User talk:Abhishek0831996

5007:. Ctrl + F also helps, and you will see koimoi included in the list. Not reliable The following should not be considered reliable sources. If an otherwise reliable source attributes information to an unreliable source then that information is likewise unreliable. (see WP:FRUIT) Any "blog" of "blog"-type websites, in particular (see WP:BLOGS) Allindiansite.com Andhra Box Office Andhra Cafe Andhrakaburlu.com Assamtimes.org (discussed here) auditionform.in Bestoftheyear.in (see bestoftheyear.in) Bollymoviereviewz.com Bollyspice.com Bollywoodbubble.com Bollywoodlife.com (discussed here) bollywoodsociety.com (discussed here) Cinechicken (discussed here) Cinegoer.com Dailyhunt.in (blacklisted, discussed here) dailymovieupdates.com Dreamdth.com Greatandhra.com Filmibeat.com Indiaforums.com Indiglamour.com International Business Times by IBT Media (see WP:IBTIMES) Iwmbuzz.com (discussed here) Jan Bharat Times (discussed here) KeralaDaily Kollytalk.com 2927:

commeon excuse if anyone reverts is Calling him Sock user,I am yet to make Wiki account but still They are backed up by Another User Ravensfire who even if anyone revert their edits revert them again. I cant find it other than Propaganda removing Name of Prithviraj Chauhan further more they do mention another Rajput ruler from Same time,If possible readd prithviraj name as he is well estbalished figure from Rajput Community,Also al historians Like Dasrath Sharma,Rv Somani who wrote about Chauhans call them Rajputs All of Major online enclyopedia mention him Rajput and even removing him from Brief List page seems a Clear agenda if possible u are senior user u can revert these edits.

3758: 2834:

Established Rajput kings from everywhere as Possible, Like they did also mostly of their Talk are copypaste edits from other Talk page anyway If Rajput dont exist pruor to 16th century should remove everyone who born before 16th century Rana Kumbha,Rana Sanga,Bhatti ruler,Ratan Singh and So On also therr are several historians who conclude Rajput as Caste emerge in 12ty and 13th century itself most notably Brajadulal Chattopadhaya and Jadunath Sarkar.Satish Chandra,Thapar,Mohmmar Habib all mention him as Rajput so cant get point of removing him from Breif List of Rajputs Page.

2977: 3058:, No Problem take ur time but its very misguidng to remove all Content of Rajput resistance to Arabs,Ghaznavids and Ghurids and further Misusing Sources to satisfy their own Agenda. Just thought that Content removed from Rajputs resistance to Muslim Conquests was in hate and More of Jealousy further removal of Prithviraj Chauhan in List of Rajputs page Confirm that they only target popular rulers of race,Thanks for replying, Please Check out those 2 articles in near future Whenever u feel free.Thanks. 645: 359: 2352: 772: 5186: 5128: 3684: 511: 1704: 4467: 3867: 1772: 3716: 476: 5386: 5354: 5096: 4715: 4338: 4022: 2060: 1321: 1004: 931: 858: 190: 669: 1227: 5233: 4904: 1184: 3187: 3146: 2433: 2145: 1581: 1145: 1076: 735: 548: 426: 383: 262: 132: 1918: 1877: 1633: 2652:

a banned user, it can end with you blocked for supporting them. Showbiz doesn';t get it, but the best thing they can do for Knowledge is not edit here. Strident POV warriors just don't end well and end up making the area so toxic good faith users stay away rather than deal with the massive disruption, drama and headaches of trying to put together a good, NPOV article.

5518:, which will be supported by different sources, all published after 2022 by internationally recognized university presses. I will put up an "inuse" sign before I make my edits, which will not take me more than half an hour. I trust that you will not make any edits to he lead during this time, let alone revert my edits, as you did 3656:

citations included several major news organizations (Bloomberg, Reuters) does not make it "unsourced or poorly sourced" as specified by BLP. BLP does not say that negative information about living persons cannot be included at all, it must strictly abide by verifiability, the neutral point of view, and no original research.

