User talk:Anetode/archive 14

494:

BetacommandBot once when it was malfunctioning, and he was very quick in spotting the error and stopping the bot, so I unblocked the account after some nine minutes. This is a completely different situation. If you disregard, as I did, the initial reactionary blocks of all his accounts and accusations of sockpuppeteering, there was a substantial discussion about Betacommand's apparent incompetence in effectively implementing new ideas for bot tasks. The most recent example of which is the defaultsort faux pas, but since monitoring the account and the relevenat AN and AN/I threads, I've noticed that there is a substantial history of similar mistakes. Quite a few members of the community, including admins and bot operators, expressed a lack of faith in his ability to responsibly run automated tasks and be held accountable for them. John Nagle and Durova suggested a set of sanctions in an attempt to rectify the problem without going to the extremes of banning all future bot runs or enforcing a punitive block on the main account. These sanctions, by the time I instituted the block on Beta's Bot account, had accumulated a twelve to one support - a consensus if I ever saw one. I decided, in light of this consensus and taking into account the ineffectiveness of many prior measures, including tedious Arbcom discussions, to proceed in enacting one of the least controversial conditions of the sanctions, one that would prevent Betacommand from running tasks under his bot account for a period of time sufficient to satisfy concerns about lack of forethought and responsibility. The decision to block came after some thought and consideration of the opinions of a dozen knowledgable users. A last resort would be a block of Betacommand's primary account, or a more severe restriction on the accounts he has access to. Right now, both the Betacommand and Betacommand2 accounts are unblocked, only his bot is affected, as a preventative measure in light of a prolonged discussion at AN and the removal of the bot flag. Of course the bot flag and BAG membership are matters to be decided by members of BAG, but right now there appears to be a consensus to enforce a break on any automated activities until such time as a fair review of Betacommand's willingness to obide by common sense restrictions may take place. ˉˉ

227:

the original writer. But the new writer has made a quite better work, even including references to international published material, with real and active ISBN numbers, that can substantiate the whole article, who now complies to the Knowledge rules. Please double check the old article and compare it to the new one and you will see how it cannot be claim to be a copy of previously deleted material. Also the 2 images were deleted, one of them a book cover, and both well uploaded under the guidelines and with the correct information on copyright and fair use. Both images were before never present on Knowledge, and again substantiated as being a copy of previously deleted material. I have talked with other admins that agreed this is the case of a misunderstanding, due to the article being previously deleted because of lack of real confirmable sources, which is not the case this time, and asked me to talk directly with you so you can undo the 3 deletions. As much as we might disagree with the contents, we can nevertheless deny its verifiability through published works. And in this case, there are several ones mentioned, even an international publication, that is readily available on Amazon and countless bookstores around the globe.

1599:. Two problems: the report of sexual intercourse while skydiving is anecdotal, though presumably verifiable; and the paper has not been peer reviewed. There's also a significant body of work that discusses the pathology of risky behaviors such as skydiving and risky sexual intercourse, however the two acts are never mentioned as being observed concurrently. I've skydived myself, once, and by my estimation, you would need to be an experienced skydiver and a gymnast to pull of the feat (though I suppose that the adrenaline rush would help you, um, finish the deed in the forty or so seconds of freefall). NASA might also have collected some data on boinking in the space shuttle, yet I somehow doubt they would publish a press release on it. ˉˉ 667: 240:

publication date, as it isn't as obscure as it may seem. The Aset Ka is not validated within the book, the Aset Ka needs no validation as an order and as a publisher. The Aset Ka is an official publisher from Portugal, registered in APEL, the Portuguese government institution that grants the publisher title and ISBN agency. Actually, the Aset Ka even has their own ISBN prefix and ISBN gamma intervals, officially assigned and only possible to be used by them. I have called APEL myself and validated this information, which any of you may do as well.

31: 211:

pictures that I myself own from our organization as stated. My article was deleted without any warning. I would like to add my article is quite similar in form to Cameron Crazies of Duke, however my article focuses on VCU. Once again as I stated my article was information from our organization as well as the pictures. I would like to add that my photos marked unencyclopedic were actually examples of of what the Rowdy Rams do such as the trademark paint

1919:? FYI, the fn are mostly to captions of descriptive pix; some of the mags may be hard to find, tho. I'd also say, with attached sources (I'm working on it...), the glossary'd still be a useful add to the article; it's a little short for the subject, & anybody wanting to know about custom cars has probably heard the terms & wondered about 'em. (I'll bet there's quite a few readers even of the mags on the subject who don't get it all.) 2056: 69: 1641: 830: 1989:. That way you don't have to discuss exactly which portions or why you want the archives deleted on wiki and the revisions will stay permanently hidden from anybody on the project. I trust that whoever handles the oversight request will be discreet and reasonable, it's just that I'd rather leave the decision to re-delete up to someone a little higher up the food chain. Regards, ˉˉ 602: 2132:"I would happily point out to anyone who needs to know the appropriate way to show in a court of law..." I have nothing against you personally and I hope to put this topic to rest as much as you do. Nevertheless, it is my responsibility to let you know if you stepped out of bounds of Knowledge policy. You did — please don't do so again. Thank you and happy editing! ˉˉ 182:

leaders however the article was deleted before I could. If the Cameron Crazies have a page than the Rowdy Rams should too. Cameron Crazies are known for being tough at Duke and Rowdy Rams are known for that at VCU. Duke is considered toughest in the ACC conference due to Cameron Crazies and VCU is considered toughest in CAA due to Rowdy Rams

268:. The article didn't assert that it was the first gay bar in the world, in Europe, in the British Isles or in Ireland. It is notable as the first gay bar in Northern Ireland. That's hardly "none asserting notability", as you had put it. Had you actually read the article properly, I'm sure you might have noticed that. -- 2142:

