5284:

seems to be addressing the issue reasonably constructively, so I hope that a consensus solution will be found. --

4143: 3501: 2491: 2064: 8947: 7113: 3883:

to make it easier to issue such warnings yourself? It's really a brilliant timesaver for this sort of thing. --

3779:

Good heavens!!! Have you nothing better to do than defend Yvette Cooper and undo people's changes every minute.

2861:

Hope im not offending you by putting in quotes from BLP page i'm sure you are well aware of the policy, Thanks.

10533: 9310: 8977: 8147: 7874: 7826: 6192: 5934: 5885: 5840: 5766: 4068: 3975: 3183: 3130: 3084: 2996: 2965: 2937: 1904: 849: 506: 8890: 8833:

or later the community will need to address this issue - WP is an encyclopedia, it isn't Bebo or Livejournal--

6817:

actually been in WP on some level for several years - not quite the newbie, but not an old vet, either. : -->

6170:

Last time Mrs Bencherlite and I visited the US, we enjoyed seeing the exit sign on the Interstate pointing to

4424:. I'm not using local authhority address, but rather the postal address of the place, which has always been " 4254:

was created as a redirect 5 weeks ago, so it's not exactly brand new. I wasn't questioning your good faith; I

4027: 3811: 3807: 10295: 8765:

I'm honestly not sure what on earth to make of that. The comment hardly makes sense, but it the only edit by

7136: 5313: 3705: 2625: 669:

PS - Do you know where is Alison's thread about Vintagekit's User Page? That's the only reason that I was at

533: 11024: 3510:'s article has been getting a lot of petty vandalism lately. Maybe a short term protection is in order?, Tx 10961: 10068: 9765:

His father and Ms Short's father - who is from Crossmaglen, across the border in Co Armagh - were brothers.

9636:

not find it. Thanks for your help. Maybe I'll just have to remove the category. I do not really need it. --

8674: 8669: 7461: 7300: 7296: 6639: 5589: 5573: 4998:? I thought we'd want to have things as templates to have things centralized in case of another page move. 4818: 2263: 992:

Could you cast a wee eye over the article now and see if it's o.k.? Might be one or two things to correct.

8562:

Thanks for a very clear report. I have blocked the IP for 1 week, since all that IP's edits are vandalism.

8529: 6981: 2635: 2009:

I tried installing this, but I'm not sure I did it right...counld you help, if you have time? :) Thanks!--

1228:

I have moved it as requested, and reassessed it. It's now a no-contest B-class, and should sail through a

11108:

revert -- Template:bda does the same job with simpler markup, so there is less chance of it being broken)

9974: 9844: 8959: 8953: 8678: 8388: 5623: 3837: 2184: 2036: 539: 9735: 5777:

before people feel that these historical issues are no longer reflecting their current political issues.

3717: 728:

Thank you, yes. I did find it myself as well... I couldn't see for looking. Sorry to waste your time. --

542:. IMO comments like this should never be accepted or made little of in the way Major bonkers is, thanks. 10218: 9572: 8922:

Sorry, Cailil, and I'm overstretched and I just don't have the energy to add anything sensible here. --

7146: 7096: 5653: 5409: 3846:

had removed my warning.--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Retrieved from "

3462:) 11:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Oh and could you reply on my talkpage? i Just read your red box saying so 2503: 49: 8683: 5506:

with the issue with the editor who reverted, and if the two of you can't reach agreement that you ask

4075:

a new editor, but I'm not going to speculate further on who it might be. Well-written article, though.

2456: 2447:... and all a bot needs to do is make a combined list of all the articles which are in the subcats of 862:

Sorry, you're quite right, my bad; Dunc held his cool admirably, and i have coorrected my error above.

11609: 11573: 11483: 11422: 11376: 11301: 11185: 11093: 11057: 10926: 10637: 10562:

Thanks BHG. I marked them as vandalism because they fell under the category of "sneaky vandalism" -

10547: 10403: 10280: 10203: 10160: 10118: 10072: 10024: 10002:

Reverting my edit didn't cure the problem, and a bit if testing showed that it's some obscure bug in

9922: 9862: 9780: 9689: 9621: 9583: 9514: 9468: 9426: 9379: 9259: 9191: 9124: 9084: 8930: 8861: 8807: 8712: 8661: 8577: 8469: 8367: 8268: 8188: 8142: 8109: 8043: 7998: 7962: 7905: 7869: 7847: 7821: 7767: 7720: 7639: 7580: 7472: 7426: 7374: 7311: 7202: 7176: 7053: 7010: 6971: 6798: 6724: 6581: 6538: 6465: 6414: 6285: 6255: 6188: 6101: 6052: 5987: 5930: 5914: 5881: 5862: 5836: 5795: 5733: 5685: 5638: 5576:), the only reference for which is a messageboard. I've tried to explain to the user the rules about 5518: 5441: 5418:. Could you maybe drop a note at the editor's talk page? I could drop off a welcome template, maybe? 5394: 5343: 5292: 5248: 5222: 5139: 5080: 5040: 4979: 4894: 4851: 4800: 4713: 4672: 4649: 4579: 4535: 4458: 4378: 4358: 4315: 4277: 4196: 4098: 3995: 3931: 3891: 3822: 3759: 3654: 3605: 3533: 3486: 3467: 3459: 3438: 3419: 3389: 3341: 3292: 3239: 3201: 3179: 3147: 3126: 3110: 3080: 3064: 3036: 2992: 2961: 2933: 2918: 2886: 2805: 2723: 2663: 2595: 2517: 2495: 2487: 2392: 2356: 2301: 2236: 2169: 2047: 1984: 1964:

Been reading over your contributions in the Ireland sections. Fantastic job! Keep up the great work!

1934: 1897: 1862: 1816: 1737: 1658: 1650:

to remove a lot of the excessive and unreferenced material, and to try to restore some neutrality. --

1607: 1498: 1438: 1346: 1299: 1240: 1196: 1155: 1043: 978: 938: 873: 842: 826: 760: 714: 688: 622: 579: 525: 17: 11275:

Has that clarified the template for you ? Still have objects to adding to Cowen? If so not to worry

10268:

Anyway, your work had a very beneficial side-effect, because it prompted me to do a big clearout of

9359:

search, though it doesn't include all papers, so it's best to try the newspaper website directly --

8956: 8888: 6070:. For some reason the WP page doesn't give a "correct pronounciation" in this case. Can't think why. 4757:

doing good work on WP - not so rare, but you know it's a mixed bag. No need to reply, just a smile.

3905:

I have looked into Twinkle, but since I use Internet Explorer, it's apparently not an option for me.

2895:) to avoid the use of political slogans, noting that the same applies across the political spectrum. 10016:

parameter. I can't see what's causing it, but have left a note for the military history project. --

8700:, which I have addressed by semi-protecting the page. Let's see how things settle down thereafter. 8448: 6974:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 6607: 6527: 5188: 4733: 4616: 4550: 4517: 4447: 4431: 4425: 3587: 2834: 2829:-- not many comments were received last week so this debate has been re-listed for further input. 2272: 1969: 1184:

No prob. Feel free to ask for a reassessment at any time, or alternatively to list an article at

9651: 9288: 7288:

My concern was that there was an edit war, so I protected the latest version (which inevitably is

11442: 11401: 11231:

so the outputs are the same. so when some one passes on you just the add the DOD details such as

10832: 10811: 10713: 8695: 8382: 8298: 5383: 5372: 5281: 5270: 5200: 5163: 5120: 5103: 4876: 4694: 4215: 3806:

Anyway, thanks for confirming that you are the anon IP who reinstated your attacks on Cooper (in

3367: 3320: 3313: 3056:) are continuing this disruptive squabble after a clear warning, so I will now seek probation. -- 2754: 2556: 2475: 2336: 2145: 1596: 1576: 733: 659: 8904:

17:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC) BTW can you see a justification for the tags that SorsImmanis1 added to

4090:

bucketload of salt. To my eye, Buster Martin looks about 65. But then I do like older men :) --

2946:

TU as a self admitted member of the UUP are you making a legal threat? If not could you clarify.

1802: 1133: 1081: 11643: 10914:, and if the template cannot accommodate the different points of view, then the template fails 9674: 8517: 8412: 7270:

http://www.nuzhound.com/articles/Sunday_Tribune/arts2007/oct28_Enniskillen_airbrush__SBreen.php

6783:

No he doesn't. I see no evidence anywhere that Finbar Wright says any such thing: I wrote that.

6611: 6372: 5671: 4602: 3253: 1126: 1077: 11529:

should stay, for the benefit of editors who are used to that format of project banner name. I

11110:

I don't really understand , do you simply prefer the bda template due to less fields in it?

10893:

So why are you complaining that I didn't point this out? That's exactly what I did. You were

10083: 8892:

is exactly the same as the IPs. It seems Edgerunner2005 was just an opportunist troll and is

6203: 3713: 44: 11651: 11037:; maybe some other editor did that? (tho it still seems to be there, as I think it should be) 10723:

If I may post here to shed some light on this matter. The harassment that I have experienced

10508: 10269: 10262: 10185: 10142: 10049: 8112:

said that he was considering revering the unblock himself if he did not see support for it?

6573:. It's pure genius: the best illustration of a stereotype that I have seen in a long time. -- 6346: 6300: 6178: 5770: 5364: 5363:

Hello BHG, Can you please explain how it is possible to reference the material on this page (

3774: 2820: 2316: 1480: 1466: 1420: 1406: 1328: 1013: 10998:

but i honestly can't see the difference. Can you clarify for me and did you mean too remove

10257:! And there are a lot of Knowledge guidelines and policies and conventions to get used to :) 8502:

is back and is pushing again. Here are their recent edits after returning form their block.

8191:

said that he was considering reverting the unblock himself if he did not see support for it?

7289: 7149:

and tell me what to change, or refer me to someone else who can help me with this? Thanks (

3329:

Thanks for the pointer. I took a quick peek, but it looks like I shouldn't starting cooking

1117:). Some earlier assessments may need reviewing, and I have just looked at those you listed: 489: 11657: 11602: 11566: 11476: 11415: 11391: 11369: 11342: 11294: 11178: 11086: 11050: 10919: 10765: 10664: 10630: 10604: 10540: 10488: 10447: 10396: 10334: 10273: 10243: 10228: 10196: 10153: 10111: 10017: 9915: 9855: 9830: 9773: 9682: 9614: 9576: 9507: 9461: 9447: 9437:

BHG you never go out. I don't think I've ever logged on and not seen you turn up somewhere.

9419: 9372: 9252: 9238: 9215: 9184: 9160: 9117: 9077: 8923: 8854: 8800: 8705: 8570: 8462: 8432: 8360: 8261: 8088: 8036: 7991: 7955: 7924: 7840: 7760: 7713: 7678: 7632: 7599: 7573: 7552: 7465: 7419: 7406: 7367: 7304: 7195: 7169: 7046: 7003: 6940: 6900: 6791: 6717: 6574: 6570: 6531: 6513: 6458: 6444: 6407: 6386: 6325: 6278: 6248: 6221: 6148: 6094: 6080: 6045: 6023: 5980: 5963: 5907: 5855: 5824: 5788: 5726: 5678: 5652:

A tracklisting has been released, would you be able to unlock the page at this stage? (See

5631: 5511: 5434: 5423: 5387: 5336: 5285: 5241: 5215: 5132: 5073: 5033: 4974:

and has not been sent to anyone has not already participated in the centralized discussion.

4971: 4887: 4844: 4793: 4706: 4665: 4642: 4572: 4528: 4524: 4451: 4439: 4351: 4308: 4270: 4189: 4169: 4118: 4091: 4035: 3988: 3963: 3924: 3884: 3815: 3752: 3647: 3598: 3526: 3479: 3463: 3455: 3431: 3415: 3382: 3334: 3285: 3232: 3194: 3140: 3103: 3057: 3029: 2982: 2911: 2798: 2746: 2716: 2656: 2645: 2613: 2588: 2510: 2448: 2349: 2294: 2229: 2162: 2137: 2040: 1959: 1927: 1855: 1809: 1730: 1684:

that you are able to uprate an article on other projects at the same time as you do it for

1651: 1633: 1600: 1568: 1536: 1491: 1431: 1339: 1292: 1233: 1216: 1189: 1175: 1148: 1090: 1036: 971: 931: 866: 819: 753: 707: 681: 615: 572: 10480:

I was here because brownie posted to my talk page about an unrelated matter- see below.:)

9333: 9069: 7295:

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to get involved in the substance of the dispute. That's what

7099:, as it has yet to have been moved into the Knowledge namespace. Thank you for your help. 4568:

We don't have to be consistent, except by common name ... and Lucan is fine where it is :)

3709: 2405:

Other constituency article appear to have been moved in exactly the same way, so a simple

1454: 1377:

was trying to change the name back to the former one. I made a relevant discussion in his

1362: 1103:

Thanks for looking at the assessments, and for querying them -- it's always good to check.

8: 11592: 11510: 11466: 11041: 10996: 10990: 10686: 10100: 10096: 10064: 9975: 9817: 9727: 9678: 8787: 8569:; it looks like a commendably clear report, and I'll be interested to see the results. -- 8534: 8458: 7251: 7158: 7085: 6767: 6274: 5851: 5832: 5753: 5714: 5704: 5543: 5495: 4959: 4829: 4729: 4612: 4443: 4137: 3583: 3563: 2830: 2283: 2194: 2029: 1965: 1314: 10059:

Don't worry, you're not stirring ... the strirring is Wikipéire's relentless campaign.

8782:

It does rather remind me of the time last autumn when I had a barrage of meatpuppets of

8164:

Now that Flo is asking questions rather than just saying bad bad bad, I'lla nsxwer them

6530:

are all talking about surges and collapses, and a Dimbleby is winning my attention :) --

6296:

I also note from the photo that you can get to Climax as long as you don't go too fast.

5831:

as it refers to an office and not the city it's self. There us a discussion ongoing at

4549:

Indeed, Lucan should be moved to Lucan, Dublin if we are to be consistent. I Christened

2428: 2424: 2391:

OK, I have done some checking, and the first checks look promising. I took as a example

1394: 1366: 1320: 11523: 11502: 11439: 11398: 10949: 10865: 10828: 10807: 10709: 10006: 9992: 9322: 9180: 9103: 9056: 9021: 9010: 8691: 8327: 8294: 8125: 8025: 7981: 7945: 7912: 7743: 7699: 7620: 7562: 7127: 7073: 7035: 6869: 6852: 6667: 6311: 5552: 5468: 5324: 5267: 5197: 5160: 5117: 5100: 4841:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 29#Northern_Ireland_ministers_templates

4691: 4559: 4497: 4407: 4251: 4151: 4062: 3971: 3910: 3866: 3789: 3636: 3515: 3364: 3317: 2750: 2701: 2577: 2553: 2406: 2396: 2333: 2257: 2141: 2013: 2003: 1992: 1756: 1705: 1675: 1547: 1527: 1378: 1369:, because it is the correct spelling in Turkish, namely without the space. Here is the 1319:

Hi, if you are still online, I will have a move request from you regarding the article

1263: 1118: 1069: 997: 957: 916: 729: 655: 9251:

Brilliant! That's a wonderful gadget, and well worth waking the dead for :) Thanks! --

7738:

perhaps you should have considered the appearance of your actions before taking them.

4641:

relation Iraq's WMD. This question may never be satisfactorily resolved either way. --

1846: 1520:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ireland#Irish_Political_History_Series_Navigation_Templates

1430:

No prob, and sorry for the delay (I got side-tracked). It's now moved, and it's OK. --

11031: 11002: 10580: 10503:

Despite my inclination to keep out, I did take a quick look at a few recent edits by

10465: 10422: 10378: 10320:

BHG for your info (if you're not already aware) this sorry saga has already been the

10310: 10039: 9394: 9002:"Myanmar: Death toll more than 15,000'. CNN. May 5, 2008. Retrieved on 2008-05-05". 8308: 7493: 7446: 7400: 7357: 7335: 7278: 7104: 6991: 5762:

No prob, and sorry that my reply came across as rather more growly than I intended :)

4513: 4477: 4335: 4297: 4228: 3954: 3880: 3330: 3167: 2951: 2866: 2779: 2684: 2587:

Vandals blocked, comment on your talk page. Pls let me if there is any recurrence. --

2567: 2541: 2479: 2452: 1288: 1277: 1024: 800: 746: 602: 562: 547: 11177:|df}}"), so why use a template which requires all those extra brackets and ticks? -- 10431:

Just happened to see this- is this lot forum shopping again, they have turned up on

10079: 4160:

Nice to hear from you, Kathlutz. Maybe BHG will retract her guess that "Kathlutz is

3597:

It's a combined list, transcluding the separate lists by letters of the alphabet. --

2400: 1386: 11647: 11349: 11326: 11280: 11115: 11076: 11013: 10844: 10626: 10504: 10181: 10138: 10045: 9799: 9534: 9492: 9405: 8952:. On April 29th 3-4 days into their block they created SorsImmanus1 to block evade 8687: 7536: 6771: 6619: 6606:

This discussion made me laugh ,i suggest you create a subpage for it and add it to

6343: 6297: 6175: 6171: 5189: 5059: 5003: 4751: 3920: 3734: 3017: 1987:). Can you please leave a note stating what other changes I need to make. Thanks. 1476: 1462: 1416: 1402: 1324: 704:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive399#User:Vintagekits_..._again

10095:

The mediation request is actually rather funny, because since Wikipéire possesses

5895:

right, and that taking offence is often at least as strong a motive as causing it.

