232:
1730s the nobleman's children with his lawful wife would of course be legitimate and would be recognized as such and would inherit his property/titles etc. His children with his acknowledged mistress and from the unmarried noblewoman would simply be illegitimate bastards. He would be recognized as their father, at least (which wasn't true elsewhere, where the children would be considered to have no parents at all), and he could acknowledge them and give them an allowance. But that would not make them legitimate, not even the noble woman's daughter. The only regular process for legitimizing illegitimate children was if the man's wife died and he married one of his mistresses. I am wondering if all the children could be made legitimate by an act of the king (which would be more important than the church at this point, I think), but I don't know. If this marquess was important enough, I don't see why not, but it seems unlikely.
89:
536:
480:
424:
285:
questions...I imagine a daughter with no legal father would simply have no guardian, and would have all sorts of legal problems because of it, like being unable to find a husband, or at least to provide a dowry. (But if her father acknowledged her and supported her, and was of sufficiently high standing himself, they could probably get around some of the problems.) Sorry, I'm really not sure, so I'm not much help...
262:
Or was this acknowledgement simply a completely informal affair, with only social importance and no juridical acknowledgement or paperwork what so ever? My question whether the case of the daughter was different was caused by the fact that the law was after all different for nobles and no nobles, but
231:
Hi Aciram, sorry, I didn't see your update to the
Reference Desk question! Thanks for the further info. Although I am certainly not an expert on that period, I would say the law was not as "fluid" as it was in the Middle Ages (where I am more familiar with similar questions). In your example, in the
395:
for my action in response to your message. We need to attempt to open communication (for example, by using templated warnings) before blocking a user, particularly in cases like this where it is possible that there was a good-faith reason for at least some of the user's actions (this isn't a simple
319:
I once again can't be very helpful. When I said that 18th century French family law isn't what I tend to focus on, I probably should have said that family law, in general, is not something I'm all that familiar with - most of my knowledge is in political and diplomatic history. I'm sure there have
598:
You recently added to her page "She was the regent of
Provence during the minority of her stepson from 994 until 999". I know I've seen this somewhere before but was unable to either recall where I read it or find a new source. If you remember where you saw it I'd appreciate it. I'd like to add a
299:
Hi, Aciram, unfortunately I don't think I can add much to what Adam has already told you. 18th century French family law is not something I'm terribly familiar with. The wikipedia article on the Duc du Maine suggests that he was not merely acknowledged by Louis XIV, but legitimized by letters
284:
Sorry for my own late reply! I think it would be informal, like he would support them financially, which would be enough to acknowledge them and have everyone else recognize them as his children, even if this would have no legal standing. Unfortunately I don't know enough to answer your further
266:
There is one other matter, and perhaps the law was the same in this case no matter time period: A woman was during this period placed under the guardianship under the nearest male relative, was she not? Then who would be guardian of the daughter in this case? I suppose the father, because he
254:
Thank you very much for your answer on my question of
Illegitimate children! I am sorry for my late reply. I thank you for your tip, and I will ask User:John Kenney if he/she would be willing to help. What I am specifically interested in is this: you say that it was possible for a father to
344:
Hi Aciram, I mentioned about a month ago that I have a friend who works on illicit sexual relations between monks and nuns in the Middle Ages, which you were asking about on the
Reference Desk. Well, he actually just defended his thesis, which you can now read online,
258:
My question is, then, what did he actually do to "acknowledge" them? How did he go about in performing this acknowledgement juridically? Was this a legal act in some way, as he was afterwards recognized as their father? Was there paperwork of some
562:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
506:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
450:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
210:
Ah, you are perfectly correct! Those countries may often be mentioned to belong to the "middle east" in a cultural sense, but not to Asia, so they should not be in that list. Please feel free to move them! Thank you for noticing
566:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
510:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
454:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
304:
would probably be useful to you - it has an article specifically about the legitimation of bastards, and another article about guardianship. You ought to be able to find it if you have access to a research library.