3009:, I observe that u are a expert in History and very old reliable Editor but What I observe in recent times is that Rajputs related articles have been badly Tempered by a Group of Editors led by Charitoder they did as best as they could To reduce Rajput past as much as they Can,They are also backed up by Peoples like 4828:

it is "considered to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable". That means you can avoid using it for the subjects where the dispute over the specific information exists. Finally, there is no case of "bias in favor of the Indian government" or accepting "payments from persons

4808:

and I have removed the citations and texts from TOI. So adding unreliable sources into a contentious topic can come under disruptive editing. Just a heads up about that. Feel free to add more on the controversy section (which IMO, was much needed), but with sources that are reliable. Thanks and happy

2839:

Anyway I am yet to find a Historian in my 25 years of reading who said Prithviraj was not a Rajput ruler. Rajput related articles have been Hijacked by few in last 2 3 months. Anyway Dont try to engage with Talk wars with them see their history they mostly make fake claim of Consensus Despite getting

2744:

no one trust wikipedia anyway these day but so misguiding info removing a figure who has been called Rajputs by everyone from Satish Chandra,JN Sarkar,Romila Thapar,Ifran haib and so on ,Hopefully u revert it and i am not blocked user its a Range which is blocked i just inform u again keep that in ur

1735:

but your gross figure doesn't match the 49.29 crore in the source. Be more careful moving forward, please. And your change from Box Office India to Bollywood Hungama for the budget isn't much of an improvement, since both sources included print and advertising costs, which should not be factored into

5423:

A number of established editors have challenged this statement in good faith, and at least one has asked you (with a ping) to return to the debate to provide further elaboration. I note you have been actively editing, can you please look to engage with the question asked in response by Ravenswing at

4278:

It has comes to my attention that article about mountain Girnar. If you look at it it is highly biased and depicted as the sight only for Jain community. If you look at references too, you will find that many are not appropriate/proper. Unfortunately, I am not in the position to do anything about it

3341:

which added that "The CDC figures do not necessarily reflect cases reported by individual states." You can't solely rely on website of CDC website, which itself notes that: "On December 18, 2020, Texas started reporting probable cases, which included 171,505 new probable cases, in addition to 13,253

2651:

Besides all the reasons he was originally blocked? Poor sources - Raj era sources, tertiary sources and yesterday tried to use a self-published source from a nobody they called a "historian". The blatent POV pushing and disregard for Knowledge policies are plenty of reasons. Please don't proxy for

4843:

Agreed. But when you are adding a controversy section in a contentious topic, you have to have the controversies backed up by multiple reliable sources. Simple as that. And there are multiple sources that are completely reliable which talks in detail about the controversies you have added. Hence, I

4498:

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee.

2778:

Also source i gave mention PrithvirajVijay a contemparay text present About Rajputs,So how can Rajout dont exist during that time neither tablot said that way And User who removed it yesterday mostly Copypaste all stuff from other talk page And then paste it he himself has Zero knowledge of history

2695:

Get over the proxy thing and go back to the page's edit history to see how many times I've tried to improve the page, so in future whenever I would've visited the page, I would've definitely gone into the discussion of why the name was removed. And calling Kaushik Roy a nobody shows your arrogance,

5465:

The question asked of you was, can you please show where in our policies and guidelines it says "This is contrary to the fact that admins should be so confident about their closure that they should not expect a DRV with regards to their closure" (or words to that effect). That is the question that

3013:

Recently they removed all Content of Rajput Confrontations with Arabas,Ghazanvids and Ghurids on Page of Rajput resistance to Muslim Conquests, Also they removed name of Prithviraja-III on List of Rajput page which was established from last 10 odd years, I just informed u as a Normal Subscriber of

1914:

We met at a bitter dispute spread over one talk, a handful of user talks and a couple of ANIs, not the best places to meet fellow editors. I regret my loss of cool, which I hope haven't damaged the possibility of you and I collaborating in future, on something. After all we are often interested in

3085:

Hiya, Showbiz826. Please stop making requests of editors. If you continue to edit, the next step is to take this to ANI to see about getting your range blocked because of repeated block evasion, edit-warring, genre-pushing and general disruptive edits. Your choice on how this needs to proceed.