4015: 3919:

So far as I know, every operating system which runs IE will also run Firefox (and

1373:

for verification. And I did so. Around ten minutes later, I noticed that the user

10981: 10901: 10852: 10845: 10789: 10757: 10657: 10597: 10590: 10564:

reverting legitimate edits with the intent of hindering the improvement of pages.

10481: 10440: 10327: 10239: 10224: 10107: 9823: 9759: 9718: 9641: 9603: 9557: 9503: 9440: 9231: 9208: 9153: 9116:

to generate the date, but that's a lot more typing than just writing the date. --

8341: 8080: 7508: 6933: 6920: 6893: 6824: 6745: 6705: 6506: 6437: 6379: 6318: 6247:

as often as possible in the hope that words would be split on the line breaks. --

6214: 6141: 6073: 6016: 5956: 5627: 5581: 5507: 5419: 5025: 4995: 4762: 4481: 4216: 4165: 4114: 4031: 3679: 3671: 3579: 3262: 2978: 2789:

Sorry, not that I know of. If there is a way, then the person who might know is

2641: 2537: 2533: 2420: 2371: 1689: 1629: 1212: 1171: 1086: 11211:,requires knowledge of just one template to cover every BOD and DOD possibility 6161: 3923:

work better with Firefox, which I find indispensable). Your choice, though :) --

3026:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/The_Troubles#Probation_for_disruptive_editors

2548:

is one of many who are peers and should also be under rayment-hc. Thank you for

11588: 11506: 11462: 10941: 10915: 10907: 10696:

discussion, I had been looking back over those past discussions (in particular

10693: 10261:

applied to all Irish biographical articles, we'd have about 15,000 articles in

9962: 9943: 9881: 9807: 9747: 9345: 9294: 8783: 8779:), so I'd be inclined to just ignore it unless there is more from that quarter. 8612: 8525: 8352: 7789: 7658: 7247: 7154: 6787: 6759: 5899: 5828: 5749: 5710: 5539: 5491: 5263: 5237: 5096: 4955: 4825: 4627: 4184: 4133: 3254: 2932:

As you will seef rom the talk page, this user has left WP open to legal action.

2279: 2256:

No worries BHG. I hadn't even noticed that it was you until I got your note. —

2251: 2219: 2209: 2190: 1882: 1836: 1783: 1768: 670: 524:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on my

11475:

Thanks for the reminder. The redirect is now an ex-redirect, it is no more. --

9897:

John, I don't know what your game is here, but it only took a few seconds for

5876:

Politics in Northern Ireland Councils doesn't work like that. Your opponents

5584:, but the user continues to revert, and is now resorting to personal attacks ( 4784: 3478:

already started expanding them, so that clearly isn't going to be the case. --

3079:

For defending mysef from an inflamatory question? That's not very reasonable.

485: 10945: 10861: 10679: 10436: 10254: 9988: 9902: 9739: 9349: 9307: 9099: 9006: 8665: 8240: 8122: 8021: 7978: 7942: 7909: 7756: 7739: 7709: 7695: 7617: 7559: 7123: 7069: 7031: 6883: 6566: 6208: 5657: 5611: 5597: 5577: 5464: 5320: 4555: 4493: 4403: 4147: 4058: 4054: 4023: 3967: 3906: 3862: 3800: 3785: 3632: 3511: 2853: 2697: 2573: 2471: 2032:, look at the "skin" tab, and check that it is set to "monobook.js" (default) 2010: 1988: 1923: 1752: 1719: 1701: 1697: 1543: 1523: 1374: 993: 953: 912: 647: 491: 11565:. I think that the benefits outweigh the downsides. Does that make sense? -- 11085:

I really didn't intend any sort of kick, let alone to your poor donkey :) --

10351:

Iridescent, with respect, I had already mentioned the RfC, and the previous

8336:

an academics-related page?? Did you intend to write something else instead?

5280:

The boldness of the move may have been inappropriate, but the discussion at

4914: 840:

Actually I think you meant Domer, Dunc was quite calm despite the trolling.

11225: 11215: 11205: 10622: 10576: 10461: 10432: 10418: 10374: 10306: 8958:

and have since been trolling talk feminism. The account revealed their IP

7520: 7489: 7442: 7396: 7353: 7331: 7274: 7100: 6986: 6887: 6862: 6838: 6680: 6561:←I thought I would return to something serious, and found myself assessing 6236: 6067: 5781: 5534:

deletions because his photos also appeared elsewhere! I prefer to continue

4866: 4687: 4331: 4293: 4224: 4079: 3858: 3163: 2947: 2862: 2849: 2775: 2470:

I have also checked the privy council lists, which are less encouraging :(

1845:

In principle, the detail belongs in the article on the court. However, the

1726: 1685: 1458: 1398: 1390: 1389:

for your records. I gave the right to him and tried to move the article to

1382: 1273: 1229: 1137: 1020: 796: 680:

I found it last night in the latest ANI archive, whatever the number is. --

651: 598: 597:. If only people would stop using these words and realise it is offensive. 558: 543: 11642:

independence movements for those interested in Irish history. By the way,

11505:

now that they are empty and don't want to have any more redirects. Thanks

8247:

think twice, more than twice; I thought long and hard, and concluded that

6858:

would have been better, but it's virtually defunct, especially given that

6165:

Climax welcomes careful drivers, just follow that upward pointing arrow...

5382:

If it's not written anywhere, then it should be removed from the article.

4022:(LA Times article). Guess who appears in the latter article?! Oh, and see 1700:

and I've had no response to my request for re-assessment there. Thanks.

11353: 11322: 11276: 11263: 11111: 11072: 11009: 10803: 9954: 9769: 9728: 9530: 9488: 9401: 8980: 8963: 8909: 8897: 8834: 8752: 8728: 8642: 8619: 8549: 8484: 8392: 7456:

Hey, all of us make mistakes. What matters is how we recover from them :)

6967: 6615: 5386:

is a fundamental principle of wikipedia, and references are essential. --

5055: 4999: 4886:

Just open a new discussion, and add a link to the archived discussion. --

4780: 3727: 3507: 2790: 1115:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Ireland/Assessment#B-class_assessment_criteria

11315:

As I've said the null templates aren't required just help the spacing ,

9762:, a respected English newspaper, and it says clearly of Frank Short that 8251:

it was the best thing to do in a difficult situation. I was prepared to

6959: 3555: 11557:

So long as we do the occasional check on the list of transclusions for

11269:

isn't required it only helps with the spacing 10:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

10391:

Thanks to Bardcom for your question and to Iridiscent for the link to

9907: 9714: 9637: 9599: 9553: 8337: 6916: 6820: 6741: 6701: 6339: 6240: 6010: 5596:). Any chance of semi-protection of the page for a few days? Thanks. -- 5553: 4758: 10792:) which I can just see being repeated between rival Knowledge editors. 8827: 7418:

but there's more work to do, and I;m not betting on the outcome. :) --

7226: 1272:, and if they have to canvass, at least get the right page? Thanks, -- 9958: 9939: 9877: 9803: 9743: 8441:) had made one similar edits, but only one, so no grounds for action. 7785: 7654: 6244: 6041: 6037: 6006: 6002: 5820: 5774: 4789: 4398:

I am surprised and disappointed to see you behaving in such a manner.

2852:

the use of loyalist vitriol on a talk page. This editor is violating

1878: 1832: 1797:), which doesn't seem to handle cacheing very robustly. I have added 1793:

oops! Thanks v much for the fix. It's a glitch in the script I use (

1779: 1122: 1073: 6174:. Even took a photo of it. Maybe next time we'll actually go there. 5773:

and all the progress since then, there's a long way to go before in

5622:

Thanks for your msg. I have protected the article for two weeks per

3454:

moment, that 'll provide me (and others) with structure to work with

2212:, not AFDed. :): So far as I can see, it has never actually emerged. 10536:). Using vandalism as a label in a dispute like this doesn't help. 9876:

No. Please provide proper references or undo your edits. Thanks. --

8905: 8657: 8507: 7524: 3139:

Enough. I am not the one who will decide whether it makes sense. --

3093:

You are well aware of arbcom's ruling in this matter, and you were

487: 9114:{{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}-{{subst:CURRENTMONTH}}-{{subst:CURRENTDAY2}} 8979:. Thank you for your help, advice and patience with all of this-- 6694:

then explain your reasons on the talk page of the disputed article

6688:

then explain your reasons on the talk page of the disputed article

5068:

Bot learner-driver, with L-plates battered from the errors, but I

10851:

So, when are you going to warn Snappy for continuous breaches of

10653: 6562: 5460: 1186:

Knowledge:WikiProject Ireland/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment

1145:

Knowledge:WikiProject Ireland/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment

742:

No prob. I was going back to ANI anyway to tag the discussion as

9772:'s father is from Crosmaglen. In what way is this inadequate? -- 6663:. For suspected POV issues which are not disputed, consider the 5948:(note to every flamer that will be MORTALLY OFFENDED, this is a 10878:

However, I presume that you are referring to the discussion at

9654:. However, that's not really the issue here: the ifeq just says 9034: 8483:

Thanks for looking at this BrownHairedGirl - much appreciated--

8313:

hey BHG how are you? how long have you been on wikipedia for?

6845: 3879:

Anyway, thanks for the apology. Have you considered installing

3570:, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: 654:

will get the message when he next logs on; let's all move on.--

10617:

Poor you, I hope that bullying didn't leave too many scars. :(

8896:

to SorsImmanis1 but the IPs are something else. Any advice?--

8421:) had made 6 almost identical reverts over 3 days, the latest 4422:

User talk:BrownHairedGirl#Monkstown_and_other_places_in_Dublin

3876:

been other repentant vandals, but this is the one I have seen.

2476:

http://www.angeltowns.com/town/peerage/02PrivyCouncils--UK.htm

1457:. There shouldn't be any Turkish letters. It should have been 492: 9820:. Of course being from Crossmaglen is relevant to her career. 9355:

As to where to look, I'd suggest newspapers. You could try a

9038: 8175:

Because a) the unblock pre-empted a community decision about

5819:

Just as with the City of Londonderry Grand Orange Lodge, and

4626:

Hello again, and sorry for my initially flawed assessment of

2455:, and the whole lot is fixed. (BTW, useless piece of trivia: 2434: 1773:

Hi again BHG, I told you we would run into each other again!

10880:

Template talk:Irish_states_since_1171#Correction_to_template

9364: 7512: 6976:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Seyhan Kurt (2nd nomination)

6673:

template instead. See Knowledge:NPOV dispute for more info.

5510:

for help? Carch seems to understand the issues very well. --

5013:

Umm, yes :) I was going to msg you, but you beatr me to it.

4921:

Hi. I'm sending this to you because you participated in the

3983:

Sorry, I didn't have any inspiration ... and the outcome of

3847: 3626:

relation to a man, but was a masculine-gender word as well!

1140:

issue, and with a few more refs it would be a clear B-class.

10517:), and I can see that there are grounds for concern there. 9042: 6661:

Do not use this template unless there is an ongoing dispute

4527:

is hardly a rural area, and hasn't been for a long time. --

1361:

Wonderful, I was looking for the real spelling of the term

10970:

suggest further changes and modifications as you see fit.

10435:

because they weren't happy with the responses they got on

9356: 8884:. It seems my first gut reaction was correct. This from 7118:

Your input and comments are welcome on the talk page here

1338:

Yes, I'm here and will be around for another two hours. --

11321:, will give {{BDA|B|1960|01|10||||df}} but ok no worries 9368: 8168:

Why was this block needed when Vk had agreed not to edit?

7708:

Giano, there was no intention to provoke, and you should

6093:

That's because men have no idea where the place is ... --

4420:

I replied above to your previous comment about this: see

2991:

Like I said, if I were Ross, I'd consider myself defamed.

1518:

Hi BHG, I'd like your thoughts on this issue please. See

9150:

5 tildes (~~~~~) will automatically insert today's date.

6565:... which unfortunately has been sabotaged, because the 5610:. Whoever it is is obviously on a dynamic connection. -- 5196:

another opportunity for you to apply critical wisdom. -

4948:

Please read and approve or disapprove the section here:

1453:

Sorry, there is a petty problem. You have changed it to

10888:

responded by pointing out that it takes two to edit war

10078:

If anyone pops in to mediate, they can mediate between

8976:

Actually it looks like this case is closed ... for now

5946:- or "the Irish language" as it's more commonly known. 5456: 4261:

I will be happy to unblock if your bot now knows about

2439:

http://www.angeltowns.com/town/peerage/(baronets?\.htm)

2130:

Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (France): 2008

2125:

Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (France): 2007

2120:

Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (France): 2006

2115:

Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (France): 2005

2110:

Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (France): 2004

2105:

Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (France): 2003

2100:

Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (France): 2002

11636: 11438: 11397: 10106:

One of these days, I'm sure that someone will open an

6406:

sounds very appropriate for this hour of the night. --

3566:. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2411:

http://www.angeltowns.com/town/peerage/(commons?\.htm)

538:

As an admin I trust could you give me your opinion on

9293:

Hi, I'm a little confused by the message you left on

9205:

Oh well... doesn't take that long to type the date...

4910:

Conclusion: Image placeholders centralized discussion

2429:

http://www.leighrayment.com/baronetage/baronetsg1.htm

2425:

http://www.angeltowns.com/town/peerage/baronetsg1.htm

2021:

Looks fine to me, but there are two things to check:

968:

Talk:The Great Northern Brewery, Dundalk#POV_problems

11153:

So far as I can see, both produce the same output ("

10886:

to "ask Snappy not to start edit-warring" ... and I

9768:

So we have a clear ref in a national newspaper that

9418:

I gotta go out now, but I'll reply later tonight. --

9360: 8799:

Sorry I can't offer any more helpful suggestions. --

8599:

BrownHairedGirl but it seems the above user is back

7653:

I support your block following consensus at AN/I. --

6187:

I won't have that - don't be putting yourself donw;)

2397:

http://www.angeltowns.com/town/peerage/dcommons4.htm

11550:, we'll break a lot of links in talk archives: see 10995:Hi BHG i know you had a good reason to revert here 6966:An article that you have been involved in editing, 5898:That's why I think it would be a good idea for the 4634:

course how all history should be approached anyway.

1514:

