109:. The guideline also repeatedly calls for nbsps or Nowraps in any "places where breaking across lines might be disruptive to the reader". But since I learned to read from one line to the next at a very young age, I have trouble imagining any such places where the reader would have trouble following from one line to the next. So rather than guess what other places might be intended, I use nbsps or Nowraps only in places that closely resemble the examples given in the MOS:NUM elaboration of the WP:NBSP guideline, with two exceptions covered by other guidelines:
34:
program exceptions to a Find and
Replace. As a workaround, I change the exceptions by adding YwBsF and other meaningless code words, so the main Find and Replace won't Find them. After that main Find and Replace, I change YwBsF back again. Then the process repeats for another Find and Replace and its exceptions. It works for me, but it doesn't work in an edit summary to see all the text changed to YwBsF and back again.
433:. This happens most often in a citation in a list of authors. That is a debatable interpretation of WP:&, because citations aren't exactly "running prose", but neither are they a place where "space is limited" because the reader has no reason to look down at the references unless he clicks one of them.
456:
No guideline requires multiple pages to be "pages 14–17" not "page 14–17", but that is common sense if
English is your native language. Similarly, I didn't find a command to use "p." only for single pages and "pp." only for multiple pages, but dictionaries agree that "p." means "page" and "pp." means
125:
Most of the
Nowraps I add are to dates in citations, such as the date= and accessdate= parameters. The guideline specifies "12 November" as an example of a good place for an nbsp or Nowrap, but they probably had normal text in mind when they said "disruptive to the reader", not citations. However, 1)
65:
Not counting the general fixes and RegexTypoFixes linked in the previous paragraph, below I have listed my most frequent (as of July 2010) changes, along with a link to the Manual of Style guideline or other rule that I am trying to enforce. If I have too automatically applied the Manual of Style to
33:
Why don't I let AWB list all of my changes in its edit summary, as most AWB users do? Because most of them usually wouldn't fit in the summary. And also because most of my changes would be meaningless without understanding how I programmed my AWB Find and
Replaces. AWB doesn't provide an easy way to
223:
For better or worse, I don't substitute hyphens with dashes in dates of the form mm-dd-yyyy, which are usually the date that a reference is retrieved. My thought was that such dates are more likely to be updated, and an editor updating that date is unlikely to take the trouble to use dashes instead
194:
Here are the most common situations in this category. A hyphen with a space before and after is often used to mean something like a comma. According to the guideline, any such hyphen should be changed to an en dash (the guideline also allows em dashes if the spaces are removed). A hyphen without
178:
What's the difference? Look closely: - – — − They each look different. The first is a hyphen, the second is an en dash, the third is an em dash, and the fourth is a minus sign. If I changed one of those four lines to another, or if I added or removed spaces before and after, it's because of
558:
If you mean do it myself, the expected level of vanity wildly underestimates the difficulty of learning new software, and I'd rather clean up
Knowledge than study software. Could anybody even direct me to a manual for programming a bot, and examples of how to interface it with Knowledge?
497:
Other AWB users make AWB edits that I could easily add to my software if there were a consensus. But where the Manual of Style is ambivalent on an issue, I don't see how you can argue that the consensus really exists. If it does, why don't you change the guideline? Specifically:
215:
which asks for the URL, or you might even look up the web page's title using a search engine like Google – but any search engine we've checked ignores punctuation. But if you're looking for a book (that is, anything on paper rather than the
Internet), you're likely to use
130:
in a citation, and 4) the drawback of Nowrap or nbsp, which is that it interferes with editing by making the edit page less readable, is also less important in a citation because the editor is likely to skip over the entire citation when trying to comprehend the edit
41:
and its subpages. I don't try to enforce all of the Manual of Style, because most of the manual is too subjective to be automated with AWB. Even the parts I do automate have frequent exceptions, so this project could not be accomplished with a
126:
a Nowrap doesn't hurt a citation 2) unlike human editors, AWB software doesn't get tired of adding
Nowraps throughout an article 3) it would actually take more programming to tell AWB to only change dates that
269:. Sometimes I rearrange a sentence, rather than insert another comma into a place such as almost at the end of a sentence. I also make sure each comma has a space afterwards, and no space before.
195:
spaces often occurs in phrases like "The Civil War, 1861-1865" or "pages 14-16". Those hyphens should also be en dashes. More often than not, these hyphens occur in the titles of references.
155:
would make it a redlink. But that link is blue for me, despite the nbsp you can see in edit mode. Nobody using different browsers or operating systems has ever complained on this issue.
485:, it's probably based on some obscure Manual of Style guideline, similar to the sections above. Or if you can figure it out, you might look for it in my AWB Find and Replaces listed at
30:
editing. It does not specifically explain the edit whose edit summary you probably just clicked, nor does it explain AWB itself. It explains all of my similar edits in a general way.
