Knowledge

User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive2

Source 📝

2301:
explanation. I finally squeezed one out of you yesterday. For that I am greatful. My feelings are not hurt over your comment about other images much better than mine were left out, because beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and I don't think you're beholding too much. I can understand that everyone thinks they are a photographer; and everyone has a favorite Sunset photo they've taken. So I will respect your wishes and not re-post the photo, not because I don't think it adds to the beauty of the page; but that this section must be a Royal Pain in the Butt to keep under control; so I won't add to the confusion. Thank you for finally stepping forward and letting me know who has been deleting this photo. I truly believe that all removal of another's work deserves an explanation by the remover. By the way, in my short time here and only about 100 edits, I have NEVER removed another's photo or text, but only corrected grammer if I found an error; or added text to the already existing text; or a photo in a spot where I really thought it would enhance the page for the reader. Perhaps you can learn something from a New Guy.
128:, please go ahead and replace it. It has to do with the basic principles of any written text produced to transmit some message to other people, where pictures are not just decorative but play a specific role in illustrating the concepts addressed in the text. This is true with books, scientific papers as well as with newspaper or encyclopedia articles. Knowledge is not an album where we can post our own pictures or even a warehouse of media. For this last purpose we have Commons. (I wonder if we can find any featured article with a gallery. Perhaps not.) -- 2343:
it is with the anticipation of seeing the most stunning photos of Sunsets that Wiki has in it's valt. There too is a BIG Void. My suggestion would be a Gallery section at the bottom of the page where an editor would be allowed to choose only 1 Sunset photo from his favorites to display if he is so inclined. This will solve all the issues you guys seem to be having with this section, and also leave it up to the READER to decide what is beautiful and what is boring. Because in my opinion......that page is a giant Bore. Thanks for your reply,
432:, which also serves as an example of how the poll should progress when none of the available options suit the contributors. The question on dealing with unclear consensus has apparently been the most controversial so far. I remain hopeful that we will succeed in representing people's opinions by the time the poll ends. Feel free to change your vote or add a new reply option if the three new ones still don't quite work for you. (But obviously, try to create something general enough that it's likely to gather a following.) Thank you. 2143: 713: 797: 566: 849: 512: 1771: 1052: 1713: 1558: 925: 620: 1431: 454: 2006: 242: 1176: 1096: 327: 2087: 2369: 36: 2321:, which was selected from a set of wonderfull high quality pictures, after a long discussion. Being a professional photographer you are certainly aware of the fact that the image quality of your photo is on the poor side. Though it is a beautiful photo in thumb size, very obvious chromatic noise becomes visible when viewed in full resolution. That is, of course, the result of using a small sensor. 217:
against inserting a repository of images in the articles, in the form of galleries. That is Commons' business. As for your own picture, I'm afraid the quality is not good enough for illustrating a typical subject of Photography. The main problem is chromatic noise, due to the lack of light, high ISO rating (for this type of camera) and poor quality of the sensor. --
1880:
but your depiction is clearly not the right choice. However I don't have the truth in my pocket and don't own the article. If you are really convinced of your rightness you should start a thread in the article talk page. Anyway (please forgive me if I'm wrong about your intentions), you don't need to put the picture in the taxo box for nominating it to FPC. --
99:"? well, I admit your photo is superb, and deserves all compliments, but why deleting all others? Such drastic action done by the only "survivor" may indicate some COI. With all due respect I would let an objective editor to decide about that. Perhaps you are right, after all. Perhaps not. Etan J. Tal 16:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2220:
that Mr. Joca has not returned in a month is exactly why we have such policies and why your actions and attitude are so disruptive. You have driven a prospective editor away from this project, and those editors are a valuable resource that we cannot afford to waste. So congratulations, you've won. As
1879:
Come on Muhammad, cuteness is hardly an acceptable criterion for choosing a picture for a taxo box! The one there (for about 9 months, now) is not perfect but has much better ev than yours, as it shows the animals swimming in their natural environment. It could be replaced by a better one, of course,
1674:
You will certainly agree that this has nothing to do with my opinion on the nomination. Trying to game the system by creating new accounts is not, to the best of knowledge, a common phenomenon in WP:FPC. I just acted boldly (in the ways of Knowledge) to prevent something that may become more frequent
2296:
In reply to this message left by you in on my talk page: "Please stop forcing your photos into the sunset article. A discussion has taken place here on what pictures to put in the article and images much better than yours were left out. Please understand that your status of professional photographer
1632:
Eu não sei o que posse dizer: monitorizar a página, editar excessivo imagens e registar as suas opiniões com a comunidade. Eventualmente o "blotting" vai ser viste por pessoas com mais experiença e ele não pode escapar. Tive problemas com o numero de páginas nesta página no passado, mas as adicicões
1061:
project. The VPC project is suffering from a chronic lack of participation to the point that the project is at an impasse. A discussion is currently taking place about the future of this project and how to revitalize the project and participation. If you're interested in this project or have an idea
2421:
You are receiving this because of your current or past association with the Featured Pictures project. Following on from several cases where closers did not observe the prescribed minimum votes required for a delisting, there is now a motion to entirely dismiss the requirement for a minimum. Please
2342:
Let me leave you with these thoughts to ponder about the Sunset section. First of all you've made it a RED page. There is every single color in the spectum at sunset during a variety of Atmospheric conditions. That is the main VOID on that page. Also, when a reader finds himself on the Sunset page,
1192:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if
1112:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if
216:
It is all right for an article to have more than one picture, of course! As long as they illustrate particular aspects of the subject (preferably addressed in the text), have adequate captions and good enough quality. After all these are the normal rules applicable to any illustrated text. But I am
2316:
Thanks for your message. Please understand that there is nothing personal in reverting the edits of other users. That is a very common practise in WP as a way to protect the integrity and quality of the articles. On the other hand the purpose of the pictures is to illustrate the articles with the
1689:
I didn't mean to imply that it did have anything to do with your own view of the image, I was only meaning that it doesn't come across too well- be that to regulars, non-regulars or the new user themself. I don't think new users taking part in FPC is necessary a bad thing- I don't see how this is
1654:
I have unstruck the vote from the new user. Yeah, anonymous votes are typically ignored, which is bad enough to start with, but you feel we should extend this to the votes of new users? How should a new user offer an opinion, if not creating an account and then posting? If you have evidence that
1633:
recente foram excessivo. Fiz alguns editos hoje para diminuir, mas acho o minimo uma imagen por cada tema seria suficiente para comunicar as ideias (ou numa imagen também). Como ele tem uma historia de edição e colaboração no EN Knowledge estou suprendido que o Caliphat123 não começe um diologo.
2300:
My reply to you is this: I only continued to post the photo: Large Blue Joshua-B.jpg because I beleive a quality photo that enhances a page for which there is a perfectly good space open for it under the 1st photo, should not be deleted by another editor without the courtesy of at least a brief
1612:
Hi. I noticed you removed two labeled pictures from the page, on account of it being "low quality". I reversed your edit. The purpose of those pictures wasn't "quality" but the identification labels of the individuals on the monument. Until someone comes up with a better picture and does the
154:
Afocal photography · Bokeh · Contre-jour · Cross processing · Cyanotype · Film developing · Fill flash · Fireworks · Harris Shutter · Kite aerial · Macro · Multiple exposure · Night · Panoramic · Panning · Photogram (Kirlian) · Print toning · Rephotography · Rollout · Sabatier Effect ·
1858:
Yes but the image you inserted does not show that either. Additionally, that image is already used in the article once and is IMO not as compelling an image as the one I had uploaded. A taxobox image should attract the reader, I believe my picture does that more than the one you have placed
2317:
best possible depictions of the subject, not to decorate them. In many articles the illustrations are chosen very carefully among the best available pictures, taking into account their encycoplaedic value as well as their photographic quality. That was the case of the leading picture in
895: 902:
Cat-five suggested extending the voting period for undervisited, unanimously supported noms. I can't think of a way this system could be gamed, but thought I'd pass it by you as you seemed at previous discussions to have some expertise in game theory.
429: 2241:
Thanks for your prompt response. May I say again that I'm happy you are not an admin, as more qualities are necessary for the job other than blind political correctness? Btw, I didn't win anything, the article and Knowledge did. Greetings. --
2337:
Actually it's the result of being retired and selling all my Nikon equipment. I just tinker around now with a Leica Lumix Point and Shoot. Whenever you are using small digital equipment in low light situations, you are going to run into some
1914:
I'm assuming good faith, Muhammad. There is nothing wrong in nominating a picture to FPC! We only need to be careful in keeping the correct perspective and avoid affecting the more general goals of our encyclopaedia. --
896: 1943:
Hello Alvesgapar. I am Portuguese and I know what I say about this topic. I will easily find a ton of references about anti-nuclear in Portugal and restore all the statements done before. I will remember you the
1655:
there's something up here, by all means, present it, but striking the vote of a new user (especially when the new user is supporting something you happen to oppose) just because they're new is more than a little
1259: 1363: 1283:
Hi Alvesgaspar, The editor's page said I had to give you a notice that I had made a comment, so, here is your notice: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at
1759: 1675:
and fashionable. You are certainly aware that, in many Wikimedia projects (including COM:FPC), voting is restricted to accounts older than a certain number of days and with a minimum number of edits.
1419: 1994: 1690:"gaming the system" at all unless, as I say, something is untoward (sock/meatpuppetry...). Yes, I am aware of voting restrictions used on other projects, but that's not really related to this issue. 914: 421: 500: 164:- each adds a different aspect which enriches the article both visually and in contents. Examples - when relevant and in high-quality - are always welcome. One may think of different aspects of 2192: 1760: 1952:, in 1976, when the anti-nuclear movement, with the overwhelming support of the civil local population, defeated a project for the first nuclear power plant to be built in the country. 1420: 1995: 443: 1894:
I will do that. Anyway, I thought we were supposed to assume good faith not the other way round. Had I wanted its placement solely for a nomination why haven't I nominated it yet? --
1810: 1470: 422: 2045: 1291:
I am new to Knowledge, and I have not been part of any scientific edit warring, and I only want to use the drawings of why sunsets and sunrises are red and orange and peach colors.
