Knowledge

Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Cheyenne

Source 📝

316:
the corporation for each mile of its road or line, and to certify to the county clerks of the counties in which the property was situated the assessment per mile, specifying the number of miles and amount in each of the counties, and which required the county commissioners to decide and adjust the number of miles and amounts within each precinct, township, or school district within their respective counties and cause such amounts to be entered on the lists of taxable property returned by the assessors, withdrew the duty of assessing fractional parts of such railroad and the property of such companies from all local assessors in the territory, including its incorporated cities.
144: 35: 358:
The high court found that the allegations of the bill in this case bring it fairly within the jurisdiction of the court. It showed that it would involve the plaintiff in a multiplicity of suits as to title of lots laid out and being sold; would prevent their sale, and would cloud the title to all its
349:
The main question raised by the bill is whether the Union Pacific Railroad, which passes through the whole length of Wyoming Territory, and in its course passes through the City of Cheyenne, with its accompanying telegraph, appurtenances, and rolling stock, is liable to be assessed and valued for the
331:
and its marshal, Ryan, to enjoin the collection of certain city taxes for the year 1880, which the railway company alleges were unlawfully assessed against it. The bill was demurred to by the defendants, and the District Court for the First Judicial District of Wyoming, in which the suit was brought,
319:
A statute which provides a general scheme for assessing and taxing the property of railroad and telegraph companies as a whole and for distributing it ratably among the different counties and their several precincts, townships and districts according to the number of miles of line in each repeals, as
315:
a list for assessment and taxation of the roadbed, superstructure, and other enumerated property of every railroad and telegraph company in the territory when any portion of the property of such company was situated in more than one county, and required the board to value and assess the property of
366:
Another point raised by the defendants, not affecting the jurisdiction of the court but the propriety of its taking jurisdiction, is that the complainant ought to have paid the taxes which are conceded to be due to the city for the year 1880. As the court understood the facts stated by the bill
298:
regarding a bill charging that the collection of an illegal tax would involve the plaintiff in a multiplicity of suits as to the title of lots being laid out and sold, which would prevent their sale, and which would cloud the title to all his real estate, states a case for relief in equity.
367:(which, of course, the demurrer admits to be true), the complainant did pay to the city all the taxes which would be due upon the assessment and valuation made by the board of equalization, including taxes due on outside property of the company in the city. 340:
prayed for. The defendants adhered to their demurrer and appealed to the supreme court of the territory, and the decree of the district court was reversed and the bill ordered to be dismissed, and the case is now brought here by appeal.
370:
The court found that the decree of the Supreme Court of Wyoming should be reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to enter a decree in favor of the complainant in conformity with this opinion, and it was so ordered.
320:
to such property, a power conferred upon the authorities of a city to make provisions for the assessment of the taxes which they were authorized by other provisions of the city charter to assess and collect.
363:
has not been proven, and cannot therefore have any effect in the case. It is unnecessary to inquire into the sufficiency of other grounds for equitable relief which are alleged in the bill.
312: 506: 404: 52: 463: 435: 412: 185: 99: 17: 71: 78: 501: 85: 388: 67: 511: 359:
real estate. We think that these results are sufficiently apparent, and render it unnecessary to look further. The allegation of
396: 148: 380: 118: 92: 531: 516: 56: 324: 350:
purposes of taxation in Cheyenne by the city authorities, or only by the territorial board of equalization.
483: 521: 536: 526: 251: 45: 467: 439: 243: 227: 219: 177: 295: 239: 8: 474: 442: 263: 231: 328: 180: 211: 495: 308: 307:
An Act of the Legislature of Wyoming, passed December 13, 1879, required the
255: 337: 34: 333: 294:, 113 U.S. 516 (1885), was an appeal from the Supreme Court of the 192: 143: 406:
Union Pacific Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
