402:
the birds we ever stored there." Next I asked the USAF Colonel, Retired, who was an RSO in the bird at Beale, but became the
Program Money Manager after his stint as a crew member. His answer: "I am not aware of any SR assets ever being at Mohave. I didn't get into program til 74 but as the SR-71 PEM at the Pentagon from 80-84 and the Det 6 CC from 84-90 I pretty became aware of all the history before that. I also can't think of any reason why they should have been since we had plenty of storage at Palmdale and Norton. If they were it would have had to have been before the logistics were moved to Norton but the two previous locations were in the Chico area between San Bernardino and LA. Me thinks the "Mojave storage" was probably a cover for a lot of assets we kept at " the Ranch". But if you find out anything different I would be interested." So, there you are: a mystery! Can you email a JPEG of the storage you told me about? If you can, I'll try and find out some more data.
277:), Southern Air Transport, and several other charter companies. Marchetti and Marks state in "The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence" (1974), that by the early 1970s, the powers-that-be at Langley decided that Southern Air Transport's usefulness had passed. There was a real risk that the operation might turn a profit, and, by law, the excess would have to be returned to the treasury, and agency officials wanted no paper connection tieing them to SAT operations. The CIA tried to quietly dispose of Southern Air Transport in 1973, but had trouble finding a buyer, especially when three legitimate airlines raised protest that SAT was a subsidized operation competing with them for government contracts. The book describes it as "something of a fiasco for the agency". It was sold at a fire sale price to a former employee who was based in Miami, but the airline remained based in Nepal. A short while later, he liquidated much of the assets for a handsome profit.
88:
floats in Lake
Washington and has taken us up the Inside Passage to SE Alaska and back during 5 different boating seasons. If I lived where you do all the moss would dry out between my toes from your sunshine and heat. I'll try and do some digging, re your Mojave storage question. I'm familiar with the A-12 and SR storage that was done in the Palmdale area for many years, but not at the Mojave airport. If I find any answers I'll pass them on to you. Also, if you, or Bill CJ ( who I see visits in here ) ever want to contact me directly with a Blackbird question, my email is
2204:? As you were the one recommending I put the two models together (I think it was you!), you'd be the only one objecting to taking the 201 back out, so I don't think a poll is necessary here. If you still plan on adding to the 201 info, then I can hold off for while. I'm not as big now on doubling-up articles on the same page as I once was, and I really don't see much growth potential for the 201 material. Anyway, as I always tell Chris when making thse requests, do what you think is best. Thanks. -
154:
255 px because it then comforms to the width of the infobox. If the infobox is hardsized at a width, why can't the pictures match that width? Moreover, I see that highly ranked articles like the B-17 and F-105 articles contain hardsized pictures. Several of the F-105 pictures are hardsized at 300 px, which is considerably larger than anything I use. I frankly don't understand these selective enforecement policies, nor do I understand the concern with 255 px hardsizes.
31:
527:
165:
are inappropriate because they leave insufficient room for text. "ecause not everyone around the world (or in the US for that matter), have nice big hi-res monitors. I sometimes edit/read on a 800px wide monitor, and having large, fixed thumbs is a serious annoyance." I argue that I do nothing that an infobox doesnt also do. Most infoboxes contain a hardsized image at the width of 255 px. Seems to me that must therefore be acceptable per the MOS.
1265:, where Signaleer clearly changed other people's comments to fit his agenda. He changed peoples comments in the second section, where the majority supported his position, but not the earlier section, where the majority supported my position. I did not change anyone's words at all, but just combined two sections about the same topic so that other readers could read it all together. Why did you revert my change, but not his? --
197:
much sense to me. In the legal world, you would be correct, rules are rules. And in wikipedia, there are some hard and fast ones. Don't spam, don't vandalize. Here, I see you and another guy ordering me to follow a rule that seems advisory at best and illogical at worst. And I don't frankly feel compelled to obey you or the other guy. It's kind of a petty issue, but that's where I'm at.
1938:
1094:. I'm not even sure what incident this was supposed to be. Looks like it was deleted b/c it had a prod no one responded to. I guess we need to find these orphaned accident articles, and try to save what needs to be saved. It's also got me curious as to what incident this is, so if you know right off, could you fill me in just a little? Thanks. -
2341:
Congrats from me too. Hopefuly you won't be spending so much time admining that you can't find time for aviation stuff (although something tells me that's kinda unlikely, based on what I've thus far seen of you... ;-). I don't really have much of an excuse for the lateness, though. Just wasn't around
1740:
The AfD of the Regno d'Italia... article presents an interesting twist on GFDL matters, I posted a further comment there, but given the likely "slam dunk" outcome of that Afd, the issue which will recur will not receive the thoughtful consideration it is due: A quick recap of my comment is below, but
1668:
Thanks for your kind words, dear
Akradecki! :) And don't mention my comment at yoour RfA, which will surely be successful - a good candidate deserves nothing but good comments! ;) I'll beglad to take care of your request for a suerpage design; be aware, tho that it may take me up to a week to fulfill
1426:
We are not an aircraft directory. Survivors should be limited to notable models. Other than that, this project is not here to contain the indiscriminate collection of surviving aircraft, there are other databases that can be obtained from. I saw one the other day and almost nommed it for deletion.