162:
559:
44:
346:
353:
40:
204:
176:
525:
464:
116:
520:
380:
329:
314:
294:
279:
643:
625:
267:
acknowledged her, but afterwards? Would it be her (legitimate) half brother, because he was the eldest male relative after the death of their father?
220:
74:
239:
works on modern Europe (but maybe a bit later than this), so I would suggest contacting him. If he can't help, maybe he would know someone who can.
413:
95:
88:
608:
248:
469:
447:
503:
320:
been books written on all these subjects, though - some keyword searches and a trip to a good library are probably the best way to go here.
157:
588:
365:
548:
492:
436:
54:
26:
408:
371:
I do remember, and I am delighted that you do as well! I would in fact be very interested to read it all. Thank you very much! --
112:
47:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
50:
255:
acknowledge his illegitimate children, and that he would thereafter be recognized as their father - in they eyes of the law?
543:
527:
593:
32:
616:]. I have been told it is correct to do so. It should be in her article, after all, if it is indeed correct. --
570:
226:
614:
Well, when I added that I wrote in the edit history that the information was from the article of her stepson
352:
And if you don't want to read an entire thesis, he's also written a shorter article on the same subject,
552:
516:
496:
460:
440:
392:
152:
123:
579:
article, so people understand there are other
Ottoman princesses with the same name... Thanks. --
339:
301:
386:
361:
290:
244:
512:
456:
107:
270:
I thought I should ask just in case you had more to add after this. Thank you very much!--
195:. I can fix this later, but as you have been adding these I thought I'd check with you. -
8:
639:
604:
147:
621:
396:
case of vandalism). It remains to be seen whether the user will engage in discussion.
376:
275:
216:
200:
70:
61:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
404:
399:
Thanks for the alert. Be careful not to get yourself into an edit-war situation! --
357:
325:
310:
286:
240:
236:
134:
124:
82:
17:
584:
102:
235:
There must be
Wikipedians better suited to answer this question than me. I know
635:
600:
576:
575:
Would you mind adding something to disambiguate on top of the texts of every
431:
415:
196:
179:
page, and I noticed that there are several non-Asian countries in the list -
133:
If you are still interested in the area, could you drop by the entry for the
487:
471:
66:
62:
617:
400:
372:
321:
306:
271:
212:
634:
That's a good lead, I'll follow-up and see what I can find. Thank you.
580:
141:(1959), which appears to be a scholarly work if a bit out-of-date.
560:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Adelaide, Countess consort of Savoy
188:
184:
180:
172:
137:
and take a look at my edits? I'm basing them off of
Robbins's
36:
192:
177:
List of the first female holders of political offices in Asia
163:
List of the first female holders of political offices in Asia
119:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
541:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
485:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
429:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
35:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
547:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
491:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
435:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
263:perhaps she would not be considered to be noble.
448:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Helena Ekblom
300:patent. A quick google search suggests that
504:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mor Sæther
167:Hi! I was going to correct the spelling of
139:Encyclopedia of Witchcraft and Demonology
94:Hello, Aciram. You have new messages at
14:
599:source citation (or you can). Thanks.
549:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
544:Adelaide, Countess consort of Savoy
528:Adelaide, Countess consort of Savoy
493:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
437:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
23:
87:
24:
657:
558:The article will be discussed at
502:The article will be discussed at
446:The article will be discussed at
33:Catherine Birgersdotter of Bjelbo
534:
478:
422:
27:Disambiguation link notification
381:15:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
366:08:19, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
13:
1:
644:19:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
626:19:28, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
609:18:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
589:21:54, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
113:18:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
75:10:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
31:Hi. When you recently edited
521:00:55, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
465:23:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
391:Hi. I got your message; see
7:
409:14:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
330:19:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
315:18:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
10:
662:
594:Adelaide-Blanche of Anjou
393:User talk:188.249.195.140
295:21:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
280:16:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
551:or whether it should be
495:or whether it should be
439:or whether it should be
249:08:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
221:17:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
205:16:38, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
158:08:49, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
571:Hatice Sultan articles
96:Sphilbrick's talk page
92:
227:Illegitimate children
91:
63:opt-out instructions
356:. Hope this helps!