2795:

Also,Raj era sources ????? I gave source of Kaushik Roy book which is 2 months Old,So how 2020 is still Raj era i dont know Next thing The book is Published by Routledge by Kaushik Roy how he is self claimed historian ???? Many of his books have been published even in Cambridge universty like on

3157:. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! 2926:

The Users especially a group of users like Chariotder,Lukemily,Heba Aisha are really hijacking Rajput related articles best example is removing name of Prithviraj Chauhan on List of Rajputs Page further even removing Word Rajput wherever is possible even if it is present in source and there most

2833:

Some of the excuses given on talk page of Removal of Prithviraj clearly show agenda of New editors in recent past they said removing Bhatti ruler isnt right as He was not a notable Rajput ruler while Prithviraj was so we removed him,Anyway it seems a deliberate attempts to Remove famous And Well

2761:

I provided u a source which clealry mention Prithviraj as a Rajput fact is I can give ton of More Sourced for the Same and Mentioning him On List of Rajput Page is no wrong either as I said almost every term Got its present day meaning today, And all Scholars of bygone time mention Prithviraj as

2444:. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! 2310:

the chronolgy order is absolutely wrong it mentions Prithviraj chauhan on last in Images like u did at List of Rajput plesase do on that too Soon and add Prithviraj chauhan on 1st Kumbha on 2nd Sanga on 3rd and so on, Also Kindly Add better description instead of this Add something like he unite

3655:

And your basis for your argument against this coverage is an editorial piece with obviously dissenting opinions ("we know, from painful experience, that lockdowns don’t work") rather than an objective finding that the gatherings have not led to spikes in the areas where they are being held. The

5011:

nettv4u.com Nowrunning.com Oneindia.in OpIndia (see WP:OPINDIA) Radio Sargam Republic TV (see WP:REPUBLICTV) Sacnilk.com (discussed here) Sahi Nahi (discussed here) serialupdates.me spicyonion.com streamingdue.com Televisionpost.com TellyChakkar (discussed here) Tellydhamaal.com Tellytadka.com

1123:

Hello Abhishek0831996, your recent good-faith edits broke several Wiki-links and the table sorting, so I have reverted them for now. But I'd be glad to discuss eventual concerns and possible improvements on article talk. It would also be helpful to avoid misunderstandings if you would use edit

5362: 3460:

We are allowed to second guess media reports once we have reason to and that reason exist in this case. Your best bet is to find report which dispute 403,359 cases of the US from a single day in December 2020 instead of repeating same sources that have obviously miscalculated the scenario.

870:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1016:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

943:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2514:

Thiss was just a list oF rajput page and Tablot didnt said Prithviraj wasnt a Rajput She said he has been described as Rajput in bit later text Also this was brief list of Rajput Page why to remove a Figure who has been said Rajput by Satish Chandra,Jn Sarkar and many

4624:

section. But it's pretty long and interspersed with too much mudslinging that detracts from the content issue itself. So can I request you to give me a list of diffs (or just date and time-stamps of the posts, which I can then CTRL-F) that I should read to understand

689:

You've received a number of warnings for a number of different disruptive tendencies: unsourced content, not leaving edit summaries, and disruptive editing. Please consider this a final warning for all of those issues, since you exhibited all of them in your edits to

3495:. Aren’t we supposed to have a consensus across Knowledge on statistics?. Why is the number being discussed here different than it is there? In the template not a single day in December 2020 is shown to be having more than 400K new cases. Correct me if I am wrong. 5486:, are contentious, and the editors on both sides of the deletion debate have strong opinions that they are right. Your stated fact would appear to mean that a closing admin should have sufficient power of persuasion that there is no questioning of the close. 1683: 202:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

5450:

I would have responded if someone could find any factual error in my statement, however, after reading the whole discussion I find that I had already made all of my important points and there is no need to respond to anyone as of now. Thanks.

1618: 4599:

I see that you've been arguing your correct claim since March 5, at length and through what appears a large over four-month time sink. Thank you for your perseverance and persistence towards accuracy, and thanks again for the ping.

1589: 1274:. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read 4444:

Just a heads up: It looks like a talk page discussion resulted in moving the page just a few months ago. It may be I’ll-advised to undo the results of that discussion unless there is evidence that consensus has changed.

4858:

Hey again. If you are interested, you can import a little bit more of referenced history from the Ram Janmbhoomi article to the ancient and medieval sub section of Ram Mandir until the events leading upto 1949. Thanks.