501: 2357: 679: 661: 607: 400: 2431: 2416: 1184: 1104: 553: 2204: 2186: 1170: 1090: 2442: 2423: 2408: 1647: 380: 362: 689: 2450: 1844:
Hi Muhammad, I believe you already know the answer to your question: it is common practise here to show the whole animal in taxo boxes, not just part of the head.
1245: 1165: 954:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 1597: 1546: 2438: 1668: 2058:
When reporting editors to an Administrators' Noticeboard, you are required to post a notice to their talk page. You failed to do so in your complaint against
2358: 1924: 1909: 1889: 1874: 1853: 376: 358: 1196:
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created
1116:
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created
965:. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found 384: 2168: 2062:. I will place a notice for him; however, it is your responsibility to directly notify all involved parties when you report incidents to noticeboards. 1648: 478:. Yes, this is very late. I had put it in as a possibility for April Fool's Day, but it didn't get picked, and then I forgot about it again until now. 2285: 1507: 1275: 2090: 1300: 226: 2330: 1285: 1063: 1699: 1684: 1390: 702: 2251: 1988: 1547: 977: 78: 1263: 1250: 26: 785: 1716: 852: 800: 312: 716: 2164: 457: 289: 2297:
is not important here and that Knowledge's articles are not showcases for our images". Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
1622: 416: 2270: 2235: 1229: 1209: 1149: 1129: 1001:, but no one seems to have acted on them. Since you seem to have edited the article heavily, perhaps you can take a look? Thanks. 366: 2266:, as the material you restored was excessive coverage of a film that, at best, rates a very brief mention as a bit of trivia. -- 2128: 1961: 1754: 890: 838: 754: 2160: 1514: 1225: 1205: 1145: 1125: 1979:. Please restore everything the way it was before. I'm considering your edits as trolling actions and will act accordingly -- 1838: 1541: 495: 2396: 2392: 2230: 2076: 2071: 2033: 2029: 1798: 1794: 1585: 1581: 1458: 1441: 810: 647: 643: 593: 589: 539: 535: 63: 59: 1375: 897:
Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Poll_on_changing_how_noms_with_no_opposition_and_less_than_4_supports_are_handled
726: 1492: 684: 176:? Are these sub-topics represented by your photo? I would like to suggest a photo of mine, NOT instead of yours (it is not 137: 1037: 1484: 1233: 1153: 761: 584: 354: 350: 281: 269: 265: 1028:
That part of the text was there since the begining and I didn't understand its meaning either. It is simplified now. --
1193:
the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
1113:
the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
1018: 2352: 2310: 2217: 1642: 1605: 1457:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at 1267: 982: 204: 115: 1534: 1333: 862: 294:
If that picture is kept on the article for one month, do you think it would stand a chance of getting promoted? --
2395:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 2216:
Actually, this incident is exhibit A in why I would have blocked you. The fact that you so egregiously violated
2032:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 1797:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 1584:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 646:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 592:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 538:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 353:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 268:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 62:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at 1900: 1865: 1829: 1789: 1345: 530: 1414: 1288:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. on your comments on "edit warring".
188:
Would you be so kind and comment? Is it of adequate quality? relevant? Etan J. Tal 19:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
2446: 2427: 2209: 1726: 1576: 1498:
Because the existing one illustrates better the function. Please seek a consensus in the talk page first. --
1453: 1085: 638: 2104: 2024: 1730: 1357: 1321: 866: 814: 730: 471: 467: 260: 1606: 1197: 1117: 2210: 2133: 2081: 1938: 1707: 1448: 910: 843: 791: 707: 698: 439: 2379: 2257: 2016: 1781: 1568: 1217: 1188:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1137: 1108:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 939:
on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a
630: 576: 522: 412: 305: 46: 1311:
Could it be helpful to inform also the people who recently partecipated to editing/discussion, that is
1895: 1860: 1824: 970: 940: 448: 404: 396: 390: 337: 252: 2108: 2053: 1734: 976:
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
870: 818: 765: 734: 475: 345: 2404: 2326: 2281: 2267: 2247: 2182: 2041: 1984: 1920: 1885: 1849: 1806: 1680: 1593: 1513: 1503: 1488: 1466: 1386: 1033: 947: 317: 222: 133: 155:
Stereoscopy · Stopping Down · Sun printing · Infrared · Ultraviolet · Time-lapse · Tilt-shift
2387: 2156: 2100: 1306: 955: 904: 692: 433: 232: 54: 1271: 408: 200: 111: 17: 2348: 2306: 1529: 1329: 1296: 1241: 1213: 1161: 1133: 966: 192: 160:
You may see that many of them contain more than a single photo. None of these photos is is
103: 8: 1974: 1695: 1664: 1618: 1371: 962: 951: 936: 86: 2400: 2225: 2159:, which proves everyone's favourite mathematical theorem in a simple and clear manner. 2122: 2066: 2037: 1957: 1823:
Hi, Why did you change the infobox picture? How do you consider it more appropriate? --
1802: 1748: 1638: 1589: 1462: 1341: 1012: 987: 884: 832: 779: 748: 489: 168:
too, which might NOT be demonstrated in your really fine photo. Perhaps colour? Night-
1970: 1478: 2322: 2277: 2243: 2178: 1980: 1916: 1881: 1845: 1676: 1627: 1499: 1382: 1353: 1317: 1029: 919: 277: 218: 196: 129: 107: 2142: 2107:
on October 9, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
2344: 2302: 1524: 1409: 1325: 1292: 1237: 1202:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
1157: 1122:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
1079: 998: 712: 1977:
were always dismissed by the governments and a majority of the local populations
1733:
on June 10, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
1232:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 1152:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 869:
on June 27, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
817:
on June 16, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
2291: 1691: 1660: 1656: 1614: 1367: 796: 733:
on May 31, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
301: 1520:
Umm, VP got shut down. (I know this is sort of a late response to your edit.)