Irish Political History Series Navigation Templates

11457:Just remember to delete the new redirect template 9400:arn't all the horses dead and buried in the race? 9005:How do I get the "Retrieved on 2008-05-05" bit? -- 5765:There's quite a good article on the name issue at 5072:this should be doable :) Fingers crossed ..... -- 4523:Your point about rural areas doesn't really work: 3102:to decide whether and to who to apply remedies. -- 2480:http://www.leighrayment.com/pcouncil/pcouncil4.htm 2088:Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Finland) 2083:Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Austria) 2078:Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Belgium) 2071:Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Ireland) 8618:. I'd appreciate it if you'd have a quick look-- 6526:'Fraid not :) The talking heads from a different 5944:"some bizarre and unpronounceable set of letters" 5266:without consensus while discussion was underway. 4245:I would expect anyone running a bot like that to 3050:OK, folks, that's enough. The latest posts here ( 2696:and resolve to leave our suburbs alone. Harrump. 2401:http://www.leighrayment.com/commons/dcommons4.htm 2093:Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (France) 2069:you put the WikiProject Numismatics box thing on 9173:Good idea in theory, but 5 tildes creates this: 5459:. It was particular useful for me to read about 3985:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2 10790:Girl gang killed neighbour with 'internet' bomb 9024:. Just fill in the fields, and all should work. 6657:And yet on template:POV it says quite clearly: 6201:You might want to visit the adjoining towns of 5835:on this that has achievied concensus to rename. 4781:Peoples Front For The Liberation Of Saddleworth 4020:British marathon man's number: 101, or maybe 94 2028:theme? If not, it won't work. To check, go to 1076:both of which seem very short on references or 11601:I generally take a peep every month or two. -- 11587:Let's hope someone remembers to check. Cheers 9906:disputing that Clare Short was a supporter of 9901:to throw up plenty of references. There is no 9348:is in primary sources, then the article fails 7030:It's nice to know my efforts are appreciated. 6376:. (I can keep this up all night. So to speak.) 4792:, while our huge armies defend the borders. -- 4779:I'm a experimental bot being developed by the 3629:Reductio ad absurdum, but true nonetheless ;) 3282:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Pryor 2859:material about living persons is "do no harm". 1080:which is very short on detail - contrast with 11461:after Steve is finsihed as he now is. Cheers 11290:break the template (as well as looking ugly). 10012:, which has decided to have a fit if given a 9957:. I'm really surprised you don't see that. -- 9742:, remove the unsupported category. Thanks. -- 9112:'Fraid not -- it's all manual. You could use 8548:so I'll update you when the results come in-- 7299:is for ... and if that fails, you should try 5929:in. I may return to it, but not for a while. 3572:List of closed railway stations in Ireland: D 2827:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/David Treacey 10692:Yesterday, in preparing my response for the 8880:(out dent) *Sigh* Yeah, I'm back about this 8387:Hi BrownHairedGirl, I left Sir Fozzie about 5262:I agree. The article has now been moved per 4928:That discussion must produce a conclusion. 4923:Centralized discussion on image placeholders 4436:Category:Towns and villages in County Dublin 2552:here; would that everybody were to do so. - 11293:So yes, I do object to adding it. Sorry! -- 10689:, however, might have been a bit too far!) 8611:. They've also made this very nice post to 8425:your warning, so I imposed a 24-hour block. 3409:Lists of closed railway stations in Ireland 2825:You may be interested in the discussion at 2204:Hiya! That's because there is no AFD; the 1926:to report their comments as if they did. -- 9794:Thanks for the reply. You'll wish to read 8293:achieved. Sanity prevailed - well done! -- 6269:And being after 9pm, I can also note that 3848:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Asher196 3747:Thanks for the notification. I have added 3568:List of closed railway stations in Ireland 3550:List of closed railway stations in Ireland 2461:719 articles on MPs who were also baronets 2443:http://www.leighrayment.com/baronetage/$ 1 11130:{{BDA|B|1960|01|10|{{`}}|{{`}}|{{`}}|df}} 10253:Don't worry, I'm sure you were acting in 10195:Things are changing in Ireland too. :) -- 4180:Sorry, I missed Kathlutz's earlier reply. 4057:article is primarily the work of an SPA, 1059:WP Ireland article assessments - VUPP etc 865:I wish that others had also done so :( -- 10417:Thanks BHG. I respect your decision. -- 9650:Ifeq is a parserfunction, documented at 9415:In that race, horses are never buried :( 8405:Sorry about the delay, but now reviewed. 6160: 3312:David Gerard said so. Wikitech-l thread 928:Talk:The Great Northern Brewery, Dundalk 10748:, then things can improve for everyone. 9352:, and should be deleted as non-notable. 8747:What do you think BrownHairedGirl does 6844:tag I put on the blatantly non-neutral 6610:,if you don't i'll be forced to follow 5481:Ulster Hockey Union Image & its use 4783:, as part of our struggle against both 4476:Lusk and Newcastle are in rural areas. 4417:Sarah, I haven't used any admin powers. 3308:Category intersects Real Soon Now maybe 2415:http://www.leighrayment.com/commons/$ 1 2395:MP, having referenced him last week to 14: 10393:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Bardcom 9035:"Myanmar: Death toll more than 15,000" 8533:And this lovely piece of vandalism to 7224: 6457:Far enough for a man to get lost :) -- 5114:Sir William Moore Johnson, 1st Baronet 4053:The main thing I noticed was that the 4016:How do record holders prove their age? 1983:Can you please check this page again ( 522:Do not edit the contents of this page. 10099:, any solution which doesn't produce 6479:So you won't give me directions from 4970:Please note this message conforms to 2427:... and fins that the page is now at 7543:The following discussion is closed. 6686:at the top of the disputed article, 6373:the junction of Cumming & Seaman 5580:both on their talk pages and on the 5016:Did you see the discussion above at 3987:turned out to be a damp squib. :( -- 3316:may be of interest. All the best, 2856:in implying racism on this article. 2679:Monkstown and other places in Dublin 2546:Michael Biddulph, 1st Baron Biddulph 2500:Category:Peers of the United Kingdom 2399:... and find that the same page now 1268:Could you ask this editor not to be 818:of you please try to defuse this? -- 11660:comment added 19:30, 14 April 2008. 10325: 9821: 9438: 9229: 9206: 9151: 7513:this conversation on your talk page 6931: 6891: 6504: 6435: 6377: 6316: 6212: 6139: 6071: 6014: 5954: 4395:are the places to decide the issue. 3022:warning to all editors of that page 1628:be notable in the context of that? 1132:I was possibly a little stringy on 1108:Vanguard Progressive Unionist Party 1066:Vanguard Progressive Unionist Party 906:The Great Northern Brewery, Dundalk 23: 11256:{{BDA||1960|01|10|2008|5|12|df}} 11250:{{BDA|B|1960|01|10|2008|5|12|df}} 10973:thank you for all your hard work. 10534:WP:VANDALISM#What_vandalism_is_not 9854:Please repopulate the category. -- 9796:Knowledge:Categorization of people 9734:Hi again BHG. I do not think that 9460:It's all tricks with mirrors :) -- 9302:a simple check of the site is the 8351:I thought that everyone knew that 6958: 5211:Eeeek! Will I hit it lucky twice? 5017: 4913: 4011:Thought you might be interested... 3562:This is an automated message from 3554: 3028:can be applied to this article. -- 3024:to calm down and to remember that 1688:. Could I ask you to do that for 809:Oh dear. I don't know what caused 24: 11670: 11497:Can we also delete the templates 11247:{{BDA|B|1960|01|10|2008|5|12|df}} 9504:the all-time-best national anthem 8946:All things come to those who wait 6651:On talk:Finbar Wright he writes: 6273:suggests that they don't use the 2159:Knowledge:WikiProject Numismatics 1648:trimmed the article substantially 595:ah sure you can call me John Bull 11253:{{BDA||1960|01|10|2008|5|12|df}} 10940:Certainly correct. It does fail 8282:The discussion above is closed. 7225: 7143:User talk:Outriggr/assessment.js 7120:User:Giano/Terms for VK's return 6930:Believe me, don't worry about it 6309:Can you get there if you follow 5359:Glenstal Abbey School references 5159:which did not previously exist. 5116:has yet another weird format. - 5054:Duly noted, bot-driver. Thanks. 4985: 4933:"Should the addition of this box 2322: 1808:Hope you're keeping well too. -- 505: 43: 10530:wrong to revert it as vandalism 10075:, which is an informal process. 7002:Thanks for the notification. -- 6211:while you're there. No, really. 5433:Good idea. I have done both. -- 4078:I also note the involvement of 2739:Killings at Coolacrease article 2492:Category:Peers of Great Britain 1557:Green Party in Northern Ireland 11531:queried it when it was created 8751:look like my friend is back?-- 8595:Sorry to bother you with this 8332:How is the basketball team in 7246:for the fix! The tool works! 6768:Knowledge is not a bureaucracy 6569:rules required the removal of 6497:. Although it might make your 5767:Derry/Londonderry name dispute 5487:Queen's University Hockey Club 1896: 841: 13: 1: 11437:Heh. He's normally right. :P 11165:" versus "{{BDA|B|1960|01|10| 10067:, which a formal step in the 9658:If cat=yes, then use the css 9569:{{UserTalkReplyhere|cat=yes}} 9314: 6955:AfD nomination of Seyhan Kurt 2433:That's another fairly simple 1795:User:Outriggr/metadatatest.js 11519:I am inclined to think that 11459:Template:Wikiproject Ireland 9334:Knowledge:V#Reliable_sources 7462:Talk:Remembrance Day bombing 6239:, by referring to the towns 3646:Words evolve over time :) -- 2844:Could you have a look please 2683:BHG; I reverted your moves ( 2423:, which I had referenced to 2409:can do the trick, replacing 42: 7: 11396:Responded on Bot Requests. 9677:property, which is defined 9311: 8994:How do I retrieve webpages? 7927: 7681: 7661:) 14:43, 6 May 2008 BG(UTC) 7602: 7503:Hoping we can work together 6013:I can't really complain...) 5624:Knowledge:Protection policy 4686:What would he have made of 4071:). My guess is Kathlutz is 35:message for BrownHairedGirl 10: 11675: 11317:{{BDA|B|1960|01|10||||df}} 11027:doesn't show a removal of 10071:process, it's just at the 9573:Template:UserTalkReplyhere 9547:Template:UserTalkReplyhere 8871:22:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 8842:22:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 8817:20:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 8760:20:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 8736:16:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 8722:16:02, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 8650:14:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 8627:12:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 8587:19:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 8557:19:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 8492:21:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 8479:03:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 8400:20:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 7097:User:Useight/Highly Active 6880:non-negotiable core policy 6571:this magnificent paragraph 5758:23:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5743:22:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5719:22:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5648:20:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 5617:20:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 5603:19:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 5451:14:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 5428:14:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 5404:18:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5377:18:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5353:14:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5329:14:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5302:18:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5276:18:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5258:23:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5232:20:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5206:20:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5169:13:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5149:13:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 5126:09:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 5109:11:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5090:02:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5064:02:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5050:01:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5008:23:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 4983: 4964:11:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 4904:22:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 4881:21:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 4861:22:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 4834:21:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 4810:20:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 4767:19:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 4738:23:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 4723:13:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 4700:12:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 4682:16:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4659:16:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4621:16:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4589:05:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 4564:05:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 4545:18:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4502:18:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4468:13:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4412:10:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4340:23:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4325:21:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4302:19:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4287:13:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4233:06:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4206:14:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4174:14:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 4156:17:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 4123:00:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 4108:23:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 4040:23:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 4005:14:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 3941:03:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 3915:03:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 3901:03:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 3871:03:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 3832:14:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 3794:13:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 3769:15:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 3742:08:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 3664:16:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 3641:15:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 3615:15:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 3592:15:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 3580:the maintainer's talk page 3543:13:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 3520:08:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 3496:14:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 3472:11:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 3448:15:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3424:15:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3399:22:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3371:22:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3351:21:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3324:21:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3302:12:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3275:10:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3249:15:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 3211:14:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3188:14:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3172:14:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3157:14:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3135:14:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3120:14:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3089:14:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3074:14:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3046:13:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 