817:
On another note, I just wanted to let you know that I really appreciate you coming back. Your wikibreak, despite causing my heart to skip a beat when I saw it, did result in at least one positive thing for me: the prospect of the
Project losing you motivated me to get off my duff and resume pre-admin
690:
Alan, is there a Boeing military aircraft (incl. helicopters) template? I know we have the airliners, 707/-135, and B-29, but I haven't found one for the other miltary types. If there's not one, I going to try to put one together, while tying not to duplicate the other templates. I'll be quite a job,
401:
Hi Alan, and after running my trap lines we have a mystery. First, I asked the last
Lockheed SR-71 site manager at Beale AFB ( now retired ) and he answered : "All the J-58 engines were stored there for some time when NASA was flying and we were trying to restore the program but I don't think any of
196:
I'm not often accused of being a team player, but I don't recall holding myself out as one. I make a concerted effort to improve a few articles that I'm interested in, but I'm not all that concerned with teamwork, especially in the form of people telling me to follows their rules when they don't make
1165:
Hi, I thought I'd direct this at you seeing as you've been reading the NTSB stuff and are therefore more familiar with it than me (I've never looked at their material on this crash): Do the NTSB documents include, by any chance, an animation of the plane's rapid descent? Or at least a standalone CGI
910:
I'm not sure I understand why you created this article when we already have one on P-factor. Both articles say that these are just two names for the same effect. When such is the case, we prefer a single article, with the alternate name redirecting to the primary article name. I've posted merge tags
840:
I am unsure of what causee them to default either way. To the best of my knowlexge, from what I have seen, it depend son the number of them on the page. If there is 1 only, i am pretty sure it defaults open. If there are multiple they default closed. I am sure you can expirement, poke around and
164:
Well, you're entitled to your opinion that I am a presumptous person who likes to force my view on others. In my opinion, it seems a bit presumptous of you give a detailed explanation which you apparently abandon because you simply believe I should do as you tell me to do. You tell me that hardsizes
811:
Hi Chris...thanks for pining back. I have a nav box question, since you use them on your user page. In some articles, the nav boxes at the footer automatically come up in hide mode, while in other articles, they come up in show mode. Your user page has them come up in hide mode as well. I've looked
507:
article up today. The mass edits seemed to have died down quite a bit since yesterday. The same thing happened with the NASA page this week with the JSC shooting (and I'm sure with VT also, though I didn't watch the VT pages directly). Anyway, good job, and thanks for helping out last night. When I
294:
Thanks for the info! Some of that, since it can be sourced, might be good to add to the SAT article, since it's rather bare. Two C-130s using Tepper call signs have recently been to Mojave, visiting ASB Avionics, who have been converting the aircraft to glass cockpit configurations. N2189M was here
153:
I always edit/read on a 800px wide monitor. I agree that large, fixed thumbs are a serious annoyance, and I routinely reduces pictures that are sized at 500px, 400px, and sometimes even 350px. I fail to see, however, why pictures hardsized at 255 px are a serious annoyance. In fact, I put them at
421:
I was a teen-age air force brat at Norton AFB, San
Bernardino, California, living in adjacent Redlands, from 1968-1972. I kept flightline serial notes and inhabited every hangar I could get into. My father was with SAMSO, at that time managing the Minuteman II program, and would tell the security
1448:
Sorry if I mucked you around a bit with that rewrite. I was living in hope that a
Georgian-speaking editor - and there are one or two - might have been able to translate what was there before it got AfD'd. Chances are there's a fair bit of useful information which I just couldn't get at, but it's
1416:
Thanks much for the help. Yeah, the RfA seems to be going quite well...I'm a bit surprised that there haven't been any additional questions. I'm a little humbled by some of the comments, too! Anyway, I saw your B-24 merge tag and commented. What do you make of all the survivors pages? We're not a
178:
Actually, I really don't mind your name calling. In my experience, when people can't come up with a coherent argument, they almost always denounce others with name-calling, in hopes that they can brow-beat others into submission, and because they're offended that someone has questioned them. I'm
87:
Alan, Thanks for your note on my talk page. No, I don't live in the AV area and haven't been "down there" in years. We moved to the
Seattle area when I joined Boeing and the anchor is really down here for us. I retired from the Big B in '93 and have been busy, busy, busy with my "other wife", who
1775:
That's a really good question. First, looking at it from a true copyright point of view, translations get their own copyrights, so wouldn't the same apply to GFDL? Since the translation is the work of the person translating, I can see where it could be considered a new work and the history would
921:
I edited the P-factor page to include the alternative name(s). I'm not certain which term is used where, but I've always known the effect as asymmetric blade effect. In any event since the effect was covered (as I subsequently realised) in P-factor it seems worthwhile simply deleting the page on
762:
Per your comments on my talk page, I would be delighted to see Flight 990 at GA and would love to help out with that project; the controversy sorounding the disaster has allways interested me. As for air crash notability guidlines, we badly need them, and they shouldn't be too hard to draw up,
425:
From my familiarity with Norton, with having seen a published photo of jigsaw puzzle of SR-71s and A-12s shoe-horned into a hangar at Plant 42, Palmdale, where
Lockheed once built the L-1011, and the awareness that Norton, an airlift base hosting the 63rd Military Airlift Wing, the Inspector
272:
Major CIA proprietary aviation concerns have included Civil Air
Transport ,(CAT), its offshoot - Air America, Air Asia, Intermountain Air (which handled the illegal export of B-26s to Portugal in 1965, in violation of U.S. sanctions - they also operated the B-17G fitted with the Robert Fulton
2018:
Many thanks, Nawlin - you've actually been a lot of help. A while back, you gave me some pointers in CSD issues, and I've watched some of your activities and learned a lot from them. Much appreciated! And, if you notice me straying, don't hesitate to knock me upside the head a time or two!
938:
Hmm... A tough question. I guess we should use local times, since that's more meaningful to the context of the article - If you say 1:00 AM local time, people immediatly know it was pitch black when (fill the blank) happened. We should probably convert to UTC in brackets, though i.e. X
91:. The Blackbird Reunion will be in Reno this year on 21-24 June and during 14-16 September our Seattle Museum of Flight will conduct a Blackbird Forum. Perhaps you'll attend some of these events ( 30 Habus will be here for the seattle Forum ) and we could swap lies, er I mean stories!
264:
Tepper has had three Hercules registered - c.n. 4129, N9205T, which crashed in Angola 27 November 1989, c.n. 4582, N2189M - Lars Olausson's most recent note for it has it spotted in Basra, April 2005, and c.n. 4796, N8183J - Olausson lists comment, "op for US govt," November 2004.
777:
Well, that's sorted, then - I'll just keep going on the new "Search and Rescue" section, and will likely expand on the reactions and media speculation bits, too (which will include what can be tracked down on the Egyptian gov.s reaction). Some time, I might see what I can do with
1760:, which has a history going back to July 13, 2005; this history has not been imported to the English-language article, yet presumably the GFDL would require some credit be given to the French-language authors whose work was translated to create the English-language article.