474:
on May 6, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at
2263: 2222: 2193: 2114: 2063: 2059: 1953: 1818: 1740: 1634: 1337: 1058: 1004: 950:
to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only
876: 824: 771: 740: 565: 481: 375:
For the record, you were also the nominator of this image. Very nice work.
2201: 1396: 124:
It has nothing to do with my picture. If you find a better illustration of
2363: 2000: 1765: 1552: 1425: 848: 614: 560: 506: 321: 236: 183: 30: 1349: 1313: 1057:
You are being contacted because you have in the past participated in the
1042: 669: 651: 597: 543: 273: 67: 1770: 511: 1712: 1557: 1430: 1402: 1074: 988: 619: 2177:
Thank you, Knight, that was a very nice and unexpected compliment ;-)
2005: 1222:
the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1142:
the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1051: 453: 241: 1189: 1109: 924: 295: 2221:
your prize, you have your own little plot of scorched earth. Enjoy!
1761:
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/File:Coreopsis July 2011-2.jpg
1175: 1095: 2439:
Knowledge talk:Featured picture candidates#Delist procedure changes
1967:
The protest of a local population hardly justifies your claim that
1421:
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg
1996:
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/Christ the Saviour Cathedral
326: 2422:
participate in the discussion as wide-ranging changes may arise.
1949: 423:
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2
2368: 2086: 502:
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/File:Poster papaver 5a.jpg
35: 2318: 1945: 428:
I'll just mention that there are some new reply options for
1483:
Why do you keep removing the updated lifeguard photo? --
1266:, but needs some help from a native speaker. Thanks. -- 184:
http://en.wikipedia.org/File:BeitShearimSarcophagus2.jpg
1062:
of how to improve it please stop by and participate in
2359:
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/Sunset with sun
946:
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
2417:
Community input required: lowering delist bar at FPC
969:, and the general policy for the trial can be found 1171:
File source problem with File:Full moon detail2.jpg
1091:
File source problem with File:Full moon detail1.jpg
1649:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/Lamadi woman 1613:labels, I believe it is useful to retain these. 1258:Could you improve the translation of the article 2099:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture 1725:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture 1548:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/Tabby cat 1286:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1280:.............................................. 861:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture 809:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture 725:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture 466:Just to let you know that the Featured Picture 2378:An image created by you has been promoted to 2015:An image created by you has been promoted to 1780:An image created by you has been promoted to 1567:An image created by you has been promoted to 629:An image created by you has been promoted to 575:An image created by you has been promoted to 521:An image created by you has been promoted to 336:An image created by you has been promoted to 251:An image created by you has been promoted to 45:An image created by you has been promoted to 1973:by choice. Projects for the construction of 1381:Thanks, I've just informed those users. -- 931:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 2085: 1711: 847: 795: 711: 452: 395:Hey, just to let you know that I listed 2155:For your wonderful picture of the day, 1264:from the Portugese Knowledge to English 14: 1260:Transportes Aéreos da Índia Portuguesa 1251:Transportes Aéreos da Índia Portuguesa 310:Changing the world one edit at a time! 27:Successful featured picture nomination 2397:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 2393:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 2196:removing the template "Keralahistory" 2034:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 2030:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 1799:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 1795:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 1586:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 1582:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 1459:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 811:File:Porto Covo pano April 2009-4.jpg 760:And I finally remembered to schedule 648:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 644:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 594:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 590:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 540:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 536:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 64:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 60:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 1046: 961:For the guideline on reviewing, see 2399:. Thank you for your contribution! 