3001:13:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2987:13:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2970:13:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2956:13:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2942:13:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2928:13:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2871:10:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2839:16:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 2815:13:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 2784:12:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 2763:12:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 2733:01:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 2706:23:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 2673:01:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 2650:23:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 2630:23:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 2605:01:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 2582:00:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 2562:09:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 2527:06:31, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 2504:Category:Peers of Scotland 2384:17:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC) 2366:17:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC) 2342:17:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC) 2320: 2311:23:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2288:22:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2268:07:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2246:05:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2199:05:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2179:00:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 2057:22:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 2024:Are you using the default 2016:20:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 1997:19:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 1974:04:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 1944:21:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1913:20:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1887:20:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1872:18:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1841:18:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1826:17:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1788:17:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1761:18:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1747:17:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1710:16:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1668:14:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1638:12:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1617:14:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1585:10:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1552:11:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1532:04:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1508:00:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1485:00:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1471:00:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1448:00:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1425:00:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1411:23:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1356:23:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1333:23:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1309:22:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1282:07:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1270:canvassing on my talk page 1250:21:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1221:20:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1206:17:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1053:18:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 1029:18:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 1002:23:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 988:17:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 962:16:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 948:16:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 921:16:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 883:02:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 858:02:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 836:01:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 805:01:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 770:16:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 738:16:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 724:16:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 698:16:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 664:16:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 632:15:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 607:15:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 589:15:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 567:15:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 557:Thanks for your input BHG. 552:15:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 50:BrownHairedGirl's archives 11124:It's the simpler markup: 10685:over-looked aspect. (The 10223:Ooops! Sorry about that. 9849:removed from the category 9365:http://www.independent.ie 9031:will produce this output: 7231: 6984:of receiving this notice? 4263:all the current redirects 3016:I have now protected the 2769:Changing edit attribution 2496:Category:Peers of Ireland 2488:Category:Peers of England 2393:Thomas Nicholas Redington 1985:History of County Wexford 1979:History of County Wexford 1211:article to that? Thanks, 1180:17:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 1165:14:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 1095:13:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 33:click here to leave a new 18:User talk:BrownHairedGirl 11619:01:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 11597:01:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 11583:23:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11515:23:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11493:16:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11471:16:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11450:14:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11432:14:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11409:14:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11386:14:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11359:10:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11331:19:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11311:17:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11285:17:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 11195:01:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 11120:01:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 11103:22:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 11081:22:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 11067:15:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 11018:11:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10986:19:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 10954:06:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 10936:21:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 10870:19:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 10837:10:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 10816:08:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 10771:18:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 10718:08:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 10672:23:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10647:23:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10612:23:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10585:15:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 10557:00:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 10496:23:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10470:23:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10455:23:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10427:21:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10413:20:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10383:21:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10360:for blindly reverting... 10343:20:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10315:19:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10290:15:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10248:11:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10233:11:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 10213:04:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 10190:02:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 10170:02:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 10147:01:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 10128:01:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 10054:01:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 9967:02:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 9723:00:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 9269:18:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 9247:17:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 8988:18:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 8971:17:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 8284:Please do not modify it. 7759:. It's not that long. -- 7545:Please do not modify it. 6608:Category:Knowledge humor 6066:And I'll trump you with 6005:. (Having lived in both 4994:Did I make a mistake on 4925:that ended on 23 April. 4551:Newcastle, County Dublin 4518:Blackrock, County Dublin 4516:shoukd also be moved to 4510:, I moved it back again. 4488:(the postal address) or 4480:is a better example. Or 4448:Newcastle, County Dublin 4432:Monkstown, County Dublin 4426:Monkstown, County Dublin 3621:Gender neutral language? 3333:'s supper just yet :) -- 3280:And I want to say is at 752:, which I hope it is. -- 11126:{{bda|1960|01|10|df=y}} 10656:or something instead.:) 10528:by Thark, but you were 10034:22:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9997:21:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9948:21:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9932:21:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9886:20:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9872:20:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9839:20:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9812:20:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9790:20:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9752:20:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9699:13:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9646:07:43, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9631:05:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9608:02:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9593:02:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9562:02:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9539:13:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9524:11:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9497:11:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 9478:20:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 9456:20:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 9410:19:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 9389:19:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 9327:17:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 9224:20:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 9201:19:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 9175:19:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 9169:18:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 9134:19:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 9108:19:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 9094:17:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 9015:07:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 8940:23:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 8917:18:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 8518:Sexual objectification‎ 8377:00:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 8346:00:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 8323:18:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 8303:13:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 8278:18:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 8187:Why did you do it when 8153:18:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 8129:18:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 8108:Why did you do it when 8094:17:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 8053:17:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 8030:17:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 8008:17:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7985:17:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7972:17:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7949:17:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7936:16:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7916:16:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7880:16:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7857:16:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7832:16:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7794:16:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7777:16:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7748:16:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7730:16:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7704:16:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7690:14:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7649:14:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7624:14:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7611:14:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7590:14:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7566:14:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7532:08:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 7498:16:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7482:14:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7451:13:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7436:13:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7411:13:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7384:12:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7362:11:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 7340:17:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC) 7330:Thanks for your reply. 7321:16:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC) 7283:16:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC) 7264:Remembrance Day Bombing 7256:22:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 7235:The Technology Barnstar 7212:20:25, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 7186:20:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 7163:19:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 7151:from one BHG to another 7132:08:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 7109:17:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 7078:20:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 7063:19:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 7040:17:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 7026:Thanks for the Barnstar 7020:14:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 6997:13:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 6949:21:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 6925:21:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 6909:19:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 6829:19:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 6808:18:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 6750:18:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 6734:17:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 6710:17:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 6648:as disruptive editing. 