1417:
directory, and I'm thinking of seeing if the Project would be willing to entertain having some kind of soft limit...documenting survivors when, say, less than 10 have acutally survived. When dozens survive, the notability of the survivors seems to be somewhat diminished.
268:
I do not have a source handy to confirm the Tepper - CIA link, but I will point out that the CIA is known to have operated out of Duke Field where the 711th Special Operations Squadron flies gunships, no more than eight miles south of the Bob Sikes Airport in Crestview.
1711:. I'm not sure want the end result is supposed to be at this point, but if it's what I think it is, it's probably a good candidate for an separate page, assuming it's notable enough. I would appreciate a second opinion, assuming it's done when you get this :) . -
1747:
The whole GFDL issue is murky when it comes to intra-WP transfers. We have these "requests for translation", when someone actually does that, how is the GFDL complied with based on the (non-English language) original contents? For example, just perusing through
812:
but can't find the switch that defaults to hide or show mode. How do you get them to default to hide, like you your page? I plan on using them in a way similar to how you've done it, as I think it results in a much cleaner-looking user page.
76:
Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave comments, critiques, etc., below. Unless you specifically request that I answer on your talk page, I'll be answering here, as I prefer to keep as much of the conversation in one place as possible.
691:
and I could use any help guidance on it. We might convert the airliner template to include other civil aircraft like the BV107 and BV234. I don't know of any other non-airliner civl aircraft by Boeing, but there may be a few. THanks. -
1836:
It is my pleasure to inform you that you are now an admin. Congratulations. You can feel free to do everything you're supposed to do and nothing you're not supposed to do. If you haven't already, now is the time look through the
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
2151:
Thanks for correcting my mistake on that article. When you do a lot of new page patrolling a row sometimes you put a tag on article that deserves to say. It's kind of a "short article+band member=speedy deletion" reflex. :)
872:
Thanks for doing that! Hmm, that's odd. I'd changed the email and confirmed it a few days ago. Don't know why it wasn't working. I've changed it back to the old address and reconfirmed. Would you mind trying again? Thanks!
2324:
Hey, you were doing more important stuff! Hope you had fun with the kids! FWIW, as I get used to the system, I'll probably be coming to you for 2nd opinions, as well as for help in matters where I have to recuse myself.
2199:
page, and I don't thnik having the 201 there is the best thing. I'd like to try to steamline it to just cover the 207, and work on adding more info on it. Here's your first request: Could you move the page to
1603:
Ha! AfDave! I love it! Actually, it might not be a bad idea to provide some aviation personality notability criteria somewhere, since it's not a field covered by the existing biographical notability criteria.
1229:? I'd like a second opinion on my interpretation of something regarding Turkey's new T129 version. The situation should be expleained well enough there, but if you need more clarification, just ask. Thanks. -
374:
I really don't have much expertise in this area, but it seems that if a 202 was modded to a 205, then that should be listed in the Variants section as well, and it would be legit to put Egypt as a user.
2402:
I just took a look, you've done a great job improving the article...tags have been removed. I hope your overall experience on Knowledge has been a good one, and that you'll stick around and write more!
2227:
Done! The lead probably should be changed, as it sounds like it's about a Bell 47. As for experimenting, I'm sure that it won't be that long until someone comes along who really needs it, either!
922:
asymmetric blade effect and creating a redirect, while leaving the commont on the p-factor page about the several terms. Furthermore, I try to avoid cliques - I do hope you understand. Cheers. (
236:
Yeah, my fat fingers failed to type properly for the edit summary. I'll go correct that and add the appropriate links. It also needs a lot of cleanup, which I'll be doing as the day progresses.
1193:
Sorry, couldn't find any animations. I did find one diagram which I've uploaded that shows the flight profile, though. I also just found the Egyptian final report...another 223 pages to read!
1552:
a few years back, and it was a remarkable story. I'm planning on ordering the book soon, and was just looking for information on him, and saw we didn't have an article. What do you think? -
1184:
There's a ton of report attachments, I haven't come across an animation yet, but I'll go look specificially. I have found some images of recovered wreckage, including one of the images.
1028:
but it is a poor photograph that I had posted earlier. It is out-of-focus and washed-out and best replaced, as I had already indicated to the editor who had listed it for deletion.
652:
page? You have a better grasp of the naming conventions for crash articles, so I'd like your advice on what the appropriate name would be. Feel free to rename it yourself. Thanks. -
1244:
1513:
is specifically for pages in a foreign language that currently exist on the English wikipedia. What was being asked for is a translation of the page as it currently exists on the
1463:
No problem! I'd suggest that the untranslated portion be put on the article's talk page, with a note that some translation is still needed. You never know who might stop by...
586:
464:
Actually I have a question. I have a lot of pictures that I took & of course they're mine. What shell I do to put them in the pages? Is there any special procedure? Thanks
128:
articles. Please look at comments in history of these articles, seems a bit offensive. Maybe you will be able to explain him why his editions are senseless? Thanks in advance,
771:
2392:
I made several changes to the page, please check them out to see if they will satisfy the removal of the tags... If you would recomend any other changes please let me know.
1669:
your request, as I currently have my hands somewhat full. A few pointers would make my task easier, like preferences regarding color, or layout. Anything in mind? Love,
722:
were going to start some pre-admin coaching with me...after an extended delay, I'm interested in getting back into it. I've already started discussing this with Lar at
589:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
790:
757:
1749:
616:
isn't defined only by having a Wikiarticle; there are plenty of redlinks that will be filled in one day (hopefully soon). I look forward to editing with you again! —
1580:
guidelines too. This'll be first attempt at a biography, so it may take me a while. THanks for the suport. I just wanted to be just it would survive an AfDave ;) -
1544:
Alan, do you think Corwin "Corky" Meyer is notable enoguh to have an article?As a Grumman test pilot, he flew everything from the F4F to the F11F-1F, and his book,
2129:
Hey Alan, belated congratulations! I somehow missed out on your RFA, but if I'd noticed, I surely would have supported! Good luck with the new tools :) Take care,
1792:
Each of our edits is arguably a derivative work of each prior edit (or the collective of all prior edits), so this applies in more than the translation scenario.