2036:. Thank you for your contribution! 1801:. Thank you for your contribution! 1588:. Thank you for your contribution! 762:File:Spider and bee June 2008-1.jpg 650:. Thank you for your contribution! 596:. Thank you for your contribution! 585:File:Papaver April 2010-13_crop.jpg 542:. Thank you for your contribution! 357:. Thank you for your contribution! 355:Knowledge:Valued picture candidates 351:Knowledge:Valued picture candidates 290:LittleOwl360 picture valued picture 272:. Thank you for your contribution! 270:Knowledge:Valued picture candidates 266:Knowledge:Valued picture candidates 172:, Fill-light effect, Long-exposure 66:. Thank you for your contribution! 23: 2367: 2004: 1769: 1556: 1429: 1174: 1094: 997:I posted a few questions I had at 923: 727:File:Torre Belém April 2009-4a.jpg 618: 564: 510: 325: 240: 34: 24: 2462: 943:scheduled to end 15 August 2010. 2141: 2103:is due to make an appearance as 1729:is due to make an appearance as 1050: 865:is due to make an appearance as 863:File:Hoverfly January 2008-6.jpg 813:is due to make an appearance as 729:is due to make an appearance as 470:is due to make an appearance as 180:but perhaps of some value still) 2149:The Graphic Designer's Barnstar 2077:06:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC) 2046:00:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC) 1989:18:06, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 1962:15:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 1790:File:Coreopsis July 2011-2.jpg 1234:Media copyright questions page 1154:Media copyright questions page 531:File:Papaver April 2010-8a.jpg 13: 1: 2353:19:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2331:17:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2311:17:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2286:23:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC) 2271:19:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC) 1727:File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg 1577:File:Cat November 2010-1a.jpg 1508:21:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC) 1493:21:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC) 1471:05:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC) 1454:File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg 1391:16:22, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 1376:13:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 1301:02:22, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 1276:16:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1246:10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 1166:10:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 935:" userright, allowing you to 639:File:Papaver April 2010-9.jpg 2451:13:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 2432:13:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 2252:12:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 2236:12:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 2205:04:43, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 2187:08:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 2025:File:Moscow July 2011-7a.jpg 1542:22:00, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 1415:16:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 1206:criteria for speedy deletion 1126:criteria for speedy deletion 685:Replied to FPC review thread 468:File:Missing square edit.gif 261:File:Wasp August 2007-23.jpg 7: 2409:22:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 2169:23:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC) 2129:16:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 1925:16:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1910:14:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1890:09:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1875:00:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1854:07:20, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1839:02:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 93:removing gallery of mostly 10: 2467: 1598:23:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 1442:Featured picture candidate 1262:? It has been translated 1185:File:Full moon detail2.jpg 1105:File:Full moon detail1.jpg 1086:00:07, 2 August 2010 (UTC) 952:a small number of articles 444:09:18, 28 April 2010 (UTC) 417:15:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 385:02:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 367:02:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 313:09:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 2218:WP:Don't bite the newbies 2140: 1811:21:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 1623:21:18, 3 April 2011 (UTC) 1607:Padrão dos Descobrimentos 1038:22:57, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 1019:18:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 983:06:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC) 937:review other users' edits 891:16:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 839:17:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC) 397:File:WInd Rose Aguiar.png 