6624:17:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 6591:01:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 6548:23:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6522:23:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6475:23:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6453:23:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6424:23:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6395:22:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6351:22:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6334:22:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6305:21:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6265:21:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6230:21:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6197:21:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6183:21:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6157:19:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6111:19:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6089:19:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6062:19:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 6032:18:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5997:18:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5972:18:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5939:21:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5924:18:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5890:17:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5872:17:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5845:17:24, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5805:00:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5695:13:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 5663:12:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 5548:07:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 5538:the articles I work on. 5528:07:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 5500:06:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 5473:08:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 5282:Talk:Fritzl incest case 4132:article was written by 3502:Mary Harney - vandalism 3100:Arbitration enforcement 2532:There are many such as 2065:WikiProject Numismatics 1597:User talk:Green Kit Kat 1401:. Thanks in advance. -- 10884:posted there yesterday 9767: 9713:changing it to 4em. -- 9652:m:Help:ParserFunctions 9369:http://www.ireland.com 9064:Check date values in: 7095:table can be found at 6970:, has been listed for 6963: 6886:and its baby brother, 6819:illuminating things... 6782: 6612:Knowledge:Hold grudges 6403:Tongue of Westerbister 6166: 5748:assuming good faith.-- 4918: 4785:Manchester imperialism 4772:Oi! how dare you! I'm 4705:tune on that point. -- 4490:Dundrum, County Dublin 4438:, which also includes 3978:) 08:32, 15 March 2008 3559: 3020:article, and posted a 2152:) 00:43, 18 April 2008 1692:? It's still rated as 1127:Caesar Litton Falkiner 1078:Caesar Litton Falkiner 11644:The Drapier's Letters 10296:Advice and assistance 10270:Category:Irish people 10263:Category:Irish people 9763: 9297:. I thought that the 8567:the checkuser request 7297:the article talk page 7137:Tag & Assess tool 6962: 6778: 6491:? We could end up at 6164: 5771:Good Friday Agreement 5457:Buster Martin article 5365:Glenstal Abbey School 5314:Amused and supportive 4917: 3782:I thought I was sad. 3558: 2550:taking responsibility 2419:I then looked at the 534:Could you have a look 520:of past discussions. 11535:Badagnani's response 11499:Template:Irelandproj 11049:for us editors!). -- 10962:Michael McGlynn biog 10568:to cool the rhetoric 8189:Deacon of Pndapetzim 8143:Deacon of Pndapetzim 8110:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7906:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7870:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7822:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7517:my posting at WT:CAT 7114:VK's proposed return 6788:not biting newcomers 6640:Reply about POV tags 6428:Is it anywhere near 6189:Traditional unionist 5931:Traditional unionist 5882:Traditional unionist 5850:I have commented at 5837:Traditional unionist 5825:Mayor of Londonderry 5815:Mayor of Londonderry 5630:for more details. -- 4931:We originally asked 4819:Department infoboxes 4525:Lucan, County Dublin 4440:Lucan, County Dublin 3180:Traditional unionist 3127:Traditional unionist 3081:Traditional unionist 2993:Traditional unionist 2962:Traditional unionist 2934:Traditional unionist 2610:hello how are you? 2449:Category:British MPs 2035:Did you remember to 1899:One Night In Hackney 1803:Talk:Mairéad Farrell 1134:Republican Sinn Féin 1082:Republican Sinn Féin 844:One Night In Hackney 11042:Special:Preferences 10063:is not actually at 9976:Robert Ballard Long 9571:, as documented at 9076:Hope this helps! -- 8535:Talk:Feminism/to do 8230:See previous answer 6275:missionary position 5852:Talk:Mayor of Derry 5833:Talk:Mayor of Derry 5827:is not affected by 5155:I have now created 4444:Lusk, County Dublin 4247:check for redirects 3838:Mary Hanafin revert 3751:at the RfD page. -- 3724:the discussion page 2910:Hope this helps. -- 2228:Hope this helps. -- 2185:Emergent Party prod 2030:Special:Preferences 1595:See my comments at 11503:Template:WPIRELAND 10687:Gilbert O'Sullivan 10219:Overcategorisation 10069:dispute resolution 9673:The "bottom" is a 9371:etc. Good luck! -- 9332:The issue here is 9181:Template:cite news 9022:Template:cite news 8605:User:80.192.60.134 8565:Well done opening 7546: 7301:dispute resolution 7192:reply on your talk 7190:Done, I hope. See 6964: 6370:← No, he lives at 6167: 5410:Thanks re Kathlutz 5214:I'll have a go. -- 4919: 4486:Dundrum, Dublin 16 4252:Template:WPSCHOOLS 4018:(BBC article) and 3670:RfD nomination of 3560: 2467:multiple passes). 2459:tells me that are 2407:regular expression 1323:. Thanks a lot. -- 1119:Broadstone, Dublin 1070:Broadstone, Dublin 61:List of archives 11617: 11581: 11491: 11430: 11384: 11309: 11193: 11101: 11065: 11025:diff of my revert 10934: 10835: 10814: 10716: 10645: 10555: 10411: 10322:subject of an RFC 10288: 10211: 10168: 10126: 10032: 9930: 9870: 9788: 9697: 9629: 9591: 9522: 9476: 9434: 9387: 9361:http://www.tcm.ie 9267: 9199: 9132: 9092: 8938: 8869: 8815: 8720: 8585: 8500:User:80.192.60.20 8477: 8375: 8305: 8301: 8276: 8150: 8051: 8006: 7970: 7933: 7877: 7855: 7829: 7775: 7728: 7710:assume good faith 7687: 7647: 7608: 7588: 7544: 7480: 7434: 7413: 7382: 7319: 7290:the wrong version 7261: 7260: 7210: 7184: 7061: 7018: 6995: 6985: 6806: 6732: 6614:against you all 6589: 6546: 6473: 6422: 6293: 6263: 6109: 6060: 5995: 5953: 5922: 5870: 5803: 5741: 5693: 5646: 5582:article talk page 5526: 5449: 5402: 5351: 5300: 5256: 5230: 5147: 5088: 5048: 4980:Rayment templates 4976: 4902: 4859: 4808: 4721: 4680: 4657: 4587: 4543: 4514:Blackrock, Dublin 4478:Blackrock, Dublin 4466: 4379:Monkstown, Dublin 4366: 4323: 4285: 4204: 4127:What's an SPA? I 4106: 4082:, which raises a 4003: 3979: 3966:comment added by 3939: 3899: 3830: 3767: 3677:I have nominated 3662: 3613: 3541: 3494: 3446: 3397: 3349: 3300: 3247: 3209: 3155: 3118: 3072: 3044: 2926: 2813: 2765: 2749:comment added by 2731: 2685:Monkstown, Dublin 2671: 2636:Dev's father Juan 2632: 2616:comment added by 2603: 2542:Williams Baronets 2525: 2453:Category:Baronets 2364: 2309: 2266: 2244: 2177: 2153: 2140:comment added by 2055: 2037:bypass your cache 1942: 1870: 1824: 1745: 1666: 1615: 1587: 1571:comment added by 1565:Regards Katrina 1506: 1446: 1354: 1307: 1248: 1204: 1163: 1051: 986: 946: 881: 834: 768: 736: 722: 702:Here's the link: 696: 662: 630: 587: 531: 530: 526:current talk page 499: 498: 477: 476: 11666: 11661: 11608: 11605: 11572: 11569: 11549: 11543: 11528: 11522: 11482: 11479: 11448: 11421: 11418: 11407: 11375: 11372: 11356: 11300: 11297: 11268: 11262: 11230: 11224: 11220: 11214: 11210: 11204: 11184: 11181: 11176: 11172: 11168: 11164: 11160: 11158: 11131: 11127: 11092: 11089: 11056: 11053: 11036: 11030: 11007: 11001: 10925: 10922: 10855:? Or is it only 10831: 10810: 10768: 10764: 10760: 10712: 10668: 10661: 10636: 10633: 10627:Northern Ireland 10608: 10601: 10546: 10543: 10492: 10485: 10451: 10444: 10402: 10399: 10341: 10339: 10332: 10279: 10276: 10202: 10199: 10159: 10156: 10117: 10114: 10110:on Wikipéire. -- 10092:) and himself :) 10023: 10020: 10015: 10011: 10005: 9921: 9918: 9861: 9858: 9837: 9835: 9828: 9800:Talk:Clare Short 9779: 9776: 9688: 9685: 9669: 9661: 9620: 9617: 9582: 9579: 9570: 9513: 9510: 9467: 9464: 9454: 9452: 9445: 9425: 9422: 9378: 9375: 9319: 9318: 9313: 9258: 9255: 9245: 9243: 9236: 9222: 9220: 9213: 9190: 9187: 9176: 9167: 9165: 9158: 9123: 9120: 9115: 9083: 9080: 9073: 9067: 9062: 9060: 9052: 9050: 9049: 9030: 8985: 8968: 8929: 8926: 8914: 8902: 8860: 8857: 8839: 8806: 8803: 8757: 8733: 8711: 8708: 8699: 8681: 8647: 8624: 8576: 8573: 8554: 8489: 8468: 8465: 8461:on all three. -- 8397: 8366: 8363: 8297: 8290: 8267: 8264: 8146: 8091: 8087: 8083: 8042: 8039: 7997: 7994: 7961: 7958: 7931: 7925: 7873: 7846: 7843: 7825: 7784:I applaud it. -- 7766: 7763: 7719: 7716: 7685: 7679: 7638: 7635: 7606: 7600: 7579: 7576: 7555: 7530: 7471: 7468: 7425: 7422: 7404: 7373: 7370: 7310: 7307: 7229: 7222: 7221: 7201: 7198: 7175: 7172: 7052: 7049: 7009: 7006: 6989: 6979: 6947: 6945: 6938: 6907: 6905: 6898: 6867: 6861: 6857: 6851: 6843: 6837: 6797: 6794: 6723: 6720: 6685: 6679: 6672: 6666: 6580: 6577: 6537: 6534: 6520: 6518: 6511: 6502: 6496: 6490: 6484: 6464: 6461: 6451: 6449: 6442: 6433: 6413: 6410: 6405: 6393: 6391: 6384: 6375: 6332: 6330: 6323: 6315:for long enough? 6314: 6284: 6281: 6254: 6251: 6228: 6226: 6219: 6206: 6155: 6153: 6146: 6137: 6100: 6097: 6087: 6085: 6078: 6051: 6048: 6040:and raise you a 6030: 6028: 6021: 5986: 5983: 5970: 5968: 5961: 5947: 5913: 5910: 5861: 5858: 5823:, the office of 5794: 5791: 5732: 5729: 5684: 5681: 5676: 5670: 5660: 5637: 5634: 5614: 5600: 5517: 5514: 5440: 5437: 5393: 5390: 5342: 5339: 5291: 5288: 5273: 5247: 5244: 5221: 5218: 5203: 5190:Elisabeth Fritzl 5166: 5138: 5135: 5123: 5106: 5079: 5076: 5039: 5036: 4989: 4988: 4968: 4893: 4890: 4850: 4847: 4799: 4796: 4712: 4709: 4697: 4671: 4668: 4648: 4645: 4578: 4575: 4534: 4531: 4508:my comment above 4457: 4454: 4357: 4354: 4314: 4311: 4276: 4273: 4238:Sorry, but this 4195: 4192: 4097: 4094: 3994: 3991: 3961: 3930: 3927: 3890: 3887: 3821: 3818: 3758: 3755: 3738: 3731: 3721: 3703: 3653: 3650: 3604: 3601: 3532: 3529: 3485: 3482: 3437: 3434: 3388: 3385: 3340: 3337: 3291: 3288: 3272: 3267: 3238: 3235: 3200: 3197: 3146: 3143: 3109: 3106: 3063: 3060: 3035: 3032: 3018:Martina Anderson 2917: 2914: 2804: 2801: 2744: 2722: 2719: 2662: 2659: 2611: 2594: 2591: 2559: 2516: 2513: 2444: 2440: 2416: 2412: 2381: 2376: 2355: 2352: 2339: 2326: 2325: 2300: 2297: 2273:Twinkle AfD noms 2262: 2235: 2232: 2224: 2218: 2168: 2165: 2135: 2046: 2043: 2002:Installation of 1933: 1930: 1911: 1907: 1900: 1861: 1858: 1815: 1812: 1736: 1733: 1724: 1718: 1657: 1654: 1606: 1603: 1566: 1497: 1494: 1437: 1434: 1345: 1342: 1298: 1295: 1239: 1236: 1195: 1192: 1154: 1151: 1042: 1039: 977: 974: 937: 934: 872: 869: 856: 852: 845: 825: 822: 759: 756: 751: 745: 732: 713: 710: 687: 684: 658: 621: 618: 578: 575: 509: 502: 501: 493: 481:Cumulative index 58: 57: 47: 36: 27: 26: 11674: 11673: 11669: 11668: 11667: 11665: 11664: 11663: 11655: 11639: 11603: 11567: 11559:for Irelandproj 11547: 11541: 11526: 11520: 11477: 11416: 11394: 11370: 11354: 11345: 11318: 11295: 11266: 11260: 11254: 11248: 11228: 11222: 11218: 11212: 11208: 11202: 11179: 11174: 11170: 11166: 11162: 11161:10 January 1960 11156: 11154: 11129: 11125: 11087: 11051: 11034: 11028: 11005: 10999: 10993: 10964: 10920: 10849: 10766: 10762: 10758: 10682: 10666: 10659: 10631: 10606: 10599: 10593: 10541: 10490: 10483: 10449: 10442: 10397: 10335: 10328: 10298: 10274: 10221: 10197: 10154: 10112: 10073:Mediation Cabal 10042: 10018: 10013: 10009: 10003: 9979: 9916: 9899:a google search 9856: 9847:, who you also 9831: 9824: 9774: 9760:The Independent 9732: 9683: 9667: 9659: 9615: 9577: 9568: 9567:Have you tried 9549: 9508: 9462: 9448: 9441: 9420: 9397: 9373: 9317: 9315: 9291: 9253: 9239: 9232: 9216: 9209: 9185: 9174: 9161: 9154: 9118: 9113: 9078: 9065: 9063: 9054: 9053: 9047: 9045: 9033: 9028: 8996: 8981: 8964: 8924: 8910: 8898: 8855: 8835: 8801: 8753: 8729: 8706: 8672: 8656: 8643: 8620: 8571: 8550: 8485: 8463: 8393: 8385: 8383:Edit warrior IP 8361: 8330: 8311: 8288: 8287: 8262: 8089: 8085: 8081: 8037: 7992: 7956: 7932: 7841: 7761: 7714: 7686: 7633: 7607: 7574: 7553: 7549: 7539: 7528: 7505: 7466: 7420: 7368: 7305: 7266: 7196: 7194:. Good luck! -- 7170: 7139: 7116: 7088: 7047: 7028: 7004: 6980:Do you want to 6957: 6941: 6934: 6901: 6894: 6865: 6859: 6855: 6849: 6841: 6835: 6792: 6718: 6683: 6677: 6670: 6664: 6642: 6575: 6532: 6514: 6507: 6498: 6492: 6486: 6480: 6459: 6445: 6438: 6429: 6408: 6401: 6387: 6380: 6371: 6326: 6319: 6310: 6279: 6277:in Michigan. -- 6249: 6222: 6215: 6202: 6149: 6142: 6133: 6095: 6081: 6074: 6046: 6024: 6017: 5981: 5964: 5957: 5908: 5856: 5817: 5789: 5727: 5707: 5679: 5674: 5668: 5658: 5632: 5628:Talk:Silent Cry 5612: 5598: 5557: 5512: 5508:User:Carcharoth 5483: 5435: 5412: 5388: 5361: 5337: 5316: 5286: 5271: 5242: 5216: 5201: 5193: 5164: 5133: 5121: 5104: 5074: 5034: 5026:Glynne Baronets 4996:Glynne Baronets 4992: 4991: 4986: 4982: 4912: 4888: 4869: 4845: 4821: 4794: 4754: 4707: 4695: 4666: 4643: 4605: 4573: 4529: 4482:Dundrum, Dublin 4452: 4381: 4352: 4309: 4271: 4220: 4217:User:BoxCrawler 4190: 4092: 4013: 3989: 3957: 3925: 3885: 3840: 3816: 3777: 3753: 3736: 3729: 3694: 3680:Asgard Childers 3678: 3675: 3672:Asgard Childers 3648: 3623: 3599: 3553: 3527: 3504: 3480: 3464:Halowithhorns89 3456:Halowithhorns89 3432: 3416:Halowithhorns89 3411: 3383: 3335: 3310: 3286: 3268: 3263: 3258: 3233: 3195: 3141: 3104: 3058: 3030: 2912: 2883:Ulster Vanguard 2848:With regard to 2846: 2823: 2799: 2771: 2741: 2717: 2681: 2657: 2638: 2589: 2570: 2557: 2538:Earl of Gosford 2534:Earl of Gosford 2511: 2442: 2438: 2437:job, replacing 2421:Glynne Baronets 2414: 2410: 2377: 2372: 2350: 2337: 2329: 2328: 2323: 2319: 2295: 2275: 2254: 2230: 2222: 2216: 2197: 2187: 2163: 2067: 2041: 2007: 1981: 1962: 1928: 1910: 1905: 1898: 1856: 1847:Mairéad Farrell 1810: 1771: 1731: 1722: 1716: 1678: 1652: 1601: 1559: 1539: 1516: 1492: 1432: 1340: 1317: 1293: 1266: 1234: 1190: 1149: 1061: 1037: 1016: 972: 932: 909: 867: 855: 850: 843: 820: 754: 749: 743: 708: 682: 616: 573: 536: 500: 495: 494: 488: 473: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 11672: 11638: 11635: 11634: 11633: 11632: 11631: 11630: 11629: 11628: 11627: 11626: 11625: 11624: 11623: 11622: 11621: 11555: 11538: 11533:, but I found 11435: 11434: 11393: 11390: 11389: 11388: 11365: 11344: 11341: 11340: 11339: 11338: 11337: 11336: 11335: 11334: 11333: 11319: 11316: 11291: 11252: 11246: 11245: 11244: 11243: 11242: 11241: 11240: 11239: 11238: 11237: 11236: 11235: 11234: 11233: 11232: 11142: 11141: 11140: 11139: 11138: 11137: 11136: 11135: 11134: 11133: 11038: 10992: 10989: 10963: 10960: 10959: 10958: 10957: 10956: 10905: 10898: 10891: 10876: 10848: 10843: 10842: 10841: 10840: 10839: 10821: 10820: 10819: 10818: 10796: 10795: 10794: 10793: 10783: 10782: 10781: 10780: 10774: 10773: 10753: 10749: 10737: 10733: 10729: 10681: 10678: 10677: 10676: 10675: 10674: 10618: 10596:blocked user. 10592: 10589: 10588: 10587: 10501: 10500: 10499: 10498: 10478: 10477: 10476: 10475: 10474: 10473: 10472: 10389: 10388: 10387: 10386: 10385: 10370: 10369: 10368: 10365: 10361: 10297: 10294: 10293: 10292: 10266: 10258: 10220: 10217: 10216: 10215: 10177: 10176: 10175: 10174: 10173: 10172: 10131: 10130: 10104: 10093: 10076: 10041: 10038: 10037: 10036: 9978: 9973: 9972: 9971: 9970: 9969: 9895: 9894: 9893: 9892: 9891: 9890: 9889: 9888: 9852: 9845:Kevin McNamara 9841: 9731: 9726: 9710: 9709: 9708: 9707: 9706: 9705: 9704: 9703: 9702: 9701: 9671: 9663: 9655: 9548: 9545: 9544: 9543: 9542: 9541: 9485: 9484: 9483: 9482: 9481: 9480: 9416: 9396: 9393: 9392: 9391: 9353: 9341: 9316: 9290: 9287: 9286: 9285: 9284: 9283: 9282: 9281: 9280: 9279: 9278: 9277: 9276: 9275: 9274: 9273: 9272: 9271: 9177: 9141: 9140: 9139: 9138: 9137: 9136: 9074: 9032: 9025: 8995: 8992: 8991: 8990: 8945: 8943: 8942: 8878: 8877: 8876: 8875: 8874: 8873: 8850: 8847: 8830: 8820: 8819: 8797: 8780: 8745: 8744: 8743: 8742: 8741: 8740: 8739: 8738: 8701: 8639: 8629: 8590: 8589: 8563: 8542: 8541: 8540: 8531: 8526:Discrimination 8523: 8515: 8503: 8497: 8496: 8495: 8494: 8445:Edgerunner2005 8442: 8426: 8406: 8384: 8381: 8380: 8379: 8357: 8353:Dart Killester 8329: 8326: 8310: 8307: 8281: 8234: 8233: 8232: 8231: 8225: 8224: 8220: 8219: 8218: 8217: 8208: 8207: 8203: 8202: 8201: 8200: 8193: 8192: 8184: 8183: 8182: 8181: 8170: 8169: 8162: 8161: 8160: 8159: 8158: 8157: 8156: 8155: 8103: 8102: 8101: 8100: 8099: 8098: 8097: 8096: 8060: 8059: 8058: 8057: 8056: 8055: 8018: 8017: 8016: 8015: 8014: 8013: 8012: 8011: 8010: 7926: 7901: 7900: 7899: 7898: 7897: 7896: 7895: 7894: 7893: 7892: 7891: 7890: 7889: 7888: 7887: 7886: 7885: 7884: 7883: 7882: 7837: 7805: 7804: 7803: 7802: 7801: 7800: 7799: 7798: 7797: 7796: 7736: 7735: 7734: 7733: 7732: 7680: 7671: 7670: 7669: 7668: 7667: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7663: 7662: 7629: 7601: 7593: 7592: 7550: 7541: 7540: 7538: 7535: 7504: 7501: 7485: 7484: 7457: 7439: 7438: 7393: 7392: 7391: 7390: 7389: 7388: 7387: 7386: 7345: 7344: 7343: 7342: 7324: 7323: 7293: 7265: 7262: 7259: 7258: 7238: 7237: 7232: 7230: 7219: 7217: 7216: 7215: 7214: 7138: 7135: 7115: 7112: 7087: 7084: 7083: 7082: 7081: 7080: 7027: 7024: 7023: 7022: 6978:. Thank you. 6956: 6953: 6952: 6951: 6912: 6911: 6813: 6812: 6811: 6810: 6784: 6775: 6763: 6737: 6736: 6641: 6638: 6637: 6636: 6635: 6634: 6633: 6632: 6631: 6630: 6629: 6628: 6627: 6626: 6559: 6558: 6557: 6556: 6555: 6554: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6528:Hole of Bugars 6494:Hole of Bugars 6368: 6367: 6366: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6361: 6360: 6359: 6358: 6357: 6356: 6355: 6354: 6353: 6338:Is that where 6237:Guardian Diary 6130: 6129: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6122: 6121: 6120: 6119: 6118: 6117: 6116: 6115: 6114: 6113: 6036:I'll see your 5977: 5941: 5896: 5816: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5808: 5807: 5785: 5778: 5763: 5706: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5699: 5698: 5697: 5608:78.150.252.205 5605: 5562:78.148.101.199 5556: 5551: 5531: 5530: 5482: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5476: 5475: 5411: 5408: 5407: 5406: 5360: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5315: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5268:Kittybrewster 5212: 5198:Kittybrewster 5192: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5161:Kittybrewster 5118:Kittybrewster 5101:Kittybrewster 5029: 5021: 5018:#Leigh_Rayment 5014: 4984: 4981: 4978: 4911: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4868: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4820: 4817: 4815: 4813: 4812: 4777: 4753: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4730:ChildersFamily 4692:Kittybrewster 4638: 4635: 4631: 4628:Molly Childers 4613:ChildersFamily 4604: 4603:Molly Childers 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4569: 4521: 4511: 4471: 4470: 4429: 4418: 4400: 4399: 4396: 4389: 4380: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4332:Adam McCormick 4294:Adam McCormick 4259: 4243: 4242:a malfunction. 