360: 413:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 113
507:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Waite Court
59:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 493: 156:Argued November 18 – November 19, 1884 390:Union Pacific Railway Company v. Botsford 344: 167:Union Pacific Railway Company v. Cheyenne 119:Learn how and when to remove this message 353: 323:The bill in this case was filed by the 68:"Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Cheyenne" 14: 494: 460:Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Cheyenne 432:Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Cheyenne 291:Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Cheyenne 131:1885 United States Supreme Court case 57:adding citations to reliable sources 28: 398:Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad 24: 149:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 548: 502:United States Supreme Court cases 470:516 (1885) is available from: 452: 382:Kansas Pacific R. Co. v. Dunmeyer 313:territorial board of equalization 142: 137:Union Pacific R. Co. v. Cheyenne 33: 18:Union Pacific R. Co. v. Cheyenne 44:needs additional citations for 512:1885 in United States case law 425: 13: 1: 418: 325:Union Pacific Railway Company 302: 7: 374: 10: 553: 276: 271: 205: 200: 172: 162: 155: 141: 136: 532:1885 in rail transport 517:Union Pacific Railroad 345:Question on certiorari 158:Decided March 2, 1885 354:Opinion of the Court 296:Territory of Wyoming 53:improve this article 484:Library of Congress 280:Bradley, joined by 336:, and granted the 311:to furnish to the 216:Associate Justices 522:Cheyenne, Wyoming 287: 286: 264:Samuel Blatchford 232:Joseph P. Bradley 191:5 S. Ct. 601; 28 129: 128: 121: 103: 16:(Redirected from 544: 537:Railway case law 527:1885 in case law 488: 482: 479: 473: 446: 429: 329:City of Cheyenne 252:Stanley Matthews 244:William B. Woods 228:Stephen J. Field 220:Samuel F. Miller 201:Court membership 146: 145: 134: 133: 124: 117: 113: 110: 104: 102: 61: 37: 29: 21: 552: 551: 547: 546: 545: 543: 542: 541: 492: 491: 486: 480: 477: 471: 455: 450: 449: 430: 426: 421: 377: 356: 347: 305: 254: 242: 230: 196: 157: 151: 132: 125: 114: 108: 105: 62: 60: 50: 38: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 550: 540: 539: 534: 529: 524: 519: 514: 509: 504: 490: 489: 454: 453:External links 451: 448: 447: 423: 422: 420: 417: 416: 415: 410: 402: 394: 386: 376: 373: 355: 352: 346: 343: 332:overruled the 304: 301: 285: 284: 278: 274: 273: 269: 268: 267: 266: 240:John M. Harlan 217: 214: 212:Morrison Waite 209: 203: 202: 198: 197: 190: 174: 170: 169: 164: 163:Full case name 160: 159: 153: 152: 147: 139: 138: 130: 127: 126: 41: 39: 32: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 549: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 499: 497: 485: 476: 469: 465: 461: 457: 456: 444: 441: 437: 433: 428: 424: 414: 411: 409: 407: 403: 401: 399: 395: 393: 391: 387: 385: 383: 379: 378: 372: 368: 364: 362: 351: 342: 339: 335: 330: 326: 321: 317: 314: 310: 309:state auditor 300: 297: 293: 292: 283: 279: 275: 270: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208:Chief Justice 207: 206: 204: 199: 194: 188: 187: 182: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 161: 154: 150: 140: 135: 123: 120: 112: 109:February 2016 101: 98: 94: 91: 87: 84: 80: 77: 73: 70: –  69: 65: 64:Find sources: 58: 54: 48: 47: 42:This article 40: 36: 31: 30: 27: 19: 459: 445: (1885). 431: 427: 405: 397: 389: 381: 369: 365: 357: 348: 327:against the 322: 318: 306: 290: 289: 288: 281: 272:Case opinion 259: 247: 235: 223: 184: 166: 115: 106: 96: 89: 82: 75: 63: 51:Please help 46:verification 43: 26: 256:Horace Gray 496:Categories 419:References 338:injunction 303:Background 79:newspapers 282:unanimous 173:Citations 458:Text of 375:See also 334:demurrer 277:Majority 93:scholar 487:  481:  478:  475:Justia 472:  434:, 408:(2009) 400:(1916) 392:(1891) 384:(1885) 262: 260:· 258:  250: 248:· 246:  238: 236:· 234:  226: 224:· 222:  193:L. Ed. 95:  88:  81:  74:  66:  466: 438: 361:fraud 100:JSTOR 86:books 468:U.S. 440:U.S. 195:1098 186:more 178:U.S. 176:113 72:news 464:113 443:516 436:113 181:516 55:by 498:: 462:, 189:) 183:( 122:) 116:( 111:) 107:( 97:· 90:· 83:· 76:· 49:. 20:)

Index

Union Pacific R. Co. v. Cheyenne

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Cheyenne"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
516
more
L. Ed.
Morrison Waite
Samuel F. Miller
Stephen J. Field
Joseph P. Bradley
John M. Harlan
William B. Woods
Stanley Matthews
Horace Gray
Samuel Blatchford
Territory of Wyoming
state auditor
territorial board of equalization
Union Pacific Railway Company

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.