Again, I did not offer legal consultation in any manner whatever, nor did I suggest taking legal action against wiki-anything. I did not violate any wikipedia policy, and I would hope that anyone who took on themselves the responsibility of enforcing a policy would do so carefully and not leave other

2116:

I did not offer legal consultation in any manner whatever, and I object to your insistence that I did. Nor did I suggest taking legal action against wiki-anything, and I do not understand why you would want to create the impression that I did. This whole topic is something you initiated, and I do not

2105:

Cute. Point is, you need to refrain from offering legal consultation of any sort on Knowledge, especially when talking about possible legal actions against the Wikimedia Foundation. Please have some consideration for the illiterate contributors to this project, some of them are allowed a handy little

787:

Hen House Studios has been repeatedly spamming Knowledge, and I believe this article is included, even though a different editor started it. I don't believe the album itself is notable even though the band is, mainly because it is a compilation of old stuf released by the studio after the band gained

245:

My central point is, even though we may disagree with such claims from the order such as age, it is still an esoteric and spiritual tradition, substantiated by a book with a full thesis of the mystical system and tenets, throughfully described. And the Knowledge article does not, again, endorse their

226:

Good evening, I am contacting you in the hopes to solve this situation. This article and images, uploaded by the user Hellensmith37, are not a copy of the old material that was deleted a year ago. The article was actually removed before due to an act of vandalism and not supporting with references by

181:

The Rowdy rams are very well known. ESPN mentions us on TV and in articles alot. We been around since around 2002 and we're considered the reason that VCUs basketball team does so well at home. I have more info to add to the article as far background information that I needed to recieve from other

2217:

and a few minutes later, I noticed my mistake and purged the page. Unfortunately, the black developer notice appeared for a few minutes for those who were trying to access the recent changes page. I don't know if the problem lasted for users after that, but anyone who reloads the page shouldn't have

1149:

article replacing the image of the 2008 Centenary Emblem. This image is seen as vandalism/nonsense/whatever because it gives the South Sydney team a bad name. The wooden spoon is often seen a sign of defeat in Rugby League as it is often given out to the team that comes dead last each year, in this

714:

I would like to know why the hell you deleted my article. I followed the rules. And you know what, i just searched up hottopic, nike, addidas, they all got a wiki. now why the hell did you delete that?? eh? you didnt even give me a reason ,your not doing a very good job as a mod. Now give me a REALY

433:

Thanks for the head ups. I find the possibility of being subject to arbitration for failure to comply with such demands to be kind of absurd. If it comes to that, I guess I'll try my best to offer a frank explanation of the events that transpired. Most arbcom cases I've looked at tend to get kind of

210:

The article was about the student organization Rowdy Rams at Virginia Commonweath University. My article was owned by me and organization and the info provided was from the creators and I owned the rights to that articles. I also has sources and references to my article. My pictures were personal

190:

Yesterday/today you deleted an image from the article "University of the Arctic." I had written that I have permission from the owners to use this image on Knowledge. Why did you delete it? The right authorities within the organization (UArctic) have given me the explicit permission to publish these

1175:

Thanks for clarifying. G1's the proper tag, but it's subjective and I had no idea that this image was some cheesy joke. Sometimes a brief explanatory tag helps, like {{db|reason}}, if there's a chance that the image might be reviewed by a clueless admin from across the pond :) Anyway, it's deleted

918:

Thank you for taking the time to merge this article. I originally thought the history had been lost, so I restored the history as a redirect. However, I then realised you had actually merged the history in page moves and I had just restored the very old history of an article in the same place that

877:

would then, probably become, as with many neologisms that would, in fact, result in Knowledge look-ups, be referred to the relevant section of the Dodgson article. Again, thanks for seeing through the noise to hear this clear signal, keeping the welfare of the project foremost. It does not always

873:

Dodgson's work, and my plan is to ensure that there is, indeed, an article on that work, and then the question of the mention of the modern work, if any, can be resolved as an ordinary editorial question, as there is no doubt about the notability of Dodgson's work on proportional representation.

872:

It appears to me that you actually read the arguments and evidence, and I want to congratulate you for that. I'm sure that if the article stays as-is, it will again face AfD, for there were, as I acknowledged from the beginning, problems with the article and its sourcing. I have a book coming on

2284:

that this was someone's sockpuppet and could identify that someone, I would block the account. Even then, though, I'd challenge the prod on the same grounds. So would any one of the other admins who check the prods prior to deletion (since the inclusion threshold for educational institutions on

1543:

I leave you a message planning to suggest an exception to the standards on FPC and try to argue it through, the borders of Our Rules being my particular area of interest, and here you go and pull out a chance for a perfect solution. That is the most awesome thing I've seen today, and I've seen

1322:, despite the fact that the groups record label released them, so instead of starting another edit war because I know Tasc0 is never going to stop could you perhaps block the page with the albums on them? Tasc0 has as history of getting pages blocked because of his reverting for no reason (See 567:

I'm done. I worked my ass off to make this article good, and that includes working with the photographer to get this image. I'm so over WP's process wonkery that favors deletion per bureaucratic nonsense over actually building a useful, helpful encyclopedia. Have fun deleting stuff. Good bye.

239:

Although we may disagree with the contents of the book and any claims behind it, the Knowledge article nevertheless does not endorse any of those claims, but merely presents them as a reference. As for the publication of the book, not only isn't that recent, since it has nearly one year as of

136:

I'd also like for one big thing to be taken into consideration with the article. Rowdy Rams are frequently mentioned on ESPN. ESPN broadcasts sports events around the globe which means everything they say is of high importance. That being said Rowdy Rams would not be mentioned on a channel

493:

You're right, you don't. I'm aware that blocking is a last resort, a drastic measure that must have a clearly defined reason. I don't recall ever having blocked an establised editor for anything more than a 3RR violation and I have never blocked Betacommand's primary account. I have blocked

1430:

allows me to do just that. I can assure you that these deletions were not carried out because of any political bias. However the election season's upon us, and I'd rather not encounter any userbox that promotes an antagonistic or defamatory approach to declaring one's political beliefs.