4225:Adam McCormick 4219: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4181: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4076: 4051: 4047: 4012: 4009: 4008: 4007: 3956: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3877: 3839: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3804: 3776: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3674: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3622: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3584:CorenSearchBot 3564:CorenSearchBot 3552: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3503: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3451: 3450: 3410: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3376: 3365:Angus McLellan 3354: 3353: 3318:Angus McLellan 3309: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3257: 3255:Jonathan Pryor 3252: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2908: 2900: 2896: 2879:left a warning 2845: 2842: 2831:Coccyx Bloccyx 2822: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2794: 2770: 2767: 2740: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2713: 2692:and and three 2680: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2637: 2634: 2608: 2607: 2569: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2554:Kittybrewster 2474:has a link to 2472:Lord Pantsdown 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2334:Kittybrewster 2321: 2318: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2274: 2271: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2226: 2213: 2206:Emergent Party 2193: 2186: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2133: 2132: 2127: 2122: 2117: 2112: 2107: 2102: 2096: 2095: 2090: 2085: 2080: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2033: 2006: 2000: 1980: 1977: 1966:ChildersFamily 1961: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1919: 1902: 1851: 1806: 1770: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1641: 1640: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1558: 1555: 1538: 1535: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1451: 1450: 1385:. Here is the 1359: 1358: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1226: 1141: 1130: 1111: 1104: 1101: 1100:Hi Valenciano! 1060: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 908: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 863: 847: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 675: 674: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 612: 535: 532: 529: 528: 511: 510: 497: 496: 490: 486: 484: 483: 478: 475: 474: 472: 471: 464: 457: 452: 447: 442: 437: 432: 427: 422: 417: 412: 407: 402: 397: 392: 387: 382: 377: 372: 367: 362: 357: 352: 347: 342: 337: 332: 327: 322: 317: 312: 307: 302: 297: 292: 287: 282: 277: 272: 267: 262: 257: 252: 247: 242: 237: 232: 227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 202: 197: 192: 187: 182: 177: 172: 167: 162: 157: 152: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 122: 117: 112: 107: 102: 97: 92: 87: 82: 77: 72: 66: 63: 62: 54: 53: 52: 48: 40: 39: 34: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 11671: 11662: 11659: 11653: 11649: 11645: 11620: 11615: 11611: 11607: 11600: 11599: 11598: 11594: 11590: 11586: 11585: 11584: 11579: 11575: 11571: 11564: 11563:for WPIRELAND 11560: 11556: 11553: 11546: 11540:If we delete 11539: 11536: 11532: 11525: 11518: 11517: 11516: 11512: 11508: 11504: 11500: 11496: 11495: 11494: 11489: 11485: 11481: 11474: 11473: 11472: 11468: 11464: 11460: 11456: 11455: 11454: 11453: 11452: 11451: 11447: 11444: 11441: 11440:Steve Crossin 11433: 11428: 11424: 11420: 11413: 11412: 11411: 11410: 11406: 11403: 11400: 11399:Steve Crossin 11387: 11382: 11378: 11374: 11366: 11363: 11362: 11361: 11360: 11357: 11351: 11332: 11328: 11324: 11320: 11314: 11313: 11312: 11307: 11303: 11299: 11292: 11288: 11287: 11286: 11282: 11278: 11274: 11273: 11272: 11271: 11270: 11265: 11257: 11251: 11227: 11217: 11207: 11200: 11199: 11198: 11197: 11196: 11191: 11187: 11183: 11152: 11151: 11150: 11149: 11148: 11147: 11146: 11145: 11144: 11143: 11123: 11122: 11121: 11117: 11113: 11109: 11106: 11105: 11104: 11099: 11095: 11091: 11084: 11083: 11082: 11078: 11074: 11070: 11069: 11068: 11063: 11059: 11055: 11047: 11046:date and time 11043: 11039: 11033: 11026: 11022: 11021: 11020: 11019: 11015: 11011: 11004: 10997: 10988: 10987: 10983: 10979: 10974: 10971: 10967: 10955: 10951: 10947: 10943: 10939: 10938: 10937: 10932: 10928: 10924: 10917: 10913: 10909: 10906: 10903: 10899: 10896: 10892: 10889: 10885: 10881: 10877: 10874: 10873: 10872: 10871: 10867: 10863: 10858: 10854: 10847: 10838: 10834: 10830: 10829:Major Bonkers 10825: 10824: 10823: 10822: 10817: 10813: 10809: 10808:Major Bonkers 10805: 10800: 10799: 10798: 10797: 10791: 10787: 10786: 10785: 10784: 10778: 10777: 10776: 10775: 10772: 10769: 10761: 10754: 10750: 10747: 10743: 10738: 10734: 10730: 10726: 10722: 10721: 10720: 10719: 10715: 10711: 10710:Major Bonkers 10705: 10701: 10699: 10695: 10690: 10688: 10673: 10670: 10669: 10663: 10662: 10655: 10650: 10649: 10648: 10643: 10639: 10635: 10628: 10624: 10619: 10616: 10615: 10614: 10613: 10610: 10609: 10603: 10602: 10586: 10582: 10578: 10573: 10569: 10565: 10561: 10560: 10559: 10558: 10553: 10549: 10545: 10537: 10535: 10531: 10527: 10522: 10520: 10516: 10513: 10510: 10506: 10497: 10494: 10493: 10487: 10486: 10479: 10471: 10467: 10463: 10458: 10457: 10456: 10453: 10452: 10446: 10445: 10438: 10434: 10430: 10429: 10428: 10424: 10420: 10416: 10415: 10414: 10409: 10405: 10401: 10394: 10390: 10384: 10380: 10376: 10371: 10366: 10362: 10358: 10357: 10354: 10350: 10349: 10348: 10347: 10346: 10345: 10344: 10340: 10338: 10333: 10331: 10323: 10319: 10318: 10317: 10316: 10312: 10308: 10302: 10291: 10286: 10282: 10278: 10271: 10267: 10264: 10259: 10256: 10252: 10251: 10250: 10249: 10245: 10241: 10235: 10234: 10230: 10226: 10214: 10209: 10205: 10201: 10194: 10193: 10192: 10191: 10187: 10183: 10171: 10166: 10162: 10158: 10150: 10149: 10148: 10144: 10140: 10135: 10134: 10133: 10132: 10129: 10124: 10120: 10116: 10109: 10105: 10102: 10098: 10094: 10091: 10088: 10085: 10081: 10077: 10074: 10070: 10066: 10062: 10058: 10057: 10056: 10055: 10051: 10047: 10035: 10030: 10026: 10022: 10008: 10001: 10000: 9999: 9998: 9994: 9990: 9986: 9982: 9977: 9968: 9964: 9960: 9956: 9951: 9950: 9949: 9945: 9941: 9936: 9935: 9934: 9933: 9928: 9924: 9920: 9911: 9909: 9904: 9900: 9887: 9883: 9879: 9875: 9874: 9873: 9868: 9864: 9860: 9853: 9850: 9846: 9842: 9840: 9836: 9834: 9829: 9827: 9819: 9815: 9814: 9813: 9809: 9805: 9801: 9797: 9793: 9792: 9791: 9786: 9782: 9778: 9771: 9766: 9761: 9756: 9755: 9754: 9753: 9749: 9745: 9741: 9737: 9730: 9725: 9724: 9720: 9716: 9700: 9695: 9691: 9687: 9680: 9676: 9672: 9670: 9664: 9662: 9656: 9653: 9649: 9648: 9647: 9643: 9639: 9634: 9633: 9632: 9627: 9623: 9619: 9611: 9610: 9609: 9605: 9601: 9596: 9595: 9594: 9589: 9585: 9581: 9574: 9566: 9565: 9564: 9563: 9559: 9555: 9540: 9536: 9532: 9527: 9526: 9525: 9520: 9516: 9512: 9505: 9501: 9500: 9499: 9498: 9494: 9490: 9479: 9474: 9470: 9466: 9459: 9458: 9457: 9453: 9451: 9446: 9444: 9436: 9435: 9432: 9428: 9424: 9417: 9414: 9413: 9412: 9411: 9407: 9403: 9390: 9385: 9381: 9377: 9370: 9366: 9362: 9358: 9354: 9351: 9347: 9346:Sean O'Rourke 9342: 9339: 9335: 9331: 9330: 9329: 9328: 9324: 9320: 9309: 9305: 9300: 9296: 9295:Sean O'Rourke 9289:Sean O'Rourke 9270: 9265: 9261: 9257: 9250: 9249: 9248: 9244: 9242: 9237: 9235: 9227: 9226: 9225: 9221: 9219: 9214: 9212: 9204: 9203: 9202: 9197: 9193: 9189: 9182: 9178: 9172: 9171: 9170: 9166: 9164: 9159: 9157: 9149: 9148: 9147: 9146: 9145: 9144: 9143: 9142: 9135: 9130: 9126: 9122: 9111: 9110: 9109: 9105: 9101: 9097: 9096: 9095: 9090: 9086: 9082: 9075: 9071: 9058: 9044: 9040: 9036: 9026: 9023: 9019: 9018: 9017: 9016: 9012: 9008: 9003: 9000: 8989: 8986: 8984: 8978: 8975: 8974: 8973: 8972: 8969: 8967: 8961: 8957: 8954: 8951: 8948: 8941: 8936: 8932: 8928: 8921: 8920: 8919: 8918: 8915: 8913: 8907: 8903: 8901: 8895: 8891: 8889: 8887: 8883: 8872: 8867: 8863: 8859: 8851: 8848: 8845: 8844: 8843: 8840: 8838: 8831: 8828: 8824: 8823: 8822: 8821: 8818: 8813: 8809: 8805: 8798: 8795: 8792: 8789: 8785: 8781: 8778: 8775: 8772: 8768: 8764: 8763: 8762: 8761: 8758: 8756: 8750: 8737: 8734: 8732: 8725: 8724: 8723: 8718: 8714: 8710: 8702: 8697: 8693: 8689: 8685: 8680: 8676: 8671: 8667: 8663: 8659: 8653: 8652: 8651: 8648: 8646: 8640: 8636: 8633: 8630: 8628: 8625: 8623: 8617: 8614: 8610: 8608: 8606: 8602: 8598: 8594: 8593: 8592: 8591: 8588: 8583: 8579: 8575: 8568: 8564: 8561: 8560: 8559: 8558: 8555: 8553: 8547: 8539: 8536: 8532: 8530: 8527: 8524: 8522: 8519: 8516: 8514: 8512: 8509: 8506: 8505: 8504: 8501: 8493: 8490: 8488: 8482: 8481: 8480: 8475: 8471: 8467: 8460: 8456: 8453: 8450: 8446: 8443: 8440: 8437: 8434: 8430: 8427: 8424: 8420: 8417: 8414: 8410: 8407: 8404: 8403: 8402: 8401: 8398: 8396: 8390: 8378: 8373: 8369: 8365: 8358: 8354: 8350: 8349: 8348: 8347: 8343: 8339: 8335: 8325: 8324: 8320: 8316: 8306: 8304: 8300: 8296: 8295:Major Bonkers 8291:<ahem: --> 8285: 8280: 8279: 8274: 8270: 8266: 8257: 8254: 8250: 8246: 8242: 8237: 8229: 8228: 8227: 8226: 8222: 8221: 8215: 8212: 8211: 8210: 8209: 8205: 8204: 8197: 8196: 8195: 8194: 8190: 8186: 8185: 8178: 8174: 8173: 8172: 8171: 8167: 8166: 8165: 8154: 8149: 8144: 8139: 8138: 8137: 8136: 8135: 8134: 8133: 8132: 8131: 8130: 8127: 8124: 8119: 8116: 8113: 8111: 8106: 8095: 8092: 8084: 8077: 8073: 8068: 8067: 8066: 8065: 8064: 8063: 8062: 8061: 8054: 8049: 8045: 8041: 8033: 8032: 8031: 8027: 8023: 8019: 8009: 8004: 8000: 7996: 7988: 7987: 7986: 7983: 7980: 7975: 7974: 7973: 7968: 7964: 7960: 7952: 7951: 7950: 7947: 7944: 7939: 7938: 7937: 7934: 7930: 7922: 7921: 7920: 7919: 7918: 7917: 7914: 7911: 7907: 7881: 7876: 7871: 7867: 7862: 7861: 7860: 7859: 7858: 7853: 7849: 7845: 7838: 7835: 7834: 7833: 7828: 7823: 7819: 7818: 7817: 7816: 7815: 7814: 7813: 7812: 7811: 7810: 7809: 7808: 7807: 7806: 7795: 7791: 7787: 7782: 7781: 7780: 7779: 7778: 7773: 7769: 7765: 7758: 7755: 7751: 7750: 7749: 7745: 7741: 7737: 7731: 7726: 7722: 7718: 7711: 7707: 7706: 7705: 7701: 7697: 7693: 7692: 7691: 7688: 7684: 7675: 7674: 7673: 7672: 7660: 7656: 7652: 7651: 7650: 7645: 7641: 7637: 7630: 7627: 7626: 7625: 7622: 7619: 7614: 7613: 7612: 7609: 7605: 7597: 7596: 7595: 7594: 7591: 7586: 7582: 7578: 7570: 7569: 7568: 7567: 7564: 7561: 7557: 7548: 7534: 7533: 7527: 7526: 7522: 7518: 7514: 7510: 7500: 7499: 7495: 7491: 7483: 7478: 7474: 7470: 7463: 7458: 7455: 7454: 7453: 7452: 7448: 7444: 7437: 7432: 7428: 7424: 7416: 7415: 7414: 7412: 7409:was added at 7408: 7402: 7398: 7385: 7380: 7376: 7372: 7365: 7364: 7363: 7359: 7355: 7351: 7350: 7349: 7348: 7347: 7346: 7341: 7337: 7333: 7328: 7327: 7326: 7325: 7322: 7317: 7313: 7309: 7302: 7298: 7294: 7291: 7287: 7286: 7285: 7284: 7280: 7276: 7271: 7257: 7253: 7249: 7245: 7244: 7240: 7239: 7236: 7233: 7228: 7223: 7220: 7213: 7208: 7204: 7200: 7193: 7189: 7188: 7187: 7182: 7178: 7174: 7167: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7160: 7156: 7152: 7148: 7144: 7134: 7133: 7129: 7125: 7121: 7111: 7110: 7106: 7102: 7098: 7092: 7079: 7075: 7071: 7066: 7065: 7064: 7059: 7055: 7051: 7044: 7043: 7042: 7041: 7037: 7033: 7021: 7016: 7012: 7008: 7001: 7000: 6999: 6998: 6993: 6988: 6983: 6977: 6973: 6969: 6961: 6950: 6946: 6944: 6939: 6937: 6929: 6928: 6927: 6926: 6922: 6918: 6910: 6906: 6904: 6899: 6897: 6889: 6885: 6881: 6876: 6871: 6864: 6854: 6847: 6840: 6833: 6832: 6831: 6830: 6826: 6822: 6809: 6804: 6800: 6796: 6789: 6785: 6781: 6776: 6773: 6769: 6764: 6761: 6756: 6755: 6754: 6753: 6752: 6751: 6747: 6743: 6735: 6730: 6726: 6722: 6714: 6713: 6712: 6711: 6707: 6703: 6698: 6695: 6690: 6689: 6682: 6674: 6669: 6662: 6658: 6655: 6652: 6649: 6645: 6625: 6621: 6617: 6613: 6609: 6605: 6604: 6603: 6602: 6601: 6600: 6599: 6598: 6597: 6596: 6595: 6594: 6593: 6592: 6587: 6583: 6579: 6572: 6568: 6564: 6549: 6544: 6540: 6536: 6529: 6525: 6524: 6523: 6519: 6517: 6512: 6510: 6501: 6495: 6489: 6488:Buttock Point 6483: 6478: 6477: 6476: 6471: 6467: 6463: 6456: 6455: 6454: 6450: 6448: 6443: 6441: 6432: 6427: 6426: 6425: 6420: 6416: 6412: 6404: 6400:Somehow, the 6399: 6398: 6397: 6396: 6392: 6390: 6385: 6383: 6374: 6352: 6349: 6348: 6345: 6341: 6337: 6336: 6335: 6331: 6329: 6324: 6322: 6313: 6312:Wan King Path 6308: 6307: 6306: 6303: 6302: 6299: 6295: 6294: 6291: 6287: 6283: 6276: 6272: 6268: 6267: 6266: 6261: 6257: 6253: 6246: 6242: 6238: 6233: 6232: 6231: 6227: 6225: 6220: 6218: 6210: 6209:Big Bone Lick 6205: 6200: 6199: 6198: 6194: 6190: 6186: 6185: 6184: 6181: 6180: 6177: 6173: 6169: 6168: 6163: 6159: 6158: 6154: 6152: 6147: 6145: 6136: 6135:Nether Button 6112: 6107: 6103: 6099: 6092: 6091: 6090: 6086: 6084: 6079: 6077: 6069: 6065: 6064: 6063: 6058: 6054: 6050: 6043: 6039: 6035: 6034: 6033: 6029: 6027: 6022: 6020: 6012: 6008: 6004: 6000: 5999: 5998: 5993: 5989: 5985: 5978: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5969: 5967: 5962: 5960: 5951: 5945: 5942: 5940: 5936: 5932: 5927: 5926: 5925: 5920: 5916: 5912: 5905: 5901: 5897: 5893: 5892: 5891: 5887: 5883: 5879: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5868: 5864: 5860: 5853: 5849: 5848: 5847: 5846: 5842: 5838: 5834: 5830: 5826: 5822: 5806: 5801: 5797: 5793: 5786: 5783: 5779: 5776: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5761: 5760: 5759: 5755: 5751: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5696: 5691: 5687: 5683: 5673: 5672:editprotected 5666: 5665: 5664: 5661: 5656:.) Thanks. -- 5655: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5644: 5640: 5636: 5629: 5625: 5621: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5615: 5609: 5604: 5601: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5583: 5579: 5575: 5571: 5567: 5563: 5555: 5550: 5549: 5545: 5541: 5537: 5529: 5524: 5520: 5516: 5509: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5497: 5493: 5488: 5474: 5470: 5466: 5462: 5461:verifiability 5458: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5447: 5443: 5439: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5425: 5421: 5417: 5405: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5385: 5384:Verifiability 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5374: 5370: 5369:193.1.100.110 5366: 5354: 5349: 5345: 5341: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5326: 5322: 5321:Fiddle Faddle 5303: 5298: 5294: 5290: 5283: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5274: 5269: 5265: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5254: 5250: 5246: 5239: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5228: 5224: 5220: 5213: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5204: 5199: 5191: 5170: 5167: 5162: 5158: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5145: 5141: 5137: 5129: 5128: 5127: 5124: 5119: 5115: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5107: 5102: 5098: 5093: 5092: 5091: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5071: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5046: 5042: 5038: 5030: 5027: 5022: 5019: 5015: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4977: 4975: 4973: 4972:WP:CANVASSING 4966: 4965: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4952: 4946: 4943: 4941: 4937: 4934: 4929: 4926: 4924: 4916: 4905: 4900: 4896: 4892: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4878: 4874: 4873:74.131.105.46 4862: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4842: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4816: 4811: 4806: 4802: 4798: 4791: 4786: 4782: 4778: 4775: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4719: 4715: 4711: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4698: 4693: 4689: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4678: 4674: 4670: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4639: 4636: 4632: 4629: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4618: 4614: 4608: 4590: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4570: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4552: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4541: 4537: 4533: 4526: 4522: 4519: 4515: 4512: 4509: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4479: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4472: 4469: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4449: 4445: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4430: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4409: 4405: 