845:
and click on technical, they could prob help ya! Sorry I cant be of more help, good luck with admin coaching, if you ever need anything feel free to ask! Thanks.
2350:
1210:
1188:
965:
1805:
911:
on both articles...please feel free to respond either there or here if there's a compelling reason to have two articles rather than one combined one. Thanks.
388:
379:
142:
2381:
201:
183:
169:
1821:
1796:
1787:
1118:
1098:
1500:
1002:
299:
597:
2184:
1576:
OK, good. I'll check around the web and see if I can find a biograph to start things off with. I think he is still alive, so I'll have to read up on the
582:
492:
2030:
637:
2336:
2290:
2013:
1982:
1431:
1421:
1411:
1197:
1178:
1086:
926:
849:
835:
253:
1994:
1966:
1533:
1104:
I'm guessing it was either vandalism or a hoax...AFAIK, there's not been any 747 crashes, much less a UA one, and even much less one in LA this year!
554:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
226:? In that case, you must give attribution to the original authors, for example, with a link to the history of the original wiki it was copied from. --
2395:
2371:
1879:
895:
886:
877:
749:
740:
623:
240:
2275:
2238:
2121:
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Knowledge, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL.
1910:
1863:
1655:
1608:
1570:
1480:
1467:
1398:
1305:
1296:
1287:
1247:? Jeff has a question regarding the power rating for a civil S-61R, and I thought you might have some ideas. Thanks again, again, again, aga. . . -
1132:
page for me? the edits there have been very "interesting" of late, with possible COI from an Erickson employee. I have moved the incedents items to
1108:
1080:
670:
1518:
1510:
1154:
132:
1894:
1043:
2218:
1729:
1694:
1646:
1497:
1374:
1931:
680:
656:
576:
818:
coaching. I'd started it back in December, before Mercy 2 crashed and complicated my life, and I just never got around to picking it back up.
1769:
955:
434:
915:
1971:
Yeah, but it looks, based on the picture on the right, that I also have a new name! Is that one of those secret admin initiation rituals??
438:
1292:
Thanks. I will let you put it where you think it belongs. Do you agree that it makes more sense for the two sections to be combined? --
179:
familiar with your ilk, and I don't hold it against you. That said, I'm pretty sure we're at the end of any constructive discourse here.
158:
2414:
408:
368:
315:
288:
95:
1070:
708:
695:
1715:
1384:
for admin advice and helps. but felt you need to ba aware of his actions to, as you have worked on many of these articles. Thanks. -
730:
1955:
1853:
1324:
is engaging in vindictive actions towards me for taking a hard line regarding notability and sourcing on an article he has created,
1140:
1092:
629:
In a general sense, I fully agree with you, but typically for lists of names on Knowledge, inclusion is a result of have notability
454:
1354:
344:
1233:
230:
2140:
1842:
1838:
1503:
602:
328:
1632:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1032:
1846:
1349:
1251:
676:
Looks good, thanks! You might want to place links to the project pages you mentioned on the crash's talk page, just in case. -
2304:
2258:
2208:
1457:
984:
2358:
2318:
1618:
1597:
1584:
1556:
1279:
diff is what I was looking at when I reverted, and my intent was to revert Signaleer's changes. This was a discussion, not a
643:
512:
504:
482:
468:
2167:
1012:
1663:
1344:
1339:
1269:
36:
89:
1948:
Congratulation's! You've earned the trust of the Knowledge community, good work; and, for the future, good luck. Cheers,
1388:
805:
340:
295:
in April 2006, and N3867X was here in November, 2006. I've got pics of both, and will be adding a couple to the article.
866:
1160:
723:
891:
Oops...my bad...for got to check the "Enable e-mail from other users" box on user preferences. One more time? Thanks!
1301:
I really don't have any problem with combining the sections, it was the adding of "support" and "oppose" statements.
701:
549:
1262:
571:
1642:? If you could reply to me privately with any thoughts or comments you may have, I'd appreciate it much. Thanks. -
940:
1146:
Good day sir, I had an interesting e-mail from Erickson on my home account when I got home today. I posted it on
1008:
is a "tragedy". Unfortunately, the whole article is unsourced, including some material he added today. Thanks. -
905:
663:
103:
305:
I have just detailed the best data and i.d.s I can give for the list of Tepper aircraft, listed in the article.
980:, Svetovid will probably be in there to give the Slovak inventor credit for everything in the whole article. --
826:
have agreed to do the coaching, but if you ever want to throw suggestions/advice in, it would be most welcome.
2364:
1276:
1049:
685:
1548:, is referenced in several aircraft articles. I read a piece by him on his experiences testing the F6F in
610:
Good job on watching the Palmdale article. And while I agree that whomever is adding people shouldn't be,
2387:
1735:
1699:
947:). That way we have what I feel is more descriptive first, with the other supplied to keep people happy.
2077:. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a
1831:
1329:
1202:
Ah well... A good image with an overview of the majority of the recovered stuff should suffice, though.
1136:, and will remove (again) the rest soon. I just want to make sure my iron's not getting dull! Thanks! -
2254:- they seem to be ganging up against disruptive users all the time, and need to be watched carfully. -
1517:
wikipedia. This is not the place to ask for such a translation. If you'll read the second paragraph of
1123:
944:
555:
1708:
478:
Didn't mean to re-insert the bolding, I was reverting other changes and put that back in by accident.
1928:
1722:
1226:
418:'Scuse me for jumping into your discussion, but I have a few thoughts about the SR-71 storage issue.
148:
1776:
start there. I'll have to look into the "derivative work" concept, and see what is said about that.
1756:, which has an en:WP history that goes back to April 18, 2007. However, it was translated from the
1325:
1261:
If you are going to revert my so called "refactor other people's comments", you should also revert
1220:
1017:
933:
713:
649:
745:
Thanks! Saw your comment over on the other page, will be quite interested in your guidance there.
385:
365:
129:
2091:
Remember when you make these errors, someone will be more than happy to point them out to you in
336:
211:
2343:
1623:
1203:
1171:
1170:
photograph, and we need something good for the infobox. If not that, then any alternate ideas?