2208:

Short version: I'm an idiot. Long version, I clicked on a link to an old revision of the recent changes page, but since it was a black notice that covered parts of the interface, the "old revision #" notice did not show up. Since images were also not showing up for a few minutes (see

1493:

Hola. Since you seem better acquainted with the process of featuring pictures on the basis of your argument for the John F. Kennedy image, and more aware of the artistic and technical standards of images on the basis of you being anyone else than me, I'd like to ask if you think

344:

By the way, can I please apologise profusely for undeleting that page. I was assuming good faith (something I do religiously, which can get in the way of common sense at time). I'm glad you spotted this, as the DELREV is going very SPA, if you know what I mean. Apologies.

1251:

I note that you speedy-deleted this article a week or so back. You were quite likely justified in doing so, but the speedy deletion process does have a side-effect of removing the evidence. I rather hope that the "patent nonsense" wasn't the then elector/archbishop

520:

Hi, you protected my talk page a while back because of some abuse/vandalism I was getting from a dynamic IP. Any chance at looking at this again as the same user (I presume) has returned to make similar edits both to my talk page and talk archives. Thanks

242:

The article is not original research, but information based on a TV documentary, a published book (that even though we may disagree from its contents, it is still a published source and deserves its credit) and a few workshops and debates on Portuguese

1267:

was added to the article by me about three years ago), as it inaugurated a period of over 150 years during which all the electors came from the Bavarian branch of the Wittelsbach family. It is also important as part of the historical background to the

246:

claims, but merely presents the tradition as a reference, that independently of being something that we agree or do not agree upon, is at best a New Age tradition and philosophical system in the occult, that deserves its respect and acceptance as such.

1126: 459:"what should be done is Betacommand2, BCBot unblocked, BCBot flag is returned and "Quercus basaseachicensis" will no longer edit. I will also agree to a 30 day halt on BCBot edits, except for ant-spam related reports and the article by size see 1984:

I don't mean to offend you, but there is a long-standing consensus against deleting talk pages wholesale. If your page contained personal info or other comments you wish to delete for personal reasons, a better approach would be to ask for

1213::) Although that's just one unimportant link and I think this'll remain an orphan until someone writes a decent article on the Vietnamese publishing industry or on international partnerships for the translation of children's lit. Cheers, ˉˉ 541:

left on my talk page, it's pretty clear that the permission e-mail re-affirmed the noncommercial license on the photo. I'm thinking it should be deleted pending a better release. I'm not getting the hostility of the uploader, but whatever.

1272:. While I don't have time at the moment to look up the sources necessary for an article on the topic and then write it, I would like to be assured that if and when I do so, the article would not simply be deleted again (at least by you). 1998:

You're not offending me, you're causing me problems. The stuff had been deleted by other admins, concensus or not, and your restoration, months after the event, seems rather pointless to me. Anyway, I'll go to oversight.

1551:

Incidentally, now that you're solving problems would you happen to know where one would start looking for a reliable source for the fact that skydivers have had sex in freefall? I'm drafting a rewrite for the

1526:

is an astonishingly timed and historically significant image well worthy of being a Featured Picture. Unfortunately, the resolution of the current scan falls short of the technical standards required by the

248:

With this in mind I ask for you to reconsider your view of it, that although understandable, is biased by an old highly incomplete and mistaken article. I thank you again for your time and thought –Gustavus

1534:. If everything goes all right, a high-resolution version of this photograph will be available within a few weeks. At that time, I think it would stand a good chance of passing the rigors of FPC. Cheers, ˉˉ 1484:

I have uploaded and added some pictures on this article: Muhammad Ali (actor) - which were have no copyrights problems... you can visit the source. I still dont understand, why those pictures were deleted.

769:

I couldn't tell that, because you were deleting the speedy tag faster than Twinkle could process it! Since you insist on declining the speedy for this non-notable album, I'm forced to go to AfD (sigh). -

531: 1135: 1195:

Although i still think this article needs a lot of work, at least it's good to see you improved the article after not deleting it, so thanks! (if you could de-orphan it as well, you'd make my day ;) )

1335: 696:

Why was this image removed? I went to great lengths to get in touch with the company that owns this image and convinced them to release it under an attribution license. Why was it removed?

1556:

article, you see, and that would be a small but intricate tidbit for terrestrial comparisons. There are some very unambiguous photos, but using those as references would be problematic.

750:

constitute "free" content as outlined in WP policies. Right now I'm not spending too much time here due to real-life matters, but I'll consider the free content page advice later on. --

556:

Yeah, that message did little to alleviate any concerns over using that image. I've deleted it pending verification of the photographer's consent to release it under a free license. ˉˉ

1676: 923:

as well so it is nearly all in one place. It is now complete and I have retained the redirect as it could be helpful for navigation. Please let me know if there are any problems.

116:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 864: 221:(Deletion log); 00:37 . . Anetode (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:AsetianBible.jpg" (Speedy deleted per (CSD G4), was a copy of material previously deleted per XfD. using TW) 1860:, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, 219:(Deletion log); 00:37 . . Anetode (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:DarkMark.jpg" (Speedy deleted per (CSD G4), was a copy of material previously deleted per XfD. using TW) 148:

I have had a Request for my username to be changed since May 24th. I have not heard back from any administrators as of yet, and I was hoping to get the name changed soon.

1074: 1230:

You declined my speedy, stating the club is notable. Fine with me, but could you tell me WHY a private group of coin collectors in Missouri is notable? I don't get it.

1061:

I am not using it as reference. And I was not talking about the article you showed. I will alter the reference for any useful information using mainstream newspaper.

1969:

I think you restored my speedied Talk archives (on Aug 4). If that's the case I'd rather you undid that action, they were deleted for good personal reasons. Thanks.