4397: 4394: 4390: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4348: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4257: 4253: 4248: 4244: 4241: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4218: 4207: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4186: 4182: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4142: 4139: 4135: 4130: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4120: 4116: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4074: 4070: 4067: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4055:Buster Martin 4052: 4048: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4024:Buster Martin 4021: 4017: 4006: 4001: 3997: 3993: 3986: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3942: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3922: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3849: 3843: 3833: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3802: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3780: 3775:Yvette Cooper 3770: 3765: 3761: 3757: 3750: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3740: 3739: 3733: 3732: 3726:. Thank you. 3725: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3702: 3698: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3673: 3665: 3660: 3656: 3652: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3627: 3616: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3575: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3557: 3551: 3544: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3497: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3449: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3400: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3380: 3377: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3369: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3352: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3322: 3319: 3315: 3303: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3283: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3273: 3271: 3266: 3256: 3251: 3250: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3212: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3101: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3055: 3052: 3048: 3047: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3014: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2909: 2906: 2901: 2897: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2855: 2851: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2821:David Treacey 2816: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2795: 2792: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751:Pat Muldowney 2748: 2734: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2686: 2674: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2633: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2606: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2563: 2560: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2507: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2483: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2468: 2464: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2445: 2436: 2431: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2417: 2408: 2403: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2385: 2382: 2380: 2375: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2340: 2335: 2317:Leigh Rayment 2312: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2247: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2227: 2221: 2214: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2180: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2160: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142:Kevin hipwell 2139: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2123: 2121: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2103: 2101: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2091: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2072: 2058: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2038: 2034: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2022: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2005: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1945: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1925: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1909: 1908: 1901: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1807: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1776: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1728: 1721: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1680:Hi. I notice 1669: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1649: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1626: 1625: 1618: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1598: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1573:Green Kit Kat 1570: 1563: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1509: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1449: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1357: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1310: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1251: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1231: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1054: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1014:Final warning 1003: 999: 995: 991: 990: 989: 984: 980: 976: 969: 965: 964: 963: 959: 955: 951: 950: 949: 944: 940: 936: 929: 925: 924: 923: 922: 918: 914: 907: 884: 879: 875: 871: 864: 861: 860: 859: 854: 853: 846: 839: 838: 837: 832: 828: 824: 817: 812: 808: 807: 806: 802: 798: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 771: 766: 762: 758: 748: 741: 740: 739: 735: 731: 730:Major Bonkers 727: 726: 725: 720: 716: 712: 705: 701: 700: 699: 694: 690: 686: 679: 678: 677: 676: 672: 668: 667: 666: 665: 661: 657: 656:Major Bonkers 653: 649: 644: 633: 628: 624: 620: 613: 610: 609: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 590: 585: 581: 577: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 555: 554: 553: 549: 545: 541: 527: 523: 519: 518: 513: 512: 508: 504: 503: 482: 470: 469: 465: 463: 462: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 441: 438: 436: 433: 431: 428: 426: 423: 421: 418: 416: 413: 411: 408: 406: 403: 401: 398: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 376: 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 358: 356: 353: 351: 348: 346: 343: 341: 338: 336: 333: 331: 328: 326: 323: 321: 318: 316: 313: 311: 308: 306: 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 291: 288: 286: 283: 281: 278: 276: 273: 271: 268: 266: 263: 261: 258: 256: 253: 251: 248: 246: 243: 241: 238: 236: 233: 231: 228: 226: 223: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 201: 198: 196: 193: 191: 188: 186: 183: 181: 178: 176: 173: 171: 168: 166: 163: 161: 158: 156: 153: 151: 148: 146: 143: 141: 138: 136: 133: 131: 128: 126: 123: 121: 118: 116: 113: 111: 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 81: 78: 76: 73: 71: 68: 67: 65: 64: 60: 59: 56: 55: 51: 46: 41: 38: 37: 29: 28: 19: 11640: 11436: 11395: 11392:Bot requests 11346: 11343:AfD question 11258: 11255: 11249: 11107: 11045: 10994: 10975: 10972: 10968: 10965: 10911: 10894: 10856: 10850: 10745: 10741: 10724: 10706: 10702: 10691: 10683: 10665: 10658: 10623:The Troubles 10605: 10598: 10594: 10571: 10567: 10563: 10538: 10523: 10511: 10502: 10489: 10482: 10448: 10441: 10352: 10336: 10329: 10303: 10299: 10236: 10222: 10178: 10086: 10043: 9987: 9983: 9980: 9912: 9896: 9832: 9825: 9764: 9733: 9711: 9665: 9657: 9550: 9486: 9449: 9442: 9398: 9337: 9303: 9298: 9292: 9240: 9233: 9217: 9210: 9162: 9155: 9046:. Retrieved 9004: 9001: 8997: 8982: 8965: 8944: 8911: 8899: 8886:SorsImmanis1 8881: 8879: 8836: 8790: 8773: 8767:SorsImmanis1 8754: 8746: 8730: 8644: 8621: 8600: 8596: 8551: 8544:I've opened 8543: 8498: 8486: 8451: 8435: 8422: 8415: 8409:80.192.60.20 8394: 8386: 8331: 8312: 8289: 8283: 8258: 8252: 8248: 8244: 8238: 8235: 8213: 8199:meta-debate. 8176: 8163: 8120: 8117: 8114: 8107: 8104: 8075: 8071: 7928: 7902: 7865: 7753: 7752:Giano, just 7682: 7603: 7551: 7542: 7523: 7511:pointed out 7506: 7486: 7440: 7394: 7267: 7242: 7241: 7234: 7218: 7150: 7140: 7117: 7093: 7089: 7029: 6965: 6942: 6935: 6913: 6902: 6895: 6879: 6874: 6814: 6779: 6777:You also say 6738: 6699: 6693: 6691: 6687: 6675: 6660: 6659: 6656: 6653: 6650: 6646: 6643: 6563:this article 6560: 6515: 6508: 6446: 6439: 6388: 6381: 6369: 6347: 6327: 6320: 6301: 6223: 6216: 6179: 6150: 6143: 6131: 6082: 6075: 6068:Clitterhouse 6025: 6018: 5965: 5958: 5949: 5943: 5877: 5818: 5782:Europa Hotel 5708: 5606:Another IP: 5574:example diff 5570:78.144.25.55 5566:84.13.114.27 5558: 5535: 5532: 5484: 5413: 5362: 5317: 5194: 5069: 4993: 4969: 4967: 4949: 4947: 4944: 4940:introduction 4935: 4932: 4930: 4927: 4920: 4870: 4822: 4814: 4773: 4755: 4688:David Irving 4609: 4606: 4489: 4485: 4401: 4392: 4382: 4346: 4266: 4255: 4239: 4221: 4185:sockpuppetry 4161: 4140: 4128: 4087: 4083: 4080:Max Clifford 4072: 4065: 4026:, which had 4014: 3958: 3859:Mary Hanafin 3844: 3841: 3784: 3781: 3778: 3735: 3728: 3676: 3631: 3628: 3624: 3576: 3561: 3505: 3452: 3412: 3311: 3269: 3264: 3259: 3229: 3094: 3049: 3015: 3011: 2904: 2889: 2857: 2847: 2824: 2772: 2742: 2693: 2689: 2682: 2639: 2609: 2571: 2549: 2508: 2484: 2469: 2465: 2446: 2432: 2418: 2404: 2390: 2378: 2373: 2330: 2276: 2258: 2255: 2188: 2134: 2068: 2025: 2008: 1982: 1963: 1960:Outstanding! 1924:WP:SYNthesis 1903: 1892: 1772: 1693: 1679: 1564: 1560: 1540: 1537:Imam bayildi 1517: 1474: 1459:Imam bayildi 1455:İmam bayıldı 1452: 1414: 1399:Imam bayildi 1391:Imam bayildi 1383:Imam bayildi 1363:İmam bayıldı 1360: 1318: 1267: 1230:good article 1138:good article 1062: 1017: 952:Thanks! :-) 910: 848: 815: 810: 645: 642: 594: 537: 521: 515: 467: 460: 134: 30: 11656:—Preceding 11648:Ottava Rima 11545:Irelandproj 11537:persuasive. 10991:Brian Cowen 10505:TharkunColl 10182:Jack forbes 10139:Jack forbes 10046:Jack forbes 10014:class=start 9770:Clare Short 9729:Clare Short 9668:bottom: 1em 9660:bottom: 5em 9357:Google News 8180:Vintagekits 7405:—Preceding 7147:my monoskin 7086:New Project 6968:Seyhan Kurt 6868:is the tag 6344:Bencherlite 6298:Bencherlite 6176:Bencherlite 6042:Green Witch 5705:Stroke City 5414:Thanks for 4484:. It isn't 3962:—Preceding 3749:my comments 3508:Mary Harney 2791:User:Alison 2745:—Preceding 2694:Our Fathers 2612:—Preceding 2136:—Preceding 2004:WP:FRIENDLY 1567:—Preceding 1477:Chapultepec 1463:Chapultepec 1417:Chapultepec 1403:Chapultepec 1395:İmambayıldı 1367:İmambayıldı 1325:Chapultepec 1321:İmambayıldı 1315:İmambayildi 514:This is an 11606:HairedGirl 11570:HairedGirl 11480:HairedGirl 11419:HairedGirl 11373:HairedGirl 11352:? Thanks, 11298:HairedGirl 11182:HairedGirl 11157:1960-01-10 11090:HairedGirl 11054:HairedGirl 10923:HairedGirl 10910:says that 10634:HairedGirl 10544:HairedGirl 10400:HairedGirl 10353:sorry saga 10277:HairedGirl 10255:good faith 10240:Fergananim 10225:Fergananim 10200:HairedGirl 10157:HairedGirl 10115:HairedGirl 10021:HairedGirl 9919:HairedGirl 9908:Troops Out 9859:HairedGirl 9818:Troops Out 9777:HairedGirl 9686:HairedGirl 9666:otherwise 9618:HairedGirl 9580:HairedGirl 9511:HairedGirl 9465:HairedGirl 9423:HairedGirl 9376:HairedGirl 9256:HairedGirl 9188:HairedGirl 9121:HairedGirl 9081:HairedGirl 9048:2008-05-05 8927:HairedGirl 8858:HairedGirl 8804:HairedGirl 8709:HairedGirl 8574:HairedGirl 8466:HairedGirl 8429:68.2.74.58 8364:HairedGirl 8328:Academics? 8315:Leoenroysh 8265:HairedGirl 8249:on balance 8074:way. The 8040:HairedGirl 7995:HairedGirl 7959:HairedGirl 7844:HairedGirl 7764:HairedGirl 7717:HairedGirl 7636:HairedGirl 7577:HairedGirl 7556:HairedGirl 7529:uelWantman 7509:Carcharoth 7469:HairedGirl 7423:HairedGirl 7371:HairedGirl 7308:HairedGirl 7199:HairedGirl 7173:HairedGirl 7050:HairedGirl 7007:HairedGirl 6795:HairedGirl 6721:HairedGirl 6578:HairedGirl 6535:HairedGirl 6500:Fanny Burn 6462:HairedGirl 6411:HairedGirl 6340:Wayne Kerr 6282:HairedGirl 6252:HairedGirl 6241:Scunthorpe 6204:Beaverlick 6098:HairedGirl 6049:HairedGirl 6011:Hunstanton 5984:HairedGirl 5911:HairedGirl 5859:HairedGirl 5792:HairedGirl 5730:HairedGirl 5682:HairedGirl 5635:HairedGirl 5554:Silent Cry 5515:HairedGirl 5438:HairedGirl 5420:Carcharoth 5391:HairedGirl 5340:HairedGirl 5289:HairedGirl 5245:HairedGirl 5238:WP:SNOWing 5219:HairedGirl 5157:Rayment-pc 5136:HairedGirl 5077:HairedGirl 5037:HairedGirl 4990:Unresolved 4951:Conclusion 4891:HairedGirl 4848:HairedGirl 4797:HairedGirl 4710:HairedGirl 4669:HairedGirl 4646:HairedGirl 4607:Hello! :) 4576:HairedGirl 4532:HairedGirl 4455:HairedGirl 4355:HairedGirl 4312:HairedGirl 4274:HairedGirl 4193:HairedGirl 4166:Carcharoth 4115:Carcharoth 4095:HairedGirl 4032:Carcharoth 3992:HairedGirl 3928:HairedGirl 3888:HairedGirl 3819:HairedGirl 3756:HairedGirl 3651:HairedGirl 3602:HairedGirl 3530:HairedGirl 3483:HairedGirl 3435:HairedGirl 3386:HairedGirl 3338:HairedGirl 3289:HairedGirl 3236:HairedGirl 3198:HairedGirl 3144:HairedGirl 3107:HairedGirl 3061:HairedGirl 3033:HairedGirl 2979:Valenciano 2915:HairedGirl 2802:HairedGirl 2720:HairedGirl 2690:Hail Marys 2660:HairedGirl 2642:Red Hurley 2592:HairedGirl 2514:HairedGirl 2353:HairedGirl 2327:Unresolved 2298:HairedGirl 2233:HairedGirl 2210:WP:PRODded 2166:HairedGirl 2044:HairedGirl 1931:HairedGirl 1859:HairedGirl 1831:submit. -- 1813:HairedGirl 1799:my comment 1734:HairedGirl 1690:Free Derry 1676:Free Derry 1655:HairedGirl 1630:Valenciano 1604:HairedGirl 1495:HairedGirl 1435:HairedGirl 1343:HairedGirl 1296:HairedGirl 1289:WP:CANVASS 1264:Canvassing 1237:HairedGirl 1213:Valenciano 1193:HairedGirl 1172:Valenciano 1152:HairedGirl 1087:Valenciano 1040:HairedGirl 975:HairedGirl 935:HairedGirl 870:HairedGirl 823:HairedGirl 757:HairedGirl 711:HairedGirl 685:HairedGirl 619:HairedGirl 576:HairedGirl 11589:ww2censor 11552:this list 11524:WPIRELAND 11507:ww2censor 11463:ww2censor 11350:WP:CANVAS 11044:(see the 10572:something 10526:this edit 10519:This edit 10101:The Truth 10097:The Truth 10080:Wikipéire 10065:mediation 10061:That case 10040:Mediation 10007:WPMILHIST 9395:Greetings 9308:FCSundae 9057:cite news 8894:unrelated 8784:Ryoung122 8459:checkuser 8334:this edit 8309:wikipedia 7616:actions. 7507:Hi BHG, 7248:Rosiestep 7243:Thank you 7155:Rosiestep 6853:pov-check 6772:WP:POLICY 6668:POV-check 6271:the photo 6245:Penistone 6007:Wymondham 6003:Towcester 6001:I prefer 5821:Derry GAA 5775:Norn Iron 5750:Nanometre 5711:Nanometre 5540:Weejack48 5492:Weejack48 5099:today. - 4956:Kleinzach 4826:Nanometre 4824:Thanks.-- 4790:Yorkshire 4788:place in 4776:real!!!!! 4393:talkpages 4146:), btw.-- 4134:CloudNine 3955:Beta mess 3808:this edit 2905:providing 2568:Vandalism 2280:DarkAudit 1775:This edit 1379:talk page 1225:Hi again! 1123:Buttevant 1074:Buttevant 11614:contribs 11578:contribs 11561:and for 11488:contribs 11446:(review) 11427:contribs 11405:(review) 11381:contribs 11306:contribs 11201:Because 11190:contribs 11163:(age 64) 11098:contribs 11062:contribs 11032:Navboxes 11003:Navboxes 10946:Sarah777 10931:contribs 10902:WP:CIVIL 10862:Sarah777 10853:WP:CIVIL 10846:WP:CIVIL 10759:Rockpock 10698:this one 10660:Merkin's 10642:contribs 10600:Merkin's 10552:contribs 10515:contribs 10484:Merkin's 10460:say. -- 10443:Merkin's 10408:contribs 10285:contribs 10208:contribs 10165:contribs 10137:care. -- 10123:contribs 10090:contribs 10029:contribs 9989:Urselius 9927:contribs 9867:contribs 9802:, ok? -- 9785:contribs 9694:contribs 9626:contribs 9588:contribs 9519:contribs 9473:contribs 9431:contribs 9384:contribs 9264:contribs 9196:contribs 9129:contribs 9100:Kathlutz 9089:contribs 9007:Kathlutz 8935:contribs 8906:Feminism 8866:contribs 8812:contribs 8794:contribs 8777:contribs 8717:contribs 8658:Feminism 8634:and more 8631:And more 8615:about me 8582:contribs 8508:Feminism 8474:contribs 8455:contribs 8439:contribs 8419:contribs 8372:contribs 8273:contribs 8123:FloNight 8082:Rockpock 8048:contribs 8003:contribs 7979:FloNight 7967:contribs 7943:FloNight 7929:(1 == 2) 7910:FloNight 7852:contribs 7772:contribs 7725:contribs 7683:(1 == 2) 7644:contribs 7618:FloNight 7604:(1 == 2) 7585:contribs 7560:FloNight 7537:Vk block 7477:contribs 7431:contribs 7379:contribs 7316:contribs 7207:contribs 7181:contribs 7070:Blueboar 7058:contribs 7032:Blueboar 7015:contribs 6972:deletion 6870:FRIENDLY 6803:contribs 6729:contribs 6586:contribs 6543:contribs 6470:contribs 6431:Twathats 6419:contribs 6290:contribs 6260:contribs 6106:contribs 6057:contribs 5992:contribs 5919:contribs 5867:contribs 5800:contribs 5738:contribs 5690:contribs 5659:Schcambo 5643:contribs 5613:Schcambo 5599:Schcambo 5536:sourcing 5523:contribs 5465:Kathlutz 5446:contribs 5399:contribs 5348:contribs 5297:contribs 5253:contribs 5227:contribs 5144:contribs 5085:contribs 5045:contribs 4899:contribs 4856:contribs 4805:contribs 4752:Just hi! 4718:contribs 4677:contribs 4654:contribs 4584:contribs 4556:Sarah777 4540:contribs 4494:Sarah777 4463:contribs 4404:Sarah777 4402:Regards 4363:contribs 4320:contribs 4282:contribs 4201:contribs 4148:Kathlutz 4144:contribs 4103:contribs 4069:contribs 4059:Kathlutz 4000:contribs 3976:contribs 3968:Franamax 3964:unsigned 3936:contribs 3907:Asher196 3896:contribs 3863:Asher196 3827:contribs 3812:this one 3786:Cannonmc 3764:contribs 3659:contribs 3633:Urselius 3610:contribs 3538:contribs 3512:Snappy56 3506:Hi BHG, 3491:contribs 3443:contribs 3394:contribs 3346:contribs 3297:contribs 3244:contribs 3206:contribs 3152:contribs 3115:contribs 3069:contribs 3041:contribs 2923:contribs 2893:contribs 2810:contribs 2759:contribs 2747:unsigned 2728:contribs 2698:Sarah777 2668:contribs 2626:contribs 2614:unsigned 2600:contribs 2574:Snappy56 2522:contribs 2361:contribs 2306:contribs 2259:Moondyne 2241:contribs 2174:contribs 2150:contribs 2138:unsigned 2052:contribs 2026:monobook 2011:Sallicio 1989:Dneale52 1939:contribs 1867:contribs 1821:contribs 1753:Scolaire 1742:contribs 1702:Scolaire 1663:contribs 1612:contribs 1581:contribs 1569:unsigned 1544:Dumarest 1524:Snappy56 1503:contribs 1443:contribs 1375:Dumarest 1351:contribs 1304:contribs 1245:contribs 1201:contribs 1160:contribs 1048:contribs 994:Fribbler 983:contribs 954:Fribbler 943:contribs 913:Fribbler 878:contribs 831:contribs 765:contribs 747:resolved 719:contribs 693:contribs 627:contribs 584:contribs 455:Post-Aug 450:Aug 2023 445:Jul 2023 440:Jun 2023 435:Jan 2023 430:Sep 2022 425:Aug 2022 420:Jun 2022 415:Apr 2022 410:Feb 2022 405:Dec 2021 400:Nov 2021 395:Oct 2021 390:Jul 2021 385:Jun 2021 380:Mar 2021 375:Oct 2020 370:Sep 2020 365:Aug 2020 360:Jun 2020 355:Apr 2020 350:Mar 2020 345:Feb 2020 340:Nov 2019 335:Nov 2019 330:Oct 2019 325:Sep 2019 320:Jul 2019 315:Jul 2019 310:Jun 2019 305:Apr 2019 300:Mar 2019 295:Feb 2019 290:Dec 2018 285:Oct 2018 280:Apr 2018 275:Feb 2018 270:Jul 2017 265:Apr 2017 260:Mar 2017 255:Feb 2017 250:Aug 2016 245:Jun 2016 240:Dec 2015 235:Jan 2015 230:Jul 2014 225:May 2014 220:Mar 2014 215:Feb 2014 210:Oct 2013 205:Apr 2013 200:Jan 2013 195:Oct 2012 190:Aug 2012 185:Feb 2012 180:Jan 2011 175:Nov 2010 170:Aug 2010 165:Mar 2010 160:Feb 2010 155:Dec 2009 150:May 2009 145:Mar 2009 140:May 2008 135:Apr 2008 130:Mar 2008 125:Jan 2008 120:Dec 2007 115:Nov 2007 110:Sep 2007 105:Jul 2007 100:Jun 2007 95:Apr 2007 90:Mar 2007 85:Jan 2007 80:Oct 2006 75:Aug 2006 70:Jan 2006 11658:undated 11128:versus 11008:also ? 