948:
783:
764:
396:
117:
82:
2102:
and finally, Remember to contact me if you ever need assistance, and I will do what I am able.
526:
430:
list in 1995, all makes it very unlikely that any SR-71/A-12 airframes were stored at Norton.
120:) didn't understood my comment about removing fixed width in images and started revert war in
2160:
1639:
1524:
1488:
1238:
1063:
862:
Hey; I was going to retrieve that essay for you but you'd need to enable your email first. --
542:
2052:
246:
2190:
2109:
1563:
1443:
620:
612:
603:
351:
1962:
Look at this, you disappear for a while and everyone loses their head!! Congrats, Alan! --
1757:
1039:
Ok, no problem. I didn't make the connection that it was yours and you were in agreement.
8:
1802:
1793:
1766:
1539:
1394:
Yeah, saw that...been reverting his bad-faith noms, and posted a note to his talk page...
498:
413:
405:
92:
17:
1919:
Congrats from me as well... well done. Now what's up with this new loud signature? :) ++
1991:
1952:
1129:
1025:
989:
841:
see. You could also probably throw a request in at the technical village pump ( go to
451:
447:
332:
320:
312:
308:
285:
281:
2214:
PS, you can experiment on Born2, since he's still off in the real world somwhere ;) -
2378:
2368:
1590:
1283:, and it was inappropriate for him to add the material that he did. Hope that helps.
1256:
971:
779:
488:
Not a problem...I've done the same thing myself...can get quite confusing sometimes!
198:
180:
166:
155:
113:
30:
1753:
325:
I was wrong on one side but they in fact have 41 747s they have some on order also.
2309:
2155:
1477:
1454:
1147:
1059:
1018:
479:
459:
1407:. Good call on them being bad faith noms! Looks like the RFA is going well also.
2135:
2085:
2078:
2059:
2010:
1404:
1315:
1280:
1055:
995:
617:
568:
219:
212:
2405:
2327:
2315:
2287:
2266:
2247:
2229:
2175:
2074:
2021:
1973:
1963:
1901:
1870:
1812:
1778:
1670:
1652:
1605:
1567:
1530:
1464:
1428:
1418:
1408:
1395:
1381:
1302:
1284:
1194:
1185:
1105:
1077:
1040:
981:
962:
923:
912:
892:
874:
846:
832:
802:
746:
727:
667:
634:
489:
473:
465:
376:
360:
article? Personally I think that Egypt Air Force bought some original MC.205Vs
296:
250:
237:
139:
121:
2264:
Ah, yes, that nefarious gang of airplane groupies...definitely need a block!
2146:
2070:
2063:
1988:
1949:
1924:
1850:
1721:
I made some major edits, including moving the new section to the very-skimpy
1577:
1509:
Because it is a redlink. There is no such page on the English Knowledge, and
1151:
1133:
857:
594:
590:
222:
with the edit log "created article with GNDL-licensed text". Do you mean the
1899:
Thanks, and yes, I think. Are you volunteering for me to expiment back on??
2196:
1860:
1707:
I am (finally) heading to bed, but some interesting edits are happening in
1523:
If the intent is to ask for a translation, the correct place to do that is
1321:
883:
863:
842:
819:
796:
737:
357:
227:
2301:
2255:
2251:
2215:
2205:
1891:
1726:
1712:
1643:
1629:
1615:
1594:
1581:
1553:
1473:
1450:
1385:
1293:
1266:
1248:
1230:
1137:
1115:
1095:
1067:
1009:
705:
692:
677:
653:
517:
509:
125:
109:
2131:
1490:
565:
1529:" So, the short answer is I removed it because it didn't belong here.
2096:
1029:
508:
watch foreign-language DVDs, I can't edit Wiki at the same time :) -
1704:
Alan, thanks for the email. Will definitely look into the coaching.
1166:
image? Reason I'm asking is, in this case there isn't much wreckage
426:
General's office, and the Air Force film library, was placed on the
2201:
2088:
ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block.
1920:
823:
719:
533:
1628:
You might want to check this out, and weigh in on the AfD page. -
1058:
page the other day, and went ahead and put it up for a merge with
218:
Hi, I see you have pasted an apparently full-formed article into
384:
OK, I'll add this as separate version and add Egypt as a user.
2314:
Sorry for the late congrats! Congrats on your successful RFA!
2037:
1937:
1024:
Hi Akradecki, I appreciate the effort to save this photograph
364:
some refurbished and reengined MC.202s, but I may be wrong. --
441:
1845:. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the
2363:
FYI. I changed my second and third comments on the AfD for
2092:
1562:
Definitely! Test pilots are typically notable, and there's
736:
I'll be happy and honoured to help you in any way I can. --
537:
427:
223:
1521:, it says (and the bolding is included in the original), "
2044:. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy:
1750:
Knowledge:Translation/*/Completed_Translations/April_2007
1496:
Why did you remove Pierpoljak from the translation page?
1275:
Hi Rogerd, the answer is basically because I screwed up.
356:
Alan, could you be so kind and look on recent changes in
2066:
them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5)
1589:
I might see what I can find on Chuck Sewell also. Found
726:. Are you interested in continuing this? Thanks muchly!
2377:
Update - The article was approved for keep yesterday.
1225:
Alan, when you get a chance, could you take a look at
1449:
obviously better to have a stub than nothing at all.
976:
Gotta run for a while. Will pop in when I can. Watch
581:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
1427:This is even a step further than trivia sections.
2173:Don't sweat it...I've done the same thing myself!!
1593:on my first serach, has some short biographies. -
758:EgyptAir 990 GA and air crash notability guidlines
1810:Thanks! And good point on the derivative works.
1801:Congrats! I just noticed the posting below. :-)
1519:Knowledge:Pages needing translation into English
1511:Knowledge:Pages needing translation into English
1868:Wow...thanks! Now the real learning starts!
1638:PS, Alan, could you look at the comments on
1087:2007 Los Angeles United Airlines 747 crash
546:was updated with a fact from the article
1936:
1335:These are the articles affected so far:
2367:from Keep to Comment per your request.
1472:Good idea. Why didn't I think of that?