764: 2063:

could give Knowledge contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against the Wikimedia Foundation. Please note that this is

417: 1750: 223:(Deletion log); 00:37 . . Anetode (Talk | contribs) deleted "Aset Ka" (Speedy deleted per (CSD G4), was a copy of material previously deleted per XfD. using TW) 1488: 887: 229:

I am sorry for all the trouble and I appreciate some help on this case to bring the article and images back in place. Thanks a lot for your time. -Gustavus

1347: 1259:

The main reason I ask about this is that I am convinced that there should be an article on the topic - it was an importance incident in the history of the

781: 569: 1087: 185: 117: 2213:, I thought there was really something wrong with the servers. The notice itself was poorly written, so I attempted to copyedit it. A stupid talk page 200: 2274: 1516: 2152: 2136: 2126: 2110: 2099: 893:

Thanks, I really do hope that Dodgson's work receives better coverage on wiki. I was just a fan of his children's literature prior to this AfD. Now

2270:

the user is just attempting to be disruptive and does not actually care about the article. please re-add the prod and revert he sockpuppet please.

919:

was previously deleted. I was just going to leave it, but I decided to prevent future confusion just to merge the history of the old article into

2262: 1703:

I was just going to block this account indef when I noticed you beat me to the punch. Just as a quick heads-up, though, you seem to have left a

1097: 932: 911: 2252: 2243: 1121: 819: 799: 314: 171: 1812: 1694: 2289: 1531:

process. I've made an e-mail request to the Naval Historical Center for a high-resolution scan of the original photo/negative as suggested by

585: 428: 92: 2167: 1958: 1467: 1435: 1357:

Why my "This user cannot stand Barack Obama" userbox was CSDd, but the "This user wants George Bush impeached" userbox is allowed to remain.

1217: 920: 395: 265: 125: 2008: 1993: 1790: 1648:

Thank you, Anetode, for your support !vote at my RFA. I will be doing my best to make sure that your confidence has not been misplaced. --

1417: 655: 507: 498: 59: 2185: 2040: 1857: 1760: 1007: 993: 673:

Thanks for supporting my RfA, which went through 93/12/5. I'll be steadfast in this trust the en.Knowledge community has given me. Cheers!

113: 102: 2085: 1665: 947: 858: 438: 358: 2222: 1796: 1210: 1109: 1603: 1572: 1538: 1396: 1180: 560: 472: 1289: 1688: 1204: 1170: 905: 1634: 2202: 1845: 1618:

Thanks for fixing that for me, it was inadvertent and made me look kinda looney. I seem to do it by accident with the laptop. Cheers

2060: 2046: 1632: 1303: 912: 140: 128:

Just wanted to let you know I'm challenging for the page. I really want this page to stay because this organization deserves it

759: 1157: 100: 374: 1579: 1366: 1299: 1037: 525: 277: 2214: 1801: 410: 1916: 705: 487: 450: 295: 2157: 1886: 645: 576: 269: 1284: 682: 385: 1740: 1405:

If you believe these userboxes are "divisive and inflammatory" then take it to MdD; do not delete them unilaterally. --

989:, until you guys work something out at the talk page. As for the actual dispute, I've no opinion one way or another. ˉˉ 550: 503:

Fair enough, though I don't completely agree that the block is justifiable, I can still respect the logic you used. --

191:

images here, so I do not see why you felt like you could delete it. I am awaiting your quick reply to this question. --

1940: 1905: 1188: 1070: 1033: 975: 2030: 1978: 1780: 1627: 808:

I reported this user as a username vio and spammer more than an hour ago. It was finally blocked two minutes ago. -

1986: 1343: 2148: 2122: 2095: 538: 416:

Careful Anetode, you do want to fail to comply with his demands and be taken to arbcom as I'm about to be dragged

2264: 1881: 1140: 338: 260: 1239: 985:

since there's been a bizarre edit war brewing for the past couple of weeks. The same might have to be done with

109: 2231:

No problem. I just wanted an explanation. I guess you got pretty chocked, right? I know I would have been. :)))

1726: 1670: 1660: 1256:) of Cologne converting to Calvinism - because, however preposterous it sounds, that is precisely what he did. 1253: 2048: 1145:

G'day. I noticed you changed the deletion tag which I placed there earlier today. The image was placed on the

1043:

I'm afraid you're going to have to give me something more to go on. That website could certainly be used as a

205: 1545: 732: 1352: 1063: 1026: 515: 1714: 844: 2163: 1835: 1567: 1511: 1452: 1339: 406:

Please reverse that block, there have been other agreements made. your block just set back the progress.

283: 2210: 1946:

That seems reasonable and referenced. As for the discussion in general, I think it's time to bring in a

2070: 38: 1338:) and of course they were kept. Anything you can do to solve the matter would be greatly appreciated. 2078: 1189: 737: 2144: 2118: 2091: 1823: 167: 651:

No prob, sorry for the overlap. I gotta learn to work these backlogs in reverse-alphabetical :) ˉˉ

2239: 2181: 2036:

I'm not sure that my tiny reptilian brain is worthy of such praise, but you're most welcome ;) ˉˉ

1684: 1080: 691: 572: 530: 302: 273: 1717:

for 24 hours, so you might want to stop by and sort that out when you have a chance. Thanks! --

1523: 1146: 755: 401: 121: 2218:

a problem. Again, I'm an idiot, and I'm sorry for any inconvenience that might have caused. ˉˉ

666: 364: 2271: 1851: 1260: 1105: 1099: 625: 434:

convoluted and political, so if it comes to that I suspect my involvement will be minimal. ˉˉ

407: 252: 1479: 1048: 2173:

And why were you linking to an external non-Wikimedia site in German in that announcement?