282:05:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 227:19:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 138:17:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 79:18:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 2262:I reverted your edit to 2109:Template:POTD/2011-10-09 1755:22:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 1735:Template:POTD/2011-06-10 1700:23:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 1685:21:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 1669:21:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 1182:Thank you for uploading 1102:Thank you for uploading 956:Special:OldReviewedPages 915:23:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 871:Template:POTD/2010-06-27 819:Template:POTD/2010-06-16 786:17:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC) 755:17:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC) 735:Template:POTD/2010-05-31 703:17:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC) 680:21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC) 662:21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC) 608:21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC) 554:21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC) 476:Template:POTD/2010-05-06 346:File:Mosquito 2007-2.jpg 1643:09:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 768:. Sorry for the delay! 496:23:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC) 2388:File:Sunset 2007-1.jpg 2372: 2157:File:Pythagoras-2a.gif 2101:File:Pythagoras-2a.gif 2093: 2009: 1774: 1719: 1561: 1434: 1401:Hi, I've emailed you. 1179: 1099: 928: 855: 803: 719: 623: 569: 515: 460: 330: 245: 148:Photography Techniques 55:File:Pythagoras-2a.gif 39: 2371: 2211:Re: Nuclear free zone 2089: 2008: 1773: 1715: 1560: 1433: 1178: 1098: 927: 851: 799: 715: 622: 568: 514: 456: 407:. I hope this is OK. 329: 244: 146:If you look at other 38: 18:User talk:Alvesgaspar 1975:nuclear power plants 1447:Your nomination for 403:to be replaced with 2443:Papa Lima Whiskey 2 2424:Papa Lima Whiskey 2 2391:, was nominated on 2134:A barnstar for you! 2028:, was nominated on 1939:Nuclear in Portugal 1793:, was nominated on 1635:Ruben JC (Zeorymer) 1580:, was nominated on 963:Knowledge:Reviewing 642:, was nominated on 588:, was nominated on 534:, was nominated on 349:, was nominated on 264:, was nominated on 58:, was nominated on 2373: 2258:Unnecessary detail 2105:Picture of the Day 2094: 2010: 1775: 1731:Picture of the Day 1720: 1562: 1435: 1212:. If the image is 1198:in your upload log 1180: 1132:. If the image is 1118:in your upload log 1100: 929: 867:Picture of the Day 856: 815:Picture of the Day 804: 731:Picture of the Day 720: 624: 570: 516: 472:Picture of the Day 461: 331: 246: 40: 2414: 2413: 2233: 2174: 2173: 2126: 2082:POTD notification 2074: 2051: 2050: 1971:nuclear free zone 1907: 1872: 1836: 1816: 1815: 1752: 1708:POTD notification 1603: 1602: 1476: 1475: 1444:has been promoted 1070: 1069: 1016: 906:Papa Lima Whiskey 888: 844:POTD notification 836: 792:POTD notification 783: 752: 708:POTD notification 694:Papa Lima Whiskey 667: 666: 613: 612: 559: 558: 493: 449:POTD notification 435:Papa Lima Whiskey 391:Delist nomination 372: 371: 287: 286: 209: 195:comment added by 150:articles (such as 120: 106:comment added by 84: 83: 2458: 2380:featured picture 2364: 2229: 2145: 2138: 2137: 2127: 2120: 2117: 2070: 2054:ANI notification 2017:featured picture 2001: 1901: 1866: 1830: 1782:featured picture 1766: 1753: 1746: 1743: 1569:featured picture 1553: 1540: 1537: 1532: 1527: 1449:featured picture 1426: 1412: 1407: 1204:per Knowledge's 1124:per Knowledge's 1084: 1082: 1077: 1054: 1047: 1017: 1010: 1007: 980: 934: 907: 889: 882: 879: 837: 830: 827: 784: 777: 774: 753: 746: 743: 695: 676: 673: 658: 655: 631:featured picture 615: 604: 601: 577:featured picture 561: 550: 547: 523:featured picture 507: 494: 487: 484: 436: 409:Mahahahaneapneap 405:this SVG version 322: 237: 208: 189: 119: 100: 74: 71: 47:featured picture 31: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2437:Courtesy link: 2419: 2384: 2362: 2294: 2260: 2234: 2214: 2198: 2136: 2115: 2112: 2084: 2075: 2056: 2021: 1999: 1941: 1821: 1786: 1764: 1741: 1738: 1710: 1652: 1630: 1610: 1573: 1551: 1535: 1530: 1525: 1521: 1518: 1515:Valued pictures 1481: 1446: 1424: 1410: 1403: 1399: 1309: 1253: 1226:speedy deletion 1173: 1146:speedy deletion 1093: 1080: 1075: 1073: 1045: 1005: 1002: 999:Talk:Porto Covo 992: 978: 941:two-month trial 932: 922: 905: 900: 877: 874: 846: 825: 822: 794: 772: 769: 741: 738: 710: 693: 687: 674: 671: 656: 653: 635: 602: 599: 581: 548: 545: 527: 505: 482: 479: 451: 434: 426: 393: 342: 320: 318:Congratulations 292: 257: 235: 190: 101: 89: 72: 69: 51: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2464: 2454: 2453: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2376: 2374: 2361: 2356: 2340: 2339: 2334: 2333: 2293: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2228: 2213: 2208: 2197: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2172: 2171: 2152: 2151: 2146: 2135: 2132: 2083: 2080: 2069: 2060:User: Mr. Joca 2055: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2013: 