249:
for a word like "Asia". The list was chosen conservatively; that is, more links should probably be unlinked, but hopefully we can agree that at least this list of links is covered by
515:
207:
Removed after an objection. I still change hyphens and similar punctuation in web page titles, but not books. If you're looking for a web page, you'll probably use the
202:
66:
a special situation where the guideline in the Manual wasn't intended to apply, you could be right. But if you believe the Manual of Style guideline I'm using is
106:
257:
fought a war" might be considered unfair to either India or
Pakistan, because I linked one but not the other, so in such a case I would probably unlink both.
242:
567:
55:
347:
136:
Why do I sometimes use Nowrap instead of nbsp? It has been argued that Nowrap is easier for newbies to understand (not everyone knows or remembers what
156:
531:
117:, where what is now the third bullet point to the end begins, "When both a figure ...". The other exception is the nbsp before three dots; see
477:
My software looks for a list of problems much longer than this explanation page. If a change isn't listed above, and it isn't listed with AWB's
188:
145:
71:
351:
574:, but they don't want to solve the problem. If I want something done, I do it myself, and occasionally my example inspires some imitation.
162:
I don't use nbsp or Nowrap near the beginning of a paragraph. Such an nbsp would not matter unless the reader were using a very narrow
144:
of WP:NBSP. So if you don't like Nowrap, please discuss or change MOS:NUM so the rest of us can share in your wisdom. Once again, see
478:
58:
problems, and do other proofreading such as changing "pages 14" to "page 14". My AWB "Find and
Replace" selections are listed at
47:
113:
is listed as an example, but not 11 billion without any currency symbol; however that situation is covered near the end of
70:
wrong, or if you wonder why I care at all about things like the difference between hyphens and dashes, then please see
457:"pages", and I didn't find other publications confusing the two (with or without the periods or spaces afterwards).
482:
51:
571:
266:
440:. That company's article, website and logo consistently say "Barnes & Noble", not "Barnes and Noble".
530:. That is in the Manual of Style, and I might be persuaded to include it in my editing. But in the past,
323:
97:
template and are used when you don't want a line to end in the middle of an expression like
570:, among the most widespread typos on Knowledge, has also been impossible. I meet plenty of people who
486:
246:
59:
38:
566:
on
Knowledge. Just getting agreement on specifications is usually impossible. Getting anyone to fix
299:
465:"From x–y" should be "from x to y", and "between x–y" should be "between x and y", according to
524:, and there is frustratingly little interest in harmonizing the guideline with actual practice.
527:
311:
282:
114:
436:
If I changed "and" to "&", it is because my program looks for a list of companies like
412:
514:
Changing – and — to – or — despite no mention in the Manual of Style.
170:. A couple editors have opposed an nbsp in places where it would normally have no effect.
8:
224:
of hyphens. That would result in a mixture of dashes and hyphens in the retrieved dates.
520:"Fixing" redirects that aren't broken. Several automated processes promote this despite
548:
250:
163:
118:
437:
406:
141:
563:
201:, do we change the hyphen even though that may change the title? This was discussed
538:
than it is worth, so I leave that to the wikiwarriors who enjoy that sort of thing.
466:
184:
17:
535:
212:
91:
448:
AWB allows manual editing at the same time, if I see something obviously wrong.
322:
With frequent exceptions, it should usually be US or U.S. not USA, according to
509:
430:
180:
121:
where it says, "To keep the ellipsis from wrapping to the next line ...".
102:
552:
521:
378:
245:. The exact list of links that my software removes can be found by searching
238:
43:
27:
363:
503:
343:
152:
220:, which doesn't work if the punctuation doesn't match, as of August 2010.
502:
Removing double spaces between words, or double spaces after a period.
187:
also helps explain it. Who cares about obscure guidelines? Again, see
418:
167:
346:
should be capitalized, whether the header is an article header (see
254:
217:
413:
Remove phrases like "Note that ..." or "Clearly ..."
369:
151:
You might think that adding into a wikilink like
137:
62:, but they aren't as easy to read as they are within AWB.
562:
If you mean organize others to do it, I've had no success
555:? Probably for the same reasons you aren't volunteering.
208:
348:
WP:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Section headings
568:
User:Art LaPella/Citation template double period bug
205:, and someone reinstated my dashes again afterwards.
101:. Most of my Nowraps and nbsps are specified by the
56:
User:Art LaPella/Citation template double period bug
173:
547:So why don't I fix some of this stuff by changing
352:WP:Manual of Style (tables)#Captions and headings
293:
370:7 kg with a (non-breaking) space, not 7kg
337:
189:User:Art LaPella/Because the guideline says so
146:User:Art LaPella/Because the guideline says so
72:User:Art LaPella/Because the guideline says so
472:
451:
227:
37:Most of the changes in my edits are based on
508:A space after the equal signs in a heading.
288:
77:
241:should usually be unlinked according to
492:
14:
572:make the perfect the enemy of the good
400:
140:stands for). Nowrap is recommended at
232:
197:So if a cited book has a title like
429:If I changed "&" to "and", see
115:MOS:NUM#Numbers as figures or words
23:
542:
516:Some want to reverse that process.