1938: 1930: 1693: 1462: 1412: 1314:. Everytime I put the compilations on their article, Tasc0 keeps removing them saying that 1311: 1280: 1200: 814: 794: 776: 661: 381: 310: 291: 214: 8: 2000: 1970: 1897: 1879: 1861: 1808: 1776: 1623: 1244: 1232: 678: 641: 163: 88: 1083:. It's certainly a useful source in the context of that article. Very nice work, btw. ˉˉ 446:

Consensus is a funny word to use for this situation. Personally, I'm not seeing any. --

2235: 2190:

It should be noted that that website was the old "server status" page for Knowledge. —

2177: 2074: 2026: 1733: 1707: 1680: 1656: 1581:

Sexual Event Classification System (SECS): A Proposed Classification of Human Sexuality

1132: 1003: 971: 953: 850:

I've been getting them successfully deleted; I was instructed towards that solution...

701: 196: 2286: 2249: 2219: 2133: 2107: 2082: 2037: 2016: 1990: 1955: 1891: 1842: 1787: 1757: 1600: 1535: 1432: 1323: 1214: 1177: 1084: 1056: 990: 986: 959: 943: 928: 902: 751: 652: 557: 495: 435: 392: 352: 332: 47: 17: 477:

For such a long time editor and admin, honestly, I should not have to tell you that

2248:

Yeah, definitely one of those "I think I just broke the encyclopedia" moments :) ˉˉ

2198: 2090:

It could only create that impression if the contributors did not know how to read.

1964: 1951: 1910: 1766: 1613: 1532: 1392: 1362: 1269: 1127:

20:43, 4 June 2008 Anetode (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:I-31269.jpg" ‎ (fgsfds)

1117: 894: 464: 1451:, and does not apply to userboxes in userspace; that was the reason for the whole 131: 1933: 1925: 1771:

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page and blocking that user. =) --

1562: 1506: 1456: 1406: 1379: 1331: 1276: 1196: 1108:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

1052: 809: 789: 771: 377: 320: 306: 287: 1423: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1870: 1804: 1772: 1746:

Thanks for letting me know. A bit too quick on twinkle. On further inspection,

1619: 1044: 718: 674: 637: 504: 484: 460: 447: 84: 257:

Obviously you didn't read the article very well, as evidenced by your comment

2022: 1817: 1718: 1649: 1528: 1306:

two compilation albums released by Dangerous Records, the label for both the

1298:

recently, so perhaps you can help me with another problem Tasc0 has started.

999: 967: 883: 728: 697: 633: 626: 192: 1640: 1947: 1923:

Given it's better posted to Wiktionary, where/how would you suggest adding?

1553: 1223: 1021: 939: 924: 874: 866: 851: 837: 468: 422: 370: 347: 327: 137:

broadcasting sports around the world if they were considered not important

2192: 1932:

11:57 & 11:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC) Never mind, I figured it out...

1831: 1388: 1358: 1264: 1245: 1113: 1015: 636:

at exactly the same time. I'll get out of the way and let you finish. —

522: 1373: 836:

Is there a solution to these types of files (other than deleting them)?

715:

good reason why its deleted. I see someone else posted this befor. why?

455:

And this takes the cake, showing that a block was totally uncalled for:

1559: 1503: 1307: 1295: 742:

Thank you for your advice. Beforehand I had trouble understanding what

543: 1376: 1150:

case South Sydney have came last a fair bit since the 90's onwards. -

1327: 982: 963: 1336:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Bang'n on Wax: The Best of the Crips

2055: 879: 827: 724: 159:

sorry just picked a few admins that were active to ask about this*

1677:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Moneyfacts.co.uk (2nd nomination)

1495: 612: 237:

I fully understand your view, although I highly disagree with it.

68: 369:

It's always a good day for me when I can remove someone fro the

1827: 608: 176: 1047:

for information about its claims, but propaganda tracts like

2106:"block user" button right next to your username. Regards, ˉˉ 1595:: sexual intercourse during skydiving was categorized as an 1051:

might not pass muster, unless put into context according to

632:

Woops, looks like you and I were doing the history merge on

1224: 1055:. Of course this depends on the article in question. HTH ˉˉ 1502:

has to be done to get it some proper recognition. Thanks,

301:

Thanks Anetode. I've left you a further reply on the same

1786:

lol, for every such revert I make, you make like 20 :P ˉˉ

601: 325:

Yes, I took it to DRV, as you seem to have noticed. :)

2143:

user's talk pages filled with unsupportable allegations.

1841:

Thanks for the notice. I guess you reap what you sow. ˉˉ

1163:

Edit: By the way, I selected the wrong tag, didn't I? -

1756:

was deleted. So much for slaps on the wrist I guess. ˉˉ

1110:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

829: 1915:

Re the glossary of custom car terms: something like

723:Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. -- 1954:, if Zerocannon is willing to calm down a bit. ˉˉ 1498:has a chance of passing a FPC nomination because 1334:). Tasc0 even nominated the albums for deletion ( 2162:Do you mind explaining what you were doing with 2117:know where you are going with it; please stop. 765:Critical Times - Fishbone's Hen House Sessions 591: 1489:Bugging you about FPC potential of old images 921:United Kingdom in the Eurovision Song Contest 1587:, Association for Academic Psychiatry, p. 24 670:Gwen gleans, wending keen by the wikirindle. 2285:Knowledge is rather low and subjective). ˉˉ 1079:Ah, I didn't realize you were using it for 186:You deleted an image on the UArctic article 1372:Here are the two impeachement userboxes. 865:Thank you for your closure of the AfD for 1387:Thanks for the civility on my talk page. 1024:can be used as RS or not? I am confused. 998:By all means. I'm at my wit's end, here. 66: 788:fame. But we'll see how the AfD goes. - 665: 1558:You are not expected to answer this. -- 913:Scotland in the Eurovision Song Contest 152:sling21012 is what i would like to do. 14: 1577: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2077:. Users who make such threats may be 1304:Bang'n on Wax: The Best of the Damu's 938:Please see my reply on my talk page. 469:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 1300:Bang'n on Wax: The Best of the Crips 596: 25: 1797:Personal attacks by Tasc0 continued 1548:jump off the moon carrying Dracula. 23: 1639: 1294:I see you have recently delt with 1290:Another Day, Another Tasc0 Problem 206:You deleted Rowdy Rams and my pics 60:I don't know if this goes here but 24: 2301: 958:May be worth noting his edits at 2211:WP:VP/T#Images aren't showing up 2054: 1263:(and what is now the redlink to 828: 600: 67: 29: 2280:Doesn't matter. If you had any 2265:Capitol Medical Center Colleges 141:Renaming my Account overlooked? 83:For deleting my stupid article 2069:under Knowledge's policies on 1254:Gebhard Truchsess von Waldburg 463:which are run on cronjobs." - 13: 1: 1578:Fidler, Donald (2005-12-31), 155:Thanks for a speed response. 2158:MediaWiki:Recentchangestext‎ 1824:WP:ANI#Ban proposal of Tasc0 901:makes a lot more sense :) ˉˉ 617:SHURIKEN STRIKE! Ninja away! 7: 2290:23:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2275:23:49, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2253:00:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 2244:23:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2223:23:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2203:23:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2186:23:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2164:MediaWiki:Recentchangestext 2153:15:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2137:03:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2127:03:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2111:03:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2100:03:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2086:04:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2049:User talk:Thaïs Alexandrina 2041:04:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 2031:09:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 2009:22:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 1994:11:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 1979:11:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 1959:21:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 1941:12:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 1896:...and goodbye to you too. 1856:Thanks for your support in 1020:Hi, can you please tell if 259:"There are competing claims 93:04:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 10: 2306: 1906:00:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 1675:Hi. Please take a look at 1597:adult bonding sexual event 1378:. Also, aself-made one on 688: 108:An editor has asked for a 1887:20:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 1846:08:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 1836:19:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC) 1813:00:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC) 1791:06:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC) 1781:04:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 1761:06:48, 19 July 2008 (UTC) 1741:04:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 1633:Thanks for your !vote at 1628:09:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1604:22:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1573:21:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1539:02:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1517:00:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 1480:ref: Muhammad Ali (actor) 1468:18:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 1436:06:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 1418:13:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 1397:20:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 1367:18:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 1348:20:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 1190:Kim Dong Publishing House 480:blocking is a last resort 172:15:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 126:02:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 73: 1689:02:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 1666:18:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1285:17:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 1240:23:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1218:21:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1205:21:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1181:20:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1171:11:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1158:11:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1136:01:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1122:20:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1088:02:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1075:09:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1038:09:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1008:01:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 994:00:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 976:00:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 948:18:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 933:10:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 906:02:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 888:02:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 859:22:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 845:22:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 820:05:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 800:05:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 782:05:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 