1895:

and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by offering someone else a peace pipe, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend who just likes to smoke.

3063: 3019: 2806: 2784: 2767: 2750: 2550: 2486: 2316: 2270: 4186: 3770: 2851: 2159:, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the 5420:, and made the statement "This is contrary to the fact that admins should be so confident about their closure that they should not expect a DRV with regards to their closure" in your original application post. 2800:

Talk page from now As i dont want him to be get blocked better remove all of them and Mention This community has no Past as They are already removing all of Rajput rulers especially famous one from everywhere.

2873:

You are right. After going through their recent edit history. It is pretty clear that they have an agenda against the community. They have also coined a half baked term Rajputization to further their agenda.

4539: 3237:

article as being among events cited as superspreaders? This statement is supported by sources, though I expanded it to acknowledge one of them saying the elections in general may have been issues too.

2796:

Hinduism and Warfare in South Asia,Tell me how he is a Self claimed historian as Usual if cant counter someone Fact say his sources as Tertiory,Raj era and what not anyway i wont even post message on

4744:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4367:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4049:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2087:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1348:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1028:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 955:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 882:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 214:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1909:}} to someone's talk page! You can use a parameter to insert the name of the recipient and add your own text to the message with a second. Smoking this wiki-peace pipe does not affect your health. 2151:. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at 3111: 2307: 1084: 2736:

they call me a block user and what not what i only do is Informing u about these Biggots hijacking history and removing well established facts of History for Ur Kind Information They removed

4499:

When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Knowledge administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

3730:

saw that pic you uploaded on the wiki page on narayan dynasty, would be glad if you can tell me how you got that pic as i am also writing some blogs and want to upload some pics thanks

4175:. You even reverted so many important changes and references and left nothing but just a skeleton. I've spent 2 years in bringing that article from nothing to everything and it hurted. 1721: 4760: 4530:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics

4383: 4065: 3344:

This raised the total number of new cases in the US on December 18 to 403,359; without the influx of reporting from Texas, the daily new case count for the US would have been 231,854.

2103: 1364: 1044: 971: 898: 230: 3915: 1820: 582:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

296:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

3492: 2779:

and specially only change Rajput related page. The conversation he is having with u on talk page too Is copying the comments from Prithviraj Chauhan Talk page. Upto u how to tackle.

694:. Removing content without explanation is disruptive; editing without edit-summaries is disruptive; and adding content not supported by a source is disruptive. Please stop, or you 4729: 4352: 4035: 3908: 2073: 1813: 1334: 4829:

and entities in exchange for positive coverage" with the sources that I have used so far. There is no problem with using these TOI references in my recent edits on Ram Mandir.

2576: 2554: 2505: 2496:

Actually, the source he provided tells that Rajput identity came into existence in 14th-15th century. I'm trying to find sources to refute claims till then I can't revert it.

632:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting

346:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting

5590:

Thanks for notifying. Initially I thought this should be deleted but later I felt it should remain. Thus, I forgot to change "delete" to "keep" when I completed my comment.

3059: 3015: 2928: 2802: 2780: 2763: 2746: 2546: 2482: 2312: 2266: 101: 4182: 3900: 3774: 3766: 2572: 1805: 3576: 3099: 2490: 5311: 3822: 3630: 2847: 3330: 1276: 1663: 1957: 1974: 3978: 3950: 3944: 2947: 2000: 1116: 3896: 1801: 1450: 248: 146:. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the 1062: 4092: 3105: 2900:

Mostly towards a single community please if you have authority or if you can contact proper authority please take down those pages and restore the previous.

2129: 1852:") on talk pages means you are contributing to the disruption and making the discussion uncivil. It also appears you are trying to disrupt the discussion by 1283: 1390: 989: 916: 518:. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Knowledge without adequate explanation, as you did at 4111: 4103: 3641: 2545:

u will found it its a secondary source anyway By same token The term India Rajasthan Elepahnat all came in existence in later times anyway fetch my source.

1399: 5390: 5100: 4196: 1502: 1133: 2027: 5379: 5339: 5326: 4007: 3973: 3851: 3834: 3595: 2320: 2160: 2148: 155: 135: 3040:

Thank you for reminding, I'm working on how to counter that narrative but it'll take some time, will surely try to get the original information back.