10966:Hi BHG 10942:WP:NPOV 10916:WP:NPOV 10908:WP:NPOV 10694:WP:AN/I 10654:airsoft 10591:Brownie 10577:Bardcom 10462:Bardcom 10419:Bardcom 10375:Bardcom 10307:Bardcom 9037:. CNN. 8727:WP:GS-- 8675:protect 8670:history 8638:WP:SSP. 8613:WP:RS/N 8546:an RFCU 8253:discuss 8177:whether 7490:GDD1000 7443:GDD1000 7407:comment 7397:GDD1000 7354:GDD1000 7332:GDD1000 7275:GDD1000 7101:Useight 6987:Jeepday 6982:opt out 6848:. Yes, 6762:policy. 6760:WP:NPOV 6482:Nob End 6342:lives? 6038:Toaster 5829:WP:IMOS 5626:. See 5264:WP:BOLD 5236:It was 4450:etc. -- 4347:purpose 3881:twinkle 3697:protect 3692:history 3164:BigDunc 3162:around. 2948:BigDunc 2863:BigDunc 2776:Rye1967 2774:list.-- 2618:Kev1232 2457:CatScan 2451:and/or 2191:doktorb 1542:you. -- 1274:Domer48 1106:On the 1021:Ardfern 811:BigDunc 797:Gibnews 671:WP:AN/I 652:Gibnews 599:BigDunc 559:BigDunc 544:BigDunc 517:archive 11637:Thanks 11610:(talk) 11574:(talk) 11501:& 11484:(talk) 11443:(talk) 11423:(talk) 11402:(talk) 11377:(talk) 11355:Bastun 11323:Gnevin 11302:(talk) 11277:Gnevin 11186:(talk) 11112:Gnevin 11094:(talk) 11073:Gnevin 11058:(talk) 11010:Gnevin 10927:(talk) 10900:As to 10882:. You 10833:(talk) 10812:(talk) 10804:Bielle 10714:(talk) 10638:(talk) 10548:(talk) 10437:WP:ANI 10404:(talk) 10281:(talk) 10204:(talk) 10161:(talk) 10119:(talk) 10025:(talk) 9923:(talk) 9903:WP:BLP 9863:(talk) 9781:(talk) 9740:WP:BLP 9690:(talk) 9622:(talk) 9584:(talk) 9531:Narson 9515:(talk) 9489:Narson 9469:(talk) 9427:(talk) 9402:Narson 9380:(talk) 9350:WP:BIO 9260:(talk) 9192:(talk) 9125:(talk) 9085:(talk) 9066:|date= 8983:Cailil 8966:Cailil 8931:(talk) 8912:Cailil 8900:Cailil 8862:(talk) 8837:Cailil 8808:(talk) 8755:Cailil 8731:Cailil 8713:(talk) 8679:delete 8645:Cailil 8622:Cailil 8578:(talk) 8552:Cailil 8487:Cailil 8470:(talk) 8395:Cailil 8368:(talk) 8299:(talk) 8269:(talk) 8241:WP:AGF 8044:(talk) 7999:(talk) 7963:(talk) 7848:(talk) 7768:(talk) 7757:WP:AGF 7721:(talk) 7640:(talk) 7581:(talk) 7473:(talk) 7427:(talk) 7375:(talk) 7312:(talk) 7203:(talk) 7177:(talk) 7054:(talk) 7011:(talk) 6884:WP:IAR 6846:Zlarin 6799:(talk) 6725:(talk) 6676:Place 6616:Gnevin 6582:(talk) 6539:(talk) 6466:(talk) 6415:(talk) 6286:(talk) 6256:(talk) 6172:Climax 6102:(talk) 6053:(talk) 5988:(talk) 5915:(talk) 5904:Lizzie 5863:(talk) 5796:(talk) 5734:(talk) 5686:(talk) 5639:(talk) 5592:, and 5578:WP:NOR 5568:, and 5519:(talk) 5442:(talk) 5395:(talk) 5344:(talk) 5293:(talk) 5249:(talk) 5223:(talk) 5140:(talk) 5081:(talk) 5056:Choess 5041:(talk) 5000:Choess 4895:(talk) 4852:(talk) 4801:(talk) 4714:(talk) 4673:(talk) 4650:(talk) 4580:(talk) 4536:(talk) 4459:(talk) 4434:is in 4359:(talk) 4316:(talk) 4278:(talk) 4197:(talk) 4099:(talk) 3996:(talk) 3932:(talk) 3921:popups 3892:(talk) 3823:(talk) 3801:WP:BLP 3760:(talk) 3730:JulesN 3701:delete 3655:(talk) 3606:(talk) 3534:(talk) 3487:(talk) 3439:(talk) 3390:(talk) 3368:(Talk) 3342:(talk) 3321:(Talk) 3293:(talk) 3284:... -- 3240:(talk) 3202:(talk) 3148:(talk) 3111:(talk) 3065:(talk) 3037:(talk) 2919:(talk) 2854:WP:BLP 2806:(talk) 2724:(talk) 2664:(talk) 2596:(talk) 2540:(e.g. 2518:(talk) 2357:(talk) 2302:(talk) 2264:click! 2252:Yachts 2237:(talk) 2170:(talk) 2048:(talk) 1935:(talk) 1918:been). 1863:(talk) 1817:(talk) 1769:Glitch 1738:(talk) 1698:WP:NIR 1659:(talk) 1608:(talk) 1499:(talk) 1439:(talk) 1347:(talk) 1300:(talk) 1241:(talk) 1197:(talk) 1156:(talk) 1044:(talk) 979:(talk) 939:(talk) 874:(talk) 827:(talk) 761:(talk) 734:(talk) 715:(talk) 689:(talk) 660:(talk) 648:WP:AGF 623:(talk) 580:(talk) 468:future 461:future 11604:Brown 11568:Brown 11478:Brown 11417:Brown 11371:Brown 11296:Brown 11221:uses 11180:Brown 11088:Brown 11052:Brown 10978:Anuna 10976:Lucy 10921:Brown 10680:Hello 10632:Brown 10542:Brown 10532:(see 10433:WP:AN 10398:Brown 10337:scent 10330:iride 10275:Brown 10198:Brown 10155:Brown 10113:Brown 10108:RFC/U 10019:Brown 9917:Brown 9857:Brown 9833:scent 9826:iride 9775:Brown 9715:Bduke 9684:Brown 9638:Bduke 9616:Brown 9600:Bduke 9578:Brown 9554:Bduke 9509:Brown 9506::) -- 9463:Brown 9450:scent 9443:iride 9421:Brown 9374:Brown 9254:Brown 9241:scent 9234:iride 9218:scent 9211:iride 9186:Brown 9183:). -- 9163:scent 9156:iride 9119:Brown 9079:Brown 9039:May 5 9027:e.g. 8925:Brown 8882:again 8856:Brown 8802:Brown 8707:Brown 8696:views 8688:watch 8684:links 8601:again 8597:again 8572:Brown 8464:Brown 8423:after 8362:Brown 8338:Neier 8263:Brown 8076:right 8072:right 8038:Brown 8022:Giano 7993:Brown 7957:Brown 7866:SINCE 7842:Brown 7762:Brown 7740:Giano 7715:Brown 7696:Giano 7634:Brown 7575:Brown 7554:Brown 7467:Brown 7421:Brown 7369:Brown 7306:Brown 7197:Brown 7171:Brown 7153:)! -- 7124:Giano 7048:Brown 7005:Brown 6943:scent 6936:iride 6917:Jjdon 6903:scent 6896:iride 6888:WP:WL 6821:Jjdon 6815:: --> 6793:Brown 6742:Jjdon 6719:Brown 6702:Jjdon 6576:Brown 6533:Brown 6516:scent 6509:iride 6460:Brown 6447:scent 6440:iride 6409:Brown 6389:scent 6382:iride 6328:scent 6321:iride 6280:Brown 6250:Brown 6224:scent 6217:iride 6151:scent 6144:iride 6096:Brown 6083:scent 6076:iride 6047:Brown 6026:scent 6019:iride 5982:Brown 5966:scent 5959:iride 5909:Brown 5900:Shaun 5857:Brown 5790:Brown 5728:Brown 5680:Brown 5633:Brown 5513:Brown 5436:Brown 5389:Brown 5338:Brown 5287:Brown 5243:Brown 5217:Brown 5134:Brown 5075:Brown 5070:think 5035:Brown 4938:(See 4889:Brown 4846:Brown 4795:Brown 4759:Jjdon 4708:Brown 4667:Brown 4644:Brown 4574:Brown 4530:Brown 4453:Brown 4353:Brown 4310:Brown 4272:Brown 4191:Brown 4093:Brown 4088:pinch 3990:Brown 3926:Brown 3886:Brown 3817:Brown 3814:). -- 3754:Brown 3718:views 3710:watch 3706:links 3649:Brown 3600:Brown 3528:Brown 3481:Brown 3433:Brown 3384:Brown 3336:Brown 3331:Godot 3287:Brown 3270:glass 3265:Gallo 3234:Brown 3196:Brown 3142:Brown 3105:Brown 3059:Brown 3031:Brown 2913:Brown 2800:Brown 2718:Brown 2712:area. 2658:Brown 2590:Brown 2512:Brown 2441:with 2435:regex 2413:with 2379:glass 2374:Gallo 2351:Brown 2296:Brown 2231:Brown 2220:prod2 2195:words 2164:Brown 2042:Brown 1929:Brown 1857:Brown 1811:Brown 1732:Brown 1727:WP:GA 1694:Start 1686:WP:IE 1653:Brown 1602:Brown 1522:. Tx 1493:Brown 1433:Brown 1341:Brown 1294:Brown 1235:Brown 1191:Brown 1150:Brown 1038:Brown 973:Brown 933:Brown 868:Brown 821:Brown 755:Brown 709:Brown 683:Brown 617:Brown 574:Brown 16:< 11652:talk 11593:talk 11511:talk 11467:talk 11327:talk 11281:talk 11259:The 11116:talk 11077:talk 11023:The 11014:talk 10982:talk 10950:talk 10918:. -- 10895:both 10866:talk 10746:that 10581:talk 10509:talk 10466:talk 10423:talk 10379:talk 10364:etc. 10311:talk 10244:talk 10229:talk 10186:talk 10143:talk 10084:talk 10050:talk 9993:talk 9981:Hi, 9963:talk 9959:John 9955:WP:V 9944:talk 9940:John 9882:talk 9878:John 9808:talk 9804:John 9748:talk 9744:John 9736:this 9719:talk 9679:here 9642:talk 9604:talk 9575:? -- 9558:talk 9535:talk 9493:talk 9406:talk 9323:talk 9304:most 9299:best 9104:talk 9070:help 9043:2008 9020:See 9011:talk 8960:here 8826:page 8788:talk 8771:talk 8749:this 8692:logs 8666:talk 8662:edit 8449:talk 8433:talk 8413:talk 8389:this 8342:talk 8319:talk 8243:. I 8148:Talk 8026:talk 7875:Talk 7827:Talk 7790:talk 7786:John 7754:read 7744:talk 7700:talk 7659:talk 7655:John 7494:talk 7447:talk 7401:talk 7358:talk 7336:talk 7303:. -- 7279:talk 7252:talk 7159:talk 7128:talk 7105:talk 7074:talk 7036:talk 6992:talk 6921:talk 6825:talk 6746:talk 6706:talk 6620:talk 6243:and 6207:and 6193:talk 6044:. -- 6009:and 5950:joke 5935:talk 5886:talk 5878:must 5841:talk 5754:talk 5715:talk 5654:here 5594:here 5590:here 5586:here 5544:talk 5496:talk 5469:talk 5424:talk 5416:this 5373:talk 5325:talk 5240:. -- 5097:bold 5060:talk 5004:talk 4960:talk 4877:talk 4867:oops 4843:. -- 4830:talk 4763:talk 4734:talk 4617:talk 4560:talk 4498:talk 4408:talk 4336:talk 4298:talk 4229:talk 4170:talk 4152:talk 4138:talk 4119:talk 4063:talk 4036:talk 4028:this 3972:talk 3911:talk 3867:talk 3810:and 3790:talk 3737:Talk 3714:logs 3688:talk 3684:edit 3637:talk 3588:talk 3516:talk 3468:talk 3460:talk 3420:talk 3379:This 3361:this 3314:here 3184:talk 3168:talk 3131:talk 3085:talk 3053:and 2997:talk 2983:talk 2966:talk 2952:talk 2938:talk 2887:talk 2881:for 2867:talk 2850:this 2835:talk 2780:talk 2755:talk 2702:talk 2646:talk 2622:talk 2578:talk 2502:and 2284:talk 2208:was 2161:. -- 2146:talk 2039:? -- 1993:talk 1970:talk 1883:talk 1879:John 1837:talk 1833:John 1784:talk 1780:John 1757:talk 1729:! -- 1720:WPNI 1706:talk 1682:here 1634:talk 1599:. -- 1577:talk 1548:talk 1528:talk 1481:talk 1467:talk 1421:talk 1407:talk 1387:link 1371:link 1329:talk 1291:. -- 1278:talk 1217:talk 1188:. -- 1176:talk 1147:. -- 1121:and 1091:talk 1072:and 1025:talk 998:talk 970:. -- 966:See 958:talk 930:. -- 917:talk 816:both 801:talk 706:. -- 603:talk 563:talk 548:talk 540:this 11612:• ( 11576:• ( 11486:• ( 11425:• ( 11379:• ( 11304:• ( 11226:bda 11216:BDA 11206:BDA 11188:• ( 11096:• ( 11060:• ( 10929:• ( 10667:mum 10640:• ( 10625:in 10607:mum 10550:• ( 10491:mum 10450:mum 10406:• ( 10326:— 10283:• ( 10206:• ( 10163:• ( 10121:• ( 10027:• ( 9925:• ( 9910:? 9865:• ( 9822:— 9783:• ( 9692:• ( 9675:CSS 9624:• ( 9586:• ( 9517:• ( 9471:• ( 9439:— 9429:• ( 9382:• ( 9262:• ( 9230:— 9207:— 9194:• ( 9152:— 9127:• ( 9087:• ( 8933:• ( 8908:?-- 8864:• ( 8810:• ( 8715:• ( 8603:as 8580:• ( 8472:• ( 8370:• ( 8271:• ( 8245:did 8214:Any 8126:♥♥♥ 8046:• ( 8001:• ( 7982:♥♥♥ 7965:• ( 7946:♥♥♥ 7913:♥♥♥ 7850:• ( 7770:• ( 7723:• ( 7642:• ( 7621:♥♥♥ 7583:• ( 7563:♥♥♥ 7525:Sam 7475:• ( 7429:• ( 7403:) 7377:• ( 7314:• ( 7205:• ( 7179:• ( 7056:• ( 7013:• ( 6932:— 6892:— 6882:of 6875:500 6863:pov 6839:pov 6801:• ( 6727:• ( 6681:POV 6584:• ( 6567:NOR 6541:• ( 6505:— 6485:to 6468:• ( 6436:— 6417:• ( 6378:— 6317:— 6288:• ( 6258:• ( 6213:— 6140:— 6104:• ( 6072:— 6055:• ( 6015:— 5990:• ( 5955:— 5917:• ( 5902:or 5865:• ( 5798:• ( 5736:• ( 5688:• ( 5641:• ( 5521:• ( 5444:• ( 5397:• ( 5346:• ( 5295:• ( 5251:• ( 5225:• ( 5142:• ( 5083:• ( 5043:• ( 4942:). 4897:• ( 4854:• ( 4803:• ( 4774:not 4716:• ( 4675:• ( 4652:• ( 4582:• ( 4538:• ( 4461:• ( 4361:• ( 4318:• ( 4280:• ( 4267:and 4256:was 4240:was 4199:• ( 4162:not 4101:• ( 4084:lot 4073:not 3998:• ( 3934:• ( 3894:• ( 3825:• ( 3762:• ( 3657:• ( 3608:• ( 3536:• ( 3489:• ( 3441:• ( 3392:• ( 3344:• ( 3295:• ( 3242:• ( 3204:• ( 3150:• ( 3125:it? 3113:• ( 3095:all 3067:• ( 3039:• ( 2921:• ( 2808:• ( 2726:• ( 2666:• ( 2598:• ( 2544:). 2520:• ( 2359:• ( 2304:• ( 2239:• ( 2172:• ( 2050:• ( 1937:• ( 1906:303 1893:law 1865:• ( 1819:• ( 1801:at 1740:• ( 1696:on 1661:• ( 1610:• ( 1501:• ( 1441:• ( 1397:to 1349:• ( 1302:• ( 1243:• ( 1199:• ( 1158:• ( 1046:• ( 981:• ( 941:• ( 876:• ( 851:303 829:• ( 763:• ( 717:• ( 691:• ( 625:• ( 582:• ( 11654:) 11595:) 11548:}} 11542:{{ 11527:}} 11521:{{ 11513:) 11469:) 11368:-- 11329:) 11283:) 11267:}} 11261:{{ 11229:}} 11223:{{ 11219:}} 11213:{{ 11209:}} 11203:{{ 11159:) 11118:) 11079:) 11035:}} 11029:{{ 11016:) 11006:}} 11000:{{ 10984:) 10952:) 10868:) 10857:me 10827:-- 10742:me 10725:is 10708:-- 10583:) 10468:) 10425:) 10381:) 10373:-- 10313:) 10305:-- 10246:) 10231:) 10188:) 10180:-- 10152:-- 10145:) 10052:) 10010:}} 10004:{{ 9995:) 9965:) 9946:) 9938:-- 9914:-- 9884:) 9810:) 9750:) 9721:) 9644:) 9613:-- 9606:) 9598:-- 9560:) 9552:-- 9537:) 9495:) 9408:) 9367:, 9363:, 9336:: 9325:) 9106:) 9061:: 9059:}} 9055:{{ 9041:, 9013:) 8853:-- 8704:-- 8694:| 8690:| 8686:| 8682:| 8677:| 8673:| 8668:| 8664:| 8344:) 8321:) 8260:-- 8151:) 8028:) 7990:-- 7954:-- 7878:) 7830:) 7792:) 7746:) 7702:) 7572:-- 7521:☑ 7496:) 7449:) 7360:) 7338:) 7281:) 7254:) 7161:) 7130:) 7122:. 7107:) 7076:) 7038:) 6923:) 6866:}} 6860:{{ 6856:}} 6850:{{ 6842:}} 6836:{{ 6827:) 6748:) 6716:-- 6708:) 6684:}} 6678:{{ 6671:}} 6665:{{ 6622:) 6195:) 5937:) 5888:) 5843:) 5756:) 5725:-- 5717:) 5675:}} 5669:{{ 5588:, 5564:, 5546:) 5498:) 5471:) 5426:) 5375:) 5335:-- 5327:) 5131:-- 5062:) 5032:-- 5006:) 4962:) 4954:-- 4879:) 4832:) 4765:) 4736:) 4690:? 4619:) 4562:) 4500:) 4446:, 4442:, 4410:) 4350:-- 4338:) 4307:-- 4300:) 4265:, 4231:) 4172:) 4154:) 4129:am 4121:) 4038:) 3974:• 3913:) 3869:) 3850:" 3792:) 3716:| 3712:| 3708:| 3704:| 3699:| 3695:| 3690:| 3686:| 3639:) 3590:) 3582:. 3518:) 3470:) 3430:-- 3422:) 3231:-- 3193:-- 3186:) 3170:) 3133:) 3087:) 2999:) 2985:) 2968:) 2954:) 2940:) 2869:) 2837:) 2797:-- 2782:) 2761:) 2757:• 2704:) 2648:) 2628:) 2624:• 2580:) 2506:. 2498:, 2494:, 2490:, 2463:) 2348:-- 2286:) 2223:}} 2217:{{ 2148:• 1995:) 1972:) 1885:) 1854:-- 1839:) 1786:) 1778:-- 1759:) 1723:}} 1717:{{ 1708:) 1636:) 1583:) 1579:• 1550:) 1530:) 1483:) 1469:) 1423:) 1409:) 1331:) 1280:) 1219:) 1178:) 1093:) 1035:-- 1027:) 1000:) 960:) 919:) 803:) 795:-- 750:}} 744:{{ 605:) 565:) 550:) 479:+ 11650:( 11616:) 11591:( 11580:) 11554:. 11509:( 11490:) 11465:( 11429:) 11383:) 11325:( 11308:) 11279:( 11264:` 11192:) 11175:' 11173:| 11171:' 11169:| 11167:' 11155:( 11132:. 11114:( 11100:) 11075:( 11064:) 11012:( 10980:( 10948:( 10933:) 10890:. 10864:( 10767:t 10763:e 10644:) 10579:( 10554:) 10512:· 10507:( 10464:( 10439:. 10421:( 10410:) 10377:( 10324:. 10309:( 10287:) 10242:( 10227:( 10210:) 10184:( 10167:) 10141:( 10125:) 10087:· 10082:( 10048:( 10031:) 9991:( 9961:( 9942:( 9929:) 9880:( 9869:) 9806:( 9787:) 9746:( 9717:( 9696:) 9640:( 9628:) 9602:( 9590:) 9556:( 9533:( 9521:) 9491:( 9475:) 9433:) 9404:( 9386:) 9340:. 9321:( 9312:∨ 9266:) 9198:) 9131:) 9102:( 9091:) 9072:) 9068:( 9051:. 9009:( 8937:) 8868:) 8814:) 8791:· 8786:( 8774:· 8769:( 8719:) 8698:) 8660:( 8584:) 8537:: 8528:: 8520:: 8510:: 8476:) 8452:· 8447:( 8436:· 8431:( 8416:· 8411:( 8374:) 8340:( 8317:( 8275:) 8145:( 8090:t 8086:e 8050:) 8024:( 8005:) 7969:) 7872:( 7854:) 7824:( 7788:( 7774:) 7742:( 7727:) 7698:( 7657:( 7646:) 7587:) 7492:( 7479:) 7445:( 7433:) 7399:( 7381:) 7356:( 7334:( 7318:) 7292:. 7277:( 7250:( 7209:) 7183:) 7157:( 7126:( 7103:( 7072:( 7060:) 7034:( 7017:) 6994:) 6990:( 6919:( 6890:. 6823:( 6805:) 6774:) 6744:( 6731:) 6704:( 6618:( 6588:) 6545:) 6503:. 6472:) 6434:? 6421:) 6292:) 6262:) 6191:( 6108:) 6059:) 5994:) 5952:) 5933:( 5921:) 5884:( 5869:) 5839:( 5802:) 5752:( 5740:) 5713:( 5692:) 5645:) 5542:( 5525:) 5494:( 5467:( 5448:) 5422:( 5401:) 5371:( 5350:) 5323:( 5299:) 5272:☎ 5255:) 5229:) 5202:☎ 5165:☎ 5146:) 5122:☎ 5105:☎ 5087:) 5058:( 5047:) 5020:? 5002:( 4958:( 4901:) 4875:( 4858:) 4828:( 4807:) 4761:( 4732:( 4720:) 4696:☎ 4679:) 4656:) 4630:. 4615:( 4586:) 4558:( 4542:) 4496:( 4465:) 4406:( 4365:) 4334:( 4322:) 4296:( 4284:) 4227:( 4203:) 4168:( 4150:( 4141:· 4136:( 4117:( 4105:) 4066:· 4061:( 4034:( 4002:) 3970:( 3938:) 3909:( 3898:) 3865:( 3829:) 3803:. 3788:( 3766:) 3720:) 3682:( 3661:) 3635:( 3612:) 3586:( 3540:) 3514:( 3493:) 3466:( 3458:( 3445:) 3418:( 3396:) 3348:) 3299:) 3246:) 3208:) 3182:( 3166:( 3154:) 3129:( 3117:) 3083:( 3071:) 3043:) 2995:( 2981:( 2964:( 2950:( 2936:( 2925:) 2890:· 2885:( 2865:( 2833:( 2812:) 2778:( 2753:( 2730:) 2700:( 2670:) 2644:( 2620:( 2602:) 2576:( 2558:☎ 2524:) 2363:) 2338:☎ 2308:) 2282:( 2243:) 2176:) 2144:( 2054:) 1991:( 1968:( 1941:) 1881:( 1869:) 1835:( 1823:) 1805:. 1782:( 1755:( 1744:) 1704:( 1665:) 1632:( 1614:) 1575:( 1546:( 1526:( 1505:) 1479:( 1465:( 1445:) 1419:( 1405:( 1353:) 1327:( 1306:) 1276:( 1247:) 1215:( 1203:) 1174:( 1162:) 1089:( 1050:) 1023:( 996:( 985:) 956:( 945:) 915:( 880:) 833:) 799:( 767:) 721:) 695:) 673:. 629:) 601:( 586:) 561:( 546:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index