760:04:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 733:02:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 706:15:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 683:01:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 656:01:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 646:01:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 586:22:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 561:22:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 551:22:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 526:22:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 508:06:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 499:09:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 488:04:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 451:03:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 439:09:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 429:20:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 411:18:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 396:18:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 386:04:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 359:20:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 339:16:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 315:00:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 296:06:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 278:03:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 215:Aset Ka content deletion 201:05:59, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 2059:Your recent comment at 1524:Image:Kamikaze zero.jpg 1453:Great Userbox Migration 1141:Image:Souths mascot.png 1081:Cuba-Pakistan relations 1065:Otolemur crassicaudatus 1028:Otolemur crassicaudatus 966:today. I don't get it. 1671:An article you deleted 1645: 1522:I agree with you that 1340:Live and Die 4 Hip Hop 1147:South Sydney Rabbitohs 685: 475: 1950:. You could also try 1643: 1261:Electorate of Cologne 1106:Template:Creationism2 1100:Template:Creationism2 669: 471:, 14:58, 16 May 2008 457: 151:slingshotecity -: --> 42:of past discussions. 2166:? I am referring to 1353:Please explain to me 1312:Nationwide Rip Ridaz 899:Alice in Puzzle-Land 878:come out that way.-- 516:Talk page protection 420:for the same thing. 132:Rowdy rams continued 101:Deletion review for 2066:strictly prohibited 2021:A prescient move.-- 1713:template but only 1646: 1324:Bloods & Crips 1098:TfD nomination of 987:Bloods & Crips 960:Bloods & Crips 686: 349:weburiedoursecrets 329:weburiedoursecrets 77:The Minor Barnstar 2145:Thaïs Alexandrina 2119:Thaïs Alexandrina 2092:Thaïs Alexandrina 1803:is one example. 1664: 946: 931: 818: 798: 780: 738:free content page 622: 621: 583: 574: 98: 97: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Anetode 2297: 2058: 2006: 1976: 1936: 1928: 1903: 1877: 1755: 1749: 1738: 1731: 1723: 1712: 1706: 1654: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1586: 1570: 1565: 1514: 1509: 1465: 1459: 1422:I'm afraid that 1415: 1409: 1320:it's not notable 1270:Thirty Years War 1238: 1168: 1155: 1066: 1029: 942: 927: 895:Raymond Smullyan 856: 842: 832: 812: 792: 774: 611:are better than 607:This user knows 604: 597: 577: 573: 548: 539:this e-mail text 465:User:Betacommand 425: 355: 350: 335: 330: 282:Comment for you 71: 64: 63: 33: 32: 26: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2268: 2160: 2052: 2019: 2001: 1971: 1967: 1934: 1926: 1913: 1898: 1894: 1884: 1871: 1854: 1820: 1799: 1769: 1753: 1747: 1734: 1727: 1719: 1710: 1704: 1698: 1673: 1638: 1616: 1590: 1588: 1584: 1568: 1563: 1512: 1507: 1491: 1482: 1463: 1457: 1426:speedy deletion 1413: 1407: 1355: 1292: 1249: 1231: 1228: 1193: 1176:now. Cheers, ˉˉ 1166: 1153: 1143: 1129: 1112:. Thank you. — 1103: 1064: 1027: 1018: 981:I've protected 956: 940:Camaron | Chris 925:Camaron | Chris 916: 870: 852: 838: 834: 767: 740: 721: 694: 692:AK-74 deletion? 664: 630: 623: 594: 582: 544: 535: 532:Primavera image 518: 423: 404: 367: 353: 348: 333: 328: 323: 266:nomination page 255: 217: 208: 188: 179: 143: 134: 110:deletion review 106: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2303: 2293: 2292: 2267: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2236:David Göthberg 2232: 2226: 2225: 2178:David Göthberg 2159: 2156: 2140: 2139: 2114: 2113: 2051: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2018: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 1966: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1912: 1909: 1893: 1890: 1882: 1853: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1819: 1816: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1768: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1697: 1692: 1681:Richard Cavell 1672: 1669: 1637: 1631: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1557: 1550: 1549: 1546:Doctor McNinja 1490: 1487: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1400: 1399: 1384: 1383: 1354: 1351: 1332:Bangin' on Wax 1291: 1288: 1248: 1243: 1227: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1142: 1139: 1128: 1125: 1102: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1045:primary source 1017: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 955: 952: 951: 950: 915: 910: 909: 908: 869: 863: 862: 861: 833: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 803: 802: 766: 763: 739: 736: 720: 717: 713: 710: 693: 690: 672: 671: 663: 660: 659: 658: 629: 624: 620: 619: 605: 595: 593: 590: 589: 588: 578: 564: 563: 534: 529: 517: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 444: 443: 442: 441: 403: 402:block of BCBot 400: 399: 398: 376:Welcome back. 366: 363: 362: 361: 322: 319: 318: 317: 254: 251: 247: 244: 241: 238: 236: 234: 233: 232: 228: 225: 224: 222: 220: 216: 213: 207: 204: 187: 184: 178: 175: 164:Slingshotecity 161: 160: 142: 139: 133: 130: 105: 99: 96: 95: 80: 79: 74: 72: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2302: 2291: 2288: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2273: 2266: 2254: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2216: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2195: 2194: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2174: 2171: 2169: 2165: 2155: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2138: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2112: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2088: 2087: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2071:legal threats 2068: 2067: 2062: 2057: 2050: 2042: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2010: 2007: 2005: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1988: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1977: 1975: 1960: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1948:third opinion 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1939: 1937: 1931: 1929: 1924: 1920: 1918: 1908: 1907: 1904: 1902: 1889: 1888: 1885: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1859: 1852:RFA thankspam 1847: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1826:. Thanks. -- 