2011: 1998: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1969:Portugal is a 1940: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1778: 1776: 1763: 1758: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1651: 1646: 1629: 1626: 1609: 1604: 1601: 1600: 1565: 1563: 1550: 1545: 1517: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1480: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1438: 1436: 1423: 1418: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1361: 1312: 1308: 1307:Sunrise/Sunset 1305: 1252: 1249: 1172: 1169: 1092: 1089: 1068: 1067: 1064:the discussion 1059:Valued Picture 1055: 1044: 1041: 1026: 1025: 991: 986: 921: 918: 899: 894: 845: 842: 793: 790: 789: 788: 709: 706: 686: 683: 665: 664: 627: 625: 611: 610: 573: 571: 557: 556: 519: 517: 504: 499: 450: 447: 425: 420: 399:for delisting 392: 389: 388: 387: 377:Bradjamesbrown 370: 369: 359:Bradjamesbrown 338:valued picture 334: 332: 319: 316: 291: 288: 285: 284: 253:valued picture 249: 247: 234: 233:Valued Picture 231: 230: 229: 213: 212: 211: 210: 186: 181: 158: 151: 141: 140: 88: 85: 82: 81: 43: 41: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2463: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2401:Makeemlighter 2398: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2383: 2381: 2375: 2370: 2366: 2365: 2360: 2355: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2298: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2268:Donald Albury 2265: 2264:Vasco da Gama 2253: 2249: 2245: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2232: 2227: 2224: 2219: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2195: 2194:Vasco da Gama 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2175: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2139: 2131: 2130: 2124: 2119: 2118: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2088: 2079: 2078: 2073: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2038:Makeemlighter 2035: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2020: 2018: 2012: 2007: 2003: 2002: 1997: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1976: 1972: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1948:affair, near 1947: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1908: 1905: 1899: 1898: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1873: 1870: 1864: 1863: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1837: 1834: 1828: 1827: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1803:Makeemlighter 1800: 1796: 1792: 1791: 1785: 1783: 1777: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1756: 1750: 1745: 1744: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1723: 1718: 1714: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1650: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1608: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590:Makeemlighter 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1572: 1570: 1564: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1549: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1516: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485:71.200.70.155 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463:Makeemlighter 1460: 1456: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1443: 1437: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1422: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1408: 1406: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1304: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1289: 1287: 1281: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1256: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1236:. Thank you. 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1177: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1156:. Thank you. 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1097: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1078: 1065: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1040: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1014: 1009: 1008: 1000: 995: 990: 985: 984: 981: 974: 972: 968: 964: 959: 957: 953: 949: 948:autoconfirmed 944: 942: 938: 926: 917: 916: 912: 908: 898: 893: 892: 886: 881: 880: 872: 868: 864: 859: 854: 850: 841: 840: 834: 829: 828: 820: 816: 812: 807: 802: 798: 787: 781: 776: 775: 767: 763: 759: 758: 757: 756: 750: 745: 744: 736: 732: 728: 723: 718: 714: 705: 704: 700: 696: 690: 682: 681: 678: 677: 663: 660: 659: 649: 645: 641: 640: 634: 632: 626: 621: 617: 616: 609: 606: 605: 595: 591: 587: 586: 580: 578: 572: 567: 563: 562: 555: 552: 551: 541: 537: 533: 532: 526: 524: 518: 513: 509: 508: 503: 498: 497: 491: 486: 485: 477: 473: 469: 464: 459: 455: 446: 445: 441: 437: 431: 430:this question 424: 419: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 347: 341: 339: 333: 328: 324: 323: 315: 314: 311: 307: 306:Contributions 303: 302:☎ Contact me! 299: 298: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262: 256: 254: 248: 243: 239: 238: 228: 224: 220: 215: 214: 206: 202: 198: 194: 187: 185: 182: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 152: 149: 145: 144: 143: 142: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 