443:
82:
24:
583:
324:WP:MOS#Acronyms and abbreviations
357:
174:Hyphens, dashes, and minus signs
305:
272:
267:WP:COPYEDIT#Parenthetical comma
460:
294:Removing periods from captions
13:
1:
300:WP:MOS#Formatting of captions
7:
338:Uncapitalization in headers
253:. A phrase like "India and
107:this elaboration at MOS:NUM
10:
588:
473:Even less frequent changes
452:Page, pages, pp., p., etc.
228:My not so frequent changes
211:, or you'll resort to the
133:Removed after objections.
487:User:Art LaPella/AWB list
350:) or a table header (see
260:
247:User:Art LaPella/AWB list
60:User:Art LaPella/AWB list
39:Knowledge:Manual of Style
424:
342:Only the first word and
289:My less frequent changes
199:The Civil War, 1861-1865
157:Previous discussion here
78:My most frequent changes
317:
283:WP:MOS#Quotation marks
142:the elaborated version
26:This page explains my
105:guideline, including
493:Changes I don't make
279:Quotation characters
534:has generated more
401:ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
379:MOS:NUM#Conventions
334:, except ..."
46:. I also do AWB's "
438:Barnes & Noble
364:MOS:NUM#Typography
233:Removing wikilinks
153:World War II
579:
396:
392:
388:
384:
333:
329:
166:or a very large
112:
111:£11 billion
100:
96:
90:
18:User:Art LaPella
587:
586:
582:
581:
580:
578:
577:
576:
545:
543:More automation
495:
475:
463:
454:
446:
444:Typos I noticed
427:
415:
403:
394:
390:
386:
382:
372:
360:
340:
331:
327:
320:
308:
296:
291:
275:
263:
237:Wikilinks like
235:
230:
213:Wayback Machine
176:
110:
98:
94:
88:
85:
83:Nowrap and nbsp
80:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
585:
544:
541:
540:
539:
528:WP:UNLINKDATES
525:
518:
512:
506:
494:
491:
483:RegexTypoFixes
474:
471:
462:
459:
453:
450:
445:
442:
426:
423:
414:
411:
402:
399:
371:
368:
359:
356:
339:
336:
326:: "Do not use
319:
316:
312:WP:CONTRACTION
307:
304:
295:
292:
290:
287:
274:
271:
262:
259:
243:this guideline
234:
231:
229:
226:
175:
172:
84:
81:
79:
76:
52:RegexTypoFixes
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
584:
575:
573:
569:
565:
560:
556:
554:
550:
537:
533:
529:
526:
523:
519:
517:
513:
511:
507:
505:
501:
500:
499:
490:
488:
484:
480:
479:general fixes
470:
468:
458:
449:
441:
439:
434:
432:
422:
420:
410:
408:
398:
380:
377:paragraph in
376:
367:
365:
355:
353:
349:
345:
335:
325:
315:
313:
303:
301:
286:
284:
281:paragraph of
280:
270:
268:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:United States
225:
221:
219:
214:
210:
206:
204:
200:
192:
190:
186:
183:. The end of
182:
171:
169:
165:
160:
158:
154:
149:
147:
143:
139:
134:
132:
129:
122:
120:
116:
108:
104:
93:
75:
73:
69:
63:
61:
57:
53:
49:
48:general fixes
45:
40:
35:
31:
29:
19:
564:herding cats
561:
557:
546:
504:MOS:FULLSTOP
496:
476:
464:
455:
447:
435:
428:
416:
404:
375:Unit symbols
374:
373:
361:
344:proper nouns
341:
321:
309:
306:Contractions
297:
278:
276:
273:Curly quotes
264:
236:
222:
198:
196:
193:
177:
161:
150:
135:
127:
124:
123:
95:}}
89:{{
86:
67:
64:
36:
32:
25:
551:or using a
461:From x to y
358:24th not 24
251:WP:OVERLINK
119:WP:ELLIPSIS
54:", correct
532:that issue
407:WP:ALLCAPS
387:29 kg
99:17 kg
549:templates
536:wikidrama
467:WP:ENDASH
419:MOS:NOTED
383:10 m
185:WP:HYPHEN
168:font size
431:WP:&
277:See the
255:Pakistan
218:WorldCat
510:WP:HEAD
381:: "use
181:WP:DASH
103:WP:NBSP
50:" and "
522:WP:R2D
389:, not
328:U.S.A.
261:Commas
164:window
128:aren't
92:Nowrap
68:always
425:&
131:text.
16:<
481:and
417:See
405:See
395:29kg
362:See
310:See
298:See
265:See
203:here
138:nbsp
87:The
553:bot
397:."
393:or
391:10m
385:or
354:).
332:USA
330:or
318:USA
209:URL
44:bot
28:AWB
489:.
469:.
421:.
409:.
366:.
314:.
302:.
285:.
191:.
159:.
148:.
74:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.