2953:

Thank you for reminding, I'm working on how to counter that narrative but it'll take some time, will surely try to get the original information back.

2285: 4995: 3923: 2932: 1828: 1458: 3544: 3467: 3448: 3385:

India has recorded the highest one-day tally of new Covid-19 cases anywhere in the world - and the country's highest number of deaths over 24 hours.

3354: 3134: 2821: 2788: 2771: 2754: 1945: 1584:

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Knowledge. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to

5358: 5089: 4844:

urge you to take up on those, rather than a semi reliable/unreliable source as the sole citation for a controversy in a contentious topic. Thanks.

4787: 4410: 4279:

as my changes are getting reverted. You seem like a good unbiased Knowledge editor and supporter. Can you please take a deeper look at the article

2610: 2529: 1436: 1117: 4883:. The paragrah you added needs to be trimmed and reworded from Pant's perspective. At the moment it is from the the Mandir issue's perspective. - 4225: 2721: 2665: 2645: 2631: 1569: 5538: 4302: 4273: 2867: 179: 5244:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to 4915:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to 4667:

as it was added without any reliably-sourced article content supporting its inclusion as is required by the policies I've linked to, as well as

3078: 3034: 5406: 4190: 3261: 2903: 5021: 3926:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 3370:

As you said, there is enough reliable source that I cited which says that India has the the highest daily recorded new cases: Hindustan Times:

1831:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 5577: 5116: 3748: 2687: 1441: 2420: 394:

without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an accurate

5278:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

4949:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

3859: 3250: 2962: 2300:

thanks for restoring info on List of Rajputs page anyway That user Again Remove Prithviraj Chauhan from list so keep that in ur watchlist.

996: 4238: 3939: 5533: 4012: 3789: 2472: 2050: 844: 727: 5317: 1969: 1311: 1242:

on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to

923: 850: 4159: 3631:

https://www.livemint.com/news/india/india-surpasses-us-in-reporting-highest-daily-increase-in-covid-cases-in-world-11619064929278.html

5514:

Later tonight, I will be adding a different, and more comprehensive, version of the disputed lead sentences on Gandhi's last fast in

5417: 4982: 4804:, just be extra careful when you all references. As you've been alerted before, Times of India is deemed as an unreliable source per 3334: 2045: 4146:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 3338: 4642: 4102: 3313: 5509: 2390: 1646:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

1600:

submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on

1497: 1096: 536: 4978: 4615: 4574: 4566: 4476: 1915:

similar articles, and we all want to improve them to the best of our abilities. Maybe sometime we could have a beer together, or

3739: 2991: 5599: 5287: 4958: 4707: 4330: 3839:

I see; thanks. Yet, if someone else reverts your removal, pointing to the creator of the page as being a sock may not suffice.

3228: 2337: 2228: 5374: 5081: 5044: 4838: 3698: 2467: 2453: 2373: 2242: 437:

appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please

5218: 4459: 3191: 2538: 2261:

even from List of Rajputs page kindly readd his photo Such things are misguidng at best ,This was well sourced its a request.

1153: 743: 552: 398:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the 266: 22: 2205: 2191: 5344: 4783: 4633:, which mention or quote from specific sources and not the ones that interpret/debate those sources. Thanks for your help. 4406: 4250: 4088: 3166: 2916: 2883: 2125: 1386: 1058: 985: 912: 244: 62: 5503: 5475: 5460: 5176: 3223: 1853: 1845: 1306: 4892: 4868: 4853: 4609: 3180: 2405: 1759: 1655: 800: 38: 4630: 4620:

I got curious about the actual content issue at the center of the dispute at the Gandhi article and started reading the

4268: 3642:

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2021-04-23/india-records-highest-daily-coronavirus-count-of-any-country

3049: 1478: 376: 2177: 1212: 1177: 534: 4880: 1541: 1111: 2032: 1745: 833: 765: 708: 69: 4150:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

2156: 1865: 469: 414: 171: 4298: 3804: 2911: 1519: 662: 504: 462: 113: 3373:

Sunday was the fifth day running that the single-day cases in the country have broken all previous global records.