1825: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1792: 1789: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1762: 1759: 1752: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1737: 1732: 1730: 1724: 1722: 1716: 1709: 1701: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1668: 1667: 1662: 1658: 1653: 1652: 1642: 1636: 1630: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1583: 1582: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1555: 1547: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1525: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1510: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1486: 1469: 1466: 1460: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1434: 1429: 1427: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1416: 1410: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1316:its a Bootleg 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1271: 1266: 1262: 1257: 1255: 1247: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1226: 1219: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1191: 1182: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1148: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1133:ViperSnake151 1124: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1101: 1089: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1067: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1023: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 992: 988: 984: 980: 979: 978: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 949: 945: 941: 937: 936: 935: 934: 930: 926: 922: 914: 907: 904: 900: 896: 892: 891: 890: 889: 885: 881: 876: 868: 860: 857: 855: 849: 848: 847: 846: 843: 841: 831: 821: 816: 811: 807: 806: 805: 804: 801: 796: 791: 786: 785: 784: 783: 778: 773: 762: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 735: 734: 730: 726: 716: 711: 708: 707: 703: 699: 689: 684: 680: 676: 668: 657: 654: 650: 649: 648: 647: 643: 639: 635: 634:David Marwell 628: 627:David Marwell 618: 614: 610: 606: 603: 599: 598: 587: 584: 581: 575: 571: 566: 565: 562: 559: 555: 554: 553: 552: 549: 547: 540: 533: 528: 527: 524: 509: 506: 502: 501: 500: 497: 492: 491: 490: 489: 486: 482: 481: 474: 473: 470: 466: 462: 456: 453: 452: 449: 440: 437: 432: 431: 430: 427: 426: 419: 415: 414: 413: 412: 409: 397: 394: 390: 389: 388: 387: 383: 379: 375: 372: 360: 357: 356: 351: 343: 342: 341: 340: 337: 336: 331: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 293: 289: 285: 280: 279: 275: 271: 270:90.206.36.142 267: 263: 261: 253:Sarcasm Pt II 250: 243:universities. 230: 212: 203: 202: 198: 194: 183: 174: 173: 169: 165: 158: 157: 156: 153: 149: 146: 138: 129: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 104: 94: 90: 86: 82: 81: 78: 75: 70: 65: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2281: 2269: 2197: 2191: 2189: 2175: 2172: 2161: 2141: 2115: 2089: 2065: 2064: 2053: 2020: 2003: 1973: 1968: 1922: 1921: 1914: 1900: 1895: 1873: 1869: 1866: 1855: 1821: 1800: 1770: 1751:test5article 1735: 1728: 1720: 1715:blocked them 1702: 1700:Hi Anetode, 1699: 1695:User:Goobwad 1674: 1650: 1647: 1617: 1596: 1589:, retrieved 1580: 1554:sex in space 1499: 1492: 1483: 1447: 1446: 1441: 1440: 1425: 1356: 1319: 1315: 1293: 1274: 1258: 1250: 1234: 1229: 1194: 1164: 1151: 1144: 1130: 1104: 1062: 1025: 1019: 957: 917: 898: 875:Asset voting 871: 867:Asset voting 853: 839: 835: 768: 752:Andrewlp1991 747: 743: 741: 722: 712: 709: 695: 687: 662:my RfA - Ta! 631: 616: 579: 545: 536: 519: 479: 478: 476: 458: 454: 445: 421: 405: 391:Thanks :) ˉˉ 368: 346: 326: 324: 281: 258: 256: 235:Hello again. 231: 218: 209: 189: 180: 162: 154: 150: 147: 144: 135: 118:Nightstanger 107: 76: 55: 43: 37: 1822:Please see 1458:Orange Mike 1408:Orange Mike 1380:this user's 1265:Cologne War 1246:Cologne War 365:You're back 354:inthegarden 334:inthegarden 36:This is an 1935:TREKphiler 1927:TREKphiler 1591:2008-06-30 1496:this image 1308:Damu Ridas 1277:PWilkinson 1197:Shoombooly 954:User:Tasc0 815:Talk to me 810:Realkyhick 795:Talk to me 790:Realkyhick 777:Talk to me 772:Realkyhick 570:Bellwether 378:hbdragon88 307:Setanta747 288:Setanta747 177:Rowdy Rams 114:Rowdy Rams 103:Rowdy Rams 2168:this edit 2017:Thank you 1987:oversight 1952:WP:MEDCAB 1892:Thanks... 1867:Cheers! 1805:JBsupreme 1773:Gogo Dodo 1708:uw-block3 1620:Die4Dixie 1500:something 1448:templates 1445:1 is for 1428:criterion 1328:The Twinz 983:The Twinz 964:The Twinz 675:Gwen Gale 638:Wknight94 505:Ned Scott 485:Ned Scott 448:Ned Scott 303:talk page 85:Uzimaster 2263:Prod on 2215:question 2075:civility 2023:Folksong 2002:Channel 1972:Channel 1965:Restored 1911:Glossary 1899:Channel 1862:just ask 1661:Contribs 1651:lifebaka 1614:All caps 1310:and the 1275:Thanks. 1233:Channel 1165:Cheers, 1152:Cheers, 1053:WP:UNDUE 1049:this one 1000:Chubbles 968:Chubbles 854:E_dog95' 840:E_dog95' 698:Koalorka 193:Misha bb 2079:blocked 1876:delanoy 1644:Thanks! 613:Pirates 461:WP:DABS 424:MBisanz 321:Aset Ka 264:on the 145:Hello, 39:archive 2193:Werdna 1858:my RFA 1767:Thanks 1635:my RFA 1529:WP:FPC 1389:McJeff 1359:McJeff 1114:Neelix 944:(talk) 929:(talk) 719:Thanks 609:Ninjas 523:Severo 373:list. 2282:proof 2081:. ˉˉ 2047:From 1818:Tasc0 1721:jonny 1585:(PDF) 1424:this 1382:page. 1296:Tasc0 1211:Voila 1167:Vicer 1154:Vicer 546:Kelly 483:. -- 467:, at 418:there 371:WP:MW 284:here. 16:< 2240:talk 2199:talk 2182:talk 2149:talk 2123:talk 2096:talk 2073:and 2027:talk 1917:this 1883:adds 1832:talk 1809:talk 1777:talk 1685:talk 1679:. - 1657:Talk 1624:talk 1464:Talk 1455:. -- 1414:Talk 1393:talk 1375:and 1363:talk 1344:talk 1318:and 1302:and 1281:talk 1225:ACCG 1201:talk 1131:^_^ 1118:talk 1071:talk 1034:talk 1022:this 1004:talk 972:talk 962:and 884:talk 756:talk 746:and 729:talk 702:talk 679:talk 642:talk 537:Per 382:talk 311:talk 305:. -- 292:talk 274:talk 197:talk 168:talk 122:talk 89:talk 1864:. 1560:Kiz 1504:Kiz 1461:| 1411:| 1016:RS? 897:'s 880:Abd 748:not 744:did 725:Nlu 112:of 2287:╦╩ 2250:╦╩ 2242:) 2234:-- 2220:╦╩ 2196:• 2184:) 2176:-- 2170:. 2151:) 2134:╦╩ 2125:) 2108:╦╩ 2098:) 2083:╦╩ 2061:AN 2038:╦╩ 2029:) 2004:® 1991:╦╩ 1974:® 1956:╦╩ 1901:® 1843:╦╩ 1834:) 1811:) 1788:╦╩ 1779:) 1758:╦╩ 1754:}} 1748:{{ 1711:}} 1705:{{ 1687:) 1659:- 1626:) 1601:╦╩ 1536:╦╩ 1433:╦╩ 1431:ˉˉ 1395:) 1365:) 1346:) 1330:, 1326:, 1283:) 1235:® 1215:╦╩ 1203:) 1178:╦╩ 1120:) 1085:╦╩ 1073:) 1057:╦╩ 1036:) 1006:) 991:╦╩ 974:) 903:╦╩ 886:) 758:) 731:) 704:) 681:) 653:╦╩ 644:) 615:. 592:?! 558:╦╩ 496:╦╩ 436:╦╩ 393:╦╩ 384:) 313:) 294:) 286:-- 276:) 199:) 170:) 124:) 91:) 2272:β 2238:( 2180:( 2147:( 2121:( 2094:( 2025:( 1874:. 1872:J 1830:( 1828:B 1807:( 1775:( 1736:t 1729:m 1725:- 1683:( 1663:) 1655:( 1622:( 1569:r 1564:o 1513:r 1508:o 1442:T 1391:( 1361:( 1342:( 1279:( 1252:( 1199:( 1116:( 1069:( 1032:( 1002:( 970:( 882:( 817:) 813:( 797:) 793:( 779:) 775:( 754:( 727:( 700:( 677:( 640:( 580:C 408:β 380:( 309:( 290:( 272:( 262:" 195:( 166:( 120:( 87:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index