998:? GOt a user who thinks having lots of
587:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion
450:03:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Mark Sublette
311:00:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Mark Sublette
284:22:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Mark Sublette
14:
1843:Knowledge:Administrators' reading list
1839:Knowledge:Administrators' how-to guide
577:Image:Pioscale.JPG listed for deletion
2051:Remember you will always protect the
1890:Congrats! Can you block . . . ? ; -
1847:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard
1245:User talk:BillCJ/Test Article 3#Specs
1066:, if you want to weigh in. Thanks. -
700:I'm starting to work on something at
505:2007 Blue Angels South Carolina crash
2058:Remember you must always follow the
1741:I'd like to get your take on this:
1752:, I took the first article listed:
1128:Alan, could you take a look at the
273:recovery system seen at the end of
245:If you have a moment, please check
23:
724:User talk:Akradecki/Admin coaching
24:
2426:
1403:I posted him a link to check out
718:Hi Guinnog, at one point you and
702:Template:Boeing military aircraft
550:2002 Jalandhar India MiG-21 crash
249:to see if I got it worded right.
1849:. Best wishes and good luck, --
1709:EC-121 Warning Star#Deep Sea 129
1150:to get some thoughts. Thanks, --
1114:OK, thanks! Was just curious. -
525:
422:police that I was not a threat.
108:Alan, I've posted this issue on
29:
2195:Alan, I've been looking at the
1243:Alan, could you take a look at
994:Alan, could you take a look at
664:1994 Scotland RAF Chinook crash
444:? THEY passed through Norton!
2300:Speak of the devil . . . :) -
593:17:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC) --
13:
1:
2365:Chinese American Food Society
2359:Chinese American Food Society
2246:Thanks. Be sure to check out
1375:Talk:Consolidated Liberator I
644:Chinook helicopter crash page
2316:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
1664:Thank you! And of course! ;)
1546:Corky Meyer's Flight Journal
1429:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
1409:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
882:Still not working, sorry. --
847:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
803:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
648:Alan, could you look at the
44:
27:
25:
7:
10:
2431:
1614:Glad it made you laugh. -
1161:Flight 990 NTSB animations
916:20:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
896:19:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
887:19:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
878:19:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
867:19:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
850:19:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
836:19:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
806:14:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
772:10:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
750:05:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
741:04:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
731:21:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
709:00:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
696:23:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
681:18:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
671:17:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
657:17:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
638:21:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
624:21:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
598:17:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
572:12:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
513:20:04, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
493:04:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
483:06:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
469:10:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
455:03:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
409:02:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
389:19:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
380:19:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
369:18:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
345:22:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
316:00:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
300:23:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
289:22:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
254:17:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
247:Tepper Aviation#References
241:17:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
231:17:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
202:22:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
184:20:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
170:19:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
159:21:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
143:20:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
133:20:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
96:05:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1723:EC-121 shootdown incident
1227:Talk:Agusta A129 Mangusta
556:"Did you know?" talk page
2415:04:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2382:22:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
2372:19:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2351:17:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2337:16:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2319:14:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2305:14:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2291:11:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2276:00:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2259:00:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2239:00:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2219:23:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2209:23:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2185:22:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2168:22:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2141:10:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
2031:13:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2014:13:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
1995:06:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
1983:13:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
1967:11:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
1956:09:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
1932:09:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
1911:22:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1895:22:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1880:20:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1864:20:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1854:20:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1822:21:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1806:21:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1797:21:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1788:19:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1770:18:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1730:18:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1716:08:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1695:05:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1656:22:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1647:15:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1633:05:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1619:05:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1609:23:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1598:18:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1585:18:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1571:18:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1557:18:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1534:15:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1504:14:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1481:04:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1468:02:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1458:01:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1432:19:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1422:19:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1412:18:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1399:18:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1389:18:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1326:Consolidated Liberator I
1306:14:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1297:14:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1288:14:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1270:10:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1252:19:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
1234:04:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
1211:06:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
1198:04:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
1189:19:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
1179:18:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
1148:BillCJ's Discussion page
650:Chinook helicopter crash
138:Done. Will watch these.
2097:descriptive terminology
1640:User talk:Rlandmann#RFA
1330:WT:AIR#Liberator B Mk I
1155:01:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
1141:19:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1119:14:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1109:13:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1099:06:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
1081:20:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
1071:16:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
1044:03:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
1033:05:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
1013:05:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
985:08:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
966:13:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
956:06:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
927:00:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
906:Asymmetric blade effect
791:06:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
104:Fixed width issue again
2286:Damn conspiracists! --
2062:, except for when you
1942:
1091:Alan, I just ran into
633:within a wikiarticle.
503:Good work getting the
2342:at the right time...
2009:Congratulations AKR!
1940:
1525:Knowledge:Translation
1064:Talk:Museum of Flight
1054:Alan, I ran into the
1050:City of Everett merge
585:, has been listed at
331:comment was added by
1651:Check your email...
1564:Category:Test pilots
1328:, in my comments at
1062:. There's a poll on
686:Boeing manf template
604:Palmdale, California
2388:School Tyme Hip-Hop
1859:Congratulations! --
1736:GFDL in translation
1700:EC-121 Warning Star
18:User talk:Akradecki
1943:
1130:Erickson Air-Crane
1124:Erickson Air-Crane
583:Image:Pioscale.JPG
2346:Blood Red Sandman
2126:
2125:
2122:
2071:assume good faith
1758:fr:Jean Fourastié
1206:Blood Red Sandman
1174:Blood Red Sandman
951:Blood Red Sandman
786:Blood Red Sandman
780:Gameel Al-Batouti
767:Blood Red Sandman
562:
561:
348:
149:Fixed width issue
114:User:M Van Houten
72:
71:
2422:
2411:
2410:
2348:
2333:
2332:
2272:
2271:
2235:
2234:
2181:
2180:
2163:
2158:
2138:
2120:
2093:dazzling clarity
2038:
2027:
2026:
1979:
1978:
1907:
1906:
1876:
1875:
1832:You're an Admin!
1818:
1817:
1784:
1783:
1690:
1688:
1686:
1684:
1682:
1566:to put it into.
1221:Agusta A129/T129
1208:
1176:
1060:Museum of Flight
1019:Orenda Aerospace
1007:
1001:
953:
934:Flight 990 times
801:ping! whats up?
788:
769:
714:Ping on coaching
662:Done...it's now
529:
522:
521:
386:Piotr Mikołajski
366:Piotr Mikołajski
326:
130:Piotr Mikołajski
33:
26:
2430:
2429:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2408:
2406:
2398:May 22nd, 2007
2390:
2361:
2344:
2330:
2328:
2312:
2269:
2267:
2232:
2230:
2193:
2178:
2176:
2161:
2156:
2149:
2136:
2110:KillerChihuahua
2042:Congratulations
2024:
2022:
1976:
1974:
1904:
1902:
1873:
1871:
1834:
1815:
1813:
1781:
1779:
1738:
1702:
1680:
1678:
1676:
1674:
1672:
1666:
1626:
1542:
1494:
1478:Schreit mich an
1455:Schreit mich an
1446:
1355:Bell/Agusta 609
1318:
1259:
1241:
1223:
1204:
1172:
1163:
1126:
1089:
1056:City of Everett
1052:
1022:
1005:
999:
996:Talk:E-3 Sentry
992:
974:
949:
936:
908:
860:
799:
784:
765:
760:
716:
688:
646:
608:
579:
520:
501:
476:
462:
416:
399:
354:
327:—The preceding
323:
220:Tepper Aviation
216:
213:Tepper Aviation
151:
106:
85:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2428:
2418:
2417:
2389:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2360:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2311:
2308:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2279:
2278:
2248:User:Akradecki
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2222:
2221:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2148:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2124:
2123:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2104:
2103:
2100:
2089:
2082:
2067:
2056:
2046:
2045:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1935:
1934:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1833:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1803:Carlossuarez46
1799:
1794:Carlossuarez46
1767:Carlossuarez46
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1754:Jean Fourastié
1737:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1701:
1698:
1665:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1625:
1624:Orbitalcraft I
1622:
1612:
1611:
1574:
1573:
1550:Wings/Airpower
1541:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1493:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1445:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1378:
1377:
1372:
1367:
1362:
1357:
1352:
1347:
1342:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1258:
1255:
1240:
1237:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1125:
1122:
1112:
1111:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1021:
1016:
991:
988:
973:
970:
969:
968:
935:
932:
931:
930:
907:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
859:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
828:
827:
814:
813:
798:
795:
794:
793:
759:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
715:
712:
687:
684:
674:
673:
645:
642:
641:
640:
607:
601:
578:
575:
560:
559:
530:
519:
516:
500:
497:
496:
495:
475:
472:
461:
458:
415:
412:
406:David Dempster
398:
397:Mojave Mystery
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
353:
350:
322:
319:
303:
302:
280:
259:
258:
257:
256:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
189:
188:
187:
186:
173:
172:
150:
147:
146:
145:
122:Albatros D.III
112:'s talk page.
105:
102:
100:
93:David Dempster
84:
83:Mojave Storage
81:
70:
69:
43:
42:
41:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2427:
2416:
2413:
2412:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2397:
2393:
2383:
2380:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2370:
2366:
2352:
2349:
2347:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2335:
2334:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2317:
2307:
2306:
2303:
2292:
2289:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2277:
2274:
2273:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2257:
2253:
2249:
2240:
2237:
2236:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2220:
2217:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2207:
2203:
2198:
2186:
2183:
2182:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2159:
2142:
2139:
2134:
2133:
2128:
2127:
2119:
2118:
2111:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2101:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2087:
2083:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2054:
2053:wrong version
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2043:
2040:
2039:
2032:
2029:
2028:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2012:
2008:
1996:
1993:
1990:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1981:
1980:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1954:
1951:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1939:
1933:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1893:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1881:
1878:
1877:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1862:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1823:
1820:
1819:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1804:
1800:
1798:
1795:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1786:
1785:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1768:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1731:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1714:
1710:
1705:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1691:
1657:
1654:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1631:
1621:
1620:
1617:
1610:
1607:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1596:
1592:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1579:
1572:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1535:
1532:
1528:
1526:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1502:
1499:
1492:
1482:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1466:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1456:
1452:
1433:
1430:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1420:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1380:I have asked
1376:
1373:
1371:
1370:Schweizer 300
1368:
1366:
1365:Sikorsky S-72
1363:
1361:
1360:Sikorsky S-69
1358:
1356:
1353:
1351:
1348:
1346:
1343:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1307:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1295:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1239:S-61R engines
1236:
1235:
1232:
1228:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1169:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1135:
1134:S-64 Skycrane
1131:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1110:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1027:
1020:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1004:
997:
987:
986:
983:
979:
967:
964:
961:Sounds good!
960:
959:
958:
957:
954:
952:
946:
942:
928:
925:
920:
919:
918:
917:
914:
897:
894:
890:
889:
888:
885:
881:
880:
879:
876:
871:
870:
869:
868:
865:
851:
848:
844:
839:
838:
837:
834:
831:Many thanks!
830:
829:
825:
821:
816:
815:
810:
809:
808:
807:
804:
792:
789:
787:
781:
776:
775:
774:
773:
770:
768:
751:
748:
744:
743:
742:
739:
735:
734:
733:
732:
729:
725:
721:
711:
710:
707:
703:
698:
697:
694:
683:
682:
679:
672:
669:
665:
661:
660:
659:
658:
655:
651:
639:
636:
632:
628:
627:
626:
625:
622:
619:
615:
614:
605:
600:
599:
596:
592:
588:
584:
574:
573:
570:
567:
557:
553:
552:
551:
545:
544:
543:Did you know?
539:
535:
531:
528:
524:
523:
515:
514:
511:
506:
494:
491:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
471:
470:
467:
457:
456:
453:
452:Mark Sublette
449:
448:Mark Sublette
445:
443:
440:
436:
431:
429:
423:
419:
411:
410:
407:
403:
390:
387:
383:
382:
381:
378:
373:
372:
371:
370:
367:
363:
359:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:Sparrowman980
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:Mark Sublette
310:
309:Mark Sublette
306:
301:
298:
293:
292:
291:
290:
287:
286:Mark Sublette
283:
282:Mark Sublette
278:
276:
270:
266:
262:
255:
252:
248:
244:
243:
242:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
229:
225:
221:
214:
203:
200:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
185:
182:
177:
176:
175:
174:
171:
168:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
144:
141:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
101:
98:
97:
94:
90:
80:
79:
78:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
45:
40:
39:
38:
32:
28:
19:
2404:
2394:
2391:
2362:
2345:
2326:
2313:
2299:
2265:
2245:
2228:
2197:Bell 201/207
2194:
2191:Bell 201/207
2174:
2154:
2153:
2150:
2130:
2069:Remember to
2041:
2020:
1972:
1900:
1869:
1835:
1811:
1777:
1765:
1739:
1706:
1703:
1671:
1667:
1627:
1613:
1588:
1575:
1549:
1545:
1543:
1522:
1514:
1495:
1447:
1444:Nikortsminda
1379:
1350:Bell 427/429
1334:
1322:User:Davegnz
1319:
1260:
1242:
1224:
1205:
1173:
1167:
1164:
1127:
1113:
1090:
1053:
1023:
993:
977:
975:
950:
937:
909:
861:
800:
785:
766:
761:
717:
704:. THanks. -
699:
689:
675:
647:
630:
611:
609:
580:
563:
548:
547:
541:
502:
477:
463:
446:
433:Now, secret
432:
424:
420:
417:
404:
400:
361:
358:Macchi C.202
355:
352:Macchi C.202
324:
307:
304:
279:
274:
271:
267:
263:
260:
217:
199:M Van Houten
181:M Van Houten
167:M Van Houten
156:M Van Houten
152:
107:
99:
86:
75:
74:
73:
35:
34:
2396:Josh Howard
2252:User:BillCJ
1725:article. -
1540:Corky Meyer
1026:thumb|right
499:Blue Angels
480:Quadzilla99
435:Rivet Chain
414:Norton brat
275:Thunderball
126:Pfalz D.XII
110:User:BillCJ
2011:NawlinWiki
1987:Uh, sure!
1491:Pierpoljak
1281:straw poll
990:E-3 Sentry
978:Helicopter
941:local time
631:documented
613:notability
606:notability
439:Rivet Yard
321:Qantas 747
261:Hey - - -
2288:Born2flie
1964:Born2flie
1653:Akradecki
1606:Akradecki
1591:this site
1568:Akradecki
1531:Akradecki
1465:Akradecki
1419:Akradecki
1396:Akradecki
1303:Akradecki
1285:Akradecki
1257:refactor?
1195:Akradecki
1186:Akradecki
1106:Akradecki
1078:Akradecki
1041:Akradecki
1003:fact tags
982:Born2flie
972:Wikibreak
963:Akradecki
924:Weirpwoer
913:Akradecki
893:Akradecki
875:Akradecki
833:Akradecki
747:Akradecki
728:Akradecki
668:Akradecki
635:Akradecki
490:Akradecki
466:Coimbra68
377:Akradecki
297:Akradecki
251:Akradecki
238:Akradecki
140:Akradecki
2310:Congrats
2202:Bell 207
2084:Use the
2073:and not
1851:Cecropia
1405:WP:POINT
1345:Bell 214
1340:Bell 222
1152:Trashbag
763:either.
595:Ysangkok
591:Ysangkok
534:23 April
460:Pictures
341:contribs
329:unsigned
118:his talk
37:Archives
2409:Radecki
2331:Radecki
2270:Radecki
2233:Radecki
2179:Radecki
2025:Radecki
1977:Radecki
1905:Radecki
1874:Radecki
1861:Guinnog
1816:Radecki
1782:Radecki
1316:Davegnz
884:Guinnog
864:Guinnog
820:Guinnog
782:, too.
738:Guinnog
618:Scouter
77:Thanks!
2302:BillCJ
2256:BillCJ
2216:BillCJ
2206:BillCJ
2162:Day349
2064:ignore
1941:Horay!
1892:BillCJ
1727:BillCJ
1713:BillCJ
1644:BillCJ
1630:BillCJ
1616:BillCJ
1595:BillCJ
1582:BillCJ
1578:WP:BLP
1554:BillCJ
1515:French
1474:BigHaz
1451:BigHaz
1386:BillCJ
1320:Alan,
1294:rogerd
1267:rogerd
1249:BillCJ
1231:BillCJ
1138:BillCJ
1116:BillCJ
1096:BillCJ
1076:Done.
1068:BillCJ
1010:BillCJ
706:BillCJ
693:BillCJ
678:BillCJ
654:BillCJ
569:(Talk)
510:BillCJ
474:Thorpe
442:C-130s
2379:Chris
2369:Chris
2157:Dooms
2147:Sorry
2132:Riana
2086:block
2079:troll
2060:rules
1989:Dfrg.
1950:Dfrg.
1501:P@zzo
1382:Chris
858:Email
843:WP:VP
566:ALoan
16:<
2250:and
2095:and
2075:bite
1841:and
1277:this
1263:this
1030:Bzuk
822:and
797:Ping
538:2007
437:and
428:BRAC
337:talk
224:GFDL
124:and
1992:msc
1953:msc
1921:Lar
1489:rm
945:UTC
943:(Y
824:Lar
720:Lar
621:Sig
532:On
518:DYK
362:and
228:bd_
2407:AK
2329:AK
2268:AK
2231:AK
2177:AK
2023:AK
1975:AK
1923::
1903:AK
1872:AK
1814:AK
1780:AK
1693:-
1498:Il
1476:-
1453:-
1332:.
1168:to
1035:.
1006:}}
1000:{{
666:.
564:--
558:.
540:,
536:,
343:)
339:•
65:,
61:,
57:,
53:,
49:,
2137:⁂
2099:.
2081:.
2055:.
1929:c
1927:/
1925:t
1689:l
1687:e
1685:i
1683:r
1681:d
1679:e
1677:a
1675:h
1673:P
1527:.
929:)
347:.
335:(
116:(
67:6
63:5
59:4
55:3
51:2
47:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