1613: 1417: 823: 120: 4986: 4779: 4570: 4434: 4402: 4202: 4084: 3919: 3255: 2121: 1951: 1930: 1824: 1695: 1674: 1620: 1463: 1382: 1054: 981: 908: 240: 139: 5550:

Most of the items are notable thus there is no serious issue. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 10:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

4621: 3669: 638: 352: 5121: 4701: 2401: 2262: 1639: 1624: 4454: 3706: 3674: 2967: 1659: 1446:

Kumbhkarna is not incarnation of kaitabha or madhu. He is one of Jay / Vijaya. The other is Ravan's himself.

1208: 1173: 527: 52: 5072:

is koimoi reliable or unreliable? One page shows its unreliable and the other does not have it on the list.

4990: 1690:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

5519: 5283: 5249: 5206: 5164: 4954: 4920: 4753: 4376: 4058: 3329:. Enough reliable sources reported that US reported 403,359 cases on a single day in December. It includes 2096: 1983: 1691: 1670: 1357: 1262:. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the 1160:

have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the

1037: 964: 891: 830: 788: 750:

have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the

680: 515: 223: 158:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the

57: 4818: 4679: 1732: 5444: 5306: 4765: 4388: 4070: 3162: 2342: 2108: 1585: 1369: 1049: 976: 903: 796: 235: 5528: 5245: 4916: 4888: 3904: 3234: 3233:

Is there any other reason why you removed references to the prime minister's campaign rallies from the

3219: 2224: 1965: 1809: 1454: 1271: 1088: 5389:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

5099:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

4593: 2311:

Rajputs against Turkish invaders which he did.Please do its a request To mainatain timeline of rulers.

1537: 25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 5499: 5293: 5214: 4964: 4652:

Abhishek0831996, you've been here for quite some time, so you must be aware that you need to include

4418: 4233: 3846: 3799: 3074: 3030: 2943: 2863: 2817: 2449: 2416: 2281: 2033: 2006: 1200: 779: 674: 523: 3564: 5256:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 4927:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 3818: 2291: 1515: 1235: 1204: 1188: 1169: 1149: 1092: 441:

or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the

438: 5316:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at

1856:

an unnecessary question which was already answered while the NPOV template had also been removed.

1413: 5424:

09:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)? (Searcing that timestamp should allow you to find the comment easily.)

4668: 4450: 4325: 3762: 3750: 3663: 3244: 3195: 2426: 2210: 1658:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 1471: 1464: 1300: 1196: 590: 391: 304: 3491:

The claim of 403,000 daily new cases in any particular day in 2020 December is not reflected in

2894:

I have been reading these pages and it is very disturbing. Even chariotrider is favouring them.

5394: 5279: 5237: 5104: 4950: 4908: 4874: 4800:

Hey, thanks for the additons. But since, as you may already know, that the article comes under

4690: 4546: 4479:, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles 4419: 4294: 3785: 3538: 3442: 3307: 3158: 1902: 1861: 1263: 1069: 792: 754:. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 372: 125: 91:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 43: 29: 2840:

overpowered by other sources, Thank u for trying to Revert but its no point in Wasting time.

72:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge. You can visit 5523: 5057: 5032: 5004: 4997: 4884: 4741: 4364: 4046: 3735: 3215: 2987: 2726: 2369: 2220: 2138: 2084: 1961: 1741: 1493: 1345: 1217: 1025: 952: 879: 762: 755: 704: 595: 445:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 402:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 309: 211: 84: 4685:

As you used a sub-par source to restore the content, I want to ensure that you are aware of

3873:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

1778:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

5591: 5495: 5452: 5402: 5210: 5112: 5077: 5036: 5017: 4864: 4849: 4830: 4814: 4752:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4605: 4589: 4375:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4286: 4246: 4178: 4139: 4057:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3840: 3826: 3812: 3793: 3486: 3463: 3365: 3350: 3347: 3172: 3095: 3088: 3070: 3055: 3041: 3026: 3010: 2954: 2939: 2923: 2875: 2859: 2843: 2827: 2813: 2797: 2733: 2713: 2683: 2676: 2661: 2654: 2637: 2623: 2606: 2599: 2568: 2497: 2459: 2445: 2412: 2397: 2382: 2329: 2297: 2277: 2254: 2234: 2197: 2183: 2173: 2095:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1937: 1751: 1356:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1138: 1036:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 963:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 890:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 615: 460: 446: 434: 329: 255: 222:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 96: 80: 33: 2219:. Can you elaborate? Typically lists are maintained alphabetically as per the surnames. - 8: 5431:

and therefore withdraw it, so that no further discussion regarding it needs to continue.