45:fix with Dab solver
302:this edited volume
117:remove this notice
93:
53:• Join us at the
58:
653:
538:
537:
482:
481:
426:
425:
237:User:John Kenney
155:
150:
135:Mora witch trial
125:Mora witch trial
120:
110:
105:
48:
41:check to confirm
18:User talk:Aciram
661:
660:
656:
655:
654:
652:
651:
650:
596:
573:
539:
535:
532:
513:ReformedArsenal
483:
479:
476:
457:ReformedArsenal
427:
423:
420:
389:
342:
229:
191:, and probably
165:
153:
148:
128:
121:
108:
103:
100:
85:
55:DPL WikiProject
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
659:
649:
648:
647:
646:
629:
628:
595:
592:
572:
569:
533:
531:
526:Nomination of
524:
477:
475:
470:Nomination of
468:
421:
419:
414:Nomination of
412:
388:
385:
384:
383:
341:
340:Monks and nuns
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
317:
268:
264:
260:
256:
228:
225:
224:
223:
164:
161:
149:Garamond Lethe
130:Hello Aciram,
127:
122:
101:Message added
99:
86:
84:
81:
79:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
658:
645:
641:
637:
633:
632:
631:
630:
627:
623:
619:
615:
613:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
591:
590:
586:
582:
578:
577:Hatice Sultan
568:
564:
561:
556:
554:
550:
546:
545:
529:
523:
522:
518:
514:
508:
505:
500:
498:
494:
490:
489:
473:
467:
466:
462:
458:
452:
449:
444:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:Helena Ekblom
417:
416:Helena Ekblom
411:
410:
406:
402:
397:
394:
387:1804 in Haiti
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
350:
348:
331:
327:
323:
318:
316:
312:
308:
303:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
222:
218:
214:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
160:
159:
156:
151:
145:
142:
140:
136:
131:
126:
118:
114:
111:
106:
97:
90:
80:
77:
76:
72:
68:
64:
59:
56:
52:
46:
42:
38:
34:
19:
597:
574:
565:
557:
542:
540:
530:for deletion
509:
501:
486:
484:
474:for deletion
453:
445:
430:
428:
418:for deletion
398:
390:
351:
343:
234:
230:
168:
166:
146:
143:
138:
132:
129:
78:
60:
30:
358:Adam Bishop
287:Adam Bishop
241:Adam Bishop
171:(should be
488:Mor Sæther
472:Mor Sæther
115:. You can
104:SPhilbrick
65:. Thanks,
636:Bearpatch
601:Bearpatch
175:) in the
49:Read the
197:Ttwaring
169:Morrocco
144:Thanks!
83:Talkback
553:deleted
497:deleted
441:deleted
211:this!--
189:Tunisia
185:Algeria
181:Morocco
173:Morocco
67:DPL bot
618:Aciram
401:Orlady
373:Aciram
322:john k
307:john k
272:Aciram
213:Aciram
154:(talk)
109:(Talk)
37:Coswig
581:E4024
259:sort?
193:Egypt
16:<
640:talk
622:talk
605:talk
585:talk
517:talk
461:talk
405:talk
377:talk
362:talk
354:here
347:here
326:talk
311:talk
291:talk
276:talk
245:talk
217:talk
201:talk
71:talk
51:FAQ
642:)
624:)
607:)
587:)
555:.
519:)
499:.
463:)
443:.
407:)
379:)
364:)
349:.
328:)
313:)
293:)
278:)
247:)
219:)
203:)
187:,
183:,
73:)
43:|
638:(
620:(
603:(
583:(
515:(
459:(
403:(
375:(
360:(
324:(
309:(
289:(
274:(
243:(
215:(
199:(
98:.
69:(
57:.
39:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