122: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 98: 96: 80: 76: 75: 65: 61: 57: 56: 50: 48: 42: 37: 33: 32: 19: 2420: 2386: 2385:Your image, 2377: 2341: 2299: 2295: 2261: 2215: 2200:I agree. -- 2199: 2148: 2113: 2098: 2096:Hi Joaquim, 2095: 2057: 2023: 2022:Your image, 2014: 1968: 1942: 1903: 1896: 1868: 1861: 1832: 1825: 1822: 1788: 1787:Your image, 1779: 1739: 1724: 1722:Hi Joaquim, 1721: 1653: 1631: 1611: 1575: 1574:Your image, 1566: 1522: 1519: 1482: 1452: 1439: 1404: 1400: 1310: 1290: 1282: 1279: 1257: 1254: 1221: 1201: 1195: 1183: 1181: 1141: 1121: 1115: 1103: 1101: 1071: 1027: 1024:Hi Howcheng, 1003: 996: 994:Hi Joaquim, 993: 975: 960: 945: 930: 901: 875: 860: 858:Hi Joaquim, 857: 823: 808: 806:Hi Joaquim, 805: 770: 739: 724: 722:Hi Joaquim, 721: 688: 670: 668: 652: 637: 636:Your image, 628: 598: 583: 582:Your image, 574: 544: 529: 528:Your image, 520: 480: 465: 463:Hi Joaquim, 462: 427: 394: 344: 343:Your image, 335: 309: 296: 293: 259: 258:Your image, 250: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 153: 147: 125: 95:sub-standard 94: 92: 90: 68: 53: 52:Your image, 44: 2323:Alvesgaspar 2278:Alvesgaspar 2244:Alvesgaspar 2179:Alvesgaspar 2161:The Cavalry 1981:Alvesgaspar 1917:Alvesgaspar 1882:Alvesgaspar 1846:Alvesgaspar 1677:Alvesgaspar 1500:Alvesgaspar 1383:Alvesgaspar 1303:Wanbli-g53 1268:92.8.153.90 1214:copyrighted 1134:copyrighted 1030:Alvesgaspar 219:Alvesgaspar 197:Etan J. Tal 191:—Preceding 174:contre-jour 170:contre-jour 166:contre-jour 130:Alvesgaspar 126:contre-jour 108:Etan J. Tal 102:—Preceding 87:Contre-jour 2345:Pocketthis 2303:Pocketthis 2276:OK, fine. 2165:Message me 1362:about the 1326:Falcon8765 1293:Wanbli-g53 1238:Sfan00 IMG 1228:criterion 1158:Sfan00 IMG 1148:criterion 989:Porto Covo 1692:J Milburn 1661:J Milburn 1615:Walrasiad 1479:Lifeguard 1368:GianniG46 1190:copyright 1110:copyright 691:Regards, 2116:howcheng 1954:Mr. Joca 1897:Muhammad 1862:Muhammad 1826:Muhammad 1742:howcheng 1628:Portugal 1451:status, 1358:contribs 1346:contribs 1338:Spiel496 1334:contribs 1322:contribs 1218:non-free 1138:non-free 1006:howcheng 979:Tiptoety 933:reviewer 920:Reviewer 878:howcheng 826:howcheng 773:howcheng 742:howcheng 483:howcheng 205:contribs 193:unsigned 116:contribs 104:unsigned 97:pictures 2202:Raghith 1950:Peniche 2382:status 2338:noise. 2319:Sunset 2292:Sunset 2019:status 1946:Ferrel 1784:status 1571:status 1411:(talk) 1364:thread 1350:Kbrose 1314:Grafen 766:June 1 633:status 579:status 525:status 340:status 274:Elekhh 255:status 178:Better 162:Better 49:status 2226:Isaac 2067:Isaac 1819:Hippo 1657:bitey 1531:COMMS 1526:ƒETCH 1440:Your 1366:? -- 1076:raeky 16:< 2447:talk 2428:talk 2405:talk 2349:talk 2327:talk 2307:talk 2282:talk 2248:talk 2183:talk 2123:chat 2091:POTD 2042:talk 1985:talk 1958:talk 1921:talk 1904:talk 1886:talk 1869:talk 1850:talk 1833:talk 1807:talk 1749:chat 1717:POTD 1696:talk 1681:talk 1665:talk 1639:talk 1619:talk 1594:talk 1504:talk 1489:talk 1467:talk 1405:Tony 1397:Ping 1387:talk 1372:talk 1354:talk 1342:talk 1330:talk 1318:talk 1297:talk 1272:talk 1255:Hi, 1242:talk 1224:per 1216:and 1162:talk 1144:per 1136:and 1034:talk 1013:chat 971:here 967:here 911:talk 885:chat 853:POTD 833:chat 801:POTD 780:chat 749:chat 717:POTD 699:talk 675:din\ 657:din\ 603:din\ 549:din\ 490:chat 458:POTD 440:talk 413:talk 401:here 381:talk 363:talk 308:) 297:Tyw7 278:talk 223:talk 201:talk 134:talk 112:talk 2223:Van 2111:. 2064:Van 1737:. 1348:), 1336:), 1324:), 1043:VPC 873:. 821:. 764:on 737:. 672:Mae 654:Mae 600:Mae 546:Mae 73:din 70:Mae 2449:) 2441:. 2430:) 2407:) 2351:) 2329:) 2309:) 2284:) 2250:) 2231:WS 2185:) 2167:) 2072:WS 2044:) 1987:) 1960:) 1923:) 1888:) 1859:-- 1852:) 1809:) 1698:) 1683:) 1667:) 1659:. 1641:) 1621:) 1596:) 1506:) 1491:) 1469:) 1461:. 1389:) 1374:) 1360:), 1299:) 1274:) 1244:) 1230:F7 1220:, 1210:F4 1208:, 1200:. 1164:) 1150:F7 1140:, 1130:F4 1128:, 1120:. 1072:— 1036:) 973:. 958:. 913:) 701:) 442:) 415:) 383:) 365:) 304:• 280:) 225:) 207:) 203:• 136:) 118:) 114:• 77:\ 2445:( 2426:( 2403:( 2347:( 2325:( 2305:( 2280:( 2246:( 2181:( 2163:( 2125:} 2121:{ 2040:( 1983:( 1956:( 1919:( 1906:) 1902:( 1884:( 1871:) 1867:( 1848:( 1835:) 1831:( 1805:( 1751:} 1747:{ 1694:( 1679:( 1663:( 1637:( 1617:( 1592:( 1536:/ 1523:/ 1502:( 1487:( 1465:( 1385:( 1370:( 1356:| 1352:( 1344:| 1340:( 1332:| 1328:( 1320:| 1316:( 1295:( 1270:( 1240:( 1160:( 1081:T 1066:. 1032:( 1015:} 1011:{ 909:( 887:} 883:{ 835:} 831:{ 782:} 778:{ 751:} 747:{ 697:( 492:} 488:{ 438:( 411:( 379:( 361:( 300:( 276:( 221:( 199:( 157:) 132:( 110:( 91:"

Index

User talk:Alvesgaspar

featured picture
File:Pythagoras-2a.gif
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
Maedin
18:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
Etan J. Tal
talk
contribs
Alvesgaspar
talk
17:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/File:BeitShearimSarcophagus2.jpg
unsigned
Etan J. Tal
talk
contribs
Alvesgaspar
talk
19:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

valued picture
File:Wasp August 2007-23.jpg
Knowledge:Valued picture candidates
Knowledge:Valued picture candidates
Elekhh
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.