5335: 5302: 5253: 5172: 4974: 4924: 4638: 4562: 4535: 3694: 3260:

Highest ever recorded daily new cases in USA was 313,000 not 403,000 as you claimed when

1979:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1906: 1717: 1609: 1601: 1507:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1267: 1165: 1129: 658: 634: 500: 348: 92: 3207: 2891:

Lukeemily and heba have a agenda and they started vandalising a single community pages.

5554:

I assume you are using a bot helper and clicked the delete instead of keep by mistake.

5241: 4647: 4446: 3658: 3239: 3211: 3139: 2737: 2671: 2258: 1892: 1726: 1294: 1108: 1100: 841: 820: 541: 419: 411: 403: 73: 5483: 5370: 5061: 5028: 4723: 4346: 4264: 4221: 4164: 4029: 4003: 3969: 3613: 3496: 3455: 3400: 3321: 3265: 3150: 3130: 2999: 2976: 2907: 2712:. Just because wikipedia does not have an article on him makes him a nobody for you. 2535: 2437: 2067: 2040: 2023: 1925: 1924:

tea. It's better than beer, you know. Apologising again for all the badblood. Peace.

1882: 1857: 1574: 1565: 1432: 1328: 1161: 1012: 939: 866: 751: 625: 571: 563: 492: 484: 442: 399: 395: 368: 339: 285: 277: 198: 180: 159: 147: 143: 5494:

where you made it. However, it was probably a throw-away comment having no value.

3379:

country set a new global record of the most number of COVID-19 infections in a day.

5585: 5555: 5482:

It is very much an observable fact that some deletion discussions, including about

5471: 5440: 5411: 4897: 4772: 4737: 4542:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the 4395: 4360: 4155: 4077: 4042: 3935: 3731: 2983: 2365: 2115: 2080: 1764: 1737: 1593: 1533: 1489: 1376: 1341: 1091:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to 1021: 948: 875: 806: 759: 739: 715: 700: 620: 334: 207: 167: 16: 3895:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called 1800:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called 5398: 5275: 5108: 5073: 5013: 4946: 4860: 4845: 4810: 4801: 4601: 4585: 4487:. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and 4483: 4430: 4321: 4290: 4242: 3984: 2741: 2478: 2169: 1703: 556: 519: 480: 479:

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge, as you did to

456: 430: 270: 106: 2698: 150:. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been 5515: 5331: 5298: 5168: 5051: 4970: 4749: 4634: 4558: 4439: 4372: 4114:, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 4054: 3690: 2521:

I am giving u a link to Kaushik Roy page which mention Prithviraj as a Rajput

2092: 1713: 1605: 1353: 1125: 1033: 960: 887: 654: 600: 496: 488: 314: 219: 151: 2351: 2233:

I mean sequencing them according to their year of birth. Sorry for my English

5491: 5346: 5226: 4912: 4825: 4805: 4795: 4745: 4686: 4660: 4368: 4283:( You can see in the history that even your change got reverted right away. 4147: 4050: 3203: 3199: 2982:

Happy editing! Wishing you and your loved ones a great next year and beyond.

2594: 2088: 1870: 1850:

Stop being so thankless and dishonest to actual events of Bangladeshi history

1837: 1597: 1511: 1349: 1157: 1124:

summaries for all substantial changes in content or structure. Best regards.

1104: 1080: 1029: 956: 883: 837: 816: 691: 684: 610: 407: 387: 324: 215: 3765:

and give your valuable inputs there as you were pinged by few users. Thanks

3683: 3391:

India surpasses US to report world's largest single-day tally of covid cases

1669:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

644: 358: 5427:

Alternatively, if you no longer stand by the statement, you are welcome to

5366: 5321: 4653: 4523:

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

4260: 4256: 4217: 4213: 4125: 4119: 4115: 3999: 3995: 3965: 3961: 3779: 3326: 3126: 3122: 2745:

watchlist and many Rajput pages which have been hijacked, Good luck cheers.

2696:

he is a budding historian. Here's the link if you want to know who he is -

2166: 2019: 2015: 1561: 1557: 1428: 1424: 1405: 1239: 795:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 771: 48: 2897:

Take a look at the time they joined and look at the edits they habe made.

2328:

Sure, I'll be making improvements on these pages. They're in my watchlist

5467: 5436: 5152: 5140: 5067: 4664: 4151: 4135: 4131: 3931: 3892: 3650: 3115: 1841: 1797: 1548: 832:

after NeilN gave you a final warning. Please use this time to go through

163: 5264:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

4935:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

4756:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4466: 4379:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4061:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3866: 3715: 2099:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1771: 1673:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1484:

Your addition included no sources, and Kaushik Roy makes no mention of "

1360:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1040:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

967:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

894:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

510: 226:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5205:. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see 5163:. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see 4733:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4694: 4672: 4426: 4356:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4317: 4039:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2400:

for barnstar u desever this mate. You have command over boring history.

2077:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1888: 1526: 1338:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1255: 719: 487:. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been 5490:

Some of us think that you should be ready to defend your claim in the

3577:"Daily caseload hits all-time high as 3,54,709 test Covid-19 positive" 2622:

He informed me before I saw it myself. I would've anyway reverted it.

138:. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed 5361:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

5194: 5190: 4714: 4579: 4337: 4308: 4172: 4165: 4021: 3596:"PM Modi says India shaken by coronavirus 'storm', U.S. readies help" 3206:, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the 2059: 2039:

Looks like we are nearing a consensus. Won't you make a comment now?

1989: 1320: 1251: 1003: 930: 857: 605: 475: 319: 189: 3614:"Covid: India sees world's highest daily cases amid oxygen shortage" 2762:

Rajput it seems a Propganda to remove his name if possible reads it.

2531:

Military Thought of Asia: From the Bronze Age to the Information Age

5148: 5136: 4314: 3888: 2458:

Ok, Actually I was in a hurry, will keep that in mind from now on.

1993: 1793: 1702:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1247: 668: 5543:

At Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_comedy_anime you said:

1099:, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on 803:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 451: 4663:. I've reverted your addition of personal info to the infobox at 3565:

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#trends_dailytrendscases

3493:

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United States medical cases chart

1642:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1449:

Please provide reference to what is posted about Madhu Kaitabha.

1192: 747: 4769:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4392:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4201:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

4074:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3983:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3949:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3879:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

3110:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2112:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1784:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

1404:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1373:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 829:

This is for removal of maintenance template without explanation

21:

Hello, Abhishek0831996, and welcome to Knowledge! Thank you for

5012:

Tellyupdates.com TheReviewMonk (discussed here) Upperstall.com

4759:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

4727:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

4382:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

4350:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

4206: 4064:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

3210:. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the 2152: 2102:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

1409: 1363:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

1164:. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the 1043:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

970:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

897:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

229:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

5274:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

4945:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

4033:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

3194:

has been undone because it added the Good Article template to

3186: 3014:

Knowledge hope u undertstand my Concern Sir i wil be grateful.

2182:

I apologise for removing your comments. It wasn't by mistake.

2144: 2071:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

1956:

Hi, you left a ref tag ("ref name=Shailendra_1999") undefined

1580: 1144: 1075: 734: 425: 382: 131: 5144: 5132: 3954: 3884: 1876: 1789: 1259: 1243: 1083:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 88: 3397:

India Records Highest Daily Coronavirus Count of Any Country

3342:

confirmed cases, for a total of 184,758 new cases reported.

3149:

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an

2636:

Is there any other reason you want to give other than this

2436:

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an

1632: 105:, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 4584:

Thanks for the ping, will read the long section tomorrow.

3988: 1680:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

1282:

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at

5393:

regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on

5312:

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

5103:

regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on

4130:

Information that can't be referenced should be removed (

1332:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1095:

and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the

491:. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the 390:. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 4740: